►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting February 11, 2020
Whole Meeting
TRT 1:42:25
Produced by San Bruno CityNet Services
A
A
A
C
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
safety
of
the
center
over
here
at
the
intersection
City
Council
members
should
expect
the
best
efforts
from
their
city,
employees,
police,
firefighters,
Street
workers,
office
personnel
and
themselves.
I
expect
the
best
of
them
to
because,
as
an
experienced
school
teacher,
I
know
that
expectations
are
often
the
difference
between
a
c-grade
and
the
honor
roll
between
success
and
failure.
C
After
days
of
my
pushing
the
point,
more
than
thirty,
several
trucks
and
men
were
out
in
front
putting
down
cones
in
front
of
the
Senior
Citizens
Center
and
I
was
elated
that
best
efforts
were
forthcoming
to
secure
the
safety
of
the
seniors
at
this
dangerous
intersection.
This
without
time,
wasting
committees
or
consultants,
leaders
with
foresight,
cojones
involved,
because
there
was
they
recognize.
The
immediacy
of
the
situation.
C
After
a
couple
of
hours,
they
left
only
painted
intersections
already
ten
years
late,
and
then
they
left
I
asked
them
as
they
were.
Leaving
is
that
it
you're
done
yep
happiness,
balloon
deflated.
What
about
the
speed
bumps
the
flashing
lights
in
the
roadway,
the
three
signs
that
were
at
the
approaches
to
the
center,
never
to
be
shorted,
cheaped
out
I
know
it
was
the
least
expensive
way
to
do
it,
but
jeez.
These
are
your
grandparents
beyond
that
seniors
at
the
intersection
deserve
and
have
a
legal
right
to
the
best
and
immediate
safety
at
the
intersection.
C
This
is
not
a
political
luxury
to
be
dystopia
stowed.
True
safety
is
implemented
before
an
accident,
not
afterward
a
good
start.
Thank
you
now
finish.
The
job
will
the
reality
of
the
thud
of
crippling
impact
of
hard
steel
against
soft
old
flesh,
be
your
legacy,
something
that
you
could
have
prevented
with
mere
money
when
I
was
a
teacher,
I
never
used
this
term,
but
we're
all
adults
here
and
it
fits
this
could
be
described
as
a
half-assed
effort
towards
safety.
We
have
expectations
of
you.
We
have
expectations
of
you.
Thank
you.
C
B
D
Hi
I'm
Nancy,
Foreman
I
leave
on
live
on
Poplar
Avenue
in
San,
Bruno,
I'm,
fairly
new
to
attending
council
meetings,
planning,
department,
traffic
and
safety
and
I
want
to
share
my
observations
about
San
Bruno
I
hear
a
lot
of
what
we
can't
do.
We've
never
done
it
that
way
before
or
that's
not
allowed.
D
I
would
like
to
see
our
city
adopt
a
we
can
approach,
or
at
least
a
willingness
to
look
at
concerns
with
the
new
approach
in
December
when
Linda
Mason
was
installed
as
council
person,
it
was
odd
to
me
that
she
was
installed
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
The
council
was
down
a
voice
and
a
vote
because
you've
always
done
it.
This
way
does
not
make
it
the
only
way
departments
need
to
talk
to
each
other.
We
all
know
there's
a
lot
of
proposed
buildings
in
the
pipeline,
be
at
the
TCP
youtube/google
school
campuses.
D
D
San
Bruno
has
already
agreed
to
reduce
one
lane
of
traffic
on
Huntington
Avenue
southbound
at
San
Bruno
Avenue
to
accommodate
a
large
housing
unit
that
was
not
designated
within
the
legal
setback.
According
to
code,
we're
not
careful
and
consider
an
Oliver
community
plan.
The
city
will
end
up
in
gridlock.
D
Today.
You
only
need
your
eyes
to
tell
you
that,
there's
a
significant
increase
in
traffic
when
a
member
of
the
community
writes
a
letter
to
the
city
me
included,
we
get
no
response
or
acknowledgement.
Example:
I
wrote
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
September
2019.
When
a
for
sale
sign
went
up
on
the
house.
D
In
back
of
me,
I
knew
it
was
going
to
be
a
teardown
I
asked
to
speak
to
the
owners
before
they
spent
any
money
on
plans
inviting
them
to
visit
our
house
to
see
elevation
problems
asked
to
work
together
for
win-win,
hoping
to
save
them
money
in
time.
No
response,
till
last
week,
when
I
got
a
letter
that
they
were
requesting,
a
variance
for
a
monster,
build
April,
2018
I
wrote
to
traffic
and
Safety
Committee
regarding
a
very
difficult
t,
intersection
at
poplar
and
santa
lucia.
Then
again
in
September,
2019
I
had
no
response.
D
I
finally
went
to
traffic
and
Safety
Committee
meeting
only
to
be
told
my
letter
hadn't
come
to
the
top
of
the
pile
really
since
April
2018
I
know
the
school
board
and
City
Council's
are
separate
entities
I
get
that
yet
one
does
affect
the
other
I.
Please
ask
you
to
be
proactive
and
not
reactive.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
A
E
Good
evening
the
Senior
Center
will
be
hosting
the
annual
Valentine's
Day
party
on
Friday
February
14th
2020
join
us
for
roasted
turkey.
Lunch
and
entertainment
by
the
full
house
band
advance
tickets
can
be
purchased
at
the
Senior
Center
for
a
$6
suggest,
suggested
donation
for
those
60
and
over
the
San
Bruno
library
we'll
be
presenting
another
installment
in
the
coffee
and
the
cosmos
series
on
Saturday
February
29th
at
4
p.m.
in
the
downstairs
community
room.
The
featured
speaker
will
be
dr..
Nick
Jay
Scott
lead
research,
scientist
at
NASA,
Ames
Research
Center
in
California's,
Silicon
Valley.
E
Please
join
us
for
a
talk,
some
refreshments
and
informal
question-and-answer
session.
We
are
now
accepting
applications
for
various
part-time
positions
for
summer
employment
interviews
will
take
place
in
April.
You
can
pick
up
and
return
your
application
to
the
Recreation
Center
in
the
San
Bruno
city
park
or
visit
Cal,
ops
or
org.
We
are
hiring
for
summer
camp
and
aquatics
programs
on
February
21st
from
7:30
to
9:30
p.m.
six,
seventh
and
eighth
graders
from
San
Bruno
invited
to
the
teen
dance
held
in
the
gym
at
the
Recreation
Center,
come
and
dance
to
your
favorite
songs.
E
Presale
tickets
will
be
sold
at
Parkside
school
and
the
Recreation
office
for
$10
tickets
can
also
be
purchased
at
the
door
for
13
dollars
and
finally,
the
father-daughter
dance
will
be
held
on
Saturday
February
22nd
from
5:30
to
8:30
p.m.
here
at
the
Senior
Center
tickets
are
available
at
the
Recreation
Center
office,
enjoy
dinner
dancing
and
receive
a
commemorative
photo
with
your
daughter
to
remember
the
special
night.
Thank.
F
Evening,
audible,
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
Thorpe's,
director
Jim
tan,
the
objective
of
the
presentation
tonight
is
to
provide
you
with
a
brief
update
on
the
Chris
McKenna
project.
Since
our
last
council
meeting
on
January
28th,
we've
made
some
additional
progress
on
the
contractor
Hill
site
rolling
continued.
There
are
drilling
operations
and
installed
a
sealed
beams.
F
All
the
drilling
work
to
install
the
ceilings
were
completed
on
January
31st
and
on
February,
third
and
fourth,
the
contractor
removed
their
drilling
would
regard
and
offer
all
the
excavated
materials
off
the
site.
So
the
construction
of
the
would
lag
and
also
began
during
the
time
and
starting
on
the
5th
of
last
week
the
contractor
began
installation
of
the
tiebacks.
F
They
ran
into
some
issues
with
the
installation
process,
but
was
able
to
bring
a
new
equipment,
so
I
stopped
yesterday
to
tiebacks
were
installed
and
additional
tiebacks
were
installed
today
as
well,
and
staff
from
the
geotechnical
engineering
firm,
Conn
showers
as
an
associates
habit
has
been
on
site
daily
to
inspect
the
project
Kearney.
There
are
still
traffic
control
measures
in
place
and
thought
sorry.
At
times
there
may
be
a
need
for.
Excuse
me
intermittent
stoppage
of
traffic
during
construction
activities,
so
residents
driving
through
the
construction.
F
F
F
F
Here's
a
machine
that
they're
actually
using
to
install
the
tie
backs
it's
you
know
quite
an
interesting
machine.
You
know
it's
again.
It's
sitting
on
the
the
roadway
or
on
top
of
the
sidewalk
and
they're
drilling
backwards.
Perpendicular
tore
assembly
Avenue
toward
minorities,
so
so
the
angle
of
entry
for
the
tie-back
is
22
degrees,
so
there
are
12
tie
backs
as
part
of
this
project.
F
There's
another
picture
of
the
machine,
that's
being
used
for
the
tie
back
installation
and
there's
another
picture
that
was
taken
today
this
morning
of
the
operation,
so
we're
hoping
that
the
whole
construction
activities
will
be
done
by
the
early
March
and
and
will
can
close
out
the
project.
