►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Education Enhancement Reserve Joint Powers Authority Board Meeting
B
Okay,
okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
call
this
medium
to
order
of
the
education
enhancement,
Reserve
joint
Powers
board
during
this
declared
state
of
emergency.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953,
subsection
e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
Mountain
view.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
education
exam
enhancement,
Reserve
joint
Powers
Authority
board,
will
participate
in
the
median
by
a
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location.
B
As
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda,
members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
for
an
item
by
joining
the
zoom
webinar
at
https,
backslash,
mountainview.gov,
backslash
meeting
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
ID
841-328-80012.
Any
emails
received
by
three
o'clock
today
were
forwarded
to
the
board.
Now
I'll
ask
assistant
city
manager,
Audrey
ramberg,
to
proceed
with
the
roll
call
Audrey.
C
A
B
You,
okay
now
we'll
move
to
oral
Communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
board
on
any
matter,
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
two
minutes.
During
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
board
from
acting
on
non-agendized
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda?
B
B
Do
not
see
any
public
comments
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
to
approval
of
the
minutes.
The
minutes
for
the
December
16
2021
meeting
have
been
delivered
to
board
members
and
copies
posted
on
the
city
hall
bulletin
board.
If
there
are
no
Corrections
or
additions,
a
motion
is
in
order
to
approve
these
minutes.
Is
there
a
motion.
F
D
B
In
favor
aye,
okay
minutes
adopted,
thank
you
all
right,
so
we'll
move
to
new
business.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
5.1,
which
is
the
current
status
of
School
District
activities
funded
by
the
education
enhancement,
Reserve
board
members,
Dr,
Meyer
and
Dr
Rudolph
will
discuss
activities
in
the
Mountain
View
Los
Altos,
Union,
High,
School
District
and
Mountain
View
wisman
School
District,
respectively,
funded
by
the
education
enhancement,
Reserve
and
board.
Members
may
ask
questions
following
the
presentation,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Dr
Meyer.
First,
all.
D
Right,
thank
you
chair.
The
mbla
high
school
district
receives
3.204
545
million
dollars
in
revenue
from
this
particular
reserve,
and
the
uses
are
as
follows.
It
is
currently
used.
1.124
million
is
currently
used
to
support
our
freestyle
Academy
of
communications
and
Arts
and
Technology,
which
is
a
career
pathway.
It
includes
teacher
salaries
and
benefits.
D
E
The
funding
received
contributed
to
living
classroom
science,
count
technology,
Services,
Chromebook
software
licensing,
as
well
as
administration
of
the
actual
funds.
A
large
portion
of
the
funds
received
continue
to
fund
a
one-to-one
environment
by
providing
replacement,
Chromebooks
and
software
that
are
used
across
the
district
salary
benefits
and
for
technology
staff
are
supported
by
the
shoreline
funds.
I
live
in
classroom
provides
Hands-On
science,
lessons
to
TK
through
fifth
grade
students
at
the
elementary
level
School
in
the
district
and
helps
to
maintain
native
plant
Gardens
on
each
campus.
E
F
B
G
F
B
B
Okay,
I
do
not
see
any
questions
or
public
comments,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
to
item
5.2
the
funding
schedule
and
amounts
for
fiscal
year.
2022-23
we'll
now
hear
from
Jessie
Takashi
the
treasurer
of
the
shoreline
Regional
Park
Community.
He
will
present
the
funding
schedule
for
both
districts
for
fiscal
year
22-23,
and
we
will
be
able
to
ask
questions
following
his
presentation.
Tessie
great.
H
So,
as
you
know,
we
have
the
the
jpa
agreement
and,
in
that
agreement,
section
3.4
addresses
annual
payments
that
are
made
to
the
districts
based
on
change
in
the
property
tax
revenues
between
years,
subject
to
a
minimum
payment
amount.
So
for
the
current
year,
the
upcoming
23
payment
that
increased
by
6.82
percent
this
past
year
and
is
really
indicative
of
the
ongoing
strength
in
the
real
estate
Market
that
we've
been
seeing
for
for
quite
some
time.
