►
From YouTube: May 2, 2023 Heritage Preservation Commission
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
Submit written comments about agenda items to: councilcomment@minneapolismn.gov or https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/meetings/public-comment/online-comment
A
A
C
B
A
A
Our
first
order
of
business
is
to
adopt
the
agenda
for
this
meeting,
we'll
work
from
the
agendas
that
are
available
over
by
the
clerk
and
I'll
go
through
the
agenda
and
sort
out
which
items
will
be
discussed
and
which
items
we
put
on
consent
to
be
approved,
as
recommended
by
staff.
Without
further
discussion.
A
Item
number
four:
606
Washington
Avenue,
North,
ward
3.
This
application
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Item
number
four
will
be
on
consent
unless
someone
wants
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
item
number
five
1213
Franklin,
Avenue,
East,
Ward
6th
item
number
five
is
for
a
demolition
of
a
historic
resource
and
it
will
be
on
consent
unless
someone
wants
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendations.
A
Item
number
six
2501
25
41
2543,
Stevens,
Avenue,
2535,
2nd
Avenue,
South,
2540,
Third,
Avenue,
South,
Ward
10..
This
application
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
and
item
number
six
will
be
on
consent.
Unless
someone
wants
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
item
number
seven
200
First
Street
North,
Ward
3..
This
application
is
for
certificate
of
appropriateness.
A
The
item
number
seven
will
be
on
consent
unless
someone
wants
to
speak
in
opposition
two
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation.
Finally,
item
number
eight
117
through
125
First
Street
northward.
Three,
this
application
is
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Item
number
eight
will
be
discussed.
A
I'd
like
to
note
that
commissioner
bjornberg
has
joined
us
so
the
proposed
agenda,
the
consent
agenda
will
be
include.
The
following
items:
item
number:
four:
606:
Washington,
Avenue,
North,
ward,
3
item
number:
five:
twelve,
thirteen
Franklin
Avenue
East
Ward,
6.;
item
number;
six
2501
25,
41,
2543,
Stevens,
Avenue,
2535,
2nd
Avenue,
South,
25,
30,
Third,
Avenue,
South,
Ward,
10
and
item
number
7
200,
First,
Street,
North,
Ward
3..
Is
there
any
opposition
from
Commissioners
to
the
staff
recommendations
for
these
items?.
A
Hearing
no
opposition
to
playing
placing
these
items
on
consent
will
approve
these
consent
items
in
one
motion
at
the
start
of
the
meeting,
the
following
item
will
have
staff
presentation,
public
comment
and
commission
discussion
in
action.
It's
item
number
eight
117
through
125
First,
Street,
North,
Ward,
3.
Commissioners
may
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
proposed
agenda
so
moved.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
San
bolt.
Is
there
a
second?
A
A
A
A
A
You,
commissioner,
moblem,
is
there
a
second
massed
seconds?
Thank
you,
commissioner,
mast
in
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye,
there's
a
post,
say,
nay,
any
abstentions,
commissioner
van
Derek
stains.
Thank
you,
commissioner
van
Derek.
The
minutes
from
April
18th
are
approved
before
I
open
the
hearing
to
public
comments.
Let
me
summarize
the
process
for
our
public
hearings.
First,
we
will
act
on
the
consent
agenda
that
we
just
set
once
items
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved.
A
A
Commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
Staff,
then
I'll
open
the
public
hearing,
and
we
will
hear
from
the
applicant
and
Commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
the
applicant
after
that.
We
will
invite
public
comment.
If
you
do
wish
to
speak,
you'll
need
to
do
two
things
be
sure
to
sign
up
on
the
sheet
over
by
the
clerk.
If
you
haven't
done
this
already,
you
can
do
so
afterwards.
When
you
come
up
to
testify,
make
sure
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
keep
your
comments
to
the
application
before
us
today.
A
If
you
happen
to
have
any
materials
to
hand
out
also
give
those
to
our
committee
clerks
so
that
they
can
be
distributed
to
the
commission
and
entered
into
the
public
record.
Do
not
commission
approach
the
Commissioners
on
the
diocese
after
the
public
comments
are
complete,
I
will
close
the
hearing
and
Commissioners
will
deliberate
and
act
on
the
applications
before
us.
A
So
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
on
the
consent,
agenda
items
and
read
them
once
again.
Item
number
four:
606
Washington,
Avenue,
North
ward,
3
item
number,
5,
1213,
Franklin,
Avenue,
East,
Ward,
6,
item
number,
six
2501
2541,
2543,
Stevens,
Avenue,
2535,
2nd
Avenue,
South,
25,
43rd,
Avenue,
Southward,
10.,
item
number,
seven
200,
First,
Street,
North,
ward,
3
again
do
Commissioners
oppose
the
staff
recommendations
for
these
items.
A
A
A
G
I'll
begin
with
some
background
about
the
project
and
then
outline
the
application
before
you
today.
This
project,
known
as
The
commutator
Foundry
development,
came
before
the
HPC
in
2017
and
again
in
2019,
and
was
approved
both
times.
This
application
is
an
amendment
to
the
previously
approved
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application.
G
G
The
three-story
red
brick
building
at
the
right
end
is
The,
commutator,
Foundry,
Company,
building
built
in
1884
and
also
a
contributing
resource
to
the
historic
districts.
It
was
previously
approved
that
the
project
would
include
the
demolition
of
the
two
non-contributing
resources,
Rehabilitation
of
the
two
contributing
resources
and
new
constructions
surrounding
the
blacksmith
row.
Wolf
building,
as
shown
here.
G
G
This
photo
shows
recent
site
conditions
as
of
early
April
2023
with
the
project
well
underway.
Aspects
of
the
project
have
been
refined
since
the
previous
2019
approval
that
requires
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
I
will
first
address
the
proposed
alterations
to
The
commutator
Foundry,
building,
followed
by
the
proposed
alterations
to
the
blacksmith
row.
G
Wolf,
building
and
I
will
focus
on
staff
findings
related
to
compliance
with
the
Minneapolis
Warehouse,
historic
district
design
guidelines
and
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
alterations
to
The
commutator
Foundry
include
a
modified
storefront
entrance
on
the
North
elevation,
a
refined
design
for
the
new
hotel
entry
on
the
west
elevation
and
the
removal
and
replacement
of
the
roof
membrane,
starting
with
the
north
entrance
here
are
two
historic
photographs.
