►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting May 11, 2021 6b. Design of the Acappella Well Replacement Project
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting May 11, 2021
6b. Design of the Acappella Well Replacement Project
C
D
Hi
good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
the
city,
council
and
members
of
the
public,
I'm
dolly
manaus
with
the
public
works
department
and
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen.
D
D
B
D
D
D
As
I'm
sorry
excuse
me
on
the
agenda,
we
have,
we
will
cover
the
acapella,
well,
replacement
background
project,
phasing
and
scheduling,
scope
of
work,
staff,
recommendation,
council
questions,
public
public
comment
and
council.
B
Okay,
is
that,
can
you
go
to
slideshow.
D
D
So,
as
we
are
aware,
the
city
owns
and
operates
its
water
system.
The
city
operates
five
groundwater
wells
that
extract,
treat
and
pump
water
into
the
distribution
system.
Four
wells
are
currently
active
and
one
inactive,
and
that
is
the
well
15,
also
known
as
commodore.
Well
so,
while
15
had
been
a
significant
source
of
the
city's
water
production
until
it
went
out
of
service
in
2010
due
to
low
production,
requiring
constant
maintenance.
D
So
in
2012,
the
city
procured,
erler
and
kallowski
in
inc,
also
known
as
eki
for
engineering
design,
services
for
the
well
15
replacement,
the
scope
of
work
included,
constructing
test
wells
and
the
design
of
the
production.
Well,
the
following
year
in
2013,
the
city
evaluated
six
potential
well
sites
for
the
well
number,
15
replacement
project
and
two
sites
were
selected.
D
Three
four
and
five
without
additional
infrastructure
that
includes
piping
or
pumps
in
october
of
2013
staff,
rep
present
presented
an
update
on
well
15
replacement
project
to
the
city
council,
with
the
recommendation
to
proceed
with
the
design
and
award
of
a
construction
contract
for
the
two
wells,
so
one
at
the
acapella
site
and
the
other
at
the
commodore
park
site.
Here
you
see
in
the
circles
the
first
test
wall
would
be
installed
at
the
acapella
site
and
the
other
at
the
commodore
park
site.
D
D
The
city
council
concurred
with
staff's
recommendation
the
following
year
in
september,
2014
construction
of
the
test
well
at
the
acapella
site,
was
completed.
Drilling
logs
were
analyzed
and
water
quality
sampling
was
performed
at
the
new
test.
Well,
eki
concluded
that
a
production
well
installed
at
the
acapella
site
should
be
capable
of
producing
similar
to
the
production
rate
of
several
other
wells
in
san
bruno.
D
D
So
during
the
conceptual
design
of
the
production,
well,
it
was
determined
that
the
required
building
footprint
for
the
well-head
treatments
facilities
needed
to
be
larger,
to
accommodate
the
filters,
piping
and
electric
electrical
equipment.
So
the
ingredien
ingress
and
egress
for
the
well
site
was
obstructed
by
an
adjacent
vacant,
parcel
that
I've
highlighted
here
in
blue.
D
D
D
One
proposal
was
received
from
lns
staff
conducted
an
evaluation
on
the
received
proposal
and
has
determined
that
ludhor
and
scalminili
is
highly
qualified,
has
demonstrated
accurate
project
understanding,
has
substantial
design
experience
on
water
roll
projects
and
has
successfully
completed
similar
design
projects
for
various
water
agencies
across
the
state,
such
as
san
jose
water,
company,
sfpuc
and
the
city
of
mountain
view,
and
the
the
proposal
cost
is
610
000
and
within
the
current
budget
of
1.8
million
available
in
this
fiscal
year,.
D
So
the
acapella
well
replacement
project
will
be
completed
in
two
phases.
The
first
phase
will
consist
of
designing
and
constructing
a
production.
Well
I
mean
this
includes
drilling
water
quality,
soil
sampling,
wall,
construction
and
well
development
with
an
estimated
completion
of
about
12
months,
and
the
second
phase
will
consist
of
designing
and
constructing
the
well
facilities
that
includes
necessary
housing,
pump,
motor
automatic
control
equipment
such
as
scada
and
discharge
piping
and
disinfection
equipment
with
an
estimated
completion
of
18
months.
D
So
the
scope
of
work
for
the
acapella
well
replacement
project
includes
preparing
bid
documents
and
construction
support
for
phase
1
and
2
also
obtaining
approvals
and
permits
from
regulatory
agencies
and
preparing
required
regulatory
documents.
