►
Description
San Bruno Special City Council Meeting October 18, 2021
Whole Meeting
trt 1:53:15
D
C
A
A
Seeing
no
hands,
we
will
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
special
meeting
portion
of
the
agenda
and
we
will
receive
a
report
regarding
the
recently
adopted
new
housing
laws,
and
we
will
first
turn
that
over
to
our
city
manager,
for
some
opening
remarks
and
then
he
can
pass
it
off
on
to
our
community
development.
Director,
say
manager.
F
F
It's
important
to
note
that
the
conversations
and
presentation
tonight
on
that
project
is
not
appearing
on
the
project.
It
is
simply
a
mechanism
to
provide
information
to
the
city
council,
as
well
as
the
community
we're
going
to
begin
tonight
with
a
presentation
from
our
community
and
economic
development
director
pamela
wu.
F
A
E
Thank
you
mayor
good
afternoon.
Thank
you
city
manager,
so
not
a
city
manager
mission.
Today
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
the
some
of
the
recently
adopted
new
housing
laws
as
we're
migrating
to
the
first
slide.
The
objective
again
is
really
to
provide
an
overview
of
these
state
legislations
and
also
how
it's
impacting
the
local
jurisdiction
on
our
policies,
regulations
and
limit
the
city's
ability
to
include
to
influence
these
housing
projects.
E
The
agenda
for
tonight
we'll
start
with
the
objective,
as
I
stated
earlier,
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
where
we
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
today.
The
background
then
we'll
select
some
of
the
highlighted
recently
adopted
housing
laws
such
as
my
sp
10,
the
accessory
dwelling
unit,
ordinance,
sp,
35,
housing,
accountability,
acts
such
as
haa
on
sb
330
and
ended
with
the
state
density,
bonus
law
and,
of
course,
I'll
conclude.
My
presentation
with
questions
from
mayor
and
city
council.
E
These
regulations
have
been
adopted
by
city
council,
in
some
cases,
a
planning
commission
architectural
review
that
have
provided
a
recommendation
that
considered
environmental
review,
the
placement,
the
location,
high
design
parking
among
other
features.
What
most
of
these
actions
are
commonly
referred
to
as
the
discretionary
review
application,
where
a
project
will
go
through
architectural
review
committee
for
consideration
and
then
go
to
planning
commission
for
a
second
recommendation
or
city
council
may
have
the
final
say
as
opposed
to
a
project
that
goes
through.
E
E
Some
of
these
new
state
laws
are
designed
to
streamline
the
review
and
approval
of
development
application
in
an
effort
to
increase
the
production
of
both
affordable
and
market
rate
units.
The
new
state
law
has
also
restricted
this
discretionary
review
by
limiting
the
applicability
of
local
zoning
regulations,
including
those
approved
by
a
vote
of
people.
E
E
So
this
was
one
of
the
recent
laws
that
was
signed
into,
in
fact
by
governor
newsom
on
september.
19Th.
The
effective
day
of
this
law
will
take
place
january.
1St
2022,
in
a
nutshell,
this
law
will
allow
single-family
residential
lots
to
be
split
up
to
have
a
total
of
four
units
from
the
original
one.
It
will
prohibit
any
discretionary
review
and
only
require
ministerial
reviews
through
a
building
permit.
Should
the
homeowner
want
to
split
their
home,
their
lots
up
to
construct
additional
units.
E
The
criteria
is
that
they
will
have
to
meet
objective
design
standard.
It
would
also
allow
the
r1
mods
to
be
splitted
up
each
at
a
1200
square
feet,
minimum
with
a
two
unit
or
duplex
constructed
on
the
original
lot.
Simple
math
puts
you
from
one
existing
house
to
up
to
four
units.
If
the
homeowner
designs
desires
to
go
through
this
exercise,
sp
9
will
also
preempt
zoning
standard
to
have
new
units
at
a
minimum
of
800
square
feet.
E
E
E
This
is
a
illustration
for
the
sv9.
The
picture
on
the
left
hand.
Side
shows
you
the
existing
neighborhood
with
single
family
homes,
where
potentially
your
neighbors
on
the
left
and
the
right
wants
to
split
them
up
and
also
to
put
a
duplex
on
each
of
the
newly
locked
and
also
the
picture
on
the
right
also
shows
the
fundamental
characteristic
of
an
existing
r1
zoning
district
that
potentially
will
be
different
after
sb9
takes
place
in
january
of
2022.
E
E
Sb10
allows
a
city
but
does
not
require
the
city
to
have
up
to
a
10
unit
apartment
building
in
a
single
family,
residential
r1
district
ship.
The
city
council
wants
to
enact
the
ordnance
council
can
direct
staff
to
upzone
a
certain
area
to
allow
whether
it's
a
discretionary
or
administrative
or
a
ministerial
process
for
such
upzoning
to
take
place.
E
Sb10
also
allows
such
upzone
exercise
to
be
exempt
from
sequa.
That's
california,
environmental
quality
act.
If
the
location
of
that
project
is
what
we
call
within
a
transit-rich
area
in
simple
term,
a
transit
ridge
is
anywhere
within
half
a
mile
to
a
transit,
stop
in
city
of
san
bruno.
That
would
be
el
camino,
san
bruno
avenue
or
half
a
mile
from
the
caltrans
or
the
bart
station
sb10.
As
I
mentioned,
if
city
council
or
local
jurisdiction
elects
to
upzone,
we
could
design
the
observed
exercise
either
to
go
through
administrative,
discretionary
or
whatever
sequel
analysis.
E
On
the
left,
in
comparison
to
a
potential
mix
of
single
family
homes,
with
sv9
being
split
up
to
two
lots
with
two
duplexes
and
a
potential
of
sb10,
being
in
fact
where
we
allow
upzoning
of
the
r1
to
a
10
unit
apartment.
So
this
again
will
change
the
traditional
characteristic
of
a
neighborhood
from
single
family
home
only
mr1
to
a
variety
of
different
housing
products.
E
E
All
of
the
accessory
dwellings
in
san
bernardino
are
subject
to
building
permit
and
earlier
in
2021
city
council
has
also
adopted
the
zoning
code
amendment
to
merit
with
the
statewide
legislation
to
require
no
discretionary
review
for
any
junior
adus
and
adus
adus
can
be
up
to
a
hundred
eight
hundred
to
a
thousand
square
feet.
Detached
units
could
be
up
to
sixteen
feet
height
with
four
feet,
set
back
and
also
any
homeowner
who's
interested
in
building
an
adu
can
also
benefit
to
to
have
an
additional
junior
adu.
