►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Board of Adjustment Meeting, 3/22/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
right,
good
evening,
this
time,
I'd
like
to
call
the
board
of
adjustment
meeting
to
order
okay,
if
we'd
all
rise
to
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republicans
one
nation
under
God,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
okay
purchase
starting
the
meeting
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
to
reflect
on
one
of
our
past
board
members
who
recently
passed
Jerry
Walters.
He
was
fantastic.
He
served
on
this
board
and
many
other
boards.
He
served
numerous
times.
I
served
on
this
board.
The
veterans
board
the
planning
board.
He
sat
on
city
council
for
a
number
of
years
and
if
we
could
just
pause
for
a
moment
to
remember,
he
said
he
recently
passed,
he
was
a
fantastic
gentleman.
A
A
A
C
My
name
is
David
Llewellyn,
212,
Bengal,
Circle
and
I
know
you
have
an
item
on
the
agenda,
but
I
would
say
in
general,
I've
only
been
here
for
15
years,
unlike
some
of
you
all,
but
when
I
first
came
here
we
drove
down
Shore
Drive
West
and
Shore
Drive
East
Lafayette
Park,
Bay
View.
You
saw
these
beautiful
streets
nicely
landscaped
with
well-kept
lawns,
and
it
was
it
was.
C
It
was
Pride
that
everybody
had
whether
you
lived
on
that
street
or
you
lived
in
one
of
the
other
houses
down
the
block
and-
and
it
was
a
it-
was
a
beautiful
place
and
I
know
that
we've
all
had
some
issues,
covid
and
all
kinds
of
other
things,
but
it
would
seem
that
these
are
streets
that
that
are
important
beyond
their
location.
The
the
entire
Drive
the
entire
Shore
Drive
is
is
important
as
a
as
a
package.
C
It's
it's
total
I
mean
we
can't
we.
We
have
one
location
in
town
where
somebody
put
a
commercial
garage
up
in
a
residential
building
lot.
We
have
other
locations
where
we've
got
trailers
and
and
boats
all
over
the
place.
Although
we're
not
allowed
to.
In
my
HOA.
C
A
E
G
Hello,
Tatiana
Childress
city
of
Oldsmar
planning
and
Redevelopment
director,
so
this
is
case,
VAR,
2301,
front
yard,
setback
and
secondary
front
yard
setback,
variance,
requests
the
subject:
property
is
a
corner
lot
located
at
106,
Shore
Drive
West
and
is
developed
with
a
single
family
home.
G
This
property
has
a
Zone
and
designation
of
the
R2
residential
single
family
zoning
District,
the
R2
zoning
District.
Setbacks
are
25
for
the
front
25
for
the
secondary
front,
six
for
the
side
and
10
for
the
rear,
the
existing
front
setback
for
the
existing
house,
the
existing
setbacks.
They
vary
from
25
foot
on
the
south
west
corner
to
21.5
feet
on
the
Southeast
Corner
along
Shore
Drive
West,
due
to
the
irregular
lot
shape
and
the
secondary
front
setbacks
along
Bayview
Boulevard.
They
also
vary
from
16
feet
to
17
17
feet.
G
0.6
is
demonstrated
on
this
existing
survey
that
you
can
see
so
just
wanted
to
point
out
here
that
on
Bayview
Boulevard,
which
is
the
secondary
front,
the
existing
setback
is
already
at
16.7
feet.
So
it's
not
at
25
feet,
probably
because
the
house
was
built
prior
to
the
zoning
regulations
when
they
were
in
place.
So
this
is
a
request
for
variances
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
13
feet
for
a
porch
Edition
and
to
reduce
the
secondary
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
again.
G
G
On
this
slide,
you
can
see
the
proposed
site
plan.
This
is
the
overall
survey
with
the
existing
house
and
pool,
and
this
is
more
of
a
enlarged
area
of
the
addition.
So
this
is
the
porch
Edition,
and
this
is
the
garage
Edition.
