►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting November 24, 2020
5. Consent Calendar
A
Consent
consent,
calendar
all
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
on
an
earlier
council
act
and
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested
so
first,
if
I
can
ask
from
our
our
folks
if
there
are
any
items
that
they
want
to
pull
for
a
separate
vote,
separate
vote.
A
B
A
A
A
C
This
is-
and
I
think
this
has
come
up
a
couple
of
times
now
where
people
have
asked
for
traffic
calming
measures
in
some
way
or
the
other,
and
we
talked
about
the
process
going
to
the
traffic
and
safety
committee
and
so,
for
example,
one
of
the
requests
was
made.
It
looks
like
on
august
7
2019
and
we're
now
about
13
or
14
months
later.
Another
request
was
just
made
in
the
last
couple
of
months,
so
I
think
for
myself
and
for
the
public
who's
watching
and
other
council
members
who
may
be
interested.
C
E
F
Good
evening,
everyone
please
juan
ricci
city
engineer.
I
can
try
to
answer
that,
so
we
did
have
a
traffic
engineer
who
completed
or
helped
to
complete
the
tj
tjkm
setting.
So
they
were
monitoring
that
and
and
pulling
items.
Some
of
the
items
would
need
additional
study,
and
so
you
could
take
additional
funding
or
you
know,
take
some
time
to
in
order
to
do
to
form
those
days.
F
So
those
take
a
little
bit
longer
and
I
think
there
was
some
balance
tried
to
achieve
and
you
know
trying
to
somewhat
to
respond
to
resident
concerns
while
at
the
same
time
you
know
working
on
those
longer
term
items,
and
so
I
know
the
tjcam
we
are
reviewing
that
again.
Unfortunately,
we
did
have
some
staff
tone
turnover,
and
so
you
know
the
more
experienced
traffic
engineer
that
was
working
on
the
time.
F
C
F
Is
some
of
it
may
be
just
determined
on
our
timeline
for
the
studies
and
when
it's
available
and
we're
able
to
prepare
the
staff
report?
And
you
know
we
also
try
not
to
overload
a
single
meeting
with
many
items
and
not
have
any.
You
know
another
meeting,
and
so
we
do
try
to
also
spread
out
the
items
so
that
you
know
they're
approximately
equal.
C
Okay
and
one
final
question
through
the
mayor:
if
it's
okay,
please,
okay,
thanks
that
one
of
the
one
of
the
proposals
is
for,
I
believe
the
apartments
near
chesmar
and
in
the
staff
report,
which
I
don't
have
right
in
front
of
me,
but
it
referred
to
four
collisions
that
were
not
specifically
identified
or
directly
related
to
that
particular
gray
area.
That's
going
to
be
red
striped,
I'm
just
concerned,
because
the
parking
is
really
bad
over
there
as
it
is,
and
so
the
recommendation
that's
been
given.
C
F
And
so
the
actual
determination
was
to
so
they
had
actually
requested
more
red
curve
to
be
applied
and
in
doing
the
evaluation
of
the
collisions
and
not
being
related
to
this
parking
zone.
The
decision
actually
and
the
recommendation
was
to
actually
allow
the
parking
to
resume,
and
so
more
parking
would
actually
be
allowed
than
had
originally
been
requested
by
the
apartment,
and
so
I
think
that
the
parking
was
really
a
consideration
and
was
really
evaluated
with
all
the
facts
that
were
before
us.
A
D
I
did
so
I'm
really
kind
of
concerned
about
the
red
curve,
removal
at
rosewood
drive
and
glen
brooklyn,
and
I
guess
it's
really
the
process,
and
I
wasn't
a
council
member
back
in
2016
and
I'm
sure
that
council
members
that
are
here
today
might
have
a
little
bit
more
information.
But
you
know
it
sounds
like
from
what
I'm
understanding
is.
A
group
of
residents
came
to
the
committee
kind
of
saying,
hey.
We
want
this
area
red
and
paint
these
curves
and
it
sounded
like
we
got
no
oppositions
and
so
go
ahead.
D
Let's
paint
it
red
and
kind
of
since
since
then,
things
have
changed
and
I
always
get
concerned
when
there's
a
few
residents
who
want
to
change
something,
because
I
look
at
that
intersection
and
there's
so
many
more
just
like
it
in
san
bernardino-
and
I
I
you
know,
grew
up
in
the
neighborhood,
so
I
know
it
very
well
walked
by
it.
A
number
of
times
had
friends
that
lived
in
that
court.
It's
not
really
a
dangerous
intersection.
D
I
can't
remember
accidents
even
in
that
area,
but
I
was
honestly
shocked
when
I
saw
the
red
carpet.
