►
From YouTube: 07 11 19 Special
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
E
F
F
F
F
G
G
F
C
F
G
F
D
G
H
F
F
F
I
F
K
K
B
C
H
C
C
H
H
F
E
E
E
E
H
F
H
H
H
H
F
F
Okay,
I.
G
H
H
C
C
If
you
go
to
the
website
and
you
hover
over
council,
then
you
get
a
list
of
things
and
you
get
to
the
meeting
videos
and
hover
over
that,
and
then
you
can
pull
it
up
by
year
and
then
by
date,
and
if
you
don't
do
it
in
that
location
on
the
website,
you
can
scroll
down
further
again
on
the
home
page
to
to
below
the
red
bar,
and
there
are
several
things
that
are
there
for
quick
reference.
One
of
them
is
like
our
charter,
our
codified
ordinances
and
then
meeting
videos.
C
H
C
F
F
F
F
F
A
You,
mr
president,
we're
looking
to
move
ordinance,
90
2019
to
tonight's
agenda
and
also
looking
to
waive
the
second
and
third
readings.
Can
I
go
on
and
talk
now
or
after
you.
A
Okay,
as
I
think
most
of
you
are
aware,
this
is
we're
looking
to
sell
some
property
for
a
total
of
34
point
acres
to
clinton,
aluminum
district
distribution
for
469
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars.
That
includes
a
cra
abatement.
This
is
not
written
in
stone.
It's
not
concrete
either
side
at
this
point
could
back
out
if
someone's
not
the
company's,
not
happy.
This
is
in
no
way
saying
this
is
a
done
deal
any
of
the
dollars.
A
A
E
K
F
F
A
A
G
I'm
also
in
agreement
with
miss
whipkey
about
the
sensitivity
of
it
and
I
think
the
integrity
of
the
group
up
here
needs
to
be
somewhat
supported
or
supportive
of
our
residents.
I
also
have
a
project
in
my
own
word
that
we
may
be
visiting
and
their
well-being.
Other
properties,
I
think,
is
an
issue
for
them.
There's
not
a
big
crowd
here
and
I
don't
think
we
have
to
necessarily
divulge
any
secret
information,
but
it
doesn't
hurt
to
let
them
speak.
I
I
think
I
speak
for
the
administration
work.
I
appreciate
you
know,
probably
at
my
behest
of
the
sensitivity
that
you
guys
are
applying
to
the
situation.
I
think
we're
always
in
support
of,
although
doesn't
make
it
accused.
Otherwise,
with
public
comment,
I
think
we're
okay,
I
mean
if
we
can
allow
comment-
and
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
cause
a
problem-
may
not
have
a
lot
of
answers
for
the
questions
that
are
being
asked,
but
I
always
think
it's
appropriate
to
let
people
comment
before
you
vote.
F
I
I
think
people
pretty
much
know
where
I
generally
stand
on
public
comment.
I
mean,
even
though
it's
not
generally
a
part
of
a
special
counsel
meeting
I
didn't
feel
like.
I
could
just
add
it,
because
it's
not
what
the
council
rules
say,
but
there
is
a
motion
pending
to
allow
public
comment.
It's
been
seconded,
I
don't
see
any
harm
whatsoever
in
letting
residents
speak.
I
mean
this
is
this?
Is
their
forum,
so
any
other
discussion
with
clerk
call
the
role
please
on
the
motion.
F
Yes,
public
will
be
allowed
to
comment.
What
I'll
say
is:
let's
go
ahead
and
get
these
moved
into
new
legislation
and
then
before
we
do
the
introduction
of
legislation
then
we'll
allow
for
public
comment.
It'll
be
under
the
same
rules
as
normal
will
be
five
minutes
and
we'll
do
that.
We'll
add
that
in
before
introduction
of
new
legislation,
so
we
were
talking
about
letter
a
is
there
any
further
discussion
regarding
that?