E
In
other
words,
any
single
family
homes
can
have
a
detached
adu
in
your
backyard,
in
addition
to
a
converted
bedroom
that
turns
to
turns
into
a
junior
adu,
that
will
be
a
total
of
three
units
for
each
of
the
residential
lot.
As
I
mentioned
that
city
san
marino
has
seen
a
steady
increase
of
these
adu
permits.
Since
2020,
we
have
received
43
building
permits
in
year
of
2020
and
before
concluding
2021.
E
The
project
must
have
a
multi-family
component,
including
more
than
two
units.
I'm
sorry,
I
think
it's
two
units,
that's
a
typo,
not
10
units.
It's
a
two
units.
It
must
include
affordable
units
and
also
it
has
to
comply
with
the
applicable
objective
design,
standards
for
the
state
and
also
purge
the
city.
This.
It
was
a
state
law
that
was
enacted
in
2017.
E
This
only
applies
to
those
cities
who
have
not
produced
enough
housing
units
for
their
current
rena
cycle.
That
is,
your
regional
housing
needs.
L
assessment
in
the
city
of
san
bruno's
case
we're
currently
obligated
to
provide
a
total
of
11
55
units.
We
felt
short
of
meeting
that
goal
where
a
developer
can
come
in
and
says:
hey
city,
you
have
not
provided
enough
and
therefore
we
would
like
to
propose
a
sp35
project
further.
E
In
addition
to
the
streamlining
and
the
note
discretionary
review
mandate,
if
a
project
is
compliant
with
sp
35,
there
is
state
mandated
review
time
frame.
The
first
clock
starts
at
the
time
of
submittal.
The
city
must
provide
a
consistency
determining
determination
letter
within
60
days.
If
the
project
is
less
than
150
units,
if
the
project
is
larger
greater
than
150
units,
then
the
city
gets
90
days
to
provide
that
letter
subsequent
to
that.
E
If
the
project
again
is
less
than
150
days
from
the
time,
that's
the
middle,
the
city
must
determine
if
this
project
is
sp,
35
eligible
or
compliant
and
to
approve
or
deny
that
project.
If
the
project
is
greater
than
150
units,
then
the
city
has
180
days
to
do
so.
These
are
state
mandated
timeline
for
any
sb35
compliant
projects.
E
Next,
let's
talk
about
housing,
accountability,
act
and
also
sb
330.
housing.
Accountability
act
has
been
around
again
since
2017,
but
has
been
amended
in
2021,
and
this
has
to
do
with
affordable
and
market
rates
where
you
have
more
than
two
units.
It
also
applies
to
mixed-use
projects,
which
two-thirds
of
the
square
footage
is
residential,
applies
to
emergency,
shelter,
transitional
and
supportive
housing,
as
well
as
others
since
2018
the
housing
accountability
act,
has
significantly
increased
the
ability
for
housing
developer
to
secure
an
approval
for
development
in
california.
E
If
the
project
complies
again
with
all
the
applicable
objective
design
standards
listed
in
a
general
plan,
zoning
or
subdivision
rules,
the
city
cannot
disapprove
the
project
or
reduce
the
density.
The
city
must
make
written
finding
that
there
is
a
specific
adverse
impact
upon
the
public
health
or
safety
and
that
it
cannot
be
mitigated.
E
E
E
Let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
state
density
bonus.
This
allows,
in
a
very
simple
term,
a
developer
to
exceed
the
maximum
allowable
density
in
a
development,
for
instance.
If
the
density
for
a
particular
project
is
at
20
units
per
acre.
The
density
bonus
law
allows
the
developer
to
come
in
to
increase
that
allowable
density,
to
a
much
greater
so
long
there.
If
there
are
additional,
affordable
units
included
in
the
project
proposal,
the
amount
of
density
bonus
is
set
on
a
sliding
scale
depending
on
how
affordable
or
how
deep
the
affordability
a
project
becomes.
E
In
addition
to
increased
density.
A
density
bonus
law
also
allows
a
developer
to
request
incentives
or
concessions
for
a
project,
a
waiver
or
reduction
of
a
redevelopment
standard
and
also
qualify
a
developer
from
reduced
parking
ratio.
You
may
want
to
ask
what
are
the
differences
between
incentives,
concession
waivers
and
reduction
of
development
standards?
They
all
sound,
very
much
alike
in
which
they
are
but
per
the
state
law.
E
The
incentives
and
concessions
are
possibly
flexibility
on
needing
a
step
back
to
make
the
project
financially
feasible
or
a
waiver
or
reduction
of
the
development
standard
is
where
a
developer
can
request
a
height
exceedance
or
number
of
story
to
make
the
project
physically
feasible.
There
are
clear
definitions,
including
the
state
density
bonds,
with
bonus
law,
and
the
developer
has
the
burden
to
clearly
state
which
concessions
and
which
waivers
the
project
is
seeking.
E
D
I
have
a
few
questions,
so
my
first
one.
Actually,
you
actually
answered
during
the
presentation,
which
was
how
how
is
close
to
transit
defined.
It
looks
like
you
can
confirm,
both
for
both
sb9
and
sb10.
It's
it's
a
much
more
rigorous
or
a
more
rigorous
definition
of
being
in
a
transit,
rich
area
than
was
then
the
the
adu
law
was
a
lot
more
broad
in
terms
of
defining
what's
near
transit.
Is
that
correct?
D
C
D
D
Well,
I
guess
it
would
apply
to
either,
but
I
would
I
would
think
it
would
be
more
applicable
for
sb10,
if
you're,
for
example,
going
to
replace
a
single
family
home
with
a
10
unit
apartment
building,
you
might
want
to
go.
You
know
cover
the
entire
lot
with
that,
where
you
know
traditionally,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
cover
an
entire
lot
with
a
building
in
an
r1,
because
there
are,
we
have.
There
are
rules
for
how
much
of
the
lot
can
be
covered.
E
D
D
So,
given
that
is
there
any
requirement
whatsoever
that
compels
building
owners
to
specifically
try
to
attract
those
people
or
even
to
disclose
what
the
parking
conditions
are
in
the
neighborhood
to
prospective
tenants-
and
I
asked
this
because
of
I
know,
for
example,
with
the
when
the
aperture
building
first
opened,
then
we
were
attracting
tenants
and
it
was
clear
that
there
wasn't
going
to
be
enough
parking.
The
prospective
tenants
in
that
building
were
told
by
the
ownership
just
go
park
in
the
neighborhood.
