►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting June 22, 2021
6. Approve FY 2021-22 Operating and CIP Budgets
B
Item
six
a
hold
a
public
hearing
and
adopt
resolutions
approving
fiscal
year,
2021-20
operating
in
fiscal
two
fiscal
year;
2021-26
capital
improvement
program,
program,
budget,
approving
city
appropriations,
scan
limit
for
fiscal
year;
2021-22
approving
the
cost,
recovery
policy
and
updated
user
fee
schedule
for
fiscal
year.
2021-22.
C
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
in
council,
javon,
groban
city
manager,
I'll
be
assisted
in
this
presentation
with
our
finance
director
chinese
son.
In
addition,
all
of
your
department,
directors
from
every
department
are
available.
Some
of
them
are
with
me
in
this
room.
We
are
not
wearing
masks
because
we
are
all
fully
vaccinated
and
compliant
with
the
new
ocean
requirements.
So
it's
nice
to
be
back
to
little
normal,
and
so
why
don't
we
begin?
C
As
the
council
knows,
we
did
have
a
meeting
just
prior
to
this,
where
you
did
provide
staff
with
direction
to
utilize,
arpa
funds
for
the
million
dollar
stormwater
deficit,
and
so
that
is
within
the
presentation
and
for
time.
Efficiency's
sake
we'll
skip
over
those
slides,
because
we
have
that
discussion
at
our
meeting
and
clear
directions
from
the
city
council.
C
C
As
a
reminder,
we
operate
on
a
july
through
june
july,
1
june
30
fiscal
year,
and
so
this
will
take
us
through
july
1,
2021
to
june
30.
2022
approve
appropriations
related
to
the
city's
gan
limit,
as
well
as
adopt
changes
to
our
master
fee
schedule
for
the
coming
year.
Our
agenda
is
as
follows:
there
are
a
total
of
eight,
I'm
sorry,
not
eight,
my
roman
numerals
13
sections
on
this
presentation.
We
will
talk
about
the
general
side
enhancements.
We
will
recap
reserves
quickly.
C
We
will
talk
about
enterprise,
internal
service
funds,
our
capital,
improvement
program,
measure,
g
vehicles,
gan,
limit
user
fee
schedule,
alternatives,
the
request
to
counsel
and
then
have
questions
and
discussion
with
a
number
of
the
items.
There
are
decision
points
for
council.
We
can
pause.
Should
the
city
council
want
to
have
those
discussions
at
that
moment
or
we
can
complete
the
entire
presentation
and
go
back
to
those
sections
and
why
don't
we
begin
so?
C
C
C
As
a
reminder,
the
city's
overall
budget
is
193
million
dollars
all
funds
as
all
of
our
sewer,
water,
storm
water
city,
net
general
fund
and
all
of
our
special
revenue
funds.
So
to
provide
programs
and
services
to
the
citizens
of
san
bruno
and
the
proposed
budget
envision
spending,
193
million
dollars,
inclusive
of
operating
and
capital.
C
The
baseline
budget
includes
246
ftes
council
knows
that
that
is
less
24
positions
that
were
either
frozen
or
eliminated.
During
the
prior
budget
cycle,
we
do
pull
at
19
and
our
need
to
trim
the
city's
budget.
There
are
104
capital
improvement
projects
and
the
total
general
fund
budget,
which
is
our
general
checking
account,
is
51
million
dollars.
C
C
That
leaves
a
deficit
of
1.2
million,
with
the
ending
fund
transfer
of
1.4
and
in
the
fund.
Balance
of
1.4
was
a
transparent
for
mr
g
that
is
proposed
that
we'll
talk
about
that
will
be
aligned
to
specific
service
categories
of
0.6
or
600
000,
with
a
projected
ending
fund
balance
of
2
million
prior
to
the
general
fund
enhancements
that
we'll
talk
about
shortly.
C
With
regard
to
overall
revenues
and
expenditures.
I
know
the
city
council
has
seen
this
several
times
during
our
budget
presentations.
This
is
the
exact
same
pie.
Graph
is
when
we
look
at
our
revenues,
our
property
tax
and
sales
tax
together,
making
45
of
our
baseline
general
fund
revenues
24
for
property
tax
21
for
sales
tax.
With
regard
to
our
expenditures,
the
largest
share
of
our
expenditures
at
58
is
for
police
and
fire.
Our
only
two
24-hour
operations
operating
departments.
D
D
Our
property
tax
is
going
to
increase
moderately
with
the
housing
market
remaining
pretty
high,
so
tax
will
increase
by
11
when
economic
activity
increase
after
the
stakeholders.
Of
course,
we
have
already
fully
opened
that,
since
the
15th
of
the
june
theory
were
increased
by
72,
but
still
more
than
half
behind
the
pre-covet
level
vehicle
license
fee,
which
is
beta.
D
Will
be
nine
percent
lower,
as
most
schools
are
referring
to
basic
schools,
and
thank
you
mayor
for
issuing
the
letter
to
the
state
legislatures
and
the
the
governor.
Hopefully,
the
state
will
come
up
with
additional
funding
to
make
us
call
it.
In
the
upcoming
year
there
will
be
a
lifesaver
for
us
if
that
happens,.
D
For
expenditures-
and
we
all
know
that
detection
cost
is
really
a
big
factor
for
increasing
costs
and
increasing
spending
in
general
funds
and
another
big
increase,
our
health
and
insurance
costs
and
all
the
union
emius
are
subject
to
negotiation
by
the
end
of
this
calendar
year.
The
step
we
under
the
city
manager's
diet.
Guideline
we
develop
a
status
quo,
baseline
budget,
meaning
the
reduced
gapping
in
the
current
year
is
not
a
recovery
in
this
baseline
budget.
D
D
D
Now
we're
talking
about
a
general
fund
summaries
is
tied
back
to
one
of
the
supplies
that
women
I
talked
about.
We
are
beginning
with
the
general
fund
balance
that
for
the
next
fifth
year
and
2.6
million,
that's
2.573
from
the
top
and
the
operating
revenues
is
about
the
15.3.
That's
including
some
fund
transfers.
D
Such
as
the
six
hundred
thousand
transfer
from
entity,
totally
operating
expenditures
is
going
to
be
about
fifty
point.
Nine
million
dollars
we're
seeing
a
debt
surplus
we've
seen
invested
about
six
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
bear
in
mind
that
that's
that's
as
fast
as
it
will
increase.
If
we
take
the
measure
to
transfer
out
of
it,
so
we're
seeing
him
ending
on
the.
D
D
We,
although
we
have
20
26
million
dollars,
doesn't
mean
we
have
23
26.3
million
in
the
bank.
We
do
have
some
significant
deficit
with
enterprise
funds.
The
enterprise
deficit
has
has
to
be
covered
by
general
bond
on
restricted
reserves,
establishes
our
disciplinary
service
funds
at
almost
fifty
fourteen
and
a
half
million
dollars,
and
we
also
have
talked
about
the
stormwater
is
going
to
enter
a
100
deficit.
D
B
D
C
Thank
you,
members
of
the
council
and
the
public
when
we
as
we
talk
about
enhancements.
I
wanted
to
begin
with
a
slide
that
we
talked
about
at
our
first
budget
meeting
on
june
1st,
and
so
in
the
proposed
budget.
We
included
funding
for
a
number
of
new
city
council,
strategic
initiatives
in
the
amount
of
1.388
million,
just
under
1.4
million,
and
so
they're
listed
up
here
above
and
I'll
run
through
these
really
quickly.
C
There's
a
downtown
streetscape
implementation
and
architectural
services
for
300
000
that
was
proposed
to
be
funded
by
measure
g
upgrades
to
our
channel
to
channel
one
wildfire
mitigation
and
fire
prevention
of
a
total
of
244
thousand
dollars.
That
was
both
stacking
as
well
as
150
000
to
do
brush
clearing
this
year.
A
new.
C
Development
manager
position
conducting
a
water
and
sewer
rate
study,
installation
of
down
beginning
the
process
to
examine
and
install
downtown
parking
leaders
and
wayfinding
signage,
adding
an
additional
75
000
to
that
budget.
70
000
for
our
affordable
housing
plan
implementation,
60
000
for
grant
writing
assistance,
work
to
begin
developing
cannabis
regulations
of
40
000
funding
to
help
supplement
the
budget
to
replace
our
newspaper
racks
and
enhance
holiday,
decor
of
25
000
for
holiday
decor
at
city
hall
in
downtown,
and
that's
with
a
total
of
nearly
1.4.
C
In
addition,
we
recapped
a
number
of
city
council
strategic
initiatives
that
were
not
included
in
the
proposed
budget
and
for
various
reasons.
We
went
through
these
in
detail
last
time,
if
I
point
out
a
few
just
with
the
east
west
street
sleeping
alignment,
it's
important
to
note
that,
with
the
unsuccessful
storm
drain
and
flood
protection
fee
costs
to
began
and
undertake
this
effort
are
currently
unknown.
C
So
the
fund
is
currently
one
million
dollars
in
deficit.
What
we
said
last
time
is
that
we
would
need
to
fully
analyze
the
cost
to
undertake
this.
It
would
significantly
increase
the
workload
for
street
sweeping
and
certainly
have
a
cost
implication
that
may
be
offset
in
the
short
term
by
revenue
from
fees.
C
But
what
we
know
with
street
sweeping
is
that
once
people
get
a
ticket
a
few
times,
they
they
move
the
car,
and
so
you
don't
fund
street
sweeping
off
of
citation
revenue,
and
so
we
knew
that
it
would
be
an
additional
cost,
but
the
cost
was
not.
It
was
not
identified.
Yet
without
that
revenue
we
would
need
to
look
for
other
funding
sources.
C
Climate
action
plan
we're
exploring
a
partnership
with
skyline
college
citywide
performance
metrics.
We
mentioned
that
we
would
plan
to
issue
an
rfp
and
bring
that
proposal
to
council
charter
city,
knowing
that
that's
a
initiative
to
work
on
that,
coupled
with
the
initiative
of
a
transfer
tax
may
be
cost
positive,
but
certainly
the
work
would
undertake
a
cost.
We
haven't
identified
those
costs
just
yet,
but
we
would
return
to
council
once
those
costs
are
doubled
summer
closures
of
downtown
on
saturdays
or
sundays.
C
We
were
not
able
to
identify
or
budget
the
cost.
For
that.
