►
From YouTube: April 20, 2023 Public Works & Infrastructure Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
Submit written comments about agenda items to: councilcomment@minneapolismn.gov or https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/meetings/public-comment/online-comment
A
A
To
the
regular
meeting
of
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
committee
for
April,
20th,
2023,
I'm,
Emily,
Koski
and
I
am
the
vice
chair
of
this
committee.
At
this
time,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
so
that
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
B
A
The
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum.
I
will
also
recognize
that
we
have
council
member
rainville
joining
us
here
today
as
well
with
that
the
agenda
for
today's
meeting
is
before
us.
I
am
going
to
move
to
add
a
new
item
which
will
be
item
number
19
to
receive
and
file
an
update
on
the
Bryant
Avenue
street
reconstruction
project.
We'll
take
up
this
item
at
the
end
after
we've
completed
the
items
on
our
published
agenda,
all
those
in
favor
of
adding
this
item
to
the
agenda.
A
Before
we
begin
our
agenda
I'd
like
to
acknowledge,
we
have
some
special
guests
here
with
us
today
and
what
they're
we're
all
going
to
come
up
and
they
can
get
a
chance
to
introduce
them
themselves,
but
director,
Anderson
Kelleher.
Would
you
like
to
do
a
quick
introduction
right
now
too?
Thank.
C
You,
madam
chair
and
committee
members
today
with
us,
is
a
group
of
Delegation
from
both
Finland
and
the
Netherlands,
and
they
are
here
because
they
came
to
visit
the
North
American
snow
and
ice
conference
which
took
place
in
Omaha
and
that
was
led
by
Scott
Grayson
who's,
going
to
give
you
a
wave
and
he'll
also
come
up
and
introduce
himself
Scott
is
the
CEO
president
CEO
of
the
American
public
works
Association,
and
so
when
we
talk
about
Public
Works
week
and
you'll,
see
some
of
the
posters
around
Scott's
group
is
responsible
for
the
promotion
of
Public
Works
careers.
C
But
also
I
will
say
personally
is
a
valuable
resource
because
we
gather
as
directors
of
large
cities
and
counties
at
least
once
a
year
and
exchange
ideas
share
both
wonderful
triumphs
and
also
discuss
what
some
of
the
pain
points
are
around
the
country
about
public
works
and
so
he's
a
great
resource
and
chair
Koski
I.
C
Think
if
we
could
invite
the
group
to
come
forward-
and
they
will
all
introduce
themselves,
but
we
are
so
glad
they're
here,
the
mayor
came
and
greeted
them
earlier
when
we
were
having
lunch
in
in
203
as
well
as
having
meet
Minneapolis
come
over,
because
many
of
you
know
we
have
a
sister
city
relationship
with
the
city
of
cuopio
Finland,
which
I
will
say.
C
I
have
been
to
on
a
sister
city
trip
in
another
role,
and
it
was
really
wonderful
hospitality
and
of
course,
we
also
have
a
really
great
network
of
both
Dutch
folks
and
Finnish
people
in
Minnesota.
So
we're
so
glad
that
you
are
here
today
and
we're
I
think
we're
going
to
move
the
the
Rope
side
and
we
can
come
around
this
side.
Okay,
great
foreign.
D
Thank
you
so
much
for
having
us
here.
My
name
as
you
heard
is
Scott
Grayson
I'm,
the
chief
executive
officer
of
the
American
public
works
Association,
and
we
actually
represent
31
000
people
in
North,
America,
largely
in
the
United
States
and
and
as
was
so
well
explained,
we
provide
education.
We
we
also
Lobby
in
DC
and
help
the
passage
of
the
1.2
trillion
in
infrastructure
spending
which
we're
so
excited
about,
which
is
making
its
way
here
and,
as
it
happens,
I
live
here
too
so
pleased
to
be
here.
E
Hello:
everyone,
my
name,
is
the
street
and
park
maintenance
director
in
the
city
of
Helsinki
capital
of
Finland
and
the
also
the
CEO
of
the
Finnish
Association
of
Municipal
engineering,
so
I'm,
the
colleague
of
Scot,
and
actually
one
extra
point
is
that
the
the
president
elected
on
the
International
Federation
of
Municipal
engineering,
so
traveling
globally,
seeing
that
we
are
sharing
the
same
problems
around
the
world
and
we
are
trying
to
face.
We
officers
we're
trying
to
seek
solo
students,
Global
solutions
for
our
Public
Works
issues
so
great
to
be
here.
F
G
Hello,
everybody,
my
name
is
George
monsonides
I'm
from
the
Netherlands,
the
only
one
and
I
work,
33
years
for
Amsterdam
airport
scripple
responsible
for
winter
operations,
and
in
that
period
we
developed
together
with
the
University
of
the
Netherlands
snowblower,
what
can
compress
snow.
So
you
save
a
lot
of
money
and
Emissions
if
you
can
put
two
times
more
snow
inside
one
dump
truck
and
since
2019
I'm,
the
managing
director
of
snow
cone
and
together
with
the
city
of
Helsinki,
we
developed
a
smaller
machine
for
inside
the
cities.
Thank
you.
H
Hello
and
thank
you
for
this
great
opportunity
to
find
out
and
check
out
your
all
the
good
things
that
you
do
here
in
the
US.
What
comes
to
Fleet
and
Windsor
operations,
and
so
my
name
is
yusu
ranola
and
I
work
as
a
fleet
manager
for
Helsinki,
City
and
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
good
practices
to
bring
back
home.
I
J
A
F
A
All
right
with
that
we'll
move
on
to
our
consent
agenda.
There
are
14
items
on
the
consent
agenda
today
which
I'll
read
for
the
record.
The
first
is
authorizing
negotiation
of
easements
for
the
2023
Parkway
Paving
program
and
88
pedestrian
ramp
program.
Next
is
authorizing
a
Cooperative
funding
agreement
with
Hennepin
County,
Regional
railroad,
Authority
for
repair
of
the
Martin
Sable
bridge
over
Hiawatha
Avenue.
A
We
have
another
one
here
authorizing
permanent
and
temporary
easements
for
the
15th
Street
sanitary
sewer,
rehabil
Rehabilitation
project.
The
next
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
board
of
Soil
and
Water
Resources
for
green
infrastructure
improvements
and
I
also
understand
that
staff
is
requesting
a
change
to
the
dollar
amount
in
item
number,
nine,
that
is
the
joint
Powers
agreement
with
the
city
of
Columbia
Heights
for
the
37th
Avenue
Northeast
Street
reconstruction,
Project,
Director,
Anderson
Kelleher,
who
is
here
to
summarize
or
who
is
here
to
summarize
that
change
Madam.
C
Chair
I'm,
going
to
summarize
the
change
for
the
committee,
so
initially
the
contingency
was
included
in
the
estimated
amount
showing
that
is
highlighted
and
after
discussions
with
Columbia
Heights,
the
contingency
amount
added
is
taken
out
of
that
estimate
amount.
That
is
why
the
estimate
is
actually
reduced.
C
A
Thank
you
for
that
information.
That
item
will
be
amended
to
degrees,
to
decrease
the
dollar
amount
of
the
agreement
and
I
will
just
state
it
for
the
record:
seven
million
fifty
thousand
eight
hundred
and
thirty
two
dollars
and
forty
eight
cents
down
to
six
million
four
hundred
and
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
and
forty
seven
dollars
and
seventy
one
cents.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
the
consent
agenda
or
are
there
any
items
anyone
would
like
to
pull
for
further
discussion?
A
I
am
not
seeing
any,
and
so
I
will
move
approval
of
the
consent
agenda,
noting
that
the
amendment
to
number
nine
as
well
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
those
opposed,
say,
nay,
the
eyes
have
it
and
the
consent
agenda
is
approved
all
right
today.
Our
first
public
hearing
is
considering
the
mill
District
Street
resurfacing,
Project
Director,
Anderson
Kelleher,
who
will
be
presenting
this
item
today.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
today,
presenting
on
this
item
is
Larry
Matsumoto,
principal
professional
engineer
in
transportation,
maintenance
and
repair.
M
M
Shown
on
your
map
on
March,
2nd
2023,
the
city
council
designated
the
improvements
of
the
of
the
proposed
Street
resurfacing
program.
The
purpose
of
the
asphalt
pavement
resurfacing
program
is
to
extend
the
life
of
some
city
streets,
which
are
not
scheduled
for
any
preventive
maintenance,
renovation
or
reconstruction
in
the
foreseeable
future.
M
The
milduristic
also
has
bike
info
new
bike
infrastructure
and
pedestrian
safety
features
included
with
the
project.
These
enhancements
are
funded
from
other
sources
and
not
paid
for
by
these
assessments.
The
transportation
maintenance
repairs
worked
with
Transportation
Planning
and
programming
and
transportation
engineering
design.
With
on
these
additional
improvements
proposed
resurfacing.
A
A
N
You
so
much
my
name
is
James
Haskins
I'm,
the
managing
director
of
the
Guthrie
Theater
at
818,
South,
2nd
Street.
We
had
received
assessments,
a
total
of
eight
assessments
and
the
amount
of
forty
nine
thousand
dollars,
which
we
felt
was
an
inordinate
amount
in
terms
of
the
the
total
project
amount
that
was
being
assessed
to
the
Guthrie
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
We
also
have
some
concerns
about
the
Dual
Carriage
Bikeway.
L
O
O
C
Madam,
chair
I
think
that
after
you,
close
the
public
hearing,
Mr,
hattiland
and
others
can
step
out
in
the
hallway
and
talk
to
both
parties.
A
Great,
thank
you,
I'm,
not
seeing
any
other
anyone
else
wishing
to
speak
so
I'll
now
close
the
public
hearing.
Are
there
any
questions
from
committee
members?
A
Not
seeing
any
I
will
move
approval
of
this
item,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
those
opposed,
say,
nay,
eyes
have
it,
and
this
committee
recommendation
will
be
forward
to
the
next
week's
council
meeting
for
final
action
all
right.
Our
second
and
final
public
hearing
today
is
considering
amendments
to
code
citation
in
the
water
and
sewer
code,
director
Anderson
Kelleher,
who
will
be
presenting.
Thank.
K
Thank
you,
director,
Madam
Vice,
chair
and
committee
members.
Here
we
are
here
today
requesting
passive
ordinances,
amending
provisions
and
portions
of
the
city
code.
The
proposed
amendments
will
eliminate
references
to
previously
repealed
title
19
within
the
code
and
replace
them
with
appropriate
references
in
the
title
19
chapter
505
billing.
K
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
I'm
going
to
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing.
I'll
ask
the
clerk.
Is
there
anyone
signed
up?
Is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item?
All
right,
I
am
not
seeing
anybody
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing.
Are
there
any
questions
from
committee
members?
A
Not
seeing
any
I
will
move
approval
of
this
item.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
those
opposed,
say,
nay.
The
ice
Habit
in
this
committee
recommends
recommendation
will
be
forward
to
the
next
week's
council
meeting
for
final
action.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
committee
members,
Ethan
Fowley,
Vision,
zero
program
coordinator,
Transportation,
Planning
and
programming
will
present
both
the
2023
annual
Vision
zero
annual
report
on
infrastructure,
as
well
as
he
will
be
presenting
the
2023-2025
Minneapolis
Vision
zero
action
plan.
P
Thanks
chairkosky
members
of
the
committee,
so,
as
you
all
know,
the
city
set
a
vision,
zero
goal
in
2017
of
getting
to
zero,
severe
and
fatal
crashes
on
our
streets
by
2027.
P
we're.
We
have
two
items
related
to
this
today.
This
is
a
receiving
file
and
then
we're
going
to
have
the
adoption
of
the
2023-2025
vision,
zero
action
plan
as
well.
