►
From YouTube: MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board - February 2, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning
and
welcome,
thank
you
for
joining
our
maps
for
Citizens
Advisory
board
meeting
for
February,
2nd
2023..
A
First
order
of
business
item
under
two
is
a
approval
of
minutes
of
the
January
5th
2023
maps
for
Citizens
Advisory
board
meeting
the
minutes
were
included
in
your
packet.
If
does
anybody
have
any
additions
or
Corrections
otherwise,
I
take
a
motion
in
a
second
to
approve,
as
presented.
A
Well
sure,
okay,
we
have
a
motion.
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
same
sign.
Okay.
The
motion
passes.
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
Item
B
receive
the
maps
for
monthly
financial
report,
ending
December
31st
2022.
B
C
B
D
A
Move?
Okay:
we
have
a
motion,
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
Jessica,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
same
sign.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Now
we'll
move
on
to
item
2C
recommend
receipt
of
consultant,
Review
Committee
report
and
authorizing
negotiation
of
an
architectural
services
contract
with
Bacchus
Pain
Associates
architects
for
the
maps
for
youth,
centers
programming
and
planning
Mr
Todd.
A
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
same
sign,
fantastic.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Moving
on
to
item
2D,
recommend
approval
of
maps
for
homelessness
program,
operating
agreement
among
the
Oklahoma
City
Property
Authority,
the
City
of
Oklahoma
City,
and
the
Oklahoma
City
Housing
Authority.
B
E
Been
here
yeah
good
morning,
everyone
thank
you
for
having
me
this
morning.
I
have
seen
a
few
of
you
this
week,
but
those
that
I
haven't
happy.
New
Year
feels
a
little
weird
saying
that
in
February,
but
I
hope
everybody
had
a
good
break
and
a
good
holiday
so
yeah.
So
as
David
mentioned,
we
really.
We
have
two
items
on
the
agenda
today:
they're
kind
of
companion
items.
So
the
first
item
is
the
operating
agreement,
which
I'm
going
to
try
to
speak
to
a
little
bit.
E
Ian
Colgan
with
the
Oklahoma
City,
Housing,
Authority
I,
think,
is
going
to
get
up
after
me
and
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
next
item.
But
I
really
just
I
think
with
this
presentation
more
than
anything
else
and
David.
If
you
have
anything,
you
want
to
add
Feel
Free
as
we're
going
through
this,
but
I
felt
like
it
made
sense
to
really
kind
of
return
back
to
the
resolution,
and
it's
been
the
thing
that
occurred
to
me.
E
I
think
in
the
last
week
is
like
it's
been
a
long
time
since
we've
talked
about
this
project
publicly,
and
so
it
I
felt
it
felt
appropriate
to
go
back
and
give
everybody
some
context
and
and
kind
of
remind
everybody
how
we
got
here,
and
so
obviously
the
first
place
to
start
would
be
with
the
resolutions
of
Summer
of
2019
I.
Think
we've
all
read
the
resolution.
You
guys
have
probably
not
read
it
as
many
times
as
I
have,
but
certainly
everyone's
familiar
with
it.
E
You
can
see
on
this
slide
that
we've
prepared
really
a
lot
of
the
language.
That's
in
that
resolution.
Obviously
there
was
this
intent
to
transform
the
city's
approach
to
reducing
and
potentially
eliminating
homelessness.
There
is
a
language
which
talked
to
affordable
housing.
This
idea
of
a
housing
first
strategy,
which
really
just
reduces
a
lot
of
barriers
to
entry.
There
is
there's
items
in
the
in
the
resolution
related
to
The
Leverage
leveraging
of
funds,
the
the
at
the
time
the
resolution
was
passed.
It
was
50
million
dollars.
E
E
We
finished
the
implementation
plan
I'm
bringing
this
I've
brought
this
with
the
presentation
today,
just
to
remind
everyone
the
way
that
we
originally
structured
this
project,
it
was
envisioned
to
be
a
series
of
five
allocations.
E
You
know,
I
think
one
thing
I
would
say
generally
the
the
green
boxes
that
you
see,
we
call
those
pre-designed
phases.
Those
are
the
the
steps
that
we
take
to
hire
consultants
and
enter
into
agreements
and
things.
One
thing
that
we
found
out
after
the
implementation
plan
was
issued
is
that
the
entities
that
potentially
would
be
responding
to
this
really
needed
to
have
an
understanding
of
when
they
could
anticipate
funding
from
the
program.
E
So
we,
as
we
were
developing
the
RFP,
it
became
apparent
to
us
that
we
needed
to
provide
some
flexibility
in
that
regard,
and
so
the
RFP
that
we
issued
gave
respondents
the
opportunity
to
provide
a
plan
for
one
of
these
allocations
or
all
of
these
allocations,
and
so
the
operating
agreement
that
you're
seeing
today
is
really
to
cover
all
five
of
these
allocations.
That's
the
intent
and
the
agenda
item
that
is
going
to
appear
behind.
E
This
is
actually
the
first
of
these
allocations
and
it's
just
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
how
those
funds
will
be
used
in
that
first
phase
of
work.
So
really
just
a
point
of
clarification.
The
the
implementation
plan
schedule,
because
of
the
way
that
we
structured
it
to
provide
some
flexibility
to
the
city.
It
also
seems
to
imply
that
there's
going
to
be
five
operating
agreements.
That
is
not
the
case
that
will
be
one
operating
agreement
and
that's
what
we're
here
to
discuss
today
so
I've
included
here
the
the
updated
budgets
as
I.
E
E
So
that's
where
the
implementation
plan
just
a
little
bit
of
history,
on
how
we
got
here
so
in
the
fall
of
21,
we
started
preparing
the
RFP
that
came
before
this
board
for
approval.
We
issued
it
late
in
that
fall.
We
issue
we
actually
issued
the
RFP
and
then
in
February
we
received
a
response
from
the
Oklahoma
City
Housing
Authority.
They
were
the
only
one
that
responded.
E
I
think
we
spent
about
three
to
five
hours
with
the
Housing
Authority,
really
just
talking
about
how
they
intended
to
execute
these
projects,
and
so
we
did
that
in
the
spring
in
the
late
summer,
really
all
the
way.
Until
last
month
we
were
working
through
the
operating
agreement
and
the
details
of
that
agreement.
This
is
a
very
unusual
agreement,
I
think
as
it
relate
when
you
compare
it
to
other
Maps
operating
agreements.
E
You
know
we're
not
building
a
senior
health
and
wellness
center,
we're
not
building
a
youth
center,
and
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
different
animal,
and
so
it's
really
taken
some
time.
I
think
think.
On
the
city's
part,
the
housing
authorities
part
to
really
come
to
an
agreement
that
everyone
was
comfortable
with,
took
a
lot
of
support
from
Laura's
office,
Lord,
mcdevitt's
office
and
so
I
think
that
it
obviously
just
took
us
some
time
to
get
through
that,
and
so
we're
happy
today
to
bring
that
forward.
E
The
Oklahoma,
City
Housing
Authority,
actually
their
board,
received
this
this
draft
agreement,
or
this
final
agreement
on
I,
think
Monday
of
this
week.
Ian
can
speak
to
that
in
a
minute,
but
they
they
have
approved
the
agreement,
and
so
it's
it's
really
coming
to
this
board
for
your
consideration,
obviously
to
go
on
to
council.
So
we
can
get
this
thing
buttoned
up
and
moving
down
the
road
before
I.
Go
on
any
questions
you
want
me
to
just
keep
marching
on.
E
Okay,
keep
moving
okay,
so
I
am
I,
have
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
the
Housing
Authority
I'm,
really
just
going
to
hit
the
high
points.
I
think
Ian
and
their
group
can
go
into
a
lot
more
detail,
but
really,
as
they
looked
at
the
RFP
and
put
together
their
response.
Really.
E
This
was
their
vision
for
the
program
and
you
know
I
think
it
probably
I'm
guessing
that
this
vision
goes
all
the
way
back
to
whenever
the
the
rest
of
the
original
resolution
was
drafted,
but
obviously
this
idea
of
construction
of
permanent
City
controlled
housing
for
people
that
are
either
currently
experiencing
homelessness
or
at
risk
of
experiencing
homeless
homeless.
E
One
thing
that
Ian
will
speak
about
and
I
think
you'll,
probably
get
a
better
understanding
when
he
comes
up
is
there's
a
lot
of
different
housing
types
that
are
out
there.
