►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Planning Board Meeting, 7/12/2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
I
I'm
opening
the
open
Forum
anyone
wish
to
speak
to
any
item
prior
to
us
visiting
the
agenda.
You're
welcome.
You
can
speak
longer
in
five
minutes
if
you're
Jerry
beaverland,
but
if
you're
not
you
only
get
five
minutes.
Anyone
wish
to
speak
public
forum,
no
I
closed
public,
the
public
forum,
the
open,
Forum
swearing
in
process.
Anyone
need
to
be
sworn
in
for
tonight's
proceedings.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
if.
D
A
Okay,
the
approval
of
the
minutes;
seven,
four:
zero
against.
Thank
you.
Let's
see,
Wednesday
July
12th
the
first
meeting
on
the
agenda
today.
Well,
we
already
did
that
number
one
has
been
approved:
number
two
Washington
Park,
Village,
rezoning
applicant
Pedro,
Gonzalez.
E
A
little
bit
on
the
background
of
this
project.
You've
probably
seen
it
multiple
times
here,
but
the
project
is
located
on
1.1,
Acre
Site
and
it's
part
of
the
Washington
Park
Subdivision,
which
includes
15
plotted
units.
The
properties
currently
developed
with
two
of
those
Town
Homes,
which
were
constructed
as
phase
one
of
the
originally
approved
development.
The
extent
of
the
project
is
to
construct
13
additional
Town
Homes
per
the
original
plot.
With
some
major
revisions
to
that
plot
and
site
plan,
the
site
went
through
multiple
rounds
of
rezoning
amendments
in
2006..
E
They
originally
approved
plan
in
2005,
included
the
15
town
homes
and
had
limited
retail
development
to
only
those
uses
currently
permitted
in
the
TCB
District,
which
is
Town
Center
Boulevard
District
in
2006.
The
applicant
requested
a
zoning
amendment
to
remove
the
TCB
restrictions
which
allowed
them
to
incorporate
seven
commercial
live
work
units
as
part
of
that
project.
The
project
was
on
hold
for
an
extended
period
of
time
and
then
in
2016
it
was
reinstated
and
two
of
the
proposed
units
were
constructed
as
part
of
the
phase
one
of
the
construction
in
2021.
E
The
project
was
sold
to
another
developer,
who
is
the
current
applicant
on
this
application,
and
the
new
owner
encountered
practical
difficulty
incorporating
those
live
work
commercial
units
into
the
residential
Townhomes
due
to
the
change
in
flood
maps
that
took
effect
in
August
of
2021,
so
the
live
work
units
they
require
commercial,
ADA
compliance
and
accessibility,
which
requires
longer
ramps
for
those
Ada
sidewalks.
In
addition,
the
marketability
of
the
live
work
units
may
be
difficult
due
to
the
locational
characteristics
of
this
project
and
its
proximity
to
the
residential.
B
E
Tcb
only
allows
residential
component
on
this
project,
so
under
the
current
zoning,
the
project
permits
a
mixed-use
development
with
residential
density
up
to
15
units
and
requires
a
commercial
component
to
be
incorporated
into
the
project
and
allows
up
to
one
point:
floor
area
ratio
for
the
commercial,
so
the
commercial,
so
in
other
words
the
regional
request
included
from
the
original
owner
to
add
this
commercial
component
to
the
site,
and
now
the
current
order
would
like
to
remove
the
commercial
component
from
the
site,
so
we're
technically
reverting
the
zoning
back
to
what
it
used
to
be
in
2006.,
and
all
of
this
is
due
to
the
marketability.
E
So
in
2006,
the
prior
owner
thought
that
live
work
units
is
something
new.
Something
is
going
to
go
after
that
project
and
they're
going
to
be
his.
You
know
sale
point,
unfortunately,
that
didn't
happen,
and
the
current
situation
was
the
location
of
this
project
being
surrounded
by
residential.
The
current
owner
is
really
looking
into
just
building
the
residential
units.
