►
From YouTube: November 3, 2022 Human Relations Commission Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Human Relations Commission
A
So
before
we
do
roll
call
I
have
to
make
the
Regular
announcement
that,
during
the
declared
state
of
emergency,
this
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953e,
as
authorized
by
the
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clark
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
this
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
HRC
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location.
C
A
B
Right
for
General
consensus,
we
can
use
raised
hands,
but
if
there
does
not
appear
to
be
a
consensus,
we
will
need
to
do
a
roll
call
quote.
I
would
also
like
to
clarify
for
the
commission
that
the
vote
is
not
on
whether
or
not
the
commission
views.
This
is
an
excused
or
unexcused
absence,
but
whether
or
not
the
absence
is
excuse
or
unexcused,
as
defined
by
the
council
policy.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
clarifying
that
and
I
know
it's
something
that
we
all
read
when
we
when
we
joined
the
commission,
it's
just
I,
don't
think
I
have
it
memorized
right
now
off
the
top
of
my
head.
So
in
that
case,
for
vice
chair
Sylvester's
absence,
her
absence
tonight
is
for
personal
matter.
That
is
not
among
the
list
of
qualified
excuses
and
thus
under
cons.
Council
policy
k02
is
defined
as
unexcused.
If
you
are
in
agreement
Commissioners,
please
raise
your
hand.
A
Okay,
I'm,
seeing
all
the
Commissioners
raising
their
hand,
so
there
is
a
general
consensus
there.
Thank
you
and
then
I'll
go
ahead
and
propose
also
that
commissioner
Ball's
absence
which
for
tonight
is
for
illness
is
cons,
is
considered
a
qualified
excuse
and
can
be
defined
as
excused
under
the
council
policy
k02.
A
A
A
B
E
A
Thank
you.
Next
is
oral
Communications
from
the
public
I,
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
in
the
attendees
list
right
now,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
read
this
section
and
if
anyone
shows
up,
they
can
speak
if
they'd
like
and
if
not
we'll,
move
on
to
the
next
portion.
So
this
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
commission
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
A
A
So
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
the
next
section
of
the
of
of
the
agenda
is
for
unfinished
business
but
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
propose,
since
we
have
staff
other
staff
here
that
we
discuss
that
we
can
discuss
I'm,
sorry,
I
think
I
have
the
wrong
I'm.
Sorry
I
think
I
have
the
wrong
agenda
in
front
of
me,
so
I
believe
we
have
folks
from
the
community.
A
F
Yes,
okay!
Thank
you
good
evening,
Commissioners
I'm
Harsha
ramchandani
housing,
specialist
one
along
with
Michaela
Hellman,
tinsure
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager
and
Wayne
Chen
assistant
community
development
director.
We're
pleased
to
be
with
you
this
evening
to
discuss
the
city's
Federal,
Community,
Development,
block,
grant
and
home
investment
partnership
programs.
F
F
The
city
of
Mountain
View
receives
annual
grants
on
a
formula
basis
for
the
CDP
and
home
programs
from
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
or
HUD
to
receive
the
annual
Grant.
The
city
must
develop
and
submit
to
HUD
a
five-year
Consolidated
plan.
This
is
a
comprehensive
planning
document,
aligning
the
city's
priority
goals
for
a
five-year
period
and
how
cdpg
and
home
funding
would
be
used
to
achieve
those
goals.
The
six
priority
goals
in
the
city's
fiscal
year,
2020
through
2025
Consolidated
plan,
are
as
shown
on
screen.
F
The
amount
of
funding
depends
on
the
federal
budget
approved
for
these
programs
and
do
vary
year
by
year.
In
recent
years,
the
city
has
received
approximately
620
000
in
cdbg
funds
and
approximately
295
000
in
home
funds
annually.
The
city
also
receives
repayment
of
cdbg
and
Home
Loans
made
to
affordable
housing
developers
in
previous
years.
This
is
known
as
program
income.
F
The
purpose
of
adbg
funding
is
to
help
jurisdictions
address
their
Community.
Development
needs
cdbg.
Funding
users
allow
for
a
maximum
of
15
percent
of
the
grant
to
go
towards
Public
Services
Public
Service
activities
include
social
services
and
or
other
direct
support
to
individuals
and
households
in
need
of
assistance.
