►
From YouTube: July 18, 2023 Committee of the Whole
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
Submit written comments about agenda items to: councilcomment@minneapolismn.gov or https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/meetings/public-comment/online-comment
A
C
A
Record
reflect
we
have
a
quorum.
We
have
two
items
on
the
published
agenda
today,
in
addition
to
our
reports
of
committees
that
have
met
this
cycle.
I'll
also
note
that
at
our
last
meeting
we
had
postponed
the
legislative
Department
update,
that's
file
2023-00248
to
a
future
meeting,
and
now
that
item
has
been
scheduled
for
the
September
5th
meeting
item
number
one
is
receiving
and
filing
a
report
on
community
engagement
around
the
third
precinct
location
during
the
month
of
April
2023
I
will
invite
up
director
Heather
Johnston
interim
chief
operations
officer
to
introduce
that
item.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
I,
want
to
just
give
some
brief
introductory
comments,
and
then
I
will
turn
it
over
to
our
presenters.
Today.
First
I
want
to
thank
our
project
team
here:
Alexander
Cato,
Nick,
no
and
Karen
Moe
for
all
of
their
work
on
this
project.
It's
been
a
challenging
one
and
I
really
appreciate
their
their
efforts
on
this
particular
Outreach.
D
E
D
So
there
was
a
budget
amendment
in
the
2022
or
2023
budget
process
talking
about
engagement
for
the
third
precinct
site.
So,
as
we
started
into
that
process,
we
looked
at
wanted
to
really
get
a
sense
of
whether
or
not
we
knew
that
there
was
some
urgency
from
regarding
the
third
precinct
and
getting
our
officers
into
some
permanent
space.
At
the
time
we
were
directed
to
come
back
with
an
engagement
process
that
was
concluded
at
the
end
of
May,
and
so
you'll
hear
more
details
about
that
process.
D
So
I
won't
go
into
that,
but
really
had
some
urgency
with
making
that
decision,
and
so
we
had
a
process
and
the
details
will
be
reviewed
as
part
of
this,
but
there
have
been
additional
inputs
that
have
happened
since
that
process
began,
and
so
we
will
go
into
that
in
some
detail
throughout
this
presentation.
I
just
want
to
be
very
clear
with
a
council
that
we
are
not
asking
you
to
make
a
decision
today
about
either
of
these
sites
with
the
urgency
as
we
narrowed
down
the
process,
the
the
sites.
D
We
came
up
with
two
sites
that
and
in
the
name
of
transparency,
we
wanted
to
make
it
very
clear
to
the
community
that
those
seem
to
be
the
feasible
sites
at
that
point
in
time.
So,
but
at
this
point
in
time
we
are
just
giving
you
a
receiving
file
on
this
report
are
not
asking
you
to
make
a
decision
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Alexander
Cato
to
go
into
some
of
those
additional
inputs,
as
as
I
mentioned.
Thank
you.
E
Can
everyone
hear
me
good
morning,
chair
palmasano,
Vice,
Chavez
and
members
of
the
committee?
My
name
is
Alexander
Cato
I'm
in
I'm,
a
senior
project
manager
in
the
Office
of
Public
Service.
Here
today
to
present
the
findings
of
the
third
precinct.
Building
engagement
that
we
conducted
in
April
I'd
be
remiss
to
not
acknowledge
this
body
of
work
and
why
we're
here
on
May
25th,
2020,
George
Floyd,
was
murdered
by
a
former
Minneapolis
police
officers.
E
A
few
days
after
the
third
precinct
building
at
3000
Minnehaha
was
burned.
It
was
really
the
the
climax
of
of
that
murder
and
changed
our
city
changed.
Our
country
changed
our
world
and
the
body
of
work
that
we
conducted
in
April
is
because
of
that
and
I
I.
Just
think.
We
need
to
acknowledge
that
and
continue
to
learn
and
and
heal
from
that.
E
This
body
of
work
was
really
challenging
to
conduct.
Many
members
in
this
room
attended
those
meetings
and
we
asked
community
members
infrastructure-based
questions.
Do
you
want
a
Precinct
here
at
3000
Minnehaha,
or
do
you
want
it
at
2600
Minnehaha?
It
was
I
would
say.
E
Probably
our
first
formal
engagement
since
the
murder
of
George
Floyd
with
a
community
that
had
been
traumatized
by
that
Murder
By
that
aftermath
and
by
many
decisions,
decades
and
centuries
prior
to
that
it
was
incredibly
challenging
to
do
that,
engagement
to
lead
with
infrastructure,
knowing
that
there
was
a
line
of
other
concerns
that
members
of
the
community
wanted.
E
E
We
are
not
given
any
recommendations
today,
as
Heather
indicated,
but
just
sharing
these
findings
to
package
into
Future,
Vision
and
work
with
the
body
of
work
that
we
started
was
around
a
Precinct
building
in
the
end
of
May
2020,
the
precinct
burned
down
in
January
of
21
third
precinct
staff
were
moved
to
a
downtown
building,
they're
still
operating
out
of
that
building.
E
There's
several
challenges
with
that
one
that
building
is
really
just
a
formal
office
space.
Some
of
our
engineering
staff
was
there
prior
they're
in
public
service
building.
You
know
police
officers
and
other
staff
are
there
now,
but
it's
really
just
a
repurposed
office
building.
It's
not
what
we
would
typically
provide
as
a
building
for
police
officers.
It's
also
outside
of
the
third
precinct
geographic
area.
We
have
five
precincts
in
the
city.
We
place
them
in
a
geographically
central
location,
so
that
it's
accessible
for
staff
and
for
community
members.
E
The
building
that
they're
currently
using
is
not
in
an
ideal
location.
It's
also
impacted
police
response
times
as
well.
There's
a
table
here
you
can
see
in
2019
response
times
are
around
12
minutes
and
22
they're
around
17
minutes.
Obviously,
crime
patterns
have
changed
over
the
last
few
years.
Staffing
levels
are
different
right
now,
but
their
data
does
indicate
a
change
in
response
times
for
Priority
One
responses.
Those
are
responses
where
there's
immediate
threat
to
life
or
property,
and
this
scene
is
unstable.
E
So
this
was
where
we
were
at
when
we
started
this
body
of
work.
We
started
in
April
of
this
year
and
I
would
say
where
we're
at
now,
we've
learned
a
lot.
It's
July
of
23
we're
kind
of
Midway
through
the
summer,
we're
three
years
after
the
murder
of
George
Floyd.
E
When
we
started
this
work
in
April,
it
was
challenging.
As
I
said,
there
was
a
lot
of
concerned
desire
for
other
things
from
community
members.
E
Other
reports
and
Etc
came
out
the
21st
century
task
force
around
kind
of
a
21st
century
model
for
Public
Safety
emerged.
The
mdhr
settlement
agreement
came
out
in
June,
the
Department
of
Justice
report.
Findings
came
out
just
last
week.
The
safe
and
thriving
communities
report
came
out.
So
there's
this
emergence
of
all
this
other
information.
F
F
The
first
phase
of
the
process
began
in
June
of
2020
following
the
damage
to
the
precinct
building,
which
rendered
the
facility
inoperable
for
its
function
from
June
through
September
of
2020
11
locations
were
considered
using
industry
standard,
citing
criteria
for
municipal
buildings
and
Facilities.
Of
this
nature,
one
facility
was
selected
with
the
intent
of
leasing
to
accomplish
a
short-term
location
for
the
third
precinct
operations
in
the
days
leading
up
to
the
finalization
of
the
lease
agreement.
F
F
Third
party
real
estate
Consultants
were
employed
in
an
effort
to
move
forward
with
realizing
options
for
the
third
precinct
to
be
located,
while
several
sites
and
Facilities
were
identified.
Very
few
met
the
necessary
criteria
for
a
Precinct,
Maine,
disqualifiers
included,
inadequate
sizing,
limited
access
points
or
improper
zoning.
F
F
G
G
I'm
Kieran,
De
Young
with
the
young
Consulting
Services
we're
a
Minneapolis
based
consulting
firm,
actually
just
a
block
over
so
very
close
by
the
project
scope.
So
this
is
our
understanding
at
the
at
the
beginning
of
the
project,
was
to
facilitate
a
community
conversation
to
determine
a
new
location
for
the
third
precinct,
Minneapolis
Police
Department,
and
we
all
realized
now
that
it
was
much
much
more
complex
than
that,
but
as
we
were
brought
in,
that
was
our
understanding
of
the
work.
G
So
we
partnered
with
Longfellow
Community
LCC
I,
forget
Rachel
the
last
the
last
one
stands
for
to
organize
Community
conversations
and
that
included
securing
locations
and
conducting
Outreach
to
community
members.
That
was
done.
That
Outreach
was
done
within
a
very
short
time
frame.
There
was
an
attempt
to
do
select
locations
that
were
throughout
the
third
precinct
be
representative.
Then
we
did
a
community-wide
survey
and
the
idea
was
to
provide
broader
participation
and
that
information
was
public.
G
We'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
challenges
surrounding
the
survey
and
then
eight
curated
conversations
were
held
and
I
think
the
thinking
behind
that
was
that
not
everyone
is
going
to
want
to
come
to
participate
to
an
in-person
service.
We
want
to
target
folks
who,
who
may
not
feel
comfortable
or
may
want
a
different
venue
and
make
sure
that
those
voices
were
targeted.
G
The
qualitative
data
was
using,
we
use
SurveyMonkey,
the
qualitative
data
was
used.
We
analyzed
that
using
the
the
software,
the
qualitative
data,
so
the
open-ended
survey
responses
were
analyzed
and
we
used.
We
used.
The
software
called
deduce
to
do
that
because
of
the
the
difficulty
with
the
survey,
the
limitations
of
the
survey,
the
survey
design.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
emphasized
the
open-ended
responses
from
the
paper-based
survey.
G
So
once
from
the
beginning,
with
the
community-based
conversations,
and
even
that
first
meeting,
we
had
paper-based
surveys
and
once
we
saw
that
it
was
much
more
Beyond,
these
two
sites
that
we
really
emphasized
the
use
of
those
paper-based
surveys.
So
all
of
the
responses,
the
site
responses,
as
well
as
the
open-ended
responses,
were
entered
into
our
spreadsheet
and
entered
into
our
software
to
make
sure
that
it
was
more
of
a
big
picture
of
everything
and
not
just
a
survey
itself,
because
it
was
much
more
complex
as
I
said.
G
So
these
are
the
the
locations
that
we
held.
The
community
engagement
sessions,
as
Alexander
said
it
had
been
three
years
and
people
clearly
hadn't
had
an
opportunity
to
process
what
had
happened.
So
there's
a
lot
of
of
that
during
our
time.
I
would
say
also
that
our
facilitators,
we
had
skilled
facilitators
who
were
working
with
us.
Our
facilitators
commented
after
the
sessions
how
meaningful
it
was
that
we
had
folks
who
were
defund
the
police
and
folks
who
were
very
pro-police
who
are
actually
having
conversations
with
each
other
and
listening
to
each
other.
G
So
in
the
beginning
there
were
you
know
there
were
you
know.
Folks
had
there
was
distrust
as
we'll
say
the
city,
but
when
they
were
sitting
with
their
neighbors
and
talking
to
their
neighbors,
the
folks
were
willing
to
to
talk
to
each
other
and
hear
perspectives,
even
though
they
may
not
agree
with
them.
G
Strength
of
theme,
so
a
lot
of
times
we'll
try
to
quantify
as
much
as
possible
qualitative
data,
so
the
qualitative
data
being
that
the
numbers
based
on
the
survey,
but
the
things
that
people
said.
So
we
tried
to
as
much
as
possible
say
whether
things
were
strong
theme,
a
medium
theme
or
a
low
theme,
and
so
qualitative
data
analysis
is
part,
art
and
part
science.
So
we
had
to
given
all
the
numbers
that
were
the
number.
G
There
was
a
vast
majority,
so
there
were
in
the
survey
the
open-ended
responses
where
I
think
there
were
3
000
responses.
So
that's
why
it
took
us
so
long.
Each
each
comment
was
coded
under
a
theme
and
then
so
it
took
us.
You
know
all
of
Staff
members
were
working
on.
It
was
just
a
lot
of
data
So.
Based
on
the
number
of
comments
we
tried
to
do
like
75
or
above
was
a
strong
theme,
25
to
74
being
medium
and
then
under
25
being
low.
So
you'll
see
that
as
we
report
the
findings.
G
Limitations
and
there
there
are
significant
limitations,
of
course,
the
the
biggest
elephant
in
the
room
being.
The
survey
was
limited
to
two
options,
having
the
required
question
of
the
location
of
the
facility,
and
there
was
no
option
to
express
that
there
were.
There
was
no
location
desired,
that
they
didn't
want
either
one
of
those,
and
then
people
outside
of
this
third
precinct
may
have
responded
to
the
survey.
We
looked
at
different
options
to
try
to
potentially
address
that,
but
they
really
couldn't
find
anything.
G
So
we
we,
it
was
broad,
so
people
who
lived
worked
or
visited
the
third
precinct,
but
there
certainly
could
have
been
people
who
were
outside
of
that.
Individuals
may
have
included
digital
Maple
surveys
multiple
times
some
people
organized
community
members
to
complete
the
survey,
and
we
saw
that
regardless
of
position.
So
we
saw
that
we
saw
evidence
of
that
for
folks
who
were
sort
of
defund
the
police.
G
We
saw
evidence
of
that
for
folks
who
were
very
supportive
of
the
police
as
well,
and
there
was
a
group
of
10
to
15
community
members
who
attended
multiple
Community
conversations
repeated
their
arguments.
We
really
we
we
really
didn't
in
those
Community
conversations
did
not
emphasize
identification
of
who
the
person
was.
We
didn't.
We
thought
about
potentially
doing
sign-in
sheets
that
didn't
go
over
very
well,
so
it
really
wasn't
and
we
didn't
take
notes
based
on
person.
G
We
didn't
take
notes
based
on
the
name,
so
there
really
was
no
way
to
to
monitor
that
and
then
the
community
conversations
attracted
mostly
white
people,
and
there
was
also
a
lack
aside
from
the
one
African-American
curated
conversation
was
a
lack
of
blackmail
representation
in
the
findings.
G
So
this
is
a
complex
slide,
so,
as
I
said,
I
showed
the
purpose
at
the
beginning.
You
know
choosing
a
site,
but
it
was
clearly
much
more
complex
than
that.
So
this
was
our
effort
to
try
to
to
share
that
complexity,
and
so
I
know
for
folks
who
can't
see
the
screen.
It's
small
I'll
try
to
to
walk
through
it,
so
go
through
additional
processes
before
a
site
decision
is
made.
So
that's
that's
the
main
question.
G
Yes,
if
you
want
to
do
that,
what
what
happens
so,
instead
of
just
selecting
a
site,
let's
do
some
things
before
we
do
that.
So
there
were
folks
who
said:
let's
do
it
first,
The
Truth
and
Reconciliation
reconciliate
process
and
you
see
that's
an
N.
So
a
number
of
the
number
of
people
who
were
spotted
in
that
way
was
136.
G
Trust
is
damaged.
Over
500
people
mentioned
that
first
police
reform.
Before
selecting
a
site.
There
were
160
folks
who
said
that
and
then
the
committee
wants
to
form
and
Trust
building.
There
was
269
folks
who
said
that,
on
the
other
side,
folks
who
wanted
to
not
go
through
a
process
necessarily
before
the
site,
there
were
folks
who
said
no
Precinct
whatsoever
and
that's
an
n308.
So
there
are
300
references
to
that.
I
should
say
to
that:
N
means
not
necessarily.
G
There
were
308
individual
people
who
set
that
comment,
but
that
there
were
308
references
throughout
to
that
comment.
I
want
to
clarify
that
so
the
folks
who
said
no
Precinct
building
a
308.
G
So
if
you
see
on
the
bottom
left
of
the
drawing
you'll
see
that
it
says,
invest
money
in
something
other
than
the
project
building
the
precinct
building
there
were
188
references
to
that
invested,
addressing
group
causes
of
crime
118
and
then
the
folks
middle.
There
is
decide
on
an
infrastructure
to
support
I'm.
Sorry,
the
middle
one
actually
goes
to
the
bottom
left:
decide
on
an
infrastructure
to
support
Community
division
of
Public
Safety.
So
that's
a
sort
of
a
broadheading
for
the
things
that
I
just
said:
investing
money
in
something
other
than
that
than
the
precinct.
G
Investing
the
root
causes
Etc,
and
then
there
were
the
folks
who
said
decide
on
a
site.
Now
then
there
were
the
survey
specifically.
There
were
folks
responded
to
the
survey
who
For
Whom
It
Was
a
Very,
a
Clear
Choice
predominantly
cost
for
many
of
them.
So
of
the
folks
again
in
the
the
survey
is
broader.
G
There
were
I
forget
how
many
people
who
responded
this
survey,
but
a
significant
number
did
not
complete
the
survey
or
they
answered
the
questions
A
or
B
in
order
to
be
able
to
give
what
to
say
what
they
really
wanted
to
say
so
that
taking
that
group
out
the
folks
who
were
left
of
that
group,
66
chose
the
original
site
and
34
chose
the
new
site,
and
then
there
were
folks.
G
The
idea
of
a
Satellite
Hub
was
was
popular
with
84
responses,
and
then
there
were
folks
that
are
244
responses
for
neither
site.
So
that
meant
we
don't
we
don't
want
either
site
in
many
cases
cases
it
was.
This
is
too
close
to
people
who
are
impacted
by
by
racism.
It
needs
to
be
further
away
folks,
who
are
impacted
by
environment,
lack
of
environmental
justice
Etc,
so
I
will,
but
that's
the
overarching
finding
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
my
colleague
IO
for
additional
findings.