In
addition,
the
flood
maps
changed
and
the
commercial
component,
as
I
mentioned,
needed
to
be
elevated,
while
the
residential
you
could
use
it
for
Access
Park
in
your
storage
below
that
base
flood
elevation.
B
E
Minute,
so
this
is
just
an
official
request.
So
what
we're
changing
here?
We're
changing
from
Town
Center
commercial,
neighborhood
tccn
with
planned
unit
development,
which
is
a
pod
overlay,
Without
Youth
restrictions,
those
are
TCC
and
restrictions,
two
Town
Center
commercial,
neighborhood,
TCC
and
with
plan
unit
development,
overlay
and
TCB
use
restrictions.
The
use
restrictions
are
those
uses
permitted
in
the
Town
Center
Boulevard
zoning
District.
Only
on
this
slide,
you
will
see
the
updated
site
plan,
so
the
site
plan,
as
you
can
see,
still
includes
the
15
originally
approved
units.
E
It
has
improved
fire
Access
Lane
directly
on
Saint
Petersburg
Drive.
We
have
another
access
on
Washington
Street,
that
was
from
the
original
plan.
We
also
have
some
updated
floor
plan
and
revised
lot
lines
on
the
next
slide.
You
see
updated
plaid,
so
the
Plaid
addresses
existing
encouragement
issue
of.
B
E
One
and
two
that
were
constructed
as
part
of
Phase
One
Construction
so
both
of
those
units
they
have
encroachment
of
approximately
four
feet
into
the
common
area.
So
the
three
plot
will,
at
the
same
time,
address
this
encroachment
issue
and
also
it
includes
adjusted
lot
lines
to
accommodate
the
updated
site
plan.
So
the
unit
slightly
changed
on
the
new
plan.
E
So
the
rezoning
request
was
reviewed
against
the
11
conditions
outlined
in
section
3.15.3,
as
described
in
the
staff
report,
an
amendment.
This
amendment
meets
all
of
the
11
conditions
and
is
consistent
with
the
district
regulations,
the
Land
Development
code
and
the
comprehensive
plan.
I
can
go
in
the
details
of
all
of
those
11
conditions
if
needed
or
if
you
have
any
additional
questions.
E
But
at
this
time,
based
upon
the
above
discussion
and
review
against
the
section,
3.15.3
staff
recommends
that
the
city
council
authorized
the
City
attorney
to
prepare
an
ordinance
rezoning,
the
Washington
Park
Village
property
from
Town
Center
commercial
neighborhood
tccn,
with
a
planned
unit.
Development
overlay
without
use
restrictions
to
Town
Center
commercial
neighborhood
tccn,
with
a
planned
unit,
development
on
overlay
and
TCB
use
restrictions,
approval
shall
Beacon
shall
constitute
a
bind
Insight
plan
and
Zoning
overlay
of
the
subject
parcel.
E
If
a
building
permit
for
the
approved
development
is
not
secured
within
one
year
of
the
approval
set,
approval
shall
expire
and
Zone
in
shall
revert
to
the
underlying
District.
They
rezone
into
the
tccn
with
a
planned
unit.
Development
overlay
with
the
TCB
restrictions
will
require
the
applicant
to
record
the
master
development
plan.
Any
development
must
strictly
comply
with
the
recorded
Master
development
plan.
A
D
F
E
11
conditions
so
those
the
conditions
for
approval
for
any
rezoning
case
they
are
outlined
in
a
and
they
go
into
three.
They
start
on
page
three
and
it's
the
available
uses
to
which
the
property
may
be
put
are
appropriate.
So,
yes,
the
uses
are
appropriate
because
the
multi-family
development
is
permitted
by
tccn
and
is
also
permitted
by
the
TCB.
The
live
work
component
is
going
to
be
eliminated,
so
the
commercial
space
is
not
going
to
be
required
when
the
TCB
restrictions
are
going
to
be
removed.
E
So
this
a
regional
plan
and
colluded
15
units
and
it
had
two
cars
per
unit,
so
this
particular
product
will
have
three
car
garages
with
some
extended
porches
and
some
additional
guest
parking.
