►
From YouTube: September 27, 2022 Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council and Shoreline Regional Park Community
Description
Live Teleconference of the Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council (Regular) and Shoreline Regional Park Community (Special) scheduled for Tuesday, September 27, 2022
A
Council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting.
Lives
May
do
so
at
Mountain
view.lexstar.com
youtube.com
forward,
slash
Mountain,
View
gov
and
on
Comcast
channel
26.
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda.
Members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
by
visiting
Mountain
View
of
mountainview.gov
forward,
slash
meeting
to
Enter
The
Zoom
meeting
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
ID
843-5126-7142.
B
Have
aquarium
with
Showalter
and
Abaco
absent.
A
Very
much
we'll
now
move
on
to
item
three
or
3.1
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan
proposed
scope
of
work.
The
purpose
of
this
study
session
is
to
receive
city
council
input
on
the
proposed
scope
of
work
for
the
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan.
Community
Services
director,
John
Marchant,
will
present
the
item
whenever
you're
ready.
C
C
Great
thank
you
Christine
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
My
name
is
John
Marshall
I'm,
the
community
services
director.
The
purpose
of
this
evening
study
session
is
to
receive
city
council
input
on
the
proposed
scope
of
work
for
the
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan.
The
city
has
two
existing
plans
related
to
the
agenda
item.
First
is
the
recreation
plan
which
was
adopted
by
Council
in
2008.
C
and
the
parks
and
open
space
plan
that
was
most
recently
adopted
by
Council
in
2014.,
as
both
the
recreation
plan
and
parks
and
open
space
plan
have
reached
the
intended
lifespan.
The
city
council
approved
the
development
of
a
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan.
As
part
of
your
strategic
priorities.
C
The
plane
will
create
a
cohesive
document
to
address
the
open
space
needs
of
the
community,
as
well
as
to
find
a
Clear
Vision
and
action
plan
for
the
future
of
Mountain
View
related
to
Parks
and
Recreation.
The
plan
is
proposed
to
be
developed
as
a
10-year
document,
while
the
forecasting
completed
in
the
analysis
will
be
for
the
next
15
years.
C
C
The
following
17
proposed
tasks
will
be
included
in
the
request
for
proposals.
These
tasks
are
not
necessarily
in
chronological
order
and
staff
anticipates
that
the
consultant
team
will
be
working
on
several
tasks
concurrently
throughout
the
plan
development
process
and
now
I
will
highlight
each
of
the
tasks
listed
task.
One
is
related
to
the
overall
management
and
coordination
to
develop
the
plan.
The
second
task
is
to
establish
a
planned
Vision
with
Associated
goals
and
objectives.
This
task
will
be
completed
through
a
public
input
process
which
the
consultant
team
will
incorporate.
C
The
themes
listed
task
3
is
a
review
of
all
relevant
city
ordinances
and
state
laws,
including
Quimby
act,
as
well
as
the
city's
General
plan,
precise
plans,
housing
element
among
others,
community
outreach
and
engagement
is
a
major
key
to
the
success
of
the
plan.
The
robust
Community
engagement
process
will
be
developed
and
the
consultant
team
is
expected
to
have
Innovative
and
creative
ways
to
attract
and
involve
a
wide
range
of
community
members
in
the
process.
C
Task
5
will
include
a
full
assessment
inventory
and
Analysis
of
existing
Parks
facilities
and
open
spaces
and
how
they
are
used,
and
the
consultant
will
develop
a
comparative
analysis
of
other
agencies.
Task
six
will
take
the
inventory
and
assessment
information
to
recommend
any
changes
to
the
existing
list
of
Open
Spaces
calculated
towards
the
city's
total
acreage.
C
The
consultant
will
also
Define
the
different
types
of
parks
in
open
space
within
the
city
and
recommend
how
to
calculate
it.
Toward
the
city's
total
open
space
for
task
seven,
the
consultant
will
determine
the
amount
of
park
space
needed
to
meet
the
city's
existing
goal,
providing
three
acres
per
one
thousand
residents
with
a
focus
on
the
next
15
years,
along
with
anticipated
growth
within
the
city.
C
The
consultant
will
provide
a
cost
estimate
to
create
new
part
acreage
to
meet
the
existing
goal
and
recommend
creative
funding
strategies.
Cascade
will
establish
Park
accessibility
goals
and
we'll
focus
on
walkability
and
access
to
parks
and
task.
9
we'll
provide
a
review
of
recreation
programming
and
identify
gaps
in
service
task.
10
is
review
and
Analysis
of
the
recreation
cost,
recovery
policy
and
existing
fees,
as
well
as
a
review
of
the
financial
assistance
program
and
in
task
11.
C
C
We
haven't
had
a
cohesive
mission
and
vision
and
mission
statement
for
quite
a
while
and
finally
task.
16
and
17
will
focus
on
the
development
of
the
draft
plan
and
final
report,
as
well
as
providing
numerous
presentations
throughout
the
process
for
public
meetings,
including
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
and
city
council.
C
C
The
consultant
will
focus
on
community
outreach
and
development
of
the
plan
based
on
the
tasks
outlined
in
the
presentation
tonight
over
the
course
of
the
quarters,
2
and
3
of
23.,
and
at
the
moment
the
we
anticipate
bringing
the
final
document
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
and
city
council
for
adoption
in
Q4
of
23..
However,
the
anticipated
timeline
may
be
adjusted
once
a
consultant
team
is
selected
and
we
work
together
on
a
project
schedule.
C
They
shared
a
desire
to
create
opportunities
for
deep
engagement
within
the
community,
so
they
want
staff
and
the
consultant
to
go
out
in
the
community
where
people
are
in
parks
and
at
events.
Neighborhood
Gatherings,
through
neighborhood
associations
to
incorporate
Community
visioning
exercises
to
determine
what
the
community
wants
the
city
to
look
like
in
the
future.
They
stated
social
Equity
related
to
park.
Access
is
important
and
they
suggested
that
staff
consider
creating
a
community
advisory
committee
or
similar
group
to
be
engaged
in
the
process.
C
They
would
like
data
being
used
to
develop
the
plan
to
be
available
early
in
the
process
to
understand
what
is
being
measured
and
they
supported
taking
time
to
create
the
plan
and
shared
concern
with
the
current
schedule.
Being
too
short
in
these
supported,
they
supported
regular
updates
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
and
to
engage
them
in
the
plan
development
process
and
there's
an
interest
to
build
flexibility
into
the
plan
to
accommodate
future
trends.
C
So
with
that,
we
have
two
questions
for
Council
this
evening
and
first
questions
does
council
support.
The
staff
recommended
proposed
scope
of
work
for
the
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan,
and
the
second
is:
does
council
have
any
additional
considerations
for
staff
to
include
in
the
proposed
scope
of
work
and
with
that?
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
John,
and
we
will
proceed
first
to
staff,
sorry
to
public
comments
and
then
to
return
to
the
council
for
questions.
So
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
allocate
three
minutes.
The
first
speaker
is
Bruce
England.
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Try
to
squeeze
this
in
I've
got
several
points,
but
this
will
be
familiar
to
John
and
others
on
the
call.
This
is
really
great.
A
great
plan,
that's
being
proposed,
so
totally
support
it
and
also
speaking
for
green
spaces.
Mountain
View
I
should
say
as
well
as
myself.
The
question
about
the
Quimby
Act
is
interesting,
because
what
we
really
want
are
the
right
park.
D
Spaces
in
the
right
places,
depending
on
community
needs
within
a
particular
area,
so
one
park
in
one
place
might
not
be
the
same
as
a
park
in
another
place
depending
on
community
needs,
so
understanding
the
Quimby
act,
but
that
shouldn't
be
the
only
thing,
lighting
considerations
for
sure
following
the
international
dark
sky,
Association
other
standards,
recommendations
for
lighting,
de-emphasizing
Turf
as
much
as
possible,
using
it
where
it's
needed
in
active
areas,
amenities
such
as
drinking
fountains
benches
restrooms
all
public
facing.
D
We
would
like
to
see
that
Sirius
Popa
consideration.
Those
can
actually
be
good,
open
space
public
spaces
to
be
used
as
long
as
they're,
not
really
fitting
for
Mountain
View
like
covered
passageways
shouldn't,
be
considered
popas
strictly
ornamental
areas
shouldn't
be
considered.
Boba's
that
sort
of
thing
this,
the
Synergy
with
a
biodiversity
strategy
project,
is
important
and
I
know
that
in
the
PRC
report
you
talked
about
a
living
action-oriented
outcome
driven
document.
D
That's
really
key
to
not
just
have
a
PDF
that
sits
on
a
shelf
somewhere
and
just
we
welcome
engagement
with
our
group
with
green
spaces,
Mountain
View,
and
also
in
coordination,
With
Friends
of
Stevens
Creek,
Trail
and
Friends
of
Mountain
View
Parks.
So
that's
a
lot,
but
at
least
I
got
it
within
three
minutes.
Thank
you.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
mayor
council
members.
I'm
really
happy
to
see
this
we're
going
forward.
I
think
it's
long
overdue.
In
fact,
a
few
months
ago,
I
was
so
eager
to
see
what
the
results
might
be.
I
did
my
own
analysis,
which
I'd
like
to
share
some
results
here.
Next
slide,
please
the
main
the
main
difference
is
I,
don't
count
school
property
as
parks
and
we've
seen
what
can
happen.
Schools
can
close
that
off
and
actually
I
think
the
school
security
purposes.
E
You
know
public
should
not
be
allowed
to
just
previously
going
to
school
grounds
anytime.
They
want
and
so
I've.
So
this
map
shows
what
happens
if
you
remove
School
ads
from
the
sort
of
open
space
amounts
and
only
shows
city-owned
parks,
and
you
can
see
the
areas
north
of
central
really
really
take
a
big
hit
next
slide.
Please
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
details,
so
I
hope
you
can
go
back
these
slides
a
little
bit
in
more
detail
later.
E
This
compares
the
Palo
Alto,
which
is
where
I
grew
up
and
followed
a
slightly
higher
ratio.
Again.
This
is
just
City
owned
parks
and
I'm,
not
counting
the
big
Regional
Parks
like
Bixby
or
Shoreline,
or
Foothill
Park.
The
main
difference
is
Palo,
Alto
Parks
tend
to
be
much
bigger.
Their
typical
parks
are
four
to
five
acres,
whereas
Mountain
View
has
a
lot
of
one
and
two
acre
parks
next
slide.
Please
now.
E
Here's
where
the
the
real
meat
is
I
took
the
2020
census
numbers
and
updated
the
populations
and
then
calculated
new
park
ratios
based
on
those
and
look
at
the
change.
As
you
can
see,
a
lot
of
the
areas
had
big
population
increases
and,
of
course,
there
weren't
that
many
new
parks,
so
the
park
ratios,
went
down
and
again
the
area.
The
sort
of
Sterling,
Thompson
and
ring
store
are
way
down.
You
know
below
a
half
acre
per
thousand
people
next
slide,
please.
This
is
the
last
one.
E
I
showed
the
version
of
this
a
few
weeks
ago,
when
you
told
us
about
the
purchase
in
the
Terra
Bella
area,
and
so
the
only
thing
I
want
to
add
here
is
that
you
know
just
based
on
the
3
000.
People
that
are
coming
in,
we
know
are
coming
in
based
on
the
approved
projects.
E
You
know
we
would
want
nine
acres
of
Park,
but
you
know
at
the
current
based
on
that
price
that
you
paid
for
those
1.6
acres,
that
nine
acres
would
cost
110
million
dollars,
and
you
know
where
are
we
going
to
get
that
kind
of
medicine?
In
fact,
if
you
look
at
a
total
area,
I
mean
for
Sterling,
you
know
it's
like
say:
10
000
people,
so
there
should
be
30
Acres
of
parks.
You
know
how
are
you
going
to
get
the
money
and
the
property
to
possibly
meet
that
number?
E
F
Hello
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
city
council
and
staff,
my
name
is
Hala
elshawani
I'm,
a
Cuesta
Park
resident,
long-time
resident
of
Mountain
View
I,
just
wanted
to
say.
I
I
support
the
many
of
the
recommendations
that
the
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan
included
in
the
scope
providing
three
acres
of
park
for
every
one
thousand
residents.
That's
a
great
idea
that
should
really
be
tied
to
the
to
the
eight
years
cycle
of
housing
element
because,
as
you
know,
the
housing
element
keeps
planning.
F
For
addition
of
you
know,
thousands
of
tens
of
thousands
of
people
and
the
strategic,
Parks
and
Recreation
plan
should
really
follow
that
so
that
the
ratio
stays
at
that
rate,
which
would
be
great
I
wanted
to
Second
the
previous
caller
and
saying
that
the
schools
really
should
not
be
counted
in
the
Parks
land,
since
they
were
all
fenced
in
the
last
year
or
so.
F
We
really
cannot
access
the
parks
for
many
hours
from
the
morning
until
four
or
five
during
the
week,
which
makes
it
really
hard,
for
you
know,
folks,
who
are
retired
and
want
to
be
able
to
use
the
the
Open
Spaces
for
walking
or
whatever
cannot
do
that
for
the
in
the
schools,
and
so
I
would
like
to
disclose
exclude
the
schools
from
the
park
space
count.
F
I
also
would
like
to
see
the
tree
master
plan
being
focused
on
maybe
at
the
very
beginning,
because,
as
you
know,
we're
losing
a
lot
of
trees
in
Mountain,
View,
2D
development,
the
city
releases,
the
project
list
every
other
month,
and
every
list
has
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
trees
to
be
removed
for
these
big
development
projects.
So
please
focus
on
that
and
make
that
a
priority
to
attend
to
to
address
change
the
policies
and
the
ordinances
as
soon
as
possible,
so
that
we
don't
continue
to
lose
these
trees.
F
While
we're
working
on
this
Parks
and
Recreation,
you
know
strategic
plan
which
will
take
at
least
a
year
or
two
before
anything
can
be
implemented.
In
addition
to
the
trees,
there
should
also
be
for
the
parks
consideration
for
permeable
walking
sidewalks.
You
know
more
and
environmentally
friendly
materials
to
be
to
be
considered.
You
know
more
art,
more
art
display
in
the
new
parks
and
and
such
these
are
Minor
Details,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
see
that
as
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
yield
my
time.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
The
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
Okay,
VA
I
figured
that
might
trigger
some
comments.
The
next
speaker
is
VA.
G
Hi,
my
name
is
Valentin
I
already
sent
an
email
to
Lucas
Ramirez
I
would
like
to.
H
Sorry
I
wasn't
sure
if
my
microphone
is
muted,
Mountain
View
has
announced
a
very
aggressive,
canopy
increased
goals,
and
yet
we
still
see
very
few
trees
in
CG
parks.
H
That's
true,
but
it
feels
like
the
balance
is
certainly
skewed
to
open
areas.
Right
now
and
regardless
of
that
consideration,
you
could
still
plant
trees
on
both
sides
of
all
walking
trails
and
around
playgrounds,
and
it
would
not
make
any
dent
in
the
total,
open
Turf
area
and
in
general.
I
feel
like
three
at
least
and
three
LA's
in
city
parks
and
in
streets
are
very
beautiful
and
provide
much
needed
shade
in
our
climate.
H
So
I
would
like
a
city
to
Institute
a
policy
for
trying
to
surround
all
trees
and
play
trails
and
playgrounds
with
large
trees,
and,
as
somebody
already
mentioned
before,
when
developers
removed
very
large
number
of
mature
trees,
they're
supposed
to
contribute
to
Parks
funds.
H
Unfortunately,
we
don't
see
as
many
trees
planted
as
that
are
removed,
and
it's
a
particularly
sad
to
see
redwood
trees
go
in
particular
I
understand
that
redwood
trees
are
not
currently
doing
very
well
due
to
Drought,
but
could
you
perhaps
consider
planting
comparable
trees
like
large
Conifer
trees,
some
of
which
are
quite
drought?
Resistant?
I
Good
evening
Sarah
Ramirez,
mayor
Ramirez
and
council
members,
my
name
is
sunny
kleinhaus
I'm,
the
environmental
advocate
for
Santa
Clara,
Valley
Audubon
Society.
Thank
you
for
starting
the
Strategic
plan
for
Mountain
View
Parks
and
Recreation
facilities.
Mountain
View
parks,
open
space
and
Recreation
facilities
are
important
to
Residents
and
regionally.
Integrating
habitat
for
birds
and
pollinators
into
public
spaces
is
important,
and
we
should
be
planting
native
vegetation
everywhere
and
trees
where
habitat
goals
in
three
canopy
goals
do
not
conflict.
I
It
would
be
good
to
understand
how
the
proposed
tasks
relate
to
the
new
biodiversity
strategy
in
urban
Forest
plan
and
also
the
study
session.
Memo
doesn't
mention
outdoor
lighting,
and
we
now
know
that
LED
lighting
can
be
detrimental
to
many
species
and
harm
you
in
health,
and
attention
to
this
issue
is
needed.
It
may
be,
can
become
an
issue,
for
example,
when
you
consider
art
in
reviewing
the
scope
of
work,
we're
pleased
to
see
a
consideration
of
Maintenance
practices.
I
You
know
it
is
time
our
community
stop
shaping
plants
into
squares
where
there
is
no
impediment
to
mobility,
and
perhaps
we
can
allow
some
trail
Leaf
litter
to
accumulate
rather
than
replacing
it
with
wood
chips,
reducing
the
intensity
of
landscaping,
activities
and
pruning
of
trees
and
shrubs
is
better
for
the
environment
better
for
biodiversity,
especially
when
printing
occurs
during
the
nesting
season.
In
many
practices,
involve
use
of
fossil
fuels,
create
noise
and
noxious
films.
I
A
couple
of
comments
about
Shoreline,
as
thousands
of
residents
will
live
in
North
Bayshore
and
with
the
city
assuming
care
for
the
retention,
Basin,
additional
stuff
and
Ray
enjoys,
will
be
needed
to
protect
both
the
recreational
resources
and
the
natural
resources
from
Ultimate
and
inappropriate
use.
Pets.
Fires
of
Trail
activities
threaten
both
people
and
habitat
in
the
species
of
Shoreline
I.
I
Remember
seeing
some
people
trying
to
have
a
bonfire
on
top
of
the
landfill
right
next
to
one
of
the
events
over
there,
so
we
need
to
have
people
watching,
please
consider,
for
example,
also
extending
fencing
to
discourage
visits
after
closing
hours.
Thank
you
so
much
for
starting
this
process
and
we
hope
to
participate
in
it.
Thank
you.
A
J
I'm
going
to
start
with
I
actually
I
want
to
thank
staff.
I
thought
it
was
a
very
clear
report
and
it
was
I
had
to
really
rack
my
brain
to
figure
out
what
I
might
comment
on
or
ADD,
but
I
do
have
a
few
questions
and
comments
later.
J
I
have
to
say
that
my
own
questions
and
comments
coincide.
A
lot
with
with
members
of
the
public
that
I've
been
I've,
been
going
to
a
lot
of
ice
cream
socials
lately,
so
that
I've
been
talking
to
at
ice
cream,
socials,
also
email
that
we've
had
come
in
and
then
our
public
commentary
today.
So
my
questions
are
going
to
be
aimed
at
the
things
that
members
of
the
public
have
have
talked
to
me
about
and
and
really
there's
a
lot.
J
A
lot
of
people
seem
to
be
on
the
same
page,
and
my
question
is
really
these
things
that
seem
to
be
very
important
to
a
lot
of
people.
Do
you
think
they
fit
in
well?
Where
would
they
fit
in
to
to
the
scope
and
or
should
we
create
another
section
for
them?
So
the
first
thing
I
hear
a
lot
about
really
a
lot
about
is
trees
like
we
heard
tonight
that
I
hear
it
in
a
number
of
contexts.
J
I
hear
I
was
at
an
ice
cream
social,
where
people
in
the
playground
said
that
they
couldn't
play
there
during
much
of
the
day
because
of
our
continuous
heat
waves,
and
they
don't
think
there
are
enough
trees
planted
around
our
shade
structures
and
then
also
people
saying
you
know
the
borders
of
the
parks
that
there's
a
dominance
of
lawn
over
trees
so
that
whole
area
of
trees
and
integration,
integration
with
the
community
tree
master
plan.
C
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
Hicks
appreciate
the
question
within
the
staff
report
under
plan
coordination
on
page
12..
We
do
talk
about
the
integration
of
a
number
of
plans
that
are
currently
on
Parallel
path,
with
the
Parks
and
Recreation
strategic
plan.
So,
for
example,
Public
Works
is
working
on
their
active
Transportation
plan.
We
will
look
toward
ways
to
facilitate.
C
In
addition
to
that,
we
have
the
biodiversity
strategy
and
urban
Forest
plan,
and
so
the
urban
Forest
plan
and
biodiversity
strategy
are
working
a
little
bit
ahead
on
the
timeline
compared
to
the
parks
and
rec
strategic
plan,
so
we'll
be
able
to
have
some
information
and
data
available
so
that
the
consultant
from
the
parks
and
recreations
strategic
plan
can
work
with
the
other
Consultants
to
look
at
ways
to
incorporate
trees,
biodiversity
into
what
may
be
new
parks
as
well
as
how
do
we
incorporate
those
elements
into
existing
Parks
as
part
of
our
maintenance
plan?
