►
From YouTube: Riverfront Design Committee - March 2, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
C
Welcome
to
the
March
2nd
2023
meeting
of
the
riverfront
design
committee.
My
name
is
Ricardo
Montoya
I'm,
the
vice
chair
of
the
committee,
and
will
be
acting
chair
for
today's
meeting
when
called
on
applicants
and
speakers
will
come
to
the
front
Podium
to
speak.
Only
one
person
at
a
time
should
come
to
the
podium.
C
Don't
approach
the
podium
until
vacated
by
previous
speaker
into
the
microphone
please
and
identify
yourself
and
provide
your
address
for
the
record
when
you
begin
speaking,
address
address
your
comments,
questions
and
testimony
to
the
committee
limit
your
comments
to
three
minutes.
It
is
unnecessary
to
repeat
testimony
previously
given
by
others.
C
Citizens
May
address
the
committee
on
agenda
items
by
responding
to
chairs
called
for
speakers
during
discussion
on
each
item
and
signing
the
speaker's
log
on
the
podium.
All
comments
must
be
relevant
to
the
item.
The
chair
or
presiding
officer
May
in
his
or
her
discretion,
prohibit
a
person
from
addressing
the
committee
and
or
remove
that
person
from
the
council
chambers.
If
that
person
commits
any
disorderly
or
disruptive
behavior,
please
see
the
agenda
for
more
information
about
these
requirements.
C
B
C
B
B
C
That's
correct:
we
have
item
2B
approval
of
minutes
for
the
January
5th
2023
meeting.
Do
we
have
a
motion
motion.
E
C
B
C
C
B
B
C
Thank
you
item
six
indiv
cases
for
individual
consideration;
item
six,
a
s
r
c,
a
23-00003
at
900,
Hangar,
Drive,
Laura,.
B
Thank
you,
Laura
Griggs
planning
department
and
let
me
get
to
the
pictures.
I
always
forget
that
so
both
of
these
next
requests
are
in
in
Wheeler
district
and
for
those
that
have
been
on
a
little
bit.
The
new
members
wouldn't
know
this.
You've
only
seen
one
building
out
in
the
wheeler
District,
their
PUD
was
written,
unique
to
that
location
and
the
building
you've
seen
actually
has
Clarity
coffee.
B
So
this
is
located
in
the
and
I
get
turned
around
when
I
go
down
there
in
the
corner
next
to
Western,
and
there
currently
is
a
hanger
located
on
that,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
items
on
the
agenda
and
I'll
be
making
some
modifications
to
staff
recommendation
in
my
presentation,
I'm
going
to
clarify
that
here
in
a
minute.
So.
B
B
It
looks
like
nothing
else
in
the
Oklahoma
City
area,
so
with
that
being
said,
there
are.
There
are
sites
that
are
ready
for
new
construction,
which
is
what
you're
seeing
all
around
this
one,
and
this
particular
one
is
immediately
to
the
north
and
that's
the
next
item
that
we're
going
to
be
discussing
so
they're
across
the
street
from
each
other
and
I'm
going
to
just
go
back
up
to
that.
That's
the
easiest
one
to
look
at
so.
B
I
summarize,
the
history
as
I
usually
do
in
the
staff
reports
and
the
case
I
referenced
was
from
2019.
That
has
been
the
only
thing.
That's
come
to
you
other
than
when
the
Pud
came
through.
You
all
made
a
recommendation
on
their
rezoning
to
a
PUD
D,
so
I
provided
a
lot
of
information.
There
is
a
couple
of
variances
that
they
would
need
if
you
approve
their
project
as
they're
requesting.
So
the
first
one
deals
with
the
setback.
The
base.
B
Zoning
for
this
project
is
one
of
the
downtown
zoning
districts,
and
that
requires
a
maximum
10
foot
setback
from
the
property
line
at
the
street.
The
building
could
actually
be
set
on
the
property
line
and,
as
you
could
see,
from
the
submittal
they
had
with
their
application,
they
have
pushed
it
back
in
some
areas.
B
They
specifically
and
I'm,
going
to
quote
because
I
quoted
in
the
staff
report.
The
decision
to
place
the
first
floor,
building
facade
back
from
the
property
line
was
intentional
and
allows
opportunity
for
covered
outdoor
patios
in
walk-up
conditions
along
Hangar
Drive,
which
is
in
kind
with
the
spirit
of
the
wheeler
District
placement
of
the
building.
B
They
have
and
I
I
just
saw
a
typo,
so
there's
a
building
overhang,
not
overhand,
sorry
about
that
on
both
facades,
and
it
provides
the
visual
appearance
that
the
building
is
close
to
the
property
lines
than
it
actually
is.
But
the
setback
on
the
first
floor
allows
for
these
Street
frontages
to
be
developed
with
desired
program
and
streetscapes,
for
the
reasons
that
they
cited
in
that
information
staff
is
supported.
Supportive
of
this
request
to
be
set
back
further
than
10
feet
in
some
areas
of
their
Street
frontages.
B
The
next
variants
they're
going
to
need.
If
you
approve
the
project
as
presented,
is
they
are
proposing
tree
wells
in
the
parking
lot
that
do
not
meet
the
minimum
size
or
minimum
Dimension?
There's
a
width
that
they're
required
to
meet.
B
B
They
want
they're
saying
they
want
to
maximize
the
parking
spaces
while
still
providing
trees.
The
smaller
footprint
of
proposed
tree
wells
will
be
designed
with
structural
soil
underneath
to
encourage
healthy
tree
growth
in
an
urban
environment.
They
referenced
that
it
was
used
in
downtown
those
were
streetscape
projects,
not
parking
lot
projects.
B
They
did
provide
pictures
that
was
in
the
packet
and
the
one
example
they
had
was
up
on
Northwest
13th
and
the,
and
it
was
done
in
2006
in
my
comment
to
that.
