►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 03-20-19 Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
And
it's
your
show:
meirin
pays
procurement
manager,
procurement,
solicitor,
request
for
qualifications
under
the
state
of
florida
statute
for
consultants,
competitive
negotiations,
act
for
construction
engineering
inspection
service
is
also
known
as
CEI
services,
and
we
were
wanting
to
establish
a
Master
Agreement
for
these
services
for
projects.
When
the
city
deemed
it
was
necessary
to
have
the
services,
but
we
didn't
want
to
award
it
to
just
one
firm,
because
if
that
foam
was
the
engineer
of
record,
they
could
not
be
the
CEO.
B
So
we
did
state
in
the
solicitation
that
we
wanted
to
award
it
to
at
least
two
firms,
so
the
evaluation
of
selection
committee
went
through
and
they
evaluated
their
Britain's
medals
and
also
went
through
the
interviews,
and
they
did
shortlist.
The
three
firms
that
submitted
and
KCC
s
came
in
first
and
a
e-comm
second,
so
the
the
committee
did
select
those
two
to
enter
into
negotiations.
B
Since
KCC
s
was
selected.
First,
we
did
include
in
the
solicitation
a
scope
of
work
for
a
specific
authorization,
one
which
would
be
CEO
services
for
Harborwalk
area,
2a
and
2b.
So,
with
a
EECOM,
we
just
negotiated
the
hourly
rates
for
the
Master
Agreement
with
KCC
s.
We
negotiated
the
Master
Agreement
and
also
the
scope
of
work
and
the
estimated
not
to
exceed
fees
for
specific
authorization
number
one.
B
So
before
you,
you
have
the
two
master
agreements
and
then
also
for
your
consideration
award
would
be
amendment
one
to
K
CCS
for
CDI
services,
which
will
also
allow
them
to
review
the
plans
before
we
put
it
out
on
the
street
for
bid,
because
then
there's
some
middle
package
and
in
the
interviews
they
did
mention
a
couple
of
items
that
they
would
like
discuss
on
the
plans
before
I
went
out
for
bid.
It
is
a
not
to
exceed
hourly
rate
of
or
not
to
exceed
amount
of,
300
thousand
five
hundred
seventy
dollars.
C
C
A
C
This
is
well
within
my
purview
as
city
manager
to
to
approve.
However,
this
is
a
committee
that
was
formed
by
City
Council
and
you
requested
that
they
come
back
when
they
have
ideas
and
suggestions.
The
chair,
the
committee
is
here:
I
would
like
to
her
to
come
up
and
speak
to
two
items:
the
acoustical
study,
and
they
also
put
in
a
quest
for
a
camera
to
monitor
play.
We
do
not
have
any
extra
cameras
to
monitor
play
there.
They
are
a
member
of
their
committee
is
willing
to
purchase
one
if
we
put
it
up.
E
A
A
A
G
Basically,
what
we've
agreed
to
with
both
vendors
is
to
have
the
courts
fully
loaded,
preferably
to
do
the
testing
on
a
Friday
or
Saturday
when
the
noise
levels
are
at
their
highest.
We've
agreed
to
do
studies
before
the
acoustical
abatement.
Fencing
is
up,
and
after
and
we've
agreed
to
test
the
courts
at
Gilcrest,
as
well
as
across
the
streets
from
the
courts.
G
A
And
as
far
as
a
camera
someone's
willing
to
purchase
a
camera,
how
would
that
be
monitored?
Because
and
the
reason
why
I
ask
is
because
I
live
in
burnt
store
aisles?
We
have
two
cameras
at
our
entrances
and
they
are
surveillance
cameras.
They
are
not
monitored,
so
they
are
not
because
there
were
residents
were
concerned
about
being
watched
and
they
are
only
the
they
go
back
to
the
cameras.
If
there's
an
incident
that
needs
to
be
where
information
they're
looking
at
the
police
are
looking
for
information.
A
E
The
thought
behind
the
camera
was
that
we
wanted
to
validate.
I
mean
there.
There
are
people
who
believe
that
the
courts
are
played
12
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week,
eight
eight
constant,
and
we
really
wanted
to
just
capture
and
really
for
our
own
knowledge
to
know.
You
know
when
is
peak
play
and-
and
is
that
really
true?
Are
they
really
operated
at
full
capacity?
Okay,
I
mean
so
it
would
not
be
for
an
extended
period
of
time,
but
again,
a
time
lapse.