H
This
resulted
in
the
Mountain
View
School
District,
receiving
about
5.3
million
dollars
and
the
high
school
district
receiving
about
3.4
million
dollars
totaling
about
8.7
million
dollars
in
payments
for
this
upcoming
year
and
just
looking
ahead,
we
do
expect
that
the
growth
will
continue.
Of
course,
we're
only
halfway
through
and
anything
can
happen.
However,
we
we
do
just
want
to
be
aware
of
that.
The
recent
economic
conditions
that
we've
been
seeing
there
has
been
a
Slowdown.
H
This
back
in
2011
have
been
76.7
million
dollars
in
total
and
including
payments
going
back
to
fiscal
five
and
six
before
the
actual
current
Agreements
are
in
place,
total
of
almost
82
million
dollars
have
been
paid
out
from
the
Shoreline
Community.
So
that
concludes
the
presentation
and
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
B
Okay,
I
do
not
see
any
public
comments,
so
we
will
go
ahead
and
move
to
the
next
item.
Item
5.3
the
status
of
Education
enhancement,
Reserve,
joint
Powers,
Authority
agreement
negotiations,
Audrey
Seymour,
ramberg
assistant
city
manager
will
present
a
memorandum
and
a
presentation
regarding
the
negotiation
status
and
we
will
be
able
to
ask
questions.
The
board
members
will
follow
in
her
presentation,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
you.
Audrey.
A
and
that's
currently
under
the
auspices
of
the
education
enhancement,
Reserve
jpa
agreement,
which
is
set
to
expire
on
June
30th
of
next
year.
2023.,
the
jpa
board.
This
group
appointed
staff,
which
is
myself
and
my
colleagues
at
the
districts
to
negotiate
a
successor
agreement
for
the
ultimate
approval
of
the
board
and
then
the
respective
governing
bodies.
A
F
A
So,
for
its
part,
The
District
staff
provided
information
and
answered
cities,
questions
about
school
funding,
both
kind
of
the
mechanisms
and
the
process
for
budgeting,
and
also
to
better
understand
the
concerns
of
the
district
that
they
were
expressing
about
the
impact
of
anticipated
housing
growth
on
future
School
enrollment
and
the
district's
ability
to
fund
that
school
capacity
increase
in
these
meetings.
Both
the
city
and
the
school
district
talked
about
the
interest
and
continued
Shoreline
Regional
Park
Community
payments
and
an
increase
in
those
payments
to
the
district.
A
In
March
of
this
year,
I
shared
with
Mike
and
Rebecca
that
the
long-range
forecast,
which
we
will
use
to
illustrate
the
community's
ability
to
fund
both
its
obligations
and
the
continued
and
increased
payments
to
the
districts,
depended
on.
The
assumptions
that
are
will
be
part
of
an
adopted,
Google
master
plan
and
that
master
plan
will
Implement
a
Lion's
Share
of
the
housing
development
that
is
allowed
for
in
the
North
Bay
Shore
precise
plan
and
is
expected
to
come
to
council
for
adoption
in
the
spring
of
2023..
A
Considering
that
a
proposal
and
expressing
a
range
of
thoughts
about
the
possibility
of
the
extension
and
then
most
recently
Rebecca
and
Mike
and
I,
along
with
Jesse,
met
yesterday
to
talk
about
a
proposed
approach
that
the
city
also
outlined
in
the
memo.
That's
part
of
your
packet
for
today
for
a
a
long-term
transition
of
increased
payments
to
the
school
district
and,
ultimately,
following
a
development.
A
During
that
time
frame.
Also,
the
assessed
value
from
The
increased
residential
growth
is
expected
to
increase
significantly,
and
all
of
that
would
take
place
over
a
roughly
20-year
time
frame,
which
is
the
time
that
it
would
be
needed
to
get
to
a
more
steady
state
for
the
Shoreline
Community,
at
which
point
the
scope
of
its
obligations
would
be
significantly
reduced
to
focus
on
Regional
benefits
that
would
continue
and
would
exceed
the
scope
of
City
general
fund
obligations
and
capacity.