You
know
we
kind
of
I,
think
of
it
as
this
ladder
and
there's
areas
in
that
ladder,
that
the
private
sector
can
deliver
efficiently
and
and
those
housing
products
appear
out
on
the
market
for
for
people
to
take
advantage
of
and
purchase
you
know
or
or
live
in.
E
But
there
are
areas
in
that
Spectrum
or
in
that
ladder,
where
the
market
really
doesn't
deliver
the
right.
It
can't
deliver
those
housing
products,
and
so
those
are
the
areas
where
I
think
the
Housing
Authority's
approach
to
this
project,
they're
really
trying
to
deliver
housing
products
in
those
areas,
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
a
ton
of
detail
on
the
specifics
of
these
housing
types.
Ian
can
do
a
can
go
into
that.
E
Think
of
that,
as
existing
public
housing
properties
that
we
have
that
need
reinvestment
and
then
Workforce
housing,
Workforce
housing
in
essence
is
housing
that
is
needed
in
areas
of
the
city
which
really
because
of
the
economic
conditions
around
those
properties,
it's
almost
impossible
to
provide
a
housing,
that's
affordable
in
those
areas,
but
those
same
areas
are
the
ones
that
have
great
access
to
Transit
and
get
jobs
and
good
schools,
and
so
really
the
goal
of
the
Housing
Authority
is
to
really
provide
affordable
housing
in
those
areas.
E
And
so
those
are
really
the
the
three
categories
of
housing
that
this
agreement
really
speaks
to
or
that
the
Housing
Authority's
plan
speaks
to.
You
can
see
the
number
of
units
that
are
anticipated.
Those
are
obviously
approximate,
but
that's
what's
currently
planned,
I
think
as
a
part
of
this
agreement,
so
I
haven't
brought
the
entire
Oklahoma
City
Housing
Authority
response
with
me.
It
was
I,
think
a
two
or
three
hundred
page
document,
maybe
not
quite
that
big,
but
it
was
a
very
thorough
response
and
I've
just
provided
an
excerpt
here
from
it.
E
You
can
see
the
three
housing
types
that
are
included
in
the
agreement.
This
is
really
a
table
of
all
of
the
different
projects
and
they're,
obviously
categorized
by
color
to
kind
of
communicate
which
type
of
housing
product
they're
aimed
at,
and
so
that's
really
just
a
summary.
Ian
can
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
these
when
he
gets
up
and
presents,
but
I
wanted
the
group
really
to
see
the
board
to
see
the
really
an
overarching
view
of
what
this
plan
looks
like
as
we
enter
into
this
first
phase
of
work.
E
So
just
a
few
highlights,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
a
little
bit
of
an
atypical
agreement.
It's
not
one
that
we've
done
a
lot
of
I!
Think
because
of
the
way
that
the
agreement
is
structured
and
the
way
that
the
Housing
Authority
will
be
executing
these
projects.
E
We
had
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
created
or
provided
a
lot
of
flexibility,
but
at
the
same
time
we
had
to
also
structure
it
so
that
there
was
transparency
and
that
the
city
understood
exactly
what
was
being
done
as
the
projects
moved
forward,
and
so
you
can
see
that
in
the
agreement
you
know,
there's
there's
a
section
agreement
which
speaks
to
measurable
benchmarks,
which
is
required
by
the
resolution.
E
There's
a
reporting
system
that
need
that
will
be
established
according
to
the
terms
of
the
agreement
and
then
a
quarterly
report
to
the
city
as
required,
and
so
all
of
that
language
is
in
the
agreement.
It
is
a
it
does,
have
a
10-year
term,
there's
options
for
Renewal,
obviously
I.
We
we
would
hope
that
we
can
get
done
and
through
all
this
work
in
10
years,
if
there
is
some
need
to
renew
to
extend
beyond
that,
there
would
be
ability
to
renew
the
agreement.
E
One
thing
that
the
agreement
requires
is
that
the
Housing
Authority
come
forward
with
a
plan
for
each
allocation
before
those
funds
are
made
available,
and
so
that's
really
what
we're
doing
here.
I
mentioned
the
companion
item
on
the
agenda.
That's
behind
this.
We
are
essentially
trying
to
check
that
box
for
this
first
allocation
and
so
as
allocation
two
and
three
and
four
and
five
as
the
Housing
Authority
is
ready
to
execute
those.
They
will
come
forward
with
really
similar
presentations,
I
think
for
those
for
the
city's
consideration
and
approval.
E
So
there
will
be
a
so
one
of
the
things
that's
a
little
bit
unusual
about.
This
is
typically
when
we
execute
Maps
projects,
we
go
through
a
site
selection
process.
We
identify
exactly
what,
where
it's
going
to
be
located
because
of
the
nuances
of
this
agreement
and
the
way
that
it's
structured
there
is
a
need
to
provide
some
flexibility
on
the
part
of
the
housing
authority
to
identify
project
locations.
Some
of
them
are
identified,
you'll
notice.
E
If
you
look
in
the
agreement,
the
public
housing
recapitalization
projects,
those
are
existing
properties
that
the
Housing
Authority
operates
or
is
part
of,
and
so
those
locations
have
obviously
been
identified.
The
other
two
categories
of
housing,
you'll
notice,
like
it
will
say,
Supportive
Housing
one
project,
one
or
project
two,
and
that's
because
they
really
I
have
not
identified
the
exact
location.
The
agreement
has
some
exhibits
in
the
back
of
it,
which
basically
identify
the
areas
that
these
projects
will
be
located
in
and
so
obviously
you're.
E
You
can
dig
into
that
if
you're
curious
about
where
these
are
located,
but
really
again
trying
to
provide
the
Housing
Authority
some
flexibility,
while
also
providing
some
transparency,
I
think
to
the
city
in
terms
of
where
these
projects
would
potentially
be
located
there
is.
There
are
Provisions
in
the
agreement
as
it
relates
to
Workforce
housing.
Obviously,
economic
conditions
can
change.
E
Development
patterns
can
change,
and
so
it
provides
some
ability
for
them
to
adjust
that
map
based
on
various
metrics
and
those
are
identified
in
the
agreement
as
well
once
the
allocation
plan
is
approved,
so
the
allocation
plan
for
allocation
one
that's
coming
forward
today,
assuming
that
the
board
recommends
that
to
council
and
Council,
approves
it
really.
The
operator
is
then
authorized
to
expend
funds
and
so
they'll
go
forward.
They'll
execute
those
projects,
it's
all
based
on
the
goals
and
objectives
of
the
of
the
the
program,
but
really
turns
them
loose
to
get
started.
E
The
operator
in
the
agreement
will
be
responsible
for
securing
any
additional
funding.
One
of
the
things
that
I
didn't
touch
on
in
that
summary
table
with
the
three
colors
on
it.
There
was
a
column
out
to
the
right,
which
indicated
the
anticipated
leverage,
so
the
city
in
no
way
is
involved
in
going
out
and
securing
that
funding
and
bringing
that
to
the
funding
stack.
That's
all
the
responsibility
of
the
Housing
Authority
they're,
obviously
very
Adept
at
that
and
are
going
to
be
responsible
for
that
portion
of
it.
E
They
will
be
responsible
for
the
management
of
all
the
construction
of
these
projects,
and
so
that
will
be
something
that
they
will
take
on
their
shoulders
again.
One
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out.
This
is
a
little
bit
atypical,
as
you
might
imagine,
there's
going
to
be
Architects
and
engineers
and
contractors
and
construction
managers
involved
the
way
the
city
is
the
city
standard
process
is,
we
would
go
out
and
advertise
an
RFQ.
We
would
select
bring
that
selection
here,
negotiate
a
contract.
E
All
of
that
all
of
that
responsibility
is
really
moving
to
the
housing
authority,
and
so
they
have
a
process
that
they
will
go
through.
I
would
assume
and
I
I
think
Ian
would
confirm
this.
It's
all
title
61
compliant
like
they.
They
have
the
ability
to
select
Architects
and
Engineers
based
on
qualifications.
They
have
a
pool
of
pre-qualified
construction
teams,
design
teams
that
will
help
them
execute
these
and
they
will
be
responsible
for
selecting
people
from
that
pool
and
then
obviously
assigning
them
to
projects.
E
Once
the
projects
are
done,
they
will
be
operated
and
maintained
by
the
Housing
Authority
in
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
here
on
the
next
agenda
item
about
who
those
partners
are,
but
obviously
their
response
included
some
information
in
that
regard,
all
the
players.
You
would
probably
anticipate
that
would
be
involved
in
supporting
projects
like
this,
and
so
they
have
really
strong
Partnerships
and
I
would
anticipate
that
that
will
be.