F
F
F
Staff
has
developed
principles
to
make
policy
recommendations
for
the
cdbg
and
home
nofa
funding
cycle.
These
include
previous
items
that
have
been
discussed
with
the
HRC
and
that
require
follow-up,
as
well
as
new
items
to
establish
a
policy
framework
that
enhances
program
implementation,
informed
by
recent
funding
cycles
and
feedback
from
the
HRC,
the
city,
cdbg
and
home
Consultants,
Grant
recipients
and
HUD
staff.
The
principles
are
meant
to
build
on
effective
past
practices
and
set
up
new
procedures
to
improve
the
city's
Focus
for
allocating
cdbg
and
home
funds
shown
on
screen
are
the
suggested
principles.
C
F
Due
to
these
considerations,
staff
recommends
analyzing
the
best
use
and
method
of
allocating
the
capital
funds
on
an
annual
basis,
either
recommending
a
direct
allocation
to
an
activity
with
an
identified
need,
as
the
city
did,
for
the
Crestview
Hotel
conversion
to
housing
or
undergoing
an
offer
to
solicit
potential
proposals
from
non-profit
organizations
with
capital
needs.
This
approach
would
allow
for
Effective
and
flexible
administration
of
the
capital
funds.
F
F
Based
on
the
suggested
principles,
three
policing
rep
policy
recommendations
are
proposed
for
the
upcoming
no
founding
speaker.
The
first
recommendation
is
aligned
with
previous
HRC
feedback
about
establishing
a
minimum
funding
threshold
for
public
service
grants.
The
hard
minimum
is
five
thousand
dollars.
F
F
The
input
received
is
that
the
administrative
burden
for
a
five
thousand
dollar
Grant
award
would
be
relatively
High,
while
a
ten
thousand
dollar
threshold
would
likely
impact
the
number
of
public
service
agencies
that
could
be
funded.
Given
the
high
demand
for
the
funds,
which
has
historically
been
oversubscribed,
therefore,
a
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollar
minimum
would
achieve
an
appropriate
balance.
F
The
second
recommendation
is
issuing
two
cdbg
Capital
project
nofas
for
fiscal
year.
2023-24
staff
recommends
that
30
000
of
cdbg
capital
projects
funding
be
set
aside
and
available
for
non-profits
that
assist
low-income
homeowners
with
minor
home
repairs
for
Grants
of
up
to
five
thousand
per
household.
F
The
grand
amount
has
been
determined
after
reviewing
past
Grant
requests
and
feedback
from
non-profits
about
average
number
of
requests
received
on
an
annual
basis.
The
funds
would
be
available
to
qualifying
homeowners
in
single-family
homes,
multi-family
units
and
mobile
homes
due
to
reporting
and
monitoring
regulations
associated
with
cdbg
staff
recommends
establishing
a
minimum
threshold
for
funding
capital
projects.
F
Typically,
Capital
funding
is
used
by
affordable
housing
developments
or
non-profits
serving
low-income
households
or
persons
with
special
needs
for
acquisition
or
Rehabilitation
activities.
Based
on
recent
examples
of
cdbg
funded
capital
projects,
staff
recommends
a
minimum
threshold
of
three
hundred
thousand.
F
As
noted
on
the
prior
slide,
it
has
been
difficult
to
fund
capital
projects
through
the
nofa
process
to
better
leverage
other
City
funds
dedicated
to
affordable
housing
and
more
purposely
align
the
funding
with
the
city's
existing
goals.
Staff
recommends
not
doing
a
nofa
for
home
funds
and
working
with
developers
of
affordable
housing
projects
in
the
city's
pipeline
that
are
shovel
ready
to
fill
existing
funding
gaps.
F
F
funding
requests
will
then
be
evaluated.
Public
service
and
capital
funding
applications
and
staff
recommendations
will
be
brought
back
to
the
HRC
for
consideration
in
March
2023
in
April,
2023
Council
will
review
and
approve
funding
recommendations
and
the
annual
action
plan
which
details
how
the
annual
cdbg
and
home
grants
will
spend.
F
The
annual
action
plan
will
then
be
submitted
to
HUD
in
May
2023,
and
the
program
here
will
begin
in
July
2023
in
closing
staff
recommends
a
new
policy
framework
to
improve
the
city's
implementation
of
the
cdbg
and
home
programs
and
requests
HRC
feedback
of
proposed
principles
and
the
populations
in
advance
of
the
upcoming
nofa
cycle.