Thank
you
take
any
questions
you
may
have.
B
A
G
B
Item
6a
hold
a
public
hearing
wave
first
reading
and
introduce
an
ordinance
to
amend
and
replace
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
title
12
land
use
article
3,
zoning
chapter;
12
point
one:
zero,
zero
off
street
parking
and
loading
in
amend
chapters.
One
two
point:
nine
two
one
two
point:
nine
six
and
one
two
point:
two:
zero
zero
and
adopt
The
Associated
parking
design,
standards,
resolution
and
parking
fee
resolution.
H
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
members
of
the
City
Council,
my
name
is
Darcy
Smith
and
I'm.
The
city
Community
and
Economic
Development,
Director
and
tonight
I'll
be
giving
you
a
brief
introduction
to
this
item.
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
city's
proposed
new
parking
regulations,
which
consists
of
an
ordinance
that
will
amend
the
zoning
article
of
the
Municipal
Code
and
The
Associated
parking
design,
standards,
resolution
and
parking
fee
resolution
so
I'll
be
making
this
presentation,
along
with
the
city's
lead
contractor
on
this
effort.
H
Kelly
Beggs
from
good
city
company,
also
in
attendance
tonight,
from
the
project
tima
can
assist
in
answering
any
questions
or
clarifying.
Any
information
presented
is
pamela
wu,
the
city's
planning
and
housing
manager
and
jason
moody,
the
managing
principal
from
economic
and
planning
systems
who
provided
the
economic
analysis
and
additionally,
given
this
long
and
lengthy
effort
involving
many
city
departments,
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
the
work
from
the
Public
Works
staff,
especially
on
the
parking
design
standards
resolution
and
the
city
attorney
mark
zephyr
Ono.
H
The
objective
for
this
item
tonight
is
to
hold
this
public
hearing,
and
the
staffs
recommendation
is
to
introduce
the
ordinance
and
adopt
the
associated
resolutions.
There's
many
objectives
of
this
work,
so
I
just
want
to
highlight
some
of
them
now
and
you'll
hear
them
interwoven
throughout
the
presentation
tonight.
H
The
City
Council
also
adopted
the
downtown
parking
management
plan,
which
identified
the
long
term
strategy
of
increasing
parking
supply
in
the
downtown
through
a
parking
garage
and
funding
that,
in
part,
through
the
new
parking
in
lieu
fees
which
are
presented
tonight
in
the
parking
fee
resolution
for
consideration
that's
interrelated
to
the
city's
significant
interest
in
downtown
economic
revitalization,
and
we
really
are
optimistic,
and
hopefully
these
regulations
really
pave
the
way.
For
that
to
happen.
H
The
city's
been
undertaking
other
efforts
to
address
parking,
such
as
the
recently
adopted,
revised
residential
parking
permit
program,
so
I've
touched
on
some
of
those
key
objectives,
but
I
think
you'll
you'll
see
clearly
tonight
just
the
breadth
of
this
effort.
Why
so
much
time
was
involved,
my
so
many
departments
were
involved
and
the
real
purpose
of
it
to
both
the
residents
of
this
community
and
the
business
community.
I
The
ordinance
update
began,
as
Darcy
said,
with
direction
from
City
Council
to
revise
the
proposed
TCP
parking
standards
and
then
continued
with
a
public
town
hall
meeting
on
parking
issues
in
San
Bruno
from
a
residents
perspective
in
December,
Planning
Commission
recommended
that
council
adopt
the
ordinance
and
resolution
unanimously
and
lastly,
two
weeks
ago,
council
reviewed
and
provided
feedback
on
the
ordinance
and
resolution
next
I'll
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
ordinance
and
the
resolutions.
All
note
that
there
are
three
separate
documents
for
review.
I
The
first
document
is
the
ordinance
which
contain
zoning
standards
that
regulate
off
street
parking
and
loading
next
there's
a
parking
design
standards
resolution
which
includes
traditional
parking,
design,
standards
and
mechanical
and
automated
parking
design
standards
and
then,
lastly,
there's
a
parking
fee
resolution
which
outlines
the
fee
amount
for
the
in
Luffy
and
the
parking
compliance
permit,
and
some
of
this
information
has
been
separated
into
resolutions
that
facilitate
updating
standards.
That
change
more
frequently
due
to
technological
and
design
innovation.
I
So,
to
start
off
with
that
first
document,
the
ordinance
the
ordinance
applies
to
new
construction
enlargements
to
existing
buildings
and
changes
of
land-use
in
existing
buildings.
It
will
replace
the
existing
parking
chapter
and
amend
other
sections
of
the
code
to
resolve
conflicts
between
the
proposed
ordinance
and
existing
Municipal
Code.
I
Some
key
features
of
the
ordinance
the
ordinance
regulates,
the
minimum
vehicle
parking
and
loading
spaces,
as
well
as
parking
spaces
for
motorcycles,
scooters
and
bicycle
parking
landscaping.
Requirements
for
parking
areas
are
set
forth
and
transportation
demand
management
and
parking
management
plan
requirements
are
also
included.
I
This
slide
reviews
the
objectives
of
the
ordinance.
The
proposed
ordinance
includes
updated
standards
designed
to
be
both
resident
and
business
friendly.
It
also
includes
regulations
that
aim
to
increase
off
street
parking
for
residential
areas,
facilitate
economic,
revitalization
in
the
downtown
and
implement
policies
of
the
city's
long-range
planning
documents.
I
The
next
two
slides
provide
examples
of
the
updated
parking
standards
for
major
land
use
categories.
As
you'll
see,
the
organization
has
been
streamlined
to
make
the
chapter
more
reader
friendly.
This
slide
shows
the
required
citywide
off
street
parking
for
residential
land
uses,
which
have
been
revised
to
be
consistent
with
council
direction
regarding
more
conservative,
TCP
parking
standards
and
then
also
to
be
consistent
with
state
density,
bonus
law.
I
This
slide
shows
the
required
off
street
parking
for
major
non-residential
land
uses.
As
you
can
see,
one
category
on
the
far
left
can
cover
multiple,
similar
land
uses
and
then
on
the
right
side.
The
number
of
required
parking
spaces
is
shown
and
sets
forth
a
number
of
spaces
required
per
square
foot
of
floor
area.
I
This
slide
outlines
some
strategies
to
increase
supply
of
off
street
parking
in
residential
areas.
Many
older
homes
in
San
Bruno
cannot
fit
a
modern
vehicle
in
existing
garages
and
driveways,
and
these
strategies
aim
to
remedy
the
those
issues.
The
bulleted
strategies
would
allow
property
owners
with
non-conforming
garages
and
driveway
depths,
to
bring
one
of
those
elements
into
conformance
to
fit
a
modern
vehicle
and
to
help
alleviate
that
demand
for
on
street
parking
by
moving
more
vehicles
onto
private
properties.
I
Now
I'll
move
on
to
the
economic
revitalization
objective
and
these
exemptions
apply
to
buildings
in
the
central
business
district
that
are
constructed
prior
to
2005,
as
the
property
owners
in
these
buildings
have
paid
into
a
parking
assessment
district
which
existed
from
the
late
1980s
to
the
mid
2000s
and
those
that
parking
assessment
district
funded
the
existing
surface
parking
lots
that
you
see
downtown
with
this
exemption.
No
additional
off
street
parking
or
in
lieu
fee
would
be
required
for
the
first
2,500
square
foot
of
any
change
in
use
to
a
more
intensive
use.
I
I
Another
policy
that
will
facilitate
economic,
revitalization
is
the
parking
in
lieu
fee.
The
fee
would
apply
to
non-residential
land
uses
located
in
specific
plan
areas
and
property
owners
could
pay
the
P
the
fee
on
a
per
space
basis
in
lieu
of
providing
on
off
street
parking
for
up
to
30%
of
required
parking
spaces.
I
This
slide
presents
the
recommended
fee
amounts
for
different
specific
plan
areas.
Staff
recommends
a
sliding
scale
for
specific
plan
areas,
not
including
the
Bay
Hill
specific
plan
area,
and
the
sliding
scale
is
designed
to
facilitate
the
resolution
of
small
parking
deficits
and
then
to
disincentivize
the
resolution
of
larger
being
deficits.
A
fee
of
$60,000
per
space
is
feasible
for
the
Bayhill
specific
planning
area
as
you'll
see
on
this
slide
and
that's
due
to
higher
land
values
and
the
elevated
cost
of
constructing
an
underground
parking
garage
which
is
required
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
I
In
this
area,
I
will
point
out
that
there
is
an
additional
fee
on
this
slide,
which
is
highlighted
in
the
black
box
and
that's
included
for
office
land
uses
and
specific
plan
areas.
Excluding
the
Bay
Hill.
The
fee
is
a
flat
per
space
fee
of
$25,000
for
office
land
uses
and
after
an
additional
analysis,
staff
has
found
that
office
uses
can
generate
higher
rents
than
other
non
residential
land
uses
and
can
support
a
higher
fee
than
the
sliding
scale
amounts
originally
proposed.
