►
From YouTube: Administrative Appeals Board | Mar 23 2022
Description
Regular meeting of the City of Palm Springs Administrative Appeals Board, held March 23rd, 2022
A
That
goes
in
your
favor.
It
is
up
to
you
if
you
would
like
us
to
hear
your
case
now
or
push
it
to
next
month.
A
A
A
Probably
got
a
message
that
this
is
being
recorded,
so
my
name
is
Mike
panessa
I
am
the
chair
of
the
administrative
appeals
board
good
evening
to
everybody
hereby
call
the
regular
meeting
of
the
administrative
appeals
Board
of
March
23rd
2022
to
order
board
secretary.
Could
you
please
call
the
roll.
B
D
A
We
knew
Vice,
Chair
King
was
not
going
to
be
or
Kane
sorry.
It
was
not
going
to
be
here
and
we'll
proceed
with,
as
I
mentioned,
we
do
have
a
quorum
with
four
and
just
so
we're
clear,
Mr
Hedrick
will
be
voting
tonight
all
right.
Our
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
acceptance
of
the
agenda.
The
board
can
discuss
and
may
amend
the
order
of
the
agenda,
but
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
and
a
second
for
acceptance
of
the
agenda
so
moved.
A
Second,
thank
you
board
secretary.
Could
you
please
take
the
vote.
D
A
You
Mr
Sinclair,
you
are
muted,
so
we're
assuming
we
can
understand
you
all
right.
We're
gonna,
move
on
next
item
is
public
comment.
This
time
is
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
board
on
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter,
jurisdiction
of
this
board.
The
three
minutes
will
be
assigned
to
each
speaker.
Although
the
board
values
your
comments
pursuant
to
the
brown
act,
the
board
generally
cannot
take
any
action
on
any
item
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
D
E
Hi
everybody,
it's
just
a
quick
one.
Just
to
let
you
know,
the
city
council
is
going
to
start
reviewing
data
about
vacation
rentals
on
March
29th
in
a
working
session
and
I'm.
Also
asking
you
to
please
make
sure
you
have
made
some
time
and
allowances
to.
E
A
You
and
Monique:
can
you
kind
of
make
a
note
of
that,
because
I
believe
you
have
the
various
components
that
we
have
offered
up
over
the
last
probably
a
couple
of
years.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
number
three.
It
is
the
appeal
of
a
two-year
suspension
of
the
vacation
rental
registration
certificate
for
the
property
located
at
1350,
South
Farrell
drive
and
an
administrative
fine
of
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
board
secretary.
Could
you
please
ensure
that
the
city
staff
and
the
appellant
understand
that
their
testimony
is
under
oath.
D
F
F
Yes,
good
evening,
chair
board
members
attendees
on
call
this
evening.
My
name
is
Patrick
Clifford
with
the
Department
of
special
program
compliance
and
we
oversee
the
vocational
rental
program
here
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs.
The
staff
report
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
regarding
a
property
located
at
1350
South
Farrell
drive
here
in
Palm
Springs.
F
It
was
found
at
this
property
had
received
three
violations
within
a
12-month
period,
with
the
first
citation
issued
on
June
30th
2021,
a
second
citation
issued
on
July
31st
2021
and
the
third
citation
issued
on
October
9th
2021.
F
With
that,
pursuant
to
our
Municipal
Code,
we
did
Issue
a
letter
of
suspension
for
the
vacation
rental
certificate
for
a
period
of
two
years.
The
code
officers
that
did
Issue
the
citations
are
on
this
call
this
evening
code
officer
Wade
is
the
code
officer
that
issued
a
third
citation
that
then
set
for
the
path
of
suspension
and
he
is
available
to
give
his
testimony
on
the
findings
and
I'd
like
to
offer
him
a
chance
to
testify
things.
F
G
Officer
Dustin
Wade
for
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
on
October
17
2021
at
2,
51
PM,
the
vacation
rental
hotline
received
a
complaint
regarding
too
many
cars
parked
at
the
location.
I
arrived
at
the
property
at
302
pm
and
observed
the
property
from
the
street
in
front
of
the
location,
a
violation
for
the
number
of
cars
parked
in
the
driveway
was
clearly
observed.
There
were
five
cars
parked
in
the
properties
driveway
and
the
home
is
registered
as
a
four
bedroom
allowing
them
for
vehicles.
G
I
contacted
the
occupants
and
asked
to
speak
with
the
responsible
renter.
After
a
few
moments,
the
person
identified
as
the
responsible
renter
came
to
the
door
and
I
explained
the
complaint,
and
my
observations
I
attempted
to
issue
a
citation
to
the
responsible
renter
and
was
then
advised
that
they
were
not.
There
I
followed
up
with
the
local
contact
for
the
property
and
he
stated
that
he
would
send
the
identification
of
the
responsible
Runner
to
me
via
text.
G
A
All
right,
thank
you
anything
further
from
the
city.
F
A
You
why
don't
we
go
through
the
board
for
questions
to
the
city,
Mr
Hedrick?
