►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
Hear
this
all
this
okay,
do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
B
A
E
All
right
great
well,
the
changes
in
blue
is
what
chip
pots
and
his
staff
have
recommended,
and
I
read
through
everything
and-
and
I
graded
him-
and
I
spoke
this
morning
a
little
bit
and
so
basically
mostly
just
changing
parks
and
recreation
to
leisure
services
throughout
and
then
there
was
he
had
to
do
it.
I
need
to
go
through
everything
word
by
word
or
something.
E
All
right,
like
we
have
a
definition
for
park
roads
now
and
special
events,
which
I
thought
that
was
very
good
too,
are
these.
Your
changes
are
there.
These
are.
E
So
and
and
then
section
4235
those
changes,
oh
and
and
some
of
the
things
they
actually
through
the
staff
took
a
lot
of
time
to
really
address
all
these
and
they
saw
what
largo
and
some
other
municipalities
were
doing
and
that's
how
they
came
up
with
with
a
lot
of
these
those
new
sections
that
they
added.
E
As
far
as
for
the
responsibility
of
the
park
visitors,
those
areas
in
blue
that
they
added
and
and
then
there's
one
area
where
it
says,
ask
tom,
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed
that
tom,
it's
section,
4238
proper
use
of
facilities,
letter
a
I
guess
they
had
a
question
about
that
him
and
I
didn't
touch
on
that
at
all.
But
he
wanted
me
to
ask
you
if
that
was
okay.
I
guess.
D
B
So,
that's
just
you
know,
creating
some
type
of
minimum
age,
so
I'm
not
aware
of
any
particular
code
provision
or
statute
that
requires
six
years.
I
guess
I
could
look
at
the
state's
state
statutes.
I
just
received
this
tonight,
so
I
could
look
at
the
state
statutes
and
and
and
come
back,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
anything
that
would
make
this
something
that
you
should
change.
B
Well,
I
can
tell
you
that
you
know-
and
I
don't
ever
remember
it
coming
up
before
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
real
big
issue.
Okay,
I
would
tend
to
leave
it
alone.
E
Okay,
good,
I
agree
with
that
and
I
liked
the
the
the
c
through
h
those
things
that
he
had.
I
thought
those
all
sounded
really
good.
I
thought
that
was
a
good
idea
that
they
put
those
in
there
and
then
42
39.
They
basically
reworked
all
those
items,
one
through
six
with
the
new
in
blue
and
they
talked
about
more
about
plant
life
and
wildlife
and
sand
and
soil
and
all
and
all
those-
and
I
think,
and
that
all
sounded
good
to
me
as.
A
E
That's
a
good
question:
he
the
only
we
talked
about
signage
when
he
talks
about
when
he
mentioned
smoking,
and
he
said
that
because
I
mentioned
well,
do
you
need
to
address
vaping
and
he
said
well,
no
we're
mostly
just
talking
I'm
concerned
about
the
cigarette
butts.
You
know
trash
and
secondhand
smoke,
so
the
vaping
wasn't
really
an
issue.
So
he
said
that
their
plan
is
with
some
areas.
If
they
did
want
to
have
other
restrictions,
then
they
would
put
up
signage.
Restricting
you
know
certain
things
that
they
wanted
to.
I.
F
E
A
B
Shall
dress
or
undress
in
any
vehicle,
so
the
answer
is
no.
You
couldn't
do
any
of
that.
What
I
mean.
So,
if
you
left
your
underwear
on,
for
example,
that
would
still
be
a
state
of
dress
or
undress.
If
you
got
down
to
your
underwear,
so
this
would
be
covered.
So
to
answer
your
question,
it
would
be
by
way
of
signs
just
like
any
other
major
problem,
that
we
see
that
we
would
add
a
sign
to
put
people
on
notice.
A
D
B
G
C
H
E
C
G
C
D
G
E
G
D
G
E
G
E
Let's
read
over,
and
I
mean
I,
I
didn't
really
see
anything
that
I
had
a
problem
with.
I
mean
a
lot
of
these
are,
of
course
hard
to
enforce,
but
for
a
lot
of
it
they
just
have
it
on
the
books,
I
guess
in
case
they
need
to
enforce
it
for
some
reason,.
H
D
E
E
E
G
Curious
about
the
placement
of
4240
c,
I
think
that's
more
of
a
general
statement
that
should
go
across
all
the
parks.
If
I'm
correct,
on
open
possession
open
container,
not
just
to
peers.
E
D
F
Well,
maybe
adding
a
little
sentence
under
that
4240c
with
like
maybe
something
like,
with
the
exception
of
special
events
as
designated
by
the
city
of
olesma.