As
you
can
see,
the
garage
is
only
going
to
extend
by
roughly
five
feet
past
the
secondary
front
facade
of
of
the
house.
G
So
the
request
was
reviewed
against
the
10
conditions
outlined
in
section
3.17
of
the
Land
Development
code.
The
special
circumstances
or
conditions
applying
to
the
structure
or
premises
in
question
are
peculiar
to
such
structure
or
premises
and
do
not
generally
apply
to
other
structures
or
premises
in
the
vicinity.
G
G
So
this
graphic
demonstrates
the
existing
conditions.
This
is
the
existing
front.
Elevation
of
the
house.
Existing
house
lags
architectural
detail
and
curb
appeal.
It
also
doesn't
have
a
functional
garage
because
the
function,
the
garage
original
garage
was
converted
by
a
prior
owner.
Apparently,
so
the
granting
of
the
application
is
necessary
for
the
preservation
and
enjoyment
of
the
property
right
and
does
not
merely
serve
as
a
convenience
for
owner.
G
The
applicant
is
trying
to
improve
the
architecture
of
the
facade
of
the
house
and
to
construct
a
garage
addition
with
code,
conforming
driveway
access
from
the
secondary
front.
This
is
a
proposed
front,
porch
and
garage
Edition.
This
is
a
graphical
representation,
so
porches
are
typically
added
to
that.
Curb
appeal
that
the
gentleman
just
described
on
Shore
Specialists,
so
on
Corner
Lots,
you
do
want
to
have
maybe
a
reduced
setback
and
have
front
porches,
there's.
Actually
a
movement.
New
urbanized
movement
where
porches
and
the
reduced
friends
sent
back,
creates
more
walkable,
Community
more
attractive,
Community.
G
The
relief
for
the
variance
thought
did
not
result
from
an
action
by
the
owner
or
with
the
prior
knowledge
or
approval
of
the
owner,
and
granting
of
the
variance
request
will
not
confirm
the
owner
any
special
privileges
that
is
denied
by
the
provisions
of
this
code
to
to
lands,
buildings
or
structures
in
the
same
Zone
and
District.
The
approval
of
the
variances
will
not
Grant
the
owner,
a
special
privilege,
because
the
front
yard
setbacks
for
porches
and
secondary
front
setbacks
for
structures
on
corner
lot.
G
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
the
front
porch
to
improve
the
curbside
appeal
from
Shore
and
to
add
a
new
garage
with
the
code,
conforming
driveway,
so
this
is
just
a
graphical
representation
of
what
that
porch
will
look
like.
G
So
the
request
is
not
based
primarily
upon
the
desire
of
the
owner
to
secure
a
greater
Financial
return
from
the
property.
The
applicant
is
proposing
these
additions
for
the
preservation
and
enjoyment
of
the
property
and
the
granting
of
the
variance
will
not
be
detrimental
or
injurious
to
other
property
or
Improvement
in
the
neighborhood
in
which
the
property
is
located,
so
proposed,
porch
Edition
will
result
in
the
general
attractiveness
of
the
home
and
an
improvement
in
the
neighborhood,
while
the
proposed
garage
has
a
new
driveway
that
meets
current
code
regulations.
G
G
G
So
even
with
the
garage
extension,
they
would
still
be
able
to
see
the
water,
hopefully
if
no
trees
in
there,
so
granting
of
the
variants
will
be
in
Harmony
and
serves
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
and
is
consistent
with,
the
county-wide
future
land
use
plan,
the
old,
smart,
comprehensive
plan
and
also
these
regulations.
The
granting
of
the
variants
shall
not
constitute
an
amendment
to
the
ultimate
comprehensive
plan,
the
Oldsmar
Land
Development
code
or
the
county-wide
comprehensive
plan.
A
A
I
do
okay,
you
got
a
single
variance
for
the
porch
that
wraps
around,
which
actually
affects
two
of
them.
So
when
you
have
needed
two
variances
for
the
same
porch,
because
you
got
the
porch,
that's
on
Shore
Drive
and
then
you
got
the
porches
on
Bayview
I.