F
Council
member
hamilton,
to
our
knowledge,
no,
there
is
no
provision
that
requires
that
the
property
owner
disclose
to
the
new
residents
the
parking
conditions.
What
the
law
requires
is
that,
subject
to
being
in
a
transit-rich
zone.
Parking
does
not
have
to
be
required,
and
the
reasons
for
that
are
many.
I
watched
a
lot
of
debate
at
the
state
legislature
when
they
were
talking
about
that
in
in
many
ways.
F
D
And
that's
the
only
one
that
allows
that
so
so
I
guess
I
guess
what
I
wanted
to
clarify
for
the
public
and
from
what
I
saw
on
social
media.
This
isn't
a
city
led
effort,
the
these
bill.
These
bills
are
from
our
state
government
and
they're
being
imposed
on
the
city,
because
the
city
isn't
building
enough
housing.
C
F
G
D
D
E
F
Vice
mayor
with
regard
to
that,
I
think,
if
we're
able
to
do
that,
the
best
place
to
do
that
would
be
on
our
g,
our
on
our
geo
cortex.
Our
online
gis
map,
we'll
have
conversations
with
the
staff
that
run
that
site
to
see.
Is
there
the
ability
to
incorporate
those
maps
that
you're,
describing
as
a
layer
within
the
gis
system,.
A
And
just
for
clarity,
it
was
stated
san
bruno,
we're
referencing
san
bruno
avenue
and
the
same
trans
buses
do
count,
even
though
some
people
have
the
belief
that
it
means
near
the
train,
station
or
bart.
But
just
so
people
are
clear
that
it
also
qualifies
for
the
same
trans
buses,
councilmember
mesa.
B
E
B
E
E
So
if
a
project
is
under
construction
right
now
and
they
change
their
mind,
they
want
to
come
back
and
also
claim
that
sp
330
and
you
have
to
qualify
for
certain
criteria
to
be
at
sb
330
project
and
if
they
do
qualify,
yes,
they
will
be
entitled
to
the
fee
at
the
time
when
they
apply
and
all
the
subsequent
fees
are
frozen.
From
the
time
of
the
new
requirement.
The
new
submittal.
B
E
I
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
laws
pertaining
to
sb,
35
or
density
bonus
or
other
sorts,
but
there
is
a
feasibility
that
was
conducted
for
the
sb9.
This
study
by
the
turner
center
estimated
about
500
units
that
will
occur
in
city
of
san
bruno
in
the
next
10
to
20
years.
Should
the
homeowners
want
to
pursue
after
the
sv9
auction.
B
Okay,
very
helpful,
thank
you
and
then
I'm.
I
hear
you
around
the
parking
and
I
think
the
parking
is
probably
the
biggest
complaint
for
even
pre.
You
know
previous
laws.
It's
been
the
biggest
complaint.
I've
heard
about
even
before
being
a
council
member,
so
I'm
curious
to
know.
Can
cities
provide
incentives
to
develop
to
provide
additional
parking?
So
it's
clear
that
you
can't
require
the
additional
parking
it's
clear
that
we
don't
have
to.
They
don't
have
to
fulfill
our
local
rules.
F
That's
a
question
that
is
actually
hard
to
answer,
given
the
nature
of
how
these
development
projects
come
about.
Oftentimes
we're
talking
about
private
property.
Most
of
the
time
we're
talking
about
private
property,
someone
has
either
purchased
the
property
in
a
transaction
that
the
city
is
not
a
part
of
and
or
negotiated
a
contract
with
the
owner
of
the
property
and
then
comes
and
files
an
application,
and
so.
F
There
may
be
an
opportunity
to
negotiate
concessions.
The
challenge
with
that
is
timing.
If
the
application
is
compliant
with
state
law,
they
may
not
have
to
negotiate
a
reduction
in
parking,
and
so
it
it's
really
something
that
has
to
or
negotiate
a
change
in
parking
in
this
case,
an
increase
in
parking,
and
so
it's
really
something
that
has
to
be
done
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
because
the.
B
Is
it
something
we
can?
I
guess
explore
a
little
bit
further.
I
mean
just
really
that
the
issues
really
is
it
is
it
prohibited
and
if
not,
maybe
it's
something
that
we
that
might
be
worth
looking
into,
that
could
help
the
city
with
the
parking
to
balance
out
the
need
for
housing
right,
because
we
all
need
we.
We
all
know
that
we
need
housing.
F
Sure
so,
under
all
of
the
state
laws
that
we
reviewed
tonight,
developers
are
responsible
for
paying
all
the
normal
and
customary
fees
that
includes
our
development
impact
fees
as
when,
as
well
as
any
service
connection
fees,
that
any
other
developer
would
have
to
provide
whether
they're
taking
advantage
of
the
state
legislation
or
not,
and
so
those
fees
are
paid.
What
the
loan
requires
is
that
those
fees
can't
be
increased
after
the
application
has
been
received.
B
F
Yes,
so
councilmember
mason,
the
law
does
not
impact
the
responsibility
to
pay
the
fees
with
respect
to
who
does
the
work
often
times
it
is
the
city,
but
there
are
all
are
other
times
where
it
is
a
negotiation
with
a
specific
application.
You
may
remember
a
project
that
was
required
to
pay
the
cost
to
upsize
our
water
utility
to
serve
their
project
in
cases
like
that,
they
are
required
to
pay
the
fee
and
we
will
work
with
the
developer
and.
F
F
You,
the
in
the
engineering
exercise
that
you're
going
through
when
you
set
your
feet,
is
so
that
the
fee
amount
covers
the
cost
of
providing
the
infrastructure,
and-
and
you
may
remember,
that
our
development
impact
fees
oftentimes
do
not
cover
all
of
the
new
infrastructure.
The
city
needs
it.
It
is
only
development
paying
their
fair
share
of
that
new
infrastructure
that
that
would
be
needed.
F
F
F
A
What
the
question
is
correct
for
the
contractor
subcontractors-
I
I
I
just,
I
believe
what
I've
understood
or
have
heard,
but
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
for
the
those
those
projects,
because
obviously
they're
streamlined,
so
there's
very
little
time
in
which
to
go
through
that
process.
So
I
I
thought
that
there
was
was
a
stipulated
in
the
sb
35
legislation
that
accounted
for
that.
But
I
understand
thank
you
for
your
response
at
this
time,
not
seeing
any
more
hands
up.
A
I
wanted
to
see
if
there
were
any
members
of
the
public
that
had
questions,
and
I
certainly
want
to
thank
everybody
for
being
here
and
certainly
give
anybody
the
opportunity.