The
adopt-a-drain
program
was
a
strategic
initiative
that
we
at
the
time
of
developing
the
budget,
did
not
have
a
cost
for
with
regard
to
small
business
attraction,
it's
important
to
know
that
there
is
a
proposal,
for,
I
believe,
a
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
that
will
be
talking
about
shortly,
and
that
was
added
during
the
proposed
budget
discussions
with
respect
to
a
program
that's
being
run
by
the
bay
area,
entrepreneurship
center.
C
But
as
far
as
enveloping
a
larger
small
business
attraction
program
there
there
was
a
position
or
there
is
a
position
recommendation
for
an
economic
development
manager
that
we
were
going
to
look
to
that
manager
to
help
help
us
with
developing
that
program
and
then
by
bringing
forward
any
financial
recommendations.
But
funding
for
pulsey
park.
There's
an
estimate
of
500
000..
C
In
addition,
there
are
540
000
of
general
fund
enhancements
that
are
included
in
the
enhancement
request.
This
500
000,
as
the
finance
director
mentioned
when
you
have
a
projected
ending
balance
of
2
million
dollars-
and
you
add
this
we
would-
we
were
projecting
to
end
at
the
policy
limit
of
1.5
a
fund
balance.
I
won't
go
through
all
of
these
because
I
know
we've
talked
about
them
several
times
and
we
can
return
to
any
of
these.
C
B
C
C
Is
made
up
of
three
components:
it's
funding
for
the
cannabis
initiative
of
40
000
funding
for
the
grant
writer
at
60
000
and
an
additional
50
000
for
a
general
professional
services
budget
in
the
city
management
office.
So
I
know
the
city
council
has
received
that
all
of
these
others.
We've
talked
about
happy
to
return
to
in
the
interest
of
time.
A
number
of
them
are
have
one
time
cost.
C
C
We
know
that
we
can
fund
that
position
at
75
funded
from
developer
reimbursements,
and
so
that
brings
us
to
this
slide,
which
brings
presents
a
total
of
that
arc
of
funding
as
a
glide
path
to
restore
a
portion,
but
not
all
of
the
positions
that
were
reduced
in
the
prior
budget
cycle
and
also
having
strategic
additions
tied
to
strategic
initiatives
and
other
items.
And
so
in
that
second
proposed
column
for
2021.
C
C
With
regard
to
the
measure
g
funding,
there
are
three
columns
here
and
I
want
to
pause
here
to
have
the
finance
director
begin.
The
articulation
of
measure
g
and
the
measure,
g
funding
recommendations
and
the
meeting
that
we
had
with
the
citizens
revenue
oversight
committee
on
friday
in
their
recommendations
to
council,
and
then
we
will
continue
with
other
discussions.
D
Thank
you
I'll
just
run
through
the
progression
of
a
measure
of
proposed
use
throughout
the
decision
budget
development
season.
So
imagine
as
we
expected
it
at
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year,
is
going
to
have
a
1.25
million
dollars
in
fund
balance,
which
is
much
better
than
we
had
projected
in
the
last
budget
season
and
we
are
going
to
expect.
D
So
originally
in
our
first
version
of
proposed
by
the
electricity
manager
proposed
to
from
1.4
million
street
project
with
energy
funding,
and
then
three
hundred
and
thousand
four
states
in
the
street
street,
and
then
eight
hundred
four
thousand
foot
positions
and
and
six
hundred
thousand
for
general
transfer
to
general
fund
to
help
gentlemen
achieve
the
fund
balance
target
and
then
there's
another
two
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars
for
the
treatment
trucks.
After
discussion
with
the
council.
D
During
this
study
session
on
june
8th
and
then
9th,
the
council
expressed
concern
on
the
94
position,
so
we
moved
to
some
of
the
positions
out
of
the
message
debugging
and
you
can
see
in
an
employee
position
line.
It
will
reduce
from
80
to
800
4
000
to
517
thousand.
Everything
else
remain
the
same
in
several
weeks.
We
believe
the
fire
city-wide
fire
mitigation
is
in
the
line
with
the
spirit
better
to
the
election
at
the
beginning.
So
we
moved
that
hundred
thousand
into
the
mexican
post
budget.
D
The
committee
members
felt
that
massachusetts
funding
should
be
used
for
street
projects,
so
they
approved
a
unanimous
blade
for
the
street
project
cip
bracket
1.4.
They
also
felt
150
thousand
dollars
for
bio
mitigation,
was
appropriate
usage
of
the
measure
g
funding,
and
then
they
also
allowed
us
to
use
the
240
for
the
payment
truck.
D
So
we
that's
the
difference.
The
progress
of
the
measure
g
proposal
in
the
budget
season,
as
you
can
see
the
the
various
different
proposals,
the
ending
balance
of
the
msg-
is
going
to
be
well
above.
A
million
dollars
with
a
with
the
most
right
column,
keep
the
most
of
the
balance.
If
you
just,
if
we
don't
we're
only
allowed
to
follow
the
synthesis.
D
C
C
It
was
nearly
a
three-hour
meeting
and
a
very,
very
robust
discussion,
the
the
committee
of
really
understood
the
challenges
facing
the
city,
I
believe,
but
but
in
light
of
the
arc
of
funding,
I
really
thought
that
before
utilizing
the
funds
as
proposed,
we
should
look
towards
larpa.
It's
certainly
connected
to
positions.
In
fact,
the
the
committee
felt
that
it
was
not
appropriate
to
use
the
funds
for
employee
positions,
even
if
there
was
a
path
to
gradually
progress
off
of
that.
C
C
We
know
that
slurry
still
is
the
cheapest
rule
treatment,
but
some
of
the
more
expensive
rule,
treatments,
the
reconstruction
or
the
grind
and
overlay
cost
several
million
dollars,
even
if
you're
only
doing
a
few
block
segments
so
to
let
a
little
money
accumulate
in
measure
g,
so
we
can
do
larger
projects.
It's
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing,
but
we
know
that
there
are
a
number
of
pressing
needs,
which
is
why
the
proposed
budget
was
structured
by
the
the
way.
C
With
regard
to
funding
decisions
related
to
measure
b
and
harpa,
we
did
want
to
call
out
four
key
ones
based
on
where
the
where
we
are
now
and
it's
essentially,
let's
consider
these
funding
decisions
related
to
new
information.
The
first
one
certainly
is
stormwater
that
we've
talked
about,
so
we
won't
go
over
that.
The
the
next
three
are
connected
to
the
met,
the
citizens,
revenue
oversight,
committee,
recommendations
and
then
that's
considering.
C
With
regard
to
number
three,
the
the
transfer
to
the
general
fund
to
support,
essentially
the
baseline
budget
and
the
the
city
council
articulated
before
to
just
not
tie
these
expenditures
to
fund
balance,
support
or
general
blanket
general
fund
support,
but
instead
to
articulate
it
for
key
items,
and
so
staff
did
provide
a
subsequent
information
to
council.
That's
on
the
screen,
which
is
sample
allocations
of
600
000.
F
C
C
The
current
year
this
current
adopted
budget,
both
the
committee
and
the
city
council,
supported
and
adopted
utilizing
two
million
dollars
of
g
funding
to
support
the
city's
baseline
budget
to
essentially
prevent
further
reductions
and
services
to
the
community.
In
the
proposed
budget,
we
were
able
to
drop
that
from
2
million
to
600
000,
and
so
that's
a
1.4
million
dollar
reduction
in
just
one
year,
and
so
when
we
talked
to
the
committee
about
this,
the
committee
understood
this.
C
C
And
lastly,
connected
to
this
transfer,
it
is
important,
so
the
general
fund
projected
ending
fund
balance
with
the
measure
g
transfer
and
the
the
general
fund
enhancements
is
1.5
million,
which
was
targeted
to
meet
the
city's
policy
target.
If
you
pull
that
general
fund
transfer
out
the
general
fan,
the
general
fund
projected
ending
fund
balance
will
be
nine
hundred
thousand
so
lower
than
the
policy
target
of
one
point,
five
million,
and
so
if
from
professionally
from
staff,
I
do
believe.
C
While
I
understand
the
committee's
position,
it
is
important
that
we
get
with
that
1.5
million
dollar
target.
So
I
would
encourage
the
city
council
to
think
about
allowing
that
transfer
and
having
check-in
points
during
the
fiscal
year
with
the
hope
that
will
not
need
it.
Maybe
we'll
have
additional
revenue
but
understanding
that
meeting
those
policy
targets
are
are
critically
important.
C
Other
items
and
where
the
committee
landed,
I
did
want
to
proffer
to
the
city
council
that
one
funding
force
is
utilizing
the
city's
general
fund,
capital
reserve
and
one
time
initiatives
fund.
That
does
have
a
projected
ending
fund
balance
of
sort
of
a
net
of
five
million
dollars,
and
I
called
it
a
net
of
five
million
dollars,
because
that
takes
out
that
4.5
million
that
remembers
in
that
balance,
but
is
planned
to
be
used
for
the
the
recreation
and
aquatic
center
next
fiscal
year,
and
so
really
there's
with
that.
C
With
the
rack
funding,
there's
five
million
dollars
available,
so
you
you
could
utilize
three
million
or
300
000
from
that
fund
to
cover
this.
The
challenge
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
pressures
on
that
fund
and
our
capital
reserve
fund
in
general,
which
is
why
tied
to
vendor
g,
we
thought
it
was
appropriate,
but
that
is
certainly
a
decision
for
for
the
city
council
in
your
final
budget
deliberations,
and
so
that
concludes
those
discussions
on
those
items.
C
C
A
D
D
So
for
internal
service
fund
we
have
a
lofty
goal
and
maintain
the
25
percent
of
annual
budget
expenditures
for
three
of
the
founders
like
central
block,
garage
building
facilities
and
technology.
I
want
to
let
you
know
london
is
going
to
remain
we'll
be
able
to
achieve
that
goal.
Actually,
so
our
reserve
for
these
funds
at
the
end
of
a
2122
as
a
state
of
the
dollar
amount,
is
between
between
15
percent
to
about
18
percent
of
the
budget.
D
But
internal
service
fund
usually
have
an
application
from
all
departments
to
replenish
to
provide
a
funding
source.
We
we
have
gone
through
the
proposed
budget
development.
All
the
departments
are
really
having
a
lot
of
pressure
on
the
expenditure.
It
is
hard
for
them
to
come
up
with
additional
money
to
to
support
the
internal
service
bus.
So
we
take
a
decision
to
reduce
the
balance
target
to
have
at
least
a
15
percent,
but
we're
not
able
to
achieve
25
percent
of
the
internal
services,
but
that's
a
target.
D
D
D
Next,
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
gang
limits.