This
concludes
our
presentation.
I
am
happy
to
answer
questions
along
with
Michaela
and
Wayne.
Thank
you.
A
Thanks
so
much,
let
me
see
I
think
before
we
begin
with
commissioner
questions,
I
believe
commissioner
Webb
has
been
moved
to
the
attendees
list,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
the
way
to
transfer
him
back
to
panelists,
but
while
we're
doing
that,
oh
there
you
go.
Are
there
any
questions.
I
feel
like
I.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
I
have
a
question
that
might
be
a
little
bit
out
from
Left
Field.
Actually,
first
of
all,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation
and
the
very
clear
slides
having
been
through
this
process
in
a
number
of
Cycles
I,
still
always
appreciate
being
reintroduced
to
it
and
reminded
of
the
different
components
of
it
with
cbbg
and
home
and
the
general
funds.
So
so
thank
you
for
that.
E
So
my
question
is
perhaps
a
little
bit
from
left
field,
but
I've
wondered
about
the
issue
of
earthquake
retrofitting
in
Mountain
View
and
that
I
think
that
there
are
a
number
of
structures
in
Mountain
View
that
are
really
in
need
of
that
and
the
challenges
of
how
to
pay
for
that,
and
it
occurred
to
me
during
the
presentation.
I
just
wondered
if
any
of
the
funding
sources
could
or
would
ever
be
used
to
help
support
earthquake
retrofitting
just
wondering
if
there
were
any
comments
on
that.
G
C
C
But
there
was
some
discussion
at
the
time
of
whether
it
made
sense.
If
there
were
a
city
program,
whether
there
could
be
funding
made
available
to
the
older
apartment
buildings,
which
is
mostly
what
the
soft
story
retrofits
would
go,
and
so
there
was
some
discussion
about
how
that
would
interact
with
our
rent
stability
stabilization
program
and
whether
it
would
be
feasible
or
if
it
would
be
appropriate.
Whether
City
Investments
might
go
towards
Apartments
covered
in
that
program.
C
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
do
remember
when
that
report
came
out
some
years
ago
and
of
course,
with
the
pandemic,
there
have
been
other
priorities,
but
I
I
think
perhaps
we
were
all
reminded
recently
for
the
especially
for
those
of
us
who
felt
the
recent
earthquake
that
you
know
that
it
is
something
to
consider
moving
forward
the
need
for
retrofitting,
especially
for
you
know,
frankly,
a
lot
of
the
buildings
where
lower
income
residents
of
this
community
are
and
the
the
dangers
for
them
for
their
for
families
without
having
the
retrofitting.
E
C
Michaela
and
I
are
also
looking
at
as
part
of
our
displacement
response
strategy
opportunities
to
implement
an
acquisition
preservation
program.
Part
of
that
was
discussed
at
our
August
30th
study
session
we
recently
held
with
Council,
and
we
laid
out
some
initial
thoughts
about
the
potential
for
such
a
program
and
seeking
Partnerships
and
funding
Partnerships
with
external
agencies
and
entities
to
potentially
generate
funding
sources
to
facilitate
acquisition
of
such
projects
or
to
facilitate
Rehabilitation
of
such
projects.
So
that
is
on
our
work
plan,
for
you
know
the
the
coming
one
to
five
years.
C
D
D
If
you
used
all
5K,
that
only
gets
you
to
six
people
and
it
seems
like
there
might
be
a
greater
need
for
this,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
the
issue
is
that
there's
not
enough
PR
about
the
program
existing
and
so
in
the
past
is
that's.
Why
I
I
guess
I
just
like
to
understand
why
it's
only
30k
and
not
a
greater
portion
of
the
map.
G
Thanks,
commissioner
raystraw,
when
we
we
haven't
done
this
program
for
a
few
years.
So
when
we
were
thinking
about
bringing
it
back,
we
did
reach
out
to
some
nonprofits
that
do
this
kind
of
work
and
ask
them
about
what
they
anticipated.
The
demand
might
be
in
Mountain
View,
and
what
the
past
demand
had
been
and
that's
how
we
came
up
with
the
30
000
recommendation.
G
We
are
a
little
cautious
about
allocating
funds
that
we
can't
spend
because
we
will
get
penalized
if
we
do
too
much
of
that,
but
we'd
be
open
to
considering
a
different
amount.
