►
From YouTube: June 7, 2023 Charter Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
E
A
A
A
B
D
E
B
E
B
A
F
A
F
E
A
A
With
that
the
motion
passes
and
the
agenda
is
adopted.
The
next
is
the
chairs
report
and
I
have
nothing
to
add
on
for
the
chairs
report
other
than
what
will
be
discussed
in
the
next
items.
A
G
Mr
Carl
thank
you,
Mr
chair
and
before
I
get
started
with
the
presentation
on
behalf
of
the
body.
Allow
me
please
to
make
a
few
introductions.
We
have
joining
us
today
at
the
diocese
Andrea
Neff
from
the
city
attorney's
office
assistant,
City
attorney,
Andrew
Neff,
who
recently
has
been
assigned
to
the
clerk's
office
and
as
an
extension
of
that
is
working
at
least
for
the
time
being.
G
His
attorney
for
the
charter
commission,
so
we'll
be
attending
our
meetings
and
working
with
the
charter
Commission
on
its
official
work
in
the
capacity
as
your
attorney,
your
legal
counsel
and
so
I
want
to
welcome
Ms
Neff
to
the
team
and
to
the
group
and
also
give
her
a
chance
to
introduce
herself
formally,
but
I
also
would
like
to
introduce
Jody
molinar
Hanson
a
long
time.
Member
of
the
City
attorney
and
I'm
sorry.
The
city's
Workforce
recently
has
joined
our
city
auditor's
office.
G
The
city
auditor's
office
was
elevated
and
recreated
through
the
Charter
amendment
that
created
our
new
executive
mayor
legislative
Council
structure,
authored
by
this
body
and
as
part
of
that
work,
the
city
Auditor.
In
addition
to
traditional
internal
audit
and
Assurance,
work
is
now
providing
the
council
with
a
dedicated
non-partisan
team
to
provide
policy
level,
research
and
evaluation
services
and
Ms
molinar
Hansen
is
one
of
the
first
members
of
the
auditor's
team
in
the
research
and
evaluation
division.
G
So
I'll
first
with
your
Indulgence
Mr
chair,
ask
Ms
Neff
to
give
a
brief
introduction
herself
and
then
maybe
Ms
mullinar
Hansen
can
introduce
herself.
H
Thank
you,
Casey
hi,
my
name
is
Andrea
Neff
I've
been
with
the
city
attorney's
office
for
about
10
years
now,
but
just
recently
assigned
to
work
with
Casey
and
the
clerk's
office,
and
so
I'll
be
here
with
you
going
forward
to
assist
you
and
support
you
and
your
work
happy
to
take
any
questions
from
anyone.
I
do
recognize
a
couple
faces
in
particular
chair
Ginder,
who
used
to
be
my
boss.
So
it's
good
to
see
all
of
you.
A
And
I
would
just
note
that
we're
very
fortunate
to
have
MS
Neff
assigned
to
to
the
commission
her
work
is
really
excellent,
so
I'm
pleased
to
have
her
here.
I
Hi,
this
is
a
little
unexpected
I'm
Jody
mulliner
Hansen,
as
the
clerk
mentioned
I
am
now
working
in
the
policy
and
research
division
of
the
office
of
City
auditor
I've
been
at
the
city
for
over
28
years.
The
last
15,
as
the
manager
of
continuous
Improvement
helping
departments,
improve
the
the
work
that
they're
doing
and
it's
nice
to
see.
Mr
Ginder
we've
worked
together
in
the
past
as
well,
so.
G
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair
for,
for
allowing
me
that
moment
to
introduce
the
staff
who
are
going
to
be
working
with
us
and
I
say
that,
because
not
only
in
their
capacity
working
directly
with
the
council
and
also
at
this
body,
but
one
of
the
first
priorities
that
we've
been
working
on
in
the
city
attorney's
office,
a
partnership
that
will
involve
the
city,
attorney's
office,
the
city
auditor's
office
and
the
clerk's
office
is
a
process
to
reform
the
city
council's
legislative
process.
