►
From YouTube: Oklahoma City Planning Commission - June 11, 2020
Description
The regular meeting of the Oklahoma City Planning Commission, via video conference, for
June 11, 2020.
A
B
C
They're,
knocking
you
hear
me:
yes,
ma'am
all
right.
Welcome
to
the
rationale
meeting
the
Oklahoma
City
Planning
Commission
for
Thursday
June,
the
11th
night
2020,
we're
meeting
by
a
video
conference
because
of
the
continued
need
for
us
to
maintain
social
distancing,
getting
a
little
bit
of
feedback
there.
C
Thank
you
in
advance
for
your
participation
and
your
patience
with
this
change
and
format.
We're
doing
things
a
little
bit
differently.
So
here
are
a
few
things
you
need
to
know.
If
the
video
conference
is
disconnected
at
any
time
and
during
the
meeting
the
meeting
will
stop
and
it
will
reconvene
once
the
connection
is
restored.
C
If,
for
any
reason,
communications
cannot
be
restored
within
30
minutes.
Those
items
which
have
not
been
heard
will
be
continued
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission,
which
I
believe
is
July.
The
9th
2020
at
1:30
p.m.
which
will
also
be
conducted
by
videoconference.
The
agenda
and
documents
are
located
on.
Ok,
COF
staff
will
present
each
item
to
be
heard,
summarizing
the
application
and
identifying
any
points
remaining
to
be
resolved.
C
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
about
an
agenda
item
or
speak
understands,
as
we
heard
hopefully
you'll-
have
previously
notified
staff
by
phone
or
email
or
will
have
signed
up
online
and
I'll
call
on
you
to
speak
at
the
appropriate
time.
If
not,
I'll
also
call
for
public
comment
on
each
agenda
item
and
anyone
who
calls
in
after
their
item
can
be
heard
after
their
item
has
been
heard,
will
be
allowed
to
speak
under
citizens
to
be
heard
when
called
upon
to
speak.
Participants
should
state
their
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
All
comments
and
questions
should
be
directed
to
the
Commission
because
of
the
ends
usual
circumstances
and
the
challenges
of
this
format
will
hold
pretty
strictly
to
our
time
limits.
So
please
be
brief.
If
more
than
one
person
wishes
to
speak
on
an
item,
please
try
not
to
repeat
comments
already
made
as
participants
call
in
staff
will
mute
or
unmute
yes,
we'll
meet,
which
is
with
line
so
keep
your
line
on
you
until
you're
recognized
to
speak
and
to
unmute.
You
press.
C
Star-6
staff
will
not
meet
the
commissioners
who
are
allowed
to
ask
questions
or
comment
at
any
time
during
the
meeting.
However,
I
would
ask
you
to
the
commissioners
to
make
them
to
mute
themselves
unless
they
wish
to
speak
I'm
just
using
that
on
the
on
your
device.
Otherwise
the
background
noise
can
be
distracting.
Please
remember,
only
one
person
can
be
heard
at
a
time
if
more
than
one
person
speaks,
neither
one
can
be
heard.
There
will
be
a
roll
call,
every
thirty
minutes
if
necessary.
C
C
E
C
E
C
C
B
B
F
Do
but
it's
not
giving
me
a
bit
the
availability
to
vote
so
I
go
yes
and
it
happened
last
time.
It
wouldn't
never
give
me
the
availability
to
vote
or
make
a
move
for.
Second,
so
I
can
see,
aces
and
I
can
see,
mark
improve
it
and
I
can
see
that
it
passed
and
it
shows
that
I
voted.
Yes,
but
I
don't
have
the
ability
to
vote,
hey,
henkle,
what
browser
using
it's.
J
D
C
C
F
C
C
C
D
M
D
Right:
first
item
for
public
hearing
is
item
7
its
PD
SP
1674
B.
It's
an
application
for
a
specific
plan
in
PUD
1674
located
at
73.
Excuse
me:
3700
North,
East,
104th
Street,
and
this
is
an
application
for
one
building
in
a
development
known
as
fusion
industrial
park.
It's
located
west
of
I-35,
just
south
of
Hefner
Road,
staffs
review,
found
it
to
be
meet.
The
requirements
of
the
PUD
and
Brodie
Tucker
represents
the
application.
D
N
C
O
I
O
A
I
C
D
C
Commissioners,
this
is
an
odd
little
piece
of
property.
If
you
happened
to
be
by
it,
it
is
really
tucked
away
in
a
quiet,
little
neighborhood,
north
of
a
little
church
property.
It
was
a
huge
huge
lot
at
one
time.
It's
been
split
and
split
again
and
now
this
final
portion
they're
seeking
to
have
split
to
permit
to
single
family
homes.
They'll
have
enormous
li
long
lots,
but
you
know:
they'll
have
they'll,
take
their
frontage
from
Grand
Boulevard,
which
at
this
point
is
not
doesn't
really
go
anywhere
else
it
doesn't
attach
to
the
north.
C
D
K
C
N
D
Q
N
F
F
P
Though
item
nine
is
the
preliminary
flat
for
the
Grove
phase
15,
it
is
located
west
of
North
Portland
Avenue
north
northwest
178
Street.
The
developer
is
proposing
113
single-family
locks
and
one
common
area
on
27.9
one,
a
KERS
yielding
a
gross
residential
density
of
4.0
for
dwelling
units
per
acre.
P
P
P
R
P
P
Have
number
10
is
the
preliminary
plat
for
aniseed
East.
It
is
located
north
excuse
me,
south
of
North
Lozano
50th,
Street
and
west
of
North
MacArthur
Boulevard
they're,
proposing
147,
single-family
residential
lots
and
for
common
areas
on
75.5,
two
acres
yielding
a
gross
residential
density
of
1.95
dwelling
units
per
acre,
they're,
proposing
private
streets.
With
this
subdivision.
The
site
is
currently
zoned.
R1
Lots
in
this
subdivision,
arranged
in
size
between
6700
square
feet
and
20,000
square
feet.
P
I
P
They
are
requesting
a
variance
to
te
to
to
the
subdivision
regulations
which
requires
interconnection
between
quarter
sections
and
then
also
connections
with
adjacent
parcels.
That
is
section
five
point
three
point.
One
point
D
point:
five
Tim
Johnson
with
Johnson
&
Associates
is
representing
the
applicant
and
he
is
on
the
line.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I.
C
Do
have
a
question
I'm
just
a
little
bit
confused
here
with
respect
to
the
access
it
page.
A
staff
report
indicates
that
the
pro-left
proposed
form
a
flat
request
to
revise
the
eastern
half
of
a
preliminary
plan
approved
2019
so
very
recently,
and
the
new
preliminary
plan
removes
an
east/west
Street
connection
over
the
creek
that
would
have
provided
access
to
the
western
half
of
a
subdivision
and
so
I'm
I'm
curious
about
what
has
changed
to
prompt
you
to
seek
that
change
to
the
preliminary
plan.
C
S
So
we
did
not
start
this
project.
There
was
another
engineering
firm
involved
originally
and
there
it
was
a
layout
street
configuration
and
layout
that
included
quite
a
bit
of
encroachment
into
the
waters
of
the
United
States.
There
are
five
locations
on
this
site
where
we're
dealing
with
the
Corps
of
Engineers
on
waters
of
the
United
States.
S
In
addition
to
that,
an
oil
company
came
in
and
took
a
very
large
piece
property
on
the
west
side
of
the
creek,
which
is
the
lake
Satana,
see
that
I
think
you've
already
seen,
which
then
created
an
impact
of
the
the
whole
addition.
By
losing
the
number
of
lots,
we
could
get
yield
totally.
So
the
developer
made
the
decision
at
that
time
that
the
cost,
the
seven
hundred
fifty
thousand
two
million
dollar
bridge
that
it
was
going
to
take
across
the
creek,
was
not
cost-effective.
S
And
so,
therefore,
we
designed
it
as
two
subdivisions
and
we're
taking
all
of
our
access
on
this
subdivision
from
MacArthur
the
lake
city
SC,
which
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
creek.
It's
taking
two
entry
points
off
of
150th
Street,
and
this
variance
that
we're
asking
for
is
really
a
variance
to
make
connectivity
to
the
r2
tract
that
we
don't
own
to
the
north
east
and
because
we're
private
streets.
We
did
not
want
to
create
a
stub
up
there
to
duplex
development.
R
This
is
Commissioner
Cravens
I,
don't
have
any
questions.
I,
just
I
was
gonna
kind
of
remind
people
it's
if
you're
in
the
twilight
zone,
or
you
feel
like
you've
seen
this
before
it's
because
you
have,
as
Tim
said
this
came
through
once
before
we
had
the
discussion
about
connectivity
and
private
streets,
the
issue
with
that
natural
separation
in
the
middle.
Apparently
since
Tim's
referring
to
them
waters
the
United
States.
He
flirted
a
log
test
on
that
thing.
Very
nicely
done
there
Tim
and
but
we
we
debated
this
before
I
looked
at
it
again.
R
I
don't
have
any
concerns,
given
that
discussion
we
had
previously
or
the
way
that
it
sets
out
again
two
points
of
access
taking
out
the
separate
stream
if
they
cut
it
in
half,
it's
not
ideal,
but
I
think
it
makes
sense,
given
the
the
difficulties
with
sight,
so
I'm
I'm
in
support
of
the
application.
Nope
no
issue
with
the
variance
for
me
other
commissioners,
want
to
make
comments.
Please
feel
free,
otherwise,
I'll
make
a
motion
move
already.
R
C
F
C
C
D
The
item
11
is
SP.
544
is
an
application
by
American
fidelity
property
company
for
a
hospital
located
at
80
516
Broadway
extension.
This
is
a
two
acre
site.
It's
located
east
of
Broadway
extension
at
North,
East,
85th,
Street,
request
for
a
fairly
small
hospital
and
surgery
center
includes
seven
patient
rooms.
Three
surgical,
suites
staff
review
determined
it
meets
the
standards
for
special
permit
and
recommends
approval
with
no
two
E's
Tim
Johnson
represents
the
applicant.