A
The
agreement
with
the
school
district
or
with
the
county
rather
related
to
a
complex
set
of
of
transactions
with
regard
to
some
legal
legal
obligations
of
the
of
the
county
and
I,
wasn't
privy
to
that
negotiation
and
and
I.
Don't
have
the
terms
of
those
agreements
fluidly
enough
to
respond
to
how
that
has
a
distinct
purpose.
A
Course
I've
received
analysis
from
Mr
Takahashi
I,
don't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
Jesse
that
does
a
comparison
to
what
the
district
or
what
the
county
would
receive
if
it
were
having
its
full
tax
rate
allocation
and
what
it
receives
through.
The
agreement
with
the
community
and
I
do
not
believe
that
it
is
the
full
tax
allocation.
E
The
city
is
requiring
us
to
have
an
unfunded
mandate
to
pay
for
students
when
we're
not
collecting
a
full
tax
increment,
which
is
what
the
tax
increment
is
meant
for.
It's
actually
not
even
meant
to
build
schools,
it's
meant
to
cover
the
operational
cost.
So
is
that
or
is?
Will
any
of
that
be
taken
into
account
as
we
move
forward,
because,
technically,
once
these
students
start
showing
up,
we
need
an
additional
2.8
million
dollars
which
otherwise,
what
we're
saying
as
a
collective
entity
is
that
the
taxpayers
are
subsidizing.
E
The
cost
of
educating
kids
in
an
area
where
the
tax
revenue,
both
commercial
and
residential,
isn't
paying
for
it,
and
our
numbers
suggests
that,
once
the
build
out
occurs,
that
are
expenditures
of
twenty
three
thousand
dollars
per
year
will
drop
to
less
than
fifteen
thousand
dollars
per
student
per
year,
which
could
put
us
into
a
lcff
district
as
opposed
to
a
what
we
call
a
basic
Aid,
District
or
Community,
funded
District.
That
relies
solely
on
its
tax
revenue.
A
Thank
you
for
sharing
that
information.
I
appreciated
that
Dr
Westover
also
asked
shared
some
of
that
information
and
asked
a
related
question
when
we
met
yesterday
and
I've
been
able
to
gets,
seek
some
clarity
from
our
Community
Development
Department
on
the
timing
at
the
residential
development
being
completed
at
sobrato,
I
I.
Don't
have
full
information
on
that.
I
knew
it's
I
know
it's
going
to
happen
over
two
phases
and
and
I
will
definitely
want
for
us
at
the
staff
level.
A
E
A
E
E
But
we,
our
budget
cycle,
actually
starts
in
February,
which
means
that
we
need
to
go
ahead
and
start
presenting
a
2.8
million
dollar
budget
cut
because
we
don't
have
a
successor
agreement,
and
that
is
a
reflection
of
of
this
taking
place.
I
I
also,
you
know
just
for
the
record
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
the
county
receives
their
full
share
of
funding,
provided
that
they're
not
going
to
provide
litigation
and
that
you
know
school
districts
are
viewed
a
little
bit
differently
and
you
know:
we've
been
at
least
Mountain.
E
And
so
this
is.
This
is
a
major
concern.
I
understand,
I'm,
not
you
know.
I
I
understand
that
there
are
obligations
and
I
understand
that
there
are
other
things
that
need
to
take
place.
However,
I
I
just
it.
It
seems
a
little
disingenuous
to
wait
for
Google
to
make
determinations
about
what
they're
going
to
do,
knowing
that
projects
are
moving
forward
and
that
there
will
be
kids
and
that
those
kids
are
going
to
exceed
what
the
base
payment
cost
is
for
for
educating
them
and
that
we
don't
have
a
solution
for
that.
E
So
I
just
want
to
a
put
out
where
at
least
Mountain
View
whisman
stands
in
terms
of
the
six
months,
and
just
you
know,
I
don't
want
to
surprise
anybody
when
we
start
our
budget
conversations
that
if
there
is
no
agreement
before
we
adopt
our
budget,
we
will
Mountain.
View
Westman
will
undergo
2.8
million
dollars
in
Cuts
in
order
to
address
the
shortfall
of
funding.
A
A
substantial
change
to
make
a
substantial
change
in
the
amount
and
the
use
of
the
funds
made
available.