Is
that
that,
at
that
time
it
was
not
a
Design
District
that
didn't
happen
until
2007.,
but
they
did
provide
pictures
showing
you.
How
that
looks
in
that
parking
lot.
Setting
staff
understands
their
desire
to
maximize
their
parking
spaces,
but
we
would
prefer
the
parking
lot.
B
Islands
meet
the
minimum,
it's
100
square
feet
and
there's
a
minimum
with
the
five
feet
and,
as
stated
in
the
regulations,
part
of
the
reasoning
for
that
is
to
help
reduce
glare
and
heat
buildup.
B
Since
staff
does
not
support
this
request.
We
have
a
condition
at
the
end
of
this.
In
the
recommendation
that
the
project
comply
with
parking
lot
Island
regulations,
we
then
go
into
the
guidelines
and,
as
you
know,
the
demolition
guidelines
are
very
long.
This
is
where
staff
is
making
a
modification
in
our
recommendation.
B
So
it
would
be
up
for
you
to
decide
if
you
feel
that
it's
an
architectural
resource
or
not
it
if
it
should
be
retained
or
not.
We
provide
some
information
about
the
history
of
the
Air,
Park
and
I
know
that
the
applicant
is
going
to
discuss
this
item
they're
here
today
to
talk
about
this.
B
The
other
thing
under
guidelines
that
I
wanted
to
mention
deals
with
the
fiber
cement.
If
the
end,
if
if
this
had
to
comply
with
Scenic
River
regulations
and
guidelines,
the
fiber
cement
is
a
regulation
and
not
a
guideline,
but
in
the
downtown
handout.
It's
a
guideline.
So
what
that
means
is
that
there
is
a
recommended
maximum
for
30
percent
of
the
total
exterior
building
materials
of
any
facade,
not
including
windows
and
doors,
and
what
I've
discussed
in
here.
So
this
is
a
discussion
that
we
more
typically
find
in
downtown
projects.
B
We've
had
numerous
multi-family
projects
constructed
that
have
over
30
percent
of
fiber
cement,
different
types
of
fiberglass
cement,
siding
and
in
this
particular
case,
the
facades
range
from
85.4
to
91.1
percent
and
then
I
referenced
some
stuff
in
downtown
I.
Don't
really
have
anything
in
River
so,
but
since
they're,
following
downtown
zoning,
West
Village
just
down
the
street
here
on
Main
Street,
all
of
that
exceeds
the
30
percent.
B
The
lift
and
then
the
newest
one
is
the
muse
that's
at
fourth
in
chartel,
it's
very
large
one
and
so
staff
doesn't
have
an
issue
with
their
request,
their
their
design.
That
has
more
than
30
percent.
B
B
But
if
the
committee
determines
that
the
hangar
is
not
an
historic
resource,
then
you
could
approve
the
application
on
the
basis
that
the
project
complies
as
with
the
conditions
that
the
applicant
obtains
the
variance
from
the
board
of
adjustment
from
the
regulation
required
in
the
first
two
floors
of
new
construction
to
be
at
or
within
10
feet
of
the
street
right
away.
Now,
as
I.
B
B
The
revised
parking
lot
shall
be
provided
to
staff
prior
to
the
issuance
of
their
certificate
of
approval
and
then
there's
a
need
for
a
second
motion
because
they're
having
to
go
to
the
board
of
adjustment
and,
at
this
point,
I'm
recommending
that
the
regulation
requiring
the
first
two
floors
of
new
construction
to
be
added
within
10
feet
of
the
street
right
of
way
with
an
erroneous
pair
in
there.
Sorry.
B
So,
obviously,
if
you
make
modifications
to
the
recommendation
or
to
the
support
for
whatever
part
of
the
project,
we
will
be
looking
at
making
modifications
here
at
the
end
of
this.
So
do
you
have
any
questions?
B
G
Just
want
to
note
that
you
also
have
the
ability
to
find
the
hangar
to
be
a
historic
resource
and
still
approve
the
demolition
on
the
basis
of
the
other
criteria,
including
that
there's
no
viable
economic
use
for
the
structure
that
it's
you
know,
structurally
infeasible
to
rehabilitate
and
reuse
in,
in
staff's
opinion.
Based
on
the
information
that
we've
seen,
we
think
there
is
potential
for
the
the
structure
to
be
considered
historically
significant.
G
The
Air
Park
was,
and
is
a
historically
significant
piece
of
Oklahoma
City's
history,
and
this
is
one
of
the
few
remaining
structures,
but
we
think,
based
on
information,
the
applicants
provided
about
previous
efforts
to
redevelop
the
hangar
that
it
is
a
pretty
strong
example
of
what
was
intended
when
we
drafted
the
criteria
for
a
building
with
no
viable
economic
use
available
to
it.
So
you
have
a
number
of
different
criteria
to
consider
when
you're
looking
at
the
Demolition
and
why
you
would
or
would
not
approve
that.
B
G
Yes,
we
we
received-
and
this
hasn't
been
forwarded
on
to
you
all-
we
probably
should
attach
it
after
the
meeting
and
the
applicant
may
want
to
speak
to
it
as
well
when
they
present.
But
we
received
just
email
correspondence
describing
previous
efforts
to
look
at
redeveloping
the
hangar,
the
work
that
would
be
needed
to
get
it
into
a
usable
condition
that
they
investigated,
whether
it
would
qualify
for
historic
tax
credits
and
we're
told
that
it
would
not
as
an
individually
designated
building.
C
B
When
I
go
out,
I
just
take
them
from
the
outside.
Okay,
okay
and
I
didn't
realize
how
massive
it
was
until
I
got
out
there.
D
I
F
F
Okay,
I
have
some
questions
regarding
the
parking
you
talk
about
five
parking
spots
that
they
would
lose
if
they
went
to
the
size
that
you're
that
the
city
suggests.