Just
to
get
the
notion
of
usage.
D
E
D
Disagree,
we
should
have
done
a
sound
study
first
before
we
even
went
forward
with
the
acoustical,
fencing
and
I
mentioned
that
a
couple
of
meetings
back
but
I
well,
I
think
it's
important
that
I
just
think
that
we're
putting
an
awful
lot
of
money
into
pickleball
and
we're
getting
a
lot
of
pushback
from
the
community
because
of
that
so
I
would
caution
us
to
not
approve
a
whole
lot
of
money.
In
addition
to
what
we've
already
approved,
it's
it's
becoming
a
real
sticking
point
with
a
lot
of
people.
F
So
would
be
the
the
purpose
of
the
acoustic
study
to
be
to
generate
raw
quantitative
data
that
would
be
applicable
to
other
sites
too,
before
you
were
actually
to
decide
that
this
would
be
an
applicable
site
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
just
move
the
problem
inappropriately
from
one
area
to
the
other,
but
to
be
able
to
say
that
a
particular
site
would
be
able
to
support
based
on
the
raw
data
that
we
collect
from
here.
So
this
is:
is
this
more
like
a
scientific
experiment.
H
H
So
we
know
there
is
noise
I'm,
looking
at
the
firm's
that
proposed
so
far,
they
are
more
like
music
oriented
like
there
will
be
able
to
measure
how
much
town
there
is,
but
they're,
not
specialized
in
health
effects
and
property
value
effects
and
I
think
that
if
we
were
to
proceed
with
this,
it
had
to
be
someone
who
really
specializes
in
looking
at
environmental
noise,
community
noise
and
sound
impacts
and
I
find
it
like
this
firm
proposed.
Their
focus.
H
Just
their
training
itself
is
more
music
industry,
make
sure
building
has
good
sound
effects
and
then
they're.
Their
specialty
is
not
in
community
noise
and
I
find
that
that
just
measuring
noise
is
not
the
issue
because
it
cuz
I
get
my
decibels
are
not
the
issue.
It
really
is
like
the
actual
health
effects
and
then
the
subsequent
community
effects
on
housing
I
think
that
you
know
that
kind
of
study.
What
is
gonna
cost
more,
but
I
think
only
that
kind
of
said
it
would
be.
G
Can
I
speak
to
that?
Please
sure
mr.
Hartwig,
who
is
an
industrial
hygienist,
he's
an
environmental
engineer,
that's
his
background
and
he
is
very
much
a
subject
matter
expert
on
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
noise
in
environmental
areas.
He
does
testify
in
court
on
behalf
of
I
believe
businesses
as
well
as
neighborhoods,
so
I
think
he
is
maybe
what
your
this.
I
I
know
enough
about
acoustic
studies
to
be
dangerous,
so
what
we?
What
I
do
know
is
that
many
municipalities
in
an
effort
to
address
the
impact
of
noise
and
sound,
have
adopted
quantitative
regulations
that
identify
at
what
decibel
level
the
noise
is
a
violation
of
their
code.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
we
don't
have
something
like
that,
and
we
were
provided
this
morning
with
some
information
which
I
believe
is
a
copy
of
our
code
that
uses
the
word
offensive
beyond
the
premises
and
I'm
wondering
in
in
the
in
the
backup
material
for
this
item.
I
In
addition
to
the
sound
level
measurements
there's
a
it
indicates,
data
analysis
as
part
of
the
scope
of
of
the
service
is:
does
that
data
analysis
go
beyond
simply
identifying
the
DB
level,
but
our
decibel
level,
but
qualifying
qualitatively
identify
whether
or
not
that
level
would
be
offensive
so
that
we
could
put
that
into
perspective
of
our
ordinance.
I
guess.
I
So
so
again,
it
would
be
my
recommendation
that
if
the
city
was
going
to
approve
a
study,
then
that
study
is
going
to
need
to
take
into
consideration
the
terms
of
our
ordinance
as
to
whether
or
not
the
level
is
whether
the
noise
level
or,
however,
they
measure
it
beyond.
Just
simply
the
decibel
level
that
would
be
such
that
would
be
offensive
beyond
the
premise,
because
that
would
be
something
that
we
could
then
consider
in
terms
of
our
ordinance.
A
D
I
Hopefully,
I
mean
hopefully,
and
to
try
to
put
this
into
legal
perspective
in
in
the
application
of
our
ordinance.