Gal
limited
is
a
vote
improvement
initiative
to
limit
amount
of
tax
generated
revenue
based
on
the
fiscal
year
in
78
and
79
budget
adjusted
each
year
with
the
cost
of
living
and
population
growth.
This
cost
of
living
and
population
growth
are
data
published
by
the
department
of
fine
department
finance
with
the
state
of
california.
D
D
Next,
let's
talk
about
the
draft
cost
recovery
policy.
The
council
reviewed
the
draft
request,
cost
recovery
policy
during
the
meeting
on
march,
2nd
2021,
and
this
policy
provides
a
framework
for
the
city
council
to
communicate
to
the
public
why
fees
have
different
class
recovery
levels
once
this
policy
is
established,
that
it
would
be
reviewed
during
the
future
user
pdf
date
or
when
the
city
council
believe
review
is
necessary,
and
this
policy
will
create
some
flexibility
for
staff
to
respond
to
our
newer
unusual
circumstances
or
unique
opportunities
in
its
pricing
of
services.
D
The
cultural
company
processing
has
several
levels
of
full
cost:
recover
recovery
or
near
food
cost
recovery
such
as
the
building
permits.
We
are
hoping
to
recover
the
cost
at
eighty
two
hundred
percent
level
and
the
medium
cost
recovery
is
a
forty
to
eighty
percent
level
and
the
typical
example
is
the
middle
school
recreation
program.
The
low
cost
rate
of
recovery
are
full
yes
and
below
40
level.
One
good
example
is
a
senior
knowledge
program.
D
The
proposed
user
visa.
We
talked
about
in
several
study
sessions
and
with
the
council's
recommendation,
we're
making
a
series
of
updates
and
changes.
So
currently
the
total
number
of
fees
about
547
and
there
are
273
increases.
The
10
was
just
increased
88
new
fees
and
121
piece
of
work
moving
at
the
current
level,
and
there
is
a
summary
deposit
based
on
cost
recovery
in
2021.
D
D
C
D
C
Should
we
go.
There
would
recommend
that
the
city
council
at
a
minimum
adopt
a
capital
improvement
budget,
so
we
do
not
have
delays
with
our
rac
project
and
our
other
capital
improvement
projects
and
alternative
resolution
is
attached
to
this
report.
But
we
are
here
ready
to
support
the
city
council
through
your
discussions
and
deliberations.
So
again,
I
want
to
thank
the
council
and
the
staff
for
just
the
loan
process
that
took
us
to
here
and
again,
all
of
your
department
directors
are
available
virtually
to
support.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation,
thank
you
very
much
to
director,
sun
and
all
in
the
finance
department,
the
directors
for
all
the
time
that
goes
into
these
budgets.
I'm
sure
everybody
looks
forward
to
this
time
of
the
year,
but
I
know
it's
daunting
and
it's
a
lot
to
deal
with.
So
thank
you
very
much.
D
G
Good
evening
again,
I
got
just
a
couple
issues.
First
off
on
the
measure
g
fund
usage.
You
know
when
it
first
came
out
about
just
being
on
the
ballot.
It
was
to
improve
the
roads.
With
the
caveat
that
you
know
they
could
use
it
for
other
items.
But
if
you
go
to
the
city's
website,
you
look
at
measure
g
priorities.
Not
one
of
them
says
for
personnel
costs
and
I'd
just
be
careful,
and
my
my
personal
opinion
is
that
we
shouldn't
use
that,
for
that
we
should.
G
G
And
then
my
last
comment
is,
you
know
the
staff
and
the
city
council
uses
the
lexicon
of
city
speak
all
the
time,
but
but
we
don't
there's
a
lot
of
acronyms
being
thrown
out
there
and
I
try
to
search
for
some
of
them
like
the
ar
pr
and
it
doesn't
come
up
with
anything.
So
I
don't
know
what
that
stands
for,
but
it'd
be
helpful.
If
you
could
spell
those
out,
or
at
least
have
an
acronym
list
that
we
could
look
through
so
that
we
could
know
what
you're
talking
about.
A
A
A
motion
by
salazar
seconded
by
hamilton
to
close
public
hearing-
let's
just
say
I
think
at
this
time
I
was
told
we
could
just
do
a
role.
I
mean
we
don't
need
a
roll
call,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
hi
hi.
So
I'm
going
to
record
that
in
city
clerical
record
that
is
5-0
in
favor
of
closing
public
hearing.
A
If
I
am
incorrect
in
that
statement,
please
correct
me
now:
okay,
with
that
said,
city
manager,
I
I
have
a
comment
but
or
the
thing:
how
best
would
it
be
to
go
through?
That
would
be
best.
You
think,
so
we're
not
going
all
going
back
and
forth,
or
is
that
how
you
prefer
it?
Because
I
can
tell
you
if
we
could
probably
take
on
the
gan
limit
real
quick-
and
I
bet
you
there
wouldn't
be
any
too
many
questions
and
we
all
could
have
a
win
there.
C
I
would
suggest,
beginning
from
the
user
fee
resolution
and
then
the
game
limit-
and
I
said,
user
fees
first,
because
we
do
have
consultants
that
are
on
board
from
from
will
dan
who
produced
the
user
feed
study
as
well
as
craig
whittam,
who
has
supported
us
through
those
discussions.
Just
in
case
the
city
council
has
any
questions.
I
know
we
had
two
study
sessions
on
it,
but
if
you,
if
we
want
to
take.
C
A
A
I
B
B
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
in
regards
to
the
cost,
recovery
policy
and
updated
user
fee
schedule,
seen
nothing
from
my
colleagues
and
we
can
take
the
resolutions
either
one
at
a
time
or
we
can
take
them
as
we're
completed
with
all.
I
don't
know
that
there's
a
preference
but
we're
gonna
have
to
get
to
all
three
of
them.
Let's
with
no
other
questions
on
that,
let's
move
to
approving
the
city
appropriations
gan
limit
for
fy21222.
E
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
a
procedural
question.
Actually,
as
I
was
flipping
through
the
attachments,
I
didn't
notice
that
there
was
actually
a
fourth
resolution
that
wasn't
listed
in
the
agenda
and
it's
one
for
proving
fully
burdened
hourly
staff
rates,
and
so
as
we're
stepping
through
these.
I'm
just
wondering.
Is
that
one
that
we're
going
to
address?
Or
are
we
not
going
to
address
that
one
because
it
wasn't
on
the
agenda.
C
C
C
E
C
E
Yeah-
and
it
was
a
clarification
because
we
we
listed
three
resolutions-
we
have
four
resolutions,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
addressed
all
four
since
we
were
discussing
whether
or
not
we
would
take
them
all
at
once
or
individually.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
miss
one
because
they
are
separated
in
the.
H
Just
make
the
suggestion
that
once
we
once
we
finish
deliberation
on
these
two,
that
we
just
take
the
votes
on
them
and
get
them
off
the
table,
especially
because
there's
a
little
bit
of
confusion
on
this
one.
We
just
discussed
it,
and
maybe
it
might
be
an
hour
from
now
before
we
come
back
to
vote
and
might
as
well
just
get
them
done.
A
C
Council
member,
I
can't
say
that
we
have
the
information
to
answer
that
question
when
we
met
with
council
at
our
last
study
session
on
the
user
fees.
We
we
talked
about
a
september
one
implementation
date,
and
so
the
proposed
budget
was
adopted
with
the
september
one
implementation
date
in
mind
and
we
did
not
carve
out
the
analysis
for
what
it
would
be
if
we
delayed
that
implementation
until
january.
It's
worth
noting
that
there
are
a
number
of
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline.
C
I
A
Yeah,
I
think
they
they've
been
lowered
as
well
as
they've,
been
staggered
out
over
a
period
of
time
up
to
four
years,
and
we've
been
on
this
a
couple
times,
so
this
would
be
halting
it
having
to
go
back
for
analysis
having
to
come
back
at
a
later
date.
Potentially
so
are
there
any
the
city
manager
was
any
more
clarification
to
the
three
resolutions
versus
four.
Are
we
okay
yeah.
C
I
went
back
to
the
agenda.
There
are
four
resolutions
on
the
agenda.
There
are
three
bullets,
however.
The
final
bullet
says:
cost
recovery
policy,
which
is
a
separate
resolution
and
updating
the
user
fee
schedule,
which
is
a
separate
resolution,
and
so,
instead
of
calling
it
out.
As
for
individual
bullets,
the
agenda
calls
it
out
as
three
bullets,
but
that
last
item
includes
two
that
last
bullet
includes
two
resolutions,
so
I
know
that
that
was
confusing.
C
F
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
medina.
This
is
a
lot
and-
and
I
did
want
to
acknowledge,
councilwoman
mason's
comments,
and
I
think-
and
I
think
I'm
okay
with
proceeding
tonight,
because
those
as
noted
those
fees
that
are
the
most
out
of
scale
that
are
that
are
so
far
over
away
from
what
the
actual
charges
are.
F
A
Yes-
and
I
appreciate
that,
I'm
going
to
say
what
I
had
said
earlier-
I
appreciate
the
comment,
but
we
we've
met
on
this
and
you
know
we
are
still
subsidizing
certain
classes
and
activities.
So
it's
not
making
us
whole
is
just
trying
to
get
us
back
to
where
we
we
need
to
be,
and
we
should
be
in
some
cases.
A
H
H
E
F
A
H
A
A
H
F
A
F
A
A
A
Okay,
with
that
said,
let's
move
on
to
the
operational
side.
I'm
gonna
begin.
If
it's
okay,
I
wanna,
I
think
what
we
have
to
get
down
to
when
I
was
trying
to
take
notes
as
we
were
going
through.
This
is
really
we're.
We're
gonna
have
to
have
some
dialogue
in
regards
to
enhancements
but
enhancements
in
the
measure.
G
or
oh,
and
I
apologize,
we
had
our
speaker,
which
was
asking
as
far
as
the
salaries
the
salaries
that
are
being
presented
within
the
budget.
A
C
Is
arpa,
or
it
is
the
american
rescue
plan
act
that
was
was
recently
passed
that
is,
provide
providing
relief
to
all
municipalities
in
the
country
due
to
revenue
losses
related
to
covet
19..
It
is
allocated
based
on
population,
and
so
our
allocation
amount
is
10.2,
four
million
dollars
that
money
is
due
to
be
submitted
or
submitted
to
the
city
or
remitted
to
the
city.
Mind
you
in
july
of
next
next
fiscal
year,
so
just
a
month
or
a
few
days
from
now.
A
Thank
you
so,
on
the
measure
g,
I
think
that's
going
to
be
something
that
we
as
as
a
council.