I
mean
it
literally
is
a
crazy
amount
of
red
curving
and
just
really
takes
away
all
parking
in
front
of
somebody's
home
on
a
corner
and
even
a
little
bit
on
a
side
street,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
see
it
be
removed,
and
so
I
just
say
that
you
know
moving
forward
that
we
all
need
to
think
about
when
you
make
a
decision.
D
Are
we
doing
that
for
the
rest
of
the
city
like
that,
and
if
so,
this
would
be
just
crazy
red
curved
striping.
So
I
I
think
that
what
was
done
back
in
2016,
I
think
in
hindsight
we
should
really
think
about
that
moving
forward
and
then.
Secondly,
I
happen
to
be
participated
in
that
meeting
and
the
the
committee,
the
tsp,
came
up
with
an
idea
of
putting
a
yield
sign
and
again,
I
asked
well
gee.
There's
other
yield
signs
are
there's
other
intersections
without
yield
signs.
D
It
was
not
the
recommendation
by
the
consultant.
So
now
I
wonder
why
we're
actually
putting
in
the
yield
sign.
You
know
the
person
leaving
glenbard
court
should
really
be
the
one
who's
going
to
proceed
with
caution
and
not
really
come
out
into
the
rosewood
drive
unless
it's
clear.
So
again
I
just
I,
I
think,
that's
something
that
I
would
again
not
recommend
going
forward
with
something
where
you
know
are
we
doing
yield
signs
every
time.
There's
a
side
intersection,
that's
coming
into
another
street,
because
we
don't
have
that.
D
I
mean
there's
some
areas
in
town.
We
do
have
it,
but
we
don't
have
it
consistently.
So
I
would
be
careful
with
adding
something
and-
and
the
other
thing
I
really
didn't
like-
and
it
was
actually
mentioned
by
a
resident-
is
that
it
wasn't
the
recommendation
from
the
consultant.
But
then
you
know
some
one
of
the
members
of
the
committee
said.
Oh,
I
think
we
should.
We
should
add
this
and
everybody
okay.
That
sounds
great,
but
I'm
not
familiar
with
that
intersection.
D
D
And
I
appreciate
that-
and
I
think
it's
not
just
for
staff,
but
also
for
council
members
and
those
listening
want
to
become
a
council
member
that
you
know.
We
really
need
to
think
before
we
kind
of
make
these
decisions
on
these
one-off
situations.
So
you
know
if
you,
if
you
prove
it
here,
do
we
apply
that
same
theory
throughout
san
bernardino
thanks
so
much
appreciate
it.
A
Okay,
was
there
anything
else
from
others?
On
this
item?
Item
e:
okay:
let's
go
on
to
item
j,
which
is
expect
resignation
from
bicycle
pedestrian
advisory
committee
member,
effective
november
6
2020.
at
the
city
clerk
post.
He
noticed
a
vacancy
in
accordance
with
state
law
marty
and
a
couple
of
us
are
bringing
it
up
and
obviously
others
can
comment,
but
it
is
mr
walter
byrd
who
is
just
shall
we
say
one
who
has
always
been
an
advocate
very
passionate
going
into
the
schools.
A
B
A
D
E
E
A
B
I
pulled
this
item
because
I'm
concerned
about
the
impact
to
the
residents
that
live
on
huntington
north
of
the
parking
permit
zone
near
the
corporation
yard.
I
spoke
with
the
resident
today.
They
and
I
heard
that.
Not
only
is
there
numerous
cars
that
park
that
are
probably
not
from
the
neighborhood
that
are,
they
believe
they're
contractors
that
leave
their
large
vehicles
there
and.
B
Recently
street
sweeping
was
added
to
that
section
on
huntington
and
I
have
a
number
of
questions
and
we
all
know
that
parking
is
very
difficult
in
numerous
areas.
It's
even
worse.
Now,
with
more
people
working
at
home,
it
was
getting
a
little
bit
better,
but
it
looks
like
we're.
Gonna
slide
back,
and
so
I'd
like
to
hear
a
little
more
about
the
need
for
it.
How
many
parking
spaces
are
we're
trying
to
open
up
how
many
employees
arrived
at
that
time?
G
G
G
We
do
not
have
the
space
at
our
corporate
yard
for
on-site
employee
parking,
nor
the
money
to
construct
a
parking
facility,
and
so
this
recommendation
I
was
put
forward
actually
quite
some
time
ago,
but
was
put
on
hold
internally
until
we
developed
and
established
our
residential
parking
permit
program,
because
we
wanted
to
make
sure
before
we
went
forward
with
establishing
a
parking
zone
for
city
staff.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
had
a
program
out.
G
H
H
All
right,
so,
as
you're
aware,
you
know,
the
topic
is
related
to
the
establishment
of
a
parking
zone
on
a
portion
of
200
block
of
huntington
avenue
for
city
employee
parking.