If
you
went
to
the
smaller
sizes
they
requested
I
mean,
could
that
hold
like
a
compact
car
and
how
many
spots
would
they
actually
lose?
I
mean
parking,
is
really
rough
in
that
in
that
area,
and
so
I
can
understand
that
they
need
as
many
as
they
can
get.
F
So
that's
one
question
is
if,
if
they
went
to
compact
size,
you
know
because
I
see
that
a
lot.
The
other
thing
is,
if
the
if
the
building's
torn
down
and
it's
deemed
historical
or
whatever
I,
think
if
I
was
living
in
that
building
I
mean.
Can
we
not
put
like
a
plaque
with
some
photos
on
the
outside
the
bronze
plaques?
G
B
But
as
far
as
your
comment
about
the
tree
Wells,
so
compact
car
parking
is
allowed
in
parking
lots
over
I
think
it's
20
or
25
spaces.
The
main
issue
with
compact
cars
and
I
know
our
regulations
allow.
B
It
is,
there's
no
enforcement
of
that
and
it
doesn't
matter
how
big
or
small
somebody's
vehicle
is
they're
going
to
park
wherever
they
can
find
a
place
to
park
and
as
a
person
who
drives
a
four-door,
pickup
truck
I
know
that
can
be
problematic
if
one
of
those
that
big
parks
in
that
space
But,
that's
always
an
option.
I'm
thinking
that
he's
our
they've
already
got.
B
That's
what
I
thought
they've
already
got
compact
car
spaces
in
this
one,
but
I
don't
know,
and
that
could
be
a
question
for
them.
If,
if,
in
fact
you
all
support
staff
and
they
have
to
enlarge
them,
is
there
a
way
for
them
to
redesign?
And
it
maybe
add
more
compact
cars,
so
they
don't
lose
five
I
guess
would
be.
Maybe
one
question
that
I
would
ask,
but
and
we're
going
to
have
the
same
discussion
on
the
next
one,
so
we
could
probably
get
about
the
tree.
E
And
going
back
to
the
hangar,
do
you
mean
do
we
know
if
there's
been
any
other
companies
trying
to
use
the
space
or
any
other
and
how
many
or
how
long
has
it
been
out
there
like
I.
G
Don't
know
so
I
I
think
I'll.
Let
the
the
applicant
answer
that
in
more
detail,
but
they
did
indicate
that
there
had
been
several
different
attempts
to
look
at
rehabilitating
the
hangar
into
various
uses
and
that
that
had
not
been
successful
and
I
think
we
have
information
in
the
staff
report
about
when
it
kind
of
ceased
to
be
in
operation
just
searching,
Oklahoman
archives.
That
looks
like
at
various
points.
G
There
were
events
in
the
hangar
public
events
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
it
has
not
been
the
downtown
Air
Park
I,
think
has
not
been
in
operation
for
decades.
At
this
point
as
a
whole.
C
Thank
you
any
additional
comments
from
the
committee
to
staff,
if
not
I'll,
invite
the
applicant
to
come
forward
and
speak
on
this
item.
I
B
H
So
I
should
clarify.
My
name
is
Blair
Humphries
I
I
serve
as
president
of
the
wheeler
district
and
I've
been
involved
with
the
project
since
we
bought
the
land
in
2006..
H
I
was
involved
partially,
then
then
went
off
to
school
and
to
do
other
things
and
then
came
back
to
the
project
in
2014.,
so
we've
been
edit
a
while
I
guess
you
could
say,
and
thankfully
now
have
some
things
to
show
for
it
actually
clarify,
though
I'm
not
actually
the
applicant.
So
this
is
being
developed
by
a
third
party.
H
It's
actually
a
developer
that
we
recruited
out
of
the
Atlanta
area.
Urban
royalty,
we've
partnered
with
them
before
on
a
project
in
Atlanta.
We
feel
like
they
do
exceptional
work
and
that
they
would
be
ideally
suited
to
do
the
first
at
scale
multi-family
project
as
part
of
Wheeler
District.
H
As
you
saw
the
pictures
of
the
hanger
I'll
just
tell
you
that
you
know:
we've
we've
always
attempted
to
take
what
downtown
Airpark
had
to
offer
and
and
make
it
something.
That's
an
integrated
and
embedded
component
of
the
place
that
started
in
2014
with
our
charette.
So
we
did
a
public
charette
where
we
we
brought
in
the
community.
We
had
over
a
thousand
people
turn
out
over
the
course
of
a
week
when
we
looked
at
it,
the
kind
of
residual
components
that
we
had
to
offer
were.
H
We
had
a
terminal
building
which
is
kind
of
this
old
office
and
Diner
that
sat
there
and
then
we
had
the
runway
and
because
we
only
had
three
things,
we
attempted
to
save
all
three
and
you
can
even
see
that
the
hanger
itself
is
prominently
featured
in
terms
of
its
Center
axis
on
that
Wheeler
Street.
And
that's
because
we
designed
it
that
way.
We
wanted
Wheeler
Street
to
have
a
terminal
Vista
on
the
south
of
the
hangar.
H
It
has
a
terminal
Vista
on
the
North,
with
the
ferris
wheel,
we
were
able
to
save
the
runway
and
reincorporate
it
as
a
multi-way
or
a
multi-path
Boulevard,
with
a
kind
of
a
tree-lined
bike
path
leading
out
to
the
river,
and
so
now
people
have
a
residence
on
on
Runway
Boulevard
and
call
that
home.
We
were
able
to
save
the
terminal
building
and
it
Now
features.
H
H
I,
don't
know
if
that
one
was
ever
a
good
idea,
but
I
was
I
was
naive
and
excited
and
we
couldn't
get
financing.
We
ultimately
got
turned
down
for
all
the
tax
credits
that
we
pursued
and
included
in
the
material
that
we
provided
to
the
city,
we'd
gone
out
and
hired,
who
we
were.
