►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board Meeting 05-25-2022
Description
Code Enforcement Board Meeting 05-25-2022
C
Did
you
see
the
people
who
say
they
want
to
be
friends
and
they?
My
grandson,
is
half
peruvian
and
a
quarter
lithuanian
and
a
quarter
italian
right,
so
he
was
raised
in
peru
most
of
his
life
so
because
he
has
so
many
friends
in
peru.
They
all
show
up
on
my
facebook
page.
You
know
it's
because
because
he's
on
my
page,
my
grandson
and
so
all
of
his
pals.
C
See
he's
an
adjunct,
professor
in
california,
and
he
just
put
up
a
post
about
how
none
of
his
students
can
create
a
grammatically
correct
sentence,
not
a
one
and
he
and
he
went
on
about
it
and
and
how
the
students
are
blackmailing
their
professors,
because
they
they're
all
allowed
to
rate
their
professors.
Now
the
professors
don't
give
them
at
least
a
b.
They
downgrade
the
professor.
So
the
professor
is
at
the
mercy
of
his
students
for
his
for
his
rating
and
that's
the
whole
thing
has
become
a
system
of
cousins
ethics,
as
opposed
to
academics.
B
F
D
B
D
F
Do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
to
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
in
today's
proceedings,
when
you're
ready
to
speak,
please
come
to
the
podium
state.
Your
name
and
indicate
you've
been
sworn
speaking
from
the
audience
is
not
permitted.
Please
direct
your
comments
to
the
board
rather
than
to
other
members
of
the
audience.
This
meeting
is
being
recorded
and
all
comments
need
to
be
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
B
D
B
B
H
For
the
record
nick
faulconer
compliance
officer
for
the
city
of
punta
gorda
and
I
have
been
sworn
according
to
the
charlotte
county
property
appraiser's
records,
the
property
located
at
420
carmelita
street
is
within
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
punta
corta
florida
and
the
property
is
owned
by
the
respondents.
Submitting
19
photos
for
the
record.
The
pictures
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
condition
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken.
H
The
respondent,
mr
vega,
replied
back
saying
that
his
daughter
was
supposed
to
be
cleaning
up
the
property
and
would
work
on
it.
During
the
upcoming
weekend
on
february
22
2022
at
10
35
a.m.
I
issued
a
citation
number
10404
to
donald
k,
van
gundy
for
a
violation
of
chapter
chapter
9,
section
9-2-h
in
chapter
9,
section
9,
a
or
sorry
chapter
9,
9a,
section,
98-13
c8
for
trash
litter
and
debris
throughout
the
front
yard
of
the
property.
H
H
H
H
On
february
24th
2022
at
306
pm,
I
issued
citation
number
10392
to
donald
k
van
gundy
for
a
second
violation
of
chapter
9,
section
9-2-h
in
chapter
9a,
section
98-13,
c-8
for
trash
litter
and
debris
throughout
the
front
yard
of
the
property.
The
citation
has
a
200
fine
and
was
issued
at
420
carmelita
street.
H
H
This
is
a
violation
upon
the
gorda
code,
chapter
9a,
section
98-10,
h
and
chapter
9,
a
section
9
8-8
e.
The
fight
has
not
been
paid
for
60
days
from
march
26
2022
to
may
24
2022
february
28
2022
at
10
24
a.m.
I
issued
citation
number
10406
to
donald
cape
and
gundy
for
a
third
violation
of
punta
quarter:
code
chapter
9,
section
9,
chapter
9,
section
9-2-h
and
chapter
9,
a
section
98-13
c8
for
trash
littered
debris
throughout
the
front
yard
of
the
property.
H
The
citation
has
a
200
fine
and
was
issued
at
420
carmelita
street.
On
february
28
2022
citation
number
10406
was
mail
certified
to
donald
k
and
regina,
a
benghani
which
was
received
on
march
2nd
2022
on
march
16
2022.