F
B
G
C
G
F
Yes,
letter
b,
mr
gainer.
F
B
Are
you
doing
the
same
thing
to
be
then?
Yes,
I'd
like
to
also
make
a
motion
to
move
91
2019
to
tonight's
agenda.
F
I'll
second,
that
there's
a
motion
in
the
second
to
move
ordinance
number
91
2019
to
tonight's
agenda
for
first
reading.
Is
there
any
discussion
regarding
that
motion.
I
Okay,
and
just
just
to
clarify
mr
curtin,
if
I
could
yes.
G
I
Read
that
for
the
fourth
time
on
monday,
we
said
we
were
not
going
to
move
it
forward
at
this
time
to
re-zone
the
property,
the
golf
course
property.
This
allows
for
the
same
process,
that's
being
used
in
the
c1
district,
where
all
site
plans
go
to
plain
commission
and
council
for
approval
under
specific
circum
under
specific
guidelines,
so
to
help
provide
some
more
control.
G
K
F
Mr
kernan,
yes,
all
right,
we
do
not
have
a
sign-in
sheet.
Do
you
have
one
handy
that
you
could
just
I.
F
That
particular
ordinance,
I
think,
we'll
just
do
it
as
communications
from
the
public.
I
think
that's
what
the
okay,
so
when
you
come
up
to
speak,
just
raise
your
hand,
but
when
you
come
up,
if
you'll
just
sign
in
on
the
sheet
and
then
you'll
have
five
minutes
normal
normal
process,
anyone
wish
to
give
communications
from
the
public.
Ms
van
der
veen.
B
J
So
we've
had
lots
of
discussions
about
this
property
a
lot
starting
on
march
12th.
You
guys
have
given
lots
of
insight.
Lots
of
good
advice,
things
that
I've
taken
away
from
those
conversations
have
been
that
when
it
came
time
to
do
what
you
want
to
do
this
evening,
then
an
important
factor
were
the
deed
restrictions,
which
is
what
we're
asking
for
and
I'll
say
it
again
on
the
record
that
we
are
in
no
way
opposed
to
the
prosperity
coming
to
norton.
J
J
Nobody
should
have
to
live
with
that
in
their
backyard.
I
realize
that
there
are
not
a
ton
of
residents
that
surround
the
perimeter
of
the
square
eastern
fairland
union,
cleveland
masoline.
It
is
a
small
group
of
us,
but
these
are
our
homes.
This
is
where
we
live,
and
it's
it's
just
the
right
thing
to
do.
J
J
It
doesn't
say
where
on
the
property,
it
is,
although
I
did
email
council
president-
and
he
did
inform
me
what
it
was.
I've
had
conversations
with
mr
fowler,
michael
and
I
have
we
knew
that
it
was
going
to
be
the
corner
on
eastern
and
fairland.
That
was
developed.
First,
because
it's
got
the
water
there
I
get
that,
but
there
are
people
that
live
there.
J
J
Most
people
didn't
pay
attention
to
that,
and
there's
very
few
people
here
tonight
to
speak
against
it,
but
I'm
not
the
only
person
that
lives
in
this
square
that
is
upset
about
this,
and
we
just
want
to
know
that
you're
going
to
protect
what
we've
asked,
which
is
boundaries,
setbacks,
mounds
shrubs,
so
that
we
do
not
have
to
contend
with
lights.
Beeping
tractor
trailers
dirt
dust:
what
are
the
deed
restrictions?
So
that's
that's
why
I
wanted
to
come
tonight.
That's
why
I
asked
to
speak.
J
Thank
you,
mr
towsley,
for
making
a
motion
to
allow
that
to
happen.
I'm
not
trying
to
screw
up
any
deal
that
the
city
has
with
norton.
I
don't
even
know
anybody
from
clinton
aluminum.
I
don't
really
care
about
people
from
clinton
aluminum.
