►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Council Goal-Setting Subcommittee Meeting
B
A
Authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council,
please
contact
city.clearcap
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
city
council
goal
setting
subcommittee
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location.
As
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda,
members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
for
an
item
by
joining
the
zoom
webinar
at
https
colon,
slash,
mountainview.gov,
forward,
slash
meeting
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
ID
871-5731-2365.
A
D
A
Here,
thank
you
very
much.
We'll
move
on
to
item
three
oral
Communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
subcommittee
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
subcommittee
from
acting
on
non-agendized
items
when
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
E
E
I,
don't
know
that
that
part's
possible,
but
I
just
want
to
bring
that
up
since
I
saw
it
in
this
particular
agenda
file
and
then
I
I'm
not
sure
how
this
meeting
is
going
to
go,
but
I
just
want
to
bring
this
up
might
be
appropriate
for
a
different
meeting,
but
I
know
that
the
advisory
bodies
are
going
to
go
to
in-person
meetings
for
the
public
in
February.
That's
the
current
plan,
I'm,
really
against
that.
E
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
that
concludes
public
comment.
I
will
proceed
now
to
item
four
minutes
approval.
The
minutes
for
the
December
15
2020
meeting
have
been
delivered
to
subcommittee
members
and
copies
posted
on
the
city,
a
city
hall
bulletin
board.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
speak
on
the
minutes?
A
A
Yes,
fantastic.
Thank
you
very
much
passes
unanimously,
we'll
move
on
to
item
five
discussion,
action
items,
5.1
fiscal
years,
2023-24
and
2024-25
work
plan
development
process.
This
item
provides
an
overview
of
an
opportunity
to
provide
Direction
regarding
the
proposed
timeline
and
process
for
developing
the
fiscal
years
2023
before
and
24
to
5
Council
work
plan.
Septivity
members
will
ask
any
questions
they
may
have
following
the
presentation
and
the
public
comment
period
will
follow.
The
conclusion
of
subcommittee
member
questions
related
to
staff's
presentation,
principal
management
management.
C
Thank
you,
chair,
Ramirez
I
will
share
my
screen,
and
can
we
all
see
that?
Yes?
Thank
you.
So
the
purpose
of
this
presentation,
as
you
mentioned,
is
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
proposed
work
plan
development
process,
as
well
as
to
seek
feedback
on
criteria
for
analysis
of
proposed
projects,
a
process
by
which
Council
may
receive
input
on
the
work
plan
from
Council
advisory
bodies
and
an
approach
to
categorize
projects
by
priority.
C
So
in
2021,
the
council
adopted
based
on
feedback
and
input
from
Council
Members,
as
well
as
the
community
and
City
staff,
a
set
of
strategic
priorities
and
a
vision
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
The
Strategic
priorities
of
which
there
are
seven,
are
visible
here
and
familiar
I
believe
to
all
of
you.
C
They
include
Community
for
all
intentional
development
and
housing
options,
mobility
and
connectivity,
sustainability
and
climate
resiliency,
livability
and
quality
of
life,
economic
vitality
and
organization,
organizational
strength
and
good
governance
as
we're
wrapping
up
the
implementation
of
the
fiscal
year,
21-23
work
plan
and
beginning
to
discuss
the
fiscal
year.
2325
work
plan
will
be
revisiting
these
priorities
to
frame
the
projects
that
Council
decides
to
include.
In
those
work
plans,
so
moving
on
this
is
the
slide
illustrates
the
proposed
process
for
work
plan
development
and
for
check-ins
on
the
implementation
of
the
adoptive
work
plan.
C
We're
beginning
now
highlighted
in
red
with
this
subcommittee
meeting,
and
the
next
step
would
be
a
council
item
to
review
the
work
plan
process,
and
one
of
our
questions
for
you
that
we
will
review
later
is
whether
that
should
be
a
new
business
item
or
a
consent,
calendar
item
and
that
will
be
followed
by
two
study
sessions.
Looking
at
project
discussion
and
then
prioritization
and
again
culminating
adoption
in
June.
C
We
also
wanted
to
put
forth
in
alignment
with
council's
commitment
to
equity
that
staff
can
identify
whether
communities,
particularly
historically
disadvantaged
or
underserved
communities,
would
be
benefited
by
or
be
burdened
by
potential
projects
similar
to
the
review
of
budget
proposals
and
one
of
the
analysis
criteria
we
suggest
is
impact
on
future
capacity
and
projects,
whether
or
not
the
project
frees
up
staff
Time
by
creating
efficiencies
or
if
it
is
necessary
as
a
foundation
for
further
projects.
One
example
might
be
a
precise
plan
that
can
lead
to
further
projects
or
development
in
an
area.
C
C
The
next
item-
we're
seeking
feedback
on
today
is
a
council
advisory
body
participation
process,
and
the
proposed
process
is
that
CMO
staff,
city
managers,
office
staff
and
Council
advisory
body
staff
Liaisons
will
attend
regular
meetings
to
facilitate
a
structured
discussion
about
the
council
work
plan
and
proposed
projects
eliciting
feedback
on
High
level.
Input
on
identified
potential
projects
to
ask
the
community
advisory
bodies.
C
Excuse
me
Council
advisory
bodies
to
identify
critical
issues
for
consideration
in
the
work
plan
and
for
them
to
share
input
on
what
they
think
the
highest
priority
should
be
for
the
upcoming
work
plan.
This
feedback
will
be
summarized
and
provided
to
council
for
youth
in
their
project,
prioritization
discussion
under
the
proposed
process
and
then,
finally,
when
we're
talking
about
prioritization
before
we
get
into
that
topic
more
deeply.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
ask
Council
to
prioritize
projects
is
because
of
capacity.
C
So
with
that
in
mind,
we
are
proposing
that
Council
prioritize
projects
based
on
buckets
in
thoughtfully
labeled,
here,
A,
B
and
C,
where
a
would
be
the
highest
priority
considered.
First
in
the
staff
allocation
and
phasing
recommendations,
Project
B
would
projects
label
B
would
be
high
priority
and
considered
after
category
a
in
the
staff
allocation
and
phasing
recommendations,
and
then
projects
that
were
in
the
seat
bucket
would
be
considered
a
high
priority
for
Council
that
will
be
worked
on
as
time
and
resources.
C
Allow
acknowledging
that
there
does
need
to
be
some
sort
of
hierarchy
in
achieving
the
projects
laid
out
in
the
work
plan.
It's
just
again
to
address
the
workload
and
capacity
considerations
so
for
this
subcommittee.
Today
we
did
come
with
four
questions,
which
is
first
of
the
January
Council
work
plan
process
item,
be
a
consent
or
new
business
item.
Second,
are
there
any
additional
analysis
criteria
other
than
the
four
here,
in
addition
to
the
impact
on
achieving
the
Strategic
priorities
that
the
subcommittee
would
like
to
see?
C
Third,
does
the
subcommittee
have
feedback
on
the
proposed
Council
advisory
body
participation
process
and
fourth,
does
the
subcommittee
have
feedback
on
the
proposed
project,
prioritization
categories?
This
is,
of
course,
in
addition
to
any
feedback
you
have
on
the
process
overall
and
just
before
we
get
into
the
discussion.