Originally,
the
entrance
was
in
the
center
of
the
storefront
at
an
unknown
date.
G
After
the
period
of
significance
it
moved
to
the
east
or
left
end
of
the
storefront
in
2019.
The
applicant
proposed
a
single
leaf
door
with
two
sidelights,
which
was
approved,
and
the
storefront
area
is
outlined
in
Blue
on
this.
Drawing
now
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
single
leaf
wood
door
with
one
side,
light,
three-quarter
glazing
and
a
height
that
reaches
the
transom
above
and
the
storefront
area
is
outlined
in
red.
G
G
Staff
finds
that
the
proposed
door
design
is
simple
and
compatible
with
the
historic
character
of
this
building
and
the
district,
and
that
the
treatments
of
the
walls
and
ceiling
are
also
consistent
with
the
historic
character.
Therefore,
the
modified
North
storefront
meets
the
design
guidelines
and
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
moving
to
the
west
elevation.
It
was
previously
approved
that
there
would
be
a
new
entry
at
the
North
End
of
the
one-story
portion
of
the
building,
known
as
the
shed.
G
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
slightly
widen
the
opening
for
accessibility
requirements
and
cap
off
the
rough
edge
of
brick
on
the
south
side,
with
concrete,
the
entry
doors
will
be
glazed
with
two
side
lights
all
set
within
an
anodized
aluminum
frame.
The
applicant
also
proposes
a
metal
canopy
of
simple
design.
G
Historic
photos
confirmed
that
this
location,
where
the
entry
is
proposed
originally
had
a
large
window
like
the
remaining
Bays
of
the
elevation.
The
photo
on
the
left
is
dated
in
1979,
while
the
photo
on
the
right
is
dated
to
the
1980s
at
an
unknown
date.
It
appears
that
the
bottom
three
rows
of
pains
in
this
northernmost
window
were
removed
and
recovered
by
plywood,
since
that
condition
is
not
shown
in
the
photograph
on
the
right.
G
G
Here's
a
photograph
taken
by
the
project
team
of
the
interior
of
the
shed,
the
top
rows
of
pains,
the
top
two
rows
of
pains
in
the
historic
window,
appear
to
remain
extant.
Although
the
window
is
in
poor
condition,
a
historic
window
survey
completed
for
the
first
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
recommended
replacement
in
kind
of
this
window.
G
So
the
review
here
is
the
proposed
design
for
this
entry
staff
considers
the
proposed
treatment
of
the
rough
brick
edges
to
secure
loose
bricks
on
the
North
side
and
cap.
The
south
side,
with
concrete
to
be
appropriate.
The
new
wall
material
will
be
distinguished
from
the
original
brick
without
suggesting
that
this
was
an
original
entrance.
G
The
proposed
design
of
the
entry
doors
and
the
canopy
is
simple,
contemporary
and
also
compatible
in
the
district
design
guidelines.
Guideline
2.2
states
that
distinctive
architectural
features
shall
be
preserved.
Guideline
2.21
states
that
original
and
historically
significant
Windows
shall
be
retained
and
repaired,
and
guideline
2.24
states
that
windows
on
primary
facades
shall
not
be
removed
or
blocked
to
install
air
conditioning
mechanical
equipment
louvers
or
for
any
other
reason.
G
The
final
alteration
on
The
commutator
Foundry
is
the
removal
of
the
non-historic
roof
waterproofing
membrane,
which
is
deteriorating.
The
existing
historic
wood,
roof
joists
and
decking
will
remain
and
be
reinforced
by
sistering
with
new
wood
joists.
The
new
roofing
system
will
be
a
green
roof
set
back
from
the
existing
historic
parapet.
G
The
roof
is
flat
and
will
not
be
visible
from
the
street.
Therefore,
staff
finds
that
this
alteration
meets
the
guidelines
and
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards.
This
concludes
the
alterations
proposed
on
The,
commutator
Foundry,
so
we'll
move
on
to
the
blacksmith
row.
Wolf
building
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
remove
and
replace
the
roof,
remove
portions
of
the
brick
along
the
roof
lines
on
the
side
elevations
and
remove
masonry
on
the
first
story
of
the
side.
Elevations.
G
At
this
point
in
time,
the
applicant
has
already
removed
the
roof,
including
the
non-historic
roof,
waterproofing
membrane,
wood,
decking
and
wood
roof
joists
and
the
roof
lines,
including
the
top
two
feet
of
the
brick
walls.
The
applicant
had
thought
this
part
of
the
scope
had
already
been
approved.
Seatbed
staff
reviewed
the
previous
applications
and
permit
applications
and
determined
that
had
not
been
approved,
which
is
why
it
is
included.
Now
the
applicant
proposes
to
replace
the
roof
with
a
new
precast,
concrete
roof
structure
and
green
roof.
G
Although
removal
of
the
roof
lines
does
not
comply
with
the
guideline,
2.62
staff
finds
that
the
roof
is
not
a
distinctive
architectural
feature
of
this
building
and
the
new
roof
will
be
minimally
visible
from
the
street.
Steph
finds
that
this
alteration
is
appropriate
and
meets
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards.
G
These
side
elevations
show
where
the
masonry
removal
is
proposed.
It's
identified
by
the
diagonal
hatching
and
then
the
areas
surrounded
by
Cloud
marks
opening
is
not
included
in
the
cloud
marks
were
previously
approved
by
staff,
and
then
here
is
a
plan
view
comparing
the
demolition
plan
from
last
summer
to
the
ones
submitted
in
February,
which
has
greater
openings
proposed
along
those
side.
Elevations.
G
According
to
chapter
520.160
of
the
Minneapolis
code
of
ordinances,
demolition
is
defined
as
the
act
of
moving
or
raising
a
building,
including
the
removal,
substantial
removal
or
relocation
of
60
or
more
of
the
building's
exterior.
The
building's
roof
shall
constitute
20
percent
of
the
total
exterior
above
the
finished
floor
of
the
first
story.
The
remainder
shall
be
a
calculation
of
the
percent
change
to
the
perimeter
of
the
building,
measured
per
story
in
linear
feet.
