►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting Part 1 | December 12, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
C
D
G
C
C
People
who
have
and
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
many
items
we
will
get
through
by
the
noon
break,
but
there
are
a
number
of
items
that
I
don't
anticipate
we
will
get
to
until
the
afternoon.
The
question
really
with
the
agenda
is:
is
there
a
a
finite
number
of
items
we
should
go
through
before
the
break,
so
that
people
who
are
here
will
know
that
when
their
items
might
come
up?
Madam.
G
Chair,
it's
difficult
to
anticipate
the
amount
of
discussion
that
will
occur
with
each
item.
I
would
guess
just
based
on
past
experience
that
we'll
be
able
to
get
two
items
to
F
or
two
G
before
noon
and
with
the
remainder
of
the
items
coming
up
after
our
noon
break.
What
I
would
recommend
is
that
we
have
public
comment
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
C
C
H
I
C
Okay,
this
is
the
time
for
public
comment.
This
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
consent,
calendar
and
other
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
Please
note
that
the
Planning
Commission
is
prohibited
from
taking
action
on
items
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
Three
minutes
will
be
allowed
for
each
speaker
for
people
who
intend
to
remain.
C
You
should
know
that
items
to
a
b,
c
d,
e,
f
g
h,
I
j,
k
and
L-
are
all
public
hearing
items
so
that
you
may
address
the
Commission
on
these
items
now
or
you
may
wait
till
the
public
hearing
and
you'll
have
another
chance
to
address
the
Commission.
The
public
hearing
is
now
open.
Any
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
come
forward.
Please
do
so.
I
The
one
started
out
saying
the
quality.
Many
of
us
value
most
in
the
Coachella
Valley
and
Palm
Springs
is
our
mountains.
Andreas
hills
where
the
pinnacle
point
project
is
located,
sits
in
a
bowl
surrounded
by
this
beauty.
You,
as
a
Planning
Commission,
have
been
the
stewards
of
maintaining
our
mountainside
beauty.
We
are
asking
you
today
to
continue
your
protection
of
our
natural
beauty.
This
project
does
not
attain
the
level
of
standards
expected
by
the
citizens
of
PS
and
we
seek
denial
in
reviewing
the
project.
I
understand
the
developer
has
met
many
of
their
concerns.
I
There
are
still
questions
in
looking
at
the
end,
the
grading
plans
and
the
even
the
dimensioning
plants.
It
seems
to
have
selective
dimensioning
there's.
Not
every
dimensional
line
is
not
filled
in
the
planter
bed.
That
was
added
at
the
back
edge.
The
pool
I
believe
is
it
intended
to
soften
the
break
between
the
open
space
and
the
pool
turns
out
it's
a
thin
line,
that's
planted
with
barrel
cactus
and
it's
still
a
7
foot
drop
off
from
the
based
on
the
grading
plan.
It's
a
7
foot
drop
off.
It
appears
in
the
renderings.
I
Retaining
walls
have
been
brought
down
to
six
feet,
but
there's
still
a
general
concept
of
this
house
on
this
site
does
not
seem
to
be
appropriate
for
the
hillside
lot
that
it
sits
on
in
looking
at
an
aerial
view
down
to
the
house,
you've
got
a
swimming
pool
and
a
wall
of
glass
facing
south
you've
got
sunlight
coming
in
reflecting
on
to
glass
onto
the
sitting
area.
This
is
just
not
a
comfortable
space
to
be
sitting
in
as
a
custom
home
in
a
custom
home
neighborhood.
I
There
has
also
been
some
submittals
in
your
package
regarding
some
of
the
letters
that
an
approval
that
was
submitted
from
the
president
of
the
Pinnacle
Point
HOA
and
a
another
letter
describing
some
of
the
contentions
of
the
other
owners
within
the
development,
so
I
hope
you
have
a
chance
to
look
at
that.
Thank
you.
F
Good
morning
my
name
is
Paula.
Auburn
I've
been
a
resident
of
Palm
Springs
since
1999
when
I
first
spoke
about
this
project,
which
is
the
Pinnacle
Point
project
and
I'm
not
able
to
stay
until
this
afternoon.
So
I'll
make
my
remarks
now.
It
was
to
the
advisory,
architectural
Advisory,
Committee
and
philosophically
I'm
against
hillside
development
period.
I
understand
that
these
homes
will
be
built,
so
my
remarks
will
be
contained
to
that.
I
am
concerned
about
environmental
impact.
F
Not
only
this
appear
environmental
impact
for
a
building
on
a
hillside,
but
also
for
the
aesthetic
impact
tourism
is
our
driving
economy.
Here,
ecotourism
is
one
of
the
fastest
growing
sectors
of
that
people
come
to
look
at
our
magical,
mystical
mountains
if
we
build
on
them
or
if
we
allow
projects
such
as
this
to
go
forward
which
are
not
high
quality
and
not
of
good
architectural
design
and
that
do
not
fit
into
the
landscape,
we
will
be
impacting
in
a
negative
way.
F
Our
tourism
industry,
particularly
as
that
ecotourism
grows
I'm
concerned
about
this
fitting
into
the
character
of
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
Is
it
something
that
fits
in
with
what's
been
done
in
other
housing
developments?
Does
it
fit
in
with
the
quality
of
the
three
existing
homes
in
reading
through
all
of
the
staff
reports
and
tracking
this
project
I've,
nicknamed
it
a
ping-pong
ball
project,
because
it
has
been
back
and
forth
and
back
and
forth
so
many
times
that
I
had
to
ask
myself?
F
F
F
Did
the
developer
go
to
the
HOA,
which
is
an
existing
HOA
for
the
homes
that
are
already
built,
or
does
the
developer
in
fact
control
that
HOA
that
any
proposal
on
his
part
that
he
had
been
to
the
HOA
for
any
approvals
is
in
fact
a
bogus
claim,
and
he
was
a
point.
I
would
like
to
defer.
Ask
you
to
defer
to
what
the
neighborhoods
and
the
neighborhood
organizations
in
that
area
would
like
to
see
done
and
that
you
give
preference
to
that.
Thank
you.
I'm
sorry,
I
ran
over.
B
Hi
I'm
Tom
Ford
again
I'm
gonna
keep
looking
down
because
I
get
a
little
flustered.
Each
I
might
come
here
so
I'm
in
the
neighborhood
and
we're
not
out
to
get
the
developer
and
but
once
he
leaves
we
are
the
ones
that
have
to
look
at
these
houses
for
the
rest
of
our
lives.
Literally
so
again,
I'd
like
to
just
go
over
the
things
that
the
neighbors
on
my
street,
which
more
would
like
and
some
of
the
changes
I
see,
have
happened.
B
B
But
what
we'd
like
is
landscaping
to
be
natural,
like
the
existing
houses,
especially
on
Fayette
south-facing
slope,
which
I've
sees
put
in
that
the
overhang
that
he
has
in
the
back,
which
my
house
faces
south
too
and
he's
got
way
a
lot
bigger
windows
of
me
than
me.
It's
not
practical
not
to
have
an
overhang
on
that
side
for
the
people
that
live
there,
because
that
space
will
be
unusable,
that
we
keep
to
the
low
level
lighting
consistent
with
the
dark
skies,
ordinance
that
the
landscaping
in
front
be
more
naturalized
with
no
semicircles.
B
None
of
that
just
more
naturalized
to
blend
into
the
mountains
that
the
color
of
the
house
blend
into
the
hillside
that
the
I
don't
know.
If
the
engineering
on
that
pool
that
slope
right
now
from
the
last
rains,
this
little
back
slope
is
starting
to
erode.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
building
a
safety,
but
someone
should
look
about
with
that
pool
and
there's
some
foot
retaining
wall
with.
What's
going
on
with
some
of
the
erosion
that's
happening
right
now,.
B
Hi
I'm
Linda,
McAlister
and
I'm
here
to
support
the
people
that
have
just
spoken
on
this
pinnacle
development
and
I'm,
a
homeowner
I've
been
in
Palm
Springs
for
about
15
years,
and
we
all
moved
here
for
a
certain
type
of
beauty
and
untouched
beauty
of
the
mountains.
I'm
also
for
development,
but
controlled
development
and
I
think
you've
heard
some
very
specific
things
that
the
developer
hasn't
provided
and
I
urge
you
not
to
approve
this
project
until
you
get
those
things
and
we
have
a
more
complete
project.
B
Morning,
everybody,
my
name,
is
William
Mills
I'm,
the
owner
and
founder
of
next
level,
vaping
located
right
next
to
hair
of
the
dog
I've
known
Larry
in
them
for
some
time
now,
great
stand-up
guy
here
the
dogs
been
an
iconic
bar
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
for
a
very
long
time.
We
all
know
that
I'm
actually
really
excited
to
have
him
as
a
neighbor.
Hopefully
you
guys
will
see
the
same
thing
that
I'm
seeing
right
now
and
keep
that
tradition
alive,
not
that
much
of
a
good
speaker
but
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
C
I
Affordable
housing,
it
sounds
like
I'm
jumping
around
portable
housings
important,
we're
passionate
about
it.
We
believe
that
mandates
should
be
met
and
even
exceeded
density
bonus,
I'm
talking
about
that,
because
a
highly
sensitive
cultural
site
that
I'm
talking
about
I'm,
a
member
of
architectural
enthusiasts,
we
identify
as
a
tribe
because
of
our
passion,
our
innate
passion,
about
that.
So
a
tribe
isn't
always
identified
by
its
DNA,
the
Wexler
steel
frame
homes.