G
A
Mr
Young
I'm
not
seeing
any
questions
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
Welcome,
hey,
have
you
is
Dr
ay
Ebola.
H
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
Yeah
sorry
I'm,
not
very
compassent
with
the
protocols,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
be
here
today.
H
Yes,
I
will
pick
off
from
where
my
colleague
Karen
the
young
left
are.
These
findings
is
about
a
side
decision
and,
while
I'm
going
through
this
I
want
us
to
look
at
that
with
the
limitations
of
this
survey
in
mind,
knowing
fully
well
that
solipo
did
not
complete
the
survey
at
all
because
they
basically
called
the
story
because
it's
not
it
doesn't
allow
them
to
proceed
while
some
started
and
did
not
complete
that.
So
this
number
we
should
do
that.
H
Bearing
that
in
mind
at
the
same
time,
while
we
do
this
as
well,
like
Karen
said
we
had,
we
had
more
people
that
actually
responded
to
the
survey,
but
we
had
to
remove
the
people
that
say
that
they
don't
want
a
site
so
to
to
be
able
to
come
to
this
of
the
24
and
12th
respondents
who
leave
work
and
or
visit
the
top
present,
and
it
not
indicates
that
they
do
not
want
a
Precinct.
So
we
have
1591,
which
is
66
percent.
H
The
selected
current
size,
the
the
current
site,
where
we
have,
and
also
821,
which
is
34
selected,
a
new
site
that
was
proposed
like
I,
said
again.
Let's
bear
in
mind
the
limitations
of
the
survey
as
we
interpret
this
and
also
many
people
want
to
spend
money
on
more
police
reforms
and
also
addressing
the
root
cause
of
crime.
So,
instead
of
actually
spending
more
money
on
a
building,
so
the
focus
is
more
on,
while,
instead
of
spending
more
money
on
a
building
which
doesn't
change
much.
H
But
why
not
focus
actually
on
the
root
cause
of
the
issue
and
also
reforming
the
police,
making
sure
that
they
are
community-based
people
and
also
they
focus
on
protecting
the
community
and
and
also
we
have
a
a
good
number
of
people
that
do
not
want
a
present
on
either
side
and
some
believe
that
they
should
not
even
be
close
to
the
current
neighborhood.
Where
so
many
people
have
been
traumatized.
Considering
the
everything
that
happened,
ranging
from
the
mother
of
George
Floyd
to
all
the
unrest
that
happened.
H
So
many
people
actually
don't
want
the
the
sites
in
that
place
in
any
of
the
two
side,
because
they
feel
that
the
sites
are
very
close
to
each
other
and
being
considering
that
they
are
very
close
to
each
other
having
the
sites
and
then
in
any
of
those
two
places.
Really,
it
doesn't
help
the
community
that
actually
has
gone
through
a
lot
of
challenges
and
also
you're
still
going
through
that
till
now,
and
also
again
on
the
finding
on
the
side
decision
as
well.
H
There
are
people
that
want
to
do
something
with
the
current
sites.
Again
considering
every
I
mean
what
it
looks
like
for
many
people,
you
represent
trauma
for
them
every
time
you
look
at
that
site.
They
look
at
the
history
of
everything
that
has
been
in
that
place
and
again
the
mother
of
George
Floyd.
At
the
same
time,
also
the
Honors
that
followed,
so
they
want
to
do
something
quickly
with
the
site
so
that
it
can
be.
H
They
don't
have
to
see
that
again
when
they
are
when
they
are
passing
by
so
some
actually
suggested
alternative
use
of
the
site
of
the
original
site
and
the
most
prominent
ones
are
a
memorial
for
George
Floyd
and
a
monument
for
Uprising
or
a
museum
on
police
brutality
and
the
other
one
was
a
community
center
that
mainly
we
served
community
that
has
been
harmed.
So
that's.
These
are
the
two
main
ones
that
we
that
we
have
and
on
the
theme
that
we
have
here
and
also
like
I,
said
someone
to
be
something
else.
H
Instead
of
a
police
building
and
again
many
people
also
said
that
they
want
it
as
a
reminder
of
everything
that
happened,
because
history
should
not
be
forgotten.
They
believe
that
we
should
put
something
in
there
that
I
remind
everyone
of
us
of
everything
that
just
transpired
in
that
place
and
the
and
what
interests
that
was
done,
and
some
also
talk
about
really
again
decides
as
a
center
to
serve
the
neighborhood
again,
it's
more
to
to
do
something
for
the
animal
to
really
help
them
to
heal,
as
as
they
go.
H
Defining
number
two
is
about
the
community
response
to
the
on
engagement,
and
the
prevalent
theme
is
that
is
most
people.
Actually
they
are
very
skeptical
about
the
process
as
a
whole.
They
feel
that
it
should
not
be
made
and
they
are,
and
the
city
was
only
trying
to
come
to
really
just
get
a
consent.
H
So
so
again,
the
again
that's
that's
the
perspective
that
they
have
and-
and
that
was
prevalent
in
most
of
the
conversations
that
we
that
we
have
and
also
many
people
Express
a
lack
of
trust
in
a
process
based
on
the
how
the
city
handled
the
mother
of
George
Floyd
and
the
uprising
that
followed.
They
feel
that
the
city
did
not
do
enough
to
to
respond
to
the
to
the
to
the
mother.
H
H
H
So
that's
one
of
the
key
things
and
you
can
see
that
it's
a
very
strong
finding
people
have
a
very
strong
opinion
about
that,
and
also
another
strong
thing
that
we
find
is
people
Express
frustrations
that
they
don't
have
enough
information
to
make
a
decision
about
either
site
a
or
site
B.
Yes,
they
were
provided
with
some
information
about
how
much
it
will
cost
and
a
timeline,
but
they
want
more
information
about.
How
did
we
come
to
the
conclusion
that
these
are
the
only
two
sites
that
can
be
in
this
place?
H
So
they
express
that
and
that's
a
very,
very
strong
finding
that
we
have
another
one.
Also,
that
really
was
very
strong
is
that
people
want
actually
an
acknowledgment
of
what
happened.
H
They
want
the
city
to
acknowledge
the
mother
of
George
Floyd
and
take
responsibility
for
it
at
the
same
time,
also,
the
uprising
that
followed
as
well.
They
want
an
acknowledgment
for
that,
and,
and
also
they
want
healing
truth
and
restorative
justice
and
police
reform
and
the
reconciliation
process.
Before
we
start
talking
about
a
building.
H
They
feel
that
the
building
is
the
last
thing
that
needs
to
happen,
but
they
feel
that
all
of
these
things
should
happen
way
before
we
are
actually
having
any
conversation
about
a
building
and
also
I
mean
we
also
have
a
good
number
of
people.
That
said
that
police
reform
should
come
first
before
anything.
Anything
about
the
building
should
be
considered
and,
like
one
participant
said
that
it
doesn't
matter
whether
you
put
a
b
in
one
house,
you
transfer
it
to
a
different
house.
It
doesn't
change
what
the
bill
will
do.
H
The
bill
was
this
thing
so
and
that's
one
one
of
the
key
things
I
can
bring
up
because
your
earnings
in
memory
every
time
and
that's
what
the
person
said-
that
a
police
reform
is
needed
before
that
a
building
will
not
change
anything
or
a
reform
is
needed
to
make
sure
that
the
police
are
serving
the
community
and
they
are
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
do.
So
that's
one
of
the
major
findings
also
that
that
came
from
that
defining
number
three
is
about
the
community
impacts
of
Judges,
Floyd,
mother
and
the
ensuing
unrest.
H
That
happened
in
the
course
of
that
they
say
that
the
participant
has
said
that
a
felt
betrayed
by
the
city
and
again
the
response
of
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department
during
the
uprising.
They
feel
that
they
feel
that
the
response
was
was
not
good.
At
the
same
time,
also
many
felt
abandoned
in
the
course
of
the
whole
unrest
that
happened
because
they
felt
that
their
city
were
being
burned
down,
and
there
was
no.
H
There
was
really
no
response
by
anyone
to
really
help
them
out
and
also
they
also
talk
about
the
the
response
to
the
again
the
unrest
that
followed
as
well,
and
they
said
again
for
many
people.
Initially,
there
was
a
mistrust
of
the
city
and
a
mistrust
grew
to
a
full
distrust
in
the
course
of
this,
because
they
feel
that
they
did
not
do
enough
to
protect
them
their
or
their
properties
in
the
course
of
this
and
are
based
on
everything
that
happened.
H
Also,
we
know
actions
have
consequences
and
based
on
everything
that
happened,
they
talk
about
a
limited
response
and
increased
insecurity
in
the
area,
especially
in
the
in
the
corridor.
I
mean
we
are
the
the
police
building
used
to
be
many
business
owners
that
we
talked
to
and
also
citizens.
They
talk
about
how
they
unrest
has
devastated
the
community
whereby
many
people
are
businesses
are
living.
There
is
a.
There
has
not
been
enough
to
help
these
small
businesses
that
are
there
and
big
businesses
that
are
there.
H
Also
they
are
living
and
they
think
some
might
be
considering
living
as
well
because
of
the
increased
crime
and
also
less
Security
in
the
area
and
also
the
community
members.
They
continue
to
feel
the
trauma
because
again,
like
I,
said
looking
at
the
building
and
at
the
same
time
also
for
many
people
when
what
happened
on
that
day,
it
changed
their
lives
completely
and
and
based
on
that,
they
still
feel
that
the
trauma
continues,
and
nothing
has
really
been
done
also
to
help
them
to
really
heal
from
that
trauma.
H
They
said
that
this
actually
has
given
way
for
more
conversations
about
race
and
white
privilege,
and
some
feel
that,
because
of
this
also
neighbors
are
coming
together
to
help
each
other
to
protect
each
other
and
also
to
hear
more
perspectives
about
the
things
that
have
been
happening,
especially
when
it
comes
to
risk
relations
and
why
privilege,
in
the
course
of
this
also,
some
also
feel
that
this
issue
also
has
further
divided
the
community
again
because,
like
Karen
said
earlier,
some
are
pro
police.
H
The
final
number
four
is
about
the
community
perception
of
the
many
police
police
department.
The
general
theme
about
that
is
that
the
the
many
of
the
MPD
is
unresponsive
and
helpful,
ineffective,
overly
aggressive
and
generally
does
not
perform
the
theories
of
responding
to
calls
solving
or
preventing
crime,
and
that
was
a
very
strong
theme
that
came
up
in
the
course
of
the
conversation
they
referred
to
the
history
of
violence
and
use
of
excessive
force
and
also
how
much
atrocities
they
are
committed
in
the
community.
H
So
that
was
a
very
strong
team
that
came
up
and
also
the
the
participant
talk
about
how
the
MPD
officers
they
dehumanize
members
of
certain
communities,
the
Bible
Community,
the
LGBT
community
lgbtq
community.
So
they
talk
about
the
how
they
demonize
them
many
times
the
way
they
treat
them
the
way
they
talk
to
them
and
also
sometimes
times
also
how
they
are
unfairly
targeted
in
arrests
and
different
things.
H
So
all
of
these
things
were
strong
themes
that
came
from
the
conversations
that
we
have
with
people
and,
at
the
same
time
also
I
want
to
bring
up
another
theme
that
came
up
as
well.
It's
a
medium
theme
and
that's
why
there
are
so
many
negative
view
of
the
MPD.
Some
are
actually
sympathetic
towards
them.
They
feel
that
the
job
is
difficult.
The
support
they
don't
have
enough
support
at
the
same
time,
also
some
field
that
MPD
is
understaffed
and
then
the
police
also
themselves
their
bond
out.
H
H
The
funded
number
five
were
suggestions
about
solutions
to
Public,
Safety
and
and
the
first
one
again
going
back
to
the
police
reform.
That
was
a
very,
very
strong
theme.
People
want
a
real
police
reform.
H
It
people
people
want
whereby
the
MPD
is
transformed
to
a
community
supporting
police
force,
because
they
believe
that
the
current
culture
of
the
MPD
is
not
sustainable,
because
they
believe
that
the
core
choice
of
corruption,
violence,
aggression,
racism
and
they
believe
that
it
does
not
support
Public
Safety.
It
does
not
support
citizens,
it's
not
support
individuals
or
businesses
that
live
in
the
environment
and
and
also
one
of
the
key
thing
that
came
up
also
that
they
feel
that
addressing
the
root
cause
of
crime.
H
Again,
the
same
thing
came
up
again
because
it's
a
very
strong
theme.
People
feel
that
when
we
address
the
root
cause
of
crime
such
as
poverty
in
illiteracy,
mental
health
and
Homeland
homelessness,
they
believe
that
the
crime
will
reduce
and,
and
they
believe,
that,
again
lack
of
basic
Services.
It
increases
crime
and
police
arrests,
so
the
addressing
all
of
these
issues.
Basically,
they
feel
that
it
will
actually
impact
crime
in
such
a
way
to
reduce
that,
and
also
with
less
crime.
H
There'll
be
less
arrests,
and
also
there
will
be
lessening
for
aggression
and
also
they
talk
about
the
officers
need
to
build
and
strengthen
relationship
with
the
community.
H
They
feel
that
the
officers
are
they
serve
the
community
and
is
their
job
to
make
sure
that
people
know
them
in
the
community.
They
know
they
understand
how
the
community
operates,
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
in
the
course
of
this
is
some
people
feel
that
some
officers
actually
live
outside
the
communities.
So
they
don't
even
know
people
that
live
in
those
communities.
They
don't
understand
their
challenges
or
their
way
of
life.
H
Some
feel
that
they
only
come
to
police
them
not
to
relate
with
them,
but
they
want
officers
that
come
to
them
and
relate
with
them
and
be
part
of
that
community.
So
that's
one
of
the
key
things
that
came
up
and
people
want
a
lot
of
that
again.
It's
also
about
about
serious
reform
to
transform
MPD.
The
last
one
that
also
came
up
was
a
cultural
and
systematic
change
within
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department.
Again
they
talk
about
the
culture
whereby
there's
corruption.
H
There
is
a
racism
and
everything
they
really
want,
a
change
in
the
cultural
and
and
the
system
in
which
they
operate.
So
that's
one
of
the
key
things
that
came
up
and
people
are
really
strong
about
that
opinion,
that
a
good
police
culture,
a
good
Department
culture,
will
make
the
comments
safer
than
it
is
currently,
and
this
is
just
last
finding
and
we
try
like.
H
We
said
that
we
had
curated
conversations
for
specific
communities
that
may
not
be
able
to
come
out
and
based
on
that,
we
try
to
talk
to
Latino,
Community,
African,
American,
Indians,
Asian,
American,
African-American,
East
Africans
and
the
lgbtq
community.
We
try
to
talk
to
all
of
them
to
make
sure
we
get
key
information
from
them,
so
that
so
that
this
reports
also
can
be
inclusive
as
much
as
possible
for
the
Latino
Community.
H
They
want
increase
Public
Safety
for
businesses
on
lake
Lake,
Street
Corridor,
while
they
they
want
that
they
also
acknowledge
the
harm
that
has
been
done
to
their
own
Community
too.
Some
also
said
that,
while
the
the
desire,
the
police
to
come
back,
they
want
them
to
treat
them
as
also
equal
citizens
with
their
white
counterparts.
H
They
feel
that
many
times
they
are
targeted
sometimes,
and
they
feel
that
they
really
want
the
police
to
really
be
in
that
place,
but
they
want
them
to
really
see
them,
as
also
citizens
in
that
place.
For
the
American
Indian,
they
express
the
greater
need
for
Public
Safety
in
the
Little
House
Community.
They
feel
that
some
people
are
leaving
the
place
and
also
they
feel
that
Public
Safety
is
needed
in
that
place.
H
They
also
acknowledge
the
history
of
police
as
well,
because
some
of
them
said
the
issue
of
police
is
about
how
police
used
to
chase
leaves,
and
that's
really
also
what
has
been
becoming.
What
has
been
what
has
been
going
on
right
now
too,
it's
more
like
they
still
see
a
certain
Community
as
as
a
challenge
that
they
still
have
to
go
in
after
every
single
day
and
for
the
Asian
American
Community.
They
want
increased
Public
Safety,
but
also
they
acknowledge
the
harm
that
has
been
done
to
the
community.
H
Many
many
of
them
feel
that
the
Communists
continue
to
be
harmed
while
they
want
the
police
to
be
there.
They
also
want
to
make
sure
that
the
police
are
not
committed
to
harm
the
community.
They
are
coming
there
to
help
the
community
and
to
bring
policy
Public
Public
Safety
for
the
African-American
Community.
They
also
desire
increased
Public,
Safety
Services
I
mean
which
pollution
is
one
of
them.
H
They
talk
a
lot
about
other
things
that
could
be
done.
How
Public
Safety
can
be
improved
in
the
environment
and
also
they
want
police
to
be
less
harmful
to
the
community
members,
because
they
feel
that
most
like
again,
like
I,
said
earlier,
they
feel
targeted
and
they
feel
that
the
I
mean
the
police
need
to
be
more
working
with
them
less
harmful,
but
being
able
to
also
bring
safety
to
the
community
for
the
East
African
Community.
H
They
also
desire
good
Public
Safety,
but
there
is
a
concern
about
the
2600
mini
higher
location.
They
said
that
there
has
been
an
interest
that
that
will
be
a
community
mall
for
the
East
American
east
African
Community.
So
they
raised
that
as
a
concern
that
that's
not
it
for
them.
It's
not
having
that
location
is
a
non-starter
because
it
still
that
has
been
promised
to
them.
H
To
be
a
community
center
for
the
East
African
Community
and
for
the
LGBT
community
community,
most
of
the
participants,
they
don't
want
the
top
person
to
return
at
all,
so
instead
they
want
a
more
creative
solution
to
public
safety
issues
and
the
challenges
that
we
have.