G
And
so,
if
you
have
been
tracking
what
we're
doing
at
the
city
council
recently
in
front
of
the
council's
committee
of
the
whole
government
structure
subcommittee,
we've
been
talking
about
reforms
to
the
council's
legislative
process
to
make
that
process
more
transparent,
more
accessible,
understandable
and
available
to
the
public
at
large
and
Ms
mullinar
Hansen
is
the
project
manager
leading
the
legislative
process
reform
so
grateful
to
have
her
and
obviously,
as
we
codify
those
reforms
and
ordinance
working
with
attorney
Neff.
So
moving
forward
to
the
government
structure
implementation,
a
sort
of
status
report.
G
Hopefully
you
have
a
copy
of
a
couple.
Pages
looks
like
about
this,
and
then
we
have
a
five
PowerPoint
slides
I'm,
going
to
try
and
walk
through
very
quickly,
but
I
tried
to
put
a
brief
status
report
together
for
us
here.
This
first
slide
shows
you
a
timeline
since
the
proposal
that
this
body
put
forward
for
the
executive
mayor,
legislative
Council
was
put
forward
and
approved
by
voters
at
the
general
municipal
election
on
November,
2nd
2021
question
City
question
number
one
which
was
approved
and
then
adopted
and
codified.
G
Omnibus
ordinance
it
put
in
place
the
new
operating
structure
for
the
city
Enterprise
shown
on
this
slide
and
also
on
the
handout
I
gave
you.
So
you
can
see
the
major
changes,
as
we've
discussed
previously
to
the
structure,
are
really
centralizing
and
consolidating
streamlining
under
the
executive
mayor,
the
operating
departments
that
are
part
of
what
we
refer
to
as
the
city's
Administration.
G
These
are
the
Departments
that
deliver
the
city's
Services,
manage
its
programs
and
operate
the
data
day,
mechanics
of
the
city
government,
as
a
municipal
Corporation,
the
mayor
essentially,
is
assisted
in
performing
those
executive
functions
by
a
cabinet
of
three
Executives
who
are
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
confirmed
by
the
council.
That
is,
the
city
operations
officer
and
the
city
operations
officer
is
reflected
here
in
the
blue
circle
called
Office
of
Public
Service.
So
the
Office
of
Public
Service,
is
headed
by
the
city.
G
Operations
officer
and
reporting
to
that
office
are
17
of
our
25
operating
departments.
For
those
of
you
who
are
familiar
with
other
forms
of
local
government,
the
city
operations
officer
is
modeled
very
closely
on
a
city
manager
model.
So
the
city
operations
officer
is
the
chief
policy
advisor
to
the
mayor,
the
operational
director
of
the
city's
management
functions.
G
You
can
see
that
finance
and
Property
Services
Human
Resources
information
technology
and
a
lot
of
those
core
functions
that
make
the
Enterprise
work
report
to
the
office
of
Public
Service
you'll
see
that
five
of
our
operating
departments
all
focused
on
community
safety
functions
are
under
that
blue
circle
called
the
office
of
community
safety.
The
office
of
community
safety
is
headed
by
a
new
position.
G
And
then,
of
course,
the
office
of
City
attorney
is
very
unique
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis
structure,
a
direct
report,
obviously
to
the
mayor
as
the
city's
Chief
legal
officer
and
the
head
of
the
office
of
City
attorney,
but
also
is
the
attorney
for
the
city
council,
the
board
of
estimate
and
Taxation
for
all
offices,
all
departments
all
boards
and
commissions.
So
that's
why
we've
included
the
dotted
line
over
to
council
as
well.
G
The
City
attorney
the
city
operations
officer
and
the
Commissioner
of
community
safety
are
the
three
members
that
then
make
up
the
mayoral
cabinet
and
then
under
the
Council.