The
term
offensive
must
be
objective,
not
subjective,
and
the
term
of
art
would
be
whether
it
would
be
offensive
to
a
reasonable
person,
and
that's
why
I'm
thinking
that
you
know
in
in
the
industry,
there
must
be
a
way
of
qualifying
not
quantifying
but
qualifying
whether
the
noise
would
be
offensive
to
a
reasonable
person.
I
I,
don't
know
enough
about
the
state
of
the
art
and
the
testimony
of
the
experts
or
whatever,
because
I
personally
haven't
been
involved
in
any
type
of
prosecution
relating
to
a
noise
ordinance
similar
to
ours.
Ours
is
not
unique,
however,
and
so
hopefully
that
would
be
the
information
that
would
be
developed
by
a
study
as
to
not
just
what
is
the
DB
level,
but
is
it
it?
Would
it
be
offensive
to
a
reasonable
person.
A
J
It
seems
to
me
and
I
really
I
understand
what
you're
saying
about
it's,
not
the
decibels.
I
really
I
do
get
that.
But
if
we
say
that
the
noise
is
a
problem
and
the
study
shows
that
before
the
fence,
you
can
hear
something
and
after
the
fence
you
can't
hear
anything,
then
we've
proven
that
the
fence
works
and
we've
eliminated.
One
of
the
problems
correct.
J
I
mean
I
I
can't
give
you
a
if
it's
you
know
if
it's
that
concrete
of
a
response
that
there
is
no
noise
or
nothing
registers
or
whatever,
then
that's
something
that
we
can
use
going
forward.
If
we
try
to
move
the
quartz
or
if
we
still
need
to
do
some
more
remediation
at
Gilchrist,
Park
I
I
can
understand
why
they
want
to
study
mm-hmm.
A
F
That
might
be,
and
that's
for
me,
the
purpose
of
the
committee
and
to
me
whatever
we
were
decision
we
were
to
make
in
the
future
that
the
having
this
kind
of
raw
data,
it
would
be
instrumental.
Excuse
me
instrumental
and
being
able
to
make
that
type
of
decision
appropriately.
So
I'm
inclined
to
go
forward.
D
F
C
D
B
D
D
A
D
F
I
D
J
A
J
The
only
thing
I
would
say
about
the
big
brother
Ernest
of
this
camera
is
that
there
are
a
preponderance
of
pickleball
people
on
this
committee
and,
if
they're
in
favor,
of
having
the
camera
on
their
play,
I
mean
it's
not
like
we're
going
out
to
the
general
public
and-
and
you
know,
photographing
something
we
are
photographing.
People
who
are
asking
to
be
recorded
so
I
think
it's
okay,.
A
A
I
A
A
K
The
area
is,
has
the
star
in
front
of
it
there
and
what
there
were
three
there
was
a
recommendation
for
a
bike,
rack
installation
or
a
no
Park
parking
striping
of
the
space
and
then
in
addition,
they
also
asked
that
we
look
at
crosswalks
to
be
installed
in
the
area
so
for
and
safety
the
pricing
is
included.
The
bike
rack
would
be
slightly
under
18
under
$2,000.
K
K
C
Also,
we
don't
feel
the
bike.
Rack
is
appropriate.
There
there's
bike
racks
as
you
enter
in
Lashley
pirate
there's
bike
racks
within
the
Ashley
Park
striping
is
very
easy
to
do
a
couple
hundred
dollars
and
we
can
get
that
done
and
we're
really
not
at
this
point,
ready
to
recommend
a
crosswalk
at
least
get
the
striping
done,
get
the
parking
space
get
the
park
car
parking
out
of
there.
We.
D
Then
I
support
marking
off
this
spot
because
we
have
had
a
lot
of
near
misses
at
that
location
and
the
Harborwalk
folks
have
been
complaining
about
this
for
a
long
time
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
keep
it
100
percent
clear
of
any
kind
of
vehicles,
whether
they
be
bicycles
or
motorcycles,
or
anything,
because
it
is
going
to
be
an
infringement
on
the
line
of
sight.
If
we
let
anybody
park
there,
I
would
totally
support.