I
Then,
on
to
the
last
objective,
implementation
of
the
city's
long-range
planning
documents,
so
this
has
also
been
a
key
goal
of
the
ordinance
update,
especially
as
the
city
is
required
to
implement
certain
housing
element.
Policies
to
maintain
its
housing
element.
Certification,
in
particular,
I'll
point
out
that
the
ordinance
will
implement
important
policies
in
the
housing
element,
especially
housing
element
program
3h,
and
it
does
that
by
updating
residential
parking
standards
pursuant
to
the
state
density,
bonus
law
requirements
and
allowing
tandem
parking.
I
The
parking
design
standards
resolution
is
one
of
the
other
resolution
documents
that
you
have
and
that's
a
separate
document
from
the
ordinance.
It
includes
design
standards
for
parking
spaces
and
Lots,
as
well
as
mechanical
and
automated
parking
standards
and
mechanical
and
automated
parking
is
an
area
of
emerging
technology.
That
staff
expects
continual
evolution
and
innovation,
and
the
resolution
specifies
operational
performance
standards
for
mechanical
and
automated
parking
that
cover
items
like
maintenance,
inspection
and
availability
of
vehicles
to
ensure
that
these
structures
are
truly
functional
and
long-lasting.
I
However,
if
a
lay
assistance
is
provided,
the
issues
with
the
delay
and
the
new
technology
would
be
alleviated,
so
staff
has
revised
the
limit
to
a
maximum
of
75
percent.
If
valet
assistance
is
provided,
if
no
valet
assistance
is
provided,
the
limit
would
be
50
percent,
which
is
no
change
from
the
previous
version
of
this
document.
I
Council
also
urged
staff
to
consider
the
recommendation
of
Planning
Commission
to
allow
tandem
parking
for
customers
of
businesses
with
valet
assistance
and
similar
to
mechanical
parking
tandem
configurations
for
custom
parking
for
customer
parking
could
be
functional
if
there
is
valet
assistance
provided.
So
the
ordinance
now
does
allow
that
if
valet
assistance
is
provided
and
then
lastly,
in
response
to
public
comment
about
the
difference
in
fee
amounts
between
Bay
Hill
and
other
specific
plan
areas
for
the
parking
in
Luffy.
I
There
was
a
discussion
at
the
last
meeting,
and
staff
did
respond,
that
the
higher
land
values
in
the
Bay
Hill
area
can
support.
The
higher
and
Luffy
staff
is
proposing
no
change
the
Bay
Hill
fee,
but,
as
we
discussed
earlier,
there
is
one
additional
fee
for
office
land
uses
in
other
specific
plan
areas
that
are
not
the
Bay
Hill.
I
I'll
move
on
to
tonight's
action.
In
conclusion,
City
Council
is
requested
to
take
action
tonight
to
hold
the
public
hearing
waive
the
first
reading
and
introduce
an
ordinance
to
amend
and
replace
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
title
12
article
3
chapter
12,
point
100
and
amend
chapters;
twelve
point:
nine
to
twelve
point:
nine,
six
and
twelve
point
two
hundred
and
adopt
the
Associated
parking
design
standards,
resolution
and
parking
fee
resolution.
I
A
You
Kelly
why
Kelly
it's
at
the
mic.
Are
there
any
questions
for
her?
Why
she's
at
the
mic?
No
one!
Okay!
Thank
you.
We'll
call
you
up.
If
something
comes
up,
this
is
a
public
hearing.
So
are
there
any
speaker
cards?
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak?
It
is
a
public
hearing.
Once
we
close
the
public
hearing,
then
it
will
preclude
you
from
speaking
further
on
the
topic
when
it
comes
back
to
Council.
C
Didn't
fill
out
a
card,
Robert
recalls
7th
Avenue.
Now
one
of
the
previous
meetings,
a
question
came
up
on:
how
do
you
figure
the
square
footage
of
a
business,
because
all
of
the
business
square
footage
is
not
necessarily
used
by
the
customers,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
has
been
really
addressed.
It
talks
about
fees
per
square
foot,
but
it
doesn't
cover
that.
Thank
you.
J
Tom
Hamilton's
crestmore
Drive
I'm
on
the
Planning
Commission.
We
said
this
to
you.
501
I've
been
thinking
about
this
more
since
it
left
the
Planning
Commission
and
after
the
last
the
last
meeting
here
when
we
talked
about
it.
Regarding
the
in
lieu
fees
at
the
Planning
Commission
I
commented,
you
know
on
a
desire
to
keep
those
fees
as
low
as
possible.
J
I'm
thinking,
you
know
about
the
economic,
revitalization,
revitalization
plans
for
downtown,
and
but
in
thinking
about
it
more
with
the
2500
square
foot
exemption,
that's
already
in
place
in
the
ordinance
for
the
majority
of
businesses
downtown
there
are
most
businesses
are
100%
covered
and
would
never
need
to
use.
We
never
need
to
purchase.
You
know,
I
need
or
use
the
in
Luffy,
so
it
might
be
prudent
to
maybe
even
raise
it.
Just
to
you
know,
you
know,
encourage
you
know,
businesses
or
to
you
know,
provide
parking,
because
your
parking
is
needed.
J
B
Sorry
Glasner
on
Linden,
Avenue,
I,
really
just
kind
of
have
a
question
when
you're
talking
about
the
valley,
the
valet
assistance
for
the
mechanical
parking,
whether
that
would
be
required
to
be
free
or
whether
there
would
be
a
charge
for
that
because
it
just
seems
like
that,
would
definitely
you
know
affect
the
the
acceptability
of
that
to
to
the
people
who
need
to
park.
That's
all
thank.
K
Hi
everyone,
my
name,
is
max
Wayne
and
I
am
the
owner
of
Atlas
pizza,
parlor
and
yes,
back
to
Roberts
question.
Actually
I'm
gonna
re
emphasize
on
the
square
footage,
because
I
have
a
unique
situation,
because
I
have
sixty
six
hundred
square
feet
of
space,
which
is
I'm
only
using
maybe
one-third,
not
even
one-third,
and
when
we
increase
the
usage
for
the
customers,
2500
square
feet,
I
still
don't
even
fall
into
the
category.
K
L
A
L
A
H
Sure
I'll
I'll
try
to
answer
that:
Darcy
Smith
Community
and
Economic
Development
Director.
The
definitions
for
this
particular
ordinance
are
contained
within
the
ordinance
you
have
to
flip
around
to
a
different
section
of
the
Municipal
Code
and
they're,
quite
detailed
many
pages
of
it
and
there's
the
floor.
Airy
definition
for
non
restaurant
uses
I'll
answer
that
question
next
is
basically
you
measure
to
the
outside
walls.
H
If
you
had
shared
spaces,
you'd
measure
kind
of
the
inside
walls,
if
you
had
multiple
tenant
spaces
within
a
larger
building,
for
example,
and
for
those
we
do
include
the
storage
areas
and
and
habitable
spaces,
but,
for
example,
like
attics
and
basements,
we'll
be
excluded
for
restaurants.
This
issue
has
come
up
of.
How
do
you
count
the
space
we're
a
little
different?
Sometimes
we
have
a
lot
of
storage.
H
Sometimes
we
have
space,
you
really
don't
use,
it
doesn't
add
more
customers,
it
doesn't
add
more
employees,
so
most
cities
and
we're
following
that
that
general
but
general
trend
define
restaurants,
we're
a
little
bit
separately
when
they
calculate
the
parking
requirement
and
we
only
count
the
area
that
is
for
public
public
space
and
we
exclude
the
storage
area.
So
that's
a
special
definition
and
we've
just
found
that
more
a
more
accurate
way
to
kind
of
estimate
the
the
parking
demand
associated
for
the
customers.
H
There
was
also
a
question
about
valet
assistance,
so
our
ordinance
and
the
associated
resolutions
don't
specify
whether
if
he
could
be
charged
but
I
think
generally,
these
are
when
there
is
valet,
it's
usually
offered
to
the
employees.
So,
for
example,
in
our
conversations
with
YouTube
they've
said
it
would
be
only
for
the
employees
only,
and
so
they
wouldn't
charge
a
fee
just
because
it's
they're
trying
to
facilitate
their
employees
using
it
and
I
think
it
would
just
be
a
typical
to
charge
a
fee.
H
It's
not
a
typical
valet
system,
where
you're
pulling
up
to
a
restaurant
and
someone's
parking
your
car
for
you,
it's
something
that
the
property
owner
or
the
tenant
is
doing
to
try
to
facilitate
making
sure
they
have
the
parking
and
you're
using
it.
That
makes
sense.
There's
also
the
comment
about
the
fees
and
I
think
you
saw
tonight.
We
did
take
another
example
at
just
the
office
use
which
commands
higher
rents,
higher
property
values
of
a
office
building,
and
so
we
have
a
new
fee
for
you
to
consider
tonight
for
the
office
uses.
H
F
B
A
M
H
No
so
I'll
read
the
definition
public
floor
area,
pub
floor
area
open
and
accessible
to
customers
of
the
business
utility
rooms,
storage
areas,
restrooms
kitchens
and
backup
house
operation
areas
are
not
included
in
public
for
area.