C
H
D
Item
12,
SB
1219
is
an
application
by
ram
jack
american
leveling
to
rezone
62
25
shiloh
boulevard
to
nuke
SPD.
This
is
a
one
acre
site.
It's
located
on
Shiloh
Boulevard,
which
is
just
south
of
59th,
Street
and
west
of
highway,
152
rezoning
to
an
SPD
with
an
i1
base,
and
it
permits
all
those
current
uses
in
the
existing
PD,
but
adds
retail
and
construction
sales
and
services.
D
C
C
N
D
E
C
T
T
K
T
G
D
G
G
R
Commissioner
Claire
just
for
the
point
of
clarification
on
your
question:
I
just
I
know:
I
know
you
know
this,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
that
you
know:
they've
got
retail
sales
and
service
in
general,
for
example,
so
Dollar
General
comes
along
and
pulls
an
application,
for
this
pulls
a
permit
and
builds
it
now.
You're
gonna
have
semi
trucks
delivering
and
there's
nothing
to
prevent
that.
Yeah.
I
K
T
Don't
know
if
there
would
be
a
way
as
the
owner,
but
I
would
be
more
than
willing
to
have
that
added
into
the
spud
for
no
large
vehicle
traffic
to
be
used
on
the
property.
The
location
is
not
going
to
be
good
for
super
high-end
retail.
As
far
as
you
know,
dollar,
generals
or,
or
anything
like
that.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
low
volume
type
of
business.
That's
always
going
to
work
in
there.
You
know
office
spaces,
delivery,
type
of
businesses.
Nothing
that's
going
to
need
a
large
amount
of
traffic
in
and
out.
R
Mr.
Koller,
with
all
due
respect,
I
understand
that
that's
not
your
intention,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
like
to
make
clear
and
I
know,
there's
some
folks
that
are
signed
up
on
here
to
be
heard
on
this
as
well,
once
it's
rezone
anybody
can
come
use.
It
so
always
is
a
strong
word,
which
is
why
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
commissioner
Claire
that
that
point
so.
N
D
P
C
C
F
U
V
C
V
V
So
I
I
appreciate
you
letting
me
speak
here
on
this.
Some
of
the
worries
that
we
have
or
the
the
scenic
values
the
property
of
the
actual
South
East
59th,
all
together
with
this,
with
whatever
this
front
building
is
going
to
be
I'm
still
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around.
What's
going
on
with
that
I
know,
I've
been
told
that
the
back
building
is
a
medical
marijuana
grow,
which
is
totally
legal
and
not
here
to
dispute
that
at
all.
That
is
that's!
That's
fine,
I!
V
V
T
Sure,
as
of
right
now,
I
am
the
the
property
owner
and
I
have
at
least
two
a
gentleman
and
his
first
intention
was
to
just
do
a
medical
grow.
But
he
did
say
that
the
state
was
passing
legislation
to
be
able
to
deliver
the
medical
marijuana,
and
he
knows
that.
That's
not
a
good
high-volume
retail
location.
So
he
wanted
to
set
up
a
business
to
be
able
to
deliver
it
because
of
the
good
access
to
I-40
and
the
southern
part
of
the
chaulk.
All
the
seven
3:02
area
code.
V
So
then,
then,
and
thanks
Robert,
for
clarifying
that
so
then
the
only
traffic
would
be
coming
in
would
be
the
amount
of
business
that
he
may
or
may
not
have,
or
she
may
or
may
not
have
meaning
it
would
me,
is
it's
pretty
open-ended
I
mean.
Is
that
one
vehicle
coming
in
going
or
is
that
a
fleet
of
vehicles?
What
does
all
of
that
entail
and
on
this
petition
that
was
signed?
I,
don't
know
if
the
numbers
are
familiar
or
familiar
with
the
area,
but
it
is
it's
dangerous
because
people
drive,
you
know
it.
V
The
speed
limit
is
50,
but
people
drive
a
lot
faster
than
that.
It
is
on
top
of
the
hill
and
I
mean
living
right
next
door
to
you.
Don't
stop
at
that.
Stop
sign
to
pull
out
on
South
East
59th
that
there's
nobody
coming.
You
just
go
because
it's
just
people
come
flying
over
that
hill,
so
I'd
have
real
safety
concerns
just
about
the.
I
T
From
my
understanding,
based
off
of
what
I
talked
to
on
the
previous
toner,
they
had
and
I.
Don't
know
this
number
exactly,
but
you
know
upward
to
200
people
for
there.
Maybe
it
wasn't
that
much
but
150-200
somewhere
in
there
and
the
amount
of
traffic
would
be
drastically
less
than
it
was
for
the
previous
tenant
that
was
in
there
for
I,
believe
12
to
15
years.
So
the
number
of
traffic
would
definitely
go
down.
V
T
I
would
be
more
than
willing
to
adjust
them
to
you
know
fit
the
community
I
would
want
as
a
neighbor
to
it,
for
it
to
be
something
that
I
would
be
happy
with
to
if
8
o'clock
and
the
p.m.
was
sufficient
for
me
to
tell
my
tenants
to
shut
down
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
tell
them
that
I
don't
believe
that
they're
going
to
be
open,
past,
8
and
I,
don't
believe
they're
going
to
be
open
on
Sundays
and
not
open
until
probably
10
to
11
a.m.
T
S
T
T
V
I
V
T
C
It
sounds
to
me
is
if
the
issues
to
be
resolved
here
really
have
more
to
do
possibly
with
lease
terms
than
they
do
with
the
zoning
mm-hmm,
and
so
perhaps,
if
you
two
would
like
to
exchange
information,
if
you
don't
have
it
already,
yeah
did
I
hear
somebody
say
that
you
dirty
track
my
phone.
If
there
are,
if
there
are
details
about
the
operation
that
you
think
need
to
be
worked
out,
perhaps
that's
something
that
you
might
do
privately
between
yourselves
between
now
and
the
time
this
matter
lands
at
City,
Council,
I,.
V
Work
I'm
all
for
trying
to
to
you
know,
work
this
work.
This
out.
I
was
always
a
good
neighbor,
with
Delbert
Reed
with
the
church
next
door.
I
want
to
be
a
good
neighbor.
I
just
want
to
know
what
our
community
is
getting
into
because,
like
I
said
earlier,
everybody
it
is
surrounding
that
piece
of
property.
Veera's
owned
is
not
comfortable
with
the
open
endedness
of
what
can
or
can't
be
done
with
the
property.
V
So
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
speaking
out
of
turn
here,
but
it
might
it
be
better
that
that
Robert,
that
you
kind
of
get
together
with
us
being
that
all
the
people
to
sign
the
petition
which
there
were
14
of
the
houses
close
by
and
closest
proximity
to
determine.
You
know
what
you're
getting
into
what
we're
getting
into
so
that
there's
no
surprises
for
anybody.
I'd
be
boiling
more
than
willing
to
meet
and
further
discuss
that.
M
V
C
V
I
C
C
E
M
V
T
C
C
C
D
Sorry
I
was
muted
item.
14
is
PD
1767
application
by
bentwood
investment
to
rezone
1800
Northwest
115
Street
from
r12
PD
1767.
This
is
a
22
acre
site.
That's
going
from
r12
a
PUD
with
an
order
three
base.
The
application
has
been
amended
since
she
last
saw
it
on
may
28th
to
eliminate
multifamily
as
a
permitted
use
now
permits
single-family
through
for
family,
in
conformance
with
the
urban
low
luda,
recommends
approval
with
two
tes
and
David
box
is
the
applicant.
C
Commissioners,
this
is
an
item
that
has
undergone
quite
a
lot
of
well
amendment
and
and
changed
since
it
was
first
admitted
the
basic
overall
idea
for
the
for
the
development
I
think
is
the
same.
It
was
always
intended
to
be
a
residential
development,
but
meetings,
heated
meetings
with
the
neighbors
to
the
east
and
our
educational
neighbor
to
the
north
and
I
think
yielded
a
better
product.
C
Frankly,
there's
been
agreement
by
the
applicant
to
limit
the
type
of
housing
on
the
eastern
half
half
eastern
side
of
the
property
that
backs
up
to
the
neighborhood
to
the
east,
some
single
or
duplex
developments
and
a
number
of
small
changes.
A
specific
plan
will
be
submitted,
cladding
will
be
done.
C
W
So
all
of
those
things
combined,
the
the
last
zoom
conference
we
got
I-
think
the
the
sense
that
both
myself
and
my
client,
as
well
as
I,
think
the
chair
received
was
that
there
was
support
and
at
least
satisfaction
with
all
the
modifications
that
we
were
able
to
to
come
up
with
there.
There
are
two
tes,
the
first
being
a
request
that
we
agree
with,
but
we
would
ask
to
modify
it
a
bit
so
that
the
Common
Era
can
be
spread
across
the
development
and
not
just
in
that
southwest
corner
and
then
human.
W
It
talks
about
the
protection
of
the
trees,
we're
gonna
protect
the
trees
where
feasible,
but
it
is
anticipated
that
Southwest
portion
is
gonna
have
to
have
our
detention
facilities
there.
If
you
were
to
look
at
a
flood
map,
you'd
see
that
the
southwest
portion
has
both
floodplain
and
floodway,
and
so
inevitably
there
will
be
a
scenario
in
which
some
trees
have
to
be
removed.
W
The
staff
has
seen
to
try
to
I
guess
remedy
that
by
asking
that
if
new
trees
are
not
or
trays
are
not
retained,
that
new
tree
shall
be
planning
to
come
here
to
retrieve
a
ratio
of
one
tree
per
3,000
square
feet,
and
my
client
does
agree
to
that.
So,
essentially,
what
we're
asking
to
be
revised
in
te1
is
allow
us
to
spread
the
common
area
out
over
the
development.
In
fact,
I
can
just
read
into
the
record
the
language
we
suggest.
W
If
that
is
easier,
what
we
would
suggest
is
to
e1
to
read,
provide
two
acres
of
common
area
within
the
development.
The
common
area
should
retain
existing
healthy,
mature
trees
when
feasible
and
may
contain
amenities
for
residents.