H
A
A
K
D
Yes,
we
can't
vote
on
this
today,
but
I
was
also
asked
by
Commissioner
Constance
that
in
at
a
future
meeting,
we
consider
the
possibility
of
reducing
the
speed
limit
on
Nesbit
at
that
location
during
that
from
that
segment
from
from
Marion
North
tends
to
be
a
very
high
traffic
area
and
the
speed
limit
is
getting
pretty
excessive
in
certain
parts
of
it,
and
he's
asked
for
us
to
think
about
considering
that
so
I'm
gonna
ask
Howard
to
put
that
on
a
future
agenda
for
our
consideration.
Okay,
yeah.
L
The
downtown
farmer's
market
has
grown,
as
we
all
know,
and
they've
extended
over
into
the
Sullivan
Street,
and
they
would
like
to
be
able
this
started
back
in
2008.
As
a
temporary
use
came
annually
to
City
Council
for
a
review
in
2013
council
was
requested
and
council
approved
the
weekly
market
to
continue
without
the
need
to
come
back
every
year.
The
downtown
merchants
pay
a
local
business
tax
based
on
the
number
estimated
number
of
vendors.
They
don't
pay
any
Street
rental
or
Park
rental
fees.
L
The
downtown
merchants
would
like
to
be
able
to
manage
the
weekly
market
in
a
more
efficient
manner,
similar
to
how
special
events
are
held
on
public
property
staff
has
researched
various
rental
rate,
Street
rental
rates
for
different
municipalities,
which
range
range
from
$50
up
to
$15,000
for
her
or
per
week
or
per
day
for
comparison.
The
rental
of
all
of
Lashley
Park
for
one
day
to
include
the
park
and
the
pavilions
would
be
750
dollars
a
day,
plus
a
five
hundred
dollar
damage
deposit.
F
A
C
I
M
Yes,
under
boards
and
committees,
we
have
a
few
vacancies.
We
have
an
unexpired
term.
Excuse
me
on
the
burn,
store,
aisles,
Canal,
Advisory,
Committee
and
unexpired
term
on
the
Historic
Preservation
Advisory
Committee,
and
a
two-year
term
on
the
firefighters
pension
board
under
nominations.
We
have
a
three
year
term
as
an
alternate
on
code
enforcement.
We
have
one
eligible
applicant
if
you'd
like
to
nominate
an
appoint
that
would
be
mr.
Jane
Adel
s'en
I
need
a
motion
nominate.
A
M
A
Okay,
under
policy
and
legislation.
Thank
you
all
to
everyone
who
participated
last
week
was
just
a
great
week
of
community
input
and
there
were
some
hiccups,
I'll
say,
but
but
in
the
end
I
think
there
was.
It
was
really
rewarding
to
see
the
turnout
from
our
community
throughout
the
week
and
the
participation,
the
high
level
of
participation.
A
But
I
actually
talked
to
the
the
executive
vice
president
and
chief
operating
officer,
michael
richens,
for
a
Sun
seeker.
I
talked
to
him
this
morning
we
were
at
the
Sunseeker,
it
was
their
rib
their
groundbreaking
and,
of
course
we
couldn't
stay
for
the
whole
thing,
but
we
were
there
for
the
kind
of
the
social
time
and
I
mentioned
it
to
him
and
he
goes
wow.
We
would
love
to
work
with
you
on
that.
A
So
I
think
that
there's
interest
from
sons,
the
accordion
and
working
with
the
city
and
partnering
on
that,
because
I
think
it
could
be
so
that's
really
good
and
so
I
want
to
thank
everyone.
Jehan,
oh
you're,
going
to
Tallahassee
next
week
to
carry
our
torch
since
I
know.
Vice
mayor
has
a
too
busy
of
a
schedule
and
I
can't
be
walking
as
much
as
I
would
like
to
so.
I
can't
go
either.
So
please
keep
us
informed
and
let
us
know
what
goes
on
and
anything
any.
A
H
A
A
D
Mayor,
thank
you.
This
is
not
something
we
can
vote
on,
because
it's
not
on
our
agenda,
but
I
do
want.
I
have
some
comments
related
to
the
Buckley's
past
project
that
I've
been
asked
to
relay
to
the
councilmembers.
I
have
been
overwhelmingly
inundated
with
phone
calls
and
personal
visits
and
group
meetings
and
other
a
sundry
citizenry
that
are
affected
by
the
Buckley's
past
project.
D
Now
that
they've
all
received
their
assessment
letters
and
what
started
out
as
a
really
good
project
that
would
benefit
a
lot
of
people
has
now
turned
into
a
major
financial
burden
for
a
lot
of
people.