We
we
heard
from
the
city
staff.
The
measure
g
committee
has
given
recommendations.
Of
course
those
are
recommendations
to
this
body.
I
will
tell
you
what
it
comes
down
to
obviously
and
correct
me:
is
there
sport
positions,
police
officer,
firefighter
fire
inspector
economic
development
manager,
also
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
contribute
to
public
safety
splash
park
maintenance?
A
I
think
those
are
the
items
of
question
you
know,
and
I
know
we
have
this
one
time
money
is
there.
They
are
opera
but
at
the
same
time,
I'll
tell
you,
based
on
the
verbiage
within
the
ballot
measure.
Some
of
these
positions,
I.e,
the
you
know,
a
fire
inspector,
the
police
officer
firefighter
in
my
mind
they
do
they
do
qualify.
A
So
I
want
to
see
those
funded
periods.
I
also
want
to
recognize
and
articulate
the
police
officer
and
firefighter
positions
are
not
enhancements,
they're,
not
new
positions.
Those
are
trying
to
restore
to
where
we
were,
which
I
think
it's
critical
for
public
safety
in
our
community.
That
is
one
thing
I'll
tell
you
as
mayor.
A
That
makes
me
either
stay
up
or
sleep
well
at
night
is
to
know
that
we
have
the
men
and
women
of
serbian
art
community
and
at
this
last
budget
session,
where
we
had,
the
departments
asked
to
freeze
positions,
we've
had
departments
across
the
board,
but
even
in
fire
and
police.
That
said,
hey
we
we'll
we'll
get
through
it.
We're
going
to
do
our
part,
but
the
other
concern.
I
have
too
is
at
some
points:
there's
vacations,
there's
eternity,
there's
injury,
there's
other
elements
that
may
have
to
that
that
occur.
A
A
So
you
know
I
I
want
to
hear
from
my
colleagues,
but
I
will
tell
you
for
me
to
go
forward
on
this
budget.
It's
going
to
have
to
have
an
opportunity
and
an
answer
as
to
how
we
move
forward,
because
I
think
we've
concurred
the
economic
development
manager.
It
is
a
new
role
and
on
the
fire
inspector
that
also
is
a
cost
recovery.
So
whatever
it
costs,
there
are
going
to
be
money
that
come
back
in
by
that
task,
that
that
is
performed,
and
that
is
another
critical
necessity.
A
I
think
for
keeping
this
community
safe
and
keeping
it
proactive
rather
than
responding
to
a
fire,
because
her
store
wasn't
inspected
or
something
went
by
you
know,
and
so
I
just
want
to
give
my
my
first
comments
and
then
the
last
one
is
again:
it's
a
600
000
also
that
the
city
manager
brought
up.
So
I
don't
know
how
my
colleagues
want
to
take
it.
I
see
the
vice
mayor's
hand
is
up,
but
I
know
the
measure
g
thing
might
be
something
we
want
to
tackle.
F
F
However,
we
also
acknowledge,
or
my
my
argument
would
be,
that
it
was
advertised
a
little
heavy
on
the
street
repair,
and
so
if
we
could
go
ahead
and
maybe
make
that
decision
on
on
where
the
funding
should
be
from
and
then
go
to
each
of
the
individual
positions
of
whether
or
not
we
agree
on
having
those
but
but
before
we
go
too
much
further.
Mr
mayor,
there
are
some
other
questions
that
I
have
but
I'll
reserve
for
now,
just
to
see
how
we
can
how
far
we
can
get.
A
E
E
It's
huge
and
I'm
not
doubting
that
the
positions
are
are
necessary,
but
but
it
is
interesting
to
note
that
not
only
to
most
members
of
the
public
that
have
opined
on
this
as
well
as
the
majority
of
the
members
of
the
committee,
we
appointed
felt
that
funding
salaries
was
was
not
in
the
spirit
of
what
was
so
and
and
to
the
letter
of
the
law.
You're.
Absolutely
right,
that's
exactly
the
way
it
was
spelled
out
and
we
said
that
that
would
be
an
appropriate
use
of
it.
E
A
H
I
I
I
I
I
mean
it's
a
deputy
director,
but
it's
not
the
head
of
a
department
and
I
am
curious
to
know
if
that's
the
south,
the
going
salaries
for
like
cities,
you
know
to
oversee
the
programs
that
we
don't
have
yet
that
we
will
have
at
some
point
because
it
does
seem
a
little
high
and
and
the
other
ones,
as
I
mentioned
before.
I
I
had
hoped
my
position
would
change
around
this,
but
the
assistant
positions.
I
think
I'm
sorry
councilman
mason.
I
Yeah
they're
connected
because
if
we,
the
funds
will
be
available
if
we
switch
out
some
of
the
some
of
the
arpa
some
of
the
arpa
positions,
but
you
know
I
I
had
hoped
that
we'd
hear,
maybe
that
there
had
been
a
little
bit
of
pivoting
or
some
outside
the
box
thinking.
We
still
have
a
department
that
has
one
director
two
deputy
directors
and
three
assistants,
and
what
mayor
medina
said
is
right.
We
need
a
we
need.
I
We
need
a
police
right,
we
need
a
firefighter,
we
need
a
fire
inspector
and
I'm
I'm
a
little
just
kind
of
concerned
on
what
this
signifies.
As
far
as
you
know,
what
what
we're
prioritizing
can
we
have
them
all
if
we
can
have
them
all?
That
would
be
wonderful,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
needs
and
I
really
feel
that
this
year
our
vote
around
how
we
spend
the
measure
g
funds
is
critical,
especially
given
the
results
we
just
received
from
the
stormwater.
A
Thanks
so
what
I'm
hearing
from
my
colleagues
and
and
please
correct
me
on
the
four
positions-
police
officer,
firefighter
fire
inspector
economic
development
manager-
not
to
use
measure
g,
but
the
arp
is,
is
that
accurate?
I
see
one
thumbs
up
two
thumbs
up
a
nod,
three
thumbs
up
and
a
nod,
and
so
there's
a
five,
oh,
that
we
all
concur
on
it's
not
about,
but
just
the
consensus
that
is
5.0,
and
I
appreciate
that.
I
think
those
are
important
and
we've
talked
about.
So
thank
you,
the
city
manager.
A
C
Yeah,
and
so
that
was
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
support
the
baseline
general
fund
budget,
and
so
the
city
council
did
articulate
that
they
would
like
to
see
those
funds
allocated
to
specific
services
that
aligned
to
the
intent
of
measuring.
Should
they
support
that
and
we
did
provide
those
sample
allocations
with
funding
baseline
budgets,
not
enhancements
or
restoring
positions
that
were
reduced.
C
D
C
The
committee
felt
is
that
utilize
other
sources
as
much
as
possible,
and
there
was
a
mention
of
arpa.
I
would
say
to
the
council
that,
with
the
decision
to
utilize
arpa
for
the
one
million
dollars
of
the
stormwater
water
deficit
and
the
four
positions
that
you
don't
have
two
million
left
in
I'm
sorry,
six
hundred
thousand
left
in
our
to
pull
all
of
this
from
marco.
With
the
other
enhancement
requested.
C
You
approve
those,
and
so
you
could
potentially
do
300
000,
which
would
be
essentially
the
remaining
arpa
funds
and
and
maybe
300
000
for
martha
300
000
from
measure
g
would
be
a
potential
way
to
reduce
the
amount
from
entergy
but
utilize
our
book.
And
so
I
would.
I
would
proffer
that
as
an
alternative
to
what's
in
the
proposed
budget.
A
F
F
F
That
shows
the
measure
g
funding
in
on
in
the
middle
part
of
the
page.
Is
that
available
city
manager
grogan,
it
kind
of
makes
it
a
little
easier
to
kind
of
bounce
around.
If
we
could
put
that
up,
if
available
and
and
my
question
comes
down
to
this,
then
if,
if
we
don't
have
enough
arpa
funding
to
do
everything,
then
I'm
looking
at
what
we
could
remove
out
of
the
arpa
funding
table
and
that
looks
like
it.
That
would
be
300
000
and
I'm
not
convinced.
F
C
Through
the
mayor,
can
I
just
make
one
clarifying
point?
Yes
please!
So
if
I
can
go
to
that
table
because
it's
important
to
note
that
the
funding
for
the
deputy
director
position
that
was
included
in
the
proposed
budget,
there
are
some
offsets.
The
194
was
a
fully
loaded
cost.
Only
91
000
is
in
the
proposed
budget
for
the
current
year,
and
so
it's
not
the
full
one.
One
194
just
wanted
to
make
that
clarification.
F
C
F
A
E
All
of
this
council
member
mason
brought
up
some
good
questions
about
which
positions
really
are
priorities
and
which
ones
align
with
with
our
strategic
goals
and
staff
has
provided
us
with
an
option
to
approve
of
the
cip
and
continue
this
discussion,
and
given
the
results
that
we
saw
earlier
this
afternoon
from
the
stormwater
ballot
and
given
those
requirements,
I
would
really
like
to
come
back
and
see
all
of
the
enhancements
fully
reflecting
all
of
those
commitments,
including
an
ongoing
support
for
storm
water.
Now
that
it
won't
be
funded
through
a
property
tax.
E
I
want
to
see
all
those
things
sort
of
spelled
out
the
way
we've
seen
the
the
migration
from
measure
g
and
arpa
to
general
fund.
I
want
to
see
how
that
is
going
to
play
in,
because
we
have
to
do
something
with
that
and
it's
it's
not
a
one-time
million
dollar
commitment.
It's
an
ongoing
at
least
million
dollar
commitment
going
forward
for
stormwater
and-
and
I
think
that's
a
reality
that
we
we
didn't
have
when
we
started
these
discussions.
E
H
I
actually
I
I
agree
with
councilmember
salazar.
It
would
be
good
to
be
able
to
see
all
see
all
the
changes
that
we've
that
we've
discussed
and
be
able
to
look
at
it
in
a
in
an
organized
way,
because
you
know
we're.
You
know
we're
moving
around
a
lot
of
money
here
and
and
really,
as
council
members,
salazar
said,
understanding
how
we're
going
to
continue
to
fund
the
stormwater
problem
is
is
important.
H
I
don't
know
how
far
we
can
push
it
off,
because
we
need
to
improve
a
budget,
though,
and
you
know,
and
we
been
for
the
stormwater
we're
going
to
need
to
do
a.
