►
From YouTube: Oklahoma City Riverfront Design Committee - July 2, 2020
Description
The regular monthly meeting of the Oklahoma City Riverfront Design Committee, via video conference, for July 2, 2020.
D
D
My
name
is
Scott
Howard
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
the
committee
as
you're
aware
during
the
state
of
emergency
in
place
during
the
copa
de
19
pandemic,
no
physical
location
will
be
provided
for
the
riverfront
design
committee
meeting.
The
meeting
will
instead
be
live
streamed
from
remote
locations.
We
want
to
request
that
anyone
everyone's
joining
us
today,
except
committee
members,
keep
your
mic
and
phone
muted
until
you
are
called
on
to
speak,
as
instructed
in
the
agenda
those
who
called
in
or
emailed
us
in
advance
to.
D
Let
us
know
your
name,
contact
number
and
agenda
item
you
wish
to
speak
about
will
be
recognized
first
before
the
RTC
votes
on
each
item.
I
will
ask
if
any
members
of
the
public
wish
to
speak.
Anyone
speaking
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak.
Since
you
are
muted.
When
I
call
on
you,
please
unmute
yourself
on
a
phone.
You
will
press
star
six
and
then
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
before
you
speak
on
a
desktop
or
laptop.
You
will
hover
your
cursor
over
the
microphone
icon
to
remove
the
diagonal
red
line.
D
If
we
lose
our
connection
for
this
meeting,
the
meeting
shall
be
stopped
and
reconvened
once
the
connection
is
restored.
If
communications
are
unable
to
be
restored
within
30
minutes,
items
remaining
for
consideration
will
be
continued
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
riverfront
design
committee
meeting
on
Thursday
August
6
2020
at
9:00
a.m.
by
videoconference.
D
C
D
E
F
You
this
is
Laura
Greg's,
Planning
Department.
This
is
a
request
for
a
revision
to
a
project
that
most,
if
not
all,
of
you
saw
last
year,
the
revised
items
are
outlined
in
a
staff
report.
I
would
point
out,
probably
the
biggest
three
would
be
eliminating
the
second
story
of
the
main
building
at
the
corner
there,
eliminating
the
vestibule
building
and
then
there
eliminating
the
garage
building.
F
F
Berkshires
in
2b
TV
2
zoning,
so
this
area
is
in
not
only
Scenic
River,
but
it's
also
in
the
downtown
zoning.
So
you
have
to
use
both
sets
of
design
guidelines,
so
the
minimum
hide
in
DTD
2
is
2
stories.
The
original
structure
was
two
stories.
The
original
approval
was
to
rebuild
it
to
two
stories
and
staff
is
concerned
that
setting
the
tone
for
a
one-story
structure
at
this
prominent
corner
location
across
from
the
lower
part
would
be
setting
a
bad
precedent.
F
We're
excited
that
the
structure
is
going
to
get
renovated,
that
this
site
is
going
to
get
renovated,
and
hopefully
it
will
set
the
tone
for
what's
going
to
happen
on
the
rest
of
this
side
of
hubcap
valley,
in
conjunction
with
be
little
Park,
which
you
approved
recently,
which
is
immediately
across
the
street.
So
the
next
slide
that
Cameron
is
going
to
so
I
will
say
that
all
of
the
red
is
the
clouds
that
I
put
on
his
staff,
because
there
were
no
clouds
showing
the
changes
to
the
document.
F
And
so,
as
you
can
see
here,
the
building
originally
was
going
to
have
a
vegetable
vestibule
building
on
the
east
side
and
then
the
garage
building
there
was
going
to
be
a
patio
and
it
was
going
to
be
eliminated
so
that
open
area
will
still
remain
open
and
there's
just
one
Street
to
Street
tree
that
was
being
eliminated.
Cameron
you
can
go
on
to
the
next
one,
and
so
then
literally
the
religion
to
eliminate
constriction
of
the
second
storey
affects
all
the
facades
of
the
main
building.
They
were
adding
some
exterior
lighting
they're,
adding
metal.
F
F
One
thing
I
will
say
is
that
I
am
I'm
I'm
excited
to
see
that
it
was
going
back
with
Rick.
You
might
recall
the
last
approval
was
not
for
rebuilding
a
brick.
It
was
going
to
be
some
blank
limestone
limestone,
like
material
that
was
going
on.