But
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
the
districts
are
not
disadvantaged.
In
that
mean
time
and
the
sobrato
development
isn't
a
portion
of
that
only
and
it
would
be
available
for
occupation
in
2024,
mid
2020
for
so
I,
don't
feel
like
we
are
in
danger
of
getting
to
the
point
of
of
a
significant
impact
on
the
district.
H
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
the
point.
Dr
Rudolph
I
was
asking
or
a
question
about
the
county
share
and
how
much
they're
getting
so
they
are
not
receiving
the
full
their
full
allocation.
It
is
really
closer
to
about
40
percent
of
what
they
would
otherwise
be
getting.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
point
of
clarification.
E
Is
it
possible
that
you
can
send
that
over
just
I'm
I'm
reading
a
copy
of
the
county
agreement
that
was
signed
in
20
2005.,
so
it
ramped
up
over
a
seven
year
period
and
started
in
fiscal
year
to
2010-11
and
for
all
future
years
the
county
receives
full
funding
equal
to
20
percent
of
the
total
Shoreline
tax
revenues,
the
same
amount,
if
you
can
send
that
agreement
so
that
we
can
look
at
it.
That
would
be
great
sure.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you
Jesse,
because
that
was
one
of
the
points
that
I
was
had
a
question
and
had
some
curiosity
about
and
thank
you
Dr
Rudolph
for
going
back
to
that
2005
contract
and
looking
at
that,
because
that
is
definitely
pertinent.
Information
to
this
discussion,
my
staff
and
Mike
you've
done
a
great
job
of
sharing,
but
I
did
also
just
want
to
share
that.
D
D
Secondly,
I
very
much
appreciate
this
write-up
Audrey
and
I
had
a
quick
question
about
the
phased
transition,
I'm
very
interested
in
that
component
and
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
But
previously
was
there
a
discussion
about
that
phase
transition
being
20
years
and
perhaps
now
we're
looking
at
a
different
phase,
or
is
that
phase
transition?
Or
do
you
have
any
idea
about
what
that
phase
transition
might
look
like.
A
D
A
D
B
C
Thank
you
is
one
of
the
original
Shoreline
six,
who
advocated
to
have
material
srpc
funds
shared
back
with
the
schools
over
13
years
ago,
I
found
it
very
rewarding
to
see
the
millions
of
dollars,
get
redirected
back
to
the
schools
and
to
see
how
our
schools
have
benefited.
The
2010
deal
was
intended,
as
an
interim
deal,
to
get
City
time
to
evaluate
how
much
of
the
shoreline
funds
it
needed
to
carry
out
its
obligations.
Those
studies
showed
that
sea
level
rice
is
inherently
and
continues
to
be.
C
A
regional
problem
requiring
Regional,
Solutions
and
potentially
state
or
federal
funding.
Mountain
View
alone
can
never
solve
the
problem
with
sea
level.
Rise
and
developer
fees
should
cover
transportation
and
infrastructure
improvements,
as
they
should
now.
Armed
with
information
from
those
studies
in
the
from
the
2010
time,
the
parties
negotiated
the
current
10-year
deal
that
expires
in
June.
C
The
city
now
expects
to
finalize
the
new
North
Bay
Shore
development
plan
and
negotiate
a
development
agreement
with
Google
before
the
fiscal
year
ends
and
wants
to
delay
successor
jpa
negotiations
until
after
that
happens,
I
urge
you
to
do
exactly
the
opposite
and
negotiate
with
the
jpa
parties.
First
and
then
press
Google
to
foot
the
bill
for
more
of
the
fancy
infrastructure
they'd
like
to
see
Bill
rather
than
diverting
Shoreline
tax
revenue
funds
that
should
be
going
to
our
schools.
Google
reported
third
quarter
profits
just
for
last
quarter
of
17.3
5
billion
dollars.
C
C
My
understanding
was
that
the
county
had
been
receiving
has
been
receiving
its
full
share
of
tax
revenues
for
the
past
17
years.