So
it
meets
the
district
regulations
for
parking
and
four-dimensional
characteristics.
The
applicant
is
asking
for
a
couple
of
variances
and
those
are
design
exceptions
mainly
to
just
accommodate
the
visitor
parking
I
believe.
So
the
visitor
parking
will
be.
E
The
amendment
will
not
consider
a
grant
a
special
privilege
to
an
individual
owner,
so
it
will
not
be
a
privilege
to
the
owner
because
we
add
these
restrictions,
zoning
restrictions
to
other
zoning
cases
on
a
regular
basis.
So
it
is
a
common
practice
to
add
zoning
restrictions,
and
here
we're
really
scaling
it
down.
So
we're
not
giving
more
we're
just
scaling
it
down,
so
it
used
to
be
more
intense.
Now
it's
less
intense,
there's,
no
commercial
component.
E
The
fourth
condition
is
the
amendment
will
not
conflict
with
the
needs
of
the
neighborhood
or
the
city,
and
the
amendment
will
not
conflict
with
the
needs
of
the
neighborhood
or
the
city.
The
subject
property
is
surrounded
by
residential
uses.
In
addition
of
the
the
least
traditional
Town
Homes
are
consistent
with
the
district,
so
they
will
bring
home
ownership
to
the
area
and
the,
as
I
mentioned,
the
majority
of
the
homes
around
our
residential
homes,
and
these
are
residential,
Townhomes,
there's
only
one
commercial
property
across
the
street.
E
E
So
again,
this
project
will
be
limited
to
traditional
town
homes
and
eliminate
the
live
work
component.
There
will
be
less
activity,
so
a
commercial
component
will
bring
some
activity,
but
this
is
just
residential
excuse
me,
and
the
amendment
will
not
deter
the
Improvement
or
development
of
other
property
in
accord
with
the
existing
zoning.
E
Regulations,
the
TCC
and
district
with
the
spot,
overlay
and
TCB
restrictions
and
the
updated
master
plan
are
compatible
with
the
surrounding
property
development
and
then
condition.
Seven
is
the
amendment
will
not
adversely
burden
public
facilities,
including
the
traffic
carrying
capacity
of
streets
in
an
unreasonable
or
disproportionate
manner.
So
there's
sufficient
potable
water
there
are
sufficient
sanitary
sewer
and
the
axis,
as
I
mentioned,
will
be
provided
from
both
Saint
Petersburg,
Drive
and
Washington.
E
In
addition,
on
Park
the
two
units
that
are
already
built,
they
have
access
walkable
access
from
Park
and
then
they
have
parking
off
of
Washington
and
then
we
have
two
more
conditions,
which
is
the
district
boundaries.
We've
already
mentioned
that
we'll
adjust
the
plot
of
the
two
units,
the
overbuild
of
the
two
units
in
the
common
areas.
So
the
plot
will
be
corrected
and
then
condition
number
nine.
E
The
amendment
will
result
in
enhancing
the
health,
safety
and
Welfare
of
citizens
of
Oldsmar,
while
this
particular
site
it's
been
vacant
as
long
as
I've
lived
in
Oldsmar
so
and
it's
going
to
be
an
improvement
in
the
area.
E
Unimproved
area
is
considered
blight
area
and
we
had
some
issues
at
that
site
with
recently
with
some
right,
so
I
believe
that
improving
the
site
with
Town
Homes
will
bring
stability
to
the
area,
especially
if
these
are
town
homes
that
are
owned
and
then
number
10
is.
The
amendment
will
further
the
express
purpose
of
the
Land
Development
code.
It
complies
with
the
Land
Development
code
and
the
amendment
will
not
in
any
way
deter
the
implementation
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
E
Architecture
probably
will
just
slightly
change
just
to
mimic
the
proposed
architecture,
because
they
can
only
do
so
much
with
it,
but.
E
Color,
probably
in
some
architectural
details,
will
have
to
work
out
at
the
site
plan.
Yes,
prior
to
the
final
site
plan
approval,
so
Council
will
have
to
vote
on
the
plot.
You'll
see
the
plot
one
more
time
in
here,
but
the
actual
site
plan.