Of
course
you
have
the
office
of
city
clerk
and
under
the
independent
audit
committee
you
have
the
office
of
City
auditor,
as
I
mentioned
newly
reconstituted
and
elevated
per
this
body's
proposal
to
amend
the
city
Charter
so
that
that
structure
is
now
in
place
and
has
been
operating
since
October
of
last
year.
G
What
we
are
hoping
to
focus
on
as
we
consider
further
amendments
that
may
be
necessary
to
the
Charter
to
really
Implement
the
voter
approved
executive
mayor
structure
working
with
the
office
of
City
attorney,
are
a
series
of
process
and
sort
of
operating
improvements
that
we
think
would
be
important
to
make
and
chair
Ginder.
Certainly
you
know
this
as
well
as
anyone
from
your
time.
In
the
attorney's
office,
there
are
a
number,
since
our
Homeworld
Charter
was
adopted
in
1920
a
wide.
G
What
thousands
of
special
laws
that
were
adopted
over
the
city's
history
applicable
to
the
City
of
Minneapolis
that
apply
to
us
and
continue
to
apply
to
us,
despite
the
fact
that
we
have
a
city
Charter?
And
it
would
be
important
in
our
estimation,
for
us
to
go
through
that
process
and
look
at
amendments
that
would
allow
us
to
eliminate
special
laws
that
are
no
longer
applicable
that
are
no
longer
needed
or
desired
by
the
city.
G
So
we
can
sort
of
clean
up
the
books
if
you
will
and
if
there
are
provisions
of
those
special
laws
that
the
city
feels
remain
compelling
and
of
need
that
we
would
use
our
home
rule
authority
to
codify
those
either
in
the
charter
or
in
our
code
of
ordinances.
This
is
in
keeping
with
the
idea
that
a
charter
City
should
have
as
much
local
control
as
possible.
Much
of
those
local
laws
were
requested
by
us
of
the
state
legislature
over
the
years,
despite
being
a
Homeworld
Charter.
G
G
So
one
Amendment
we
would
bring
forward
in
article
one,
as
shown
here,
which
is
sort
of
the
high
level
General
introduction
to
our
our
Charter
or
our
constitution
would
be
the
appropriate
Amendment
or
amendments
that
would
address
the
disposition
of
that
history
of
special
laws
and
I'll
note
here
that
managing
City
attorney
Susan
Trammell
has
been
working
over
the
past
year
to
collect
an
accurate
listing
of
all
of
those
special
laws
and
has
been
working
with
a
team
to
not
only
identify
the
the
number
of
special
laws
but
which,
which
may
also
have
special
laws
that
might
be
in
conflict
with
each
other,
and
so
once
we
have
that
analysis,
completed
I
would
expect
the
city
attorney's
office
would
come
forward
to
this
body
and
say
Here's.
G
The
list
here
are
the
special
laws.
We
recommend
that
we
work
to
rescind
and
here's,
maybe
the
special
loss
that
we
would
work
to
incorporate
either
in
the
charter
or
in
the
code
under
our
home
rule
authorities.
So
that's
one
of
the
pieces
we've
looked
at
the
the
next
one
I
think
is
probably
I'm
going
to
suggest,
might
be
a
scrivener
error
and
could
probably
be
easily
accomplished.
With
this
body's
support.
G
We
talked
about
this
body
created
the
elevated
or
reconstituted
office
of
City
auditor
as
a
critical
piece
of
the
council's
legislative
function
in
this
new
government
structure
and
I
know
that
when
this
body
worked
to
create
the
city
auditor,
there
was
much
deliberate
effort
to
ensure
that
that
position
was
protected
to
the
greatest
degree
possible
from
any
inappropriate
political
interference
or
undue
influence
political
influence.
And
so
there
was
a
proposal
that
removal
of
the
city
auditor
would
be
a
high
bar.
G
The
auditor
would
be
appointed
to
no
less
than
a
four-year
term
and
could
not
be
removed,
except
for
cause
during
that
four-year
term.