C
I'd
also
like
to
review
the
next
steps
following
this
meeting
will
be
for
staff
to
incorporate
the
saucony's
input
into
the
development
process
laid
out
here
to
bring
to
the
council
in
January
on
the
24th
for
the
adoption
of
the
fiscal
year
23
through
25
work
plan
development
process,
which
would
be
followed
by
a
February
28th
update
on
the
fiscal
year
21
through
23
Council
work
plan,
which
would
be
included
in
the
mid-year
budget
update
and
also
the
beginning
of
the
fiscal
year.
2325
work
plan
project
discussion.
A
D
I
do
have
some
questions
and
possibly
because
I
have
not
been
on
this
committee
before
maybe
I'm
a
little
disoriented
regarding
things
that
the
rest
of
you
are
oriented
to.
First,
the
the
projects
labeled
21
through
22
projects
that
may
not
be
the
full
label.
I
have
my
notes,
not
the
document
in
front
of
me,
but
so
that
is
not
the.
If
I
get
it
right,
that's
not
the
full
list
of
projects
that
we'll
be
considering
when
we're
when
we're
going
over
this
during
the
study
session.
I.
D
Imagine
because
there
were
things
I
didn't
see
on
it.
Ones
that
jumped
out
at
me
were
not
necessarily
ones
that
I
advocate
for,
but
I
just
didn't
notice.
There
was
something
about
sustainable,
leading
or
the
market
precise
plan,
they're,
probably
others,
but
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
what
that
list
was
and
whether
there
are
addition
projects
that
past
Council
people
have
mentioned
before
that
are
not
on
that
particular
list.
That
was
in
our
staff
report.
A
C
That's
that
absolutely
so.
That
attachment
is
the
most
recent
update
on
the
current
existing
work
plan
that
was
provided
in
the
budget
and
it
was
included
in
the
memo
to
be
informational
as
a
status
update
or
a
reminder
of
the
most
recent
status
update
on
the
fiscal
year
21
through
23
more
time.
Okay,.
D
Good
because
I
know,
we've
named
other
projects
that
were
kind
of
off
list
and
they
weren't
there
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
they
hadn't
gotten
lost
somewhere
and
then.
My
second
question
is,
it
may
have
been
partially
answered,
but
where
the
housing
element
projects,
the
projects
that
are
generated
through
the
housing
element
are
they
listed.
I
noticed
some
of
them
listed
there,
but
it
didn't
that
didn't
look
like
a
full
list,
either
so
I'm
wondering
about
that
and
are
and
how
they
function.
Those
are
non-discretionary
projects
I.
C
That's
correct
on
the
non-discretionary
projects
list
that
was
included
as
an
attachment
to
the
memo
that
includes
the
housing
element
projects
that
would
be
that
on
the
housing
element.
Implementation
plan
are
scheduled
for
during
this
work
plan
period.
So
there
were
other
projects
that
are
scheduled
for
further
out
on
the
timeline
that
were
not
listed
under
those
non-discretionary
projects
simply
because
they
are
for
for
their
years
that
are
further
out
from
this
work
plan.
B
D
D
C
G
Thank
you
Laurel,
so
so
I
wanted
to
actually
clarify
the
just
an
answer
to
the
question,
also
from
vice
mayor
Hicks
regarding
the
housing
element
items.
So
what
you
all?
What
council
will
have
the
ability
to
do?
Is
you
can
prioritize
certain
housing
element
projects
over
others
once
you
get
into
it?
So,
as
you
mentioned,
all
of
those
items
that
are
going
to
end
up
being
included
in
the
housing
element
are
non-discretionary,
meaning
we
do
have
to
do
them
within
the
next
eight
year.
G
But
certainly
there
will
be
other
things
that
we'll
have
to
get
to
like
in
the
fourth
year
in
the
sixth
year
and
then
up
up
to
the
eighth
year,
but
I
think
you
all
will
have
the
opportunity
to
discuss
that
and
then
staff
gonna
also
have
to
look
at
just
their
capacity
like
which
ones
can
they
balance
at
the
same
time
with
the
staff
that
they
have
on
board.
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
that
there
there
will
be
opportunities
to
do
all
of
them.
G
We
just
won't
be
able
to
do
them
all
at
once
and
then,
in
regards
to
your
recent
question
about
advisory
body
feedback
from
what
I
remember-
and
we
did
this
lesson
2020.
So
this
this
committee
generally
only
meets
once
every
two
years.
So
the
committee
is
the
the
current
mayor
and
vice
mayor
and
the
previous
mayor,
and
so
it's
like
you
got
to
forgive
me
for
20,
the
2020
Haze
of
when
when
we
decided
what
to
do
in
2020.
G
The
challenge
that
we
have
is
that
because
of
the
timing,
and
because
there
are
already
so
many
Council
priorities,
it's
hard
to
get
to
a
place
where
advisory
bodies
can
can
tell
Council
here's
the
50
things
that
we
want
you
all
to
do.
So,
it's
more
of
a
here
are
the
things
that
Council
and
staff
have
identified.
Please
provide
feedback,
and
then,
if
there
are
things
that
we're
hearing
that
are
certain
themes,
of
course,
Council
or
staff
can
bring
that
forward
to
council,
but
I
think.
B
F
Great
thanks
so
much
mayor,
yeah
and
I
just
wanted
to
thank
staff
and
just
clarify
for
the
vice
mayor.
I.
Don't
think
any
of
us
were
on
the
prior
Council
goal
setting
subcommittee,
so
we
are
all
coming
into
this
with
the
same
knowledge
and
the
same
background.
So
just
appreciate
staff
reiterating
that,
because
I
think
whoever
was
mayor
vice
mayor,
an
immediate
past
mayor
was
none
of
us.
So
we
are.
We
are
all
with
the
same
perspective,
so
really
appreciate
staff
reiterating
that.
Thank
you
so
much.
A
E
Thank
you,
chair,
yeah
I
have
several
things
I
wanted
to
bring
up
here,
so
just
do
them
and
sort
of
Rapid
Fire
order
here
going
over
the
memo
pretty
much
Page
by
Page.
There
is
an
item
in
there
potential
projects
previously
raised
by
council
members.
One
of
them
is
the
international
dark
sky,
Association
ordinance
incorporating
that
into
City
policy.
E
Greenspace
is
a
mountain
view,
is
very
entrusted
and
seeing
that
happen
so
it'd
be
great
to
sort
of
pin
that
to
the
wall.
Somehow,
in
your
considerations,
either
here
or
in
later
meetings,
you
have
other
critical,
planned
and
continuing
projects
listed.
One
of
them
is
intranet
design,
redesign,
not
sure
what
that
means,
if
it's
public
facing
at
all
or
specifically
for
staff
and
just
can't
tell
from
that
item
in
the
table
the
fiscal
year,
2122
year-end
Council
work
plan
updates
I
noticed
that
a
lot
of
the
updates
aren't
actually
up
to
date.
E
I,
don't
know
how
critical
that
is,
but
I
wanted
to
note
that
item
three
four
is
about
the
travel
demand.
Citywide
travel
demand
update,
including
the
greenhouse
gas
Reduction
Program.
If
that
has
to
do
with
City
policy,
around
travel
to
conferences,
and
things
like
that,
that
could
be
very
interesting.
E
Lucas
tell
me
if
I'm
running
out
of
time,
because
I'm
looking
at
my
notes
here,
why
are
four
one
and
four
five
separate?
They
have
to
do
the
community
tree
master
plan
and
the
biodiversity
requirements
for
landscaping.