That's
the
council
action,
so
the
master
development
plan,
the
elevations
detailed
elevations,
will
be
submitted
to
the
council
for
detailed
review.
This
is
just
kind
of
like
a
zoning,
the
first
step
just
to
remove
that
commercial
live
work
component
from
the
design
concept.
E
Correct
and
they
will
have
to
provide
accessible
route
to
that
commercial
space
that
has
to
meet
a
certain
slope
and
the
site
is
constrained.
It's
only
one
acre,
so
those
ramps
are
pretty
lengthy
because
of
the
new
FEMA
flood
maps.
The
elevation
there
is
12.
E
B
Just
one
you
were
talking
about
the
visitor
parking
on
St
Pete
Drive,
yes,
is
that
all
going
to
be
for
visitors
of
the
complex
or
not
so.
E
E
C
I
I
wouldn't
have
thought
that,
but
okay,
my
turn,
it
was
your
turn.
It's
been,
it's
been
a
while
since
I've
been
by
this
property,
but
if
I
remember
there
was
a
Structure
on
the
corner
of
Park
and
Saint
Pete
and
it's
some
kind
of
a
business
lumber
for
some.
What
what
is
a?
What
is
it?
There's.
E
No
on
the
existing
site,
there's
a
little
house
well.
C
H
E
Parkinson
Pete
there
are
two
new
units
that
are
billed
and
then
the
residential
home,
so
it's
all
surrounded
by
residential
Parkinson,
Pete
or
Washington,
and
St
Pete.
E
C
Don't
get
me
started
what
yeah
you
said
that
yeah
I?
It
is
basically
it
it
pretty
much
an
empty
lot
there,
and
this
would
be
an
improvement.
They
sure
aren't
they
going
to
take
down
a
beautiful,
huge
oak
tree,
though
it's
probably
been
there
for
no
telling
how
many
years
I
mean
it's
just
huge,
but
so
I
hate
to
see
that
go.
C
So
this
is
already.
This
is
already
there.
So
it's
three
stories
and
it's
already
there.
So
my
next
question
was
going
to
be
which
I
didn't
know
these
were
there.
The
next
question
is
going
to
be
height
requirements.
There
are
they
you
know.
Obviously
this
is
the
new
ones
that
you
showed
us.
Pictures
of
the
elevations
of
a
while
ago
are
going
to
meet
the
height
requirements.
C
C
With
this
rendition
that
we're
looking
at
here,
it
looks
like
it
has
a
total
of
maybe
four
garage
doors
or
two
garage
doors
and
two
other
types
of
doors.
Are
we
looking
how
many
units
are
we
looking
at
in
this
rendition
here.
E
C
C
H
Have
any
questions?
Is
there
any
sort
of
timeline
just
out
of
curiosity
building's
going
to
be
done.
E
So
as
soon
as
we
approve
the
site
plan,
the
site
plan
is
in
the
final
stage
of
the
review
right
now.
As
long
as
the
plot
is
in
Con
in
compliance,
so
they
will
then
submit
for
the
vertical
construction.
So
that's
gonna,
probably
take
at
the
county
for
the
plans
review
six
to
eight
months.
I
would
think
so
you
never
know
until
you
see
the
shuffle
there
yep.
E
E
Occupied
or
not,
this
District
allows
well
permanent
if
it's
town
homes
they
have
to
be
owner
occupied,
but
we
do
have
Provisions
for
rentals
as
well
in
the
Land
Development
code.
So.
A
F
End
again,
I'm.
Okay,
thank
you.
Let's
talk
about
the
barriers,
can
you
kind
of
describe
what
the
barriers
with
the
property.
I
G
A
G
G
I
Again,
the
the
elevation
is
conceptual.
You
know
we're
I've
worked
with
this
type
of
project
before
where
we
have
to
blend
in
you
know
product
with
an
existing
product
and
existing
HOAs,
so
the
product
that
was
built-
it
has
a
you
know-
has
a
design
of
the
year
it
was
built.
