►
From YouTube: March 3, 2022 Human Relations Commission Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Human Relations Commission
A
A
Okay,
I
see
we're
recording
all
right,
hi
I'm,
chair
Lynn
of
the
Mountain
View
human
relations.
Commission
I'll
read
this
item
in
the
call
to
order
during
this
declared
state
of
emergency.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953
e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
human
relations
commission
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location.
A
As
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda,
members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
for
an
item
by
joining
the
zoom
webinar
at
mountainview.gov
forward.
Slash
meeting
any
emails
received
by
5
pm
today
were
forwarded
to
the
commission.
Now
I
will
ask
the
assistant
to
the
city
manager
to
proceed
with
roll
call
assistant
to
the
city
manager
will
now
take
attendance
by
roll
call.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you
now,
we'll
move
on
to
minutes
approval.
The
minutes
for
February
3rd
2022
meeting
have
been
delivered
to
commission
members
and
copies
posted
on
the
city
hall
bulletin
board.
If
there
are
no
Corrections
or
additions,
emotion
is
in
order
to
approve
these
minutes.
Do
any
of
the
Commissioners?
Have
anything
I
see
a
commissioner
Solomon
I
see
your
hand
race
go.
C
A
A
B
A
Yes,
thank
you
great
now,
we'll
move
on
to
oral
Community
Communications
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
commission
on
any
matter,
not
in
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
commission
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
any
non-agendized
items?
A
A
E
E
Let
me
get
back
to
the
beginning
of
that
slideshow.
So
again,
my
name
is
Michaela
helmutincher
I'm,
the
new
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager.
Here
for
the
city
and
it's
my
honor
to
meet
with
you
all
tonight,
I'll
just
share
that
I've
had
an
opportunity
to
work
with
the
Human
Rights
Commission,
our
human
relations
Commission
in
other
venues
before
I
joined
the
city
and
I
really
am
quite
Amazed
by
the
amount
of
dedication
that
the
Commissioners
put
into
their
work
into
making
our
community
a
better
place
and
I.
E
So
tonight,
I
have
the
opportunity
to
share
with
you
an
overview
of
some
federal
grants
that
we
received
from
the
from
HUD
from
the
housing
Urban
Development
Department
of
the
federal
government,
and
we
will
be
coming
back
to
you
later
this
year
to
ask
for
your
thoughts
on
some
decisions
about
what
to
do
with
these
funds.
So
tonight
is
really
just
an
overview
to
get
ready
for
that.
Next
conversation.
E
So
the
city
receives
what
we
call
cdbg
and
home
funds,
because
we
are
sometimes
what's
known
as
an
entitlement,
jurisdiction
or
a
participating
jurisdiction.
So
not
every
city
in
the
United
States
receives
these
funds,
and
some
of
them
are
too
small
or
don't
have
the
capacity
to
receive
the
funds
and
receive
them
as
part
of
a
larger
conglomerate
of
cities
or
jurisdictions.
E
So
it's
Unique
that
it's
Unique
to
our
size
and
our
capacity
that
we
receive
these
funds.
The
funding
allocations
that
we
receive
depend
on
the
federal
budget,
so
they
go
up
and
they
go
down
and
we
also
occasionally
have
access
to
additional
funds.
When
we
have
income
paid
back
from
former
loans
that
we've
made
with
the
funds,
it's
a
little
bit
hard
to
always
know
exactly
how
many
funds
we'll
have
available
in
a
given
year.
E
E
around
we
get
around
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
every
year.
You
may
recall
that
last
year
we
also
received
some
additional
what
they
call
CV,
which
is
related
to
the
coronavirus
pandemic,
cdbg
funds
of
about
a
million
dollars,
and
we
also
used
a
significant
amount
of
the
program
income
funds
that
I
referenced
last
year.
So
some
years
we
have
several
million
dollars
to
spend.
In
some
years
less
the
cdbg
funds
can
be
used
for
quite
a
large
range
of
activities.