I
would
think
that
those
are
in
the
biodiversity
strategy
and
urban
Forest
plan
work
and
could
be
one
line
item
the
next
one
is
seven
to
develop
and
Implement
an
enhanced
legislative
program.
It
marks
it
is
complete,
but
it's
actually
not
complete.
E
That's
going
to
be
an
ongoing
item
right
and
this
that's
my
understanding
and
then
item.
Seven
three
is
oversee
covid-19
recovery
efforts
since
Etc.
That
might
be
where
this
hybrid
mode
question
for
advisory
body
meetings
could
go
if
you
would
consider
that
and
lastly,
just
my
comment
on
the
advisory
body
input
process-
probably
no
surprise
from
some
of
you
I-
think
that's
essential.
I
would
really
like
to
see
that
happen.
Somehow
and
that's
it.
Thank
you.
E
E
A
That
can
public
comment
and
actually
a
response
to
that.
A
question
that
I
think
may
be
helpful
to
ask:
is
we're
not
bound
to
this
list
right?
This
is
a
list
of
ideas
that
have
come
up
in
a
number
of
different
contexts.
These
don't
necessarily
have
to
be
Advanced
to
the
council
for
consideration
right.
It's
just
here's
a
reminder,
some
items
that
the
council
has
expressed
interest
in.
B
Are
you
speaking
about
attachment
to
the
section?
That
is
the
kind
of
items
that
have
been
mentioned
by
council
members,
since
the
last
work
plan
was
adopted?
Yes,
yeah?
That
is
correct.
Some
of
these
other
projects,
while
they
may
not
be
of
council's
interest
to
have
be
in
the
work
plan,
they
wouldn't
be
things
that
we
could
necessarily
not
do.
They're
just
intended
to
give
this
kind
of
broader
context
in
picture.
A
A
So
why
don't
we
go
through
a
round
of
comments
and
then
once
we've
concluded
comments,
then
all
I
think
only
one
of
these
will
require
and
I
know,
we're
all
I
think
maybe
seeing
the
questions
for
the
first
time.
So
we'll
take
a
minute
to
digest
those
only
question.
One
I
think
really
requires,
like
a
formal
majority
decision,.
F
A
F
Sorry
question
one
reminds
me
that
I
that
I
wanted
to
ask
staff
so
we're
deciding
between
a
new
business
item
and
a
consent
and
I
guess
I
would
ask
what
would
be
the
intent
of
the
memo?
Is
it
just
explaining
what
the
process
is
or
would
it
be
actually
trying
to
solicit
feedback
because
I
feel
like
if
it's
you
know
an
a
memo
kind
of
saying
we're
going
to
have
this
happen.
That
to
me
makes
sense
more
for
consent,
I
think.
F
C
I
believe
that
the
purpose
is
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
the
council
to
adopt
the
work
plan
development
process
and
have
some
ownership
of
it.
And
if
the
subcommittee
feels
that
this
process
is
satisfactory
and
there
are
no
major
changes
and
I
think
a
consent
item
would
be
in
order.
But
if
there
is
more
discussion
that
needs
to
be
had,
then
perhaps
a
new
business
item
would
be
in
order.
But
I
defer
to
kimbera
on
what
that
might
look
like.
G
Thank
you
Laurel,
so
I
think,
if,
if
you
all
are
comfortable
with
this
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
also
do,
I
really
like
the
visuals
that
Laurel
presented
in
the
presentation,
just
the
the
that
shows
the
time
frame
of
how
things
will
unfold.
Also,
the
check-ins,
which
I
know
that
that's
been
important
to
council,
which
essentially
is
a
check-in
every
six
months
over
the
full
two
years.
G
We
can
certainly
include
those
sort
of
visual,
AIDS
and
charts
in
the
actual
agenda
staff
report,
and,
if
you
all,
are
okay
with
it,
I
I
think
consent
would
be
fine.
We
just
wanted
to
give
you
all
the
option
to
discuss
if
you
felt
like
you
know,
there
might
want
to
be
an
opportunity
for
Council
to
discuss
this
more
at
length,
but
I
think
similar
to
other
Council
subcommittees.
You
know,
if
you
all
give
a
recommendation
on
the
process
and
you're
comfortable
with
it.
G
A
A
No
I
I
do
have
some
general
comments
which
I'm
happy
to
get
into
if
no
other
member
of
the
committee
has
General
comments
so
as
a
high
level
concern
or
consideration
I
think
we're
starting
to
see
some
of
the
limits
of
the
goal
setting
process.
Part
of
that
challenge
has
been
coveted
and
how
disruptive
that
was.
A
So
that
way
we
can
get
our
work
done
and
also
make
space
for
new
and
priority
issues,
and
so
the
the
most
significant
change
I
personally
would
love
to
see
and
would
love.
The
input
of
the
committee
is
I
I
think
we
should
no
longer
divorce
Council
initiated
projects
from
the
rest
of
the
immense
workload
that
we've
got.
A
This
is
something
that
the
my
employer
as
a
city
of
San
Jose,
has
done
just
to
make
sure
the
council
really
understands
how
much
staff
capacity
is
available.
It's
here's
here
are
the
non-discretionary
things
you
know
here
are
priorities
that
are
established
through
other
contexts,
so
in
Mountain,
View.
A
We
have
the
Downtown
parking
strategy,
we
may
have
a
list
of
programs
from
the
economic
Vitality
strategy.
We've
talked
about
the
housing
element,
we've
got.
You
know
the
general
plan
action
items,
we've
got
the
environmental
sustainability
action
plan,
all
of
that
contributes
to
staff's
work
and
all
of
that
detracts
from
your
capacity
and
I
feel
like
we
go
into
the
next
goal.
Setting
cycle
and
we've
got
40
great
ideas,
but
we
don't
place
them
in
a
pro
that
appropriate
context.
A
Then
we're
setting
ourselves
up
for
failure
and
we
will
have
to
continue
to
advance
projects
that
were
prioritized
years
ago
into
subsequent
goal,
setting
Cycles,
because
we
really
haven't.
We
really
haven't
taken
all
of
this
into
consideration.
We
haven't
thought
about
the
workload
holistically,
so
this
might
be
a
big
change
and
it
might
take
a
little
bit
of
time
to
think
about
how
to
make
this
work.
But
I
would
love
to
see
sort
of
like
the
totality.
G
A
Comparable
actions
or
items
in
the
work
plan
so
that
way
when
the
council
begins
to
engage
and
provide
new
ideas,
and
we
get
new
ideas
from
the
community
that
we
all
come
in
with
similar
expectations
about.
What's
achievable,
I
have
a
few
other
ideas.
But
let's
go
to
council
Committee
Member
to
May.
F
Sorry,
sorry
do
you
would
you
mind
chair
if
we
removed
the
question,
so
we
could
see
each
other.
While
we
talk
about
this,
since
this
is
a
general
conversation
first
perfect,
thank
you.
So
you
know
I.
Think
I,
guess
I
have
a
couple
different
thoughts
about
what
you're
bringing
forward
and
I
understand
the
intent.
I
would
say.
Perhaps
my
thought
process
has
been
a
little
bit
different,
which
is
I
look
at
attachment
to,
as
almost
like
parking
lot
items
for
future
goal
setting
discussion
so
because
this
is
not
a
council.