Do
you
want
to
start.
I
I
G
It
would
be
it
wasn't
citable,
because
I
didn't
have
anybody
to
issue
a
citation
too.
Therefore,
the
citation
for
failure
to
get
identification
went
to
the
owner
all.
A
So
and
I
have
a
kind
of
a
question
related
to
that.
So
had
the
the
local
contact
gotten
back
to
you
with
ID
on
that
renter,
the
citation
would
have
been
for
too
many
vehicles
correct,
correct.
A
And
that's
is
that
one
of
those
citations
we
haven't
had
a
lot
of
citations
for
cars.
Is
that
one
of
the
citations
that
actually
goes
to
the
renter?
Even
though
the
house
gets
a
strike
correct.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
I,
don't
have
any
further
questions
at
this
time.
I'd
like
to
open
the
appeal
hearing,
the
appellant
is
invited
to
speak
for
up
to
10
minutes.
Any
members
of
the
public
who
desire
to
speak
on
this
appeal
hearing
shall
have
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak.
If
a
member
of
the
public
testifies,
the
appellant
will
be
given
the
provided
a
time
for
a
rebuttal
for
up
to
two
additional
minutes,
a
board
secretary.
Could
you
please
begin
the
public
testimony
period.
C
Okay,
my
name
is
Chris
reddaway.
Thanks
for
having
me
on
I
appreciate
you
providing
the
opportunity
for
the
appeal
I
I
sent
through
to
the
board.
I'm,
not
sure.
If
you
all
received
it,
I
do
have
a
copy
of
the
renter's
ID.
A
C
Okay,
so
we
I
do
have
an
ID
present
for
that
renter.
C
Had
in
place
at
the
time
has
since
been
let
go
and
replace
by
someone
which
we
deemed
much
more
professional
than
what
was
in
place
at
the
time.
I
do
take
full
ownership
for
having
a
property
manager
in
there.
That
was
learning
some
of
the
rules
from
the
city
perspective
and
actually
didn't
have
my
personal
contact
information
on
file,
because
this
was
a
VRBO
rental.
Everything
was
documented
driver's
license
on
file
credit
card
on
file
contact
information
on
file
for
the
renter,
but
I
did
not
know
about
that.
C
I
went
through
the
property
manager
who
obviously
didn't
follow
through
with
me,
even
though
I
had
the
identification
and
that's
present
in
the
evidence
submitted
to
each
of
you
that
you
should
have
in
front
of
you
and
then
from
a
a
renter's
perspective.
Once
again,
I
I've
been
very
good
about
contacting
and
getting
a
hold
of.
Whoever
is
there.
So
if
there
is
something
that
we
need
to
do
to
make
sure
that
we're
abiding
by
city
laws,
we
always
want
to
be
doing
that.
This
is
my
sole
extra
vacation
property.
C
And
everything
that
we
need
to
be
doing
to
be
a
a
body
of
citizen
of
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
and
also
providing
everything
that
we
need
to
to
the
city
and
staying
within
the
codes
and
ordinances,
but
I
I
never
heard
from
from
anyone.
During
this
time.
I
just
ended
up
getting
a
citation
which
is
unfortunate
because
I
feel
like
I,
could
have
fixed
this
very
quickly
as
I
had
all
contact,
information
and
ID
information
for
the
renter
and.
C
Think
it
was
officer,
Wayne
I,
think
you
said
if
the
ID
was
present
and
I
could
have
gotten
that
to
you,
then
there
would
have
been
a
violation
for
the
cars.
If
someone
would
have
been
able
to
get
a
hold
of
me
and
we
could
have
someone
move
those
cars
or
reduce
it
down
to
four
cars,
would
there
still
been
a
violation.
G
C
So
so
from
that
perspective,
then,
if
you're
saying
that
there
was
an
ID
present
and
there
would
still
be
a
violation,
I
mean
I.
As
far
as
from
an
explanation
standpoint,
what
I
can
tell
each
of
the
board
members
here
and
anyone
present
on
this
phone-
is
that
we've
taken
extra
measures
to
make
sure
that
this
would
never
ever
happen
again.
In
fact,
we've
we've
engaged
luxblock
agency.
We
pay
them
a
management
fee
to
make
sure
that
we've
also
installed
nestable
decibel
noise
alarms
at
the
property
inside
and
outside
the
property.
C
They
have
extra
surveillance
on
on
the
property
from
a
multiple
people,
monitoring
the
property
on
a
daily
basis.
If
someone
is
staying
there,
just
so,
no
one
ever
has
a
noise
violation
at
this
property.
Ever
again,
we've
also
increased
the
documentation
that
people.
E
C
To
sign
when
they
actually
rent
the
property
stating
that
there
will
be
absolutely
no
noise
outside
of
the
property
anybody
inside
the
property,
they
need
to
stay
below
a
certain
decibel
level.