You
know
we'll
make
an
effort
to
try
to
you
know
blend
in
as
much
as
possible,
but
we
want
to
meet
today's
standards
and
the
direction
that
the
you
know
that
oldsmars
you
know
moving
towards
in
that
area.
I
So
again,
once
we
have
site
plan
approval,
then
we'll
design
specific
to
the
actual
product
you
know
for
for
the
site
plan.
G
C
You
good
question
sorry
when
looking
at
the
the
tracks
here,
it's
like
Jim
was
talking
about.
It
looks
like
there's
some
like
duplexes,
oh,
which
one
other
question.
You
said
the
the
rendition,
the
the
rendition
that
we
were
looking
at
a
while
ago
and
I
was
asking
questions.
That's
on
that's
two
units.
C
Else
I
know
it's
not
fine,
okay,
all
right
in
the
other.
The
other
units
here
is
there.
It
looks,
there's
a
space
between
some
of
them,
a
small
space
and
there's
some
kind
of
a
some
there's.
Some
writing
there.
That
tells
me
what
it
is
or
what
but
I
can't
read
it
it's
too
small.
But
what
is
in
between
those
units?
Well.
I
Like
we're
talking
about
there'll
be
some
detached
units,
so
even
though
the
you
know
they'll
be
fairly
limited
setbacks
between
the
units,
they
will
be.
Actually
you
know
single
family
detached,
so
you
know
there'll
be
side
yards
Landscaping,
whatever
the
requirements
are
that
will
meet.
You
know
at
the
time
that
we
submit
for
final
final
approval.
Okay,.
C
Surrounding
those
as
well,
okay,
I
think
that's
all
I
got
yeah.
Thank
you,
of
course,.
H
Of
course,
there
have
been
any
kind
of
study
as
to
the
effect
the
traffic
wise
with
the
addition
of
those
people
in
the
neighborhood.
It.
I
Was
an
original
traffic
study
I
believe
you
know
the
the
density
Remains,
the
Same,
you
know
so.
There's
no
changes
here
to
the
unit
count
and
I
suspect
with
the
down
you
know
the
down
zoning
to
residential
versus
commercial
would
reduce
whatever
the
traffic
impact
was
before,
even
though,
of
course,
the
Market's
growing.
But
you
know
from
our
side
we're
you
know
we're
going
down
to
residential
and
that
would
reduce
parking
traffic
counts.
Etc.
H
Have
you
done
any
any
other
building
within
Oldsmar,
not.
I
I
Will
be
yeah,
I
think
what
you'll
see
the
next
meeting?
It's
questionable,
whether
that
pool
is
going
to
survive
the
site
plan,
it's
small,
it's
tight
and
I.
Think
we've
had
some
pushback
on
it
already
with
with
internally.
So
it
remains
to
be
seen
whether
it'll
actually
make
it
to
the
final
site
plan
proposal.
A
The
there
will
be
actually
two
driveways
on
St
Pete
Drive,
the
existing
one
and
this
new
one
with
the
multiples
and
the
new
modality
concept
on
Saint
Pete
Drive
allows
for
the
angular
parking,
which
will
allow
for
visitor
parking.
First
come
first
serve
at
Tatiana
alluded
to
earlier,
which
are
represented
in
these
little
diagonal
lines
along
here.
A
So
that's
a
good
thing,
because
we've
got
that
problem
already
and
the
the
rear
of
the
building
there's
no
conceptual
on
it,
because
you
still
haven't
done
finished
conceptual.
We
see
what
the
front
looks
like,
but
we
won't
see
the
fronts,
though
only
the
owners,
the
residents,
will
see
the
fronts
we'll
see
the
backs
going
down.
St,
Pete,
Drive,
so
I
think
that.
D
I
The
reality
is
they
it,
you
know
with
the
driveway,
you
know
probably
most
likely
be
what
I
call
rear
loader
alley
load
products.
So
in
fact
the
street
most
likely
will
see
the
front
of
the
house,
and-
and
you
know
the
garage
entrance,
the
garage
will
be
on
the
back
side,
so
be
alley
load
type
of
type
of
product.