The
stove,
the
scope
also
includes
decommissioning
of
well
15
in
accordance
with
california's
title
22,
core
code
of
regulations
related
to
drinking
water.
A
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
I
appreciate
it
and,
if
there's
any
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
speak,
if
you
could
raise
your
hand
at
this
time,
I'll
wait
a
couple
minutes
and
I'll
turn
it
to
council
members
for.
A
Questions
any
questions
from
council
at
this
time.
Okay,
let's
go
to
the
public,
I'm
I
know
the
city
clerk
will
correct
me,
but
I
I
see
no
hands
at
this
time.
So
we
will
end
public
comment
on
this
topic
and
we
will
bring
it
to
council
for
questions
or
comments.
G
C
I'm
sure
council,
member
mason,
I
can
help
to
answer
that
hammer
chief
city
engineer
for
san
bruno
good
evening.
C
There
is
currently
sequa
exemption
for
this
project
because
it
is
replacing
well
15,
but
we
have
been
advised
that
if
we
wait
too
long
to
construct
this
project
and
get
it
underway
that
that's
sql
clearance
could
expire,
and
so
you
know
in
an
effort
to
not
go
through
the
environment
or
you
know,
go
through
the
environmental
process
of
clearing
a
new.
Well,
we
would
like
to
move
forward
with
the
design
as
soon
as
possible.
G
G
You
know
this
design
this
project,
to
get
it
up
to
the
place
where
construction
would
actually
occur,
and
then
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
fund
the
actual
construction
and
they're
kind
of
part
of
the
same
question
is
without
the
three
million
dollars
for
the
construction?
Are
we
going
to
be
in
compliance
with
sequa.
C
And
so
this
first
phase
will
be
the
design
and
we
hope
to
you
know,
go
through
the
design
and
then
we
will
have
to
budget
for
the
design
or
sorry
for
the
construction
once
those
estimates
are
better
known
and
we
are
undergoing
the
budgeting
process
right
now
and
we
will
budget
to
know
what
is
necessary
in
order
to
construct
the
project
at
the
appropriate
fiscal
year.
C
It
could
mean
that
we
proceed
with
the
design
now
and
then
budget
for
construction
and
fiscal
year,
2023
so
22-23,
so
that
we
can
award
in
the
early
part
of
the
next
fiscal
year
and
of
course,
we
work
closely
with
finance
to
ensure
that
we
have
adequate
funding
in
order
to
you
know
meet
the
project
needs.
G
E
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
council
member
mason
your
question
begun
with
potentially
holding
off
until
the
next
budget
cycle.
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
there's
not
an
appropriation
request
with
the
action
that
is
before
you
tonight.
The
money
for
this
project
was
built
into
the
current
budget,
which
is
typical
for
these
projects,
because
you
sort
of
go
on
the
stair
step
ladder
of
design
and
then
budget
for
for
construction.
E
It's
also
worth
noting,
because
I
spent
the
last
few
weeks
in
very
detailed
capital
budgeting
meetings.
All
of
our
with
all
of
our
staff
is
that
we
are
going
through
a
practice
of
budgeting
for
the
dollars
that
will
be
expended
in
the
fiscal
year
that
that
work
will
occur
versus
saying.
H
G
Okay,
helpful,
so
then,
in
that
case
the
should,
then
the
actual
construction
be
also
a
portion
of
it
budgeted
then
in
the
next
year.
Would
we
anticipate
that
in
june,
as
opposed
to
2000
the
following
year,
that's
2023.
C
So
that
is
possible,
but
I
think
currently
we
are
budgeting
to
design
until
we
have
a
better
idea
what
the
construction
costs
would
be,
because
the
first
phase
of
construction
is
production
well
and
there
there
may
potentially
be
some
adequate
funding
in
order
to
award
the
construction
of
the
production.
Well,
but
of
course,
I
think
the
next
phase,
which
is
the
building
and
the
pumps
and
the
electrical
that
will
likely
not
occur
until
the
next
fiscal
year,
and
so
we
would
request
that
appropriate
amount
at
that
time.
B
G
Actually,
it's
in
the
pull
up
the
staff
report
that
there's
kind
of
like
this
gsr
partnership,
south
san
francisco,
coma
daily
city
and
san
bruno,
and
so
whether
this
is
you
know
over
half
a
million
dollars.