If
existing
trees
are
not
retained,
new
tree
shall
be
planted
in
the
common
area
to
achieve
a
ratio
of
one
tree
per
3,000
square
feet
of
common
area
te2.
We
would
seek
to
eliminate
that
it
is
our
intention
to
install
speed
tables
along
Belair
place.
Belair
place
is
the
street
in
the
neighborhood
to
the
east.
W
D
I
D
C
So
there
I
think
there
are
two
issues
here.
One
is
whether
it's
appropriate
to
include
that
language
as
a
te,
given
that
the
property
in
question
is
not
within
the
confines
of
the
property
thought
to
be
rezone.
So
that's
one
question
and
we
can
talk
about
that,
but
the
other
question
the
question
of
the
speech
angles.
You
know
we
spent
a
lot
of
years
working
out
traffic,
calming
techniques
that
you
know
the
traffic
Commission
initiated
that
will
work
through
at
length
with
public
works.
C
K
This
is
commissioner
Clara
I
can
I
can
give
a
little
background
on
this,
so
what
has
gone
to
traffic
Commission
was
Public
Works
and
a
subcommittee.
Excuse
me,
the
traffic
department
and
a
subcommittee
of
traffic
Commission
put
together
a
toolbox
of
traffic
calming
techniques
and
they
evaluated
close
to
a
dozen
and
of
various
types
and
so
far
to
date,
one
of
those
options
has
been
approved
and
I
believe
that
is
speed
bumps
and,
to
my
knowledge,
that's
as
far
as
it's
gone,
so
it's
kind
of
got
high,
centered
and
and
I.
K
Don't
I,
don't
know
the
current
status
of
it.
But
in
my
opinion,
there's
been
a
lot
of
effort
and
a
lot
of
background
to
put
together
a
lot
of
options,
and
it's
not
going
anywhere
so
I
completely.
Concur,
agree
that
you
know
these.
These
are
all
options
that
are
valid
and
need
to
be
pursued.
That
and-
and
maybe
it's
something
as
Planning
Commission-
that
we
can
help
help
nudge
along.
K
W
We're
about
to
get
there
and
I
think
this
case
is
what's
going
to
allow
us
to
help
us
get
there.
This
is
very,
very,
very
important
to
the
council
person
for
this
work.
I
understand
the
public
works
has
not
found
a
way
to
have
what
they
need.
I
have
no
idea
why?
But
it's
hard
for
me
to
imagine
why
all
over
the
country,
cities
have
figured
out
how
to
use
speed
tables
and
we're
unable
to
figure
out
how
to
do
it.
W
There
are
agreements
with
neighbors
and
peds
I
think
all
the
time
understanding
it's
an
off-site
improvement
I
understand
the
current
view
of
speed
tables,
as
we
sit
here
today,
I'm
here,
to
tell
you
that
by
the
time
this
side
and
gets
to
Council,
perhaps
there's
a
different
view,
and
it
is
critically
important
to
the
neighbors.
My
client,
the
council
person,
that
this
be
a
part
of
the
document
just.
D
C
Little
bit
further
than
that
I
mean
we.
You
know
we
had
multiple
discussions
with
the
neighbors.
They
were
righteously
indignant
about
the
idea
of
this
development.
They
had
a.
They
were
quite
most
difference
about
their
objections
to
it
until
and
it
was
mostly
because
of
the
traffic
issues
that
they
face
when
this
proposal
was
made
by
the
applicant
and
it
it
completely
changed
their
view
of
this
development.
C
I,
don't
think
I
have
anybody
I,
don't
yeah,
we'll
see
I
guess
when
we
get
around
to
that
part,
whether
there's
anybody,
you
know
who's
who's,
listening
in
and
wants
to
speak
on
this
item
from
the
neighborhood
to
the
east.
But
if
not,
it
is
because
of
this
agreement.
I
don't
often
go
against
staff
on
things
like
this,
but
I
want
to
see
this
TE
eliminated
and
I
want
this
language
retained.
C
W
I
C
W
R
Jj,
can
you
give
this
Commissioner
Cravens?
Can
you
give
me
another
example
of
a
time
where
we
have
approved
or
required
off-site
improvements
outside
of
a
zone
parcel?
This
is
this
I
feel
like
we've
never
done
this
before?
Is
that
correct
or
am
I
not
right
about
that
David
seems
to
say:
we've
done
this
before
I.
Don't
remember
one.
R
R
Well,
that's
that's
my
point.
Just
so
I
can
get
this
out
of
anybody
said
I'm
all
in
favor
of
these
traffic
calming
measures
and
all
that
being
installed.
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
neighbors
are
actually
gonna,
get
what
they're
bargaining
for
here
outside
of
them
and
because
this
is
something
that
I
feel
like
should
be
a
private
agreement.
That
was
a
contract
that
was
in
her
between
the
parties,
not
a
part
of
this,
because
I
don't
see
how
could
ever
be
in
force.
I,
don't
see
how
I
could
be
required.
Well,.
W
W
You
would
find
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
it's
lots
and
lots,
but
there
are
instances
where
off-site
improvements
because
of
agreements
to
be
made
with
neighbors
have
been
accomplished
through
a
PUD.
The
idea
that
you
have
a
neighborhood
like
this
that
I
believe
the
HOA
is
informal
and
not
mandatory,
and
that
we
would
go
and
seek
to
you
know,
engage
in
a
contract
with
all
of
these
individuals
on
a
public
street
is
just
not
going
to
happen.
R
I'll
have
to
have
legal,
explain
this
to
me
later
like
hour,
three,
because
I
don't
get
it
and
I
think
this
is
dangerous
for
us
to
go
about
it.
This
way,
I
get
that
we
want
to
see
it
happen,
I
think
it's
a
great
idea,
I
think
it's
brilliant,
as
Mike
said,
I
think,
there's
Commissioner,
Griffin
I
think
there's
a
bunch
of
neighborhoods
that
would
love
to
have
these
type
of
traffic
calming
measures.
I
just
don't
want
to
set
a
precedent
through
a
zoning
case.
R
W
F
R
R
I'm
I'm,
all
for
this
thing,
I
can't
stress
that
enough,
especially
if
the
neighbors
and
the
developer
and
agreement
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
using
the
tools
at
our
disposal
to
create
something,
that's
presidential
that
could
actually
be
used
in
the
future,
and
we
have
confidence
about
the
outcome.
That's
the
only
thing,
I'm
saying
and.
C
C
N
I
D
15
is
PD
1770
application,
9000
Broadway
to
rezone
8300,
Broadway
extension,
tube
feeding,
1772
cents,
PMC
1770,
hey
this-
is
it
on
the
east
side
of
Broadway
extension
at
Northwest,
82nd
Street,
it's
going
from
an
existing
PD
1665
and
it
provides
for
a
30-foot,
650
square
foot.
Multi
tenant
development
sign
for
the
entire
development.
Extending
north
staff
found
it
to
be
in
conformance
with
urban
low
luda,
but
suggested
that
the
if
this
is
truly
to
be
the
only
multi
tenant
development
sign
for
this
development.
We
should
limit
it
to
that.
D
However,
the
other
two
beauties
to
the
north
include
their
own
large
multi
tenant
signs.
So
we
worked
with
the
applicant
to
come
up
with
a
way
to
limit
the
entire
development
to
this
one
multi
tenant
sign
through
a
plat
note.
The
the
balance
of
this
development
will
be
included
in
one
subdivision
and
that
note
on
the
plant
that
states
that
multi-tenant
development
signs
would
be
limited
to
the
one
side
in
this
PUD
770
as
depicted
on
Exhibit
C,
and
that's
reflected
in
your
technical
evaluation.
S
Good
afternoon,
everybody
I'd
like
to
add
a
little
background
to
this
multiple
peds
done
on
this
property
simply
because
it
was
acquired
over
time
from
different
entities,
and
so,
as
we
went
forward
with
the
development
and
added
more
land,
we
basically
duplicated
same
PUD
going
forward.
So
now
that
the
development
has
moved
ahead,
we
have
public
streets,
creating
a
circular
condition,
18
second
to
Oklahoma
North
to
85th
and
then
back
to
the.
S
S
C
S
So
that's
something
that
the
staff
is
kind
of
pulling
away
from
and
understand.
We
understand
that
it's
not
going
to
be
a
requirement
in
the
new
coordinates
because
of
lack
of
maintenance
and
lack
of
the
ability
of
city
staff
to
police
that,
if
you've
been
to
the
addition,
we
have
Boulevard
streets
with
trees,
lining
both
the
center
and
the
sides,
all
in
all
the
boulevards,
including
the
private,
83rd
Street.
S
C
Okay,
so
having
said
all
that
I'll
just
throw
out
there
that
it
seems
to
me
that
staff
may
be
jumping
began
again
on
what's
going
to
be
required
by
the
new
sign,
ordinance
and
I
wish.
They
wouldn't
drop
these
things
in
on
this.
If
we're
going
to
stop
requiring
things
like
this,
it
might
be
worth
discussing
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
having
some
kind
of
an
you
know.
Since
it's
about.
C
C
C
C
That's
a
little
unclear
to
me
from
just
the
way
it
reads
in
the
staff
report
and
then
and
then
also
a
separate
page
7,
the
second
of
the
last
paragraph.
It
says,
monument
signs
with
structures
located
in
this
beauty
or
with
an
established
development
theme,
wait.
What
is
that
language
mean
exactly
right?
There.
S
S
C
S
I
S
C
I'm
a
little
unclear
about
that
I.
Remember
when
the
was
it
that
the
Humvee
dealership
that
moved
in
at
the
very
northern
edge
of
Oakland
City
had
this
giant
sign
thing
that
they
wanted
to
do,
and
it
was
the
cutting,
have
big
metal
bolts
on
it
and
so
on
and
didn't
meet
sign
code
at
all.
But
it
was
consistent
with
their
theme
for
their
vehicles
and-
and
you
know,
I-
that
just
seems
a
little
fuzzy
to
me.
Consistent
with
an
established
development
theme
is
a
little
fuzzy.