You
know
that's
only
for
restaurants
because
of
their
special
layouts.
M
H
I
would
say
this:
is
these:
are
brand
new
fees,
so,
let's
see
how
they
are,
how
they
are
received.
We
haven't
had
anyone
running
down
to
City
Hall
I
can't
wait
to
pay
those,
but
that
sometimes
have
new
foods
go,
but
I
would
say
we
should
check
in
after
we
get
the
first
few
payments
and
see.
How
is
how
is
that?
H
M
Then,
just
a
clarifying
kit
question
on
we've
seen
and
I've
heard
and
I've
talked
to,
but
I've
never
really
been
on
site
in
a
location
where
there's
mechanical
spaces
and
I
know.
If
you
go
on
the
East
Coast
they've
been
around
for
many
many
many
years.
In
fact,
I
think
20
years
ago,
I
was
looking
at
mechanical
lifts,
and
so
it's
a
it's
a
normal
thing
for
them.
I
would
assume
just
like
anything.
M
It's
just
a
matter
of
getting
used
to
it
and
you
know:
you'll
see
these
mechanical
spaces
and
parking
garages
and
it'll
become
just
norm
and
it
doesn't
require
any
sort
of
support
or
direction
you.
Basically
you
get
a
key.
You
unlock
it.
Your
key
unlocks,
a
certain
level
that
comes
up
drops
down
whatever,
so
you
can
either
pull
in
Park
out
or
you
get
out
of
a
remote.
M
How
that
works,
but
I
would
say
it's
pretty
simple,
that
the
people
get
it
whether
it's
I
mean
if
you're
living
in
a
building
it's
and
your
residential
you're
going
to
get
it
you're
gonna
understand
it.
Can
you
do
it
every
day,
but
to
have
them
in
spaces
where
it's
public
parking
I,
don't
see
that
yeah.
H
We
had
a
meeting
last
week
with
a
developer,
who
really
said
this
is
really
gonna,
make
a
big
difference
in
me
being
able
to
build
this
project
or
not
build
it,
and
that's
what
we're
hearing,
especially
given
issues
with
the
water
table
and
in
San
Bruno,
which
is
really
high,
and
the
prohibition
on
above-ground
parking
garages
in
many
areas
of
town.
That
said,
it
is
more
commonly
accepted
by
a
repetitive
user,
such
as
a
home
homeowner
or
an
apartment
resident
or
a
repetitive
office
employee
you
mentioned
public.
H
It
would
not
be
common
in
a
public's
scenario:
whether
there
are
cities
in
California
such
as
West
Hollywood,
with
which
built
an
entire
municipal
parking
garage.
That's
fully
automated!
That's
a
little
different.
You
kind
of
pull
in
you're.
Actually
on,
like
a
turntable
that,
then
it's
you
know.
It's
really
futuristic,
it
sucks
your
car
and
it
parks
it
for
you,
and
then
you
push
you,
you
retrieve
it
on
your
phone.
H
It
reappears,
but
Kanaka
parking
as
simple
as
just
an
up-down
lift
is
sort
of
the
more
entry
point
that
we're
seeing
initially
here
and
that
with
the
valet
assistance,
especially
for
the
car
that
comes
in
and
is
actually
moved
up
is,
is
an
easier
entry
point,
but
it
would
not
be
really
the
public
or
a
customer
or
guest
parking.
That
would
be
the
sort
of
initial
entry.
It
would
be
more.
The
repetitive
users
perfect.
G
And
Ravel
this
a
little
bit,
if
you
can
help
me
a
little
bit
more
so
the
$60,000
fee
is
going
to
be
for
the
Bay
Hill
specific
plan
office
space
and
in
the
staff
report.
It
says,
as
after
further
consideration
and
more
detailed
analysis
staff
recommends
revising
the
in
lieu
fee
for
office
land
use
in
all
specific
plan
areas
except
Bay
Hill.
So
when
I
looked
at
the
Bay
Hill
specific
plan,
I
just
noticed
the
Bay
Hill
specific
plan,
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
If
you
take
out
Bay
Hill.
What
are
we
looking
at?
N
When
we
looked
at
it
again,
office
can
really
there's
a
value
there
to
obtain
additional
and
low
fee
payments,
whereas
we
were
really
looking
at
the
in
lieu
payments
to
be
something
to
incentivize
more
revitalization
along
downtown
and
some
of
those
businesses
that
really
have
a
hard
challenge
expanding
because
they
cannot
provide
the
parking.
The
other
thing
that
I
think
is
important
to
note
that
we
talked
about
last
time
as
both
the
in
lieu
fee
and
mechanical
parking
is
completely
discretionary.
N
It
is
not
because
it
is
allowed
in
a
coat
that
a
building
will
come
in
and
be
able
to
do
it
or
business,
and
so
they
will
apply
in
depending
on
approval
body.
It
may
be
staff,
it
may
be
the
Planning
Commission
or
it
may
be
the
City
Council,
depending
on
what
their
project
requests.
And
so
we
will
take
a
look
at
all
of
the
issues
that
we've
talked
about.
Who
are
the
users?
Is
it
appropriate?
N
So
in
Bay
Hill,
you
cannot
do
above-ground
parking.
You
have
to
do
subterranean
parking,
so
subterranean
parking
is
quite
a
bit
more,
sometimes
oftentimes
double
what
it
would
cost.
You
know
it
wouldn't
be
surprising
to
see
figures
upwards
of
eighty
to
one
hundred
two
hundred
twenty
thousand
per
space
to
build
a
subterranean
parking
space
and
so
in
building
the
in
Luffy.
N
You
you
want
to
have
the
fee
at
a
level
where
it
is
enticing
to
use,
but
not
so
low
that
there's
overuse
of
the
in
Luffy,
and
so
that's
why
it
is
higher
in
Bay
Hill,
because
the
criteria
around
Bay
Hill,
where
you
have
to
do
subterranean
parking
and
the
economic
development
prowess
of
Bay
Hill,
sort
of
mandates
that
you
can
charge
a
larger
in
lieu
fee
than
some
of
your
other
areas
and
then
the
tcp
transit
corridors
area.
You
can
do
above-ground
parking,
and
so
typically
it
would
be
less.
Okay,.
N
N
So,
typically,
these
are
wrapped
into
other
entitlement
applications
for
so
a
brand-new
building.
That
is
not
asking
for
any
zoning
change
or
variance
changed.
The
decision-making
body
would
be
the
Planning
Commission.
If
wrapped
into
those
approvals,
they
are
asking
for
a
discretionary
action
of
the
City
Council.
N
When
that
package
comes
up
to
you,
it
would
be
you're
making
a
decision
on
the
entire
development
so
lien
Luffy,
and
that
discretionary
action
there
are
times
where
it
can
be
a
staff
level
decision,
but
it's
it's
gonna
be
rare
far
fuen
in
between
most
of
these
actions,
we're
talking
about
really
are
gonna
require
a
Planning
Commission
or
the
City
Council.
Okay,.
G
I
N
L
Just
to
kind
of
follow
up
on
Linda's
comment:
it
seems
to
me
that
it
wouldn't
the
the
in
Luffy
wouldn't
be
a
penalty.
If
anything,
it
would
be
an
opportunity
for
businesses
that
have
no
more
space
to
add
parking
to
actually
have
a
mechanism
to
expand
their
business
and
as
long
as
it
the
numbers
pan
out,
they
would
have
an
opportunity
to
grow
and
pay
the
in
Luffy
and
rather
than
having
to
scrounge
around
and
find
parking
and
I
know.
That's
been
an
issue
with
a
lot
of
the
businesses
that
have
come
through.
L
L
Don't
think
I've
in
my
years
on
council,
seeing
anything
as
comprehensive
as
this
proposal.
It
addresses
so
many
issues.
It
really
tackles
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we've
been
talking
about
for
a
lot
of
years,
so
I
think
it's
really
exciting
that
we're
at
this
point
where
we
can
make
these
changes,
update
our
Municipal,
Code
and
start
addressing
something.
That's
been
a
big
issue
for
the
community
for
a
long
long
time.
So,
looking
forward
to
approving
this
tonight,
Marty
thank.
O
Downtown's
parking
is
is
difficult
currently
today,
with
the
amount
of
vacancies
that
we
have
right
now,
if
they
were
filled
and
they
were
busy,
it
would
be
almost
impossible
to
come
in
get
a
parking
spot
when
you
wanted
to
and
enjoy
our
downtown.
So
we
have
a
downtown
parking
plan,
and
that
has
key
elements
it
our
to
put
in
parking
meters
and
to
build
a
parking
garage.
Okay.
How
are
we
gonna
pay
for
it
to
me
when
I
look
at
what
other
cities
are?
Are
charging.
O
O
San
Carlos
is
raising
their
parking
in
Luffy
to
25,000
from
18,000
from
a
few
years
ago,
Redwood
City
is
at
25,000
started
in
2015
Berlin
games
at
54,000,
so
I
definitely
appreciate
the
concept
that
we
are
going
to
try
to
incentivize
our
downtown
to
flourish
by
making
this
parking
a
transition
of
businesses
easier
financially.