J
Yes,
thank
you
and
then
second
question
is:
where
does
appropriate
lighting
fit
in?
Because
that's
what
I've
I've
heard
that
also
from
a
number
of
people.
C
If
Council
would
like
to
make
that
a
specific
task
to
review,
that
is
something
you
can
discuss
doing.
J
Okay,
good,
that's
why
I'm
asking
these
questions
and
then,
let's
see
and
then
integration
with
the
biodiversity
plan,
the
whole
host
of
things
that
people
have
brought
up
tonight,
but
also
at
other
times
to
me:
environmentally
friendly
materials
native
plants,
dry,
Landscaping,
permeable,
Paving
and
less
grass.
What
area
do
you
think
all
of
those
are
well
covered,
or
should
we
beef
those
up
in
some
in
some
places.
C
You
know
I
think
we
have
those
those
covered
within
inventory
assessment
and
again
there's
going
to
be
elements
coming
out
of
public
comment
that
we
can
take
into
consideration
throughout
the
process.
Even
if
it's
not
part
of
a
specific
task
tonight
and
again,
if
there
are
certain
elements
that
you're
looking
to
add.
That's
fine
and
I
see
the
city
manager
with
a
hand
up.
K
Thank
you,
John
I
actually
had
my
hand
up
from
the
question
from
vice
mayor
Hicks
about
lighting,
so
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
Council
has
discussed
the
Dark
Skies
ordinance
before
and
the
possibility
of
that.
So
this
is
teed
up
for
Council
to
discuss
in
your
next
work
plan
discussion.
So
staff
has
noted
this.
So
just
wanted
to
remind
you
of
that.
J
J
Should
also
talk
about
it
in
the
context
of
parks,
so
those
are
two
of
the
main
things
I
hear
from
people
and
I
will
leave
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
were
fitting
in
well
two
or
three
main
things
and
I
will
those
are
my
questions
for
now?
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
just
a
few
questions
overall.
I
should
want
to
start
with
a
comment
and
I'll
add
it
later
too,
and
this
is
incredibly
comprehensive
and
I'm
really
excited
about
it.
So
I'm
talking
about
knits
here
as
opposed
to
major
changes,
and
because
it's
so
comprehensive
and
exciting
I'm
wondering
if
there
is
a
way
to
have
phases
or
any
like
quick
hits
that
we
might
be
able
to
do
things
that
might
take
longer
that
for
sure
we
need
to
do.
C
C
However,
we
wanted
the
ability
to
receive
the
request
for
proposals
and
determine
how
we
can
work
with
different
consultant
groups
to
make
that
happen,
and
so
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
a
task,
but
just
know
that
we
as
staff
are
looking
for
ways
to
get
those
whether
and
you
heard
from
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission.
Let's
look
at
the
metrics
early,
and
so
how
do
we
come
up
with
certain
elements
that
we
can
done
soon
get
done
sooner
than
later?
And
we
are
interested
in
doing
that
as
well.
L
Great,
thank
you
and
then
I
want
to
follow
up
on
a
couple
of
comments
from
the
public
that
I
have
questions
about,
because
I
think
there
might
be
a
misunderstanding:
I'm
not
aware
of
any
requirement
for
developers
to
contribute
to
the
tree
fund.
I
know
we've
asked
some
to
do
that,
but
there's
no
requirement
to
do
that.
Is
there.
C
You
know
that
goes
back
to
the
mitigation
for
that
site,
in
particular
so
feedback
to
the
parks
and
open
space.
That
typically
does
not
happen.
L
Because
it's
not
a
requirement
correct
and
then
the
other
one
is.
We
have
a
definition
of
Popa.
It
has
to
be
a
certain
size.
It
has
to
have
certain
elements,
and
so
things
like
a
Breezeway
or
I
don't
know
a
Paseo
would
probably
not
fit
the
definition
of
Popa.
Is
that
correct
that.
C
Is
correct,
there's
minimum
sizes,
minimum
elements
and
the
city
needs
to
approve
each
of
those
elements
according
to
what
is
in
city
code
and
in
the
ordinance.
So
you
are
correct
and
sometimes
I
think
the
the
public
see
some
publicly
accessible
areas,
but
I
do
want
to
clarify
that
we
currently
don't
have
a
true
defined
Copa
in
the
community,
yet
those
are
being
developed
now
and
so,
as
some
of
the
areas
are
being
identified
as
possibly
purposed
by
by
the
public.
C
We
don't
have
any
yet,
but
there
are
some
that
are
just
around
the
corner
that
will
start
seeing
being
developed.
M
Well,
first
I'd
like
to
apologize
for
being
so
late.
I
was
having
computer
problems
and
had
to
reboot
my
computer
and
that's
a
lengthy
process.
Sometimes
anyway,
I
did
read
the
report
quite
carefully,
but
I'm.
Sorry,
I,
didn't
I
missed
your
presentation
because
I
would
have
liked
to
have
heard,
particularly
what
you
reported
from
the
parks
and
rec,
but
that
aside,
there's
two
things:
I
wanted
to
to
ask
one
is
kind
of
about
where
how
extensively
you
think
an
evaluation
of
volunteer
services
will
be
part
of
the
plan.
M
You
know,
particularly
with
Recreation
events.
We
use
a
lot
of
volunteers
and
that's
great,
but
I
also
have
wondered
about
utilizing
kind
of
combining
our
neighborhood
program.
You
know
we
have
the
we
have
the
the
neighborhood
associations
and
many
of
them
are
associated
with
parks
and
and
the
volunteer
program
for
the
parks.
So
I
just
wondered
if
you
comment
on
that
a
little
bit
and
how
you
think
that
will
work
into
the
Strategic
plan.
C
Thank
you,
council,
member,
still,
Walter
again
great
question
and
I.
Think
Christine
could
be
smiling
right
now,
because
leading
into
this,
she
and
I
had
a
discussion
specifically
about
the
volunteer
program
and
whether
that
should
be
a
integrated
task
or
not,
and
we
decided
not
to
because
it
falls
under
the
recreation
Division
and
so
as
we
move
forward,
the
recreation
division
actually
oversees
the
city-wide
volunteer
program.
C
As
a
matter
of
fact,
we
just
had
someone
start
yesterday
as
our
brand
new
Citywide
volunteer
coordinator,
and
so
we're
excited
to
have
someone
new
starting
in
that
position
and
really
taking
us
where
we
have
been
and
taking
us
forward
to
where
we
can
be
and
I
think.
The
things
that
you
are
talking
about
are
certainly
things
that
we're
interested
in
doing.
C
We
do
see
an
increase
in
of
interest
in
the
part
of
Community
groups
looking
to
enhance
city
parks
and
other
areas
of
the
city,
and
we
are
interested
in
developing
some
some
of
those
types
of
programs
and
putting
some
framework
around
it,
so
that
they
can
become
more
official
and
also
follow
the
city
guidelines
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
everything
we
can.
So
we
certainly
believe
that
the
volunteer
program
will
will
be
will
be
part
of
the
recreation
programming
review
process
as
part
of
that
task.
M
Okay,
yeah
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
potential
there
and
then
and
then
the
other
question
I
had
was
just
about
the
interview
process
itself.
I've
been
involved
in
a
number
of
consultant
interviews
over
the
years
and
who
sits
on
the
panel
varies
over
time
and
I
think
sometimes
it's
a
good
idea
to
consider
having
someone
from
a
neighboring
agency
actually
take
part
in
the
Consulting,
the
Consulting
interviews,
you
know,
for
instance,
we
have
mrosd
and
County
Parks,
who
are
really
great.
C
Thank
you
again
and
yes,
both
those
agencies
are
not
just
great
agencies,
they
are
great
Partners.
They
have
a
lot
of
ways
with
us
So.
Currently,
what
we
have
scheduled
is
for
several
community
services
staff
to
be
involved
in
the
interview
process
as
well.
We
see
a
definite
benefit
to
having
someone
from
the
public
works
department,
as
they
work
on
some
of
the
plans
that
they're
working
on
and
absolutely
Community
Development,
due
to
the
the
close
coordination
with
future
development
and
being
able
to
look
at
Future
growth.
C
M
Well,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
I
found
that
it
was.
It
was
very
helpful,
but
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
what
other
people
think.
Thank
you
and,
and
and
I
echo
my
colleagues
thanks
about
this
report.
It's
just
it's
very
well
done
very
comprehensive
and
I'm
I'm
personally
looking
forward
in
both
kind
of
taking
part
in
some
of
the
sessions
and
and
also
enjoying
the
the
what's
produced
from
it.
M
A
If
not,
what
I'm
going
to
propose
is
something
substantially
similar
to
how
we've
approached
study
sessions
in
the
past
and
that's
basically,
if
there's
a
particular
I,
think
they're
defined
the
task
that
you
would
like
to
propose
to
modify
or
remove
or
add
that
you
identify
that
very
clearly
and
explicitly
I'll
write
it
down
and
then
we'll
go
back
for
each
one
and
do
a
check-in
with
the
council
and
then
we'll
also
do
a
check-in
as
part
of
question
one
I
I'm
presuming
there
will
be
general
counsel,
support
for
the
totality
of
the
staff
recommendations,
but
we'll
start
there
with
question
one
and
then
please.
A
Let
me
know
if
there
are
special
considerations.
You
would
like
the
the
council
to
evaluate
and
then
also
feel
free
to
use,
question
one
as
an
opportunity
to
provide
General
comments
about
the
about
the
work.
So
would
anyone
like
to
start
us
off.
N
Thank
you,
mayor,
well,
I
I,
very
much
support
the
the
scope
of
work
that
we've
we've
been
given.
I
would
like
to
see
if
there
are
ways
that
we
can
amplify
the
the
opportunities
that
are
available
to
the
community
with
disabilities
and
the
issue
of
neurodiversity,
you
know
that
we're
coming
forward
with
with
one
parks
that
will
be
focused
on
that,
but
I
think
looking
for
opportunities
to
integrate
that
into
all
of
our
Parks
and
paths
and
Etc
would
be
very
helpful.
N
I
I
also
really
love
the
opportunity
to
tie
in
our
history
as
as
a
community.
Our
environmental
history
and
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
the
the
activities
at
Heritage
Park
that
touched
on
environmental
learning
and
our
history
and
I'd
like
to
see
more
opportunities
that
would
bring
out
the
diversity.
That's
existed
in
Mountain
View
over
time
and
then
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
the
emphasis
that's
going
to
be
put
on
co-creating
the
biodiversity
plan.
In
conjunction
with
this
plan,
I
think
that's
really
essential.
N
N
I
am
also
very
interested
in
seeing
how
we
can
work
in
more
trees
and
a
maintenance
philosophy
and
perspective
and
functions
that
are
congruent
with
it.
We
tend
to
have
sort
of
big
expanses
of
grass
with
little
shade
and
I
I'd
like
to
see
more
trees,
and
if
we
can
have
the
the
minimum
of
leaf
blowing
possible.
N
I
know
that
before
we
had
leaf,
blowers
in
the
past
leaves
just
fell
and
it
was
the
way
the
things
things
were
on
playing
fields
and
Etc
and
I
would
also
like
to
see
if
there
are
going
to
be
more
opportunities
for
Community
Gardens
as
I
know
that
the
Community
Gardens
that
we
have
are
really
fully
subscribed
right
now.
N
So
looking
at
that
and
that
I
very
much
agree
with
the
lighting
issue
that
was
raised
by
the
vice
mayor
and
I'm,
I'm,
very
happy
to
see
the
community
members
that
keep
coming
back
to
talk
about
the
impact
of
over
lighting
in
the
community.
N
It's
it's
a
real
impact
on
on
neighborhoods,
which
I
know
is
in
a
different
part
of
the
city
organizationally,
but
I
think
it
can
be
in
terms
of
our
our
Parks
as
well,
and
I'd,
really
like
to
see
Mountain
View,
be
a
model
community
on
lighting
that
is,
is
congruent
with
environmental
values
and
not
over
lighting
under
the
guise
of
well,
it's
a
more
efficient
lighting
system,
but
looking
at
the
issue
of
lighting
up
everything
at
night,
because
we're
we're
failing
to
have
dark
areas
appropriately,
dark
areas
in
our
community,
so
those
are
most
of
the
things
that
I
I
saw
in
it
that
that
would
be
wish
list
items
for
me.
A
Council
member
Lieber
just
for
for
my
benefit,
so
it
sounds
like
support
for
the
staff
recommendation
and
then
there
were
several
ideas
and
I
wasn't
clear,
which
ones
you
would
like
me
to
bring
back
to
the
council
for
for,
like
a
straw
poll.
N
Think
the
top
one
that
would
fit
into
that
rubric
would
be
the
lighting
issue
and
I
think
that
the
other
some
of
the
other
issues
that
I
raised
are
more
a
matter
of
amplification
and
of
what
is
already
in
this
very
complete
report
and
looking
for
opportunities
where
we
can
incorporate
some
other
Concepts
into
our
current
programming.
A
That's
helpful
by
smear
hits.
J
Okay,
so
I
I
agree
with
all
the
things
that
have
been
said:
I
guess:
you're
gonna
pull
us
again
for
a
straw
vote,
so
I
don't
even
have
to
say
that
I
guess
the
one,
although
I,
I
I,
agree
that
I
want
all
parts
to
be
accessible
to
the
disabled,
I
like
the
phrase
all
ages
and
abilities
because
having
had
having
and
having
had,
for
example,
parents
in
their
90s,
you
know
I,
don't
know
whether
you
you
describe
them
as
one.
J
Whether
you
describe
them
at
this
point
as
disabled,
they,
they
definitely
want
different
things
from
Parks
such
as
frequent
benches
so
and-
and
my
other
caveat
related
to
that
is
that
I
would
like
to
find
a
way
of
serving
people
of
all
ages
and
abilities,
while
still
keeping
our
Parks
biodiverse
I
know
that
we
have
sometimes
I
find
that
when
things
are
made
accessible,
they
become
very
plastic
and
Lawn
oriented
and
I
know.
J
There
was
around
that
we
have
a
Mountain
View
resident,
who
was
actually
she's,
moved
to
Santa
Cruz
Heidi
cartan
who's.
A
particular
expert
in
that
field
has
a
paraplegic
son
and
believes
that,
when
things
are
are
are
accessible
to
the
disabled,
the
disabled
also
deserve.
J
You
know
the
benefits
of
of
tree
canopy
and
biodiverse
materials
green
materials.
So
we
might
consult
with
her
so
that
we
don't
go
down
the
plastic
Road.
J
Let's
see
in
addition
to
that,
I
liked
the
part
on
on
accessibility
of
perks
through
I
guess,
possibly
tree-lined,
sidewalks
and
bike
paths.
I've
also
talked
to
our
Peninsula
open
space,
Representatives
about
how
important
that
both
accessible,
Pleasant,
sidewalks
and
also
linear,
Parks
or
Parks,
made
for
running
and
walking
and
walking
your
dog
are
to
protecting
our
open
space
because,
as
our
population
grows,
the
open
space
is
often
being
overrun.
J
It's
often
hard
to
even
find
a
parking
space
and
get
in
and
as
those
Representatives
have
have
said,
you
know
you
don't
want
to
take
a
hike
in
open
space
among
crowds
of
people
and
some
of
those
people
may
like
walking
in
the
city.
J
So
that's
something
that
I
would
like
to
amplify,
making
sure
that
that
we
either
make
linear
Parks
or,
as
you
said,
I
think
in
the
in
the
scope,
walkable
access,
let
me
see
if
I
and
then
another
one
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
address
is
the
schoolyards
which
I
agree
with
with
members
of
the
public.
That's
who
have
said
we
have
to
reassess
how
we
count
those
and
whether
we
count
them
at
all.
J
At
the
same
time,
in
the
interim
between
now
and
hopefully
when
we
create
more
abundant
Parks
I
think
we
do
want
to
I
think
we
do
want
to
use
them
in
some
ways
and
make
sure
that
that
we
use
them
in
better
ways,
possibly
than
we
have
been
now.
I
recently
talked
to
a
school
board
member
who
said
that
he
thought
that
the
the
gates
and
entrances
could
be
better
labeled
and
possibly
even
redone,
to
be
more
inviting.
J
So
I
would
like
to
address
that
issue
in
an
interim
where
we
don't
have.
You
know
where
we
haven't
yet
created
a
lot
more
Parks.
How
could
we
better
work
with
the
schoolyards?
J
A
J
C
No,
we
are
in
in
coordination
with
the
school
district,
currently
working
on
a
new
joint
use
agreement
and
through
that
process
we
are
talking
about
some
of
the
ways
we
can
improve
signage.
So
that's
being
done
in
the
background
at
the
moment
and
we'll
continue
to
work
on
that.
J
L
So,
as
I
said
earlier,
this
is
an
incredible
scope
of
work
for
this
project.
I'm
very
supportive
of
it
I
appreciate
how
much
it
covers
I'm
a
little
bit
worried
about
how
much
it
covers
too.
It's
a
lot-
and
you
know
again,
these
are
just
little
knits
here.
L
That
I
feel
like
we're
talking
about
at
this
point,
while
I
support
the
lighting
I
want
to
remind
everyone
that
that
would
be
something
we
would
discuss
when
we
talk
about
the
work
plan
for
20
20
in
2023,
as
opposed
to
adding
it
to
this
so
I'm
supportive
of
it,
but
only
because
for
when
it
comes
to
us
in
early
2023
to
put
on
our
work
plan.
L
For
me,
we're
probably
going
to
do
this,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
called
out
that
we
look
at
the
parks
at
a
lower
level
than
the
planning
areas.
Those
are
pretty
Broad
and
you
know
if
we
have
the
goal
of
having
parks
within
a
10-minute
walk
of
residence,
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
it
at
a
more
granular
level,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing
I
see
John's
head
nodding.
So
I
assume
we're
going
to
do
that.
We
probably
don't
need
to
call
it
out
right.
L
Okay
and
then
I
am
supportive
of
the
PRC
being
very
involved.
As
many
of
you
know,
I
watch
a
lot
of
our
advisory
body
meetings
and
the
PRC
is
awesome
and
they
all
have
great
knowledge,
different
knowledge.
They
all
participate.
They
ask
great
questions.
L
They're
very
engaged
and
I
think
they
do
terrific
work
so
I'm,
very
supportive
of
them
being
involved
in
this
in
a
a
big
way
and
I
think
somebody
else
mentioned
that
I'm
not
sure
we
have
to
vote
on
that,
because
I
think
that
that's
in
the
plan
right,
John,
okay,
so
I,
don't
know
if
I
have
anything
I
want
to
specifically
add
I'm,
just
basically
highlighting
things
that
are
really
important,
I,
think
and
reiterating
what
others
have
said.
M
Yeah
I
I
think
I
fall
into
the
category
of
highlighting
things
as
well.
I'm,
very
overall,
very
pleased
with
the
comprehensive
nature
of
this,
but
I
particularly
want
to
talk
about
task
two
and
task
11.
and
task.
M
Two
we're
talking
about
the
vision
and
I
think
that
that
is
is
really
just
a
hugely
significant
part
of
this
I've
been
you
know:
I
I
grew
up
in
an
area
that
didn't
have
parks
that
didn't
have
city
parks,
and
so
it's
been
sort
of
one
of
the
Delights
of
my
adult
life
living
here
and
and
being
able
to
really
visit
my
neighborhood
park
twice
a
day.
I
mean
pretty
much
365
days
a
year.
M
It's
you
know
it's
a
very
important
part
of
my
my
life
and
many
of
my
neighbors
life,
so
I
think
that
the
concept
of
parks
as
the
the
physical
and
the
social
Foci
of
our
community
is
just
really
vital
and
and
over
the
years
of
course,
my
use
of
the
park
has
varied
when
I
moved
here,
I
had
a
six
month
old,
baby
and
I
got
her
in
the
stroller,
and
we
went
off
to
the
park
and
now
she's
all
grown
up
and
my
dog
and
I
could
go
off
to
the
park
every
day
and
I.
M
You
know,
I
I've
observed
people
utilizing
that
space.
You
know
at
all
different
points
in
their
life
and
so
I
think
that
that
I'm
really
concentrating
on
what
does
that
mean?
What
does
that
social
focus
of
each
of
our
Parks
mean
and
and
also
the
park
system
collectively,
is
really
important?
And
so,
when
I
looked
through
that
through
the
reports
on
and
try
to
figure
out
where
it
belonged,
the
two
places
it
seemed
to
be
task
two
and
then
task
11.
M
When
you
talk
about
the
you
know
what
you
do
at
the
parks,
so
that's
that's
really.
What
I
I
want
to
share
is
that
you
know
these
Parks,
whether
they're,
big
or
small,
are
social
and
physical
focuses
of
our
community,
and
we
need
to
be.
You
know
really
aware
of
of
how
that
works
and
and
and
also
to
to
make
the
most
of
it,
because
it's
it's
just
a
tremendous
amenity
for
all
of
us
that
live
here
but
I,
don't
think
it
adds
anything
to
the
list.
P
Thank
you
mayor
and
apologies
for
being
late.
