►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Advisory Board 7-27-2023
Description
Historic Preservation Advisory Board 7-27-2023
A
A
A
A
A
C
D
The
applicant
proposed
to
reface
the
existing
metal
ground
sign
on
the
street
front
side
of
the
property
staff,
recommends
approving
the
ca
application,
as
the
sign
is
requested
as
a
vinyl
decal
material
that
will
meet
all
zoning
requirements
outlined
in
chapter
26.
Article
11,
science
standards,
section,
11.11,
Jane,
freestanding
signs
and
the
sign
is
in
keeping
with
surrounding
uses
and
as
such
will
have
no
adverse
impact
on
the
architectural
or
historic
character
of
the
national
registered
historic
overlay.
District.
E
D
Okay,
moving
on
ca35
2023,
509,
West,
Olympia
Avenue,
it's
a
shed
application
information.
Only
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
install
a
10
foot
by
six
foot
wooden
shed
near
the
rear
southwest
corner
of
the
property.
The
shed
will
be
placed
five
feet
away
from
the
rear
inside
property
lines.
Staff
has
approved
the
ca
application
because
the
proposed
wooden
outdoor
shed
would
not
have
any
substantive
impact
on
the
historic
nature
of
the
primary
structure.
The
shed
is
architecturally
compatible
with
the
main
structure
through
the
use
of
like
exterior
materials,
portions
and
treatments.
D
Ca
36
2023,
653,
Mary
Street
roof
application
information.
Only
this
house
has
a
current
code
violation
on
it
because
of
the
roof
and
it
was
really
destroyed
during
Ian,
the
applicant
proposed
removing
the
remainder
of
the
existing
metal
roof
and
replacing
it
with
asphalt,
shingle
material
for
the
entire
roof
of
the
structure.
Staff
approved
CA
application
as
the
proposed
roof
removal
and
replacement
with
asphalt.
Shingle
roofing
material
complies
with
chapter
26
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
D
Ca
37
2023
118
Sullivan
Street
roof
application
information.
Only
this
is
the
Women's
Club.
The
applicant
proposed
removing
the
existing
flat
roof
and
replacing
it
with
like
same
roofing
material
for
the
flat
roof
portion
of
the
structure
and
replacing
the
asphalt
shingle
portion
with
metal.
Roofing
material
staff
approved
the
ca
application
as
the
proposed
flat
roof.
Removal
and
replacement
with
like
same
roofing
material
and
the
shingle
to
metal
replacement,
complies
with
chapter
26
zoning
in
Land
Development
regulations
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
D
D
Modify
modified
roofing
material
for
the
entire
room
for
the
primary
and
accessory
structures.
Staff
approve
the
ca
application
as
the
proposed
modified
roofing
removal
and
replacement
with,
like
sand
material,
complies
with
chapter
26
zoning
and
Land
Development
regulations
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
structure.
D
Ca
39
2023,
1009,
Taylor,
Road,
roof
application
information.
Only
the
applicant
proposed
removing
the
existing
tile
roof
and
replacing
it
with
like
same
Spanish
tile
for
the
tile
roof.
Portions
of
the
roof
staff
approved
the
ca
application
as
the
proposed
tile
roof.
Removal
and
replacement
with
like
say,
moving
material
complies
with
chapter
26
zoning
and
Land
Development
regulations
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
subject
structure.
D
Ca40
2023
301,
West,
Marion,
Avenue,
roof
application
information.
Only
the
applicant
proposed
removing
the
existing
flat
roof
from
replacing
it
with
like
same
material
for
the
entire
roof
of
the
primary
structure.
Staff
approved
the
ca
application
as
the
proposed
flat
roof.
Removal
and
replacement
with
like
same
material,
complies
with
chapter
26
zoning
and
Land
Development
regulations
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
structure
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood
last
one
CA
42
2023
is
401
West
redda
Esplanade.
It's
a
Windows
application
information.
Only
the
applicant
proposed
to
remove
and
replace
nine
existing
exterior
windows.
D
On
the
first
floor
of
the
primary
structure,
the
replacement
windows
are
made
of
the
Legacy
material
as
the
existing
windows
and
will
match
the
storm
damage
when
those
day
are
replacing
and
Grill
pattern
and
size,
as
well
as
the
windows.
On
the
second
floor,
the
windows
are
on
the
North,
West
and
Northeast
sides
of
the
house
located
in
the
dining
room,
main
living
room
and
kitchen
areas
and
can
be
seen
from
the
public
right-of-way.
All
of
the
new
windows
would
be
impact.
Rated
staff
approved
the
ca
application
as
the
proposed
window.
D
F
So,
just
briefly
staff
comments.
We
have
a
couple
of
things
to
announce.
The
first
thing
is
we
have
a
new
person
working
for
us
Matthew
up
here
is
our
new
grants
coordinator
and
you'll
be
hearing
from
him
in
the
future
when
it
comes
to
reporting
about
the
the
grant
for
the
AC
Freeman
house,
as
we
move
forward
with
that
project,
once
we
get
to
the
actual
expenditure
of
funds
in
the
actual
construction
phase
of
that
project,
Mitchell.