S
S
C
Yeah
I
get
the
Internet
I'll
just
for
the
record,
it's
a
little
fuzzy
for
me,
but
that's
all
I
have
I
glad
that
we
got
out
up
front
that
this
is
that
this
these
signs,
this
sign
is
in
addition
to
the
monument
signs
that
will
be
throughout
the
development.
It's
not
an
either/or
generally,
when
we
approve
Tennant
signs
like
this.
It's
instead
of
the
signs
for
each
user,
the
separate
signs
for
each
user,
but
here
we're
talking
about
doing
this.
In
addition
to.
S
Very
heavily
traveled
highway.
We
have
elevation
challenges,
so
this
is
being
located
on
the
high
spot
of
our
property.
Once
you
get
into
the
property,
look,
I
can
see
the
design,
and
so
the
monument
signs
are
intended
and
you
know
we're
a
thousand
feet
in
from
the
frontage
road
before
you
turn
and
go
up
Oklahoma,
and
so
it's
a
it's
a
very
lengthy
street
circulation.
It's
public
street
inside
there
are
large
property.
C
D
X
Good
afternoon,
commissioners,
can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
yes,
Thank
You
Cindy
for
getting
our
screen
sharing
going.
This
is
the
first
of
three
items
related
that
you're
going
to
consider
this
afternoon.
This
is
actually
not
an
action
item,
because
it
is
an
annexation
request
that
was
previously
reviewed
by
the
ad-hoc
annexation
committee
on
May
11.
So
again,
we'll
start
with
just
a
brief
description
of
the
annexation
request.
Then
we'll
move
into
the
comp
plan
amendment
and
then
a
colleague
will
discuss
the
zoning
case
with
you.
X
So
just
briefly,
the
city
received
a
request
to
annex
a
8.4
acre
parcel
in
the
in
that
part
of
Oklahoma
City
that
where
Moore
and
Norman
or
Cleveland
County
all
come
together,
and
so
you
can
see
the
parcel
in
the
dashed
red
outline,
it
is
again
an
eight
point.
Four
seven
acre
parcel
next
slide,
please
so
on
May
11th,
the
ad
hoc
committee
considered
a
staff
report
on
this
request.
X
Again,
the
request
raised
no
objections
from
city
staff
and
the
staff
report
recommended
approval.
The
ad
hoc
committee
subsequently
voted
to
recommend
approval
to
City,
Council
and
Council
will
consider
this
request
sometime
during
the
summer
of
2020.
I
wanted
to
add
that
the
applicants
attorney
is
on
the
line
and
may
want
to
tell
the
Commission
a
little
bit
more
about
the
process.
David.
Are
you
on
the
yes.
W
W
So
David
box
520
two
o'clock
or
drive
it
yeah,
so
the
math
that
you're
looking
at
now
my
client
owns
everything
that's
outlined
in
white
and
with
that
the
majority
to
the
site
is
already
in
the
city
of
Oklahoma.
City.
You've
got
this
strange
little
swath
through
there,
in
which
it
is
an
unincorporated
Cleveland
County.
So
we
have
one
development.
It's
a
single-family
development
which
you'll
have
a
comp
plan,
change
next
single
the
rezoning
application.
W
After
that
and
then
in
July,
you
will
see
the
plat
for
this
development,
but
in
order
to
make
this
development
move
forward,
we
needed
all
of
it
to
be
within
one
jurisdictional
control,
that
being
the
city
of
Oklahoma
City.
So
we
made
application.
We
filed
our
notices
with
the
clerk
of
Oklahoma
City
published
pursuant
to
the
statutes.
The
the
city's
ordinances
are
frankly,
fairly
silent
on
annexation.
Out
of
an
abundance
of
caution,
the
city
puts
these
items
through
Planning
Commission.
W
It's
debatable
whether
or
not
the
Planning
Commission
under
the
statutes
and
ordinance
ever
even
hear
these.
The
ordinances
are
assuming
the
statute.
It
seemed
to
indicate
we
go
straight
to
Council,
but
the
the
practice
has
been
to
go
through
Planning
Commission
day
for
a
recommendation,
which
is
a
bit
odd
because,
like
Susan
had
said,
we
already
have
gone
to
the
ad
hoc
committee
on
annexation.
That
consisted
of
a
little
called
Todd
stone,
David
green,
well
and
Larry
McAtee
on
this
item,
and
they
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
the
annexation.
W
That
will
be
then
put
forward
to
City
Council
as
who's
at
some
point
this
summer.
So
it's
a
it's
a
statutory
process
to
annex
into
a
municipality,
and
we
have
followed
that
statutory
process
with
working
through
the
City
Attorney's
office,
as
well
as
the
city
clerk's
office,
and
we
now
find
ourselves
here
before
you
on
annexing
the
that
small
piece
of
the
overall
development.
X
W
M
W
F
C
F
I'm,
looking
through
the
next
couple
of
three
applications,
the
fire
department
working
for
sprinkling
houses
has
worked
its
way
back
into
our
conversation
again,
even
though
the
City
Council
hasn't
come
to
terms
with
what
they
want.
That
wording
to
be
and
I'm
just
curious.
What
our
thoughts
on
that
are
well.
R
L
L
C
F
X
Again,
we've
set
up
the
geography
for
you
in
this
particular
case,
because
the
parcel
was
not
in
the
municipal
boundary,
it
did
not
have
a
designation
in
the
comp
plan,
but
again
we're
talking
about
an
eight
point.
Four
seven
acre
parcel
and
the
staff
recommendation
is
that
it
and
the
applicants
request
is
that
it
come
in
as
an
urban
low
intensity
parcel.
X
Again
we
mentioned
to
you
that
there's
an
Associated
zoning
application
which
will
combine
this
ADA
SH
acre
parcel
with
the
parcel
to
the
north
in
order
to
create
a
fifty
two
point,
three
acre
parcel
for
low-density
residential
use.
You
will
consider
that
again
in
the
zoning
case
in
just
a
minute,
next
slide
please.
X
So
this
is
just
the
the
customary
map
that
shows
you
where
the
subject
site
is
relative
to
the
city
as
a
whole.
Next,
thank
you,
and
this
describes
the
land
use
and
existing
conditions
in
the
vicinity.
As
you
can
see
the
parcel
we're
discussing
here,
but
a
an
urban
low
intensity
parcel
to
the
north.
There
is
urban
reserve
to
the
west.
That
area
is
not
in
play
here
at
the
moment.
So
again,
you
can
see
that
the
applicants
request
is
fairly
consistent
with
the
prevailing
land
use
in
the
area
next
slide.
X
X
In
this
particular
case,
the
area
will
be
served
with
water
and
wastewater,
in
both
cases
the
subdivision
to
the
north
of
the
north,
but
one
of
the
subject
parcel
is
fully
served
and
and
it's
in
an
open
sewer
shed.
So
it's
an
easy
matter
to
extend
water
and
waste
water
services
south
to
this
parcel.
X
X
This
is
a
an
edge
location
of
our
city,
very
unlikely
that
there
will
be
a
fire
station
built
in
this
vicinity,
possibly
ever,
but
certainly
not
for
a
long
time,
one
of
the
things
that
had
been
in
process
around
the
time.
This
application
was
received
was
discussion
between
the
city
of
Moore,
the
city
of
Harman
and
the
city
of
Oklahoma
City
for
mutual
aid
agreements.
So
we
did
include
the
fact
that
the
city
of
Moore
fire
station
nearest
is
about
two
miles
northeast
of
the
subject:
site
and
Norman's
fire
station
number.
X
X
Sorry,
office
sharing
and
then
again
these
are
the
existing
land
use
in
the
vicinity.
There
is
a
low
density
residential
to
the
north.
We've
talked
about
that
a
couple
different
times.
This
is
still
a
largely
undeveloped
part
of
the
city.
It
is
slowly
changing
as
as
time
passes
next
slide.
Please.
So
in
terms
of
our
recommendations,
we
recommend
that
you
consider
designating
this
parcel
as
urban
low.
X
We
believe
that
is
consistent
with
development
and
density
patterns
in
the
vicinity
and
that
the
applicant
will
extend
water
and
sewer
services
to
the
area
and,
of
course,
we
talked
just
now
about
the
emergency
services
situation.
So
if
the
Commission
has
any
questions
for
me,
I
will
try
to
answer
them
so.
C
D
Item
18
is
pc10
656
application
by
area
development,
3
zone,
1770,
101,
South,
Santa,
Fe
Avenue
from
the
a
agricultural
district
to
the
r1
single-family
district,
and
this
is
54
2.3
acres.
It's
the
8.47
parcel
up
for
annexation,
plus
43
acres.
Currently
in
Oklahoma
City,
that's
zoned,
double-a
David
box
represents
the
applicant.
W
Good
afternoon
once
again,
David
box-
this
is
the
companion
item
that
is
now
urban
low
intensity
and
we're
asking
for
your
approval
on
the
rezoning
application.
Like
I
mentioned,
you
will
see
the
associate
plat
on
your
docket
in
July.
So
with
that
we'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
after
your
approval.
W
F
W
Agree,
the
city
has
the
authority,
through
the
City
Council,
to
go,
enact
an
ordinance
short
of
that
we
do
not
agree
to
sprinkle
the
houses.
If
City
Council
passes
an
ordinance,
then
that's
that's
the
rule.
That's
the
way
it
worked,
but
to
be
treated
differently.
I
think
is
inequitable
as
it
was
mentioned.
I'm
sure
there
will
be
some
sort
of
in
a
local
agreement
with
Moore
and
Norman
to
serve
this.
So
we
would
ask
I,
guess
I,
just
for
the
purpose
of
the
record.
C
C
You
know
I
I,
really
wish
that
we
could
get
some
clarity
on
this
item
I'm
as
we've.
You
know
we've
talked
about
this
before
and
if
it's,
if
it's
a
safety
issue,
you
know
to
me,
I
think
it
needs
to
be
done,
but
it's
it's
got
to
be
a
consistently
applied
standard
and
you
know
I
I
would
really,
even
if
we
had
the
ability
to
to
require
it
today,
I
think
I
would
still
be
inclined
to
sort
of
punt.