The
outside
the
original
structure
is
brick
and
so
that
that
aspect
of
this
revision,
I
I,
am
supportive
of
the
issue
with
me
still
remains
the
regulation
for
two
stories
and
so
Cameron.
You
can
go
on
to
the
next
slide.
F
Which
is
the
sections
go
on
to
the
next
one,
because
I'm
trying
to
and
I
think
there's
one
more
and
so
then
the
one-story
building?
It's
just
I
read.
It
was
just
a
garage
door
change
which
I
have
no
issue
with
that
that
building
is
going
to
be
pretty
much
as
it
is
existing
and
that's
an
accessory
building
to
the
to
the
main
building.
So
Cameron.
If
you
will
go
back
I'm,
gonna
I
know
you
told
me
yet
I'm
supposed
to
tell
you
which
slide
I'm,
sorry
to
the
first
one
of
these.
F
As
I
stated
at
this
moment,
location
staff
is
extremely
concerned
about
supporting
the
one
storage
structure
and
allowing
the
building
to
be
permanently
reduced
to
one
story:
it's
not
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
minimum
height
regulations.
It
is
for
this
reason
that
staff
recommends
denial
of
the
height
reduction
and
continuing
the
rest
of
the
project
to
allow
redesign
of
the
corner
building
to
a
minimum
of
two
stories
or
30
feet
in
height.
F
The
first
is
to
deny
case
item
1f
main
building
corner
revised
project
to
eliminate
construction.
A
second
story.
The
second
is
continue,
the
rest
of
the
case
items
to
sit
that
September
third
meeting
and
the
reason
I'm
recommending
September
3rd.
As
you
know,
if
we
continue
it
to
the
next
meeting,
I've
got
it.
I
have
to
have
everything
in
by
next
Tuesday,
and
that
is
really
not
very
much
time
for
somebody.
B
F
B
G
F
If
at
this
point
they
are
seeing,
they
are
having
conversations
with
the
Apple
applicant.
They
they
know
she's
working
on
designs
for
the
building,
I'm,
not
sure
what
type
of
time
clock
is
ticking
from
that
perspective
and
if
legal
has
any
additional
information,
add
police
because
Laura,
but
it
is
my
understanding
that
they
will
work
with
the
property
owner
as
long
as
possible,
so
that
in
the
interest
of
both
the
city
and
the
property
owner
are
realized.
C
A
F
D
D
H
H
We've
punched
the
numbers
everywhere
we
can,
but
the
amount
of
leasable
space
does
not
offset
the
cost
of
adding
a
stair
tower
stairs
an
elevator,
a
fire
suppression
system.
I
went
through
several
with
contractor
on
this.
He
suggested
we
change
from
steel
to
wood,
went
through
a
considerable
redesign
to
try
to
get
it
in
budget.
The
estimates
were
coming
a
little
over
twice
what
the
maximum
amount
to
make
this
workout
economically
could
be,
and
then
the
pandemic
it
and
I
change
contractors
to
someone
who
does
residential
work
in
life.
H
Our
shuttle
thinking,
maybe
with
a
debt
of
subs.
They
could
get
this
closer
to
where
it
needed
to
be,
and
as
my
contractor
kept
saying,
Dickie
we
have
a
problem.
The
numbers
don't
so
in
light
of
the
pandemic
and
the
fact
that
brick-and-mortar
retail
may
be
dead
or
dying
and
there's
going
to
be
a
glut
of
office.
Space
I
decided
what
I
needed
to
do,
because,
as
one
of
your
members
mentioned,
was
that
I
needed
to
restore.
H
E
E
The
reason
I
know
that
is
because
there's
all
this
concrete
structure
on
the
inside
and
then
they've
added
steel
columns
in
a
way
that
you
typically
would
not
do
even
today,
and
certainly
not
at
the
time
the
building
was
built,
but
really
even
more
than
that.
There's
this
concrete
beam
that
runs
through
the
building
and
sticking
of
steel
column
in
the
middle.
Doesn't
really
it
changes
the
stresses
in
that
concrete
being
that
existing
concrete
beam.
Well,
what's
so
clear,
now
is
also
when
you
get
up
on
the
what
we
originally
thought
was
the
second
floor.
E
What
we
now
know
is
the
original
roof.
There's
a
couple
kind
of
humps
of
concrete
they
put
there.
What
they
did
was
they
sort
of
added
on
to
that
concrete
beam
up
on
top,
which
you
know
seems
crazy,
looks
crazy,
but
I
guess
he
kind
of
worked,
and
in
that
way
they
were.