If
that's
what
the
commission
would
like
us
to
do,
but
the
30
000
came
from
an
estimate
based
on
what
they
thought
their
demand
would
be
I'm,
not
sure
you
know
if
it
was
based.
D
You
know
people
to
get
the
weeds
down
and
to
bring
in
you
know,
Mulch
and
everything
that
people
were
totally
open
to
that,
but
they
just
didn't,
have
the
resources
themselves
and
I
wonder
if
you
know
by
finding
other
organizations
to
work
with
and
finding
these
other
resources.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
out
there
that
have
this
need,
but
they
just
don't
necessarily
have
access
to
the
knowledge
of
how
to
get
the
funds
or
who
to
turn
to.
D
C
Well,
Michaela
and
Harsha
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
believe
part
of
the
assessment,
too,
was
looking
at
both
that
maybe
the
demand
side,
but
also
at
the
ability
for
potential
non-profits,
whether
they
have
the
capacity
to
serve
a
greater
number
of
households
and
the
agencies
who
typically
provide
these
services
are
region-wide.
So
they
do
serve
multiple
cities
and
I
believe
that
was
part
of
the
assessment.
C
E
D
G
So
we
currently
have
a
pretty
significant,
affordable
housing
pipeline.
We
have
I
believe
have
to
count,
I,
think
four
projects
that
are
currently
approved
by
the
council
to
move
forward,
and
then
we
have
another
three
or
sorry
another
two
that
are
likely
to
come
forward
in
the
next
year
and
then
we
have
several
others
that
are
likely
to
come
afford
in
the
coming
years.
So
and
as
we
described
in
our
study
session
on
August
30th
to
the
council,
we
do
anticipate
a
funding
gap
for
our
pipeline
at
large.
G
So
what
I
would
say
is
that
once
we
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
funding
available,
we
would
analyze
our
whole
Pipeline
and
make
a
recommendation
about
which
projects
to
allocate
the
funds
towards,
but
I
think
we
are
pretty
confident
that
we
we
have
places
that
we
can
spend
the
funds
on
affordable
housing
and
that
pipeline
doesn't
include
the
preservation
projects
that
Wayne
was
referencing,
as
well
as
any
rehab
rehabilitation
that
might
be
required
in
existing,
affordable
housing
developments
that
we
would
also
consider
so
I
guess.
The
short
answer
is
no.
G
We
would
wouldn't
be
scrolling
it
away.
We
have
a
place
to
suspend
it
and
it
may
involve
you
know
replacing.
For
example,
you
know
the
council
has
allocated
local
fees
for
some
of
these
projects
and
we
could
reallocate
the
home
funds
towards
that
and
then
use
those
local
fees
for
later
projects.
The
local
fees
don't
have
as
strict
timeliness
requirements
as
the
home
funds,
and
so
that
would
be
a
way
of
simultaneously
meeting
our
requirements
for
HUD
and
also
helping
us
with
our
funding
gaps.
A
G
Yeah
and
just
to
be
to
share
with
the
commission
just
because
there's
so
much
to
be
proud
of
in
our
city
and
we
do
anticipate
the
Crestview
hotel
opening
next
year,
the
La
Avenida,
affordable
housing
development
starting
construction
next
year,
hopefully
Montecito
Housing,
Development
and
Lot
12,
not
too
far
after
that,
and
we
just
approved
funding
for
the
Terra
Bella
Housing
Development
and
there's
more
to
come.
So
lots
of
good
things
in
the
affordable
housing
World
happening
in
the
city.
Thanks
to
thanks
to
this
community.
A
Yeah,
that
is
helpful,
I
think,
especially
in
terms
of
guidance
I
think
sometimes
when
we
come
across
sort
of
our
when
we
have
to
allocate
funding
and
deal
with
those
issues.
I
think
this
is
helpful
to
help
to
give
us
guidance
during
that
time
and
then
another
question
is
sort
of
these
policy
recommendations.
G
Thanks
I
think
for
most
of
these
they
do
allow
quite
a
bit
of
flexibility,
so
Archer
mentioned
in
several
cases.
You
know
if
we
get
it,
for
example,
for
the
Capital
minimum
funding
threshold
for
300
000.
If
we
get
an
application
for
Less,
we
can
consider
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
potentially
awarding
funds
to
an
organization
that
requests
less
I.