A
lot
of
what
we're
talking
about
today
with
the
annual
report,
is
more
about
the
action
plan
we've
been
working
through
that
was
adopted
in
2019.
P
So
the
high-level
news
here
is,
unfortunately,
we're
still
seeing
an
increased
spike
in
fatal
crashes
in
2022.
This
is
a
trend
that
continues
across
the
country.
Although
we
continue
to
be
a
little
bit
more
heightened
here
locally
and
yeah,
it's
very
troubling.
We
I
every
time,
I
think
we
like
so
far.
This
year
we
have
had
one
fatal
crash,
which
is
terrible
and
also
an
improved
Trend
and
I
hope
that
that
continues.
P
Unfortunately,
we
ended
last
year
very
poorly
in
the
last
few
months.
So
it's
it's
still
something
we're
very
much
looking
forward
I'm
going
to
talk
about
that.
Just
a
little
bit
talk
about
stats.
I
always
do
this
right,
as
we
also
have
to
humanize
right
the
numbers
you
know:
20
23
people
dying
in
2022
here
are
some
of
their
names.
I'm
just
going
to
share
a
little
few
of
the
story.
Stories
too.
So
a
six-year-old
was
killed
by
a
driver
going
94
miles
an
hour.
P
P
Similarly,
a
76
year
old
was
killed
by
a
left
turn
driver
while
crossing
First
Avenue
South,
a
woman
experiencing
houselessness,
was
sleeping
on
a
mattress
in
an
alley
and
was
probably
inadvertently
run
over
by
a
driver
and
killed
a
24
year.
Old
medical
researcher
at
the
University
was
hit
and
killed
by
a
driver
who
ran
a
red
light
on
University
Avenue
Southeast
at
75
miles
an
hour.
P
P
P
He
was
described
as
a
gentle
giant,
an
Edison
High
School
graduate
he
loved
his
family
fishing,
chess,
Sports
babies,
pets
puzzles
and
the
outdoors
now
I,
don't
have
everyone's
story
and
I
and
I,
and
so
I
couldn't
share
them
all,
and
there
are
many
more
with
the
names
here
and
many
more
people
impacted
by
these
tragedies
which
we
know
are
unacceptable
and
preventable,
and
you
see
some
of
the
trends
just
even
reflected
in
the
stories
there,
where
we
see
the
increase
of
really
high
speeds,
impacting
things
and
I
think
about
that
from
how
do
we
think
about
that
from
a
system
perspective
as
well,
and
the
reality
is
that
how
do
we
think
about
the
reality
that
people
were
physically
able
to
drive
that
fast
on
our
streets
and
that's
something
that
I
think
about
from
a
system
perspective
like?
P
P
Okay,
back
to
some
stats
from
the
stories.
So
I
spoke
about
fatal
crashes
being
up.
We
also
saw
severe
crashes
up
at
basically
the
highest
level
that
we
have
comparable
data,
which
is
only
the
last
few
years
because
they
changed
the
the
system
for
that.
But-
and
this
is
still
happening,
while
all
crashes
are
way
down,
we're
still
at
historically
low
levels
for
all
traffic
crashes
in
the
city
and
all
pedestrian
and
bicycle
crashes.
P
So
it's
it's
really
about
like
how
are
we
we're
seeing
progress
in
total
crashes
while
seeing
you
know
the
the
increase
in
these
really
high
speeds,
leading
to
more
severe
and
fatal
crashes?
At
the
same
time,
we
see
a
continuation
of
the
intensifying
disproportionate
impacts
here.
So
this
is
just
a
map
of
where
the
severe
and
fatal
crashes
happened.
Last
year
you
can
see
overall,
if
we
look
at
our
transportation,
Equity
priority
areas,
one
and
two
they
had
59
of
all
fatal
crashes
while
having
just
28
of
the
population.
P
So
we
still
see
that
in
an
inequitable
impact
and
as
it
talked
about
the
you
know,
the
percentage
of
crasses
involving
clear
speeding
has
just
really,
as
you
can
see
here,
just
increased
a
lot
since
2020,
and
that
has
continued.
P
So
as
we
talk,
you
know,
those
are
kind
of
the
base
reality
and
also
just
transitioning
on
just
talk
about
like
what
are
we
doing?
What's
the
work,
what
have
we
been
implementing
and
the
you
can
see
here
just
generally,
we've
been
making
a
lot
of
progress
on
our
2020
to
2022
Vision
zero
action
plan
across
a
lot
of
different
departments
really
appreciate
that
I'm
going
to
highlight
a
few
recent
things
from
2020
here
now.
So,
first
of
all,
we
installed
what
really
is
I
think
an
unprecedented
amount
of
proactive
safety
improvements.
P
Last
year
at
more
than
141
intersections
through
our
vision,
zero
Capital
program,
we
installed
what
are
mostly
quick,
build
with
primarily
with
the
flexible
post,
Bollard
improvements,
and
you
can
see
some
of
the
numbers
here
and
just
like
the
scale
of
this
city-wide
I
will
talk
about
this
when
we
get
to
the
action
plan.
Portion
of
the
conversation
in
a
minute,
but
by
using
those
these
materials,
we
are
able
to
get
to
this
scale
and
and
really
invest
proactively,
and
then
we
can
continue
to
improve
safety
over
time.
P
We've
also
had
a
lot
of
capital
projects
continue
to
move
through
and
we've
been
incorporating
safety
as
a
big
part
of
of
those,
and
so
there
are
a
lot
of
these,
but
it's
really
impressive
I.
Also,
we
have
a
lot
more
coming.
We
were
very
successful
in
getting
Regional
solicitation
grants
through
the
my
Council
this
past
cycle,
as
was
Hennepin
County,
so
we
have
a
lot
more
safety
projects
coming
as
well,
which
I'm
really
excited
about
four
to
three
lane.
P
Conversions
are
especially
important
and
we
had
two
more
this
last
year
on
Lyndale
Avenue,
South
and
31st
Street
East,
and
we
also
are
working
towards
some
of
on
some
of
the
more
complex
roadways
in
the
city
coming
up
as
well,
so
really
excited
for
the
progress
being
made
in
this
area.
This
is
one
of
their
most
proven
safety
measures.
P
P
This
about
this
in
the
action
plan
section
as
well,
but
we've
been
working
to
advance
towards
a
traffic
safety,
camera
pilot
program,
including
getting
legislative,
Authority
and
there's
more
to
come
here.
But
we've
been
making
a
lot
of
progress
and
then,
as
you
all
know,
we
we
finished
division,
zero
crash
study
and
we
are
updating
our
action
plan
which
we'll
get
to
in
the
next
item.
So
that's
it
for
my
annual
report,
presentation
and
I'll
pause
for
that
action
before
moving
on
to
the
next
one.
A
Thank
you
for
the
presentation,
any
questions
for
my
colleagues
customer
wansley's
in
queue.
First
thank.
Q
You
chair,
akoski,
first
Ethan,
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
meeting
with
my
office
to
discuss
the
vision,
Terror
action
plan.
Specifically,
you
know
around
questions
related
to
the
traffic
calming
pilot
pilot
that
the
city
is
interested
in
advancing
and
that
the
public
has
shown
so
much
interest
in
while
I
recognize
you
know.
Traffic
enforcement,
specifically
traffic
information
enforcement
without
police
officers
is
still
something
many
of
our
communities
are
asking
for.
Q
I
wanted
to
touch
base
on
that
camera.
Piece
of
you
know
really
looking
at
how
this
pilot
will
impact
people's
privacy
and
or
unintentionally
increase
our
surveillance
So.
Currently,
our
city
does
not
have
a
robust
policy
around
surveillance.
That's
something
that
I'm
working
on
in
partnership
with
some
of
our
other
council
members
and
external
Partners.
But
can
you
touch
on
or
talk
about
the
mechanisms
of
accountability
that
will
be
put
in
place
to
ensure
that
data
is
not
abused?
That's
going
to
be
captured
through
these
cameras
and
then
also
second
question.
P
Yeah
chairkoski
councilmember
wansley,
if
I
may
I'm
I
have
several
slides
in
the
in
the
the
next
part
of
this
related
specifically
to
the
traffic
Sam
safety.
Camera
pilot
I'm
going
to
work
to
make
sure
to
address
your
questions
as
part
of
that.
But
please,
if
I
missed
something
we
can
come
back
at
that
point.
Does
that
make
does
that
work?
Sure.
C
Yeah
and
Madam
chair,
if
I
could
I
I
think
the
important
part
councilmember,
wansley
and
I
know
that
Ethan
will
cover
this,
but
we
do
not.
If
we
got
the
authority,
if
the
legislature
granted
the
authority
to
implement
such
a
program,
we
actually
would
probably
have
a
like
something
like
a
year-long
process
of
developing
the
policy
of
of
determining
who
would
be
the
lead
on
that
policy
which
it
could
be
public
works.
C
There
are
some
issues
with
data,
though,
and
I'm
sure
he's
going
to
go
through
that,
but
I
think
that
you
know
your
concerns
are
heard
by
many
many
people
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
getting
the
benefit
of
that
47
reduction
in
crashes
and
not
adding
to
people
being
surveilled
or
anything
else
that
would
profile
any
activity.
So
that
is
that
is
the
goal
is
that
we
could
not,
even
if
we
got
the
authority
in
this
legislative
session,
there's
a
long
road
ahead.
Q
I'm
glad
you
shared
that
commitment
I
again,
this
is
something
that
we've
ever
reiterated
with
Ethan
from
our
office,
especially
someone
who's
from
Chicago,
where
there
was
a
very
troubling
rollout
of
their
traffic
camera
program
that
did
engage
in
a
lot
of
racist
profiling
of
residents
and
led
to
lots
of
lawsuits
in
the
end
too.
So
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
cognizant
of
how
other
cities
have
rolled
these
out
those
problems,
and
it
sounds
like
being
thoughtful
of
how
we
carry
out
this
particular
program
here.
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
actually
was
first
wanting
to
say
thank
you
for
bringing
those
individual
stories
into
this
I
think
it's
really
easy
to
lose
sight
of
what
we're
actually
working
towards
and
I
got
a
little
weepy,
as
you
were
telling
some
of
those
stories.
So
I
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
that.
But
and
it
sounds
like
you
have.
R
Some
slides
and
I
was
going
to
ask
questions
or
make
some
comments
about
the
cameras
but
I,
just
based
on
this
conversation
that
we
just
had
I
had
originally
started
work
around
a
more
comprehensive
framework
around
how
the
city
is
an
institution
evaluates
and
implements
surveillance
technology.
That's
actually
technically
still
in
Flight
we're
still
waiting
on
some
analysis
from
the
city's
attorney's
office,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say-
and
maybe
some
of
this
will
be
addressed
in
some
of
your
future
slides.
But
we
have
a
facial
recognition
ban
already
passed
by
ordinance.
R
That's
a
one-time
approach
to
a
single
type
of
technology,
and
what
we
know
is
that
these
types
of
Technologies
are
evolving
really
quickly
much
faster
than
our
legislative
process.
I
would
suggest
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
really
focus
on
is
a
a
comprehensive
approach
to
evaluate
new
technology.
Give
opportunity
for
public
comment,
weigh
the
benefits
and
the
costs
associated
with
those
Technologies
and
really
be
thoughtful
about
how
we
Implement
them.
R
Because,
again,
when
we
ground
some
of
these
decisions
and
the
stories
of
lives
lost,
we
can't
lose
sight
of
that
and
we
also
can't
lose
sight
of
the
potential
harm
that
could
be
caused
by
you
know
whether
it's
capturing
images
of
people
that
are
you
know,
engaged
in
things
unrelated
to
traffic
that
might
be
used
against
them
in
a
court
of
law
or
other
civil
liberty
protections.