H
We
were
referred
to
as
one
of
the
best
and
and
the
historic
preservation
space,
and
they
ultimately
concluded
that
the
the
hangar
itself
didn't
have
the
required
merits
necessary
to
attract
historic
tax
credits
and
so
that
kind
of
shut
down
that
first
iteration.
We
came
back
with
an
office
user
and
any
e-user.
H
They
themselves
did
all
the
planning
and
Engineering
work
to
try
to
reincorporate
the
building
into
an
office
use
and
ultimately,
their
conclusion.
After
getting
about
a
half
million
dollars
deep
into
design
and
development
was
that
they
weren't
going
to
be
able
to
make
it
work
economically,
they
would
be
better
off
to
tear
down
the
building
and
start
from
scratch.
H
H
What's
now
kind
of
the
minimum
build
standard
because
the
hanger
sits
low
and
it
it
floods
in
the
spring
and
then
we'd
have
to
reinforce
the
majority
of
the
still
structure
inside
of
it,
and
and
so
we
had
to
change
the
building
is
only
a
foundation,
a
structure
and
skin,
and
we
would
have
to
change
the
foundation,
bring
four
up
change
the
structure
and
change
the
skin,
and
so
ultimately
that
fell
flat,
and
that
was
the
first
time
that
our
team
looked
at
each
other
and
said
wow
I,
think
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
go
a
different
direction.
H
So
that's
that's.
Where
we've
been
that's,
how
we
got
here,
I'll
just
tell
you
that
I
I
mourn
the
fact
that
that
we
were
unable
to
figure
it
out
and
yet
that's
the
reality
of
where
we
got
to
it
wasn't
a
quick
decision.
It
was
one
that
played
out
over
an
eight
year
period.
We
are
very
excited
about
the
quality
of
the
development
and
the
quality
of
the
architecture
that
is
set
to
replace
it,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
I
can
at
least
feel
good
about
in
Oklahoma.
H
City,
you
know
Oklahoma
City's
lost
far
too
many
buildings
in
the
past,
but
at
the
very
least,
I'm
always
excited
when
we
actually
have
the
ability
to
replace
it
with
something
that
is
of
quality.
That's
Urban,
that
is
an
asset
to
our
community
I'll,
let
I'll
let
the
rest
of
their
team.
Tell
you
more
about
their
project.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
the
work.
You
do
we're
delighted
to
be
a
neighbor
and
the
scenic
River
overlay
and
we're
excited
about
the
future
of
the
river
and
our
part
in
it.
So
thanks.
J
Hello,
my
name
is
Sarah
Hannah
and
I'm
with
Gardner's
Studio.
We
also
have
a
few
other
members
from
our
team
in
the
audience
today.
That
can
also
help
to
answer
any
questions
if
something
comes
up
but
I'm
going
to
kind
of
lead
the
charge
here
so
as
Blair
has
kind
of
walked
you
through
the
vision
for
wheeler
District,
we've
just
included
some
additional
images
to
hopefully
set
the
scene
for
the
building
that
we
have
in
front
of
you
all
today.
J
J
The
architecture
that
we're
presenting
is
really
inspired
by
the
Wheeler
Community
that
has
been
set
already.
This
walkable
Community
this
exchange
of
neighbors
and
relationships.
It's
a
community,
that's
designed
by
the
community,
and
so
we
have
developed
projects
that
we
feel
support.
Those
environments,
particularly
at
the
streetscape
level,
maybe
maybe
yeah
so
we've
included
a
version
of
the
site
plan
that
you
received
in
your
original
submission,
with
some
rendered
color
and
shade
canopies
added
onto
that
mostly
to
help
illustrate
some
further
items
that
we're
we're
incorporating
into
the
project.
J
You
know,
as
we
introduce
a
surface
parking
lot,
we
have
made
an
intentional
effort
to
create
the
least
amount
of
curb
cuts
to
disturb
the
The
Pedestrian
path
as
as
minimally
as
possible.
We're
bringing
a
lot
of
attention
into
the
streetscape
development,
particularly
along
Hangar
drive
and
Wheeler
Street,
as
we
talk
about
the
other
projects,
but
also
along
Western
Avenue,
as
this
is
kind
of
one
of
the
first
ones
to
be
positioned
directly
west
of
that
that
main
thoroughfare,
and
so
that
paired
with
the
building
placement,
that's
anchored
at
the
corner.
J
We
feel
like,
creates
a
really
unique
identity
for
this
neighborhood,
as
you
enter
this
kind
of
new
portion
of
the
development.
That's
just
beginning
a
couple
other
things
too,
that
we're
introducing
on
this
site
plan
scale
is
a
Breezeway
that
that
connects
the
the
users
of
the
the
property
to
the
north
to
the
outdoor
amenities
of
this
project
and
those
outdoor
amenities
are
located
on
the
rear
side
of
that
North
bar
of
the
building,
and
so
one
of
those
things
or
one
of
the
intentional
moves
here,
is
that
that
Breezeway
is
aligned
with
Wheeler
Street.
J
We
reviewed
that
image
earlier
of
the
hangar
and
how
it
has
that
really
specific
alignment
to
that
street
as
you
look
towards
the
South
and,
unfortunately
losing
the
hangar
building.
These
are
some
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
introduce
to
keep
those
alignments
and
at
least
give
a
nod
to
what
was
there
before
the
darker
kind
of
green
circles
that
show
up
on
this
image
are
meant
to
illustrate
the
mature
country,
canopies
of
all
the
trees
being
placed
on
this
site,
so
that
we
can
hopefully
help
to
help.
J
You
guys
understand
kind
of
what
the
the
vision
is
for
that
we've
been
working
with
a
landscape
architect
to
help
identify
particular
species
of
different
sizes.