It
could
be
for
acquisition
of
property
for
the
rehabilitation
of
residential
structures.
E
The
most
important
thing
is
that
the
cdbg
funds
must
meet
one
of
three
National
objectives,
so
either
benefiting
people
with
lower
moderate
incomes
aiding
in
the
prevention
or
elimination
of
blight
or
meeting
some
other
particularly
urgent
need,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
a
vague
term,
and
then
there
are
expenditure
requirements
for
the
cdbg
funds,
so,
for
example,
I'm
having
trouble
seeing
my
whole
screen
here.
So
let
me
just
move
some
something
around.
E
E
E
I
just
want
to
reference
that
we've
had
access
to
some
special
funds
in
the
past
couple
of
years
that
have
been
allocated
specifically
in
response
to
the
covid-19
pandemic.
Last
year
we
appropriated
a
large
amount
of
funds
from
the
cdbg.
Cv
cares
act
bucket
and
this
year
we'll
have
access
to
something
called
home:
ARP
which
I'll
be
explaining
home.
E
Arp
are
funds
that
came
were
allocated
in
the
American
Rescue
plan
and
their
home
funds,
and
that
they're
meant
to
work
on
housing,
but
they're,
particularly
targeted
towards
people
who
are
unhoused
or
at
risk
of
becoming
unhoused
or
some
other
populations,
and
these
are
the
qualifying
populations
that
are
listed
here.
We
have
almost
a
million
dollars
allocated
to
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
E
The
eligible
activities
are
also
a
little
different
production
or
preservation
of
affordable
housing,
rental
assistance.
It
can
be
used
for
Supportive
Services,
which
is
not
something
that
home
funds
typically
are
used
for,
and
it
could
also
be
used
for
the
purchase
or
development
of
non-congregate
shelter,
sort
of
like
our
life
moves.
Child
shelter,
which
is
people,
have
individual
rooms,
and
for
this
85
of
the
funds
must
be
used
for
the
services
or
the
housing
or
the
shelter.
E
Just
a
reminder
for
those
of
you
who
have
done
this
before
and
welcome
to
those
of
you
who,
like
me,
are
new
to
the
process.
The
way
the
city
typically
allocates.
These
funds
is
in
a
two-year
cycle
for
public
services
funds,
so
we
typically
do
a
notice
of
funding
availability
nonprofits
apply,
and
then
they
get
granted
funds
for
two
years.
E
E
E
So
that's
just
something
that
I'm
trying
to
learn
from
and
think
about
what
to
do
with
and
I
wanted
to
share
with
the
commission.
I
also
want
to
share
that.
You
know.
Last
year
the
the
HRC
and
the
council
decided
to
allocate
all
the
capital
funds
to
the
Crestview
Hotel
project,
because
it
was
a
project
where
we
knew
there'd
be
a
significant
Capital
need,
and
it
was
a
priority
of
both
the
HRC
and
the
council.
E
So
it's
something
that
we
might
want
to
consider
learning
from
both
of
these.
These
points
going
forward
and
I
think
we'll
probably
plan
on
coming
to
you
next
fall
to
consider
how
we
want
to
handle
Capital
funds
next
year
and
whether
we
want
to
do
a
nofa
process.
Some
things
we
might
want
to
consider
are
trying
to
align
our
Capital
funds
with
our
affordable
housing
pipeline
I'll
share
that
the
city's
affordable
housing
pipeline
is
starting
to
exceed
our
available
funds.
E
We
will
come
back
to
you
on
your
April
7th
meeting
and
ask
you
to
consider
some
recommendations
about
how
to
spend
cdbg,
Capital
funds
and
home
funds,
as
well
as
the
home
ARP
funds,
then
at
the
end
of
April,
we'll
be
bringing
those
recommendations
to
council
and
then
in
the
fall.