It
is
high
time
coming
fiscal
year
for
the
srpc
to
allocate
to
the
school
districts
their
full,
roughly
40
percent,
share
of
Sterling
tax
revenues
that
are
so
necessary
to
enable
the
school
districts
to
serve
this
to
serve
the
students
who
will
live
in
the
new
developments.
Please
do
the
right
thing
and
ask
Google
to
contribute
its
share
and
let
the
schools
have
the
money
they
deserve.
Thank
you.
I
Yes,
I
would
just
like
to
say
that,
as
a
member
of
the
city
council,
a
personal
member
of
the
city
council,
I,
can
say
that
the
city
is
committed
to
negotiate
in
good
faith
with
both
school
districts.
We
are
committed
to
coming
up
with
a
solution
that
meets
the
needs
of
our
infrastructure
and
the
school
districts.
It's
a
joint
problem,
sea
level
rise
is
a
real
problem
for
all
of
us.
It
it.
I
You
can
look
at
it
as
a
regional
problem,
but
because
we're
if
you
want
to,
but
because
we're
a
shoreline
City,
it's
very
much
a
local
problem,
and
we
have
a
responsibility
as
the
local
government
to
see
that
those
sea
level
rise.
Protections
are
built
and
are
built
in
a
timely
fashion.
Otherwise
this
development
really
won't
be
able
to
continue
and
go
forward
and
provide
the
community
benefits
which
include
housing,
that
sorely
need
some
office
space
and,
of
course,
the
schools
that
we
all
love.
I
We
can't
do
that
without
the
sea
level
rise
protections.
Hopefully,
those
sea
level
rise
protections
will
be
completely
constructed
in
the
20
years
that
the
interim
period
And,
so
that
so
then
the
the
infrastructure
funding
that
will
be
needed
will
revert
to
maintaining
them,
maintaining
Shoreline
Park
the
landfill
and
that
sort
of
thing
much
less
money,
which
would
mean
much
more
money,
of
course,
for
the
schools.
I
So
I
think
that
it's
it
it's
it's
naive
to
assume
that
state
and
federal
funding
will
be
forthcoming
in
the
manner
that
we
need.
Of
course,
we
will
be
applying
for
all
the
state
and
federal
funding
that
we
possibly
can,
but
so
will
every
other
entity
that
has
a
shoreline
and
you,
you
all
know
more
than
80
percent
of
the
population
of
America
lives
in
Shoreline
cities.
That's
where
we
live
so
that
money
from
the
feds
in
the
states.
It
has
to
be
divided
by
lots
and
lots
of
people.
I
So
it's
incumbent,
Upon,
Us
locally,
to
come
up
with
our
share
and
to
be
responsible
about
this
problem
that
we
know
is
coming
and
to
take
care
of
it
and
we
have
the
means
to
take
care
of
it.
So
it's
the
responsible
thing
to
do
to
do
that,
so
I
urge
you
to
consider
reasonable
negotiations
that
that
do
involve
an
extension,
so
we
can
do
this
properly
and
meet
all
the
needs
of
our
community.
Thank
you.
B
Is
there
any
further
discussion?
Okay,
no
okay,
I'll,
just
reiterate
what
our
assistant
city
manager
said
and
really
that
this
it
is
the
city's
interest
to
pay
the
school
districts.
Not
only
the
amount
this
to
have
the
certainty,
the
amount
that
you
had
received
this
past
year.
But
of
course
any
of
those
increases
that
may
come
about
as
part
of
the
property
value.
B
We've
all
talked
about
many
many
times
all
the
obligations
that
the
city
has
to
not
only
the
Shoreline
Community
but
to
the
Mountain
View
Community
and
the
region
that
that
enjoys
everything
that's
out
at
Shoreline,
not
to
mention
the
the
former
landfill
and,
of
course,
sea
level
rises
as
we've
discussed.
So
we
do
believe
that
this
this
phase
approach
is
a
thoughtful
and
careful
way
to
achieve
what
both
the
school
districts
and
the
city
need.
B
And
it's
essentially
telling
you
all
that
we
we
do
intend
to
put
forth
the
full
amount
that
you
all
got
last
year
and
give
us
a
little
bit
more
time
to
finish
the
legal
and
the
fiscal
analysis
so
that
when
we
have
the
conversation
again,
it
can
be
more
informed
and
we
can
have
better
information
and
we'll
certainly
provide
any
information
about
the
county
share,
but
they
they
are
not
receiving
that
that
full
amount
either.
