►
From YouTube: 1-13-2020: Rental Housing Committee Meeting
Description
Council Chambers, 500 Castro St., Mountain View, CA 94041
7:00 p.m. Monday, January 13, 2020
A
So
unsurprising,
the
NC
to
a
football
national
championship;
yes,
probably
a
bigger
draw
than
the
RHC
the
RC
meeting
tonight,
but
still
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
today's
meeting
of
the
Mountain
View
Rental
Housing
Committee
on
January
13
2019,
we'll
start
with
roll
call
committee.
Members
Susan
almond
here.
C
A
Pardo
does
Ella
president,
and
vice
chair,
emily
ramos
and
Vanessa
honey.
Do
two
relocation
of
her
primary
residence
has
been
for
now
been
deemed
ineligible
to
participate
in
the
rental
housing
committee
due
to
the
language
in
the
CSF
array.
I
would
just
like
to
thank
her
for
her
years
of
volunteering
for
this
committee
and
as
our
inaugural
chair,
you
know,
setting
a
precedent
for
balanced
debate
and
yeah
again,
just
just
thankful
and
wanted
to
communicate
our
thanks
to
her
in
her
stead.
A
A
A
A
Right,
all
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
I
great
now
we
move
on
to
or
welcome
patience
from
the
public.
This
portion
on
the
beating
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
Committee
on
any
matter,
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
the
topic
for
one
three-minute
period
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
committee
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
anyone
like
to
address
the
committee
at
this
time
seeing
one
you
have
the
floor?
Please
state
your
name.
D
There
we
go
okay,
Steven,
Goldstein,
I
haven't
been
around
for
a
long
time,
because
I've
been
forced
to
do
some
work
off-site
for
a
long
time,
but
I'm
back,
and
the
reason
why
I'm
here
is
because
I
discovered
something
very
weird
about
a
petition
process.
That
seems
to
have
gone
askew.
And
that
was
that
at
one
point
in
time,
a
landlord
that
my
landlord
petitioned
for
a
rent
increase.
D
But
when,
when
he
declared
that
he
was
in
compliance
with
the
C
sfra,
he
may
have
committed
fraud
because
he
was
charging
me
late
fees
and
under
the
C
sfra.
There
are
no
fees
effect
allowed,
except
for
their
lawful
rent.
And
what
happened
is
that
the
hearing
officer
did
not
validate
to
make
sure
that
he
was
actually
in
compliance
with
the
C
sfra,
which
means
that
the
decisions
that
was
made
in
effect
has
to
be
reversed.
D
Because
in
order
for
a
petition
to
be
even
considered,
you
have
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
C
sfra
and
it
clearly
states
that
there
are
no
fees
allowed
other
than
the
lawful
rent.
If
you
look
at
the
letter
of
the
of
the
Charter
and
so
I
was
completely
surprised
to
basically
discover
that
this
is
actually
had
happened,
and
it
was
not
uncovered
by
the
hearing
officer
or
at
least
investigated
prior
to
the
actual
hearing.
D
None
and
I
know
my
landlord
was
at
those
meetings
because
I
actually
witnessed
it
so
I
to
me.
It
really
shows
that
this
particular
person
literally
made
a
false
claim
in
a
legal
document
to
the
city
that
is,
fraud
and
I'm
surprised
that
this
has
not
been
even
discussed.
Yet.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
discuss.
Thank
you.
A
A
E
By
way
background,
we
just
have
a
little
timeline
for
you
of
when
the
CSF
RA
became
effective
in
November
of
2018,
the
council
accepted
a
an
initiative
petition
to
amend
the
CSF
RA
that
will
be
on
the
November
3rd
2020
ballot
November
in
2019.
The
City
Council
also
adopted
their
proposed
amendments
to
the
CSF
RA
and
voted
to
submit
those
to
the
voters
on
the
March
3rd
2020
ballot.
So
we
wanted
to
go
over
for
you
what
those
proposed
amendments
are.
E
So
there
are
basically
four
main
categories
of
changes,
and
then
there
are
some
sort
of
cleanup
changes.
The
first
one
is
the
relationship
between
the
RHC
in
the
city
and
the
City
Council,
so
the
this
is
sort
of
clarifying
language
has
been
put
into
the
C
sfra
I
think
in
Section
1709
to
allow
the
council
to
remove
rhc
members.
Currently,
the
CS
f
ra
says
that
the
council
appoints
them,
but
it
does
not
state
anything
about
removal,
so
just
clarify
that,
as
with
other
City
Commission's,
the
council
can
remove
or
its
team
members.