So
that
way,
if
everything
comes
close
to
obtaining
outside
hearing,
so
we've
really
upped
our
processes
all
the
way
around
from
our
ranking
perspective,
to
ensure
to
the
city
and
anyone
else
from
a
neighboring
perspective
that
we
we
care
about,
we
don't
want
to
disturb
them
at
all,
and
we
once
again
this
is
not
a.
C
This
is
not
something
that
we
take
very
lightly.
This
is
a
an
income
source
for
me
and
my
family
that
I
want
to
take
very
seriously
and
have
taken
very
seriously,
and
unfortunately,
you
know
the
property
manager
we
had
previously
was
a.
He
was
a.
C
And
contractor
of
barns
that
I
think
it
was
his
first
foreign
to
property
management
and,
and
we
found
out
pretty
quickly
as
you
can
see,
a
lot
of
these,
these
citations
are
pretty
condensed
into
a
couple
month.
Time
frame,
he
just
wasn't
on
top
of
things,
and
so
we
had
to
learn
and-
and
we
figured
that
out
and
we
understood
that
we
needed
to
go
in
a
different
direction
as
soon
as
possible
to
make
sure
that
that
we
could
set
the
right
precedent
for
the
future
and
not
let
this
happen
again.
C
My
question
for
you
just
from
a
documentation,
standpoint:
I
know
you
went
to
the
property
and
says
you
saw
noise,
but
I
noticed
on
item
327.
There's
no
decimal
reading
staking.
Did
you
take
a
decimal
reading
when
you
were
there.
K
Chairperson,
if
it's
appropriate
to
answer,
is
it
all
right,
go
ahead
sure
so,
due
to
the
timing
of
that
particular
complaint
in
my
observation,
it
was
a
high
traffic
period
coming
through
feral.
As
you
know,
that's
a
main
artery
artery
thoroughfare
in
the
city,
so
I
wasn't
able
I
wasn't
able
to
get
accurate
decibel
readings
because
of
the
vehicular
traffic
throughout
my
observation
period,.
C
A
So
if
I
can
make
a
comment
here
officer
not
not.
L
A
If
you
can
comment
on
this,
when
it
comes
to
music,
a
decibel
reading
is
not
required.
It
is
a
a
yes
or
a
no.
If
they
can
hear
music,
it's
an
automatic
citation.
Is
that
correct.
K
Yes,
that's
correct,
really
and
that's
a
that's
a
a
rule
that
is
more
restrictive
at
vacation
rental
properties
than
it
is
for
a
property.
That's
not
a
registered
vacation
rental.
So
yes,
it's,
whether
it's
audible
at
the
property
line
or
not
audible
at
the
property
line.
We
do
the
accompanying
decibel
readings
as
more
of
a
point
of
reference
for
informational
purposes,
but
it
doesn't
factor
into
whether
or
not
a
violation
was
observed
or
not.
C
K
So
you
weren't
issued
a
citation
for
a
noise
violation.
You
were
issued
a
citation
for
a
violation
of
the
vacation
rental
ordinance
525070g,
which
is
music
audible
at
the
property
line,
so
they're
they're
they're,
two
separate
things.
C
Okay,
I
mean
that
that's
all
that
I
have
I
mean
I'm,
just
looking
at
kind
of
the
factual
evidence
that
I
have
here
once
again,
all
I
can
say
is
that
I?
You
know
I'm
trying
to
be
humbled
to
the
board
here
and
let
you
know
that
I'm
trying
to
do
everything
in
my
power
to
make
sure
that
this
never
happens
again
and
I
would
hope
that
you
grant
us
the
ability
to
try
to
do
that
and
make
sure
that
we
do
it
right
and
create.
Obviously
the
right.
C
You
know:
tax
revenue,
Etc
that
comes
from
the
vacation
property
to
go
to
the
city
and
I
am
very
happy
to
abide
by
every
single
rule
possible
there,
and
the
measures
that
we've
taken
are
above
and
beyond.
Anything
we've
had
in
place
with
these
citations
took
place,
and
that's
my
commitment
to
the
city,
so
I
I
hope
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
to
continue
this
and
do
it
the
right
way
and
make
sure
that
we
we
don't
come
back
to
this
situation
again.
A
Excuse
me
anything
further
Mr
right
away.
No!
Thank
you
all
right!
So
then,
next
it
will
be
actually
board
secretary.
Is
there
anyone
from
the
public
that
wanted
to
speak
on
this
case.
A
Right,
thank
you
very
much
so
at
this
point
we'll
see
if
the
board
has
any
questions
for
the
Appellate,
why
don't
I
go
in
reverse
Mr
Vasily
I
noticed
you
have
joined
us.
Are
you
up
here
for
his
the
entire
testimony.
A
A
Okay,
Mr
Sinclair.
I
C
C
I
M
D
E
C
A
H
Do
you
know
how
many,
during
the
six
months
that
you
had
this
property
manager,
how
many
rentals
you
had
during
that
period.
H
Thank
you.
Yes,.
H
A
J
C
A
So
on
the
and
I'm
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
this
stuff
on
the
permit
application,
when
you
put
his
name,
you
made
it
that
he
was
the
contact
for
the
city
is
that
is
that
accurate.