F
I
would
say
my
understanding
is
kind
of
what
they
do
at
the
county
or
on
the
federal
level,
a
little
bit
more
of
like
an
ear
marking
process
for
the
special
projects
that
people
would
like
to
put
forward.
I
think
for
the
goal
setting.
My
understanding
has
been
that
it's
always
to
look
at
like
the
holistic
view
of
the
the
city
and
then,
if
a
council
majority
votes
for
that,
then
it
gets
incorporated
into
the
the
goal
setting
and
the
work
plan.
A
I
I,
don't
actually
think
we're
we're
just
agreeing
with
each
other
I
think
I'm
failing
to
explain
what
I'm
hoping
to
achieve
so
I
think
maybe
this
is
where
maybe
staff
can
help
me
understand.
We
often
use
that
metaphor
of
the
iceberg
right,
here's
the
stuff
at
the
top
that
you
know
the
council
sees
and
that
we
prioritize
and
then
there's
the
immense
workload
that
that
is
opaque
to
blessed
right.
A
So
that
way,
when
we
come
in
with
goal
setting,
because
this
happens,
every
single
cycle
we
end
up
with
you
know
dozens
and
dozens
of
great
ideas
that
we
realistically
can't
achieve,
because
we've
got
all
of
this
other
stuff
that
you
know
takes
precedence
because
it's
non-discretionary,
you
know
other,
you
know
urgent
items
or
you
know
core
services
and
I
think
what
I?
What
I'd
love
to
better
understand
is
to
what
extent
does
or
can
staff
help?
A
The
council,
when
we're
coming
up
with
new
items,
share
with
us
what
that
work
looks
like
you
know:
how
does
the
environmental
sustainability
action
plan
and
the
Downtown
parking
strategy
and
the
general
plan
action
plan
and
the
economic
Vitality
strategy?
How
do
all
of
those
pack
up
in
terms
of
priority
relative
to
the
new
stuff?
You
know
that
we're
adding
to
to
the
goal
setting,
but
maybe
assistant
city
manager.
You
can
help
us
understand
how
that
can
inform
our
work.
B
Thank
you
chair.
We
have
a
moved
more
in
that
direction
in
the
2021
goal,
setting
process
where
a
lot
of
that
context,
you
know
perhaps
attachment
to
is
in
an
exhaustive
list
of
all
the
different
projects
that
get
generated
through
other
planning
or
prior
priority.
Setting
that
you
know
are
outside
of
the
council
or
plan,
but
we
have
really
been
moving
in
the
direction
to
try
to
identify
those
things
so
that
we're
mindful
of
the
ways
that
they
draw
on
staff
capacity.
B
Just
as
you
say,
we
have
talked
more
generally
about
the
examples
of
things
that
are
of
the
more
kind
of
core
ongoing
day-to-day
responsibilities
and
what
that
generally
means
in
terms
of
the
percent
of
our
total
staff
capacity.
That
is
available
for
things
that
are
special
projects,
which
is
above
the
water
line,
and
then
there's
the
already
committed
to
special
projects
with
which
further
limit
you
know
the
the
portion
of
that
peak
of
the
the
iceberg
that
is
available
capacity
for
the
Council
work
plan.
B
What
I
think
has
been
challenging
for
staff
and
I
think,
while
we
can
continue
to
move
in
that
direction?
I
I
don't
know
that
we
could
get
to
something
that
would
be
as
ideal
as
perhaps
you
are
suggesting
is
being
able
to
capture
and
quantify
all
of
the
the
ways
in
which
those
existing
core
duties
and
special
projects
do
absorb
staff
capacity
and
then
having
a
relative
priority
between
those
and
the
new
things
that
are
coming
up.
B
These
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
would
fit
in
a
category
a
that.
We
would
feel
comfortable
committing
to
with
the
the
all
of
this
context
taken
into
consideration,
which
would
be
different
than
presenting
all
of
it
to
Council,
in
a
way
that
you
could
kind
of
move
the
pieces
around
and
I
wonder
if
that
you
know
would
satisfy
what
you're
seeking.
A
Yeah
I
I
don't
mean
to
let
the
perfect
be
the
enemy
of
the
good
I
I.
Think
what
what
I'm
getting
at
is
I.
Think
about
the
community
Workforce
agreement,
for
instance,
which
we
prioritized
in
June
2019
and
have
yet
to
see
as
a
council
and
we're
probably
going
to
prioritize
it
for
the
next
goal,
setting
cycle
and
I
guess
what
I
don't
understand
is
you
know
where
that's
accounts?
A
That's
been
a
council
priority
for
a
very
long
time,
but
it
doesn't
feel
like
a
priority
because
we've
consistently
done
other
things
instead
of
it
and
I.
Think
helping
us
come
up
with
a
better
sense
of
like,
what's
realistically
achievable
within
two
years,
given
the
new
normal
post
pandemic
normal.
D
Yeah
so
I'm,
just
so
a
Committee
Member
Ramirez
I'm
just
going
to
ask
for
a
little
clarification
on
what
you're
asking
for,
because
I'm
not
completely
clear.
Are
you
just
asking
for
a
longer
list
of
all
the
projects,
not
only
the
projects
that
Council
has
put
forward,
but
also
the
ones
that
we
just
plan
to
do,
because
I
assumed
I,
I'm
I'm
unclear
on
what
format
you
want
this
to
take
and
I
assumed
we'd
get.
You
know
some
additional
attachments
with
additional
projects
that
are
not
the
ones
we're
putting
forward.
A
F
So
I
I
guess
I
would
say
if,
if
that's
what
you're
looking
for
I
would
ask
staff
if
we
could
create
a
consistent
format.
The
you
know.
So,
instead
of
attachment
two
being
a
list
and
attachment
three
being
a
table,
would
it
be
possible
to
get
them
I
mean
my
preference
and
kind
of
you
know
what
the
city
manager
was
saying.
Visually
I
think
it's
very
helpful,
so
I
would
say
attachment
two:
have
a
work
plan,
that's
a
table
and
then
for
attachment.
F
Three
have
a
work
plan
of
our
goal,
setting
and
I
think
maybe
it's
looking
rather
than
a
mega
list
mayor
if
we
could
have
like
two
side-by-side
lists.
This
is
everything
on
the
work
plan,
and
this
is
you
know
the
description,
the
department,
the
lead,
the
status
and
the
update,
and
then
we
can
look
at,
and
this
is
where
we
are
with
goal
setting
and
I.
Think
perhaps
that
would
be
where
we
could
get
a
better
kind
of
holistic
view
of
what
you're
talking
about.
F
That
would
be
my
maybe
suggestion
and
and
maybe
kind
of
how
it
came
to
council
correct,
because
some
of
these
are
coming
from
item
eight.
Some
of
these
are
coming
from
Council
business,
and
maybe
we
can
add
a
section
in
the
table
that
kind
of
clarifies
how,
like
the
Genesis
of
of
the
of
the
item,
I,
think
that,
for
me
you
know,
hearing
your
explanation
would
be
useful
and
perhaps
stuff
could
could
move
to
that
format.
For
the
the
item
in
January.
A
Thank
you
and
that
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
that
too
I
think
it's
just
more
about
making
sure
we
go
in
with
a
full
understanding
of
what
is
the
work
plan,
because
it's
more
it's
as
the
as
the
staff
presentation
to
be
clear.
It's
far
more
than
just
the
priority
items,
so
I
think
I
think
so.