That
will
help
to
also
reduce
that
heat
island
effect
and
some
of
the
glare
that
we
were
mentioning
before,
or
that
Laura
was
mentioning
before
and
I
think
we
can
talk
about
any
questions
you
might
have
specific
to
the
tree
Wells.
But
here
you
can
see
where
those
are
located
a
little
bit
more
clearly
and
those
also
show
up
on
the
other
property
as
well.
J
And
just
to
give
you
kind
of
a
brief
explanation
of
the
building's
architecture,
this
is
meant
to
be
a
five-story
apartment,
building
with
amenity
spaces
on
the
ground
floor.
That
is
a
large
building
in
a
primarily
single
family,
residential
environment
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
really
specific
architectural
moves
being
made
to
meet
the
buildings
program
and
size
requirements,
but
also
break
down
the
scale
as
it
sits
along
major
streets,
but
also
adjacent
to
smaller
developments.
J
And
excuse
me,
the
other
big
part
of
this
project
are
balconies,
and
so
that's
something
that
respond
to
each
different
building
facade,
but
also
is
sort
of
a
nod
to
the
the
outdoor
component
of
the
individual
single-family
houses
of
Wheeler.
Everyone
has
a
porch
and
the
intent
is
with
these
apartments
that
everyone
has
that
experience
as
well,
and
so
that
was
something
that
was
really
intentional
in
developing
the
architecture
of
this
project.
J
So
in
conclusion,
I
think
the
thing
that
we
would
like
to
ask
of
you
all
is
that
you
approve
staff's
recommendation,
with
the
exception
of
the
tree
well
item
to
be
I,
believe
it's
numbered.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
or
want
some
additional
clarification,
we
are
here
to
answer.
B
J
Already
have
compact
car
spaces
in
the
parking
lot.
That
is
how
it
is
designed.
So
there
are
none
that
we
can
change
to
become
compact,
but
I
think
what
we
could
potentially
do
is
change
the
size
of
the
tree
well
to
be
five
by
five.
Just
as
you'd
mentioned,
the
project,
180
condition
is
maybe
slightly
different
than
what
we're
talking
about
and
I
think
that
adjustment
is
much
easier
to
manage
and
maintain
the
desired
parking
count
than
changing
to
the
larger
100
square
foot.
Minimum
City
standard.
B
There,
so
the
one
thing
also
is
the
location
of
these
trees.
They
have
all
the
parking
spaces
have
to
be
within
75
feet
of
a
medium
shade
tree.
So
they
always
they
add
the
circles,
because
it
shows
what
what
those
the
tree
canopy
is
going
to
be
like.
That
helps
me
see
that
it's
going
to
meet
it.
So
it's
not
necessarily
a
matter
of
well.
If
you
combine
them
over
here
and
then
maybe
you
only
lose
one
instead
of
two,
because
they
still
have
to
meet
the
the
75
foot
requirement
and.
J
And
one
other
thing:
I'd
like
to
expand
on
a
little
bit.
You
know
the
the
task
at
hand
is
providing
parking
spaces
for
these
apartment
units
and,
as
the
project
is
currently
designed
between
the
site
and
the
other
site,
we
actually
still
can't
even
manage
enough
surface
parking
spaces
for
all
potential
renters,
and
so
you
know
we're
maximizing
as
much
as
we
can,
but
also
introducing
the
outdoor
amenity
space
as
a
development.
J
C
H
You
guys
in
2019,
2019.
so
yeah
so
between
2014
and
2019.
There
were
I
would
say
three
significant
attempts
and
and
one
lesser
attempt,
but
it
was.
We
keep
a
list
of
like
the
top
10
priorities
for
wheeler
district
and
it
was
on
the
list
every
year
and
every
year
we'd
sit
and
talk
about
it
and
say:
how
are
we
going
to
pull
this
off
so
yeah?
To
answer
your
question?
That's.
D
B
And
I
just
went
from
the
low
to
the
High
and
I
got
this
all
out
of
order
because
hey
there
it
is
so
85.4
to
91.1,
but
that's
the
entire.
That's
a
very
big
building
and
I
was
just
looking
at
the
percentage
by
facades,
and
so
it's
just
it's
just
a
range
now.
B
I
would
say
that
some
of
the
projects
that
I
talked
about
it
they're,
basically
100
percent
fiber
cement
I-
think
it's
probably
come
a
long
way
from
when
it
was
first
introduced
and
I've,
not
I've,
not
noticed
that
we've
had
an
issue
with
any
of
the
newer
projects
that
have
been
using
it.
B
Probably
several
a
few
decades
ago,
that
would
have
been
more
of
a
concern,
but
I
think
that
product
has
come
a
long
way
and
our
our
guidelines
and
regulations
were
written.
Those
were
written
back
in
2006
as
they
just
started
this
process.
B
So
we
haven't
reassessed
these
since
they
were
adopted.
D
J
B
D
J
D
J
C
If
there's
no
additional
questions
or
comments,
I'd
like
to
invite
any
citizens
that
want
to
address
the
committee
on
this
agenda
item,
is
that
good
him
hearing
none
any
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
B
Sorry,
just
as
a
reminder,
staff
eliminated
number
one
under
staff
recommendations
and
then
Katie
made
a
suggestion
for
alternative
wording
for
number
two,
where
you
can
either
find
that
the
hangar
is
not
a
historic
resource
like
I
had
and
then
you
could
find
that
it
is
and
then
you
could
cite
and
we
could
come
up
with
those
things
that
Katie
was
citing,
justifying
why
you're
supporting
it
being
demolished.
G
14.
well
page
nine
talks
about
economic
feasibility
that
there
is
no
viable
economic
use
of
the
structure,
so
I
I.
It
I
think
that
the
wheeler
District
folks
would
agree
that
they
feel
that
it's
a
historic
resource,
but
that
there
is
no
viable
economic
use
for
the
Redevelopment
of
the
hangar
building.