So
this
is
the
summary
of
all
the
findings
that
we
have
and
I
will
will
be
open
to
questions.
Thank.
A
You
we
have
a
couple
in
queue
so
far:
council
member
onesie.
I
Thank
you,
chair,
palmisano
I,
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
our
consultants
for
delivering
a
very
thorough
report.
I
also
want
to
name
you
know.
Anyone
who
has
been
paying
attention
to
Minneapolis
since
2020
will
not
be
surprised
by
these
results.
Also,
anyone
in
community,
especially
in
South
Minneapolis,
would
not
be
surprised
by
these
results.
Anyone
who
attended
the
listening
sessions
in
the
curated
conversations
would
not
be
surprised
by
these
results.
I'm
not
surprised
by
them,
as
my
office
attended,
every
single
one
of
them
and
I
also
want
to
name.
I
You
know
my
office
and
I
know
some
of
my
colleagues
attempted
to
warn
our
city
officials
about
asking
our
residents
to
choose
between
two
false
choices
and
that
this
would
not
be
well
received
by
the
public.
They
will
recognize
that
this
is
not
the
threshold
in
which
we
need
to
settle
for,
and
you
know,
I
it's
very
clear.
As
a
result
of
this
process,
we've
doubled
down
on
the
harm
that
we've
already
created.
I
For
so
many
working-class
people
in
our
city,
especially
as
it
relates
to
Public,
Safety
and
specifically
policing,
and
it's
unfortunate
that
mayor,
Fry's
Administration
thought
they
could
manufacture,
could
send
around
something
that
our
residents
have
advocated
against
for
quite
some
time.
So
with
that,
you
know.
I
I
also
want
to
thank
our
residents
for
continuing
to
hold
the
city
to
our
promise,
to
transform
Public,
Safety
and
I'm
happy
and
I'm,
proud
that
they're
continuing
to
hold
the
line
when
we
Retreat
from
that
line,
and
the
demands
are
super
clear
in
this
report
around
what
it
looks
like
to
take
those
next
steps
and
that
being
first
doing
good,
Truth
and
Reconciliation
process.
I
So
that
said,
I
do
want
to
let
my
colleagues
know
that
I'm
bringing
forward
two
motions.
The
first
motion
is
to
make
a
substantial
investment
into
Our
Truth
and
Reconciliation
work.
I'm
gonna
bring
in
that
alongside
council
member
Jason
Chavez,
who
also
Vice
chairs
race
and
Equity.
The
subcommittee
of
this
committee
last
year,
MPD
was
fully
funded
and
at
the
end
of
the
year
they
had
about
11
million
dollar.
I
You
could
call
11
million
dollars
of
unspent
funds.
This
motion
is
to
move
about
555
000
of
mpds
on
the
side
fund,
balance
from
2022
to
fund
The,
Truth
and
Reconciliation
work.
Again,
residents
made
it
clear
that
a
Truth
and
Reconciliation
a
process
must
complement
our
Public
Safety
efforts.
This
is
affirmed
on
page
42
of
the
report,
which
quotes
participants
expressed
their
amazement
about
how
the
city
concluded
that
replacing
the
building
comes
before
a
process
of
Truth
and
Reconciliation.
I
It's
affirmed
again
on
page
49,
which
states
many
participants
stated
that
a
healing
and
Reconciliation
process
is
critical
to
the
community
members
to
rebuild
trust
with
the
city
and
MPD
and
I
want
to
note
again
this
reiterated
on
page
15.,
so
all
throughout
the
report.
This
is
one
of
the
top
recommendations
that
we
can
move
forward
on
and
it's
one
thing
we
can
actually
take
action
on
today,
especially
again
since
three
years
we
have
not
done
so
and
one
barrier,
that's
stopping.
I
The
advancement
of
this
work
is
the
need
for
programmatic
dollars
so
that
Our,
reib,
Truth
and
Reconciliation
staff
can
actually
have
the
operating
dollars.
They
need
to
actually
Implement
existing
plans
that
they
develop
around
this
work,
so
that
said,
I'm
motioning
to
fully
fund
or
finally
fund
the
one
thing
that
this
report
does
conclusively
tell
us
and
that
we
don't
have
to
wait
on
anymore.
I
Basically
refers
to
the
26th
meeting
site
and,
as
the
report
just
emphasized
in
finding
six,
we
have
a
community,
that's
advocated
for
our
different
usage
of
that
site
for
a
number
of
years.
So
this
allows
us
to
finally
get
serious
around
initiating
the
development
of
that
cyber
for
the
purpose
of
what
the
community
would
like
to
see
that
become,
and
communities
have
been
very
clear.
They
would
like
to
see
this
support.
I
You
know
the
site
they
used
to
support
youth
programs,
job
trainings
health
and
wellness
culture
and
Community,
and
as
long
as
I've
been
in
office,
I've
met
with
dozens
of
community
groups
that
have
yes,
why
can
we
not
move
forward
with
the
site,
and
my
office
has
always
been
told?
Well,
it's
unavailable
to
do
so
in
light
of
the
findings
in
this
report.
I
In
light
of
us
possibly
moving
forward
with
the
third
option
for
the
third
precinct,
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
support
existing
City
process
to
initiate
the
RFP
process
for
this
site.
So
we
can
actually
have
that
Democratic
and
open
process
for
Community
to
make
bids
on
how
they
would
like
to
develop
that
site.
I
For
the
well-being
of
the
surrounding
community
in
that
area,
so
I
at
least
went
to
give
some
contacts
for
the
two
motions
that
me
and
several
of
my
colleagues
are
bringing
forward
that
directly
correlates
to
what
is
emphasized
in
this
report
and
can
support
us
in
moving
forward
with
some
positive
action
steps
in
light
of
just
how
unwell
this
process
was
rolled
out
and
how
traumatic
it
was
for
our
residents
to
go
through
it
when
it
was
not
necessary.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
wansley
will
take
that
as
a
comment
for
now
and
deal
with
those
motions
at
the
end,
I
I
felt
this
cue
was
at
least
started
by
questions
and
comments
about
the
report
itself.
A
To
that
end,
I
have
a
question
for
Dr
oy
Ebola.
You
know
something
particularly
important
to
me
and
part
of
engaging
a
consultant
in
this
work
to
help
the
city
have
conversations
with
Community
is
about
hearing
the
quieter
voices
in
a
room
by
quieter
voices.
I
mean
people
who
are
not
usually
able
to
attend
in-person
kinds
of
evening
meetings.
People
who
we
know
that,
generally
speaking,
online
surveys
skew
to
one
demographic,
a
wider
demographic.
A
Despite
having
it
available
in
multiple
languages,
could
you
help
us
and
finding
number
six
tell
me
a
little
bit
more
of
a
range
of
those
smaller
Community
conversations.
You
you
intentionally,
went
towards
certain
demographics,
and
can
you
give
me
a
sense
because
I
was
not
part
of
those
conversations?
What
the
range
was,
how
many
people
attended-
and
you
know
I
also
saw
in
your
slides
that
a
small
group
of
community
members
attended
many
conversations.
A
The
broader
conversations
and
you
know,
work
to
insert
their
input
multiple
times
so
to
me,
that's
not
a
quieter
voice,
but
one
that
is
going
to
be
consistent.
How
did
we,
how
did
we
invite
people
to
those
smaller
demographic
conversations
and
how
many
people
were
in
the
room
for
those?
Generally
speaking,.
J
Good
morning
umassano
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Nick
Bell
I'm,
the
clean
engagement
manager
under
neighborhood
and
community
relations.
To
your
question
or
regarding
the
Outreach,
I
guess,
plan
for
the
curated
conversations
or
the
smaller
Community
conversations.
We
actually
did
work
with
a
lot
of
our
partners
internally
and
externally,
with
community
so
internally,
within
NCR
and
externally,
within
our
respective
Community
Partners,
in
terms
of
curating
that
space
and
finding
a
lot
of
diverse
voices
to
come
into
those
particular
particular
meetings.
J
The
way
that
it
was
structured
was
to
recognize
that
the
folks
participating
does
not
represent
the
entire
Community
for
those
particular
segments.
But
we
wanted
to
get
a
diverse
set
of
experiences
both
prior
to
the
murder
of
George,
Floyd
and
afterwards,
as
well
as
just
historically
within
their
respective
communities
with
police
relationships
and
then
the
relationship
to
the
precinct
in
itself.
So
the
conversations
are
ranged
in
terms
of
participants.
J
Some
conversations
were
roughly
five
folks
and
some
went
up
to
60..
So
we
wanted
to
kind
of
provide
a
space
for
everyone
to
voice
their
opinions,
their
thoughts
and
kind
of
their
relationship
within
the
third
precinct
area,
and
that
was
one
of
the
key
indicators
to
it.
You
needed
to
have
a
relationship
within
the
third
precinct,
Regional
area
itself,.
A
Thank
you,
that's
helpful
and
it's
helpful
as
I.
We
look
at
that
one
slide
anyway
to
see
how
many,
how
many
voices
were
in
those
conversations
is
all.
Thank
you,
council,
member
Koski
is
next
thank.
K
You
chair,
palmisano,
first
I,
just
want
to
thank
the
staff
and
our
consultants
for
the
work
and
for
all
of
the
constituents
and
business
owners
that
showed
up
at
these
meetings.
K
I
was
able
to
attend
several
of
them
and
I
think
what
you
reported
out
was
very
accurate
and
of
what
kind
of
happened
there
at
these
meetings
and
although
I'm
grateful
for
the
work
that
they
did,
it
was
also
very
disappointing,
I
think
for
Ward
11
residents
to
not
really
have
a
process
that
they
felt
that
they
could
really
engage
with
and
felt
disappointed
that
there
were
only
two
questions
for
them
to
to
answer
and
I
think
now
today
it
still
is
a
bit
confusing
to
the
residents,
and
you
know
we
we
do
have
this,
this
new
data.
K
We
have
these
findings,
we
have
done
a
lot
of
work
around
reimagining,
Public
Safety
and
what
that
looks.
Like
I
mean
we
created
a
new
office
of
community
safety.
We
just
heard
a
safe
and
thriving
Community
report.
We
know
that
we
are
in
a
settlement
agreement
with
mdhr.
We
will
have
a
consent
degree
with
the
doj.
K
We
just
heard
yesterday
about
a
potential
Third
location
that
was
announced
that
included
discussions
about
Community
safety,
centers,
but
I
think
the
question
here
for
me
and
for
Ward
11
residents
and
I.
Think
probably
a
lot
of
people
in
Minneapolis
is
how
should
we
even
begin
to
understand
all
of
this?
What
does
this
mean?
How
does
this
connect
to
my
day-to-day
life?
L
So
good
morning,
Madam
president
Madam,
vice
president
I
also
do
all
the
counsel
members
that
are
present
and
everyone
that's
in
the
room.
So.
L
I
want
to
answer
your
question:
councilman,
McCoskey
and
I'm,
going
to
be
as
a
candid
as
I.
Normally
am,
and
I'm
gonna
be
very
Frank
about
how
I
see
this,
how
I
experience
and
how
I
believe
we
truly
need
to
move
forward,
but
I
need
to
regress
for
just
a
moment.
I
can
go
back
to
2014.
L
the
death
of
Michael
Brown
in
Ferguson
in
many
of
the
issues
that
are
being
raised
here
and
the
concerns
that
are
being
raised.
Many
of
the
concerns
and
the
thoughtfulness
you
just
heard
from
councilmember
wansley
and
others
as
it
relates
to
how
we're
going
to
need
to
move
forward
and
what
the
findings
have
been.
What
the
findings
were
then
are
so
similar
to
the
findings
that
are
now
in
this
present
place
that
we're
in,
and
we
all
are
aware
between
that
time.
L
Up
to
now
all
the
events
that
have
taken
place
that
continue
to
plague
many
of
our
cities
across
the
country,
I
was
there
in
2014.
I
worked
with
the
doj
in
2014.,
so
I
know
the
pain
and
the
suffering
of
that
community
in
Ferguson,
as
I've
learned
it
here.
So
as
we
go
through
this
process
coming
up
to
this
very
moment
where
we
are,
as
relates
to
your
question
very
specifically,
we
begin
to
think
about
how
do
we
think
about
mdhr?
L
How
do
we
think
about
a
consent
decree
that's
going
to
be
imposed
upon
this
city?
How
do
we
think
about
this
comprehensive
plan?
That's
been
offered
to
us
by
doctor
after
off
a
Telly?
How
do
we
bring
all
these
things
together
for
the
betterment
of
the
community?
How
do
we
listen
to
what
we've
just
heard
from
Dr
oyibola
in
terms
of
what
days,
what
those
findings
were,
because
those
findings
are
very
real
to
people
in
this
community
and
they
have
a
historical
context
to
them.
L
L
Is
our
priorities
were
to
ensure
that
there
was
coordination
and
collaboration
across
this
city
with
five
of
our
safety
departments?
All
five
of
them
and
that's
what
we
have
worked
towards,
but
we
also
now
coming
up
on
the
end
of
this
first
year,
are
now
going
to
have
to
turn
the
page
and
begin
to
think
about.
How
do
we
create
a
comprehensive
plan?
That's
going
to
be
to
the
advantage
of
this
community
that
encapsulate
and
includes
this
community
that
provides
Police
Services,
specifically
very
different
than
what
we
have
before.
L
So
even
as
we
talk
about
building
the
next
Precinct
I
think
Dr,
Oyen,
Oya
Bola
was
very
clear
and
I
have
always
said
and
have
always
thought
myself
is
that
including
community
in
the
process
we
go
forward.
Helping
them
understand
the
importance
of
the
work
that
we
do
to
keep
them
safe.
L
But
I
think
and
I'm
gonna
name.
Five
of
these
action
steps
that
I
have
outlined
in
order
I
think
to
maybe
hopefully
bring
us
all
together
here
and
then
there's
a
couple
of
more
things.
I'll,
say:
I
think
we
have
to
increase
our
collaboration
for
growing
Partnerships
through
relationship
building
with
external
stakeholders.
L
And
let
me
talk
a
little
bit
about
these
Community
safety
centers
and
how
I
visualize
them
I,
visualize
them
and
just
think
for
a
moment,
a
place
where
people
can
come
in
their
community.
And
it's
not
just
seen
identified
as
a
police
precinct.
But
it
is
seen
as
a
community
center,
a
community
center
that
houses
police,
a
community
center,
that
houses,
social
services
and
wrap-around
services
for
those
in
our
community,
regardless
whether
it's
around
mental
health,
homelessness
or
whatever.
We
have.
L
The
ability
in
the
community
have
the
ability
to
be
as
creative
as
it
wants
to
be.
When
we
start
talking
about
safety
centers,
it
gives
us
a
whole
new
look
in
terms
of
how
we
deliver
Services
we're
all
located
right
there
together,
where
we
can
share
information
where
Community
can
come
in
and
go
out,
and
it's
just
not
here
again.
It's
just
not
police
there.
L
L
L
We
have
had
those
that
have
not
worked
at
the
best
interests
of
this
city
of
people
in
our
community,
but
we're
going
to
have
to
move
Pub
forward
with
Public
Safety.
But
it's
going
to
take
all
of
us
an
opportunity,
I
truly
believe
to
begin
to
heal
and
I.
Don't
know
how
we
begin
that
process,
but
I'm
certainly
willing
to
listen
to
The
Experts
and
those
that
do
this.
Consulting
work
give
us
Direction
how
to
do
that,
but
we
have
to
move
simultaneously.
L
L
L
It's
going
to
truly
take
all
of
us
and
I
think
what
has
been
demonstrated
and
what
has
been
talked
about
here
today
in
the
way
in
which
we're
going
to
have
to
move
and
how
we
think
about
moving
going
forward
is
really
going
to
be
just
knock
everything
off
the
table
that
we've
known
before
and
really
somewhat
building
up
from
the
ground.
This
is
about
transformation.
This
is
about
cultural
change,
cultural
shift.
This
is
not
about
a
policy
policy
are
reforms
you
can
have
all
the
mdhr.
L
You
can
have
all
the
the
consent
decrees,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
still
going
to
require
transformation
and
cultural
shift.
That
is
going
to
involve
Community
input
and
the
input
from
persons
within
police.
Who
themselves
are
experts
and
have
experience
also
in
which
we
can
rely
on
this.
Is
a
partnership
and
I
think
we
can
get
there
I
believe
we
can
get
there
in
and
I
think
you
can
get
there.
I
think
you'll
be
able
to
get
there,
but
that's
how
I
see
it
council,
member
Koski
yeah?
L
We
got
Truth
and
Reconciliation
work
to
do.
We
keep
hearing
it.
We
just
heard
it
loud
and
clear.
You've
heard
it.
The
community
heard
it.
The
cities
heard
it
now.
We
got
that
work
to
do,
but
I
will
say
as
we
do
that
work.
We
also
have
to
do
this
work
and
it
has
to
be
done
simultaneously
and
we
have
to
move
together
because
we
have
to
have
Public
Safety
in
this
community.
People
want
Public
Safety,
but
they
want
good
Public
Safety.
L
They
want
Public
Safety
in
which
they
feel
they're
a
part
of
and
Public
Safety.
That
truly
honestly
cares
about
them
and
I
will
say
to
you
in
a
short
time
that
I've
been
here.
There
are
people
in
public
safety
that
truly
do
care
about
this
community,
and
there
are
people
also
in
this
community
who
are
saying
we
just
want
that
good,
Public,
Safety
and
that's
all
I
got
to
say
about
that.
Unless
you
have
other
questions.
A
A
I'll
also
acknowledge
Commander
Wilkes
in
the
room
leads
our
mdhr
efforts
and
deputy
chief
Schoenberger
I
believe
your
acting
Chief
well,
the
chief
is
out
of
town
right
now.