If
you
could
please
raise
your
virtual
hand,
it
would
be
appreciated
and
we'll
see
how
many
speakers
we
have
I'm
seeing
four
or
five
and
then
based
on
the
number,
we'll
we'll
go
with
the
time
and
then
stop
that.
So
currently
I
see
five
speakers,
and
so
at
this
point
we
will
have
five
speakers.
A
G
G
G
I
I
don't
think
any
reasonable
person
is
going
to
believe
that
100
100
unit
or
more
building
that
you're
just
going
to
have
100
people
in
there.
There's
gonna
be
multiple
people
living
in
each
unit
because
of
you
know
the
cost,
so
you
could
have
two
to
four
hundred
cars
and
there's
nowhere
for
these
people
to
park.
C
C
C
C
E
C
I've
unmuted
there
you
go
hi
good
afternoon.
Thank
you
dave.
That
was
my
first
question
in
and
looking
at
the
pictures
of
the
in-law
units
this
year
show
houses
two
units
side
by
side
in
a
given
lot.
That
now
has
one
house
ever
been
in
a
one
of
the
shotgun
houses
in
new
orleans.
You
know
that's
interesting
living
when
you're
going
room
to
room
as
you
go
through
a
house
as
opposed
to
having
a
separate
hallway
to
go
around
rooms,
there's
really
not
much
privacy
in
those
units.
C
So
what
about
one
on
top
of
the
other?
So
in
my
neighborhood
I
live
in
portola
highlands
when
these
houses
were
built
in
65,
they
were
plumbed
for
a
full
bath
downstairs.
A
lot
of
the
one
of
my
neighbors
have
in-law
units
is
what
we
call
them.
Basically,
an
apartment
downstairs.
That's
separate
from
the
house.
Is
that
included
in
in
these
state
regulations,
or
is
it
just
a
totally
separate
unit?
C
And
the
third
question
I
had
was
around
parking
you
know
seek
when
they
look
at
doling
out
funds
for
things
like
bicycle
pedestrian
improvements.
They
look
at
how
many
cars
per
house
you
have
my
next
door.
Neighbor
he's
got
seven
cars
now
he's
down
from
the
11
he
used
to
have.
Well,
there
appears
to
be
no
limit
on
the
number
of
cars.
C
A
person
can
have
a
lot
of
several
of
my
neighbors,
I
should
say,
are
limo
drivers,
so
they
have
multiple
cars
by
necessity,
it's
the
family,
business
they're
driving
driving
limits,
so
they
have
many
cars.
So
is
there
anything
in
this
or
in
the
works
in
this
city
council
to
limit
the
number
of
cars
you
can
have
or
legally
park
on
the
streets
in
san
bruno
and
I'll?
Take
my
answers
offline.
Thank
you.
C
My
questions
have
to
do
around
infrastructure
and
I'm
not
sure,
are
police
and
fire
considered
part
of
infrastructure
or
students,
and
then
my
second
question
would
be
is
sb.
35
intention
is
to
streamline
the
permit
process
who
and
how
do
you
take
into
account
increased
students
or
the
need
for
increased
police
or
fire
and
who
pays
for
that
and
that's
my
questions.
A
C
C
C
H
San
bruno
doesn't
have
a
great
reputation
when
it
comes
to
evaluating
projects
quickly.
I
think
mills
park
was
one
example
of
a
project
that
really
dragged
on
a
very
long
time
and
required
a
sort
of
threat
of
sb
35
to
finally
get
an
approval,
and
I
think
it's
not
surprising
that
more
developers
when
they
look
at
do
I
want
to
go
through
a
discretionary
process
versus
a
ministerial
one,
choose
the
ministerial
ministerial
one,
and
I
think
that's
something
you
know.
If
you
all
want
more.
H
I
think
input
on
incoming
projects.
You
should
think
care.
Think
about
like
what
can
you
offer
developers
to
make
it
worth
it
to
go
through
sort
of
the
negotiation
with
the
city?
You
know
what
kind
of
zoning
can
you
give
them?
That's
discretionary.
Maybe
you
give
them
a
bigger
boost
in
zoning
or
other
concessions
that
would
make
it.
You
know
appealing
for
developers
to
roll
the
dice
and
go
through
a
discretionary
process.
H
The
other
thing
I
would
encourage
you
all
to
do,
because
I
think
parking
comes
up
pretty
consistently
in
san
bruno
as
an
issue
that
folks
are
concerned
about
is
parking
permits,
residential
parking
permits.
I
think,
if
you
look
at
the
research
by
donald
shoop,
the
sort
of
famous
professor
out
of
ucla
and
their
planning
school,
one
of
the
big
problems
is
that
parking
is
free
in
most
places
and
like
any
good
that
you
give
away
for
free.
It
ends
up
being
overused
and
I
think
you're.
H
H
So
I'd
encourage
you
all
to
think
about
that
in
parallel
to
decisions
like
this,
where
maybe
you
don't
have
total
flexibility
on
how
the
developer
proposes
their
project,
but
you
do
have
flexibility
on
on
how
you
manage
parking
in
the
city
and
I
think
it'd
be
a
really
progressive
move
that
other
cities
would
copy.
If
you
did
something
major
in
that
area.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
your
comments
and
thank
you
for
everybody's
participation
and
keeping
it
to
the
time
limit
and
to
the
point
of
your
question,
I
appreciate
it.
I
wanted
to
address,
because
by
listening
to
some
of
the
callers,
the
the
transit
is
a
little
confusing.
The
question
was
more
specific
as
sam
trans,
so
when
people
visualize
that
they're
thinking
everywhere
throughout
our
community
that
that
would
equate
to
a
half
a
mile,
so
we
could
just
quantify
that
a
little
bit
very
clear
as
to
what
that
means
on
the
transportation
element.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
medina,
so
the
request
is
to
clarify
transit,
rich
and
the
application
of
each
of
these
laws
with
regard
to
transit.
Unfortunately,
that
is
something
we
cannot
do
on
the
fly
and
it's
not
a
very
easy
statement
to
make,
because
each
of
the
laws
use
a
slightly
different
definition
right
in
state
density
bonus.
It's
a
major
transit
stop
with
that,
has
a
stop
eight
times
per
day
and.
C
F
There's
been
a
request
for
that,
and
staff
will
take
that
back.
I
totally
understand
the
clarity,
that's
being
asked
for
in
a
very
simple
elevator
speech
statement,
unfortunately,
based
on
how
the
transit
is
defined
in
the
various
laws.