F
F
E
F
Excuse
me
for
that,
with
the
with
the
public
hearings
going
forward
for
Planning
Commission
next
month
in
August
and
then
City
Council
in
September,
the
the
comprehensive
Plan
update.
That
process
is
still
on
track
for
public
hearings
in
September
or
excuse
me.
Yes,
September
and
October,
so
September
Planning,
Commission
October
city
council,
so
that
we
can
transmit
that
on
time.
F
C
Mitch,
this
is
David
Perry
for
the
record.
When
you
talk
about
I've,
read
a
little
bit
about
this
new
Land
Development
regulation
plan
and
when
it
says
seven
feet
above
and
I,
believe
that's
what
it
I
read
above
base
flood
level.
Do
you
mean
that
you're
able
to
raise
the
property
up,
seven
feet,
put
in
seven
feet
of
fill,
and
then
you
get
your
height
from
that.
F
So
the
way
that
the
current
Land
Development
regulations
are
written,
there
were
exclusions
from
building
hide
and
one
of
those
exclusions.
Is
we
don't
we
don't
start
counting
Building
height
until
you
get
to
base
flood
elevation,
we're
clarifying
that
in
the
code
based
on
city
council
direction
as
base
flood
elevation,
plus
the
one
foot
of
required
free
board
under
the
Florida
building
code?
F
So
when
you
see,
if
you're
familiar
with
the
flood
maps,
you'll
see
in
the
downtown
area,
we
go
from,
maybe
ae8
elevation,
eight
all
the
way
up
to
velocity
Zone
with
like
a
12..
So
if
you're
at
elevation,
eight
that's
eight
feet
above
sea
level,
not
the
ground
level,
so
the
ground
levels
in
the
downtown
area
may
be
anywhere
between
three
and
seven
feet.
F
So
the
the
base
flood
elevation
is
really
always
measured
from
sea
level,
which
you're
not
seeing.
So
you
see
some
places,
they
look
like
they're,
elevated
to
the
moon
like
there's
a
whole
story
underneath
the
house
before
you
get
to
the
first
floor
and
then
some
it's
only
very
minor
a
couple
of
feet
and
that's
just
based
on
the
elevations
of
the
the
land.
That's
there.
E
G
F
Typically,
what
happens
is
the
the
building
permit
comes
in?
We.
Let
them
know
that
hey
you've
got
to
get
approval
from
a
stork
preservation.
Advisory
Board,
the
permit
has
already
run
through
the
entire
process.
It's
ready
to
go
it's
just
waiting
on
the
sign
off
from
Zoning
for
historic.
So
as
soon
as
this
board
takes
action,
we
sign
off
in
our
system
that
that
it's
approved,
and
then
we
also
notify
the
applicant
that
has
been
approved
and
their
permit
can
be
picked
up.
So
it
is,
it
is
a
pretty
seamless
process.
C
G
F
Approval
so
those
get
approved
immediately
by
staff.
They
don't
they
don't
wait
on
being
heard
here
again,
that's
the
the
difference
city
council,
when
this
code
was
adopted
back
in
2005,
was
very
concerned
about
people
believe
people
being
able
to
get
their
permits
quickly,
which
is
why
you
have
very
limited
review
Authority
under
the
the
current
code,
because
we're
in
that
post,
Arcane
Charlie
environment,
so
they
wanted
those
permits
pushed
out
quickly
for
repairs.
F
G
G
E
D
F
Behind,
historically,
going
into
the
period
between
Charlie
recovery
and
and
hurricane
Ian,
hitting
us
building,
department
on
permits
was
running
a
handful
of
business
days,
very
quick
turnarounds
when
compared
to
our
peers
in
Southwest
Florida.
But
now
those
permits
could
be
weeks.
So
that's
one
piece
of
the
puzzle.
The
other
piece
of
the
puzzle
is
because
these
historic
properties
have
that
certificate
of
appropriateness
and
we
go
back
and
forth
with
contractors,
sometimes
because
they
don't
understand
and
they're
not
asking
their
client
the
right
question
like
the
historical
society's
sophisticated
client.
F
G
Well,
my
concern
was
that
again
that
both
these
properties
are
on
the
National,
Registry
and
further
damage
and
harm
to
the
buildings
occurs
because
of
the
delay
within
the
city.
If
that
was
the
case
or
it
could
have
been,
the
contractor
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
would
think
that
consideration
would
be
given
to
those
two
specific
properties.
Given
the
nature
that
they're
on
the
registry
and
I
don't
know
where
that
falls.
G
F
So
I
don't
know
where
the
that
either
of
those
permits
how
they
got
processed
when
they
got
approved,
but
any
delay
because
of
building
is
really
due
to
the
volume
of
permits
and
that
is
permits
get
put
in
line
as
they're
received.
So
until
we
receive
them,
we
don't
put
them
in
line
and
until
they
they
make
it
to
the
top
of
that
line.
They
don't
get
reviewed
on
the
certificate
of
appropriate.
In
this
side,
those
can
be
turned
in
separately
from
the
building
permit.