G
For
the
purpose
of
this
definition,
removal
shall
include
any
adjustment
to
fenestration
or
wall
location.
From
the
finished
floor
to
the
surface
of
the
floor
above
additionally,
removal
of
the
roof
is
an
All
or
Nothing
calculation.
Partial
removal
counts
the
same
as
complete
removal
and
constitutes
20
of
the
total
exterior
that
proposed
alterations
to
the
blacksmith
were
a
wolf
building
amount
to
the
removal
of
65
percent
of
the
building
which
meets
the
definition
of
demolition.
Therefore,
the
additional
findings
for
Destruction
must
be
addressed
to
comply
with
code
requirements.
G
G
The
destruction
is
necessary
to
retain
the
remaining
Integrity
of
the
property
by
integrating
it
into
the
overall
project,
although
the
building
can
be
used
without
the
selective
removal
of
masonry
on
the
first
story
of
the
side.
Elevations,
this
alteration
will
increase
the
usefulness
of
the
building,
so
people
can
more
easily
circulate
between
this
building
and
the
surrounding
development.
G
The
historic
wood,
Joyce
and
rooftex
shall
remain
in
place
on
the
roof
of
the
three-story
commutator
Foundry
building
number
four.
The
demolition
of
the
blacksmith
real
wolf
building
shall
remain
at
65
percent.
There
shall
be
no
further
alterations
to
increase
the
demolition
of
the
building
and
the
final
two
conditions
are
the
standard
conditions
for
approval.
G
A
H
I
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
review
our
application
today,
and
we
would
respectfully
request
that
the
HPC
accept
the
application
with
all
recommended
staff
conditions,
except
for
conditions,
one
and
two
which
would
prohibit
the
installation
of
metal
paneling
around
the
West
entrance
and
require
the
in-kind
replacement
of
that
window.
J
Good
afternoon
Commissioners,
my
name
is
David
Wilson
and
I
reside
at
901,
South,
2nd
Street
in
Minneapolis,
as
Lauren
just
mentioned.
I
am
one
of
the
developers
that
are
working
on
this
building
and
I.
Think
as
of
there
we
go.
This
is
a
photograph
of
the
building.
As
of
this
morning.
Actually
I
was
over
there
and
I
thought
I
would
share
latest
progress.
What
you
can
see
here
is
that
obviously
the
building
is
topped
off
and
it
is
now
all
framed
on
the
exterior
and
we
are
actively
framing
the
interior.
J
I
wanted
to
just
talk
a
little
bit
before
we
share
some
of
the
details
regarding
the
the
West
entrance.
Just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
my
partners
and
I
are
trying
to
achieve.
You
know:
we've
taken
a
very
challenging
set
of
parcels
of
land,
small
Parcels
with
historic
buildings,
and
we
are
I
think
trying
to
do
something.
No
less
than
create.
You
know
one
of
the
nicest
finest
design
projects
in
North
Loop.
J
We
are
really
committed
to
Stark
preservation
and
we
are
committed
to
restoring
the
exteriors
of
the
the
two
historic
buildings
on
the
site.
While
incorporating
those
in
a
commercially
viable
way
with
really
a
beautifully
designed
new
all-masonry
project
designed
by
snow
krylic,
when
the
project
is
completed,
there
will
be
123
guest
rooms.
So
I
should
also
mention
that
the
project
now
has
a
formal
name.
It's
the
West
hotel
and
the
West
hotel
has
been
named
after
a
19th
Century
hotel
that
was
located
a
few
blocks
away.
J
J
J
Viable
use,
we
are
also
on
the
Interiors
making
some
of
these
buildings
accessible
to
the
public
for
the
first
time,
so
the
shed,
for
example,
has
been
inaccessible
to
the
public
for
a
few
decades.
The
roof
is
down
and
that
shed
is
now
going
to
be
the
new
Lobby
for
the
hotel
and
then
we're
also
going
to
be
making
the
first
floor
of
the
three-story
commutator
building,
as
well
as
the
first
and
second
floors
of
the
blacksmith
building
open
to
the
public
through
restaurants
and
meeting
spaces.
J
I'd
like
to
really
kind
of
wrap
up.
My
opening
comments.
Talking
about
the
the
entrance
on
third
Third
Avenue
I'm,
sorry
on
Second
Avenue,
we
did
look
at
a
lot
of
different
options
for
where
to
locate
the
main
entrance
to
the
hotel
and
due
to
where
the
three
elevators
needed
to
be
located
in
the
building
and
our
strong
desire
that
the
shed
space
be
kind
of
the
Premier
architectural
Focus
for
the
project.
This
entrance
on
2nd
Avenue
was
the
The
Logical
and
best
solution.
J
So
that's
why
this
is
where
we've
we've
put
the
the
entrance
to
the
hotel
when
we
worked
with
our
designers
to
to
kind
of
set
what
are
our
objectives
for
the
entrance?
We
really
had
four
key
objectives.
The
first
one
obviously
was
to
make
sure
that
it
could
accommodate
the
guests
24
7,
so
this
hotel
will
be
open
every
day
of
the
year
24
hours
a
day
and
with
123
rooms,
a
large
restaurant
Etc.
J
We
expect
hundreds
of
people
to
be
coming
in
and
out
of
the
the
hotel
every
day,
and
so
we
needed
a
entrance
that
would
really
function
for
that
purpose.
We
also
as
it
is
a
hotel
needed
to
accommodate
valet
services
for
people
parking
cars,
also
guest
transportation
services.
People
waiting
for
for
rides,
as
well
as
significant
luggage,
handling
surfaces,
because
this
is
where
guests
will
be
dropped
off
with
luggage
and
escorted
into
the
hotel.
So
the
entrance
had
to
accommodate
those
needs.
J
We
also
wanted
to
really
reflect
the
importance
of
this
Redevelopment
and
reflect
the
key
design
components
of
this
project.
So
we
really
wanted
to
accentuate
the
historic
nature
of
the
building,
while
at
the
same
time
also
reflecting
the
21st
century
design.
That's
incorporated
into
it
and
you'll
see
that
there
are
uses
of
Steel
and
we
do
have
a
sample
that
can
be
passed
around
as
well
as
concrete,
which
are
design
elements
that
are
reflected
throughout
the
interior
of
the
project.