So
thank
you
both
for
being
here
for
this
conversation,
council
member
of
Utah.
N
G
Yes,
so
we
did
make
it
so
that
only
one
IP
address
could
respond
to
the
survey,
but
because
we
emphasize
so
much
the
paper-based
surveys.
I
know
I
received
one
packet
that
had
a
stack
of
of
paper
surveys
that
had
been
distributed.
There's
really
no
way
to
know
for
sure.
In
that
regard,
and.
G
Could
people
we
gave
people
the
option
of
taking
the
online
survey
or
the
paper-based
survey
at
those
sessions?
Most
people
wanted
to
have
the
paper-based
survey,
but
again
there's
no
way
to,
and
people
actually
could
because
it
was
IP
address,
they
could
have
used
their
phone
and
their
computer.
So
we
did
what
we
could
to
try
to
limit
that.
G
N
Did
you
collect
racial
demographic
data
on
and.
G
We
do
have
that
for
the
survey
again
not
for
the
curated
conversation,
the
Community
conversations
and
curated
conversations
and.
G
E
At
a
really
high
level
survey,
respondents
tended
to
be
white,
middle-aged
and
older
and
were
over
represented
in
comparison
to
the
demographics
of
the
third
precinct
geographic
area.
E
M
M
Under
no
circumstance
should
the
City
of
Minneapolis
rebuild
this
Third
Precinct
Police
Station
at
the
former
Lake
in
Minnehaha
location,
located
in
Ward
9,
which
I
proudly
represent.
My
constituents
in
particular
have
made
that
very
clear.
We
will
never
rebuild
a
police
station
at
Lake
Minnehaha
and
while
it
will
make
people
feel
like
they
were
saving
money
to
even
entertain
this
discussion,
the
reality
is
that
it
would
have
come
with
the
long-term
cost.
M
M
Both
options
to
begin
with
were
expensive.
I'm
not
sure
that
there
was
a
well
thought
out
plan
to
make
Outreach
to
communities
of
color
and
immigrants.
I
know
there
was
specific
curated
Community
conversations
that
were
even
hard
to
access
to
begin
with
people
outside
of
their
Precinct
responded
to
the
survey
they
don't
live
here.
We
should
be
deciding
what
we
want
to
do
in
our
buildings.
M
M
And
then
people,
even
at
in-person
sessions,
were
able
to
give
up
a
third
option
which
I
agreed
with,
but
that
obviously
changed
the
Dynamics
of
the
survey
results,
which
means
that
I
don't
know
if
we
can
actually
trust.
The
survey
results
to
begin
with,
I'll
say
that
my
constituents
in
particular
are
frightfully
frustrated
and
then
the
constituents
of
Ward
9
for
too
long
have
have
to
put
up
with
this
torched
and
blighted
sight
of
a
burned
down.
M
M
It's
not
what
our
community
members
in
South
Minneapolis
deserve
a
need,
but
you
know
what
did
happen
after
that.
Our
community
members
constituents
of
Ward
9
in
South
Minneapolis,
came
together.
They
put
out
the
fires
themselves,
along
with
our
fire
department.
They
gave
out
free
food
to
people,
they
give
out
resources.
They
were
outdoor,
knocking
having
Papa
food
banks
all
over
the
city
and
we
kept
our
community
safe.
M
M
After
attending
all
public
engagement
sessions,
I
was
there
every
single
one
of
them
that
were
public
I,
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
could
hear
from
all
my
constituents
and
residents
in
the
third
precinct
before
I
made
a
decision
on
what
my
opinion
was
because
I
do
believe
that
that's
important
part
and
component
in
decision
making
I
heard
very
loud
and
clear
about
the
needs
and
wants
from
our
constituents.
People
wanted
to
talk
about
Community
safety
initiatives.
M
People
want
to
talk
about
structurally
reforming
the
police
department
healing
through
a
Reconciliation
process
that
has
not
occurred
for
the
past
three
years,
criteria
of
any
station
and
process
and
what
a
building
can
look
like
an
integrated,
Public,
Safety
Center
that
goes
beyond
policing.
That
involves
all
our
community
safety
initiatives
in
one
building
and
they
wanted
to
have
a
say
on
what
happens
in
their
side
of
town,
without
predetermined
decisions
being
made
for
them.
M
I
think
that
today
we're
gonna
go
one
step
in
the
right
direction.
It's
time
that
we
close
this
chapter
and
that
our
community
can
begin
to
heal
and
that
they
can
decide
what
non-police
functions
are
going
to
happen
on
Lake
Minnehaha
I
want
to
thank
our
residents
for
showing
up
in
these
public
engagement
sessions.
M
There
was
people
that
wanted
the
police
back
in
the
third
precinct,
people
that
wanted
it
at
26
minutes
people
that
didn't
want
it
anywhere,
but
one
thing
happened:
people's
opinions
changed
when
they
were
in
that
room
and
they
decided
that
I
care
about
my
neighbors,
so
I
actually
don't
want
it
at
Lake,
Minnehaha
I.
Actually,
don't
think
this
process
is
even
the
right
way
to
go
about
it,
and
that's
because
neighbors
were
talking
one
to
one.
M
They
were
talking
with
each
other
and
a
beautiful
thing
happened
and
the
young
Consulting
did
a
really
good
job
of
taking
those
voices
and
letting
people
feel
it
out
and
I
think
that
was
a
beautiful
thing
that
happened
and
that
should
have
happened
in
2020.
It
should
have
happened
in
2021.
It
should
have
happened
a
long
time
ago,
because
that
is
how
you
heal
a
city
when
we
talk
about
healing
a
city.
M
That
is
how
you
heal
it,
and
that
is
how
you
move
forward
in
deciding
what
you're
going
to
do
in
the
future
and
overall
I
just
want
to
thank
the
residents
for
showing
up
in
this
process
and
for
speaking
up
about
how
this
engagement
went.
It's
clear
that,
having
two
options
without
any
accountability,
engagement
or
say,
was
short-sighted
to
begin
with,
I
think
that
today's
move
is
a
victory
for
a
lot
of
people
in
this.
M
In
this
part
of
a
process,
it's
very
clear
that
concessions
were
made,
even
though
when
there
was
seen
to
be
no
hope
or
no
third
option.
Even
if
that's
what
we
were
told,
it
seems
like
that's
going
to
happen
today
and
with
the
moving
of
the
third
precinct
to
the
first
precinct
for
co-working
purposes.
It
is
my
understanding
and
I'll
clarify
with
the
clerks
and
the
authors
moving
forward
today,
the
lake
Minnehaha
location
and
the
26th
in
Minnehaha
location
are
dead
and
not
no
longer
part
of
this
process.
A
J
M
I
appreciate
it
thanks
so
much
Council.
Vice
president
I'd
also
like
to
see
an
appetite
of
my
colleagues
to
work
on
a
legislative
directive
about
the
need
of
a
couple
things:
a
strong
engagement
framework,
Community
safety
and
livability
conversations
across
the
city
to
help
build
our
comprehensive
public
safety
system,
a
city-wide
police,
accountability
and
structural
reform
conversations,
because
our
constituents
deserve
to
stay
in
our
Police
Department
Acts,
especially
as
the
heels
come
from
the
mdhr
consent,
decree
and
dsj
concentricle
that
are
coming
conversations
of
well
integrated
and
holistic.
M
M
As
we
work
on
that
legislative
directive,
I
think
it's
important
to
move
forward
today
on
a
Reconciliation
process
that
I'm
working
on
here
with
councilman
wansley.
This
is
what
our
residents
have
asked
for
for
years.
Three
years
now
and
I
think
it's
time
that
we
move
forward,
that
we
fund
a
Reconciliation
process,
so
our
staff
and
reib
can
do
it
and
that
we
begin
to
do
the
right
thing
for
our
residents.
M
O
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president
mine
will
be
quick.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that
presentation.
You
have
given
us
I
think.
The
theme
is
that
Community
is
in
pain.
They
have
been
in
pain
for
last
three
years
and
the
purpose
of
this
survey
and
the
community
engagement
is
to
listen
people
that
live
there.
O
People
that
work
there,
people
that
represent
there
as
a
council
members
I
do
want
to
I,
do
have
a
question
on
26th
and
Minnehaha.
If
this
staff
can
answer
this
as
council
member
wansley
mentioned,
we
have
been
contacted
for
community
members
and
Community
organization.
Is
that
I
want
to
do
something?
Former
council
member
onward
two,
and
also
a
current
council
member
and
I,
have
listened
to
those
and
every
time
they
go
to
the
city?
O
There
was
this
beautiful
plan
where
this
organization
wanted
to
build
this
and
make
it
a
community
center
where
people
can
come
and
and
youth
can
play
basketball
and
have
a
women's
swimming
thing,
this
great
beautiful
building.
O
That
is
a
hub
for
everything
you
need
in
the
community,
employment,
the
county
offices,
city
offices,
and
they
were
willing
to
to
put
that
together
and
I
believe
that
you
know
nothing
move
forward
on
that
request
and
that
those
requests
is
then-
and
there
are
money
interest
from
this,
so
I
do
like
to
ask
what
is
the
history
of
2600
on
the
survey
it
it
mentioned?
They
don't
have
enough
information
and
I
would
like
to
know
what
is
the
history
of
2600
I
mean
anyone
Eric.
If
you
can
answer
this.
A
Yes,
please,
director
Eric
Hansen
interim
cpad,
director.
P
Good
morning
Madam
chair,
councilmember,
Osman,
American
cped,
director
2600
Minnehaha,
is
the
last
remaining
Seward
South
Industrial
Park
parcel
that
the
city
purchased
through
the
mcda
back
in
the
80s
and
the
90s.
It's
about
an
acre
site
at
the
corner
of
Minnehaha
and
26th
Street
in
the
Seward
neighborhood,
and
it
was
originally
platted
out
for
a
specific
company
to
build
its
headquarters
on
that
spot
back
in
the
late
90s.
P
If
you
can
imagine-
and
they
did
not-
that
that
did
not
materialize
and
since
that
time,
since
it's
a
little
bit
smaller
for
a
conventional
industrial
and
Industrial
since
then,
since
that
period
of
time
has
those
buildings
have
gotten
bigger
and
so
that's
kind
of
an
obsolete
industrial
building.
But
the
department
of
seeped
for
the
last
20
years
have
been
issuing
rfps
and
cleaning
up
the
site
to
try
and
find
an
industrial
user,
because
that
is
the
designated
use
for
the
property.
P
In
the
last
handful
of
years,
we've
been
looking
at
options
of
a
different
use.
A
fueling
station
is
a
number
one
request
for
that
site.
The
neighborhood
has
not
wanted
it.
Cpet
has
not
wanted
it,
but
we
have
been
open
to
potentially
some
other
uses
that
might
be
more
Community
focused
at
that
site
that
that
conversation
kind
of
stopped
when
this
became
a
potential
location
for
the
third
precinct
So,
based
on
the
the
action
of
the
city
council
and
the
mayor.
O
Thank
you
Doctor.
Hopefully,
that
conversation
don't
stop
and
what
the
community
interests
is
I'm,
glad,
first
of
all,
that
gas
station
or
that
has
been
stopped
and
we're
engaging
in
the
community
to
find
something
purpose.
O
And
hopefully
this
resolution
passes
that
councilman
and
I
are
bringing,
and
we
brought
RFP
for
non-law
enforcement
development
for
this
city
on
land
and
open
to
people
that
lived
there
in
the
communities
that
are
lived
there,
that
don't
have
access
to
recreation,
centers
access
to
community-owned
buildings
that
are
this
big
and
yeah.
So
thank
you
so
much.
That
is
my
comment
and
thanks
councilmember
wansley
for
us
bringing
this
forward,
and
hopefully
it
passes.
C
C
I
want
to
thank
Longfellow,
Community,
Council,
Stuart,
neighborhood
group
and
many
other
community
organizations
who
also
raise
concerns
about
processes
as
well
related
to
this
I,
I,
I,
I'm,
gonna,
say,
look
I
think
there
are
aspects
of
this
report
which
are
valuable
for
us,
particularly
the
qualitative
data,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
to
give
voice
to
the
concerns
around
this
survey,
particularly
with
this
choice
between
two
sites.
Councilmember
Vita
asked
about
folks
being
able
to
take
it
multiple
times.
C
We
heard,
for
instance,
about
and
I
being
limited
on
the
IP
address,
but
how
you
could
take
it
multiple
times
if
you
simply
use
different
Networks.
The
limitations
on
the
IP
address
also
meant
that
folks,
for
instance,
who
go
to
the
library.
If
someone
else
had
taken
the
survey
there
wouldn't
be
able
to.
We
heard
that
there
were
no
Geographic
limitations
either,
so
it
was
truly
worldwide
or
Global,
though
attempted
distribution
here
within
the
Twin
Cities
or
within
Minneapolis
and
I
would
ultimately
call
it
a
poll.
C
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
got
poll
results
here,
not
really
a
survey
result
and
most
significantly,
what
was
missing
from
the
limitation
slide,
though
it
was
alluded
to
around
the
over-representation
of
white
residents,
is
that
this
is
not
a
representative
sample.
C
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
even
look
at
that
data,
how
it
is
even
of
value
for
this
Council
and
I'm,
not
looking
to
insult
or
blame
or
knock
this
effort
that
brought
this
for
today.
What
I
am
looking
to
do
is
to
stand
up
for
this
body
in
terms
of
the
information
and
the
data
that's
presented.
C
You
know
there
are
and
again
as
I
say
that
there
were
elements
of
this
that
were
of
value,
so
I
do
want
to
recognize
that
as
well
and
appreciate
the
efforts
to
collect
those,
you
know
I
think
for
a
lot
of
folks.
This
felt
like
a
very
Rush
process
in
community.
After
years
of
Silence
around
this
and
I
think
that
what
it's
really
Illustrated
is
that
there
are
three
opportunities:
well,
actually
Four
opportunities
for
conversations
that
need
to
happen
moving
forward.
There
is
the
conversation
around
reconciliation,
Truth
and
Reconciliation.
C
Ultimately,
what
police
reform
work
has
happened
since
George
Floyd's
murder,
there's
a
conversation
that
needs
to
be
had
around
Public
Safety
and
the
concerns
with
crime
and
Public
Safety.
There's
a
conversation
that
needs
to
be
had
around
how
the
community
can
meaningfully
influence
a
future
home
for
third
precinct
officers
and
what
that
ultimately
looks
like,
including
a
Consolidated
integrated
approach.
That
was
mentioned,
for
instance,
by
our
commissioner
and
there's
a
conversation
around
what
the
city
should
do
with
the
former
third
precinct
side
and
I.
Think
all
of
those
are
things
that
need
to
happen.
C
A
Thank
you
I'll.
Take
your
comments
and
understand
that
a
lot
of
them
were
about
the
survey
itself,
not
data
Integrity,
right.
C
Yes,
Madam
chair,
they
were
specifically
around
that
survey
that
was
released
with
the
two
options
and
the
data
that
was
included
that
came
back
from
that
I
certainly
don't
mean
to
critique
the
full
set
of
data
that
came
back
just
that
subset
of
data
and
really
being
able
to
lend
my
voice
to
accurate
data
science
and
the
value
and
role
in
which
we
interpret
data.
Thank
you
thank.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
want
to
start
by
just
thinking
the
the
young
Consulting
team
for
their
efforts,
as
well
as
our
city
staff
and,
and
probably
most
importantly,
the
voices
community
members
that
showed
up
to
participate
in
this
process.
Q
It's
easy
to
be
cynical
and
cynicism
is
around
government
writ
large
around
Minneapolis
government,
specifically
around
Minneapolis,
Police
Department
and
that's
a
cynicism
is
validated
by
several
reports:
Minnesota
Department
of
Human
Rights
report,
the
Department
of
Justice
has
issued
a
report
exciting
the
inequities
in
the
police
department,
the
racism,
the
sexism,
the
discrimination
against
LGBT
community
members
Etc,
and
yet
we
have
to
continue
to
try
to
move
forward
in
our
city
in
our
society,
and
so
you
know
I
try
to
take
the
information,
however
challenged
or
flawed.
Q
It
may
be
that
many
of
my
colleagues
have
pointed
out,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
people
did
show
up,
and
people
did
express
some
very
pointed
concerns.
Q
I
heard
people
say
they
felt
intimidated
and
fearful
to
express
their
feelings
as
well
as
I
heard,
people
say
that
they
are
not
in
favor
of
any
site
period,
and
so
I
tried
to
come
to
some
kind
of
creative
resolution
that
will
allow
us
to
continue
to
have
these
conversations
that
council
member
Chavez
has
suggested
that
councilmember
Johnson.
E
Q
Suggested
that
our
commissioner
has
suggested
that
we
have
these
really
important
conversations
about
the
future
home
of
a
third
precinct
about
how
do
we
transform
Public
Safety
in
our
community
about
how
do
we
really
address
the
root
causes
of
some
of
the
challenges
and
inequities
in
our
society?
Q
Q
Q
The
transformation
of
Public
Safety,
the
ending
of
racism
which,
if
we
are
being
truthful,
is
the
root
cause
of
all
the
issues
that
we
are
discussing
here,
but
that
work
is
going
to
take
a
long
time,
and
so
we
cannot
wait
for
these
conversations
to
end.
Q
We
have
to
be
working
simultaneously
as
a
community
together,
which
means
you
know,
I
I,
heard
people
say
the
Departments
have
to
collaborate.
The
city
council
has
to
collaborate,
but
we
also
need
the
community
to
step
forward
and
be
a
part
of
this
work
as
well,
and
so
that
is
what
I
am
proposing
a
third
option
to
give
us
time
to
have
these
conversations
to
really
engage
our
community
on
what
where
we
want
to
see
a
permanent
home
for
the
third
precinct.
