►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board 05/24/2023
Description
Code Enforcement Board 05/24/2023
D
D
A
D
If
you're
here
for
a
case
today
and
would
like
to
speak
during
that
case,
please
stand
at
this
time
and
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
to
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
in
today's
proceedings,
when
you
are
ready
to
speak,
please
approach
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
indicate
that
you've
been
sworn.
Thank
you.
A
A
Speakers
will
be
courteous
in
their
language
and
presentation
is,
and
any
person
making
insulting
and
pertinent
distributive
or
threatening
remarks
or
use
as
language,
that's
boisterous,
vulgar
or
offensive
may
be
requested
to
discontinue
with
their
testimony,
and
if
the
conduct
continues
directed
to
leave
the
meeting.
Furthermore,
the
speaker
may
be
barred
from
further
presentations
before
the
board.
A
B
A
C
Chapter
9,
section
9-2-a
in
chapter
26,
section
8.14,
B,
I'm,
submitting
17
photos
for
the
record.
Just
the
pictures
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
condition
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken
on
January,
27
2023,
a
notice.
The
violation
and
Order
of
corrective
action
was
sent
to
the
respondent
order
and
corrective
action
be
taken
and
the
stagnant
water
be
removed.
C
Environmentally
and
maintained
and
a
temporary
safety
barrier
placed
around
the
pool
area
and
the
outside
storage
on
the
entryway
of
the
property
of
the
Rooftop
entryway
of
the
property
of
roof
tiles
be
removed
within
seven
days
of
receipt
of
the
notice
on
January
27
2023
I
posted
the
notice
of
violation
on
the
property
and
at
City
Hall
on
January
31st
2023.
They
notice
the
violation
order.
C
Second
notice
of
violation
and
Order
of
corrective
action
was
received
by
the
respondent
Via
certified
mail
on
May,
1st
2023,
I
reinspected
the
property
and
found
that
the
stagnant
water
has
been
cleared.
However,
no
safety
barrier
had
been
installed
around
the
pool
area
and
the
broken
windows
remain
on
the
rear
of
the
house
structure
on
May
1st
2023,
an
Affidavit
of
violation
and
those
hearing
was
sent
to
the
respondent.
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
was
received
on
May,
the
3rd
2023.
C
reinspected,
the
property
on
May,
23rd
2023
and
the
violations
have
not
been
corrected
and
that
no
safety
barrier
had
been
installed
around
the
pool
area
and
the
broken
windows
remained
on
the
rear
of
the
house
structure.
I'm
submitting
an
invoice
in
the
amount
of
24.42
cents
for
case
cost
incurred.
B
G
A
A
A
B
F
I
G
B
Well,
the
barrier
has
been
the
rebuild
of
the
cage
has
been
the
the
biggest
challenge
of
all,
as
you
could
probably
well
imagine
you're.
Looking
now
at
the
contract,
that's
that
deals
with
reliable
Screen,
Pro
they're,
all
pretty
much
in
the
same
situation,
trying
to
find
a
pull
cage
replacement
in
this
community
next
to
Impossible
without
having
at
least
minimally
about
a
9
and
12
month,
timeline.
B
D
B
A
handle
on
anything
of
that
nature
I've
even
tried
to
elicit
help
of
possibility
of
a
handyman,
and
it
seems
like
they're,
basically
they're
in
the
same
dilemma
as
the
actual
pool
replacement,
cage
cage
are
as
well
so
like
I
said.
Just
to
reiterate,
that's
really
been
the
biggest
challenge
and
stumbling
block
of
all
is.
A
I'm
suggesting
to
you
that
you
might
want
to
give
some
consideration
to
be
creative
because,
as
it
is
right
now,
there's
a
standing
violation
and
just
to
say
I've
talked
to
some
contractors,
and
they
can't
give
me
an
idea.
It's
just
not
a
sufficient
reason
to
excuse
the
conduct
you
need
to
have,
in
my
view,
a
little
more
diligence
in
resolving
this
problem.