J
I
think
the
most
important
thing
that
we
were
also
trying
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
creating
kind
of
a
false
sense
of
History,
as,
as
you
heard
from
Lauren,
the
entrance
that
we
are
using
for
the
hotel
is
probably
only
15
years
old.
There
didn't
used
to
be
an
entrance,
so
there
used
to
be
a
window,
and
when
we
looked
at
this
line
of
Windows
and
we
are
putting
historically
accurate
replacement
windows
and
all
of
the
others
we
didn't
want.
J
This
entrance
to
feel
like
this
entrance
had
always
been
there
since
it
had
not
been.
It
had
actually
been
one
of
these
large
windows,
and
so
we
very
purposefully
wanted
a
21st
century
design,
aesthetic
to
this
entrance,
to
make
it
clear
that
it's
not
part
of
the
historic
Fabric,
and
indeed
this
is
a
21st
century
Edition
to
the
to
the
project
and
I.
Think
you'll
see
as
we
get
into
some
of
the
details
of
how
we've
designed
this.
There
are
also
some
functional
requirements.
J
We
wanted
to
minimize
components
like
the
canopy
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
that
it
wasn't
detracting
from
the
exterior
of
the
historic
structure
so
kind
of
getting
that
balance
between
not
having
a
false
narrative
that
there
was
always
an
entrance
there,
while
at
the
same
time
making
it
clear
that
this
is
a
the
entrance
to
a
large
project
was
what
we
were
trying
to
achieve
with
this.
So
I
really
appreciate
your
consideration
of
this
request
with
that.
Oh
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
we
have
been
engaging
the
North
Loop
neighborhood
association.
J
We've
met
with
them
a
couple
of
times
over
the
last
two
months.
We
have
presented
these
designs
to
them
and
we
did
and
I
believe
this
has
been
shared
with
the
Commissioners.
We
did
receive
a
a
letter
of
support
for
the
design
changes
that
are
in
front
of
all
of
you
today.
If
they're
I'll
pause
for
any
questions.
K
My
name
is
Nathan
vanwilen
I
reside
at
3400,
Edmond
Boulevard
in
Minneapolis,
so
yeah
good
afternoon.
My
name
is
Nathan
vanwilin
I'm,
a
project
architect
at
snow
crylic,
Architects,
We're,
The
Architects
for
the
the
corn,
shell
of
the
building
you're.
Looking
at
and
I'll
speak
a
little
more
specifically
to
the
design
of
the
West
country,
which
is
David
noted,
is
going
to
be
the
main
entrance
for
the
hotel
component
of
this
building.
K
K
So
so
yeah
like
I,
was
saying
all
these
elements
kind
of
work
together
to
create
kind
of
a
distinctive
element,
that's
distinct
from
the
rest
of
the
historic
facade.
So
this
the
canopy
I'll
start
start
with
the
steel
structure,
the
canopy
backspins
into
the
building.
So
you
can
see
in
the
image
here.
K
The
canopy
extends
about
five
feet
out
from
the
building
and
then
it
back
spans
into
the
building,
and
with
that
backspan
we
were
able
to
kind
of
create
a
very
minimal
canopy
profile
that
projects
out
to
the
building
and
within
this
we're
providing
coverage
for
guests,
visiting
the
hotel
and
also
providing
lighting
and
then
also
as
this
canopy
goes
into
the
building.
It
leads
visitors
up
to
the
the
main
doors
into
the
into
the
shed
building
then
directly
above
the
canopy.
K
A
black
and
steel
panel
encloses
the
existing
opening
in
the
wall,
and
then
it
conceals
the
structure,
that's
needed
for
the
for
the
canopy
and
then
the
black
and
steel
panel.
Next
to
the
opening
is
used
for
signage
that
you
can
see
in
this
image
and
also
visually
ties
the
canopy
into
the
frame
around
the
window.
K
Then
you
know
adjacent
to
that
panel.
We
have
the
the
frame-
that's
going
around
the
window,
the
black
and
steel
panel
next
to
the
opening
or
the
the
Json
Windows,
partially
concealed
by
this
Frame,
and
also
creates
a
frame
that
looks
into
the
the
shed
building
the
the
plate.
Steel
for
this
structure
is
set
off
from
the
building.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
it's
set
up
about
six
inches
from
the
face
of
the
the
Brick,
so
it
doesn't
actually
attach
to
the
window.
K
It's
set
off
from
it,
and
so
it
not
only
kind
of
provides
an
opportunity
to
create
some
separation
from
the
entrance
and
can
create
some
conceal
that
what's
happening
on
the
inside,
but
also
as
you
walk
by
here,
you
can
look
in
through
the
frame
and
see
into
the
building
and
see
what's
happening
inside
the
building,
and
this
Frame
will
be
attached
to
the
building
with
with
angles
that
are
attached
through
the
motor
joints.
K
So,
as
mentioned
before,
we
believe
all
these
almonds
play
important
part
in
the
design
of
the
entrance
and
help
distinguish
the
main
entrance
into
the
hotel
and
I'll.
Let
Lauren
come
up
here
now
and
speak
a
bit
further
about
how
this
entry
meets
the
warehouse,
Design
District
guidelines.
Thank
you.
I
Thanks
Nathan
I
won't
take
too
much
more
of
your
time
here,
but
I
did
just
briefly
want
to
Circle
back
on
how
we
believe
that
what
we're
proposing
here
at
the
West
entrance
meets
the
spirit
of
the
Minneapolis
Warehouse
District
design
guidelines
and
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards,
which
are
the
best
practices
for
historic
preservation
in
general.
I
As
David
stated,
the
materials
of
this
West
Entry
are
really
compatible
with
the
Industrial
and
Commercial
nature
of
the
warehouse,
historic
district
and
the
commutator
building,
while
that
contemporary
design
of
the
entrance
does
distinguish
it
as
a
modern
intervention,
like
David
noted,
we
just
wanted
to
be
really
careful
to
not
create
a
false
sense
of
History
here,
by
giving
the
impression
that
this
was
always
a
historic
entrance
which
it
was
not,
and
unlike
the
original
three-story
commutator
building,
which
was
originally
designed
as
a
hotel.