Q
It
also
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
really
explore
these
Community
Public,
Safety,
centers
and
so
I
will
be
bringing
for
a
legislative
directive
to
have.
E
Q
Explore
the
potential
of
co-locating,
the
first
and
third
precinct,
while
we
have
those
conversations
about
the
future
home
of
a
permanent
third
precinct,
if
that
is
what
is
the
community's
desire,
maybe
we
have
some
other
forms
of
Public
Safety
centers
that
emerge
from
this
process.
So
thank
you
and
those
are
my
comments.
Thank.
N
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano,
I,
just
I
have
a
quick
question,
but
I
want
to
start
by
saying
I
feel
like
the
victims
get
lost
in
these
conversations
about
the
third
precinct.
There's
a
lot
of
people
who
call
for
service
in
these
precincts-
and
my
question
is
really
how
many
calls
for
service
do
we
have
I,
don't
know
if
someone
here
could
answer
it,
but
how
many
calls
for
service
do
we
have
in
the
third
precinct
and
have
we
done
any
work
to
engage
victims?
N
I
know
when
I
was
doing
this
Chief
search
conversations
I
had
lots
of
people
who
kind
of
got
off
topic
about
why
we
needed
to
achieve
but
talked
about
the
third
precinct,
and
they
have
very
different
feelings
than
what
I'm
hearing
this
report
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
know
how
many
calls
for
services
in
the
third
precinct
also
I,
think
someone
said
here
this
morning
that
the
call
time
is
greater
than
it
had
been
in
previous
years,
which
means
that
there's
life
at
risk
here
you
know
when
someone
is
in
danger.
N
It's
just
a
matter
of
seconds
between
life
and
death
and,
as
I
said
as
someone
who's
been
a
victim
who's
called
the
police
and
knew
that
you
know
when
they
got
there.
Things
became
different
than
when
I
was
by
myself.
I
really
want
us
to
think
about
that.
You
know
I
this
isn't
about
where
the
physical
place
is,
or
any
of
that
for
me,
but
that
you
know
we
have
probably
a
large
amount
of
people
if
the.
N
If
there's
over
a
hundred
thousand
people
in
this
Precinct,
we
probably
have
you
know
five
times
that
amount
of
that
amount
of
calls
and
I
I.
Just
don't
want
us
to
lose
sight
that
they're
victims
there
are
people
who
call
the
police
every
day
who
are
looking
for
services
and
they
deserve
good
service.
They
deserve
good
timing.
You
know
for
police
to
be
there
here.
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
A
Thank
you
well,
I'm,
not
sure,
there's
somebody
in
the
room
that
can
specifically
answer
your
question
right
now,
we'll
take
that
and
get
that
information
back
to
you.
I
do
I
have
just
been
given
information
that,
generally
speaking
this
last
year,
the
third
precinct
handled
roughly
26
percent
of
our
call
load
and
had
over
43
000
calls
for
service.
A
So
that's
a
lot
in
proportion
to
all
of
our
precincts,
but
we'll
get
some
additional
information
for
you.
I
had
put
myself
in
queue
just
to
note
that
the
time
is
now
11,
44
and
to
say:
I
want
to
be
able
to
receive
and
file
this
report.
Let
these
good
people
that
worked
on
this
effort
go
and
then
we
can
work
on
some
of
these
other
motions
before
us,
some
of
which
I
saw
for
the
first
time
when
I
sat
down.
R
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
I,
don't
have
a
lot
to
say:
I
have
a
few
disparate
comments.
I
want
to
thank
our
staff
and
our
consultants
and
the
people
who
did
all
of
this
work.
It's
very
difficult
to
be
out
there
in
community,
where
there's
a
lot
of
emotion
and
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
of
doing
what
we
asked
you
to
do.
This
is
our
professional
staff,
as
well
as
the
people
who
have
been
helping
us
so
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
R
I
I
agree
with
council
member
Chavez,
I
I
really
and
I've
said
this.
In
the
meetings
we've
had
with
staff,
I
I,
don't
believe
we
should
be
even
discussing
the
current
site
as
the
place
for
whatever
Public
Safety
looks
like
going
forward.
I
feel
like
that's
just
kind
of
a
simple
thing.
We
should
potentially
consider
ruling
out
primarily
because
of
all
of
the
very
legitimate
emotions
surrounding
it
and
I
feel
like
we're
going
to
try
to
put
a
square
peg
in
a
round
hole
and
I.
R
Don't
think
that
it
moves
anything
forward
to
consider
that
option
as
it
pertains
to
3
600
many
I
I
am
indifferent
to
this.
R
I
am
curious
with
regard
to
cped
staff,
why
we
haven't
had
an
RFP
or
have
we
had
rfps
and
what
is
the
Staffing
capability
to
do
that
now,
because
our
Economic
Development
directors
now
acting
as
the
cped
Director
and
we
don't
have
any
extra
Economic,
Development
people
and
other
council
members,
including
the
very
learned
one
next
to
me-
has
other
properties
he
wants
to
RFP
also,
and
so
we
can
pass
something
saying:
go
ahead
and
do
it,
but
will
it
happen,
probably
not
because
we
just
simply
don't
have
the
Staffing
to
take
on
as
many
of
these
Economic
Development
projects
as
we'd
like
and
if
others
are
working
on,
trying
to
increase
staff
and
cped?
R
That
would
be
fantastic.
That
doesn't
necessarily
mean
we
have
the
ability
to
hire
them,
even
if
we
have
the
money
and
to
bring
people
on
board
to
do
this
work
and
then,
lastly,
you
know
the
the
idea
of
a
third
way.
This
would
be
in
the
word
that
I
represent
and
I
am
not
have
not
been
on
the
inside.
Of
these
conversations,
I
had
a
brief
conversation
with
the
council
vice
president
and
then
a
longer
briefing
with
professional
staff.
R
That's
even
further
away
from
the
precinct
But
ultimately
would
we
would
have
the
ability
to
do
it
due
to
the
space
available
and
then
give
the
council
I
won't,
be
here
the
time
to
figure
out
what
these
buildings
and
these
collaborations
look
like
moving
forward.
So,
while
I
didn't
think
of
the
idea
and
I
have
not
been
on
the
inside
of
the
conversation,
I
do
think
it
is
a
good
idea,
because,
ultimately,
the
city
of
lakes
building
is
not
the
best
option.
R
I'm
relatively
transactional,
so
I
think
we
need
to
put
these
employees
somewhere
where
they
feel
comfortable,
continuing
to
treat
employees
in
public
works
and
the
police
as
if
their
workplace
doesn't
exist
as
antithetical
to
the
way
we
try
to
recruit
people
to
come
to
the
city
and
I.
Think
it's
important
for
us
to
try
to
figure
out
how
we
can
do
something
on
an
interim
basis
and
not
in
a
room
like
a
couple
years,
but
interim,
probably
like
eight
years
until
we
figure
out
what
the
plan
is
and
then
execute
on
property.
That's
available.
R
I
will
note
that,
on
a
daily
basis,
properties
become
available.
So
what
was
an
option
when
they
looked
at
this
a
year
ago?
My
might
be
a
completely
different
option.
A
year
from
now
the
real
estate
industry
is
fluid,
and
at
least
we
know
with
this
building,
it's
something
we
could
move
forward
with.
So
I'll
just
turn
the
my
comments
back
to
the
chair
and
see
if
Mr
Hansen
can
answer
my
question
with
regard
to
the
availability
of
staff
to
look
at
this,
and
so
that
was
where
I
was
at
director.
Hanson.
P
Madam
chair
council
member
Goodman,
thank
you
for
your
concern
about
the
staff.
Yes,
we
do
have
a
lot
of
major
development
projects
underway
in
cped.
2600
Minnehaha
has
had
a
series
of
requests
for
proposals
over
the
years
that
timeline
I
shared
earlier.
That's
why
we
have
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board.
We
do
take
meetings
on
that
development
site
for
some
new
and
creative
ways
of
using
that
site.
That's
what's
opened
us
up
to
some
other
options
we
would
have.
P
If
the
legislative
directive
went
through,
we'd
have
to
work
with
the
mayor's
office
around
the
timing.
It
would
not
be
immediate.
I
would
say
that
right
now
and
we'd
have
to
line
it
up
with
others,
but
there
there
are
interested
parties
for
that
property.
That
makes
it
that
puts
us
into
a
different
calculation
about
what
kind
of
Journey
that
property
would
be
on.
R
Madam,
chair
I
really
want
to
get
to
yes
on
this,
so
I'm,
just
trying
and
I
appreciate
your
explanation
and
I
can
live
with
and
I'm
pretty
sure
those
Biz
committee
members
could
live
with
a
conversation
and
committee
about
it.
What
would
happen
if
this?
What
wouldn't
happen
if
this
needs
to
happen
but
I'm
wondering?
Does
the
zoning
and
comp
plan
guidance
for
this
site
allow
for
something
other
than
industrial?
R
Are
we
talking
about
an
extended
process
with
the
Met
Council
to
change
the
guidance,
because,
if
that's
the
case,
we
might
as
well
bundle
it
with
all
of
the
I
know
you
guys
I'm,
sorry
I'm
super
transactional,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
I
can
get
my
head
around.
What
would
happen
next
with
this?
If
that's
the
case
we
better
get
going,
then
maybe
we
should
pass
this
to
get
it
to
committee
to
just
put
it
in
with
the
grouping
of
things
we
need
to
change
as
it
pertains
to
the
comp
plan.
P
Madam,
chair
councilmember
Goodman,
we
have
a
new
zoning
code.
I
have
to
check
in
there's
a
lot
more
flexibility
in
what
I
believe
can
be
can
happen,
including
the
uses
that
are
being
proposed.
More
Community,
centered
community
centers,
that
sort
of
thing
museums
at
multiple
use.
Those
things
have
been
at
the
cursory
review
acceptable
under
the
new
zoning
code,
but
we
we'd
have
to
look
at
the
specifics.
S
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
first
want
to
say
thank
you
to
DeYoung
prior
to
becoming
a
council
member
I
worked
on
the
work
we
were
doing
around
BCR
and
I
actually
had
to
do.
The
survey
analysis
and
I
know
how
hard
that
is
to
actually
pull
themes
out
and
I
think
he
did
a
really
great
job
of
pulling
those
themes
out.
S
S
I
know
it
has
to
have
been
extraordinarily
challenging,
not
just
from
a
technical
perspective,
but
also
from
an
emotional
perspective
and
I
also
want
to
Express
gratitude
to
my
colleague,
council
member
wanzi
and
council
member
Chavez
for
in
very
quick
order,
taking
what
was
really
beneficial
from
that
report
and
making
an
action
for
us
to
take
today
on
this
Truth
and
Reconciliation
I.
Think
that
was
the
one
thing
that
was
very
clear
from
your
report
around
being
able
to
do
something
productive
with
something
that
was
really
complex
and
challenging
and
I'm.
S
Very
supportive
of
this
I'm
really
grateful
for
you
to
to
lead
there,
and
it
also
is
suggesting
an
area
of
your
leadership
around
wanting
to
drive
forward
the
full
service,
Safety
Center,
so
I
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
that
in
the
future,
and
you
as
well,
commissioner
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
definitely
need
to
do
and
I'm
grateful
to
president
Jenkins
for
bringing
forward
this
motion
to
co-locate
the
third
precinct,
to
give
us
that
space
in
that
room
to
really
truly
make
this
a
community
centered
approach,
so
I
will
be
supporting
both
of
those
resolutions
today.
A
And
this
support
I'll
direct
the
clerk
to
file
that
report,
there's
been
a
request
from
some
of
my
colleagues
to
take
a
five
minute
recess
before
we
consider
these
other
emotions
in
front
of
us.
Are
there
any
objections
to
that
so
yeah?
Thank
you.
We
will
take
a
five
minute
recess
and
then
work
on
the
rest
of
the
things
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
today.
Thank
you.
A
A
Colleagues,
the
time
is
1202
I'd
like
to
get
started
again
so
that
we
can
try
and
wrap
up
this
meeting.
I
know
some
of
our
colleagues
have
appointments
and
stuff
to
get
to
so.
Let's
resume
colleagues
council
president
Jenkins
distributed
a
legislative
directive
requesting
the
analysis
of
the
potential
for
co-locating
Minneapolis
Police
staff
currently
assigned
to
the
third
precinct
within
other
Precinct
facilities,
with
a
report
back
by
September
5th
colleagues.
Q
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano
and
yes,
I
am
moving
forward.
The
legislative
directive.
Q
To
City
Charter,
section
7.1
H2,
the
Minneapolis
city
council
here
by
request
the
mayor
to
undertake
a
nonpartisan,
multi-disciplinary
review
of
the
potential
for
collate
co-locating
Police
Department
staff,
MPD
staff
currently
assigned
to
the
third
precinct
within
other
Precinct
facilities.
A
report
back
on
this
direction
is
requested
to
the
committee
of
the
whole
by
September
5th
2023.
A
So
you're
making
that
motion
is
there
a
second
to
her
motion
seconded
comments
or
conversation
on
this
legislative
directive
from
my
colleagues.
A
I'm
not
seeing
any.
Thank
you,
president
Jenkins
for
bringing
this
forward.
We've
talked
about
it.
Yesterday
we
talked
about
it
earlier
in
the
in
the
last
conversation
on
the
community
engagement
report
and
I.
J
A
Strongly
this
is
the
right
path
forward,
so
seeing
no
further
council
member
Johnson
I'll.
C
Be
super
brief.
Madam
chair,
I,
appreciate
council
president
Jenkins,
bringing
this
forward
I
look
forward
to
the
information
coming
back
I.
Just
my
one
encouragement
is
I
hope
we
can
continue
these
efforts
or
that
this
doesn't
inadvertently.
I
know
this
is
certainly
not
Council
president's
intent,
but
inadvertently
slow
down
or
delay
the
efforts
around
trying
to
find
a
site
and
doing
that
real
engagement
work
with
Community
around
having
a
third
precinct
location
within
the
precinct
itself.
So
I
I
again
appreciate
the
motion.
C
Q
Be
on
well
and
thank
you,
I'm
Madam,
chair
and
just
want
to
reiterate
and
confirm
that
my
intent
is
that
we
will
simultaneously
be
engaging
with
our
residents
and
community
members,
particularly
in
third
precinct
area,
about
a
the
potential
for
a
third
precinct.
T
Thank
you,
I
I'm,
going
to
vote
for
this,
but
I
just
wondered.
Will
this
include
any
impact
it
would
have
on
the
first
precinct
if
the?
If
the
third
wasn't
to
move
for
the
first,
will
that
be
part
of
the
directive?
Q
And
that's
a
great
question:
council
member
Goodman.
R
R
So
I
see
it
as
a
win-win
because
it
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
acquire
more
space
in
that
building
for
future
needs
that
are
Beyond
policing,
combined
with
police
in
the
same
site
and
remember
we
have
a
year
until
we
move
into
that
site.
So
there's
plenty
of
time
to
look
at
this
analysis.
A
T
Councilmember
Goodman,
thank
you
for
your
wise
response.
I
appreciate
it.
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
Commissioner
Alexander
I'm
going
to
put
a
Time
clock
on
you.
L
Council
president
Council
vice
president
and
council
members
in
regards
to
that
question
great
question:
councilmember
rain
veal.
There
won't
be
any
issues
that
we
we're
going
to
add
two
two
new
floors
in
Precinct,
one
and
Precinct
two
will
be
separated
from
each
other
and
I.
Think
also
I
need
to
add
that
actually
will
be
about
four
three
and
a
half
four
blocks
away
from
the
third
precinct
with
easy
access
on
to
35W,
but
also
understanding
calls
for
service
are
not
dispatched
out
of
those
those
precincts
there.
L
Those
officers
go
to
their
assigned
areas
at
the
beginning
of
their
shift,
so
there
won't
be
any
issue
there
and
in
addition
to
that
very
important
quickly,
it
also
allows
them
to
get
out
of
that
place
where
they're
in
which
is
very
uncomfortable
and
we're
still
talking
a
year
from
now
to
go
into
a
place
over
the
next
several
years,
where
they
have
all
the
modern
amenities
that
they
need
parking,
accessibility
and
all
those
things.
So
thank
you.
A
A
Separate
inspectors
right
Etc,
yes,
thank
you!
Yes,
ma'am!
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues
seeing
no
further
I
think
this
is
generally
a
resolution,
we're
all
interested
in
all
those
in
favor.
Just
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
that
carries.
That
item
is
approved
unanimously.
Thank
you,
so
much
council
president
Jenkins.
We
also
have
before
us,
though,
not
on
today's
agenda.
Two
items
where
council
member
wansley
is
the
primary
author
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
her.
A
Could
we
start
with
the
resolution
authored
by
you
and
council
member
Osman?
Please.
I
Yes,
thank
you
for
that.
I
Our
resolution
that
we're
moving
forward
both
councilmember
Osmond
and
I
and
I'll
just
read
the
text
for
the
public
record
states
that
being
resolved
at
the
city
council
of
the
City
of
Minneapolis
supports
the
issuance
of
a
request
for
proposals
for
non-law
enforcement,
development
of
the
city
on
land
and
20
at
2600,
Minnehaha
Avenue
South.
So
we
just
had
a
really
good
conversation
with
our
cpad
director
around
what
next
steps
in
energy
and
momentum
looks
like
around
that
site.
We're
really
excited
to
initiate
that.
I
Thank
you,
councilmember
Osman
for
being
an
avid
Champion
or
uplifting
existing.
You
know
engagement
from
the
community
around
what
they
would
like
to
see
that
site
be
developed
into.