J
A
Liability
right
when
they
were
doing
my
Seawall,
to
give
you
an
example,
went
over.
As
I
said,
I
went
over
to
Home
Depot,
it's
a
four
foot
fence,
it's
rolled,
so
you
unroll
it.
You
just
have
to
put
something
down
any
kind
of
stanchion
to
mount
that
on
and
I
had
to
put
that
around
to
protect
people
from
going
down
to
where
the
seawall
construction
was
because
the
the
repair
people
didn't
do
it,
but
there's
a
solution
for
you
that
would
bring
you
into
compliance
and
it's
not
expensive.
A
K
A
E
H
So
that's
a
state
requirement
that
that
modern
patterned
by
the
city's
code
and
I
think
finding
a
violation
there
and
giving
an
appropriate
amount
of
time
that
you
think,
based
on
the
evidence
and
testimony
is
necessary
to
bring
that
into
compliance.
That
would
be
the
order
that
we
would
be
looking
for
and
if,
if
that
time
frame
is
coming
and
the
work
still
hasn't
been
accomplished,
we'll
one
of
two
things
can
happen:
either
the
respondent
can
request
an
extension
of
time
based
on
whatever
evidence,
he's
able
to
demonstrate
that
due
to
his
reasonable
efforts.
H
Nevertheless,
the
third
party
contractors
have
been
able
to
fulfill
the
requirement,
get
an
extension
of
time
or
from
staff
or
come
before
you
and
ask
for
an
extension
of
time
based
on
the
factory
issue
and
order.
I
would
not
feel
like
that.
A
continuance
would
be
appropriate.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
an
order
in
place
to
make
sure
that
the
work
is
done
on
a
diligent
fashion.
It.
H
J
H
Still
a
violation
in
place.
No,
but
of
course,
look
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
make
sure
there's
an
order.
That's
enforceable,
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
the
respondent
could
do
this,
but
if
you
did
not
keep
the
order
on
the
books
and
and
have
a
means
to
enforce
the
order,
if
it's,
if
it's
not
necessarily
ignored,
but
if,
for
whatever
reason,
maybe
there's
a
hardship
that
the
contract
had
to
be
canceled.
That
would
not
get
us
to
where
we
need
to
be.
Okay.
A
A
We
could
then
so
there'd
be
an
order
for
that.
Mr
Riley
has
an
outstanding
contract
which
there's
no
specific
time,
but
if
we
have
a
general
time,
that's
eight
months
down
the
road
before
the
people
that
has
the
contract
with
will
be
available
to
do
this.
Can
we
then
table
any
further
action
on
this
matter?
So
it's
not
something
we
have
to
keep
tracking
for
eight
months
or
a
point
in
time
for
then
Mr
Riley
to
come
back
or
Mr
Faulkner
to
verify
that
the
action
has
or
has
not
been
completed,
and.
H
H
And
again,
we
have
evidence
from
the
respondent
that
he's
done,
everything
that
he
can
theoretically
do
yes,
but
for
the
fact
that
you
know
the
contract
is
in
was
April,
then
to
April
and
we're
in
May.
You
know
you
could
make
the
argument
that
that
contract
should
have
been
entered
into
like
six
eight
months
ago,
it's
almost
yeah
we're
coming
up
close
to
a
year
of
the
storm,
but
but
well.
F
A
A
E
I'm
saying
I'm
thinking
it
through
here:
okay
I'm,
going
to
take
a
swing
at
this
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
at
the
respondent
has
been
in
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
9-2,
Hotel
and
chapter
9,
section
9.,
2,
Alpha
for
stagnant
water
and
outside
storage
and
has
come
has
since
they
have
been
repaired.
A
cease
and
desist
would
be
provided
for
no
future
violations
of
those
orders
or
those
chapters.
In
addition,.
E
And
he
responded
in
his
order
to
pay
court
case
costs
in
the
amount
of
24.42
cents
within
30
days
has
received
this
order
and
it's
further
ordered
that
failure
to
comply
may
cause
the
code
enforcement
board
to
impose
a
fine
up
to
250
dollars
per
day,
plus
applicable
interest
and
I.