There
is
a
low
I
mean
a
portable
housing
project
being
proposed
there,
where
they
want
to
apply
the
density
bonus
that
I
understand.
I
The
importance
of
this
density.
Bonus
I
understand
why
the
state
has
implemented
it,
but
my
concern
is
that
it's
not
used
at
the
cost
of
negatively
impacting
such
a
historically
cultural
site
as
architecture
here
in
Palm
Springs.
Right
now,
as
I
speak,
there's
a
billboard
on
the
10
freeway
with
an
advertisement
for
modernism
week.
Its
sole
imagery
is
one
of
the
Wechsler
folded
roof
homes.
I
It
drives
tourism,
a
very
critical
sector
of
tourism
that
brings
to
Palm
Springs
the
identity
we
use
in
our
motto,
a
place
like
no
other
architecture,
is
important
in
Palm,
Springs
and
I'm
just
concerned
that
density
bonuses
could
be
used
in
places
that
could
negatively
impact
such
important
sites
here
in
Palm,
Springs,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
those
are
considerations
here
and
going
forward
when
applying
those
density.
Mrs.
thank.
J
C
C
G
H
Page
4
or
5
of
the
minutes
of
that
of
October
24th
under
public
hearings,
item
2
way.
Second,
paragraph
I'm
gonna
do
some
rewording
of
this
I
think
it
misstated
my
my
my
problem
was
here
because
I
I've
raised
this
issue
several
times.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
the
right
issue
listed
here.
The
second
sentence
should
read:
he
thinks
they
need
to
look
at
standards
for
physically
detached
on
a
common
condominium
lot
within
multifamily
zoning
as
a
separate
item
for
future
Commission
review.
H
C
K
C
It
passes
six
with
one
six
zero,
with
one
abstention:
okay,
public
hearing
items,
loss
moving
on
to
two:
a
Las
Palmas
brewing
on
behalf
of
Larry
and
Connie
Graham
weaith
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
for
a
cocktail
beer
lounge,
an
accessory
brewery
at
461,
North,
Palm,
Canyon,
Drive,
Stafford
alert.
Please,
and
do
we
have
additional
materials
on
this?
C
C
L
L
The
applicant
intends
to
operate
a
brewery
nanobrewery,
as
well
as
a
beer
tack,
room
offering
a
selection
of
beer
and
wine
from
their
own
selection,
as
well
as
others
with
other
various
from
other
various
breweries,
and
they
do
intend
to
offer
a
selection
of
coffee,
tea
and
packaged
snacks
that
there
will
be
a
total
of
17
indoor
seats.
20
outdoor
seats
at
the
rear
of
the
business
and
5
seats
in
front
of
the
business
their
operation
would
be
from
12
noon
to
12
a.m.
daily.
L
The
site
currently
contains
no
parking.
So
that
is
an
issue
that
we
have
addressed
in
the
report.
As
you'll
note,
on
page
5
of
your
report,
staff
prepared
a
of
the
requirements
of
the
business
as
it
relates
to
the
downtown
parking
combining
zone
with
respects
to
the
seating,
as
well
as
a
variance
that
was
granted
in
1963
for
this
site,
granting
a
waiver
of
4
parking
spaces.
With
the
total
proposed
seating.
The
requirement
is
to
have
a
total
of
seven
point
four
spaces
with
the
waiver
of
four
spaces:
three
spaces.
L
L
The
payment
would
be
required
of
seven
thousand
two
hundred
and
thirty
three
cents,
so
that
is
a
condition
that
staff
is
recommending
as
a
part
of
its.
The
draft
resolution
before
you,
staff
also
reviewed
this
application
with
the
fire
and
police
departments,
and
the
fire
department
has
responded
with
some
additional
requirements
that
would
be
required
or
that
they
are
recommending
primarily
related
to
the
adding
fire
extinguishers,
posting
occupancy
limits
and
some
other
fire
safety
protections
at
the
business.
L
L
L
The
conditions
that
I
would
like
to
just
draw
your
attention
to
in
the
resolution
relate
to
the
brewing
aspect
of
the
business,
so
staff
has
establish
appeal
into
in
the
draft
resolution
in
regards
to
the
brewing
on
site.
The
intention
here
is
to
essentially
allow
an
accesory
brewing
facility
and
not
allow
a
full
established
brewing
operation.
So
we
have
added
peel
into
to
limit
the
amount
of
barrels
that
would
be
created
annually
to
1,000,
so
the
additional
requirements
related
to
odor
and
gas
so
that
there
are
no
obnoxious
odors
emitted
or
detected
from
the
business.
L
The
African,
as
far
as
entertainment
goes,
does
not
intend
to
have
live
bands,
but
they
do
have.
They
do
intend
to
have
music
in
the
background
for
the
interior
of
the
business,
so
we
do
have
a
condition,
and
here
PL
and
5
to
ensure
that
they
are
in
compliance
with
the
noise
ordinances.
So
that's
PLN,
5
an
administrative
condition
10.
With
respect
to
the
decibel
limits.
L
L
As
I
noted,
you
did
receive
some
additional
photographs
from
one
of
the
commissioners
so
that
that
commissioner
may
wish
to
address
the
Commission
with
some
additional
items.
It's
with
respect
to
maintaining
or
upgrading
the
the
frontage
of
the
building,
and
you
did
receive
an
email
from
a
neighboring
property
owner
regarding
the
proposed
business.
So
staff
responded
to
the
questions
for
from
that
email
and
I
did
note
that
his
correspondence
would
be
provided
to
you
today.
So
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have,
and
that
concludes
my
report
before.
L
L
So
question
regarding
noise
and
as
I
noted
in
my
presentation,
the
business
intends
to
have
essentially
background
noise
on
the
interior
of
the
building,
so
that
would
not
be
an
issue
with
respects
to
odor
the
Afghan
has
described.
The
potential
of
odors
in
his
letter
and
staff
has
also
recommended
a
condition
to
prohibit
any
odors
that
are
obnoxious
of
any
kind
in
respects
to
parking
I.
Believe
we've
addressed
that
with
the
D
requirement
to
pay
in
lieu
parking
fees.
L
In
response
to
the
garbage
request
for
garbage
our
question
on
garbage
the
Afghan,
there
is
no
intention
to
add
any
additional
garbage
bins.
There
are
receptacles
at
the
rear
of
the
business
and
those
would
be
the
applicant
would
take
those
to
the
trash
and
closures
in
the
nearby
parking
lot
and
then,
lastly,
in
respects
to
the
grease
trap,
there
will
be
no
grease
trap
for
this
business
nor
kitchen.
That
would
require
additional
improvements
to
the
building
or
result
in
removal
of
grease
from
the
site.
C
D
D
L
For
typically
in
a
manufacturing
district,
you
may
have
some
odors
that
result
from
a
larger
scale
operation
and
the
size
of
this
operation
is
what's
known
in
the
industry
as
a
nano
brewery.
So
it's
much
much
much
less
than
what
you
typically
might
see
in
some
sort
of
more
industrial
areas.
So
that's
again,
why
we've
limited
it
to
1,000
barrels?
The
ABC
has
allowances
for
60,000
barrels
or
more
or
60,000
barrels
or
less.
L
So
this
is
much
much
much
smaller
than
that,
but
there
is
some
potential
for
emitting
of
steam
and
that
is
may
results
for
the
process
and,
and
the
afternoon
may
be
able
to
explain
this
better.
But
based
on
my
discussions
with
the
applicant
that
the
smell
is
not
obnoxious
and
it's,
it's
will
not
be
obtrusive
for
the
area
and.
D
C
L
Well,
we
would
contact
the
African
to
notify
them
that
there
are
some
concerns
with
this
issue
and
if
there's
any
remedies
that
they
may
consider
to,
where
you
know,
remove
the
odors
or
the
smell,
then
we
would
go
that
path
and
ultimately,
if
it
become
a
noose,
it
became
a
recurring
nuisance.
The
Commission
has
authority
to
recommend
councils
revocation
of
the
permit.
I
have.
D
L
D
D
M
B
D
C
D
D
Okay,
so
I
thought
I
got
the
answer
that
but
I'll
ask
it
anyway,
yeah
my
honest
site,
inspection
I
noted
that
the
store
facade
is
in
is
in
very
bad
condition.
Its
dilapidated
and
I
recommended
some
I'm
recommending
some
changes
of
that,
and
under
was
conditions
or
finding
II
mmm-hmm
finding
he
would
we
be
able
to
condition
the
C
of
P
on
something
like
that.
Yes,
all
right!
Thank
you.
Other.
K
A
question
regarding
parking:
what
is
the
historical
tradition
with
respect
to
areas
in
the
central
business
district,
where
you
have
just
a
few
numbers
that
lacking
based
on
the
code?
Is
it
discretionary
with
respect
to
the
Planning
Commission
of
the
city,
to
allow
a
payment
in
lieu
fee
for
the
missing
parking
spaces,
or
is
it
is
it
mandatory?
I
mean
if
there
are,
if
it's
under
a
certain
threshold
like
this
is
three:
must
we
allow
the
applicant
to
pay
in
lieu
of
parking
spaces,
or
can
we
do?
L
However,
the
council
has
adopted
a
process
by
which
applicants
can
make
that
payment,
and
so
it's
it
is
the
up
to
the
discretion
of
the
Commission.
If
this
is,
if
the
Commission
rejects
to
the
proposal
and
the
applicant
or
excuse
me,
the
property
owner
would
then
have
to
find
a
tenant
that
would
meet
current
requirements
or
not
exceed
the
downtown
parking
combining
zone
allowances
for
the
four
spaces
that
they
have
essentially
been
waived.