We'll
come
to
you
to
talk
about
some
of
these
sort
of
strategic
questions
about
how
we
should
handle
next
year's
cycle
together
and
with
that
I
am
ready
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
C
C
E
Sure
and
I
should
share
I'm,
just
sort
of
throwing
some
ideas
out
there.
I
don't
have
any
specific
recommendations
yet
I'm
too
new
to
the
team.
I
have
too
much
to
learn
from
you
all
and
my
other
City
colleagues,
but
what
I
was
sort
of
thinking
about
is.
If
we
were
not
going
to
do
the
notebook
process
that
we
had
typically
done
every
year,
would
we
want
to
come
up
with
some
sort
of
program
where
we
alerted
non-profits?
You
know
every
five
years
we're
going
to
do
some
sort
of
capital
program.
E
E
I
know
some
other
jurisdictions
do
things
like
that,
but
I
don't
know
what
the
nonprofit
Community
really
wants
or
needs.
So
I
think
part
of
my
job
between
now
and
when
I
come
back
to
you
in
the
fall
is
to
try
to
learn
more
about.
You
know
the
lessons
learned
from
what
they've
received
in
the
past
and
what
they
are
hoping
for
in
the
future.
E
E
I
think
that's
something
I
need
to
do
more
research
on,
and
that's
where
I
turn
to
my
consultant
colleagues
here
exactly
what
we
can
do.
I
know
you
know
the
other
question
I
have
we
have
is
if
we
want
to
be
able
to
put
some
of
the
funds
towards
housing,
how
we
would
do
that
so
I
think
it's
going
to
require
a
little
bit
of
projections
on
our
part
about
how
much
funding
we're
going
to
receive
over
the
next.
E
You
know
five
years,
both
from
the
federal
government
but
also
from
the
program
income
which,
as
I
mentioned,
can
be
considerable.
I
mean
that's
part
of
why
you
were
able
to
allocate
so
much
funding
last
year,
and
so
that's
that's
where
we
might
want
to
do
some
projecting
and
some
planning
and
saying,
okay.
We
know
we're
going
to
have
this
much
money
here
and
we'll
spend
it
here.
This
much
there
and
we'll
all
together
can
come
up
with
a
more
strategic,
perhaps
a
multi-year
plan,
but
I
don't
I,
don't
actually
know.
E
D
Ahead,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
say,
welcome,
Michaela.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
great
presentation
and
it's
really
great
to
start
working
with
you,
I
guess
back
a
couple,
logistical
questions:
when
will
we
get
information
about
this
year's
applicants
and
how
will
that
be
delivered,
and,
secondarily
do
you
have
any
sense
of
how
many
applicants
we
might
have
to
review.
E
Thank
you
so
this
year
we
do
not
have
any
public
service
nofa
at
all,
because
we'll
just
be
continuing
the
same
Public
Service
one.
We
also
did
not
do
a
nofa
for
the
capital
funds
this
year,
so
I
think
what
we'll
probably
be
considering
is
some
of
the
existing
projects
that
we
can
consider
if
we
want
to
use
and
if
you
have
other
direction,
but
there
won't
be
a
non-profit
applicants
this
year.
A
G
I
have
a
it
may
be
a
silly
question:
I'm
looking
at
slide,
13
and
I'm.
Looking
at
the
numbers
where
you
say
you
have
to
85
minimum
for
this
home
arp,
but
it
says
we
can
use
up
to
15
percent
administrative
costs.
So
if
there's
a
difference
between
it
so
say
we
spend
10
percent
where's
that
five
percent
go.
E
I
believe
that
we
either
could
not
spend
the
funds,
in
which
case
we
don't
actually
use
them.
We
don't,
we
only
draw
them
down,
you
know
when
we
actually
get
to
use
them
or
we
or
we
would
put
it
towards
the
the
services
or
the
shelter
or
whatever
we
decided
to
use
the
funds,
for.
Let
me
just
make
sure
I'm
correct
about
that
Susan
or
calling
is
that
is
that
correct?
Yes,.