E
It
also
would
allow
the
council
to
delegate
some
tasks
to
the
rhc.
There
is
language
to
make
it
clear
that
those
tasks
have
to
come
with
some
financing
Authority,
since
the
only
financing
Authority
the
rhc
has
is
the
fees
collected
from
covered
units,
so
this
is
primarily
thought
to
address
if
the
council
adopts
mobile
home
run
control,
but
it
could
cover
other
things.
E
There
was
also
an
amendment
that
would
allow
the
council
to
appoint
non-residents
to
serve
on
the
RHC.
If
they
don't
get
enough
qualified
applicants
for
vacancies,
the
non-residents
that
could
be
appointed
have
to
either
own
property
in
Mountain
View
or
manage
real
property
in
Mountain
View
covered
units
in
Mountain
View.
So
that's
it
and
then
there's
language
that
prohibits
the
RHC
from
compensating
themselves
which
you
never
have,
but
just
to
clarify
shocking.
E
E
E
The
amendments
do
specify
some
of
the
categories
for
the
capital
improvements,
so
capital
improvements
that
would
be
loud
are
those
that
are
necessary
for
compliance
with
health
and
safety
codes.
So
this
was
particularly
motivated
by
the
fact
that
the
city
may
in
the
future,
consider
a
mandatory
retrofit
ordinance
for
soft
story
buildings,
and
there
is
a
desire
to
allow
property
owners
to
recoup
some
of
that.
If
they
have
to
do
it,
environmental
sustainability
measures
would
also
be
allowed
and
capital
improvements
that
extend
the
useful
life
of
the
property.
There
are
some
guiding
principles.
E
The
improvements
have
to
benefit
the
tenants.
This
is
a
little
inaccurate,
because
this
was
a
last-minute
change.
They
cannot
increase.
If
they
are
environmental
sustainability
measures,
they
cannot
increase
the
tenants
utilities
costs.
So
that
was
a
change
that
was
made
at
the
council
meeting
the
evening
that
it
was
passed
and
we
they
exclude
luxury
improvements.
So
you
know
no
gold
plating
improvements
would
be
allowed.
E
There,
in
terms
of
the
process,
there
needs
to
be
a
cap
on
the
amount,
the
percentage
increase
that
would
be
applicable
the
10%
per
year.
Would
the
capital
improvement
increases
would
be
subject
to
the
10%
per
year
and
then
there,
the
capital
improvements
need
to
be
amortized.
So
one
of
the
things
the
RHC
would
have
to
look
at
is
your
current
amortization
schedule
and
see
whether
you
need
to
update
that
and
add
items
to
that
if
this
passes.
E
And
then
the
amendments
also
make
it
clear
that
mobile
homes
are
not
subject
to
the
CSF,
are
a
mobile
home
space
friends
and
once
again
that
there
is
the
ability
for
the
City
Council
to
adopt
mobile
home
rent
control
and
then
to
assign
to
this
body
the
obligation
of
implementing
that
ordinance.
Should
they
adopt
it.
E
So
the
homeowners
initiative,
the
homeowner
mentor
and
taxpayer
initiative
I
think
we've
talked
about
this
before-
is
very
different.
It
is
basically
an
income
eligibility
requirement,
so
only
those
households
with
income
to
add
or
below
a
hundred
percent
of
ami
would
receive
the
benefits
of
rent
stabilization.
E
There
is
a
minor
change
to
the
Just
Cause,
which
removes
the
warning
notice.
In
the
case
of
criminal
activity.
There
are
restrictions
on
the
use
of
city
funds
to
fund
the
RHC
which,
as
you
know,
the
city
initially
funded
the
startup
cost,
but
you
have
paid
those
back,
so
the
city
does
not
fund
the
RHD.
E
There
is
a
maximum
fee
of
$100.00
per
year.
It
allows
capital
improvements
as
part
of
the
petition
process.
The
C
sfra
would
be
suspended
if
the
vacancy
rate
is
three
percent
or
higher,
and
then,
if
the
csfi
is
suspended,
there
is
a
rental
housing
dispute
resolution
program.
During
that
suspension,
that
involves
mediation
for
certain
rent
increases.
E
A
A
E
So,
as
I
said,
if
the
council
initiated
amendments
are
adopted
in
March,
we
will
need
to
consider
new
regulations
pretty
quickly
for
property
owner
petitions
related
to
capital
improvements.