I
was
dealing
with
the
MTC
Transportation
related
issue
that
can
deeply
affect
our
city,
so
I
had
to
do
some
leg
work
there,
but
so
I'm,
sorry,
I,
missed
the
presentation.
I
did
read
the
staff
report
and
appreciated
also
the
questions
that
were
asked
in
writing.
I
had
similar
questions,
I
I,
don't
have
anything
to
add.
I.
Think
the
the
scope
of
work
is
is
very
extensive.
P
I
think
if
anything
I
do
have
similar
concerns,
says
councilman
check
that,
if
maybe
it's
too
extensive,
but
frankly,
I
think
it's
time
that
we
do
have
this
comprehensive
review.
It's
been
a
long
time
in
coming.
I
know
there
is
some
interest
in
separating
the
parks
open
space
piece
from
the
recreation
piece,
but
I
actually
think
it
think
that
it
goes
hand
in
hand,
and
you
know
some
of
the
areas
that
aren't
haven't.
P
I,
don't
think,
have
been
highlighted
as
much,
but
just
from
like
my
I
personally,
as
councilmember
Showalter
mentioned,
you
know
some
of
this
effect
as
the
way
we
look
at
it
is
affected
by
where
we
are
in
our
lives,
and
you
know
for
me
in
the
last
you
know
several
years,
I
would
say
the
recreational
programming
and
even
the
issue
of
you
know:
Youth
Sports
and
the
different
leagues
and
the
clubs
and
the
competitive
Sports
has
been
what
you
know.
I've
been
involved
in
and
I
I
know.
P
We've
talked
about
this
in
the
past
in
terms
of
even
the
fee
schedule
and
how
that
impacts,
our
the
need,
the
usage
and
then
you
know
the
real
need
or
perceived
need
and
real
need
of
more
facilities
and
space.
So
I
think
it
does
make
sense
for
us
to
look
at
all
of
this
comprehensively
and
I
appreciate
doing
that.
You
know
I
I
would
just
like
amplify
or
highlight
in
terms
of
like
the
fee
issue.
P
We
looked
at
this
probably
10
years
ago,
and
it
was
a
time
when
we
were
looking
at
upping
our
fees
for
the
use
of
sports.
Our
athletic
fields
and
I
think
I
I,
don't
remember
the
exact
numbers
I
think
we
were
going
from
one
dollar
an
hour
to
two
dollars
an
hour
and
Los
Altos.
If
I
remember
correctly,
was
I
think
up
at
to
25
an
hour.
So
we
experienced
a
lot
of
these
Mountain
View
Los
Altos.
P
O
P
That
issue,
so
those
types
of
things
you
know
affect
right
effect,
our
actual
space
needs
so
I
think
that's
really
important
for
us
to
look
at
and
then
you
know,
one
thing
I
would
just
like
to
highlight
is
and
I
appreciate
the
review
and
some
it
was
in
the
questions
too
about
you
know
Trends
in
Recreation,
and
what
I
would
highlight
there
is
just
being
mindful
of
Equity.
P
You
know
I
would
say
the
traditional
sports
like
baseball
soccer.
Even
golf,
you
know
maybe
football.
Those
have
been
the
ones
that
we've
focused
on
in
the
past,
but
you
know
for
there's
like
boys
versus
girls.
Sports
right
and
you
know
I
would
say,
like
my
girls,
my
girls
were
in
volleyball
and
that's
a
very
popular
sport
with
you
know
the
females
and
yet
our
facilities.
P
We
haven't
necessarily
accommodated
for
that,
and
so
you
know
I
would
be
very
interested
in
how
we
can
ensure
that,
as
others
were
saying,
we
have
you
know
not
just
parks
and
open
space,
but
also
Recreation
programs
and
all
facilities
for
books
of
all
different
backgrounds
and
interests
and
making
sure
it's.
You
know
Equitable
for
everyone.
So
those
are
just
my
short
comments
and
otherwise
thank
you,
staff
for
all
of
your
hard
work
and
look
forward
to
its
progress
thanks.
Q
Great,
thank
you
so
want
to
Echo
my
my
thanks
to
staff.
I'm
I'm
really
excited
I,
think
that
this
is
such
an
incredible
opportunity
for
our
community
and
I,
really
appreciate
the
the
staff
is
listening
to
the
feedback
in
terms
of
consolidating
different
plans
into
one
great
big
plan
and
like
the
like,
the
comments
about
potentially
doing
it
as
a
as
a
phased
approach.
I
think
that'd
be
really
nice
to
have
various
touch
points
for
the
community,
as
well
as
staff
to
share
kind
of
where
we
are
in
the
different.
Q
You
know
processes
because
this
is
Evergreen.
So
in
terms
of
question
one
I'm,
supportive
of
the
scope
of
work
I,
do
have
a
couple
comments
that
I'd
like
to
highlight,
which
is
in
particular
on
page
13
when
it
was
talking
about
the
the
other
plans,
so
I'm
very
encouraged.
That
staff
was
already
Forward
Thinking,
and
you
know
talking
about
the
biodiversity
strategy
and
the
urban
forestry
plan
and
I
did
hear
in
public
comment
a
little
bit
about
trees
and
I
know
a
lot
about
looking
at
our
heritage
tree.
Q
So
I'd
just
like
to
add
that
plan
to
the
list
and
what
I'd
also
ask
staff
to
do
is
as
we're
going
along,
maybe
adding
things
to
the
work
plan
that
might
be.
That
might
have
some
crossover
if
we
can
kind
of
capture
those
under
the
umbrella
as
well
and
and
I.
Q
Think
that
would
be
really
helpful
because
these
all
have
to
do
with
each
other,
so
that
that's
kind
of
my
my
big
comment
there
and
then
I
guess
when
we
were
talking
when
there
was
a
discussion
about
lighting
I,
had
thought
that
Council
had
talked
about
some
years
past
about
a
dark
skies
ordinance
so
for
the
some
of
the
lighting
issues
that
are
being
discussed,
I
don't
know
if
we
would
be
able
to
incorporate
that
into
a
potential
ordinance
that
has
already
been
set
forth
in
the
work
plan.
Q
We
will
probably
talk
about
this
in
the
new
year
when
we
reconfirm
our
goals,
but
I
would
say
that
that
would
be
what
I
would
hope
for
is.
Perhaps
it's
it's
using
that
as
the
opportunity
to
discuss
lighting,
so
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that
and
then
in
terms
of
question
number
two
with
the
proposed
scope
of
work,
there
were
two
areas
that
I
wanted.
Well
I.
Think
actually
three
that
I'd
like
to
highlight.
Q
So
when
we're
talking
about
the
recreation
division,
programming
I,
do
know
that
there's
quite
a
bit
of
programming
that
happens
from
the
community.
So,
for
example,
you
know
we
have
our
Cuesta
Park,
pollinator
project
and
so
I
know
that's
not
necessarily
A
city-led.
Q
But
it's
a
city,
partnership
and
I
wonder
how
we
can
incorporate
the
you
know:
Soil
and
Water
at
Heritage,
Park
I,
wonder
how
we
can
incorporate
some
of
these
existing
kind
of
programs
that
are
on
city
property
into
programming,
even
if
they're,
not
necessarily
like
Recreation,
LED
and
so
I'll
I'll,
leave
that
to
staff
to
figure
out
how
you'd
like
to
do
that.
But
there's
so
much
out
there
right
and
as
we're
talking
about
creating
a
comprehensive
plan.
Q
I
think
it
would
be
really
wonderful
to
kind
of
add
that
into
the
scope
and
then
this
kind
of
also
falls
into
number
two,
which
is
when
we're
talking
about
fees.
I
know
that
councilmember
Showalter
brought
up
volunteers
and
one
of
the
things
that
has
come
up
is
Insurance
fees
and
I.
Don't
know
if
this
would
be
like
under
this
portion
of
the
scope
of
work,
but
would
also
ask
leave
it
to
staff
discretion
I'm,
not
looking.
Q
None
of
my
comments
are
for
straw
polls,
but
would
leave
it
to
stop
discretion
to
to
look
into
like
the
the
insurance
and
and
fees
under
if
it's
under
item
10
grade
or
somewhere
else
in
the
scope
of
work.
That
would
be
great
and
then
also
on
the
flip
side
of
that
grant
opportunities.
I
I
think
it
was
just.
There
was
just
the
national
parks
and
rec
conference,
or
something
and
I
know
that
there
are
is
quite
a
bit
of
actually
competitive
funding
for
Creative
projects
and
I.
Q
Wonder
how
some
of
the
things
that
we're
working
on,
particularly
this
project
or
sorry,
this
plan
could
maybe
potentially
lead
to
grant
opportunities
so
I.
It
says
something
of
Interest
a
comment
but
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
as
well.
So
thank.
A
Thank
you,
I'll,
take
a
quick
turn
and
essentially
reiterate
what
Richton
said:
I'm
deeply
impressed
by
the
scope
of
work.
It
is
comprehensive.
It's
it
was
I
was
going
through
the
staff
report.
Thinking
is
there
anything
that
I
would
add,
and
the
answer
is
no.
A
You
thought
about
everything
and
I'm
very
excited
to
see
the
end
result,
but
I
also
I
think
share.
Some
of
the
sentiments
that
have
been
been
expressed
about
it
feels
very
ambitious
and
I
am
a
little
concerned
about
staff
capacity
and
workload,
but
I
guess
if
there's
an
upside
to
it,
John
and
Christine
I'm,
guessing
that
this
means
you'll
be
working
for
the
city
for
the
next
20
years,
at
least
right,
because
you
have
to
see
it
through
in
its
totality,
so
very
excited
for
that
commitment.
A
So
we'll
first
take
I,
think
a
straw
poll
on
the
staff
recommendation
and
then
there
was
I
heard
only
one
other
item
and
I'll
get
some
clarification
from
Staff
first,
but
let's
raise
our
hands
if
there
is
support
for
the
staff
record
augmentation
that
passes
unanimously
great.
So
there
were
some
ideas
around
lighting
and
I.
Think
my
question
for
staff
is:
is
there
anything
that
would
be
unique
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
component
that
ought
to
be
included
within
the
scope
of
work
or
is?
K
Mayor
Ramirez,
if
I
may
so,
the
Dark
Skies
ordinance
is
intricately
linked
with
the
biodiversity
strategy.
Also,
so
I
think
we
would
suggest
that
this
be
part
of
your
work
plan
that
you
would
discuss
in
February,
but
then
staff's
going
to
have
to
do
that,
work
and
Analysis
just
as
far
as
timing
and
how
they
all
link
together,
but
certainly
if
there
is
Council
interest.
K
A
Okay,
that's
helpful,
I
I
think
so.
I'll
I'll
turn
to
council
member
Lieber,
but
I'm.
Taking
from
that,
there
isn't
a
need
at
this
point
to
provide
Direction
on
this
item.
Councilmember
Lieber.
N
Thank
you
mayor,
yes,
I,
think.
The
the
approach
suggested
by
the
city
manager
is
a
good
one
and
I
think
it's
been
beneficial
for
staff
in
the
community
who
are
really
Ardent
and
requesting
us
to
hear
the
the
level
of
support
coming
from
Council
and
to
the
extent
that
there
can
be
one
factor
in
park
designs
that
may
come
up
before
these
parallel
plans
are
fully
completed.
I
I
think
that
staff
has
really
heard
the
the
priority
that
we
place
on
that.
So
that
should
be
sufficient.
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
the
Joint
meeting
of
the
Mountain
View
city
council
and
Shoreline
Regional
Park
Community
of
September
27
2022.
and
we'll
Now
read
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
sydney.clerk
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
A
A
A
A
A
M
A
Why
don't
for
for
sure?
Why
not.
M
Okay,
well,
one
I
was
just
going
to
say:
I
was
4.5.
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
this
on.
Our
you
know
on
our
list.
I
think
that
adopting
a
policy
to
support
the
proposition
one,
the
constitutional
right
to
reproductive
freedom
is
it's
very,
very
important
for
our
community
and
particularly
for
such
a
woman's
strong
Council.
It's
a
you
know
it's
an
excellent
thing
to
be
doing
so.
M
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
that
on
our
agenda,
I
also
wanted
to
congratulate
all
of
the
staff
who
were
involved
in
getting
the
life
moves
and,
and
others
who
are
involved
in
getting
the
life
moves
grant
for
five
million
dollars.
We
will
put
that
to
good
use
and
and
also
I,
just
am
pleased
to
see
that
the
the
affordable
housing
project
for
teachers
and
City
staff
members
is
moving
forward,
which
is
part
of
4.7.
So
that's
my
comments.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you,
mayor,
well,
I'd,
like
to
add
on
about
item
4.5
I,
think
it's
tremendously
important
that
we
be
on
the
record
in
terms
of
proposition
one.
N
As
we
know,
our
state
is
one
of
the
few
that
has
a
constitutional
right
to
privacy,
and
so
this
measure
is
very
much
congruent
with
that
and
I
I
agree
wholeheartedly
with
the
term
woman,
strong
and
I
think
we've
got
a
100
feminist
counsel,
that
is,
that
is
very
ready
to
stand
up
for
Californians
who
need
to
Avail
themselves
of
Health
Care
Services
like
abortion
and
also
the
availability
of
contraception.
N
So
I
appreciate
Council
agreeing
to
take
this
measure
up
and
I.
I
too
think
that
it's
critically
important.
Thank
you,
foreign.
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
other
comments
before
we
turn
to
the
public,
if
not
what
any?
Member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
any
item
on
the
consent
calendar.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hands
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
I
am
not
seeing
any
members
of
the
public
wish
to
speak
so
then
we
will
close
public
comment
and
return
to
Council.
I
will
now
bring
the
added
back
to
council
for
action
and
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar
calendar
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolution
attached
to
item
4.2
by
smear
kicks.
J
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
pass
the
consent
calendar,
including
the
resolution
attached
item
4.2,
which
is
Adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
updating
the
list
of
designated
positions
required
to
file
statements
of
economic
interest
to
be
read
entitled
only
further
reading
waived.
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
questions
or
comments.
Not
then,
let's
do
a
roll
call
book
vice.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We'll
now
move
to
item
five
oral
Communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
Council
on
any
matter,
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
and
I'll
see
how
many
speakers
there
are
before
I
pick
the
time
state
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items,
but
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
on
this
item.
A
R
Thank
you
very
much.
If
you
can
hear
me
I'm
here,
to
address
a
problem
with
John
Carr,
the
city
inspector
twice,
he
has
been
brought
into
hearings
regarding
the
rental
housing
committee,
making
claims
that
he
could
not
support
regarding
the
safety
of
the
building
at
184,
Center
Street
owned
a
match
by
David,
Abney
and
out
of
the
city
landlord
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact
what
he
did
is
in
the
last
hearing.
R
He
pointed
out
that
there
was
Major
Renovations
done
to
one
of
the
units
that
was
not
issued
a
building
permit
prior
to
the
work
and,
in
fact
now
he's
trying
to
issue
a
billing
permit
and
I'm,
simply
saying
if
the
billing
permit
is
issued
today
or
in
the
last
week.
R
That
would
mean
that
all
the
renovations
that
were
done
previous
to
the
work
that
permit
would
have
to
be
in
effect,
redone
because,
technically
that
that
was
work
that
was
done
without
a
building
permit
and
at
the
same
time
a
new
tenant
was
moved
in
that
unit
prior
to
the
building
permit
being
issued
at
the
same
time.
So
we
actually
now
have
a
rental
agreement
that
is
illegal
because
of
the
fact
that
there
were
major
Renovations
that
were
not
cleared
and
not
tested.
R
As
a
result,
the
work
that's
been
done
has
significantly
destabilized
the
flooring
of
my
unit
as
well
as
starting
to
twist
and
bend
the
door
frame.
That
goes
to
my
front
door
along
with
a
number
of
other
issues,
and
basically
it's
all
involving
the
fact
that
there
was
a
lot
of
new
weight
being
put
in
the
units
in
which
the
city
inspectors
clearly
should
have
had
a
record
showing
what
was
the
vacancy
weight
and
the
tolerance
weight
regarding
what
could
be
put
inside
the
lower
court
to
be
safely
occupied.
R
What
I'm
saying
is
that
the
this
building
is
showing
significant
signs
of
of
being
very
unsafe,
and
yet
the
city
inspector
has
used
no
tools
whatsoever
to
image
any
of
the
support
beams
underneath
the
floor
or
in
the
building
to
establish
that
they
are
actually
in
good
condition
or
not
I'm,
just
wondering
what's
going
to
happen
when
the
5.0
earthquake
hits.
Finally
one
other
last
note
is
that
at
one
point
time
in
the
phone
conversation,
he
basically
told
me
if
I'm
not
happy
with
my
particular
apartment.
R
Why
I
just
leave
and
I'm
like
saying
that
was
an
inappropriate
comment
you
make
from
any
City
employee
and
not
only
that,
but
it
would
be
also
a
sign
of
the
fact
that
he's
actually
trying
to
avoid
taking
his
responsibilities
seriously
and
advocating
for
an
out
of
City
resident.
That's
all
I
can
say
thanks.
E
Yes
slide,
thank
you
time
or
two.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this
opportunity
to
address
you.
Based
on
the
previous
comments.
I
thought
I
would
give
a
little
short
presentation
on
Heritage
Street
preservation.
There
seemed
to
be
two
standards
for
Heritage
trees.
The
average
homeowner
can
is
almost
it's
almost
impossible
for
you
to
get
a
Heritage
tree
removed.
Even
if
you
planted
it
yourself.
On
the
other
hand,
large
developers
often
get
a
free
pass
to
remove
hundreds
of
Heritage
trees
with
scarcely
a
second
thought.
E
Next
slide,
please
I've
been
walking
around
North
Bay
Shore
area
for
probably
the
last
six
years
several
times
a
week
because
we
got
a
dog
and
so
I've
watched
with
interest
is
how
Charleston
East
has
developed
and
the
clock
picture.
You
see
what
it
looked
like
before.
Building
started
and
bottom
picture
is
what
you
look,
what
it
looks
like.
Actually
this
has
taken
a
few
months
ago
before
they
put
some
Street
trees
in,
as
you
can
see,
you
know
they
wiped
out
a
whole
row
of
really
mature
redwoods
and
I.
E
Looked
at
the
report
for
this
project
and
almost
200
Heritage
trees
removed
next
slide.
Please
I
used
to
walk
down
this
really
nice
shaded
path.
Next
to
Shoreline
Boulevard,
it
was
like
walking
through
a
forest.
Now
there's
a
straight.
What
I
assume
will
eventually
be
a
bike
path
and
there's
no
shade.
E
They
did
plant
some
trees
along
the
side
there,
but
there's
no
way
they're
ever
going
to
get
as
large
as
those
redwoods
next
slide,
please,
on
Amphitheater,
Parker
Parkway
same
thing:
they
clear
cut
these
redwoods
and
on
the
right
you
can
see
what
it
looks
like
today
and
what's
particularly
telling
about
this
picture,
is
the
next
slide
please
when
they
made
the
sidewalk
I,
don't
know
how
many
years
ago
they
purposely
routed
around
these
big
trees.
I
mean
that's
a
very
expensive
proposition.
They
really
cared
about
preserving
those
trees.
E
So
why
did
Google
just
cut
those
down?
They
leave
the
little
jog
in
the
sidewalk
There
To
Remind
people
hey
there
used
to
be
some
really
big
trees
there.
We
just
cut
them
down
so
yeah
I'm,
just
saying
I'm,
really
afraid
of
what's
going
to
happen
in
North
Bay
Shore.
As
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
streets
there
are
lined
by
redwood
trees.
You
know
out
tub
Joaquin,
Huff
and
I'm
afraid
that
when
Google
starts
redeveloping
that
area
just
like
they
did
with
Landings
actually
just
recently,
you
know
at
Landings.
E
They
also
took
down
a
lot
of
redwood
trees
that
were
near
the
street
and
you
know,
probably
could
have
been
saved
I
just
don't
see
why
they
had
to
cut
those
down
when
they
didn't
interfere
with
the
building.
It's
like
these
trees,
around
Shoreline
I
mean
Charleston.
East
I
mean
they
put
that
bike
path
in.
Why
couldn't
they
just
put
the
bike
path
in
further
away
from
the
street
and
kept
those
trees
and
routed
everything
around
them?
I
think
it
just
points
to
the
priority.
E
S
Thanks
for
the
time
I
I've
been
a
resident
of
Mountain
View
for
probably
four
years
now
my
family
and
I
are
living
in
Shoreline
West
and
the
kids
are
going
to
Randall's
and
and
love
it
there
and
and
I
was
done.
Some
work
off
and
on
with
like
reach
potential
and
life
moves,
move
Mountain
View
with
the
RV
community
and
and
I
know
the
the
prophecy
Narrow
Street
parking
ban
goes
into
enforcement
on
Friday
and
I.
S
Guess
what
I
had
heard
from
some
of
the
community
that
we
work
with
and
some
of
these
com?
Some
of
these
organizations
is
that
folks
just
need
a
little
more
time
to
comply.
S
I
think
I
heard
a
list
of
like
maybe
25
folks
who
are
trying
to
get
in
the
system
and
and
they're
doing
their
best,
but
won't
be
ready
by
Friday
and
so
I
guess.
I
had
kind
of
two
apps
for
this
Council
one.