The
recommendation
is
as
follows:
is
to
adopt
the
resolution
established
in
the
parking
permit
zone
on
the
portion
of
200
block
of
huntington
before
city
employees.
H
H
H
H
However,
during
the
time,
tspc
staff
deferred
making
a
recommendation
and
requested
the
item
to
be
brought
back
when
the
the
city-wide
residential
parking
program
was
established.
The
rpp
was
approved
by
city
council
on
august.
27,
2019
and
staff
recently
brought
the
item
back
to
csbc
for
their
review
and
recommendation
on
november
4th
last
month
or
actually
earlier
this
month,
and
the
tspc
members
voted
unanimously
unanimously
to
approve
the
permanent
parking
zone.
H
H
So
this
slide
shows
the
location
map
at
the
the
northwest
corner
of
the
intersection
of
philippe
and
huntington
avenue
is
the
location
of
the
public
works
corporation
yard
and
the
proposed
permanent
parking
zone
is
located
from
the
intersection
towards
the
northerly
direction
along
huntington
avenue
and
the
slide
shows
the
intersection
again
looking
north
and
the
corporation
are
to
your
left
there
at
the
corner
and
the
project
scope
will
remove
the
curved
striping
adjacent
to
department
adjacent
to
the
building,
as
well
as
the
center
median.
That's
noted
there
and
then
the
stop
sign.
H
It's
on
the
west
side,
which
is
the
side
where
the
corporation
is
located.
The
proposed
parking
zone
is
from
the
intersection
to
north,
to
the
end
of
the
to
the
north
end
of
the
yard,
building
and
on
the
opposite
side,
the
east
side
of
huntington
avenue.
The
closed
parking
zone
will
be
from
the
intersection
to
a
point
about
maybe
200
feet
north
of
the
intersection,
so
this
will
create
approximately
40
parking
spaces
for
employees,
since
the
work
hours
are
from
7
am
to
approximately
3
30
pm
on
weekdays.
H
H
The
you
know
for
the
staff
is
from
7
00
a.m
to
3
30
p.m,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
so
the
zone
will
benefit
both
the
employees
and
the
city
and
then
the
city's
resident,
because
employees
will
be
able
to
park
adjacent
to
a
corporation
or
near
their
homes.
You
know
during
the
day,
but
outside
these
permit
hours
you
know,
residents
will
be
able
to
use
the
spaces
to
park
their
vehicles
more
after
4
pm
and
staff
has
also
heard
from
concerns
about.
H
You
know:
vehicles
parking
within
the
areas
for
a
long
period
of
time,
and
this
implementation
of
this
parking
permit
zone
will
resolve
that
issue
as
well,
which
will
allow
you
know,
request
portal,
have
all
those
vehicles
to
be
moved.
You
know
on
more
of
a
repetitive
basis
here,
so
the
cost
here
is
about
three
three
hundred
dollars,
for
this
will
pay
for
the
the
staff's
time
to
install
new
signs.
H
Staff
is
not
requesting
any
additional
appropriation
at
this
time.
Since
you
know
the
streets
operating
budget
has
some.
It
has
the
available
funds
to
cover
the
cost
and
therefore
the
alternative.
You
know
there
are
two
the
first,
the
city
council
should
choose
to
establish
a
part:
the
parking
permit
zone
of
a
different
size
or
two
to
not
approve
the
zone
for
the
the
public
works
corporation
or
employees.
B
H
So
my
understanding
is
that
the
the
residents
were
contacted
when
we
first
previously
went
to
gsbc
you
know,
and
then
additionally,
they
were
contacted
again
or
they
were
sent
notices
for
the
recent
tsbc
meeting
on
earlier
november.
Four,
so
you
know,
they've
been
made
aware
of
you
know
twice
of
the
the
city's
interest
to
create
the
the
permanent
parking
zone
in
this
area.
B
Got
it
and
I
served
with
the
mayor
on
on
the
on
the
subcommittee
that
worked
on
the
residential
parking
permit
program
and
in
those
meetings
we
we.
We
understood
that
when
you
start
one
area
of
permitted
parking
to
take
away
some
of
that
parking
that
you
kind
of
push
that
problem
into
other
areas
and
and
that's
the
primary
concern
that
I'm
having
for
those
12
residences
that
are
north
of
the
parking
permit
program
of
that
parking
zone.
H
Yeah,
I
can
say
that
I
don't
know
staff
hasn't
looked
into
that.
You
know
additional
extension
of
the
the
spaces
that
we
know
you're
actually
referring
to,
and
that's
something
that
we
can
take
a
look
at
on
our
end
for
additional
evaluation
as
well.
