►
From YouTube: (2022) 05-17 - Planning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
D
It
is
5
30,
so
we
will.
We
will
call
the
meetings
order
for
a
planning
and
zoning
meeting
of
may
the
17th
2022.
D
D
Are
there
any
deletions,
additions
or
corrections.
G
Yeah
I'll
take
that
one
just
to
give
you
guys
an
update
on
where
we
stand.
So,
as
of
last
week's
city
council
meeting,
the
city
council
designated
the
city
administrator
as
code
enforcement
officer
to
comply
with
all
provisions
of
the
charter.
G
So
that
being
me
right
now,
I
am
also
going
to
delegate
those
powers
to
a
couple
different
individuals,
just
because
the
workload
that
we
have
going
on
right
now
has
a
little
bigger
than
just
one
person
can
bear.
So
now
that
brad's
been
with
us
for
over
a
year
now
he's
doing
a
great
job
he's
going
to
be
taking
over
what
I
consider
the
front
end
role
for
code
enforcement
duties.
That's
the
planning
and
zoning,
the
administration
of
the
initial
plat
reviews,
any
other
preliminary
reviews
that
need
to
be
done.
G
G
Is
going
to
continue
with
heading
up
the
marshall
service
as
well?
We
just
hire
two
new
marshals
to
do
robust
code
enforcement
in
this
community
and
eventually
we're
going
to
grow
that
into
its
own
kind
of
standalone
division.
But
for
right
now
patrick
will
be
heading
that
up
there's
some
other
odds
and
ends
that
fall
in
between
and
I'll
continue
to
delegate
those
out
between
patrick
and
brad
calendar.
Here,
as
we
move
along.
D
A
A
This
is
on
at
250,
mlk
boulevard
out
there
on
highway
138,
it's
proposed
to
have
one
entrance
off
of
mlk
they've,
already
gotten
their
gdot
approval
for
this
location
and
they're,
proposing
to
enter
that
site
from
that
one
location,
they're
going
to
have
parking
in
the
front,
as
you
can
see
on
the
plan
behind
you,
they'll
be
parking
in
the
front
of
the
building
and
there's
a
10
000
square
foot,
building
proposed
in
the
center
of
the
site,
and
then
they'll
have
more
associated
parking
for
that
business
around
each
side
of
the
building,
their
representative
architecture.
A
They
provided
with
this
application.
It
meets
the
requirements
of
the
cdo
architectural
standards,
they've
also
included
a
landscape
plan
and
some
other
detailed
engineering
plans
with
this
application
that
does
meet
our
cdo
requirements.
So
staff
repeat
this
request
and
has
recommended
two
conditions:
one
specifically
just
dealing
with
monument
signage.
That's
your
first
condition
and
then
the
second
condition
is
the
replacement
of
ifa's,
siding
and
stucco.
In
place
of
that,
and
those
are
the
two
recommendations
from
staff-
that's
all
I
have,
mr
chairman.
B
Away
so
it's
basically
the
same
project,
just
we
got
caught
up
in
our
and
our
permitting
was
expired
on
this
particular
one.
So
I'll
be
here.
We
we
are
here
to
answer
questions.
If
you
care
to
ask
any.
B
A
D
So
motion
to
approve
with
with
condition
conditions-
yes,
second
and
a
second
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
request
is
approved.
A
Yes,
sir,
mr
chairman,
the
request
before
planning
commission
for
recommendation
to
counsel
is
a
request
to
dnx
17.2
acres.
This
is
located
on
the
kind
of
the
southeastern
flank
of
this
property
here
that
a
butt,
snozz
mill,
road
property
is
currently
owned
by
the
walton
county
development
authority
and
they
are
requesting
per
their
applicant
to
de-annex
this
property
from
the
city.
I
believe
they
have
an
applicant
here
tonight
that
can
explain
that
request
further,
but
I
believe
they've
gone
through
the
proper
channels
and
processes
with
the
county
at
this
point
to
consider
that
de-annexation.
F
Let's
see,
as
mr
calendar
told
you,
we
are
here
requesting
to
de-annex
17.223
acres
and
to
give
you
an
idea
of
where
that
sits
in
relation
to
the
city
limits.
F
a
little
bit
closer
view
here.
You
can
see
that
as
part
of
the
piedmont
industrial
development
park
right
now,
that's
owned
by
the
walton
county
development
authority.
My
client
has
worked
with
that
development
authority
to
reach
an
agreement
to
purchase
this
17.223
acres
for
the
purposes
of
building
a
new
meeting
facility
for
the
veterans,
association.
F
The
17.223
acres
is
part
of
a
72-acre
tract
that
they're
working.
I
believe
they
may
have
come
before
you
last
month,
possibly
to
do
their
preliminary
plat
approval
to
split
off
these
into
two
parcels
and
here's
a
little
bit
closer
view
with
our
site
plan
overlaid
on
it.
The
blue
shading
on
the
property
is
all
undevelopable,
there's
a
good
bit
of
flood
plain
on
the
property,
but
there's
plenty
left
to
use
and
you
can
see
there
that
we've
got
about
a
5,
000
square
foot,
building
some
outdoor
pavilion
type
space
and
then
parking.
F
So
it
is
our
intent
to
de-annex
this
property
from
the
city
to
be
able
to
use
it
for
this
use
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
abutted
on
the
eastern
side
by
property,
that's
already
in
the
county,
so
it's
contiguous
to
a
consistent,
designation,
the
deannexation
process.
You
probably
haven't
seen
many
many
of
these
come
through,
maybe
maybe
you've
seen
none
of
these
come
through,
but
georgia
law
does
have
a
process
for
it
under
36,
36
22..
F
It
requires
that
we
file
an
application
to
the
city
which
we
did
and
that
the
county
issue
a
resolution
approving
taking
that
property
back
into
the
county,
because
once
we
de-and
de-annex
it
from
the
city,
it'll
go
back
to
the
county,
and
that
has
been
part
of
our
application
and
then
we're
here
tonight
asking
for
approval
from
the
city
and
again
because
this
is
a
veterans
owned.
You
know,
non-profit
organization,
the
property
will
be
tax-exempt,
so
the
city
is
not
going
to
be
losing
any
tax
revenues
off
this
property.
F
Because
of
the
use
that's
intended,
and
the
really
the
reason
that
they're
asking
to
be
annexed
is
the
city
won't
be
providing
any.
You
know,
sewer
utility
type
services,
and
so
that
is
the
basis
for
their
request.
So
again,
we're
here
before
you
tonight
to
request
de-annexing
the
17.223
acres
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
C
Any
questions
just
curious,
like
this
be
county,
provided.
F
It'll
be
septic
because
the
county
doesn't
have
sewer.
G
D
If,
if
not,
I
don't
think
there's
any
there's.
No
opposition
to
this
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
de-annexation.