However,
what
got
codified
on
page
20
of
the
printed
version
of
our
code
says
that
the
auditor
may
be
removed,
subject
to
section
8.2,
G3
and
I've
put
that
on
the
slide
here
and
I'm,
referring
to
it
section.
8.2
G3
deals
with
the
removal
of
other
elected
and
appointed
officials.
G
What
that
section
says
is
that,
subject
to
notice
and
a
trial,
a
trial
being
conducted
before
the
council
or
the
appropriate
appointing
authority
and
by
a
two-thirds
majority
vote,
an
official
could
be
removed.
However,
despite
pointing
to
section
8.2
G3
on
page
20,
in
the
section
that
deals
with
the
city
auditor,
4.2
G,
it
says
that
the
council
must,
by
ordinance
set
the
auditor's
term
for
at
least
four
years
during
which
the
council
may
only
remove
the
auditor
under
Section
8.2
G3,
for
cause
by
a
majority
vote.
G
So
under
8.2
it
says
a
two-thirds
vote,
but
specific
to
the
auditor.
We've
lowered
that
threshold
to
a
simple
majority
of
the
council.
If
we
are
appointing
to
section
8.2
G3,
it
seems
likely.
We
intended
that
to
be
the
higher
two-thirds
vote
threshold.
So
I
believe
this
is
likely
a
scrivener
error,
and
so
this
body,
as
the
author
could
certainly
give
us
that
corrective
direction
to
say
what
we
really
intended
was
the
higher
vote
threshold
to
remove
the
city
auditor,
which
is
in
line
with.
G
So
that
would
be
an
amendment
in
article
four
and
then
the
bulk
of
our
proposals
are
upon
reviewing
for
many
years
since
the
adoption
of
the
plain
language
Charter
in
2013
effect
of
2015
in
article
8,
which
deals
with
officers
and
other
employees
and
I,
think
this
is
the
section
that
we
internally
in
our
operations,
sort
of
get
confused
about.
The
most
section
are
article
3
deals
with
elected
officials,
appointed
officials,
administrative
officials
and
employees.
It
defines
them,
but
then
it
doesn't
distinguish
between
them.
G
And
so
you
really
have
to
read
the
entire
article
in
context
to
understand
when
we're
talking
about
appointments
terms,
removals
vacancies,
how
vacancies
are
determined
and
similar
types
of
matters.
We
think
that
the
article
could
be
Rewritten
and
put
together
in
a
series
of
new
sections
that
would
provide
very
clear
definitions,
so
one
around
officers
generally
officers
include
those
who
are
elect,
executive
and
administrative,
so
officers
generally,
and
then
a
section
specifically
on
elected
officials,
the
appointment
vacancy
resignations,
holdover
provisions
and
how
appointments
could
be
made
to
fill
an
unexpired
term.
G
Another
sexual
deal
with
what
we
call
local
appointed
officials,
we're
calling
them
local
appointed
officials,
because
that
aligns
with
State
statutes
in
terms
of
who
is
applicable
or
who
must
file.
For
example,
statements
of
economic
interest,
disclosures
and
other
types
of
details,
so
local
appointed
officials
and
then
within
that
section
we
would
distinguish
between
executive
officers,
those
being
the
mayor's
cabinet.
I've
listed
them
here.
The
city
operations
officer,
Community
safety,
commissioner
and
City
attorney
administrative
officers,
which
we,
the
city,
have
defined
pursuant
to
our
government
structure,
ordinance
2022-4-5.
G
So
basically,
an
administrative
officer
would
be
the
head
of
each
of
our
operating
departments
under
the
mayor,
not
otherwise
an
executive,
official
and
then
a
category.
A
catch-all
category
for
other
other
would
include,
for
example,
the
city
clerk,
the
city
auditor,
the
superintendent
for
the
Minneapolis,
Park
and
Recreation
board
and
other
officers
staff
officers
from
the
Minneapolis,
Park
and
Recreation
board,
and
then
the
secretary
for
the
board
of
estimate
and
Taxation.