That
will
be
a
big
part
of
how
these
projects
are
operated
in
the
future.
E
So
with
that
I
know,
I
went
through
it.
Pretty
quick.
That's
the
highlights
I
would
be
pleased
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Obviously,
this
morning,
any.
A
Questions
for
Jason
anybody
have
any
questions.
I've
got
a
couple,
so
you
said
that
this
operating
agreement
is
for
10
years.
So
what
happens
after
10
years.
E
Well,
really,
all
I
was
speaking
to
was
the
fact
that
they
could
renew
it
if,
if
both
parties
agreed
that
it
was
in
both
parties
to
renew
it,
that
they
would
do
that
that
okay,
David
or
Laura
could
probably
speak
to
you
know
the
city
I,
don't
think,
has
the
ability
to
enter
into
indefinite
contracts.
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
the
requirements
are
there.
B
A
A
Well,
yeah
and
then
also
on
the
locations
that
are
still
to
be
determined.
Will
that
be
part
of
what
is
reported
or
part
of
the
plan
that
is
presented
for
the
the
next
set
of
allocations?.
E
I
think
I
might
so
so
the
allocation
plan
that
you'll
be
receiving
today.
For
me
in
the
presentation
you
know
those
projects
where
specific
locations
have
not
yet
been
identified.
It's
going
to
be
very
apparent
when
he
presents
it
like
those
locations
have
still
not
been
identified.
Okay,
I'm,
not
quite
sure,
on
the
Nuance
of
the
agreement,
I
I
think
he
comes
back
or
they
come
back
at
some
point.
So
the.
B
A
You
being
here,
okay,
so
is
Ian
going
to
go
ahead
and
present.
Now,
no.
B
A
B
F
Ian
Colgan
representing
the
Oklahoma
City
Housing
Authority
I,
was
about
to
say
that
Jason
did
a
great
job
and
pretty
much
covered.
Everything
I
didn't
need
to
come
up
and
do
anything.
But
I
would
like
to
talk
about
this
program
a
little
bit
from
our
persp
our
perspective
from
the
prospective
operating
operating
standpoint.
So
for
those
who
don't
know
the
Oklahoma
City
Housing
Authority
is
one
of
the
largest
housing
authorities
in
the
country
and
the
largest
in
the
state.
F
On
any
given
day,
we
manage
3
000
public
housing
units
and
about
4
500
housing,
Choice
vouchers,
also
known
as
Section
8
vouchers,
so
that's
7,
500.,
plus
households
and
15
000
individuals,
all
of
which
holistically
make
an
average
of
ten
thousand
dollars
per
household.
So
the
housing
authority
and
its
role
really
is
a
fundamental
housing
infrastructure
piece
to
affordability
in
the
city,
as
are
most
housing
authorities
across
the
country
for
the
hope,
the
maps
homelessness
program.
F
Supportive
Housing
goes
to
the
very
notion
that
we
are
desperately
in
need
of
new
housing
units
dedicated
solely
to
those
experiencing
homelessness
or
at
risk
of
homelessness.
You
know
it's
any
it's!
It's
not
just
getting
people
directly
off
the
streets,
but
it's
people
in
lots
of
different
situations.
Maybe
that
aren't
even
accounted
for
in
the
point
in
time.
Count
that
need
stable
housing
and
access
to
services,
and
that
is
what
Supportive
Housing
is,
and
we
propose
to
create
a
network
targeting
different
types
and
needs
and
services
of
properties.
F
We've
proposed
500,
I
hope
to
produce
more.
That
will
include
on-site
wraparound
Services
through
a
housing
first
model
that
will
place
people
in
there
provide
them
access
to
services
to
where
they
need
to
go,
and,
as
Jason
mentioned,
the
ecosystem
of
housing
can
be
considered
as
a
ladder
where
you
can
stay
in
such
a
type
of
housing
or
you
might
reach
a
level
of
services
that
allow
you
to
be
more
flexible
in
different
types
of
housing,
whether
it's
public
housing
through
a
section
8
voucher,
another
affordable
housing
opportunity.
F
Since
the
last
20
to
30
years,
the
amount
of
dollars
allocated
to
public
housing
from
Congress
has
declined.
Precipitously
to
the
point
where,
in
our
case,
we
are
provided
about
five
to
six
million
dollars
from
HUD
to
address
200,
plus
million
dollars
of
capital
of
deferred
Capital
needs.
The
most
recent
public
housing
property
was
built
in
1979.
F
and
most
of
the,
and
it
goes
all
the
way
back
to
the
1930s
and
none
of
those
because
of
this
issue
of
funding
has
received
a
holistic
overhaul
that
is
badly
needed.
That
in
multi-family
is
typically
done
about
15
to
20
years
we're
pushing
50
to
60
years.
In
some
cases,
of
course,
you
know,
roofs
have
been
replaced.
F
Hvac
has
been
fixed,
but
we're
talking
about
a
whole
holistic
overhaul,
because
if
those
properties
don't
get
the
capital
they
need
for
these,
this
deferred
maintenance
and
capital
needs,
as
we've
seen
in
other
parts
of
the
country,
they
will
go
offline
and
that
housing
is
no
longer
needed.
So
it
doesn't
matter
how
many
more
units
are
adding
if
we
lose
them
we're
at
a
net
zero,
so
preservation
and
addition
are
kind
of
two
two
parallel
tracks
we
want
to
focus
on.
F
A
third
is
Middle
Market,
Workforce
housing.
As
we
worked
through
our
proposal,
we
thought
there
was
a
lot
of
demand
and
focus
on
the
increased
unaffordability
of
a
lot
of
neighborhoods,
particularly
in
downtown
and
around
downtown.
That,
on
one
hand,
benefit
from
the
massive
investment
of
previous
maps
and
just
the
general
quality
of
life
improvements
that
have
been
happening.
But,
as
those
are
built
you
know
the
lack
of
affordability,
affordable
housing
following
that
provides
a
opportunity.
Gap,
where
you
know
people
may
not
be
able
to
access.
F
You
know
the
choice
neighborhoods
that
we've
created
in
the
community.
They
also
address
more
of
a
concept
of
not
just
affordable
housing
but
affordable
housing
in
combination
of
Transportation,
because
affordability
is
both
where
you
can
live
and
then
where
you
need
to
go
in
terms
of
where
you
work
and
other
things.
So
a
component
of
this
we
wanted
to
add,
was
a
Workforce
housing
portion
that
would
Target
Middle
Market
housing
for
sale
or
rental
in
these
high
growth
areas.
F
So
what
we've
proposed
is
500
units
of
permanent
Supportive
Housing,
the
preservation
of
at
least
1500
public
housing
units
and
I
said
three
thousand
before,
but
there's
possibility
that
we
can
leverage
other
funds
to
do
the
rest
of
our
portfolio
so
we're
targeting
really
at
least
1500
and
then
150
Workforce
homes.
F
Jason
mentioned
this
before,
but
one
of
the
aspects
of
our
proposal
was
that
we
did
not
want
to
be
in
a
position
where
we're
competing
with
the
private
sector.
You
know
we
want
to
allocate
These
funds
in
a
manner
I
think,
as
Maps
has
done
in
the
past.
Where
is
a
true
public
sector
intervention
to
leverage
other
benefits,
whether
they're,
Financial
or
social,
and
the
areas
of
housing
we've
identified,
the
public
housing,
Supportive,
Housing,
Workforce
housing
fall
into
what
we
term
inefficient,
Market
delivery
for
the
private
sector.
F
It
either
is
not
feasible
to
build
those
from
the
private
sector,
not
profitable,
or
requires
so
much
money
from
a
public
sector
entity
to
get
it
done,
that
the
public
sector
and
its
Partners
might
as
well
do
it
on
its
own,
and
so
we
really
wanted
to
Target
these
areas
where
we
weren't
saying
well,
this
developer
or
this
developer
or
these
groups,
you
know,
could
do
the
same
thing.
We're
doing
a
unique.
F
So
those
include
the
Mental
Health
Association
of
Oklahoma,
homeless,
Alliance
and
pivot
and
they'll
play
a
crucial
role
in
implementing,
in
particular,
the
support
of
Housing
Programs,
because
they
have
lots
of
experience
addressing
you
know,
building
such
housing,
focusing
that
housing
on
certain
groups
like
those
experiencing
mental
health
barriers
or
youths
aging
out
of
foster
care
and,
of
course,
the
universe
that
is
used
to
place.
People
experiencing
homelessness,
you
know,
runs
through
the
city
and
the
homeless
Alliance.