E
G
So
we've
already
when
you
look
at
the
plan,
so
we've
taken
into
consideration
this
and
the
variance
for
the
secondary
front
is
to
the
10
feet.
So
just
it
covers
the
porch.
Basically,
so,
instead
of
running
another
variance
and
saying
it's
for
the
porch,
so
it's
10
feet
or
10.37
for
for
the
the
porch,
Edition
and
13.67
for
the
garage
Edition.
So
we
covered
it
with
the
secondary
variance,
which
is
at
10
feet
from
the
property
line.
So
you
would
not
need
a
secondary
variance
for
the.
A
G
H
G
So
you
wouldn't
be
even
seeing
this
back
in
2015
or
16
Michelle
perrisano
I
think
she
they
made
an
arrangement
where
all
of
the
secondary
front
variances
would
be
reviewed
by
staff
internally
and
not
presented
to
the
board
because
all
of
them
been
approved
and
if
it's
a
secondary
front,
six
foot
would
be
acceptable.
What
triggered
here
for
the
main
variant
so
to
say
that
needs
to
go
to
the
board
of
adjustment?
Is
that
front
porch
the
front
setback,
so
the
secondary
is.
G
I
G
A
G
G
A
A
A
Okay,
so
it's
like
says:
we've
been
I've
been
caught
on
eyewe
been
caught
on
this
before
and
I
want
to
make
sure,
because
the
dimensions
that
you
have
there
with
the
23
foot
wide
34
foot
long,
that's
not
going
to
be
a
three-car
garage,
so
I
don't
want
to
approve
a
three
as
it's
shown
right
here.
J
J
A
J
If
the
drawings
and
the
dimensions
don't
demonstrate
that
it
could
possibly
be
a
three-car
garage,
I
would
say
that
that
lends
favorably
towards
it
perhaps.
But
that
would
be
determination
that
you
would
have
to
make
as.
G
A
A
Okay,
just
just
hold
on
sorry,
okay,
so,
okay,
based
on
the
information
we
have,
does
anybody
else
have
any
questions
to
the
board
on
this
application?
Nope.
A
Thank
you.
We
call
you
back
later,
maybe
sure.
A
B
The
record
I
live
and
own
106
Shore
Drive
West
right
here
we
applied
for
the
variance
and
in
fact
it
was
a
typo,
because
that
was
the
original
application.
After
a
few
reviews
and
design,
we
landed
on
our
final
design,
which
is
only
and
I
can
attest
a
two-car
garage,
and
so
you
may
take
my
sworn
statement.
That's
true.
Okay,.
B
Understand
and
we've
submitted,
the
plan
lands
at
this
point,
but
they're
not
final,
and
so
as
soon
as
we
get
them
stamped
and
they
are
final.
They
are
going
to
show
a
two-car
garage
and
those
plans
that
are
going
to
be
submitted
to
the
city
and
also
to
the
county
are
going
to
only
show
a
two-car
garage,
so
I'm
sure
that
will
land
upon
review
on
your
desk
and
at
that
time
you
can
then
triple
check
whether
in
fact,
what
I'm
stating
today
is
true.
A
A
K
Yeah,
my
name
is
Randy
Martin
I
live
at
609,
South,
Bayview,
Boulevard,
two
doors
down
from
the
proposed
setback,
change
and
actually
no
Sean
I
looked
at
some
plans.
He
was
doing
a
while
back
anyway
I'm
a
building
contractor
and
a
swim
pool
contractor
here
in
Oldsmar,
been
here
for
25
years
or
actually
over
25
years
now,
I
have
concern
with
the
setback
change.
K
Currently,
as
they
stated
prior,
the
home
was
built.
Obviously,
maybe
they
got
a
variance,
maybe
they
didn't
back
then,
with
the
25
foot,
side,
setbacks
and
the
25
foot
front
setback.