Think
that
does
it
I'll.
Second,
that
laughs.
A
A
Has
been
corrected,
correct
and
and
that
he
has
taken
action
to
correct
Property
Maintenance,
which
is
a
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
8.14
B
regarding
broken
windows,
with
a
contract
to
have
them
repair.
You
said
12
months,
12
12
months
and
in
presently
in
violation
of
chapter
9-9-2,
G,
dangerous
condition
of
a
hazard
lacking
is
a
fence
area
around
the
pool
for
which
he
is
given
30
days
to
come
up
with
corrective
action
on
that
violation.
A
H
F
A
B
B
H
H
E
H
C
B
D
A
A
K
A
B
H
B
F
L
G
G
A
E
A
H
Well,
we
we
can
start
off
by
recognizing
that
Mr
Scully,
yes,
sir,
has
has
stated
under
oath
that
he's
been
requested
and
authorized
to
act
on
behalf
of
the
respondent.
Ultimately,
this
board
will
issue
an
order.
The
order
will
be
served
upon
the
respondent
if
it
found
guilty
and
then
the
respondent
can
make
whatever
arguments
that
they
might
have
that
they
were
inappropriately
represented,
but
I
think
we
have
enough
to
go
forward.
H
L
A
C
For
the
record
Nick
Faulkner
code,
compliance
officer
for
the
city
of
Punta,
Gorda
and
I
have
a
sworn.
According
to
the
Charlotte
County
Property
Appraiser's
records,
the
property
located
at
341
Lake
Court
is
within
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
Punta,
Gorda
Florida
and
the
property
is
owned
by
the
respondents
on
April
12
2023.
After
receiving
an
internal
complaint,
I
inspected
the
property
and
found
the
property
was
cleared
of
trees,
shrubs
and
sod
without
submitting
or
receiving
an
approved
building
permit,
which
is
the
violation
of
the
funding
order.
C
Code,
chapter
26,
section
12.3
K
in
chapter
26,
section
1.4,
1.5,
1.10
and
the
debris
had
been
piled
on
the
right-of-way
next
to
the
roadway,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
plunder
quarter.
Code
chapter
9,
section
9-2-h
in
chapter
10,
section
10-10,
A,
no
cell
phone,
silk
fence
barriers
were
in
place
on
the
property
which
are
required
to
be
in
place
prior
to
any
Excavating
clearing,
grading
and
feeling
activities,
which
is
the
violation
of
the
Punta
Gorda
code.
C
Chapter
26,
section
8.13
and
there
is
exposed
soil
throughout
the
property,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
Punta
Gorda
code.
Chapter
26,
section
12.4,
k,
I'm
submitting
eight
photos
for
the
record.
The
picture
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
condition
of
the
site
at
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken.
C
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
has
not
been
received
or
returned
on
April
12
2023
I
posted
the
statement
of
irreversible
and
irreparable
violations
and
notice
the
penalty
hearing
on
the
property
at
341
League
court
and
at
City
Hall
Annex
on
April
19
2023.
A
notice
of
continuance
to
a
future
date
and
location
was
sent
to
respondents.
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
was
delivered
on
April
24th
2023.
C
F
J
G
A
L
H
L
I
made
a
wrong
decision
to
bring
in
some
dirt
to
fill
in
the
areas
where
I
removed
the
pepper
tree
stumps
to
prevent
them
from
growing
back
I,
admit
responsibility
for
getting
too
aggressive
and
having
more
dirt
brought
in
than
I
thought.
I
needed.
I
am
currently
working
with
an
architect
to
drop
a
house
plan
that
I
will
be
submitting
to
the
city.
Hopefully
by
fall.
It
was
my
only
intent
to
help
improve
and
remove
the
destructive
the
destruction
that
hurricane
Ian
had
done
to
my
neighbor's
fence
and
be
rid
of
the
invasive
pepper
trees.