E
Open
container
yeah-
and
I
had
mentioned
that
to
him
and
then
he
said:
well,
we
it's
probably
not
necessary,
because
then
we
do
talk
because
these
new
sections-
okay,
at
the
end,
there's
this
new
section
42
that
that
they
added
and
they
weren't
sure
what
they
talk
about.
You
know
what's
prohibited
activities
in
the
park
and
but
then
they
talk
about
special
events.
E
G
A
E
But
seems
so,
however,
the
profession
provisions
of
this
section
do
not
in
any
way
restrict
the
use
of
cameras
by
amateur,
photographers
or
professionals,
not
using
set
scenery
cast
or
models.
Oh
okay.
So
it's
only
if
it's
only
abusing
casserole
yeah.
So
if
you're
taking
a
picture
of
your
son,
that's
that's!
Okay!
Even
if
it's
a
professional
they
just
don't
yeah,
I
guess,
but
if
you're
using
professional
models,
they
don't
want
you
doing
it.
Yeah.
E
I
D
D
I
I
E
A
E
If
you
look
at
4292
animals
in
city
parks,
there's
a
whole
area
on
that.
I
G
I
mean
they're,
not
no
one's
really
causing
a
problem,
and
I've
never
really
seen
any
kind
of
discharge
from
pets
on
the
pier
right.
So
I've
never
seen
like
not
walking
through.
I
H
A
You
have
a
vehicle,
that's
wrapped
for
your
business
and
you're,
going
to
watch
your
kid
play
a
sport
at
a
park.
You
can't
drive
your
vehicle
into
the
parking
lot
or,
if
you
are
a
candidate
for
office,
and
you
want
to
go,
show
up
in
a
little
league
game
and
pass
out
your
flyers.
If
you
have
signs
on
your
car,
you
can't
park
in
the
parking
lot.
E
Well,
I
don't
think
it
really
pertains
to
the
vehicles.
Does
it
say
any
nearby
vehicles.
C
I
I
I
Sure
well,
yeah
everything
kind
of
is:
did
chip
give
any
indication
as
to
did
he
did
he
draft
all
these
on
his
own,
or
was
he
using
a
model
from
a
different
city
or.
I
E
He
said
they
I
mean,
because
they
were
working
on
this
for
what
two
months
they
needed
more
time
and
everything
so
yeah.
They
said
they
really
did
a
lot
of
research
and
and
saw
how
other
cities
you
know
how
they
were
writing
it.
I
I
just
think
the
difficulty
we're
having
is
since
the
information's
so
vast
and
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
dissect
it.
It's
the
same
thing
when
utilities
first
came
up
and
we
had
all
those
changes
from
from
nan
and
from
cindy
nano
it
was.
We
need
time
to
to
just
go
through
it
and
see
and
be
able
to
strike
things
out.
I
think
we're
trying
to
do
it
on
the
fly
and
that's
kind
of
hindering
all
of
us,
because
all
of
our
heads
are
down
we're
saying
what
about
this.
Well,
what
about
that.
I
I
But
maybe
do
we
take
a
beef
and
be
able
to
read
through
this
discuss
it
real,
quick
in
the
september
meeting
and
then
and
then
move
forward
with
whatever
we
were
doing
in
the
september
meeting
beyond
that,
I
just
I'd
I'd
like
to
sit
down
and
go
through
it
line
by
line
just
to
see
if
everything's
in
there
maybe
get
some
more
feedback
from
chip
on
that
stuff.
A
I
That's
a
difficult
thing,
too,
is
that
we
can't
we
can't
discuss
it
amongst
ourselves
unless
we're
here.
So
you
know
if
we
see
chips.
Availability
on
whenever
the
meeting
is,
I
think
september.
1St
is
the
next
meeting.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
think
that's
the
first
monday
in
september,
maybe
not
might
be
the
eighth
or
the
seventh
regardless.
A
I
D
B
Long
as
that
meeting
is
noticed,
it's
open
to
the
public
in
minutes
are
going
to
be
taken.
It
doesn't
matter
whether
there's
two
of
they're
there
or
not,
so
you
just
not
want
to
be
talking
amongst
yourselves
as
to
something
that's
going
to
come
back
here,
but
you
know,
my
suggestion
is:
is
that
you,
the
purposes
of
this
committee,
is
not
to
go
out
and
seek
public
input
that
public
input
comes
to
you.
If
someone
was
interested,
it
comes
to
you
nobody's
interested.
B
B
I
I
just
don't
see
that
that's
your
role
to
take
your
work,
send
it
on
to
another
committee
to
get
their
opinions
and
comments
and
bring
it
back
to
you.
That's
really
not
what
the
ordinance
review
committee
does.
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
illegal
or
improper,
just
not
what
we
normally
would
do.