K
K
G
Chair,
let
me
just
jump
in
and
clarify
what
mr.
Newell
has
said
is
that
if
this
is
not
approved,
then
the
use
would
not
be
able
to
go
into
this
location.
The
parking
code
does
require
that
you
provide
adequate
parking
places
on-site
for
your
business
in
this
situation.
There's
a
change
in
use
where
it's
going
from
a
retail
use
to
a
restaurant
use,
if
you
will,
which
is
more
intense
in
terms
of
the
number
of
parking
spaces
that
are
required.
G
City
Council
has
set
up
a
process
to
waive
the
on-site
parking
spaces
for
payment
of
an
in
lieu
fee
and
it's
separated
by
an
in
lieu
fee,
based
on
an
existing
building
versus
an
in
lieu
fee
for
new
construction.
But
again,
as
mr.
Newell
has
said,
if
you
don't
approve
this
in
Luffy,
the
business
would
not
be
able
to
locate
here
and
they
would
have
to
seek
another
location.
Thank.
K
D
G
H
I
have
a
question
on
the
site
plan,
and
maybe
David
can
answer
it,
or
maybe
later
with
the
developer
would
be
more.
One
confusing
item
is
there
is
about
an
eight-foot
space
between
what
is
marked
on
the
site
plan?
Is
the
existing
sidewalk
and
I'm
looking
at
sheet
a
1.00
and
the
proposed
front
patio
is
about
if
I
can
eight
or
ten
foot
space
there
that
it's
not
I'm,
not
sure
what's
happening
in
that
area,
and
that's
right
in
front
of
the
fence
between
the
fence
and
the
street.
H
L
And
if
you'll
forgive
me,
I
meant
to
go
through
the
slides
on
the
screen,
so
I'll
jump
to
that
slide
here
and
this
this
is
just
again
the
aerial
of
the
property,
some
photographs.
This
actually
might
help
you
with
that.
You
see
the
green
area
is
where
essentially,
the
fence
would
enclose
the
seating
behind
or
closer
to.
The
bottom
of
the
photo
is
is
the
remaining
sidewalk
area,
so
it's
essentially
would
be
an
open
sidewalk
space
beyond
the
area.
L
E
You
David
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
planning
condition
number
two
specifically
to
the
capacity
the
production
capacity
of
the
nanobrewery
I.
Don't
know
if
you
can
provide
this
or
if
the
applicant
is
here
if
they
can
provide
some
sense
of
scale
of
that,
a
thousand
barrels
I'm
to
be
frank,
I,
don't
know
what
that
means
and
I
guess
that
follows
into
B
of
planning
condition.
E
Number
two:
the
odor,
which
I
would
assume,
is
a
fairly
major
concern
or
the
neighbors
and
I
guess
the
question,
perhaps
more
for
the
applicant
would
be
what
would
be
the
containment
techniques
or
arm
or
technology
rather
for
odor
containment.
If
that
became
a
problem,
is
it
in
fact
something
similar
to
our
cannabis
odor
that
we've
been
discussing
lately?
So
perhaps
if,
if
we
can
request
that
of
the
applicant,
if
they
are
in
fact
here,
yeah.
L
L
E
B
L
Well,
this
ordinance
has
been
in
place
since
probably
the
80s
or
90s,
and
so
it
was
established
at
that
time.
My
guess
would
be
that,
generally,
your
restaurant
interior
seating
is
going
to
be
used
more
regularly
and
more
often
than
the
outdoor
seating
in
most
cases,
not
in
all
cases
but
and
I
think
that
was
probably
the
reasoning
at
the
time.
C
It's
questions.
I
have
one
for
Flynn,
which
is
going
to
the
amount
of
the
in
lieu
fee
for
parking.
Do
we
is
it
within
the
discretion
of
the
Commission
to
raise
that
amount
to
a
amount
closer
to
what
it
would
cost
to
build
offsite
parking
so
that
we
could
raise
it
to
say
ten
or
eleven
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
G
Unfortunately,
it
is
not
the
fees
were
adopted
by
the
City
Council
via
resolution
and
would
need
to
be
modified
by
the
City
Council
as
well.
Excuse
me,
I,
believe
it
was
in
the
1990s
that
that
resolution
was
adopted.
If
there
is
a
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission.
What
we
can
do
is
forward
that
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
that
they
reconsider
the
fees
that
were
established
for
the
in.
G
G
I
Well,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Commission
I
would
suggest
that
the
Commission
not
do
that,
because
we
have
no
certainty
as
to
you
know
what
the
council
may
do
with
respect
to
the
fee.
Setting
on
this
one
I
think
really.
The
Commission's
options
here
are
to
either
approve
the
project
conditioned
on
the
project.
Finding
parking
which
has
Flynn
ascension
earlier
may
be
an
insurmountable
obstacle
for
the
developer
or
to
approve
it
with
the
n'
Luffy,
as
set
by
current
council
resolution
with
a
recommendation
at
the
council.
C
C
L
C
B
C
N
We're
also
very
thankful
to
have
very
supportive
landlords
who
share
in
our
vision
for
the
space
now
regarding
the
business
and
its
operations,
I
will
talk
typically
to
the
brewing
operations,
as
I
will
be
the
person
doing
the
majority
of
the
brewing
on-site
and
so
essentially
to
address
some
of
the
questions
from
the
from
the
panel.
A
two-barrel
brewery
just
to
give
perspective
some
of
the
other
are
basically
the
two
largest
breweries
in
the
valley
in
CVB
is
a
17
barrel.
N
Brew
house
and
they're
brewing
many
times
a
day
and
to
much
larger
fermenters
and
LaQuinta
is
at
fifteen
barrel
batches.
So,
like
david
said,
a
two
barrel,
brew
house
would
be
wouldn't
be
considered.
A
micro
brewery
be
considered
a
nanobrewery,
so
this
is
frankly
slightly
larger
than
what
someone
would
be
doing
in
their
garage
at
home.
N
The
entirety
of
our
production
would
be
consumed
in
in-house
and
and
frankly,
that
that
to
us
is
one
of
the
biggest
draws
of
having
a
nano.
Breweries
is
the
sense
that
the
only
place
that
you
can
find
this
beer
is
at
our
brewery.
So,
in
terms
of
our
goal
to
be
a
community
gathering
space,
we
we
imagine
it's
similar
to
from
our
experiences
in
the
industry,
how
people
enjoy
going
and
visiting
a
winery
to
see
where
the
production
is
happening,
to
see
who
is
making
the
beer.
N
You
know
the
size
of
the
kettles
are
somewhere
around
two
feet
wide
and
maybe
four
or
five
feet
high,
so
very
small
and
then
in
terms
of
its
also
unique
that
we're
putting
in
a
electric
fully
electric
Brewhouse.
So
there
will
be
no
gas
in
the
building,
so
there
will
be
no
odors
from
gas.
The
only
by-product
of
the
brewing
process
is
steam,
which
we
are
we've
also
been
able
to
address
in
the
sense
that
we
will
be
able
to
purchase
which
what's
called
a
condenser
and
a
condenser,
simply
captures
steam.
N
J
J
We
both
believe
that
this
is
a
very
essential,
very
needed
gathering
space
for
for
the
following
years
to
come
in
terms
of
what
we
plan
to
do
with
this
project
is
to
essentially
keep
everything
very
small,
very
private
and
intimate
so
the
actual
gathering
space
inside
wouldn't
be
much
larger
than
this
room
here
alone
and
like
they
mentioned
before
no
live
loud
music.
Everything
will
be
in
regard
to
the
appropriate
decimals
and
same
with
the
outside.
J
We
also
anticipate
to
set
our
hours
to
end
at
appropriate
times.
We
don't
plan
on
keeping
the
place
open
past
after
midnight,
but
most
likely
11
p.m.
and
we
simply
just
want
to
introduced
some
amenities
that
we
find
necessary
and
that
we
love
in
other
cities
and
bring
it
to
this
place.
Palm
Springs
that
we
love
so
much.
Thank
you.
C
E
I
hate
to
sort
of
keep
harping
on
this,
but
if
you
could
just
respond
to
the
comment
or
question
about
odor,
if
I
looked
at
your
plan
and
I'm
correct,
the
brewing
component
is
contained
in
a
separate
room.
Is
that
correct.
N
N
We
are
hoping
to
introduce
the
brewing
process
and
the
idea
of
it
to
people,
so
we
don't
want
to
have
it
kind
of
cordoned
off
to
the
world,
but
when
I
was
what
I
was
mentioning
regarding
the
condenser,
that
would
be
the
only
that
would
capture
the
only
possible
aroma
from
the
brewing
process
and
and
just
for
those
that
are
unfamiliar.
The
best
analogy
for
the
the
aroma
that
comes
from
the
bring
process
would
be
baking
bread,
so
it's
steamed.
It
smells
a
little
bit
like
baking.
N
Bread
and
one
thing
I
did
want
to
clarify-
is
with
this
small
of
a
brewing
process.
We
would
only
be
brewing
most
likely
once
a
week,
and
the
portion
of
that
brew
day
would
that
there
would
be
aroma
or
coming
from
or
steam
coming
from.
Our
kettle
would
be
two
hours
of
that
day
once
a
week,
so
just
for
the
idea
of
you
know,
as
as
they
were
mentioning
before.
This
is
far
from
an
industrial
process
where
there's
five
batches
being
run
every
day,
seven
days
a
week.
N
C
C
N
C
Also,
if
we
ask
that
you
respond
to
complaints
within
24
hours
of
notification,
would
that
be
a
problem
for
you?