I
I
And
furthermore,
though
this
west
elevation
of
the
shed
does
face
the
street
and
I
will
advance
to
my
slide.
Apologies
as
you
can
see
here
it.
It
really
functions
as
a
side
elevation
of
this
property,
and
that
is
a
primary
facade.
Making
this
elevation
an
acceptable
location
for
a
new
entrance
and
regarding
the
existing
remnant
of
the
the
steel
window
above
the
entrance
opening.
I
This
window
is
really,
as
Aaron
mentioned,
only
a
portion
of
the
historic
steel
sash
window
and
integrating
this
partial
window
Remnant
into
the
entrance
design.
We
feel
has
the
potential
to
create
that
false
sense
of
History,
as
there
was
never
a
transom
window
above
the
entrance
at
this
location
and
furthermore,
as
Nathan
alluded
to
trying
to
integrate
it
into
this
proposed
design,
would
conflict
with
the
interior
structure.
I
So
just
in
closing
the
the
work
proposed
here
is
essentially
additive
and
reversible
in
nature,
because
we're
installing
this
metal
paneling
into
mortar
joints
we're
doing
that
with
the
idea
that
if,
if
we
needed
to
be
removed
in
the
future,
we
could
do
so
without
damage
to
Historic
materials,
and
so
in
closing.
I
would
just
respectfully
and
our
team
excuse
me
would
respectfully
request
that
the
HPC
approve
the
application
with
recommended
staff
conditions,
except
for
conditions.
I
One
and
two
which
we
would
request
that
you
strike
and
as
David
mentioned,
we
do
have
a
material
sample
of
the
proposed
metal
paneling
that
will
provide
to
the
clerk
for
your
reference.
Thank
you
David
and
we're
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
Thank.
L
So,
just
to
I
think
you
said
this,
but
just
to
make
it
completely
clear.
The
expectation
is
that
the
the
opening
will
be
maintained
behind
this
metal
panel.
So
if
somebody
were
to
want
to
add
the
window
back
at
some
point,
there
would
be
the
opportunity
to
do
so.
Is
that
correct
am
I
Gathering
that
correctly.
K
Yes,
that's
correct
we're
the
way
that
we've
structured,
the
canopy
and
everything
will
keep
the
opening
intact
and
yeah
will
allow
a
future
installation
of
a
window
in
the
future
if
needed.
L
Okay
and
then
I
have
a
another
comment
more,
it's
probably
worthless,
but
I'm
going
to
provide
it
anyway.
We
not
too
long
ago
heard
a
item
from
the
canopy
Hotel,
Sherman
and
sources
project
about
the
difficulty
they're
having
for
resident
or
guests.
I
guess
they'd
be
in
multi-family
development.
So
that's
how
I
talk
finding
the
front
door
of
the
of
the
hotel.
L
This
is
a
much
smaller
building
and
maybe
that
would
be
easier
to
navigate.
But
I
just
want
to
make
a
point
of
reference
that
this
well
I
think
you
guys
did
a
really
successful
job
of
Designing
in
a
way
that
kind
of
Blends
in
with
the
with
the
historic
nature
of
the
building,
and
so
then
it
doesn't
detract
for
some
of
the
more
historic
features.
L
I
do
worry
on
your
behalf,
you're
welcome
that
maybe
guests
might
have
a
hard
time
finding
the
front
door
and
that
you
might
be
back
in
before
us
after
you're
up
and
operating
to
that
so
I'm,
just
making
that
as
a
point
of
reference.
That
is
useless
information
at
this
exact
moment,
but
I
thought
I'd
make
it
no
for
a
record
commissioner.
J
May
I
just
make
a
quick
time.
Yeah
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
we
have
thought
about
that
when
we,
since
this
was
not
an
entrance
before
it
had
no
address,
and
so
when
we
requested
an
address,
it
actually
was
the
same
number
as
one
of
the
storefronts
on
the
First
Street
side.
So
we
actually
requested
again
because
we
were
worried
that
with
the
same
number
it
would
get
quite
confusing.
So
we
do
appreciate
that
that
heads
up
thank.
L
You
yeah
just
a
out
for
future
reference,
but
appreciate
the
clarification
on
the
on
the
opening
itself.
E
Yeah
Nathan
Mr
van
Weiland
question:
did
you
say
that
this
that
the
metal
panels
are
gonna,
stick
six
inches
in
front
of
the
brick
or
did
I
not
understand
that
correctly.
K
Yeah,
maybe
I
can
jump
back
to
so
the
the
metal
panels
themselves
that
are
above
and
next
to
the
canopy.
Those
won't
be
protruding
six
inches
from
the
face
of
the
canopy,
but
the
I
was
referencing.
K
The
the
frame
around
the
window,
okay
frame
around
the
window,
will
actually
be
set
out
in
front
of
the
window
so
from
the
inside
you'll
you'll
be
able
to,
you
know,
see
out,
and
we
designed
that,
as
you
know
as
plate
steel,
so
that
when
you
look
from
the
inside
out,
you
will,
you
would
see
you
know
a
finished
panel
and
then
looking
from
the
inside
from
outside.
K
In
you
know,
you
will
be
able
to
see
through
most
of
the
window
depending
what
angle
you
take,
but
that
that
part
of
the
project
will
be
kind
of
set
out
from
the
building
a
bit,
so
it
doesn't
attach
directly
to
the
window.
If
that
makes
sense,
how.
E
E
What's
that
South,
if
you're
walking
south
from
the
corner
of
first
and
second,
so
you
could
see
the
Window
Up
Above
behind
that
whether
the
window
is
there
or
not
kind
of
is
I'd
say.
Maybe
this
not
as
big
of
a
concern
to
me
right
now,
but
you'd
be
able
to
see
the
recess
where
the
window
was
because
you're
hanging
these
off
the
wall.
Correct
yeah,
that's
correct!
E
So
is
that
something
that
you
would
consider,
because
I
think
that
would
at
least
in
my
mind
as
an
architect
that
would
begin
to
address
I.
Think
some
of
the
issues
of
being
able
to
see
what
was
historically
there
yet
layering
something
modern
in
front
of
it
to
call
attention
to
the
fact
that
this
is
the
entry
to
your
hotel.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
most
important
portal
to
the
whole
building
for
your
purposes,
commissioner,.