G
So
these
are
not
executive
or
administrative
officials
under
the
mayor,
but
who
need
to
be
covered
as
officials
or
officers
of
the
city
Enterprise,
and
then
also
the
attorneys
have
identified
that
the
Minneapolis
civil
Services
Commission,
which
deals
with
our
professional
employees
and
our
represented
groups.
Our
labor
represented
groups,
is
created
under
the
same
article
article
eight.
However,
unlike
the
other
policy
making
boards
that
are
created
by
the
charter
and,
for
example,
I'd,
say
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
Civil
Rights
Commission.
G
There
is
a
lot
of
operating
details
put
into
the
charter
which
we
like
to
think
of
as
our
constitution
for
the
Civil
Service
Commission
that
are
not
put
in
there
for
those
other
boards.
We
think
it
would
be
wise
for
us
to
have
those
policy
making
boards
very
similar
in
nature
and
to
remove
the
operating
details
from
the
charter
and
put
that
in
code
consistent
with
this
body's
Direction,
when
we
did
plain
language
Charter
that
if
it
isn't
a
constitutional
provision,
it
probably
belongs
in
code,
and
so
that
is
a
very,
very
high
level.
D
Commissioner,
Clegg
on
the
thank
you
Mr
Carl
on
the
Article
1
amendments.
It
seems
like
there
would
be
three
baskets
of
special
laws
that
that
we
would
look
at.
One
would
be
ones
that
we
need
to
keep.
One
would
be
ones
that
we
could
repeal,
which
we
could
do
by
a
subsequent
Charter
Amendment,
and
the
third
batch
would
be
those
that
are
inconsistent
with
each
other,
but
we
need
to
keep
and
those
we
would
need
to
amend
the
charter
to
make
consistent,
correct.
G
Through
the
chair,
commissioner,
click
I
believe
that
is
broadly
correct,
that
there
are
at
least
those
three
categories.
There
may
be
additional
categories
for
those
that
there's
a
lot
of
specialized
that
deal
with
Personnel
positions,
that
we
went
to
the
legislature
and
requested
authority
to
create,
and
then
subsequent
to
that,
we've
renamed
them,
we've
retitled
them,
we've
reclassified
them
and
so
there's
probably
personnel
and
then
there's
operation.
E
A
E
Sure,
thank
you
Mr
chair
and
thank
you.
Mr
Carl
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
meeting
that
we
are
planning
with
the
committee
of
the
whole
sometime
in
the
future.
Will
these
be
some
of
the
issues
we'll
be
discussing
with
them
and
hearing
their
point
of
view.
G
Concur
that,
yes,
you
would
agree
that
these
these
amendments
could
be
done
by
ordinance
and
then
the
charter
I
mean
the
city
council.
Could
work
with
the
city
attorney's
office,
bring
them
forward.
The
city
council
would
have
to
adopt
those
ordinances
by
a
unanimous
vote
of
its
entire
membership,
so
13-0
and
the
mayor
has
to
approve
them.
So
the
process
is
a
little
bit
more
complex
and
it
takes
a
lot
more
time
and
a
lot
more
collaboration
to
make
sure
that
all
of
these
parties
are
all
on
the
same
page.
A
Other
questions,
commissioner,
go
ahead.
Please.
F
Well,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
Mr,
Carl
I
I
hear
what
you
say
about
the
complicated
time
consuming
process.
What
are
you
looking
at
realistically
next
year,
Well.
G
Realistically,
I'm
sorry
Mr,
chair
and
to
commissioner
Kozak
I
think
that
realistically
it
will
go
into
next
year.
I
think
the
faster
we
get
that
process
started
then
the
earlier
the
actions
can
happen
into
2024
and
obviously
any
action
by
ordinance
to
amend
the
charter
is
subject
to
a
petition,
and
so
a
significant
number
of
registered
voters
could
petition
to
say
we
don't
want
you
to
make
those
changes
by
ordinance
submit
those
to
the
ballot.