R
We
just
really
need
to
be
thoughtful
about
that
trade-off
and
I
think
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
in
our
one-on-one,
just
in
terms
of
I,
really
like
the
idea
of
using
cameras
and
minimizing
police
interactions.
What
I,
really
don't
like
is
the
idea
of
having
a
big
brother
net
that
can
then
criminalize
just
your
existence
in
the
world
and
so
I
think
we
will
never
be
able
to
draw
that
boundary
on
a
technology
by
technology
basis.
S
Probably
thank
you
so
much
for
coming
in
and
and
presenting
on
this
issue.
I
I
really
deeply
appreciate
your
work
on
on
Vision
zero
and
our
cities,
our
City's
prioritization
of
of
this
type
of
work,
I,
I,
think
I.
Remember
last
year,
when
you
came
in
to
present,
you
also
went
through
the
list
of
of
names
and
shared
a
little
bit
about
the
the
individuals
who
lost
their
lives
as
as
a
result
of
of
preventable
traffic
related.
S
Cases
and
it
just
it's,
really
powerful.
Thank
you
for
doing
that.
I
hope
you
continue
to
to
make
that
a
practice.
It's
really
important
for
us
to
be
grounded
in
in
the
the
actual
people
in
their
lives
and
their
stories.
Their
communities
that
are
impacted
by
this
I
want
to
talk
specifically
about
I
want
to
talk
specifically
about
the
4-3
conversion
on
Lindale
in
it's
at
the
border
between
the
Whittier
and
Lowry
Hill
East,
neighborhood,
I,
I.
Remember
when
this
was
implemented.
Last
year,
I
had
a
an
elderly
constituent.
S
His
name
is
Harry.
Who
approached
me
and
he's
he's.
He
lived
right
off
of
Lindale
for
forever
and
and
I
remember.
He
said
like
who
did
that
because
it
saved
my
life
and
it
just
was
one
of
the
most
meaningful
things
I've
I've
heard,
and
it's
it's.
It
was.
That
was
the
point
of
of
this
4-3
conversion.
S
S
Thankfully,
has
health
insurance
and
what
you
know
spent
several
months
in
the
hospital
is
going
to
have
a
lifelong
struggle
with
Rehabilitation
from
such
a
severe
injury
that
that
she
suffered
so
that
those
two
stories
kind
of
remind
me
of
it
was
really
important
for
us
to
make
these
changes
on
on
Lindell.
The
4-3
conversion
is
is
a
critical
thing.
It
is
saving
lives
and
it's
going
to
save
lives,
but
there
are
additional
changes
that
need
to
be
made.
S
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
speak
to
like
the
the
the
the
tools
the
city
has
to
influence
additional
traffic,
calming
measures
on
on
Lindell
Avenue
South,
where
this
is
still
a
pilot
and
there
there
could
potentially
be
other
measures
implemented.
P
Thank
you
for
the
question.
We
were
really
very
happy
to
partner
with
Hennepin
County
on
the
on
the
pilot
four
to
three
on
safety
conversion
on
Lyndale
Avenue
South
this
year,
and
you
are
right.
We
we
do
have
more
work
to
do
there.
Thankfully,
one
of
those
projects
that
was
funded
through
the
regional
solicitation
is
Lindale
Avenue
South,
so
there's
going
to
be
a
future
Street
reconstruction
coming
there
and
so
we'll
be
partnering
again
with
the
county
on
building
a
lot
of
those.
P
You
know
we
did
a
lot
of
additional
safety
things
with
a
median
and
you
know
access
control,
but
also
you
know,
bike
and
pedestrian
safety
improvements
there.
So
there's
a
lot
of
tools
that
we
can
bring
in
as
part
of
a
street
reconstruction
project
that
are
maybe
beyond
what
you
can
do
in
a
pilot
in
the
short
term.
So
yeah
we're
really
excited
for
that
future.
It's
really
going
to
be
an
important
part
of
decision
making.
There.
A
Thank
you
not
seeing
any
other
questions
from
my
colleagues.
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
file
this
report.
I
also
want
to
note
that
we've
been
joined
by
vice
president
Lynette
palmisano
as
well
here
and
our
final.
Oh
sorry
before
that
my
apologies
I
just
jumped
through
this
getting
through
all
these
things,
but
I
also
want
to
just
thank
you
so
much
for
just
noting
and
listing
the
names
of
those
that
we've
lost.
A
Unfortunately,
and
sadly,
the
single
fatal
fatality
is
was
in
my
neighborhood
Mr
David
Norris
was
struck
in
January
of
this
year
and
he
was
walking
around
like
Nokomis,
and
that
case
is
still
open,
and
so
just
want
to
say.
Thank
you
so
much
for
just
making
sure
that
we
continue
to
remember
these
lives.
He
was
a
librarian
at
St,
Kate's,
39
years
old
and
again
I
think
preventable
crash
that
we
could
be
doing
so.
I
appreciate
this
work
and
I
know
now,
where
this
kind
of
rolls
us
into
the
action
plan
here.
A
Q
You
chair
Crossing,
no,
you
sharing
your
testimony.
I
think
I
definitely
have
tried
to
block
this
out,
but
knowing
one
of
the
victims
of
the
motorcycle
crash
back
in
August
I
believe
I
actually
discovered
them
yeah
yeah.
That
was
very
hard
in
the
community
that
was
there
when
the
crash
was
happened,
happened
and
trying
to
support.
What
we
would
learn
would
be.
Q
The
the
deceased
victim
was
very
traumatizing,
so
it
does
make
me
think
we're
trying
to
do
a
lot
of
work
on
council
with
our
partners
and
Performance
Management
and
Innovation
around
advancing
victim
Services,
because
one
of
the
most
immediate
things
that
my
office
could
think
of
at
that
time
was
working
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
safety
and
I
want
to
come
in
director,
Josh
Peterson
for
supporting
our
office
and
getting
access
to
restorative
justice
services
that
we
went
in
canvas
around
the
site
of
the
accident.
Q
Just
to
let
our
neighbors
know
that
you
know
their
support
for
them.
Q
So
just
thinking
of
ways
in
which
we
can
link
the
survivors
and
the
family
members
that
she
mentioned,
who
are
still
in
their
morning
or
those
who
even
bear
witness
to
these
tragic
incidents
towards
some
of
those
broader
victim
services
that
we
can
absolutely
provide
in
a
more
formalized
sense
and
I
think
that's
what
our
office
is
working
on
in
partnership
with
our
colleagues,
but
knowing
that
we
have
a
great
resource
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
safety
that
can
support
some
of
that
work
too.
So
I
did
want
to
uplift.
P
Thank
you,
chairkovski
for
your
story
and
councilmember
wansley
for
your
story
as
well.
I'm,
sorry
for
all
that
that
trauma-
and
we
do
have
a
couple
things
around
or
sort
of
Justice
pieces
that
we've
included
in
the
vision,
zero
action
plan,
but
I
I,
really
like
your
ideas
and
I,
think
there's
even
more.
We
can
potentially
look
at
in
the
future,
so
really
appreciate
those
thoughts
and
thanks
for
sharing
that
traumatic
story.
C
So
Madam
chair,
I,
really
thought
about
where
to
say
these
words,
but
I
want
to
thank
Ethan
and
I
want
to
thank
his
team
and
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
works
on
this
issue.
This
is
a
very
hard
issue
to
work
on.
It's.
You
know
largely
preventable
to
these
crashes,
but
the
outcomes
of
these
crashes
are
tragic
and
we
cannot
lose
sight
that
the
reason
we
do
this
work
in
public
works.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Everyone
has
said
almost
everything
I
want
to
say,
but
I
want
to
thank
you
Ethan,
because
I
know
you
started
this
work
a
really
long
time
ago
and
you're
still
at
it
and
I'm
so
proud
of
you
for
continuing
at
it.
I
remember
the
first
time
we
had
a
meeting
about
what
Vision
zero
was
and
we're
still
having
people
die.
We
had
Josiah
in
my
ward,
who
you
acknowledge.
Today.
I've
spoke
with
his
mother
Desiree
several
times
about
that
extremely
tragic
accident.
L
I
went
to
the
scene
and
saw
what
happened,
and
that
was
just
so
unfortunate.
It
really
was,
and
so
thank
you
for
acknowledging
the
people
who
have
lost
their
lives
due
to
these
very
tragic
accidents
and
I
just
want
to
encourage
you
to
keep
at
it.
No.
If
anyone
can
get
us
down
to
zero,
it's
going
to
be
you
Ethan
and
your
team,
so
keep
at
it.
I
appreciate
you
and
I
support
all
the
work
you
do
around
this.
Thank
you.
A
Not
seeing
any
other
comments
right
now,
I'll,
let
you
continue
on
with
your
presentation.
Okay,.
P
Now
yeah
now
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
reality
is
we
can
get
to
zero
right
and,
and
we
are
working
with
urgency
to
make
progress
there
and
our
2023
to
2025
Vision
zero
action
plan
is
our
way
of
showing
what
are
the
key
things
that
we're
focused
on
so
I
presented
the
draft
of
this
action
plan
back
in
November
we
had
a
public
comment
period
and
now
we're
bringing
forward
the
final
plan.
P
I'm
gonna
for
today
just
highlight
some
of
the
things
we
highlighted
in
engagement
just
to
ground
everybody,
and
then
I'll
talk
about
some
of
the
changes.
Some
of
the
feedback
we
heard
and
some
of
the
changes
we've
made
for
the
final
version
coming
to
you
all
here,
and
so,
let's
start
there
so
continuing
to
make
proactive
safety
improvements
focused
on
our
highest
injury
streets,
our
high
injury
streets,
as
we
call
them.
So
we
do
have
our
vision,
zero,
Capital
program,
but
we're
also
seeking
again.
P
We
were,
unfortunately,
unsuccessful
in
getting
a
federal,
Safe
Streets
for
all
Grant
this
last
year,
but
we've
gotten
some
really
good
feedback
and
we
are
going
to
be
bringing
an
another
action
for
you
all
to
reapply
for
that.
Funding,
which
really
is
a
big
chunk
of
our
work
here,
is
moving
from
these
quick,
build
improvements,
but
also
upgrading
to
full
concrete
and
additional
safety
Investments,
and
we
have
our
updated,
High
injury
street
map.
P
So
those
are
some
of
the
highlights.
What
do
we
hear
from
folks?
We?
We
got
170
comments
on
the
on
draft
Vision,
zero
action
plan
I
want
to
first
of
all,
just
acknowledge
that
this
was
primarily
through
online
means,
so
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
I
wouldn't
expect
this
to
be
wholly
representative
of
the
entire
city
of
Minneapolis.
Just
you
know
recognizing
that
we
did
make
it.
P
We
had
some
other
engagement
leading
up
to
our
comment
period
as
well,
that
reached
a
lot
more
people,
and
we
know
also
that
we
want
to
engage
on
those
key
details
in
the
future
even
more
robustly
things
like
Traffic
Safety,
camera
pilot.
You
know
those
kind
of
details,
so,
as
you
can
see
here
just
summarizing,
we
had
more
support
than
opposition
to
all
those
key
strategies.
P
P
So
some
of
the
things
we
heard
on
that
pilot
was
supporters
are
really
thought
it
would
improve
safety,
but
we
heard
concerns
about
surveillance
or
people.
Thinking
was
unconstitutional.
We
also
heard
some
interest
in
red
light
cameras
as
well.
P
We
really
well
I'm
going
to
highlight
some
of
the
what
we
try
to
build
in
protections
on
this,
so
you
all
are
like
just
clear
on
what
we've
been
working
on
and
hopefully
that
addresses
some
of
the
questions
and
concerns
that
came
up
earlier
as
well,
and
we
have
adjusted
some
things
in
the
the
final
plan
just
to
be
clear
about
traffic
safety
cameras
more
broadly,
which
gives
us
flexibility
around
speeding
and
or
or
red
light
running.