I
posted
citation
number
10406
on
the
property
in
a
city
hall
on
may
2nd
2022.
I
inspected
the
city
upon
the
quarter,
records
that
found
that
the
200
fine
for
citation
number
10406
had
not
been
paid.
This
is
a
violation
of
upon
the
quarter
code,
chapter
9a,
section
980-10h
in
chapter
9a,
section
988e.
H
on
march
7th
2022
at
11
14
a.m.
I
issued
citation
number
10409
to
donald
k,
van
gundy
for
a
fourth
violation
of
chapter
9,
section
9-2-h
chapter
9,
a
section
9
8
13,
9,
8-13
c8
for
trash
litter
and
debris
throughout
the
free
guard
of
the
property.
The
citation
has
a
200
fine
and
was
issued
at
420
carmelita
street.
H
On
march
7
2022
citation
number
10409
was
bound
certified
to
donald
k
and
regina,
a
van
gundy,
which
was
returned
unclaimed
on
march
25
2022
on
march
16
2022.
I
posted
the
citation
10409
on
the
property
in
at
city
hall
on
may
2nd
2022
I
inspected
city
upon
the
gorda
records
and
found
the
200
fine
for
sanitation
number
10409
had
not
been
paid.
This
is
a
violation
upon
the
gorda
coach
chapter
9,
a
section
9,
a
10
h
in
chapter
9,
a
section
9,
a
8
e.
H
The
fine
has
not
been
paid
for
60
days
from
march
26
2022
to
may
24
2022.
on
may
2nd,
2022
and
notice.
The
hearing
imposing
penalty
was
mailed
to
the
respondents
via
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
has
not
been
received
or
returned
undelivered
on
may
2nd
2022.
I
posted
the
notice
of
hearing
opposing
penalty
on
the
property
and
at
city
hall
annex
on
may
24
2022
I
reinspected
city
clerk
records
and
found
citations
number
10404,
92
10406
10409
had
not
been
paid.
I'm
spending
an
invoice
in
the
amount
of
37.77
for
case
costs
incurred.
H
H
I
F
F
B
B
It's
not
it's
k,
you're,
giving
when
you
gave
them
a
second
citation.
You
increased
the
fine
amount
correct,
and
you
could
do
that
because
they
had
not
complied
with
the
first
citation
right.
So
it's
just
not
like
you
get
re
telling
you
got
to
clean
up
it's
it's
a
continuing
and
there's
only
a
certain
amount
of.
I
just
want
to
make
sure.
There's
no
problem.
Yes,
200!
This
is
the
max
fine.
Okay.
B
B
C
C
A
B
D
B
B
F
26Th
for
the
record
day,
mccarty
compliance
supervisor,
vince
horn.
The
reason
the
difference
in
the
number
of
days
is
the
two
of
the
citations
were
received
by
the
property
or
two
were
not
received.
Probably
those
two
have
the
same
number
of
days,
because
the
date
goes
from
the
date
of
posting,
not
from
the
date
of
the
issuance
of
the
citation.
B
C
D
B
B
Violation
of
the
address
is
73
sable
drive,
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
8.11,
subparagraph
e
sub,
1
property
maintenance,
violation
of
chapter
9,
section
9-2,
sub,
h,
tall
grass
and
or
weeds
violation
of
chapter
section,
9-2-a
visual
blight
dry.
Excuse
me:
dirty
boat,
visual
blight
outdoor
storage,
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
8.14
b.
Outdoor
storage
respondents
are
not
present
so
on
the
third
behalf.
I
will
enter
a
plea
of
not
guilty.
G
Chapter
9,
section
9-2-h,
and
there
was
a
dirty
boat
docked
on
the
rear
yard
on
the
property,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
point
of
order
code,
chapter
9,
section
9-2-a,
and
there
was
outdoor
storage
of
trash
cans
and
yard
waste
cans
on
the
front
yard.
On
the
property,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
puna
gorda
code.