The
house
obviously
was
built
less
than
25
feet
now,
they're
asking
for
an
additional,
approximately
five
more
feet
and
my
concern
is
putting
the
garage
on
that
rear
of
the
property
when
they
do
have
an
existing
garage,
which
was
I,
would
say
non-code
compliant
in
the
front
of
the
house
which
they
bought
the
house
with
the
garage
conversion.
K
But
since
there's
been
extensive,
interior
Renovations
done
with
no
permits
on
a
house,
including
structural,
high
beams
and
so
on,
and
that
doesn't
it
kind
of
bothers
me
being
a
residential
or
a
building
contractor
at
no
permits
were
pulled
during
that
time
and
my
my
my
main
concern
I
just
had
to
state
that
they
do
have
a
garage
in
the
front
that
could
be
converted
back
to
a
garage.
They
don't
really
need
a
garage.
K
K
K
Unfortunately,
it's
a
corner
lot.
They
didn't
have
to
buy
a
corner
lot.
They
could
have
bought
a
lot
anywhere
added
on
to
it,
but
corner
lot
when
you're
obstruction,
the
vision
of
pedestrians
and
vehicles,
I
think
you're
looking
for
possible
trouble
down
the
road
somebody
getting
hurt,
and
the
last
thing
we
want
to
see
is
somebody
getting
hurt
here
in
the
city
of
Oldsmar,
one
of
our
children,
grandchildren,
whatever
you
have
and
that's
my
concern.
A
C
J
A
Just
to
reiterate
for
your
question
or
whatever
I
believe
that
the
planning
director
stated
that
this
house
was
built
prior
to
a
lot
of
the
setbacks
being
enforced
or
whatever
and
a
lot
of
the
roles,
it
seems
to
be
a
has
been
there
for
a
while,
probably
part
of
old
Oldsmar,
probably
four
years
40
years
ago,
and
there's
been
many
changes
and
we
didn't
have
the
setbacks
in
the
rules
and
everything
we
did
now.
A
So,
yes,
there's
no
doubt
that
the
whole
house
probably
encroaches
on
looking
at
the
drawings
that
I
have
encroaches
on
all
the
setbacks,
whether
it
be
on
Shore
Drive
or
whether
it
be
on
Bayshore
I,
do
understand
your
concern
on
that.
There's
no
doubt,
but
like
I
says
it's
just
like
I
said,
if
you
look
at
it,
look
at
the
setback
lines
of
the
hojas
front
and
side,
you
know
violated
25
foot
setback
exactly.
A
Okay,
I,
like
I,
said
I,
do
understand
your
your
concern
but,
like
I
said,
as
the
the
director
said,
these
these
this
house
was
built
way
back
when
yeah
the.
A
A
J
A
G
So
again,
the
secondary
front
setback
on
Bayview
Boulevard.
The
only
reason
why
you're
seeing
it
in
front
of
the
board
is
because
it's
the
front
setback
is
what
triggered
it
to
bring
it
here
and
we
combined
them
together.
So
today
they
could
go
to
the
TRC.
We
review
for
compliance
with
the
code
and
they
can
probably
get
the
garage
Edition
without
even
using
a
three-car
garage,
two-car
garage.
As
long
as
they
meet
the
impervious
surface
area
ratio
they
can
demonstrate.
The
lot
coverage
is
good.
G
They
can
demonstrate
that
the
driveway
meets
the
requirements
being
50
feet
away
from
the
intersection
which
this
plan
does
demonstrate,
the
compliance
as
well
as
the
length
of
the
driveway.
So
specifically,
the
reason
why
you
probably
saw
the
three-car
garage,
because
originally
the
driveway
was
a
little
bit
closer
and
if
you
align
three
cars
in
line,
you
can
see
that
they
would
probably
fit
in
there.
But
then
we
made
them
change
that
driveway
in
the
back.
G
So
now
it's
more
like
a
two-car
garage,
the
front
setback
on
the
Southeast
Corner
they're,
actually
at
25
24.9,
which
is
also
almost
25
feet,
which
is
on
the
side
and
then
it
tapers
down.