I
think
that's
gonna,
be
the
biggest
area
of
your
work.
Initially
is
to
address
that
and
come
up
with
both
a
process,
and
when
we
talk
about
process
it
can
be
an
expedited
petition
process.
E
It
can
be
something
other
than
a
petition
process,
so
they
don't
really
have
one
in
mind
at
the
moment,
but
a
lot
of
the
discussion
around
this
topic
centered
around
a
process
that
would
be
somewhat
expedited
and
not
require
property
owners
to
submit
a
lot
of
detailed
information
about
their
property
finances,
although
of
course
they
would
need
to
submit
information
about
the
capital
improvements.
So
that's
gonna
be
the
first
thing
that
we're
going
to
have
to
address
to
have
that
process
in
place.
E
If
it
passes,
I
think
we
could
expect
to
see
an
increase
in
petitions
potentially
as
or
an
increase
in
whatever
it
is.
Whatever
this
process
is
of
property
owners,
requesting
increases
and
so
I
think
staff
is
gonna
have
to
think
about
that,
and
we're
gonna
have
to
think
about
how
to
manage
the
potential
for
that
with
the
hearing
officers
and
having
the
appropriate
staffing.
C
G
C
A
C
A
H
Think
email
I
wonder
if
they
asked
you
what
you
thought
about
the
RNC
in
your
poll,
but
another
question
is:
is
it
also
possible
that
we
could
also
look
at
depending
on
March
elections
of
how
we
could
also
X
do
an
expedite
supposed
to
say
no,
we
talked
about
that,
but
obviously
you
probably
shouldn't
move
forward.
Unless
we
see
the
outcome
of
the
election.
E
Right
so
we've
talked
about
this
in
the
past
that,
although
you're
the
see,
if
the
see
sfra
limits,
rent
increase
petitions
to
fair
return,
we
think
there
is
a
way
to
adopt
regulations
that
would
allow
capital
improvements
subject
to
fair
return,
and
it's
obviously
would
not
be
as
simple
as
or
as
easy
to
understand.
Probably
for
all
of
us
and
we're
gonna
have
to
give
it
some
real
thought,
as
if
the
amendments
were
passed.
E
But
if
the
amendments
are
not
passed,
we
think
that
is
still
an
option,
and
that
may
be
something
that
II,
even
if
they're
not
passed.
This
committee
may
want
to
consider
adopting
so
we've
talked
about
in
the
past
because
of
the
amendment
we
kind
of
pushed
it
put
it
on
the
side.
Until
we
saw
how
the
amendment
came
so.
A
E
That's
a
really
good
question.
So
if
the
council
initiated
amendment
passes
in
March,
you
will
get
to
implement
that
until
November
and
then
in
November.
If
the
citizen
initiated
amendment
passed,
that
will
then
become
the
see
sfra.
So
we
will
then
have
a
different
composition.
You
know
a
different
whole
work
plan.
E
So
the
issue
is
gonna,
be
that
the
citizens
initiative
amends
the
see
sfra
as
it
currently
exists.
So
what
gets
approved
should
that
get
approved
in
November
will
be
amending,
something
that
no
longer
exists
and
so
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
work
pretty
carefully
with
the
City
Attorney's
Office
to
come
up
with.
Actually
what
is
the
law,
so
it
is
tricky.
This
is
not
going
to
be
easy
if
they
both
were
to
get
past.
A
E
E
I
do
not
think
that
you
approved
anything
with
regard
to
a
flat,
and
you
know
the
annual
general
adjustment
or
the
mobile
home
issue,
but
I
think
as
a
body.
You
have
not
taken
an
official
position
on
this
amendment,
so
I,
don't
think
as
a
body
you
can
say
anything
one
way
or
the
other.
Unless
you
were
to
take
an
official
position
which
you
could
agendize
for
your
February
meeting,
you
know
as
individuals,
we
don't
constrain
your
position.
A
All
right,
that's
helpful,
I
mean
I
have
no
plans
to
necessarily,
but
it
it
might
provide
clarity
for
the
media,
I
guess
on
other
things
that
we've
already
recommended
as
a
body
but
I,
know.
There's
a
per
your
point.
Look
closer
at
the
how
the
final
version
netted
out,
because
I
did
write
the
flat
yeah.