I
just
want
to
know
that,
as
you
start
this
process
you're
going
to
do
what
you
said
you
were
going
to
do.
A
J
J
What
you're,
stating
very
clearly
right
now
on
the
record,
is
that
the
ordinance
that
is
put
forth
tonight
is
solely
for
the
purpose
to
give
mr
fowler,
mr
zeta
and
mr
markey
the
authority
to
see
if
they
can
come
to
a
sales
agreement
and
if
one
is
reached
before
anything
is
signed.
That
has
to
come
back
before
council
to
be
approved.
Is
that
what
I'm
hearing
you
say.
I
Right:
it's
okay,
so
the
the
purchase
and
sale.
What
I
think
to
clarify
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
is
an
agreement
on
terms
to
sell
property.
You're
right,
the
council
ordinance
does
give
authority
to
actually
sell
the
property
in
order
to
what
I
think
miss
whipkey's,
meaning
is
when
you
develop
the
property
as
opposed
to
just
buying
the
property.
When
you
actually
go
to
develop
those
actions
to
develop
the
property,
that's
what
goes
before
playing
commission!
That's
what
has
to
come
back
before
council
there's
there's!
J
F
D
J
Buy
the
property-
and
they
don't
agree
with
those
things,
what
if
they
put
forth
the
site
plan
and
they
don't
like
the
mounds
and
the
and
the
and
the
the
shrubbery
and
having
to
lay
concrete
so
that
there
are
aren't
dirt
roads
and
dust
flying
all
over
the
place
now
see
now,
I'm
kind
of
mad,
because
we've
had
lots
of
discussions
about
this
on
the
record
and
privately
after
meetings
and
what
I've
taken
away
from
those
conversations
is
the
deed
restrictions
needed
to
be
in
the
sale
of
the
land.
F
F
J
J
Maybe
not
you,
council,
member
members,
but
I
absolutely
believe
that
this
has
been
in
the
works
with
clinton
aluminum
for
some
time
and
that
this
this
was
the
intent
and
that
that
is
why
this
is
moving
along
and
I'm
frustrated,
because
the
ask
of
the
amendment
to
the
ordinance
of
light
industry
simply
to
change
the
footage
to
protect
residents
is
a
reasonable
request.
25
and
100
feet
is
not
reasonable
and
you
all
have
done
nothing
with
what
was
put
forth.
J
A
A
So
we're
not
required
to
put
something
to
take
in
and
look
at
something
just
because
a
citizen
you're
right.
F
L
All
right,
michael
stack,
3004
in
the
street,
thanks
for
allowing
me
to
speak
this
evening,
and
it
was
said
that
we
would
put
a
deed
agreement
on,
because
I
believe
it
was
said
that
we
couldn't
change
i1
throughout
the
district,
so
we
thought
that
the
best
possible
the
best
way
to
do
it
was
to
put
a
deed
restriction
on
that
property
so
that
we
could
meet
our
standards.
But
you
know
here
again
I
was
here
that
was
residential
you're
bringing
industry
to
me.
You
have
to
protect
me
and
the
other
residents
around
there.
L
L
I
can't
imagine-
and
I
don't
think
anybody
up
there-
could
a
business
running,
24
7
out
your
back
door,
25
feet
from
your
boundary
line
or
100
feet
from
your
from
your
property
line.
There's
no
way-
and
I
think
that's
why
I
stated
this
all
along
you
know
what
what
hours
of
operation
are.
You
are
you
guys
going
to
allow
these
people
to
run?
L
You
know
what
am
I
going
to
see
what
I'm
going
to
hear?
What
am
I
going
to
taste
you
know,
and
here
we
are.
We
have
no
deed
restrictions
and
you're,
not
saying
if
you
have
any
setbacks
any
boundaries,
any
any
illegal
times
of
operation.