This
decision
I
believe
it's
entirely
likely
that
there
will
be
cooperative
agreements.
C
There
are
two
fire
stations
within
two
miles.
You
know
in
opposite
directions
for
us,
but
you
know
the
idea
that
they're
going
to
be
homes
there
that
are
built.
You
know
at
a
at
an
urban
density
are
one
you
know
that
are
beyond
the
rural
response
time.
That
is
really
problematic
for
me,
but
it
also
seems
entirely
possible
that
that's
not
that's,
not
actually
what
will
happen
so
and
and
frankly,
on
a
straight
our
one
request:
we
don't
have
the
authority
to
require
them
sprinkle,
so.
F
Let
me
weigh
in
here
for
a
second,
this
in
Ward
5
is
like
Commissioner
Cravens
pick
a
corner
in
his
neighborhood
I
realized
that
Norman's
part
of
it
and
Morris
part
of
it
within
the
next
five
or
six
years,
you're
going
to
have
four
corners
of
400
home
neighborhoods,
and
if
the
people
of
Norman
and
the
people
of
Moore
aren't
required
to
sprinkle
their
houses,
then
this
applicant
just
loses
that
all
the
way
around,
because
and
I
understand
about
the
cross
city
agreement.
That's
an
awesome
thing.
F
F
C
Y
Jj
and
thank
you,
madam
chair
commissioners,
and
also
take
a
moment
while
I
pull
the
presentation
up,
take
a
moment
to
thank
city
manager,
Craig
Freeman
and
the
assistant
assistant
city
managers,
Audrey
McDermott,
Laura,
Johnson
and
Kenny
strudle
for
their
support
of
this
effort.
It's
been
several
years
of
extensive
research
and
planning
that
went
into
this
document
and
this
the
city
manager's
office,
created
a
real
environment
for
collaboration
that
will
help
make
this
plan
a
success.
So
what
brought
us
to
today
this
consideration
for
the
first
sustainability
plan
for
Oklahoma
City
to
be
adopted.
Y
As
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment,
we
held
a
public
comment
period
from
Earth
Day
April
22nd
through
May
20th,
received
over
200
comments,
a
lot
of
very
robust
comments
via
email,
and
so
we
we
thank
the
public
for
their
engagement
and
their
interest
in
this
topic
and
all
of
the
topics
covered
here
and
again
for
the
for
the
supportive
comments
we
received.
So
this
plan
it's
important
to
just
to
draw
a
distinction
between
adaptation
and
sustainability.
While
there
we
recognize
they're,
not
the
same
thing,
sustainability
seeks
to
ensure
that
we
have
enough
resources
for
survival.
Y
In
the
future,
while
adaptation
is
a
constant
state
of
refinement,
we're
looking
to
continuously
improve
to
have
a
future
generations
a
chance
to
thrive
in
the
future.
So
that's
what
brings
this
adaptive
KC
and
so
again,
the
purpose
of
this
plan
is
to
strengthen
our
community
through
our
research.
We
found
several
challenges:
we've
identified
some
and
we
leave
Gras.
We
we've
gained
a
further
deeper
understanding
of
others
and
and
those
those
will
be
discussed
as
I
go
through
each
chapter.
Y
So
what
the
plan
does
not
do
it
does
not
it's
not
an
ordinance
and
it
doesn't
override
existing
regulations
or
policies
or
priorities.
The
council
may
have,
and
but
it
is
it
will,
how
we
vision
this
coming
back
to
you
is
in
packages
or
in
individual
proposals
that
will
be
considered
at
that
time,
and
so
each
of
those
may
have
a
public
process
involved
and
we
do
foresee
some
of
this
plan
potentially
being
implemented
through
the
unified
code,
development
or
unified
development
code
update,
that's
ongoing,
believe
in
phase
2
right
now.
Y
We
can
expect
an
increase
of
average
annual
temperatures
in
Oklahoma,
City
and
and
that's
difficult
for
the
layperson
to
understand
or
to
realize
what
an
average
annual
temperature
increase.
It
means
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
more
extreme
days.
In
fact,
the
National
Climate
Assessment
goes
as
far
to
say,
the
top
2%
of
hottest
days.
That
is
those
that
are
between
95
degrees
and
100.
The
that
we
should
receive
about
seven
on
average.
Y
Every
year
we
could
see
an
increase
with
about
27
of
those
by
by
mid-century,
so
we
can
have
more
than
a
month's
worth
of
super
hot
days
by
mid-century,
and
that
also
goes
for
nine.
So
we
could
see
an
increase
of
35
of
the
2%
warmest
nights
by
mid-century,
so
the
the
warming
trend
that
we
see
and
the
the
dry
hot
that
we
see
that
again
effect
of
all
neural
populations,
affected
electricity
used
usage
and
and
a
lot
of
things
that
that
is
something
that
we've
identified
in
the
plan
and
have
recommendations
to
improve.
Again.
I
I
I
Y
I'm
sorry,
well
what
we,
what
we
hope
to
do
is
is
is
to
reduce
operating
and
maintenance
costs
for
city
operations,
but
also
make
our
community
more
prepared
and
resilient
into
the
future.
And
that's
what
that's?
What
our?
How
will
we
adapt?
That's
what
our
recommendations
will
point
to.
We
want
to
mitigate
the
urban
heat
island
and
we
also
want
to
look
at
the
ways
we
use
electricity,
energy
efficiency,
whether
it's
for
city
operations
or
through
energy
codes
for
for
new
construction
or
for
retrofit
programs.
That
is
revenue,
and
so
we
need
to.
Y
We
need
to
view
it
as
such
and
treat
it
as
such
and
then
also
we
want
to
look
at
the
way
we
generate
electricity
and
rely
more
on
clean
sources
on
renewable,
like
renewables,
solar,
wind
that
that
come
with
also
good-paying
jobs
that
can
help
diversify
our
economy
and
and
and
keep
us
a
little
bit.
Keep
our
air
a
little
bit
clean
up.
Y
So
the
outline
of
the
plan.
We
have
four
chapters
of
content
in
terms
of
topics,
so
energy
productivity.
That's
where
we
talk
a
lot
about
energy
generation
and
how
we
use
it:
natural
and
built
environment,
air
quality
and
waste
reduction,
and
then
at
the
intro
we
do
talk
about
the
history
of
the
office.
The
office
was
created
in
2009
2010
through
the
stimulus
package,
the
American
Recovery
and
Reinvestment
Act
Oklahoma
City
received
about
5.4
million
dollars
to
implement
a
series
of
projects,
one
of
which
was
created,
green
and
office
of
sustainability.
Y
So
that's
why
we're
here
and
that's
why
this
plan
is
here
and
then
again
we
have
policies
and
implementation
chapter
that
covers
how
we
plan
to
do
this.
The
priorities
we
have
and
start
by
days,
which
is
important
to
note,
are
not
wait
until
dates
that
week,
so
we
can
be
opportunistic
as
implementation
presents
itself.
Y
So
the
first
chapter
and
I'll
go
through
each
chapter
and
talk
about
the
gist,
the
goals
and
initiatives
at
a
high
level
and
if
there's
any
questions,
feel
free
to
jump
in
as
I
go,
but
for
energy
productivity
we
want
to
reduce
emissions
associated
with
energy
consumption.
So
again,
that's
that's
twofold.
We
want
to
be
more
efficient
in
how
we
use
power
and
we
want
to
use
clean
sources
of
energy
or
to
generate
electricity,
and
so
what
there.
Y
There
are
several
ways
to
do
that,
but,
but
one
important
factor
of
why
we
should
do
that
is
electricity
right
now
is
cheap
in
terms
of
the
price
of
it
in
Oklahoma
and
and
that's
across
all
sectors
compared
to
national
averages.
We
have
cheap
costs
are
cheap,
so
you
can
achieve
prices
of
electricity
and
what
that
does
that.
That's
actually
means
that
we
have
we.
We
use
a
lot
more
than
other
places,
because
if
something
is
the
low
low
price,
a
lot
of
more
will
be
used.
Y
So
we
do
use
more
per
person
than
the
national
average,
which
means
low
low
income,
households,
households
that
may
not
be
weatherized.
They
face
a
larger
energy
burden
whereby
they
spend
more
of
their
at
their
aunt,
their
income,
their
total
income,
with
a
greater
percentage
of
that
on
just
paying
their
utility
bills.
And
so
that's
something
that
we
we
think
it
is
a
challenge
and
needs
to
be
addressed
and
can
be
addressed
through
the
tools
we.
Y
We
lay
out
in
the
plan
so
again,
I
mentioned,
diversify
local
local
and
state
economies
through
job
creation
and
that's
both
through
energy
efficiency
and
renewable
energy
jobs
with
energy
code.
Compliance
also
can
come
job
creation.
So
that's
that's
where
we
want
to
go
with
it
with
energy
productivity,
natural
and
built
environment.
This
chapter
looks
largely
at
water
quality
and
the
urban
heat
island
effect.
Y
So
the
urban
heat
island
effect
is
the
phenomenon
where
urban
areas,
where
there's
a
lot
of
asphalt,
a
lot
of
buildings,
things
that
absorb
heat
and
thermal
energy
throughout
the
day
they
can
be
up
to
22
degrees,
hotter
than
a
nearby
undeveloped
area,
a
green
field,
and
so
that
can
have
really
negative
impacts
for
vulnerable
populations
or
people
with
respiratory
illnesses
or,
if
there's
a
global
pandemic.
That's
impressed
datoria
illness
going
on
that
those
can
have
its
d'être,
bating
effects,
and
so
with
with
the
mitigation
of
the
urban
heat
island,
we
want
to
increase
vegetation.
Y
Y
Cottage
food
industry,
but
is
legal
at
the
state
levels,
but
there
are.
There
are
zoning
aspects
of
it
that
make
it
not
allowable
in
Oklahoma,
City
right
now,
so
diving
deeper
into
that
low-impact
development
can
help
catch
that
first
flush
of
rainfall,
as
I
mentioned,
with
an
increase
of
inundation
rainfall.