But
I
don't
know
hey
one.
Do
you
have
anything
to
add
on
that.
F
I
do
the
residential
portion,
we
do,
you
know,
have
a
process
to
establish
a
residential
parking
zone
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
something
that
the
residents
want,
because
for
one
reason
or
another,
they
may
not
feel
that
it's
something
that
they
want
to
pursue,
and
so
I
think,
before
we
establish
a
new
zone,
we
definitely
want
to
engage
with
the
public
and
make
sure
it's
something
that
they
want
before
we,
you
know
tell
them.
This
is
how
it's
going
to
be.
H
B
B
B
It
keeps
one
car
from
taking
two
spaces
and
people
saving
spaces,
and
I
know
in
my
neighborhood
people
do
that,
and
I
heard
that
happens
also
in
other
neighborhoods,
where
one
car
will
conveniently
wedge
themselves
in
between
two
spots
so
that
they
can
save
that
spot
for
another.
So
I
I
can't
support
this,
but
I'd
like
I
would
like
those
hash
marks
to
be
applied.
H
G
Is
also
articulating
is
the
desire
to
do
that
more
throughout
the
city.
I
know
that
the
city's
engineering
staff
did
undertake
a
limited
study
on
potentially
putting
in
those
markings,
and
what
was
shown
is
that
you
actually
reduce
the
number
of
partial
spaces,
and
it
was
an
observation
that
that
happened
at
night,
counting
the
number
of
sort
of
cars
that
went
in,
and
so
I
think
part
when
we
were
talking
about
this
topic
at
its
core.
G
What
we're
talking
about
is
a
disagreement
with
whether
with
how
many
cars
you
actually
benefit
in
one
methodology
over
another
methodology
and
I'm,
I
think
staff
can
go
back
and
look
at
that
analysis.
But
if
our
goal
is
to
actually
have
more
cards,
one
way
is
typically
better
than
the
other
and
what
the
analysis
that
the
engineering
staff
did
before
it
was
proven
through
that
analysis
that
you
actually
get
more
cars
on
an
average
night
basis
without
having
the
markings
just
because
of
people
that
wedge
in
now,
in
anecdotal
observations,
you
can
see.
F
That's
correct
and
I
also
believe
that
there
may
be
other
regulations
that
start
to
apply
and
then,
of
course
it
will
be
the
ongoing
maintenance.
That's
required.
You
know
not
only
this
one
time,
but
on
a
continuing
basis
if
we
do
install
the
markings.
So
it's
something
else
to
consider,
but
it
is
something
that
can
be
looked
at.
C
H
C
G
C
C
C
The
second
issue
is
that
this
area
around
and
the
issue
around
east
and
west
ticketing
with
the
street
sweepers,
I
think
that's
a
big
issue.
I
think
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
this
was
brought
to
us
before
we
had
a
full
discussion
around
the
ticketing.
That's
been
happening
between
the
east
and
the
west
side
of
the
city
and
without
addressing
that
we're
moving
forward
with
identifying
parking
spaces
specifically
for
our
employees,
who
are
paid
to
come
to
work,
and
it's
not
minimizing
our
employee
work
effort,
their
work
product
that
they're
committed
to
the
city.
C
But
it
is
saying
that
if
you
live
somewhere,
you
want
to
be
able
to
park
near
where
you
live,
and
you
want
to
be
able
to
sleep
comfortably
and
not
have
to
worry
about.
You
know
getting
up
early
to
move
your
car,
which
is
already
an
issue
that
we
hear
about
all
the
time
because
of
street
sleeping,
and
so
the
fact
that
at
that
first
public
meeting,
the
second
public
meeting
was
the
day
after
the
biggest
probably
the
biggest
election
in
u.s
history.
C
And
my
understanding
was
that
there
was
no
public
comment
made.
But
being
that
I
was
at
the
first
one
being
that
I
do
recall
how
controversial
this
issue
was
and
being
that
I
do
know
how
controversial
the
ticketing
issue
is.
I'd
rather
address
that
before
we
say
yes,
we're
gonna
assign
this
entire
street
to
parking
or
this
entire
area
to
parking
for
employees.
C
What
I
would
prefer
as
an
alternative,
is
that
we
do
create
a
permit
program
where
employees
are
not
ticketed
if
they
park
in
and
around
a
community
that
might
have
street
sweeping
or
for
whatever
reason
they
might
go
past
the
hour
time
requirement,
and
that
might
be
a
balance,
but
for
the
equity
issues
that
are
there
with
our
communities.
I
just
can't
support
this
at
this
time.
So
thank
you.
A
D
Thank
you,
mayor
medina,
so
there's
there's
several
concerns.