They
were
able
to
put
in
some
some
steel
that
kind
of
compensated
for
the
way
that
they
radically
changed
the
moments
by
adding
me
into
your
column.
So.
F
E
Think
most
everybody
would
agree
looking
at
that
right
there
that
that's
that's
not
a
typical
way
that
you're
going
to
build
the
second
floor
and
what
they
did
was
they
put
wood
framing
all
around
that
to
kind
of
compensate
for
that
so
and
actually,
in
our
plan,
when
we
were
going
with
the
second
floor,
you
know
we
were
having
to
work
around
those
things.
So
that's
kind
of
my
spiel
with
that
then
I
just
have
a
couple
more
comments.
E
E
That
that's
that's
before
that's
a
picture
of
you
know,
obviously,
before
that
additional
brick
was
removed,
but
that
building
next
door
to
it,
for
example,
in
this
picture
here,
doesn't
look
that
bad,
but
with
a
little
bit
of
bricks
fell
over
on
it,
it
just
totally
destroyed
that
building
and
I
Dickie
had
me,
go
inside,
look
at
it,
and
that
thing
is
it's:
just
it's
really
kind
of
a
commercial
shanty
I
would
describe
it
and
a
lot
of
those
buildings
on
there
are.
They
are
like
that,
so
I
guess.
E
You
know
the
owners
not
going
to
come
up
with
an
extra
million
dollars
that
that's
gonna,
make
economic
sense
to
do.
What
we
would
like
to
see
happen
here.
So
what's
gonna
happen
is
that
building
is
gonna,
be
torn
down
the
city's
gonna
tear
it
down
and
we're
gonna
be
left
with
an
empty
parking
lot,
and
maybe
20
years
from
now.
Something
really
magnificent
that
we'll
all
love
will
be
built
there,
but
that's
just
not
the
reality
of
today.
So
with
that
I'll
just
turn
it
back
over
to
Vicki.
H
Thank
you
John.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
yeah,
okay.
So,
as
John
said,
those
are
our
options
and
we
we
looked
at
a
number
of
different
pains
to
try
to
make
this
work.
One
was
I
thought.
Well
what
if
we
built
four
storeys
there
and
I
had
more
square
footage
to
average
out
the
cost
of
that
infrastructure
to
go
vertical,
and
because
this
concrete
structure
is
old
and
was
never
intended
to
be
more
than
one
story
that
wasn't
a
viable
option.
H
But
the
contractor,
who
was
lingo
at
the
time,
said
that
they
are
chasing
a
number
of
projects
like
that.
The
banks
won't
loan
money
for
it,
because
Oklahoma
City
just
isn't
there
yet
to
support
that
kind
of
project.
So
we
can
either
have
a
very
nice
high
quality.
One-Story
building
that'll
be
considerably
higher
than
you
see
here,
because
I
made
the
parapet
tall
enough
to
do
a
rooftop
garden.
The
roof
structure
is
already
there.
H
The
concrete
is
there,
so
the
cost
is
really
putting
us
on
back
on
the
building
and
we
can
make
it
very
attractive.
I
think
you
can
see
that
from
the
elevations
or
we
will
tear
it
down.
So
if
there
are
any
other
questions,
I'd
be
glad
to
answer.
I'd
also
want
to
say
that
the
code
for
the
Western
gateway
is
very
clear,
that
there
is
no
minimum
height
restriction
for
a
building
and
I
know
that
staff
has
said
that
they're
applying
downtown
Design
District
2
to
this,
but
the
way
I
see
the
code.
H
I
So
the
issue
of
whether
or
not
a
variance
is
required
for
the
minimum
height
is
not
really
an
issue
for
the
riverfront
design
committee.
That
would
be
an
issue
for
the
Board
of
Adjustment
and
so
either
the
applicant
could
pursue
the
variance
request
with
a
recommendation
from
the
riverfront
design
committee
or
appeal
the
interpretation
of
the
code
to
the
board
separately.
D
F
D
D
D
B
H
Don't
Dana
the
only
historical
picture
that
we
have
in
this
building
looks
like
from
the
cars
that
it
was
probably
in
the
1950s
that
second
floor
was
there
at
the
time
and
I
think
that,
but
the
bottom
of
the
building
had
already
been
drastically
altered
to
put
garage
doors
across
the
front
that
we
see
in
that
photo,
and
that
was
in
the
1950s.
