►
From YouTube: 12-18-20 BZA Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Okay,
so
now,
if
they,
they
put
the
new
one
up
and
they
sell
the
place
and
a
new
company
comes
in
and
they
want
to
redo,
the
sign
then
it
would
have
to
it
would
well
obviously
would
have
to
conform
to
to
our
zoning
requirements,
but
obviously
we'd
have
to
give
an
ex.
I
would
think
we
would
give
an
exception
to
the
variance
as
far
as
it
might
be
a
different
thing.
A
Right:
okay,
all
right!
Well,
let's
get
going
then
so,
we'll
pick
up
from
there
all
right!
It's
six
o'clock
on
december
17
2020
hereby
call
to
order
this
meeting
before
the
city
board
of
norton
zoning
and
building
appeals,
because
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
board
and
when
wishing
to
speak
tonight,
I
will
be
given
the
opportunity
to
do
so.
C
A
All
right
in
that
case,
then,
I
just
will
just
move
right
straight
ahead
to
listening
to
bza
application,
a
12-2020
bank,
one
of
akron
chase
bank,
the
owner
4169
cleveland
madison,
road,
parcel
number
46-01762,
the
variance
to
zoning
code.
A
C
The
the
city
had
negotiated
through
the
road
widening
project,
everybody's
setbacks
and
signed
locations.
Signs
everything
down
through
the
roadwinding
project
area
chase
was
one
of
the
last
ones
to
negotiate
in
that
in
their
negotiation.
C
In
addition
to
having
the
court
have
the
court
record,
they
also
wanted
it
as
a
city
action
as
a
variance.
So
it's
on
record
through
the
city
at
all
times
within
that
they
negotiated
that
you
know
whatever
sign
that
they
negotiated
through.
That
will
will
be
there
moving
forward
if
a
new
tenant
comes
in
and
changes
the
actual
size
or
something
of
the
the
sign.
C
You
know
minus
rebuilding
it
or
using
the
that
actual
template,
then
they
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
board
if
they
wanted.
You
know
if
they're
looking
for
something
different,
that
that's
there,
the
setbacks
we
know
that
are
not
are
not
going
to
make
it
their
chase
bank.
They
took
a
lot
of
the
frontage
there
and
it
does
not
meet
our
our
requirements
that
it
never
will.
C
A
So
if
I
understand
bill
what
you're
saying
is
right,
the
chase
wants
it
on
record
the
setback,
variance
variants,
etc.
The
setback
is,
there's
a
variance
that
they
can
have
that
you
know
for
that
signage
going
forward,
then,
if
they
sell
that
property
the
new
tenant,
if
they
decide
to
change
the
entire
sign
whatsoever,
in
other
words,
if
they
decide
to
take
and
take
that
sign
down
and
build
a
new
one,
then
it's
understood
that
that
business
or
that
new
owner
would
have
to
come
before
the
zoning
board
to
deal
with
a
variance.
C
Correct
I
I
I'm,
I
can't
really
recall
exactly
what
sign
is
there?
I
know
it's
a
poll
sign,
but
I
don't
know
the
measurements
off
hand
whatever
was
negotiated
through
that
road
writing
project.
Whatever
you
know,
the
sign
that
they
have
there
now
yeah
is
is
what
was
negotiated
now.
If
don
you
happen
to
purchase
the
property
and
put
in
an
ice
cream
stand
there,
and
you
would
like
to
change
the
size
and
the
height
or
something
of
that
sign,
then
you
would
have
to
come
and
handle
that
as
a
separate
action.
C
If
you're
going
to
use
that
sign
and
just
put
your
contents
within
the
means
of
that,
then
we
can
move
forward
that
way.
But
you
know
that's
that's
the
same
as
anybody
else
down
through
there,
but
I
mean
I
think
the
biggest
thing
was
the
the
frontage
setback
that
has
changed
so
drastically
there
that
they
were
concerned
about
you
know
the
sign
is
what
it
is,
but
the
setbacks
are
are
different
there
and,
in
addition,
I
think
they
just
want
to
double
protect
themselves.
C
D
Okay
in
in
the
in
the
email
that's
attached
to
the
application
for
variants,
it's
an
email
from
justin
to
you
and
robert
there's,
two
attachments.
One
is
the
the
sign
variance
the
map,
the.
B
D
Is
a
contract
for
sale
and
purchase
of
real
property,
and
it
appears
that
in
the
email
there
is
a
copy
and
paste
of
some
of
the
language
from
that
purchase
agreement
correct.