S
There
does
seem
to
be
a
need
for
more
spaces,
open,
safe,
sparking
parking
spaces.
I
think
the
law
is
getting
folks
to
be
interested
in
that
path,
which
is
great
and
I
know.
It
was
part
of
I,
think
the
desire
of
that
law,
but
then
I
think
two
is
just
some
more
time
or
or
some
understanding
of
how
strong
that
enforcement
will
be,
as
folks
are
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
comply
with
this,
particularly
I.
S
Think
about
there's
a
number
of
folks
who
are
disabled
or
have
immobile
RVs
and
are
trying
to
figure
it
out,
but
kind
of
need
some
more
options
on
places
to
park,
but
also
just
a
little
more
time.
So
that
was
really
my
ask
for
today.
A
Davita,
are
you
able
to
unmute
yourself.
T
T
I
am
reaching
out
today
to
share
my
concern
regarding
measure
c,
as
the
previous
speaker
spoke
about,
both
as
a
private
resident
as
well
as
it
with
my
job
in
the
with
the
Los
Altos
Mountain
View
Community
Foundation
I've
really
been
lucky
enough
to
get
to
know
members
of
the
RV
community
and
understand
their
challenges,
but
also
understand
the
challenges
the
city
faces
with,
and
why
the
city
enacted
measure
c
after
the
voters
voted
on
it
and
I'm
concerned
with
the
October
1st
deadline
coming
up
very
rapidly
and
as
the
previous
speaker
mentioned,
there
really
aren't
enough
open
spots
and
safe
lots
for
folks
that
to
just
move
there
by
Friday,
some
of
the
RVs
are
not
functional
or
they
have
trailers,
and
so
there's
funding
needed
to
get
those
RVs
and
the
train
or
the
trailers
to
well
the
non-existent
spots
or
whatever
spots
are
deemed
possible
for
them,
and
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
72
hour
time
limit
for
keeping
a
vehicle
parked.
T
That's
going
back
into
effect,
so
folks,
who
do
have
trailers.
How
are
they
going
to
sort
of
stay?
You
know
manage
their
home
if
they're
in
danger
of
being
towed
every
72
hours,
so
I
was
really
interested
I
understand
from
folks
on
the
ground,
working
with
organizations
that
support
the
RV
dweller
population
and
there's
really
not
money
or
anything.
The
city
has
resource-wise
to
to
towards
this
issue.
However,
I
really
think
if
there
was
ever
a
time
for
compassion,
it
is
now
these
are.
You
know
human
beings
and
these
are
their
homes.
T
So
how
can
we
all
work
together
to
support
folks
in
finding
A
Way
Forward
on
this,
so
I
guess
I'll
leave
it
with
that.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
U
U
Great
fantastic,
so
I'm,
also
calling
regarding
the
RV
community
and
I
am
also
a
current
resident
in
the
shoreline.
West
Community
with
my
husband
and
we've
had
a
chance
to
also
get
to
know
the
community
and
just
a
few
concerns,
as,
as
previous
speaker
said,
about
the
1772
hour
limit
of
trying
to
move
something
that
the
council
needs
to
also
to
understand,
as
well
as
people
around
is
a
lot
of
these
folks,
just
medical,
wise,
but
also
I,
don't
have
the
funds.
U
If
they
get
tickets,
you
know
they
won't
have
funds
to
pay
for
the
tickets,
and
then
we
just
make
them
further
impoverished
on
their
end.
Also,
trying
these
safe
lots
are
a
wonderful
idea
to
build
community.
Something
to
consider
is
when
we
disperse
these
residents,
they
lose
their
community
and
then
there's
they're
left
to
just
fend
for
themselves,
so
something
that
we
need
to
also
consider
when
making
these
choices
and
laws
into
places
where
dispersing
their
Community
they're
people
that
can
connect
and
humans
need
Community
to
get
along.
U
D
That's
weird
I
like
Kavita
I
unmuted,
but
it
didn't
work.
Okay,
do
you
hear
me
now.
D
Yeah
I
just
want
to
Echo
what
the
previous
speaker
said
about
vehicle
residence,
not
dilemma
around
measure
C
and
also
the
fact
that
the
amount
of
safe
parking
that
we
have
right
now
at
the
various
Lots
will
eventually
go
away.
So
tarabella
Evelyn,
those
lots
are
going
to
transition
to
something
else
and
the
amount
of
spaces
we
have
in
the
current
safe
parking.
D
Lots
are
not
going
to
be
enough
if
they
are
enough
already,
and
so
gems
just
want
to
Echo
that
that
it's
living
on
the
streets
in
vehicles
is
not
ideal
living
in
safe
parking.
Lots
is
not
ideal
either,
but
it's
better
and
as
a
community,
we
should
exercise
compassion
and
try
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
safe
parking
for
people,
which
means
we
might
need
to
expand
our
existing
safe
parking
program.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
see
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
about
proceed
to
the
next
item,
which
is
6.1
870
East,
El,
Camino,
Real
residential
project
with
any
council
members
like
to
make
disclosures
I'll
start
by
disclosing
that
I
met
with
the
applicant
Vice
miracles.
J
I
met
with
the
applicant
as
well
and
also
went
by
the
site.
Thank.
N
Thank
you,
mayor
to
my
knowledge.
I've
never
been
contacted
by
the
applicant,
so
it'll
be
great
to
hear
the
presentation
tonight,
but
I
did
go
out
and
take
a
look
at
the
property
and
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
we'll
now
proceed
to
the
staffs
presentation,
senior
planner,
Brennan
and
planning
manager
and
Zoni
administrator
Stephanie
Williams
will
present
the
item
whenever
you're
ready.
V
V
Well,
good
evening
to
Mayor
Ramirez
vice
mayor
Hicks
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Philip
Brennan
I'm
the
project
planner
for
this
development
application
I'll
be
providing
you
a
brief
overview
of
the
project
this
evening.
I
did
want
to
make
note
that
the
applicant
has
prepared
their
own
presentation
that
will
focus
on
the
design
aspects
of
the
project.
V
Like
to
start
by
just
providing
a
brief
overview
of
the
entitlement
timeline,
the
formal
application
for
this
project
was
originally
submitted
in
March
of
2019..
The
city
worked
with
the
applicant
through
a
number
of
changes
to
the
project,
scope
and
design,
which
required
several
subsequent
rounds
of
review
by
staff
and
the
development
Review
Committee.
The
DRC
recommended
approval
of
the
project.
This
April
with
design
Rec
conditions
for
the
applicant
to
continue
work
with
staff
to
refine
minor
design,
details
which
are
outlined
in
the
staff
report.
V
Most
recently,
the
environmental
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval
of
the
project
to
council
by
a
six
to
zero
vote
with
one
absent.
The
staff
report
includes
a
summary
of
the
key
items
discussed
at
the
meeting
and
includes
staff
responses.
I
did
want
to
make
note
that
a
virtual
neighborhood
meeting
was
held
on
March
3rd
of
this
year.
Meeting
attendees
asked
a
wide
range
of
questions,
including
potential
traffic,
related
impacts,
continuance
of
rent
control
for
existing
units,
provision
of
affordable
units,
construction,
noise,
building,
High
heightened
pedestrian
access.
V
Many
of
the
issues
raised
are
addressed
in
standard
conditions
of
approval,
such
as
the
construction
timing
and
notification
and
asbestos
abatement.
The
staff
report
also
includes
a
summary
of
the
issues
discussed
with
detailed
staff
responses
included
with
respect
to
the
project
location.
This
is
an
approximately
99
Acre
Site,
located
within
the
El
Camino,
precise
plan,
the
site
abuts,
the
city
of
sunnyvale's
boundary
along
its
South
Side
property
line
and
our
two
zoning
districts
areas
along
its
north
and
east
property
lines
to
the
north.
V
V
The
project
is
a
tier
one,
precise
plan
development
project
which
allows
for
increases
in
height
and
floor
area
with
the
contribution
of
public
benefits
and
requires
review
before
the
environmental,
Planning,
Commission
and
approval
from
the
city
council.
The
project
proposes
two
six-story
buildings
that
will
provide
233
units.
191
units
are
considered
net
new,
as
the
project
will
be
replacing
42
of
the
existing
units
on
site.
The
combined
unit
count
for
the
existing
and
new
development
will
be
371
units
in
total.
V
V
Some
of
the
key
features
of
the
project
will
include
a
new
Public
Access
easement
between
mirror
drive
and
El
Camino,
which
will
provide
a
direct
connection
for
pedestrian
travel
to
and
from
the
commercial
retail
uses
along
El
Camino
for
both
residents
of
the
development
and
surrounding
surrounding
neighborhood.
The
project
proposes,
with
more
than
50
000
square
feet
of
common
usable,
open
areas
for
tenants
and
several
on-site
amenities,
including
a
fitness
facility,
rooftop
Terrace
and
Clubhouse,
two
Courtyards
outdoor
seating,
dining
and
work
areas.
As
previously
noted,
this
is
a
tier
one
project.
V
The
applicant
has
opted
to
meet
the
tier
one
public
benefit
requirement
by
paying
the
public
benefit
value
in
lieu
of
physical
improvements.
The
public
benefit
value
is
approximately
638
thousand
dollars
for
this
project,
and
those
funds
will
be
available
for
future
use
for
improvements
within
the
precise
plan
area.
V
The
project
will
enhance
on-site
circulation
for
both
new
and
existing
tenants,
as
the
project
area
will
be
integrated
with
the
existing
on-site
network
of
Pathways
to
provide
an
intuitive
and
efficiently
designed
walkways
again.
The
new
Public
Access
easement
shown
in
the
highlighted
green
area
will
provide
a
safe
and
connected
pathway
for
bicyclists
and
pedestrians
traveling
to
and
from
El
Camino.
V
A
total
of
202
trees
were
inventoried
across
the
site
of
which
117
are
categorized
as
Heritage
trees.
The
project
is
proposing
to
remove
39
trees
in
total,
including
15
Heritage
trees
due
to
their
location
within
the
pro
proposed
building,
Footprints
and
or
necessary
site
improvements
associated
with
the
development.
The
project
will
provide
153
new
trees,
plantings
across
the
site,
all
of
which
will
be
at
least
24
bucks,
24
inch
box
in
size
or
larger.
Additionally,
three
new
Street
trees
are
proposed
along
El
Camino.
V
The
project
is
providing
11
of
the
base
density
for
very
low
income.
Households
as
such,
the
project
is
eligible
for
a
35
density
bonus
with
up
to
two
concessions
or
incentives.
In
addition
to
available
development
waivers
per
the
provisions
of
the
state
density
bonus
law,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
utilize
one
concession
to
request
an
approximately
two
percent
reduction
to
the
open
area
requirement
and
five
development
waivers
related
to
increased
Building
height,
reduced
setbacks
from
property
lines
and
between
structures
to
allow
construction
of
the
affordable
units
at
the
density
permitted
via
the
state
density
bonus.
V
The
project
is
subject
to
the
following:
three
applicable
local
and
state:
affordable
housing
requirements.
It's
important
to
note
that
these
requirements
are
inclusive
and
not
additive.
Sb
330
States
expressly
states
that
the
replacement
units
can
be
counted
towards
both
density
bonus
and
local
inclusionary
requirements.
The
project
is
meeting
the
city's
15
local
inclusionary
requirement
by
providing
24
units
at
two
income
levels.
As
previously
mentioned,
the
project
is
providing
eleven
percent
of
the
total
base
units
to
very
low
income
households
and
with
respect
to
the
replacement
unit
requirements.
V
Council
recently
adopted
policy
pursuant
to
SB
330,
requiring
rent
stabilized
units
occupied
by
households
earning
above
80
Ami
to
be
replaced
as
deed,
restricted
units
at
80,
Ami
or
below.
As
a
result,
this
project
will
replace
the
noted
42
units
with
33
replacement
units
at
50
Ami
and
the
remaining
nine
units
yeah.
The
remaining
nine
units
at
80
Ami.
V
All
42
of
the
apartment
proposed
for
demolition
are
covered
under
the
Community
stabilization
and
fair
Fair,
rent
act
or
csfra
and
are
subject
to
the
stricter
of
relocation
assistance
requirements
specified
under
the
2018
tenant,
relocation,
assistance,
ordinance
or
Trejo,
and
SB
330..
Under
these
local
and
state
Provisions
displaced
tenants
are
eligible
for
different
relocation
assistance
based
on
income.
It
should
be
mentioned
that
the
applicant
is
voluntarily
proposing
to
provide
the
cash
equivalent
of
four
and
a
half
months,
rent
of
tenants
for
tenants
eligible
for
category
B.
V
This
is
a
month
and
a
half
beyond
the
standard
requirement
and
finally,
the
right
of
first
return
is
available
to
displaced
tenants
eligible
under
categories
A
and
B,
and
this
provision
allows
displaced,
tenants
the
first
right
to
return
to
their
previously
occupied
unit.
If
the
project
is
canceled
and
the
original
units
are
returned
to
rental
market
I
did
want
to
make
note
that
we
have
staff
from
our
housing
division
that
can
speak
in
detail
regarding
the
affordable
housing
requirements
and
our
team
tenant
relocation
program.
V
Finally,
an
initial
study
of
environmental
significance
was
prepared
to
evaluate
whether
any
new
environmental
effects
would
occur
as
a
result
of
the
project
which
were
not
already
examined
under
the
precise
plans
program
eir.
The
initial
study
found
that
the
proposed
project
would
result
in
either
the
same
or
lesser
impacts
than
those
addressed
in
the
precise
plan
final
eir
and
complies
with
this
California
Environmental
Quality
Act.
V
V
I
did
want
to
make
note
of
item
three
on
the
slide.
A
notice
of
intent
to
vacate
public
easements
at
the
project
site
was
brought
forward
to
City
Council
on
August
30th
on
consent
for
initial
reading.
Today's
motion
would
include
whether
to
formally
adopt
the
resolution
of
vacate
a
public
wire
clearance
easement
along
the
southern
border
of
the
site,
and
this
will
conclude
staff's
presentation,
staffs
available
for
any
questions
city
council
may
have
and
as
a
reminder,
the
applicant
team
does
have
a
brief
presentation
prepared.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you
very
much
Philip.
The
applicant
will
now
provide
a
presentation
and
we
will
hear
from
Drew
Sullivan
from
Equity
residential.
W
W
I'm
joined
tonight
by
with
Steinberg
Architects
and
James
Munden
with
London
Frye
Landscape
Architects
and
I'll
make
a
few
quick
remarks
and
then
hand
it
off
to
them
to
present
the
design
a
quick
overview.
Hopefully
this
isn't
repetitive
or
too
repetitive.
The
project
was
announced
in
2019
and
at
the
outset
we
implemented
a
very
successful
resident
relocation
program.
Philip
mentioned
this
that
offered
significantly
more
benefits
and
were
acquired
by
the
city,
including
the
alternative
to
move
to
an
unaffected
apartment.
The
program
was
very
well
received
and
we
think
it
is
functioning
well.
W
The
planning
process
with
the
city
has
been
collaborative
and
we
think
the
proposal
embodies
the
city's
El
Camino
Real
precise
plan.
He
had
its
vision
for
people-friendly
places,
with
the
focus
on
sustainability
and
high
quality
design.
Our
neighborhood
Outreach
has
been
comprehensive
and
has
included
Zoom
conversations,
a
custom
website,
thousands
of
notice,
mailers
and
meetings
with
their
own
residents.
The
Outreach
has
been
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
communicate
with
our
neighbors
and
we'd
say.
The
feedback
has
been
generally
supportive.
I'll
mention
a
few
key
features.
It
will.
W
The
building
will
include
30
at
least
33
units.
This
will
get
discussed,
I'm
sure
that
replace
non-means
tested,
rent
control
units
with
below
market
rate
homes,
affordable
to
very
low
income
households
138
existing
Apartments,
will
remain
on
the
site.
They'll
function
as
one
Community
when
combined
with
the
new
homes,
which
will
offer
a
unique
spectrum
of
housing,
choice
and
affordability
for
existing
and
future
residents.
W
The
project
project
will
be
making
a
payment
of
over
12
million
dollars
to
the
city
to
fund
Parks,
which
is
over
fifty
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
The
project
will
include
a
new
shuttle,
stop
for
Mountain
View's
mvgo
shuttle
service,
together
with
funding
to
support
it
Philip
mentioned
the
project
will
include
the
new
Public
Access
easement,
which
we
will
include.
Wayfinding
signage
for
and
the
project
will
Target
a
lead
gold
designation,
which
is
one
of
the
highest
standards
in
Green
Building
design.
W
X
W
X
It
off
to
a
chef,
thank
you,
drew
I
will
share
my
screen
here.
So
hopefully
we
see
the
screen
here:
okay
and
yeah,
as
as
Drew
mentioned,
my
name
is
ushers
I
have
a
partner
in
charge
of
this
project
for
Steinberg
heart
and
it's
great
to
be
working
in
Mountain
View.
Again,
I
worked
on
the
projects
just
down
the
street
on
El
Camino
a
few
years
back,
and
just
to
give
you
a
real
high
level,
big
picture
design
goals
that
we
had
when
we
started.
X
This
project
was
really
to
look
at
the
current
community
that
exists,
as
you
see
in
this
aerial
photograph,
and
really
try
to
understand
where
we
could
focus
the
development
and
the
density
and
what
made
most
sense
because
of
also
the
split
zoning
of
the
site
is
to
focus
the
density
towards
East,
El,
Camino
and
just
I
know
many
of
the
council.
Members
walk
the
site
in,
so
these
images
will
be
familiar
to
you
as
we
move
around
the
site.
X
Just
to
give
you
a
bit
of
context
of
how
there's
varying
scales
of
buildings
taller
buildings
towards
El
Camino
and
then
the
current
Community
starts
to
step
down
into
the
neighborhood
scale.
So,
as
you
can
see
here
in
this
image,
we
really
focused
our
two
buildings
towards
East
El
Camino,
and
look
for
an
opportunity
to
stitch
together
the
new,
the
new
buildings
with
the
existing
ones
that
we
were
retaining
and
and
on
two
fronts.
X
One
is
through
the
massing
of
the
project,
making
sure
that
we
started
stepping
the
building
down,
as
we
moved
towards
page
left
here,
and
also
through
the
use
of
landscape
and
stitching
the
landscape
together,
which
I'll
let
James
speak
more
too
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
a
few
views
just
to
highlight
specifically
what
we
were
looking
at
as
we
were
designing
this
project.
So
this
is
looking
from
Sunnyvale
looking
down
into
Mountain
View
on
on
East,
El,
Camino
and
the
building
off
to
the
right.
X
So
you
can
see
we
have
some
large
trees
in
the
median,
and
we
also
have
the
Heritage
tree
that
we
that
Philip
mentioned
that
we're
looking
to
retain
in
right.
Right
on
El,
Camino
and
I
think
the
use
of
the
materials
as
we
started
exploring.
This
was
really
to
help
ground
the
building,
as
as
you
as
it
faces
the
street,
as
you
can
see
here
and
then
to
use
different,
warm
materials
technology
entry
and
allow
for
that
weight.
X
Natural
Way
finding
to
occur,
as
you
can
see,
we've
also
utilized
balconies
to
allow
for
the
residents
to
have
access
to
outdoor
space
on
on
multiple
levels
and
as
we
get
closer
to
the
building,
you
could
see
that
there's
a
rich
material
palette
that
is
combined
with
the
landscape,
that's
being
developed
in
order
to
really
create
a
welcoming
threshold
into
the
project
and
this
slides.
This
turns
us
all
the
way
back
into
the
neighborhood
and
mirror
drive
and
just
wanting
to
show
the
impact
of
the
existing
trees
that
will
be
retained.
X
Some
of
the
existing
buildings
that
will
also
be
retained
and
then
just
the
view
of
the
northernmost
building
that
we're
inserting
into
the
site
and
and
its
impact,
which
is
minimal
after
the
landscape
has
has
taken
hold.
As
you
can
see
here,
I'll
turn
it
over
to
James.
To
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
we're
tackling
outdoor
space
for
for
the
community.
O
Thank
you.
Can
everyone
hear
me.
X
O
Great
so
yeah
as
the
Landscape
Architects,
our
our
goal
was
really
to
to
help
marry
this
new
new
development
within
the
larger
context,
and
so
there
was
a
real
focus
on
you
know:
preserving
as
many
trees
as
we
can
and
I
think
the
the
main
goal
there
was
to
really
keep
keep
all
those
trees
along
the
perimeter.
O
O
You
know
open
space
to
really
help
kind
of
provide
a
very
kind
of
pedestrian,
focused
environment.
That's
inviting
and
very
intuitive
with
with
wayfinding.
O
This
next
slide
really
shows
the
existing
canopy
condition
up
above
and
below
is
the
anticipated
growth
which
will
exceed
50,
so
be
a
big
Improvement
there,
and
that's
done
through
a
variety
of
different
techniques
of
preservation,
but
also
bringing
in
a
variety
of
diverse
trees,
native
Native
species.