We
said
in
the
previous
session
tonight
that
we're
going
to
organize
a
study
session
for
that
regarding
the
the
deputy
community
development
director
position,
I'm
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
vice
mayor
and
council
member
mason
that
that's
not
something
that
I
think
we
should
fund
in
this
year.
H
H
Yet
if
we,
if
we
need
to
push
this
topic
off
a
little
bit,
but
it's
still
part
of
the
measure
g,
the
the
oversight
committee
did
not
recommend
the
300
000
for
the
downtown
streets
game
plan,
but
I
didn't
hear
it
was
very,
very
clear
their
reasoning
for
not
funding
the
other
items,
but
I
didn't
hear
the
reasoning
for
that
one,
and
I
just
want
to
like
to
understand-
and
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
watch
the
to
watch
the
recording
either
today.
So
I
was
wondering.
A
C
One
was,
it
was
appeared
to
be
three
hundred
thousand,
in
their
words
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
work
toward
implementing
the
downtown
streetscape
plan,
which
is
a
10
million
dollar
plan.
Without
knowing
exactly
when
we
would
have
the
funds
to
implement
portions
of
that
plan,
we
did
articulate
that
it
was
to
develop
a
block
by
block
schematic
of
installation
of
trees
and
as
well
as
other
landscapes,
but
without
a
understanding
on
exactly
when
and
how
that
would
be
funded.
C
In
addition,
what
the
committee
mentioned
was-
or
I
wouldn't
say
that
this
came
from
the
entire
committee,
but
there
were
questions
raised
about
what
contributions
would
there
be
from
downtown
from
businesses
downtown
to
help
pay
for
portions
of
the
streetscape
plan
with
the
city,
or
is
the
city
considering
a
bait,
a
business
improvement,
district
or
other
other
funding
mechanisms?
And
so
we.
C
This
is
the
dollar
amount
on
that
four-year
ramp
down
of
25,
25,
25
and
so
of
the
10
million
dollars,
including
those
four
positions.
The
amount
is
8.8
million,
and
so
there
was
1.3
million
left
to
fund
the
stormwater
deficit,
which
the
city
council
in
the
prior
meeting
decided
to
do
so.
We
didn't
adjust
this
between
the
5
30
meeting
and
the
7
30
meeting,
but
the.
C
And
so
you,
you
know
that,
should
you
fund
that
one
million
from
from
storm
water
you're
looking
at
a
residual
amount
of
arpa
of
394
000.,
and
so
that's
why
I
did
say
that
you
could
potentially
pull
300
from
arpa
and
another
300
from
measure
g
to
make
that
600
allocation.
That
was
originally
going
to
come
from
all
from
measure
g.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
those
numbers
have
been
projected
and
done
for
you
tonight.
H
Okay,
thank
you
so
going
back
to
the
streetscape
one,
just
just
the
I
thank
you
for
providing
those
that
that
that
the
details
of
their
discussion,
I've
been
very,
very
clear.
My
position
on
this
since
joining
the
council
that
that
we
need
to
make
start
making
improvements
downtown
and
not
wait
for
wait
for
full
funding
because-
and
I
sound
like
a
broken
record.
H
So
while
I
appreciate
the
oversight
committee's
hard
work,
I
disagree
with
their
recommendation
on
that
line
item
and
I
think
that
300
000
should
come
from
msg
on
the.
Regarding
the
other
positions,
the
600
000,
the
I
I
I
could
be
talked
into
splitting
splitting
it
300
each
between
barpa
and
measure
g,
the.
A
A
May
I
say
it
sounds
like
on
the
91
000
plus,
let's
just
round
it
down
right,
91
000
for
the
deputy
community
services
director,
but
if
that's
not
going
to
be
utilized
that
could
also
be
put
in
to
defray
it
even
more
right.
So
it
doesn't
have
to
be
300
300.
It
can
be
200
and
change,
and-
and
so
anyway,
just
because
I've
already
heard
her
dad,
articulate
so
other
thoughts
from
my
colleagues
on
the
600,
000
or
measure
g
items,
councilmember
mason.
I
I
just
said
I
for
me
I'd
like
to
I:
I
do
agree
with
councilmember
salazar
that
I
would
support
continuing
the
item,
because
I
would
like
to
hear
what
the
metro
g
committee
said
specifically
around
the
fund,
these
funds,
the
600
000,
and
then
I
would
just
comment
that
I
did
listen
to
the
three
hundred
thousand.
I
do
think
we
should
try
to
take
that
out
of
our
general
fund.
I
I
don't
believe
that
that
was
the
spirit,
at
least
at
this
time
of
measure,
g
and
again,
given
that
funds
were
not
spent
last
year
on
street
repair,
I
really
think
that
needs
to
be
our
focus
this
year.
I
think
our
residents
want
to
see
the
change
and
I
feel
like
there's
a
way
that
we
can
find
those
funds
in
the
general
fund
and
still
meet
the
meet
our
commitment
to
both
downtown
and
to
measure
g
in
the
street
repair.
F
F
However,
I
am,
I'm
also
open
to
spending
the
money
with
the
measure
g
money.
For
for
that
piece
again,
looking
at
arpa
first,
we
haven't
gone
through
all
the
positions.
Yet.
Mr
mayor,
I
asked
a
few
questions
about
a
number
of
the
items:
the
public
work,
public
works
and
parks,
maintenance
workers,
I'm
in
support
of
the
idea
of
bringing
people
back
in
order
to
do
more,
but
I'm
interested
in
knowing
specifically
what
are
what
more
is
going
to
get
done.
F
I
also
brought
up
my
concern
about
the
medians
and-
and
it
is
my
understanding
that
these
additional
workers
have
so
much
to
do
that
they
probably
would
will
not
get
to
maintain
the
medians,
but
that's
something
that
I
think
is
also
important.
So
how
about
I?
How
about
I
stop
now?
I
do
have
some
questions
in
general
about
all
of
this
basis
of
this
budget
doesn't
include
any
increased
costs
and
pensions
doesn't
include
any
increased
cost
in
health
care
coverage.
F
It's
the
question
is
it's
currently
set
as
zero,
but
we
know
it's
going
to
go
up.
Do
we
have
an
estimate
of
what
it's
going
to
go
up?
The
worst
thing
that
a
council
can
do
is
bring
on
new
staff
and
then
not
be
able
to
pay
for
it
and
then
you're
going
to
have
to
lay
people
off
well,
we
we
have
a
contract
currently
that
we're
not
allowed
to
lay
people
off.
F
A
So
that,
let's
start
to
leave
the
measure
g
per
se,
I
think
we've
articulated
on
the
four
positions.
The
last
one
was
600
000.
There
is
still
300
from
oh.
There
still
is
300
like
thomas
said,
to
split
it,
but
also
there
was
a
concern
on
the
300
or
downtown
whether
that
should
come
out
from
g
or
not
also,
we
have
other
positions
that,
depending
if
they're
funded
or
not,
that
may
add
and
doesn't
have
to
be
equal
and
equal.
A
C
That
is
true,
I'm
sorry
through
the
mayor.
That
is
true,
yes,
and
I
think
I've
heard
a
majority
of
the
city
council
say
that
they
are
not
in
favor
of
funding
the
deputy
director
position
at
that
time,
and
so
we
can
add
another
91
000
to
that
available
number,
and
so
we
will
give
you
the
total
on
that
in
just
one.
Second,
in
response
to
council
member
medina's
comments,
I
I'd
like
to
sort
of
have
those
discussions,
and
I
know
staff
is
here
ready
to
provide
answers.
C
B
C
C
In
addition,
I
want
to
say
just
overall
that
we
won't
be
able
to
solve
the
stormwater
challenge
before
we
have
to
adopt
a
budget,
and
so
I
know
that
we
have
to
have
those
discussions
and
we
are
certainly
committed
to
having
them,
but
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
identify
a
path
forward
before
we
have
to
adopt
a
budget
by
july
1..
And
so,
if
we
can
address
some
of
the
other
questions,
maybe
we
can
get
there.
C
C
While
you
were
asking
the
question,
but
council
member
medina,
I
did
pull
up
our
powerpoint
slide
from
june
1st
that
had
a
total
of
159
slides,
a
few
of
the
slides
we
did
go
through
were
the
additional
pension
costs
that
are
included
in
the
proposed
budget,
and
so
there
is
a
guess,
including
an
increase
of
43
000
additional
pension
costs.
There
is.
B
C
Liability
and
with
regard
to
health
costs,
we
did
include
based
on
knowing
what
the
rates
will
be
for
the
coming
fiscal
year,
projecting
out
what
the
rates
will
be
for
the
we
know
what
the
rates
will
be.
Definitely
for
the
last
six
months
of
the
calendar
year,
which
are
the
first
six
months
of
the
fiscal
year.
C
With
regard
to
the
second
six
months
of
the
fiscal
year,
we
always
make
projections,
and
so
we
have
projected
an
increased
cost
of
our
health
and
insurance
costs
of
370
000,
that's
included
in
the
budget,
and
all
of
our
projections
go.
That
goes
forward,
include
factors
for
increased
increased
pension
costs,
because
we
know
that,
based
on
this
table
in
our
actuarial
projections,
as
well
as
assumptions
for
increase
in
health
care
costs.
C
C
D
B
Canadian
council,
members
and
matilda
community
services
director,
so
what
we
didn't
have
time
to
do
since
the
last
time
we
met
and
the
council
member
of
vice
mayor
medina,
asked
about
kind
of
a
study
on
this.
We
didn't
do.
We
certainly
didn't
have
the
time
in
two
weeks
to
do
a
study,
but
what
we
do
know
in
the
field.
I
think
I
spoke
a
little
bit
about
how
we
tend
to
be
always
running
behind,
and
I
think
this
is
no
secret.
This
is
something
which
the
council
has
reacted
to.
B
So
what
are
some
of
those
things
if
you
go
into
the
park,
you'll
see
some
of
our
infrastructure
pieces,
which
may
be
in
disrepair
a
lot
of
the
natures
and
benches,
so
we
could
probably
be
more
on
top
of
that
irrigation,
particularly
during
the
the
sports
season.
When
the
fields
are
in
high
use,
you
want
to
be
immediately
responsive
to
irrigation
and
a
lot
of
times
when
we
take
our
crews
off
they're,
doing
that
regular,
daily
maintenance.
We
get
behind
on
that,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
our
users
are
served.
B
We
don't
have
constant
staffing
requirements
or
anything
of
that
nature,
but
what
it
does
do
is
it
makes
it
particularly
this
time
of
year
we're
seeing
as
people
do
put
time
in
for
vacations.