C
That's
not
coming
to
find
out
that
I
should
not
have
been
doing
right
with
it
with
the
new
Property
Management
that
we
have.
They
are
the
primary
contact,
but
my
my
contact
information
I
mean
we
haven't
done
short-term
rentals,
but
we
would
have
myself
on
there
as
an
immediate
contact
that
will
handle
anything
but
I
understand
what
you're
saying
yeah.
A
So
and
yeah
so
I
guess
yes,
thank
you.
My
my
point
is
that
you
chose
to
have
him
as
the
contact
now
I
understand.
The
city
requires
a
local
contact
for
incidents,
but
it
was
that
property
manager
that
you
chose
so
I
guess
I'm,
responding
to
your
testimony
that
the
city
didn't
reach
out
to
you
when,
in
fact,
you
asked
the
city
to
reach
out
to
your
property
manager.
A
C
But
obviously
we
got
that
second
violation
on
July
31st,
and
so
after
that
we
started
putting
measures
into
place
even
further
Beyond
with
you
know,
a
noise
decibel
alarm
and
then
actually
making
sure
that
we
had
more
constant
contact
with
the
renter
that
was
in
place
and
actually
having
a
document
that
stated
all
the
different
roles
associated
with
staying
at
the
property,
including
parts,
and
that
was
supposed
to
be
presented
to
the
renter
upon
check-in
and
check
out.
And
so
we.
B
C
Additional
process
I
actually
paid
quite
a
bit
through
a
through
a
lawyer
here
locally
to
produce
a
document
that
people
would
have
to
sign
as
a
renting
perspective
as
an
additional
check-in
balance,
above
and
beyond
what
they
were
doing
through
Airbnb
and
VRBO.
So
I
was
doing
that
prior
and
then
that
third
violation
around
the
cars
came
and
I'm,
not
sure
why
that
happened,
because
we
tried
to
take
extra
procedures
to
make
sure
that
that
never
happened
and
I
can't
speak
for
the
property
manager.
C
A
And
I
guess
you
know
just
a
little
commentary
on
my
part.
You
can
go
through
all
of
this
effort
and
sometimes
guests
still
don't
care.
I
mean.
Unfortunately,
the
homeowner.
The
permit
holder
pays
the
price
for
that
I.
C
Agree,
I
can
tell
you
another
thing,
just
I
guess
to
add
to
that,
just
things
that
you
learn,
because
this
was
our
first
four
into
it.
You
know
the
property
manager.
Originally,
you
know
he
was
telling
us.
You
know
we
should
be
doing.
You
know
two-day
rentals.
C
I've
come
to
find
out
that
I
think
you
do
that
you
attract
the
wrong
crowd
right
and
so
we've
actually
switched
to
at
least
a
five
to
seven
day
minimum.
If
we
were
to
do
this
again,
probably
more
like
a
seven
day
and
get
people
that
actually
are
coming
there
to
enjoy
the
area
and
the
property
and
not
just
coming
to
the
party
right
and
I
I.
Think
that's
another
thing
that
we
learned
as
well.
That
is
going
to
be
part
of
our
further
going
process.
If
allowed
the
ability
to
okay.
A
Any
board
members
any
questions
for
Mr
Hedrick.
Please.
H
Ms
tremway
well,
first
for
the
Alan.
How
many
bedrooms
does
this
have.
B
H
So
miss
tremway
I
it
it's
my
understanding
that
during
the
day
you're
allowed
to
have
a
certain
number
of
extra
people
is
that
correct.
F
I
can
be
happy
to
answer
that
yeah.
D
F
You
are
allowed
additional
people
during
the
day
additional
four,
in
this
case
it's
a
four
bedroom,
so
there's
allowed
to
be
two
guests
per
bedroom
for
overnight
an
additional
four
during
the
day.
That's
not
including
two
children
that
are
under
the
age
of
as
12
or
13.
I
have
to
look
it
up,
but
minor
children,
but
yeah.
You
can
have
four
additional
guests
during
the
day.
H
A
All
right,
thank
you,
so
does
the
city
have
any
additional
testimony,
Mr
Moses.
B
B
We
have
the
discretion
to
say
well,
they
had
a
a
an
agent
who
didn't
perform
and
they
didn't
it's
not
their
fault.
If
they
had
a
you
know,
can
we
say
that
I
don't
think
yeah.
A
Can
I
can
I
actually
ask
you,
let's
it's
a
good
question
and
I
don't
want
to
lose
it,
but
let's
save
that
until
after
the
testimony
and
part
of
our
discussion
but
I
think
it's
a
good
question
and
I
don't
want
to
lose
it.
So
at
this
point,
does
the
city
have
any
response
to
the
testimony
that
was
presented.
A
Thank
you
so
then,
at
that
point,
at
this
point
we
will
close
the
open
discussion,
part
of
the
appeal
and
now
this
is
the
time
for
the
board
members
to
discuss
and
now
let's
go
to
Mr
Moses's
question
so.