Chapter
9,
section
9-2-a
and
chapter
26,
section
8.14,
I'm
submitting
42
photos
for
the
record.
The
pictures
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
condition
of
the
site.
G
G
G
On
april
18
2022,
I
reinspected
the
property
and
found
that
the
violations
had
not
been
corrected
and
that
the
dense
overgrowth
of
trees
and
shrubs
remained
on
the
property.
There
are
dead
palm
fronds
on
the
ground
on
the
property.
The
dirty
boat
remain
docked
on
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
there
is
outdoor
storage
of
paper
yard,
waste
bags
and
yard
waste
cans
on
the
front
and
right
side
yard.
G
I
posted
the
affidavit
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
on
the
property
and
at
city
hall
I
reinspected
the
property
on
may
24
2022
and
found
that
the
dense
overgrowth
of
trees
and
shrubs
remain
on
the
property
and
there
are
dead
pond
prawns
on
the
ground
on
the
property.
The
dirty
road
remains
stocked
on
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
there
is
outdoor
storage
of
paper
yard,
waste
bags
and
yard
waste
cans
on
the
front
and
right
side
yard.
On
the
property.
I
am
submitting
an
invoice
in
the
amount
of
25.98
for
case
cost
incurred.
G
G
B
B
E
G
C
B
B
B
L
K
For
the
record,
lavoisier
price,
junior,
co-compliance
officer
for
the
city
of
punta
gorda-
and
I
have
been
sworn
this
matter-
was
before
the
board
on
march
23
2022.
At
which
time
the
board
heard
testimony
received
evidence
and
entered,
entered
its
order,
which
was
received
by
the
respondent
via
certified
return
receipt
mail
on
march
30th
2022.
K
I
reinspected
the
city
of
punta
gorda
records
on
april
13
2022
and
found
that
the
creative
action
ordered
by
the
board
had
not
been
taken
and
that
defined
amount
of
500
plus
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
10.28
had
not
been
paid.
An
affidavit
of
non-compliance
and
notice
of
hearing
imposing
penalty
was
melted.
K
Respondent
on
april
13
2022
be
a
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
was
received
by
the
respondent
on
april
18
2022.,
I
reinspected
the
city
of
punta
gorda's
records
on
may
24
2022
and
found
that
the
defined
amount
of
500
plus
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
10.28
had
not
been
paid.
The
respondent
has
been
in
non-compliance
for
55
days
from
march
31st
22
to
april
24
2022,
I'm
submitting
an
invoice
in
in
the
amount
of
18.31
for
case
costs
incurred.
L
D
E
Several
cases
brought
against
the
respondent
that
the
respondent
took
over
an
appeal
of
those
cases,
and
the
respondent's
attorney
requested
a
stay
of
further
action
relating
to
those
cases
that
were
taken
up
on
appeal
to
the
circuit
court,
so
no
further
action
with
respect
to
the
fines.
What
has
been
taken
with
respect
to
those
prior
cases?
The
case
before
you
today
is
a
new
violation
separate
and
apart
from
the
violations
that
were
previously
heard
by
you
and
taken
up
on
appeal,
and
so
there
has
been
no
stay
requested
with
respect
to
this
action.
E
Mr
sheets
has
another
group
of
attorneys
that
are
representing
him.
In
that
case,
that
case
is
being
was
brought
into
federal
court,
but
still
no
requested
stay
of
the
code.
Enforcement's
action
in
that
in
this
new
case
was
requested,
and
therefore
we
are
seeking
a
payment
of
the
penalty
and
and
fail
and
a
penalty
for
failure
to
pay
the
fine
that
was
instituted
by
this
court
by
this
board.
Thank.
L
You
my
turn:
what's
your
answer
so
again
he's
not
telling
the
truth
four
tickets!
Last
time
you
gave
me
a
fine
on,
you
went
straight
to
a
lien
in
my
house.
You
are
not
telling
the
truth.
That
is
what
you
said.