C
I
just
wanted
to
follow
on
to
commissioner
Sylvester
Sylvester's
question
so
commonly
when
this
time
of
year
comes
around.
We
get
a
huge
binder
of
materials
to
review,
and
it
sounds
as
though,
since
there
weren't
nofas
this
year,
we
probably
won't
have
a
huge
binder
of
materials
to
review,
but
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
we
will
be
expecting
some
sort
of
binder
of
materials
to
review
in
advance
just
just
to
know
so
that
we
can.
E
A
F
E
Thanks,
yes,
so
we
did
not
have
a
nofa
process
this
year,
so
it
will.
We
will
not
have
applicants
to
consider.
We
will
have
spending
opportunities
to
consider
that
I
we're
still
doing
our
internal
staff
work
to
determine
exactly
what
what
we
will
be
bringing
forward,
but
I
I
expect
there
will
be
some
decisions
to
be
made
and
oops
and
some
some
questions
to
answer,
but
it
will
not
be
applicants,
as
you
typically
do
with
the
nofa
process.
A
The
commissioner
ball
is
that
the
conclusion
of
your
questions?
Yes,
thank
you
in
that
case,
I'll
go
ahead
and
ask
my
questions.
Sort
of
this
is
a
very
popular
question.
I'm
glad
we
got
it
started,
I
was
wondering
for.
Are
we
allowed
to
request
those
materials
to
be
delivered
to
us?
Paperless
I,
don't
know
if
Michaela,
if
that's
a
question
for
you
or
if
that's
more
of
a
question
for
Christina.
A
I
would
I
always
appreciate
the
effort
that
goes
into
printing
out
those
large
binders
when
we
have
those
nofa
years
that
we
need
to
consider,
but
I
I
don't
know
I'm
used
to
going
paperless
now
and
if
any
other
Commissioners
are
interested
in
that
I
know,
I
would
be
I
see.
Colleen
has
her
hand
raised,
go.
I
So
you
will,
and
it
is
a
continuation
like
Michaela
said
of
what's
the
city
is
currently
funding
this
year,
but
so
you
will
have
you
know
that
opportunity
to
kind
of
remind
yourself
and
review
how
those
funds
are
being
used,
and
you
know
what
those
agencies
are
doing
and
whatnot.
So
you
will
have
all
that
information
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there.
A
And
then
I
had
another
question:
Michaela
and
Colleen
and
Susan.
If,
in
the
feedback
that
you
said,
you
got
from
applicants,
you
said
something
about
a
high
administrative
burden
on
them
and
I'm
curious
where
that
administrative
burden
came
from.
Is
that
sort
of
something
that
the
city
could
control
or
is
that
sort
of
strings
attached
to
the
the
federal
application?
I
So
and
I
I'm
Michaela,
please
feel
free
to
interrupt
me
if
you
want,
but
I
know
Michaela's
new,
so
she
probably
hasn't
gotten
quite
as
much
feedback.
But
you
know,
the
real
issue
is
just
the
the
HUD
regulations
around
the
use
of
cdbg
and
home
funds.
Environmental
review
requirements
just
documentation.
It
is
a
very
you
know,
it's
a
it's
a
federal
program.
It's
very
extensive.
I
I
You
know
this
pot
of
money
to
do
this
repair
work
in
our
community
room.
We
didn't
understand
that
we
had
to
do
all
of
these
things.
So
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
two
pieces
right
and
I.
Think
City
staff
has
had
those
internal
conversations
about
being
very
clear
from
the
beginning
of
the
process,
what
it
means
to
get
cdbg
and
home
funds,
because
I
I
do
think
that
piece
was
missing
in
previous
years,
but
also
just
you
know,
it's
a
federal
program.
It's
pretty
extensive.
What's
required,
I
hope
that
answers
your
questions.
I
It's
two
pieces.
It
really
is.
It
really
is
Hud's
fault,
no
just
kidding,
but
it's
also
just
you
know
it's
it's
an
administrative
burden
and
I
do
think
moving
forward.