O
The
another
important
aspect
was
really
to
kind
of
marry
as
I
say,
the
the
existing
site
with
this
new
component
and,
in
addition
to
the
the
swimming
pool
and
bocce
court
and
outdoor
grill
area,
which
is
shown
in
A
and
B,
where
we're
starting
to
bring
in
a
new
dog
run
also
a
areas
for
seating
and
outdoor
dining,
there's
opportunities
for
exercise
and
play,
and
as
well
as
having
these
outdoor
rooms,
which
very
much
for
during
these
times
when
people
are
also
during
these
times
when
people
are
working
more
at
home.
O
The
next
slides
to
start
to
show
you
a
little
bit
more
of
those
details.
This
is
a
courtyard
which,
as
I
say,
has
these
kind
of
outdoor
rooms
that
are
very
flexible,
allowing
for
small
Gatherings
or
larger
Gatherings.
Maybe
outdoor
exercise
and
yoga,
as
well
as
opportunities
for
play.
O
This
slide
shows
how
we're
utilizing
a
Service,
Roads,
obviously
predominantly
normally
for
vehicles,
but
really
trying
to
tame
that
reducing
the
the
width
to
its
its
minimum
and
and
really
integrating
these
moments.
These
small
exercise
areas
that
can
be
utilized
and
as
I
say,
really
help
make
this.
This
kind
of
development,
a
pedestrian
focused
place
and
dining
opportunities,
as
well
I,
think,
are
important
again
providing
in
areas
where
there's
good
shade.
O
As
we
know,
it
gets
very
hot
in
Mountain
View
and
we
want
to
provide
lots
of
opportunities
for
people
who
are
are
living
here,
and
this
last
slide
is
just
a
little
bit
more
zoomed
in
and
some
renderings
of
that
dining
area
and
I.
Think
just
a
note
on
the
bottom
right.
O
We've
allocated
areas
where
we
can
plant
some
larger
trees,
especially
to
offset
some
of
the
Heritage
trees
that
we've
had
to
remove
with
some
large
72-inch
box,
so,
for
example,
that
bottom
right
image.
There
shows
that
larger
tree,
where,
where
we're
planting
that
but
overall
I,
think
we're
we're
excited
to
to
see
this
project
through
and
and
and
really
improve
the
overall
diversity
of
of
this
environment.
X
A
J
I'm,
one
of
the
things
I
think
about
when
we
look
at
these
developments
is
that
as
our
housing
gets
denser
one
of
the
reasons
we
do
that
one
of
the
many
reasons
is
often
density
allows
people
to
get
out
of
their
cars
and
walk
to
things
and
take
transit.
But
not
always
it
depends
on
on
how
you
design,
denser
developments.
So
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
more
I
like
that.
J
You
said
it
was
pedestrian,
focused
and
I,
like
I,
appreciate
the
pictures
but
I
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
more
about
where
the
public
access
easement
goes
and
who
can
use
the
different.
You
know
all
those
different
Pathways
that
you
showed
us
like
the
ones
with
the
exercise
equipment,
for
example,
how
many
are
private?
How
many
can
neighbors
use
yeah
and
where?
Where
does
the
well
come
back
to?
If
you
skip
any
of
the
questions,
I
asked
a
lot
I'll
come
back
and
ask
them
again.
O
Okay,
yeah,
no
I
think
we're
good
questions
and
and
I
think
overall,
the
the
philosophy
is
that
it
is
very
open
and
very
permeable,
and
allowing
for
people
who
live
there
and
their
guests
and
and
the
public
to
kind
of
walk
through
the
development.
I
think
they're
by
the
nature
of
certain
spaces
are
closer
to
some
of
the
the
outdoor
kind
of
deck
areas.
Maybe
more
privatized
areas,
I,
don't
think,
there's
going
to
be
any
Gates
per
se
to
prevent
people
from
going
in
there,
but
I
think
from
a
design
standpoint.
O
We're
strong
advocates,
for
you
know
creating
a
good
neighborhood
that
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
areas
where
people
are
overlooking
public
space
and
so
I.
Think
by
that
that
will
help
kind
of
provide
a
safer
environment,
but
still
not
having
lots
of
screens
and
barriers
up
so
so
I
think
genuinely.
O
We
are
really
trying
to
kind
of
to
create
spaces
that
are
open
and
accessible
for
all,
as
I
say,
I
think
where,
where
we
have
some
overlap
of
of
kind
of
vehicular
and
pedestrian,
we
are
just
trying
to
kind
of
make
it
feel
more
pedestrian
focused
just
to
help
slow
traffic
down,
which
again
will
be
another
way
of
just
making
it
overall
nicer
environment
to
be
in
and
so
I
think
the
the
passageway
through
is
utilizing
and
I
know.
O
O
It's
really
the
main
kind
of
vehicular
entry
and
there's
a
sidewalk,
that's
kind
of
adjacent
to
that
that
roadway
and
we
have
a
particular
line
of
trees,
I
think
it's
glidity,
which
will
will
stand
out
and
be
very
inviting
kind
of
passageway,
Alleyway
and
so
I
think
with
the
the
kind
of
Horticultural
wayfinding
it
will
just
I
think
allow
people
to
naturally
want
to
kind
of
come
in
and,
as
I
say,
there's
no
no
Gates
per
se
to
to
stop
them
from
doing
that.
I'm,
not
sure.
O
J
J
And
I
know
that
there's
only
a
small
part
of
this
project
that
runs
along
El,
Camino
but
I
think
it's.
You
know.
The
people
who
live
here
can
walk
only
a
short
distance
to
a
lot
of
restaurants,
hair
cutting
places,
dentists,
a
lot
of
neighborhoods
serving
retail
if
the
sidewalk
kind
of
tells
them
that
they
can
walk
there.
J
If
it's,
if
the
sidewalk
along
El
Camino
as
it
is
now
kind
of,
tells
you
get
in
your
car
and
drive
even
if
you're
going
to
drive
a
half
a
block,
so
I
know
this
is
only
a
small.
You
know
you
can't
make
all
of
El
Camino
walkable,
that's
you
don't
own
it,
but
but
every
development
adds
adds
a
little
a
little
bit
to
that.
So
can
you
tell
me
a
little
bit
about
like
how
wide
is
that
sidewalk
and
I
mean
I?
J
Looked
it
up,
I
think
it's
seven
feet
with
maybe
a
four
or
five
foot
planting
strip,
which
is
between
the
sidewalk
and
El
Camino,
which
is
good
but
I'd
like
a
rich
Landing
strips
so
that
you
really
feel
screened
from
the
road
and
to
give
that
example
to
other
developments
nearby.
Can
you
tell
me
what
you've
done
to
make
that
little
strip
more?
You
know
suggest
that
you
want
to
walk
to
the
restaurant
down
the
street
yeah.
O
Yeah
and
and
I
think
we
we
were
also
kind
of
encouraging
that
effect
of
having
more
planting
along
the
curbside
and
I
think
we
originally
did
actually
have
that
as
part
of
our
proposal.
But
then
we
had
pushback
because
of
other
requirements
and
I
think
other
design
guidelines
that
we
had
to
follow,
but
I
think
the
we
by
setting
the
building
back
and
having
a
more
of
a
of
a
buffer
and
and
kind
of
transition
from
the
sidewalk
to
the
building.
O
There's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
provide
a
lot
of
green
Lush
kind
of
plantings
as
well
as
the
the
you
know,
the
three
new
Street
trees,
the
the
existing
Heritage
tree
that
previously
actually
in
the
existing
condition,
is
set
back,
which
I
think
there's
actually
a
curb
and
when
a
physical
barrier
to
to
be
able
to
get
to
it.
O
Whereas
now
that
that
physical
barrier
is
gone
and
there's
a
seat,
that's
going
to
be
wrapping
around
that
existing
Heritage
tree
along
with
some
some
yeah
bike
racks
and
some
other
trees
that
are
going
to
be
filled
in
within
the
the
planting
butter
buffer
between
the
sidewalk
and
and
the
building.
But
you're
right.
It
is
a
narrow
strip
generally
and
I.
Think
we've
pushed
the
building
back
as
far
as
we
can
with
with
that.
But
I
do
feel
that
this
is,
you
know,
definitely
a
better.
O
A
big,
Improvement
and
and
I
do
think.
We'll
encourage
people
to
to
walk
and
and
and
kind
of,
yeah
want
to
walk
as
a
pedestrian.
O
No,
no
there's
not
we've
not
been
allowed
to
do
that.
Oh.
O
There
is
that
this
tree-
well,
yes,
there's
tree
walls
and
we've
got
Scarlet
Oak
there,
which
is
part
of
the
yeah
design
guidelines
recommended
tree
and
rather
than
planting,
underneath
the
the
design
guidelines
to
be
I
believe
are
an
aggregate,
Stone
aggregate.
So
yeah.
X
I
think
what
we
also
did
just
to
reinforce
what
James
was
describing
was
to
create
more
of
an
alley
of
trees
here,
which
typically
you
just
have
the
street
trees,
but
we've
also
got
a
second
row
of
trees
right
behind
those
three
trees
and
to
your
point,
how
do
you
encourage
more
movement
along
El,
Camino
and
Foster
that
pedestrian
movement
I
think
that
alley
really
helps
as
we've
seen
in
other
cities?
X
When
you
walk
between
an
alley
of
trees,
it
really
starts
to
feel
inviting
for
folks
to
do
that,
and
then
we
couldn't
keep
doing
that
down
here,
because
we've
we've
got
the
large
Heritage
tree,
but
that
really
creates
a
point
of
orientation
for
for
the
pedestrians
and
a
point
of
respite
as
James
described
with
with
a
bench
that
sort
of
wraps
the
the
trunk
base
of
there
so
I
think
through.
X
Even
though
we
have
a
small
strip
along
El,
Camino
I
think
we
created
some
variation
along
there
to
hopefully
encourage
movement
up
and
down
El
Camino.
You
know
whether,
towards
Sunnyvale
or
past,
the
hotel
Labonte
or
to
the
Hotel
Avante
as
as
folks
walk
the
street
and.
V
You
vice
mayor
yeah,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
Hicks,
I
do
have
a
Graphic
that
I
think
will
be
informative.
With
respect
to
your
question,
let
me
share
it
now.
V
V
So
this
graphic
really
speaks
to
some
of
the
site
constraints
with
respect
to
the
sidewalk
and
any
potential
area
for
providing
additional
land,
land
strips
or
landscape
strips,
there's,
a
series
of
underground
utilities
and
telecommunication
telecommunication
boxes
along
this
way.
V
These
are
the
the
proposed
tree
planter
areas
and
we
have
another
telecommunication
box
here,
as
well
as
a
light
pole.
So
there
is
opportunity
to
potentially
add
additional
landscape
area,
but
it's
it's
relatively
minor.
It
would
be
a
relatively
minor
Improvement
along
this
area.
L
Thank
you.
So
if
this
project
is
approved
tonight,
what
is
the
estimated
completion
date
when
people
could
move
in.
W
I
will
take
that
I
I
think
we
have
probably
a
good
six
to
nine
months
of
you
know,
construction,
drawings
and
permitting
and
working
with
contractors
and
getting
the
project
Finance
before
we
start.
So
that's
kind
of
a
mid
2023
construction
start
and
then
I
would
expect
that
it
will
be
something
on
the
order
of
you
know,
call
it
27
months,
so
it
would
be
kind
of
in
the
late
2025
range
that
the
first
units
would
be
available.
L
Okay
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
that
is
because
I
sent
in
the
question
about
if
one
of
the
current
residents
opts
to
move
to
Sunnyvale-
and
it
said
the
rent
would
be
at
the
same
rate
they're
paying
now
and
that
for
three
years
you
would
honor
the
csfra
rent
increases
in
Mountain,
View
I
was
wondering
if
folks
would
have
would
still
be
subject
to
that
by
the
time
this
project
was
completed.
L
But
can
we
say
that
if
somebody
like
issue
don't
know,
maybe
you
could
make
that
a
little
bit
longer
in
terms
of
how
long
you
would
have
the
csfra
rent
increases
apply
to
somebody
who
moved
to
Sunnyvale,
so
their
rent
would
not
be
increased
more
than
that
before
they
had
the
opportunity
to
move
back
to
this
complex.
W
Right
yeah
I
mean
it
applies
even
more
so
I
think
council,
member
to
the
president
to
move
on
site
to
the
extent
that
that's
available
right,
there's
138
homes
that
are
going
to
remain
and
those
are
obviously
subject
to
csfra.
W
So
I
think
that
you
know
we'll
and
there's
only
five
of
those
original
residents
who
are
still
in
occupancy,
I
think
so.
I
I
think
we've
covered,
but
I'm
not
I'm,
not
sure.
Well,.
L
I
guess
you
know
if
somebody
does
opt
to
move
to
Sunnyvale,
they
would
only
be
covered
for
three
years
right.
W
And
that's
that's
what
we
committed
to
that's
what
I!
You
know!
That's
what
our
company
committed
to
you
know
three
years
ago
after
a
lot
of
internal
discussion,
so
I'm
not
sure,
are
you
asking
us
to
extend
that
period.
L
Well,
if
somebody
who's
living
in
Sunnyvale,
if
the
project
for
some
reason
is
delayed
or
takes
longer
than
expected,
they
could
be
subject
to
a
fairly
sizable
rent
increase,
because
you
would,
the
agreement
to
have
them
covered
by
the
csfra
for
three
years
could
expire.
W
L
Y
That
that
was
a
voluntary
commitment
from
the
developer,
so
the
city
can't
require
it,
but.
Y
L
Only
if
they
opt
to
move
to
a
Sunnyvale
location
and
it
could
be
one
but
that
one
you
know
I
would
not
want
them
to
be
subject
to
the
csfra
for
three
years,
then
all
of
a
sudden
have
a
large
rent
increase,
because
you're
no
longer
honoring
that
before
the
building
in
Mountain,
View
is
done.
L
But
we
can
talk
about
that
when
we
get
to
the
comments.
Okay,
so
I'll
move
on
to
my
other
questions,
so
I
was
wondering:
how
do
you
actually
go
about?
What
is
the
process
for
measuring
the
tree
canopy
now
and
in
the
future?
O
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
I
think
it
all
depends
on
where
you
evaluate
each
tree
species
and
their
growth
rate.
We
know
the
size
approximately
of
the
canopy
size
of
when
they
go
in
so
on
our
diagram.
We
can
pull
that
back
up
on
that
diagram.
We
show
I
think
the
first
two
years
of
that
growth,
then
the
five
and
then
I
believe
maturity
and
so
okay.
Here
we
go
yeah,
so
construction
completion
and
then
five-year
coverage.
O
That's
right!
Yes,
we've
got
construction
completion,
then
a
five
ten
year
coverage
and
then
full
growth,
so
I
think
the
you
know:
there's
definitely
a
lot
of
variables
and
a
lot
of
those
variables
very
much
relate
to
maintenance
and
you
know
trees
once
they
do
start
to
kind
of
like
connect.
Their
canopy
joins
with
other
tree
canopies.
O
I.
Think
the
thing
where
we
feel
fairly
certain
with
this
analysis
is
that
because
we
are
putting
in
a
lot
of
trees
and
within
quite
a
dense
area
and
the
choice
of
those
tree,
species
are
are
kind
of
being.
O
You
know
carefully
thought
out
where,
where
we
are
having
them
more
dense,
so
the
smaller
tree
canopies
on
their
own,
don't
provide
such
a
large
canopy.
But
when
there's
a
dense
kind
of
more
Forest
like
we're
having
in
some
of
the
podium
areas,
they're
combined
Canon
people
really
kind
of
provide
that
overall
coverage.
So
so
really
is,
as
I
say,
looking
at
each
individual
species
and
their
placement
and-
and
you
know
just
kind
of
calculating
that
expansion
where
there
is
no
obstruction.
So
where
there's
a
building,
we
can't
calculate
that
that
will
be.
L
Yeah,
so
you
are
looking
at
each
tree
or
its
location,
its
species
and
a
growth
rate.
You
would
expect
for
that
species.
That's.
O
Right
and
that's
why
you
start
to
see
these
different
sized
circles.
They
are
reflective
of
of
their
their
mature
size
versus
yeah.
One
of
the
trees
we're
putting
in
is
a
London
plain
and
the
California
Sycamore,
and
so
that's
regarded
as
a
larger
tree
which
will
get.
You
know
a
lot
more
like
45
feet
in
diameter.
If
it's
unobstructed
versus
a
smaller
tree
like
a
Melaleuca
that
we're
putting
in
may
only
get
to
say,
20
feet
wide,
so
be
half
the
size,
yeah.
Okay,.
L
So
in
let's
see
the
staff
report,
it
said
that
there
were
two
native
tree
species
and
yet
in
the
council
q
a
came
back
and
said
there
were
three
and
this
time
it
included
the
California
hazelnut.
So
just
kind
of
curiosity
I
thought
well
what
the
heck
does
that
look
like,
and
is
it
really
native.
O
It's
often
used
it's
often
it's
a
pioneering
species
similar
to
The
Birches,
an
aspen
that
you
would
have
in
other
parts
of
the
country,
so
it's
more
associated
with
damp
conditions
and
it's
not
as
commercially
grown
as
other
species
in
in
the
landscape
kind
of
commercial
sector.
But
it
is
something
that
can
be
available.
O
We
are
apply
to
them,
so
they
want
a
smaller
size,
but
they
are
a
multi-stem,
so
I
suppose
the
closest
I
would
say
they
look
like
is
a
birch
tree,
a
kind
of
a
river
birch
or
a
Himalayan
birch,
which
you
you
have
a
few
actually
I,
think
in
Mountain,
View
and
they're.
Quite
a
commentary
to
use
in
landscape
schemes.
L
And
so
I
also
asked
the
question
about
what
percent
of
the
not
of
the
entire
landscape
but
I'd.
G
L
O
That's
a
good
question:
I
I
think
and
like
I've
got
like
my
planting
plan.
Let's
see
I
think
you
know
the
quantity
of
California
sycamores
that
we're
putting
in
that
there's
a
42
there's
29
of
those
and
they
have
quite
a
large
canopy
size.
O
The
California
Hazel,
there's
42
of
those
Western
Red
Bar,
technically,
is
not
native,
although
it
has,
it
is
within.
You
know,
within
close
range,
the
as
I
say
the
the
quercus
on
the
street
I
believe
that's
also
native.
So
if
I
had
a
on
the
spot,
give
you
a
percentage
I,
don't
actually
have
it
on
me,
but
I'd
say
probably
around
30
40
percent
of
quantity
countries,
yeah
and
and
I
think
you
know,
there's
always
a
balance.
O
You
know.
Obviously
in
every
project
you
can
imagine
and
every
staff
meeting
we
go
to
or
design
review.
We
get
asked
similar
questions
and
I.
Think
there's
that
balance
with
what
one
is
commercially
available
to
what's
I
think
going
to
be
sustainable,
long
term
and
there's
a
lot
of
species
that
are
even
though
they're
not
technically
native.
They
do
follow
the
same
characteristics
as
natives,
being
drought,
tolerant
and
also
providing
a
lot
of
habitat
potential
and
and
very
much
kind
of
complementary
to
other
native
species,
so
definitely
not
invasive.
O
L
Okay,
I
also
sent
in
a
question
about
the
Club
room
and
I
wasn't
necessarily
looking
for
the
footprint
of
it.
I
was
looking
for
what
it
looked
like,
because
the
way
it
was
described,
I
thought
it
was
a
like
a
separate
thing,
but
now
that
I
look
at
the
plans,
it's
actually
just
a
room
in
the
building
right.
That
looks
like
the
rest
of
the
building
from
the
outside.
Is
that
correct.
X
L
Okay,
let's
see
here,
that's
it
thanks.
M
Yeah
I
have
a
few
questions.
I
submitted
quite
a
few
and
thank
you
to
staff
or
the
applicant,
whoever
it
was
that
answered
them.
I
really
appreciate
it.
One
is
who
is
going
to
have
access
to
the
community
room
on
the
sixth
floor.
M
Oh
okay,
so
everybody
would
have
access
to
that
yep.
Would
you
do
you
reserve
it
or
something?
How
would
that
work.
W
No
I
think
there'll
be
it'll,
get
broken
up
into
a
variety
of
spaces,
but
I
would
say
these
days.
Most
of
it
will
be
probably
smaller
rooms
that
a
lot
of
people
are
using
for
working
from
home.
Just
you
know
kind
of
comfortable
Lounge
seating,
and
you
know
nice
work
from
home
type
seating.
Does
that
make
sense.
M
Is
great,
okay
I
also
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
safe
routes
to
school.
We,
you
know,
that's
been
a
tremendous
issue
in
our
community
recently
and
El
Camino
is
you
know
it's
hard
to
Traverse
for
elementary
school
kids.
There's
no,
no
two
ways
about
it.
So
I
wanted
to
you
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
you
think
the
children
who
who
will
be
living
in
this
community
will
get
to
school.
W
Oh
council
member,
that
is
a
terrific
question
if
the
elementary
school
is
across
El
Camino,
Real
I,
don't
know
that
it's
a
terrific
question.
I
have
two
fourth
graders
myself.
So
that
is
a
big
deal
to
me,
but
I'm,
not
I,
don't
have
a
ready
answer
for
you.
Okay,.
W
Z
If
I
may
speak,
I'm
sorry
I
was
not
promoted.
Panel
I
was
just
unmuted.