Well,
it's
not
that
simple
and
we
don't
want
to
do
that
on
the
fly
and
have
some
walk.
Have
someone
walk
away
with
the
definition
that
and.
A
F
A
I
I
think,
that's
fair,
so
it's
it's
correct,
but
I
can
see
folks
saying:
okay,
we
said
el
camino,
we're
saying
san
bernardino
avenue,
but
now
mr
robinson
says:
okay,
I'm
up
here
and
the
bus
goes
by.
Does
that
as
an
example,
you
you
have
it
clear?
One
of
the
questions
was
also
in
regards
to
can
these
laws
or
would
these
laws
potentially
affect
development
at
cressmore
high?
Why
would
why
don't
we
also
put
in
involved
school
sites
since
that's
a
potential
for
development
as
well?
F
So
the
state
law
applies
everywhere
in
san
bruno
that
that's
that's
the
easiest
answer:
whether
a
individual
developer,
property
owner
seeks
to
take
advantage
and
utilize
the
state
law
to
potentially
develop
more
housing
or
housing
with
less
parking.
There's
a
question
that
we're
not
able
to
answer
right
now,
but
the
easy
answer
is
yes.
The
state
law
applies
to
every
parcel
in
san
bruno.
A
F
However,
with
regard
to
the
operating
costs
for
public
safety,
police
and
buyer
in
particular,
there
is
not
a
requirement
that
the
developments
either
pay
a
additional
fee
ongoing
to
support
police
and
fire
based
on
the
number
of
units
that
they're
creating.
Nor
is
there
a
requirement
in
state
law
that
the
new
property
tax
that
may
be
generated
or
sales
taxes,
if
it's
a
commercial
property
that
would
generate
sales
tax.
There's
there's
not
a
requirement
that
that
new
revenue
have
some
nexus
to
the
public.
F
Safety
need
that's
created
by
the
building,
and
so,
while,
yes
with
development,
there
often
comes
additional
ongoing
revenue
because
the
there's
a
resetting
of
the
property
tax
and
the
investment
over.
What's
there
now,
the
the
assessed
value
is
a
lot
higher
to
say
that
there's,
a
rational
relationship
that
we
can
draw
between
that
amount
and
the
added
public
safety
or
requirement
is
just
not
true,
and
so
that
is
not
required
to
stay
long.
A
Thank
you,
and
it
I
know.
In
summary,
you
know.
Obviously
under
sb10
council
has
some
latitude.
If,
if
we
chose,
however,
other
than
that,
we
have
very
little
latitude,
I
mean
the
last
time
was
not
this
council,
but
prior
the
adus.
When
it
came
up,
I'm
going
off
memory
wanted.
I
think
it
was
a
maximum
up
to
640
square
feet
is
what
you
could
have.
Then
council
took
an
action
to
have
it
less
than
that
which
was
within
our
ability
to
do
so
that
it
wasn't
as
much
on
the
property.
A
A
So
those
are
not
new
to
this
council
or
or
to
what
it
is.
The
unfortunate
thing
is
where
many
communities
are
not
meeting
the
arena
numbers
not
just
san
bruno
and
so
therefore
sacramento
and
their
wisdom
has
said:
okay,
we'll
we'll
make
it
happen,
then,
and
that's
where
we're
at
today
and
I
think
staff.
That's
why
you
were
trying
to
update
us
and
well
and
then
the
community,
specifically
especially
with
the
potential
sp35
project
staff.
Is
there
anything
you'd
like
to
add
or
find
on.
F
Just
two
things,
mr
mayor:
one
of
the
clarification
when
I
said
before
that
the
new
state
laws
apply
to
every
parcel
in
san
fran.
It's
every
parcel,
that's
owned
residential.
Now
we
can
actually
rezone
any
parcel
to
be
residential.
That
doesn't
say
that
we
have
to,
but
it
does
the
new
laws
apply
to
residential
parcels,
but
it's
important
to
know
that
that
a
parcel
today,
that's
not
some
residential-
can
be
rezoned
residential
through
a
discard
stereo
through
a
discretionary
action
on
the
city
council.
F
Should
that
that
be
the
case
later
on
in
the
future.
There
was
another
public
comment
with
regard
to
off-street
parking
and
driveways,
not
being
long
enough.
I
do
think
it's
important
to
note
that
boy,
I
guess
pre-covet
19
about
two
years
ago,
the
city
council
did
pass
new
regulations
that
actually
streamlined
and
allowed
residents
to
make
changes
on
their
private
parcel
to
extend
the
length
of
their
driveway
either
actually
in
setting
their
garage,
making
the
garage
smaller
so
that
parking
space
out
in
front
can
actually
fit
a
car.
F
A
A
Okay,
then
I
want
to
thank
those
who
participated
this
evening
and
and
whether
you
spoke
or
not,
but
just
for
being
here.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
colleagues,
for
making
the
time
and
thank
you
to
staff
for
your
presentation
and
being
available
and
appreciate.
I
know
out
of
this
meeting
has
now
some
other
items
to
to
be
looking
at
as
well.
A
So
we're
going
to
go
now
to
item
4b,
which
is
more
specific
to
that
was
the
overall,
which
is
receiver
report
regarding
the
sb,
35
and
density
bonus
development
proposal
on
732
740
el
camino
real
at
this
time
we're
going
to
have
our
director
of
community
development,
pamela
wu,
but
of
course,
city
manager.
If
you
had
any
intro.
F
A
C
Oh
yes,
council
member,
thank
you
for
asking
and
even
though
the
city
manager
indicated
this
is
not
a
meeting
about
the
project.
It's
just
an
informational
session.
There
may
be
questions
and
answers,
and
so
on,
which
would
result
in
your
participation
in
the
item,
and
so
I
do
recommend
that
you
reduce
yourself
to
avoid
the
appearance
of
any
conflict.
D
A
E
Thank
you
and
thank
you
very
patients.
So
this
is
the
second
item
for
tonight's
meeting.
I
will
be
focusing
our
energy
on
the
application
that
has
been
submitted
for
a
sp35
and
a
density
bonus
project.
Tonight's
agenda,
we'll
start
with
the
background
and
then
go
into
the
project
summary
and
also
talks
about
the
entitlement
process
order.
The
next
steps
for
the
city
to
take
and,
of
course,
conclude,
my
presentation
with
questions
from
council.
E
E
E
E
E
Project
summary
the
proposed
building
height
will
be
77
feet
and
nine
inches.
There
will
be
a
total
of
six
stories:
total
building
sizes,
no
basement
with
the
podium
ground
level
parking
will
be
approximately
120
900
square
feet.