No
okay,
I
think
those
those
the
other
questions.
As
we've
had
some
comments
regarding
the
storefront
and
the
look
of
the
storefront.
Have
you
have
you
been
thinking
about
any
improvements
yourself
to
the
storefront
in
terms
of
what
it
would
look
like,
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
in
our
packet.
That
suggests
upgrades.
N
Addressing
your
concern
regarding
the
awning
that
that
is
fine
for
us
and
we
will
be
you
know,
I
guess
the
best
way
to
put
it
touching
up
the
windows
in
terms
of
removing
the
current
glazing
that
has
the
the
verbage
and
whatnot
so
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that
appropriately
addresses
what
your
concerns
are,
but
with
the
front
patio
we
do
hope
to
make
the
building
look
very
cosmetically
upgraded
and.
C
N
J
C
C
Remove
the
awning
redirect
the
roof
drains
to
conceal,
to
conceal
within
the
wall,
cavity,
remove
and
relocate
miscellaneous
electrical
devices
on
the
sod
and
the
facade
demo,
and
remove
the
storefront
glazing
and
the
door
system
and
replace
with
new
gemo
and
removed
the
existing
planter
at
the
storefront
base
and
extend
the
paving
to
the
storefront
to
reface
the
existing
solid
storefront
area
with
new
exterior
plaster,
and
for
this
to
come
back
for
a
review.
I.
B
D
Thank
you
for
coming
for
us.
These
were
my
comments,
so
I
come
from
a
retail
architectural
background.
Yes,
and
typically
when
a
tenant,
particularly
a
food
or
beverage
use
tenant,
goes
into
an
existing
space.
There
is
some
negotiation
between
the
landlord
and
the
tenant
as
far
as
any
kind
of
upgrade
to
the
property
and
who's
responsible
for
it.
Yes,.
B
B
Discussions
we've
hit
that
we've
had
thus
far,
basically
whatever
what
it
came
down
to
whatever
they
wanted
to
do
in
there.
As
long
as
it
met
code,
they
were
welcomed.
They
were
free
to
do
so.
We
put
on
a
new
roof,
which
means
that
I
I
really
hesitate
to
start
playing
around
on
drains
on
the
roof,
because
I
just
literally
put
a
new
roof
on
the
paint.
Yes,
no
problem
to
like
sit
to
redo
the
whole
glazing
thing.
B
D
D
K
C
K
K
L
So
the
noise
ordinance
has
a
number
of
stipulations
in
it
with
respect
to
decibel
limits,
as
well
as
just
some
general
requirements
in
terms
of
what
can
be
permitted
outside.
You
know,
people
with
instruments
or
amplification
of
loudspeakers
things
like
that.
So
in
this
condition,
what
we've
done
is
we've
allowed.
We've
noted
that
entertainment
or
music
may
be
permitted
inside
now,
you've
heard
from
the
applicant
that
they
do
not
intend
to
have
any
entertainment
within
the
interior.
L
Aside
from
background
or
ambience
speakers,
however,
if
there
is,
if
there
is
intention
to
have
speakers
outside,
we
would
recommend
that
those
be
limited
in
in
terms
of
the
noise
that
would
be
permitted,
so
it
should
be.
We've
had
conditions
in
the
past
where
we've
noted
that
outdoor
music
may
be
permitted
and
only
serve
as
background
to
to
the
to
the
people
having
conversation
outdoors.
So
it
would
be
an
intention
that
it
is
creating
ambience
sound
and
not
a
loudspeaker.
Essentially,
so
we
could
add
that
as
a
condition
as
well.
If
that
is
I,
would.
K
C
Same
topic,
where's,
the
closest
residential
to
this-
it's
the
closest
residential,
is
the
next
door.
I
was
going
to
ask
the
question
of
typically
and
we've
seen
I
remember
doing
Zelda's
years
ago.
We
basically
required
that
the
doors
stayed
closed
and
there
not
be
music
outside
and
that
music
could
not
penetrate
outside
if
their
residences
nearby,
so
I
I
just
want
to
ask
you
you're
you
looked
at
this
condition
and
thought
you
could
have
music
outside
I.
J
C
Yeah
I
have
a
suggestion
as
to
how
we
proceed.
My
suggestion
as
to
how
we
proceed
is
that
we
continue
this
until
our
next
meeting
to
give
the
applicant
and
the
owner
a
chance
to
look
at
the
facade
issues
that
the
Commission
raised.
The
concerns
that
we
have
now,
but
that
we
not
take
a
vote
on
it
until
until
and
we
can,
we
continue
it
until
our
January
9th
meeting
for
action.
I'm.
E
Sure
I
might
add
that
we
request
the
applicant
discuss
the
possibility
or
scheduling
of
potential
ambient
or
ambience
music
on
the
outs
outdoor
patio
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
Perhaps
there
are
options
for
certain
times
of
day
and
so
forth,
but
maybe
they
could
come
forward
with
with
some
plans
for
ideas.
It's.
D
Would
support
that
motion
and
again
I
would
encourage
the
applicant
and
the
landlord
to
have
a
discussion
about
financial
responsibilities,
because
it's
in
the
main
part
of
our
downtown
it's
next
door
to
a
very
upscale
antique
of
business
and
it
it
I'm
all
for
this
project.
100%
I'm
behind
this
project,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
great
addition
to
the
city.
I
think
it's,
but
I
think
it
deserves
to
have
a
fresh
face.
I
think
the
face
that
its
presenting
right
now
is
it's
very
unfortunate.
C
I'm
going
to
just
go
down
through
Commissioner
Hudson
and
around
for
comments
for
the
applicant.
Before
we
take
the
moment,
we
have
a
motion
to
continue
and
we
have
a
second
I
believe
Commissioner
Caledonian,
Commissioner
Hirsch
fine,
but
before
we
vote
issues
and
directive,
sort
of
directives
to
staff
and
the
applicant.
B
O
First
of
all,
I
think
the
foundation
of
our
city
is
based
on
small
businesses.
I
think
this
is
in
essence
a
very
wonderful
small
business.
That's
needed.
It
fills
a
niche,
that's
not
out
there
right
now,
so
I
applaud
you
for
moving
forward.
I.
Think
it's
also
very
difficult,
with
with
small
margins
for
small
businesses
that
you
get
started
so
I'm,
I'm
glad
that
we
have
an
in
lieu
fee
on
a
site
that
obviously
cannot
provide
parking
it's
much
better
than
a
vacant.
O
Building
in
that
location
in
our
central
business,
district
I
also
am
NOT
concerned
about
the
ambience
music
that
goes
on
there.
I
think
we
have
a
noise
ordinance
if
it
were
to
get
out
of
hand.
It
appears
at
this
point
that
the
resident
and
the
conditions
resolved
the
odor
problem,
if
I
do
hope
that
the
landlord
and
the
tenant
can
cannot
come
up
with
a
facial
facelift,
as
was
stated
otherwise,
I'm
in
full
support
of
the
project.
C
What
I
would
like
to
see
is
the
condition
too
rewritten
to
to
indicate
no
gas,
a
condenser
or
similar
equipment
to
capture
steam
and
a
response
within
24
hours
for
odor
complaints,
so
that
we
we
do
with
that
and
so
as
a
little
strengthening
of
that
ordinance.
I
am
concerned
about
the
the
music
and
I
agree
with
Commissioner
Hudson
that
there
should
be
some
language
if
it's
going
to
be
outside
that
limits
it
and
also
that
hours
get
limited
so
that
it's
not
it's
not
intrusive.
H
Their
staff
is
there
a
standard
decibel
level
that
we
could
apply.
Maybe
they
may
not
have
it
today
but
deployed
to
outdoor
music
in
general,
when
it's
just
background
ambience,
maybe
it
doesn't
set
it
at
45
decibels
or
I.
Don't
know
what
the
right
never
would
be,
but
it
should
be
very
simple
to
come
up
with
a
maximum
number
for
outside
ambience
type
music.
So.
H
C
So
if
something
comes,
when
something
comes
back
to
us,
I'd,
like
that
recommendation
to
council
to
be
included
in
the
actions
that
we
take
and
I
you
know,
parking
I
think
here
in
some
sense
will
be
less
of
a
problem
once
the
Andaz
is
built
because
there
will
be
public
King
across
the
street
and
it
will
increase
the
parking
so
I
you
know,
I
would
have
a
lot
more
concern
about
parking
if
the
Andaz
parking
the
public
parking
portion
of
it
weren't
going
in
anybody
else
for
comments.
One.
E
Other
issue,
madam
chair,
that
probably
should
be
discussed
a
little
bit
more
detail.
I
was
a
bit
confused
reading
through
the
staff
report
and
some
of
the
comments
and
that
pertains
to
trash.
This
is
a
strange
site
and
that
it's
landlocked
and
I've
heard
mention
of
read
comments
pertaining
to
the
location
of
dumpsters
and
sort
of
shared
location
of
those
dumpsters
and
I
to
support
this
project
and
want
to
see
it
go
forward.
But
I
think
there
needs
to
be
discussion
about
those
dumpsters
and
how
they're
shared
and
who
takes
care
of
the
trash.
C
D
D
Odor,
even
trash
I,
this
is
a
very
small
operation.
We
have
codes
in
place
governing
those
issues,
I
think
the
staff
conditions
addressed
them
even
further,
so
operationally
I'm,
not
at
all
concerned
about
this
project,
but
I
just
want
to
add
one
more
architectural
comment,
and
that
has
to
do
with
a
question.