So
when
the
house
was
constructed,
it's
slightly
less,
it
goes
down
to
21,
but
to
the
back
of
the
sidewalk,
it's
still
25
feet
so
to
the
back
of
the
sidewalk
from
the
front.
There
are
almost
at
30
feet
on
shore,
so
it's
a
varying
distance,
as
I
mentioned
earlier
too,
and
I
can
demonstrate
it
with
this
graphic.
G
So
with
the
curb
appeal
and
I
believe
the
Mr
Martin's
property
is
also
on
Bayview
and
he
does
have
a
driveway
on
Bayview.
Bayview
is
a
one-way
road,
so
it's
not
a
two-way
traffic.
Although
it
is
a
busy
road,
there
are
multiple
driveways
on
Bayview,
so
with
adjacent
neighbors,
also
having
their
driveways
there.
Maybe
the
design
could
be
done
when
it's
a
circular
driveway
similar
to
how
then
you
have
a
little
bit
more
safety.
G
G
A
A
A
Okay,
okay
back
to
okay,
is
anybody
else
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition?
Please
step
forward
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
I
I
I
The
property
in
question
is
in
a
distinctive
and
unique
situation,
as
it
lies
on
the
northeast
corner
of
the
intersection
that
encompasses
the
main
entrance
to
re
old
park,
the
streets
that
this
property
lies
on
Shore,
Drive
and
Bayview.
Boulevard
are
major
arteries
to
access
Ariel's,
Park
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
I
These
streets
are
heavily
vehicle,
have
heavy
vehicle
and
pedestrian
traffic.
This
property
abuts
the
principal
feeder
crosswalk
traversing
Bayview
that
connects
to
the
crosswalk
that
traverses
Shore
Drive.
This
crosswalk
is
designated
to
service
the
main
entrance
of
the
park.
There
are
no
stop
signs
or
other
traffic
measures,
either
westbound
or
eastbound
on
Shore
Drive.
At
this
juncture,
this
variance
violates
the
presumed
engineered
calculations
of
the
necessary
site,
distance
and
field
of
view.
I
These
concerns
are
especially
brought
to
the
fore
as
we
are
par
are
upon
the
one-year
anniversary
of
the
tragic
death
of
the
little
girl,
Leah
sorby,
the
six-year-old's
death
at
the
corner
of
Bayview
and
Saint.
Pete
is
a
stark
reminder
that
we
have
to
be
mindful
and
good.
Stewards
of
our
city
with
the
aim
towards
improving
safety
features,
not
removing
them.
I
I
It
is
presumptuous
to
think
that
the
extra
land
afforded
to
Corner
Lots
is
just
a
bonus
to
be
built
upon.
Rather,
this
land
is
a
decisive
and
necessary
feature
designed
to
accommodate
the
engineered
safety
feature
of
the
setbacks.
These
setbacks
are
designed
to
endow
all
persons
of
the
proceeds.
The
altering
of
these
setbacks
infringes
upon
these
pragmatic
endowments.
I
B
Course,
thank
you.
Daniela
carrion
and
106
Shore
Drive
West
I
just
want
to
address
some
of
my
neighbors
concerns
because
I
do
understand
their
concerns
and
I
think
their
concerns
are
valid.
They've
lived
there
for
a
while
they've
seen
us
come
in
the
place
was
completely
torn
apart.
When
we
came
into
the
house,
it
was
turned
into
a
office
and
it
was
used
for,
like
all
kinds
of
things,
we're
really
trying
to
live
here
long
term.
B
B
Think
that's
something
that
really
went,
and
a
lot
of
thought
was
put
into
that
when
we
looked
at
the
design
of
the
garage
and
specifically
having
two
cars
being
able
to
park
behind
the
garage
as
they
pull
in
and
out,
which
is
exactly
right,
where
the
r,
our
neighbor
right
next
door,
pulls
their
car
in
and
their
boat
and
their
trailer.
And
so
we
have
a
really
big
tree
right
there
as
well
right
on
the
corner.