I
I
think
that's
a
good
recommendation
and
I'm
comfortable
with
whatever
format
you
know,
staff
can
produce.
That
would
be
helpful
for
everybody
too
quick,
hopefully
much
quicker
concerns
or
ideas.
A
I've
watched
the
council
advisory
body
discussions
over
the
years
as
they've
provided
input
on
the
goal
setting
process
and
the
concern
I
have
is
I
feel
like
there's
inequity
in
the
treatment.
Some
advisory
bodies
are
told.
You
can
provide
comment
only
on
items
within
your
scope
and
then
others
are
told
you
could
provide
comments
on
anything
and
so
there's
there's
what.
However,
we
decide
to
do
it.
It
needs
to
be
consistent
because
I
I
feel,
like
you
know
it
really
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
you
know.
E
E
A
I
I
feel
like
to
save
a
lot
of
time
and
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page.
It
might
be
good
to
think
about
a
way
where
we
can
provide
some
preliminary
scoping,
so
we're
not
just
giving
a
huge
idea
and
it
gets
majority
support,
and
then
staff
is
kind
of
left
figuring
out.
Okay,
what
does
this
actually
mean?
A
F
Sure
do
you
want
us
to
go
question
by
question?
Yes,
please,
okay,
great
okay
got
it.
Let's
see,
I,
have
the
questions
so
given
given
staff's
explanation,
I'm
comfortable
with
this
being
on
consent,
I
think
that
we
will
have
opportunity
at
the
council
goal
setting.
You
know,
agenda
item
meeting
to
get
into
the
further
discussion
and
so
I'm
comfortable.
If
this
is
just
kind
of
adopting
the
process
for
it
to
be
on
consent
with
you
know,
obviously,
all
of
the
attachments
with
it
for
number
two
for
additional
analysis
criteria.
F
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
thinking
about
when
I
was
reading.
The
staff
report
was
under
the
umbrella
of
equity.
I
did
appreciate
that
there
was
going
that
that
was
a
topic
of
of
criteria.
I
think
there's
two
places
where
I
feel
like
there's
overlap
to
what
the
city's
already
worked
on,
which
is
our
our
Equity
lens.
F
That
would
be
kind
of
my
comment
on
the
analysis
criteria.
I
hope
that
that
would
be
possible
and
then
another
item
under
analysis
criteria
to
me,
that
could
be
helpful
is
to
include
the
alignment
on
the
Strategic
priorities.
We
have
seven
strategic
priorities
and
I'd
love
to
see.
You
know
this
project
is
includes
Equity.
It
includes
alignment
on.
You
know
number
two
of
our
seven
prior.
F
You
know
strategic
priorities
and
kind
of
have
that
reinforcement
kind
of
similar
to
what
the
mayor
was
commenting
earlier,
just
kind
of
reiterating
the
like
our
our
Council
prioritization
and
how
everything
fits
together.
I
think
would
be
helpful
for
number
three
about
this.
The
proposed
cab
participation
process,
I
I,
hear
what
the
mayor's
saying
in
terms
of
his
concern
on
getting.
F
Feedback
from
our
advisory
bodies
and
I
would
say
something
that
I
realize
in
being
on
a
commission
and
being
on
Council
and
just
kind
of
watching.
A
few
meetings
recently
is
narrowing
the
scope.
You
know
similar
to
how
we
have
four
questions
in
front
of
us
this
afternoon.
Perhaps
one
or
two
questions
for
each
advisory
body
would
be
a
way
to
to
make
it
more
Equitable
in
terms
of
the
feedback
that
we're
soliciting
and
it
could
be-
maybe
just
two
catch-all
questions.
F
You
know
I
I
I,
don't
want
to
like
Wordsmith
from
the
from
the
zoom
screen,
but
I
I
Look
to
staff
on
maybe
just
providing.
You
know
one
to
two
broad
questions
that
each
commission
answers
and
then
being
able
to
provide
that
back
to
council.
I
think
is
also
more
fruitful
in
terms
of
all
of
the
commissions
were
asked
these
two
questions,
and
this
is
what
each
commission
individually
contributed
back
I
think
would
be
helpful
and
then
I
think
it
will
also
bring.
F
Maybe
some
make
commissions
feel
like
they're,
actually
part
of
the
process
and
they're
being
heard,
because
they
were
directly
solicited
questions
in
which
they
could
contribute
answers,
and
then,
let's
see
for
item
four
on
the
project,
prioritization
categories,
the
kind
of
only
other
thing-
and
maybe
this
falls
into
like
a
a
an
Etc
bucket-
is
I'd
love
to
see
you
know.
Status
is
helpful,
but
in
progress,
I,
don't
see
that
unless
I
go
to
the
update
column
and
I
would
love
just
a
separate
column.
F
That
tells
me
maybe
like
projected
date,
completed
Q3,
and
then
the
update,
like
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
understand
what
in
progress
actually
means
and
I
would
say
for
the
whether
it
be
the
work
plan
or
the
comments
on
the
proposed
projects
from
attachment
to
kind
of
understanding
of
we
have
30
projects
in
progress.
10
are
already
completed,
five
haven't
been
started
and
being
able
to
start
the
goal.
Setting
with
that
understanding,
I
think
would
be
a
really
helpful
framework.
F
You
know
I
had
to
go
through
the
attachment
and
count
myself
how
many
are
in
progress.
How
many
but
I
think
in
terms
of
kind
of
demystifying,
the
what's
under
the
iceberg,
that
that
would
be
helpful
and
give
a
little
bit
more
context
to
just
how
great
staff
is
working
on
these
items
because
I
know
it.
F
It
is
quite
a
bit
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
say
in
the
past,
there's
been
an
opportunity
for
Council
to
remove
projects
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
we
have
to
add
any
back,
but
as
we're
talking
about
goal
setting
for
next
year,
I
wonder
if
there's
any
that
will
we.
You
know
we've
naturally
already
adopted.
For
example,
one
of
the
things
we
had
looked
about
was
like
leaf
blowers
right
and
trying
to
move
away
from
gas
leaf
blowers
to
Electric.
Then
there
was
State
legislation.
That
already
did
that.
F
So
we
didn't
have
to
keep
that
as
a
goal,
so
opportunities
like
that,
where
maybe
were
able
to
remove
items
because
of
State
legislation,
the
county
we're
already
working
on
it,
one
of
the
other
jpas
that
we're
a
part
of
has
done
it,
so
those
those
would
kind
of
be.
My
last
catch-all
comments
for
item
four
thanks,
chair.
A
F
G
Council,
member
kame
and
Audrey-
maybe
let
me
see
if
I
can
help
fed
some
light
on
this
I
think
the
challenge
that
we
have
now
as
staff
is.
We
just
have
this
work
plan
with
like
50
things
on
it
and
something
that
the
mayor
just
mentioned
was
like
the
community
Workforce
agreement
right
that
that's
been
on
a
work
plan,
the
past
two
two
work
plan
cycles
and
we
don't
have
right
now
a
process
where
you
all
prioritize
which
of
your
top
projects.
G
There
are
so
instead
of
doing
like
a
b
c
d,
e,
f
or
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
we
were
actually
thinking.
It
would
just
be
like
three
buckets,
basically
like
category
a
or
whatever
we
end
up
doing
or
category
one
are
your
top
priority
projects
like
these?
You
know
10
or
15.
Things
are
your
top
priorities
that
staff
is
really
gonna.