I
think
that
I
that
marty
tried
to
address
as
well,
and
I
mean
I
first
of
all,
I
understand
the
staffing
issues
with
parking
at
that
site.
So
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
and
haven't
heard
tonight,
it's
it's
probably
you
know
it's
probably
like
going
to
a
you
know,
giants
game
in
the
parking
lot
and
they're
packing
a
bunch
of
cars
into
a
spot,
and
you
go
to
be
the
first
one
there
you're
like.
Oh,
can
I
get
my
key.
D
That's
in
that
car
locked
up
in
the
corner
over
there,
because
that's
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
they're
they're
stuffing
a
bunch
of
cars
on
this
city
stop
lot
because
they
don't
have
the
on-site
parking
for
staff.
So
I
get
that,
but
I
also
get
that
there's
a
community.
That's
lived
in
this
neighborhood
with
limited
parking,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
see
a
couple
things.
D
I'm
happy
to
see
that
at
least
we're
looking
at
increasing
the
number
of
parking
spots
by
removing
a
number
of
red
curved
spots,
adding
parking
to
those
spots
on
the
on
the
west
side
of
huntington.
So
all
that
in
front
of
our
building,
our
property
makes
sense
to
be
permanent
parking,
there's
another
little
bit
of
red
around
on
san
anselmo,
and
so
I
guess
I
question
why
we
can't
take
more
advantage
of
san
anselmo.
D
It's
a
pretty
wide
street,
so
has
staff
looked
into
even
adding
diagonal
parking
along
san
anselmo
in
front
of
our
property,
not
in
front
of
a
residential
neighborhood,
adding
permanent
parking,
like
you
know,
we've
heard
already
to
a
time
frame.
That
is
definitely
not
really.
I
mean,
there's
really
who's
going
to
park
there
right
who's
going
to
get
up
at
you
know,
4
am
to
go
move
their
vehicle
to
make
sure
they're
gone
for
permanent
parking
five
days
a
week
to
add
40
spots.
That's
permanent
parking
is
a
huge
hit
to
that.
D
D
Can
we
add
additional
diagonal
parking
on
san
and
selma?
Can
we
add,
I
notice
on
milton,
if
I'm
correctly,
the
street
behind
the
property
there's
some
curb
curbing?
Is
that
curb
needed?
Do
vehicles
really
exit
from,
and
I
would
doubt
it
that
they
actually
exit
onto
milton
large
vehicles
at
that
back
gate?
If
we
put
a
curb
in
there,
can
we
add
more
parking
there
I
mean:
what
can
we
do
to
with
the
least
minimal
impact
of
that
neighborhood?
H
Yeah,
we
didn't
look
into
any
diagonal
parking
spaces,
but
the
only
thing
is
with
diagonals,
parkinson's.
It
does
require
a
lot
more.
You
know
area
right
because
the
cars
are
at
an
angle
and
and
then
the
vehicle
travel
lanes
would
have
to
be
shifted
in
order
to
do
that.
So
right
now,
there's
only
one,
you
know
vehicle
travel
lane
in
each
you
know
direction
and
the
diagonal
parking
spaces
would
definitely
alter.
H
You
know
the
you
know
the
roadway,
the
vehicle
travel
lanes
and
I
don't
think
there's
just
by
looking
at
the
google
street
view
maps
right
now,
as
we
were
talking
earlier
customer
davis.
I
just
don't
think
there's
enough
with
to
install
any
diagonal
parking
spaces,
long
stand
fleet
or
even
san
antonio,
at
this
at
this
moment,
unless
we
ended
up
creating,
maybe
one-way
streets
or
something
like
that
and
which
will
allow
additional.
H
I
I
We
have
to
move
the
trucks,
to
get
the
city
trucks
out
of
the
way
or
to
load
them
or
to
get
tobaccos
to
load
the
trucks
or
to
get
at
the
pipes,
and
so
it's
the
only
city
facility
where
the
employees
do
not
have
a
dedicated
parking
lot
and
there's
just
there's
just
nowhere
else
to
put
the
cars.
In
my
time,
for
the
corporation
yard
and
for
the
30
years
of
my
service,
the
area
used
to
be
a
no
man's
land.
You
could
drive
up
and
there
was
hardly
any
cars
there.
I
What
I've
seen
now,
basically,
is
cars
that
are
from
contractors,
and
you
see
them,
they
drive
up,
they
jump
out,
someone
else
gets
in
the
it
gets
in
the
trailer
or
sometimes
a
motor
home
and
councilman
medina.
If
you
said
you
walked
to
today,
if
you
noticed
there
was
one
car
one
truck
with
a
trailer
and
there
was
a
home
these
vehicles.
I
These
vehicles
are
are
from
some
other
place,
and
you
know
we.
We
know
our
neighbors
down
there
and
we
know
their
cars
and
some
of
the
comments.