You
would
do
if
I
did
not
pay
the
fine
straight
to
a
lien
on
my
house,
so
he
is
a
liar
again
and
I
do
not
know
why
I'm
being
called
back
in
here.
This
is
this
is
like
double
jeopardy.
L
Also
he
just
admitted
this
is
out
of
your
jurisdiction.
Federal
court.
Has
you
guys
already
you
guys
already
screwed
up?
Okay
federal
court
has
it.
This
is
out
of
your
hands,
so
what
he
is
doing
is
malicious
prosecution,
which
is
also
illegal.
When
is
this
going
to
stop
when
I
have
to
personally
sue
each
and
every
one
of
you,
including
him,
for
this
insanity
for
free
speech
seriously,
did
he
tell
you
got
three
more
tickets
coming?
L
They
were
supposed
to
be
next
month
and
he
pushed
him
off
until
after
the
state
because
they
know
he's
going
to
get
killed
in
state
court,
let
alone
federal
court.
So
he
is
a
liar.
They
went
straight
to
lean
last
time.
That's
what
we
expected
this
time
and
now
he's
making
it
more
crap
and
lies
for
malicious
prosecution,
which
I
will
file
a
bar
complaint
against
your
ass.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
standard
process
is
when
a
code
enforcement
order
is
issued
by
this
board.
It
constitutes
a
lien.
Under
the
statute,
there
was
no
additional
action
taken
to
impose
a
lien
on
the
property
it's
automatically
imposed
by
by
virtue
of
the
statute
and
the
recording
of
the
of
the
action
of
the
board.
E
E
But
at
the
moment
there
is
no
stay
before
you
were
nothing
that
would
prevent
you
from
moving
forward,
including
the
fact
that
there
may
have
been
a
filing
in
federal
court
on
this
case
until
that
court
issues
a
an
order
staying
any
type
of
further
action
from
you
or
or
you
issue
an
order
staying
any
action.
It's
it's
a
fair
game.
B
B
E
E
E
B
I
B
C
J
B
Over
again,
I
don't
think
mr
sheets
would
be
willing
or
even
able
to
not
continue
to
violate
this.
So
it's
called
free
speech.
No
we're
not
talking
about
free
speech
now,
no,
we
aren't
we're
talking
about
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
continue
to
come
before
the
board,
and
I
believe
that
you
would
continue
to
do
this.
Even
if.
C
B
I
B
J
E
B
Well,
mr
sheets,
you
obviously
you're
aware
of
the
the
citation
that
was
given
to
you
so
and
you've
expressed
yourself
as
to
how
what
you
consider
the
value
of
the
citation
that
was
given
to
you.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
really
need
to
have
any
more
of
a
presentation.
So
the
issue
before
the
board
is:
how
do
we
want
to
resolve
this
violation.
D
F
Dave
mccarty
cook
playing
super
brothers
been
sworn
it's
failure
to
pay
the
fine
it
would
come
back
again.
This
is
just
like
a
penalty
hearing
on
any
other
case
where
the
property
owner
doesn't
come
into
compliance
system
to
respond,
it
didn't
come
into
compliance
and
that's
sort
of
the
same
situation
as
that.
C
Motion
to
find
that
the
respondent
is
violation
of
the
order
in
order
that
a
finite
amount
of
25
dollars
being
thirteen
hundred
and
seventy
five
dollars
being
posed
representing
a
fine
of
twenty
five
dollars
per
day
for
55
days
for
non-compliance
from
march
31st
2022
to
may
24,
2022
plus
applicable
interest
of
4.25
percent
per
annum
and
said
fine
shall
continue
to
run
until
respondent
comes
into
compliance
with
the
punta
gorda
coordinators.
Further
ordered
that
the
responders
required
to
pay
additional
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
36
dollars
and
81
cents.