So
this
again
would
also
be
part
of
this
phasing.
B
So
I
don't
know
if
you
all
want
to
dive
into
that
further
now,
but
we
certainly
want
to
continue
discussing
this
and
just
make
it
really
clear
that
it
is
the
city's
intention
to
be
very
collaborative
and
to
recognize
the
importance
of
schools.
It's
also
why
we
intend
on
revising
the
act
as
Audrey
stated,
so
that
schools
are
included
and
are
recognized
because
they
weren't
when
this
was
originally
contemplated
all
those
decades
ago.
B
E
H
E
Here:
here's
how
and
frequent
the
negotiations
are
going
to
go
I
I
and
as
it
stands
right
I
mean
I,
I
get
and
I
appreciate
the
sentiment
that
you
know
you
want
to.
You
want
to
find
a
way
to
deal
with
this.
The
amendment
of
the
ACT
I'm
sure
that's
a
large
requirement
too.
So,
like
I
I,
completely
understand
right.
We
all
do
the
work
and
we
all
know
that,
like
what
seems
like
it's
elegant
and
simple
solution,
oftentimes
becomes
something
a
lot
more
massive
than
what
we've
ever
envisioned
and
requires
a
lot
more
work.
E
E
E
It
just
seems
like
we're,
unfortunately,
up
against
a
time
crunch
unless
we
just
say
like,
oh,
which
I
can't
do,
but
if
I
was
to
say
oh
well,
we'll
just
go
with
the
12
to
18
months,
so
I
I,
guess
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
comes
next
so
that
you
know
yes,
I
have
a
board
member
on
the
line,
and
you
have
to
count
two
council
members
right
and
there's
a
outgoing
board
member
from
mvla,
but
I
have
to
go
back
and
tell
them.
Here's
what's
going
to
happen
next
and
I.
E
Don't
know
if
I
have
a
clear
picture
of
that
which
you
know
doesn't
do
y'all
any
service
and
it's
not
like
anything
against
you
right.
It
just
simply
says
like
we
want
to
do
this.
We
just
don't
know
how
it's
all
going
to
look
so
I
I'm,
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
what
the
process
is.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
A
A
shorter
term
agreement
followed
by
a
longer
term
agreement,
or
you
know,
a
full
extension
that
would
be
needed
to
get
to
the
long-term
agreement
right.
What
I'm?
What
I'm
hearing
is
that
we
all
kind
of
want
a
new
agreement.
That's
talking
about
the
things
that
we,
we
think
really
matter,
which
is
how
to
support
school
capacity
in
the
Shoreline
Community
to
recognize
the
impacts
of
the
increased
residential
development
there
and
I
I.
A
A
E
Right
so
I
think
for
the
schools
we
present
our
formal
budget
May.
Is
that
correct
to
the
boards?
Yes,
so
we
would
need
it,
I
mean
for
us.
If
we
were
looking
for
a
trigger
right,
we
either
have
to
plan
for
2.8
million
dollars
in
Cuts.
Oh,
we
have
to
have
something
by
the
time
we
present
our
final
budget
in
may.
We
need
to
have
an
agreement
that
sort
of
guarantees
and
I'm
I
hear
what
you're
saying
right
like
that,
it's
the
intent,
but
also
got
to
look
at
like.
E
If
there's
no
agreement,
then
there
isn't
a
payment,
there's
no
no
knock
on
any
of
y'all,
but
we
would
need
that
I'm
I'm
just
backwards
mapping,
which
is
what
you
know,
how
we
sort
of
think.
We
need
something
approved
and
I,
don't
know
for
us
as
two
meetings
to
get
something
approved
right.
So
we
you
know
we're
talking
about.
We
need
to
have
something
within
the
next
three
or
four
months
is
I.
B
Think
that's
very
doable
and
again.
I
would
hope
that
you
wouldn't
be
considering
cutting
Staffing
when
you're
hearing
us
tell
you
today
that
we
intend
to
keep
you
whole
with
what
your
amount
is
now
and
that
could
increase
with
with
the
increment.