It
events,
we
could
see
a
lot
more
of
that
pollution
from
streets
and
parking
lots.
Oklahoma
City
is
made
up
of
our
total
surface
area.
Is
four
percent
made
of
parking
lots,
just
the
land
use
of
parking
lots,
and
so
that's
where
we
store
cars.
Y
Cars
are
dirty
and
half
oil
and
gasoline,
and
things
like
that,
and
as
it
rains
all
of
that
that
first
five
minutes
of
rainfall
sweeps
the
pollution
straight
into
our
natural
water
system.
There's
no
treatment,
there's
no
pretreatment
before
it
reaches
our
lakes
and
streams
and
rivers,
and
so
that
means
we.
We
have
to
treat
that
before
it
becomes
drinkable
water
again,
and
so
that's
that's
an
important
aspect
where
low-impact
development,
rain
gardens,
bioretention
cells.
Y
Y
So
that's!
What's
measured
in
terms
of
whether
we're
in
attainment
or
not,
and
that's
a
very
important,
that's
a
very
important
distinction
to
remain
in
attainment,
because
there
are
studies.
Austin,
Round
Rock
is
one
that
I
believe
it
was
anywhere
between
27
and
41
billion
dollars
over
the
course
of
about
30
or
40
years
that
it
could
end
up
costing
their
economy
if
they
were
to
go
a
high
level
of
non-attainment
and
there
are,
there
are
varying
stages
of
attainment.
Y
Without
the
introduction
of
you
know
regional,
rail
or
something
like
that,
and
and
so
what
we,
what
we
think
we
can
do
and
what
we
think
the
real
opportunity
is
is
is
being
able
to
convert
that
to
the
low
or
no
emission.
So
by
encouraging
the
use
of
alternative
fuels,
electric
vehicles
compressed
natural
gas.
These
types
of
things
can
reduce
the
amount
of
congestion
and
and
excuse
me,
can
reduce
the
amount
of
emissions
associated
with
our
commutes
and
then
also
we
want
to
address
sustainable
transportation
infrastructure
funding.
Y
How
we
get
you
know,
funding
for
to
maintain
roads
and
and
and
streets.
Those
are
that's
through
a
lot
of
time
to
do
gas,
taxes
and
and
but
in
Oklahoma.
Since
FY
96
and
that's
1996
average
since
then,
through
I,
believe
FY
18,
we
average
about
a
million
dollars
total
annually
in
terms
of
how
much
gas
tax
of
the
city
of
Oklahoma
City
receives
and
we
receive.
You
know
this
was
something
I've
reinforced
in.
Z
Y
It's
fairly
straightforward.
We
want
to.
We
want
to
send
less
stuff
to
landfills
in
a
variety
of
ways,
and
some
things
are
hazardous:
medical,
sharps
and
pharmaceuticals
and
have
water
water
quality
problems.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
people
have
the
right
Avenue.
Sometimes
people
flush,
those
things
and
that's
that's
not
where
it
needs
to
go.
That
causes
other
problems
so
having
avenues
for
those
that
type
of
waste,
as
well
as
generally
expanding
beyond
expanding
the
focus.
Y
We
want
to
leverage
the
city's
purchasing
power
to
be
able
to
buy
the
materials
with
recycled
content,
and
we
also
want
to
encourage
other
industries
to
do
so
as
well,
and
so
the
more
the
more
materials
that
are
available,
the
more
likely
there
will
be
products
made
with
recycled
content
and
again
we
can.
We
can
have
that
closed-loop
cycle
and
again
here's
my
contact
information
I
failed
to
put
the
website.
Ok,
so
you
go
backslash
sustain
but
again,
I.
Thank
you.
Your
time
in
consideration
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
G
Katie,
oh,
this
is
a
ASA
I.
Hope.
You'll.
Excuse
me
paraphrasing.
You
know
my
interpretation
of
the
document
for
for
I
guess
everyone
else,
but
it's
my
I
guess
I
guess,
to
put
it
all
in
a
sentence.
I
would
say
that
the
city
of
Oklahoma
City,
like
most
American
cities
right
now,
is
headed
toward
financial
ruin.
If
we
don't
take
these
things,
serious
and
I
mean
that
and
we
look
at
these
things
and
we
kind
of
like
you
know,
think
that
that
might
be
quote
unquote:
cute
ideas
or
nice
ideas,
but
these
are
very
necessary.
G
C
Thank
you,
mr.
Bowman,
very,
very
much
for
your
presentation
and
for
all
your
hard
work.
I
think
we
do
take
it
pretty
seriously
and
I'm
just
so
pleased
that
we
have
taken
now
this
additional
step
that
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction,
that
we
have
a
framework.
That's
going
to
help
guide
us
as
we
take
those
steps
and
I
think
the
city's
commitment
to
sustainability
is
very
real
and
will
only
increase
over
time.
But
thank
you
so
very,
very
much
for
your
expertise
and
your
efforts
and
your
time
and
your
energy
thank.
Y
You
very
much
madam
chair
and
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
mention
the
other
half
of
the
sustainability
office,
our
associate
planner
Ryan
Baker,
who
put
countless
hours
into
this
plan
and
has
spent
the
last
three
months
being
the
epitome
of
a
public
servant
and
in
helping
the
emergency
manager
with
with
understanding
of
and
collection
of
data
and
and
responding
to
the
köppen
19
pandemic.
So
you
know
jack
of
all
trades,
and-
and
you
know
you
you
can
you
can
put
him
anywhere
and
he'll
and
he'll
work
until
he
can't
work
anymore.
F
I
F
Z
Madam
chair,
this
is
rusty.
If
I
may
I
had
a
couple
of
conversations
on
this
recently
and
I'm
prepared
to
make
a
motion
if
I
can
make
a
few
comments.
Is
that
okay,
of
course
yes,
okay,
thanks
I
had
it
I
did
have
a
couple
conversations
recently
and
I
recall
a
discussion
last
year.
At
this
time
we
discussed
the
arguable
advantages
to
rotating
the
chair.
On
occasion,
Commissioner
Cravens
was
and
I
believe,
still
is
interested
in
willing
to
serve
as
a
chair,
while
I
will
be
making
motion.
Z
First
I
want
to
comment
on
how
well
you
have
served
us
in
the
city
as
chair
motion
to
rotate,
the
chair
is
not
at
all
a
results
of
any
reflects
on
your
service
and
to
the
contrary.
You've
served
us
tremendously
in
many
important
ways,
but
but
I
do
feel
and
have
had
these
conversations
about
us
rotating
I.
Believe
you
asked
the
other
day
I
think
you
have
served
as
a
chair
since
every
one
of
us
have
joined
in
just
the
last
few
years.
We
have
all
served
under
your
chairmanship
and
it's
very
appreciated
and.
I
Z
It
passes,
I
did
all
that
everybody
know.
I
had
a
conversation
with
with
madam
chair
Bowers
that
she
I'm
delighted
as
she
indicated.
She
would
like
a
vote
in
favor
of
it
as
well,
and
I'm
more
delighted
she
indicated.
She
would,
of
course,
continue
to
serve
on
the
Commission
with
us
and
with
that,
unless
anyone
has
anything
further
I'm
prepared
to
make
that
motion
with
respect
to
chair.
If
somebody
prefers
to
first
talk
about
a
vice
chair,
I
did
not
have
any
conversations
on
that.
C
And
I
would
like
to
make
a
couple
of
comments.
If
I
could
we
did
have
this
discussion
last
year
about
whether
or
not
it
is
advisable
to
rotate
the
chairmanship
and
I?
Think
that's
not
something
that
I
feel
as
strongly
about
as
perhaps
some
other
people
do.
As
you
know,
I
served
for
many
many
many
years
under
John
yokels
chairmanship,
and
that
worked
very
well.
He,
of
course,
did
not
have
have
a
ward
to
represent.
He
was
at
large,
and
so
he
was
free
to
tend.
C
Important
for
the
Planning
Commission
during
the
time
that
I
have
served
as
chair
I've
tried
to
make
as
many
of
the
motions
that
and
votes
that
we
have
taken
unanimous
as
I
could
sometimes
voting
even
against
my
own
I
won't
say
against
my
own
conscience,
but
my
own
inclinations,
never
against
my
better
judgment,
I
would
say,
but
against
my
inclinations,
because
I
think
it
is
very
important
that
people
understand
and
recognize
the
position
and
power.
The
Planning
Commission
Planning
Commission
is
a
statutory
body.
C
You
may
have
noticed
during
the
time
that
I've
served
as
chair
I.
Don't
I,
don't
talk
about
us,
making
recommendations
to
City
Council,
except
in
unusual
circumstances
such
as
the
annexation
vote
that
we
had
earlier
today.
If
you
look
at
the
statutes
the
Planning
Commission
acts,
the
City
Council
is
free
to
overrule
the
Planning
Commission.
If
it
chooses
to
do
so,
but
I
don't
think
of
the
Planning
Commission
is
recommending
body
and
I.
C
Don't
think
that
that's
what
the
statutes
indicate
that
it
is
so
I've
been
I've
been
careful
about
that
and
another
thing
that
I've
done
during
the
time
that
I
was
on
in
the
chair
is
to
try
to,
and
this
was
difficult
for
me.
We
all
have
so
many
connections
with
the
development
community
and
with
the
people
who
appear
in
front
of
us
I
had
been
practicing
land
use
law.
C
You
know
many
many
many
years
before
I
came
to
Planning
Commission
and
had
have
many
many
friends
who
appear
in
front
of
us
regularly,
but
I
think
it
is
really
important
that
we
guard
against
any
kind
of
perception
in
the
public
right
wrong
or
indifferent,
and
it's
wrong
99.9
percent
of
time.
You
know
that
the
fix
is
in
or
the
whole
thing's
rigged
or
that
doesn't
matter
what
people
say.
We
hear
people
tell
us
that
all
the
time
it
doesn't
really
matter.