Contrary
to
what
some
people
in
the
community
may
think,
people
in
PGI
are
not
rolling
in
money
and
in
some
cases
we've
got
many
people
who
are
widowed,
who
live
alone,
who
worked
their
whole
life
to
buy
a
house
in
the
aisles
so
that
they
could
retire
and
live
on
the
water
and
now
they're.
D
There
they're
left
with
a
major
financial
burden.
In
one
case,
a
couple
that
they've
become
almost
too
old
to
even
own
a
boat
and
go
boating
are
now
being
assessed
for
$1,000
and
it's
a
it's
a
huge
financial
burden,
and
so
just
as
the
other
council
members
do
for
their
districts
I.
This
is
my
time
to
stand
up
for
the
people
in
my
district
and
I
just
want
to
offer
some
suggestions
as
alternative
solutions
for
this
project,
because
it's
broken
it.
D
In
my
opinion,
it
was
mismanaged
from
the
very
beginning
and
I,
don't
think
we
should
have
ever
segregated
out
part
of
our
population
for
the
sake
of
this
project,
I
think
that
has
caused
great
divisive,
nesara
Napa's
ition.
Now,
where
we
can
do
something
to
make
it
right.
Now
that
we've
been
turned
down
by
the
Mack
committee
for
the
$500,000
grant,
it
makes
it
even
more
unpalatable
for
the
people
that
are
affected.
D
D
F
D
But
they've
got
eighty
five
point,
one
feet
of
seawall,
so
therefore
they
have
two
water
access
units
and
that's
two
thousand
dollars
they
don't
have
so
anyway.
I
would
like
us
to
consider
the
per
foot
basis
as
an
alternative
method
of
assessing.
I
would
like
us
to
consider
now
that
we
know
where
FEMA
stands
with
the
with
the
money
for
the
sea
walls.
D
We
have
a
little
more
levity
with
that
account
now
and
perhaps
we
could
use,
maybe
even
a
half
or
so
of
that
what's
in
reserve
in
that
account
to
help
soften
the
blow
on
this
and
I
would
also
like
to
suggest
that
we
we
look
at
no
more
than
a
maximum
specified
amount
to
the
taxpayers
that
are
that
are
going
to
be
subjected
to
this
assessment.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
that
are
very,
very,
very
upset.
D
I
know
there
are
several
people
that
have
talked
to
me
that
are
seriously
considering
putting
their
houses
on
the
market,
because
they're
so
affected
negatively
by
this.
So
I
just
would
like
us
to
think
about
some
of
those
things
before
the
April
third
hearing
and
I
would
ask
for
you
guys
to
really
do
your
due
diligence
on
this
one
and
let's
make
it
right.
D
The
other
thing
that
I
will
mention
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
people
that
are
still
asking
for
a
strawpoll
and
I
would
strongly
recommend
that
we
do
that
if
it
holds
the
project
up
for
a
month
or
two,
then
so
be
it
I
think
we
have
to
do
this
right
and
it
has
to
be
right
and
fair
and
ethically
correct.
So
thank
you.
F
Two
shortcomings:
what
is
I'm
partially
in
agreement
with
you?
We
all
reserve
that
common
I
would
just
like
to
ask
ourselves
and
the
citizens
of
the
of
our
great
city
to
in
their
daily
lives.
Today,
take
a
few
moments
and
just
think
contemplative
ly
about
the
events
in
Christchurch
New
Zealand.
It
affects
us
globally
as
well
as
in
this
country,
I
even
had
to
diss
mentor,
so
I
just
want
a
moment
and
complete
of
thought
contemplate
a
thought
for
us
all.
That's
it
Thank.
J
Well,
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
during
the
Charette
process
and
during
the
design,
studios
I
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
so
many
people
that
I
had
not
met
in
my
daily
travels
around
through
publics
and
wherever
they
always
seem
to
grab
you.
But
it
was
amazing
to
me
that
the
number
one
thing
that
came
out
of
almost
every
conversation
was
how
much
these
people
love
Punta
Gorda.
So
we've
got
to
be
doing
something
right,
I
just
hope
we
can
keep
doing
it.
Thank.
A
N
And
first
I
want
to
say
that
you've
heard
me
use
the
word
I
and
we,
when
I
make
my
comments
and
part
of
that
is
because
I'm
here
not
representing
the
HOA
I'm
here
representing
some
of
my
neighbors,
who
are
not
in
a
position
to
come.