G
You
know
work
on
and
have
the
full
like
staff
allocation
staff
allocation
of
our
time
and
resource
and
just
getting
it
done
sooner
basically,
and
then
category
B
would
follow,
and
then
category
C
was
really
intended
to
address
those
work
plan,
projects
and
I.
Guess
something
that
I
can
equate
to.
This
might
be
like
the
Broadband
initiative
that
you
all
have
on
the
work
plan
right
now,
where
it's
a
priority,
but
there's
a
lot
of
nuance
around
it.
G
G
They
are
important,
but
these
other
two
categories
have
projects
that
are
more
important
to
council,
so
we're
just
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
that
we
could
have,
not
only
you
know,
certainly
disciplined
for
Council,
but
also
staff,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we
know
what
all
of
the
you
know.
Top
priorities
are
and
where
the
allocation
goes
so
I
think
that's
what
we
were.
You
know
trying
to
get
at,
and
certainly
we
can.
You
know
change
it
to
a
numbering
system,
but
we
were
definitely
trying
to
avoid.
G
F
Yeah
I
mean
I'll
I'll,
defer
to
vice
mayor
Hicks,
but
I
I,
don't
know
if
she's
going
to
go
through
all
three
of
the
the
or
all
four
of
the
questions
or
if
we
should
talk
about
the
the
project
prioritization
or
hold
it
till
last
I,
don't
know
vice
mayor.
What
would
you
like
to
do,
or
if
you
want
to
talk
about
this
topic.
D
Are
you
well
actually
I
agreed
with
a
lot
of
what
you
said
and
was
going
to
do
a
deeper
dive
on
on
prioritization
before
you
were
even
gonna?
Ask
that
question,
but
if
you
want,
but
it's
a
little,
what
I'm
going
to
say
is
a
little
different
than
what
we've
just
been
talking
about.
But
if
you
want
to
add
what
you
know,
what
this
triggered
in
your
mind
feel
free,
yeah
I
mean
I.
F
Think
I
I
would
say
this.
Maybe
we
could
go
back
to
this
question
then,
given
what
the
city
manager
said
vice
mayor,
if
you
want
to
go
first
and
then
we
can
talk
about
this,
because
I
do
think
that
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
clear,
I,
apologize
and
so
I
think
to
I,
don't
I
what
we've
done
in
the
past.
As
a
council
was,
you
know,
it
was
all
on
a
white
board
and
people
put
stickers
and
whatever
had
the
most
stickers
was
how
we
did
the
priority
right.
F
If,
if
something
got
six
little
dots,
it
got
prioritization.
You
know.
So.
My
concern
is
how
we
discuss
this,
because
we
may
have
members
who
want
to
go
back
to
the
dot
system
and
I'm
comfortable
moving
into
the
three
bucket
system,
but
I
do
think
we
need
to
talk
about
it
a
little
bit
more.
Okay,
thanks.
G
Thank
you
and
I'm.
Sorry,
mayor
may
I
say
something
real
fast,
too
sure,
so
we
thought
that
staff
would
suggest
the
three
buckets
too
and
give
you
all
something
to
react
to
so
that
way,
you're
not
starting
from
scratch
and
kind
of
feeling
like
you're
scrambling,
because
part
of
this
process
is
Staff,
doing
the
analysis
on.
So
you
all
are
going
to
be
either
suggesting
projects
or
we
know
the
things
that
staff's
going
to
be
recommending
to
you
all
and
then
staff
will
then
suggest
to
you
all.
G
Here's
category,
a
here's
category,
B,
here's
C,
then
you
all
can
react
to
that.
And
if
there's
like
you
know,
seven
of
you
or
six
of
you,
or
at
least
four
of
you
that
want
to
move
something
from
B
to
a
then
we
can,
and
so
that
way
and
I
think
this
might
be
what
you're
getting
a
council
member
kame
that
way.
It's
not
you're,
not
starting
from
scratch,
and
you
know
throwing
spaghetti
at
the
walls.
G
D
D
D
When
I
talk
to
people
living
there,
they're
afraid
that
housing
developers
are
going
to
come
and
redevelop
some
of
the
shopping
centers
and
leave
them
with
no
neighborhoods
serving
retail
or
very
little
of
it
and
I
additionally
fear
that
if
that
happens,
we're
you
know
it's
a
like.
That
should
be
a
a
transit-oriented
and
walkable
area.
D
C
Thank
you,
Committee
Member
Hicks,
not
specifically
no
I,
think
that
you
defined
it
specifically
is
helpful,
although
it
could
be
considered
potentially
part
of
that
project
dependencies
piece
where
we
would
need
to
do
this
in
order
to
ensure
that
something
else
happens
or
in
this
case
didn't
happen,
but
thank
you
for
bringing
it
to
our
attention.
Yeah.
D
Okay,
then
I
think
that
would
be
the
one
thing.
I
would
add
a
sense
of
so
there's
urgency,
which
is
urgent
and
then
there's
something.
Maybe
a
little
softer
like
timeliness,
not
like
urgency,
makes
it
sound
like
there's
about
to
be
an
emergency,
so
a
sense
of
urgency
or
or
timeliness
that
needs
to
be
considered.
So
it
should
be
an
earlier
project
would
be
another
piece
of
criteria
for
me
and
then
the
third
feedback
on
the
council
advisory
body
participation.
D
You
know
I
basically
agree
with
what
people
have
been
saying.
I
think
that
I
would
like
to
see
a
kind
of
a
staff
report
on
that,
while
I'm
thinking
about
accounts,
my
or
Council
priorities
and
I
would
also
like
and
I
suppose.
Maybe
this
happens,
but
I
would
like
the
council
advisory
bodies
to
the
same
sort
of
honest
explanation
that
we
get
about.
I
mean
I,
don't
want
counsel,
new
people
and
Council
advisory
bodies
to
go
off
and
dream
of
you
know
spell
weekend
thinking
through
the
Thousand
new
things.
D
They
want
us
to
do
and
then
here
and
then
us
cut
them
down,
because
we
don't
have
the
staff
I
I
want
them
to
get
this
kind
of
reasonable
expectation
about
capacity
that
we're
that
council
is
always
told,
and
then
I
I
agree
with
what
the
mayor
said
about.
It
should
be
consistent.
What
Council
advisory
bodies
are
told
should
be
consistent.
D
D
Okay,
the
three
buckets
looks
good
from
it
to
me:
I
like
the
idea
that
staff
would
help,
arrange
the
buckets,
because
whether
they're
a
priority
in
part
depends
on
the
stack
capacity
and
so
forth
things
that
council
could
learn
from
background.
You
could
give
us
and
I
think
that
the
thoughts
about
urgency
or
timeliness
need
to
be
a
part
of
that
as
well,
and
then
the
last
sort
of
overall
comment
on
Howard
is
just
how
we're
doing
this.
D
I
know
the
the
whole
dots
I
think
we
did
once,
but
also
I
think
the
first
time
that
I
was
on
Council,
that
we
did.
This
I
think
you
Lucas
and
but
recommended
that
we
write
ours
up
ahead
of
time
and
then
it
wasn't
done
with
a
dots
procedure.
It
was
done
with
something
else
and
and
then
we've
had
interim
times,
maybe
interim
years,
where
we've
just
gone
through
I
think
this
was
the
beginning
of
last
year.
I
thought.
