►
From YouTube: Architectural Review Committee | Apr 19 2022
Description
The City of Palm Springs Architectural Review Committee meeting, held April 19th, 2022
A
C
B
A
B
A
Steve
all
in
favor
all
right
any
opposed.
Okay,
since
this
is
a
public
meeting
audience
members
are
permitted
to
comment
on
any
issue
that
is
within
this
committee's
purview.
Comments
on
an
item
appearing
on
today's
agenda
are
made
at
the
time
that
that
item
is
presented.
If
you
would
like
to
speak
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
today's
agenda,
you
may
speak
now.
Each
sprinkler
shall
have
three
minutes.
C
A
A
I
see
none
the
approval
of
the
minutes
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
consent
calendar.
That's
item
number.
One
item
number
two
on
the
consent
calendar
is
atlas
sign
for
for
beyond
hello,
dispensary,
requesting
a
sign
application
for
the
installation
of
new
signage
located
at
4765
east
ramon.
Road
item
number
three:
on
the
consent.
Calendar
is
front
signs
for
pineapple,
express
dispensary,
sign
application
for
the
installation
of
new
signage
located
at
695,
south
williams.
Road.
A
D
D
Mock
is
looking
to
dress
up
the
building
significantly
at
28
24
81,
north
penn
canyon,
so
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
this
property.
It
also
has
the
mural
on
the
side
that
we
in
planning
here
referred
to
as
the
sunglass
lady,
so
that
is
also
part
of
the
the
of
their
proposed
exterior
changes
is
to
refresh
and
maintain
the
existing
mineral
per
a
mural
permit.
That
was
processed,
I
believe
in
2015
they're,
also
proposing
to
add
an
exterior
stairwell
that
will
go
up
to
a
rooftop
deck.
D
They
are
also
proposing
this
rooftop
shade
structure
that
also
exceeds
30
feet
building
height,
but
the
code
also
allows
for
an
a
measurement
of
18
inches
above
the
curb
height
or
curve
of
the
street
crown
of
the
street.
Rather,
whichever
is
available
so
the
applicant
had
given
me
a
curb
height,
that's
actually,
four
inches
below
the
finished
floor
of
the
building,
so
we're
set
with
that
31,
the
total
height
for
the
shade
structure.
D
D
And
these
are
the
existing
photos,
so,
as
you
can
see,
it
will
be
quite
an
improvement
that
they
are
proposing
for
this
building.
It
is
will
also
part
of
this
project
is
also
encompassing
a
change
of
use
because
currently
they
are
apartments
on
the
second
floor,
but
it
will
become
effectively
a
an
office,
suite
kind
of
a
share
of
the
suite
type
of
use
very
similar
to
750
north
palm
canyon,
but
just
on
a
much
smaller
scale.
D
E
D
C
A
C
A
A
couple
of
questions
I
have-
and
I
don't
know
they
kind
of
need
to
be
answered
by
the
applicant-
there's
a
new
roof,
shade
structure
and
on
the
elevation
that
shows
posts,
but
on
the
plan
there
are
no
posts
showing
and
just
a
fairly
faint
dotted
line.
That
kind
of,
I
guess,
indicates
the
edge
of
that,
but
I
think
we
need
more
detail
on
that
on
the
color
and
material
board.
It
calls
out
a
wooden
ceiling,
but
I
don't
see
that
indicated
on
the
elevations
or
on
the
floor
plan.
C
A
A
question
if
that
one
stairway
going
up
to
the
roof
gives
enough
egress
for
fire
or
if
two
stairs
would
be
required
and
then
looking
at
the
site
plan
in
the
south
west
corner
of
the
building,
which
would
be
then
the
southeast
corner
of
the
parking
lot.
There's
a
little
area
shown
and
it
calls
out
new
rope,
lights,
custom,
planters
and
custom
bench.
A
E
D
That's
a
condition
from
planning
that
they
have
to
maintain
the
mural,
just
as
it
was
approved,
color
and
everything,
and
it's
part
of
the
conditions
of
approval
and
the
mural
actual
mural
approval
of
of
maintenance.
So
there's
a
maintenance
schedule
and
the
the
new
building
owner
will
maintain
that
schedule.
E
Okay
and
that's
that's
part
of
the
executed
requirements
or
the
documents,
it's
it's
an
ongoing
maintenance
program,
so
it
will
always
look
good.
That's
correct!
Okay!
Okay!
I,
when
you
look
at
the
elevations
a
dominant
feature
is
the
dark
color,
and
I
think
that
I
agree
with
tom
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see.
What's
going
on
in
the
coordination
between
plan
and
elevation,
when
it's
it's
just
it's
it's
it,
it
looks
like
it
would
be
aesthetically
successful,
but
there
are
some
things
that
don't
match.
E
The
other
thing
also
is
that
if,
if
it
is
a
requirement-
and
I
think
it
is
to
put
in
at
least
one
handicapped
space
there-
that's
going
to
have
kind
of
a
profound
effect
on
the
on
the
parking
that
that's
just
going
to
cost
some.
It
looks
like
it's
down
to
the
inch
now
so
anyway.
Those
would
be
my
conclusions.