B
B
The
address
of
the
violation
is
427,
show
waller
avenue,
violation
of
chapter
9,
section
9-2
sub-paragraph,
a
in
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
9-14,
b,
outside
storage
in
violation
of
chapter
9,
section
9-2-d,
unlicensed
in
operable
vehicles
are
the
respondents
present
are
the
respondents
presence.
Respondents
are
not
present.
Okay,.
H
23
2022,
at
which
time
the
board
heard
testimony
received
evidence
and
entered
its
compliance
order,
which
was
received
by
the
respondents
via
certified
return
receipt
mail
on
march
25th
2022
the
compliance
order
required
the
respondents
to
remove
outside
stores
throughout
the
property.
Within
30
days,
I've
received
the
order
and
to
make
the
vehicles
on
the
property
operable
and
licensed
within
30
days
of
receipt
of
the
order
and
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
future
violations
of
the
pentagon
code.
H
I
reinspected
the
property
at
427,
show
walter
avenue
on
april
25th
2022
and
found
that
the
outside
storage
remained
throughout
the
property
and
the
inoperable
and
unlicensed
vehicles
remained
on
the
property
and
submitting
nine
photos
for
the
record.
The
pictures
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
conditions
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken.
H
C
B
J
Now,
let's
start
again,
3100
fine
be
imposed
representing
a
fine
of
100
per
day
for
31
days
of
non-compliance
from
april
25th,
2022
to
may
25th,
2022
plus
applicable
interest
of
4.25
per
annum
and
said
fine
shall
continue
to
run
until
respondents
come
into
compliance
with
the
punta
gorda
code.
Further
order
that
the
respondents
are
required
to
pay
additional
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
twenty
five
dollars
and
fifty
two
cents.
B
Motion
has
been
made
to
find
that
the
respondents
are
in
violation
of
the
order
in
order
to
pay
a
fine
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
dollars
per
day,
representing
a
fine
of
thirty
one
hundred
100
for
31
days
of
non-compliance
and
further
order
to
pay
court
costs
the
amount
of
25
dollars
and
52
cents.
Is
there
a
second
to
that
motion?
Erickson
second
motion
has
been
made
in
second.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
B
C
I
wanted
to
mention
that
I
have
finally
been
subjected
to
the
scrutiny
of
the
my
code
enforcement
officers,
the
boys
that
came
out
to
my
house
to
make
sure
I
was
in
compliance
because
I
had
a
new
standby
generator
installed
and
he
has
to
come
out
and
verify
that
I
have
the
right
kind
of
shrubbery
in
front
of
the
right
kind
of
stuff.
You.
C
D
C
A
E
Let's
join
a
brief
update
now,
literally
and
figuratively
on
march
on
may
12th,
I
filed
the
city's
answer
brief
in
response
to
mr
sheetz
and
mr
massey's
initial
brief
in
the
circuit
court
appeal,
the
mr
massey
and
mr
seats
have
30
days
from
that
date
more
or
less
to
file
a
reply
to
my
answer,
brief
on
behalf
of
the
city,
and
then
there
will
be
a
date
set
for
there
is
a
date
set
for
oral
argument.
I
believe
it's
in
july,
where
the
judge
will
hear
the
the
arguments
in.
E
I
think
it's
going
to
be
zoom
so
yeah
and
if,
if
anyone
wants
to
hear
the
oral
arguments,
send
me
an
email
and
I'll
see
if
that's
okay
with
the
judge
and
get
an
invite
and
similarly,
if
you're
interested
in
re
reading
or
the
two
briefs.
The
initial
brief
and
the
in
our
answer
brief
I'll,
be
happy
to
send
you
a
copy
of
that
as
well.
Yes,
I
would
like
to
receive
that.
D
I
E
E
D
The
only
additional
thing
that
I
would
add
is
I
I
think
it's
inappropriate
for
name
calling
during
the
meeting
and
so
for
anybody
to
call
another
person
a
liar.
It's
I
understand
you
can
believe
that
someone's
not
telling
something
accurately,
but
calling
people
names
during
the
meeting
seems
inappropriate.