Think
there's
not
much
else
that
needs
that
level
of
flexibility.
But
you
know
this
is
a.
G
C
And
just
to
add
a
little
additional
context.
The
policy
recommendations
made
here
are
areas
where
HUD
authorizes
cities
or
entitlement
jurisdictions
to
implement
the
program
in
this
manner,
and
so
it
is
something
that
that
we
can
do
and
to
your
question.
Chair,
Lynn,
yes,
I
by
practice,
we've
longed
on
a
two-year
Public
Service
funding
cycle,
complemented
by
annual
Capital
project
Cycles.
C
Because
of
the
nature
of
the
need
in
recent
years
and
the
increasing
kind
of
challenges
of
dispersing
and
allocating
the
capital
project
funds.
Then,
when
we
identify
that
area,
we
felt
that
it
would
be
helpful
to
actually
establish
the
policy
and
provide
a
clear
framework
as
Harsha
mentioned,
but
also
the
flexibility
to
really
respond
to
the
needs
Michaela
mentioned.
C
You
know
there
are
families
in
this
test
to
actually
allocate
the
funds
and
for
the
nonprofits
to
expend
the
funds
and
that's
one
of
the
areas
where
we
felt
that
this
type
of
policy
clarified
to
the
commission,
to
the
council
to
the
public.
What
really
allow
us
to
be
able
to
make
the
most
effective
use
of
the
funds
but
but
implemented
in
a
way?
C
That's
the
most
effective
at
the
staff
level,
and
then
we've
also
evaluated
this
with
our
HUD
Consultants,
as
well
as
done
an
evaluation
of
best
practices,
and
we
felt
like,
through
this
kind
of
evaluation
lens.
You
know
we
were
able
to
include
that
in
our
analysis
before
bringing
these
recommendations
to
the
commission.
Okay,.
A
G
Yeah
I
can
try
to
address
both
questions
with
regard
to
chair
Lynn's
question.
These
are
guidelines
that
we
will
put
forward
in
our
notice
of
funding
availability,
and
we
will
you
know
we
can
say
you
know
at
the
discretion
of
the
HRC
and
city
council.
You
know
there.
There
may
be
exceptions
if
we'd
like
to
say
that,
ultimately,
these
are
these
are
funding
allocations
that
are
voted
upon
recommended
by
the
HRC
and
voted
upon
by
the
city
council.
G
A
And
I
totally
appreciate
that
I
know
like
I
I
think
this
is
helpful
to
have
these
guidelines
as
well,
but
I
think
maybe
adding
something
there
about
discretion.
Just
because
I
would
hate
for
I
would
just
hate
for
a
project
that
is
deserving,
but
also
like
not
Within.
These
policies
like
exactly
all
these
guidelines,
like
I,
would
hate
for
them
to
miss
out
or
for
us
to
not
be
able
to.
A
G
We
did
an
RFP
to
select
a
developer,
so
you
know
we're
not
hand-picking
sort
of
the
the
always
folks
any
anybody.
Who's
developing,
affordable
housing
in
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View
will
be
going
through
some
sort
of
procurement
process
first,
so
we
can
make
sure
that
there's
equal
opportunity
for
all
the
good
all
the
good
folks
who
want
to
do
good
works
in
our
community.
C
Does
it
meet
the
cdpg
or
home
requirements
serving
a
low
and
moderate
income
households?
Does
it
Advance
the
sixth
identified
Consolidated
plan
priorities,
and
so
those
those
are
some
of
the
key
pieces
in
terms
of
evaluating
because,
as
you
mentioned
chairman,
yes,
there
is
hardship
mentioned.
These
funds
typically
happen
over
subscribe
and
then
they'll
pass
to
your
cycle.
C
For
example,
the
300
000
threshold
and
so
I
think
we're
introducing
flexibility
in
a
way
that
we
may
not
have
formally
done
so
in
the
past.
So
I
think
that
could
allow
us
to
achieve
sort
of
the
input
that
you're,
providing
and
also
it'll
get
supplemented
by
the
fact
that
we
do
have
a
evaluation
and
scoring
framework
that
we
will
we'll
summarize
again
in
March
for
the
commission.
A
Thank
you.