G
J
We
also,
if
it's
of
use
I,
think
there
was
forwarded
to
you
guys,
but
there
is
we've
brought
paper
copies
of
that
description
from
the
historic
preservation
group
that
initially
reviewed
the
structure.
If
you'd
like
to
see
those.
C
C
H
H
One
I'll
just
say,
as
somebody
who
loves
Oklahoma
City
and
loves
Oklahoma
City
history,
we're
always
grateful
to
KD
and
the
work
that
she's
done,
because,
if
I
don't
depending
on
how
long
you've
been
around
here,
you
know
that
we
tend
to
err
on
the
side
of
tearing
down
too
many
things,
and
we
agree
with
that
when,
when
you
go
out,
though,
and
ask
somebody
to
help
you
save
a
building
and
they
come
back
and
say
you
know
the
side.
H
Inspection
revealed
that
there's
actually
several
hangers,
that,
while
he
posts
that
are
nearly
identical
to
this
hangar
in
terms
of
the
construction,
the
hangar
door,
placement
mechanisms
and
overall
Integrity
and
the
hangers
that,
while
they
post
were
the
area
was
actually
produced.
Our
Hangar
was
just
a
paint
hanger,
so
it
doesn't
have
historical
narrative
significance
as
those
do,
and
it
says
the
fact
that
the
Wiley
Post
hangars
are
more
than
a
decade
older
than
a
downtown
Hangar
farther
hinners.
Our
ability
to
nominate
it
by
itself,
and
so
in
light
of
this
new
information.
H
Linda
does
not
think
the
downtown
airport
Kanger
is
individually
eligible.
So
we
we
want
it
to
be
historic.
We
want
it
to
be
more
important
and
if
it
were
an
important
enough
historical
feature
to
attract
the
historical
tax
credits,
then
maybe
we
could
have
been
more
successful
in
putting
together
an
economically
viable
plan,
but
but
we
went
out
and
hired
a
consultant
to
represent
us
in
that
and
they
said
based
on
their
professional
Integrity.
They
were
unwilling
to
sign
off
that
it
was
significant.
H
So
from
that
standpoint,
I
guess
you
know
there's
this
kind
of
weird
thing
in
that.
If
it
were,
if
it
were
historically
significant
enough,
then
it
might
unlock
features
of
subsidy
that
would
allow
us
to
have
made
an
economically
viable
plan,
and
yet
that
wasn't
the
determination
that's
been
made
and
we've
never
had
any
more
success
in
getting
there
from
the
outside.
I'll
say
that
the
mass
of
it
it's
220
feet
by
110,
it's
a
significant
span.
H
Once
you
get
in
there,
you
realize
it's
it's,
it
doesn't
have
any
of
the
classic
kind
of
major
steel
trusses
that
you
would
hope
it's
it's
just
kind
of
a
web
of
of
different
bands.
So
that's
that's
what
we
have
in
terms
of
that
information.
I!
Guess
we're
willing
to
continue
that
conversation
as
long
as
you
feel
it's
necessary
or
we
can
leave
it
as
is
how's
that
all
right.
G
And
I
just
want
to
note
for
the
committee
and
you
all
can
obviously
make
the
decision.
However,
you
see
fit
that
while
we
much
of
the
information
that
we
have
and
that
we
reference
when
we
look
at
whether
a
property
is
historic,
is
from
National
register
evaluations,
either
listings
or
surveys
that
have
been
done.
G
Municipalities
in
their
designation
or
recognition
of
what's
historic,
are
not
tied
to
National
register
criteria.
There
are
various
reasons
that
a
building
might
not
be
eligible
for
the
national
register,
but
that
a
community
or
an
entity
might
feel
that
it
is
historically
significant
that
can
have
to
do
with
Integrity.
You
know
architectural
Integrity.
It
can
have
to
do
with
the
age
of
the
resource.
G
You
know
a
number
of
different
factors.
We
we
did
see
that
this
was
not
only
a
maintenance
building
but
a
dealership
for
these
specific
types
of
planes,
and
it
was
built
when
that
began
at
the
downtown
Air
Park.
Ultimately,
I
think
it
doesn't
make
a
big
difference.
One
way
or
the
other
I
think
acknowledging
the
history
of
the
building,
and
then
it
was
important
to
Wheeler
and
important
to
an
air
Park.
G
G
G
C
Maybe
one
question
for
staff
on
the
history
of
kind
of
the
overall
development
for
the
terminal
building.
Where
did
that
fall
as
far
as
identifying
as
a
historic?
C
B
G
The
email
that
you
have
says
that
the
consultant
thought
at
the
time
that
this
effort
was
undertaken
that
the
hangar
was
not
individually
eligible
but
that
the
Air
Park
was
potentially
an
eligible
District.
Today,
there's
very
few
structures
left
so
that
sometimes
changes
the
balance
of
what's
individually
eligible,
whether
or
not
a
district
would
be
viable.
G
You
know,
I,
don't
know
if
the
the
terminal
building
would
have
been
individually
eligible.
That
has
been
pretty
carefully
rehabilitated
so
but,
as
Laura
said,
that
wouldn't
have
that
didn't
come
through
us
for
any
sort
of
review.
C
D
All
attempt
to
make
a
motion
would
you
like
me
to
read
the
staff
record.
B
D
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
application
on
the
basis
that
the
project
complies
with
the
regulations
and
guidelines
of
the
scenic
River
overlaid,
Design
District
zoning
ordinance
as
referenced
in
section
c
and
d
of
the
staff
report,
with
the
conditions
that
a
the
applicant
obtains
a
variance
from
the
board
of
adjustment
from
the
regulation
requiring
the
first
two
floors
of
the
new
construction
to
be
at
or
within
10
feet
of
the
street.