L
I
installed
the
silt
fence
as
soon
as
I
could,
with
the
permission
of
the
Code
Compliance
Department,
my
actions
were
not
to
be
malicious
or
ignore
the
city
of
the
codes,
if
I,
if
needed,
I
will
have
sod
brought
in
to
stop
any
erosion
if
it
is
felt
that
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do,
I
will
work
with
whoever
it
takes
to
resolve
this
matter.
I
did
this
on
my
own
and
did
not
hire
anyone
except
to
remove
the
brush.
Also,
please
read
the
assessment.
L
I
had
done
prior
to
purchasing
the
lot
from
Ian
Vincent
Environmental
Services
of
which
I
gave
the
lady
a
copy
of
the
environmental
report
that
talks
about
the
property
and
the
invasive
material
that
was
removed,
and
that's
that's
it
sincerely
from
Michael,
Chapman
and
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
really
anything
else,
he
did
try
to
secure
a
permit
after
the
fact-
and
he
said
he
was
advised
by
Mr
Faulkner
that
he
could
no
per
no
permit
was
allowed
at
this
point.
L
A
L
H
Well,
the
first
thing
with
is
I,
understand
and
Nick
or
Dave
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
no
permit
has
been
applied
for
or
obtained
with,
respect
to,
the
development
of
the
property.
I
think
I
think
is
that
right
and
and
clearly
if
there
was
a
permit
for
the
development
of
the
property
that
was
issued,
then
the
exposed
soils
would
not
be
an
issue
because
that's
part
of
parcel
of
development,
so
in
in
the
interim,
until
a
permit's
been
issued,
the
the
remedial
action
and
I
think
the
respondent
has
even
suggested.
H
H
I
was
I
was
looking
see
on
the
environmental
consultant's
report
What.
If
there
was
an
identification,
an
itemization
of
the
species
that
were
removed,
I
heard
there
was
testimony
that
it
was
Brazilian,
pepper
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
believe,
I
see
that
in
the
report
and
that
and
and
additionally
it's
not
to
the
exclusion
of
any
other
species
that
might
be
on
there.
H
So
in
the
absence
of
of
an
identification
of
the
species
which
would
have
and
and
measurements
you
know
as
to
those
species,
it's
it
would
be
difficult
to
fashion
and
or
an
order
saying,
okay,
you
removed
five
oak
trees.
Five
oak
trees
of
significa
of
substantial
similar
size
need
to
be
replaced,
or
you
know
three
trees
for
everyone
that
was
removed.
We
can't
do
that.
A
J
The
permit,
but
without
plans
for
a
structure
that
you
can't
draw
a
building,
permit
without
plans,
so
is
there
a
permittee
can
draw
for
clearing
of
the
property.
I
mean.
Is
it
maybe
there
isn't
a
such
a
permit
through
the
city?
There's
no
such
permit.
So,
in
other
words,
that's
a
non-remedied
issue.
Either
we
can't
go
backwards
on
that,
so
he
needs
to
bring
the
property
up
to
the
compliance
of
the
soil
really
is
about.
All
they
can
do.
Is
that
correct.
H
K
H
H
H
J
H
Point
a
lot
clearing
was
not
drawing,
so
there
was
removal
of
trees
and
the
and
the
Expo,
the
removal
of
the
soil
to
you
know
whether
there
were
trees
there
or
not.
So
there's
two
separate
violations,
and
and
but,
as
was
noted,
you
can't
clear
the
property
to
expose
the
soil
without
getting
without
being
part
of
the
development
permit
for
the
property
as
a
whole.
E
H
K
Used
to
have
language,
something
like
that:
12
inches
at
chest
height
or
something
having
been
on
a
on
a
board
that
faced
this
with
a
multitude
of
oak
trees.
It
took
years
to
get
the
approval,
they
eventually
permitted
and
everything.
But
yes,
there
used
to
be
I,
don't
know
if
it's
still
there,
but
it
was
like
12
inches
at
chest
height
or
something
like
that
and.