So
this
is
just
using
an
existing
City
process
to
initiate.
You
know
the
consideration
of
what
we
can
do
with
that
site.
So
thank
you
again
to
our
staff
and
thank
you
to
councilmember
Osman,
bringing
us
forward
with.
A
A
Not
that
I
don't
want
there
to
be
an
RFP
at
26
mini
hot
2600
mini
I
do,
but
perhaps
this
is
an
honorary
resolution,
simply
stating
our
support
of
an
of
such
an
RFP,
if
or
when
the
mayor
or
Administration
choose
to
pursue
that
action,
and
I
would
like
to
ask
the
City
attorney
to
weigh
in
on
that,
because
I
know
that
that
speaks
a
little
bit
to
the
difference
between
the
legislative
side
and
the
executive
side.
I.
A
Also
wonder
this
is
the
first
that
I
saw
this
was
this
morning,
but
I
also
wonder
if
this
would
make
more
sense
is
a
legislative
directive
since
Council
can't
direct
departments
and
I
know
that
you
say
supports
here.
But
could
this
instead
be
framed
as
a
request
to
report
back
or
a
study
to
be
more
within
our
Authority
and
I'd
like
to
ask
the
City
attorney
to
weigh
in
on
this.
U
Council
vice
president
council
members,
so
I'm
not
exactly
sure
what
the
effect
of
this
this
resolution
is
as
Council
vice
president
pointed
out,
the
council
can't
issue
rfps
and
can't
direct
staff
to
issue
rfps
and
also
there's
actually
a
City
Property
Disposition
policy
that
would
have
to
be
followed
before
any
sort
of
RFP
is
issued.
U
So
I
do
wonder
whether
you
know
what
you're
really
looking
for
the
body
is
really
looking
for
is
some
sort
of
again
legislative
directive,
some
sort
of
study
about
alternative
uses
for
this
property,
non-law
enforcement
uses
for
for
the
property
or
yeah
I,
I,
guess
I
I'm,
not
sure
what
legal
effect
the
resolution
would
have
if
it's
just
sort
of
an
expression
of
interest
or
exactly
what
it
is.
I
As
an
author
can,
I
also
offer
a
response.
It's
very
clear
director
Hanson
named
that
there's
already
been
existing
rfps,
that's
been
issued
for
the
site
in
the
past.
Again,
this
is
an
existing
process,
we're
not
doing
anything
new.
He
also
named
that
that
process
was
halted
when
conversation
shifted
to
this
site
being
potentially
for
the
third
precinct
that
he
named
that
very
explicitly
I
believe
all
of
us
heard
that
very
clearly.
I
So
this
is
just
saying
we
support
a
current
existing
City
process
that
was
already
happening
that
halted
in
the
wake
of
these
conversations
around
the
third
precinct.
Now
that
we're
moving
forward,
exploring
the
placement
of
the
first
and
third
at
Century
Plaza.
Okay,
now,
let's
resume
that
process.
That
was
already
happening
within
our
staff.
To
do
this,
and
it's
literally
a
support
statement.
So
I
don't
see
why
and
we
work
with
the
clerks
why
this
would
need
to
be
translated
into
a
legislative
director.
We
don't
need
to
study.
U
Council
vice
president,
if
I
could
could
comment,
you
know,
I
I,
don't
know
what
the
plan
is
for
that
location.
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
off
the
table
in
terms
of
a
precinct
location
or
not,
but
that's
really
an
executive
decision
about
you
know
where
how
where
and
how
to
move
forward
with
this
property.
I
think
what
is
very,
very
legislative
is
you
know
a
report
out.
A
study
is
we've.
U
We've
done
multiple
times
a
study
of
of
what
options
are
available,
but
I
don't
think
it's
the
within
the
council's
jurisdiction
to
to
direct
that
an
RFP
be
issued.
We're.
I
Not
directing
I'm
sorry
I
just
want
to
make
that
very
clear.
It
says:
support
we've
passed,
support
statements
on
this
body
before
as
a
legislative,
you
know
process.
So
all
of
this
seems
relatively
new
to
me.
These
are
things
that
we've
done.
There's
established
President,
we
can
say
we
support
the
process.
This
does
not
say
we
direct.
R
R
Moving
forward,
councilmember,
Aspen
and
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
disrespectfully
talk,
while
other
people
were
talking
to
try
to
figure
out
how
we
can
move
forward,
and
it
seems
to
me
as
though
we
can
have
a
conversation
and
committee
where
this
belongs
on
actually
operationalizing
this,
so
I
hear
I,
hope
I
will
hear
a
unanimous
decision
to,
and
I
will
hear
it
as
to
ask
the
biz
committee
to
take
a
look
at
how
we
can
make
this
happen
and
I
see
lots
of
heads
shaking
from
councilmember,
Chavez,
council,
member
chagtai,
council,
member
Osman
and
even
council
member
rainfall
that
we
would
be
happy
to
take
this
up
in
committee,
so
I
take
it
for
what
it
is,
which
is
a
friendly
show
of
support
to
figure
out
what
different
can
happen
on
this
site
and
I
also
support
it.
I
So
that
would
be
then
a
friendly
Amendment
to
the
proposal
that
I
would
like.
If
our
clerks
can
capture
and
then
restate
for
the
public
record,
then.
V
I
W
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
just
I
I'm
concerned
about
some
comments
regarding
the
The
council's
Authority
on
this
issue,
and
you
know
want
to
agree
with
with
what
councilmember
Goodman
was
just
saying.
This
is
a
thing
we
should
all
just
agree
to
agree
on
and
take
up
in
committee,
but
to
be
to
be
clear
of
like
we
as
a
body
authorize
the
issuance
of
of
rfps
all
of
the
time,
including
really
rfps
that
relate
to
City
owned
property.
W
We
authorize
the
the
sale
of
land
to
for
for
specific
purposes,
so
I
think
it's
just
incorrect
to
say
that
the
council
has
no
authority
to
to
do
something
like
this.
So
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
and
then
hope
we
can
a
great
degree.
U
Yeah
and
Council
vice
president
council
members,
of
course
you
do
approve
rfps
all
the
time,
but
those
rfps
are
generated
by
the
executive
branch
and
then
go
to
the
to
the
council
for
approval,
so
so
that
my
confusion
is
really
like.
Are
you
you
know,
but
I
understand?
This
is
a
statement
of
support,
you're
not
directing
that
an
RFP
occur
and
if
the
executive
decides
to
not
move
forward
with
an
RFP
process,
they're
not
in
violation
of
this.
U
This
is
simply
a
statement
of
support
that,
if
it's
a
determined
that
an
RFP
is
the
right,
Next
Step,
then
you're
supportive
of
that
and
then
obviously
an
actual
RFP
would
come
before
this
body
for
your
approval,
right,
I
understand.
A
Thank
you
so,
in
other
words,
we
don't
come
up
with
rfps
or
decide
to
go
out
for
rfps
on
land
that
the
city
owns
overnight
and
bring
that
to
council
rather
and
I
had
seen
nods
of
support
from
the
author
that
this
is
absolutely
appropriate
that
we
support
this
and
we'll
continue.
E
A
A
I
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano,
as
I
named
earlier.
The
third
precinct
report
emphasizes
a
recommendation
that
the
city
moves
forward
with
the
Truth
and
Reconciliation
process,
as
we
dive
further
into
how
we
advance
our
comprehensive
public
safety
system.
I
want
to
also
emphasize
this
is
in
fully
full
alignment
with
work
that
has
already
been
established
at
the
city
council.
President
Jenkins
mentioned
this
in
her
leadership.
In
creating
the
truth
and
Rec
conciliation
process,
we've
been
able
to
hire
staff
to
carry
out
plans.
I
So
with
that,
this
resolution
and
I'll
read
it
for
the
public
record
that
both
council
member
Chavez
and
I
are
bringing
forward
is
resolved
by
the
city
council
of
the
City
of
Minneapolis
that
the
above
entitled
resolution
as
amended,
be
further
minute
by
increasing
the
decreasing
the
unassigned
fund,
balance
of
the
2022
general
fund
police
unassigned
fund
balance
I'm,
not
going
to
read
the
figure
by
555
000
and
increasing
the
race,
Equity
inclusion
and
belonging
Department
Revenue
estimate
in
the
general
fund
by
555
000
for
one-time
use
as
operating
dollars
for
the
Truth
and
Reconciliation
programming,
so
again
giving
them
a
one-time
transfer
of
funds
to
be
able
to
do
this.
I
M
Council,
member
Chavez
I
think
your
Council
vice
president
just
want
to
Echo
what
my
colleague
councilman
wansley
is
talking
about.
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
a
truth
or
Mr
conciliation
process.
I
know
that
council,
member
council
president
Jenkins
helped
lead
the
charge
here
and
now
we
just
need
the
funding
to
get
this
done.
So
today
is
just
making
sure
that
we
can
have
money
to
begin
that
process,
which
is
something
our
residents
and
people
in
Minneapolis
have
been
asking
for.
So
that's
it.
R
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
also
think
this
is
something
that
should
just
be
approved
and
moved
to
the
budget
committee.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
seen
this
we're
talking
about
half
a
million
dollars.
I
think
that
we
have
to
understand
the
trade-offs.
Probably
something
I
would
support,
but
I
also
think
that
if
we
have
a
budget
committee
coming
up
that
we
should
just
and
I
think
we
do
that.
R
We
should
just
bring
this
to
the
budget
committee
and
act
on
it
there,
because
it's
the
first
I've
seen
it
so
I,
don't
really
have
any
sense
of
what
the
trade-offs
would
be
and
I
think
that
that
may
makes
the
most
sense
process
wise.
A
Thank
you,
I'd
originally
put
myself
in
queue
to
suggest
something
similar
I
do
think
that
this
needs
to
be
considered
a
budget
committee
I
understand
that
staff
have
not
had
a
chance
to
view
to
review
this
I
am
confused
by
the
language
in
this.
That
says,
be
further
amended
by
increasing
the
decreasing
the
unassigned
fund.
Balance
I
think
this
I
know
that
this
has
not
had
staff
review.
A
This
is
the
first
time
that
we've
seen
this
in
front
of
us
and
I
do
think
it
needs
to
have
the
benefit
of
Staff
review
and
it
could
go
to
budget
committee.
This
next
cycle,
I
see
council,
member,
Koski
and
Q
right
behind
me,
but
I
do
need
to
point
out
that
MPD
is
not
projected
to
be
under
budget
this
year
or
have
fund
balance
left
over
from
the
2022
general
fund.
A
It
is
projected
to
be
millions
of
dollars
over
budget
this
year,
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
and
see
what
staff
recommend
in
terms
of
using
money
and
where
to
get
this
money
from
for
the
Truth
and
Reconciliation
programming.
I
I'm
sorry
Council
vice
president
I
would
like
to
offer
some
corrections,
because
you
made
some
inaccurate
statements.
First,
this
did
go
by
clerks.
We
consulted
with
reib
staff,
who
have
made
it
very
clear
to
this
body.
They
have
not
had
this
work
be
funded.
We
also
consulted
with
MPD
around
this.
So
to
say
we
did
not
consult
with
staff
is
absolutely
false.
We
know
that
MPD
had
about
11
million
dollars
in
unspent
funds
from
2022.
Some
of
those
are
rollover
funds,
which
means
yeah.
I
There
are
some
of
those
or
a
portion
of
those
that
are
committed
to
contracts
and
projects
that
extends
multiple
years,
but
some
are
completely
uncommitted,
which
is
referred
to
as
undecide
funds,
so
we
know
how
to
frame
this
correctly.
Also,
we
know
that
we
spent
500,
000
and
I'm
glad
council
member
rain
led
the
charge
on
this
for
the
warehouse
District
live,
we've
moved
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
support
that
and
Economic
Development
opportunity.
I
I
think
there
is
agreement
that
we
can
also
spend
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
MPD,
as
we
did
with
where
Warehouse
District
live
on
supporting
Truth
and
Reconciliation
process.
To
finally
have
a
city
official
response
to
a
global
Uprising
and
that
will
forever
change
how
we
do
this
work
around
Public
Safety,
and
that
again
is
a
top
recommendation
of
this
report.
So
I
did
want
to
provide
some
additional
contacts
as
to
where
that
figure
amount
came
from
in
regards
to
MPD,
because
we
did
talk
to
staff
on.
I
A
Councilmember
wansley
I
do
hope
that
when
people
bring
things
to
my
committee
that
I'm
at
least
consulted
with
beforehand,
I
saw
this
on
the
Deus
when
I
got
here
and
I've
heard
directly
from
Finance
staff
that
they
have
not
hit
a
chance
to
review
this
item.
And
it's
nice
to
now
hear
that
you
have
spoken
with
people
in
finance.
But
this
is
all
news
to
me.
Well,.
I
Vice
president,
maybe
you
should
also
orchestrate
us
having
review
of
official
documents
like
this,
not
within
24
hours,
so
we
just
received
the
report
yesterday.
So,
as
many
of
us
are
considering
motions,
yes,
we
had
a
very
tight
turnaround.
I
would
hope
in
the
future.
Council
leadership
when
you
know
these
things
are
coming
and
I
know.
I
You
all
been
aware
of
this
for
several
months
now
that
this
report
was
coming,
we
could
have
orchestrated
this
in
submitted
by
the
cow
deadline,
so
it
could
have
been
officially
recognized
on
the
agenda,
because
Council
leadership
did
not
decide
to
move
forward
with
that.
This
is
what
we
have,
and
this
is
responding
to
the
findings
of
the
report,
and
this
should
not
be
controversial,
and
it's
based
in
you
know
us
actually
moving
forward
positively.
So
again
hope
that's
a
memo.
Council
leadership
can
take
up.
Don't
give
us
24
hours
to
consider
things.
A
We
had
this
conversation
and
agenda
setting
of
trying
to
find
a
balance
between
getting
this
report
out
as
soon
as
possible
or
holding
it
for
a
full
additional
cycle,
and
we
did
decide
that
we
wanted
the
public
to
know
as
soon
as
we
received
that
report
that
we
had
that
report
I
don't
want
to
continue
back
and
forth
on
the
Deus.
I
will
continue
through
this
list
and
we'll
take
a
vote
accordingly.
Council
member
Koski.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
want
to
suggest
going
back
to
councilmember
Goodman
that
I'd
be
happy
as
the
chair
of
budget
to
bring
this
forward
and
the
budget
committee.
We
do
have
one
coming
up
on
August
1st,
so
if
the
authors
are
amendable
to
moving
it
and
bringing
it
forward
through
the
budget
committee,
so
we
can
have
some
continued.
K
Further
discussion
sounds
like
you've
connected
with
a
lot
of
City
staff,
but
maybe
not
everyone
that
wants
to
be
consulted
and
I
would
love
a
chance
to
connect
more
about
this
in
general
support
and
but
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
having
a
thorough
conversation
around
it.
I
I
would
prefer
to
take
a
vote.
I
see,
council
member
Chavez
maybe
wants
to
ex
maybe
split
it
into
a
substitute
motion.
I
would
like
to
have
it
taken
as
a
vote
as
originally
again,
we
know
we
can
spend
500
000
on
Warehouse,
Live
I.
Think
it's
very
clear.
We
can
take
the
vote
today
to
make
this
allocation
possible.
K
Can
I
just
speaks
so,
and
maybe
council
members
who
have
been
here
longer
than
I
have
could
maybe
speak
to
just
in
general,
the
process
of
which
we
bring
forward
budget
changes
and
allocation
changes.
You
know
we,
this
is
what
I
have
not
seen
us
do
that
here
in
our
last
year,
and
a
half
and
I
would
just
like
to
make
sure
that
we
move
it
forward
through
the
budget
committee,
so
that
we
can
have
a
thorough
conversation
around
it.
A
So
we've
already
moved
council
member
wants
is
motion
and
seconded
it.
It
sounds
like
then,
because
there
isn't
interest
from
the
authors
in
doing
so,
council
member
Koski
you're,
making
a
substitute
motion
to
instead
move
this
to
staff
and
to
budget
committee
in
the
next
cycle.
Is
that
accurate,
correct?
And
that
is
just
because
there
was
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
there
for
a
prior
project
that
was
deemed
worthy,
doesn't
necessarily
mean,
there's
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
a
fund
to
continue
and
use
this
for
another
worthwhile
project.
A
Q
Thank
you,
Madam,
chair,
I,
just
want
to
clarify
for
the
record
and
I
as
the
original
author
of
The,
Truth
and
Reconciliation
process.
I
am
deeply
committed
to
this
work
and
think
that
we
need
to
have
funding
in
place
to
be
able
to
to
functionally
operationalize
that
work.
However,
I
do
have
to
state
that
there
was
funding
for
Truth
and
Reconciliation
in
the
reib
budget
and
those
funds
were
transferred
to
the
I.
Am
my
ancestors
Wildest
Dreams
project
to
support
that
work,
and
so
it
is
untrue.
That,
the
Truth
and
Reconciliation
work
was
unfunded.
Q
A
I
Since
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
connect
with
council
president
around
further
Clarity
I
do
want
to
offer
some
context
on
why
there
has
been
prior
funding
allocated
to
reib
around
Truth
and
Reconciliation.
It
was
only
for
staff.
So,
right
now
we
have
staff
with
a
plan
who
don't
have
any
programmatic
dollars
to
actually
implement
or
execute
that
plan.
I
So
this
one-time
funding
would
be
around
us,
giving
them
five
hundred
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
to
execute
the
plans
that
we've
been
sitting
on
for
three
years
and
that
have
not
become
actualized,
and
this
feels
like
something
that
should
have
unanimous
support
and
one
thing
we
can
actually
take
action
on
today,
so
I
at
least
wanted
to
provide
some
additional
Clarity
to
council
president
Jenkins
of
yes,
there
has
been
funding,
but
that's
only
for
staff,
not
for
programmatic
dollars.