P
So
let
me
just
talk
about
a
few
details.
There.
First
of
all,
we've
been
working
at
the
legislature
on
this.
We
have
a
a
supporting
a
bill
that
was
introduced
this
session
house
file,
2098
and
Senate
file
2026.,
and
that
bill
is
not
going
to
pass
this
year.
We
did
not
have
it.
There
were
a
lot
of
priorities
in
the
Judiciary
Committee
and
we
weren't
going
to
be
able
to
make
it
through
by
deadline.
P
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
that,
but
the
we
are
hopeful
of
progress
in
2024
we
it
would.
The
bill
did
not
stall
because
of
opposition.
It
was
more
about
timing,
realities
and
so
I
also
included
on
here.
P
There
are
programs
in
the
United
States
that
I,
don't
think
meet
the
the
our
values
and
what
we
bring
through
our
racial
Equity
framework
and
transportation
and
the
city's
goals
around
equity
in
a
lot
of
different
areas.
How
do
we
take
from
the
best
ones,
learn
and
build
to
make
sure
it
reflects
our
values
here
in
Minneapolis
has
been
a
very
important
part
of
our
work
here.
So
I
did
want
to
just
share
a
few
details
around
this,
so
we
are
focused
on
changing
unsafe
Behavior,
while
protecting
fairness
and
Equity.
P
P
So
if
you
happen
to
go,
31
you're
not
going
to
get
a
ticket
in
a
30
or
you
know
26
and
a
25,
but
if
you're
going
35
and
a
25
you're
going
to
get
a
ticket
and
what's
that
ticket
going
to
be
well
first
of
all,
you're
gonna
you're
gonna,
we
have
a
we'll
have
a
one
month
warning
period.
Your
first
violation
is
going
to
be
a
warning,
and
so
again
our
goal
is
to
change
Behavior.
P
It's
not
to
punish
people,
then,
after
that
you're
going
to
get
a
40
ticket
every
time
you
can
take
a
traffic
safety
class,
that's
free
in
lieu
of
one
ticket
again
we're
trying
to
change
Behavior
we're
not
trying
to
to
punish
people
and
the
violations
do
not
go
on
your
driver's
record,
except
we
have
to
do
it
for
CDL
holders
by
federal
law.
So
it's
not
going
to
impact
your
insurance
rates
or
or
anything
like
that.
P
It
cannot
be
grounds
for
revoking
or
suspending
a
driver's
license
or
for
arrest,
and
then
you
know
we're
trying
to
change
Behavior.
So
all
locations
have
to
have
advanced
signage
and
be
listed
publicly,
and
so
that's
basically
you
know
because
speed
cameras
are
so
traffic
safety
cameras
are
so
effective
because
you
know,
if
you
do
it,
you're
going
to
get
the
ticket
where
officer
enforcement.
P
You
can
never
have
that
same
certainty
and
who
wants
to
get
a
40
ticket
every
day
in
the
mail
while
they
drive
by
the
same
location,
they're
going
to
change
their
behavior.
That's
just
the
reality
from
other
cities
and
just
as
a
note,
New
York
has
a
similar.
Very
city
has
a
very
similar
approach.
87
percent
of
people
who
gets
never
get
a
second
speed
camera
ticket
in
New
York
City
because
they
change
their
behavior.
P
So
when
we
talk
about
protecting
privacy,
there
are
a
lot
of
aspects
to
this.
So
to
talk
about
some
of
the
that
are
built
into
the
the
bill,
the
state
level
cameras
can
only
be
used
for
Traffic
Safety
enforcement.
That's
specifically
part
of
the
state
Bill.
The
cameras
can
only
take
a
picture
of
a
back
license
plate.
P
They
can't
take
a
picture
of
any
any
in
any
way
that
is
you're
taking
a
picture
of
somebody's
face.
You
have
to
it's
only
for
that
and
only
for
the
safety
enforcement,
and
then
we
so
you
can
see
some
other
details
here.
We
also
like
have
worked
to
build
in
at
the
state
level.
What
are
the
state
best
practices
around
data
privacy
and
data
management
to
protect
against
concerns
there
and
I
also
think
there's
going
to
be
more.
P
P
Once
there
is
legislative
authority
to
develop
a
local
pilot,
there's
a
lot
more
that
will
have
to
come
in
at
the
local
level,
and
we
have
said
in
the
plan
that
that
needs
to
be
informed
by
early,
robust
Community
engagement
and
making
sure
that
we're
meeting
people
where
they
are
across
culture
and
background
all
areas
of
the
city.
And
then
you
know
that
will
get
to
a
lot
of
those
questions
came
up
which
departments
are
managing
and
involved
in
the
program.
P
Budgetary
Staffing
details
all
that
ordinance,
details,
number
of
Loca
and
location
of
cameras,
making
sure
we're
doing
that
equitably
as
well,
and
so
there's
a
lot
to
come
here.
I
know
we
haven't
talked
about
this
broadly
at
the
city
council
before
so
we
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
get
into
a
few
more
of
those
details,
given
the
questions
that
we've
heard
leading
up
to
here.
So
hopefully
that
helps
a
little
bit
and
I
think
I
think
I
addressed
most
of
the
questions
that
came
up
earlier
but
I.
P
You
know
I
think
the
data
protection
pieces
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
at
the
state
level
there's
pieces
we're
building
in
on
Data
retention
requirements
like
the
data
is
not
even
going
to
be
retained
unless
there's
a
violation
and
so
that
the
the
camera
is
not
taking
a
picture
unless
there's
a
violation
and
then
it's
only
of
the
back
license
plate
and
that's
the
only
thing
that
triggers
it's.
P
The
only
thing
it
can
be
used
for
is
that
processing
and
then
and
then
I
think
we
will
have
to
work
out
those
systems
at
the
local
level
of
how
are
we
making
sure
that
that
data
and
the
connection
then
to
like
okay,
who
gets
who's
the
owner
of
the
vehicle
who
gets
the
ticket?
How
are
we
being
responsible
with
that
data?
So
that
will
be
more
local
detail,
but
there
are
some
Provisions
in
the
bill
to
manage
around
that.
So
hopefully
that
helps
okay
I'm
going
to
go
really
quickly
through.
P
We
got
some
feedback
around
High
injury,
streets
and
maintenance
and
and
and
whatnot
as
well.
We've
added
some
actions
in
the
final
plan,
around
maintenance
and
attractiveness
of
bollards.
So
more
to
come
on
that
oops.
We
also,
we
have
past
you've
all
adopted
the
racial
Equity
framework
for
transportation.
We've
updated
the
plan
to
reflect
that
we've
expanded
some.
We
have
a
few
other
actions
listed
here.
One
I
will
note,
is
we've
added
specifically
an
action
recognizing
the
work
to
create
a
victim-centered
restorative
justice
option
for
traffic
crash
cases?
P
So
that's
something
that
the
city
attorney's
office
has
been
working
on
and
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
it's
reflected
in
this
plan,
so
I
think
there's
even
more.
We
can
do
there,
but
a
starting
point
for
some
of
that.
So
that's
my
quick
overview
and
happy
for
any
other
questions
that
might
not
have
been
covered
already.
So
thank
you.
A
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
We
discussed
this
also
during
our
one-on-one
briefing,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
conversation
into
the
public
and
it's
kind
of
addressed
in
your
slide
there.
But
I
just
want
to
like
really
highlight
this.
R
The
importance
of
the
funding
mechanism
of
these
cameras,
and
so
the
conversation
we
had
was
around
other
jurisdictions
that
were
basically
doing
a
revenue
share
to
help
pay
for
the
cameras
and
that
created
this
perverse
incentive
to
increase
the
number
of
tickets,
because
that
was
how
that
vendor
was
able
to
make
their
money,
and
so
I
think
you
were
pretty
clear
in
our
one-on-one,
but
just
want
to
highlight
this
for
the
public
that
even
the
the
funding
mechanism
that
we
use
in
terms
of
bringing
implementing
this
type
of
Technology
matters
as
well,
because
we,
what
we
want
to
do
to
your
point,
is
change.
R
Behavior,
not
punish
people
or,
and
not
have
it
be
a
source
of
Revenue
generation
for
the
city
that
ultimately
kind
of
has
this
perverse
incentive
to
just
continue
ticketing
people
and
make
it
as
sensitive
and
aggressive
as
possible.
So
and
I
don't
know
if
you
had
any
more
to
say
to
that
yeah.
P
P
That
would
be
illegal
as
part
of
the
state
Bill
and
that's
to
address
some
concerns
that
have
have
existed
in
other
programs
around
the
country
where
there
has
been
that
incentive,
even
for
private
companies
to
even
want
more
ticketing
and
so
and
then
I
think
you're
right
that
a
lot
of
those
details
like
how
many
cameras,
what's
the
balance
for
a
pilot
to
start
with
right
and
and
how
are
we
seeing
those
changes,
but
also
I,
think
about
also?
P
R
And
that,
as
a
follow-up,
maybe
a
feedback
loop
that
we
should
consider
is
this
will
generate
Revenue
if
it's
implemented
right
and
do
we
want
to
put
some
controls
around
what
that,
like
that,
could
technically
lead
to
Enterprise
fund
level
revenue,
and
we
should
maybe
be
thoughtful
about
where
those
dollars
go
and
what
they're
used
for
and
a
thought
process.
That
kind
of
comes
to
mind
is
how
much
more
we
could
use
in
the
traffic
calming
budget
and
ultimately,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
slow
people
down
either
through
Road
features
or
technology.
R
Q
Thank
you,
chair
Koski,
so
I
just
had
a
quick
question
regarding
actually
strategy.
Four
in
the
Safe
Streets
section,
which
reads
for
I,
think
it's
4.1,
it's
a
managed,
Community
Traffic,
Safety
request
and
a
transparent,
consistent
and
Equitable
way
through
neighborhood
traffic
calming
program
again.
I
know
this
is
a
widely
welcomed
and
well-received
program
over
the
past
year,
and
there
was
significant
interest,
as
you
know,
demonstrated
with
the
over
700
applicants
for
the
program
across
the
city.
Q
I
know
that
there
was
also
significant
critique
that
the
city
did
not
adequately
fund
this.
So
I
just
wanted
to
know,
since
this
is
going
to
be
a
top
strategy
for
State
streets,
how
will
Public
Works
prioritize
funding
for
the
strategy
and
should
Council
respect
increase
in
a
changed
item
then
for
2024.
P
Yeah,
chair,
Koski,
councilmember,
wansley
and
I'll
just
speak,
and
then
director
Anderson
Kelleher
might
have
things
that
she
wants
to
add
as
well,
but
within
our
plan,
I
would
say
first
of
all,
like
our
number
one
priority
is
addressing
those
High
injury
streets
so
to
make
the
most
safety
Improvement
continuing
to
focus
investment
on
proactive
improvements
on
our
high
injury
streets.
I'll
just
be
honest,
is
a
bigger
priority
from
us
to
get
to
Vision
zero
than
neighborhood
traffic.
Calming
both
are
important
and
so
I
I
think
we
are.
P
You
know
reflecting
that
by
investing
in
both-
and
we
you
know
with
the
new
neighborhood
traffic
calming
program
which
we're
in
funding
basically
internally
plus
using
some
remaining
arpa
funding
for
this
year,
and
so
you
know,
I
I'll,
just
I
just
want
to
make
clear
on
that
note,
and
so
when
we
come
to
like
our
Safe
Streets
for
all
application,
other
things
like
that
you're
going
to
continue
to
see
that
reality
reflected
in
what
we're
seeking,
because
our
goal
is
to
get
to
zero,
severe
and
fatal
crashes,
and
we
can
that's
where
we
can
make
the
most
difference
towards
that
goal.