Yet
the
majority
of
our
business
is
currently
downtown.
They're
gonna
be
okay
with
just
the
2,500
square
foot
exemption,
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
exactly
needed,
but
my
view
on
that.
It's
it's
it's!
O
It's
on
the
low
side,
I'm
in
favor
of
everything
else,
I'm
ready
to
vote
for
everything
else,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
so
important
to
vote
today
on
the
in
lieu
fees
and
I'm
I
guess.
My
first
question
is
to
staff
is:
is:
is
there
a
rush
to
approve
this
resolution
and
can
we
approve
everything
else
and
going
forward
without
causing
any
problems,
see
manager.
N
N
We
do
not
have
anyone
that,
with
a
pending
application
that
I,
that
will
be
impacted
if
there
is,
if
there
is
a
delay
on
this
item,
we
did
have
the
public
hearing
two
weeks
ago
and
at
the
end,
at
the
close
of
that
public
hearing,
there
was
generally
in
general,
significant,
if
not
unanimous,
support
to
bring
this
back
as
fast
as
possible,
and
so
staff
did
absolutely
do
that
to
accomplish
the
mission
of
counsel
which
is
to
this
is
long
overdue
and
to
bring
it
back.
What
I
will
say
about
the
the
fees?
N
There
are
new
developments
that
there's
one
new
development
along
San
Bruno,
a
venir,
and
there
may
be
a
few
others
that
have
been
changed
recently
that
or
may
want
to
expand
beyond
2500
feet
and
that
expansion
may
be
beneficial
economically
for
San,
Bruno
Avenue
and
they
may
not
meet
the
parking
requirements.
And
so
that's
why
we
wanted
to
have
reduced
fees
specifically
geared
towards
downtown
and
in
the
revision.
N
N
The
other
use
is
you're,
primarily
gonna,
see
downtown
and
you're.
Absolutely
right
in
lieu
fees
are
gonna
help
to
put
money
in
in
a
fund
to
help
fund
a
parking
garage.
That
would
be
extremely
helpful.
The
other
thing
that
we
are
looking
at
is
parking
meters
to
help
with
demand
management.
Both
on-street
and
off-street,
with
our
downtown
parking
management
study
revealed,
is
that
you'll
drive
down
the
street
at
some
times
and
there
will
not
be
a
park
available.
N
And
so
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
hope
to
do
with
looking
at
paid
parking
is
to
look
at
having
paid
parking
on
Street
and
potentially
off
street,
and
if
you
have
it
in
both,
have
a
higher
on
street
rate
and
a
lower
off
street
rate
with
signage.
And
we've
talked
about
that
through
the
plan
to
really
push
people
to
those
Lots
and
so
I
do
think
the
City
Council.
N
If
you're
willing,
could
act
on
these
and
then
we
could
see
how
how
it
goes
and
come
back
and
increase
them
at
a
later
date.
But
I
do
think
that
there
are
businesses
that
have
been
thinking
about
expanding.
Maybe
they
haven't
walked
through
the
door,
but
they've
been
thinking
about
expanding
and
what
I
sort
of
have
heard
from
darcy
over
the
last
year.
Is
people
sort
of
come
in
and
a
question
and
they've
sort
of
been
told?
No,
you
can't
for
a
long
time.
A
G
Yeah
just
a
point
of
clarification
to
city
manager's
comment,
but
the
cost
isn't
being
placed
on
the
small
business
owner
it's
being
placed
on
the
property
owner.
Is
that?
Because
it
says
your
property
owner
on
page
seven
of
ten
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
public
is
clear,
fair,
I'm,
clear
sure.
N
I
think
the
best
way
to
say
it
is
that
it
is
a
placed
on
the
applicant
and
that
could
be
the
property
owner
that
could
be
the
business
operator.
They
could
be
one
in
the
same
or
they
could
have
a
financial
arrangement.
That
is
different.
We
really
don't
know,
but
the
Costas
is
on
the
applicant.
Okay.
Thank.
B
O
Have
another
question
to
staff
regarding
the
cow
or
the
determination
of
a
hundred
hundred
square
feet
for
a
restaurant
for
a
parking
space,
so
that
probably
comes
out
of
some
book
somewhere
but,
like
my
my
question
is
and
I
think
restaurants
are
changing.
You
know
with
with
with
the
delivery
of
food.
Maybe
you
don't
need
as
much
space
to
have
the
restaurants
that
are
currently
happening
because
I
know
the
restaurants
I
go
to
there's
a
lot
of
takeout,
and
so
maybe
you
don't
need
that
hundred
space
anymore?
O
Maybe
you
need
75,
and,
and
when
was
that
100
square
foot
space
last
determined
you
know,
is
it
ten
years
old
data
or
or
what?
But
I
was
just
curious
about
that
and
and
another
question
that
I
have.
Is
you
know
for
the
downtown
that
there's
only
so
many
spaces
now
and
it's
gonna
take
a
while
to
build
a
garage.
So
how
many
is
there
a
limit
on
how
many
I
know
there's
a
limit
on
the
amount
30%
that
you
could
use
in
in
Luffy,
which
is
discretionary
approval
right?
O
Well,
30
spaces
at
our
peak
power
will
make
it
very
difficult
for
the
other
restaurants,
the
other
businesses
to
have
those
spaces,
because
at
some
point,
as
city
manager
said
we're
at
85
90
plus
percent
in
parts
of
a
different
lot.
Some
lots
are
not
as
well
known
and
I'm.
Not
gonna.
Tell
you
where
those
are
that's.
Why.
I
O
O
A
N
O
N
Excess
that
way
we're
right,
so
you,
yes,
that
is
the
exact
reason
why
the
in
lieu
is
not
a
fait
accompli,
and
so
it
is
completely
discretionary.
So
if
we
do
get
someone
that
buys
up
a
number
of
parcels
and
comes
in
to
say,
hey
I'm
doing
this
massive
development
and
I
want
to
apply
for
a
30
percent
waiver.
That's
where
the
staff
analysis
will
come
in
and
say:
wait,
wait!
Wait!
We
think
that's
gonna,
be
too
impactful
on
the
app
or
too
impactful
on
El,
Camino
Real,
and
that
project
may
request
it.
N
But
when
they
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
they
may
not
have
staff
support
and-
and
we
would
raise
that
issue
and
so
you're-
absolutely
right
there
and
there's
no
cap
it
also
in
part
because
it's
based
on
a
percentage
because
we
really
don't
know
what's
gonna
come
in.
We
really
don't
know.
You
know
what
business
is.
Gonna
apply
for
X
number
of
square
feet,
I.
Think
the
other
point
or
the
other
question
about
a
hundred
square
feet
where
that
comes
from
we're.
Gonna
have
one
of
the
planners,
because
my
planning
degree
has
never
been
used.
I
Those
are
from
engineering
manuals
that
estimate
parking,
demand
based
on
square
footage
and
I.
Think
I
agree
with
what
you're
saying
and
that's
why
we've
tried
to
estimate
it
based
on
public
floor
area,
because
the
makeup
of
these
spaces
really
varies
by
the
restaurant
and
we
don't
want
to
penalize
people
who
have
a
larger
kitchen.
That's
not
going
to
have
that
much
demand.
It's
the
public
floor
area,
that's
really
generating
the
demand
for
the
parking.
N
O
I
N
O
H
The
any
CPI
still
requires
council
action
by
a
resolution,
but
you
this
wouldn't
come
back
to
you
before
July
1st
2021
and
then
it
would
also
give
us
an
opportunity,
probably
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
fees
and
report
back
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
cities
set
these
and
then
they
don't
they.
Don't
they
don't
adjust
them.
That's
what
I've
seen,
and
so
we
just
wanted
to
put
in
the
resolution
the
staff
report
that
we
would
be
raising
them
with
the
CPI.
H
M
A
H
If
the
ordinance
is
introduced
tonight,
it
comes
back
to
the
next
meeting
for
adoption,
and
then
it
goes
into
effect,
30
days
after
that,
the
parking
design
standards
resolution
would
be
effective
immediately.
The
fees
go
into
effect,
60
days
after
adoption.
So
there
is
some
value
in
acting
tonight
just
on
the
few
resolution,
in
fact,
because
it's
60
days
later
and
you
could
within
the
next
you
know
60
days,
have
someone
want
to
come
in
and
and
start
the
conversation
about
paint
it
and
I
will
say
one
thing
developers
do
like
certainty.
H
G
And
just
a
comment:
I
remember
speaking
with
Darcy
when
I
was
on
the
Planning
Commission,
and
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
that
applications
have
been
denied
for
downtown.
So
I
agree,
I
echo
that
this
has
been
a
long
time.
Waiting
and
I
also
want
to
thank
staff
for
including
for
not
just
having
six
public
meetings
but
including
them
in
the
agenda,
so
that
the
public
can
see
how
many
opportunities
they've
had
to
comment
and
I
also
appreciate
that
you've
included
the
staff
responses
to
the
questions
that
were
raised
at
the
last
meeting.