B
You
can
see
it
as
you're
driving
to
the
park,
but
there's
no
way
for
any
other
car
to
have
any
kind
of
issue
as
they're
pulling
back
or
even
infringe
on
any
kind
of
pedestrian
if
you're,
where
to
park
additional
cars
on
the
lot.
So
everything
is
really
up
to
code
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
there
was
no
infringement
on
any
neighbor's
rights
and,
as
we
spoke
to
our
neighbors,
to
the
right
and
behind
us,
one
of
their
big
concerns
was
going
to
be.
B
How
was
the
house
is
going
to
look
and
how
is
it
going
to
raise
the
price
of
their
homes?
And
so,
when
we
looked
at
the
design,
we
also
wanted
to
make
sure
we
chose
features.
That
would
also
supplement
what
other
houses
look
like,
but
also
enhance
the
value
of
our
neighbor's
home,
which
I'm
sure
after
we
finalize
the
treatment
of
our
home,
which
we
don't
just
plan
on
doing
this.
B
I
mean
that's
really
the
biggest
part
right
and,
although
I
so
appreciate
their
concern.
I
appreciate
everything
you
wrote
on
there
because
I
think
that
was
just
really.
It
was
good
to
hear
their
feedback
because
we're
going
to
be
neighbors
for
a
long
time,
but
I
certainly
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
progress
through
this,
that
we're
able
to
address
their
concerns
but
at
the
same
time
make
sure
that
we
can
continue
building
and
we
don't
get
stuck
in
when
the
house
was
built
which
was
1955..
B
You
know
if
we
keep
everything
as
status
quo
when
you
drive
by
there.
The
house
is
an
eyesore
I
mean
I,
pull
into
my
driveway
right
now,
which
is
non-existent,
hasn't
been
existent
since
I
think
2015,
when
the
prior
owner
had
it
and
turned
it
into
some
sort
of
office,
then
because
of
that
I'm
having
to
park
in
right
now,
the
grass
and
so
I'm
trying
to
create
a
space
that
will
enhance
the
home
will
make
it
prettier
and,
at
the
same
time,
will
give
us
a
livable
space.
B
A
A
L
So
the
attorney
had
mentioned
that
you
know
our
feedback
and
approval
is
based
on.
Essentially
these
10.
You
know
bullet
points
right,
so
the
comments
and
concerns
about
traffic
studies
and
stop
signs
or
viewpoints
things
like
that
are
not
our
obligation
to
address
essentially
right.
A
Thank
you
any
further
discussion,
okay,
they're
being
under
be
a
motion,
and
second,
do
we
do
roll
call
and
vote
okay,
be
a
roll
call
and
vote.
H
D
A
E
This
cases
variances
to
the
parking
requirements
inside
setback
very
VAR,
23-02.
E
The
applicant
is
reducing
the
width
of
regular
parking
spaces
from
10
feet
to
nine
feet
and
reducing
the
side
yard
setback
from
five
feet
to
zero
for
an
existing
23
410
square
foot
Warehouse.
In
order
to
develop
the
site
with
the
new
50
000
square
foot,
industrial
warehouse
and
rehabilitate
the
existing
23
410
square
foot,
industrial
Warehouse.
E
E
The
side
yard
variants
expired
since
the
building
construction
associated
with
that
2000
square
foot
planned
did
not
begin
within
the
one
year
criteria.
That's
outlining
the
code
from
the
date
the
variance
was
granted,
so
the
current
applicant
is
proposing
the
same
side
yard,
set
by
side
yard
variants
to
from
five
feet
to
zero
per
section.
15.83
of
the
city
of
Oldsmar
Land
Development
code.
Regular
parking
spaces
are
required
to
be
20
feet.
Long
and
10
feet
wide.
To
requested
parking
with
would
allow
a
decrease
in
the
overall
impervious
area
for
the
site.
E
E
E
The
relief
of
the
relief
or
varying
salt
did
not
result
from
an
action
by
the
owner
or
with
knowledge
with
prior
knowledge
or
approval
of
the
owner.