G
So
we'd
also
want
to
plan
ahead
so
that
if
there
was
a
petition
filed,
we
could
process
that
and
get
something
on
the
ballot
if
needed.
But
they
are,
they
are
very
technical
sort
of
inside
baseball,
technical
corrections.
I
would
label
them
to
to
the
code,
and
so
we
think
that
the
best
approach
would
be
by
ordinance,
and
we
think
that
between
the
15
members
of
this
body,
the
13
members
of
the
council
and
the
mayor
that
that
probably
is
a
good
process
for
us
to
do.
A
I
do
have
a
question:
Mr
Carl
a
couple
of
questions,
I'm
assuming
as
these
come
forward
that
they
will
be
broken
down
into
respective
buckets
for
vote,
because
in
my
mind,
some
of
these
are
probably
more
Technical
and
less
controversial
than
others,
although,
for
example,
with
the
special
laws,
you'll
never
know
exactly
what
you'll
find
in
there
and,
as
you
said,
I've
looked
at
hundreds
of
these
and
what
you
find
in
there
can
sometimes
be
quite
concerning
as
far
as
how
we
actually
conducting
business
as
everybody's
forgotten
about
the
special
laws.
A
A
My
other
question
would
be
do
you
plan
on
bringing
forward
work
product
to
both
the
council
and
the
commission
before
this
meeting,
so
that
each
site
can
have
a
look
at
kind
of
get
an
outline
of
what
we're
actually
talking
about
and
some
time
to
reflect
on
it
before
we
go
into
the
into
the
either
singular
meeting
or
a
couple
of
meetings
as
we
talk
with
the
council
about
what
we
think
should
be
done
or
what
their
feelings
are
as
opposed
to
what
staff
feelings
are
on
this.
G
Maybe
this
sub
piece.
That's
not
number
number
four
about
the
Minneapolis
Civil
Service
Commission.
We
don't
have
agreement
around
the
other
pieces
under
article
eight
like
then
that
would
give
the
attorneys
the
ability
to
you
know
really
spend
their
time
on
what
there
was
agreement
on,
and
so
we
do
Envision
that
there
would
be
probably
not
only
a
series
of
ordinance
drafts
coming
through
the
process
at
different
times,
but
that
this
body
and
Council
would
probably
have
to
have
more
than
one
joint
meeting
a
joint
meeting.
A
E
A
Motion
carries
the
next
item
on
our
agenda.
Is
item
number
six,
which
is
a
presentation
on
the
rent,
Control
Ordinance
being
considered
by
the
city
council.
I
asked
Mr
Carl
to
put
that
on
for
discussion
purposes,
primarily
because
this
body
was
heavily
involved
in
this
issue.
I
guess
it
was
a
year
ago,
as
we
made
our
recommendations
to
city
council
about
what
to
put
on
the
ballot,
what
not
to
put
on
the
ballot
and
changes
to
the
proposed
amendment,
which
were
not
accepted
on.
A
And
so
that
that
Amendment
just
did
pass
it
so
that
there
is
a
possibility
for
a
referendum
on
rent
control
or
rent
stabilization.
We
won't
have
a
role
in
that,
but
because
of
our
past
experience
with
this
I
thought
it
would
be
useful
just
to
have
an
update
from
Mr
Carl
on
how
this
process
is
working
out
before
and
if
this
goes
to
the
voters.
G
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
and
so
hopefully
you
all
have
a
copy.
This
one
pager
in
front
of
you,
I
I,
don't
have
any
slides
prepared,
but
the
one
pager
hopefully
summarizes
sufficiently,
as
noted.
Also
at
the
2021
General
municipal
election
City
question
number
three,
as
the
chair
alluded
to
related
to
the
authorization
to
create
a
rent.
Stabilization
policy
was
approved
by
voters
codified,
as
Charter
amendment
number
185,
and
also
became
effective,
December
3rd
of
2021..