This
is
Don
Cameron
Public
Works,
director
and
I'm
happy
to
provide
additional
information
about
safe
routes
to
school
if
you'd
like
so
the
elementary
school
that
is
served
or
that
this
Housing
Development
would
be
using
is
Randall's
Elementary
School.
Oh,
give
me
a
moment.
I
just
got
invitation
to
join
this
panelist.
B
Z
Okay,
again
Don
Cameron
Public
Works
director
as
I,
was
mentioning.
This
is
in
the
landos
Elementary
School
boundary
area,
and
there
is
a
suggested
route
to
school
map
that
does
not
rely
on
using
El
Camino
for
the
elementary
school
because
they're
not
headed
in
that
direction,
so
that
that
map
link
is
available.
Thank
you
very
much
for
screen
sharing
it.
So,
as
you
can
see,
they
would
head
up
and
they
would
be
using
Dana,
Street
and
Dana.
Street
does
currently
have
some
sidewalks
and
has
a
standard
bike
lane
on
it.
Z
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
Pitch
right
now
that
we
are
planning
to
upgrade
this
portion
of
Dana
street
with
more
complete
Street
elements.
Next
time
we
it's
in
the
paving
program,
it's
not
yet
scheduled,
but
that
is
on
our
plans
and
we
recognize
it's
part
of
the
suggested
route
to
school
for
the
middle
school,
which
is
Graham.
Middle.
Z
When
Caltrain
does
the
El
Camino
Real
Paving
project,
as
you
all
know,
because
part
of
that
will
be
to
add
bike
Lanes
to
El
Camino
Real,
which
could
which
will
help
using
the
bike
lanes
and
then
also
as
part
of
that
project
is
adding
a
new
signalized
pedestrian
Crossing
of
El
Camino
Real
at
Crestville
Butte.
Z
So
it
gives
another
location
that
will
be
easy
to
cross
it'll,
be
using
The,
Pedestrian
hybrid
beacons
that
you
see
right
now
that
you
know
pedestrians
activate
and
then
it
stops
traffic,
and
this
could
be
a
back
way
in
that
then
going
Crossing,
El,
Camino,
Real
and
then
using
Dale
to
connect
through
to
the
Dale
Heatherstone
over
Crossing
of
85
and
Connect
into
the
Stevens
Creek
Trail,
and
then
could
use
that
method
as
a
way
to
get
to
Graham
Middle
School
and
avoid
riding
at
all
on
El
Camino
Real.
M
Good
and
I
noticed
also
that
they
they
could
access
the
trail
at
the
intersection
just
on
the
other
side
of
85.
there's
an
entrance
that
they
could
do
and
and
go
under
the
tunnel
of
El
Camino
and
then
come
out.
You
know
come
out
and
go
through
Martins
and
go
that
to
school
that
way,
maybe
a
little
longer
but
quite
safe,
so
very
important
things
to
think
about.
Well,
thank
you,
Don,
the
other
question
I,
the
other
two
things
I
I
was
hoping
to
bring
up.
M
I
always
try
to
bring
these
up,
as
is,
is
the
idea
of
dual
Plumbing.
You
know
we
we
are
heading
into
with
with
climate
change.
We
know
that
our
water
supply
is
we're
going
to
have
more
variability,
and
so
the
use
of
water
for
non-potable
uses
is,
you
know,
is
really
important
and
it's
not
required
in
a
residential
building,
but
I
I
would
hope
that
it's
something
that
you
would
seriously
consider
there
will
be.
M
There
should
be
a
pretty
good
supply
of
recycled
water
available,
probably
both
from
Sunnyvale
and
Mountain
View
at
that
site
in
within
the
next
10
years,
and
then
the
other.
The
other
P,
the
other
question
I
I,
had
was
about
condo
mapping,
and
the
response
was
that
the
applicant
had
not
considered
condom
mapping,
but
in
Mountain
View.
We
consider
that
as
a
way
to
help
reach
the
missing
middle,
which
has
been
a
real
problem
in
our
community
by
so
it's
another
thing
that
I
always
ask
applicants
about.
M
Have
you
thought
about
the
possibility
of
of
mapping
this
building
or
one
of
these
buildings
for
condos?
And
what
are
what
are
the
gating
items
for
not
doing
that?.
W
I
can
address
that.
You
know
our
company
is
a
an
apartment.
You
know
for
rent
apartment,
Real,
Estate,
Investment,
Trust,
a
public
company,
the
soul,
our
soul.
Business
purpose
is
to
own
operate,
manage
apartment
buildings
for
rent
for
the
long
term.
So
it's
just
not
something
that
we
do.
We
typically
want
to
build,
or
Buy
and
Hold
apartment
buildings
for
10,
15
years
or
longer,
I
think
we
maybe
have
owned
this
one
for
10
years
at
this
point
at
least
and
I.
W
A
AA
Good
evening
my
name
is
James
Guzman
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
myself,
first
off
Simpsons
school
stuff
did
come
up.
I
did
want
to
note
that
there's
actually
the
option
of
taking
the
BTA
22
bus
to
very
near
Grand
Middle
School.
AA
However,
since
I
believe
there's
no
free
program
for
mvwsd
students
for
bday
buses,
it
would
mean
basically
a
35
a
month
monthly
pass
for
it.
Students
will
want
to
do
that,
but
that'd
be
much
faster
than
the
community
shuttle.
AA
Secondly,
to
solve
our
housing
crisis,
we'll
be
wanting
to
see
a
lot
more
projects
like
this
I
hope.
We
see
it
move
forward
as
fast
as
can
going
forwards.
AA
The
tree
replacement
stuff
seems
good
and
standard,
although
I'm,
not
an
expert
on
that
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
are
getting
a
public
easement
through
to
Mir
Road
from
El
Camino,
that
is
in
line
of
City
policy
and
I
hope
to
see
more
of
that
going
forward.
I
hope
that
in
future
projects
we
can
see
things
where
we
start
more
preemptively
get
some
amount
of
public
easement
parallel
to
El
Camino.
AA
In
this
case,
where
you
would
then
maybe
in
the
future,
if
a
Redevelopment
project
occurred
along
accoladness
drive,
then
we
could
get
a
parallel
connection
to
El
Camino
that
didn't
require
that
let
pedestrians
go
along
El
Camino
without
going
on
El
Camino,
but
I.
Don't
that's
a
thing
for
future
projects,
not
for
this
project
and
I
guess
the
final
thing
that
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing
from
the
applicant.
AA
If
it's
not
already
documented
somewhere,
is
why
there
they
felt
the
need
to
build
more
parking
than
was
required,
given
all
the
various
State
density
bonus
laws
and
such
it
applied
since
I
would
hope
that
going
forwards
we
can
see
more
in
denser
apartment
buildings,
with
more
homes
for
people
and
less
parking
along
high
quality,
Transit
corridors,
but
overall
excellent
project.
I
hope
this
happens
as
quickly
as
possible.
Thank
you.
AB
I'll
just
say
that
I
am
opposed
to
a
six
story.
Building
on
this
site,
it's
an
80
coverage
of
the
property,
that's
being
built
on
I.
Think
a
four-story
structure
would
be
fine
I'm
worried
about
what
happens
on
a
16
foot
driveway
with
overhanging
trees.
If
there
was
a
fire
emergency
at
the
hotel,
which
has
a
setback,
variance
to
the
property
line
or
to
this
new
building,
God
forbid,
if
we
needed
to
get
a
ladder
truck
in
there,
I,
don't
think
it
would
fit.
AB
Also
I
believe
that
the
hotel,
formerly
the
Hilton
Garden
Inn,
has
a
20
kilovolt
overhead
line
through
your
property,
an
easement
that
was
established
four
years
five
years
ago
and
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
plans
for
dealing
with
that
I
do
applaud
the
high
quality
design
of
the
building.
I.
Just
think
that
six
stories
is
wrong
and
that
there
are
other
site
challenges
which
are
going
to
be
troublesome.
AB
D
Thank
you
mayor.
You
hear
me
now.
Yes,
okay,
because
I
just
wanted
to
check
last
time:
okay,
yeah
Bruce,
England
speaking,
a
combination
of
for
Mountain,
View
Coalition
for
sustainable
planning
and
green
spaces.
Mountain
View.
This
is
a
really
great
discussion.
I
was
initially
going
to
comment
on
removal
of
trees,
which
green
spaces
typically
is
against.
We
like
to
retain
as
many
trees
as
possible,
but
hearing
the
discussion
sounds
like
this
has
been
very
well
thought
out.
D
It's
very
impressive,
very
different
from
the
discussion
we
heard
about
tree
removal
at
Vargas
school
by
the
way,
so
I
feel
confident
that
that
you're
going
on
the
right
track
with
this
on
the
council,
member
Hicks
was
talking
about
the
planner
strips
and
sidewalk
quality,
and
things
like
that.
There
is
a
movement
in
the
city
towards
green,
complete
streets
and
that
sort
of
design,
so
the
the
more
that
that
can
be
taken
into
consideration
would
be
great
permeability.
D
Similarly,
the
more
that
people
can
walk
and
bike
in
and
around
and
through
the
area
is
terrific
I
agree
with
what
James
said
about
parking
as
much
as
that
can
be
minimized.
That
would
be
great
and,
lastly,
on
Dana,
Street
Public
Works
director
said
that
improvement's
going
to
be
made
on
there,
they're
really
sorely
needed.
D
A
AC
Yes,
we,
my
name
is
Mitchell
Vince
aguer
I'm,
a
field
representative
with
the
Carpenters
local
405
here
in
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
I'm
here
tonight,
to
ask
as
the
city
moves
forward
with
the
El
Camino
Real
residential
plan.
I
hope
you
can
consider
developing
labor
standards
that
include
Health,
Care,
apprenticeship
and
local
hire,
one
out
of
four
or
twenty
six
percent
of
construction
workers
in
California
lack
health
insurance.
That's
two
and
a
half
times
the
rate
for
all
California
workers.
AC
These
workers
are
sometimes
reliant
on
emergency
rooms,
taxing
in
already
overburdened
medical
system
in
our
communities.
Construction,
apprenticeship
programs
are
proven
escalator
to
the
middle
class
training,
tens
of
thousands
of
California
residents
every
year
at
no
cost
to
the
taxpayers
and
policies
that
require
the
utilization
of
apprenticeships,
develop
a
pool
of
skilled
labor
in
the
local
area.
Who
can
work
on
future
projects
as
more
and
more
construction
workers
are
forced
in
the
mega
commutes
local
hire
policies
can
help
bring
stability
to
families
and
the
community.
AC
Ensuring
workers
can
spend
time
with
their
families
and
participate
in
Civic
and
Community
Life
instead
of
spending
four
plus
hours
a
day
in
traffic
Nor
Cal
Carpenters
would
also
love
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
owner
developer.
Equity
residential.
Should
you
have
any
questions,
please
feel
free
to
contact
me.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
AD
Well,
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I
think
that
six
stories
is
not
tall
enough.
I
think
that
if
anything
we
could
go
denser
we
build
once
it
lasts
a
long
time.
We
should
take
advantage
of
any
sort
of
Redevelopment
to
make
more
to
take
more
advantage
of
the
land.
The
land
use,
the
location,
the
housing
like
create
a
greater
density
of
people
who
can
take
advantage
of
the
amenities
of
the
neighborhood,
the
community.
AD
It's
worth
it,
it's
worth
the
investment
now
I,
don't
think
we
should
dumb
it
down
and
make
it
smaller
I
think
we
should
do
better
and
dig
each
project
as
something
that
is
an
opportunity
for
an
abundance
mentality
and
not
just
be
afraid
and
posit
a
bunch
of
hypotheticals
about
how
like
things,
could
go
wrong
because
big
bad
anyway.
Thank
you
also
Lucas
you're,
still
very
robot.
A
A
If
not
we'll
close
public
comment
and
we'll
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
and
action
and
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolutions
attached
to
the
report.
L
Thanks
so
I'm
not
making
a
motion
I
just
want
to
Circle
back
on
page
15
of
the
staff
report
under
alternative
C.
It
says:
option
two
is
to
move
to
a
an
apartment
in
Sunnyvale
and
Sunnyvale
does
not
have
rent
control.
As
far
as
I
know
like
the
city
of
Mountain
View
does
so.
My
question
was-
and
maybe
you
can
tell
me
more
details
about
the
potential
here.
L
Y
Council
member
matacek
I
can
respond
to
this
I
checked
with
our
project
manager
with
the
csfra
team,
and
there
are
two
of
the
renters
have
moved
into
apartments
in
Sunnyvale.
L
Okay,
thank
you
and
so
I
guess.
My
question
was,
you
know
they
could
have
annual
rent
increases
that
are,
as
we've
heard,
would
be
the
same
as
the
csfra
for
three
years.
But
after
that,
if
they
choose
not
to
come
back,
then
you
know
they
stay
in
Sunnyvale
and
they're
subject
to
market
conditions,
but
if
they
do
want
to
come
back,
it
seems
like
we
should
and
say
that
their
rent
increases
continue
with
the
csfra
until
such
time
they
come
back
to
this
project
when
it's
done
now.
L
The
timing
might
be
such
that
this
doesn't
happen
because
you're
going
to
get
this
project
done
within
three
years,
but
it
just
seems
to
me
that
if
they
do
want
to
come
back
that
they
should
be
helped
until
they
have
the
opportunity
to
come
back.
W
Is
this
a
question
to
me,
council
member
sure,
well
I'm,
looking
at
the
SB
330
right
at
first
for
a
few
years
old,
you
know,
I,
think
those
folks
who
you
know
would
qualify
to
come
back
into
a
below
market
rate,
50
or
80
Ami.
O
W
You
know
if
they
are
in
our
property
in
Sunnyvale
or
at
Reserve
Mountain
View
in
one
of
those
138
homes,
I
think
we
would
do
everything
we
could
to
make
it
easier
for
them
to
not
have
the
rent
bump
up.
You
know
before
they
got
into
a
BMR
unit.
L
Yeah
I'm
specifically
talking
about
the
folks
who
would
come
back
to
an
affordable
unit
right.
W
Right
and
I,
you
know
I
can't
tell
you
when
the
project
will
start
construction
or
when
it
will
be
completed.
I
can't
make
a
commitment
to
that.
So
I
can't
say
anything.
That's
open-ended
right,
but
if
there
was
somebody
who
was
moving
to
Sunnyvale
temporarily
wore
to
one
of
those
units
in
our
building,
like
I
said
we
would
try
to
bridge
the
gap
for
them.
So
if
it
was
four
years
instead
of
three,
we
would
do
that.
A
J
Well,
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion
with
for
the
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
council
member
Mata
checks
caveat
if
she'd
like
to
phrase
it
in
any
particular
way.
I'm
open
but
otherwise.
A
A
Okay,
fantastic.
Thank
you,
council,
member
Showalter,.
M
I
wanted
to
comment:
I'm
really
I'm
real
project.
I
I
think
that
they've
done
a
very
good
job
of
utilizing
this
site.
We
don't
have
many
places
in
Mountain
View,
where
people
feel
that
six
story.
Buildings
are
a
good
idea,
but
I
think
along
El
Camino
is
is
absolutely
the
right
place
for
them,
and
so
I'm
I'm
very
glad
to
see
this
project
coming
forward.
M
I
am
concerned
about
the
the
roots
to
school,
for
these
youngsters
I
thought
the
suggestion
of
taking
this
taking
the
public
bus
for
the
Junior
High
kids
was
certainly
a
great
idea
and
and
all
the
improvements
that
Public
Works
director
Cameron
mentioned,
are,
are
really
important
and
it's
sort
of
on
our
end.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
they
get
carried
out
and
then
the
other
thing
I'm
I'm
pleased
about
and
is
the
tree
plan.
M
A
great
deal
of
thought
has
obviously
been
given
to
this,
and
the
the
idea
of
him
I
mean
really
what
we're
working
for
is
in
increasing
our
canopy,
and
we,
we
passed
a
a
a
plan
several
years
ago
to
increase
it
by
five
percent
and
on
this
specific
site.
It
increases
it
by
a
lot
more
than
that
and
I
think
that
will
make
this
site
so
much
more
pleasant
for
the
people
who
who
live
there
in
particular
and
and
the
rest
of
us
who
pass
by
it.
M
So
I'm,
really
glad
to
to
see
that
that
is.
That
is
a
tremendous
amenity
for
for
our
community
and
then
the
other
thing
I
want
to
bring
up
again
is.
Is
that
view
of
the
bay
that
potential
view
of
the
bay?
M
We
are
called
Mountain
View,
and
these
buildings
will
have
lovely
views
of
the
mountains
and
that's
great
but
I
think
another
thing
that
having
this
particular
height
will
allow
is
some
views
of
the
bay
and
as
we
move
forward
with
the
Restorations
that
are
ongoing,
that
is
going
to
be
a
tremendous
amenity
as
well
so
I
I,
Ma
I'm
pleased
to
to
see
this
project
moving
forward.
A
If
not,
oh
councilman,
council,
member
Matic.
L
Thanks
I'll
just
respond
to
vice
mayor
Hicks
I'm,
not
sure
we
can
condition
the
project
on
that,
but
I
appreciate
the
applicant
saying
that
they
would
work
with
folks
who
have
moved
to
Sunnyvale
if
it
turns
out
that
they're
there
longer
than
expected,
and
they
said
they
do
their
best
to
work
with
them.
So
we'll
just
take
it
at
that.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
staff
for
the
presentation
at
work.
We
will
now
proceed
to
the
next
item:
7.1,
public
safety
building,
design,
project,
20-49
selection
of
site
layout,
principal
project
manager,
David,
printy
and
Public
Works,
director,
Don
Cameron,
will
present
the
item
so
I'll
need
some
assistance,
I
think
in
promoting
everyone.
I
see
Don
is
already
here
and
whenever
you're
ready
to
begin
the
presentation
go
ahead.
AE
Hello,
yes,
thank
you.
Let
me
share
my
screen.
AE
AE
AE
To
understand
how
best
to
develop
these
options,
we
did
an
extensive
study
of
the
existing
site
to
evaluate
the
existing
assets
and
limitations.
First
and
foremost,
there
are
a
number
of
Public
Utilities
that
run
along
the
Oak
Street
alignment
through
the
site
that
service
not
just
the
site,
but
the
surrounding
public
as
well.
Of
course,
as
many
public
safety
assets.
AE
Excuse
me
sorry,
many
public
safety
assets
that
serve
the
existing
building,
as
well
as
a
140
foot,
Communications
tower
that
serves
the
911
call
center,
as
well
as
a
as
a
regional,
Hub
and
repeating
station
for
the
county-wide
Public
Safety
Services.
AE
So
taking
that
information,
consultants
and
staff
have
developed
four
site
layout
options
that
fall
into
two
primary
categories
options,
one
and
two
are
in
the
category
of
layouts
that
only
require
a
partial
relocation
during
construction
of
some
of
the
Public
Safety
Services,
as
the
new
building
is
developed
options.
Three
and
four,
however,
will
require
a
full
relocation
of
all
police
and
fire
activities
or
services
off-site
to
another
location
during
the
entirety
of
construction,
which
is
anticipated
to
be
as
long
as
you
know,
36
to
40
months.
AE
So
a
little
closer
look
at
the
at
the
four
options
option.
One
as
I
stated
before
requires
only
partial
relocation
using
a
phase
construction
approach.
It
has
the
main
building
a
new
building
fronting
on
Villa
Street
as
a
joined
by
a
three-story
parking
lot
that
is,
has
shared
use
between
public
parking
and
the
public
safety
vehicles
and
staff.
Vehicles.
AE
This
option
has
a
Remnant
parcel
with
an
approximately
one,
acre
buildable
area,
primarily
because
of
the
aforementioned
Public
Utilities.
This
is
the
most
condensed
of
the
three
options.
The
Remnant
parcel
has
a
smaller
Frontage
on
Franklin
Street,
so
it
can
be
developed
for
alternate
uses
such
as
below
Market
housing.
However,
those
would
be
sandwiched
between
the
future
Evelyn
on-ramp
and
the
three-story
public
safety
parking
structure.
AE
Oh
and
just
briefly,
this
option
is
anticipated
to
cost
approximately
165
million
dollars.
Option
two
is
similar
to
option
one,
although
it
is
much
more
has
more.
This
breathing
space
between
the
elements
of
the
parking
structure
is
rotated,
90
degrees
and
only
houses,
Public
Safety
Vehicles
marked
Vehicles,
primarily
staff
Vehicles,
would
be
on
the
surface
parking
up
closer
to
Shoreline
The
Remnant
parcel
is
slightly
under
an
acre
and
fronts,
Franklin
Street
and
has
a
more
generous
Frontage
along
Franklin
Street,
which
could
be
in
this
scenario
possibly
converted
to
a
pedestrian
Plaza.
AE
It
would
still
have
Eva
access
to
Evelyn
Street,
but
is
an
option
worth
considering.
This
option
is
anticipated
to
cost
approximately
156
million
option.
Three
again,
one
of
the
first
two
of
the
two
options
that
would
require
a
full
relocation
and
therefore
would
take
longer
to
implement,
has
the
public
safety
building
fronting
on
Franklin
Street
joined
by
a
dedicated
staff,
vehicle
or
sorry
to
say,
a
public
safety
vehicle
parking
structure
and
staff
surface
parking.