The
relief
and
variance
or
the
variance
salt
did
not
result.
Basically
what
I
just
said.
So
it's
a
another
statement
did
not
result
from
the
action
by
the
owner
or
with
the
prior
knowledge
of
the
owner.
E
The
requested
parking
variants
will
reduce
the
overall
proposed
vehicular
use
area
to
V8
UA
and
the
overall
impervous
area
coverage
for
the
site
providing
more
green
space.
Current
M1
zoning
District
regulations
allow
the
purpose
coverage
of
up
to
80
percent.
The
proposed
lot
coverage
for
the
site
is
significantly
below
that
allowable
threshold.
As
summarized
in
this
next
slide
in
this
table.
One.
E
E
E
It
was
determined
that
an
amendment
to
another
land
use
category
would
not
be
appropriate
at
this
time
and
based
upon
the
above
discussion,
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
variance
request
to
reduce
the
parking
requirements
from
10
feet
by
20
feet
to
nine
feet
by
20
feet
and
reduce
the
side
yard
setback
from
five
feet
to
zero
for
an
existing
Warehouse.
In
order
to
develop
the
site
with
the
new
fifty
thousand
square
foot
industrial
raw
house
and
rehabilitate
the
existing
23
410
square
foot,
industrial
Warehouse
in
the
M1
limited
manufacturing,
District
I'll
stand
for
questions.
Okay,.
A
This
time
we'll
take
questions
from
board
to
staff,
okay,
okay,
questions,
I,
guess
to
staff
on
this
and
would
be
back
in
2007.
A
G
G
Correct:
okay,
the
parking
that
was
requested
back
in
20
I
believe
was
I'm.
Sorry,
2007
I
think
it
was
for
the
reduction
to
distance
between
the
landscape
Islands.
So
we
have
today
in
the
code
80
feet
between
the
the
Planters
and
they
were
trying
to
maximize
some
space.
So.
A
Because
I
seem
to
remember
that
piece
of
property
or
whatever
but
okay,
so
when
we
vote
on
this
or
would
we
do
the
application?
Will
this
be
on
two
separate
two
separate
requests.
A
It's
on
the
one
application,
but
the
first
part
of
it
was
from
10
feet
to
20
feet
from
10
to
20,
to
9,
to
20
and
and
then
it
says
and
producer
side
set
back
from
five
to
zero.
D
A
F
Is
the
what's
on
the
side
for
the
other
property
they're,
going
from
five
to
zero?
What's
what's
on
the
other
side,
so.
G
A
warehouse
is
being
proposed
on
the
other
side,
and
we've
confirmed
with
the
building
official.
G
The
other
site
is
under
review
under
the
Florida
billing
code
review
right
now
in
Pinellas
County,
so
they
are
providing
six
foot
setback
conforming
to
their
side
said
back
in
the
worst
case
scenario,
so
this
building
will
have
to
be
sprinkled
will
be
a
requirement,
as
stated
in
the
plan
in
the
report,
because
it's,
but
it's
too
masonry,
there's
the
Florida
building
code
role
in
building
separation
and
based
on
that
rule,
so
depending
on
what
type
of
construction,
so
both
of
these
buildings
are
going
to
be
masonry
and
depending
on
that
distance
between
the
buildings
is
then
being
dictated
by
okay.
G
What
type
of
other
measures
you
may
install
like
a
firewall
or
something
else?
So
in
this
case,
because
they're,
both
masonry
they're,
both
are
sprinkled
I,
think
are
required
to
be
sprinkled
that
was
found
to
be
sufficient
by
the
building
official.
So
we
did
contact
the
Pinellas
County.
Building
official
to
double
check
of
granting
this
will
serve
will
protect
the
other
property.
On
the
other
side,
that's
compliant.
G
It's
only
for
a
portion
of
it,
so
not
the
entire
length
because
they
have
a
parking
they're
developing
with
a
parking
and
a
menu
Warehouse
facility
or
mini
storage
facility.