B
J
Well,
the
municipal
code
and
I
found
this
section.
It's
5.25.050
on
agency
subsection
a
and
that
really
holds
the
owner
responsible
for
everything
like
the
buck
stops
at
the
owner.
Even
if
there
is
an
agent
the
fail,
it
actually
says
the
failure
of
an
agent
to
comply
with
this
chapter,
she'll,
not
relieve
the
owner
or
the
owner's
obligations
under
the
provisions
of
the
chapter.
J
So
the
city
wanted
the
the
owner
to
be
ultimately
responsible,
and
then
you
know,
perhaps
there
could
be
some
sort
of
civil
action
between
the
owner
and
the
property
management
company,
a
breach
of
contract
issue
or
or
something
like
that.
But
the
city
wanted
ultimately
to
have
the
owner
responsible.
A
All
right
so
discussion
amongst
the
board.
Why
don't
we
start
with
Mr
Hedrick.
A
Okay,
Mr
Moses
any
other.
What
discussion.
I
L
Silly
I
I
also
agree
with
the
statement
that
was
just
made
as
well.
I
think
it's
ultimately
the
homeowner.
Unfortunately,
that
has
to
bear
the
consequences.
A
Okay,
it
sounds
yeah,
like
you
know.
The
the
discussion
anyway
is
that
and
we,
like
Mr
Sinclair,
has
said
we
have
been
in
this
position
many
times
where
a
property
manager
is
really
not
doing
their
job.
A
I
A
A
A
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
your
time.
This
case
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
next
case,
and
that
is
the
appeal
of
a
two-year
suspension
of
the
vacation
rental
registration
certificate
for
the
property
at
2825,
East,
Verona
Road
and
the
administrative
fine
of
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
board
secretary.
Could
you
please
ensure
that
the
city
staff
and
the
appellant
understand
that
their
testimony
is
under
oath.
D
Free
stuff,
appellants
and
any
other
individual
who
desires
to
speak
or
to
testify
under
this
appeal
hearing
under
the
laws
of
perjury.
If
you
choose
to
speak,
you
hereby
accept
and
acknowledge
that
your
testimony
shall
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth,
and
when
it
is
your
turn,
please
begin
your
testimony
by
stating
your
name
I.
Do.
M
A
Great
at
this
time,
I
would
like
to
ask
for
the
staff
report.
F
Yes
good
evening,
thank
you,
chair
board
members
attendees
on
the
call
this
evening.
My
name
is
Patrick
Clifford,
with
the
Department
of
special
program
compliance.
We
oversee
the
vacation
rental
program
here
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
and
before
you
this
evening,
is
a
staff
report
regarding
property
located
at
2825,
East
Verona
Road.
F
Here
in
Palm
Springs,
it
was
found
that
this
property
attends
three
citations
or
violations
within
a
12-month
period,
the
first
violation
on
June
20th
2021,
the
second
violation
on
September
13
2021
and
a
third
citation
on
the
same
day,
September
13
2021
for
failing
to
submit
contract
summaries.
F
K
So
good
evening,
members
of
the
board,
fellow
City
staff
and
members
of
the
public
joining
us
for
tonight's
hearing,
my
name
is
Mitch
navahan
and
I'm,
a
co-compliance
officer
for
the
city
of
Palm
Springs.
So
there
were
two
separate
citations
issued
as
a
result
of
my
response
on
September
13
2021,
one
that
went
to
the
renters
and
one
that
was
subsequently
issued
to
the
property
owners.
So
those
were
citations
three
and
two.
K
In
the
afternoon,
I
arrived
at
the
property
at
1,
58
PM,
where
from
the
street
in
front
of
the
property,
a
violation
for
music
outside
be
on
the
property
line,
was
observed.
In
addition
to
being
able
to
clearly
identify
the
source
of
the
music,
the
song
being
played
was
also
identified.
Using
my
department
issued
mobile
cellular
device
and
was
documented
in
my
report,
included
in
attachment.
K
5
is
item
426,
which
has
been
redacted
I
contacted
the
occupants
at
the
front
door
and
briefly
discussed
the
complaint
that
was
received
and
the
observe
violation
with
the
renters.
The
identified
responsible
renter
stated
that
they
were
told
that
they
could
listen
to
music
as
long
as
they
kept
the
volume
low
I
issued
the
guests,
a
good
neighbor
brochure
and
briefly
discussed
the
contents
within
related
to
the
rules
that
vacation
rental
properties,
I
also
educated.
The
guests
on
the
specifics
related
to
the
rules
for
music
and
the
rules
for
noise
in
general.
K
I
then
issued
the
citation
for
music
and
advised
the
guests
that
further
observed
violations
could
result
in
the
issuance
of
additional
citations
so
related
to
the
citation
that
was
issued
to
the
property
owner
for
failure
to
submit
a
contract.
Summary
prior
to
my
response
to
the
complaint
for
music
at
the
property.
I
conducted
a
brief
search
to
the
city's
cloud-based
record-keeping
database
and
was
unable
to
locate
a
submitted
contract
summary
while
contacting
the
guests
at
the
property.