E
E
H
Because
I
guess
I'm,
already
I've
already
told
a
reporter
that
I'm
neutral
on
this,
because
I
well
largely
because
I
didn't
know
if
it
would
be
appropriate
for
the
community
to
think
if
we
were
one
way
or
the
other,
that
they
would
not
have
confidence
that
we
would
be
able
to
implement
it
regardless
of
the
outcome.
So
that
was
a
concern,
but
I
I
think
we,
the
letter
that
we
sent
to
Council
is
public,
so
that
could
be
something
that
we
could
refer
to.
H
B
Just
doesn't
seem
appropriate
for
this
committee
to
take
a
stance
on
what
would
basically
change
the
governing
of
this
committee.
It
just
I
could
see
any
one
of
us
taking
a
personal
stance
and
that's
your
right
under
the
freedom
of
speech,
but
I
can't
beyond
letter
I.
Don't
think
we
can
do
much.
That's
fair.
A
D
Steven
Goldstein
I
have
a
question
regarding
this
non
residency:
an
adjustment
because
I
noticed
that
I
think
what
I
heard
was
that,
in
order
for
you
to
be
considered,
you
actually
have
to
own
property
or
manage
property
within
the
city
and
Mountain
View.
In
order
to
be
a
non-resident
committee,
member
and
I'm
like
going
wait
a
minute.
This
is
supposed
to
be
a
quasi-judicial
body,
which
means
that
under
the
California
constitutional
rules
and
regulations,
it
says
that
you're
not
so
in
effect,
I
allowed
to
be
participating.
D
If
you
have
a
conflict
of
interest
and
that
would
it
affect
really
be
a
very
clear
conflict
of
interest
at
that
point,
even
if
you're
not
even
hearing
about
your
particular
property,
it
still
means
that
you're,
really
in
fact
making
that
particular
person.
In
fact
a
violation
of
the
due
process
requirements
under
California
and
federal
constitutions.
So
I'm
Michael
I'm
wait
a
minute.
D
Yes,
we
can't
let
this
person
participate
and,
in
fact
negate
the
whole
about
measure
as
a
whole,
because
I
from
I
can
see,
there's
no
severability
clause
in
the
actual
ballot
measure,
which
would
mean
that
if
one
gets
knocked
down,
the
whole
thing
gets
knocked
down.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
the
if
anyone
you're
going
the
your
attorney
or
or
the
city
attorney
has
even
figured
that
out.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
your
comment
and
I
mean
just
to
level
set.
The
valid
amendment
is
the
City
Council's
amendment.
So
any
questions
you
can
also
bring
those
up
at
the
City
Council
meeting
all
right
if
there
are
no
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
committee.
We'll
move
on
to
the
next
item
item
8.2
our
revisions
of
the
meeting
schedule
for
calendar
year
2020
exciting
stuff.
We
have
a
quick
report
from
Patricia
item.
G
8.2
as
a
staff
update
on
the
revision
of
the
RHD
meeting
scheduled
for
2020,
the
purpose
of
this
update
is
to
review
potential
revisions
to
the
arch.
The
meeting
scheduled
for
the
calendar
year
and
the
proposed
revisions
are
to
change
the
Monday
April
6th
2020
meeting
to
March
30th
2020
and
the
Monday
November
16th
2020
meeting
to
November
9th
2020,
and
the
recommendation
is
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
RHC
adopting
revisions
to
the
meeting
scheduled
for
calendar
year
2020
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further.
I
G
A
A
D
A
I
G
8.3
is
a
draft
review
of
the
CS
f
ra
annual
report
for
fiscal
year,
2018
19,
and
the
purpose
of
this
item
is
to
receive
an
informational
presentation
from
staff
on
the
draft
report.
This
is
very
high-level.
You
have
a
copy
of
it
and
if
you
have
any
specific
questions
for
staff,
I'd
be
happy
to
review
it
at
a
later
time
as
well.
G
We
have
a
timeline
of
the
activities
that
led
up
to
the
C
sfra
amendment
and
then
the
first
few
years
of
our
implementation,
followed
by
highlights
for
fiscal
year,
2018
19
then
going
into
an
executive
summary
of
our
activities
and
housing
and
mountain
view,
and
I'll
go
into
a
little
bit
of
the
overview
of
the
executive.
Summary.
G
As
you
can
see
on
that
first
page
reviews
high-level
what
we
did
this
year,
so
we
held
13
rhc
meetings.
In
the
fiscal
year
there
were
50
staff
reports
that
were
written
and
presented
to
you.
We
had
854
public
inquiries
made
on
the
rental
housing
helpline.