K
A
L
G
L
F
C
G
K
K
Let
me
see
a
chapter
9
section,
9.2
h,
chapter
10,
section
10.10,
a
yard
waste
and
chapter
26,
section
8.13
have
been
remediated,
so
all
we
can
do.
There
is
issue
a
solution,
assist
order.
Regarding
the
other
chapter,
26
section,
12.3
k,
unta
Gorda
code,
26,
section
1.4,
1.5,
1.10
of
the
Punta
Gorda
code
and
chapter
26
12.4,
the
Punta
Gorda
code.
K
G
K
K
G
A
Fair
emotion
has
been
made.
We
find
that
the
respondents
have
violated,
have
caused
an
irreparable
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
12.3,
k
and
continuing
irreparable
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
1.4,
1.5
and
1.10,
and
here
are
violation
of
chapter
nine
section:
9-2,
h
and
verb,
irreparable
violation
of
chapter
10,
section
10
point
10-10,
a
an
irreparable
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
8.13
and
an
irreparable
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
12.4.
A
G
A
H
A
Further
that
compliance
60
days,
compliance
with
the
this
order
and
the
respondent
is
required
to
pay
court
costs
in
the
amount
of
forty
nine
dollars
and
80
cents
within
30
days
of
this
order.
Failure
to
comply
with
this
order,
as
imposed,
may
cause
the
code
enforcement
board
to
impose
a
fine
of
up
to
200
dollars
per
day
plus
applicable
interest.
A
A
A
A
D
D
I
A
A
C
For
the
record
Nick
Faulkner
code,
compliance
officer
for
the
city
of
Punta,
Gorda
and
I
have
been
sworn
according
to
the
Charlotte
accounting
property
appraisers
records.
The
property
located
at
319
Allen
Street
is
within
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
Punta,
Gorda
Florida,
and
the
properties
owned
by
the
respondents
on
March
1st
2023
I,
inspect
that
the
property
and
found
hurricane
debris
on
the
property,
including,
but
not
limited
to
Limbs
and
tree
debris,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
Punta
Court
of
code.
Chapter
26,
section.
C
8.11E1234
in
chapter
6,
section
8
point
or
chapter
26,
section,
8.11,
f,
I'm,
submitting
five
photos
for
the
record,
the
picture
submitted
for
evidence
or
a
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
conditions
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
Patriots
were
taken
on
March
1st
2023.
You
notice
the
violation
order.
C
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
and
on
April
15
2023,
the
Affidavit
of
violation
notice.
The
hearing
was
received
by
the
respondents.
Via
certified
return,
receipt,
mail,
I,
reinspected,
the
property
on
May,
23
2023
and
the
violations
have
not
been
corrected
and
that
the
hurricane
debris
on
the
property,
including,
but
not
limited,
to
do
tree
limbs
and
tree
debris,
have.
A
Emotions
made
that
the
city
has
established
a
prima
facial
case.
Is
there
a
second
in
that
motion?
No
second
motion
has
been
made
in
second.
Are
there
any
discussion
calling
a
vote?
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
is
there.
Anybody
in
opposition
motion
is
carried
okay,
Mr
Gorman.
I
G
E
Chapter
26
Section
8,
11,
Fox,
trial
of
the
Punta
Gorda
code,
an
issue
assistance
assist
order
for
any
future
violations
of
these
codes,
an
order
that
the
respondent
bring
the
property
into
compliance
within
30
days
or
receive
the
order.
There's
further
order
of
the
respondents
are
required
to
pay
court
case
in
the
amount
of
13.90
within
30
days.
You
receive
this
order
and
it's
further
ordered
Affair
to
comply
with.
This
order
may
cause
the
code
for
to
impose
a
fine
of
up
to
250
per
day
plus
applicable
interest.
A
According
code
and
chapter
26.,
section
811f
of
the
Punta
Gorda
code,
in
order
that
the
respondents
bring
the
property
into
compliance
within
30
days
of
the
receipt
of
this
order,
and
it's
further
order.