A
Jamie's
ready
to
introduce
some
touching
sorry,
okay,
a
lot
of
the
what
I
felt
then
Linda
capitalized
on
a
lot
of
it
and
a
few
others
have
you
had,
but
but
at
the
same
time
to
there
was
a
lot
of
work
that
went
in
and
I
appreciate
that
and
taking
a
page
out
of
mr.
Hamilton,
who
I
watched
that
Planning
Commission
as
he
was
excited
to
see
this.
This
come
forward
and
getting
approval
from
the
Planning
Commission.
But
this
is
something
that
I
think
we
do
need
to
move
forward
on.
A
I
mean
it's
the
same
thing
that
we
had
talked
about
impact
fees.
When
a
former
councilmember
mister
iberá
was
here
and
times
things
need
to
move
forward.
It
is
a
breathing
living
document.
I'd
think
that
it
should
come
back
at
the
master
fee
schedule
which
is
done
annually
and
that's
how
we
ought
to
do
it
so
that
it
doesn't
come
back
and
get
gets
slipped
somewhere
and
all
of
a
sudden.
It's
like,
oh
god,
we
haven't
seen
that
in
five
years.
So
with
that
said,
if
there's
nothing
else
from
Council,
there
is
some
actions.
A
L
A
C
O
M
B
L
B
L
A
F
Thank
you
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
on
Jimmy
tan
public
works
director.
The
presentation
tonight
is
on
rule
20,
a
underground,
Utility
District.
The
objective
of
the
presentation
is
to
provide
the
City
Council
with
a
brief
background
and
an
update
on
rule
20,
a
discuss.
The
recent
events
and
request
the
City
Council
to
provide
direction
to
staff
regarding
whether
or
not
to
establish
a
rule,
28
underground
utility
district.
The
agenda
is
as
follows:
I'll
provide
some
information
on
the
background
of
rule
20
a
then
I'll
answer,
questions
that
you're.
F
Probably
thinking
of
why
are
we
discussing
rule
20,
a
and
also
the
council,
to
show
the
council
various
rule
28
projects
that
the
city
has
completed
next
I'll
briefly
go
over
the
rule.
28
requirements
then
provide
the
proposed
underground
district
locations
and
talk
about
the
current
rule,
20
a
status
in
terms
of
our
available
work
credits
and
some
options.
The
council
could
consider
and
lastly,
discuss
the
staffs
recommendation
and
the
next
steps.
F
So,
since
1967
conversion
of
overhead
electrical
utilities
to
underground
in
California
is
performed
under
California
Public,
Utilities
Commission
rule
20,
there
are
three
different
parts:
Parts
A,
B
and
C
Part
A
is
funded
by
PG&E
parts.
B
and
C
are
funded
through
entities
other
than
PG&E
ratepayers,
such
as
governmental
agencies
or
private
entities
through
establishment
of
maintenance
districts.
The
way
it
works
is
that
PG&E
allocates
rule
20
a
work
credits
to
communities
to
finance
the
conversion
of
overhead
to
underground
infrastructure.
F
The
work
credits
are
to
be
used
for
under
guarding
of
local
distribution
lines,
which
are
delivered,
which
delivers
electricity
to
neighborhoods
and
are
generally
supported
by
wooden
poles,
and
not
these
high-voltage
transmission
lines.
The
work
credits
are
distributed
in
proportional
to
the
number
of
customers
accounts
and
some
brunnen
gets
approximate
about
150,000
dollars
per
year.
F
So
what
is
the
purpose
of
under
grounding
the
utilities?
One
is
to
improve
the
aesthetics
being
that
the
overhead
utilities
contain
numerous
wires
for
electric
telephone
and
fiber.
It's
very
unsightly.
The
other
is
to
remove
the
exposure
of
the
utilities
to
the
uncertainty
of
a
weather,
no
high
winds
and
rain
events
or
vehicle
collisions
during
high
wind
events.
The
overhead
utilities
can
detach
from
a
falling
tree
creating
a
public
safety
issues
so
by
underground
utilities
it
increases
the
service,
reliability
and
Public
Safety.
F
So
the
city
of
San
Bruno
has
an
ordinance
in
our
Municipal
Code
section
8.28.
You
know
authorizing
the
city
council
to
designate
areas
where
overhead
utilities
exist
and
to
form
an
underground
in
district.
But
the
first
thing
the
city
must
do
is
to
identify
the
project.
That's
in
the
interests
of
the
public
and
passed
a
resolution
forming
an
underground
district,
then
the
crude
rule,
28
work
credits
can
be
used
to
pay
for
the
costs
related
to
the
underground.
F
So
if
the
existing
funny
it's
inadequate,
the
city
may
borrow
for
the
future
work
credits
from
PG&E
for
a
maximum
of
five
years.
So
why
are
we
discussing
rule
28
now?
Well,
recently,
California
Public
Utilities
Commission
passed
a
resolution,
efj
491,
which
will
take
away
or
transfer
rule
28
work
credits
from
inactive
cities
to
and
transfer
to,
the
city
of
Live
Oak,
which
is
near
Yuba
City.
Many
agencies
are
affected
by
this
passage
of
the
resolution
and
San.
F
Bruno
is
one
of
those
communities,
so
a
total
of
approximately
500
$54,000
of
unused
work
credits
will
be
transferred
from
communities
that
haven't
participated
in
the
rule,
20
a
program
over
the
past
eight
years
to
the
city
of
Live
Oak.
So
for
San
Bruno.
It's
estimated
that
about
29,000
$272
will
be
transferred
to
that
city.
F
So,
in
order
to
avoid
any
transfer
of
a
work
credits,
ng
C's
have
until
March
11th
this
year
to
become
active,
and
in
order
to
do
so,
the
city
must
satisfy
the
following:
formally
adopted
underground
district
start
or
completed
construction
of
an
underground
and
conversion
project
within
the
last
eight
years
from
2011
on
or
receive
route
28
allocation
from
PG&E
for
only
five
years
or
fewer
due
to
recent
incorporation.
So,
unfortunately
we
don't
qualify
for
any
ideas
or
items
on
the
items.
Two
and
three.
F
Therefore,
adoption
of
an
underground
in
district
is
our
only
choice,
so,
although
the
city
hasn't
participated
or
hasn't
established
in
any
underground
in
district
in
LA,
because
it's
because
the
city
has
been
practicing,
you
know
the
practice
is
to
accumulate
the
rule.
28
funds
until
an
impact
of
impactful
project
can
be
implemented
so
and
current.
So
this
is
the
the
option
that
we
we
should
consider,
which
is
to
form
the
underground
district.
F
So
the
city
has
completed
under
guarding
of
overhead
utilities
in
the
past
on
this
map
shows
the
locations
and
years
of
wind
projects
were
completed.
So,
as
noted
on
the
slide,
the
oldest
project
was
back
in
1962
along
el
camino,
between
San
Bruno,
Avenue
and
santolina
Avenue,
and
the
latest
project.
The
city
computer,
was
in
1997
along
Huntington
Avenue
between
a
forest
Lane
and
Angus
Avenue.
F
So
the
other
two
main
quarters
that
were
underground
include
the
entire
length
of
Smith
Lane
from
Scotland
to
Huntington,
Avenue
and
San
Bruno
Avenue
from
skyline
to
7th
and
San
Bernardino,
so
to
form
an
underground
district
staff,
contacted
the
PG&E
representative
to
obtain
additional
information.
Pg&Amp;E
rep
mentioned
that
agencies
must
select
an
underground
in
district
location
in
the
general
public
interest.
That's
satisfied
one
or
more
of
these
reasons
that
you
see
on
a
slide.
The
first
the
underground
will
avoid
or
eliminate
heavy
concentration
of
overhead
electrical
facilities.
F
The
second
distrito
roadway
is
extensively
used
by
the
general
public
and
carries
heavy
volume
of
pedestrian
or
vehicle
traffic
and
third,
the
street
or
roadway
passes
through
a
civic
area.
Public
recreation
area
or
an
area
of
unusual
scenic
interest
to
the
public
before
the
street
or
roadway
is
considered
an
arterial
or
major
collector.
F
So,
based
on
our
discussion
with
PG&E
rep,
there
are
several
locations
that
the
city
can
select
form
an
underground
district
and
these
locations
have
been
vetted
by
PG&E
and
will
qualify
to
be
for
the
route
28
monies
or
credits
to
be
used.
So
these
locations
are
noted
in
green
and
there's
a
table
at
the
bottom
left-hand
corner
that
shows
the
the
street
locations,
as
well
as
the
linear
footage
of
the
undergrounding
and
an
estimated
cost.
So
the
locations
include
in
100
and
Avenue
from
Angus
to
San
Felipe
mastic
Avenue
from
Angus
to
Taylor.
F
So
the
current
status
of
rule
28,
where
credit
is
shown
on
slide
as
of
November
2019,
the
city
has
more
than
six
million
work
credits,
each
work
credit
it's
equivalent
to
one
dollar.
So
within
the
box
there
is
a
calculation
that
includes
a
reallocation
of
about
29
thousand
dollars
to
the
city
of
Live
Oak.
If
the
city
chooses
not
to
form
an
underground
district,
the
city
will
still
have
a
balance
of
Proxima
six
million
dollars.