A
hundred
and
forty-three
households
received
assistance
through
the
trail
51
petitions
were
processed
and
44
workshops
and
events
were
attended
by
staff,
and
then
you
can
see
some
of
our
major
accomplishments
this
past
year,
including
what
we,
what
we
did
over
the
calendar
year
and
what
happened
with
the.
G
The
next
section
is
our
average
market
rents
for
the
fiscal
year
as
well
as
market
rents,
have
fully
covered
units
that
highlight
the
time
period
between
when
the
csfi
went
into
effect
and
current
market
rents
for
the
current
time
period.
Ending
this
report
and
then
average
vacancy
rates
are
same
so
you'll
see
all
units
fully
covered
units
and
partially
covered
units.
G
One
thing
to
note
is
the
partially
covered
units
you
see
kind
of
odd
spikes
there,
that's
actually
when
those
buildings
came
online
so
when
they
went
live
and
that
kind
of
makes
the
data
a
little
different.
So
it
shows
what
their
vacancy
rates
were
during
that
time
period
and
then,
as
you
can
see,
they
even
out
to
be
about
the
same
for
all
units.
G
The
next
section
is
a
program
overview.
So
what
you
see
here
is
the
three
main
goals
of
the
C
sfra
and
how
we
implement
them.
What
happens
and
why
followed
by
budget
our
budget
numbers
for
the
fiscal
year
and
our
staffing
for
the
fiscal
year,
and
then
we
go
into
our
program
activities.
So
we
have
six
main
program
activities
that
we
implement,
develop
and
implement
policies
manage
the
petition
process,
educate
the
community,
monitor,
request
and
required,
noticing
oversee
the
tenant,
relocation,
assistance,
ordinance
and
we're
designing
and
implementing
the
online
rent
portal.
A
C
G
A
A
D
A
Takers,
I'd
sort
of
say
you
know
well
done
I-
think
first
I
very
much
like
the
selfie
of
the
team,
and
you
know
our
pictures
and
the
pictures
of
the
community
events.
I
really
feel
like
it
bring
some
all
the
hard
work
that
everyone
does,
and
so
it's
great
to
see
that
and
I
think
the
data
is
in
a
very
digestible
and
relatable
format,
so
I
kudos
I
think
it's
a
great
a
great
outcome.
H
A
E
C
Sure
Nicole,
they
do
have
a
follow-up
question
because
it
does
look
awesome
on
the
executive
summary
that
goes
on
the
newsletter.
Would
it
be
possible
to
either
put
a
QR
code
or
link
that
people
can
go
to
like
a
quick
link?
So
folks
can
like
read
it
and
look
at
it
and
imbibe
the
awesomeness
I
can
certainly
try.
C
A
A
True,
probably
more
more
accurate
yeah
for
me,
I
don't
have
any
specific
feedback.
I
will
take
a
look
and
I'd
encourage
committee.
Members
kind
of
take
a
look,
a
closer
look
when
you
get
home
and
you
know
I'll
forward
any
feedback
I
have
on
to
I'll
guarantee
ya.
Right
now
looks
great
sure,
Julian
just
out.
H
G
B
G
G
We
have
a
total
of
391
information
requests
thus
far
in
the
fiscal
year
and
as
you
can
see,
the
biggest
chunk
is
for
just
cause
eviction
protections
we
have
for
landlord
initiated
conciliations
and
six
tenant
conciliations
down
in
the
petition
overview.
You
can
see
that
we
have
one
landlord
petition
that
is
in
review.
Staff
is
likely
to
accept
it
this
week
and
we
have
three
tenant
petitions
that
were
in
the
hearing
process
during
December.
We've
have
five
here,
tenant
petitions
that
have
settled
one
that
was
decided
and
one
that
was
not
accepted.
Thus
far.
G
We
have
not
had
any
appeals
come
before
this
body.
The
vacancy
rate
is
currently
3.8
percent
for
fully
covered
units
and
the
average
rent
rate
is
about
two
thousand
six
hundred
and
thirty
dollars
for
fully
covered
units.
So
that's
the
effective
rent
rate
that
people
are
currently
paying
when
they
sign
up
for
new
apartments.
G
One
thing
to
note
is
that
we
are
transitioning
over
to
the
fiscal
year
for
termination
notices,
so
this
information
will
be
presented
and
reported.
That
way,
going
forward
will
also
be
switching
to
the
fiscal
year
for
the
multifamily
property
sales,
but
for
the
purpose
of
this
particular
monthly
status
report,
I
thought
I'd
ease
everyone
into
that
transition
with
just
the
terminations.