G
G
Sort
of
concurrently
as
actions
have
also
happened
in
the
city
of
Saint
Paul,
what
I'm
sure
you're
all
aware
of
in
the
2021
election
Saint
Paul,
put
forward
an
actual
policy
on
the
ballot,
and
so
voters
in
St
Paul
adopted
a
policy,
whereas
voters
in
Minneapolis
voted
on
the
authorization
to
give
Council
the
power
to
create
a
rent.
Stabilization
policy
that
then,
pursuant
to
State
statutes,
must
be
put
back
on
the
ballot
for
voter
approval,
so
we
did
a
two-step,
whereas
St
Paul
did
a
one-step
process.
G
Now
that
the
council
has
the
authority
codified
in
the
charter
to
propose
a
rent
stabilization
policy,
the
body
having
received
a
report
from
its
appointed
work
group,
has
recently
moved
forward,
and
you
may
be
aware
that,
at
their
regular
meeting
on
May
25th,
a
motion
was
brought
forward
by
councilmember
that
would
direct
the
city
attorney's
office
to
go
and
craft
a
draft
policy
for
consideration
by
the
council.
I
put
in
front
of
you
the
motion
that
was
adopted.
G
It's
adopted
officially
as
Council
action
2023-a-0401
that
was
approved
on
a
vote
of
seven
eyes,
five
Nays
and
one
absence,
and
what
that
the
the
core
pillars
are
those
six
points
to
be
included
in
the
draft
policy.
It
would
fix
rent
increases
at
three
percent
annually,
with
no
adjustment
provided
for
Consumer,
Price
Index.
It
would
provide
vacancy
controls
and
no
rent
baking.
It
would
not
provide
any
exemptions
for
certain
types
or
any
houses,
any
types
of
Housing
and
no
exception
for
new
construction.
There
would
be
no
exception
process,
then,
for
investment,
substantial
Capital
Improvements.
G
You
can
see
the
implementation
enforcement
require
City
certification,
an
oversight
body
to
be
established
and
appointed
by
the
council
that
would
be
charged
with
program
compliance
and
enforcement
and
would
include
an
appeals
process
and
then
the
effective
date,
if
approved
at
the
general
election
this
year.
The
goal
to
submit
that
to
voters
this
November
as
part
of
the
municipal
election
would
become
effective
six
months
after
the
effective
date
of
the
election,
so
giving
a
brief
window
of
time.
G
G
The
statutes
require
that
the
city
submit
any
language
for
a
ballot
question
by
no
later
than
Friday,
August,
25th
and
so
I
have
to
provide
the
language
of
that
to
the
county
auditor
and
to
the
Secretary
of
State
by
that
day,
by
close
of
business,
Friday
August
25th
working
back
from
that.
This
motion
passed
at
the
council's
meeting
on
May
25th,
asking
the
city
attorney's
office
to
bring
forward
that
draft
at
our
next
council
meeting
on
June
15th.
Then
we
will
formally
begin
the
legislative
process
which
starts
with
a
formal
notice.
G
The
notice
is
given
so
that
all
policy
makers
departments
the
public
are
aware
of
the
council's
intent
to
open
up
the
code
with
respect
to
changes.
We
are
then
hoping
to
have
the
formal
introduction
first
reading
and
referral
of
that
proposal
at
the
council's
meeting
on
June
28th.
As
you
can
see
the
because
of
the
way
the
council
has
divided
up.
Subject
matters
to
its
standing
committee.
We
think
this
is
going
to
be
referred
to
what
we
call
the
biz
committee.
It
stands
for
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee.
G
As
it's
come
out,
the
Committees
also
conduct
a
public
hearing,
so
we
would
give
notice
and
conduct
a
public
hearing
so
that
the
community
could
give
their
input
as
well
on
that
proposal,
and
then
a
formal
recommendation
is
developed
by
the
committee
and
submitted
to
the
full
Council.
There
are
two
days
on
here.
You
can
see
for
the
full
Council.
The
first
would
be
August
3rd.