L
Imagine
trying
to
be
out
on
your
back
deck
on
a
sunday
afternoon
evening
with
your
family
and
all
you
hear,
is
backup,
alarms
from
truck
semi
trucks
going
down
machine,
stamping
metal.
So
I
think
that's
about
all.
I
have
to
say
miss
vanderbeen
covered
pretty
much
everything
else
I
just
wanted
to.
H
Good
evening
council
bill
mowry,
2106
warren
avenue,
norton
ohio,
I
happen
to
live
in
a
light
industrial
area
and
I
live
in
a
non-conforming
use.
I've
got
lenders,
lumberjacks,
I've
got
carter,
lumber,
I've
got
hugo
mole.
I've
got
really
good
businesses
that
have
taken
care
of
their
properties,
and
I
have
no
problem
with
them
whatsoever.
H
Norton
does
need
to
move
forward
and
I
know
a
hardship.
It
does
cost
for
some
people,
but
I
mean,
I
think
joe
and
a
few
other
were
on
council
when
cvs
came
to
town
and
we
allowed
them
to
purchase
the
property.
We
also
allow
them
a
site
plant
and
they
did
everything
they
promised
to
do
trees,
shrubbery
protection
of
the
neighborhood.
H
I
don't
think
we
can
think
anything
less
of
these
people
that
when
they
buy
the
property,
they'll
want
to
be
a
part
of
the
community
and
do
just
that
abc
plumbing
also
moved
in
up
here
at
the
corner.
Trotter
and
cleveland
madison
road
they've
been
good
neighbors.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I
had
a
lot
of
questions
when
they
first
moved
in,
but
I
really
have
never
heard
any
complaints
since
then.
That's
about
what
I
have
on
that,
but
I'd
like
to
also
say
too.
H
You
know
I
take
offense
any
one
that
would
say
anything
against
our
council
president
right
now.
I'd
like
to
see
you
all
stick
together,
I
think
you're
doing
a
great
job.
I
hope
you
all
get
reelected
to
your
seats.
I
like
to
also
commend
mr
zita
every
council
thing.
I've
ever
went
to
lincoln
day.
Dinners
he's
always
been
there.
Everyone's
always
spoke
highly
of
him
in
the
city
of
norton
how
they're
moving
ahead.
I
thank
you
for
what
you've
done.
F
F
K
President,
I
just
have
to
state
the
way
I
feel
I
wouldn't
do
business
this
way
personally
in
my
personal
life
this
quickly
and
I
I
don't
feel
right
moving
this
forward
without
it
being
aired
to
the
public
more,
so
I'm
not
against
the
bringing
the
company
in,
but
a
company
should
know
that
we're
in
municipality
and
we
have
rules
and
we
should
be
able
to
work
around
that.
B
K
F
F
G
G
F
Yes,
ordinance
number
91
2019,
mr
gainer.
B
F
F
From
my
point
of
view,
the
hurry
is,
is
that
we
want
this
piece
of
legislation
to
go
down
to
the
planning
commission
and
come
back
up
so
that
we
can
vote
on
this
and
the
final
approval
of
the
mud
district
at
the
same
time,
so
that
we
have
the
authority
to
be
able
to
to
approve
or
not
approve
final
site
plans
for
the
mud.
So
I
think
it's
just
the
timing,
we're
just
trying
to
get
it
down
to
planning
commission
while
we're
on
break,
so
they
can
do
their
job.
K
A
B
F
Exhibit
a
says,
exhibit
a
says:
section:
1287.04,
site
plan,
review,
site
plan,
review
for
all
development
in
a
mixed-use
development
district
shall
be
required
in
accordance
with
the
procedures
set
forth
in
sections
1279.15
and
1279.16
of
the
codified
ordinances
and
those
particular
sections
refer
back
to
the
requirement
that
is
in
place
for
c1
districts,
which
requires
any
site
plan
to
be
approved
by
council.
Okay.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
no
problem
did
I
get
that
right.
Mr.