D
B
B
You
feel
that
the
hangar
is
a
historic
resource,
but
there
they
have
documented
that
there
is
no
viable
economic
use
for
the
building,
in
which
case
you're
now
recommending
to
approve
the
project
which
you
read
with
the
first
condition
about
the
setback.
And
then
you
ended
there
right
there,
and
so
you
did
not
include
the
one
about
the
tree.
Wells.
D
B
J
So
on
that
North,
but
I
think
it's
about
11
and
a
half
feet
between
the
property
boundary
and
the
first
floor.
Building
facade
and
the
10-foot
build
two
line
is:
is
the
line
that
we're
sitting
behind.
B
And
then
on
the
wheeler
side,
it's
more
than
that,
but
there
were
a
lot
of
reasons.
One
is
obviously
they'll
be
hopefully
improvements
to
that
wheeler
alignment
and
they
were
also
showing
a
future
traffic
circle.
That's
not
there,
which
requires
them
to
pull
things
back
and
I
trying
to
remember
so.
It's
it's
closer.
J
J
Part,
so
so
we're
we're
pretty
close
here.
This
is
the
11
and
a
half
feet.
I
was
talking
about
this.
This
shaded
gray
box
is
the
outline
of
the
first
floor.
Building
footprint,
as
Laura
had
mentioned,
and
I
can
flip
to
the
the
renderings
to
further
illustrate
the
building
overhangs
on
the
upper
levels,
so
that
it
is
closer
to
the
property
boundary,
but
we
have
kind
of
peeled
back
the
corner
here.
There's
there's
a
couple
reasonings
for
that.
We
have
the
future
traffic
circle
that
is
planned
at
that
intersection.
J
We
also
have
a
chamfered
property
Corner
that
really
prohibits
that
upper
building
floor
footprint
and
again
addressing
the
the
general
massing
of
this
five-story
structure.
We're
trying
to
make
some
moves
on
the
ground
floor
to
help
bring
people
into
the
main
building
entry
and
not
just
have
a
really
straight
vertical
facade.
Thank
you.
Yes,.
J
It
does
so
Laura
just
handed
me
a
copy
of
our
application,
which
you
all
may
have
a
copy
of
as
well,
where
we
have
provided
in
red
the
actual
setbacks.
So
at
this
corner
here,
which
is,
is
one
of
our
more
extreme
conditions,
we're
about
14
and
a
half
feet
away
from
the
property
boundary.
And
then
this
corner
up
here,
it's
12
feet.
J
J
I
should
also
mention
I'll,
never
stop
talking,
so
you
guys
might
have
to
cut
me
off,
but
the
the
space
there
at
the
corner
too,
in
addition
to
addressing
kind
of
the
building
plane
where
that
sits
in
relationship
to
a
human
we're,
also
creating
some
usable
outdoor
space
there
at
the
corner
that
is
adjacent
to
an
interior
building
Lobby
and
that
is
meant
to
be
developed
with
you
know,
Landscapes
or
softscape
Hardscape,
and
also
be
protected
from
that
Street
intersection
in
a
way
that
makes
it
feel
useful
and
comfortable.
C
Thank
you
so
back
to
the
the
motion,
so
obtaining
the
variance
would
allow
you
to
construct
with
the
additional
over
10
feet,
correct.
C
Question
sorry
about
that
yeah
just
to
make
sure
I
understand
you're
obtaining
the
variants
to
exceed
10
feet.
B
And
when
they
go
and
I
know,
we
don't
have
a
second,
so
I,
probably
shouldn't
be
just
continuing
to
discuss,
but
and
so
when
they
apply
for
the
board
of
adjustment,
they'd
actually
be
submitting
the
site
plan.
That
shows
how
the
building
is
going
to
be
located
and
that's
what
they
essentially
get
approved
for.
So
what
you're
seeing
is
what
they'd
be
going
to
the
board
of
adjustment
for.
C
E
I
E
B
D
B
A
G
B
So
going
back
and
because
I
think,
if
I
go
back
and
I
clarify
they
can
the
person
that
made
the
motion
and
the
person
that
made.
The
second
can
accept
that
or
do
we
just
need.
G
To
so
yes,
all
the
pretty
but
I
think
Scott
can
amend
his
motion
to
also
include
a
variance
to
the
size
and
width
of
the
tree.
Wells
and.
I
D
I
I
B
C
All
right,
6B
1,
srca
230004
at
901
hanker,
Drive.
C
Would
Laura.
B
So
this
is
across
the
street
from
the
one
we
just
talked
about
and
it's
for
a
smaller
apartment
building
and
you
can
see
that
it
will
be
there's
it'll,
be
surrounded
by
existing
single-family
homes.
B
I
mean
this
is
looking
from
the
corner
and
so
you've
seen
most
of
these
before
it
was
really
nice
to
be
able
to
recycle
the
the
slides
and-
and
this
is
an
adjacent
to
that
project-
I
like
how
that
one
looks
but-
and
so
this
is
actually
look
looking
directly
to
the
ferris
wheel.
B
B
I'm
gonna,
this
does
not
include
any
demolition,
so
it
makes
for
an
easier
discussion.
As
I
said,
this
is
just
to
construct
an
apartment.
Building.
This
is
three-story
apartment
building.
B
They
do
need
a
variance
for
two
things:
one
is
they're
exceeding
the
10-foot
setback
and
the
other
is,
as
requested
they're
having
those
smaller
tree
Wells
that
we
just
discussed
in
the
other
project.
B
So
in
the
staff
report,
I
included
the
information
that
looks
very
familiar
because
it
was
identical
to
what
was
in
the
other
one
talking
about
the
requirement
for
the
10
feet
and
in
this
particular
case,
the
applicant
States,
the
location
of
the
Southern
building
facade
is
intentionally
planned
to
provide
an
open
landscaped
area
at
the
intersection
of
Hangar
drive
and
Wheeler
Street
between
this
building
and
the
five-story
one
that
we
just
discussed
stress.