So
so
this
is
the
partnership
that
we
will
be
moving
forward
to
implement.
F
One
of
the
interesting
and
I
think
unique
aspects
of
this
related
to
Maps
is
that
Maps
traditionally
is
you
know
the
city
investing
in
big
public?
You
know
public
sector
Works
projects,
the
Housing
Authority
being
a
government
agency,
can
kind
of
bridge
between
that
City
level,
policy
goal
and
implementation
at
a
non-profit
private
level
to
secure
property,
secure
funding.
The
way
that
you
know,
non-profit
developers
would,
in
a
quasi-private
manner
all
but
all
connected
back
to
City
control
through
our
through
our
board
there.
F
F
F
We
propose
to
own
all
the
properties,
so
the
Housing
Authority
through
you
know
its
subsidiaries.
But
there's
that's:
one
of
the
direct
connectivities
is
direct
ownership
control,
whether
it's
through
you
know,
direct
ownership
of
a
property
or
a
ground
lease
with
Partners
or
something
like
that,
but
that
plus
Asset
Management
always
ensures
that
there's
control.
That
goes
all
the
way
back
to
the
maps
program.
F
And
finally,
one
of
the
crucial
pieces
is
rental
assistance,
so
that
would
be
section
eight.
So
for
those
who
don't
know,
if
you're
on
a
Section
8
voucher,
you
pay
about
30
of
what
your
gross
income
would
be.
You
could
theoretically
make
no
money
and
still
get
a
house,
that's
crucial
for
the
homelessness
population,
because
there
is
isn't
a
lot
of
income
in
that
group
of
people,
so
properties
that
are
successful
really
need
project-based
rental
assistance,
and
that
is
the
resource
that
the
Housing
Authority
can
bring.
F
F
You
want
to
go
through
the
allocation
plan
now,
okay,
so
all
this
funnels
into
the
allocation
plan,
which
is
a
manifestation
of
everything,
we've
talked
about
so
first
allocation
plan.
This
is
what
we
proposed
to
start
with
right
away
once
approved.
F
So
one
of
the
aspects
of
maps
in
a
lot
of
ways
is
not
just
unit
by
unit
creation,
but
in
Opportunities
like
Creston
Park,
which
is
the
Redevelopment
of
30
Acres
of
former
public
housing.
We
can
build
more
units,
and
you
know
we
don't
know
exactly
how
that
manifests
itself
over
10
years,
but
in
the
case
of
Creston
Park,
you
know,
2.5
million
would
replace
159
units
and
receive
550..
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
Kristen
Park
phase,
two
of
260
units
can
follow
reasonably
behind
phase
one.
F
F
Oak
Grove
Apartments
is
a
288
unit.
Public
housing,
property,
just
south
of
the
Dell
campus
and
the
river
is
one
of
our
largest
properties
and
it's
largest
by
the
population
it
was
built
about
1970,
so
again
needs
a
fairly
large
refresh.
It's
it's
on.
You
know
about
50
acres,
so
it
really
represents
a
community
Innovative
of
itself
Community
Center,
one
to
five
bedroom
units
on
the
private
Market.
It's
almost
impossible
to
find
four
and
five
bedroom
units.
F
This
is
one
of
the
the
important
aspects
of
preserving
public
housing,
because
once
units
like
that
are
gone,
they'll
never
be
replaced
so
we're
proposing
a
about
50,
plus
million
dollar
renovation
of
that
property.
That
will
also
include
a
second
phase
with
new
units
and
and
other
renovated
public
housing
units.
After
this,
both
phases
will
be
done
about
400,
plus
units
being
renovated
or
built.
F
So
those
are
two
properties
that
actually
have
physical
locations
and
they're
identified
and
we've
either
started
or
about
to
start
active
pre-development
and
investment,
and
we've
been
working
on
these
for
quite
some
time
and
they've
been
part
of
the
Housing
Authority
Strategic
investment
plan,
since
at
least
2016.,
but
examples
of
how
Maps
can
layer
in
you
know
a
you
know:
million
two
million
is
not
a
small
amount
of
money,
but
the
amount
we
can
leverage
and
the
benefit
that
could
be.
F
That
could
be
leveraged
from
a
neighborhood
and
city-wide
investment
I
think
are
fairly
Apparent
from
those
two
projects,
so
supportive
housing
project,
one
and
two
generic
names.
We
would
use
the
approval
of
maps
money
to
go
out
and
acquire
properties
that
hopefully
would
yield
between
75
to
100
units.
It
might
you
know,
depending
on
how
things
lay
out
and
the
properties
available
could
be
more
than
two
projects.
We
would
leverage
about.
50
Maps,
50
leveraged
funding
to
do
that
and
that's
where
Jason
was
alluding
to
you
know
the
flexibility
of
what
we
need.
F
Is
you
know,
without
approval
or
or
some
predictability
of
availability
of
funds?
There's
no
real
project
to
go
out
and
find
there's
also
no
other
money
to
Leverage.
With
this
money
we
could
go
to
the
state,
we
could
go
to
other
Federal.
You
know
affordable
housing
sources
and
leverage
the
final
amount,
but
the
reverse
is
not
really
possible.
So
that's
why
these
projects
are
discussed.
You
know
in
generality
these
are
goals.
We
would
then
go
out.
You
know
secure
property
and
bring
back
the
details
of
how
they
would
manifest
themselves.
F
You
know,
within
the
maps
program
pre-development
fund
of
about
this
is
actually
wrong.
I
think
it
adds
up
to
1.75
million,
which
is
my
mistake
in
here.
Pre-Development
funds
are
numerous
and
add
up
to
these
real
estate
projects,
so
developers
can
expend
you
know
millions
of
dollars
in
advance
of
closing
on
financing
architecture
and
engineering,
Market
studies,
appraisals,
it
all
adds
up.
So
what
we
want
to
do
with
the
first
allocation
plan
is
to
fund
a
revolving
pre-development
fund
that
will
be
used
to
pay
for
all
those
upfront
costs.
F
Those
costs
will
then
be
reimbursed
by
the
final
Capital
stack,
go
back
into
the
revolving
fund
and
used
for
allocation
two
and
three
or
four
and
at
the
very
end,
because
we
would
be
done
with
all
the
projects
that
money
would
basically
collapse
from
the
pre-development
fund
into
a
final
Supportive
Housing
project,
Workforce
housing
project.
What
have
you
it
wouldn't
stay
in
perpetuity
and
then
an
additional
500-ish
thousand
dollars
for
operator
admin.
F
There
are,
obviously
you
know,
staff
at
the
Housing
Authority
that
exist
now,
but
will
be
needed
to
add
to
implement
a
program
of
the
scale.
It's
a
very
large
Redevelopment
development
program,
and
so
that
includes
you
know,
project
managers.
Since
we're
in
charge
of
Construction
Construction
managers.
You
know
additions
to
our
resident
services
department.
So
that
you
know
we're
building
capacity
and
making
sure
the
right,
Supportive
Services
are
available.
F
A
F
So
let's
take
Oak
Grove
Apartments
running
sound
example:
okay,
so
Oak
Grove
I
mean
the
50
million
dollars
is
actually
from
a
financial
model.
We've
developed
it's
not
pulling
out
of
a
hat
just
so
that
you
know
the
level
of
you
know,
effort
we've
put
in
so
far,
so
one
of
the
major
sources
would
be
loan,
come
housing
tax
credits,
in
this
case
the
four
percent
tax
exempt
program
that
an
application
with
a
state
and
right
now
that
is
a
if
you
meet
a
threshold.
F
That's
a
buy
right
allocation
of
long-home
housing,
tax
credits.
So
for
a
50
million
dollar
project
we
could
leverage
20
million
dollars
in
tax
credits.
Then,
through
rental
income
we
would
probably
leverage
another
20
million
dollars
in
debt.
So
a
first
mortgage
initially
issued
through
a
tax
exempt
Bond
and
then
then
from
a
bank
and
then
the
rest
is
the
gap
funding
we
need
to
fill.
So
all
these
big
projects
will
have
that
Gap,
and
so
you
know
partly
it's
maps.
F
In
this
case
we
have
about
a
million
dollars
of
Housing
Authority
money,
we're
putting
in
we're
also
selling
some
land
and
using
some
proceeds.
So
each
project
is
different
available
sources.
You
know
include
home
and
cdbg
from
the
city,
housing
trust
funds
from
the
state,
affordable,
housing
program
from
the
federal
home
bank.
So
there's
a
set
of
you
know:
programs
out
there
both
locally
and
nationally.