As
we
finished
the
annual
report,
we
noticed
that
we
could
probably
make
some
of
these
things
all
match.
G
So
that's
what
we're
doing
right
now
we
have
a
hundred
and
fifty
withdrawal
notices
for
quarter,
two
of
nineteen
twenty
and
one
demotion
notice.
We
have
three
breaches
of
lease
and
that's
about
it
and
terminations.
As
you
can
see,
for
calendar
year
2019
we
had
two
hundred
and
ninety
seven
units
affected
by
redevelopment,
and
that
has
resulted
in
sixty
households
that
have
received
assistance.
G
We
also
had
twenty-one
multifamily
properties
that
were
sold
for
a
total
transactions
of
one
hundred
and
ninety
four
units,
and
there
are
currently
three
properties
for
sale
for
twenty
units
down
in
the
workshops
and
clinics.
We
have
had
twenty-one
landlords
attend
physician
clinics
so
far
this
calendar
year
and
24
tenants,
we've
held
six
workshops
and
have
had
97
people
attend.
Our
largest
workshop
was
just
held
in
December
for
this
calendar
year
and
that
went
over.
G
There
see
sfra
amendments
as
well
as
ad
1482,
which
are
those
changes
to
the
state
law
for
rent
gouging
and
just
cause
eviction
protections,
and
then
they
M
Noi
consumer
price
index
you
can
see,
is
still
the
October
numbers
they've
yet
to
release
the
December
numbers.
It
should
be
happening
this
week.
G
That
concludes
staffs
presentation
on
item
9.1
and
then
item
9.2
is
a
monthly
workshop
overview
of
our
coming
workshop,
which
is
on
Thursday.
We
are
having
an
interactive
workshop
for
the
first
time
where
landlords
can
register
their
property
through
our
portal.
It
will
be
happening
on
Thursday,
January,
16th
at
6:30
and
change
of
location.
It
is
going
to
be
in
the
second
floor
program
room
at
the
library
everyone
will
have
well,
hopefully,
everyone
will
have
access
to
computers.
G
I
think
we
have
about
25
computers
and
they'll,
be
able
to
sit
down
and
register
for
their
property
and
then
also
learn
about
the
2020
rental
housing
fee
which,
as
you
all
know,
is
a
hundred
and
one
dollars
per
unit
and
I.
Believe
Andrea
has
a
quick
update
on
the
rental
housing
fee
collections
for
fiscal
year
1819
as
well.
A
A
G
G
A
G
A
G
H
I
get
to
hold
you
up
now.
I
got
a
question:
the
not
accepted
petition.
Do
we
have
a
reason
like
are
there
common
reasons
like
is
this
when
they
did
not
accept
I?
Remember
one
not
accepts
a
long
time
ago
was
because
mopey
it
was
a
mobile
home
resident
and
we're
like
no.
But
what
are
the
other
reasons
why
we
don't.
G
H
E
Additionally,
the
property
owners
have
to
pay
pretty
significant
relocation
to
the
households
who
are
living
in
those
you
and
the
tenants
have
to
be
given
a
rate
of
first
return
at
an
affordable
rent.
So
all
of
that
adds
up
to
a
lot
of
restrictions
on
redevelopment
of
existing
properties.
So
we
do
think
that
that's
going
to
impact
the
redevelopment
of
properties,
but.
B
F
Alright,
so
I'll
just
give
a
quick
update
on
invoices
that
remain
outstanding
for
fiscal
year,
1819
rental
housing
fee
after
staff
after
the
committee
approves
staff
to
issue
a
compliance
letter
for
the
non-payment
of
the
rental
housing
fee.
We
sent
out
a
non
compliance
letter
at
the
end
of
November
2019,
since
the
mailing
of
the
letter,
fifty
three
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
four
dollars
has
since
been
collected.
As
of
November
and
I
checked.
F
Just
this
week,
we
found
that
many
of
the
delinquent
invoices
and
fees
were
due
to
new
ownership
or
a
change
in
mailing
address.
So
I
did
go
through
the
county
database
and
updated
all
of
the
contact
information
for
owners
of
fees
that
were
not
paid,
and
it
seems
like
that
had
a
pretty
significant
effect
on
compliance.
I
also
wanted
to
just
let
you
know
that
staff
plans
to
bring
more
in-depth
analysis
of
fees
and
invoicing
in
either
the
February
or
March
meeting.