►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting January 12, 2021 6. Revise Storm Drainage and Flood Protection Fee
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting January 12, 2021
6. Revise Storm Drainage and Flood Protection Fee
A
A
D
D
So
the
first
objective
is:
we
want
to
provide
you
with
an
update
on
the
health
of
our
storm
water
system
and
we'll
overview
them.
Some
of
the
financial
challenges
facing
our
stormwater
fund
we'll
also
present
the
results
of
our
fee
study
to
provide
additional,
ongoing
financial
support
to
the
system,
we'll
present
a
recommendation
for
a
new
storm
drainage
and
flood
protection
fee.
D
We
will
explain
the
prop
218
property
assessment
process,
our
schedule,
as
well
as
the
community
outreach
portion
thereof,
and
then
we
will
have
a
council
deliberations
and
actions
on
key
the
initial
proceedings
to
establish
a
revised
storm
drain
and
flood
protection
fee.
We
are
not
asking
for
any
final
decision
from
the
city
council
tonight
on
what
that
fee
would
be.
D
We
are
really
asking
for
the
ability
to
launch
the
initial
steps
in
looking
into
having
a
prop
218
process
to
increase
the
the
assessor,
so
our
agenda
items
for
the
presentation
tonight
are
seven
up.
First,
we
will
overview
we'll
give
an
overview
of
our
water
utilities,
all
three
of
them.
We
will
discuss
our
stormwater
funding
and
and
the
fiscal
challenges
we'll
review
the
current
infrastructure
in
our
stormwater
system,
current
project,
as
well
as
that
long
list
of
the
unfunded
capital
projects
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
meet.
D
We
will
present
the
fee
study
and
again
will
dan
financial
services.
I
will
provide
that
presentation
next,
we'll
talk
about
the
recommendation,
we'll
go
into
some
level
of
detail
on
the
prop
218
process
in
our
public
outreach
process,
and
then
in
this
order
we
will
have
council
questions
public
comment,
council
deliberation
and
then
direction.
So,
let's
begin
so
here
in
san
bruno,
not
unlike
a
number
of
cities,
we
have
three
primary
components
of
our
water
system.
D
C
D
D
Healthy,
approximately
four
years
ago,
the
city
council
approved
a
five-year
rate
structure
increase
because
those
firms,
those
funds,
were
not
healthy.
Five
percent
rate
increases
for
the
next
five
years,
and
so
we
are
four
years
through
those
rate
increases,
and
they
have
been
painful.
We've
heard
that
from
our
residents,
but
there's
significant,
measurable
improvements
to
the
folly
of
those
systems
and
a
number
of
capital
projects
that
have
been
completed,
but
now
we're
talking
about
the
last
leg
of
that
system.
D
What
you'll
see
is
in
the
the
access
for
that
is,
on
the
right
hand,
side
in
1920
the
fund
had
a
fund
balance
of
just
over
a
million
dollars
in
the
budget
that
we
adopted,
that
was
to
be
around
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
then
next
year
we're
projected
to
go
negative,
and
so
the
fund
balance
is
projected
to
be
negative,
and
this
has
been
the
story
for
for
quite
some
time,
because
expenditures
have
outpaced
revenues.
What
we'll?
D
F
D
D
So
every
dollar
we
spent
out
of
the
general
fund
on
this
utility
is
money
that
does
not
go
into
the
general
programs
and
services
that
this
community
relies
on
everything
from
libraries
to
parts
to
police
to
fire.
What
have
you
when
this
fund
is
not
solvent?
The
general
fund
is
the
backstop
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
in
detail
today.
D
So
the
next
slide
shows
the
current
fee
and
the
current
fee
is
separated
in
two
categories,
and
this
is
by
our
zoning
district
and
as
we
get
into
tonight's
presentation,
we'll
talk
a
lot
about
zoning
districts,
but
the
first
category
is
for
miscellaneous
agriculture
vacant
or
condominiums.
Only
district
and
they're,
the
minimum
apn
charges
assessors
parcel
number.
So
the
minimum
charge
is
23
per
year
for
all
other,
largely
our
residential,
commercial
and
industrial
properties.
D
The
minimum
charge
per
parcel
is
46
a
year,
not
a
month
a
year,
and
then
the
per
square
foot
charge
of
the
per
1000
square
foot
charge
is
4.19.
Well,
what
does
that
mean?
It
means
what's
in
green
on
this
screen.
The
average
parcel
under
11
000
square
feet
pays
46
a
year
to
maintain
our
storm
water
system.
D
D
Is
somewhere
between
five
to
six
thousand
square
feet?
It's
typically,
let's
say
if
it's
5
000
square
feet,
it's
50
feet
wide
by
100,
feet
long,
and
so
that
is
certainly
under
11
000
square
feet,
and
so
that
parcel
is
paying
46
per
year.