You
know
with
the
city
staff,
it's
been
discussed
on
how
to
make
sure
that
these
non-profits
that
are
applying
to
this
money
if
they've,
never
managed
a
capital
project
with
federal
funds.
All
that
that
entails
because
it
is,
it
is
very
extensive.
A
Just
because
I
I
have
heard
from
us
like
non-profits
in
the
community
that
they
they
don't
even
know
that
these
funds
are
available
or
they've
never
heard
of
them,
or
something
like
that
and
I
think
that
would
be
great
to
have
more
of
more
folks
like
really
understand
what
this
is
and
have
more
transparency
into
the
processes
and
everything
so
really
glad
to
have
you
on
board
to
to
be
able
to
do
that
good
work.
Thank
you.
B
I
know:
there's
no
action
to
be
taken,
it's
just
an
informational
report.
So
just
to
recap,
you
know
the
April
and
April
meeting
regular
meeting
will
be
the
public
hearing
and
we
will
work
on
getting
that.
Staff
report
out
with
the
agenda
packet
and
I
will
coordinate
with
Michaela
to
see
if
we
can
get
out
a
few
days
earlier
than
the
regular
posting
so
that
you
have
a
few
extra
days
in
your
in
your
week
to
review
the
materials
and
be
prepared
for
the
public
hearing.
A
Great
that's
much
appreciated.
Thank
you
for
all
that
work
and
just
want
to
mention.
I
did
Skip
public
comment
because
we
don't
have
any
attendees
from
the
public
just
having
that
on
the
record,
and
in
that
case,
if
no
one
else
has
anything
to
add,
I'll
go
ahead
and
close
out
this
item
and
go
back
in
the
agenda
to
item
oh
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
Michaela
and
Colleen
and
Susan
for
joining.
A
Great
and
should
I
move
or
they'll
exit
on
their
own
okay,
great.
So
we'll
move
on
to
section
five
unfinished
business.
So
we'll
hear
now
from
the
subcommittees
and
hear
about
their
work,
section
5.1,
the
color
of
law
subcommittee,
the
color
of
loss
of
committee
will
now
present
an
oral
update.
No
action
will
be
taken
on
this
item.
D
G
D
Thank
you
for
having
a
sense
of
humor
about
that,
but
I'm
actually
thinking
of
doing
that.
But
I
don't
have
enough
sense
of
humor
right
now
to
come
up
with
something
funny
and
horrible.
I
I,
as
always
I
forget
where
we
left
less
left
off
last
month,
because
we
are
very
actively
working
in
between
meetings.
So
I
always
forget
what
I've
told
you
versus
what
we've
already
done.
So
forgive
any
redundancy.
D
D
So
there
are
three
of
us
I'm,
the
only
one
on
the
this,
this
part
of
the
project
working
that
that
are
go
that
are
actually
going
into
the
library
and
looking
for
stories
that
suggest
Trends
in
housing,
discrimination
against
different
kinds
of
biasing,
about
housing,
about
renters
and
similar,
so
we're
building
up
a
little
bit
of
an
archive.
The
management
of
those
materials
is
of
in
itself
an
interesting
subpart
of
this
project.
We
have
a
Google
Drive
and
we're
collecting
collecting
collecting
we're.
D
Also
collecting
materials
from
other
sources,
just
articles
about
housing,
more
modern
articles,
different
kinds
of
artifacts,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
we
hope
to
add
to
that
so
of
artifacts.
I
got
the
date
wrong
earlier
this
week,
I
think
in
about
two
weeks,
some
of
us,
including
Professor
Khan
from
Stanford,
will
be
going
down
to
Santa
Clara
to
actually
go
through
their
archives
to
look
for
Deeds
that
might
have
deed
restrictions
in
them.
So
wish
us
luck.
D
We
they
only
allow
groups
to
come
in
small
groups
to
come
in
once
a
month
and
the
scheduling
is
one
or
two
months
out
for
when
you
will
get
an
appointment.