The
respondents
are
required
to
pay
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
13.90
within
30
days
of
the
receipt
of
this
order,
and
it's
further
order
that
failure
to
comply
with
this
order
may
cause
the
code
enforcement
board
to
impose
a
fine
of
up
to
250
dollars
per
day
plaque
with
full
interest.
Is
there
a
second
of
that
motion?
A
A
A
Next
case
number
22-83
697
code,
compliance
officer,
Nick
Faulkner,
responded,
carabell,
Barrack
cat
address,
of
violation,
520
Dupont,
Street,
violation
of
chapter
26,
section
8.11
e
one,
two
three
four
Property
Maintenance
tree
is
the
respondent
present
is
the
respondent
present
respondent
does
not
appear
to
be
present
on
behalf
of
the
respondent.
I
will
enter
a
plea
of
not
guilty
officer
Faulkner.
Will
you
please
present
the
city's
case
for.
C
Chapter
26,
section
8.11
e
one,
two,
three,
four
submitting
seven
seven
photos
for
the
record.
The
picture
submitted
for
Evans
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
condition
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken
on
March,
2nd,
2023
and
notice.
The
violation
order
corrective
action
was
sent
to
the
respondent
order
and
corrective
action
be
taken,
and
the
tree
limbs
and
tree
debris
be
removed
from
the
property
within
30
days
of
receiving
notice
on
March,
4th,
2023
and
notice.
C
The
violation
or
correct
up
action
was
received
by
the
respondent
Via
certified
mail
on
April,
12,
2023
reinspected
the
property
and
found
that
the
violations
have
not
been
corrected
and
that
the
violation
or
that
the
hurricane
debris
on
the
property,
including
but
not
limited
to
trilliums
and
tree
debris,
remains
on
the
property
on
April
14
2023,
an
Affidavit
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
was
sent
to
the
respondent.
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
on
April,
19
2023,
the
Affidavit
of
violation
notice.
C
G
A
K
A
K
A
D
A
Order
to
respondent
bring
the
property
into
compliance
within
60
days
of
the
receipt
of
this
order,
and
it
is
further
order.
That's
respondent
is
required
to
pay
case
costs
incurred
in
the
amount
of
13.60
within
30
days
of
the
receipt
of
the
order,
and
it's
further
ordered
that
the
failure
to
comply
with
this
order
may
cause
the
code
enforcement
board
to
impose
a
fine
of
up
to
250
dollars
per
day
plus
applicable
costs.
A
F
M
A
C
The
pictures
submitted
for
evidence
are
true
and
accurate
representation
of
the
site.
At
the
time
the
pictures
were
taken
on
February,
27,
2023
and
notice.
The
violation
order
corrective
action
was
sent
to
the
respondents
ordering
corrective
action
be
taken
in
a
building.
Permit
application
be
submitted
to
the
building
department
within
30
days
to
bring
the
house
structure
into
compliance
on
February
28
2023,
the
notice
of
violation
or
corrective
action
was
received
by
the
respondents.
C
Via
certified
mail
on
April,
18,
2023,
I,
inspected
the
property
and
founded
the
violations
had
not
been
corrected
and
had
the
roof.
Decking
and
trusses
on
the
house
structure
are
missing,
leaving
the
house
structure
open
to
the
elements
and
no
building
permit
application
has
been
submitted
on
April
18
2023,
an
Affidavit
of
violation
and
notice.
The
hearing
was
sent
to
the
respondents.
C
Via
certified
return
receipt
mail
which
was
received
on
April
24,
2023.,
I
reinspected,
the
property
on
May,
23
2023
and
the
violations
have
not
been
corrected
and
that
the
roof
decking
and
trusses
on
the
house
structure
are
missing.
Leaving
the
house
structure
open
to
the
elements
and
no
building
permit
application
has
been
submitted,
I'm
submitting
an
invoice
in
amount
of
13.45
cents
for
case
cost
incurred.