F
So
what
are
our
options?
Well,
first,
the
city
can
choose
to
not
format
underground,
a
district,
as
previously
mentioned
there
will
be
a
transfer
of
about
29
thousand
dollars
from
our
credit
to
the
see
of
Live,
Oak,
second
establish
and
underground
district,
and
this
was
secure,
avoid
the
transfer
of
the
war
credits.
Lastly,
the
city
can
choose
to
trade
or
sell
the
work
credits
to
other
interested
communities.
So,
based
on
our
discussion
with
PG&E
representatives,
the
city
could
expect
to
receive
only
about
50%
on
the
dollar
for
easy
fun.
F
The
road
also
you
know,
joins
the
public
recreation
area,
which
is
City
Park
and
there's
also
a
part
of
the
scenic
corridor,
and
the
road
is
also
considered
an
arterial
Street.
So
the
total
length
is
approximately
3,700
feet
and
then
total
cost
to
underground
the
entire
length
ECR
to
El
Camino
to
Cunningham
way
is
about
7.4
million
dollars,
and
this
cost
is
based
on
the
most
recent
undergrounding
projects,
which
is
which
range
between
a
thousand
to
two
thousand
dollars
per
foot.
F
F
So
this
slide
shows
the
boundary
limits
of
the
underground
project:
long
Crystal,
Springs,
Road
from
Donner
to
El
Camino,
the
properties
within
the
red
areas
shown
that
will
be
affected.
If
the
underground
project
is
implemented,
the
overhead
service
lines
to
those
properties
will
need
to
be
under
grounded
as
well.
F
So
here
are
the
next
steps
you
know.
First,
we
need
to
hold
a
public
hearing
on
February
25th
to
establish
an
underground
district.
The
staff
will
also
public
publish
a
notice
of
public
hearing
an
ambassador
of
the
council
meeting.
My
staff
will
send
letters
to
those
properties
that
are
affected
within
that
no
red
area
and
so
request
them
to
attend
the
council
meeting
if
they
haven't
choose
to
speak
on
any
concerns
about
that
of
the
project.
So
this
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
M
Jimmy
clarifying
question
on
on
the
funding,
so
it's
been
since
1997
since
we've
done
the
wash
project,
but
you
can
see
now
that
it
I
mean
over
years
I'm
sure
that
allocation
of
points
is
continuing
to
increase
a
little
bit.
So
it's
many
years
to
build
up
this
six
million
dollar
six
million
points.
So
it
makes
sense
why
we
haven't
done
something
in
a
number
of
years
and
to
understand
that
there's
this
new
law
that
basically
says:
if
we
don't
use
it,
we
don't
participate
in
the
program.
M
F
M
I
N
Usually,
look
at
it
and
say:
well,
if
we
just
some
other
cities
have
projects,
they
don't
have
enough
money
in
the
other.
Cities
are
sitting
on
large
sums
of
money
and
they
don't
have
a
project,
nor
do
they
have
a
district.
If
we
just
pull
a
little
bit
from
every
one,
we
could
fund
these
other
areas.
N
The
other
thing
I
want
to
elaborate
on
is
the
district
boundaries
is
from
El
Camino
rial,
all
the
way
up
to
Cunningham
get
you
the
potential
project,
with
the
six
million
that
we
have
now
would
go
from
El
Camino
Real
to
Donner.
However,
what
Jimmy
also
noted
is
that
there
is
the
ability
for
the
city
to
borrow
against
five
years
of
future
credit,
and
so
you
could
establish
the
full
district
there's
currently
a
1.3
million
dollar
gap.
N
If
you
borrow
five
years,
that
is
750
thousand,
that
drops
your
gap
down
to
five
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
to
do
the
entire
length.
Now
that
sort
of
takes
it
to
be
not
an
insurmountable
sum
that
if
the
city
council
did
want
to
divert
funds
from
another
capital
project
or
wait,
we
had
other
funds
available
to
sort
of
make
a
full
project.
So
I
just
want
to.
N
Let
the
council
know
that,
while
the
full
project
is
estimated
to
be
just
over
seven
million,
and
we
only
have
six
million,
it's
not
necessarily
an
insurmountable
task,
and
so
establishing
the
district
and
then
looking
at
various
options
to
fund
it
could
be
something
that
happens
in
the
future.
Well,.
M
O
O
To
try
to
get
everything
done
at
the
same.
That's
probably
gonna
make
it
too
complicated.
So
let's
just
go
ahead:
I'm
in
favor
of
this
project
and
I
guess
we'll
talk
to
it
about
it
and
at
a
CIP
meeting,
because
I
I'll
bore
you
guys
right
now,
but
I
think
it'd
be
nice
to
to
the
trees
there
from
here
to
Crystal,
I'm,
sorry
to
the
city
park.
They're,
overgrown
and
I
walked
by
there
for
a
little
bit
today
and
saw
that
one
of
the
trees
by
the
church
did
fall
down
and
was
cut
by
staff.
O
L
F
Yeah
normally
I
think
what
we've
seen
is.
You
know
people
specify
a
certain
location,
a
specific
location
for
the
district.
That's
something
that's
something
that
we
would
have
to
discuss
with
PG&E
on
whether
we
can
actually
create
a
district
for
all
them
recommended
streets
that
you've
seen
on
the
one
of
the
slides,
but
normally
what
we've?
What
we've
research
on
online
but
with
other
communities,
is
just
mainly
more
a
single
chord
or
locations
for
undergrounding
districts,
but.
L
There
wouldn't
there's
not
necessarily
a
requirement
that
there
be
funding
available
to
do
a
project
within
the
district.
You
just
basically
say
here's
one
that
meets
these
five
criteria,
or
one
up
here,
yeah,
exactly
right,
okay
and
and
looking
at
Huntington,
so
Huntington
is
one
that
falls
within
the
dollar
amount
of
what's
available
and
our
fund
right
now
that
that
stretch
is
I
mean
it
has
a
side
of
the
street
without
any
without
any
houses
on
it.
L
F
Believe
that
we
selected
Crystal
Springs
Road,
because
you
know
it
has,
you
know
a
lot
more
use
for
public
and
it's
also
right
next
to
the
city
park,
a
lot
of
the
overhead
utilities.
There
there's
a
lot
more
trees
at
that
location
as
well.
So
I,
don't
during
you
know
heavy
storms
of
Anthony.
You
could
have
trees
coming
down
and
hitting
these
power
lines
so
I
think
it
met
all
of
the
criteria
is
that
PG&E
had
in
there.
L
F
F
You
know
a
couple
of
years
before
any
construction
activities
you
know,
will
take
place
because
there's
a
lot
of
coordination
that
needs
to
be
done
not
just
in
terms
of
with
just
PG&E
utilities,
but
with
other
utilities
that
are
also
on
the
pole.
Right
now,
with
all
the
communication
utilities
that
are
there
so
making
sure
that
know
they
can
they'll
be
able
to
transfer
their
utilities
below-grade
and
be
able
to
provide
the
same
type
of
services
to
the
the
residential
properties.
Okay,.
G
And
can
we
align
can
we
align
those
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
doing
that
underground
utilities
and
then
repaving
at
a
different
time,
so
everything's
aligning
together
sure
and
then
my
other
question
is:
does
that
mean
that
the
poles
will
come
down
that
are
all
along
that
entire
area?
Correct.
N
I
do
think
that
staff
and
them
in
the
we'll
see
IP
planning
will
continue
to
bring
this
higher
on
on
the
list,
and
we
can
look
into
putting
together
a
dedicated
effort
amount
around
making
the
project
a
reality,
and
then
that
just
has
to
go
into
our
normal
CIP
planning
and
priorities.
But
even
if
we
had
a
dedicated
effort
today,
I
mean
this
is
at
least
a
two
to
three
year.
Effort
before
ground
is
being
broke
on
it.
N
It's
also
worth
pointing
out
that,
if
should,
if
this
project
was
done,
and
the
city
wanted
to
repave
the
street
to
have
a
nice
smooth
surface
over
everything
that
would
be
on
our
cost
within
the
project
budget
does
cover
capping
the
the
trench
and
repaving
over
that,
and
so
should
it
be
possible
to
sort
of
time
this
project
right
before
Crystal
Springs
is
up
for
repaving.
That
can
be
done.
G
So
then
I
was
gonna,
actually
ask
about
Crystal,
Springs
being
repaved
and
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
aligning
our
efforts
and
our
finances.
Does
that
mean
that
Crystal
Springs
is
I,
understand
why
that
was
selected?
But
is
there
another
area
that
maybe
we
could
create
the
district
around
that
hasn't
been
repaved
so
that
we
can
get
not
just
the
repaving
done,
but
also
the
district?
Actually,
the
district
plan
actually
moving
sooner
than
five
to
ten
years
from
now,
yeah.
F
So
a
lot
of
the
streets
will
be
repaved.
I
think
Jennifer
has
has
been
repaved
when
we
did
the
sewer
replacement
project.
Huntington
Avenue
of
that
location
will
also
be
repaved.
We
have
the
city,
has
no
grants
already
in
place
for
that
it
was
Taylor.