That's
appreciate
that
further
background
and
not
trying
to
say
that
anything
non-compliance
should
happen
in
terms
of
the
federal
like
God,
like
regulations
or
anything
in
terms
of
funding
like
I,
just
I
think
when
I
see
like
sort
of
more
policies
put
on
top
of
like
the
requirements.
I
I
just
like
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
something's
built
into
that
so
that,
like
here
at
the
local
level,
we
provide
as
much
flexibility
as
we
can
for
our
residents
and
the
agencies
that
work
here.
A
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised,
so
in
that
case,
I
am
required
to
ask
if
there's
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line.
That
would
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
But
there
are
no
attendees
in
the
public
attendee
box,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
slows
out
this
item
of
new
business
forgot
to
say
in
the
beginning
that
no
action
will
be
taken
on
this
item
at
this
time.
So
no
need
for
any
votes.
A
A
Thanks
thanks.
Everyone
have
a
good
night,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
with
the
bystander
intervention
training
subcommittee,
which
will
now
present
an
oral
update.
No
action
will
be
taken
on
this
item
at
this
time.
I
understand
that
commissioner
ball
was
supposed
to
give
this
update,
but
he's
unable
to
attend
so
I
think.
Is
it
I
I
know
Laurel.
You
just
sent
me
a
message
about
this.
Is
it
commissioner,
Webb
I
think
are
you?
Are
you
able
to
provide
an
update.
D
We
have
our
next
meeting
tomorrow.
We've
already
had
one
where
we
discussed
determining
what
already
exists
for
our
community
at
large
in
terms
of
bystander
training
and
also
trying
to
really
put
a
good
I.
Don't
think
people
always
understand
what
bystander
train
intervention
training
is
so
I've
been
writing
some
stuff
up
about
how
to
explain
that
in
a
less
jargony
way
and
we're
meeting
tomorrow
to
talk
about
all
that,
and
hopefully
the
next
meeting
will
have
more
to
share
about
what
we've
learned
and
where
we're
planning
to
go.
A
H
H
H
A
B
A
H
A
A
I
I
think
we
all
know
her
or
most
of
us
know
her
a
non-profit
locally
based
called
reach
potential.
So
she's
been
doing
some
great
work
with
us
for
with
some
of
our
projects
from
previous
years,
including
the
safe
parking
work
that
we
did
in
during
the
pandemic.
So
she's
been
a
really
great
resource
for
the
community,
and
we
just
brought
her
on
to
hear
what
you
know.
A
Her
ideas
with
with
reach
have
been
and
how
that
could
maybe
tie
into
what
our
subcommittee
is
doing
so
nothing
too,
too
Concrete
in
terms
of
decisions
made
but
sort
of
just
being
high
level.
At
this
point,
I
know
we've
been
discussing.
You
know
I
feel
like
this.
Commission
really
excels
at
throwing
events
for
the
community,
which
are
really
amazing
and
now
that
we're
out
of
pandemic
like
they
can
be
even
better
because
they
can
be
in
person
I.
A
Think
I
was
also
able
to
bring
up
during
the
subcommune
meeting,
like
perhaps
making
something
of
a
artifact
that
can
be
like
that
can
be
like
an
online
or
social
media
type
artifacts,
something
along
the
lines
of
I
know.
When
years
ago,
we
sort
of
started
along
this
storytelling
process.
The
idea
of
sort
of
Journalism
that
takes
place
on
social
media.
A
H
H
H
So
we
we
may
have
some
more
something,
a
little
more
tangible
for
you
next
next
month,
but
again
we're
still
in
the
beginning
phases,
just
like
we
were
last
year
for
the
events
where
it
just
took
some
time
to
shape
up.
We
had
to
get
our
ideas
out
until
we
were.
You
know
who's
involved
who's
it
going
to
affect
outside
resources,
City
sources
or
city
resources.
H
E
Yes,
thank
you
for
that
update
I'm,
looking
forward
to
hearing
seeing
the
stories
that
are
ultimately
collected,
I
wanted
to
say
that,
as
part
of
the
follow-up
from
the
history
of
Housing
and
Mountain
View,
there
are
three
members
of
the
community
who
would
be
interested
potentially
to
be
interviewed
together
and
share
their
stories
together
about
housing,
instability
and
I.
Believe
I
sent
their
contact
information
to
Laurel
and
that
Laura
will
make
that
available
to
your
subcommittee.