K
A
second,
more
detailed
check
for
submitted
contract
summary
was
conducted
upon
arrival
back
at
my
workstation
after
completing
my
response
to
the
call
and
found
that
there
was
no
contract
summary
on
file
for
the
current
guest
day.
So
I
know
this
has
come
up
a
few
times
in
the
last
few
meetings,
but
to
detail
a
little
bit
about
how
I
search
for
a
contract
summary.
The
brief
search
before
my
response.
Obviously
times
of
the
essence
whenever
we
get
a
complaint
and
the
city's
goal
is
to
respond
in
person
within
30
minutes.
K
K
So
his
first
search
by
the
address
is
a
street
number
address
and
if
that
doesn't
yield
any
results.
I
then
revert
to
the
the
city
ID,
which
is
unique
to
every
property.
As
you
know,
some
properties
share
the
same
numerical
address,
and
so
that's
why
the
second
search
that's
done
is
done
with
the
CID,
which
is
unique
to
each
individual
property.
K
The
the
search
functionality
is
not
the
greatest,
so
that's
why
we
don't
always
base
those
citations
based
off
of
that
brief
search.
The
second
more
detailed
search
happens
when
we
actually
download
all
of
the
available
submitted
contract
summaries
and
it
downloads
them
in
bunches
of
10
000
submissions,
and
so
it
breaks
it
up
into
multiple
Excel
files
and
through
that
we
can
open
the
data
in
Excel
and
filter
out
through
specific
addresses,
and
we
can
see
the
record
of
submissions.
K
So
that's
the
the
more
detailed
search
that
we
do
and
then
obviously
we
go
back.
I
go
back
for
the
entire
year,
so
sometimes
that's
filtering
through.
You
know
many
thousands
of
submissions,
because
it's
every
single
registered
vacation
rental
property
that
has
submitted
a
contract
summary
for
their
stay,
so
just
wanted
to
kind
of
provide
that
to
you.
I
know
I
I
touch
on
it
in
in
my
narratives,
but
that's
just
to
kind
of
give
you
some
more
information
related
to
that.
K
A
Thank
you
so
we'll
open
it
up
to
questions
from
the
board
to
the
city
staff.
Why
don't
we
start
with
Mr
Hedrick?
No.
A
I
just
have
I
think
one.
So,
looking
at
the
information
we
were
provided
that
third,
it
looks
like
the
city
reached
out
to
this
homeowner
a
couple
of
times
about
contract
summaries.
Is
that
accurate.
F
Yes,
chair
I
can
answer
that.
Well,
the
first
interaction
really
comes
from
our
application,
where
they
initial
and
they
acknowledge
that
contract
summaries
have
to
be
submitted,
as
well
as
the
kind
of
like
welcome
email
that
our
staff
sends
when
we
grant
them.
You
know
permission
to
start
operating
which
shows
the
link
of
the
tool
where
to
go
to
submit
contract
summaries.
Additionally,
though,
we
did
on
a
letter
dated
August
4th
2021,
which
is
attachment.
F
Nine
in
your
packet
identified
that
this
property
did
not
submit
a
contract
summary
for
the
month
of
April,
2020
I
believe
and
we
sent
them
a
specific
letter
addressed
to
them,
noting
that
no
contract
summaries
were
submitted
for
April
2021.
My
apologies
as
if
I
said,
2020
April
2021.,
so
this
was
found
at
this
property
did
not
submit
contract.
Some
reason
this
was
a
a
specific
email
to
the
property
owner
themselves
and
so
included
with
that
letter,
provided
that
it
we
pulled
up
a
contract,
summary
history
and
it
does
look
there
like.
F
F
Yes,
so
for
when
we
send
out
these
letters,
we
found
what
we
do
is
we
do
a
overall
audit
of
the
property
profiles
and
then,
if
we
find
it
here
in
the
office,
we
do
allow
them
to
go
and
basically
retroactively,
submit
the
contract
summaries
that
we
think
are
missing,
and
so
our
property
files
can
be
updated
and
reflected
accordingly
and.
A
A
And
then,
finally,
when
you
allow
an
owner
to
retroactively,
submit
contract
summaries,
that's
kind
of
a
unique
thing
you
do
on
a
one-off
basis.
Is
that
correct?
Because
that's
not
available
to
the
general
population
of
permit
holders.
A
A
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
open
the
appeal
hearing,
the
appellant
is
invited
to
speak
for
up
to
10
minutes.
Any
member
of
the
public
who
desires
to
speak
on
this
appeal
hearing
shall
have
up
to
three
minutes.
If
a
member
of
the
public
chooses
to
speak
on
this
appeal
hearing,
the
appellant
will
have
the
opportunity
for
a
rebuttal
for
up
to
two
additional
minutes
support
secretary.
Can
you
please
begin
the
public
testimony
period.