I
brought
up
to
staff
earlier
about
the
barrier
between
the
public
right
away
and
the
front
patio
I
would
look
at
that
again.
It's
it's
rather
generic.
D
Looking
now
and
it's
more
like
a
handrail
for
a
second-story
condition,
and
it
can
be
much
more
decorative,
it
could
even
be
a
plant
or
it
could
be
just
different
things.
It
doesn't
have
to
look
like
a
generic
apartment,
a
barrack,
a
handrail
at
a
second
floor
walkway.
It
could
be
much
more
decorative
than
that
I'd
encourage
them
as
part
the
exercise
when
we
meet
next
time
to
present
something
a
little
bit
fresher.
Looking
there.
Thank
you,
I.
C
C
F
O
O
H
H
H
C
Calling
the
December
12th
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
back
to
order
we
are
moving
fairly
slowly
but
for
the
audience
most
of
the
items
before
us
today
are
pretty
complex,
so
I'm
I'm,
sorry
that
it's
taking
time
but
I
believe
it
will
okay
to
be
hair
of
the
hair
of
the
dog
Palm
Springs
LLC,
on
behalf
of
a
and
J
Palmas
LP,
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
a
cocktail
lounge
at
555,
South,
Palm,
Canyon,
Drive
staff
report.
Please,
madam.
L
Chair
Vice,
Chair
and
planning
commissioners,
the
application
before
you
is
a
conditional
use
permit
to
establish
a
five
thousand
forty
square
foot
cocktail
lounge
within
an
existing
multi-tenant
complex
located
at
five
five
five
South
home
Canyon
Drive.
The
business
is
proposed
within
a
portion
of
an
of
an
existing
7500
square
foot
retail
space
on
the
ground
floor
of
a
previously
occupied
by
barkingham
Palace,
the
business
so
going
through
some
of
the
slides
the
businesses
located.
As
I
said
within
this
multi
attending
complex
it
does.
L
The
complex
is
encompassed
by
South
Palm,
Canyon,
Drive,
Ramon,
Road
and
bolero
Road.
The
specific
building
in
question
here
is
shown
in
outline
in
a
dashed
yellow
line,
and
this
is
the
existing
storefront
as
of
last
month
at
the
rear
of
the
business.
So
this
would
be
the
parking
lot
side
of
the
building,
showing
the
patio
and
walkway
areas,
and
then
this
is
the
side
facing
Camino,
para
Sela
and
the
side
facing
South
Palm
Canyon
Drive.
L
So
you
see
here
in
grey.
The
business
is
proposed
within
this
suite.
A
111
and
the
floor
plan
is
include
65
indoor
seats,
six
outdoor
seats
in
the
newly
proposed
patio
adjacent
to
the
rear
of
the
building
the
business
proposes
to
operate
from
6:00
a.m.
to
2
P
2
a.m.
daily,
and
the
liquor
license
being
requested
as
a
type
48
with
the
Department
of
Alcoholic
Beverage
Control.
L
L
Staff
has
prepared
a
recommendation
of
support
of
the
project
and
provided
findings
in
support
of
the
application
and,
as
I
said,
the
draft
resolution
is
prepared
for
your
consideration.
The
item
is
a
public
hearing.
Today
you
have
received
in
his
attachment
to
your
report
an
email
from
a
neighboring
business
in
opposition
to
the
proposal,
and
he
has
provided
a
letter
to
the
ABC,
which
was
also
provided
as
an
attachment
to
report
protesting
the
proposed
liquor
license.
L
K
In
the
planning
conditions,
they
there's
talk
of
a
security
plan
and
I
also
remember
I.
Believe
several
years
ago
there
was
a
request
by
7-eleven
to
locate
a
facility
and
Sun
Center,
and
the
neighbors
were
quite
concerned
about
the
kind
of
people
who
frequent
the
center
and
already
there
had
been
a
lot
of
problems
with
loitering
and
some
minor
I
believe
minor
crime
incidents
around
there
did
the
applicant
go
to
the
communities
around
the
the
neighborhood
and
to
the
proprietors
in
the
center
to
seek
their
comments
regarding
this
proposal
and.
L
My
discussions
with
the
applicant
I
have
not
heard
that
those
motions
or
steps
have
been
taken.
I
will
say
that
the
public
hear
notice
was
provided
to
all
neighborhood
organizations
within
a
half
mile
of
the
site,
so
neighborhood
organizations
were
aware
of
the
project
for
the
public
hearing
notice,
but
I'm
not
aware
if
the
applicant
has
reached
out
to
other
attendance
in
the
center
or
neighboring
communities
that.
K
I
also
noticed
in
the
property
there
are
we.
There
are
doors
everywhere
in
this
in
this
property
on
all
sides,
except
for
the
southern
side.
What
is
the
applicant
planning
to
do
to
limit
the
access
to
the
bar
itself?
It
looks
like
from
the
plans
that
some
of
the
doors
are
just
being
deleted
and
removed.
Is
that
correct.
L
So
you
see
here
on
the
floor
plan,
there
are
three
doors
for
pedestrian
access,
one
at
the
top
middle
on
the
near
the
bottom
left
and
then
one
at
the
primary
entry
which
is
adjacent
to
the
parking
lot
on
the
right
side.
My
understanding
is
the
primary
entry
on
the
right
side
of
the
business
of
this
exhibit
is
the
only
the
entry
for
the
site
but
I'll.
Let
the
applicant
clarify
that
when
they
make
their
presentation.
D
In
terms
of
jurisdiction
and
process,
I
read
a
letter
that
was
in
our
packet
regarding
a
ABC
protest.
So
for
a
minute,
if
we
assume
that
the
applicant
is
able
to
acquire
a
Cu
P,
which
is
a
City
action,
I
think
is
that
correct?
Yes,
a
co
piece
of
city
action
and
the
ABC
is
a
state
agency
would
based
on
an
appeal
with
the
ABC,
then
be
able
to
overrule
the
city
action.
L
D
L
E
David
I'm,
looking
at
the
floor
plan
and
the
report
states
that
the
space
in
question
is
a
little
bit
over
five
thousand
square
feet,
and
yet
I
would
estimate
that
probably
a
third
of
the
floor
plan
has
hatched
indications
on
it
and
and
three
areas,
saying
basically
not
in
use.
Could
you
explain?
Are
there
future
plans
for
that
use?
Is
that
part
of
this
leased
space?
Do
the
occupancy
calculations
take
into
account
that
square
footage
so.
L
When
this
application
was
initially
submitted,
staff
had
indicated
some
concerns
with
the
7,000
square
foot
cocktail
lounge,
so
that
those
areas
that
are
CC
and
grey
is
hatched
not
in
use
wouldn't
include
the
seventy,
it's
actually
7,500
7551
square
feet
previously
for
retail
and
so
intensification
to
a
restaurant
or
near
occupancy
type
of
use.
We
had
some
concerns
with
that,
so
the
African
had
reduced
the
scope
of
the
floor
plan
and
ultimately
that
may
become
a
future
expansion.
L
O
L
C
H
I
have
one
concern
about
the
size
plan,
maybe
for
Public
Works,
the
extension
of
Camino
para
Scylla
on
the
I
guess
it's
the
south
side
of
the
building
becomes
a
very
awkward
intersection.
If
any
of
you
have
been
in
that
where
those
two
shopping
centers
come
together,
the
Sun
Center
and
the
this
this
one,
where
that
road
kind
of
splits
off
into
the
parking
lot
for
this
building
and
the
extension
of
communal
Purcell.
H
I
C
B
C
C
Then
we
have
a
letter
from
a
neighbor
that
says
they
are
running
a
alcohol
and
possibly
drug
recovery
facility
upstairs
and
and
that
there
are
two
of
them
in
the
building.
Can
you
possibly
there
I
have
two
questions
about
that?
Can
you
go
and
show
us
where
the
walkway
is
and
how
close
the
entrance
to
this
would
be
to
the
entrance
to
the
facilities.
L
C
L
C
L
We
we
have
not
received
any
exterior
improvements
beyond
the
proposed
patio
so
that
that's
essentially
the
only
exterior
improvements
that
are
proposed.
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
Afghan
can
discuss
further
any
talks
that
they
may
have
had
with
the
owner
with
respect
to
landscaping
or
exterior
facade
improvements.
But
I.
C
M
Morning,
madam
chair
vice
chair
commissioners,
my
name
is
Charles
Kohler
I'm,
an
attorney
I
have
this
week.
My
office
is
in
Carlsbad
I
used
to
be
here
matter
of
fact.
Mr.
patanti,
who
is
the
owner
of
the
hair
of
the
dog,
was
my
very
first
client
when
I
started
practicing
in
1991,
so
he
and
I
have
a
good
relationship.
Unfortunately,
I
haven't
made
much
money
off
him
because
he
doesn't
get
very
much
trouble.
M
M
It
was
in
that
location
for
five
years
until
it
moved
up
to
a
lay
ho
in
Palm
Canyon,
where
it
enjoyed
20
successful
years
before
the
landlord
there
decided
that
he
was
going
to
do
something
else
with
the
property,
so
Larry
found
his
next
spot,
which
was
dead
center
downtown
and
was
there
for
in
another
20
years
before
that
landlord
decided
to
sell
his
building.
Also
so
we
come
before
you
not
because
we
like
to
jump
around
but
because
we
couldn't
buy
the
buildings
we
were
in
I
wouldn't
address
a
couple
of
issues.
M
First
off
and
I,
as
his
attorney
I,
am
very
very
upset
about
this
I
direct.
Your
attention
to
that
letter
that
was
attached
to
the
to
the
staff
report
by
mr.