The
total
density
s
per
post
will
be
226.7
units
per
acre.
The
development
floor
area
far
is
stated
as
2.3
by
the
developer.
E
E
As
I
mentioned,
the
project
is
going
to
be
six
story:
total
136
unit
mostly
through
floor
two
through
six,
the
affordability
for
the
development
is
shown
in
the
table
towards
the
bottom
of
the
slide
out
of
the
136
units.
There
will
be
eight
very
low
units,
59
low
units,
six
moderate
units
and
61
market
rate.
That
brings
the
total
affordability
for
the
project
at
54.5
percent.
E
This
is
the
site
plan
is
submitted
by
the
developer,
shows
the
layout
of
the
ground
level.
This
will
be
the
first
level.
There
will
be
a
leasing
office
to
the
left
of
the
building,
a
mail
room,
a
utility
room,
trash
enclosure,
bicycle
storage,
room
in
addition
to
25
parking
spaces.
The
main
access
will
be
taken
from
el
camino
and
out
of
el
camino,
where
the
building
is
set
back,
approximately
18
feet
from
el
camino
and
about
the
closest
about
two
feet
from
hensley
in
the
back.
E
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
floor,
2
through
6
will
be
comprised
of
residential
units
for
a
total
of
136..
This
floor
plan
shows
the
exact
same
layout
for
level
three
through
six,
with
the
difference
on
level.
Two,
where
you
see
the
middle
of
the
s1
or
of
the
s1
studio
units,
will
be
converted
into
a
fitness
amenity
room
on
level.
Two.
E
As
I
mentioned,
this
is
a
sp35
in
addition
to
the
density
wellness
project,
even
throughout
the
projects
located
in
the
city's
transit
corridor
plan
to
tcp,
where
there's
no
maximum
density
imposed
with
any
project.
The
deeper
affordability
of
54.5
qualifies
the
developer
to
request
density,
bonus,
incentive
and
concession.
E
As
such,
the
developer
proposed
to
utilize
two
concessions:
the
first
being
height
exceeding
the
current
height
allowance
and
also
number
of
stories,
and
the
second
concession
on
the
step
backs
as
the
tcp
states
that
the
current
law,
the
current
zoning
regulation,
allows
only
75
feet
as
the
maximum,
where
the
developer
asked
for
77
feet
and
nine
inches
five
story
where
a
developer
proposed
to
have
a
six-story
building
and
also,
as
it's
been
codified
in
the
tcp
and
also
transit
corridor.
Zoning
district,
where
there
should
be
a
15
feet,
step
back
requirement
for
floors.
E
Four
through
six
on
hensley
and
el
camino
side
of
the
building.
The
developer
proposed
to
use
another
concession
to
waive
the
step
back
requirement.
In
addition
to
the
two
concessions
these
relate
to
financial
feasibility
of
the
project.
The
developer
also
reserved
their
right
to
request
a
future
waiver,
should
the
project
becomes
physical
impossible
and
that
waiver
will
be
coming
at
a
later
time.
E
The
entitlement
process
for
this
project
sure
the
project
is
found
to
be
sb35
eligible.
It
will
be
reviewed
by
staff
ministerially
without
any
discretionary
approval.
That
means
no
planning,
commission,
no
architectural
review
committee
or
city
council
to
beat
compliance
with
the
state
law.
State
law
also
mandated
review
period
to
take
place
from
the
time
the
submittal
is
received
and
also
a
90-day
approval
or
denial
letter
from
the
time
the
application
is
received.
E
As
I
mentioned,
the
project
is
also
currently
being
reviewed
for
the
architectural
review
permit
again.
Staff
level
review,
in
addition
to
the
destiny,
bonus,
concession
request,
review
by
staff
and
also
a
lot
merger
review
to
combine
the
underlying
lots
into
one
if
the
project
is
found
to
be
sp
35
compliant,
the
project
is
exempt
from
the
california
environmental
quality
act,
sequoia
per
section
government
code,
6591
3.4,
as
well
as
the
sequel
guideline
15628
after
the
entitlement
is
processed.
Should
the
project
wants
to
continue,
they
will
be
subject
to
the
same
building.
E
This
there's
a
slide
on
the
affordability
so
for
the
very
low
it's
usually
50
of
the
average
media
income
for
the
county.
The
ami
low
is
at
80
percent
moderates
at
110.
Margarita
has
no
restriction.
I
have
not
looked
up
the
current
a
m
I
for
the
county,
but
we
can
definitely
provide
that
number
for
you.
B
B
B
F
Councilmember
mason
those
conversations
have
not
yet
occurred.
We
received
the
application
late
in
september
and
we
are
processing
the
entitlement
application,
but
those
those
discuss
discussions
typically
happen
toward
the
latter
part
of
the
entitlement
cycle,
but
really
into
a
building
permit
issuance.
So
we
we
will
be
having
we
will
be
having
those
discussions,
but
it
is
important
to
know
that
our
ability
to
regulate
that
may
be
limited
as
well.
B
Okay
and
while
we
it's
understandable,
based
on
the
presentation
we
just
received
that
our
ability
to
regulate
this
is
incredibly
limited
as
well.
I
think,
in
this
case,
maybe
more
so
than
staff
mike
my
question.
My
next
question
is
really
about
the
neighborhood,
so
we
heard
a
caller
earlier
that
lived
on
hensley
that
was
concerned
about
the
parking,
not
surprisingly,
and
I'm
just
curious.
If,
if
this
is,
if
this
this
project
moves
forward,
would
the
residents
still
receive
notifications
of
different
points
in
the
process?
B
F
Absolutely
thank
you
for
that
question.
Council
woman,
mason.
The
city
is
making
a
commitment
by
this
presentation,
which
is
not
a
required
presentation
and
through
the
millers
that
we
sent
to
inform
the
community
that
that's
something
that
we
wanted
to
do.
First
and
foremost
after
receiving
the
application,
is
to
have
a
format
like
this,
where
we
provide
clear
and
transparent
information
to
the
community.
Part
of
your
your
your
question
alludes
to
the
community
being
notified.
F
I
would
almost
say,
as
a
typical
project
goes
through
the
discretionary
public
meetings.
A
state
law
does
not
allow
for
those
discretionary
meetings
and
those
no
those
more
routine
notifications.
The
the
city,
however,
will
make
a
commitment
to
keeping
the
community
informed
about
this
project.
It
was
in
the
city
manager's
newsletter
that
was
emailed
out
last
last
week.