D
N
Yeah
hi,
hello,
hello,
yeah,
go
ahead,
please
my
name
is
my
name
is
Manel
I'm
I'm
here
as
a
representative
folks,
the
owner
I'm,
also
the
property
manager
of
the
property,
so
yeah
I
think
that
we
had
an
issue
with
well
basically,
two
years
right.
The
first
one
is
the
the
situation
with
the
fines
for
the
for
the
noise
and
the
these
two
runs
right
that
we
we
changed
everything
after
that.
N
After
this
happens,
we
take
two
measurements
and
we
added
some
things
in
the
house
like
noise
hour,
noise,
detectors
and
cameras,
and-
and
you
know
we
did
some
measurements
in
the
house
and
also
we
changed
the
property
manager,
because
we
had
some
I
think
I'm
misunderstooding
or
something
happens
with
the
with
the
contract
summarize.
So
this
is
the
the
second,
the
second
part
of
the
of
the
situation,
and
then
we
we
also
have
a
legal
department
dealing
with
this
contact
summarize
right
now
and
and
making
sure
that
this
is
not
happening
again.
N
But
I
think
that
there
was
something
you
know
that
that
some
emails
or
something
happens
with
the
owner,
which
is
your
server-
that
never
went
through
in
regards
the
contacts
to
my
eyes,
or
something
like
that,
so
there
was
something
you
know
that
happens
with
this.
A
A
N
No
as
far
as
I
as
far
as
we
change
now
again,
I
submit
a
noise,
basically
a
plan
that
we
made
right
now
so
right
now
we
are
managing
like
as
a
company
I
managing
like
15
properties,
around
California,
right,
Big,
Bear,
Joshua
3,
also
in
Miami.
So
basically
we
have
two
property
managers
during
already
like
24
hours,
monetarizing,
all
the
noises,
all
the
we
have
noise
detectors
in
all
the
houses
right,
so
in
order
to
make
sure
that
there
is
no
parties,
there
is
no.
N
These
two
answers
to
the
neighbors
right
now
we
have
like
two
noise
detectors
in
each
house,
one
indoor
and
one
other,
and
we
are
constantly
monitorizing
the
noises
in
the
houses
as
well
come
at
us
right
to
make
ensure
that
you
know
there
is
no
more
than
than
the
guests
will
authorize
it
and
then
also
with
these
two
property
managers
that
we
have
right
now,
24
hours,
we
make
sure
that
check.
N
We
can
check
all
the
reservations
we
we
don't
accept
one
day
reserve
one
day,
reservation
or
last
minute
reservations
in
order
to
avoid
these
kind
of
parties
and
also
always
making
sure
that
the
the
guests
are
more
than
21
years
and-
and
you
know
all
their
occupants-
have
food
reviews
in
their
profiles,
and
you
know
we
make
sure
that
we
don't
bother
anyone
in
the
neighbors
because
for
for
us
you
know,
it's
super
important
to
to.
You
know,
keep
the
the
calm
in
the
neighbor
and
don't
water
no
one
around.
N
So
that's
something
that
I
really
want
to.
You
know
to
to
bring
here
that
we
change
everything
in
this
house
and
you
know
we
are
not
gonna
allow
this
happens
again
for
sure.
A
All
right,
thank
you
is,
and
I
don't
want
to
cut
you
off.
Is
that
sorry
anything
additional
okay?
So,
at
this
point
we'll
open
it
up
to
questions
from
the
board
to
the
appellant?
A
Benjamin,
if
you
want,
you
have
three
minutes.
M
Yes
actually
I'm
an
attorney
representing
the
homeowner,
so
yeah
I
mean
Mr
aguasil,
laid
out
pretty
much
a
lot
of
the
main
factual
points
that
we
wanted
to
address
with
the
board
here
today.
As
far
as
the
noise,
we
completely
understand
the
city's
very
valid
concerns
on
that
issue.
To
that
effect,
I
submitted
a
nuisance
prevention
plan
that
was
submitted
to
the
board
last
week.
M
In
that
we
detailed
the
changes
that
the
owner
has
made
to
deal
with
noise
problems,
specifically,
noise
detectors,
operated
by
noise,
aware
these
are
programmed
to
have
various
thresholds
throughout
the
day
which
can
be
adjusted
as
needed.
Furthermore,
because
the
property
owner
is
not
always
physically
present
here
in
the
valley,
we
have
local
Property
Management
that
is
available,
24
7,
to
address
issues
immediately
before
the
city
would
have
to
get
involved.
M
Ideally,
and
furthermore,
we
also
made
some
changes
to
the
lease
agreement
and
that
addendum
was
provided
to
the
board
as
well,
stating
specifically
that
violation
of
the
noise
ordinance
here
in
Palm
Springs
would
be
grounds
for
immediate
eviction.
As
to
the
issue
of
contract,
summaries
I
believe
Mr
Augusta
can
talk
in
more
detail
about
this
factually.
N
Yeah,
that's
correct
exactly
exactly
so.
There
was
something
you
know
something
missing
with
some.