P
So
I
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
and
also
recognize
that
this
is
an
important
piece
and
we
want
to
continue
to
make
progress
on
the
neighborhood
traffic
calming
side
as
well.
A
C
Ahead,
Madam,
chair
and
committee
members,
I
think
this
is
a
very
important
point.
Councilmember
wansley
I
would
note
that
in
a
city
like
Minneapolis,
even
a
high
injury
street
is
someone's
neighborhood
street.
So
thinking
about
this,
maybe
a
little
bit
in
a
different
way,
which
is
you
know
our
our?
We
have.
We
have
this
dual
emphasis
right.
We
have
this
emphasis
on
neighborhood
street
traffic
calming.
C
We
also
have
the
higher
in
jury,
Street
Network,
and
it
is
so
important
that
we
tackle
that,
and
so
a
lot
of
our
effort
in
the
last
few
years
and
going
forward
are
about
the
investments
in
those
High
Injury
Network
streets
and
the
Safe
Streets
for
all
application,
which
I
will
just
compliment
Ethan
on.
We
are
working
to
enhance,
hopefully,
our
ability
to
win
that
Federal
money
that
will
then
go
into
that.
I
would
say
that
is
a
net
positive
and
the
reason
it's
a
net
positive
is.
C
If
we
can
tackle
with
Safe
Streets
for
all
a
number
of
our
high
Injury
Network
streets,
then
we
can
do
even
more
in
neighborhood
streets
with
our
existing
dollars
that
we
have,
and
so
you
know
we,
we
have
really
been
able
to
start
to
get
data
through
the
new
traffic
calming
program,
the
application,
and
that
is
what
we
told
you
all.
We
said
what
we
need
to
do
is
we
need
to
get
this
program
underway.
C
We
need
to
understand
who,
who
is
the
street
owner
where
the
where
the
challenge
is-
and
we
need
to
you
know,
take
that
data
and
then
bring
forward
the
solutions,
and
so
that
is
what
we're
doing
right
now
and
I
can't
guarantee
there's
going
to
be
a
request,
mid
two-year
budget
cycle,
but
I
am
most
certain
that
public
works.
When
we
approach
the
next
two-year
budget
cycle
will
be
asking
for
more
traffic
calming,
as
well
as
high
injury,
Street
money,
because
that
is
where
we
can
make
a
huge
difference.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you
for
providing
somewhat
of
a
approach
that
you're
thinking
and
and
funding.
This
is
something
that
this
body
should
be
aware
of,
especially
as
we
go
into
budget
season
and
also
thinking
you
know,
council
member,
Chuck
Tai.
You
left
the
way
for
the
council
to
make
additional
investments
into
this
last
year
so
that
we
could
start
meeting
just
a
large
scale
of
Demands
for
this
particular
program
that
we're
offering
so
also,
you
know,
supplement
the
larger
policy
initiatives
to
make
all
of
our
streets
safer.
Q
Q
Q
So
this
is
a
important
goal
to
have,
but
I
do
want
to
amplify
concern
from
residents
in
the
community
that
in
the
last
year
and
a
half
there
have
been-
or
it
seems
like,
there's
been
a
disconnect
in
how
Public
Works
utilizes
that
engagement
information
that
community
community
members
go
out
their
way.
Q
Take
time
off
of
work,
try
to
find
folks
to
watch
their
kids
to
provide
to
the
city,
so
it
seems
like
often
are
we
really
taking
the
level
of
expertise
and
experience
that
our
community
members
are
providing
in
these
sessions
serious?
So
as
it
relates
to
Vision
zero
zero,
can
you
explain
how
I
will
name
it
broken
trust,
we're
about
to
go
into
the
discussion,
we're
on
Bryant
Avenue
very
shortly
after
this?
Q
But
can
you
explain
how
you
all
are
thinking
of
approaching
in
reconciling
that
broken
trust
that
can
help
lead
to
some
actionable
change.
P
C
Well,
Madam,
chair,
I'm,
not
sure
Mr
Fowley
should
have
to
answer
that
question
so
Madam
chair
and
council
members
and
council
member
winesley.
We
will
have
the
Bryant
presentation
here
in
a
little
bit
and
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
you
should
all
look
critically
about
the
elements
of
that
plan.
C
We
believe
that
every
single
safety
element
is
addressed
in
the
plan
and
we
will
get
to
the
reason
why
we've
had
to
make
the
change
in
phase
two
but
I,
don't
think
that's
Mr
fowley's
Question
to
answer
they'll,
be
my
question
to
answer.
When
we
get
to
the
Bryant
presentation
as
well
as
Miss
hagers
and.
Q
I
just
want
to
note
director
Mack
in
terms
of
this
is
also
it's.
It
hasn't
just
started
with
Brian
I'm
naming
that
there's
been
continuous.
Q
You
know
vocalization
from
the
public
about
changes
and
some
of
the
work
that
Public
Works
is
leading
after
there's
been
these
thorough
engagement
sessions
so
just
naming
even
before
Brian
Avenue
there
is
that
broken
trust
there
and
thinking
of
how
is
Public
Works
looking
to
do
some
of
that
reparative
work
so
that
that
can
hopefully
change
how
all
of
the
projects
that
you
all
are
leading
can
be
more
so
trusted
and
received.
I
think
you
know
more
positive
positively
from
the
public,
so
I
think
it
is
not
just
isolated
to
Brian.
Q
I
know
that
segues
into
it,
but
those
will
impact
how
we
do
this
work
around
Vision
zero.
Since
that
is
a
key
strategy.
Community
engagement
is
named
in
here,
so
we
want
to
show
that
we're
being
responsive
to
towards
those
concerns
that
the
public
has
raised,
not
just
around
Bryan
Avenue,
but
for
a
number
of
projects.
That's
led
by
Public
Works.
A
All
right
not
seeing
any
further
questions,
oh
or
sorry,
okay,
we
will
move
to
approve
this
item
for
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye.
L
A
Those
opposed,
say,
nay,
eyes
have
it,
and
this
committee's
recommendation
will
be
forward
to
the
next
week's
council
meeting.
Thank
you
so
much
Mr
Folly
and
really
appreciate
it
and,
like
councilmember
Vitas,
said
if
anybody
can
get
us
to
zero,
it's
you.
So
thank
you
much
all
right!
So
next
we
have
our
walk-on
item.
Today.
A
It's
to
receive
and
file
an
update
on
the
Bryan,
Avenue
South
Street
reconstruction
project,
I,
believe
the
presentation
will
be
around
15
minutes
and
then
I
will
allow
another
15
minutes
for
questions
and
I'll
be
prioritizing
the
council
members
that
have
Bryant
Avenue
in
their
in
their
Wards.
So
director
Anderson,
who
will
be
presenting
I,
see
she's
already
come
up,
but
so.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
I,
just
want
to
say
a
couple
words
too.
Before
Miss
Hager
starts,
but
Jenny
Hager
who's,
director
of
Transportation,
Planning
and
programming,
who
I
think
all
of
you
remember
that
TPP
does
design
work
up
to
the
30
Mark
and
then
it
goes
over
to
transportation,
engineering
and
design,
which
is
Mr
Elwood's
group,
and
he
is
also
in
the
audience
today.
I
will
also
note
and
I.
Don't
know
if
he's
able
to
come
back
right
now,
but
he
will
be
on
the
public
meeting
tonight.
C
Fire
chief
Brian
Tyner
was
in
the
room
and
that's
an
important
part
of
this
change
that
you
will
hear
about.
I
want
to
just
say
for
the
council
members
as
well
as
the
public
I
think
that
what
we
could
have
done
better
here
is.
We
could
have
communicated
earlier
that
we
were
alerted
to
a
number
of
issues
on
the
phase.
J
C
Of
very
quickly
into
the
winter
alerted
by
both
fire
and
EMS
that
they
were
having
significant
issues
on
phase
one
of
Bryant,
and
so
that
is
the
number
one
reason
we
are
here
and
you
will
see
I
believe
that
all
elements
of
the
design
are
here
in
the
plan
and
it
will
be
a
safer
Street
for
all
I
recently
went
and
drove
the
entire
thing.
I
think
phase.
One
is
an
amazing
design.
C
It
is
Cutting
Edge,
probably
the
most
Cutting
Edge
Street
in
the
state
of
Minnesota,
but
it
also
has
to
work
when
it
comes
to
life
safety,
and
so
the
changes
that
are
going
going
to
be
presented
today,
I
believe
get
us
there
and
it
still
is
probably
the
second
most
Cutting
Edge
Street
in
the
state
of
Minnesota
and
one
of
the
most
in
the
country.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair.
T
Thank
you,
madam
chair
committee,
members.
Thank
you
director,
Anderson
Kelleher,
so
introductions
have
been
done
so
I
will
move
right
into
the
presentation
today.
The
Bryant
Avenue
project
is
a
two
and
a
half
mile
reconstruction
of
Bryant
Avenue
between
50th
Street
and
Lake
Street.
The
project
also
includes
modifications
to
intersections
along
Lindale
Avenue
between
50th
Street
and
33rd.
Street
work
began
in
2020
with
Concept
development
and
Community
engagement.
Construction
will
be
substantially
complete
by
the
end
of
this
current
construction
season.
T
Project
goals
include
improving
pedestrian
safety
and
comfort,
creating
an
all
ages
and
abilities,
Bicycle
Connection,
supporting
existing
and
future
Transit
service,
using
green
infrastructure
to
collect
and
treat
stormwater
runoff
and
accommodating
business
deliveries
and
customer
access.
The
project
concept
layout
was
approved
by
City
Council
in
August
of
2021.
T
T
The
Bryant
Avenue
design
was
one
of
the
first
developed
under
the
guidance
of
the
transportation
action
plan
and
the
street
design
guide.
The
design
includes
several
Innovative
design,
treatments
and
Creative
Solutions
to
the
challenges
presented
by
such
a
constrained
corridor.
We've
learned
a
lot
from
this
project
so
far
and
we
expect
to
continue
learning.
T
Bryant
Avenue
has
a
right-of-way
width
of
60
feet.
However,
after
considering
existing
encroachments
into
the
right-of-way,
the
effective
right-of-way
width
is
55
feet.
Our
transportation
action
plan
tells
us
that
Bryant
Avenue
is
on
our
pedestrian
priority
Network
and
our
all
ages
and
abilities
bicycle
Network.
Our
safety
data
tells
us
that
while
Bryant
Avenue
is
not
a
high
injury
Street,
the
corridor
does
have
a
crash
history.
T
T
The
approved
concept
layout
for
the
project
included
two
typical
cross-sections,
representing
areas
with
two-sided
parking
and
areas
with
one-sided
parking
in
both
typicals.
The
concept
layout
includes
dedicated
space
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists,
a
protected
curb,
separated,
Bikeway,
a
narrowed
Street
section
with
eight
foot
parking
lanes
and
a
20,
a
10
or
12
foot
drive
lane
and
green
boulevards
to
support
Street
trees
and
green
storm
water
infrastructure.
T
T
T
Public
Works
started
to
receive
feedback
from
Emergency
Services
providers,
our
own
staff
and
Neighbors
on
phase
one
of
the
project
before
the
end
of
last
year's
construction
season,
the
issues
with
the
design
of
phase
one
were
becoming
apparent
even
before
we
had
snow
on
the
ground.
The
historic
snow
amounts
this
winter
further
exacerbated
those
issues.
T
T
T
Public
Works
staff
had
a
difficult
time
as
well
reverting
to
pickup
trucks
with
plow
blades.