It's
worth
noting
that
when
this
fee
was
established
in
1994,
if
it
had
only
had
a
cpi
a
cost
of
living
index,
inflator
the
fee
would
be
80
right
now,
nearly
double.
If
it
had
only
had
cpi,
did
not
have
a.
F
D
D
This
1718
number
for
expenditures
is
artificially
low,
the
actual
budgeted
expenditures
there
was
over
1.4
million,
but
there
was
money
that
was
not
spent
out
of
that
budget
in
in
some
operating
and
supply
line
items,
and
so,
thankfully,
that
year
the
expenditures
came
in
a
little
lower,
but
what
we
have
been
trending
is
a
million
or
so
over
the
revenue
total.
So
what.
D
If
the
annual
revenue
isn't
even
covering
capital
well,
all
of
your
capital
expenditures
are
either
coming
from
what
we
call
fund
balance
what's
left
over
in
the
account
or
there's
a
transfer
in
from
the
general
fund,
and
that
has
gone
up
and
down
with
time
and
what
you
see
here
in
1718,
there
was
money
pulled
out
as
well
as
2021,
and
you
may
be
asking
well.
Why
are
we
pulling
money
out
of
the
storm
water
fund
and
putting
it
back
into
the
general
fund?
Well,
that's
because
the
fund
hasn't
been
healthy.
D
D
Fund
money
that
had
been
put
into
the
stormwater
fund
and
we
clawed
back
a
little
bit
of
that
money
to
the
tune
of
317
000.
But
the
top
line
summary
is
the
trajectory
of
the
fund.
Balance
in
our
storm
water
fund
has
been
precipitously
declining
and
we're
projected
to
end
this
year
with
a
fund
balance
of
just
over
forty
six
thousand
dollars.
D
D
D
D
They
looked
over
the
hillside
and
one
of
our
culverts
was
enrolled
in
the
hillside
and
in
a
subsequent
and
a
prior
council
meeting,
the
city
council
allocated
450
000
from
our
general
fund
capital
reserve
to
repair
that
we
all
know
a
lot
about
the
spyglass
undersized
pipes,
a
project
that
is
projected
to
cost
1.5
million,
that
we
do
not
have
the
ability
to
fund
and
have
not
had
the
ability
to
fund.
This
is
a
project
that
the
public
works
director
will
talk
about.
D
We
are
sandbagging
two
homes
every
winter
because
of
the
history
of
flooding
in
that
area,
and
so
we
stand
back
the
back
of
their
houses
because
our
storm
water
system
is
under
size
and
routinely
backs
up,
and
so
we
are
applying
for
grants.
We
are
hoping
that
we
get
a
grant,
but
we
need
to
take
a
holistic
look
at
the
system
and
then,
as
we
all
know,
and
we'll
see,
there's
a
history
of
flooding
in
san
bruno
in
downtown
in
our
lower
lying
neighborhoods.
D
A
D
Was
aimed
at
restoring
health
in
our
general
fund,
but
also
looking
at
significant
financial
risk
to
the
general
fund
and
that's
what
we're
talking
about
today.
That's
what
we're
talking
about
tonight.
The
stormwater
fund
is
a
significant
financial
risk
to
the
general
fund.
It's
critically
important.
D
For
our
overall
physical
health
as
a
service
provider
that
we
return
solvency
to
this
fund
and
we
launched
the
fee
study
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
in
september
of
2020,
and
we
are
proposing
a
218
property
mail
ballot,
proceeding
that
will
begin
in
march
of
this
year
and
go
through
may
subject
to
city
council
approval
and
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
our
public
works
director,
jimmy
tan.
Who
will
talk
more
about
our
stormwater
system,
the
infrastructure
and
some
of
our
challenges.
F
Great
thank
you
manager,
berlin,
jimmy
kim
pumperworks,
director
I'll,
provide
provided
an
overview
of
the
stormwater
system
first
and
I'll
move
along
and
invite
you
with
some
information
regarding
the
stormwater
master
plan
as
well.
So
here's
a
quick
overview
of
the
city
storm
system.
The
system,
as
the
city
manager
mentioned,
was
originally
installed
back
in
the
1900s
1900.
So
it's
a
little
bit
over
120
years
old.
F
The
system
consists
of
drain
elements
which
captures
the
surface
water
from
the
roadways
and
conveys
the
water
into
underground
pipelines
as
large
as
72
inches
in
diameter,
and
eventually
you
know
into
larger
concrete
box
culverts.
Some
of
these
box
culverts
are
as
large
as
10
feet
wide
and
8
feet
high.
As
you
can
imagine,
these
storm
systems
are
much
larger
than
your
typical
water
and
wastewater
system
and
in
size,
because
we
have
to
be
able
to
convey
a
lot
of
the
the
stormwater
and
discharge
it
so
the
bottom
right
hand
corner.