That
developers
typically
use
to
do
that,
and
you
know
they
can
take
a
long
time
to
assemble
and
Maps
really
helps.
F
You
know
close
the
need
to,
in
some
cases,
put
six
different
additional
sources
down
the
these
can
be
sort
of
complex
and
when
you
look
at
the
capital
stack,
they
really
start
to
add
up.
So
we
don't
want
Maps
necessarily
to
be
all
that
Gap,
because
we're
not
we're
trying
to
leverage
as
much
as
possible,
but
those
are
the
typical
sources
that
would
be
used
in
any
public
housing,
light
tech
kind
of
deal
for
Supportive
Housing.
You
know
it's
possibility.
F
We've
imagined
some
grant
funding
on
top
of
the
maps,
funding,
Housing,
Trust
Fund
dollars
from
the
state
other
other
things
that
are
generally
available,
and
you
know
reasonably
available
they're,
not
just
shots
in
the
dark.
There's.
Also,
the
nine
percent
tax
credit
program
that
would
leverage
other
equity
on
top
of
that
and
that's
been
used
all
across
the
country
to
build
Supportive
Housing,
so
we're
fairly
confident
about
the
availability
but
part
of
the
predictability
of
the
long-term
program
is
you
know
we
have
a
project,
we
know
what
Maps
funding
we
have.
F
So
we
know
exactly
what
other
funding
we
need
to
go
get.
We
may
not
spend
the
maps
money
right
away,
it
might
be
later
on
in
the
construction
project
or
some
of
that
it
depends.
But
it's
all
predicated
on
you
know
generally
available
and
predictable
sources
that
you
know
they
want
to
see.
You
have
your
Capital
stack,
put
into
place
before
they'll
put
in,
and
maps
on
top
of
debt
and
Equity
really
helps
secure
those
other
funds.
H
About
I
guess
my
concern
is
some
of
the
issues
that
the
Housing
Authority
has
been
having
in
the
last
couple
years
and
how
quickly
we
can
really
see
some
change
for
the
homeless,
unhoused
population.
We
have
right
now
because,
from
what
you
have
described,
it
doesn't
seem
as
if
any
new
available
housing
is
going
to
be
open
for
subsequent
years.
F
With
some
identified
funds
on
top
of
maps,
we
could
have
a
property
Acquired
and
renovated
in
less
than
a
year.
We
just
need
to
look
to
see
what's
available,
negotiate
pricing
things
like
that,
but
without
the
maps
funds
there's
nothing
to
do
for
that.
So
once
we
start,
we
start
looking
for
those
properties,
screwing
the
other
funding,
and
then
you
know
creating
that
timeline.
F
So
you
know
older
Class,
C
apartments
or
even
hotels
are
primary
targets
that
you
know
have
are
not
as
desirable
within
those
markets
to
and
aren't
you
know
extremely
expensive
and
but
don't
necessarily
need
a
substantial
amount
of
renovation.
They're,
not
shells,
so
they
can
be.
You
know,
part
of
the
pro
the
money
is
acquisition.
Part
of
it
is
light
renovation
to
get
those
units
up
as
soon
as
possible.
H
Well,
I'm
not
I,
have
a
lot
of
concerns
here,
based
on
I
mean
because
my
idea,
or
what
I
it
had
in
my
mind
and
maybe
I'm
wrong,
is
that
we
would
see
some
immediate
our
fairly
soon
changes
for
our
unhoused
population
and
I
don't
see
that
this
particular
allocation
plan
is
going
to
help
those
that
are
currently
unhoused.
This
looks
more
like
a
plan
to
help
the
oak,
the
Housing
Authority
revamp
and
change
what
they
currently
are
offering,
which
is
not
the
what
I
thought
this
was
meant
to
be.
F
F
We
are
looking
and
forming
a
plan
to
use
our
housing
Choice
vouchers
to
better
Target
existing
homeless
people
experiencing
homelessness,
so
that
there
is
a
program
up
and
running
at
a
scale
to
help
now.
But
this
is
a
capital
program,
as
are
maps
programs,
and
that
means
Properties
Real
Estate
development,
and
that
takes
time
so
there's
you
know,
do
I
wish
all
this
could
be
built
or
all
Supportive
Housing
could
go
out
and
be
provided
in
six
months.
Yes,
but
that's
not
realistic.
H
Okay
and
and
to
your
point
I,
do
understand
that,
but
the
Creston
Park
crested
Chris
Preston
Kristen
Park
housing
is
troubled
at
best
because
some
of
those
people
were
moved
out
and
you
know,
and
so
I
guess
that's
my
thing,
and
so,
if
you
all
were
supposed
to
have
some
stuff
started
back
in,
you
know
2016
2017
and
we're
now
in
2023,
and
that
is
still
not
really
moving
forward.
I
have
tremendous
concerns
with
this
map.
Funding
that
the
city
is
allocating
for
the
unhoused.
F
So,
okay,
you
know
that's
something:
we're
really
trying
to
put
together
this
year
and
get
started
because
it's
been
a
long
time
and
going
through
a
lot
of
trouble
to
you
know,
assemble
all
that
financing.
That's
a
really
good
example
phase,
one
of
all
the
funding
that's
needed
to
be
allocated
to
this
type
of
public
housing
Redevelopment,
which
is
not
just
public
housing.
It's
other,
affordable
housing
includes
50
project-based
vouchers,
the
same
vouchers
that
will
go
into
the
support
of
housing
and
a
center
for
services
to
serve
those
residents.
I
Presentation
first
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
The
Advisory
Board
and
with
those
in
attendance
from
where
my
perspective
arises.
So
I'm
sure
you
saw
on
the
Oklahoman
last
week
where
many
of
us
went
out.
I
Well,
let
me
back
up
in
terms
of
that
pronoun
us
many
Service
providing
agencies
went
out
at
about
four
o'clock
in
the
morning
to
do
Oklahoma,
City's
annual
point
in
time
count,
and
this
is
where
we
go
to
shelters,
encampments,
panhandling
sites
Etc
to
do
a
census
on
the
number
of
people
experiencing
homelessness
in
our
community
and
to
do
a
survey
it's
about
a
four-page
survey.
I
So
I
was
one
of
two
council
members
who
actually
went
out
on
that
point
in
time
count
and
four
o'clock
in
the
morning.
I
just
want
to
walk
you
off
for
a
cup
what
that
experience
was
and
why
why
I
feel
your
sense
of
urgency
and
then
I'll
just
have
some
some
questions
after
these
comments,
so
we
went
first
to
the
Walmart
parking
lot
because
we
have
learned
that
many
of
our
unhoused
residents
sleep
in
their
vehicles
and
parking
lots
that
are
well
lit.
I
So
that's
that's
one
type
of
homelessness
that
I
I
think
we
don't
talk
enough
about.
In
fact,
when
I
was
knocking
doors
in
the
new
part
of
water
too,
the
week
before
Christmas
there
was
an
older
couple
in
their
80s
and
but
they
were
resting
and
their
daughter
opened
the
door
and
I
mentioned
you
know,
maps
for
Park
stuff.
I
She
mentioned
she
had
concerns
about
loose
dogs
in
the
neighborhood,
and
then
she
went
back
to
the
parks
and
she
goes
well
I've
seen
homeless
people
there
and
I
walked
her
through
the
maps
for
program
and
Street
Outreach
teams
and
how
Houston
had
reduced
homelessness
by
63
percent
and
she
goes
well.
But
what
about
people
who
don't
want
the
help
and
I
walked
her
through?
I
What
I
have
learned
from
folk
like
Dan,
strong
at
the
homeless,
Alliance
I've
come
to
expect
a
series
of
responses
once
I
give
that
answer
to
people
about
what
about
people
who
don't
want
help,
but
what
I
didn't
anticipate
that
day
was
This
Woman's
response
where
she
said
well,
what
about
me?
I
am
homeless,
so
just
imagine
she's
at
the
door
and
at
home,
and
she
goes
I'm
homeless
and
I
was.
It
was
like
what
and
she
said,
I
don't
live
here.
I
This
is
my
parents,
house
they're,
just
letting
me
stay
here
for
Christmas
I
sleep.
She
told
me
in
her
truck
in
the
Walmart
parking
lot
with
her
dogs,
so
that
was
like
a
super
jarring
experience
for
me,
because
so
many
of
the
calls
we
get
in
the
ward,
2
office
and
emails
are
about
encampments
in
drainage,
canals
or
I-44
and
Penn
or
in
swadic
park
right.