So.
A
I,
don't
know
yet
we
haven't
gotten
yet,
but
I
have
no
further.
Questions
now
comes
we'll
open
the
put
any
anyone
finals.
Any
final
questions.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Public
hearing
I
opened
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
wish
to
speak
to
this
issue.
We
have
please
come
to
the
podium
and
name
and
address.
Please.
A
A
J
Record
Nathan,
Rivera,
411,
Park,
Boulevard,
Baltimore,
Florida
I
just
have
slight
concerns,
I
mean
obviously
anything
like
this
is
better
for
the
city.
It's
good
to
not
have
an
empty
lot.
It's
in
that
have
an
issue,
but
my
property
borders
this,
and
these
are
three
stories.
Looking
directly
into
my
backyard
in
my
pool
and
I
have
three
little
children
I,
just
wonder
if
maybe
there'd
be
a
fence
put
up
something
bordering
in
between
would
be
nice.
J
I
mean
it
almost
looks
as
though
one
on
this
screen
I'm,
showing
here,
is
right
on
my
back
property
line
as
in
it
looks
four
feet
away.
Maybe
so
I
have
that
issue.
I
have
the
issue
with
the
driveway
will
be
facing
directly
into
the
back
of
my
house,
so
I'm
gonna
get
car
lights
shining
into
my
house,
I
already
kind
of
get
car
lights
from
the
current
two
that
are
there
with
the
drive
just
the
way
they
pull
in
and
the
angle
so
I
mean
those
are
my
main
issues.
J
J
Don't
want
people
in
my
yard,
I
already,
not
that
it's
an
issue
for
me:
I'm,
not
an
a-hole,
but
I
have
neighbors
from
the
two
that
are
built
there
now
who
let
their
dogs
out
and
their
dogs
come
into
my
yard
and
they
pee
on
my
screen
pool
enclosure
as
it
is,
and
I
don't
go
out
there
and
I
don't
yell
at
them,
because
I
just
I'm,
not
that
kind
of
person,
but
it's
still
an
issue.
It's
still
something
that
happens
or
dogs
poop.
In
my
yard.
J
It
is
what
it
is
the
world
you
know
stuff
happens,
but
if
I
can
alleviate
some
of
these
issues,
especially
because
some
of
these
may
end
up
being
rented
and
I,
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
in
there.
I
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
in
them.
I,
don't
necessarily
want
them
to
have
access
to
my
backyard,
where
my
three
little
kids
are
playing,
so
a
fence
would
be
nice
could
alleviate
a
lot
of
my
issues,
but
it's
up
to
you
guys.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
I
I
Talk
about
site
plan,
approval
and
product-
you
know,
I
can
say
right
now
that
I
understand
that
you
know
the
you
know
weird
in
my
opinion,
gonna
this
site
plan
is
an
improvement
to
the
prior
site
plan.
The
product
is
going
to
be
a
better
product
there.
You
know
it'd,
probably
be
in
our
own,
our
buyer's
interest
to
have
a
fence
in
place
anyways,
but
again,
right
now,
I
haven't
really
thought
that
far
ahead,
you
know
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
reselling
and
a
you
know
a
site
plan.
A
I
F
A
H
D
D
Okay,
the
Luz
2203
recommended
city
council
author
to
authorize
the
City
attorney
to
prepare
an
ordinance
is
approved
as
presented
with
704
and
zero
again.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Everyone
next.
A
A
D
A
Yeah
you're
right
I
did
yeah
I
left
the
place.
That's
because
I
have
political
aspirations.
Anybody
want
to
be
chair,
don't
you
I,
don't
wear
a
skirt.
The
wind
won't
help
Ross.
F
G
A
I'm
willing
to
wave
this
thing,
some
more
I
I
came
right
back
to
me.
Thanks
to
Kathy's
sweet
little
cheat
sheet.
D
B
A
A
C
G
It
I
moved
to
adjourn
absent,
I
just
didn't
know.
Second,
somebody
said
I'll.
Second,
your
name
I
can't
move
anything.
Okay,.