So
I
would
think
the
second
floor
would
have
happened
before
that.
Okay,.
A
F
A
I
A
A
Furthermore,
with
the
second
floor,
demolished,
there's
not
really
and
the
back
wall
missing,
there's
not
really
much
there
today
to
be
saved
from
a
historical
point
of
view.
In
my
opinion,
I
I
don't
think
that
it
is
worthwhile
to
it
I'm.
Speaking
purely
from
my
opinion,
I
don't
think
it's
worthwhile
to
compromise
the
planning
and
urban
design
guidelines
of
this
district,
particularly
along
the
park
frontage,
which
is
going
to
substantially
change
the
economics
and
urban
design
character
of
this
district.
A
A
Don't
think
I
would
disagree
with
that,
though
it
wasn't
my
original
point,
my
my
reasoning
was
that
what
is
being
proposed
is
very
different
than
what
the
city
has
set
forth
in
its
development
guidelines
and
in
doning
for
this
area,
and
so
the
reason
that
we
are
reviewing
this
application
is
because
it
is
different
than
what
the
city
has
said.
It
wants
to
see
here
and
so
in
evaluating
the
relative
of
this
application
to
see
if
it's
worthwhile,
disregarding
what
the
city
has
said
it
wants
to
see
developed
here.
H
If
I
may
speak
to
that,
the
building
is
designed
does
exactly
meet
the
guidelines
of
the
Western
gateway
and
it
does
exactly
meet
the
guidelines
of
the
development
framework
which
was
adopted
by
the
city
of
2015.
I.
Think
the
issue
is
that
it
does
not
meet
the
minimum
requirement
for
downtown
Design
District
2,
which
is
the
underlay
to
the
Western
gateway
and
staff,
has
interpreted
that
that
more
restrictive
code
be
applied
to
this
property,
as
opposed
to
the
Western
gateway
regulations
which
have
no
minimum
height
requirement.
H
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
the
east
wall
of
the
building
is
not
missing.
There
was
never
a
wall
there.
Those
were
garage
doors,
originally
you
drove
in
from
the
back
of
this
building
and
there
yes,
and
so
you
see
that
railing
system
that's
up
above
that's,
the
original
roof
extends
out
over
creating
an
overhang,
and
then
there
was
this
metal
rod
system
where
garage
doors
would
slide
across
there,
and
this
is
where
cars
would
drive
them.
So
it's
not
a
missing
wall.
It's
the
original
vehicle
or
entrance
to
this
building.
G
If
I'm,
if
I'm,
recalling
correctly
the
first
time,
we
thought,
if
I'm
I'm,
remembering
that
you
pulled
the
DTD
to
design
of
the
downtown
area
into
this
or
the
building,
and
so
I'd
like
to
I'll
go
back
to
double-check
that.
But
if
it
that's,
what
I
recall
I'm
confused
as
to
why
you're
saying
that
DDT
doesn't
apply
here
for
the
height,
so
you
I
mean
you
were
trying
to
pull
it
in
and
now
you're
trying
to
pull
it
out
and
so
I'm
just
I'm
just
a
little
confused
by
that.
Well.
H
It's
the
requirements
of
the
underlying
zone
do
apply
and
I
did
take
everything
into
consideration
in
the
original
design
of
the
building.
But
from
the
code
it
says
the
underlying
zoning
of
the
property,
which
is
DD
2
that
says
designated
by
the
regular
zoning
overlay
district,
which
is
Western
gateway
of
this
chapter,
shall
continue
to
regulate
the
use
and
development
of
land
unless
expressly
modified
by
this
section,
meaning
this
section
that
covers
the
scenic
river
overlay.
H
So
all
I'm
saying
that
I
think
if
you
read
the
code
and
I
know
that
it's
not
your
job
to
interpret
code
and
I
understand
that.
But
the
whole
reason
for
having
the
overlay
is
to
make
a
to
have
the
character
of
these
different
areas
be
expressed
separately
as
a
part
of
downtown
design
and
not
that
it
has
to
be
uniform
throughout
the
whole
thing.
A
H
G
I
completely
understand
what
you're
saying
and
yes,
I
I
can
read
code.
My
point
is
that
the
last
time
that
came
in
front
of
us,
we
were
having
a
discussion
about
whether
or
not
we
wanted
the
aesthetics
of
the
building
mimicked
automobile
alley
and
rather
than
the
downtown,
and
if
I
recall
correctly,
you
were
pulling
in
design
elements
from
some
of
the
buildings
in
downtown
and
so
I
think
that
we're
doing
a
little
flip-flop
here
by
you.