That
would
be
the
first
opportunity
if
the
committee
acts
quickly
for
the
city
council
as
a
whole
body
to
consider
the
recommendations
of
the
committee.
G
They
could
also
bring
forward
further
amendments
to
refine
and
perfect
the
proposal
and
adopt
it
or
at
the
latest,
their
last
regular
meeting
on
the
calendar
this
year
before
the
August
25th
statutory
deadline
is
August
17th,
and
so
they
could
also
act
on
by
August
17th.
Once
the
council
acts
on
the
official
actions
that
would
be
presented
to
them.
G
Those
would
be
transmitted
to
the
mayor
as
part
of
the
charter
requires
that
all
official
acts
go
to
the
mayor
for
the
mayor's
consideration
and
the
mayor
could
either
approve
the
acts
and
they
would
be
effective
and
go
to
the
voters.
The
mayor
could
veto
them
and
then
they'd
have
to
return
to
the
council
for
reconsideration
or
the
mayor
can
allow
them
to
become
effective
by
not
signing
the
act,
and
then
they
would
move
forward
as
if
approved,
I
would
only
back
up
here
to
to
explain
that
the
way
this
process
works.
G
When
we
submit
a
ballot
question,
the
policy
seeking
to
amend
the
code
would
be
an
ordinance,
that's
how
we
handle
the
code.
That's
our
local
laws,
our
local
legislation,
our
ordinances,
but
the
statutes
require
that
the
actual
ballot
language
be
adopted
by
resolution.
So
we're
really
looking
at
two
official
acts
that
go
together
as
companions,
one
ordinance,
which
is
the
policy
and
then
one
resolution,
that's
the
ballot
language,
an
ordinance
and
a
resolution
under
the
charter
both
require
a
minimum
affirmative
vote
of
seven.
G
So
seven
affirmative
votes
for
Passage
more
than
that
is
of
course,
okay,
but
at
least
seven
affirmative
votes
are
required
to
pass
both
the
ordinance
and
the
resolution
I
point
that
out,
because
the
direction
to
the
attorney
passed,
751,
and
so
the
political
calculus
is
quite
close.
Obviously,
assuming
that
there
is
at
least
seven
affirmative
votes
for
the
ordinance
and
the
resolutions.
Those
then
go
to
the
mayor
and,
as
I
said,
the
mayor
under
the
charter.
Has
those
three
options
approve
veto
or
allow
it
to
become
effective
without
action?
G
All
of
that
has
to
happen
before
August
25th.
So
we
are,
as
you
can
see,
every
cycle
from
now
until
August
25th
focused
on
this
issue
with
Council
and
would
look
to
as
I
said
start
that
on
June
15th
with
notice
notice
is
a
a
procedural
step.
E
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
Mr,
Carl,
putting
aside
how
high
profile
this
matter
is.
If
the
city
council
is
not
able
to
finalize
a
ballot
question
by
the
deadline,
would
it
then
be
moved
to
2024
when
we
have
the
federal
election
or
would
it.
G
Could
it
be
to
the
chair?
Yes,
of
course,
commissioner,
the
the
matter
doesn't
have
to
go
forward
this
year.
If
we
don't
meet
the
stat
the
statutory
deadline,
they
could
simply
push
that
into
next
year's
timeline
as
well.
Thanks.
E
A
F
E
A
That
passes
the
final
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
comment.
Do
we
have
any
public
comment
that
has
been
received
electronically,
Mr
Clerk,
and
do
we
have
anybody
that
is
signed
up
to
speak.
B
Chair
Ginder,
at
this
time
we
have
not
received
any
electronic
public
comments
and.
A
C
Step
by
step
through
a
renewal
form
here
is
a
licensed
annual
invoice.
It
will
be
mailed
to
the
address
you
provided
in
your
original
application.
There
are
details
on
the
bill
that
will
need
to
be
verified
like
plate
information,
insurance
provider
and
other
vehicle
information.
This
is
where
you'll
find
the
amount
you
need
to
pay
and
the
due
date.