Instead
of
our
larger
plow
trucks,
we're
often
asked
why
doesn't
Public
Works,
simply
plow
curb
to
curb
streets,
are
plowed
edge
to
edge,
however,
to
really
move
snow
up
over
and
beyond
Behind
the
curb
requires
more
speed
than
a
plow
can
safely
gather
on
our
city
streets
as
winter
progresses
and
multiple
snowfalls
occur,
snow,
Banks
or
berms
form
along
the
curb
lines
and
over
time
those
snow
berms
further
narrow
the
street.
T
T
During
the
winter.
The
challenges
with
driveway
access
grew.
The
vehicle
parked
on
the
street
is
legally
parked
even
without
snow.
The
maneuver
for
this
homeowner
is
challenging.
Snow
Banks
exacerbate
the
problem
by
tightening
up
the
space.
In
many
instances,
drivers
resorted
to
using
the
Bikeway
to
access
their
driveways.
T
T
In
order
to
balance
the
parking
proposed
in
the
concept
layout,
parking
alternated
between
the
East
and
West
sides
of
the
street,
with
two-sided
parking
proposed
in
higher
density
and
Commercial
nodes
left
or
driver's
side
parking
proved
challenging.
As
cars
were
often
encroaching
into
the
travel
Lanes.
T
T
T
The
revised
design
aligns
with
City
policy,
including
the
transportation
action
plan,
our
complete
streets
policy,
Vision,
zero
and
design
guidance
contained
in
the
street
design
guide.
The
revised
design
retains
as
much
of
the
original
design
as
possible
and
is
consistent
with
the
council
adopted
concept
layout.
It
does
not
substantially
change
what
is
included
in
the
project.
It
maintains
pedestrian
and
bicycle
modal
priority
in
the
corridor.
It
maintains
traffic
calming
and
safety
design
features
while
improving
access
for
emergency
vehicles.
T
T
T
T
Swapping
the
location
of
the
Boulevard
and
Bikeway
is
key
to
improving
access
for
emergency
vehicles.
The
curb
that
separates
the
street
from
the
buffer
and
the
Bikeway
will
be
a
five
inch
high
curve.
It's
a
barrier
curb
with
a
near
vertical
face,
not
a
mountable
curb
with
a
face
that
has
a
shallow
slope.
T
T
We
have
gotten
questions
about
snow
plowing,
especially
with
the
recent
historic
snow
amounts
we
experienced
this
winter
snow
plowing
is
challenging
and
constrained
corridors
where
space
for
snow
storage
is
limited.
With
the
revised
design,
our
crews
will
plow
the
street
toward
the
west
curb
and
the
boulevard
space
along
the
west
side
of
the
street.
T
T
Both
chicanes
and
bump
outs
offer
traffic
calming
benefits
and
increased
Green
Space
chicanes
slow
traffic
by
forcing
a
horizontal
movement
of
the
vehicle.
They
also
help
to
alternate
parking
from
one
side
of
the
street
to
the
other
bump
outs,
encourage
slower
vehicle
speeds
by
providing
Edge
friction
similar
to
a
parked
car.
T
T
T
There
are
some
details
that
differ
from
this
typical
we've
been
asked
how
the
Bikeway
will
transition
between
Phase,
1
and
phase
two.
This
is
accomplished
with
a
Bend
out
design
which
moves
the
Bikeway
away
from
the
intersection,
as
it
approaches
42nd
Street,
aligning
the
phase
two
segment
with
phase
one.
T
T
T
T
We
have
some
additional
upcoming
meetings
where
we're
sharing
this
information,
so
we're
here
with
you
this
afternoon,
a
little
bit
later
on
today
we're
going
to
be
presenting
to
the
engineering
subcommittee
of
our
pedestrian
advisory
committee
a
little
bit
later
this
evening,
we're
having
a
virtual
community
meeting.
It
will
be
recorded
and
also
posted
to
our
project
webpage
and
next
week,
we'll
be
visiting
with
our
bicycle
advisory
committee
as
well.
T
We
know
there
are
questions
about
phase
one
we're
continuing
to
evaluate
options
to
improve
the
issues
observed
in
Phase
One
For
example.
We
do
plan
to
modify
driveways
in
phase
one
we'll
continue
to
look
at
what
other
options
might
we
might
be
able
to
deploy
to
improve
the
conditions
in
Phase
One
parking
in
phase
one
has
been
restored
to
one
side
of
the
street.
However,
we
are
pulling
parking
back
from
the
chicanes
in
order
to
ensure
emergency
vehicle
access
and
additional
seasonal
changes
are
possible
in
phase
one.
T
T
A
U
Like
to
point
out
that
my
office
has
received
hundreds
of
emails,
dozens
of
phone
calls
and
I've
had
countless
conversations
at
neighborhood
meetings
and
out
in
the
community
about
the
new
part,
the
newly
reconstructed
part
of
Bryant,
so
that's
from
42nd
Street
to
50th
and
how
it's
operating
in
reality,
construction
was
completed
at
the
very
tail
end
of
last
year.
Construction
was
completed,
but
there
was
still
some
signage
that
we
were
waiting
for
for
supply
chain
issues.
So
we
really
didn't
start
using
the
street
until
like
a
couple
weeks
before
there
was
snow.
U
This
first
phase
of
the
project
is
entirely
in
the
13th
board.
I
want
to
recognize
that
some
of
those
contacts
were
about
the
loss
of
parking
on
Bryant,
and
this
is
a
quality
of
life
issue
for
those
who
live
on
the
street.
But
that's
not
the
topic
of
our
conversation
today
and
although
I
hear
their
frustrations
and
sympathize
about
such
a
drastic
loss
of
parking
on
a
dense
Corridor
and
how
this
affects
them
on
a
daily
basis.
U
I
support
the
transportation
and
the
climate
goals
of
our
complete
streets
policy,
I
support
our
transportation
action
plan
and
I
am
supporting
our
2040
comprehensive
plan.
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
today
about
the
absolute
desperation
and
pleas
for
help
that
I've
heard
from
my
constituents
that
live
on
Bryant
Avenue,
those
who
use
the
street
regularly
to
get
from
point
A
to
point
B
and
even
from
our
own
City
staff.
U
That's
just
how
it's
going
to
be
the
emotions
that
I
hear
are
from
annoyance
to
fear
fear.
Many
of
the
people
I've
spoken
with
or
heard
from
are
supportive
of
the
bike
lanes
and
the
green
infrastructure.
It's
not
an
either
or
they
are
frustrated
with
a
beautifully
executed,
Street
reconstruction
that
looks
forward
to
the
needs
of
the
future,
but
in
no
way
operates
effectively
or
safely
in
reality.
U
U
The
types
of
modifications
that
they're
suggesting
here
for
phase
two,
which
also
part
of
it,
is
in
my
ward,
the
rest
is
shared
with
council
member.
They
are
in
direct
response
to
the
lived
experiences
of
my
constituents.
I
fully
support
your
efforts
to
amend
this
plan
for
phase
two,
so
we
don't
make
the
same
mistakes
again.
U
U
The
changes
will
maintain
all
of
those
things
and
address
the
deficits
that
we
discovered
in
Phase
One
and
we've
got
to
learn
from
our
mistakes.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
the
outcome
of
the
modified
phase,
two
segment
of
this
project
and
I'm
anxiously
awaiting
working
together
to
figure
out
Solutions
in
Phase
One
that
are
not
going
to
be
a
complete
redo
of
the
street
here,
but
to
help
ameliorate
the
everyday
struggles
of
my
constituents
in
the
street.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
this
presentation.
I
appreciate
it.
A
Thank
you,
I
think
councilor
Chuck
Tai
would
like
to
allow
the
other
council
members
to
speak.
First,
so
I'll
give
each
council
member
five
up
to
five
minutes
for
question
and
answers.
So.
Q
Just
four
monthly
quick
thing,
chair,
Koski,
so
I
know
we
have
our
meeting
scheduled
till
four
o'clock,
so
I
would
hope
that
we
would
have
more
time
since
it's
a
discussion
based
committee
to
have
discussion
to
ask
questions.
So
please
know
it
might
not
stick
to
five
minutes
because
we're
here
at
least
till
four.
Nevertheless,
my
questions
are
for
our
staff
around
this.
The
number
one
question
that
my
office
has
fielded
about:
Brian
Avenue,
is
why
Public
Works
was
able
to
make
these
changes
after
a
council
vote
and
mayoral
approval.
Q
My
office
reached
out
to
the
city
attorney's
office,
just
to
get
some
clarity
on
this
and
I
was
concerned
to
get
kind
of
two
different
responses
on
why
staff
will
leave.
You
know
this
modification
did
not
need
to
come
back
to
council
for
a
vote,
so
I
also
want
to
know
when
we
reached
out
to
Public
Works
staff.
We
were
also
informed
that
kind
of
what
you
presented,
that
that
modification
was
not
needed
for
a
vote
on
Council
because
you
all
felt
like
it's
still
aligned
with
the
project
goals.
Q
So
that
being
said,
I
did
want
to
get
a
sense
of
you
know
the
concerning
Dynamic
of
we
were
given
to
separate
answers
from
two
separate
departments
and
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
how
did
each
department
come
to
those
respective
conclusions
of
us
being
on
the
Public
Works
side?
Alignment
with
you
know
the
the
project
stated
goals,
but
on
the
City
attorney
side,
I
think
it
was
you
City
attorney
Nelson
that
share
some
of
the
texts
around
well.
Q
V
Councilmember
wansley
yeah,
there's
there's
you
know
as
the
legal
advisor
I
will
typically
stay
in
my
legal
Lane
and,
as
is
the
case
often
with
many
issues
in
front
of
the
city.
There's
a
a
large
policy
component
that
typically
will
drive
ultimately
decisions
around
procedure
for
the
most
part,
legally
speaking,
no
I,
don't
the
code
does
not
require
the
public
works
department
to
come
before
the
city
for
a
layout,
for
the
approval
of
modifications
to
a
layout
on
an
existing
Street
427.20.
V
Only
references
layout
approval
by
the
council
in
conjunction
with
new
streets
and
that
same
Clause
of
the
ordinance
continues
on
to
reference
actions
that
can
be
taken
with
existing
streets,
so
thus
bolstering
the
the
legislative
interpretation
that
the
that
it's
not
required
now,
certainly
over
the
years
that,
for
a
whole
bunch
of
reasons,
the
public
works
department
has
come
to
the
city
for
original
layout.
V
Approvals
on
reconstructions
I
suspect
there
might
be
Reasons
from
the
public
works
perspective
that
are
tied
to
to
funding
considerations
from
state
or
federal
funding
needing
a
layout
approval,
an
original
layout
approval.
But
then
there
are
the
whole
host
of
other
considerations
related
to
good
public
policy.
Transparency,
Etc
and
those
are
you
know
that
I
think
staff
and
Leadership
of
Public
Works
can
address
those
considerations.
V
So,
in
terms
of
my
answer
and
I
I
think
I
reference
both
that
Public
Works
would
have
to
speak
to
the
changes
and
the
way
that
those
fit
within
the
original
layout
approval,
which
was
a
concept
approval,
it's
a
it's.
It's
not
a
100
percent,
as
would
be
a
final
design
and
and
and
that
those
those
changes
were
part
of
this
presentation
here
and
I
said
I
suspected
it
looked
like
to
me.
A
non-public
works
non-engineer
that
they
might
fit
within
arguably
fit
within
that
original
layout.
V
Approval
and
I
think
that
I've
that
that
presentation
has
been
made,
but
then,
legally
speaking,
I
I
do
not
believe
they
were
legally
required
to
come
back
for
the
for.
For
those
modification
approvals,
I.