I
Alliance
mentioned
Dan's
name
mentioned
Mental
Health,
Association
I'll,
never
forget
that
experience,
because
we
just
sat
at
her
dining
room
table
and
I
pulled
up
a
Google
image
search
of
the
homeless
Alliance,
so
she
could
see
for
herself
she
needed
to
see
this
facility
because
I
think
otherwise
we're
speaking
too
abstractly
to
a
lot
of
bull
Coop
and
let
down
along
the
way
so
I
made
it
concrete
for
her
and
then
I
told
her
after
giving
her
word
two's
contact
information
that
if
she
had
any
difficulty,
navigating
those
two
non-profits,
whether
homeless,
Alliance
or
mental
health,
to
call
us
because
we
knew
some
folk
right.
I
So
that's
one
example,
and
so
when
we
started
our
4
a.m,
drive
and
went
to
Belle
Isle
station.
That
made
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
and
I
wouldn't
have
understood
why
it
made
sense,
had
I
not
knocked
that
woman's
store.
Her
parents
store
two.
Then,
when
we
went
behind
Belle
Isle
station,
there
was
a
woman
and
I
I
hope.
You're
hearing
me
on
this
I
y'all
I
am
I
have
been
baptized
by
what
happened.
I
Last
Thursday
I
I
I'm,
not
being
hyperbolic
I,
no
longer
have
patience
on
this
issue,
I
just
don't
I
barely
did
there
was
a
woman
standing
in
wet
cardboard
scraps
behind
the
loading
dock
in
Belle
Isle
station.
She
was
standing
In,
Her
Shoes,
but
they
weren't
even
all
the
way
on
her
feet.
She
was
standing
on
her
shoes
on
her
shoes,
Sheila
from
Mental
Health
Association
did
this.
The
first
survey
asked
her
questions
turns
out.
She
had
escaped
domestic
violence
turns
out.
She
hasn't
been
with
her.
I
Kids
in
years
turns
out
even
Palomar
where
she
had
received
Services.
She
had
kind
of
fallen
through
the
cracks
there
and
she
doesn't
go
to
the
shelter
she
told
us
because
when
they
initially
were
going
to
send
her
and
her
kids
to
the
shelters,
she
didn't
trust
that
system.
So
she
didn't
go,
and
now
she
hasn't
seen
her
kids
in
years
and
any
time
she
thinks
about
going
to
a
shelter.
She
can't
because
in
her
mind,
it's
re-triggering
the
loss
of
her
children.
I
I
Oh
my
god.
She
asked
us
if
we
had
a
feminine
hygiene
products
and
thank
God
people
like
Sheila
and
Lindsey,
Cates
and
Melissa
were
in
that
SUV
with
us,
because
I
didn't
have
it
and
I,
also
just
couldn't
imagine
being
on
our
streets
at
32
degrees
and
again
wet
cardboard,
scraps
and
being
a
woman
and
not
having
access
to
just
a
fundamental
monthly
need
a
need.
Oh
my
God,
that's
our
people
and
they're,
not
busting.
People
are
lying
to
our
people
about
who
our
homeless
residents
are
I
know.
I
Many
of
you
all
know
that,
but
I
just
want
it
on
the
cameras.
I
want
to
say
that
inside,
because
we
ask
the
people
in
the
survey.
Where
are
you
from
Oklahoma
City?
They
told
us
or
the
the
the
city.
The
cities
around
here
are
towns,
because
that's
our
people,
then
we
went
to
39th
and
Penn.
The
LGBT
District
I
met
two
gentlemen,
just
huddled
under
blankets
there
around
my
age.
We
did
their
survey,
I
got
their
names
mixed
up
briefly,
and
he
goes
no
I'm.
I
Daniel
and
I
made
a
point
every
moment
from
that
second
on
to
refer
to
him
as
Daniel
I,
don't
like
saying,
homeless,
people
anymore
I
really
appreciated
the
way
you
all
spoke
earlier.
Where
you
said
people
extended
to
people
experiencing
homelessness,
are
unhoused
population
I
think
we
really
need
to
rethink
the
language.
I
When
we
speak,
then
we
went
across
the
street
to
Casey's
at
Penn
and
the
same
people.
We
just
surveyed.
Some
man
who
was
experiencing
I,
don't
know
what
kind
of
mental
health
breakdown
he
was
belligerent
and
he
was
threatening
Daniel
and
Thomas
and
Michael.
I
Can
you
imagine
who
do
you
call
when
you're
homeless
and
someone's
threatening
you
when
my
residents
who
are
housed
are
feel
threatened
by
someone
on
house?
They
call
me
and
then
I
send
out
Lieutenant,
David,
Dale
or
major
Dan
Stewart
and
then
I
reach
out
to
homeless,
Alliance
and
Mental
Health
Association,
who
are
in
housed
residents,
calling
who
are
they
calling
who
are
they
calling?
I
So
we
had
to
roll
up
beside
him.
I
asked
Lindsay
to
drive
beside
them
and
I
rolled
down
my
window
and
I
said
get
away
from
that
man.
Nothing
good
will
come
from
your
interaction
with
this
man.
Nothing
I
hope
they
heard
me.
Then
we
went
under
the
bridge
at
I-44
and
Penn.
Can
you
imagine
being
woke
up
at
five?
You
know
six
o'clock
in
the
morning
by
someone
saying
Outreach
survey.
Well,
this
man
was
very
upset
by
that
I
would
be
too
I'm
upset
when
you
wake
me
up
at
7
30
a.m.
I
I
I
It
just
almost
broke
me
last
week,
and
the
only
thing
that
keeps
me
going
is
the
compassion
of
word,
the
majority
of
word
two
people,
because
most
the
time
when
we're
two
people
are
calling
they're
saying
how
can
we
connect
them
to
the
services?
What
are
you
all
doing,
and
this
is
what
we're
doing,
and
this
is
what
I
tell
them
so
I
just
wanted
to
walk
you
all
through
those
comments.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
me.
That's
just
the
culmination
worth
of
four
years
worth
of
calls
and
emails.
I
I
I
What
role
will
the
street
Outreach
teams?
The
city
is
going
to
hire
play
in
connecting
people
like
Bianca
and
Daniel
and
Thomas
Michael
to
this
to
these
housing
units
I.
G
Good
morning,
thanks
for
having
me
here,
I'm
danced
on
I'm,
the
executive
founder
of
the
homeless,
Alliance
I
didn't
bring
a
prepared
presentation,
but
you
know
one
of
the
things
your
question
Miss
Bruner
is
is
really
pertinent
because
it's
as
Ian
said
this
is
this:
is
capital
money,
but
but
to
get
moving
with
the
stock
that
we
have
now
we
need
operating
funds
right,
and
so
you
know,
on
March
7th
there'll,
be
a
presentation
to
members
of
the
Council
of
a
plan
to
use
home
and
arpa
funds
to
to
make
the
current
system
that
we
have
now,
which
works
really.
G
Well,
it's
just
not
robust
enough
right.
So
what
happens
with
people
like
that
is
that
you
met
councilman
is
they'll,
get
an
assessment
and,
as
a
community,
we've
moved
away
from
a
waiting
list
model
to
a
triage
model
right.
G
We're
able
to
house
fewer
people,
because
the
cost
of
rent
has
gone
up
and
landlords
with
a
vacant
unit
are
able
to
be
much
more
discriminating
and
I
use
that
word
intentionally
about
who
they
rent
to,
because
they
know
it's
not
going
to
be
vacant
very
long.
G
If,
if
they
turn
down
my
client
or
when
a
mental
health
association's
clients,
a
client
without
those
issues
will
be
in
the
next
day
to
rent
that
apartment,
and
so,
while
across
the
Continuum,
we
were
able
to
move
more
than
12
000
people
experiencing
homelessness
back
into
housing,
inflow
and
lack
of
outflow
is,
is
pumping
up
that
current
number.
So
I
think
to
your
your
question
about
what's
going
to
help
tomorrow,
I
I
think
what
you're
going
to
see
on
March
7th
is
is
an
attempt
to
answer
that.
A
Thank
you
for
sharing
that
that
interim
plan
and
that
that's
really
helpful
to
to
know
that
that
kind
of
helps,
I,
think
but
put
more
pieces
together.
G
F
I
wanted
to
Dan
to
share
that,
since
you
all,
you
know,
are
familiar
with
him
in
a
large
case.
The
state
also
has
30
million
dollars
of
Home
Erp
funding
that
they're
about
to
allocate
to
rental
assistance
to
Supportive
Housing,
and
things
like
that.