C
So
when,
when
we
spoke
about
this
I
think
what
I
told
you
was
that
if
Commissioner
Cravens
is
inclined
to
serve
as
chair
and
is
desirous
of
doing
that,
I
don't
think
that
I
will
oppose
that,
not
because
I'm,
tired
of
being
the
chair,
not
because
I've
accomplished
everything
I
would
like
to
accomplish
the
wheels
of
government
move
unusually
slowly,
sometimes,
but
because
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
act
especially
choose
our
chair
in
a
unanimous
fashion.
So
that's
all
I
had
to
say.
N
Z
Thanks
Commissioner
Pennington
I
thought
about
that
as
well,
because
last
year
we
discussed
his
negative
rotating
every
year
and
going
all
the
way
around
every
commissioner
and
including
myself,
there
were
a
few
of
us
that
did
not
want
to
go
that
extreme
to
the
rotation
so
yeah.
It
may
come
back
around
to
the
few
who
are
even
interested
and
willing
to
serve
as
the
chair.
So
thank
you.
Z
What
with
that,
my
other
idea,
if,
unless
I,
wants
to
speak
up
about
vice
chair
since
Commissioner
Pennington
just
spoke
so
eloquently,
he
was
the
one
that
I
did
not
have
a
conversation
about,
but
I'm
curious
come
all
of
us.
Somebody
else
interested
you
you're,
always
very
thoughtful,
well
scripted
when
it
comes
time
for
you
to
make
your
own
motion,
I
wondered
if
you
would
be
willing
to
I
think.
Z
N
N
C
J
C
U
C
Z
C
C
R
R
Okay,
so,
as
you
guys
may
or
may
not
remember,
we
appointed
a
sort
of
a
very
quick
ad
hoc
drainage
committee
that
was
myself
Commissioner
Claire
Commissioner
powers.
The
idea
behind
that
subcommittee
was
to
root
out
kind
of
the
information
behind
the
comment
that
appeared
in
our
staff
reports
back
in
May
about
drainage
that
was
objected
to
by
some
of
the
applicants.
During
that
hearing
and
I
circulated
a
essentially
an
email
that
was
written
by
Jared
Norris
from
Public
Works.
R
He
was
gracious
enough
to
write
some
the
the
comment
itself,
along
with
some
color
to
it.
I
circulated
that
memo,
as
we
discussed
as
a
subcommittee
to
essentially
the
six
members
of
the
engineering
community
that
appear
in
front
of
the
Planning
Commission
on
a
very
regular
basis,
just
to
get
their
feedback.
That
feedback
was
received
over
the
course
of
the
last
week.
I
circulated
that
anything
I
received
I
passed
along
to
Commissioner,
Clair
and
Commissioner
powers.
R
I
had
a
call
today
and
follow
up
with
staff
with
Michele
January
and
with
Jared
Norris
about
this
issue
and
I
just
want
to
give
you
guys
a
short
update.
So
there's
a
history.
Here's
the
update
after
talking
it
over
with
them,
they
requested
a
little
bit
more
time
to
craft
some
language.
I
wanted
to
be
over
respectful
of
the
fact
that
this
was
staffs
note
and
that
we're
trying
to
be
timely
and
staff
and
getting
something
agreed
upon
that
can
be
included
in
staff
reports
they're.
R
The
ones
who
made
that
request
and
I'm
sure
I
have
no
objection
to
that.
I
just
hate
to
delay
it
because
we
only
have
one
meeting
in
July,
so
it
would
be
August
meeting
before
the
snow
could
be
back.
I
do
want
to
articulate
a
couple
things
that
I
found
interesting.
That
I'd
pass
along
at
this
point
to
commissioners
and
I
certainly
want
to
give
them
a
chance
to
comment
as
well.
If
they'd
like
to
do
so,
but
as
I
said,
Jared
prepared
a
memo,
I
am
more
than
happy
to
circulate
this
to
any
planning.
R
Commissioner
who'd
like
to
see
it
was
trying
to
spare
you
an
email
frankly,
but
Jared
proposed
some
revised
language.
That
I
think
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
and
chapter
16
is
where
these
ordinances
are
found.
In
summary,
there's
two
components:
when
detention
is
wired,
one
is
when
there
is
known
downstream
flooding
of
structures
and
for
the
lawyers
in
the
group.
That's
a
term
of
art
for
the
non
lawyers
in
the
group.
R
It
means
that
term
is
defined
in
the
law
and
structures,
and
if
you
read
that
definition,
there
is
pushback
from
the
engineering
community
about
how
that
term
is
being
enforced.
So
what
is
actually
a
structure
and
what
is
not?
Secondarily,
there
was
brought
up
through
the
discussion
that
there
is
a
drainage
map
that
highlights
where
areas
of
flood
and
prone
areas
known
flooding
issues
exist.
This
map
is
not
a
public
document;
it
is
not
widely
circulated.
It
is
not
published
on
a
website.
It
is
not
available
and
I
after
discussion
with
staff.
R
I
have
to
say,
I
take
some
issue
with
that,
primarily
because
developers
know
I
know.
Commissioner
tern
I
visited
about
this
a
little
bit
in
the
engineering
world.
If
you
want
to
know
if
a
site
is
subject
to
flooding,
you
pull
the
fema
flood
map
and
you
look
and
you
see
if
you're
gonna
have
to
deal
with
fema
before
you
can
build
within
the
flood
zone,
depending
on
how
it's
classified.
R
If
there's
gonna
be
a
map
that
staff
uses
to
decide
where
and
when
detention
should
be
utilized,
it
should
be
a
publicly
and
readily
available
document
that
does
two
things:
the
development
process.
It
improves
the
predictability
of
outcome
and,
frankly,
it
gives
us
as
planning
commissioners
something
to
swing
back
against
the
development
community
when
they
bring
forth
an
application.
This
map
exists
on
and
they
say
we
don't
want
to
do
detention
here
or
we
want
to
exclude
this
comment.
We
can
say
the
map
was
there,
it
was
publicly
available.
You
could
have
reviewed
it.
R
You
didn't
so
it
gives
us
a
little
bit
more
teeth
to
hold
them
accountable
and
I'm,
really
not
sure
why
it
hasn't
been
available
up
to
this
point,
but
I
would
stress
to
staff
that
I
think
they
should
make
this
map
available
and
update
it
right
you
early
and
provide
it
to
the
public
in
some
easily
accessible
means.
I
think
it
will
also
cut
down
on
the
amount
of
calls
and
correspondence
that
has
to
take
place
to
get
answers
about
whether
detention
will
be
required
in
certain
areas.
So
those
were
the
times.
C
Commissioner
Commissioner
Crabbie's.
Let
me
ask
you:
if
is
that
very
issue
of
the
of
the
need
to
update
it
frequently,
is
that
what
has
kept
it
from
becoming
public
document
is,
is
the
concern
that
you
know
it?
They
they
do
it
based,
at
least
in
part,
I,
don't
know
what
all
goes
into
it,
but,
at
least
in
part
based
on
reported
flooding
incidents.
Is
it?
Is
it
some
reluctance
to
hold
it
out
as
a
definitive
document,
because
it
is
so
often
or
regularly
updated?
Do
you
think.
R
Also
that
staff
comment
on
that.
What
I
would
say
is
staff
within
the
existing
ordinance
and
they
articulated.
There
are
plans
to
try
to
amend
or
alter
this
ordinance,
but
they
do
have
the
tools
at
their
disposal
within
the
ordinance,
because
one
of
the
other
conditions
Janice
and
in
the
ordinances
it
says
known,
downstream,
flooding
of
structures
or
if
it
is
determined
that
development
of
subject
property
will
cause
or
contribute
to
flooding
to
exist,
any
downstream
structures.
Then
they
can
require
so.
L
R
Think
all
the
map
will
do
is
it's
it's
it's
in
practical
sense.
What
it
would
do
is
it
would
let
these
engineers
go
and
look
at
this
map
and
see
that
drainage
of
Public
Works
has
designated
this
area
is
becoming.
You
know.
We
essentially
gonna
say
that
it
is
contributing
to
downstream
flood
development.
R
Representing
me
I'm
there
on
our
collective
behalf
that
I'm
trying
to
bring
information
back
to
you
I
would
summarize
that,
as
the
conflict
points
for
the
correspondence
I
saw
Commissioner,
Clara
Commissioner
powers-
you
guys
were
in
on
that
correspondence,
so
I'll,
let
you
add
anything
to
that
that
you
want
to
and
then,
as
I
said,
I'd
certainly
like
to
have
staff
get
a
chance
to
respond
or
make
their
make
their
points.
If
they'd
like
to.
C
So
the
one
thing
based
on
discussion
that
you
and
I
had
and
looking
over
the
comments,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
it's
important
for
us
to
be
focused
and
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
about
this.
But
my
understanding
is
that
this
really
is
an
issue
that
impacts
beauties
and
SPG's
rather
than
straight
zoning.
So
we're
really
just
talking
about
beauties
and
spds,
and
yours.
R
C
And
part
of
the
how
we
got
to
this
problem
was
language
contained
in
an
old
beauty,
because
there's
no
guarantee
that
those
things
are
going
to
be
developed
immediately.
That
indicated
that
no
detention
would
be
required
years
later
when
it
was
determined
that
it
meet.
It
was
needed.
It
was
like.
Oh
no,
but
it
says
we
don't
have
to
do
that.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
should
all
consider
the
possibility
of
is
simply
that
we
stopped
doing
that
that
we
make
it
clear
through
whatever
comment
or
decision.
C
C
Detailed
drainage
plans
has
not
been
put
in
at
that
point
for
reasons
that
make
perfect
economic
sense
as
far
as
development
goes,
and
so
I
mean,
rather
than
trying
to
craft
a
huge
big
fix
for
this
problem,
I
think
we
ought
to
at
least
consider
the
possibility
that
we
simply
make
it
clear
that
that's
not
part
of
what
is
being
decided
at
the
zoning
stage.
It's
already
not
being
decided
with
respect
to
straight
zoning.
Why
should
peds
and
s
beauties
be
any
different?
I.