Q
Do
have
a
follow-up
question
on
that,
because
I
do
want
to
know.
As
many
community
members
have
stated,
wow
there
seems
to
be
some
evaluation
that
was
done
around
the
layout
based
off
of
the
historic
you
know
snowfall
and
some
of
the
issues
that
you
know
homeowners
experience
with
trying
to
back
out
and
driveways
that
is
warrant
the
warranting.
The
modifications
that
you're
proposing
there
are
a
number
of
community
members
that
are
concerned
of
how
this
will
have
a
different
type
of
presidents
going
for
for
projects.
Q
I
know
that's
coming
in
my
ward
and
other
council
members
Awards.
So
just
on
that
basis,
the
City
attorney.
Can
you
share
what
are
some
kind
of
recourse
or
next
steps
that
Council
can
take
to
address
this
in
the
legislative
process
to
make
sure
that
those
modifications
or
changes
like
that
do
have
to
come
back
for
Council
consideration.
V
Yes,
good
question:
councilman
murkowski,
councilman
wansey,
thanks
for
the
question,
the
the
yeah,
so
I
referenced
a
provision,
a
part
of
427.20,
that's
in
the
code,
so
of
course
this
the
city
council,
as
a
legislative
body,
would
have
the
authority
to
look
at
a
potential
amendment
to
to
that
provision
that
I
I
don't
think
it's
as
simple
as
changing,
adding
a
few
words
about
about
amendments
returning,
you
know
there.
V
There
is
a
whole
host
and
magnitude
of
potential
amendments
that
can
happen
after
a
layout
approval,
especially
on
a
multi-phase
project
that
occurs
over
several
years,
a
phased
project,
and
so
there
would
need
to
be
some
thought.
I
think
it
might.
You
know
it's
certainly
something
that's
within
your
purview,
but
there
would
need
to
be
some
thought
about
the
approach
to
that
and
what
types
of
modifications
and
how
that
would
be
defined
in
terms
of
changes
that
would
be
deemed
perhaps
material
substantial
significant.
V
That
would
need
to
return
versus
other
types
of
changes
that
that
perhaps
would
not
I'm.
Q
Glad
that
you
mentioned
that
a
City
attorney
Nelson
does
public
work.
Staff
currently
have
kind
of
a
metric
of
how
you
quantify,
then
no
substantial
changes
or
like
any
metrics
or
benchmarks
that
you
know
are
codified
somewhere
that,
like
kind
of
pulls
the
trigger
on
you
know,
we
need
to
make
these
these
modifications
as
we're
thinking
about
ways
to
approach
whatever
provision
all
right.
C
Chair
Koski,
councilmember,
wansley,
council
members,
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
Mr
Elwood
could
step
to
up,
because
his
group,
transportation,
engineering
and
design
is
where
the
plan
goes
after
30,
after
approval
by
the
council,
one
of
the
questions
and
Madam
chair
if
you'd
permit
me
to
just
ask
a
question
of
Mr
Elwood
I
know:
that's
not
normal.
C
Mr
Elwood:
how
often
do
you
encounter
changes
after
a
30
design,
approval
by
City
Council
in
any
Street
concept?
That's
approved.
W
W
Quite
a
bit
as
you
as
you
get
a
concept
layout
when
you
get
into
detailed
design,
you
have
to
account
for
where
you
can
put
trees,
where
you
can
put
catch
bases
where
there's
underground
utilities
that
you
have
to
work
around
you.
You
cannot
do
enough
work
up
front
to
determine
all
those
fine
details,
so
you
get
this
concept
layout.
That
gives
me
the
general
direction
of
where
we're
trying
to
get
to
what
are
the
elements
of
the
roadway
section
we're
looking
to
accomplish?
W
What
are
the
features
that
I'm
trying
to
accomplish
and
as
we
get
into
design
based
on
buildings,
how
close
they
are
to
the
roadway?
What
the
roadway
grade
is
the
curvatures,
if
they're
straight,
if
there's
a
hill,
we
get
into
those
detailed
design
and
that's
continuous
throughout
a
project.
So
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
But
it's
it's
all
projects.
C
Q
And
I
will
thank
you,
director,
Matt,
just
offered
the
reason
why
we're
having
this
public
discussion
right
now
is
because
the
public
called
out
the
changes
and
went
to
have
a
transparent
process
of
why
those
changes
were
happening.
I'm
grateful
for
councilmember
Chuck
Tai
for
working
with
your
staff
to
get
to
this
point,
I
think
the
larger
goal
was
saying
if
we
could
have
these
more
repeatedly
for
Council
consideration
and
as
I
mentioned
earlier
for
the
first
presentation
we're
seeing
this
kind
of
build
upon.
C
C
If
we
had
said
we
are
going
to
increase
parking
on
this
Corridor
by
50
percent,
we
would
have
come
back
to
you
because
it
would
not
have
been
in
line
with
the
project
goals.
Councilmember
wansley,
Madam,
chair,
councilmember
winesley,
so
we
had
a
discussion
about
this
and
I
will
promise
you
if
somehow
on
Hennepin
Avenue,
there
is
not
a
protected
Bikeway.
We
would
be
back
to
you
in
a
heartbeat
if
somehow
we
could
not
fit
in
the
major
elements
that
we
have
come
to
you
at
30
percent
we'd
be
back
to
Council
in
a
heartbeat.
Q
Q
My
concern
is,
as
someone
who's
having
projects
coming
to
ward
two
there's
projects
in
Ward,
one
making
sure
that
we
are
not
set
up
to
have
the
same
situation
with
those
future
projects
and
getting
clear
everyone
have
the
same
page
around
what
those
quantifiable
modifications
or
measures
or
metrics
for
modifications
are
so
that
if
you
do
come
forward
and
do
similar
things
in
Ward,
2
I
can
communicate
that
clearly,
so
the
public
beforehand.
So
I
think
that
is
the
thing
going
forward.
Q
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
replicate
this
moving
forward
with
other
upcoming
projects.
That's
happening
all
across
the
city.
I
will
name
in
my
word
because
I'm
getting
questioned
by
members
who
saw
what
happened
with
Brian,
Ave
and
Hennepin
Ave
and
asking
is
this
going
to
happen
in
Ward
2?
So
that's
the
goal
on
my
end
and
it
sounds
like
we'll
have
lots
of
a
lot
more
conversations
around
this.
C
C
Q
Q
Bus
lanes,
that's
what
I'm,
referring
to
so
I'm
finishing
my
comments.
Chairkoski!
Thank
you
for
providing
the
input
and
response
and,
as
I
mentioned,
we'll
have
ongoing
conversations
with
us
with
our
city
attorneys.
To
make
sure
we
can
do
things
differently
going
forward.
A
Thank
you
all
right,
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
my
original.
Everyone
will
have
five
minutes
so
council
member
Payne
go
ahead.
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
won't
need
five
minutes,
but
I
will
Echo
councilmember
wansley
and
sing
we're
a
deliberative
body.
This
is
a
committee
we're
doing
committee
work.
We
shouldn't
put
time
boundaries
on
that,
but
I
don't
think
I'll
need
them.
I
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
just
kind
of
upfront
saying
this.
R
R
Don't
know
if
this
existed
under
previous
administrations
but
I
think
there's
a
real
opportunity
to
have
a
retrospective
approach
to
how
we
managed
and
I
mean
this
was
a
maybe
there's
not
that
much
to
learn
from
this
last
season,
because
it
was
so
historical
in
nature,
but
I
think
there's
some
lessons
that
probably
were
learned
they're
probably
been
discussed
within
the
administration.
There
might
be
some
beneficial
aspects
to
maybe
having
some
dialogue
in
a
public
setting
around
some
of
those
lessons.
R
I
know
in
my
ward,
we
had
Johnson
Street
reconstructed,
and
this
was
the
first
winter
on
that
Corridor
and
there
was
some
challenges
with
the
shared
use
path
and
plowing,
and
the
contractor
and
your
team
was
really
responsive
in
addressing
some
of
those
issues
and
so
I
think
there's
some
lessons
that
were
learned
over
this
last
storm
or
last
season
that
we
could
do
a
retrospective
analysis
on
and
operationalize
those
lessons
in
a
way,
that's
public
and
proactive
so
that
we
don't
find
ourselves.
If
we
had
that
kind
of
muscle
memory.
Institutionally
there.
R
So
I
think
this
is
the
big
gap
here
is
around
that
proactive
communication
and
getting
ahead
of
some
of
this
stuff
and
I'm,
hoping
that
a
thing
that
we
could
learn
from
this
is
how
do
we
communicate
those
those
learnings
in
a
more
transparent
way?
So
people
to
council
number
one
was
at
his
point,
really
trusts
you
when
you
show
up
with
these
types
of
modifications
and
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out.
There.
C
C
We
have
routinely
in
public
works
after
we
have
a
major
incident
just
like
we
have
learned
in
the
public
safety
side
of
this
organization,
do
sort
of
an
after
action
and
I
believe
we'll
do
internally,
not
with
everyone,
but
internally
we
will
do
an
after-action
sort
of
analysis
of
this
winter
and
what
could
have
been
done
better?
The
other
thing
I
want
to
point
out
that
we
are
trying
really
you
know.
Mr
Dodds
is
not
here
he's
out
with
the
finished
delegation
touring
right
now.
We
ask
him
to
do
that.
C
He
is
really
working
very
hard
to
have
and
our
two
leaders
actually
up
here
with
Mr
powman,
are
working
together
and
then
bringing
in
our
Public
Safety
folks
like
fire
to
be
able
to
analyze
a
design
ahead
of
time
to
actually
go
out
to
the
street
and
to
lay
it
out.
C
We
do
this
fairly
often
in
my
experience
in
a
year,
I
think
some
of
you
have
experienced
this,
where
the
team
will
go
out
and
actually
kind
of
Mark
off
what's
happening
or
what
may
happen
in
a
reconstruction
I
think
we
missed
this
one
and
I
don't
know
if
that
was
because
of
the
pandemic
and
everything
that
was
going
on.
But
it
was
definitely
missed
to
be
able
to
understand
the
needs
of
fire
and
chief
tyners
back
in
the
room,
and
he
could
speak
to
that
for
sure.
C
But
we
also
want
to
make
sure
Transportation,
maintenance
and
repair
is
involved
in
making
sure
that
our
streets
work
for
maintenance
and
repair
as
well
as
Solid,
Waste
and
Recycling.
So
it's
an
excellent
point.
We
will
be
doing
that
with
this
winter
season,
but
we
also
going
forward
are
trying
in
our
design
phase,
to
include
more
of
our
operational
Partners
to
be
able
to
try
to
identify
where
we're
going
to
have
a
pain
Point
earlier.
R
I
I
would
love
to
invite
you
to
have
at
least
you
know
if
you're
going
to
do
an
internal
after
action,
it
might
be
a
very
technical
and
very
detailed,
and
maybe
not
that
much
of
a
public
interest,
but
consider
maybe
like
a
summarized
version
of
that,
that
we
could
invite
you
back
for.
A
Thank
you
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
that
I
will
talk
to
chair
Johnson
about
how
we
can
what
team
to
do
that
and,
like
you
said,
maybe
a
summary
of
of
the
the
pieces
and
not
not
so
technical,
but
something
that
we
can
digest
and
understand
all
right,
all
right.
Okay,.
S
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Mr,
Elwood
Ms
Hager.
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
in
today.
I
really
really
appreciate
it.
I
know
that
you've
been
working
really
hard
on
this
and,
as
you
know,
you
were
going
through
the
presentation.