B
A
Sorry,
I'm
gonna,
just
I'm
gonna
pause
just
for
a
moment.
I
apologize
council
member,
I
just
don't
know
staff.
Should
we
be
going
into
these
specifics
at
this
moment
or
is
this
I
know
it's
informational
at
a
high
level,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
if,
if
each
of
us
are
giving
feedback
and
commentary
or
is
that,
okay
on
the
project.
F
Through
the
mayor,
I
think,
but
tonight
we
we
absolutely
envisioned
comments
and
questions
from
the
city,
council
and
director
wu's
presentation.
I
think
she
used
the
term
that
this
is
not
a
discretionary
meeting
where
we're
seeking
direction
from
the
city
council,
because
that's
not
prescribed
for
and
allowed
in
state
law
to
have
that
that
type
of
discretionary
hearing
where,
where
council
is
providing
direction,
this
project
has
to
go
through
a
legally
prescribed
ministerial
process
and
so
general
comments
from
the
city
council.
B
B
You
know
the
units
are
going
to
be
needed.
So
I
think,
as
far
as
just
my
comments-
that's
that's
about
it
and
then
just
to
congratulate
director
for
taking
on
yet
another
project.
With
your
I
know
these
projects
are
exciting,
but
I
know
you're
really
limited
with
your
staff.
So
hopefully,
if
we,
if
you
need
anything
from
the
council
you'll,
let
us
know
thank
you.
D
Actually
the
the
the
diagramming
question
actually
made
it
into
the
presentation
slide:
number
seven,
the
the
the
all
the
talk
about
the
parking
is
about
25
spaces,
but
then
in
the
presentation
it
says
plus
or
minus
25
spaces,
and
I'm
just
wondering
how
much
of
a
minus
would
it
be.
I
don't
think
they
can
plus
any
more
in
this
into
this
design,
but
I've.
Never.
E
D
D
E
D
D
E
I
mentioned
in
a
prior
item:
there
are
concessions,
and
there
are
waivers.
Concessions
have
to
be
something
that
will
make
the
project
financially
feasible.
Waivers
are
those
reductions
that
will
make
the
project
physically
feasible,
so,
for
instance,
the
developer
reserved
their
right
to
come
back
later
on.
To
say,
I
want
to
request
a
setback
or
step
back,
which
is
a
physical
feasibility
of
to
make
the
project
happen.
E
E
D
136
units
with
25
parking
spaces-
I
I
I
drove
on
hensley
today
and
today
it
was
street
street
sweeping
day
right,
so
you
could
only
park
on
one
side
of
the
street.
Today
there
was
approximately
37
spaces
on
one
side
of
the
street
and
just
what?
What
that's
going
to
do
to
the
community
and
and
hoping
that
there
is.
D
Some
awareness
from
the
developer
of
that
understanding
that
so
my
other
question
is,
is
looking
at
the
particular
location
of
this
project,
where
there
is
a
proposed
future
signal
light
that
requires
cal.
Trans
approval
does
caltrans
have
a
say
on
the
location
of
the
the
entrance
to
this
facility
through
this
project,
with
the
possibility
of
a
signal
being
installed,
you
know
within
I
don't
know
50
25
feet
right
there
on
on
cane.
F
F
D
E
Yeah,
so
the
new
entrance
to
the
new
project
and
in
relationship
to
the
new
intersection
for
the
mills
part
they're,
all
within
the
right-of-way
of
el
camino,
which
will
fall
under
the
jurisdiction
of
caltrans.
So
as
the
project
comes
through,
we
have
rounded
the
project
to
caltrans
for
their
feedback
and
we'll
continue
to
work
with
them
on
any
sort
of
comments
that
they
will
provide
through
the
project
review.
H
D
A
A
But
as
far
as
for
the
developer,
even
though
we
have
limited
opportunities
to
make
changes
and
modifications,
I
would
hope
and
have
an
expectation
that
the
developer
would
still
be
reaching
out
to
the
community
embracing
out
speaking
to
them
just
like
if
it
was
any
other
project
that
folks
were
brought
in
and
asked
talked
to,
doesn't
mean
they're
going
to
hear
everything
they
want
to
hear.
But
I
think
they
have
a
right
to
be
heard,
and
so
I
I
know
that.
That's
not
in
the
laws.
A
I
get
that
sb
35,
but
I'm
hoping
that
somehow
that
we
require
that
of
them,
because
everybody
wants
to
be
a
good
neighbor
in
the
end,
and
I
think
that's
the
freedom.
Let's
go
to
the
members
of
the
public.
I
have
one
person
from
the
public
at
this
time
and
if
the
city
clerk
can
bring
two
two
folks
and
if
we
could
bring
the
first
person
in
please.
G
The
director
spoke
about
the
waiver
for
environmental
stuff
that
that's
been
a
parking
lot
for
a
while
with
the
used
cars
and
stuff
in
there
is.
Are
they
required
to
clean
up
any
oil
or
gas?
That's
leaked
into
that
area
and
haven't
checked
before
or
is
that?
Is
that
the
wave
or
cover
all
that?
My
second
thing
is,
and
this
just
popped
in
my
head?
G
G
Does
the
city
pick
up
that
tab
or
because
it
sounds
like
we're
we're
going
to
end
up
having
to
pay
for
something
that
we
didn't
plan
for
and
fire
truck?
Well,
I
think
the
last
one
we
bought
was
750
000
with
a
couple
year
lead
time,
so
I
hope
someone's
looking
at
that
because
I
don't
know
if
we
have
that
capability
right
now
to
support
that.
Thank
you.
C
H
Dunham
evening,
council,
thank
you
for
indulging
me
again.
My
name
is
mike
dunham,
I'm
a
lead
with
peninsula
for
everyone,
and
I
wanted
to
offer
just
a
few
more
thoughts
on
this
particular
project.
I
went
on
google
maps
and
just
mapped
the
walking
distance
from
here
to
the
san
bruno
cal
train
station.
It's
six
minutes.
H
H
I
think
it's
not
gonna
be
that
big
a
deal,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
folks,
especially
folks
who
need
affordable
housing,
don't
want
the
expense
of
a
car
and
a
car
payment
and
insurance
and
gas
if
they
can
spend
you
know,
150
bucks
a
month
on
a
caltrain
pass,
that's
huge
and
they
can
get
to
work
and
save
themselves
a
ton
of
money.
So
I
think
that
the
location
of
this
project
is
really
going
to
bear
out
why
state
law
reduces
or
eliminates
parking
requirements
in
these
situations.