R
100%
agree
with
all
that,
and
and
and
and
dare
I
speak
for
them,
so
did
all
of
the
engineering
folks
that
we
reached
out
to
in
reference
to
that
that
you're
correct
straight
zoning,
the
drainage
ordinance
applies
and
that
they're
not
trying
to
use
the
ax.
So
the
fact
that
we
would
include
a
note
that
would
make
that
clear
does
not
give
them
any
heartburn.
It
was
the
inclusion
of
the
note
as
a
technical
evaluation
which
and
I
tried
to
call
Sarah
once
today
and
she
wasn't
it
off
the
time.
R
I
call
and
I
didn't
know
who
else
to
call
a
Jeff
out
but
I'm
curious
from
staffs
perspective
too.
When
we
get
we
get
to
them
and
they
have
a
chance
to
comment.
Is
there
really
a
difference
between
this
being
a
comment
in
the
staff
report
and
a
technical
evaluation,
because
if
it's
going
to
universally
apply
to
all
these
applications,
I
don't
see
the
need
for
it
to
be
a
technical
valuation
and
I'm.
R
Really
stealing
that
comment
from
Commissioner
Claire
made
that
point
and
I
think
that's
exactly
right,
and
so
that's
why
we
went
back
to
them,
refining
language
that
would
be
included
in
the
staff
reports
on
a
go-forward
for
SPS
and
peds,
because
everything
you
said,
I
totally
agree
with
and
and
frankly
so
do
they
and
they
had
bad.
No
objection
to
that.
C
To
me
that
just
makes
a
lot
more
sense.
I
mean
you
know,
I
I,
I,
think,
first
of
all,
public
works
are,
is
welcome
to
put
whatever
comment
they
want
to
make
in
a
staff
report
about
their
review
and
how
they
see
it
and
what
they
want
everybody
to
know,
and
it's
there
and
it's
you
know
clearly
available
to
be
read
and
the
the
actual
status
of
a
technical
evaluation.
You
I'm
not
sure
I
agree
that
it
becomes
part
of
a
PUD,
maybe
I'm
wrong
about
that.
But
it
is
a
condition
of
approval.
C
I
get
that.
But
you
know
it's
not
really
added
to
the
document
in
a
way
that
makes
the
document
cumbersome.
That's
not
my
concern,
but
it
I
think
it
is
important
for
everybody,
not
just
the
developers
and
the
applicant
and
the
people
involved
on
this
side
staff
and
so
on,
but
hug
the
public,
those
neighbors
that
live
out
there
to
understand
that
decision
is
going
to
get
made
at
a
time
when
a
lot
more
is
understood
about
how
the
actual
development
is
going
to
work.
The
nuts
and
bolts
card
that
process.
L
K
Scott
I
think
you,
you
summed
it
up
very
well,
very,
very
eloquently
yeah
I,
just
you
know
through
the
course
of
our
conversations.
I
think
you
know
it
is
those
comments.
I
think
I
feel
personally
are
most
appropriate
in
the
staff
report,
not
as
a
te
and
then
just
in
general.
You
know,
as
applicants
come
to
us,
they
may
be
the
first,
the
first
application
out
in
the
middle
of
nowhere
and
and
who
knows
what
that's
going
to
look
like
in
ten
years.
K
R
Agreed
Jared
Norris
did
a
frankly
wonderful
job
representing
the
interest
of
public
workers
in
our
conversation
and
made
a
lot
of
really
great
points,
none
of
which
I
argued
with
in
northern
available,
so
I
think
everybody's.
On
the
same
page,
it's
just
making
sure
that
we
do
this.
The
right
way,
I
think
that's
really
what
this
was
all
about,
so
I,
don't
know
I'm
sure
Jared's
on
the
line.
Still,
if
he
wants
to
add
any
comment
or
thoughts
at
I,
certainly
would
welcome
him
to
have
a
chance
to
comment.
Thank.
J
J
J
J
It's
not
you
know,
and
and
so
when
we
make
that
the
initial
comment
on
the
the
on
the
you
know
the
Planning
Commission.
You
know
on
the
Planning
Commission
cases,
that's
where
that
information
comes
from,
but
we
really
view
it
as
kind
of
as
a
beginning
place.
This
is
what
the
map
says.
I'd
love
to
you
know,
make
it
more
public.
You
know,
especially
the
process
that
we
have
you
know
and
really
and
I
and
I
really.
You
know.
J
C
Know
with
respect
to
the
issue
of
the
time
I
mean
I,
I
I.
Don't
have
any
objection
whatsoever
for
for
staff
to
take
whatever
time
they
think
they
need
to
get
this
right.
It's
better
to
be
right
than
to
be
quick,
and
really
the
impetus
is
from
them.
They
were
the
ones
who
were
seeking
the
change.
So
if
they
are
not
in
a
hurry
to
have
it
happen,
then
you
know
I'm.
Certainly
not
it's
got
to
be
August.
You
know,
that's
fine,.
J
R
Well,
so
my
suggestion
would
just
be
you
know:
Jared,
the
ball
is
in
your
court.
You
and
in
public
works
court
to
get
language
back
that
will
be
included
in
staff
reports.
I
think
the
right
thing
to
do
is
to
take
your
refined
language
circulated
for
any
final
comments,
whether
that,
whether
that
comes
before
the
July
meeting
or
before
a
first
meeting
in
August
once
we
receive
it,
we
can
circulate
it
and
and
and
await
any
feedback
and
then
we'd
be
prepared
to
you
know
sort
of
introduce
it
here
in
Planning,
Commission
committees.
C
U
Hi,
my
name
is
Kayla
Mackenzie,
and
this
has
been
very
interesting.
This
is
the
first
Planning
Commission
meeting
I've
ever
listened
to.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
ask
a
question.
I
would
also
first
like
to
acknowledge
that
this
city
and
state,
which
you
and
I
call
home,
is
stolen
land.
That
thought
should
never
leave
our
minds
as
the
city
continues
to
grow
and
our
indigenous
leaders
should
be
invited
to
the
table
at
every
city
planning.
I
U
And
brown
businesses
to
start
and/or
flourish
if
they're
already
going.
If
so,
can
you
please
explain
those,
and
if
you
are
not
already
acting
economic
justice
reforms,
then
I
think
it's
time
to
start.
Listening
to
our
black
leadership,
you
can
watch
the
streamed
conversation
on
structural
racism
within
our
city,
state
and
country
that
was
held
last
night,
six,
black
women,
all
leaders
of
our
community.
If
you
are
looking
for
people
to
bring
to
the
table
black
lives
matter,
Oklahoma
City
is
also
very
easy
to
find
on
Facebook.
U
U
U
Not
equality,
all
institutions
and
levels
of
government
in
the
city
state
country
have
played
key
roles
in
the
web
of
for
centuries.
Systemic
racism
in
this
country.
I
would
like
to
know
what
steps
the
City
City
Planning
Commission
are
taking
to
enact
real
equitable
change.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
C
C
G
G
Believe
zoning,
as
most
of
you
know,
is,
has
been
a
tool
for
you
know
whether
intentional
or
not
I
do
believe
you
know
to
some
degree
it
has
been
institutionally
intentional,
but
there's
there's
been
a
racist
history
and
I
mean
and
I
think
that
the
city
right
now
has
the
opportunity,
with
our
zoning
code,
update
to
address
that,
and
it
is
absolutely
at
least
for
this,
commissioner
part
of
my
intention
to
to
try
to
find
the
ability
for
for
equity
and
equitable
solutions.
To
some
of
these.
N
I,
can
I
this
is
come
on,
can
I
just
piggyback
off
of
what
ASA
said,
because
I
agree
with
with
with
what
he
said
and
I
think
that
the
code
update
is
our
opportunity
to
make
the
history
right,
because
that
is
where
we
have
legislative
purview.
As
far
as
me,
personally,
because
I
know
that
the
Commission
has
limited
ability
to
directly
influence
a
lot
of
the
policies
that
heat
that
the
speaker
mentioned
in
an
official
way.
N
Perhaps
one
of
the
things
that
Commissioner
Highsmith
had
me
do
was
read
the
color
of
law,
which
was
a
spectacular
book
and
I
highly
encourage
all
of
the
other
commissioners
to
read
it
as
well,
because
it
definitely
changed
my
perspective
about
equity
and
the
history
of
planning
and
zoning
in
you
know,
in
across
the
United
States
and
Oklahoma
City's,
unique
history
and
involvement
in
that
as
well.
So
not
in
any
way
trying
to
downplay
it.
AA
May
may
I
also
add
something
Sarah
Welch
planning
department
staff
I
just
want
to
tell
Taylor
that
you
absolutely
if
you're
not
already
signed
up
for
updates
on
our
code
update
project.
It's
a
great
time
to
get
involved
right
now
you
can
email
code
update
at
OKC
gov.
You
can
email
me
personally
at
Sarah
dot,
well
edit
OKC
gov
or
you
can
call
me
at
two
nine
seven,
two,
two,
a
three
Thanks
thank.
U
U
It's
hard
for
me
to
navigate
right
now,
I'm,
just
now
kind
of
jumping
into
getting
involved
and
with
my
city,
government
and
I
wonder
it's
kind
of
hard
for
me
to
navigate.
Who
has
the
answers
to
these
questions
and
you
know
like
who
is
making
these
decisions?
I
understand
it's
engineers,
it's
you
guys.
It's
City,
Council
people,
it
seems
so
spread
out
and
hard
to
navigate
and
be.
Are
these
suggestions
as
to
who
to
kind
of
poke
and
ask
and
remind
that
these
issues
are
very
important
to
their
city.
Citizens.
G
Sarah,
if,
if
you
wouldn't
mind,
if
you'd
share
my
my
contact
information,
what
whenever
he
gets
in
contact
with
you,
I'd
love
to
have
a
coffee,
this
is
Commissioner
Highsmith,
I'd
love
to
have
a
coffee
I'd,
be
happy
to
share
a
copy
of
the
book
that
Kemal
recommended
I
have
many
more
copies,
and
in
my
possession
and
I'd
love
to
just
talk
about,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
you
know
the
the
other
ways
that
you
could
get
involved.
That
I
would
feel
would
be.