What
not,
where
again,
you
really
are
stretched
then,
and
just
having
that
one
more
person
to
rotate
in
should
just
help
us
keep
us
from
our
parks
falling
into
disrepair,
and
so
I
think
that's
really
a
an
important
part
of
this.
B
B
You
know
a
study
similar
to
to
what
many
communities
do
to
make
sure
the
park.
Staffing
is
adequate
for
the
type
of
space
that
we
maintain.
Parks
are
different
than
open
space
or
different
than
median
strips
different
than
fields
and
they're
all
different
standards
for
care
for
those
different
types
of
aspects.
So
we
can.
We
can
do
that
for
you,
but
the
immediate
problem
of
us
following
is
that
we
are
kind
of
falling
behind
and
we're
hoping
to
fall
less
behind.
B
A
F
F
I
didn't
have
much
working
experience
in
the
parks
being
that
I
was
in
public
work
so,
as
has
apparently
the
usage
of
summertime
health,
can
you
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
and
how
that
could
possibly
also
be
used
to
allow
some
additional
rotating
in
to
cover
cover
some
of
the
the
absences
that
you
were
talking
about
is:
is
it
that
we
didn't
do
as
much
summertime
help
due
to
covid
or
yeah?
What
is
the
current?
What
is
the
current
policy.
B
B
I
think
we
are
just
close
to
hiring
our
second
person
to
help
because
of
rules
that
are
limited
on
the
hours
that
they
can
work
weekly.
So
it
does
take
several
of
them
to
kind
of
rotate
on
a
weekly
basis,
so
we
can
use
them.
They
are
actually
just
right
now
in
this
environment.
For
some
reason
they
are
very
challenging
to
recruit,
but
we
are.
We
are
actually
looking
at
that
resource
as
well
to
try
to
resolve
this
problem.
F
B
One
of
them
has
to
do
with
the
on-call
of
our
trade
team.
So
when
there
are
certain
wins,
we
have
to
put
people
on
standby,
sometimes
they're
called
in
sometimes
not,
but
that's
that
will
incur
over
time.
So
that
takes
a
chunk
of
it.
We
added
what
we
did
was
we
intentionally
added
some
overtime
in
there
to
we?
We
took
a
look
at
certain
programs,
certain
aspects
of
parts
that
need
to
be
rehabilitated.
B
If
you're,
looking
at
the
rotation
that
we're
trying
not
to
get
behind
on,
we
looked
at
things
that
were
outside
of
that
and
valued
what
the
overtime
would
be
in
order
to
address
that,
and
then
also
what
happens
is
during
so
in
the
summer
when
we
do
hire
our
seasonal
staff,
they
typically
will
fortify
and
take
on
the
weekend
shifts
and
we
kind
of
alternate
on
shifts
during
the
off
season.
We
still
have
to
have
staff
come
in
and
check
the
facilities
on
the
weekends
they
usually
come
in.
B
F
E
Not
a
question
per
se,
mr
mayor,
but
you
know
I,
I
understand
the
city
manager
and
his
team's
desire
to
approve
a
budget,
and
I
agree.
I
share
that
that
interest
in
doing
that,
and
one
one
path
forward
I
would
propose-
is
that
if
there
are
still
some
questions
on
the
improvements
and-
and
you
know
how
some
of
those
things
would
be
funded,
I
would
be
in
favor
of
approving
the
budget
without
the
enhancements
and
the
cip,
so
that
we
could
move
forward.
E
Have
that
budget
approved
and
then
come
back
to
look
at
the
enhancements
at
a
subsequent
meeting
where
we
could
perhaps
spend
more
time
on
some
of
the
detailed
things
I
still
have.
I
think
I
stated
this
before
that.
I
have
a
lot
of
faith
in
the
city
manager
and
his
team
in
terms
of
how
they
want
to
allocate
the
resources
and
where
they
want
to
prioritize
things.
E
I
really
like
what
what
staff
and
the
city
manager
did
in
presenting
us
that
that
forecast,
where
we
see
the
the
how
the
the
funds
transition
from
one
to
the
other.
And
I
I
really
would
like
to
see
these
other
priorities
included
in
that
in
that
forecast,
so
that
I
truly
understand
where
we
make
a
transition
from
one-time
funds
and
how
we
start
burdening
the
general
fund
with
those
same
commitments
over
time
and
how
it
all
balances
out.
A
A
A
C
C
Because,
again
we're
not
funding
that
deputy
director
position
in
the
out
years,
and
so
with
the
112
from
in
business,
grants
the
750
and
the
cip
budget
funding
the
million
in
storm
water,
transferring
in
six
million
in
measure
fee
and
the
position
funding
as
proposed
adding
in
the
four
positions
from
measure
g,
it
provides
a
total
usage
of
10.046
million,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
provide
that
information
to
the
city
council.
We
were
able
to
update
this
slide
based
on
the
information
and
the
decisions
that
you
have
made
tonight.
A
E
I
Yeah,
I
think
I
would
just
suggest
that
the
conversation
around
the
position-
not
you
know
what.
However,
we
move
forward
tonight,
but
that
did
not
end
tonight
that
we
actually
continue
to
communicate
with
the
city
manager
on
a
path
forward,
because
I
think
we'll
agree
that
a
position,
whether
it
be
that
position
or
something
similar,
that's
going
to
be
handling
the
programs
is
needed.
I
I
did
want
to
ask
the
slide
that
was
just
shown
a
moment
ago.
It
had
the
other
three
positions
on
the
bottom,
the
police
officer
firefighter
and
fire
inspector
are
those
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
those
also
would
under
that
slide
they
would
not
be
measure
g
funds
or
where
would
they
come
from?
I
guess
this
is
really
the
question.
C
F
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
that's
great
quick
work
there,
city
manager,
grogan,
but
clearly
at
some
point,
the
deputy
community
services
director
is
going
to
be
needed
to
step
in
there.
So
I
know
we
only
approve
one
year
budgets,
we're
gonna,
have
difficulty.
It
seems
like
quite
often
in
in
dealing
with
budgets
but
I'll
leave
it
at
that,
and
I'm
sure
city
manager,
grogan's
gonna
be
able
to
do
something
clever
with
it.
With
those
projections.
A
Okay,
so
so
far
there
has
been
a
suggestion:
that's
brought
forward,
which
is
to
approve
the
capital
to
prove
the
day-to-day
operating
budget,
to
approve
all
funding
from
the
arpa
funds.
This
is
a
suggestion
from
council
member
salazar
on
the
600
000.
I
think
so.
Council
member
cells
are
brought
up
like
okay,
but
that
doesn't
take
care
of
tomorrow
right,
getting
the
600
out
of
the
transfer
but
staff's
doing
the
math.
So
his
suggestion
also
was
to
bring
back
the
enhancement
positions
for
more
detail
and
further
discussion.
E
B
F
C
Direction
sure
so
through
the
mayor,
please,
I
want
to
clarify
that
the
city
council's
intent,
because
we
do
need
to
approve
a
budget
before
july
1.
A
continuing
resolution
does
continue
to
fund
the
government,
but
it
does
not
include
the
enhancements
nor
other
baseline
items
that
were
not
in
the
prior
year's
budget.
C
You
know
it
is
my
recommendation
that
if
the
city
council
can't
adopt
budget
tonight,
we
would
adopt
a
budget
and,
of
course,
continue
to
have
conversations
around
long-term
financial
challenges
that
certainly
are
not
going
away.
110
recognize
and
thank
the
city
council
for
articulating
that
some
level
of
additional
deputy
or
other
positional
support
is
needed
in
the
community
services
department.
A
Just
for
for
clarification
and
council
member,
unless
I
misunderstood
and
city
manager-
maybe
I
missed
a
misunderstanding.
I
think
council
members
said
to
approve
the
cip
to
approve
the
day-to-day
operational
budget
to
approve
anything
from
the
arpa
which
I
believe
was
public
safety
personnel.
So
that
would
take
care
of
that.
So
I
see
that
goes
forward.
That's
a
done
deal
which
would
only
thing
would
be
coming
back,
is
the
enhancements
of
positions
that
are
outside
of
that
and
correct
me,
council,
member
solved.
E
C
A
C
A
A
C
I
what
I
heard
you
articulate,
but
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
think
was
the
point-
was
to
approve
these
positions
and
the
capital
budget
and
the
other
operating
budget.
That's
what
I
heard
articulated
and
I
think
that
would
be
fine,
because
we're
approving
an
adopted
budget,
but
what
I
thought
I
heard
councilmember
salazar
articulating
was
not
to
improve.
It
approve
the
enhancements
which
would
be
these
positions.
C
It's
also
worth
noting
that
these,
when
we
say
enhancements,
we
are
well
we've
been
talking
around
the
arpa
enhancements.
There
are
other
enhancement
positions
that
are
not
harper
enhancement,
some
are
general
fun
and
some
are
actually
funded
by
other
revenue
sources.
For
example,
the
the
contract
officers
from
youtube
are
part
of
the
enhancement
package,
but
they're
there's
not
a
funding
request
tied
to
those,
and
they
don't
show
up
in
this
portrait
because
they
are
not
funded
by
harpa.
F
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Is
it
still
on
the
question?
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna.
Let
councilman
councilman
salazar
go
ahead
and
go
forward
just
stating
that
I'm
pretty
close
and
I
think,
being
the
hour.
It's
9
41!
It's
not
that
late
and
we've
worked
way
harder
on
these
budgets
that
I
don't
have
much
objections
to
anything
else.
So
I
think
we're
really
close,
but
I'll
be
quiet.
E
I
I
still
do
not
think
that
what
we've
been
presented
tonight
adequately
represents
what
we,
what
we
came
into
this
expecting
there's
still
a
lot
of
questions.
In
my
mind,
I've
heard
other
council
members
state
questions
about
where
the
priorities
should
be.
I
saw
a
slide
in
there
somewhere.
That
said
that
there
were
some
public
safety
positions
that
were
just
being
backfilled,
that
they
were
not
enhancements.
E
So
there's
my
confusion
around
what
what
is
an
enhancement,
what
is
not
an
enhancement
what's
new,
what's
not
new!
What
was
there
before
and
just
frozen
versus
you
know.
So
I
still
have
a
lot
of
questions,
and
so
I
am
not
comfortable
approving
it,
but
if
the
majority
wants
to
move
forward,
then
I
withdraw
my
motion.
H
A
F
Sorry,
mr
mayor,
that
was
a
previous
hand
up.
I
didn't
blow
her
it,
so
I'm
pretty
good,
but
since
you
did
call
on
me,
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
enhancements
are
in
I.t.