What
are
their
contributions
to
this
effort?.
C
So
the
agreement
is
more
in
agreement
with
sfp
you
see
in
new
hampshire.
Excuse
me,
I
don't
know
all
the
details
related
to
this
agreement,
but
my
understanding
is
that
we
have
an
agreement
with
sfpuc
during
the
wet
years
to
not
pump
and
that
they
would
provide
us
with
drinking
water
supply
and
then
during
the
drought
years,
then
we
would
use
the
groundwater
wells
to
supplement,
and
you
know
relieve
a
little
pressure
off
of
sfp.
C
You
see,
and
so
those
are
called
the
take
years
and
so
they're
actually
paying
us
not
to
pump
currently,
and
then
we
will
be
pumping
later
when
we
need
to
supplement
with
our
groundwater.
Well,
when
you
know,
there's
more
drought
years.
E
Most
a
number
of
those
cities
do
not
have
their
own
whales,
and
the
fact
that
we
have
our
own
whales,
which
provides
sustainability
and
a
resource
here,
also
means
that
we
have
to
do
these
projects
to
rehabilitate
them
and
and
ensure
that
they're
functioning,
and
so
while
we
are
getting
money,
it's
important
to
know
that
this
is
our
asset
that
provides
significant
benefits
that
we
pay
for
locally.
G
Okay,
okay
and
then
is
there
a
benefit
that
would
then
I
guess
end
up
saving
money
for
our
residents
at
some
point
and
do
we
have
any
projections
of
what
that
would
look
like.
C
I
think
they
would
have
the
security
of
having
a
groundwater
supply
that
not
other
as
city
manager.
Grogan
have
mentioned,
not
other,
not
many.
Other
agencies
are
fortunate
to
own
them,
their
water
enterprise
and
have
the
facilities
to
produce
water
to
meet
the
demands.
So
I
think
that
would
be
the
benefit.
I
can't
say
that
we
did
a
dollar
cost
estimate,
but
I
think
there's
you
know
inherent
value
in
having
that
supply.
A
You
vice
mayor.
I
Medina,
yes,
thank
you
for
the
report
yeah.
This
is
a.
This
is
one
of
those
projects
that
got
kind
of
lost,
but
here
we
are
dealing
with
it
right
and
my
first
question
is
I'm
a
little
surprised
by
the
lack
of
proposals
received,
and
I
don't
believe
this.
This
designer
worked
with
this
before
did
staff
get
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
find
out?
Were
people
too
busy
like
why
why?
Why
did
we
only
get
one
proposal.
C
We
we
wondered
the
same
thing,
and
so
we
contacted
some.
It
was
a
variety
of
responses
at
one
firm
we
worked
with.
Apparently
they
changed
their
processes,
and
so
they
weren't
able
to
they
didn't
I
guess
it
slipped
through
their
craft,
which
is
not
a
great
answer,
and
you
know
I
think
they're
kicking
themselves,
and
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
really
considered.
C
We
really
took
care
in
contacting
the
references
to
see
what
the
references
were
like
because
I
personally
have
not
heard
of
them
either,
but
they
had
very
positive
referrals,
and
so
I
mean
we
posted
it
on
our
website,
as
well
as
emailed
out
to
12
different
firms,
and
you
know,
we've
got
a
response
back
from
a
firm
that
we
had
to
work
with
previously.
That
was
not
one
of
the
12
that
we
had
emailed,
and
so
they
had
taken
the
initiative.
C
I
think
you
know
had
their
references
come
back,
you
know
potentially
questionable.
We
would
have
you
know
readily
re-advertise,
but
in
an
effort
to
you
know,
keep
the
project
moving
and
because
we
did
do
our
due
diligence
and
getting
references
we
we
opted
to
proceed.
I
Right
so
I'm
always
a
little
apprehensive
when
we're
dealing
just
with
one
bidder
and
it's
hard
to
determine
if
we're
getting
value
there.
But
here
we
are
I'm
in
I'm
in
favor
of
of
of
this
project
and
thank
you
for
some
of
the
questions
that
I
asked
earlier
today.
I
This
this
well
will
will
generate
or
increase
the
capacity
of
our
system.
25
and
apparently
our
water
is
produced
at
half
the
cost
of
what
we
buy
it
for
so
every
gallon.