So
you
know
it's
really
an
opportunistic
time
right
now
with
the
launch
of
of
Master
homelessness
and
this
funding
that
came
from
the
American
Rescue
plan,
and
it's
exciting
that
there
are.
You
know
things
like
this
program
or
home
or
or
the
Continuum
of
Care.
F
Not
only
these
Supportive
Housing
preserve
existing
public
housing
which
serves
those
residents
as
well
and
take
public
housing
assets
and
add
more
because
you
know
this
is
really
maybe
once
a
generation
is
slow,
but
you
know
doesn't
come
around
all
you
know
all
the
time.
So
that's
really
where
this
is
focused.
I.
I
Have
a
few
more
laser
questions,
one
to
Russell's
earlier
inquiry?
Can
we
and
then
I'm
guessing
the
subcommittee?
Excuse
me
subcommittee
the
community
one.
Can
we
receive
a
list
of
the
different
Partners
or
grants
that
were
intending
to
leverage
like
I'd
like
I'd
I'd,
because
when
I,
when
I
always
respond
to
people
and
say
oh
we're
going
to
take
the
55
and
leverage
it
into
400
and
it
sounds
wonderful,
but
I
think
that
that
will
help
be
I,
mean
I'm
not
going
to
tell
everyone.
F
Actually
in
our
proposal,
but
we
can
take
that
part
out
and
just
have
that
piece
available.
Of
course,
nope.
I
Okay,
so
thank
you
for
that
to
I
like
that
you're
talking
about
these
high
high
cost
sort
of
areas,
and
so
something
I'm
very
interested
in
it
are
kind
of
two
approaches.
There
I
mean
other
approaches,
I'm
sure
that
you
all
are
considering,
of
course,
consider
and
take
those
approaches,
but
I
think
a
lot
about
the
upcoming
bus,
rapid
transit
route
on
Northwest,
Expressway
and
class
in
our
RDC
Dan
nodding
his
head.
I
So
I'd
like
for
that
to
be
in
consideration
for
where
we
would
build
that
housing,
because
if
someone
can
more
quickly
access
the
public
transit
right
from
their
home,
then
they
can
get
more
quickly
to
Recreation
education
and
employment,
relatedly,
better
Street,
safer
City
maps
for
and
then
quite
frankly,
whatever
I'm
get
I,
don't
know
what
funding
mechanisms
made
the
streetscape
place,
making
Investments
20
years
ago
possible
in
Western,
District
the
stuff
in
Bricktown,
but
I.
I
Think,
since
the
city
has
already
made
these
investments
in
streetscapes
and
place
making
in
our
City's
historic
corridors
right
to
resurrect
them,
renew
them,
Renaissance
them
I
think
housing
makes
sense
in
those
areas,
because
my
grade
concern
and
I
thought
about
it.
Just
this
morning
walking
to
grab
an
espresso
in
my
neighborhood
Paseo
was
walking
over
to
holy
rollers
and
I'm.
A
renter
there
and
I
can
tell
you
I'm
terrified,
terrified
I
have
recurring
nightmares
about
waking
up
in
an
apartment,
not
in
the
Paseo
anymore.
In
fact,
not
even
in
Oklahoma
City.
I
I
So
happy
that
all
the
the
people
come
to
visit
us
in
the
Paseo
on
First,
Fridays
I,
don't
need
them
displacing
my
people,
I
I,
don't
and
so
I'd
like
for
some
consideration
in
Paseo
and
Uptown,
the
Asian
District
Britain,
District,
Clara,
Looper,
Corridor
I.
Think
we
should
be
very
intentional
at
looking.
Where
has
the
city
made
Investments,
because
we
have
a
stake
then
right
and
seeing
those
places
not
just
continue
to
thrive
but
honor
the
existence
of
people
who've
lived
there
previously.
So
to
me,
brt
and
those
districts,
I.
F
Think
you
I
can't
remember
when
you
came
in
at
the
beginning
of
my
presentation,
but
I
think
you're
describing
exactly
the
intent
of
that
component
and
something
I
don't
know
if
you've
ever
found,
but
I
think
you'd
find
interesting
is
there's
a
website.
I
think
it's
called
the
housing
plus
Transportation
index.
So
it's
an
attempt
to
take
the
concept
of
affordability
and
expand
it
into
the
con
into
the
framework
of
both
housing
and
transportation
right
and
you
might
find
it
interesting
noodling
around
it,
because
it's
a
map
and
you
paint
a
location.
F
You
look
at
a
neighborhood
and
they
you
know
it's
it's
obviously
from
census
data
and
the
best
that
an
analysis
can
do,
but
it
adds
that
expected
Transportation
costs
to
average
employment
areas
and
things
like
that-
and
you
know
that's
something:
we're
really
looking
to
leverage
over
all
these
locations,
because
it's
not
you
know
so
much
of
a
housing.
Affordability
is
30
percent
of
your
gross
income.
You
know
these
Federal
standards
and
and
they
work,
but
you
know:
where
are
they
located?
How
how
much
can
you
access?
F
You
know
amenities
and
services
that
you
need
and
what's
interesting
about
the
index
is,
you
could
locate,
I,
don't
know
you'd
be
in
Chicago
or
Phoenix
or
Oklahoma
City
wherever
and
pick
a
neighborhood
and
it
seems
affordable.
And
then
you
click
the
button
for
transportation,
all
of
a
sudden
like
80
of
someone's
income
whoa,
and
that
you
know
so,
focusing
on
Transportation
quarters
brt
and
in
particular
areas
of
City
investment.
I
mean
the
city
invests
in
those
areas
to
make
them
better
neighborhoods
and
that
should
be
an
opportunity
for
everyone.
Wonderful.
I
Just
a
couple
more
wine,
I'm
sorry,
y'all
I
appreciate
your
patience
on
this
when
we
crafted
maps
for
it
was
so
difficult
because
we
were
trying
to
what
Ian
just
said
when
we
were
trying
to
like
weave
it
all
together,
it
was
the
transit
with
the
walkability,
with
the
bike
ability
with
the
housing.
With
the
mental
health
I
mean
it
was
a.
It
was
a
doozy
right
now.
I
As
you
all
know,
we
have
a
program
through
planning
of
a
housing
down
payment
assistance
program
and
that
involves
financial
literacy
classes
as
well,
and
I
have
residents
and
work
too
who've
gone
through
that
and
now
own
are
on
route
to
owning
120
000
home
right.
I
But
my
understanding
is
that
that's
all
through
HUD
and
that
the
city
we
can't,
through
our
general
fund
by
Charter,
we
can't
put
more
money
in
there,
because
that
would
be
considered
a
gift.
So
I
just
looked
at
it.
Legal
they're
like
yeah,
that's
right!
So
I'm
curious
though
there's
two
things
happening
there:
one
the
people
managing
the
down
payment
assistance
program
and
that
financial
literacy.
I
Those
classes
tell
me
that
hey
it's
under
utilized,
but
then
B
I'm
guessing
if
we
were
to
better
promote
it,
there'd
be
more
people
wanting
access
to
it.
So
I
would
I
need
help
from
you
all
with
this
to
do
those
sort
of
how
do
we?
What
can
we
do?
Are
there
things?
I
Are
there
ways
to
Leverage
What,
the
city's
already
doing
that
we
just
don't
know
about,
and
how
can
we
as
an
Advisory
Board,
promote
that
through
our
respective
channels,
because
this
is
that
old,
bootstraps
thing
people
like
to
talk
about
put
yourself
up
by
your
steps?
Okay!
Well,
let's
give
them
the
tools
to
do
so
and
to
think
that
in
a
K-12
system,
we're
taking
classes
about
financial
literacy
is,
is
to
not
be
true
like
and
so
I
think
we
have
an
opportunity.
So
that's
one
thing:
I'm
curious.
F
So
one
of
the
things,
one
of
the
reasons
you
don't
see
because
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
a
lot
of
that
work
is
exactly
what
you
described.
It's
bringing
together
not
only
the
real
estate
component,
but
the
financial
literacy,
the
down
payment
assistance,
all
the
resources,
at
least
for
for
sale
housing.
We
hope
to
do
both
rental
and
for
sale.
But
since
you're
talking
about
down
payment
systems,
this
will
talk
for
sale.
It's
an
ecosystem
and
you
know
I'll
use
City
I'm
familiar
with
Indianapolis.
F
Given
you
know
this
concept
of
really
pushing
the
workforce,
housing
Middle,
Market
housing
is,
is
it
does
take
and
I
think
one
of
the
downsides
to
the
local
ecosystem
is
one
organization
has
a
down
payment
assistance
and
one
has
a
financial
literacy
and
then
they
might
be
just
out
on
their
own
to
find
housing
as
opposed
to
having
a
supply
available
through
you
know,
housing
authorities,
instrumentality
or
whatever
you
know
through
marketing
and
things
like
that.