D
J
So
from
the
interior
you'll
be
able
to
see
that
yeah
so
you're,
referring
to
the
The
Remnant
window
frame
above
the
door.
In
that
question,
yeah.
E
Or
just
like
all
the
metal
panels
that
are
staying
against
the
wall,
did
you
ever
consider
pulling
them
away
from
the
wall
so
that
you
could
see
the
the
kind
of
the
layers
you'd
see
the
layers
of
History
which
may
not?
You
know
that
may
not
satisfy
the
warehouse
District,
but
I
think
it
may
be
a
way
to
have
your
cake
and
eat
it
too.
So
to
speak.
K
Yeah
I
think
the
design
intent
here
was
to
to
flush
those
panels
out
with
the
one
the
frame
that
goes
around
the
window,
to
kind
of
create
a
cohesive
sort
of
element
for
for
or
look
for
that
metal
panel
and
then,
where
it
transitions
to
the
frame
around
the
window.
So
that
was
the
design
intent
that
we
took
here
was
to
kind
of
try
to
unify
this,
as
as
one
element
versus
setting
them
back
from
each
other.
But
I
do
understand
what
you're?
What
you're
getting
out
of
here.
M
Point
look
at
sorry,
thank
you,
exposing
the
whole
window,
or
can
you
sort
of
talk
through
the
process
of
subdividing
it
the
way
that
you
have.
J
I
can
talk
about
it
from
a
from
an
ownership
perspective.
What
we're
achieving
so
and
the
Interiors
the
interior
of
that
window
is
what
we
are
referring
to
as
the
Fireside
Lounge
area,
and
it's
designed
to
be
a
part
of
that
large
commutator
shed
space.
That's
a
little
bit
more
intimate.
There
is
a
fireplace
that
will
be
installed
there
and
because
that
front
entry
has
so
much
activity
with
guest
services
guests
coming
in
and
out
trans.
All
that
sort
of
thing
the
intent
was
to
create
a
little
bit
of
visual
blockage
from
inside.
J
A
E
You
share
Howard
Miss
Kate
is.
G
Foreign
and
chair
Howard
I
think
the
level
of
importance
is
probably
subjective,
and
so
you
know,
as
staff
discuss
the
project
and
the
proposal
we
drew
a
con.
We
came
up
with
a
conclusion
or
a
condition
that
we
felt
best
honored
the
the
design
guidelines
and
and
the
standards
in
terms
of
being
able
to
to
preserve
that
that
window
we
understand
the
condition
is
deteriorated
and
there
was
a
previous
recommendation
to
to
repair
replace
in
kind.
G
You
know,
I
think,
would
be
difficult
to
put
an
importance
value
on
there.
Certainly
there's
a
difference
between
infilling
with
brick
versus
leaving
the
window
opening
versus
putting
in
the
window,
and
so
we
just
we
came
to
that
conclusion.
I
guess
it
may
be
up
to
the
commission
to
determine
whether
or
not
you
know
that
replacement
is
critical
or
if
you
feel
that
the
retention
of
the
opening
is
an
acceptable
path.
A
Seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
Commissioners,
let's
discuss
I,
just
want
to
point
out
that
I'm
still
really
excited
to
see
this
development
happen.
A
I
think
you're
you've
got
a
couple:
tough
buildings
here
to
work
with
and
you're
doing
a
great
job
trying
to
respect
the
historic
character
that
said,
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
staff
on
the
the
two
first
conditions:
I
think
that
the
the
metal
panel
does
obscure
the
character-defining
features
of
the
property
or
we're
missing
a
pilaster
all
of
a
sudden
and
we're
missing
half
a
window
that
is
obscured
and
and
then
the
the
whole
top
of
the
the
other
one
that
is
proposed
for
a
replacement
in
kind
and
so
I
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
this.
A
I
know
that
we
need
to
have
for
a
hotel.
You
need
to
have
a
an
entrance
that
screams.
This
is
the
hotel,
but
I
think
there's
other
ways
that
that
can
that
can
be
done
here
that
doesn't
obscure
the
very
few
character,
defining
features
we
have
for
this
property
and
I
just
want
to
caution
that
commissions.
M
M
E
A
It's
difficult
for
all
of
us.
We
respect
that
I.
E
Will
I
will
probably
accede
to
the
staff's
recommendations
unless,
unless
there's
other
people,
that
would
agree
with
me
that
we
would
suggest
to
hold
it
over
to
give
them
an
opportunity
to
come
back
with
something
that
would
potentially
be
compliant
with,
with
this
more
strongly
with
the
spirit
of
the
of
the
of
the
warehouse
District
guidelines.
F
Would
say
that
I
agree
that
the
metal
panels
in
front
of
the
window
and
framing
the
window
is
problematic.
In
my
opinion,
I
think
I
have
very
few
concerns
about
covering
over
the
top
and
rather
than
installing
a
transom,
I
I.
Think
I
would
be
okay,
striking
one,
but
I
feel
very
strongly
about
number
two
in
terms
of
conditions.
C
You
chair,
Howard
I,
have
a
clarification
question.
Do
we
would
we
need
to
modify
commission
or
I
I'm
agreeing
with
what
I
think
of
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
Commissioners
and
and
in
agreement
with?
Is
that
We've
we're
finding
problematic
the
the
side
window
covering,
but
over
the
top
of
the
door?
We
are
a
little
bit
more
amenable
to
leaving
the
opening
and
having
some
sort
of
covering
or
something
there.
C
That
would
be
maybe
distinguish
that
as
the
entry
versus
a
historically
a
window,
and
so
would
we
need
to
modify
condition
number
one
or
I
would
suggest
modifying
condition
number
one
to
at
least
draw
attention
to
that,
because
it
says
both
I
believe
it
says
historic
window,
openings,
plural,
so
I'm,
assuming
that
it
includes
the
the
window
above
the
entryway,
as
proposed.
A
I
I
assume
would
assume
that
that
would
mean
all
of
the
window.
Openings
that
we
have
and
yeah
I
would.
I
would
just
point
out
that,
although
that
has
been
modified,
that
is
a
window
that
has
been
there
for
many
many
many
years.
So
I,
don't
remember
from
the
discussion
as
to
whether
or
not
that
was
done.