B
A
E
Yeah-
and
I
I
read
when
I
read
through
them
last
night,
because
I
said
you
just
sent
it
to
me
on
saturday
and
I
read
through
it
last
night
and
they
all
sounded
good
to
me.
I
thought.
Oh,
that
sounds
reasonable.
You
know
I
just
I
value
you
know
their
opinion
on.
What's
the
best
way
to
handle
things
and
so
and
I
just
had
a
couple
little
things
I
talked
with
chip
about
and
that
was
it
so
yeah
that's
up
to
you.
However,
you
wanted
best.
B
Yes
and
that's
how
other
cities
that
I
represent
have
done
it,
they
bring
the
department
head
in
to
answer
the
questions
that
they
have
and
if
they
can't
get
it,
then
they'll
gather
the
information
and
bring
it
back
to
you.
So
if
chip
can
be
here,
that
would
be
an
ideal
situation
to
answer
your
questions
or
anybody
on
his
staff.
B
E
I
A
I
Understand
in
the
car,
but
even
something
as
simple
as
that,
where
it's
it's
sparking
so
much
interest
from
us,
we
could
direct
that
to
him.
Like
is
this
a
problem?
Is
this
really
going
on?
How
are
we
going
to
even
enforce
it?
All
those
questions
can
be
answered,
but
even
as
we
were
reading
through,
you
know
it.
I
You
can't
drink
beer,
but
he
addresses
it
later
that
you
can
drink
beer
as
long
as
it's
during
something
or
other.
Well,
I
don't
have
time
to
go
from
here
to
there
during
this
meeting
of
course,
and
so
we
we'd
need
to
go.
You
know
a
full-fledged
okay,
let's
cross
it
all
out,
do
we
need
a
semicolon
or
a
period
or
a
comma?
You
know
that
sort
of
thing
and
be
able
to
bring
it
back.
A
So
yeah,
I
agree
with
those
statements.
I
I'm
only
halfway
through
this
packet.
F
F
D
F
Think
a
lot
of
it
is
is
the
enforceability
of
some
of
the
things
that
are
here
and
how
do
you
let
the
public
know
what
they
can
and
cannot
do
like
you
said
you're
talking
about
the
bathroom
thing,
I'm
thinking
I
remember
being
a
teenager,
and
I
I
don't
know
how
many
times
I
changed
in
park
bathrooms
and
never
thought
anything
of
it.
G
E
You
mentioned
largo,
and
but
I
don't
know
if
there
was
other
ones.
I
don't
have
that
email
in
front
of
me
that
very
spelled
out
exactly
how
they
came
up
with
it.
But.
D
H
H
E
And
I
actually,
I
did
call
up
the
email
that
he
had
sent
me
on
saturday
and
he
wrote
a
large
document,
many
revisions
deletions
and
additions.
But
I
think
you
will
see
that
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
was
put
into
it
by
our
team,
brynne
fraser,
jason,
conklin,
alexis
wells
and
myself
to
really
try
and
address
what
we
felt
was
important.
E
A
What
would
you
all
think
about
since
we
can't
meet
till
september
14th,
maybe
by
the
end
of
this
month,
getting
some
notes
together
that
we
compile
and
maybe
give
to
him
ahead
of
time?
Would
that
be
helpful?
Do
you
think
for
him
to
have
an
idea
of
what
some
of
the
questions
or
concerns
are
that
we
have
so
that
he
could
come
prepared
because
he
may
need
to
research?
Some
of
these
questions,
we're
saying,
is
you
know,
what's
what
is
the
citizen
reaction
going
to
be.
B
He'll
be
prepared,
you
don't
need
to
give
him
the
heads
up
on
it
and-
and
I
can't
meet
the
meeting
on
the
14th.
I
have
a
commission
meeting,
the
14th,
that's
why
we
schedule
these
meetings
at
this
time
of
the
month,
so
I've
just
asked
and
and
by
the
way
feel
free
to
set
it
for
the
14..
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
I
won't
be
here
I'll
have
to
send
another
lawyer.
Okay,
so
that's
not
a
big
deal,
but
I
can
be
here
on
the
monday
prior,
which
is
august
31st.
B
H
F
H
A
G
B
H
A
E
B
E
Only
other
things
I
had
only
like
three
three
little
things
that
that
that
we
commented
on
and
then
and
so
my
edits
are
already
in
there.
Okay
chip
made
them
and
then
sent
the
file
to,
and
so.
A
Okay,
well
then,
I
appreciate
that
everybody
and
thanks
paula
for
getting
this
to
us
and
so
we'll
resume
this
conversation.
Then
after
everybody's
had
a
chance
to
read
it
and
digest
it
on
the
end
of
this
month
on
the
31st
for
our
september
meeting.
So
then
we
will
move
on.