A
A
M
I
talked
to
one
I
guess
he
was
inspector
as
to
what
to
do
and
and
to
the
fact
that
my
house,
before
I,
could
do
anything
to
it
before
I
had
to
go
to
the
Historical
Society.
To
get
approval
to
do
this.
Do
some
improvements,
so
I
came
to
asking
the
guidance
that
I
need
to
go
through
to
get
my
house
fixed.
M
M
Morgan,
Orlando,
I,
hired
him
and
he
said
told
me
that
he
was
going
down
to
get
the
certificate
to
get
things
done.
He
was
working
with
an
engineer
to
draw
the
plans
to
get
it
all
done
so
I've
been
waiting.
He
texted
me
and
told
me
that
he
was
getting
everything
done
and
I'm
looking
for
him
to
his
guidance
has
to
tell
him
where
to
go
next.
M
M
I've
had
two,
they
told
me
because
my
house
was
supposed
to
be
it's
at
Historical
house
that
any
improvements
they
never
had
to
do
to
it.
I
had
to
do
it.
I
was
one
time
at
a
project
that
I
paid
for
permit
to
get
it
done
and
that
I
was
told
that
I
couldn't
do
it
and
that's
what
I
found
out
about
the
historical
society
today,
hey
and
so
I
went
back
downstairs.
You
know
what
kind
of
just
my
house
I
had
to
do.
M
You
know
and
they'll
be
coming
in
from
different
places,
but
then
someone
said
well:
I
can't
do
anything
in
Charlotte
County,
and
so
when
I
was
up
there
at
trying
to
get
find
out
what
to
do,
but
the
market
was
was
there
and
he
told
me
then
that
if
I
needed
something
he
would
he
would
help
me
out.
It
was
this
person
Randall,
Morgan,
Randall,.
C
N
A
record
Dave,
McCarty,
Coke
Point
supervisor
have
been
sworn
it's
a
part
of
the
standard
process
for
a
historical
structure
when
a
building
permit
is
issued
the
certificate
appropriate
application
is
submitted
at
the
same
time,
usually
for
a
major
project
like
this.
It
would
be
something
that
would
be.
You
know
fast
forwarded,
so
it
could
be
taken
care
of,
but
it
would
still
have
to
follow
the
procedures
that's
required
by
the
coat
yeah.
G
K
M
E
C
K
A
H
Why
don't
we
consider
continuing
this
case
until
the
next
hearing,
and
at
which
time
the
respondent
would
be
requested
to
bring
in
a
contract
from
the
contractor
to
indicate
their
course
of
action
and
including
the
necessity
of
applying
for
a
permit?
For
both
the
you
know,
the
construction
and
the
and
the
historic
designation.
K
H
I
mean
so
that
would
give
us
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
give
you
an
indication
of
all
the
different
steps,
and
so
once
so,
you
are
assured
that
he's
got
a
contractor
in
place,
and
you
know
how
long
it
may
take
from
the
city's
perspective
to
process.
You
could
then
ultimately
make
a
determination
as
to
how
long
it
should
take
for
them
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
A
F
A
A
E
H
I
know
that
you
know
you're
free
to
make
whatever
emotions
that
you
wish.
My
recommendation
and
request
was
that
he
come
back
with
a
contract
signed
contract,
which
is
what
I
meant
so
that
at
least
we
know
that
there's
a
path
forward
and
then
at
the
28th
meeting
you
can
then
determine
well
how
much
time
is
going
to
be
required
to
bring
them
into
compliance,
which
would
be
the
basis
of
the
order
that,
hopefully,
you
will
enter
at
that
time.
A
It's
a
piece
of
paper
but
correct,
come
back
with
the
motion
is
that
we
will
have.
It
will
defer
action
on
this
case
until
the
June
28th
meeting,
at
which
time
Mr
Riley
will
present
us
with
a
signed
contract
from
Mr
Randall,
and
we
can
decide
at
that
time.
Well,
any
any
contractor
who
is
prepared
to
take
action
on
your
property
at.