I've
heard
tonight,
basically,
and
if
you
look
at
the
map,
we're
asking
for
the
spaces
along
the
west
side
of
the
courtyard
and
on
the
east
side
of
the
courtyard
and
then
a
little
bit
farther
down,
which
is
just
east
or
across
of
that
the
is
to
the
north
of
the
courtyard
on
the
west
side.
I
So
it's
my
belief
that
when,
if
we
were
to
go
with
this
program
that
those
vehicles
will
not
be
there
and
then
it
will,
then
it
will
then
create
create
spaces
for
the
the
residents
that
live
just
the
north.
Of
the
courtyard
or
in
some
of
the
multi-unit
buildings,
it's
my
belief
that
it
will
create
that
it's
and
I
believe
that,
because,
when
I've
seen
what
what
has
been
the
the
change
from
the
from
the
speed
sweeping
is
that
the
the
large
vehicles
aren't
coming
back
as
quickly.
I
So
I
don't
know
where
they're
bringing
them
I
drive
by
the
courtyard,
obviously
every
single
day
and
up
and
down
huntington
and
they're
gone
someplace,
and
even
with
the
even
with
the
the
footprint
of
the
construction.
That's
going
on
to
huntington,
which
is
is,
which
is
a
pretty
long
length,
a
lot
of
the
a
lot
of
the
repeat
offenders
that
I
would
call
them
have
gone.
I
So
you
know
it's
it's
not
something.
I
could
put
my
my
finger
on
a
hundred
percent.
You
know
from
a
percentage
standpoint,
but
I've
already
seen
some
some
some
positives
to
it,
and
I
do
believe
that
you
know
with
the
employees
that
come
to
work
and
then
they're.
They
obviously
go
home
at
the
end
of
the
day.
It's
it
creates
a
it
creates
a
an
opening
of
units
and
and
and
vehicles
can't
can't
loiter
as
long
so.
Just
to
recap
I
mean
we've
got
the
we've
got
the
vehicles
in
the
yard.
I
I
A
A
D
Can
can
any
additional
red
spaces
on
san
felipe?
We
got
the
street
name,
he
removed
and
added
and
pull
some
of
the
off
of
huntington
over
to
in
front
of
there.
I
mean
the
other
thing
I
I
will
say
it:
it's
it's
one
of
the
weirdest
streets
in
san
bruno
because
you
come
off
all
these
narrow
streets
or
regular
streets
and
then
for
some
reason,
san
felipe
just
opens
up
much
wider.
H
E
E
E
I
mean
it
sounds
like
we're
going
to
do
the
the
roadway
expansion
anyway,
so
I
mean
really.
The
question
here
is
not
so
much
about
creating
the
spots.
It's
really
about.
Do
we
do
a
permit,
and
so,
if
we
could
limit
that
see
what
the
impact
is
and
then
if
things
seem
like
they're
a
little
bit
better,
we
leave
things
alone.
If
we
still
need
to
keep
expanding,
then
we
look
at
taking
a
few
more
away
and
just
see
what
that
does
to
the
neighborhood.
E
You
know
another
concern
too,
is
that
right
now
not
everybody's
going
to
work,
and
if
people
are
you
know,
because
of
the
pandemic,
spending
more
time
at
home
and
not
moving
their
cars
as
often
this.
This
has
that
much
more
of
an
impact
on
it.
I
don't
know
that
you
know
by
this
summer
things
are
going
to
be
dramatically
better.
They
might
be,
I
hope
they
are,
but
we
just
don't.
A
Know
yeah,
you
know
another
question
came
up
about:
can
staff
have
parking
or
are
they
identified
as
a
vehicle
so
that
they
wouldn't
be
ticketed
for
street
sweeping?
Well,
it
is
what
it
is
right.
The
the
reason
we
have
that
is
so
all
cars
move
for
a
good
process
through
it,
and
I
don't
know
how
some
community
members
I
know
if
I
parked
in
front
of
the
yellow
zone
as
a
city
employee,
when
I
did
guess
what
I
got
a
ticket
in
my
car
and
I
was
doing
city
business.
A
You
know
why,
because
I
shouldn't
have
been
in
the
yellow
zone,
so
I
don't
know
that
it's
fair
to
say:
okay
employees,
you
can
park
where
you
when
you're
not
supposed
to
and
the
residents
are
trying
to
figure
out
because
they
don't
know
it's
an
employee
car,
and
I
think
that
that
causes
more
of
a
challenge
too.
I
know
there's
areas
across
the
street
in
the
wood
slotted
area.
A
I
know
in
the
and
I'm
going
to
go
way
back
forgetting
when
that
used
to
be
more
open,
but
I
think
that
has
been
a
long
time
since
that's
been
available
for
any
usage
other
than
material
or
other
storage
items
for
the
corporation
yard.