So
we're
hoping
we
find
something
interesting
and
don't
have
to
go
back
and
try
to
schedule
again,
but
wishes
luck,
I'm,
hoping
we
find
some
very
interesting
things,
and
hopefully
these
archives
are
relatively
accessible,
but
none
of
us
know
what
we're
getting
into
Let's
see.
We
are
also
working
on
with
Mountain
View,
historical
Association,
on
what
I'm
calling
part
one
of
oral
histories.
D
We
have
some
long
time,
Mountain
View
residents
and
long-time
historical
Association
members
digging
through
some
oral
history
archives.
Looking
for
stories
that
reference
housing
discrimination
or
lack
thereof
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
they
know
their
stories
in
there,
but
people
are
manually
coming
through
transcripts.
Those
folks
are
also
going
to
be
giving
us
names
of
people.
They
think
we
can
go
talk
to
or
talk
to
their
children
and
do
some
follow-up
storytelling.
D
D
Think
I'll
save
an
update
for
next
month
on
that,
but,
lastly,
now
to
the
meat
of
it,
which
I
might
turn
over
to
commissioner
Solomon,
because
it's
fair,
we
have
been
working
on
a
survey
survey
similar
to
what
we
did
for
our
online
policing
work
where
we
had
people
tell
us
stories,
it
kind
of
abstractly
just
tell
us
stories
about
what
you've
faced
in
terms
of
housing
discrimination
in
our
community.
It's
I
think
two,
two
major
question
type
survey
very
open-ended.
D
We
have
been
working
diligently
and
very
consistently
with
Christina
and
thank
you
Christina
for
all
your
help.
We
have
an
almost
final
version
of
that.
Hopefully,
final
review
on
Monday,
it
will
get
translated
and
then
we
will
be
sharing
that
about
around
the
community
via
various
Partners
organizations
and
the
City's
health
too,
to
hear
people's
stories
that
they
can
tell
from
anywhere.
You
know,
as
far
back
as
they
can
go
up
to
current
times,
so
we
look
forward
to
seeing
what
comes
of
that.
Commissioner
Solomon.
C
I'll
just
add
that,
so
there
is
an
option
for
folks
to
upload.
We
hope
that
it
will
work
out
this
way
within
the
programming
of
the
survey
for
folks
to
upload
if
they
happen
to
have
a
document
that
provides
an
example
of
discriminatory
language,
so
that
would
be
assuming
that
that
will
be
possible
within
the
survey
platform.
It
would
be
really
interesting
to
get
some
of
those
documents
to
be
able
to
include
that
in
the
review
and
sharing
of
materials,
so
I
think
I.
Think
too
I.
G
And
we're
also
looking
at
second
person
heard
of
types
of
comments
as
well.
I
know
we
had
a
discussion
about
that
because
we
may
not
have
people
that
lived
here
that
far
long
ago,
but
their
kids
may
have
lived
there
and
they
may
have
some
experience,
but
it
would
be
second
hand
and
that
still
helps
to
contribute
to
the
discussion.
D
Thank
you
both
for
a
little
bit
more
information
and
Christina
I
guess
we
will
work
with
you
to
figure
out
how
to
get
this.
The
survey,
whatever
the
tool
is
and
sorry
we've
gone
through
a
lot
of
iterations
as
to
what
that
tool
should
look
like
and
what
it
should
be
if
we
can
distribute
that
whatever
that
link
is
to
everybody,
that
would
be
great,
so
we
don't
violate
any
brown
act.
If
you
could
do
that,
that
would
be
wonderful,
yeah.
D
A
A
A
I'll
start
with
my
own
and
I
have
several
I
guess
one
is
this
is
all
amazing
work
and
I
know
that
you
meant
there
was
mention
of
a
Google
Drive
where
you're
housing.