Anderson
and
I
can
tell
you
we
will
be
instituting
legal
proceedings
against
mr.
Anderson,
because
if
you
look
at
the
attachments
to
his
ABC
report,
specifically
paragraph
six,
it
makes
the
absolutely
defamatory
statement
that
mr.
Burton
tea
has
been
convicted
of
a
felony,
specifically
one
involving
moral
turpitude.
M
Mr.
Burton
tea
is
a
lieutenant
and
Coast
Guard
Auxiliary.
He
has
been
vetted
by
the
FBI.
He
is
a
member
of
Homeland
Security.
He
has
served
in
all
of
the
major
floodings
that
has
taken
place
through
Homeland,
Security
and
FEMA,
and
I
can
assure
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
that
he
has
zero
criminal
record
zero
and
I
and
I
find
it
offensive
that
that's
even
in
here,
because
I
think
it
was
an
attempt
to
turn
you
folks
against
him
when
it
was
absolutely
not
true.
M
Mr.
Burton
tea
has
been
a
servant
of
this
city
for
48
years.
He
has
been
involved
in
Christmas
parades.
He
has
been
a
part
of
the
city
and
he
is
an
upstanding
citizen
and
I
find
that
absolutely
unacceptable,
and
if
I
had
my
power
today,
I
would
ask
you
to
strike
it
from
the
record,
but
we'll
go
through
it
and
through
the
normal
legal
means,
but
I
just
wanted
you
to
know
that
none
of
that
is
true.
M
As
far
as
the
neighborhood
we
waited
to
see
if
we
would
got
any
comments
back
from
the
neighborhood
about
the
project.
Once
the
notifications
went
out.
Had
we
gotten
a
negative
response,
we
would
have
met
with
the
neighborhood's
we
didn't
receive
any.
So
we
didn't
do
that.
We
did
speak
with
almost
all
the
businesses
there,
including
mr.
Anderson,
about
what
we
were
doing
and
he
was
the
only
one
that
that
posted
any
objection
to
the
project
that
is
I
have
received
letters
from
Zelda's
saying
welcome
to
neighborhood.
M
We
have
been
working
cooperatively
with
the
surrounding
businesses
to
make
this
a
good
addition.
This
kind
of
new,
extended
entertainment
district
for
downtown
Palm,
Springs
hair
of
the
dog,
is
a
kind
of
a
city
landmark.
My
wife
is
a
flight
attendant.
She
has
been
for
26
years
and
she
tells
me
that
one
of
the
most
offered
questions
from
people
on
our
airplanes
is
is
the
hair
of
the
dog.
Still
here
it
is.
It
is
a
landmark
for
this
city
and
it
has
conducted
itself
with
corporate
responsibility
and
with
with
cooperation
with
all
city
departments.
M
The
reason
that
the
police
department
probably
didn't
say
anything
is
because
Larry
is
more
than
willing
to
work
with
them
on
whatever
security
plan
they
wants.
He
has
always
done
so.
In
45
years
of
a
bar,
he
has
had
two
citations
from
ABC
for
an
improper
Act.
Both
of
them
were
solved
with
with
minor
fines
and
taken
care
of.
He
has
great
relationships
with
all
the
governmental
bodies
and
we're
here
to
say
we
are
going
to
meet
all
the
conditions.
P
M
C
Q
F
Q
C
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
speak
there
being
none?
The
applicant
has
a
three-minute
rebuttal
and
if
you
don't
have
a
statement,
if
you'd
come
forward
in
case
they're
questions
and
if
mr.
patanti
would
come
forward,
are
there
questions
for
the
applicant
from
the
Commission.
H
Yes,
sort
of
building
on
something
you
said
earlier:
is
there
any
possibility
of
having
an
entrance
off
Palm
Canyon
Drive,
either
in
addition
to
or
as
an
alternative
the
one
from
the
parking
lot,
and
that
we're
trying
is
the
city
to
make
activate
the
streets
more
and
I,
don't
know
if
it
would
work
on
this
site
or
not,
but
would
it
be
possible
to
have
a
Palm
Canyon
Drive
entrance?
Yes,.
A
And
no,
yes,
there's
a
possibility.
There
could
be
an
entrance
there.
I
would
not
put
one
there
simply
because
it's
on
a
very
busy
street
and
people
who
have
to
get
out
of
the
cars,
and
all
of
that
would
have
to
get
out
in
that
traffic
which
gets
very
speedy
right
down
coming
down
the
hill
and
the
parking
where
the
car
would
have
to
go.
It's
been
back
a
few.
H
H
Yeah,
it's
gonna
make
it
baby
flicks
a
little
bit
with
our,
but
our
objective
of
having
a
more
pedestrian
environment
that
people
don't
have
to
drive,
but
right,
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from
on
them.
Do
you
expect
Mets
crossover
between
your
customers
and
Zelda's
or
the
other
liquor
serving
locations
there
in
the
Sun
Center
I.
O
H
A
A
A
We
didn't
have
that
requirement
up
at
the
old
location.
They
will
all
get
trained
and
although
and
I
have
a
gentleman
who
is
in
charge
of
the
security,
we've
already
removed
a
few
derelicts
and
things
like
that
and
they're
not
liking
us,
because
they
can't
sleep
underneath
the
awning
and
against
the
windows
and
stuff.
So
I
think
it'll
be
very
good
for
the
area
in
showing
the
people
that
you're
not
going
to
be
sleeping,
and
you
know.
M
K
K
A
L
E
A
E
A
Don't
be
offended,
but
your
pictures
are
terrible,
very
bad
contrast.
It
actually
looks
very
nice
over
there.
I
have
no
plans
I'm,
only
a
small
cog
in
the
landlord's
fixing
up
with
a
building,
and
it's
always
been
neat
and
it's
desert-type
water-saving
landscaping,
but
it
it
looks
nice.
These
are
a
little
washed
out.
These
pictures
you're
not
really
getting
a
good
picture
of
them.
It's.
C
C
A
M
D
Facility
that
serves
alcoholic
beverages
is
a
part
of
our
our
society
and
and
the
fact
that
it's
close
to
another
facility,
that's
trying
to
keep
people
from
consuming
alcoholic
beverages,
I
think
that's
just
how
cities
operate.
There's
there's
there's
conflicting
facilities
that
could
could
exist
close
by
one
another,
and
if,
if
recovery
is
predicated
on
not
walking
by
a
facility
that
serves
alcohol,
it's
not
a
very
strong
program
and
I,
don't
I!
Just
don't
want
us
I,
just
don't
want
to
condition
this
on
any
changes
to
the
entrance.
D
I
think
the
interest
is
in
the
appropriate
place
is
next
to
250
parking
spaces.
I.
Think
the
the
part
about
putting
the
entrance
on
Palm
Canyon
could
legitimately
cause
some
sort
of
traffic
problem
is
if
people
get
dropped
off
in
the
front
and
I,
don't
think
it's
appropriate
to
ask
them
to
do
it
on
for
a
number
of
reasons.
So
I
I'm,
in
support
with
with
the
staff
conditions,
is
written
I.
C
O
Are
comments
from
me,
madam
chair,
if
I
can
I
would
ask
that
we
condition
it
to
provided
bicycle
parking
that
the
all
windows
we
conditioned
as
state
all
windows,
fronting
North
or
Palm
Canyon
to
be
transparent
and
remain
transparent
and
that
we
relook
at
the
landscaping
the
applicants
not
in
there
that
we
relook
at
the
landscaping
from
what
was
originally
approved.
If
that's
acceptable
to
the
motion,
I.
H
C
C
C
C
We
we
have
to
see
in
front
of
us
Joseph
lozad
on
behalf
of
1
2
for
1
South
Palm
Canyon
Trail
for
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
an
event.
Design
Center,
an
existing
commercial
building
located
at
201,
East,
tahquitz
canyon,
Drive
I'm.
Just
looking
at
the
Commission.
Are
there
many
question?
Will
there
be
many
questions
on
this
property
I
think
there
will
be
none.
So
if
we
could
have
a
very
abbreviated
staff
report
on
this
place,
it's.
P
Currently
on
gene
autry
trail
to
this
location,
they
do
have
a
plan
to
renovate
and
improve
the
site.
That
would
be
through
a
minor
administrative
review
process
that
will
be
cried
out
by
staff.
They
do
me
the
parking
requirement
hours
of
operation
will
be
from
8
to
5.
In
short,
staff
is
recommending
the
Planning
Commission
to
approve
this
eup.
Thank
you.
I.
E
Good
morning,
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
good
morning
vice
chair
and
members
of
the
Commission.
My
name
is
Joseph
Cecchini
I'm,
an
engineer
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
mr.
lazette,
a
who
has
acquired
the
property
of
2001
East
until--.
It's
way
I
am
here,
I
did
some
of
the
drawings
and
that
for
him,
and
also
to
be
able
to
answer
any
technical
questions
that
you
might
have
I
would
like
to
just
expand
a
little
bit
on
the
project
description
section
that
came
in
the
staff
report.
E
If
I
could
please,
as
you
could
see,
as
you
know,
the
the
property
is
consist
of
two
buildings
that
are
connected
by
the
same
real
common
roof
area
there
and,
as
we've
already
said,
the
west
most
westerly
building
was
a
medical
office
surgical
center.
What
mr.
elizalde
would
like
to
do,
he'd
like
to
increase
his
usable
floor
space,
primarily
in
the
Western
or
exclusively
in
the
Western
most
building
by
occupying
some
of
the
covered
walkway
portion?