E
A
Commissioner
Solomon
and
like
commissioner
Webb
was
saying,
we
don't
exactly
know
what
sort
of
the
output
of
our
or
deliverable
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
of
this
commission
will
be,
but
but
looking
forward
to
including
those
community
members
as
stories
in
in
it
are
there
any
other.
Commissioner
questions.
A
Okay,
I,
don't
see
any
and
then
I
also
don't
see
any
attendees
from
the
public.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
Skip
public
comment
and
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
do
have
another
subcommittee
from
the
mental
health
project,
but
they
have
my
understanding.
Is
they
haven't
met
yet?
So
there
are
no
updates
unless
anyone
wants
to
provide
an
update
prior
to
subcommunity
meetings,
so
not
seeing
anything
there
and
just
gonna
double
check
that
I
covered
everything.
Yes,
so
great.
B
A
E
E
Publicly
that
that
is
still
on
my
plate
and
I'm
working
my
way
through
the
transcript
and
the
recording
and
look
forward
to
getting
that
done
very
soon.
So,
thanks
to
everybody
for
patience
as
I
finish
that
off,
and
so
we
can
I
guess
in
some
way,
we've
officially
closed
out
the
work
of
that
subcommittee,
but
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
there
is
a
task.
That's
on
my
plate,.
A
Thanks,
commissioner,
Solomon
and
I
know
you
don't
have
to
you:
don't
need
us
to
hold
yourself
accountable
because
I
know
you're
amazing
at
like
finishing
the
work
and
doing
just
doing
a
lot
of
the
the
work,
especially
like
we've
appreciated
it
so
much
over
the
years.
Great.
Are
there
any
other
commissioner
reports
or
anything.
A
B
But
okay,
no
thank
you.
Chair
Lynn,
chair
Lynn
had
graciously
volunteered
to
resign
on
a
timeline
when
she
first
notified
me
of
her
intent
to
resign
at
the
end
of
the
year
she
volunteered
to
resign
on
a
timeline
that
would
allow
for
an
immediate
fulfilling
of
her
vacancy
through
the
tradition,
our
regular
annual
recruitment
process.
So
in
order
to
align
that
with
noticing
requirements,
that's
will
need
to
happen
shortly,
which
is
why
that
would
be
happening
early.
We're
not
asking
her
properly
yeah.
A
So
of
course
I'm
I
won't
I
will
no
longer
be
a
commissioner,
but
yeah
just
wanted
to.
Let
folks
know
and
sorry
again
for
how
yeah
how
quickly
this
had
to
happen.
But
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
the
new
generation
of
Commissioners
get
get
those
you
know
their
bottoms
in
those
chairs
as
efficiently
as
possible.
A
D
A
Won't
be
far
I'll
be
in
San,
Mateo
and
I'm
very
excited
to
bring
my
learnings
from
Mountain
View
to
San
Mateo
and
give
them
a
little
bit
of
the
old
like
Mountain
View,
yeah
yeah,
a
little
taste
of
Mountain
View.
Isn't
that
the
name
of
one
of
the
festival
like
Taste
of
Mountain
View?
That's
like
one
of
the
festivals,
so
anyway,
San
Mateo's,
a
great
City
too,
but
I
will
definitely
miss
Mountain
View.
A
lot
and
I'll
miss
this
commission
a
little
bit
yeah.
E
A
A
A
And
I'll
be
I'll,
be
back
for,
like
the
December
I'm
still
gonna
be
I'll,
be
a
faceless
voice
in
the
public,
attendee
box,
I
guess
so
yeah
but
yeah
it's
been.
It's
been
amazing
to
work
with
all
of
you
as
individuals
and
as
a
group.
So
it's
been
great
to
you
know.
Julie
and
Ida,
Rose
and
Kevin
I
know
have
been
here
sort
of
the
whole
time.
A
B
E
E
E
These
won't
go
well,
yeah
I'm
supposed
to
go
to
Brazil,
and
you
may
know
they
just
had
a
presidential
election
and
there's
some
some
tensions
around
the
results
that
we
can
relate
to
here
in
the
U.S
having
been
through
a
sort
of
similar
challenges
a
couple
of
years
ago.
So
just
hope,
just
hoping
it
won't
be
a
repeat
of
the
civil
unrest
situation
in
another
country
two
years
ago,
November
while
I
was
there
so
planning
to
join
the
meeting
remotely
in
December.