D
Actually
that
format
was
pretty
helpful
where
you
had
a
list
of
the
projects
and
you
kind
of
listed
what
everybody
said:
I'm
not
being
very
clear
but
yeah.
So
I'm
going
away
and
I
agree
with
what
councilmember
said
about
being
able
to
remove
projects,
because
I
think
most
of
us
have
been
here
for
four
years
and
some
of
those
projects
may
have
gone
stale
so
yeah.
So
I'm
left
just
wondering
how
we're
doing
this.
D
B
Chair
Ramirez
may
I
provide
a
response
regarding
the
process
building
off
of
what
city
manager
McCarthy
was
saying
about
staff
coming
with
recommendations,
I
think
that
there's
a
two-step
process,
one
is
that
in
March
the
council
members
will
actually
Laurel.
Could
you
go
back
to
the
timeline
for
us.
B
So
in
February
the
council
members
will
have
the
opportunity
to
look
at
what
is
the
status
of
our
current
work
plan,
taking
to
Heart
the
comments
from
member
Kane
around
really
making
as
clear
as
possible.
What's
completed,
what's
not
started,
what's
what's
carrying
forward
and
and
and
our
best
efforts
to
show
the
kind
of
entirety
of
the
the
work
that's
already
on
the
plate
of
the
city.
B
If
you
will,
with
the
formatting
done
in
a
way
that
would
would
make
that
easy
for
the
council
to
take
into
consideration
and
then
the
council
would
identify
projects
that
it
is
interested
in
considering
for
the
work
plan,
it's
not
prioritizing.
It
is.
These
are
the
kinds
of
things
we'd
be
interested
in
considering
for
the
work
plan
and
I
think
also,
there
was
a
good
suggestion
of.
B
The
other
thing
now
that
we've
got
the
the
work
plan
timeline
up,
that
I
wanted
to
comment
on
that
would
be
very
challenging,
is
to
try
to
have
advisory
body
input
prior
to
you
and
your
colleagues
putting
forward
the
kinds
of
projects
that
you
might
wish
to.
I.
Think
that
there's
the
challenge
that
you
already
noted,
which
is
how
do
you
right
size
expectations?
G
G
Do
we
do
a
DOT
exercise
versus
do
we
write
letters
or
memo
in
advance
versus?
Are
we
brainstorming
on
the
spot?
I
think
that
that
seems
to
be
the
the
big
question
right:
how
how
do
the
new
ideas
get
brought
forward
to
the
body
right
to
the
rest
of
you,
and
you
know,
I
I
think
we
have
received
achieved
it's
interesting
because
over
the
last
several
work
plan,
Cycles
we've
just
received
various
feedback.
You
know
some
people
love
the
dot.
Some
people
hate
the
dot
exercise.
Some
people
really
like
write
in
a
memo.
G
G
If
you
remember
they
met
with
each
person
individually
and
then
things
were
identified
in
different
themes
were
identified,
and
then
you
all
discussed
it
and
I
think
we
had
probably
five
six
meetings
about
it
back
in
2020,
so
you
know
there's
no
best
way
of
doing
it,
and
you
know
I've
talked
to
many
other
city
managers
about
this
too,
because
every
every
city
does
it
differently
and
even
the
same
cities.
Try
it
different
ways
every
couple
years,
because
things
just
work
out
some
years
or
might
not
work
out.
G
Other
years,
so
I
think
it
would
be
helpful.
If
maybe
you
all
would
tell
us,
do
you
like
the
die
exercise?
Would
you
rather
do
something
different?
Would
you
rather
it
have
this
this
Matrix
of
the
things
that
that
we
know
about,
and
then
maybe
you
all
come
with.
You
know
no
more
than
a
specific
number
of
new
items,
because
the
other
thing
that
we
really
need
to
avoid
is
getting
a
work
plan
that
has
80
or
90
items
on
it.
G
We
just
can't
do
it,
and
that
was
one
of
the
big
things
that
Civic
makers
was
able
to
I,
think
really
help
staff
with
and
counsel
with
was
being
more
realistic
about
the
size
of
the
work
plan
which
I
think
this
was.
You
know
to
the
mayor's
point
and
councilmember
kame's
point
and
just
like
there's
so
many
other
things
going
on.
We
just
can't
have
like
the
work
plans
of
the
past.
G
What
what
because
you
all
were
a
part
of
what
happened
in
2020
so
and
and
you'll,
be
a
part
of
it.
You
know
next
year
as
well,
so
I
think
what
if,
if
there's
specific
feedback
that
can
help
us
help,
you
all
I
think
that
that
would
be
really
good
to
know
because
I
I
just
know
there's
just
various
opinions
on
it.
A
A
A
Okay,
I,
so
I
I
agree
with
most
of
what
my
colleagues
have
said
where
I
strongly
disfigured
his
on
the
first
question.
I
do
think
we
need
to
do
a
business
item
and
that's
because
I'm
not
confident
we're
going
to
be
able
to
devise
a
a
process
that
that
I
think
will
be
satisfactory
to
to
everybody
either
tonight
or
or
as
a
consent
item
I
have
a
suspicion.
A
It
will
likely
be
pulled,
I
think
it's
fine
to
put
it
on
consent
and
see
if
it
gets
pulled
but
but
I
feel
like
we
should
probably
start
with
new
business
and
just
tee
up
some
of
these
questions.
So
that
way
we
have
an
opportunity
to
talk
about
it
as
a
council,
rather
than
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we're
conducting
our
goal.
A
Setting
and
we're
talking
about
process
in
the
goal
setting,
because
we
didn't
think
it
through
earlier
but
I
I,
understand,
I,
think
why
why
there
may
be
a
preference
for
consent.
Item
for
number,
two
I
agree
with
with
all
of
the
ideas
that
my
colleagues
shared
so
I
do,
like
the
alignment
or
identifying
alignment
with
the
Strategic
priorities
and
I.
Think
it's
fair
to
say.
If
something
is
not
aligned
with
a
strategic
priority,
it
should
be
lower
in
priority
based
on
the
categories
in
question.
A
A
E
A
Any
any
specific
or
objective
metrics
associated
with
the
equity
Criterion
that
would
be
desirable,
so
I
strongly
support
those
recommendations.
I
also
strongly
support
incorporating
an
urgency
or
timeliness
Criterion,
because
I
think
Committee
Member
Hicks
is
Right.
We've
often
had
items
sit
on
the
work
line
for
a
long
time
and
there's
a
consequence.
They
become
stale
and
and
I'll
get
to
this
later.
E
A
I,
like
the
idea
of
a
removal
process
for
when
that
occurs
as
well.
Those
are
those
are
great
ideas
for
question
three,
very
similarly
I
I
like
the
idea
of
standardized
questions
across
all
of
the
council
advisory
bodies,
so
that
way
we're
asking
the
same
things
and
getting
the
same
input
and
I
agree
very
strongly
with
having
a
consistent
process.
A
Ideas
that
we
miss
the
consequence
but
I
think
just
as
a
high
level
remark
consistent
process-
and
you
know
a
couple
of
standardized
questions-
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
appreciate
the
assistant
city
managers.
Comments
about
temporally,
it's
extremely
challenging
to
have
the
advisory
bodies
comment
early,
so
as
much
as
I
think
that
would
be
desirable
to
get
to
I
understand
why
it
may
not
be
achievable
this
cycle
and
then
for
question.