They
know
where
to
find
it.
They
know
it's
affordable.
F
So
that'll
take
a
little
bit
of
time,
and
you
know
we
see
that
I
think
we
can
use
the
next
couple
of
years
to
create
that
ecosystem,
so
that
when
we
request
money
for
the
workforce
housing
program,
we
know
it's
going
to
be
more
successful.
I
Can
you
this
year
report
back
to
us
what
that
plan
would
look
like
absolutely
that
would
be
Beyond
helpful
for
me
and
I
think
it
would
go
some
ways
to
alleviating
some
of
our
concerns
about
our
our
fault
meeting,
to
access
this
and
being
able
to
explain
how
to
my
final
question-
and
this
is
also
to
Dr
Bruner's
concern,
I.
Think
as
we
build
these
maps
for
sidewalks,
my
understanding
is,
there
will
be
maps
for
imprint
right
right
and
with
many
of
the
projects,
I
think
a
way
to
ensure
quality.
I
You
know
just
as
we're
doing
with
the
sidewalks
to
be
able
to
say
just
like
the
WPA
made.
This
building
endure.
Maps
projects
endure
I'd
like
to
see.
Are
we
planning
on
any
sort
of
maps
for
Branding
on
on
this
housing?
So
it
becomes
that
reminder
to
us
all
that
that
the
people
living
here
are
maps
for
people.
H
While
we
are
warm
and
cozy
and
our
beautiful
homes
that
we
enjoy,
whether
we
are
buying
them
or
we
are
renting
them.
It
is
definitely
a
privilege
that
everybody
on
this
Advisory
board
has
that
those
out
there
do
not
and
I
do
not
believe
that
this
particular
plan
is
the
one
to
really
help
those
unhoused.
Now
don't
get
me
wrong.
H
I
totally
get
the
idea
that
we
need
to
have
some
infrastructure
and
we
have
to
build
on
what
we
have,
but
the
Housing
Authority
have
has
been
here
for,
however
many
years
they
should
have
been
working
on
that
and
that's
not
our
concern
as
to
what
the
problems
are
for
the
Housing
Authority,
not
our
concern.
This
Maps
money
is
for
specifically
homelessness.
H
G
H
One
through
five
I
get
that,
but
the
fact
that
it's
75
and
100
projected
units
for
the
support
of
housing,
which
is
what
I
guess
I
my
understanding
and
maybe
I
am
wrong
and
I'm
I'm
often
wrong,
but
those
Supportive
Housing
is
what
could
really
maybe
get
people
off
the
street
today.
F
H
Agree
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
my
two
cents
I
feel
very
strongly
about
this,
because
I
see
a
lot
of
unhoused
on
a
regular
basis
and
it's
so
hard
and
while
I
do
have
some
working
partners
that
try
to
help
get
people,
particularly
students
off
of
the
street
and
living
in
their
cars.
H
I
On
that
note
to
dance
earlier
point:
March,
7th,
8
30
to
11
30
A.M,
OKC,
Convention
Center.
That's
when
we're
going
to
do
the
council
workshop
on
homelessness
so
again,
8
30
to
11
30
a.m:
March
7th
OKC,
Convention
Center,
because
that's
where
we're
going
to
hear
city
manager,
Freeman,
Lindsey,
Cates
assistant,
City
assistant
city
manager,
Aubrey
McDermott
unveil.
I
I
D
I
do
want
to
also
respond
sort
of
along
the
line
of
Dr
Bruner
I
had
a
very
different
picture
of
how
Maps
four
was
going
to
approach
homelessness
and
a
more
immediate
impact.
D
However,
in
the
context
of
the
resolution,
it
puts
boundaries
specifically
housing.
First,
that's
that's
a
critical
explanation
of
how
we
can
function.
There
are
a
lot
of
different
approaches
to
homelessness.
Housing
first
is
one.
The
resolution
binds
us
to
housing
first.
D
A
second
thing
is
that
our
work
would
be
through
a
governmental
agency
so
now
we're,
depending
on
the
governmental
agency,
to
work
with
the
numerous
non-profits
and
expecting
that
to
happen,
but
we
are
bound
to
a
governmental
agency
and,
as
a
result,
there
is
only
one
applicant
to
be
an
operator
and
that
that
is
is
Oklahoma,
City
Housing
Authority.
So
with
those
parameters
that
have
been
placed
on
us
by
the
resolution,
the
subcommittee
heard
these
and
and
also
an
understanding
and
and
I,
don't
assume
that
I
got
any
understanding
ahead
of
anybody
else.
D
I'm,
although
worked
through
my
my
affiliation
with
then
Capital
Baptist
Association
and
a
a
shelter
that
we
operate
in
the
Stockyards
I
was
forced
to
a
a
very
quick
tutorial
of
trying
to
understand
homelessness
in
Oklahoma
City,
but
home.
Effective
homelessness
always
has
to
look
at
a
more
holistic
approach.
It
is
not
simply
a
facility
or
a
room
for
somebody
to
stay
in.
D
There
are
a
lot
of
factors
to
effectively
eliminate
the
the
housing
needs,
as
well
as
the
emotional
emotional
needs,
the
feeling
of
security
that
people
need
all
of
those
all
of
those
factors.
So,
while
I
wish,
we
could
just
buy
and
renovate
a
hotel
and
fix
it,
you
know
have
a
place
for
everybody.
Effective
homelessness
response
is
such
a
much
bigger,
prop
much
bigger
issue.
Concern
for
us
and
I
was
very
pleased
within
the
parameters
we've
been
given
through
the
resolution.
D
I
was
very
pleased
and
that's
why
the
and
not
just
that
I
was
pleased,
but
the
members
of
the
subcommittee
were
satisfied
with
what
we've
heard
within
the
parameters
we
have
to
work
with,
and
that's
why
we
we
brought
this
recommendation
forward.
F
A
A
F
C
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Moving
on
to
item
two
e
recommend
adoption
of
resolution
granting
10
million
seven
hundred
sixty
two
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
for
the
mops
for
homelessness
to
the
Oklahoma,
City
Housing
Authority,
and
take
a
motion
in
a
second.
If
there
are
no
questions
and
take
a
motion
in
a
second
okay,
we
have
a
motion
Shay
second,.
A
Okay,
thank
you
appreciate
that
and
I
appreciate
very
much
the
robust
conversation.
This
is
an
issue
that
clearly
is
very
important
to
our
community
and
I.
Think
it's.
The
importance
of
it
is
reflected
in
the
conversation
that
we're
having
this
morning.
So
thank
you
for
for
being
in
tune
with
all
of
our
neighbors
moving
on
to
item
three
discussion
items.
Do
we
have
any
other
items.
B
B
So
the
you
know
the
the
book
is
essentially
the
same
with
the
exception
of
the
numbers
and
then
removal
of
the
Freedom
Center,
which
was
voted
on
then
also
I
want
to
report
that
Park
Outreach
continues,
they're
very
active
right
now
and
having
their
meetings
same
thing
with
the
brt
Outreach
meetings,
Palomar
and
diversion
Hub
are
both
in
their
their
space
planning
efforts.
That's
going
well!
B
B
C
Yeah
and
just
to
add
on
to
what
David
said
about
the
parks,
I
did
attend
last
Saturday's
at
Claire
Looper,
and
it
was
very
well
attended
and
I
appreciated
all
of
the
Outreach
that
is
being
done
by
the
by
our
Architecture
Firm
to
gather
people's
feedback,
and
so
there
was
a
lot
of
robust
feedback,
but
I
do
encourage
everyone
to
go
to
their
local
park.
Meeting
group
I
think
the
next
one
is
this
Thursday
February,
the
9th
at
Sellers.
It's
they'll
start
all
the
South
Side
Parks
this
round.
C
B
B
A
So
moving
on
to
item
four
comments
by
board
staff
and
citizens
did
we
have
any
citizens
signed
up?
Okay,
great
any
other
board
comments.
I
Just
to
say,
thank
you
excuse
me
just
to
say
thank
you
to
director
Todd
and
more
recently,
the
Gooden
group
for
sitting
with
our
ocu
students
to
talk
about
the
beautification,
specifically
as
the
OC
Corridor
that
they've
listed
and
so
their
their
Student
Government.
President
Brianna
Shaw
sat
with
us
and
she's
going
to
be
connecting
us
with
more
students
on
campus.