During
the
period
of
significance
of
the
district
but
I
would
not
be
surprised,
which
would
mean
that
it's
an
alteration
that
may
have
become
historic
in
its
own
right,
so
I
would
just
caution
at
that.
E
Is
the
do
we
have
the
option
to
to
hold
over
the
the
consideration
of
this
rather
than
accepting
it
as
presented,
so
that
would
that
that
would
provide
the
applicant
the
ability
to
go
back
and
address
our
comments
here.
Correct.
A
H
I
will
make
a
comment:
Andrea
Burke
supervisor,
thank
you,
chair
Howard
and
commissioner
bobblelum,
so
the
options
here
would
be.
You
could
continue
this
to
the
next
meeting,
however,
and
I'm
not
sure,
because
I
just
emailed
Kendall
today,
we
I
don't
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
actually
happened.
Yet
we
are
proposing
canceling
the
next
meeting,
because
we
have
no
nose
projects,
which
then
would
put
this
on
the
June
6th
agenda.
If
you
chose
to
to
continue
it,
however,
someone
would
have
to
make
a
motion.
H
Somebody
would
have
to
second
it,
and
then
the
commission
would
have
to
vote
majority
to
actually
continue
in
it
to
a
future
meeting.
Also
in
consideration
of
that,
we
would
need
to
check
our
6120
to
make
sure
that
there
is
enough
time
in
the
state
law
application
period
to
allow
that
to
happen,
and
I
would
have
to
turn
to
Aaron
K
to
to
double
check
that
it
also
is
located
on
the
staff
report.
H
So
those
are
some
of
the
considerations
to
take
into
mind
in
your
deliberation
to
continue
or
not.
Thank
you.
G
Howard
at
the
end
of
the
60-day
decision
period
is
June.
10Th
and
I
did
not
calculate
the
120,
but
it'd
be
60
days
after
June
10th.
If
we
were
to
do
an
extension.
H
E
A
I
I
think
that
amendments
to
certificates
of
appropriateness
are
always
possible.
I
mean
this
is
an
amendment.
Is
it
not
so
they
can
come
back?
Yes,.
D
Yeah
I
agree
with
commissioner
Masten
that
I
would
be
sympathetic
to
striking
condition
too,
but
that
condition
one
seems
important
in
not
locking
the
large
side
window
so
that
that,
if
we
were
to
pass
it
but
to
allow
the
applicant
the
possibility
to
amend,
they
could
think
about
that
specific
issue.
L
I
guess
my
I
don't
have
a
ton
to
add
to
this,
but
my
feeling
is
that
I
think
that
that
the
staff's
recommendations
are
are
in
line
with
our
design
guidelines.
I
know
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
make
findings
if
we
strike
conditions,
but
I
I,
don't
feel
that
we
have,
even
if
we
did
have
to
do
that.
I,
don't
feel
that
we
have
reason
to,
and
so
I
worry
about
what
that
kind
of
shows.
L
If
we
were
to
do
that,
especially
around
windows
for
such
a
and
they're
such
a
pain,
sometimes
in
some
of
these
projects,
but
they
also
can
be
the
centerpiece
for
historic
projects,
and
so
I
want
to
be
careful
about
that,
and
the
treatment
of
Windows,
specifically
historic,
Windows,
specifically
so
I
would
prefer
to
keep
the
staff
recommendations.
L
Understanding
that
I
understand
the
reasoning
and
the
design
intent
around
what
what
was
created.
I
think
they're
is
I.
C
L
Up
by
staff
that
you
can
follow
yeah
all
right
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
I've
only
done
this
a
couple
of
times.
I
apologize.
The
Heritage
preservation
commission
approves
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
amend
the
previously
approved
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
to
modify
alterations
to
the
commuter
Foundry
Company
building
and
demolish
more
than
60
percent
of
the
blacksmith
slash
row:
wolf,
building
at
117
125
for
Street
North
in
the
Minneapolis
Warehouse
historic
district
and
Saint
Anthony
Falls
historic
district
subject
to
conditions,
as
noted
by
staff
in
the
staff
report.
C
E
H
Thank
you,
chair,
Howard
I
do
just
have
a
couple
items
to
mention.
We
held
our
last
Community
engagement
meeting
for
the
Washburn
Fair
Oaks
design,
guidelines
on
Saturday
April
29th
in
the
mid-afternoon,
and
held
more
of
a
presentation
Style
with
an
open
house
afterwards.
So
we
did
have
a
few
attendees
for
that.
H
We
are
looking
towards
a
getting
a
draft
of
those
design
guidelines
by
mid-may,
and
then
there
are
a
number
of
other
deadlines
that
we're
meeting
for
revisions
and
comment,
and
then
we
will
be
opening
actually
those
those
design
guidelines
up
for
a
public
comment
period
before
bringing
it
to
you
through
the
normal
regulatory
process.
So
we're
still
probably
looking
at
a
good
six
months
before
it
comes
to
you,
but
just
wanted
to
keep
you
apprised
of
some
of
the
engagement
and
the
comments
that
public
comment
periods
we
are
receiving
on
that.
H
Also,
our
team
will
be
Staffing
a
table
at
the
community
connections
conference
in
early
June.
We
will
be
having
a
table
that
is
specific
to
our
program,
with
highlighting
some
of
the
projects
that
we
have
worked
on,
as
well
as
the
landmarks
and
districts
in
the
city
this
will
be
held.
This
is
in
the
convention
center
yeah.
It
will
be
held
in
the
convention
center,
and
so,
as
I
have
more
details.
I.
Forgive
me,
the
exact
date
is
escaping
me
at
the
moment,
though,
I
think
it's
June
10th.
H
You're
welcome
to
stop
by
and
say
hi,
but
our
team
will
be
stopping
that
at
that
time
and
then
also
we
are
working
on
bringing
as
I
had
mentioned
earlier.
We
did
receive
a
certified
local
government
grant
to
resurvey
the
5th
Street
Southeast
District.
We
also
will
be
working
in
an
engagement
part
component
to
that
project,
so
at
a
future
date,
I
will
ask
for
volunteers
from
the
commission
to
participate
in
that
effort
and
no
further
updates.
Oh
forgive
me
one
more
as
I
mentioned
just
previously
in
the
last
item.