If
I'm
correct,
I
was
looking
on
san
felipe
and
I
don't
see
that
because
of
the
turn
radius
and
site
visibility
that
I
don't
know
how
you
take
away
red
there.
A
A
I
know
they
do
at
the
parks
corporation
yard.
I
know
they
do
at
city
hall.
You
know,
which
means
also
fire
can
park,
their
personnel
library
can
park
there.
So
you
know,
I
think,
there's
something
that
we
need
to
do
and
and
just
to
say,
good
luck
and
when
they
come
in
to
report
to
work-
and
it's
like,
I
couldn't
find
a
parking
spot
and
street
sweeping
I'm
sure
that
goes
over.
A
For
I
don't
know
how
long
and
you
know
just
doesn't
help
the
efficiencies
and
the
effectiveness
cars
parking
in
the
in
the
lot.
I
think
it
can
be
a
challenge
I
think.
Not
only
is
you
know
my
question
would
be,
I'm
not
gonna
ask
it
for
a
response
now,
but,
let's
just
say,
a
city
vehicle
hits
the
employee's
car
who's
liable.
I
bet
you
we're
going
to
get
a
claim,
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
variables
that
we
need
to
address.
A
B
Yes,
hey:
this
is
a
good
discussion.
So
if
I
understand
right,
we
wouldn't
implement
the
permitted
parking
until
summer,
possibly,
but
we
could
remove
the
red
curve
now
and
and
grind
away
the
the
markings
there
for
the
west
side
were
adjacent
to
our
building
to
free
up
those
eight
spots,
and
we
have
a
couple
questions
we
re-raised
and
we
could
kind
of
look
into
it
with
a
little
bit
more
research
and
we
can
get
on
with
this
meeting.
G
I'm
not
a
traffic
engineer,
but
there
may
be
the
potential
to
remove
the
sidewalk
on
the
north
side
of
huntington.
That,
of
course,
will
have
other
impacts
to
create
that
diagonal
parking,
and
maybe
the
traffic
engineers
will
say
that
there's
potentially
an
ada
reason
why
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
But
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
that,
but
in
order
to
provide
additional
staff
parking,
what
I
wanted
to
again
proffer
is
authorized.
Staff
want
to
remove
to
move
forward
for
to
move
forward
with
removing
the
red
curve.
G
A
E
E
So
if
we
wanted
to
limit
what
that
would
affect,
I
I
would
be
in
favor
of
limiting
it
and
it's
kind
of
what
I
proposed
before
that
we
just
reduce
the
the
expanse
of
it,
see
how
much
it
helps
and
then
look
at
you
know
what
we
can
do
to
expand
it
later,
if
it's
still
necessary,
be
nice.
If
at
some
point
we
could
take
over
the
old
caltrain
lot
and
use
that
for
additional
employee
parking
or
make
some
use
of
that,
it's
pretty
much
just
a
empty
storage
yard.
B
Yeah
I
I
appreciate
that
that
that
still
the
zone
wouldn't
go
into
effect
until
the
summer,
so
I
think
the
quickest
thing
to
do
would
be
to
remove
the
red
curve
and
we'll
come
back
to
this
issue
after
some
additional
research
is
done,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
go
as
far
as
to
establish
the
the
zone.
Yet
I
just
think
we
should
take
the
first
step
in
getting
rid
of
the
red
and
provide
those
parking
spaces
based
on
the
schedule
of
implementation.
B
C
I
I
A
You
know
hold
on
deputy
director,
I'm
only
going
to
say
because
he
might
have
a
bias
answer.
I
will
tell
you
for
someone
who
walked
through
the
public
works
corporation
yard
this
month
and
I
went
at
a
time
where
the
city
vehicles
were
in
and
the
personal
vehicles
were
also
in.
There
is
no
room
not
not
safely
and
they
were
bottlenecked
behind
each
other,
and
so
an
employee
had
to
wait
for
this
other
employee
to
come
out
in
order
to
get
their
personal
car
out.
A
So
I
don't
think
the
efficiency
is
well
to
say.
Okay,
you
know
park
your
car
on
the
street.
Somehow
double
park
bring
the
city
vehicle
out,
bring
your
car
in
either.
So
I
will
just
say
what
I
witnessed
at
the
end
of
the
business
day
at
the
corporation,
the
deputy
director.
You
can
go
ahead
and
respond.
I
Yeah
you
hit
it
perfectly
and
and
someone's
normal
truck
isn't
the
same
size.
Obviously,
as
some
of
our
bigger
tracks,
I
mean
our
vacuum
truck.