R
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
Moving
this
forward
to
committee
is
taking
action,
and
it
feels
to
me
like
there
are
some
unanswered
questions
that
could
be
answered
through
that
process,
and
it
doesn't
really
need
to
be
an
arguing
match
out
of
line.
Let's
just
do
it
because
we're
on
a
role
of
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
work
better
together
and
we've
had
a
lot
of
unanimity
around
very
emotional
issues.
Today,
no
one
is
saying
they
don't
want
to
fund
this.
R
We're
just
simply
saying
it's
something
we
just
saw
right
this
minute
and
bringing
it
to
committee
will
allow
us
to
make
a
unanimous
positive
decision.
So
I
would
just
urge
us
to
remember
that
we're
all
trying
to
work
through
very
difficult
times,
but
this
could
be
a
different
issue
that
other
people
disagree
on
and
we
don't
want
to
get
out
of
line
of
just
adopting
half
a
million
dollar
budget
allocations.
M
I,
thank
you
Council.
Vice
president
I'll,
just
if
councilman
Cassie
allows
me
I'd
make
the
motion
to
send
it
back
to
budget
and
I'll.
Ask
that
my
colleagues
in
this
process
make
sure
that
we
get
this
done,
that
we
find
the
money
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
Reconciliation
process,
because
this
is
what
our
residents
are
asking
for.
A
A
We
just
need
to
find
a
thoughtful
and
considered
way
is
to
where
that
funding
comes
from
and
how
we
do
it
so
seeing
nobody
else
in
queue.
Oh
council,
member
wansley,
yes,.
I
And
I
just
also
want
to
note
record
two
of
just
arbitrary
process
that
is
not
okay.
We
pass
increases
for
MPD
sergeants,
just
last
cycle
without
any
consultation
with
staff.
I
There's
a
right
now
asking
for
500
000,
apparently
is
the
problem,
so
I
will
name
the
arbitrary
standards
in
which
we
ask
for
staff
review
of
our
emotions
and
our
amendments
when
there's
requests
for
evidence
that
is
not
happening
across
the
board
and
I
need
to
name
that,
because
that
is
not
okay,
especially
when
no
one
was
asking
for
retentions,
but
people
are
asking
for
true
in
reconciliation,
so
I
want
to
highlight
if
we're
really
trying
to
be
Equitable
in
how
we
uphold
our
legislative
processes
to
stop
with
these
double
standards.
I
So
I
just
want
to
provide
that
in
light
of
some
of
the
feedback
around
needing
more
time
in
order
to
verify.
If
this
is
the
right
path
forward
or
the
right
funding
source.
A
Thank
you
in
order
to
not
be
silent.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
that
retention
vote
had
extensive
vetting
from
City
staff
and
City
leadership.
City
clerk
is
in
queue
with
a
priority
comment.
V
Madam
vice
president
I
was
just
going
to
Simply
suggest
that
if
the
now
Shava
substitute
motion
is
to
refer
to
this
to
the
budget
committee,
I
believe
there
are
some
typos
that
you've
referenced
a
few
times.
The
clerks
can
easily
clean
that
up
and
have
that
ready.
But
my
calendar
shows
the
next
budget
committee
meeting
on
July
25th
I
heard
August
1st
noted
so
I
wanted
to
clarify
the
date
as
well.
K
Oh
sorry,
I've
been
mad,
I'm
chair,
that's
right,
so
we
do
have
one
next
on
the
25th.
That
agenda
is
very
full.
The
next
budget
committee
meeting
that
has
we
have
more
open
like
time
and
I,
think
that
this
will
deserve
time
is
on
August
1st.
So
that
is
why
I
suggested
August
1st
for
that.
So.
V
Then
Madam
vice
president,
just
to
clarify
for
the
body
as
It
prepares
to
vote.
The
Chavez
substitute
is
refer.
This
entire
proposal
on
amending
the
current
2023
General
appropriation
resolution
to
the
budget
committee
requesting
to
move
555
thousand
dollars
out
of
the
police
department.
The
general
fund
for
unassigned
fund
balance
over
to
the
race
Equity
inclusion
belonging
department
on
a
one-time
basis
for
operating
dollars
for
Truth
and
Reconciliation
programming.
A
N
You
have
been
I
I,
just
wanted
to
say
that
that's
just
not
true
about
like
me
just
pulling
out
the
sky
retention
for
police
officers,
I've
been
working
on
that
for
a
year
and
a
half.
You
know
these
false
comments
get
made
up
here,
and
you
know
it
appears
to
the
public
that
it's
true
and
it's
just
not
I
worked
with
lots
of
staff.
I
work
with
the
mayor's
office.
I
work
with
the
commissioner
I
work
with
the
chief.
A
M
Yes
and
there's
just
one
last
thing,
based
on
one
of
councilman
Goodman's
comments,
I
would
like
this
body
to
consider
if
the
clerk
can
help
me
ending
Lake
Minnehaha
from
ever
becoming
a
police
station,
and
if
you
can
help
me
make
that
motion,
the
exact
wording
that
we
need.
I
think
that
we
need
to
move
forward
and
community
members
can
decide
what
to
do
with
that
site.
V
Council
vice
president,
to
to
the
point
from
council
member
Chavez
I
think
if
the
body
wishes
to
vote
to
ensure
that
the
site
referenced
by
councilman
Chavez
is
not
developed
as
a
police
precinct.
We
certainly
can
come
up
with
that
wording
and
bring
It
Forward
when
these
are
voted
on
at
the
full
Council
I.
Don't
have
it
in
front
of
I,
wouldn't
want
to
just
on
the
Fly
put
that
together.
But
all
of
these
are
recommendations,
of
course,
to
the
full
Council.
So
we
have
24
hours
to
put
that
kind
of
a
message
together.
M
A
I'll
change
that
to
say
that
council
member
Chavez
intends
to
bring
a
motion
on
Thursday
that
would
potentially
remove
Lake
and
Hiawatha
the
former
third
precinct
location
from
future
consideration.
A
Q
U
Good
afternoon,
council,
president
council
members
just
a
question
for
the
clerk
whether
the
presentation
is
queued
up
or
whether
I
need
to
somehow
put
it
on
I'll.
U
A
As
we're
doing
this,
for
my
colleagues,
I
know
that
today's
committee
meeting
has
gone
long.
I'd
want
to
point
out
that
this
is
a
receiving
file
item.
I
recognize.
Some
of
my
colleagues
need
to
run
to
other
meetings.
After
that
we
would
like
to
do
reports
of
committees,
I
think
if
you
need
to
leave,
if
you
could,
please
make
sure
someone
from
your
committee
can
briefly
go
through
the
agenda
that
we'll
be
voting
on
on
Thursday.
That
would
be
great
welcome.
Thank
you
for
presenting
today,
Ms
Anderson.
U
The
court
approved
the
agreement
very
shortly
after
the
hearing
on
Thursday
I
think
by
the
time
I
got
back
to
my
desk.
We
already
had
the
court
order
there,
so
I
wanted
to
just
briefly
talk
about
that
hearing,
answer
any
questions
and
then
talk
about
the
legislative
directive.
But,
as
I
said
on
Thursday,
we
had
the
court
approval
hearing
for
the
mdhr
settlement
agreement.
It
was
a
two-hour
hearing,
I
think
I
talked
for
about
an
hour.
U
The
the
judge
was
extraordinarily
well
prepared
and
asked
very,
very
pertinent
questions
that
I
think
that
both
parties
were
able
to
answer
to
the
court.
Satisfaction,
I
think
if
anyone
watched
the
the
hearing
that
the
sense
that
that
one
would
get
is
the
harmony
with
which
mdhr
and
the
city
are
moving
forward
with
the
work
ahead
and
I.
U
I
am
truly
proud
of
the
efforts
of
both
the
city
and
the
human
rights
Department
to
come
together
and
enter
into
in
into
really
a
historic
settlement
agreement
that
that
provides
a
really
good
roadmap
for
police
reform.
As
you
all
know,
we
do
have
a
findings
report
from
the
Department
of
Justice.
We
don't
yet
have
a
settlement
negotiation
scheduled
with
the
Department
of
Justice.
U
My
understanding
from
working
with
other
cities
is
that
doj's
processes,
often
that
they'll
kind
of
send
off
a
first
draft
for
the
city
to
react
to,
and
we
haven't
received
that
yet,
but
we
are
in
in
conversations
with
the
Department
of
Justice
and
we'll
kind
of
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
other
things
that
are
going
on,
as
as
we
walk
through
this
directive,
all
right,
so
the
legislative
directive
talking
about
operational
impacts
of
the
settlement
agreement.
So
again,
as
of
July
13
2023,
we
have
an
effective
date.
U
The
effective
date,
as
defined
in
the
agreement,
is
the
date
of
the
court
order
approving
the
settlement
agreement
and
that
effective
date
is
really
the
trigger.
Under
the
the
settlement
agreement
for
multiple
deadlines,
not
every
deadline.
There
are
some
obligations
under
the
settlement
agreement
that
that
don't
have
deadlines,
and
there
are
some
obligations
that
have
deadlines
that
are
tied
to
other
things
like
approval
of
certain
things
by
the
independent
evaluator.
But
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
are
that
are
tied
to
that
effective
date,
and
so
really
we
are.
U
We
already
started
in
Earnest
before
the
court
approved
the
settlement
agreement
and,
and
now
we
are
more
than
Off
to
the
Races
on
on
many
of
the
things
that
are
required
under
the
settlement
agreement.
So
some
of
the
first
deadlines
that
I
think
are
important
for
this
Council
to
be
aware
of
60
days
from
the
effective
date,
implementation
units
need
to
be
staffed
and,
in
particular,
the
implementation
unit
in
the
in
the
police
department.
U
We
have
to
hold
Community
engagement
sessions
regarding
the
MPD
policies
and,
if
you
remember,
under
the
settlement
agreement
that
one
of
the
the
first
things
out
of
the
shoot
is
going
into
community
and
getting
Community
feedback
about
existing
policies,
we've
got
lots
and
lots
of
policy
changes
that
are
dictated
by
the
the
settlement
agreement,
but
it
was
really
important
that
we
actually
get
out
into
the
community
community
and
get
feedback
even
before
those
policy
changes
are
made.
U
So
the
settlement
agreement
requires
a
community
engagement
sessions,
feedback
sessions
on
Mission,
Vision
and
values,
a
use
of
force,
stop
searches
and
arrests
and
non-discriminatory
policing,
and
so
those
those
Community
feedback
sessions
need
to
happen
within
the
within
the
next
60
days
and
then
hosting
a
web
page.
That
would
allow
for
engagement
on
police
policies
in
multiple
different
languages
and
then,
at
the
120
day
marker.
We
have
to
have
selected
an
independent
evaluator
and
have
performed
a
number
of
Assessments
and
I'll
talk
about
those
more
so
operational
impacts,
obviously
significant
operational
impacts
on
existing
staff.
U
U
Thankfully,
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
had
the
foresight
to
create
a
reserve
fund
for
2023
and
for
2024
2
million
dollars
in
that
Reserve
fund
for
2023
and
3
million
for
2024,
and
we've
been
using
the
2023
review
Reserve
fund
to
begin
implementation,
including
Staffing
of
the
implementation
units
both
for
MPD
some
sworn,
but
primarily
civilians,
and
then
an
implementation
unit
in
in
my
office,
uses
of
the
reserve
have
have
been
varied
again.
Mpd's
unit
about
10
people
I
think
are
already
staffed
in
that
unit.
U
There
are
spots
for
several
more
data
policy
amendments,
Community
engagements
compliance,
Specialists
and
others.
In
my
office
there
is
an
implementation
unit,
as,
as
you
know,
Sarah
Lathrop
is
the
manager
of
that
implementation
unit
and
that
unclassified
position
came
before
this.
This
Council
for
approval.
In
the
past,
we've
got
a
project
manager,
Carolina
amini.
U
The
independent
evaluator
RFP
is
actually
something
that
we
really
gotta
jump
on
even
before
the
settlement
agreement
was
approved,
because
we
know
that
that
getting
that
independent
evaluator
in
place
really
helps
us
to
get
those
policy
changes
moving,
and
so
the
RFP
was
was
posted
and
has
already
closed.
U
We
have
six
responses
that
we
and
mdh
are
reviewing,
and
if
you
recall,
we
got
an
agreement
from
the
Department
of
Justice
and
our
agreement
and
principle
that
they
would
give
us
feedback
on
our
on
our
RFP
responses,
and
we
we
have
not
gotten
that
feedback
yet,
but
we
will.
We
will
get
that
soon
and
really.
The
hope
is
that
we
can
choose
an
independent
evaluator
right
out
of
the
gate,
that
that
would
be
agreeable
to
doj
ultimately,
and
then
we've
been
using
the
reserve
fund
for
some
contracts.
U
We
have
a
contract
right
now,
with
my
office.
Does
with
an
expert,
it's
126
000
contract
for
2023,
with
an
expert
that
has
worked
on
implementation
teams
on
evaluator
teams
actually
for
for
other
cities
and
has
a
great
expertise
to
help
us
figure
out
exactly
how
to
set
up
implementation.
And
then
we
have
a
number
of
other
rfps
out
that
we
are
trying
to
fill.
U
We
have
an
RFP
for
translation
and
interpretation,
Services
RFP
for
certification,
for
adult
learning
trainers,
because
in
order
to
satisfy
the
training
obligations,
we
actually
have
to
train
people
how
to
train
adults
with
adult
learning
techniques.
We
also
have
a
and
I
think.
Actually
those
two
are
are
out
but
maybe
are
closed.
By
now
we
have
an
RFP
that
will
be
out
soon
for
a
data
system
assessment,
and
then
we
right
now
have
open
a
facilitator
RFP.
U
Looking
for
a
facilitator
for
those
Community
meetings
and
again,
if
you
have
anybody
who
you
know
would
would
be
interested
in
that
work,
please
send
them
to
the
RFP
and
then
very
soon,
a
training
for
dealing
with
minors.
U
U
So
as
as
we
talked
about
when
I
presented
the
settlement
agreement
a
few
months
ago,
the
city
has
agreed
to
be
responsible
for
providing
the
necessary
resources
in
order
to
implement
the
terms
of
the
agreement.
So
we
are
still
in
process
for
the
2024
budget.
Developing
what
that
budget
ask
looks
like
for
the
for
the
mdhr
agreement
to
carry
out
all
the
work.
We
know
that
it
will
be
a
very
big
lift.
U
We
know
the
independent
evaluator
under
the
mdhr
settlement
agreement
is
capped
out
at
1.5
million
dollars.
Obviously
we
don't
have
an
ie
yet
so
that
that
those
expenses
have
not
been
seen
in
2023.
So
far
for
2024,
we
know
again
1.5
million
dollars
for
review
of
the
mdhr
settlement
agreement,
but
the
unknown
piece
is
what
more
extensive
responsibilities
will
come
under
the
doj
consent
decree.
U
We
do
anticipate
that
what
the
doj
will
require
of
us
will
Tre
tread
a
lot
of
the
same
ground
that
mdhr
did
so
I,
don't
expect
the
IE
to
be
double
the
cost,
but
we
do
also
know
that
doj's
report
identified
some
findings
that
were
not
in
mdhr
reports,
so
I,
don't
think
it'll
be
double,
but
I,
don't
think
it'll
be
capped
at
1.5
when
we,
when
we
actually
add
the
doj
consent
decree
to
the
the
monitoring
and
then
obviously
Personnel
costs
will
continue.
U
We
are
building
the
implementation
units
as
we
believe
they
need
to
be,
but
obviously
this
is
fluid
and
and
we're
going
to
need
some
flexibility
as
we
go
forward.
Another
big
cost
that
that
is
is
absolutely
part
of
the
settlement
agreement,
but
is
very
difficult
to
actually
put
a
price
tag.
To
is
assessments.
U
One
of
the
the
obligations
under
the
settlement
agreement
is
that
we
actually
do
assessments
of
our
data
systems
of
our
training
needs
our
equipment
and
Technology
our
facilities
and
employee
Wellness
needs,
and
once
we
have
those
assessments,
you
know
we'll
have
rfps
for
Assessors.
For
for
most
of
these
things,
once
we
do
the
assessments,
then
we're
going
to
need
to
react
to
what
sort
of
improvements
the
assessments
actually
identify
and
at
the.
U
Evaluator
will
actually
require
of
us
and-
and
that's
a
cost-
that's
very,
very
hard
to
predict
at
this
point.
Training
we
know
has
some
cost
to
it.
U
We
are
going
to
try
to
do
a
lot
of
the
training
in-house
we've
got
some
expertise
in
in
my
office
and
and
and
in
MPD,
but
we
very
likely
will
need
outside
instructors
that
we'll
need
to
bring
in
to
do
at
least
some
of
the
training
and
then
obviously
putting
our
officers
through
training
will
require
more
overtime,
because
when
we
take
those
folks
off
the
street
to
put
them
in
training,
then
we
need
to
cover
those
shifts.
U
Obviously
there
will
be
other
contracts
that
will
will
crop
up
from
time
to
time
and-
and
we
know
that-
probably
the
biggest
costs
and
again
we
can't
really
put
a
number
to
that
until
we
do.
The
assessment
is
our
I.T
cost.
We
know
we
need
improved,
Data
Systems,
we
know
we
need
data
analysts
and
really
the
the
the
way
that
we
see
compliance.
You
know
from
an
objective
standpoint
is
having
that
data.
U
A
X
Good
welcome.
Thank
you,
so
some
information
on
that
was
requested
in
the
directive.
Looking
at
a
current
ftes
I'll
note
that
we're
authorized
888,
we
are
funded
for
731.