H
A
I
did
learn
that
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
has
been
listed
on
the
national
register
of
historic
places
as
of
last
week.
So
I
think
you
all
reviewed
that
while
I
was
out-
and
you
were
out
yes
so
that
is
listed
on
the
national
register.
Now
with
that
we've
completed
all
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
meeting,
I'll
ask
members
and
staff
once
more.
If
there
are
any
other
matters
to
come
before
the
meeting
there
being
no
other
business
to
come
before
this
meeting
without
objection,
I'll
declare
the
meeting
adjourned.
A
O
Welcome
to
business
licensing
our
renewal
process
has
become
faster
and
easier.
Leaving
you
more
time
to
run
your
business,
all
businesses
need
to
renew
their
business
licenses
annually.
Look
at
your
license
certificate
to
find
out
when
it
expires,
or
you
can
visit
our
website
to
view
a
list
of
renewal
and
expiration
dates
for
all
license
types.
Business
licensing
will
mail
out
a
renewal
billing
notice
approximately
45
days
before
your
renewal
is
due.
O
Most
licensees
will
only
need
to
verify
the
information
on
the
bill
if
there
are
no
changes,
sign
it
and
pay
the
amount
due
now.
Let's
go
step
by
step
through
a
renewal
form
here
is
a
license
annual
invoice.
It
will
be
mailed
to
the
address
you
provided
in
your
original
application.
There
are
details
on
the
bill
that
will
need
to
be
verified
like
plate
information,
insurance
provider
and
other
vehicle
information.
This
is
where
you'll
find
the
amount
you
need
to
pay
and
the
due
date.
O
If
you
do
not
renew
before
that
date,
a
20
late
penalty
will
be
charged
on
the
back
of
the
bill.
You'll
find
a
checklist
of
all
the
materials
and
actions
needed
to
complete
the
renewal.
You
are
always
welcome
to
come
to
City,
Hall
and
renew
your
license.
We
have
staff
available
to
assist
you
in
many
languages.
We
are
located
in
room
one
of
City
Hall.
We
are
open,
8,
A.M
to
4
pm
Monday
through
Thursday
and
Fridays
from
10
a.m,
to
4
P.M.
That's
it.
O
N
Whether
you
own
a
home
or
rent,
there
are
some
things
you
should
do
right
now
to
help
make
sure
you're
safe.
How
long
has
it
been
since
you've
tested
your
smoke
detector?
Does
it
need
a
new
battery?
The
same
goes
for
carbon
monoxide
detectors.
Not
only
is
it
smart
to
make
sure
you
have
CO
detectors
in
your
home,
it's
the
law,
here's
what
you
need
to
know.
N
You
might
not
think
carbon
monoxide
is
a
big
threat,
since
you
can't
see
it,
but
Co
poisoning
is
blamed
for
about
2
000
deaths
every
year
in
the
U.S,
so
make
sure
you
have
a
CO
detector
within
10
feet
of
every
sleeping
area
and
at
least
one
on
every
level
of
your
home.
That's
the
law.
Co
can
become
trapped
in
your
home
when
your
furnace
malfunctions
so
get
your
furnace
checked
every
year.
N
Foreign
Minneapolis
has
more
than
a
thousand
miles
of
city
streets,
they're
for
driving
of
course,
but
whenever
there's
enough
room,
the
city
also
allows
parking
along
the
curb.
If
you're
heading
to
a
restaurant
or
store,
you
can
often
find
a
place
nearby
where
on-street
parking
is
allowed
and
when
you
don't
have
a
driveway
or
a
parking
lot
on
street
parking
can
make
it
a
little
easier
and
more
convenient
to
park.
N
But
before
you
stop
your
car
look
for
signs
that
tell
you
if
you
can
park
there
and
when
parking
is
not
permitted
along
some
city
streets
and
is
only
permitted
at
certain
times
of
days
on
others
in
downtown
Uptown
and
other
parts
of
town,
you'll
find
metered
spaces
with
individual
space
numbers
to
pay
for
parking,
enter
your
parking
space
number
in
one
of
the
pay
stations.
Once
you
enter
your
space
number,
the
pay
station
will
tell
you
how
much
it
costs
to
park.
N
Select
the
amount
of
time
you
want
to
park,
that's
done
in
increments
of
25
cents,
a
dollar
or
two
dollars
for
some
meters,
spaces
parking
is
not
allowed.
At
certain
times
of
the
day.
The
pay
station
will
only
let
you
pay
for
time
when
parking
is
permitted
and
you
can't
exceed
the
maximum
time
allowed
at
a
space
to
pay
for
time
at
a
space
you
can
use
Visa
or
Mastercard
quarters
or
dollar
coins
and
remember
to
push
the
print
button
and
take
your
receipt.
That
receipt.
N
Has
your
space
number
and
tells
you
exactly
when
your
meter
time
expires
in
some
parts
of
town.
You'll
also
find
single
space
meters,
they'll,
take
quarters
and
dollar
coins,
and
some
will
take
credit
cards
too
to
find
out
more
about
our
metered
parking
spaces,
including
their
locations
and
instructions
on
use
check
out
the
City
of
Minneapolis
website.
N
Minneapolis
is
home
to
more
than
100
000
pets
and
with
plenty
of
trails,
sidewalks
and
dog
parks.
There
are
lots
of
outdoor
places
to
enjoy
time
with
your
four-legged
friend
and
when
you're
out
and
about
remember,
to
be
a
responsible
pet
owner.
Here
are
three
simple
things
you
can
do
make
sure
your
pet
is
on
a
leash.
Even
if
it's
well
behaved,
your
pet
could
become
provoked
by
another
animal
or
a
loud
noise
and
get
away
from
you,
and
some
people
are
frightened
of
animals.
A
leash
will
help
make
sure
it
doesn't
approach.
N
People
who
may
have
allergies
or
a
fear
of
animals
don't
leave
your
pets.
Mess
behind
disease
can
be
passed
from
animal
to
animal
through
feces
left
behind
and
that
can
also
pollute
our
waterways,
and
one
of
the
most
important
steps
you
can
take
is
to
license
Your
Pet
a
license
is
required
for
dogs,
cats,
ferrets
and
rabbits
in
Minneapolis.
If
your
pet
is
lost,
a
license
helps
Ensure.