You
know
replacing
switches
and
all
these
things
that
we
know
need
to
be
done.
I'm
looking
at
page
b5,
net
impact
of
the
fund,
100
105
000,
more
or
less,
and
we
need
all
those-
and
I
have
no
objection
to
any
of
those.
But
let's
see
how
we
can
get
around
a
consensus
that
would
be
pretty
nice.
A
Well,
no,
I
don't
think
anybody's
too
far
off.
I
think
where
councilmember
salazar
and
I
and
I
get
it
it's
it's
always
great-
to
get
a
budget
done,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that.
I'm
saying
we're.
We
are
almost
there
it's
about
long
term,
it's
about!
Looking
down
that!
It's
okay,
we're
not
going
to
do
it
this
time,
but
then
we
take
it
out.
So
there's
just
a
lot
of
variables
and
I
think
we're
you
know
this
million
dollars
that
we
had
to
backfill.
These
are
one-time
monies
they're,
eventually
going
to
be
gone.
I
Sorry,
so
I
think
that
I
agree
actually
with
everybody
everything
everybody
has
said.
There
was
a
new
hire
report,
a
vacancy
list
sent
to
us
in
response
to
a
question
raised
in
our
last
meeting.
If
that
helps
at
all
with
some
with
one
of
the
questions,
I
do
think
that
the
question
around
you
know
when
I
look
at
this
list.
I
know
that
all
these
departments
need
these
positions
and
I
feel
comfortable,
knowing
that
the
measure
g
funds
have
been
moved
under
arpa
and
thank
you,
city
manager.
I
don't
think
that
was
a
surprise.
I
I
A
Well,
I'm
going
to
have
the
city
manager
respond
and
I
know
council
member
hamilton,
which
I
concurred
with
on
how
he
stated,
which
is
it
was
there,
but
to
go
back
to
measure
g
which
the
city
manager
had
stated
because
they
did
not
have
that
opportunity.
Their
concern
was:
what's
the
plan
you're
asking
for
money,
but
what's
the
plan
we
don't
write
a
check
without
a
plan.
That's
that's
how
I
understand
it.
I
Right
in
msg-
and
I
think
I'm
asking
for
something
different,
which
is:
can
we
go
ahead
and
take
it
out
of
the
general
fund
because,
let's
be
honest,
the
downtown
streetscape
plan
is
20
million
dollars,
so
that
conversation
can
still
go
back
to
the
committee,
and
it
was
ranked
number
one
in
the
last
meeting
that
I
attended
with
the
san
bruno
foundation.
So
who
knows
that?
There's
going
to
be
money
invested
as
well
from
the
foundation,
but
I
do
think
for
purposes
of
moving
this
forward.
That
would
be
a
helpful
answer.
If
possible.
C
C
C
With
regard
to
your
other
questions,
I
do
want
to
bring
up
a
slide
and
let's
just
begin,
this
really
quickly
slide
show
from
the
beginning,
and
so
with
regard
to
the
decisions
we
were
talking
about,
it
was
really
the
storm
water
deficit,
the
four
positions
that
were
proposed
to
be
funded
by
measure
g,
the
600,
000
transfer
and
the
300
000,
and
I
think
we've
almost
addressed
all
of
those,
and
so
let's
go
through
this.
What
what
I
asked
staff
to
do
in
the
magic
of
zoom?
C
They
were
able
to
do
it
because
council
member
salazar
asked
which
of
these
positions
are
restorations
and
which
of
these
are
new,
and
so
we
were
able
to
highlight
in
blue
the
positions
that
are
new,
and
so
that
is
the
and
they
were
they.
Many
of
them
were
asterisks
already,
so
that
is
the
it
associate.
We
talked
about
that.
That
is
a
new
I.t
associate
to
support
our
police
and
fire
infrastructure
will
be
shared
jointly.
C
It's
the
it's,
the
the
citywide
work
addressing
our
areas
that
we
city
property
that
that
we
need
to
do
fire
mitigation
and
landscape
clearing,
as
well
as
working
with
other
agencies
and
caltrans,
for
example,
like
we
recently
did
on
the
project
to
clear
significant
eucalyptus
trees
along
280..
So
those
are
the
five
that
are
new.
The
others
are
all
restorations.
C
C
Of
available
order
for
this
work
to
proceed
forward,
as
it
is
a
strategic
initiative,
utilizing
other
funds
that
we
we
have
and
what
staff
recommended
or
offered
as
an
alternative,
is
using
300
000
in
our
general
fund,
capital
reserve
and
one-time
initiatives
fund.
That
has
a
net
balance
of
five
million
dollars,
and
we
include
the
funding
for
iraq,
and
so
should
council
want
to
adopt
a
budget
with
these
changes,
as
well
as
identifying
one
of
these
two
sources.
I
think
that
would
comprise
the
decisions
that
you
talked
about.
C
I
C
I
These
are
positions
we
don't
have
this
year
and
when
we
look
at
the
you
know,
let
me
see
what
the
total
projected
cost
is.
Let's
say
we're
looking
at
the
annual
totals
that's
what
we're
responsible
for
a
year
from
now,
so,
whether
we,
whether
the
position
was
vacant
last
year
or
the
year
before
that
it
just
makes
me
feel
like
it,
was
not
part
of
the
budget,
and
so
we
should
what
I'm
we
should
be
planning
for
next
year
to
fund
this
amount,
whether
it's
a
restored
position
or
it's
a
brand
new
position
regardless.
C
C
C
Was
a
budgeted,
funded
position?
That
position
was
the
incumbent
left
to
go
to
another
agency,
but
when
we
adopted
the
budget
it
was
a
funded
position,
but
it
was
thinking,
and
so
we
froze
it
at
that
time,
and
so,
while
there
was
not
a
person
occupying
it,
it
was
a
funded
position.
It
just
so
happened
that
the
person
left
during
during
that
fiscal
year
and.
C
Last
year
is
in
1920,
yes
pre-cove
at
19,
yes
from
frozen
like
the
police
officer,
the
traffic
engineer,
the
firefighter
the
public
works,
maintenance
worker,
yes
frozen
in
the
current
budget
year
2021.
and
that's
what
we
did,
because
we
were
faced
with
immediate
reduction
due
to
copen
19
and
no
help
from
the
federal
government.
We
froze
vacant
positions
in
order
to
not
lay
off
quarters.
I
C
I
So
I
think
so
you're
talking
about
okay
19,
so
I
I
would
not
know
I
was
in
here,
but
for
20.
I
do
remember
this
being
united
speaking
about
this
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
be.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
this
is
you
know
this
is
a
team
that
that's
that's
been
created
and
I
think,
as
you're
building
the
team,
we
all
have
a
responsibility
to
ensure
that
there's
longevity
to
what
we're
creating
and
what
we're
approving.
I
So
if
the
city
manager
has
confidence
that
there's
going
to
be
funds
to
continue
to
pay
for
these
positions
after
the
arpa
money
is
due
and
that's
the
commitment
that's
being
made
now
through
what
we're
hearing
I'm
comfortable
with
it,
because
I
know
I've
seen,
I
think
we
all
have
seen
our
streets.
We've
all
had
complaints
from
residents
about
a
number
of
these
positions
that
are
needed,
but
I
would
just
ask
that
in
the
future
we
have
a
significant
amount
of
clarity
around
these
positions.
A
I'm
gonna
have
a
couple
comments
at
first.
I
don't
think
it's
fair
to
any
city
manager
to
say
he
he
or
she
is,
can
guarantee
the
future.
You
know
nobody
could
have
guaranteed
that
we
were
going
to
get
a
covet
and
and
do
what
we
did
so.
The
city
manager
and-
and
his
team
at
this
point
are
putting
together
what
they
believe
based
on
the
economy,
based
on
the
rebound
based
on
how
how
the
city
is
doing.
A
When
you
have
a
position,
that's
been
funded,
like
the
communications
person
that
has
been
funded
and
on
the
books
and
there's
monies
allocated
for
that,
because
it's
vacant
doesn't
make
it
a
new
position
because
we
didn't,
we
didn't
get
rid
of
it
and
bring
it
back.
It
just
wasn't
filled,
therefore
those
monies
weren't
used
and
those
monies
were
used
to
balance
the
budget.
A
So
it's
it's
not
new,
it's
restored,
it's,
it
was
defunded.
Then
it's
refunded
or,
however,
the
the
terms,
but
I
don't
know
you
know
the
city
manager
and
his
team
brings
forward
to
us
their
best
knowledge
and
thoughts
and
profession
at
this
time,
but
I
I
couldn't
put
it
on
his
or
his
team,
shoulder
to
say,
you've
got
a
guarantee
because
the
future
is
is
uncertain
and
that's
why
we
have
amendments
to
the
budget
that
come
back
for
us
to
make
adjustments
if
and
when
needed.
E
Thank
you,
sir.
I
I
agree
with
you
that
I
I
realize
staff
doesn't
have
a
crystal
ball,
but
I
I
do
feel
again.
I
don't
sound
like
a
broken
record,
the
things
we
do
know
about.
We
we
need
to
reflect-
and
I
agree
with
council
member
mason-
that
this
is
not
immediately
transparent
and
in
prior
budget
years.
Whenever
we
talk
about
enhancements,
those
are
additions
to
our
budget
and
perhaps
1920
hell
help
it
had
the
positions,
but
if
2021
didn't,
then
they
were
gone.
E
So
I
think
that
just
causes
a
lot
of
confusion,
and
you
know
I
kind
of
came
into
this
conversation
thinking.
There
were
some
positions
that
were
actually
held
there
and
we
were
just
allocating
funds
because
they
were
they
were
still
in
the
budget.
Now
I'm
hearing
they
got
pulled
after
last
year
and
now
they're
coming
back,
so
that's
different
than
they
truly
are
enhancements,
and
so
I
think
you
know
again
a
lot
of
confusion
around
that
and
that's
why
I'm
really
not
comfortable
moving
forward
with
this.
G
A
A
You
know
is
that
the
best
thing
to
automatically
say
we're
going
to
take
it
out
of
reserves.
We
need
to
keep
a
balance
of
reserves.
Do
we
allow
the
city
manager
to
go
back
to
measure
g
when
there's
more
time
than
there
was
a
very
short
window?
So
I
can
understand
that
I
hear
what
council
members
are
saying.
As
far
as
the
let's
say,
definitions
is
it
enhancement?
Is
it
not?
Is
it
is
it
restore
and
how
is
it
quantified
because,
obviously
we're
all
nothing
so
city
manager?