The
design
is
her
downtown,
but
you
but
we're
not
wanting
to
follow
the
downtown
zoning.
G
H
H
Framework
and
the
codes
say
that
if
you
have
a
multi-story
building
that
the
first
floor
will
have
a
different
material
than
subsequent
floors
and
that
there
will
be
a
horizontal
delineation
between
those
floors,
that's
gone
now.
You
know
in
this
design
it's
a
one
four
story:
building
with
brick
all
the
way
up,
which
is
what,
instead
of
had
requested,
that
I
do
in
the
first
place
that
did
not
meet
the
guidelines
of
the
development
framework.
I
H
B
This
is
Dana
Templeton
and
to
be
more
pragmatic
about
this
Vickie.
Is
that
the
bottom
line
that,
if
this
doesn't
get
approved,
then
the
city
will
be
able
to
step
in
and
demolish
it
and
again
it
will
become
a
blank
lot.
Possibly
a
parking
lot
is
John.
Joyce
mentioned.
Is
that
our
options
at
this
point?
If.
H
We
can't
do
a
project,
that's
economically
viable,
which
is
to
restore
these
two
buildings.
Then
we
will
demolish
the
building.
I
mean
there's
no
reason
to
let
the
city
do
it,
because
it's
probably
going
to
cost
more
that
way.
If,
if
we
can't
get
this
approved,
yes,
we
are
going
to
tear
the
building
back.
E
I
know
that
I
visited
with
Vicki
before
the
meeting
and
I
don't
know
it's
kind,
it's
kind
of
like
another.
Another
option
she
would
have
would
be
to
ask
for
a
continuance
and
I
think
that
that
continuance
would
really
be
more
more
so
than
redesigned
and
add
the
second
floor
to
kind
of
seek
additional
legal
counsel.
F
I
The
the
applicant
couldn't
request
the
continuance,
and
then
you
know,
if
even
with
having
consulted
with
an
attorney
and
if
an
attorney
were
to
represent
her
with
this
application.
Still
the
issue
for
the
riverfront
design
committee
would
not
be
whether
a
variance
is
required.
It
would
be
whether
or
not
it
was
recommended
if
there
is
going
to
be
any
kind
of
appeal
about
how
the
code
applies
and
whether
there
is
a
minimum
height
requirement
here.
That
would
be
an
issue
not
for
the
riverfront
design
committee,
but
would
be
for
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
B
F
A
A
F
F
B
D
E
E
F
F
This
is
a
fin
sea
area.
That's
around
the
loading
dock
delivery
area
at
the
large
goodwill
site,
the
town
South
Reno
their
address
is
Blackwelder,
but
everybody
knows
that
it's
being
on
cell-free
now
and
due
to
damage
to
vehicles
and
break-ins,
they
are
requesting
that
they
be
allowed
to
install
an
electric
fence
inside
their
current
chain-link
fence.
F
Then
Scenic
River,
the
issue
is
not
the
height.
That
height
is
allowed.
The
issue
is
with
the
material,
and
so
this
is
coming
before
you,
because
they're
going
to
need
to
get
a
variance
from
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
So
here's
the
front
view
we,
when
you
pull
down
in
there,
and
so
you
can
see
the
existing
chain-link
fence
and
that's
where
the
north
installation
would
be
it'd,
be
on
the
backside
of
that
and
this
fence
is
a
six
or
seven
foot
tall
part
of
their
fence.
A
six
part
of
it.
F
What
I
included
in
your
packet
was
similar
ones
that
you
had
actually
one
in
this
area
that
you
all
had
considered
recently
and
back
in
April,
the
underlying
zoning
district
is
i2,
and
so
the
electric
fence
is
allowed.
This
is
on
the
south
part
of
that,
where
they
have
a
gated
entrance
that
you
can
get
to
from
also
South
West,
Third
Street.
F
So
immediately
south
of
this
view,
and
we're
going
to
see
that
here
in
a
minute
is
a
fence
that
you
all
approved
back
in
April
that
I
had
in
in
the
slides
I'm
on
that
camera
get
to
there
and
then
I'll
tell
them
to
stop
just
so.
You
can
see
what
it
looks
like
it's
the
bottom
slide,
but
you
can't
see
it
very
well.
I
have
some
close-ups
coming
up
so
they're
right.