So
a
portion
of
that
building
is
going
to
be
adjacent
to
the
building
for
which
the
subject
property
on,
on
which
the
variance
has
been
requested.
Right.
G
There's
no
zero
on
the
other
side
on
the
other
side,
they're
providing
6.7
and
7
feet
so
the
other
property.
What
I
was
trying
to
say
is
conforming
to
their
side,
setback
providing
a
minimum
of
five,
but
it's
actually
more
like
seven
and
six.
So
the
total
separation
between
the
buildings
will
be,
on
average,
six,
six
and
a
half
thank.
A
You
you're
welcome
okay,
any
other
questions
stuff.
Thank
you
in
this
site
plan
exactly
helmet.
What
was
the
total
parking
spots.
G
So
the
parking
is
being
requested
not
for
the
reduction
of
number
of
parking
spaces.
It's
been
requested
for
the
width
of
the
store,
I,
believe
they're,
providing
two
spaces
per
thousand
is
required
by
code,
so
they
have
50
000,
so
that
would
be
100,
so
I
believe
it's
134,
but
I
can
double
check
the
total.
G
G
On
record
for
this
project.
A
A
Maybe
answer
it
or
I
can
look
it
up
and
I
was
just
wondering
the
my
question
was
mainly
like
you're
by
reducing
it
one
foot
you're,
giving
a
ten
to
one
so
you're
only
increasing
the
imperious
impervious
ratio
by
a
10
to
1
ratio
by
reducing
the
parking
spots
by
a
foot
from
10
foot
to
nine
foot.
G
Necessarily
because
they
are
providing
more
green
space
and
it's
overall
reduction
in
in
overall
parking
is
still
a
benefit.
G
But
when,
if
you
review
the
site
data
table
so
they're
actually
providing
num
required
number
of
parking
spaces
in
an
increased
Green
Space
area
at
the
same
time,
so,
okay,
if
we,
they
would
still
comply
with
the
old
plan,
they
would
still
comply.
But
that
would
be
the
opposite
of
your
calculation,
so
one
foot
by
100
spaces.
So
that's
your
increase
in
impervious
that
they
would
otherwise
be
providing
without
this
variance,
because
the
same
parking
spaces
was
approved
on
the
prior
plan.
So
this
is
an
improvement
for
us.
G
A
F
Nico
Ramos
and
I'm,
representing
my
client
at
4,
30,
racetrack
I,
guess
mainly
the
whole
reason
for
this
operation
was
my
clients
consolidating
his
business
out
in
Odessa
to
bring
more
jobs
and
opportunity
here
in
Oldsmar.
The
reduction
in
impervious
is
only
just
to
help
the
drainage,
because
this
site
is
very
prone
of
I.
Guess,
there's
drainage
issues
going
on
in
this
area
and
we're
trying
to
fix
it
as
much
as
we
can.
F
A
Okay,
was
there
any
questions
to
the
applicant
from
the
board
yeah.
H
I
have
a
question:
did
you
say
to
bring
more
employment?
What
would
be
the.
H
J
Like
you
had
a
question,
no
I
was
thinking
about
future
legal
ponderies
that
could
arise.
Should
we
vote
on
each
ferry
to
be
taken
separately?
If
you
were
to
Grant
one
variance
and
deny
the
other
variants,
then
the
application
is
neither
granted
nor
denied.
J
So
though
I
said
it
may
be
prudent
to
take
it
up
on
two
votes
which
I
have
done
in
the
past
in
under
another,
it
may
be
best
to
take
the
application
as
a
whole,
and
then
perhaps
you
take
a
look
at
this
application
process
and
say,
if
you're
applying
for
more
than
one
variance.
Perhaps
you
need
to
see
it
more
than
one
application.
Maybe
that's
something.
A
A
There's
a
motion
in
a
second
and
no
discussion:
I
will
call
for
a
vote
and
we
will,
as
under
advisement,
okay,
all
right
I
used
to
like
you,
but
okay,
okay,
okay,
a
call
for
a
vote
and
roll
call.
Please
board.