Is
you
know,
they're
between
35
and
40
feet
long,
so
we're
actually
maneuvering
these
trucks,
the
large
trucks
around
the
city,
smaller
trucks
and
around
the
employees,
private
vehicles?
I
C
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean
I
just
I
I
hear
you,
but
I
I
don't
think
I
mean
I
don't
know
how
you're
how
long
you're
waiting
or
how
long
the
cars
are
being
blocked,
but
I've
seen
it
in
a
lot
of
yards
where
there
is
a
wait,
you
wait
for
the
person
to
move
their
car.
The
lot
is
there.
I
mean
if
there
could
be
a
configuration
of
the
lard
to
the
yard
again
to
depict
some
more
clear
parking
spaces.
C
I
would
also
be
curious
because
mayor
medina
brought
it
up
is:
do
we
have
claims
that
we
should
be
worried
about
in
these
cars,
but
I'm
just,
I
think,
taking
away
spaces
from
the
residential
community.
When
you
know
there
there
is
space
in
the
yard
and
it
might
be
somewhat
of
an
inconvenience,
but
that
might
be
better
planned
out
in
a
way
is
just
it
really
is
going
to
impact
the
neighborhood,
and
that's
that's
really
my
greatest
concern.
D
I
would
think
that
there's
other
vehicles
outside
of
city
vehicles
that
are
coming
into
the
lot
you
might
have
contractors
that
are
coming
in
dumping
off
material
and
picking
up
material,
because
you
are
a
courtyard.
So
I
think
you
know,
employee
vehicles
parked
in
there
is
kind
of
dangerous
if
it's
not
a
certain
specific
designated
area,
so
I
totally
get
where
you're
coming
from
I
mean
really.
This
is
a
long
overdue
issue.
I've
heard
complaints
for
years.
I
know
a
lot
of
employees,
work
for
the
city
and
the
challenge
that
you've
all
had.
D
D
We
know
that
some
people
take
their
vehicles
home
and
so
they're,
not
bringing
a
personal
vehicle
there
they're
actually
driving
driving
a
work
vehicle.
So
I
just
like
to
see
us
get
down
to
smaller
numbers.
So
I
like
the
recommendation
earlier,
where
we
just
limit
the
permanent
parking
to
you
know
outside
of
our
particular
property
on
huntington,
and
so
maybe
we
can
move
forward
with
something
and,
like
marty
said,
come
back
and
revisit
this
again
later
in
the
summer.
A
Okay,
I
think
we've
did
dialogue
that
is
still
under
a
consent
item.
The
current
resolution
did
go
into
much
more
detail.
The
city
manager
brought
up
a
consideration
to
remove
red
and
to
only
have
it
on
the
east
and
west
side
of
huntington
that
is
on,
that
is
in
front
of
the
property
that
is
utilized
by
public
works
or
in
front
of
public
works.
Should
we
say
on
the
huntington
side
for
now
look
into
other
elements
or
questions
that
have
been
raised
by
councilman
member
davis.
A
A
E
E
A
G
You
know
I'll
toss
that
to
juan
richie.
I
will
also
address
really
quickly.
The
comment
about
the
caltrans
lot
know
that
the
city
has
reached
out
to
couch
caltrain
numer
on
numerous
occasions,
attempting
to
lease
that
lot
and
have
been
told
no
and
they
they
have
their
own
uses
of
that
lot
and
do
not
wish
to
entertain
at
least
to
the
city.
Okay,
juan.
Will
you
address
the
question.
F
Yes,
I
was
just
looking
at
the
resolution.
I
think
it
can
be
updated
to
be
clear
that
there's
adoption
of
removing
that
red
the
red
zones
that
are
currently
on
huntington-
and
so
I
think
in
combination
with
those
red
crib
removals
and
keeping
it
in
front
of
the
courtyard
on
east-west.
I
think
the
resolution
could
be
amended.
E
Yeah-
and
I
I
think
you
know
getting
rid
of
getting
rid
of
the
red
zone
is-
is
important.
That's
going
to
be
a
major
portion
of
this
is
added,
that's
what's
really
going
to
add
some
parking
to
it,
but
the
way
the
resolution
is
written
right
now.
The
the
part
that
says,
therefore
be
it
resolved,
needs
to
include
in
that
particular
language,
and
so,
if
it's
modified,
then
I
will
support
that
as
well.
In
your
motion.
Okay,.
A
A
Okay
and
then
on
the
question,
the
only
thing
I
was
going
to
say
too
is
it
to
go
before
our
tspc
and
has
had
some
dialogue,
and
I
know
they
supported
it
in
a
in
a
more
broader
perspective,
and
I
think
we
brought
it
down
further.
So
with
that
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
that
with
those
changes
to
the
resolution
city
clerk
roll
call,
please.