You
know
something
in
the
email
or
something
he
was
in
the
plane
and
he
was
playing
with
Spain
and
something
happens
and
that's
why
it
didn't
work
through
the
the
email
or
something
yeah.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Anything
additional.
M
A
Right,
thank
you.
So
at
this
point
we
will
open
it
up
to
the
board
to
ask
questions
of
the
appellant
and
why
don't
I
start
with
Mr
basily
I.
Don't
have
any
questions
right
now,
all
right,
Mr,
Sinclair.
M
I
should
clarify:
I
was
not
retained
by
Mr
Correo
perriero
at
that
time.
I
do
not
know
if
he
had
legal
counsel
at
that
time.
I.
M
N
No,
no
yeah
yeah.
The
thing
is
that
you
say:
I
was
pretty
new
in
in
all
these.
You
know
us
with
this
property,
and
you
know
it
was
a
pretty
new
mother
for
him.
So
he
was
you
know
he
was
pretty
new
in
this
and
then
you
know
he
learned
and
now
that's
why
he
has.
You
know
a
legal
department
and
everything
dealing
with
this
right
now.
A
Right,
we'll
save
that
for
discussion
time,
Mr
Hedrick.
H
No
questions.
Thank
you.
A
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
so
Mr
aguasil,
you
are
the
property
manager,
not
the
owner.
Is
that
correct,
yeah,
okay
and
as
the
property
manager?
When
did
you
start
managing
this
property.
A
Okay,
so
were
you
managing
it
when
they
received
the
citation
for
in
September
for
contract
summaries.
N
No,
at
this
moment
so
I
mean
I
was
not
involved
in
this
property.
I
I
worked
for
the
owner
doing
another
things,
but
I
was
I
was
helping
him
with
some
things,
but
I
was
not
dealing
with
the
property
full
time.
So.
N
He
had
someone
like
his
assistant
and-
and
she
was
dealing
with
with
everything-
okay.
A
N
Well,
we
have
someone
someone
else
that
is
gonna
basically
work.
Full-Time,
like
we
have
a
legal
department
which
is
gonna,
be
dealing
with
this
matter
from
moving
forward
right.
N
A
That
was
in
charge
of
kind
of
meeting
all
of
the
city's
various
requirements
exactly.
N
As
I
said,
it
was
a
you
know,
pretty
new
situation
for
for
joseba,
and
you
know
he's
he
has
now
like
someone
full-time
dealing
with
these
models.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
all
I
had
does
the
city
have
any
rebuttal
to
the
testimony
that
was
presented.
F
Nothing
further
chair,
I
was
looking
up,
maybe
to
help
answer.
Questions
of
who
was
what
we
have
on
file
as
a
local
contact
at
that
time.
I
do
have
that
available
if
you're
interested
in
that,
but
if
not,
you
know
I'll
be
happy
to
share.
If
you
are.
F
The
local
contact
that
we
have
on
file
is
a
Jorge
araga
and
Anna
Gomez,
and
that's
current
as
of
today.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
If
there
is
no
more
questions
for
the
appellant,
we
will
close
the
appeal
hearing
and
at
this
point
it
is
a
discussion
time
for
the
board.
Mr
Moses.
Do
you
want
to
go
first,
yeah.
B
A
A
So
I
guess
you
know
from
my
perspective,
is
you
know
the
city
goes
through
some
pretty
great
pains
to
make
sure
you
know,
there's
a
local
person
there's
somebody
responsible.
They
make
the
whoever's
applying
for
the
permit
initial
all
of
these
places
that
they
know
what
the
requirements
are.
A
It's
disturbing
to
me
that
there
was
nobody.
The
owner
had
nobody
in
place
to
take
care
of
these
and
had
multiple
notices
of
no
contract
summaries-
and
you
know
we
have
been
through
this
before
that
is
pretty
serious
to
the
city's
compliance
Department.
A
So
all
right
is
there.
Unless
anybody
else
on
the
board
has
any
other
discussion
points.
Does
someone
want
to
make
a
motion
in
a
second.
I
A
Okay,
board
secretary,
can
you
please
call
the
vote.
A
No
Mr.
B
B
B
A
A
All
right,
thank
you,
everybody!
So
Mr.
Are
you
still
that
what
just
happened
was
the
board
voted
to
uphold
the
fine
and
suspension
you'll
get
official
notification
or
whoever
the
local?
The
contact
is
that
the
city
has
will
get
official
notification
from
the
city,
so
there
will
be
a
two-year
suspension
in
short-term
rentals
that
does
not
preclude
them
from
doing
what
is
a
long-term
rental
from
the
city's
definition,
but
the
board
has
uphold,
upheld
the
suspension.
So
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
your
time
and
efforts.
A
We're
gonna
move
on
to
the
next
item,
and
this
is
an
item
I'm
sorry.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
set
aside
for
General
comments,
announcements,
requests
of
the
staff
and
or
other
issues
of
concern
from
the
members
of
the
administrative
appeals
board.
Does
anybody
have
anything.
A
A
Right,
thank
you
and
finally,
is
time
set
aside
for
the
city
clerk
for
any
updates.