We.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
okay,
so
the
the
discussion
has
been
to
take
the
section
on
parks
and
recreation
chapter
42.,
have
everybody
give
feedback
and
come
back
on
august
31st
with
a
staff
member
from
parks
to
further
discuss
this?
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
proceed
with
that.
D
E
B
A
C
In
2
c,
we
were
wondering
the
reasons
behind
eliminating
the
word
chain
link
and
leaving
it
as
fence,
and
I
asked
if
you
could
be
more
specific
as
to
what
an
alarm
entails
and
reply
from
nan
was
many
subdivisions
prefer
to
screen
the
equipment
for
aesthetic
reasons.
C
This
change
allows
for
a
security
fence
that
kind
of
answering
the
alarm
issue.
This
allows
for
a
security
fence,
for
example
a
lockable
white
pvc,
fencing
for
the
equipment
without
loss
of
aesthetics,
that
chain
link
and
barbed
wire
cannot
so
that's
her
reasoning
for
elimination
eliminated
as
you
can
see
there,
the
barbed
wire
as
part
of
the
top
portion,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
and
that
was
her
explanation.
D
D
C
70
98
meddling
with
hydrants
and
my
question
was
where
accident
or
for
necessary
repairs
is
replaced
with
quote-unquote
emergency.
What
might
be
defined
and
or
limited
to
such
an
emergency
and
nan's
response
was
an
accident
such
as
a
motor
vehicle
accident
where
a
hydrant
is
broken
and
flooding.
The
street
requires
immediate
action,
however,
necessary
repairs
frequently
can
be
scheduled
by
indicating
the
only
exceptions
are
for
emergencies.
We
mean
when
life
and
property
are
at
risk
and
time
to
correct
the
problem
is
of
essence,
so
that
was
her.
C
Explanation,
if
you
will
or
more
detail
on
what
we
had
asked
about,
why
it
was
replaced
with.
C
C
and
we
had
a
question
about
the
be
highlighted
there:
no
master
meter
shall
be
allowed,
except,
as
may
be
permitted
by
written
approval
of
the
city
council,
and
the
question
was
the
line
you
highlighted.
No
master
meter
shall
be
allowed,
except,
as
may
be
permitted
by
written
approval
of
the
city
council.
The
question
being:
is
this
ever
done
and
do
you
want
this
line?
Eliminated
nan's
response
was
in
the
case
of
multi-family
developments
and
many
commercial
development
master
meters
are
preferred.
C
B
C
C
I
Because
I
think
our
question
too
was,
does
that
ever
come
before
council?
Is
that
something?
It's
almost
is
that
like
a
line
item
thing
and
it
wasn't
custom,
I
don't
think,
and
so
I
think,
if
it's
custom
for
for
nan's
office
to
say,
yeah
they're,
always
there
then
there's
no
sense
in
having
it
in
the
ordinance.
That
makes
sense.
C
Her
comment
74.50
concerning
connection
fees,
and
my
question
was:
where
commented
where
she
commented.
It's
saying
needing
further
research
will
further
details
be
forwarded
to
ann
or
tom
and
her
her
reply
was
any
staff
concerns
regarding
fees
will
be
addressed
during
our
next
rate
study
to
be
performed
by
an
outside
consultant.
So
that's
kind
of
like
let
it
be
right
until
they
change.
C
A
Okay,
so
I
have
a
motion
to
approve.
A
So
I'm
feeling
such
a
sense
of
accomplishment
that
we've
gone
through
and
we're
really
down
to
you,
know
this
parks
and
rec
leisure
services
and
then
then
we'll
be
able
to
have
some
move
on
to
the
next
phase.
A
Okay,
then
we
need
to
approve
excused
absences
from
the
july
meeting.
So
first
for
paula,
can
I
have
a
motion
to
excuse
her
absence.
A
Approved
all
right
and,
and
then
for
me,
my
in-laws
50th
wedding
anniversary,
if
that
matters
so
is
my
absence
approved,
I
need
a
motion,
a.
H
A
H
A
So
I
I
do
want
to
just
look
at
the
october
meeting.
Is
that
still
on
the
calendar
to
to
review,
then
the
next
phase
of
changes.
B
So
we'll
be
back
on
august
31st,
then
to
go
over
chapter
42
and
ann,
and
I
will
be
working
on
the
report
and
we'll
be
bringing
that
back
to
you.
Hopefully,
in
october.
B
A
Okay,
just
so
we
can
kind
of
know
the
world
is
in
such
strange
straights
right
now,
it's
kind
of
nice
to
know
what
we
have
coming.
You
know
in
the
next
few
months.
I
appreciate
that
so,
unless
there's
anything
else,
we're
out
of
here
at
6
45
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you
very
much.
Everybody
thank.