A
Four
I
support
the
categories
as
proposed,
but
I
do
agree
that
we
need
some
type
of
clear
priorities,
prioritization
process
going
in,
and
that's
it's
fine
for
stats
to
categorize
for
us
as
a
recommendation,
but
I
think
going
in
with
a
shared
understanding
of
what
does
it
take
to
get
prioritized?
Is
it
a
function
of
getting
the
highest
number
of
votes
right?
A
Is
it
a
function
of
timely
timeliness
and
urgency
so
that
way
again
we're
going
in
eyes
wide
open
and
we're
not
trying
to
you
know
figure
out
the
methodology
after
the
fact
and
I.
So
we
talked
about
the
removal
of
projects
having
some
kind
of
process
for
that,
and
then
I
also
appreciate
Committee
Member
camay's
suggestion
for
some
type
of
a
status,
transparent
transparency
or
or
Clarity
component.
F
A
The
end
I'll
do
a
quick
summary
and,
and
you
know,
and
unless
there
are
objections,
we'll
just
use
that
as
as
a
sense
of
the
direction,
but
I
saw
that
there
were
two
hands
up
so
we'll
go
to
my
colleagues
for
additional
comments
or
questions.
So
a
Committee
Member
to
me,
I
think
your
hand
was
up
first
before
you
lowered
it.
F
Great,
thank
you.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
discussion
and
staff
response
and
just
being
able
to
talk
as
a
as
a
subcommittee
about
this
and
really
really
appreciate
that
we're
trying
to
find
a
way
to
have
I
would
say
just
like
a
more
efficient
and
effective
process.
That's
kind
of
what
I'm
hearing
from
our
discussion
and
how
do
we
Implement
that?
So
you
know
in
going
through
the
work
plan
items
I
saw
that
there
were
and
stacking
probably
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
F
Would
you
for
the
categorizations
in
the
three
buckets?
Would
we
also
need
to
take
those
ones
that
are
in
progress
and
say
high
medium
low
or
are
the
ones
that
are
in
progress
already
going
to
be
high
priority,
because
they're
already
in
progress
and
staff
would
theoretically
want
to
complete
them?
Could
we
just
clarify
that.
G
I
think
most
of
the
projects
that
are
in
progress
should
be
completed
cycle.
Now
there
will
be
some
that
will
likely
need
to
move
over
into
the
next
work
plan.
Now
that
may
mean
just
like
the
first
six
months,
though
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
it's
going
to
take
another
two
years,
but
I
think
we
can
do.
G
We
can
just
make
it
more
clear,
and
you
know
as
I
even
look
at
this
myself.
I
think
you
know
status,
probably
isn't
very
helpful
that
it
is
more,
as
you
were
saying,
let's
talk
about
when
the
estimated
completion
is
and
then
kind
of
what
what
the
time
frame
looks
like
to
get
there
and
I
think
that
would
probably
be
more
helpful
because
then
you'll
see
exactly
if
it
is
going
to
be
done.
This
work
plan
cycle
or
if
it
needs
to
move
to
the
next
one.
G
G
So
you
all
understand
exactly
you
know
when
we
expect
to
either
bring
them
forward
to
council
or
finish
it
and
I
know
you
got
to
kind
of
dig
in
the
update
section
about
you
know
when
we're
going
to
bring
it
to
council,
so
I
think
we'll
just
make
it
more
clear
and
we'll
do
a
better
job
at
just
kind
of
explaining
where
things
are
at
so
I
think.
Yes,
we
would
put
those
items
that
have
already
been
started,
probably
in
category
a
just
because
they're
already
going.
F
Yeah
so
then,
maybe
you
know
because
I
as
I
think
in
terms
of
just
the
clarity
aspect,
if
it
was
status,
you
know
Q3,
2022
and
then
another
column
that
said
priority
a
and
then
the
update
part
you
know
or
just
even
removing
the
update
part
I.
Think
that
may
be
the
way
to
kind
of
move
into
this
new,
like
prioritization
system
and
and
maybe
clear
up
the
confusion
and
I
think
that's.
F
That
would
help
Council
too
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
if
something's
in
progress,
then
it's
a
because
we're
already
working
on
it
and
then
I
I
think
that
would
help
with
like
the
attachment
to
stuff
to
understand.
Okay,
we
have
33
items
that
are
in
progress
and
prioritization
a
so
we
need
to
balance
the
you
know
anything
else
with
that.
So
I
I
think
that
to
me,
a
chair
would
be
the
way
that
I
would.
You
know,
recommend
that
staff
present
this
to
council.
D
Yeah
that
generally
sounds
good
to
me.
It
does,
though,
sound
like
there's
the
potential
for
all
continued
projects
to
be
priority,
a
and
then
B
and
C
become
the
the
new
ones
so
I.
Imagine,
though,
that
that
with
some
thought
it
might
be,
you
know
some
of
the
ones
that
are
in
process
might
unfold
over
more
quarters,
so
yeah
I,
guess
I'm,
just
hoping
that
all
new
prod
all
new
projects
wouldn't
end
up
in
C.
D
I
did
this
and
I'm
I'm
sort
of
looking
forward
to
a
process
that
fits
that,
hopefully,
where
we
are,
you
know
that
it
won't
be
so
many
new
projects
and
I'm
not
sure
that
the
dots
does
fit
this
particular
situation,
but
but
honestly
I'm,
not
a
very
process-oriented
person.
So
staff
comes
up
with
a
good
process
for
this
particular
situation.
A
A
So
we'll
start
with
question
one
I
was
out
voted,
so
this
will
be
a
consent.
Item
for
question.
Two
I
I
believe
there
is
majority
support
for
commit
Committee,
Member,
Hicks
item
our
suggestion
to
have
add
a
an
urgency
or
timeliness
criteria
and
then
for
a
Committee
Member
to
May's
suggestions
to
have
a
Criterion
around
alignment
with
the
Strategic
priorities
and
then
to
to
incorporate
into
the
equity
Criterion
the
REI
action
plan
and
make
sure
there's
alignment
there
for
question
three.
A
There's
majority
support
for
applying
a
consistent
process
across
all
of
the
council
advisory
bodies,
so
they
would
be
asked
the
same
questions
and
I'm
really
glad
to
hear
that
representative
from
the
city
manager's
office
will
be.
The
same
representative
will
be
going
to
all
of
the
advisory
bodies.
The
solicit
input
I
think
that
will
really
help
make
sure
that
we're
getting
comparable
and
Equitable
input
from
all
advisory
bodies
and
then
for
question.
E
A
Were
some
additional
items
that
are
that
were
thrown
into
four
but
I
think
are
more
like
miscellaneous?
One
of
them
is
having
some
type
of
process
for
the
removal
of
projects,
and
then
a
Committee
Member
May
has
suggest,
tested
in
corporate
making,
clear
or
clearer
the
the
status
of
individual
projects
by
including
the
the
quarter
and
year
the
estimated
completion
and
then
I
think
also
including
the
relative
priority.
Abc.
A
There
was
a
question
about
the
prioritization
process
as
well:
I,
don't
think
we've
selected
a
prioritization
process
as
a
subcommittee,
but
I
think
it
you
know
having
having
that
process
so,
whether
it's
doctor
or
what
whatever
making
sure
that's
that's
clear
and
defined
for
the
consent
calendar
item.
So
that
way
it's
made
clear
to
the
public
and
to
the
committee
at
that
time.