It
has
a
Remnant
parcel
adjoining
or
fronting
on
Villa
Street
of
approximately
one
acre
this
item.
AE
AE
Lastly,
we
have
option
four
which
again
with
as
with
option
three
requires
four
relocation
and
it
locates
the
public
safety
building
at
the
corner
of
villa
and
Oak
Street,
a
little
more
prominently
than
option
three
does
and
has
all
these
same
amenities.
The
Remnant
parcel
fronts
are
is
corner
of
fernabila
and
Franklin
Street,
and
the
estimated
cost
for
this
option
is
approximately
173
million.
AE
Now,
after
taking
into
account
all
four
options
in
their
varying
elements,
staff
evaluated
them
against
five
primary
criteria.
The
program
which
would
be
the
space
needs
assessment
that
was
done
prior
to
the
beginning
of
this
exercise,
and
we
were
evaluating
if
the
full
program
can
be
accommodated
on
each
option:
Public
Safety
Services.
We
evaluate
each
one
to
confirm
that
it
minimizes
disruption
during
construction
to
ongoing
police
and
fire
operations.
AE
AE
Finally,
the
public
benefit
of
any
Remnant
Parcels
that
were
available
in
each
option
were
considered
and
evaluated
against
each
other
with
that
and
taking
all
four
options
into
consideration
and
there
are
varying
criteria,
varying
elements,
staff
concluded
the
option
two
had
the
most
beneficial
options
and
to
the
for
the
cities.
AE
It
had
the
opportunity
for
an
additional
program
element
similar
to
three
and
four,
where
there
was
an
area
to
the
North
or
should
say
West
that
could
be
programmed
for
outdoor
uses,
such
as
staff
training
and
canine
training,
a
use
that
has
been
used
in
the
past
and
is
possible
today.
That
is
not
possible
with
option
one
and
as
far
as
Public
Safety
Services.
AE
It
allows
for
services
to
be
continuous
for
the
most
part
on
site,
with
a
fair
amount
of
phasing
and
some
off-site
activities
using
Model
11
to
house
parking
to
house
staff
parking
and
marked
vehicles.
Public
services
are
not
impacted
by
this
option.
It
is
the
lowest
cost
of
the
four
options
and,
with
the
alignment
of
the
remnant
parcel
on
Franklin
Street
directly
across
an
existing
below
Market
Housing
Development,
it
provides
an
opportunity
to
create
a
community
there,
which
staff
feels
is
is
a
benefit.
AE
Therefore,
staff
would
continue
to
about
to
continues
to
recommend
that
option
two
be
considered,
as
stated
earlier,
anticipated
cost
for
this
option
is
about
156
million
dollars.
Now,
let's
take
a
moment
to
discuss
the
funding
strategy,
the
anticipated
financing
needs
would
be
given
projected
Revenue.
We
would
need
139.9
million,
given
projected
Revenue
in
hand
to
for
a
cost
of
9.1
million
dollars
a
year
annually
over
30
years.
There
is
an
existing
projection
for
aims.
AE
Well,
development
revenue
of
three
million
dollars
a
year
and
staff
is
evaluating
other
options
shown
here
to
see
how
they
can
provide
the
additional
6.1
a
million
per
year
in
annual
Debt
Service
staff
will
be
we'll,
be
hiring
a
Financial
Consultant
to
help
advise
on
these
funding
strategies
and
their
implementation.
AE
So
after
receiving
direction
from
Council,
we
would
proceed
to
to
develop
the
conceptual
design
in
more
detail
and
complete
the
secret
clearance
reports
and
process,
develop
detailed
site
and
building
designs
and,
of
course,
architectural
treatment
of
the
structures.
Along
with
the
aforementioned
funding
strategy,
we
would
return
to
council,
hopefully
in
late
spring
of
2023,
to
present
our
the
updated
conceptual
design
and
funding
strategy
to
count
for
council's
consideration.
J
Yes,
so
I'm
interested
in
the
land
underneath
the
Evelyn
on-ramp,
it's
a
pretty
significant
amount
of
land
and
and
I
I
think
that,
right
now
there
there's
parking
along
that.
You
know
it's
a
street
there's
parking,
there's
significant
amount
of
parking
there
I'm
it
wasn't
used
at
all
in
the
the
four
options,
so
I'm
wondering
whether
whether
that
can
be
used
to
provide
some
of
the
space
for
parking
I
think
there
may
be
something
else
going
on.
J
Is
there
are
there
bike
routes
or
something
else
expected
under
that
under
the
Evelyn
on
ramp?
Can
you
explain
that
a
little.
Z
Thank
you
vice
mayor
Don,
Cameron,
Public,
Works
director,
so
the
Evelyn
on
rep
is
part
of
the
Castro
grade
separation
project
and
what
is
also
part
of
that
project
is
to
create
a
multi-use
bike.
Ped
facility
that
would
continue
on
Evelyn
after
the
ramp
starts
up
and
partially
under
the
ramp
to
connect
through
to
where
Evelyn
avenue,
currently
cul-de-sacs
right
under
the
shoreline
over
Crossing,
and
one
of
the
things
that
has
happened
recently
is
working
through
another
development
project
and
their
conditions
of
approval.
A
new
bike.
Z
Ped
path
has
been
constructed
between
Evelyn
avenue
at
the
Terminus
evident
Avenue
on
the
west
side
of
Shoreline
Boulevard
that
connects
through
now
to
Villa.
So
the
grade
set
project
putting
in
this
multi-use
path.
That's
going
to
be
pretty
much
under
that
ramp
that
connects
through
to
the
end
of
Evelyn.
To
that
night.
Z
Nice
new
bike,
ped
path,
southbound
in
connects
to
Villa,
will
help
to
create
a
continuous
East-West
by
or
North
South,
depending
on
how
that
you
like
to
orient
Central
Expressway
continuous
route
now,
as
for
whether
there's
space
left
over
under
the
ramp
to
continue
to
provide
some
parking
is
something
that
we
can
definitely
have.
Z
The
grade
separation
project
look
at
as
part
of
their
final
design,
but
some
of
the
constraints
that
we're
going
to
look
at
is
any
cars
trying
to
access
that
parking
would
likely
have
to
cross
the
bike
ped
path,
and
there
would
not
be
possible
to
provide
Public
Access
easily
to
that
parking
because
you
have
the
ramp
in
the
way,
but
whether
it
could
help
provide
some
additional
parking
relief
for
the
public
safety
buildings
needs
is
something
we
can
explore.
J
Okay,
so
I'm
hearing
that
it's
mostly
being
put
to
good
use
as
a
bike
and
ped
path.
There
may
be
some
spare
spaces,
but
they
may
not
be
very
accessible
or
maybe
only
access
accessible
to
to
the
police,
and
you
don't
have
any
estimate
of
of
how
many.
That
would
rough
estimate
of
how
many
that
might
be.
Z
Not
at
this
time,
but
it
probably
wouldn't
be
that
many
spaces,
because
first
you
have
to
wait
to
a
ramp.
The
ramp
gets
to
a
certain
elevation
before
you
can
start
driving
under
it.
J
M
Yeah
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
how
we
would
fund
the
Gap
I
did
ask
a
question
about
what
the
the
the
tax
would
be
and
the
tax
cap
would
be
so
I'd
like
you
to
share
that.
K
Thank
you,
council
member
show
Walter,
so
we
are
going
to
be
hiring
a
Financial
Consultant
to
help
us
think
about
what
sort
of
strategies
that
the
city
is
going
to
have
to
put
in
place
to
fund
this
Gap.
So
we
do
have
some
money
to
get
us
through
the
next
stage,
the
design
phase,
but
we
will
have
to
consider
a
variety
of
Revenue
options
that
could
include
a
bond
would
likely
include
some
sort
of
Revenue
measure.
M
And
there
also
may
be
some
important
grant
opportunities
with
some
of
the
federal
funding.
That's
come
forward
in
the
last
year.
For
this.
K
M
Well,
I
really
am
I'm
pleased
to
hear
that
we're
going
to
be
hiring
a
financial
analyst
to
help
us
with
this
and
I.
You
know
and
because
I
know
that
there
are
several
subjects
that
we've
thought
about,
including
in
in
the
need
for
more
Revenue
such
as
Parks
acquisition
and
so
I
think.
This
is
a
really
good
idea.
Thanks.
N
Thank
you,
mayor
I
had
a
couple
questions.
When
do
we
anticipate
that
a
Financial
Consultant
would
be
brought
on
board.
K
Thank
you,
councilmember
Lieber,
so,
anticipating
council's
Direction
this
evening,
staff
already
has
been
putting
feelers
out
towards
financial
consultants.
I
know
that
our
assistant
Finance
director
Grace
sang,
has
already
been
in
contact
with
a
few
potential
firms,
so
we
will
be
getting
to
work
on
that
as
soon
as
we
get
council's
direction,
and
we
anticipate
doing
most
of
the
work
on
it,
I
would
say
likely
the
beginning
part
of
2023.
K
I
will
note
that
any
any
strategist
or
any
Financial
Consultant
will
will
tell
us
that
we'll
need
to
likely
engage
a
strategy
firm
and
polling
firm
to
really
figure
out
what
our
next
steps
would
be.
Should
this
have
to
go
to
the
voters.
N
Okay,
so
tonight's
decision
would
then
roll
into
design
and
finishes
Etc
and
then
the
where
would
we
get
the
money
would
follow
that.
K
So
what
staff
is
anticipating
is
bringing
back
both
the
design
and
the
potential
funding
strategy
for
Council
to
consider
at
the
same
time,
in
2023
and
I
would
ask
our
Public
Works
director
to
confirm
what
the
timing
was
I
believe
it
it
was
quarter
two
or
three
but
Don.
Would
you
confirm
what
we
were
thinking?
The
timing
would
be
next
year.
Z
I
we're
thinking
Quarter
Two
of
2023
and
again,
besides
more
information
on
financing
strategy
opportunities,
it
would
be
what
we
would
call
the
conceptual
design
which
is
to
start
at
looking
at
you
know.
The
building
architectural
features
massing
those
types
of
details
and
then,
as
Council,
continues
to
consider
funding
strategies
and
moving
forward
with
how
to
obtain
additional
funding.
N
Okay
and
I
I
read
in
the
staff
report
that
the
current
building
was
obviously
built
before
1986
before
the
the
current
round
of
earthquake
standards
came
into
effect
and
so
have
we
had
a
structural
engineer.
Look
at
the
current
building
to
see
if
there
are
deficiencies.
AE
I'll
take
that
question:
David
printy.
Yes,
thank
you
councilmember
as
part
of-
and
this
goes
back
to
the
previous
Council
action
when
we
were
evaluating
potential
options
for
re-renovating
and,
and
you
know,
remodeling
the
existing
site
and
the
requirements
to
bring
it
up
to
code.
Current
code
were
extensive
and
it
would
require
a
lot
of
you
know,
destructive
work
and,
and
we
had
to
decide,
would
have
to
be
vacated
so
I
guess.
AE
The
way
to
put
it
is
the
current
building
does
not
meet
current
code
and
is
not
up
to
the
essential
facilities
standards
at
all
buildings
built
after
that,
Act
was
passed,
and
so
they
they
do
not
have
the
survivability
level
that
modern
buildings
have.
AE
N
Yeah
I
I
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
an
architect
who
happens
to
be
a
family
member
today
about
this.
This
question
and
asked
about
does
being
built
before
1986
mean
that
a
building
is
not
sound
and,
and
my
concern
is
that
no
matter
which
way
we
go
we're
going
to
be
living
with
the
current
building
for
several
years.
So
so
my
question
is:
have
we
had
a
structural
engineer?
Look
at
it.
AE
I'm,
sorry,
the
answer
is
yes:
we
have
had
an
evaluation
of
the
building
several
evaluations
over
the
years
to
to
advise
staff
on
the
if
it
can
be
retrofitted
or
or
what
the
cost
would
be
to
to
do
so.
Does
it
answer
your
question
so.
Z
If,
if
I
could
just
add
on,
if
you
don't
mind,
part
of
what
is
is
David
was
saying
is
that
while
we
don't
consider
the
building
to
be
unsafe
and
it
you
know
a
seismic
event,
it
might
be
fine.
It
may
have
operational
issues
after
the
seismic
event
and,
what's
critical
here
is
that
essential
public
facilities
such
as
this,
which
is
also
Emergency
Operations
Center,
has
higher
seismic
standards
expectations
than
your
typical
building,
because
it's
absolutely
critical
that
you
want
it
to
be
able
to
maintain
full
operations.
Should
there
be
a
significant
seismic
event.
Z
So,
while
the
structural
analysis
May
indicate
there's
no
immediate
threat,
it
does
not
meet
current
standards
and
it's
not
as
as
David
was
mentioning
to
bring
it
up
to.
What
you
would
want
for
an
essential
public
facility
would
be
very
costly
to
the
point
where
you
know
you
may
be
better
off.
You
know,
that's
the
analysis.
We
did.
It
you'd,
be
better
off
investing
in
a
new
building
so
and
it's
also
very
old
building
and
presents
a
lot
of
Maintenance
headaches.
I'll.
N
Add
on
no
doubt
No
Doubt,
and
so
that's
my
concern
is
that
no
matter
which
direction
we
we
go
in?
We
will
have
several
years
of
lag
time
and
so
I'd
like
I'd,
like
counsel
to
to
know
completely
about
what
was
found,
not
in
terms
of
is
it
price
worthy
to
make
Renovations,
but
but
what
exactly
is
the
status
of
the
the
building?
N
N
I
I
wanted
to
know
if,
if
we're
looking
at
General
obligation
bonds,
how
does
this
relate
to
our
overall
bonding
capacity
and
what
would
be
the
anticipated
hit
for
our
our
residents
in
Mountain
View
to
pay
annually?
Now
that
we
all
heard
recently
or
maybe
I
just
heard
recently
from
a
number
of
residents
that
saw
the
the
water
rate
increase
and
we're
we're
having
a
hard
time
really
taking
that
on
board?
N
And
so
I
wonder
what
would
be
the
the
situation
for
them
that
you
know
households
would
be
paying
on
an
annual
basis.
K
Council,
member
Lieber,
we
don't
have
that
information
yet
so
this
is
something
that
a
Financial
Consultant
would
help
us
determine,
and
it
really
would
depend
on
what
vehicle
we
would
use
to
pursue
funding
for
the
bond.
So
it
really
depends
on
what
it
is.
If
it's
a
property
transfer.
G
K
P
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I'm
excited
to
see
this
moving
along.
I
haven't
been
a
long
time
coming,
but
my
question
has
to
do,
and
also
with
the
funding
mechanisms.
P
I
know
I
that
that's
another
conversation
to
be
had
down
the
road,
but
just
wanted
to
ask
like
I,
see
on
the
list
of
possibilities
or
I,
don't
see
on
the
list
of
possibilities
or
options
the
use
of
property,
and
is
that
a
possibility
just
similar
to
the
I
forget,
which
I
have
four
the
one
that
the
hotel
is
being
built
on?
Are
we
still
able
to
do
projects
like
that
or
that
would
bring
in
Revenue
by
use
of
our
properties
that
we
hold.
K
I
would
note
that,
for
the
lots
that
you
just
mentioned,
that
project
is
still
in
I
would
say
limbo
and
we
do
not
yet
know
the
status
of
that
and
I
would
ask
our
Public
Works
director
to
comment
further
if
she
has
any
other
information,
but
that
that
project
was
certainly
anticipated
to
help
offset
any
sort
of
expenses
we
might
have,
which
definitely
could
have
been
used
for
this
project
or
still
could
be
used
for
this
project
if
that
moves
forward.
Z
I
do
not
have
any
updated
info
to
share
related
to
that
project.
I
will
note
that,
of
course,
all
now
City
owned
property
is
subject
to
the
State
Surplus
lands
act
and
any
desire
to
use
our
land
to
for
Revenue
generation
would
have
to
first
follow
that
process
and
make
the
initially
the
offer
of
the
land
available
for
housing
Developers
non-profits,
but
at
the
same
time
the
city
can
say
that
we
do
expect
market
rate
lease
rates
which
can
help
generate
even
with
Surplus
Land
Act.
So
there
are
still
possibilities
there.
P
Great,
thank
you
again
and
I
wasn't
specifically
well.
I
would
include
that
was
a
lot
for
the
hotel
a
lot,
but
we
either
have
other
lots
too,
and
you
know
I
think
in
the
past
we
have
been
successful
at
using
city-owned
land
for
Revenue
generation,
and
you
know
I
think
that's
really
important
to
continue
to
look
at
explore
to
do
as
much
as
you
know,
I
appreciate
and
we've
done
a
lot
in
affordable
housing
that
affordable
housing
doesn't
actually
produce
revenue
and
I.
P
Believe
we
lose
property
tax
on
that
those
parcels,
and
when
we
have
something
like
this
project
that
you
know,
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
fund
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
everything
and
put
everything
on
the
table.
So
that
was
my
question
and
sorry
if
I
went
into
commentary
but
could
I
could
and
then
I
know.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
tangent,
but
I
have
been
wondering
what's
going
on
with
the
hotel.
P
So
could
we
get
a
memo
on
that
I'm,
not
sure
if
they're
We
There
were
there
were
deadlines
and
whatnot,
and
if
the
developers
Meeting
those
and
and
if
they're
not
you
know,
my
question
is
what
what
what
rights
do?
We
have
to
potentially
look
at
other
opportunities
there.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
My
smart
Hicks.
J
Okay,
so
that
that
the
previous
two
comments
lead
me
to
have
a
question
that
I
was
going
to
make
as
a
comment.
But
now
it's
a
question.
I
I
share
the
concerns
that
council
members
has
brought
up
the
last
two
I
think
about
what
the
the
revenue
might
be
and
exploring
different
ways
to
to
make
this
feasible
and
I'm
wondering
you
know,
in
particular,
with
all
the
things
that
our
community
members
want,
for
instance,
a
bond
for
parks,
and
you
know
all
sorts
of
other
needs.
J
You
know
I
want
to
make
this
something
that
people
would
in
residents
would
Embrace
I,
don't
want
to
float
a
bond
that
they
turned
down
responsible.
So
I'm
I'm,
even
wondering
about
the
plot
of
land
that,
where
the
excess
land
that
we're
looking
at
here,
whether
instead
on
this
site,
whether
instead
of
affordable
housing,
we
could
we
could
do
some
other
kind
of
housing.
Senior
housing
to
me
comes
to
mind,
because
this
is
an
area
area
where
that
might
be.
J
You
know
seniors
when
they
downsize
like
to
walk
around
downtowns
and
that
would
often
they
free
up
single
family
homes
for
people
who
want
who
want
to
raise
a
family
in
single-family
homes.
So,
although
it's
not
a
fort,
wouldn't
be
affordable,
housing
and
maybe
could
bring
in
Revenue,
it
would
provide
a
service
to
the
city.
I'm
wondering
whether
something
like
that
is
is
feasible.
Given
the
Surplus
Land
Act,
you
know,
could
we
target
it
for
something
like
that?
Z
Thank
you
for
the
question.
Vice
mayor
Hicks
and
as
I
recall
with
the
Surplus
lands
act,
their
prayer,
one
of
their
key
priorities,
is
housing.
Senior
housing
would
qualify
as
housing
as
well.
I
know
they're
very
interested
in
affordability,
but
but
yes,
a
senior
housing
project
could
go
on
there
and-
and
we,
you
know,
probably-
could
work
with
the
Surplus
lands
act
through
that
process,
but
I
guess
what
I
want
to
say?
Is
it
really?
Z
Z
So
it'll,
be
you
know,
two
or
three
years
four
years,
maybe
once
we're
under
construction.
Assuming
we
get
the
funding
you
know,
Council
will
be
asked
to
start
making
those
decisions
about
what
they
would
like
to
do
with
the
land,
and
then
we
would
follow
the
Surplus
lands
act
process,
especially
if
it's
a
housing
project
how
we
can
work
with
that.
J
Z
I
would
assume
so
we
could.
You
know,
I'm
not
involved
in
overall
scope
of
work
for
that
one.
So
I
want
to
be
careful
of
not
speaking
for
for
Grace
but
Grace.
Would
we
include
in
the
scope
of
work
looking
at
income
possibility.
AF
Sorry
this
is
Grayson
assistant,
Finance
admission
service
director.
Thank
you
vashmir
for
the
question.
AF
AF
A
M
Yeah
I'm
happy
to
move
the
staff
recommendation
for
option
two
one.
There
were
two
things
about
it
that
really
moved
me.
One
was
the
reduced
complexity
with
existing
utilities,
that's
very
important
and
then
the
other
one
was
just
the
reduced
time
of
disruption
that
translates
into
reduced
money.
M
I
think
that
it
can't
be
stressed
enough
how
really
important
it
is
to
have
our
Emergency
Services
facilities
up
and
running,
and
so
you
know
I
know
we
will
have
a
temporary
site,
but
but
the
you
know
the
the
faster
we
can
get
our
safety
Services
into
their
the
upgraded
facilities,
the
best
the
better.
So
thank
you.
It's
mine
do
I,
have
to
read
anything.