E
The
the
rest
of
his
improvements
are
just
to
the
inside
of
the
properties
are
minor
tenant
improvements.
I
wanted
to
call
attention
to
a
couple
of
things.
The
laundry
area
already
exists
in
the
West
building,
so
he
just
fully
plans
to
use
it
as
his
bathrooms.
The
West
building
already
has
four
full-size
bathrooms.
E
He
only
really
needs
three
and
one
of
which
he's
gonna
convert
to
a
fully
handicapped,
accessible
building,
and
the
other
comment
that
I
wanted
to
make
was
that
and
that's
kind
of
on
me
I
I've
labeled,
an
area
in
the
existing
building
this
kitchen?
That's
really
not
an
appropriate
title.
It's
really
just
going
to
be
a
break
room,
there'll
be
a
refrigerator
in
a
sink,
and
unless
there
were
any
other
comments,
I
didn't
have
anything
else
to
add.
Thank.
E
C
B
Mic
here
sorry
I'm
super
excited
about
this
project.
I
mean
this
poor
building
has
been
sitting
there
for
a
long
time
and
I
want
to
make
it
pretty
again.
Basically
keep
it
the
same.
The
same
look
but
new
again
and
pump.
Tahquitz
is
an
event
event
the
event
world,
I.
Guess
the
red
carpet
toad
the
downtown
and
it
needs
you.
We
put
a
great
meeting
in
down
the
street
to
make
this
talk.
Let's
look
great
I
just
want
to
make
the.
O
B
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
H
O
O
G
R
C
C
I'm
calling
the
meeting
of
the
Commission
about
to
order.
We
are
an
item:
2d
Gannett
properties,
2014
LLC,
for
an
amendment
of
a
previously
approved
conditional
use,
permit
adoption
of
an
amendment
to
a
previously
approved
negative
deck
in
a
major
architectural
application
for
a
one
hundred
and
three
thousand
six
hundred
square
foot,
cannabis
operation
and
dispensary
facility,
consisting
of
four
separate
buildings
located
at
Garnett
Road
and
interstate
10
off-ramp
staff
report.
Thank.
S
You,
madam
chair,
this,
to
give
you
some
background
information.
The
Planning
Commission
reviewed
this
and
approved
this
project
on
July
11th
2018,
and
that
was
for
the
major
architectural,
a
conditional
use
permit
and
the
adoption
of
the
mitigated
negative
declaration,
and
at
that
time
the
Planning
Commission
approved
a
63,000
650
square
foot,
one-story
cannabis
operations
facility
and
a
dispensary.
S
The
applicant
has
since
come
back
and
revised
the
application
to
add
a
second
story
to
all
the
buildings
that
are
proposed
and
in
your
staff
report
there
is
a
on
page
two
there's
a
a
table
that
describes
the
uses
within
each
of
the
floor
floor.
So
the
first
floor
will
be
60,000
square
feet
of
cannabis
operations
and
the
second
floor
will
be
thirty.
Nine
thousand
nine
hundred
fifty
square
feet
for
a
total
of
ninety
nine
thousand
nine
hundred
fifty
square
feet
of
cannabis
operations
there.
S
S
S
The
project
was
reviewed
by
the
architectural
visor
committee
on
November
5th
2018
and
the
AC
recommended
approval
of
the
project
as
presented
so
going
through.
Some
of
these
slides
you'll
see
that
this
is
the
buildings
that
are
proposed
and,
and
one
of
the
AEC
comments
was
that
by
adding
the
second-story,
it
actually
improves
the
look
of
the
building.
S
Once
again,
this
is
building
one
building
to
building
three
and
building
four
and
I'd
like
to
mention
that
building
four
is
proposed
to
be
two
storeys
and
height,
but
yet
only
be
one
storey,
meaning
there
only
be
a
ground
level.
There
won't
be
a
second
roof
plate
or
second-story
within
this
building.
So
the
proposal,
let
me
go
back
to
the
site
plan.
S
The
parking
that's
required
is
138.
Spaces
are
required
and
they
are
providing
158
parking
spaces,
so
they
meet
the
parking
requirements.
At
the
last
Planning
Commission
meeting
you
reviewed
lighting
plan
floor
plans,
landscaping
plan.
None
of
that
has
changed
and
I
have
not
included
it.
In
today's
presentation,
the
addendum
that
was
done
for
the
sequin
alysus
was
performed
by
Terra
Nova,
who
did
the
original?
An
initial
study
and
Nicole
is
here
to
discuss
that
addendum
to
you.
S
The
only
impacts
that
were
determined
was
that
the
traffic
count
would
increase
by
62
trips
and
the
mitigate
need
to
give
negative
would
not
require
any
kind
of
change
or
update.
So
within
that
document
there
are
mitigation
measures
in
terms
of
cultural
resources
and
biological
resources
and
those
feel
that
we
can
negate
them
to
lessen
significant
impacts.
H
I
Madam
chair
members
of
the
Commission,
specifically
before
you
this
morning
is
the
amendment
to
the
Cu
P
to
allow
the
additional
expansion.
However,
to
the
extent
of
that
expansion
effects,
you
know
the
the
project
as
a
whole.
You
can
certainly
consider
that
that
being
said,
if
the
Planning
Commission
does
not
approve
it,
then
the
owner
would
still
have
the
vested
right
under
the
existing
CEP
to
develop
the
first
floor
project
of
the
60,000
square
foot
level.
K
This
has
probably
been
discussed
before
because,
while
I
was
gone,
I
think
you
had
a
number
of
cannabis
facilities
to
look
at.
My
question
is:
is
in
particularly
with
respect
to
the
quality
of
the
air
and
in
particular
any
odors
coming
out
of
the
facilities
when
Nicole
does
her
negative
mitigated
declaration
and
she
finds
something
that
is
of
significance,
but
that
can
be
mitigated.
How
is
it
typically
when
you're
dealing
with
odors,
because
this
is
a
particularly
concern
with
these
kinds
of
facilities?
How
do
you
analyze
that?
K
T
T
Other
than
the
subjective
right
now
that
there
are,
and
and
as
with
everything,
dealing
Cannabis,
this
is
definitely
evolving
in
all
of
the
jurisdictions
that
were
working
in.
However,
you
do
have
Municipal
Code
standards
that
are
standard
requirements
that
mitigate
the
environment
and
environmental
impact,
from
a
secret
perspective
and
in
sequa
allows
that,
and
that
is
to
say
that
you
have
provisions
in
your
code
and
conditions
of
approval
that
you're
imposing
that
looks
at
the
technology.
T
That's
proposed
to
control,
odor
and
and
requires
that
odor
be
controlled,
that
those
standards
under
sequa
are
acceptable
mitigation
for
to
to
reduce
an
impact
that
the
types
of
air
circulation
systems
that
are
required,
we're
finding
that
most
cities
are
adjusting
as
they
go
because
different
things
work
for
different
things
in
the
case
of
a
new
building
here,
that
is
much
easier
to
control
than
when
we're
going
into
an
existing
building.
Would
you.
T
The
carbon
filters
seem
to
be
extremely
effective.
The
other.
The
other
option
that
we're
seeing
in
in
a
number
of
applications
are
HVAC
systems
that
create
negative
space,
that
is
to
say
they
are
entirely
enclosed,
and
there
is
no
that
the
the
there
is
a
it's
almost
like
vacuum.
Sealing
the
building.
Those
two
methods
seem
to
be
the
most
effective
for
controlling
order,
and
that's.
K
T
C
Had
a
question
along
the
same
lines,
and
it's
probably
for
flynn
as
I'm
looking
at
planning
condition
number
four.
This
was
done
before
you
instituted
a
consultant
chosen
by
the
city
to
review
the
odor
mitigate
plan
shouldn't.
We
have
language
now
that
we
have
a
chance
to
put
in
consistent
language
that
we've
utilized
in
other
projects.
The.
S
S
S
So
in
there
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
and
I
apologize
I
should
have
included
in
the
in
your
packet.
I.
Don't
have
the
exact
findings
in
front
of
me,
so
I
can't
exactly
respond,
but
in
in
review
of
building
permits
and
through
the
plan
check
process,
we
will
follow
the
conditions
that
the
odor
mitigation
plan
is
met.
S
K
G
To
go
back
to
madam
chairs
question
in
terms
of
a
condition
of
approval.
What
I
would
recommend
that
we
do
is?
We
include
what
will
become
our
standard
condition
of
approval,
as
we
looked
at
on
the
Anza
facility,
as
that
went
before
City
Council
is
that
the
odor
mitigation
plan
shall
be
reviewed
by
the
city's
consultant.
The
applicant
will
be
required
to
implement
any
recommendations
from
the
consultants
review
of
the
project,
something
along
those
lines,
so
that
not
only
does
it
require
the
independent
review,
but
also
the
implementation.
G
C
T
There,
the
increase
there
was
a
moderate
increase
in
traffic
cultivation
is
not
a
large
generator
of
traffic.
The
primary
traffic
generator
is
the
dispensary
in
this
case
that
we
did
have
the
traffic
evaluated
by
a
traffic
engineer.
This
was
not
our
analysis.
They
they
looked
at
the
analysis
again,
as
we've
discussed
in
these
meetings,
the
standard
for
the
ite
standard
for
for
cultivation
has
not
been
established.
It
has
been
for
dispensaries,
we
are
still
comparing
with
manufacturing
uses,
and
this
is
a
consistent
traffic.
Generator
with
a
manufacturing
use
are.
C
There
other
questions
on
the
environmental-impact
addendum.
Are
there
any
other
questions
for
staff
on
the
project?
Why
don't
we
bring
the
applicant?