So
you
know
I
I,
think
I'm,
pretty
clear
about
that
that
you
know
I
hope
that
that's
not
something
that
you
would
be
telling
folks
or
putting
out
their
that's,
not
our
intention
at
all
and
I
think
a
February
March
time
frame
is
reasonable.
B
B
I
can
commit
that
the
city
and
certainly
Audrey
will
we
will
do
everything
we
can
to
to
meet
with
your
staffs
and
for
us
as
a
board
to
meet.
We
can
schedule
a
meeting
whenever
we
need
to
so
I
think
you'll
have
that
commitment
from
the
city
I'm
I'm
absolutely
open
to
that,
and
we
can
give
our
staff
direction
we're
all
in
this
meeting
today
to
you
know,
go
negotiate!
B
E
D
E
Yeah
I
appreciate
that,
so
maybe
the
salute,
you
know
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
What's
our
what's
our
way
to
get
through
this
or
that
both
of
our
budgetary
departments
can
keep
going.
So
maybe
the
solution
is
to
come
up
with
a
quick,
a
smaller
agreement
that
guarantees
next
payment.
That
will
get
us.
You
know
that
at
least
it
commits
right
and
I.
I
can
take
you
for
your
word.
E
So
maybe
the
the
quicker
the
low
hanging
fruit
is
just
to
guarantee
the
next
payment
that
it
doesn't
stop
that
doesn't
trigger
any
Cuts.
So
we
can
take
that
into
factor
with
our
budget
and
then
between
now-
and
you
know,
before
all
of
us
walk
away
during
the
summer.
I
think
city
council
goes
into
the
summer
a
little
bit
longer
than
mvla
and
mvwsd
that
we
will
come
up
with
a
formal
process
for
negotiations
that
we
can
articulate
to
our
board
that
takes
into
account.
E
If,
if
y'all,
okay
with
that
I
think
that
gets
us
through
the
the
forced
budget
cut
part
which
is
really
a
a
big
concern.
Knowing
that
we're
about
to
enter
budget
season
and,
like
you
said
Kimbra,
we
start
this
and
we're
we
technically
are
about
to
start
now
for
budget
for
next
year.
I'm
sure
Rebecca
feels
like
she
always
does
the
budget
all
year.
D
B
A
I
was
having
some
very
similar
thoughts
to
what
Dr
Rudolph
just
shared.
Is
that
that
what
everything
that
we're
all
talking
about
now
is
an
agreement
that
follows
through
on
the
commitment
that
that
you
just
made
chair
McCarthy
around
continuing
at
least
the
current
payment,
and
that
that
would
be
a
pretty
easy
should
be
a
pretty
easy
thing
to
execute.
A
And
then
then
it
it
takes
the
what
the
city's
putting
on
the
table
as
a
an
approach
to
a
more
substantive
expansion
of
the
agreement
between
the
community
and
the
districts,
and
that
we
could
map
that
up
in
ways
that
provide
a
little
bit
more
clarity
about
the
process
and
the
timing
for
that.
Yeah
I.
Think
that
makes
great
sense.
B
E
And
and
just
that,
our
goal
is
to
have
this
ironed
out.
We
have
both
of
these
ironed
out
before
we
hit
the
summer
is
what
it
sounds
like.
We
will
have
at
least
a
commitment
of
what
the
weather
is,
a,
what
a
longer
term
deal
sort
of
looks
like
and
then
the
short-term
deal,
which
does
just
the
the
base,
funding
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear.
So,
when
I
communicate
to
the
board
I'm,
not
speaking
I,.
A
E
The
second
point
is
that
by
the
end
of
the
year,
we
would
have
came
to
some
type
of
agreement
with
an
outline
of
what
the
process
is
that
determines
whether
it's
six
that
I
mean
that's
at
this
point.
I,
don't
think
it's
any
possible,
it's
possible
that
we're
going
to
do
zero
right,
like
I,
don't
think
that
we
can
get
a
long-term
agreement
ironed
out
by
the
summer.
I.