I
Every
every
unit
of
water
that
we
get
is
is
is
a
savings,
so
I
wanted
to
to
let
people
know
about
that,
because
it's
it's,
it's
really
unique,
that
we
have
our
own
water
system
and
and
for
years
we
weren't
reinvesting
into
our
infrastructure
of
getting
this
water
out,
and
this
this
well
has
been
out
of
service
for
12
years.
I
So
we
we
need
to
make
sure
and
as
as
a
beloved
chris
palace
would
say,
you
know
water
is
life,
and-
and-
and
here
we
are
in
a
drought
here
and
we're
trying
to
work
out
that
we
we
do
have
an
agreement
to
deal
with
that
a
little
bit.
So
the
question
for
the
well
abandonment
is
that
costs
covered
in
in
in
this
part
of
the
project
or
that's
that's
a
a
separate
cost
for
abandoning
abandoning
the
current
well.
C
That
would
need
to
be
designed.
I
suppose
I
could
go
with
either,
although
it
would
potentially
make
more
sense
to
go
with
the
latter
phase
of
the
construction,
because
the
initial
phase
is
the
production
well
and
might
not
really
lend
itself
to
another
type
of
contractor
who
trolls
wells.
I
Well
but
but
this
would
be
part
of
their
scope
to
oversee
the
design
of
the
well
abandonment
and
that
all
gets
approved
by
the
from
the
state.
But
that
would
be
something
they
would
manage
in
this
six
hundred
and
ten
thousand.
I
Okay,
and-
and
I
guess
I
guess
the
biggest-
the
biggest
issue
that
I
have
with
with
this
project
right
now
is
as
I
as
I
look
at
the
capital
improvement
program,
page
290,
and
it
it
has
the
cost
there
of
46
000
and
construction
of
the
1.8
million.
I
So
I
I
think,
I'm
I'm
I'm
guessing
and
giving
staff
the
benefit
of
the
doubt.
This
is
some.
This
is
one
of
the
projects
that
kind
of
got
lost
and
there
is
no
money
budgeted
for
years.
2021,
20,
21
22
through
24
25.,
so
that
additional
3
million
to
build
the
well
isn't
anywhere,
and
but
this
is
the
reality
we're
facing
that
in
order
to
build
this
well
in
the
facilities,
we're
going
to
need
to
spend
that
money.
C
I
A
Why
don't
I
ask
the
city
manager
to
chime
in
on
this?
Please
yeah.
E
Thank
you,
mayor
medina
and
councilmember
medina.
I
think
it's
important
to
back
up
before
we
go
forward.
I
don't
think
it's
a
correct
statement
to
say
that
this
project
was
lost.
E
The
city
made
progress
on
a
number
of
water
and
sewer
projects,
and
this
one
is
now
bubbling
up
and
we
are
now
moving
forward
on
this
project.
E
In
addition,
with
regard
to
the
cip
form
that
you're
looking
at
what
I,
which
I
believe
is
in
our
adopted
2021
budget,
what
you're
seeing
is
that
the
projected
costs
and
the
out
years
are
not
there.
That
does
not
mean
that
the
city
does
not
have
efficient
funds
within
the
fund
balance
to
cover
this
project
in
other
projects.
E
It
is
true
that
the
city
did
cancel
the
fifth
five
percent
rate
increase,
because
there
are
sufficient
funds
in
the
water
fund.
I
just
had
to
ask
staff
to
confirm
for
me
the
balance
in
the
water
fund,
but
I
believe
it's
over
10
million
dollars,
and
so,
while
the
infrastructure
that
we
have
to
do
is
significant
and
they're
when
and
that's
that,
10
million
is
actually
in
the
the
the
operating
portion.
There's.
F
E
Million
dollars
accumulated
back
in
the
water
fund,
and
so,
as
we
project
out
all
of
the
projects
we
need,
there
is
sufficient
funds
to
cover
those
projects.
E
Now
that
does
not
mean
that
we
may
not
have
to
increase
water
rates
in
the
future,
and
we've
had
those
conversations
with
the
city
council
before
that,
when
you
go
a
number
of
years
without
increasing
rates,
then
you
have
to
do
a
larger
increase,
and
so
we
do
have
to
do
a
five-year
rate
study
in
the
next
calendar
year
and
we
are
planning
in
the
next
fiscal
year
and
we
are
planning
for
that.