S
Ms
Hager
in
particular,
I
I,
just
deeply
appreciate
your
acknowledgment
of
where
things
went
wrong
here
and
I
I
know:
we've
had
conversations
with
one
another
about
that,
but
I
know
it
means
a
lot
to
me
to
see
that
done
publicly
and
and
I
hope
it
will
resonate
with
residents
and
and
be
a
part
of
re-establishing
and
rebuilding
Community
Trust,
which
is
ultimately
what
all
of
this
comes
back
to.
S
I'm
gonna
ask
you
just
a
few
questions
and
then
I'll
end
with
some
comments
about
what
all
of
this
means.
The
I
I
think
this
was
made
clear
in
your
presentation,
but
I
want
to
come
back
to
it
because
I
think
it's
important.
The
placement
of
the
Bikeway
our
office
received
a
lot
of
concerns
from
residents
about
the
moving
the
Green
Space.
S
Oh
thank
you
for
these
original
and
phase
two
comparisons.
So
the
moving
of
that
green
space
from
in
between
the
drive
lane
to
the
other
side
of
of
the
bike
facility,
and
so
then
you've
got
the
drive
lane
and
and
the
bike
facility
next
to
each
other.
S
With
this
three
feet
of
space,
the
the
major
concern
I
heard
was
when,
when
we
have
the
bike
facility
right
next
to
the
drive
lane,
it
makes
it
it
increases
the
likelihood
of
of
a
vehicle
entering
the
the
bike
facility
and
making
it
more
dangerous
to
use
that
bike
facility.
S
Can
you
help
me
understand
the
chain
change
that
I
I,
believe
I,
see
reflected
here?
I
know:
you've
talked
about
with
me,
but
can
you
can
you
just
talk
about
what
has
been
done
here
to
prevent
vehicles
from
entering
that
bike
facility.
T
Sure
Madam
chair
council,
member
chug
Tai,
the
revised
design,
is
very
very
similar
to
the
original
design
in
terms
of
having
that
curb
along
the
east
side
of
the
roadway.
The
only
difference
is
about
an
inch,
so
it's
still
a
very
vertical
curve.
It's
a
curb,
separated,
protected
bike
way.
It
follows
our
street
design
guide
that
one
inch
is
just
enough
for
our
fire
trucks
to
be
able
to
come
up
only
if
needed
and
be
able
to
to
move
across
along
the
street
if
there's
an
obstruction
or
they
need
to
set
up
their
rig.
T
T
The
absence
of
any
signage
here
does
not
permit
that
activity.
It's
it's
still
unauthorized
activity,
so
engineering
is
a
tool
that
we
can
use
to
help
mitigate
these
types
of
activities
But.
Ultimately,
we
can
eliminate
it
and
that's
where
we
have
to
address
it
in
other
ways
that
the
other
ease
we
call
it.
So
there's
enforcement:
there's
education,
there's
encouragement!
So
that's
an
an
element
of
this
design
that
we're
committed
to
continue
to
evaluate
and
understand
and
look
for
options
to
mitigate
that
activity.
Unauthorized.
T
S
Sure,
and
then
just
the
aha
moment
for
me,
I
think
on
on
this
was
you
helping
me
see
that
the
bikes
were
higher
than
the
drive
Lane
right,
like
they're
up
on
a
curb,
and
so
we're
not
talking
about
just
three
feet
of
space
in
between
the
drive
lane
and
the
bike
facility.
S
We
are
talking
about
a
physical
separation
that
has
been
that
has
been
put
in
place
as
a
as
a
preventative
measure,
but
to
your
point,
obviously
we're
not
we're
never
going
to
prevent
all
unauthorized
or
it
is
really
difficult
to
prevent
all
unauthorized
uses
of
the
bike
facility.
But
I
see
that
there's
there
is.
S
There
is
an
effort
to
mitigate
that
to
the
extent
practical
here
and
then
I'm
wondering
so
I
I
think
you,
you
shared
a
lot
of
really
good
examples
and
photos
demonstrating
the
the
challenges
with
parking
and
driveways
with
emergency
vehicles
being
able
to
navigate
our
street
I
know
that
the
The
Walker
facility
on
on
36th
and
Bryant
is
is
a
emergency
Ms.
S
Is
there
every
day
fire
is
there
every
day,
and
so
it's
really
really
important
for
Bryant
to
be
accessible
for
our
emergency
vehicles,
so
that
residents
can
receive
care
in
the
time
that
they
need
it
so
and
then
also
the
challenges
you
pointed
out
with
cars
and
delivery
trucks,
idling
or
driving
in
the
bike
facility,
which
at
that
time
was
right
next
to
sidewalks,
and
so
we're
talking
about
a
really
really
dangerous
thing
happening
there
for
pedestrians,
for
cyclists,
for
residents
and
and
frankly,
drivers
too
did
you
did
you
have
any
like
3-1-1
9-1-1
data
to
help
us
to
help
us
understand
the
scale
and
scope
of
the
scale
of
the
problem.
T
Madam,
chair
council
member
chug
tight,
we
did
dig
into
calls
to
3-1-1,
we
don't
have
exact
data
and
the
reason
is
because
we
have
an
active
project
at
least
I
understand
the
Gen
left
I
understand
the
reason
is
we
have
an
active
project
so
when
those
calls
come
in
with
an
active
project,
contact
they're
going
to
that
project,
contact
and
may
not
have
a
case
recorded
in
the
system
for
further
follow-up.
So
so
yes,
we
got
a
lot
of
just
like
council
member
or
vice
president
palmisano
noted.
T
S
Well,
awesome,
that's
very
helpful,
thank
you
so
much
and
then
the
the
last
piece,
or
actually
one
more,
the
the
38
through
36th
stretch
that
isn't
that
doesn't
change
at
all
from
the
originally
approved
layout
and
I.
Just
I
really
apologize.
I
was
not
here
when
the
layout
was
approved.
I've
read
the
originally
approved
layouts,
the
most
detailed
layout
I've
ever
seen.
S
S
Are
there
any
concerns
with
emergency
vehicle
access
on?
On
that
stretch,.
T
So
Madam,
chair,
councilmember,
Chuck
Tai,
these
two
blocks
not
changing
is
is
an
important
detail.
One
of
the
reasons
we
don't
need
to
change
these
blocks
is
because
of
that
reversible
bustling
gives
us
extra
width
within
the
street.
We
did
a
lot
of
work
with
the
Walker
during
our
original
Community
engagement.
Phase.
I
can't
stand
here
and
tell
you
that
they
love
this
design,
but
we
did
a
lot
of
work
with
them
to
try
to
address
their
concerns
and
ensure
that
there
would
be
adequate
access
to
their
facility
at
all
times.
S
Thank
you
and
then
the
the
so
I
I
appreciate
you
walking
us
through
the
bump
outs
versus
chicanes,
where
they're
being
replaced
and
the
efficacy
of
those
in
in
slowing
down
traffic
and
being
a
traffic
calming
element
on
this.
In
this
re
redesign
I
know
there
are
chicanes
on
on
Grand
Avenue
as
an
example
and
one
of
the
concerns
I
heard
from
you
or
from
staff.
S
Not
you
personally
was
the
the
challenge
with
snow
plows
being
able
to
remove
snow
with
with
those
chicanes,
because
it's
not
a
straight
line
and
it
it.
Then
it
was
narrowing
the
street
more
than
what
we
had
already
planned
for.
S
T
T
So
the
main
difference
between
Bryant
and
Grand
Avenue
is
the
width
of
the
street.
So
Grand
Avenue
is
a
two-way
street
generally
with
parking
on
one
side
of
the
street.
We
have
28
feet
curb
to
curb
to
work
with
on
Grand
Avenue
Bryant
Avenue
is
more
like
20
feet
where
we
have
parking
on
one
side
of
the
street.
So
that's
the
main
difference
there
is
is
just
the
space
that
we
have
available
to
us.
This
is
what
it
looks
like
in
plan.
View
and
I
did
go
out
with
Chief
China's
staff.
T
Back
in
January
we
looked
at
Grand,
we
looked
at
Bryant,
we
looked
at
Johnson,
Street
Northeast,
we
went
all
over
and
you
can
just
see
it
feels
very
different.
One
of
the
key
things
for
our
plow.
Drivers,
too,
is
some
sort
of
vertical
indication
for
them
and
the
edge
of
these
features.
So
they
know
where
the
curb
line
is
and
can
they're
in
big
vehicles.
They
need
the
help
they
just
you
know
they're
doing
the
best
they
can.
S
So
for
sure,
I
really
appreciate
this.
Thank
you
very
much
and
then
I
think
my
last
question.
I
I
unders,
so
you
I
know
you've
got
a
really
big
day
of
community
engagement.
S
Today,
you're
here
you're
going
to
be
at
The
Pedestrian
advisory
committee's
subcommittee
today
and
you're
hosting
a
community
meeting
to
talk
about
changes
to
to
the
design
elements
this
evening
from
6
30
to
8
30,
virtually
I
I
see
you
doing
your
best
to
communicate,
changes
to
sit
with
people
and
struggle
with
the
things
that
that
are
sore
points
and
I
see
that
as
an
honest
effort
to
to
to
correct
the
mistakes
that
are
that
we
can't
go
back
and
change
now.
S
I.
Really
one
appreciate
you
doing
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
taking
it
seriously
and
then
two
I,
a
question
that
I've
been
asked.
A
lot
is
just
or
sometimes
it's
in
the
form
of
a
question.
Sometimes
it's
just
in
the
form
of
like
a
long
comment,
but
just
this,
this
frustration
and
this
lack
of
trust
that
you
know
I'm
a
person
who
lives
over
here
or
I'm,
a
person
who
uses
the
street
a
lot
I
I
invested
so
much
time
in
in
the
years
of
community
engagement
that
was
completed.
S
I
was
thoughtful
in
the
comments
that
I
shared
I
struggled
with
my
neighbors
on
this
I
I
did
my
part
and
and
I
saw
that
that
was
that
was
reflected
in
the
plan
that
was
approved
by
Council,
and
so
it
seems
like
all
of
that
was
for
nothing
when
last
minute
changes
can
get
made
and,
and
that
I
think
contributes
to
to
this,
like
mistrust
between
the
city
and
and
residents
and
I
know.
That's
something
you're
aware
of
I
guess.
My
question
is
like
what
do
you?
What
what
do
you?
T
Madam,
chair,
councilmember,
I
think.
The
first
thing
we
say
is
we're
sorry
we're
sorry,
we
missed
some
things
in
design
and
we
missed
an
opportunity
to
do
a
better
job
of
communicating
the
changes.
So
we
are
coming
out
and
we're
doing
our
very
best
to
share
the
information
and
we're
doing
our
very
best
to
honor
that
original
Community
engagement
and
input
that
we
received
and
stay
within
the
boundaries
of
our
Council
adopted
concept.
Layout.
S
I
really
appreciate
that
and
then
I'll
just
I'll
just
end
with
I
I
re.
S
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
here
again,
I
really
appreciate
the
the
the
time
and
attention
you
put
to
coming
and
being
communicative
and
transparent
with
the
public
to
the
extent
that
was
that
was
possible
and
for
for
answering
questions
about
this
I
wish
you
the
very
best
of
luck
with
all
of
the
community
engagement
you're
doing
later
today
and
and
I
see
deeply
and
honestly
that
you
have
done
the
very
best
you
can
with
the
cards
you
were
dealt
and
the
very
best
you
can
to
preserve
as
much
of
of
of
the
engagement
and
input
that
you
receive
from
Community
and
I
I.
A
X
Foreign
there's
been
Recent
research,
that's
showing
that
bee
populations
are
declining.
So
we're
doing
this
because
there
is
habitat
loss
going
on.
There
is
different
pesticides
that
are
harming
our
bee
populations
and
then
there
are
also
diseases
and
parasites,
so
you
have
to
like
rip
them
a
little
bit.