Let's
open
the
public
hearing,
the
applicant
has
ten
minutes
and
if
you
could
go
through
some
of
the
design
issues
with
this
I
think
those
people
will
have
questions
on
those.
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Commission
James
Chaffee
architect.
I
won't
take
ten
minutes
of
your
time
this
morning.
I
know
you've
been
here
a
long
time
already.
The
building
footprint
didn't
change
a
bit,
nor
did
the
landscaping.
Nor
did
the
parking.
Those
sort
of
things
all
remained
the
same.
The
plate
remains
the
same.
We
added
some
height
to
the
buildings
to
enable
and
add
some
additional
operations
in
in
the
facility.
We
actually
think
the
buildings
look
better
I
think
Commissioner
Hudson
was
at
that
AAC
meeting
and
agreed
they're,
not
quite
as
squat.
R
We
added
about
six
feet
of
height
to
the
to
the
concrete
buildings
we
embellish
the
eyebrows
a
little
bit.
We
added
a
little
bit
more
architectural
eyebrow
at
a
dispensary
building
to
call
attention
to
it
because
it's
kind
of
retail
use
and
other
than
that.
It's
it's
a
pretty
benign
situation.
It's
almost
identical
to
what
it
was
it
just
kind
of
went
like
this
and
wanted
to
make
a
point
too
about.
There
was
a
condition
about
block
walls
and
and
we're
on
broad
iron.
R
Fencing
just
want
to
clarify
that
it's
predominantly
wrought
iron
fence
and
that's
for
the
police
department.
They
want
to
be
able
to
see
into
the
property
there'll
be
some
block
wall.
Perhaps
some
block
wall
pilasters
or
something
like
that.
But
it's
a
wrought
iron
fence
project
want
to
make
sure
that's
clear
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
thank.
C
You
and
let
me
see
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
first
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
item
there
being
no
members
as
a
public
feud
stay
up
for
questions
from
the
Commission.
If
there
are
questions,
I
have
one.
If
people
other
people
don't
mine
would
be
about
the
eyebrow,
the
two-story
eyebrow,
that's
the
only
thing
in
the
project.
I
have
a
concern
with
us.
Just
for
me
as
I
look
at
it.
It
creates
a
little
bit
of
dissonance.
C
R
R
Had
the
room
we
had
the
parking
and
we
had
the
room,
and
so
the
client
the
applicant
wanted
to
bear
a
little
additional
cost.
The
percentage
of
cost
addition
is
just
a
percentage
of
the
overall
plate,
so
it
made
sense
and-
and
it's
still
over
parked
and
the
reason
for
that
is.
If
it
ever
revert
back
to
an
office
warehouse
project,
it
wants
to
go
back
to
500
feet
per
square
foot.
So
that's
why
we
did
that
and
we
left
the
parking.
Thank.
O
R
R
R
H
C
Let
me
finish
with
a
couple
of
conditions
that
showers
be
added
I,
believe
we
had
indoor
bike
facilities
in
the
earlier
approval,
so
to
make
sure
that
those
items
are
included
and
in
in
Excel
to
change.
P,
oh
and
for
to
the
standard
conditions
in
terms
of
hiring
a
consultant
to
review
the
items
being
the
applicant
being
required
to
do
the
review
and
the
24-hour
turnaround.
C
G
C
B
C
G
C
C
Okay
chewy
three
times
five
Palm
Springs
LLC
request
for
a
conditional
use
permit
and
a
major
architectural
application
approval
to
construct
a
30
room,
suite
hotel
with
kitchens
in
each
unit,
a
common
building
with
coffee
bar
and
an
event
space
on
an
undeveloped,
1.83
acre
parcel
located
at
two
four
four,
two,
three
two,
eight
two
South
Indian
Canyon
Drive
Flynn.
We
had
left
the
public
hearing
open
on
this
one.
Will
we
go
through
a
new
applicant
presentation
or
will
just
be
a
staff
report?
We.
G
P
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so
on
November
14
2018.
This
item
was
presented
to
you
and
at
that
time
the
Commission
voted
to
continue
the
item
to
a
date
certain
of
December
12
2018,
and
you
also
give
very
specific
directions
to
the
applicant
at
the
time
a
number
one.
You
asked
that
the
number
of
hotel
units
be
reduced
number
two
to
provide
adequate
parking
for
the
project
and
number
three
to
remove
the
parking
along
kya
and
Celia
from
the
required
number
of
parking.
P
P
C
C
C
P
Okay,
so
these
are
the
changes
have
been
made
to
the
to
the
plan.
So
on
currently
on
the
screen,
you
have
the
revised
site
plan
at
the
top
and
the
original
site
plan
at
the
bottom.
So
the
revised
plan
does
show
that
the
number
of
hotel
units
have
been
reduced
from
36
to
30
the
hotel
key
the
locals
have
been
reduced
from
49
to
36.
There
are
now
47
parking
spaces
that
are
provided
on
site.
P
So
if
you
look
at
this
is
the
original
I
plan-
and
this
is
building
be
right
here-
you
notice
that
there's
been
a
movement
of
sort
of
this
whole
building
a
little
bit
southward
for
about
five
feet,
to
create
about
five
feet:
variation
from
the
rest
of
this
facade.
This
is
the
old
side
plan
you
can
see.
This
all
was
all
on
a
linear
plan,
but
that
movement
has
created
additional
space
here.
We
also
ask
that
the
applicant
provide
enhanced
pavement
paving
along
this
driveway
area,
and
here
are
those
enhanced
papers.
P
I've
been
have
been
provided
and,
while
I'm
here
I
also
want
to
add
that,
if
you
recall
on
the
original
plan,
we
have
the
traction
closures
on
the
south
west
end
of
the
side
and
on
the
north
east
end
of
site,
those
two
have
been
relocated
to
the
north
west
side
of
the
location.
So
those
some
of
the
major
revisions
that
have
been
made
and
I'm
sure
the
architect
would
like
to
elaborate
more
on
those.
P
So
they
were
able
to
provide
additional
parking
on
the
north
side
of
the
site
and
also
recall
that
this
is
the
old
line.
Again,
this
landscape
area,
slightly
shifted
and
additional
parking
spaces
were
parked
here.
Your
direction
was
that
this
area
included
in
the
overall
so
overall
will
not
have
47
partner
spaces
on
the
side.
Thank
you.
P
So
I've
already
talked
about
the
enhanced
paving
area.
The
parking
spaces
are
longer
kya
and
Celia
are
no
longer
a
part
of
the
part
of
the
overall
packing,
so
go
back
are
really
quick
on
the
elevations,
so
city.
P
P
P
And
finally,
I
did
mention
that
the
two
trash
and
closures
have
been
relocated
and
bicycle
parking
area
has
been
included
in
the
on
at
the
north
side
of
the
lobby
area.
The
original
conditions
that
were
proposed
by
staff
remains
the
same
to
address
the
issue
of
parking.
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
those
and
it
will
have
more
lights
to
shed
on
that.
P
O
However,
I
have
quite
a
few
questions,
so
bear
with
me
a
minute
will
take
us,
hopefully
before
lunch.
First
of
all,
I
just
want
to
reiterate,
because
the
parking
study
that
was
submitted
has
several
different
numbers
for
the
amount
of
parking
spaces.
It's
got
45
in
other
places.
49
the
site
plan
says
47.
Your
staff
report
says
47.
I
want
to
I
want
to
confirm
that
they're
providing
47
on-site
spaces
that.
O
O
O
There
was
a
chart,
I
didn't
quite
understand,
and
let
me
just
find
it
a
minute.
I'm
sorry
I
thought
it
did
you
chilled
everything
and
it
was
really
about
the
number
of
rental
rooms
that
maybe
can
help
me
find
it
the
number
of
rooms
that
had
to
be
rented
for
an
event
space
of
50.
When
you
did
event,
space
is
used
for
50
people
or
the
event
space
is
used
for
100
people.
O
O
P
O
P
O
O
O
G
C
K
P
K
P
K
H
H
H
P
C
H
C
One
hold
on
no
and
one
perky
and
not
one
per
room,
plus
additional
parking
parking
requirements
for
the
common
space,
making
it
typically
70
I'm
wondering
as
I'm
looking
at
that.
I
still
have
a
lot
of
questions
on
parking
but
I'm,
looking
at
the
event
space
and
when
you're
putting
a
hundred
and
fifty
people
there
saying
that
twenty-seven
of
the
rooms
need
to
be
rented
to
be
able
to
have
a
hundred
and
fifty
person
event.
Where
are
you
thinking?
The
rest
of
the
people
are
going
to
be
parked
so.
Q
P
To
go
back
to
the
first
part
of
your
question,
be
the
overall
account
no
longer
stands
at
seventy,
because
the
number
of
hotel
units
had
been
reduced
from
39
to
from
36
to
30.
So
if
we
go
by
the
provision
of
section
90
306
of
the
code,
that
will
reduce
that
overall,
a
requirement
to
62,
so
the
number
of
hotel
rooms
have
been
reduced,
so
is
the
number
the
size
of
the
square
footage
of
the
common
building,
so
that
brought
down
the
number
of
spaces
to
be
required.
P
So
on
the
second
part
of
your
question,
that
is
what
the
that
question
is
being
addressed
by
the
parking
management
plan
and
if
all
the
recommendations
are
implemented,
we
believe
that
the
parking
issue
can
be
addressed,
may
not
be
to
a
hundred
to
thirty
degree
or
to
the
extent
of
a
hundred
percent.
However,
would
you
believe
that
those
issues
can
be
mitigated.