There
is
one
of
the
close-ups
of
the
entrance
and
that's
all
third
Street.
F
F
This
particular
one
which
is
on
the
south
side
of
3rd
Street,
and
you
can
see
it
here
that
is
adjacent
to
the
street
and
the
chain-link
fence
was
kept.
And
then,
if
you
can
look
in
the
lower
right
corner,
you
can
kind
of
see
where
the
angled
part
is
on
the
chain-link.
Where
it
already
had
the
barbed
wire,
then
you
can
see
the
vertical
that
goes
up,
which
goes
up
to
the
10
foot
height.
F
That
has
the
horizontal
wires
I
didn't
I
did
not
ask
that
sends
people,
although
they
might
metal
to
say
they
are
on
the
call
I
see
Michael
pate
there,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
have
any
feedback.
That
is
the
solar
component
of
that
electric
fence.
On
the
south
side.
I,
don't
know
if
they've
had
any
feedback
from
that
customer,
they
had
on
any
impact
on
the
theft
they
were
having,
and
hopefully
he
might
have
that.
F
But
this
is
two
locations
in
close
proximity
to
Goodwill
it's
in
this
neighborhood,
where
they
are
having
problems
with
with
theft
and
damage
to
property,
and
so
staff
staff
feels
that,
as
we
have
in
the
past-
and
you
can
see
on
this
drawing
on
where
the
red
line
is
that's,
where
they're
proposing
to
put
the
electric
fence
that,
as
you
saw
in
some
of
those
pictures,
the
wire
fades
eventually
over
time.
You
probably
won't
see
it.
F
E
F
B
J
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman,
basically,
we
agree
with
the
staffs
recommendation.
I
think
you've
all
heard
the
prayer
before
about
how
the
electric
fences
operate.
Battery-Powered,
pulsed,
electric
alarm,
so
I'm
not
going
to
bore
you
with
all
that
again,
but
if
you
do
have
any
questions
about
the
operations
of
the
fence
or
the
location,
you
know
I
think
what
Laura
was
telling
you
about.
The
location
is
is
true.
J
You
can't
see
this
fence
at
all
coming
down,
Southwest,
third
and
then
you
as
usual,
you
gotta,
look
really
hard
to
see
it,
but
you
know
this
is
another
property
that
we
would
like
to
secure
to
make
sure
that
no
one
is
breaking
in
there
and
damaging
those
vehicles
and
whatever
else
are
trying
to
steal
over
there.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
D
E
D
D
F
Is
Laura
Griggs
planning
department?
The
only
thing
I'll
mention
is
you
all
received
it
amended
agenda
because
I
messed
up
I
had
the
right
case
number
and
address
for
the
right
attachment
for
number
one,
but
I
had
the
wrong
description
because
obviously
they
weren't
tearing
down
a
house
at
800,
River
Sport
drive,
so
so
just
for
clarification
purposes.
F
F
Crooked
Oakes
school
so
I'm
glad
somebody
has
bond
issues
that
get
approved
and
they're
continuing
to
work.
So
we
will
have
a
meeting
on
August
8th.
So
please
check
your
calendars.
I'll
probably
send
out
an
early
quorum,
call
I
think
we
have
three
three
members
absent
this
week,
probably
because
people
are
trying
to
either
do
some
staycations
or
get
out
of
town
for
a
bit,
because
everybody
needs
to
break
it
out
now
so
and
hopefully
your
first
fully
digital
packet
worked
well
for
everybody.
F
I
hadn't
heard
anybody
was
having
an
issue
good
in
the
interest
of
our
budget
and
to
try
to
cut
down
on
our
huge
copying
costs.
We
have
been
working
towards
that
for
quite
some
time
so
and
we
haven't
heard
otherwise.
So
we
I
am
anticipating
we're
going
to
have
another
zoom
meeting
in
August.
They
are
still
working
on
the
council
chambers.
You
might
recall
at
the
Commission
workshop
there
was
a
presentation.
F
They
talked
about
all
the
changes
they
were
going
to
make
and
renovations
to
council
chambers
and
you're
going
to
have
totally
different
setups
when
we
get
it
there
with
computers
and
everything
and
part
of
that
deals
with
prenda,
which
you're
now
getting
hopefully
used
to
and
so
it'll
you'll
be
able
had
at
it
by
the
time
we
get
into
a
physical
meeting
environment.
So
thank
you
for
being
here
today
and
if
you
do
have
problems
with
digital
packet,
please.