Do
we
the
board,
need
to
see
that
contract
to
make
a
determination
as
to
the
appropriate
applicant,
for
this
variance
and
understand
what's
happening
with
that
property?
D
C
C
A
A
If
I
am
the
owner
of
the
property,
I'm
chase
bank
and
I'm
saying
okay,
I'm
gonna
get
this
variance,
even
though
they
have
this
the
ordinance
that
the
city
passed.
You
know
back
in
may
of
2018
saying
the
fact
that
they
have
the
right
to
move
their
signs
and
so
forth.
Well
that
was
going
to
that
owner
at
that
time.
E
C
Well,
keep
in
mind
there's
two
issues.
I
know
you
guys
are
on
on
the
sign
that
you,
you
guys
made
it
perfectly
clear
with
how
you
feel
about
signs,
but
there's
two
issues,
one
being
setbacks
and
the
other
signs.
So
to
me,
the
most
important
issue
in
front
of
it
is
the
setbacks.
I
think,
is
what
they're
looking
at.
They
have
drastically
changed
and
I
think
that
when
a
new
business
eventually
someone
else
will
come
into
that
build
into
that
building
and
whatever
that
may
be
they
may
their
concern
may
be.
C
Can
you
know
this
is
shows
a
b3
and
setbacks
need
to
be
this
and
it's
not.
Can
I
perform
my
business
here?
I
mean
many
calls
that
I
get
you
know
with
new
new
businesses
coming
and
going
and
so
on
and
so
forth
deal
with.
Well,
is
it
legal
non-conforming
and
is
don
you
could
probably
help
out
with
that?
A
We
wouldn't
have
even
had
this
city
ordinance
earlier
I
mean
we
have
just
gone
that
way
and
the
bank,
you
know
that
wasn't
their
fault,
I
mean
that
just
happens
to
be,
they
got
the
corner
lot
and
they
got
a
lot
taken
off
of
them.
Sure
pulling
it
back,
and
so
I
I
personally
don't
have
a
problem
with
their
setback.
A
I
guess
the
only
thing
I
would
ask-
and
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
include
that
in
there,
but
I
would
like
to
see
the
signs
stop
becoming
towers
if
we
can
bring
them
down
to
the
eight
foot
height.
That
would
be
kind
of
my
my
goal
or
my
that'd
be
something
I
would
like
to
see.
But
you
know
I
don't
know
if
that
can
be
put
in
or
if
that
could
be
a
restriction
or
or
whatever.
But
I.
C
E
D
I
I
guess
so
long
as
what
we're
doing
is
not
in
any
way
deemed
inconsistent
with
what
the
you
know
what
norton
city
council
has
done.
Then
you
know
it's
fine.
It
just
seems
superfluous
to
me,
but.
A
F
A
F
F
A
So
well,
we
could
put
that
in
this.
They
can
put
that
in
the
thing
they're
following
we're
following
suit
with
the
and
granting
the
the
above
requests,
you
know
the
variance
request
and
also
complying
with
city
ordinance.
You
know
with
the
city
ordinance
so
that
we
tie
the
two
together
yeah
and
also
the
that
way,
the
anyone
who
comes
in
who
buys
it.
If,
if
it
does
come
up
for
sale,
they
buy
it,
they
know
the
fact
that
okay,
the
sign,
got
moved
once
now.
A
If
we
want
to
start
changing
it
again,
then
it
has
to
go
back
to
the
old
way
it
has
to
go
back
and
and
so
forth.
So
it's
not
a
card
launch
that
they
can
come
in.
They
can
do
whatever
they
want
to.
You
know
all
on
down
the
road.
You
know.
If
it's
sold
and
sold
and
sold
and
sold
they
can't
they
can't
do
whatever
right.
Then
that
would
be.
That
would
be
the
proper
thing
to
do
so.
A
Okay,
okay,
we
gotta
follow
protocol,
otherwise
we'll
get
in
trouble.
So
anyone
else
have
any
questions
in
for
on
this.
D
D
D
E
D
A
Body
somewhere,
okay,
all
right,
yeah,
okay,
any
other
questions
then.
A
A
A
A
Do
I
have
a
motion
on
variance
number
a
12
2020
or,
I
should
say
application,
bza
application,
a12
202.
Do
I
have
a
motion.
A
E
E
E
A
D
E
A
Tom
made
the
motion
and
nick
nick
amended,
it.
B
Okay
and
sandy
yes-
and
I
guess
nick-
would
be
the
last
one
nick,
so
he
amended
it
so
he's
so
you
good
nick
I'm.