We
welcomed
the
city's
pickleball
committees
efforts
to
accumulate
pertinent
facts.
We
do
we
ask,
though,
that
the
facts
be
interpreted
by
the
committee
in
the
council
in
context
with
the
science
on
health
risks
on
noise,
annoyance
and
we'd
also
like
to
point
out
that
the
noise
is
a
problem.
N
It
is
both
plainly
audible,
a
distance
of
a
hundred
feet,
which
is
from
the
park
regulations
and
as
a
sound
offensive
beyond
the
premises
of
origin,
and
by
that
we
are
including
the
park
itself.
So
when
we
talk
about
its
appropriateness,
we're
not
just
talking
about
red
Esplanade
or
our
neighbors
behind
us
or
our
neighbors
in
the
vicinity.
We're
talking
about
the
park
and
how
this
kind
of
an
activity
because
of
the
noise
it
generates
is
not
appropriate
there.
And
when
you
talk
about
putting
a
sound
curtain
up
a
sound
abatement
on
two
sides.
N
You're
still
not
covering
a
whole
pie,
shaped
wedge
of
the
park
that
that
the
pickleball
courts
cover
five
percent
I've
been
told
by
somebody
plays
pickleball
of
the
the
parks
footprint
and
that
pie
shape
wedge,
has
its
large
Dan
large
expanse,
going
out
toward
to
the
harbor
and
the
harbor
walk.
So
those
people
are
still
affected
and
everybody
is
going
to
be
affected
by
the
appearance.
N
So
there's
that
issue
too,
and
as
far
as
Victor
Dover
goes.
If
you
heard
him
at
all
talk
about
pickleball,
he
did
say
this
is
the
problem,
all
the
country
which
you
know
if
you've
done
Google
searches
as
far
as
his
polls,
52%
and
61%
in
the
AM
and
PM,
and
the
initial
opening
presentation
talked
about
quality
of
life
here
in
pickle
in
Punta
Gorda
and
only
4%
talked
about
activities
of
which
pickleball
was
only
one.
They
got
also
included,
biking
and
walking.
O
Ok,
so
yes,
everybody
in
the
city,
including
myself,
who
does
not
have
a
connect
profit
property-
would
have
to
pay
a
little
bit
more.
But
in
addition
to
that,
the
benefactors
will
get
that
the
section
subject
is
a
compromised
situation
and
it's
on
despicable
thing.
I
did
go
out
and
survey
the
pickle
plex
complex,
those
of
you
who
haven't
taken
the
time
to
go
out
there.
There
are
hundreds
of
parking
spaces
adjacent
to
it.
The
ground
is
surrounded
approximately
70%
by
trees
that
absorb
that
there
are
no
residents
around
it.
O
O
And
the
half
of
that
compliment
compromise
is
that
you
would
not
spend
that
amount
of
money,
improving
a
problem
area
in
Gilcrest
Park.
No,
that
was
not
part
of
it.
I
didn't
say
that
I'm
proposing
that
you
not
spend
that
there
you
spend
it
on
the
other
which
you've
done,
and
that
should
be
satisfactory
for
that,
because
out
there
you
have
the
promise
or
the
potential
for
48
pickleball
courts
versus
eight.
Here,
it's
a
little
bit
to
give
up.
O
Folks
before
we
had
the
pickleball
people,
we
had
the
bocce
people
wanted
to
have
courts
in
Gilchrist
Park
if
you'll
read
back
about
ten
years
ago,
and
that
was
a
real
strong
push
from
them
and
you
didn't
accede
to
that.
That's
good,
okay,
but
now
think
about
it.
You've
invested
enough.
If
you
take
the
twenty
to
twenty-five
thousand,
that
you
want
to
spend
on
the
new
pickle,
plucks
and
Gilcrest
or
somewhere
nearby
and
the
cost
of
the
acoustic
study.
There's
a
problem:
okay,
Thank.
P
I,
don't
Wendy
Miller
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
the
appropriate
time,
but
in
the
charettes
and
we've
been
talking
about,
and
you
have
approved
looking
at
the
activity
center
and
different
ideas
for
it.
In
those
discussions,
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
was
the
number
I
remember
being
the
max
that
could
be
used
to
help
renovate
the
activity
center
since
the
budget,
if
for
twenty
twenty
years
on
the
table,
I'm
asking
that
some
money
is
set
aside
for
volunteers
to
have
available
in
order
to
Mabel
keep
that
Center
going.