All
of
this
great
information
and
I'm
curious,
I'm
I
think
this
subcommittee
had
started
out
as
the
a
civility
Roundtable
type
subcommittee
I.
D
I'm
happy
to
take
that
we
are
I,
don't
know
if
we're
calling
it
a
CRT
I
think
there's
been
much
discussion
about
what
that
even
means
in
the
current
HRC,
but
we
are
having
an
event
I
believe
May,
19th,
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
Christine
I,
don't
have
my
calendar,
it's
on
the
other
computer
sitting
next
to
me,
so
May
19th
we're
having
an
hopefully
knock
on
wood.
D
Looking
good
in-person
event
that
we'll
have
three
parts,
one
will
be
a
somebody
kind
of
overviewing
some
of
the
materials
and
why
we
study
this
and
some
of
our
findings.
The
second
part,
hopefully,
will
be
the
ability
for
people
to
pre
sort
of
pre-selected
people
to
share
some
of
their
stories
directly
with
the
audience
about
discrimination,
or
lack
thereof,
that
they've
seen
in
housing
so
telling
their
own
life
story
in
person
and
then
wrapping
it
up.
D
Hrc
Style
with
some
Community
dialogue
among
tables
and
we're
actually
hoping
that
all
of
us
could
help
moderate
we're.
Definitely
looking
for
moderators.
This
is
not
going
to
be
complex
questions
if
you're,
just
sort
of
leading
the
conversation
and
helping
keep
it
on
track
and
wrap.
It
up
so
that
is
still
the
output,
but
the
research
is
needed
for
part.
One
of
the
event
we're
also
still
hoping
to,
especially
since
it
looks
like
it
can
be
in
person,
have
a
if
you
will
a
physical
literal
physical
timeline
around
a
wall.
D
J
I,
don't
actually
have
a
question
but
I
just
looking
forward
to
what
you're
going
to
dig
up
it
looks
like
going
on
a
treasure
hunt.
At
the
same
time,
you
know
trying
to
dig
out.
Needless
in
a
you
know,
in
a
haystack
and
yeah,
it's
all
going
to
be
interesting.
I
just
want
to
look
forward
to
that
and
see
what
you
you
dig
up
with
I
think
we're
interested,
but
it
seems
very
tedious
at
the
same
time,
but
it
looks
like
an
amazing
thing
at
the
end
of
it
also
all
the
best.
D
The
needle
on
the
haystack
is
somewhat
appropriate
because
Mountain
View
was
a
very,
very
diverse
and
supportive
community
in
general,
so
they're
the
needles
in
the
haystack.
We
know
that
there
are
Deeds
with
restrictive
covenants
in
them,
I
mean
we
know,
and
we've
read
editorials
that
sort
of
randomly
pop
up
in
what
was
what
became
the
Mountain
View
voice.
That
are
definitely
pretty
horrible,
but
they
are
a
little
bit
harder
to
find,
and
that
is
probably
that's
a
good
thing,
but
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
that
frustrating
as
work
goes.
A
J
J
But
during
that
time,
I
also
mentioned
that
I
had
reached
out
to
Candice
speaking
and
Christina
and
I
met
with
Nicole,
and
it
was
a
great
meeting
and
I
appreciated
Christina
for
being
there.
I
was
able
to
really
give
a
very
clear
explanation
of
you
know
our
idea
or
what
we're
hoping
for
and
some
of
the
outcomes,
and
so
that
was
very,
very
helpful.
J
To
have
Christina
with
me
for
that
meeting,
but
it
went
further
where
it
now
included
adolfer,
who
actually
is
the
founder
of
canalius
speaking,
so
we
had
a
follow-up
meeting,
which
was
also
quite
interesting.
It
was
also
very
brief,
because
I
had
an
engagement
to
go
to,
and
so
the
presented
us
with
a
proposal
which
Christopher
is
you
know
going
to
kind
of
make
it
a
little
more,
simpler
and
maybe
distributed.
So
that's
just
really
it
Krishna.