H
H
A
A
That
was
one
the
income
level
oversight,
I'm
going
to
say
that
that
is
up
to
the
the
facility
there,
as
we
have
the
villa
that
has
that
type
of
housing
element
as
well,
and
to
my
knowledge
they
are
the
ones
who
facilitated
oversee
it.
Take
the
waiting
list.
Another
question
was
the
eir
cleanup
as
well
as
could
it
be
a
possibility
that
both
projects
from
each
other
across
the
street
could
be
similar
in
their
development.
F
F
F
And
so
we
know
that,
through
this
application,
we
will
continue
to
research
every
avenue
to
protect
the
community
and
to
ensure
that,
should
this
project
be
approved,
that
there
are
every
tool
at
our
disposal
to
to
ensure
that
the
community
is
protected
and
will
employ.
But
our
ability
to
implement
a
residential
parking
program
and
exclude
residents
of
this
new
building
is
limited
and
and
likely
pre-empted.
But
we
will
continue
to
look
into
that
with
regard
to
fire.
Can
our
current
ladder
truck
move
a
six-story
building?
F
The
answer
to
that
is
the
answer
to
the
other
part
of
that
question,
which
is
ensuring
that
new
development
pays
for
the
additional
operating
costs
for
police
fire.
I
think
we
asked
that
before
that,
there's
not
a
required
nexus,
but
new
development
does
come
with
increased
ongoing
revenues
such
as
property
tax
with
regard
to
an
administration
or
confirmation
that
the
this,
this
property
or
any
other
property
is
complying
with
the
ami
regulations
and
the
income
verification.
We
currently
contract
that
out
to
the
county.
A
And
I
think
the
the
final
one
was
just:
could
we
see
both
projects
going
on
at
the
same
time,
but
I
I
can
just
say:
that's:
that's
looking
into
a
crystal
ball
in
the
sense,
some
folks
thought
alan
and
mills
would
be
going
simultaneously.
Well
that
obviously
didn't
occur.
Let's
go
back
around
to
my
colleagues
for
one
last
time
and
finish
up.
Councilmember
mason.
B
B
And
so
you
know,
I
just
want
to
point
this
out,
because
I
think
that
oftentimes
councils
get
criticized
for
making
parking
an
excuse
but
living
in
san
fran.
I
can
honestly
say
that
it
is
the
biggest
complaint
we
get,
especially
from
the
east
side,
and
so
it
really
is
a
very
real
concern
and
I
think
that
as
we
move
forward
and
the
character
changes,
you
know,
part
of
our
responsibility
is
to
bring
our
community
with
us
and
we
have
to
respect
the
community.
B
What
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
is
that
you're,
six
minutes
from
the
caltrain
station,
which
is
amazing,
but
you
might
have
a
car
and
then
still
walk
to
bart
or
caltrain
to
get
to
work,
and
so
those
are
just
things
that
we
are
likely
going
to
have
to
deal
with.
As
you
know,
as
more
development
comes-
and
I
think
that's
understandable-
but
as
much
as
possible,
if
we
can
plan
ahead
and
try
to
mitigate
and
minimize
the
inconvenience
that
would
be
great
while
also
housing,
more
people.
B
F
E
F
The
answer
to
that
for
the
project
is
the
project
seeks
to
use
state
density
bonus
law
which,
if
they're
successful
in
utilizing
that
tool
that
will
allow
an
additional
story
so
from
five
stories
to
six
stories.
The
answer
is
sort
of
citywide.
Is
there
the
possibility
to
what's
caught
in
the
industry
down
zone
and
lower
the
heights
that
has
also
been
preempted
by
state
law
and
so
the
tools
in
the
tool
bag
to.
F
Design
and
curate
the
fabric
of
the
community,
through
our
local
land
use
regulations
have
in
many
ways
been
restricted
by
a
lot
of
these
new
state
laws
and,
and
those
are
the
ones
that
we
talked
about
earlier
senate
bill.
Nine
senate
bill,
10
senate
bill,
330
senate
bill
35,
sb
35,
as
well
as
state
density,
bonus
law,
and
it's
also.
F
But
the
tools
that
were
being
taken
away
from
local
municipalities
like
san
bruno
will
negatively
impact
our
ability
to
protect
the
fabric
of
the
community
and
have
new
development
designed
in
a
way
where
there
are
not
negative
consequences.
Like
the
the
parking
challenges
that
we've
been
talking
about
tonight.
So
it
is
unfortunate,
a
reality
of
the
the
the
housing
crisis
and
the
new
state
laws
that
limit
your
authority
and
the
authority
of
even
the
voters
of
the
city
of
san
bruno.
B
Thank
you
and
then
I
am
excited
to
see
the
numerous
bike
stations.
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
the
vision
statement
of
san
bruno,
you
know,
is
a
place
to
live,
learn,
workshop
and
play,
and
so
that
does
encourage
the
idea
of
having
all
of
them
and
with
all
the
companies
we
have
coming
in.
It
may
actually
be
possible
to
to
do
everything
within
san.
B
I
recall
that,
with
with
one
of
our
previous
projects,
we
had
a
commitment
from
the
developer
to
actually
communicate
with
the
community
and
to
have
a
point
of
contact
as
the
development
moves
forward
just
for
ease
and
so
that
the
community
had
a
somebody
that
they
could
reach
out
to.
If
there
were
any
issues
that
were
raised-
and
I
would
imagine-
that's
definitely
not
required,
but
I
am
asking
if
the
staff
has
had
any
communication
with
the
developer
and
you
know,
and
the
willingness
to
work
with
the
community
as
this
project
moves
forward.
F
So
we
have
had
significant
conversations
with
the
developer.
What
we
have
heard
is
the
developer
desires
for
the
city
to
process
their
application
in
accordance
with
senate
bill,
35
and
state
density
wellness.
We
will
certainly
convey
the
sentiment
that
has
been
expressed
by
the
city
council
today
that
there
be
a
process
and
an
outreach
on
the
developer
to
reach
out
to
the
community
and
I'll
interpret
that
for
both
phases.
The
entitlement
phase,
as
well
as
building
phase
and
during
during
the
potential
construction
should
the
project
be
approved.
A
F
A
F
A
Thank
you
and
again
thanks
everyone
for
your
time
and
your
presentations
and
taking
the
questions
and
again
we
concluded
within
our
time
period.
So
I
appreciate
everyone
and
so
therefore
we're
going
to
adjourn
to
the
next
regular
city
council
meeting,
which
will
be
held
on
tuesday
october
26
2021
at
7
pm.