A
P
Thank
you,
mayor
I'll,
go
ahead
and
second
the
motion,
and
also
just
add
that
I,
it's
I,
said
before
I'm
excited
to
see
this
moving
forward.
I
think
it's
important
to
continue
to
move
the
project
forward.
I
think
you've
heard
me
say
this
before
we've
looked
at
this
several
times
and
I.
Think
back
in
the
2010
2012
era,
maybe
2014
I
remember
cost
estimates
in
the
60
million
dollar
range,
and
you
know
it's
just
like
this
I
see
a
lot
of
Transportation
projects
right
now
and
the
longer
we
wait.
P
I
know,
I
I
hope
that
we
can
find
other,
maybe
even
other
pots
of
money
to
add
to
the
funds
so
that
we
can
reduce
the
need
for
whether
it's
cop
or
Debt,
Service
or
whatnot
just
try
to
reduce
that
as
much
as
we
can
to
make
it
palatable
for
the
community.
I
will
say
that
way
back
when
we
did
go
out.
P
Did
a
poll
and
I
think
it
was
for
a
bond
measure
for
this
building,
as
well
as
the
community
center
upgrade,
and
it
just
didn't
wasn't
that
exciting,
because
there
wasn't
much
interest
so
I
do
worry
about
that
and
I
think
we
may
have
to
find
other
ways
to
fund
this.
P
So
I
look
forward
to
the
consultant
in
in
their
recommendations,
but
at
whatever
we
can
do
and
that's
why
I
go
back
to
the
use
of
our
real
property,
because
that
has
been
successful
for
us
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
you
know
balance
out
those
uses,
and
one
so
is
you
know
very
important
to
me,
especially
to
keep
our
financial
stability
is
to
bring
in
the
revenue
and
so
I
hope
that
we
do
think
through
that
very
carefully.
Thank
you.
L
L
L
I
assume
that
this
is
included
in
something
we
would
look
at
in
terms
of
additional
sources
of
revenue,
but
we
talked
about
it
before
an
increase
in
the
tot
council
member
Abe
Koga
has
brought
that
up
a
number
of
times
and
we
pushed
that
out
so
that
we
could
refinance
our
Shoreline
bonds,
but
it
seems
like
that
should
be
on
the
list
of
things
to
look
at
and
while
I
know
a
couple
of
council
members
are
interested
in
housing
on
the
remnant
site,
I'm,
actually
more
interested
in
a
city,
use
I,
think
we
are
going
to
need
more
space
for
city
employees
and
I.
L
Don't
know
if
it's
Public
Safety,
it
might
be
some
other
department,
and
this
to
me
seems
like
a
good
place
to
put
that,
whether
it
be
another
building
or
an
extension
of
well
be
kind
of
hard
to
extend
this.
But
you
know
I
think
we
need
to
really
think
about
how
we
use
this
I
am
concerned
that
we
are
going
to
run
out
of
space
for
city
employees
and,
from
my
perspective
this
looks
like
a
good
spot.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
my
highest
priorities
are
to
keep
our
continuity
of
services.
This
is
something
that
we
we
cannot
fail
at
and,
second
to
do
everything
in
our
power
to
direct
the
cost
away
from
our
residents.
N
N
So
I
I'd
like
to
encourage
us
to
get
information
about
the
financing
as
early
as
possible
and
take
it
to
our
finance
committee
to
Daylight
it,
at
least
at
a
broad
conceptual
level,
so
that
we
give
the
public
every
opportunity
to
understand
what
it
is
that
we're
trying
to
do,
and
I
I
really
like
to
see
us
be
creative
in
in
how
we
allocate
the
costs
and
not
just
put
it
all
onto
our
our
immediate
residence
I
think
it
has
to
be.
N
We
have
to
get
a
little
bit
creative
and
and
spread
it
wider
than
that,
and
that's
what
I'll
be
looking
for
in
terms
of
the
financing
plan,
foreign.
J
So
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion,
but
I
just
want
to
add
that
I
have
the
concerns
that
previous
council
members
have
raised
about
how
we
fund
the
project-
and
you
know
I-
want
to
look
at
other
sources
of
revenue,
use
of
land
and
other
sources
as
well.
I,
don't
want,
certainly
not
sales
tax,
that's
a
regressive
tax
and
I.
Don't
want
you
know:
I,
don't
want
a
huge,
Bond
and
I.
J
You
know
I'm,
not
sure
that
residents
would
support
it
anyway,
so
I
I
do
want
to
emphasize
other
sources
of
revenue.
I
also
want
to
say
that,
with
with
the
option
that
we're
looking
at
with
all.
J
Us
to
remember
that
Villa
Villa
Street
is
one
of
the
oldest
streets
in
in
Mountain,
View
and
I
want
to
keep
it
walkable
we've
had
a
you
know.
There
was
like
a
very
large
setback
to
the
current
building
and
I.
Don't
think
we
need
all
of
that,
but
but
I
I
would
prefer
that
it
not
be.
You
know
a
massive
building
next
to
a
skinny
sidewalk
I
would
like
it
to
be
that
to
be
a
nice
Street
to
walk
down
both.
You
know
both
as
the
front
facade
for
the
police
building.
J
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Any
remaining
questions
or
comments.
I
have
a
quick
question
for
staff.
I
have
a
vague
recollection
when
we
were
first
starting
the
discussion
about
a
tot
increase
that
I
think
staff
had
or
Kimber
I
think
you
and
I
had
talked
about
at
least
a
subcommittee.
That
would
I
think
provide
some
initial
Direction
about
placing
the
measure
on
the
ballot
I'm.
Guessing
that
something
substantially
similar
would
be
done
for
a
revenue
generating
measure
for
this,
for
the
public
safety
building
as
well.
Is
that
right?
Yes,.
K
Thank
you,
mayor
I
was
just
thinking
that
that
typically,
what
happens
when
we
or
any
a
city
would
be
going
out
for
any
sort
of
bond
or
Revenue
measures.
You
would
have
a
committee
made
up
of
council
members
who
would
talk
to
staff
and
discuss
this
with
staff,
so
whether
you
have
a
subset
of
the
finance
committee
or
you
have
another
ad
hoc
committee-
that's
definitely
something
that
staff
would
likely
recommend.
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
everyone
for
your
work
on
the
side
and
then
the
presentation
we
will
now
move
on
to
Council
staff
committee
reports.
P
P
There
I
also
attended
that
day,
the
opening
of
Caltrain's
electric
trains,
so
the
first
trains,
electric
trains
have
arrived
they're
still
in
demo
mode,
but
I
was
able
to
go
up
to
the
Caltrain
station
in
San
Francisco
and
see
them
and
they're
very
sleek
and
looking
forward
to
them
coming
online,
probably
around
2024
when,
hopefully
the
electrification
project
is
complete
and
ready
for
operation
and
then
from
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy.
P
Actually,
there's
extensive
report
that
I'm
happy
to
assign
to
my
colleagues,
but
just
a
couple
of
items
to
note
of
October
5th
is
Clean,
Air,
Day
and
and
there's
a
number
of
activities
being
planned
and
I
know.
Our
staff
is
aware
and
I
think
involved
in
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
about.
Maybe
some
plans
that
we
are
we
might
have
in
our
city.
P
I
just
wanted
to
remind
folks
of
that
and
then,
as
you
know,
the
reach
codes
I
think
that's
on
our
October
one
of
our
October
November
agendas
that
we
are
moving
forward
and
more
cities
are
taking,
are
taking
the
opportunity
or
moving
forward
with
stronger
reach
codes
for
building
electrification,
and
there
was
one
more
item
that
I
thought
we
had
for
participation,
but
I
don't
see
it
so
I
will
I
guess
if
I
see
it
I'll
send
it
out
to
everyone.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
so
I
attended
a
Bosca,
Bay,
Area,
Water,
Supply
and
conservation
agency
board
meeting
on
September
15th
and,
as
a
reminder,
Mountain
View
gets.
The
vast
majority
of
our
water
from
the
San
Francisco
puc
in
Bosca
is
all
of
the
jurisdictions
and
other
customers
of
the
San
Francisco
puc,
and
the
puc
reported
that
their
total
system
storage
is
at
67
percent
of
maximum
capacity.
Right
now
and
usually
at
this
time
of
year,
it
is
at
83
percent,
and
so
it's
quite
a
bit
down
the
other
item.
L
L
You
know
we
covered
so
many
things,
but
I'm
just
going
to
focus
on
that
one,
because
for
me
that
was
really
exciting
to
see
and
what
we
took
a
look
at
is
what
the
area
might
physically
look
like
what
activities
could
be
included?
What
would
be
the
role
of
the
City
versus
the
role
of
the
businesses
and
what
the
community
input
was
on?
L
T
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
other
reports,
council,
member
Showalter.
M
I
wanted
to
report
on
on
the
council
neighborhoods
committee
meeting
that
we
had.
We
had
our
buy
yearly
meeting
with
the
San
Antonio
Del
Medio
and
ring
store
neighborhood,
which
is
you
know,
sort
of
the
the
Palo
Alto
border
of
of
our
our
city,
and
we
have
a
pretty
good
attendance.
I
I
think
there
were
about
30
or
40
people
that
came
on
and
off
at
different
times
and
lots
of
Staff
members.
That
I
was
particularly
interested
in
the
range
of
questions
at
this
meeting.
M
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
been
to
one
of
these
meetings
before
where
so
many
transportation
and
circulation
questions
were
asked
there
were,
there
were
really
like.
Oh
maybe
30
of
them
asked
out
of
about
50
questions,
so
that
was
you
know,
a
preponderance
of
them.
I
always
keep
a
little
tap
of
who
which
staff
member
answers
the
most
questions
and
our
our
Public
Works
director
Don
Won.
This
time
just
barely
beat
out
Rebecca
Shapiro,
but
anyway,
I
I
really
think
that
these
are
you
know.
M
These
are
meetings
that
we
should
be
proud
of
because
they
they
really
allow
our
residents
to
to
interact
directly
with
staff
that
work
on
issues
in
their
neighborhoods
and
answer
their
questions
right.
You
know
right
away
or
or
get
back
to
them
if
they
need
to
they're.
You
know
they're
really
successful
so
so
that
was
a
great
meeting.
M
I
also
had
a
great
time
at
the
pyramid.
Park
opening
I've
got
my
scarf
on
today
and
I
went
to
the
lmv
fundraiser.
That's
not
really
a
a
city,
a
a
city
program
formally,
but
many
of
us
have
taken
it
and
I
think
that
the
leadership
Mountain
View
program
really
does
a
good
job,
really
a
great
job
of
producing
individuals
who
are
interested
in
serving
on
the
various
committees
and
and
Boards.
We
have
and-
and
they
add
a
lot
to
the
community,
so
it's
fun
to
go
to
that.
M
In
addition
to
that,
on
a
more
serious
note,
I
want
to
go
back
to
to
public
comment
this
evening,
and
that
is
a
desire
for
more
safe
parking.
We're
about
to
you
know:
we've
come
to
the
point
where
we're
going
to
be
implementing
the
a
narrow
Street
span
in
just
a
few
days,
and
so
there
is
a
as
we
anticipated
a
great
deal
of
concern
about
where
some
of
those
individuals
will
go
over
the
last
couple
of
years.
M
We've
we've
put
in
place
just
a
a
very
successful
safe
parking
program
was
I.
Think
it's
one
of
the
kind
of
Silver
Linings
of
covid
in
our
community,
along
with
The,
Pedestrian,
Mall
and
so
I.
I
would
really
like
to
urge
I
know
that
staff
is
working
on
safe
parking,
but
I
think
it's
important
for
Council
to
to
discuss
this
in
public
that
you
know
that
we
care
about
this
and
and
support
it.
M
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
shelter,
maybe
a
quick
check
in
with
staff
about
existing
workload
and
of
how
this
might
best
be
accomplished.
K
Thank
you,
mayor
and
council
member
show
Walter,
so
staff
has
been
actively
working
with
Partners
to
see
where
we
can
increase
spaces
at
our
current
safe
parking
site.
So,
as
the
council
member
mentioned,
we
did
create
our
pilot
safe
parking
program
during
covid,
and
we
are
currently
the
largest
safe
parking
program
in
the
county
and
at
one
point
we
were
the
largest
safe
parking
program
in
the
entire
Bay
Area.
K
That
was
even
in
relation
to
Oakland
and
San
Francisco.
We
had
more
spaces
than
than
their
cities
and
also
San
Jose.
So
there
are
101
spaces
right
now
across
four
Lots.
K
Although
three
are
the
larger
lots
and
so
staff
has
been
actively
talking
to
Live
Nation
about
seeing
what
we
can
do
to
increase
spaces
at
the
shoreline
lot
in
particular,
so
I
anticipate
that
I
should
have
news
for
Council
and
the
community
at
some
point
soon,
because
staff
like
like
image
and
staff,
have
been
working
on
that
to
the
larger
question
about
the
expansion
of
the
safe
parking
program.
K
I
would
recommend
that
should
Council
have
an
interest,
because
what
I'm
hearing
is
essentially
taking
it
from
a
pilot
program
to
a
more
permanent
program
and
exploring
other
potential
sites.
I
do
recommend
that
this
be
part
of
your
work
plan,
because
this
would
involve
ongoing
funding
which,
right
now
we
don't
have
ongoing
funding.
K
We
we
fund
with
one-time
funds,
and
it
would
allow
you
all
more
time
to
discuss
this
and
then,
as
far
as
staff
workload,
we
certainly
don't
necessarily
have
the
capacity
right
now
to
basically
drop
the
other
projects
that
we're
working
on
and
solely
look
at
just
new
sites.
But
we
can
do
it
in
conjunction
with
the
current
work
underway,
such
as
add
in
the
spaces
that
I
mentioned,
but
I
would
suggest
that
this
is
something
that
you
all
discuss
and
certainly
add
to
the
work
plan.
K
P
Thank
you,
mayor
I,
tell
I
support
the
city,
manager's
proposal,
I,
don't
think
we
could
be.
We
can
really
discuss
this
without
looking
at
our
overall
strategic
plan
and
all
of
our
other
priorities,
and
you
know
I'll
be
on
I'm
I've
said
this
I
continue
to
say
this
I
am
concerned
about
a
recession
coming,
so
we
need
to
look
at
this
in
in
the
overall
context
of
our
fine
finances
and
budget
as
well.
P
It
was
a
pilot
project,
but
to
make
it
a
permanent
one
is
gonna
require
continuous
funding
and
I'm,
just
not
certain.
We
have
another
half
a
million
dollars
or
a
million
dollars
to
do
this
right
now
so
I'd
like
to
see
the
financial
picture
before
we
make
any
decisions,
I
also
say
I'm
actually
meeting
with
a
group
this
later
this
week.
That
has
a
proposal
to
create
a
safe
parking
program
at
the
county,
fairgrounds,
which
I
think
I'm
very
interested
in
hearing
about
in
light
of
homelessness.
P
P
I
know,
Palo
Alto
has
been
working
on
it
with
their
churches.
You
know,
I
would
like
to
see
how
we
can
work
with
other
cities,
the
county
as
a
whole,
to
come
up
with
other
options.
I.
You
know,
I
appreciate
I'm,
proud
of
what
Mountain
View
has
done,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
continue
to
shoulder
this
responsibility
on
our
own
thanks.
A
Thank
you,
a
quick
question
for
a
city
manager
within
the
scope
of
work.
Ongoing
we've
had
a
successful
partnership
with
Alta
on
Terra
Bella
for
the
use
of
one
of
their
sites
for
safe
parking
have
have
we
engaged
in
similar
discussions.
We've
got
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
at
the
pipeline.
A
K
Thank
you
for
the
question
mayor,
so
I
need
to
ask
staff
specifically,
who
recently
frankly,
they
they
have
talked
to.
I
know
that
over
the
years
there
have
been
a
number
of
discussions
with
various
providers,
various
landowners,
various
Partners
on
property
in
town
and
what
may
or
may
not
be
feasible.
Now
that
we
have
a
lot
of
various
projects
in
the
pipeline,
for
example
our
our
Evelyn
lot,
and
we
know
that
there'll
be
Charities
housing
development
beside
it,
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
possibilities
in
the
future.
K
So
again,
I
think
this
is
certainly
something
that
staff
can
explore
further
once
it's
a
fully
baked
item,
I
think
that
we
could
bring
to
council
I'll
also
note
that
just
a
reminder
that
we
are
also
going
to
be
bringing
forward
the
homelessness
response
strategy
to
Council
next
year.
So
that's
going
to
be
a
very
comprehensive
plan
where
we're
going
to
talk
about
what
the
city's
efforts
are
in
relation
to
how
we're
responding
to
to
Residents
who
are
homeless
and
all
of
the
programs
that
we
have
in
the
city
and
what's
happening
with
those.
K
J
J
You
know,
there's
going
to
be
some
immediate
rearrangement
of
of
housing
coming
up
and
that
there
might
be
ways
to
ways
to
to
ease
that
and
that
that
is
something
that
Council
should
should
probably
talk
about,
which
I
would
support
and
I
think
that
over
the
long
term,
I
mean
I,
definitely
I
agree.
This
is
a
regional
problem.
I
was
happy
to
see
that
I
think
this
it's
this
Friday
Palo
Alto
is
having
an
open
house
for
their
safe
parking
program.
I've
also
heard
about
the
county.
J
You
know
a
County
possibilities
and
you
know
I
support
all
that
at
the
same
time,
I
think
that
there
are
are
I'm,
hoping
that,
over
the
long
term,
with
our
affordability,
our
affordable
housing
strategy
and
homeless
strategy,
that
we
won't
need
to
have
safe
lots
over
the
long
term.
But
I
thought
what
council
member
Showalter
was
talking
more
about
was
the
short
term
or
maybe
short
and
medium
term,
and
we,
you
know,
the
Alta
housing
will
be
developed
and
we'll
lose.
J
Those
lots,
so
I
think
that
they
I
I
actually
would
like
to
know
as
soon
as
possible.
I
would
be
supportive
of
knowing
where
there
might
be
other
places
where
we
could.
You
know,
as
the
the
safe
parking
lot
spots
move
around
other
places
where
those
could
be,
including
even
the
even
the
site
that
we
that
we
bought
for
life
moves
parking
cars
which
I
believe
is
not
full.
J
It
seems
like
there
may
be,
you
know
short
and
medium
term
potential
spaces
and
I
may
have
misinterpreted
council
member
show
Walter,
but
I
thought
that's
what
she
was
talking
about.
Thank
you.
M
Yes,
it
had
not
occurred
to
me
that
this
was
the
time
to
ask
for
this
to
go
from
a
pilot
project
to
permanent,
frankly,
I
I
hadn't
thought
of
that
I
was
thinking
of
what
vice
mayor
Hicks
had
in
mind,
which
was
doing
the
best
we
can
to
help
people
move
around
and
get
to
the
safe
parking
when
I
speak
to
my
neighbors
and
and
people
in
the
community,
I
I
I
find
that
there's
a
great
deal
of
support
for
people
living
in
safe
parking
not
forever,
but
and
that
that
is
much
people
are
much
more
supportive
of
that
than
of
than
living
on
the
streets.
M
That
is
exceedingly
controversial,
but
I
I
am
hearing
a
great
deal
of
support
for
our
safe
parking
program.
So
that's
what
I'm
talking
about
is
is
those
individuals
that
we're
hearing
are
having
trouble.
You
know
anything
we
can
do
to
help
them
get
a
space
in
this
state
parking
or
increase
our
existing
capacity
a
little
bit
so
there's
room
for
them.
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
right
now.
A
Thank
you,
I'll
give
the
City
attorney
a
a
turn
and
then
we'll
go
to
council
member
command.
AG
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
quick
reminder
that
you
know
we'd
be
careful.
It's
fine
to
request
that
staff
prepare
report.
You
know
providing
an
update
on
safe
parking,
but
we're
we're
kind
of
getting
outside
and
there's
a
pretty
lengthy
discussion
going
on
with
regard
to
it.
So
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
that
we
should
probably
wrap
up
pretty
soon
on
this.
Q
To
yeah
I,
just
that
that
was
kind
of
gonna,
be
my
my
point
of
clarification.
Mayor
I
was
just
wondering
I'm
in
support
of
the
of
the
memo
and
the
direction
that
we're
going
in
and
I
think
the
city
manager
provided
some
information
as
well.
So
I
just
didn't
know
sounds
like
do.
We
need
a
straw
motion
for
this.
It
sounds
like
we'll
be
getting
the
information.
I
just
was
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
to
move
forward.
Thank
you,
I.
A
M
No
I
am
basically
comfortable
with
the
city,
manager's
approach
and
I
I
do
also,
you
know,
want
to
thank
the
city
manager
and
the
staff
for
continuing
to
work
on
this.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
everyone's
attention.
As
we
Face
the
beginning
of
the
implementation
period.
A
A
Okay,
perfect,
then
I
don't
believe
there
is
a
need
for
a
straw
motion.
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
reports
questions?
If
not,
then
we'll
proceed
to
item
nine
closed
session
report,
City
attorney
log.
Do
you
have
a
closed
session
report.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
joining
us,
the
next
city
council
meeting,
will
be
held
on
October,
11
2022
until
then
stay
healthy.
The
meeting
is
adjourned
at
907
pm.
Thank
you.
Everyone.