Do
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that?
Since
you
were
there
with
me,
no.
B
So
yeah,
so
the
subcommittee
will
meet
on
Monday
and
they'll,
have
an
opportunity
to
review
the
two
proposals
for
the
facilitators
and
hopefully
make
a
decision
on
which
facilitator
they
like
to
move
forward
with.
But
it's
good
good
good
news
that
we
have
two
parties
who
are
very
interested
and
excited
about
this
subcommittee's
ideas
and
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
it's
going
to
turn
out
to
be
a
great
event.
G
A
C
C
I
had
a
question
about
so
there
are
two
proposals
from
organizations
to
potentially
dislocate
and
so
is:
does
the
city
have
funds
to
pay?
The
facilitators
is
that
they've
made
proposals?
There's
some
kind
of
RFP
process
requests
for
proposals,
they've
responded,
so
it
am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
You
are
correct,
yes,
great,
okay,
great
and
is
that
and
I'm
assuming
that
that
goes
beyond
our
very
small
annual
HRC
budget?
In
other
words,
there's
funding
from
somewhere
else.
That's
available,
correct,
okay,
great
thank
you.
A
D
Do
I
have
a
somewhat
similar
question,
so
it
would
be
either
pcrc
or
candidly
speaking
doing
the
moderation
or
would
there
be
a
role
for
both
of
them?
I
know
that
you
were
very
very
interested
in
the
candidly
speaking
folks
before,
but
there
were
a
lot
of
questions
about
them,
so
I'm
just
curious
how
that's
checking
out
yeah.
A
B
B
F
A
Okay,
if
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
and
I
also
don't
see
anyone
in
the
public
attendee
rooms,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
section
5.3
the
bystander
training
subcommittee,
which
will
now
present
an
oral
update.
No
action
will
be
taken
on
this
item
me
and
well.
Chairs
of
Vice,
chair,
Sylvester
and
I
will
now
provide
an
oral
update,
so
I
know
Vice,
chair,
you've
done
a
lot
of
the
updates,
I
think
for
your
loss
of
committee.
A
Please
do
okay,
okay,
I'm
happy
too,
so
we
had
a
meeting
really
quick
with
staff
Christina,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
discuss
next
steps
of
what
we
wanted
to
do
with
the
information
that
we
had
gathered
about.
You
know
who,
among
local
folks,
might
be
interested
in
bystander
training
and
holding
one,
and
also
who
we
might
also
engage
to
facilitate
a
training.
A
D
Go
ahead,
I
think
that's
pretty
much
says
it
all,
but
I
think
the
idea
would
be
in
the
new
fiscal
year
to
have
it
relatively
new
in
the
in
the
fiscal
year
since
we're
doing
some
of
the
groundwork
now.
But
that
and
just
a
reminder:
I
do
have
the
action
item
to
follow
up
with
Joe
smithian's
office
to
see
what
his
availability
and
timing
and
what
his
support
could
look
like.
B
Yeah,
no
and
nothing
to
add,
I,
think
you
captured
it
accurately.
I
think
also.
The
subcommittee
was
tasked
to
you
know
identifying
if
there
are
other
entities
that
are
holding
bystander
trainings,
that
would
be
available
to
Mountain
View
residents
and
if
there
are
then
helping
to
promote
that
so
I
think
that's
still
an
ongoing
action
and
that
the
subcommittee
can,
you
know,
work
if
you
come
across
any
other
trainings
in
the
area
that
community
members
might
want
to
participate
in.
A
A
Okay,
I,
don't
see
any
oh
I
know
what
I
was
going
to
add,
just
that
in
hopes
that
next
year
we'll
be
able
to
have
the
bystander
training
in
person
just
because
a
lot
of
this
training
requires
like
role-playing
or
things
that
probably
are
better
communicated
in
person.
So
with
that
hope,
I
think
something
for
next
year
to
look
forward
to
great
and
then
no
one
is
in
the
attendee
box.