E
But
I
just
want
to
caution
council.
Be
that
because
there
were
not
funds
shown
in
those
out
years,
you
should
not
conclude
that
the
city
does
not
have
sufficient
funds
to
move
forward
with
this
project,
and
it
will
have
larger
conversations
about
the
water
fund
through
our
our
capital
budgeting
process.
I
I
I
appreciate
that
answer.
I
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
making
sure
that
there
was
funding
available,
so
I'm
I'm
satisfied
with
that
answer.
We
do
need
to
build
this
well
and
I
am
in
favor
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
share,
as
you
all
know,
I'm
our.
I
am
the
city's
representative
on
the
bauska
board
bay
area,
water
supply
and
conservation
agency,
which
manages
our
relationship
with
the
sfpc
to
ensure
we
have
a
voice
in
in
the
the
agreements
to
get
water
from
hetch
hetchy.
The
you
know.
We
heard
we
heard
as
part
of
the
staff
report
that
you
know
how
how
things
operate.
You
know
when
we're
in
wet
years.
H
We
try
to
let
our
aquifers,
the
local
aquifers
replenish,
so
that
that
water
is
there
for
dry
years
in
2018
sacramento
and
the
state
legislature
in
sacramento
adopted
the
approved
bay
delta
plan,
and
if
that
stands,
there's
currently
there's
where
the
currently
the
the
board
and
and
the
sfec
and
other
agencies
are
banning
together
to
try
to
get
an
alternate
plan
in
place.
H
But
if
that
plan
stands
the
the
the
in
multi-year
multi-year
drought
years,
when
we
have
back-to-back-to-back
droughts,
which
are
going
to
be
more
and
more
common
as
we
move
move
forward,
we
could
face
up
to
50
percent
mandatory
rationing
over
over
current
levels
because
of
the
amount
of
water
that
the
bay
delta
plan
would
would
require
that
we
not
take
from
the
tuolumne
river.
H
H
One
question
that
I
have
is
once
we
once
we
have
the
design.
Would
we
would
that
put
us
in
a
position
to
apply
for
for
state
or
federal
grants
to
help
with
the
construction?
Are
there
any?
Are
there
any
opportunities
that
we're
looking
at
out
there?
That
might
be
available
to
us
to
help
us
with
those
construction
costs,
considering
it
would
be
a
water
infrastructure
project.
C
Certainly
opportunities
as
they
present
themselves,
we
will
look
at
those
and
you
know
we
can
keep
an
eye
out
for
those
even
during
design.
I
don't
think
we
necessarily
need
to
wait
until
design
is
over.
It's
a
state
or
a
region
where
to
provide
funding.
We
certainly
look
into
that
and
apply
as
appropriate.
F
Thank
you,
and-
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
also
express
my
support
for
not
just
this
well,
but
the
existence
of
wells
in
general
in
san
bruno.
F
The
vice
mayor
mentioned
chris
palace,
and
it
definitely
would
be
remiss
of
us
if,
if
chris
palace's
name
were
not
mentioned
whenever
wells
come
up,
because
he
was
a
very
staunch
advocate
for
for
first
bringing
wells
to
san
bruno
and
they've
proven,
although
expensive,
to
maintain
a
valuable
and
important
asset
to
the
city
and
we've
been
without
this
well
for
a
while,
and
I
think,
looking
forward
at
our
infrastructure,
this
will
be
an
important
part
of
it,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
no
other
questions.
A
No,
as
was
stated
by
the
vice
mayor
and
council
member
salazar-
yes,
I
remember-
chris
palace
was
probably
one
of
the
few
on
the
council,
then
that
was
very
adamant
about
doing
that
and
having
the
well
supply
and
that
it
does
save
for
us
not
having
to
buy
as
much,
but
then
we
obviously
have
to
we
had
to.
A
We
were
required
to
balance
with
the
aquifer
that
we
didn't
take
too
much,
but
but
needless
to
say,
yes,
that
was
one
of
his
passions,
so
these
are
important
things
that
we
need
to
keep
up
and
take
care
of,
and
so
yes,
I
as
well
immense
support
and
appreciate
my
colleagues,
questions
and
engagement
in
this,
and
it
is
by
action
of
a
resolution.
Is
there
any
action
by
council
move
to
approve?
A
Second
motion
medina
second
and
salazar
roll
call?
Please.