E
Would
love
it
if
you
know
and
I
got
a
couple
ideas
if
you
want
to
just
write
these
down,
but
something
tells
me
you're
not
going
to
agree
with
every
term.
So
what
we
were
to
do
is
by
the
summer
we
would
come
up
with
an
agreement
of
the
extension
as
well
as
sort
of
what
are
all
the
processes,
not
necessarily
signaling
an
agreement
but
signaling
the
agreement
to
get
to
the
long-term
agreement.
Okay,
thank.
F
B
Okay,
great
so
I
think
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
Then,
with
the
next
steps,
and
as
mentioned,
we
could
schedule
a
meeting
whenever
we
need
to
so
we'll
just
be
flexible
on
whenever
our
Board
needs
to
meet,
and
certainly
just
we'll
keep
each
other
informed.
You
know
timing,
wise,
but
I
think
it's
it's
all
of
our
interests
to
do
this
as
soon
as
possible.
So
it's
great
is.
E
B
Three
of
us,
yeah,
I,
hope
I'm
out
of
our
agenda's,
future
meeting
so
I
think
yeah
that
works
I'm,
not
sure
when
your
board
meetings
are
for
calendar
year
23,
but
we
have
not
yet
adopted
our
our
City
Council
meetings
yet
so
Tuesdays
generally
for
me,
aren't
the
greatest.
But
how
about
we
just
say
we'll
meet
in
February
and
then
we'll?
Let
our
our
you
know:
assistants
kind
of
figure
out
or
our
staff
figure
out.
The
timing
of
when
that
date
might
be.
E
One
okay,
just
trying
to
get
trying
to
get
that
first,
short-term
guarantee
done
so
that
it's
off
the
table
and
we
can
keep
going
with
the
longer
term
stuff
that
may
require
a
lot
more
time.
So
quarter,
one
is,
is
fine,
I,
just
don't
want
to
get
too
far
in
the
budget
process
where
you
know,
even
if
we
have
to
contemplate
it,
even
if
it's
just
a
academic
exercise.
B
Sure
that
makes
sense
all
right,
let's
say
so:
I'll
just
move
into
I,
don't
think
we
had
any
more
discussion
moving
into
the
next
item.
Five
four
five
point:
four
future
meetings,
so
the
board
has
agreed
to
set
a
date
for
quarter
one
2023
for
our
next
meeting
to
discuss
the
short-term
agreement
and
we'll
just
know
you
know
we'll
do
it
as
soon
as
possible,
given
the
fact
that
you
all
are
in
the
middle
of
your
budget
plan
in
development,
so
we'll
plan
on
that.
B
B
E
E
Don't
know
if
you
technically
Abate
methane,
but
whatever
so
I
I
do
appreciate
just
the
willingness
to
understand
what
the
need
is
and
some
of
the
creativity
that's
been
at
least
that
Rebecca
has
sort
of
explained
in
terms
of
the
the
adjustment
of
the
amendment
or
the
act
in
order
to
include
infrastructure
for
schools
and
some
other
things.
So
I
don't
want
that
to
be
lost
in
the
fact
that
all
of
us
are
trying
to
do
what's
right
for
the
community
and
that
we
all
are
looking
at
this
from
a
different
place.
E
So
we
do
I
do
appreciate
our
our
continued
partnership.
Obviously,
the
teacher
housing
is
a
great
example.
The
Joint
use
agreement,
which
is
still
outstanding,
is
a
great
example,
and
so
I
you
know,
I,
don't
want
that
to
be
lost
in
the
fact
that
you
know
this
may
get
heated
at
times,
because
we
all
have
audiences
that
we
have
to
adhere
to
so
I
just
want
to
verbally
say
that
before
we
close
out
and
happy
holidays
by
the
way
happy.
B
Yes,
thank
you,
I
would
I
would
reiterate
that
there's
so
many
examples
of
how
we
partner
and
collaborate
together
and
I
know
we
have
different
lenses
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
path
forward,
now,
I'm
glad
that
we
got
there
and
certainly
the
continued
conversations
and
communication
and
collaboration
will
continue
so
yeah.
This
is
very
appreciative.
Thank
you.