This
strategy
seeks
to
address
the
design
challenge
of
placing
a
larger
scale,
Residential
Building
within
a
primarily
single-family
residential
development.
B
In
addition,
when
staff
was
looking
at
it,
there's
an
angled
property
line
which
also
enters
into
the
fact
that
when
you
have
a
square
building-
and
you
have
an
angled
property
line-
obviously
you're
going
to
at
some
point
you're
going
to
Veer
too
far
away.
Unless
you
want
to
have
an
angled
wall
in
in
your
building.
But
staff
continues
to
support
just
like
we
did
across
the
street,
based
on
the
design
based
on
their
intent
and
the
overall
development
in
the
area
and
I.
B
It
looked
similar
to
the
last
one
and
I
don't
know
if,
since
this
is
going
to
go
the
same
way
as
the
last
one
I
don't
know
Katie.
If
you
want
me
to
just
revise
all
the
language
just
to
make
it
easier
so
and
and
go
ahead
and
eliminate
staff's
request,
which
was
for
them
to
redesign
it
because.
G
B
So
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
project
with
conditions
that
the
applicant
obtains
a
variance
from
the
board
of
adjustment
from
the
regulation
requiring
the
first
two
floors
of
new
construction
to
be
at
or
within
10
feet
of
the
street
right
of
way
and
the
regulation
relative
to
the
size
and
width
of
the
tree
islands.
In
the
parking
lot.
B
C
Any
with
the
presenter
like
to
add
anything
else,
additional
or
any.
J
B
And
if
anybody
needs
me
to
restate
those
I
can-
and
this
would
be
subject
to
these
conditions,
but
repeat
them:
okay,
that
they
and
and
I'm
gonna.
This
one
is
as
rich
in
staff
report
that
the
applicant
obtains
a
variance
from
the
board
of
adjustment
from
the
regulation
requiring
the
first
two
floors
of
new
construction
to
be
at
or
within
10
foot
of
the
street
right
away.
And
then
this
is
where
I'm,
adding
and
obtains
the
variance
from
the
regulation
relative
to
the
size
and
width
of
the
tree.
Islands.
B
I
B
A
B
You
thank
you
now
you
need.
We
need
a
second
motion
and
that
motion
would
be
to
provide
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
the
board
of
adjustment,
for
variance
from
the
regulation
requiring
the
first
two
floors
of
new
construction
to
be
at
or
within
10
foot
of
the
street
right-of-way,
and
the
regulation
relative
to
the
size
and
width
of
the
tree.
Islands.
E
B
I
B
B
G
C
D
C
I
C
B
I
don't
know
if
it'll
keep
going
since
you
couldn't
close
out
that
vote.
Who
knows
what
it'll
do,
but
so
we
might
have
to
refer
to
your
actual
agenda,
which
I
don't
know.
Thank.
C
You
item
seven
other
business.
There's
none
item
eight
Communications
srca
23-00002
at
800,
riversport
drive
so.
B
That
I
mean
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
they're
putting
in
an
overflow
parking
lot.
The
Pud
for
The
Boathouse
District
allowed
for
alternative
surfaces
gravel
if
the
Public
Works
director
approved
it,
and
so
they
submitted
for
three
parking
lots,
but
the
other
two
are
kind
of
on
hold
for
right
now
and
they're,
just
putting
in
the
one
closest
to
the
bar
k,
because
that's
definitely
where
the
need
is
at
the
moment.
B
Yeah
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Katie
yeah.
That's
okay,
I'm
going
to
do
some
sample
emails
and
asked
you
guys
just
to
say,
got
it
because
we
we
apparently
were
having
some
issues
with
a
couple
of
the
members,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
is
getting
this
group
email
that
I
send
out
so
and
you
might
or
might
not
know,
because
some
of
you
didn't
receive
the
official
thing
from
the
mayor
because
it
got
bounced
back
because
it
had
the
wrong
address
on
it.
B
But
all
of
you
that
we
have
the
new
appointee,
but
then
all
the
rest
of
you
were
reappointed
in
the
middle
of
February
by
Council
to
sit
on
here.
So
we
appreciate
your
willingness
to
continue
to
sit
here
for
us
and
now
I'm
going
to
let
Katie
talk
about
the
upcoming.
Yes,.
G
Congratulations:
you've
been
reappointed,
even
whether
you
knew
it
or
not
and
yeah.
Just
a
reminder.
Commission
committee
training,
March
24th,
you
should
all
have
an
invite
in
your
email.
If
you
can
accept
or
decline
that,
ideally
this
week
fairly
soon
so
that
we
have
an
accurate
head
count,
that
would
be
great
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
there.
C
C
Thank
you
any
additional
comments
from
committee
members.
B
The
only
other
thing
I
would
add
is
we
have
a
vacancy
I'm
also
going
to
get
so
you
might
know
somebody
that
might
be
interested,
so
I'll
kind
of
send
a
little
blurb
about.
We
have
the
two
members
from
the
riverfront
Redevelopment
Authority,
and
so
it's
one
of
the
others.
The
rest
of
you
come
from
another
Pool
and
only
two
of
those
have
to
be
licensed
and
I
know
I'm
I'm,
looking
at
two
that
have
license
for
sitting
in
front
of
me
from
their
profession
or
three
that
are
sitting
in
front
of
me.
B
C
Thank
you
and
then
one
more
question.
Is
there
a
member
from
the
public
here
that
would
like
to
address
the
board
just
wanted
to
make
sure?
Okay?
Thank
you
well
with
that
one
of
lastly
again
welcome
our
newest
member
Elaine
Lyons.
Thank
you
for
joining
our
board.
I
did
receive
the
letter,
so
the
reimportantment
letter
from
the
mayor
that
was
great
and,
like
we
said
before
next
meeting
date,
Thursday
April,
6
2023,
with
that
we
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.