C
C
Both
the
restored
physicians
and
the
new
positions
in
the
proposed
budget
that
you
received
are
our
enhancement,
requests
and
their
enhancements
because
they're
they
were
not
in
the
current
year
budget
right.
However,
the
question
was
asked
which
one
of
these
positions
are
truly
new
positions
as
in
it
is
not
one
of
those
positions
that
we
froze
and
that's
what
we
were
providing
clarity
on
is
that
we
know
that
in
order
to
avoid
layoffs
and
to
balance
our
budget,
we
froze
a
number
of
positions,
and
we
had
that
discussion.
C
Last
year
we
were
freezing
the
positions,
not
eliminating
the
positions
we
were
literally.
We
were
literally
not
saying
to
the
police
department.
You
have
x
fewer
police
officers
as
a
authorized
head
count.
We
were
saying
your
head
count
stays
the
same.
However,
in
this
year
we
are
only
funding
this
many
positions,
and
so
there
is
a
terminal,
a
terminology,
and
I
understand
that
we've
been
sort
of
tripping
over
that
I
will
commit
to
in
the
future.
We
will
provide
a
definition
document.
What
do
we
mean
by
restored?
C
What
do
we
mean
by
a
new
position
frozen
position,
a
vacant
position?
I
also
think
that
it's
worth
at
a
later
time
frame,
not
when
we're
at
budget
time
talking
a
little
bit
more
about
how
the
personnel
budget
works
and
a
vacant
position
is
still
a
funded
position,
and
things
like
that-
and
I
will
actually
say
one
of
the
things
that
will
help
us
is
one
of
the
enhancement
requests.
C
C
A
Committee,
thank
you
city
manager.
Very
much.
Maybe
you
can
leave
that
on
the
screen.
If
you
don't
mind
just
remember:
can
we
get
a?
Can
I
go
around
with
my
colleagues
and
just
say:
there's
options,
one
two
and
three
as
far
as
the
300
000.
So
at
least
we
can
answer
that
and
give
part
of
our
direction
on
that
within
our
budget.
So
there
were
three
options
that
the
the
manager
articulated
on
the
300
000.
A
A
I
C
I
will
say
candidly
that
with
the
current
staffing
and
the
community
services
department
and
the
the
the
significant
projects
that
this
is
a
project
that
falls
on
the
director's
plate
with
not
having
an
additional
support
for
the
director
and
the
director
really
helping
to
shepherd.
At
this
point,
the
centennial
plaza
the
posing
park
improvements.
C
I
A
A
Okay
city
manager,
you
have
your
direction
on
that
item.
Thank
you
all
right,
folks,
we're
we're!
Still
back
to
the
the
budget.
I
think
we've
cleared
up
everything
on
measure
g.
We
cleared
up
everything
on
ar
pa
granted
confusion
and
then
definitions
and
managers
already
addressed
those
city
manager.
What
do
you
see
that
we
have
the
left.
C
C
With
that,
I
I
I
think
that
if
there's
a
majority
support
for
that,
then
that
is
the
operating
budget,
and
I'm
saying
that,
because
I
haven't
heard
any
other
discussions
that
I
know
we've
had
sort
of
four
plus
meetings
on
on
the
other
items
on
the
budget.
But
the
real
open
items
are
the
arbor
items.
F
C
C
C
C
We
are
going
to
be
launching
a
pilot
program
with
recology,
where
they
will
support
abandoned
ways
in
illegal
dumping,
and
so
we
are
not
factoring
in
a
portion
of
the
workload
for
abandoned
waste,
as
was
defined
before,
which
is
staff,
would
build
tickets
from
sp
response.
That
work
will
be
done
by
ecology.
Staff
will
have
to
do
some
of
these
larger
cleanups.
B
But
that
work
will
no
longer
be
there
okay,
so
the
clarification
was
provided
as
to
what
an
additional
fce
worker
could
provide.
It
would
restore
four
hours
for
a
san
mateo
avenue
downtown
area.
It
was
reduced
to
two,
so
it
was
halved.
We
store
four
hours
of
a
two
men
crew
for
excel
order,
so
those
are
requests
that
come
in
through
our
community
portal,
which
includes
trash
issues
throughout
the
city.
B
The
restoration
of
the
positions
would,
you
know,
help
to
provide
staffing
to
hopefully
provide
you
know
additional
restoration
of
services
rather
than
additional
services.
These
are
things
that
were
lost.
You
know,
with
the
positions
being
lost,
that
the
time
spent
in
downtown
time
spent
trash
pick
up
the
next
stellar
orders
they
either
take
longer.
So
when
we
have
work
orders
for
traffic,
the
traffic
work
orders
that
the
tspc
has,
whether
they
be
new
loading
zones
or
painting
a
red
curve.
F
B
To
be
maintained
once
they're
installed,
you
know
the
paint
does
not
last
forever
and
science.
Of
course
you
deteriorate
traffic
markings
so,
as
you
know,
striping
fades
the
ability
to
restore
those
a
little
bit
more
quickly,
usa
markings.
We
are
required
that
when
we
receive
usa
we
put
those
under
underground
service
alert
before
someone
digs,
they
need
to
call
and
call
usa
to
request
those
markings
so
that
you
know
the
person
who's
digging
understands
what's
below
ground,
I'm
completing
training
for
new
staff
members
and
other
requests
from
the
divisions
throughout
the
city.
F
F
Okay
and
and
that
that's
definitely
helpful
and
I'm
satisfied
if,
if
that
could
be
provided
to
us
in
writing,
that
would
be
definitely
helpful.
It's
just
deputy
director
bosh
isn't
here,
but
I'm
glad
to
see
that
that
that
restoration
is
going
to
be
made,
and
especially
in
light
of
recology,
doing
this
test
pilot
for
the
for
the
garbage
pickups
that
should
free
up
additional
time.
So
I
I
am
satisfied
with
the
answer.
Thank
you.
E
I
was
looking
through
the
position
summary
that
council
member
mason
had
requested,
and
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
section
in
there
that
is
not
funded
by
in
either
of
the
one-time
funds,
either
measure
g
or
the
the
arpa
funds.
Then
it
has
other
funding
sources.
They
all
seem
to
be
covered
in
something
other
than
you
know.
What
we're?
A
G
G
So
it
has
had
an
impact
on
operations
throughout
the
last
few
months,
as
we've
had
to
go
through
backgrounds
and
hiring
to
get
those
two
officers
into
a
police
academy.
In
order
to
ultimately
move
officers
into
that
google
youtube
position,
the
other
position
is
giu,
which
is
the
county-wide
gang
intelligence
unit
and
given
what
was
sort
of
a
troubling
increase
in
some
gang
activity
in
the
community
over
the
last,
I
would
say
12
to
18
months.
G
So
we
do
put
a
little
bit
of
skin
in
the
game
in
terms
of
cost
there,
but
essentially
it
is
funded,
and
so
hopefully
that
provides
some
description
of
those
three
positions
and
why
they
do.
I
appreciate
you,
council,
member
salazar,
recognizing
kind
of
the
difference
between
those
and
the
hard
decisions
you
guys
are
faced
with
making
this
evening.
Those
those
are
all
essentially
funded.
G
A
C
Mayors
to
see
if
you
have
majority
support
for
the
harper
proposal,
because
these
are
the
open
items
that
that
you've
been
you've
been
talking
about,
that
you
haven't
settled
on
and
if
you
get
through
that,
then
I
think
you
have
a
majority
of
support
for
the
operating
budget.
Knowing
that
we
would
have
subsequent
conversations
about
long-term
issues
and
strategies
and
storm
water
et
cetera,.
A
F
I
I'm
I'm,
I'm
good,
I'm
ready
to
go
forward
with
this.
The
the
stormwater
is
huge.
Obviously
it's
a
million
dollar
hole
each
year,
we're
approving
a
one-year
budget
and
we're
going
to
have
to
rely
on
our
team
to
come
up
with
how
to
fill
that
million-dollar
hole
each
year
and
we'll
get
there.
But
we
we
are
I'm
ready
to
support
this
budget.
A
I
I
think,
with
the
changes
that
were
made,
I
feel
I
wouldn't
say
I'm
I'd
say
I
feel
comfortable
with
moving
forward.
I
do
think,
though,
that
I'd
prefer-
and
I'm
hoping
the
council
will
support
this,
but
that
we
not
wait
until
next
year
to
hear
what
the
plans
are
going
to
be
to
continue
to
fund
some
of
these
or
all
of
these
positions.
Actually,
I
think
we
all
know
that
we've
been
short
staffed,
we've
had
a
deficit
and
it's
been
at
the
expense
of
a
lot
of
our
staff.
I
I
A
Thank
you
and
I'm
more
comfortable
with
it,
and
I
think
that's
what
council,
member
salazar's
biggest
concern
is
is
not
waiting
and
very
concerned
on
the
stormwater,
because
it
may
not
be
a
million
there's
also
other
elements
that
probably
have
to
be
done.
It
could
be
more
than
a
million
potentially,
but
that's
just
to
get
that's
just
to
keep
it
afloat
per
se.
That's
not
to
actually
move
forward
on
capital,
improvement
and
other
elements.
So
I
think
that's
where
the
council
members
rightfully
so
concern
is
this
staff.
A
I've
done
a
survey
as
to
where
you
can
go
back
and
look
at
10
years
and
between
the
first
year
than
that
10th
year,
there's
been
no
increase
in
staff
in
various
divisions
or
it's
it's
decreased
marx
is
a
great
example.
Tell
you.
I
came
across
a
piece
of
paper
about
the
17
that
used
to
be
there
one
seven
and
so
the
the
the
team
really
has
stepped
up.
A
You
had
folks
that
stepped
up
when
we
when
folks
chose
to
retire
that
had
been
here
and
served
this
community
a
long
time
so
that
others
would
remain,
which
was
just
incredible,
and
then
you
had
those
and
then
dealing
with
covet,
so
the
all
of
them
all
of
them.
I've
done
a
a
good
job
and
heck.
I
was
a
city
employee,
but
I
never
had
to
work
through
kobe,
so
they
had
an
extra
burden
to
bear
and
they've
done
it.
A
So
it's
appreciated,
but
I
think
I
share
with
councilmember
salazar
the
immediate
concern
about
looking
to
the
future
sooner
than
later
and
about
we
have
to
begin
after
this
budget
is
approved.
If
it
is
approved
to
start
planning
today
for
tomorrow,
and
we
can't-
we
can't
put
it
off
with
that
said,
is
there
any
other?
You
can,
if
you
could
city
manager
to
stop
sharing
the
screen.