Current
sworn
Staffing
is
at
586..
We
currently
have
10
people
on
Personnel
leaves,
seven
of
which
we
do
not
expect
to
return.
Three
are
on
military
leave
and
then
nine
people
are
currently
on
temporary
FMLA.
That
is
a
fairly
standard
number
that
constantly
changes
as
in
who's
in
on
FMLA.
X
X
X
Projected
separations
based
on
retirement
eligibility
are
42
additional
for
next
year
and
63
are
eligible.
We
anticipate
42
and
not
in
the
slides.
We
wanted
to
note
that
we
believe
that
the
changes
in
the
duty,
disability,
retirement
legislation
should
result
in
a
reduction
of
the
number
of
people
that
we
lose
via
PTSD.
That
number
is
still
going
down,
but
we
do
continue
to
lose
people
for
that
reason,
hiring
activity
hired
in
2021
we've
hired
53
and
42.
Last
year
we
anticipate
hiring
46
this
year.
X
I
believe
that
number
is
around
27
right
now,
but
we
expect
to
hire
46
by
the
end
of
the
year
and
we're
projecting
72
next
year,
a
list
of
the
classes,
both
Cadet
and
recruit
for
2024.
This
does
not
include
laterals,
but
we
do
lateral
classes
throughout
the
year.
I
think
we've
had
four
this
year
and
anticipate
at
least
one,
if
not
two
more
higher
reactivity
you'll
note,
we've
created
Partnerships
with
ycma
or
YMCA.
Rather
we
are
expanding
the
geographic
recruiting
recruitment
with
Police
Executive,
Research,
Forum
and
hbcus.
X
We
have
an
intern
with
us
right
now
from
an
HBCU
and
we're
looking
to
expand
on
that
partnership.
We've
developed
Partnerships
with
Alexandria
Tech
I'm,
looking
to
recruit
law
enforcement,
students
that
are
attending
schools
up
there
and
using
peace.
Pathways,
the
Step
Up
internship
programs
and
use
of
the
national
testing
Network
to
ensure
that
we
are
using
21st
century
hiring
technology
to
get
our
new
recruits.
X
Some
of
the
expenses
to
other
law
enforcement
agencies
you'll
see
over
the
years.
What
some
of
those
are,
including
large
ones
like
Super
Bowl.
Excuse
me,
Super,
Bowl
and
final
four
wanted
to
note
that
we
project
payments
to
State,
Patrol
and
Fridley,
which
are
currently
listed
as
approximately
just
over
400
000,
will
likely
exceed
a
million
dollars
this
year.
X
We're
hiring
a
significant
number
to
assist
with
aquatennial
and
other
large
events,
and
so
we
do
expect
those
numbers
to
greatly
exceed,
what's
reflected
on
the
slide
for
2023
task
force,
Revenue
kind
of
a
busy
slide,
but
different
task
forces
that
we've
been
involved
in
with
the
state
most
of
them.
Federal
you'll
note
that
those
revenues
have
been
reduced
since
2018.
X
2018
we
were
bringing
in
about
418
thousand
dollars
in
Revenue
last
year,
that
was
down
to
forty
six
thousand
dollars.
We
simply
have
greatly
reduced
the
number
of
officers
that
we
have
assigned
to
Federal
task
forces
and
very
little
at
this
time.
X
Additional
law
enforcement
support
that
we
use
at
this
time,
I
mentioned
State
Patrol
and
also
relying
on
BCA
investigators
and
analysts
to
support
some
of
our
work
in
the
gun
investigations
unit
and
the
county.
Sheriff's
department
is
assisting
with
downtown
patrols
and
we
are
involved
in
relationships
with
both
the
ATF
and
federal
well
FBI
in
various
task
force
or
similar
type
relationships.
X
Continue
to
rely
on
outside
agencies
for
large
special
events,
both
past
and
upcoming,
as
I
mentioned
looking
at
aquitennial,
and
needing
to
pull
in
some
assistance
from
other
agencies
to
cover
Staffing
to
ensure
the
safety
of
everyone
attending
those
events,
notably
the
aqua,
the
Torchlight
parade
tomorrow
night
and
the
fireworks
on
Saturday.
Y
Thank
you
I'll
see.
If
my
colleagues
have
any
questions,
councilmember.
S
Payne,
thank
you
Mr
chair.
Could
you
just
give
me
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
light
duty
assignments
like
what
is
that?
What
does
that?
Look
like
as
a
part-time
or
full-time
light
duty,
sure.
X
So
often
we
will
attempt
to
make
some
sort
of
accommodation,
some
examples
that
we've
used
the
backgrounds
investigations
unit.
Many
of
them
are
in
a
light
duty
capacity,
some
of
which
are
permanent
and
it's
we're
able
to
make
that
accommodation
because
they're
not
interfacing
with
the
public.
So
a
lot
of
times
your
light
duty.
Workability
restrictions
will
involve
no
direct
contact
with
positions
of
or
no
position
of
threat,
so
you're
not
able
to
interview
suspects
you're
not
able
to
go
out
on
the
street,
even
if
it's
just
say,
standing
Street,
Corner
you're.
X
Just
you
can't
be
in
a
position
of
threat.
We've
used
officers
to
staff
our
strategic
information
center,
so
they
can
watch
cameras.
They
can
provide
live
time,
Intel
to
officers
working
the
streets.
So
there
are
some
positions,
but
obviously
there's
a
threshold
for
that
capacity
that
we
have
in
the
Departments
and.
X
It
varies:
some
online
Duty
are
injured
on
duty,
the
the
it's
a
there's,
no
we'll
say
typical
officer,
because
whether
younger
older,
the
patrol
Bureau,
has
officers
of
all
age
and
they
get
injured.
On
occasion,
many
of
the
late
permanently
to
the
officers
have
been
are
more
tenured
in
their
time
with
the
Department.
S
And
then
last
question
is:
will
we
want,
would
there
be
a
target
for
this
level
or
is
it
kind
of
a
very
situational
thing
based
on
things
like
injuries.
X
It's
very
much
situational
I
would
say
it's
fairly
consistent
number
that
are
generally
on.
Unlike
Duty,
we
don't
see
any
large
spikes.
Y
Thank
you,
councilmember
Payne
I
had
to
put
myself
in
queue
just
for
a
few
short
questions.
One
question
for
you,
you
on
slide
I
believe
is
13.
You
mentioned
the
revenues
that
we've
brought
in
and
how
they've
been
declining
over
the
years.
Just
out
of
curiosity,
what's
the
story
there
is
there
less
of
a
need?
Is
there
is
it?
Is
it?
Is
it
a
trust
with
the
Department
kind
of
thing?
What's?
Why
are
we
being
asked
to
be
a
part
of
the
task
force.
X
Federal
task
force
lesson
so
chair
Olson,
the
reduction
in
our
participation
with
task
forces
is
almost
exclusively
as
a
result
of
Staffing
got
it.
So,
as
staffing
has
gone
down,
we've
needed
to
withdraw
from
some
of
those
relationships
to
backfill
the
street.
Y
Got
it
got
it?
Thank
you.
So
much
I
have
a
few
more
questions,
but
they're
for
City
attorney,
City
attorney,
Anderson,
I
think
they're,
all
relatively
short
as
well.
You
know
one
question
that
I
had
well
the
first
question
that
I
have
as
I'm
as
I'm.
Thinking
of
my
question,
I
should
have
written
them
down.
Is
you
know
there
was
a
lot
of
so
we
not.
We
finally
have
turned
these
the
mdhr
findings
into
a
settlement
agreement,
but
I
also
know
that
there
was
a.
Y
There
was
a
lot
of
sort
of
tension
around
whether
it
was
called
a
consent
decree
legally
enforceable
partnership.
I
can't
remember
where
we
landed
on.
That
is
the
process,
though,
through
going
to
courts
and
kind
of
sort
of
getting
everything
enshrined,
gonna
be
similar
for
the
doj,
or
is
it
going
to
be
a
very
different
process
than
what
we
saw?
How
we
got
to
the
settlement
agreement
with
mdhr.
U
Know
essentially,
the
the
real
big
distinction
that
I
see
between
the
settlement
agreement
and
the
consent,
decree
and
I
know
that
those
chain,
those
terms
are
used
interchangeably
but
I
do
think
for
the
public.
It
makes
a
lot
more
sense
to
say,
settlement
agreement
for
mdhr
consent
decree
for
for
doj.
X
U
We
know
which
one
we're
talking
about,
but
but
in
federal
court
the
court
takes
a
much
more
active
role
in
the
in
consent.
Decrees
than
state
courts
do
in.
In
you
know
it's
just
sort
of
a
matter
of
jurisdiction
and
authorities.
Y
U
O
U
It's
going
to
be
called
a
monitor
for
federal
court.
The
monitor
is
actually
an
agent
of
the
court,
so
the
court
actually
appoints
the
monitor.
Now.
I
fully
expect
that
doj
and
we
will
come
together
with
you,
know,
a
recommendation
and
very
very
likely.
The
court
will
take
our
recommendation,
but
the
court
doesn't
have
to
right
I
think
mostly
they
do,
but
that
is
actually
an
appointment
by
by
the
court
and
then
that
monitor
has
regular
reporting
responsibilities
to
the
court
so
that
that'll
look
different
in
terms
of
the
negotiation
process.
U
As
I
said
you
know,
just
knowing
what's
happened
with
other
cities
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
that's
what's
going
to
happen
with
us,
but
I
understand
the
doj
generally
starts
off
by
by
sending
a
draft,
and
then
you
know,
negotiations
then
happen
based
on
that
draft,
so
like
what
what
they
send
us
will
not
be
the
ultimate,
but
they
they
really
kind
of
do
the
laboring
or
to
get
that
draft
to
the
city
and
and
then
the
negotiations
start
from
there.
So
we
don't
have
a
timeline
with
them.
I
I
anticipate.
U
You
know
it
took
us
almost
nine
months
to
negotiate
shade
with
mdhr,
and
you
know
the
the
doj
has
the
benefit
of
of
all
of
that
work
and
I
think
that,
from
what
I
understand,
lots
of
the
things
that
are
in
the
mdhr
agreement
are
very
likely
going
to
be
things
that
the
doj
you
know
thinks
are
a
good
idea
as
well,
and
so
it
may
be
that
what
we'll
see
from
doj
is
a
you
know,
and
paragraphs
x,
y
and
z
are
Incorporated
by
reference.
Q
Y
Y
You
know:
is
the
community
engagement
going
to
be
sort
of
in
some
ways
facilitated
by
the
judge?
Is
it
going
to
be
us
giving
a
report
to
the
judge?
Y
Because,
again,
you
know
folks
will
give
us
feedback
I,
don't
want
that
feedback
to
basically
hit
a
brick
wall
where
we
can't
really
take
it
into
account
because
we're
locked
into
the
to
the
settlement
agreement
so
just
kind
of
wondering
how
we
think
Community
engagement
will
go
and
how
the
public
will
have
a
chance
to
sort
of
interact
in
that
way,
because
I
think
it
can
it'll.
You
know
if
we
do
it
correctly.
It'll
go
a
long
way,
I
think
in
beginning
to
build
that
that
trust,
yeah.
U
Yeah,
council
president
council
member
Ellison
excellent
question
so
the
way
that
the
community
there's
so
many
different
points
of
community
involvement
that
are
actually
baked
into
the
settlement
agreement
that
the
reports
that
don't
go
to
the
court.
The
one
thing
that
that
the
court
asked
of
the
parties
on
Thursday
is
that
we
file
with
the
court
the
annual
progress
evaluation
that
the
independent
evaluator
does,
which
obviously
we're
very
very
happy
to
do,
but
other
than
than
that
annual
progress
evaluation,
and
you
know
potential
disputes
between
the
parties.
U
You
know
we
won't
actually
be
before
the
court
until
we
go
for
that
four-year
termination
evaluation.
If
at
that
point
the
IE
says
yes,
you
are,
you
know
in
full
and
effective
compliance
on
On
All
or
some
at
that
point,
we'd
be
back
into
in
front
of
the
court
asking
for
termination
again
of
of
parts
or
the
whole,
but
but
really
other
than
you
know,
sort
of
these
dispute
resolution
processes.
U
You
know
we
wanted
to
make
this
not
burdensome
for
the
court,
so
Community
engagement
is
really
on
and
both
well
all
three,
the
city
mdhr
and
the
independent
evaluators.
So
right
out
of
the
gate,
the
community
engagement,
you
know
at
the
60-day
marker
is
the
city
doing
those
Community
engagement
sessions,
the
RFP
we
have
for
a
facilitator
like
we
want
a
human
or
or
a
group
of
humans
to
to
facilitate
these
meetings.
U
But
it's
not
going
to
be
the
court
and
we're
not
going
to
have
those
reports
on
on
the
community
feedback
going
to
the
court.
What
we
will
do,
though,
is
having
those
reports
go
to
the
mdhr
and
then
to
the
independent
evaluator,
so
so
right
out
of
the
gate,
those
Community
feedback
sessions,
the
the
website
that
we're
standing
up
to
get
community
feedback
on
the
policies.
U
And
then,
when
we
change
policies,
we
have
more
Community
feedback
required
and
then
the
independent
evaluator
has
many
points
of
community
feedback
and
in
fact,
in
the
selection
process
for
the
independent
evaluator.
We
we
told
the
fight
the
the
all
of
the
submitters
that
the
finalists
will
actually
have
to
do
presentations
in
the
community
so
that
we
can
get
some
Community
feedback
on
our
selection
for
the
independent
evaluator.
But
then,
once
we
have
that
independent
evaluator,
the
independent
evaluator
has
lots
of
responsibilities
to
host
a
website
to
get
community
feedback
and
to
to
Really.
U
Y
Q
Thank
you
so
much
and
seeing
no
further
questions
in
queue.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
file
and
receive
receiving
file
a.
E
Q
And
and
I
will
turn
the
chair
back
over
to
Council.
Vice
president
palmasana.
A
R
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
The
business
committee
is
bringing
seven
items
forward
for
approval
on
Thursday
item
number.
One
is
Tom's.
Watch
bar
this
is
an
expansion
of
premise.
Item
two
were
the
license
approvals
for
liquor
and
three
are
the
license
renewals
for
liquor.
Item
number
four
are
Gambling
License
approvals
item
number:
five?
Is
the
commercial
property
development
loan
for
a
project
at
1504,
44th,
Avenue,
North
item
six?
Is
a
contract?
R
A
Thank
you,
I'm,
not
seeing
any,
but
my
cue
might
be
a
lot
so
make
sure
you
get
my
attention.
If
you
have
something
else
to
say
here,
we
usually
don't
the
next
one
is
the
Pogo
committee
policy
and
government
oversight
shared
by
council
member
Ellison.
Y
I
think
you,
madam
vice
president,
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
is
bringing
forward
13
items
for
approval.
One
is
a
collective
bargaining
agreement
with
the
state
stationary
engineers,
local
70
unit
from
2022
through
2025.
two
is
the
state
and
federal
funding
opportunities
for
climate
change
mitigation,
green
infrastructure,
water
quality
and
storm
water
management.
Three
is
a
contract
with
medical
insurance
company
for
employee
medical
plan.
Services
four
is
a
contract
for
2023
housing
opportunities
for
persons
with
HIV
and
AIDS,
also
known
as
hapwa
grant.
Funding.
Y
Five
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
Special
School
District
number
one
for
election
Administration
Services
six
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
Thomas
and
Sons
for
signals
and
pedestrian
Improvement
seven
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
project
for
pride
and
living
for
Workforce
Development
Services
eight
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
smart
Data,
Solutions
LLC
for
scanning
record
labeling
and
data
transfer
services.
Nine
is
a
contract
Amendment
for
police
Community
chaplain
services.
10
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
environmental
systems,
Research
Institute
Inc
for
the
support
and
maintenance
of
the
city's
geographic
information
system.
Y
11
is
a
legal
settlement.
Ramon
Brown
versus
the
City
of
Minneapolis
at
all
and
12
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
organizations
providing
Services
Under
the
Minneapolis
strategic
Outreach
initiative
and
finally,
13
is
a
contract
Amendment
with
canopy
Roots
LLC
for
Behavioral
crisis
response
services
and
with
that
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
N
Vice
president,
the
public
health
and
safety
committee
is
bringing
forward
seven
items
item.
One
is
authorizing
the
submittal
of
a
Grant
application
to
the
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture
forest
service
for
emerald
ash
borer
related
work
item
two
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Human
Services
for
school-based
mental
health
services.
Item
three
is
accepting
and
assistance
to
Firefighters
Grant
from
FEMA
for
wellness
and
fitness
programs.
N
Item
four
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution
appropriating
funds
to
the
police
department
to
assist
foreign
investigators
item
five
is
approved
in
legislative
directive,
requesting
an
overview
of
the
pollution,
control,
annual
registration
program
and
fees.
Item
six
is
authorizing
additional
contracts
with
organizations
for
the
partnership,
engagement
fund
and
item
seven
is
adopting
the
2023
climate
Equity
plan.
I'll
stand
for
questions
on
these
items.
A
Thank
you,
I
know.
The
climate
Equity
plan
is
a
big
one,
I'm,
not
seeing
any
questions,
but
I'm
excited
about
that
one
for
Thursday.
Last
but
not
least,
Public
Works
and
infrastructure.
That
committee
report
will
be
read
by
its
Vice
chair
council
member
Koski.
K
K
Number
two:
accepting
a
grant
from
the
state
of
Minnesota
for
the
Central
City
storm
Tunnel
construction
project
number,
three:
approving
appointments
for
The
Pedestrian
advisory
committee
and
number
four
authorizing
at
least
with
the
Minnesota
state
patrol
for
storage
space
at
the
Minneapolis
impound
lot.
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.