Mastic
in
that
area
will
be
repaved
as
well
as
part
of
the
avenues,
1-1
1-2
project,
so
the
only
location,
I'm
seeing
that
won't
be
well
I,
don't
know
whether
we
be
paved
I,
think
we
pave
a
portion,
but
we're
going
to
repay
for
portion
of
Masonic
Avenue
as
well.
F
I
said
the
only
thing
that
I'm
thinking
well
even
Angus,
Avenue
West.
It's
been
repaved
too,
from
ECR
to
to
Huntington,
so
I
think
a
lot
of
the
locations
will
be
repaved.
What
we've
said
like,
except
for
Chris
just
means
Road,
we
didn't
do
a
full
repaving
there.
We
just
we
did
a
storage
seal
after
the
sewer
construction
project,
but
that's
something
you
know
be
a
good
candidate.
M
B
M
Want
to
say,
I
do
remember
the
Huntington
back
in
1997
and
I
will
tell
you
what
a
difference
it
made
to
that
area.
It
really.
It
really
was
beautiful
after
it
was
done,
and
so
I
think,
with
the
new
community
center
coming
I
think
we
shouldn't
really
look
at
the
short-sighted
piece
of
the
paving,
even
though
we
repaved
it
last
year,
because
I
think
it's
gonna
come
up
again
in
five
years
and
we're
gonna
need
to
repave
it
I.
Just
I
really
do
think
that
the
Crystal
Springs
Road
is
an
ideal.
M
A
G
A
O
Yeah,
so
this
this
is
a
message
to
people
that
know
veterans
are
that
our
veterans,
the
I
today
I
attended
a
free
barbecue
lunch
at
the
VA
clinic
on
Smith
Lane
I
got
a
late.
Invite
to
that.
So
I
wasn't
able
to
put
that
on
social
media,
but
it
occurs
every
second
twos.
It's
a
free
barbecue
provided
by
a
bunch
of
veterans
that
just
wanted
to
do
something
for
veterans
and
it's
right
at
the
VA
hospital
VA
clinic.
So
you
can
get
two
for
one
you
can
get.
O
M
You
there's
comment
that
was
made
earlier
tonight
that
kind
of
caught
me
off
guard
because
I
felt
like
if
you
really
only
knew
what
the
city
did
and
staff
members
did
and
the
council
members
did.
You
wouldn't
make
that
comment,
and
the
comment
was
that
that
the
city
should
think
about
or
have
the
approach
of,
not
what
we
can't
do.
But
what
we
can
do
and
I
think
that
it's
it's
an
unfair
comment,
because
I
think
that
the
staff
really
has
it
is
dedicated
to
this
city
and
there's
a
lot.
M
The
council
set
out
our
strategic
objective
in
terms
of
projects
we
wanted
to
complete
and
the
things
we
want
to
do
and
we're
moving
along
with
those
and
we're
getting
them
done,
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
again
this
year.
So
I
think
what
I?
What
I
feel
is
that
we
just
need
to
do
better
about
how
we
communicate
those
things
that
we
do
do
out.
We're
making
great
strides
and
we're
making
differences,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
the
hard
work
that
you
do.
M
B
N
Yeah,
yes,
we
will
be
sending
the
City
Council
the
next
PowerPoint
that
we
provide
to
the
we
are
set
on
March
4th
to
provide
an
update
on
the
Aquatic
and
rec
center
to
the
Foundation
Board.
We
will
send
that
information
to
the
council
in
your
city,
council,
mayor
and
council
office.
You
have
nearly
a
thousand
pages
of
the
draft
dir
that
is
out
and
staff
is
doing
the
page
turn
on
that
and
are
a
number
of
hours
into
turning
it
and
we're
reviewing
every
page
on
that.
N
That
is
set
to
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
April
and
then
to
come
to
the
City
Council
in
May
for
action,
and
we
are
on
track
to
put
out
construction
documents
on
the
Aquatic
and
rec
center.
This
year.
We
are
currently
in
the
process
of
drafting
a
a
draft
agreement
for
temporary
location
for
the
Aquatic
and
rec
center,
with
the
hopes
still
tracking
toward
breaking
ground
early
2021.
N
And
in
Florida
Park
is
scheduled
to
come
to
the
City
Council
I
believe
we
are
aiming
for
the
March,
10th
or
2nd
meeting
in
March.
What
that
is,
is
we
need
to
do
the
final
design
drawings
for
Florida
Park,
and
we
this
week
we're
just
reviewing
a
bit
from
the
make
the
lion
scape
architect
to
do
those
final
drawings,
and
so
we
will
get
that
contract
before
the
City
Council
as
soon
as
possible,
but
I
believe
we're
aiming
for
one
of
the
meetings
in
March
and
I.
Believe
it's
the
first
one
thank.
L
A
IRA
got
notice
that
the
police
department
squeaked
out
of
victory
and
what
it
was
was
the
police
department,
Fire
Department,
get
their
folks
and
family
and,
as
one
officers
father
said,
he
had
no
choice
but
to
come
because
his
his
daughter
told
him
to,
but
that
was
held
at
the
fire
station
this
this
afternoon,
and
so
thanks
to
a
lot
of
folks
that
came
in
from
the
community
to
help
out
to
donate
blood
for
the
Red
Cross.
But
thank
you
to
the
fire
and
police.
This
is
their
second
annual
time
that
they
have
done
this.
A
A
A
When
we
a
do
adjourn,
we
are
going
to
go
back
into
closed
session
for
two
items.
One
will
be
conference
with
labor
negotiations
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54957.6
and
then
also
to
confer
with
legal
counsel
with
anticipated
litigation,
significant
exposure
to
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54956.9
d,
2
and
those
are
four
cases
before
we
adjourn
this
evening.
I
did
most
of
you
may
be
aware
some
may
not,
but
the
gentleman
and
owner
of
artichoke
Jose
Dennis
amat
passed
away
late
last
month
and
those
that
have
been
around
you
know.
A
Dennis
is
well
known
as
the
third-generation
owner,
an
operator
of
artichoke
Jose
took
it
over
back
in
about
the
1980s
where
he
has
taken
that
business.
That
has
been
in
San
Bruno
for
over
a
hundred
years.
So
it's
something
that
many
people
know
and
have
been
talked
about
and
ran
into
Dennis
some
of
the
things
whitewater
rafting
people
would
know,
but
he
was
very
much
into
that
and
he
had
other
hobbies
and
traits.
He
was
quite
a
interesting
gentleman
because
of
the
fact
people
didn't
know
that
he
was
an
innovator.
A
He
had
patents
on
things
that
are
still
used
today
by
the
military.
So
he
was
one
man
that
had
a
business
but
also
was
forward
thinking
whether
it
comes
about
a
major
earthquake,
and
how
do
we
get
folks
in
and
out?
How
do
we
get
transportation
from
here
to
the
East
Bay,
with
all
the
congestion
and
traffic
he
produced
of
video?
That
is
very
impressive,
so
this
is
a
man
that
really
did
a
lot
of
forward
thinking.
As
far
as
that,
the
other
thing
too,
that
not
everyone
knows
some
do.
A
Some
don't
is,
in
my
mind,
Dennis
was
also
I
admired
because
he's
a
man
that
didn't
ask
for
a
plaque
didn't
need
to
be
acknowledged,
didn't
want
a
certificate.
He
just
wanted
to
give
and
try
to
make
a
difference.
He
gave
countywide
to
various
causes,
but
specifically
in
the
San
Bruno,
and
just
some
that
I
know
of
you
know
from
cap
to
Parkside
to
the
lights.
A
You
see
at
diamond
3,
that
was
from
the
salmon
foundation
from
Dennis
4-h
junior
Giants,
the
library,
recreation
project,
Reed
Community
Day
concerts
in
the
park,
and
there
are
many
other
things
and,
like
I,
said
in
finding
out
more
and
speaking
to
the
family
and
hearing
from
Dennis.
It
is
over
the
last
few
months.
What
he
really
gave
to
this
community
was
without
question.
You
could
ask
him
for
support.
You
could
ask
him
to
help
contribute
and
he
stepped
up,
and
it
was
not
that
he
asked
for
anything
in
return.
A
He
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
things
were
left
better
and
his
big
push,
as
a
blade
had
been
for
the
youth
of
this
community
and
the
education
and
the
schools,
because
he
wanted
the
young
people
to
other
opportunities.
My
Satta
in
a
school
board
meeting
where
he
wrote
a
brought
a
check
for
$10,000
to
purchase
items.
So
it
is
sad
that
we've
lost
this
very
I.
A
Think
a
man
that
I
admire
for
all
that
he's
given,
but
he
also
was,
if
you
ever
sat
and
talked
to
him
a
straight-shooter,
honest
blunt
and
to
the
point,
and
if
you
weren't
ready
for
an
honest
conversation,
then
you
shouldn't
sit
down
at
the
table
with
them.
So
I
will
miss
that.
So
with
that,
we,
as
the
council
in
this
community,
offer
our
condolences
and
support
and
love
to
his
wife
and
his
family,
and
we
wish
them
the
very
best,
and
we
are
here
to
support
them
as
we
can.
So.