F
As
you
see
there.
It
shows
an
example.
What
a
box
culprit
looks
like
the
storm
stormwater
system
flows
by
gravity
from
west
to
east
and
discharges
into
the
chamber
channel,
which
is
located
behind
the
residential
properties
on
the
east
side
of
7th
avenue
and
near
cuba.
Road
within
the
city.
There
are
also
two
pump
stations
that
were
built
back
in
the
1960s.
F
Both
are
owned
and
operated
and
maintained
by
the
county
of
san
mateo.
The
city
completed
the
stormwater
master
plan
in
2014,
and
it
recommended
capacity
improvements
totaling
more
than
20
million
dollars.
I
mean
more
than
26
million
dollars
in
2014
cost
estimates.
Since
during
inaccurate
funding,
none
of
these
projects
have
been
implemented.
F
F
F
Drink
collection
systems
pipelines
were
not
included
in
the
analysis,
but
the
model
indicates
that
the
flooding
occurs
in
all
six
watersheds
during
a
25-year
design
store
event
and
the
problem
errors
were
noted
on
a
system
map
that
you
know
was
included
in
the
store,
modern
prime
report,
and
then
two
options
were
considered
in
development,
alternatives
or
recommendations
to
address
the
flooding
issues,
and
one
of
the
options
was
to
upsize
the
existing
storm
drain
pipelines.
The
other
is
to
construct,
what's
called
a
detention
basin.
F
You
know
in
watershed
to
reduce
downstream
of
heat
flows
and
to
eliminate
any
need
for
capacity
improvements
projects.
So
one
thing
that
the
master
plan
didn't
include
is
the
condition
assessment
of
the
existing
stormwater
facilities.
Therefore,
the
recommendations
didn't
include
any
improvements
based
on
system
conditions.
F
So
here's
a
map,
you
know
from
the
stormwater
master
plan
that
shows
the
various
watersheds
and
color,
along
with
the
stormwater
system.
That
would
model
you
see
it.
You
know
in
green,
blue
and
red
there
again.
These
are
large
storm
drain
pipelines
and
then
water
shares
are
denoted
in
color
again
from
a
to
f,
as
noted
on
the
map,
there
are
problem
areas
where
flooding
is
occurring
based
on
analysis.
F
Here's
a
close-up
view
of
the
the
previous
previous
map
that
shows
the
problem
errors
resulting
from
the
model.
The
location
again
are
indicated
by
the
results.
The
model
shows
that
flooding
will
likely
occur.
You
know,
along
december
avenue
from
2nd
avenue
to
6th
avenue.
The
other
areas
are
clustered
near
cemetery
avenue
and
huntington
avenue.
F
Two
gravity
outlets,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
two
pump
stations
are
also
noted.
One
is
again
near
pine
street.
We
have
the
large
box
cover
that
discharged
into
the
chevron
channel
and
the
other
is
near
to
the
road
and
autoflow.
You
know
again.
Discharging
assembly
channel
then
flows
into
a
thai
based
structure.
That's
located
near
the
north
northern
part
of
the
san
francisco
airport
and
then
discharges
into
the
into
the
bay.
F
F
This
is
the
property
that
the
city
manager
mentioned
regarding
the
spy
glass
storm
drain
issue
back
in
2014.
It
had
a
lot
of
flooding
issues
that
happened.
It
was
in
that
area.
On
the
left
side,
it
was
a
picture
from
the
first
property
in
his
backyard.
Water
was
over
topping
shark
park
road
and
then
it's
it's
it.
You
know
it's
coming
into
his
backyard
and
eventually
it
relocated
or
tipped
over
a
shed
that
he
had
in
his
backyard
on
the
right
side.
It
kind
of
shows
the.
F
So
the
type
of
stronger
pipeline
is
located
within
the
neighborhood
are
undersized
so
there's
capacity
issues
within
that
stormwind
pipeline,
and
so
it's
unable
to
convey
the
flows,
that's
needed.
So
with
that
you
know,
water
starts
to
come
out
from
the
drain
and
that's
located
in
front
of
the
house
and
eventually
flows
down
sharp
park
road
within
that
area.
F
So
since
the
master
plan
was
completed
in
2014,
there
were
only
minimal
improvements
that
were
made
to
the
storm
system,
and
most
of
these
improvements
were
brought
to
council
due
to
the
need
of
one
emergency
repair
resulting
for
failed
storm
dam
pipelines
or
to
mitigate
erosion.
The
first,
you
know
is
the
treasure
canyon
slope.
Stability
project,
which
was
completed
in
2020,
actually
declared
local
emergency.
F
A
destroying
pipeline
connects
to
the
drain
inlet
located
in
christian's
road,
which
collects
storm
water
from
the
roadway
and
discharges
into
the
and
discharges
the
to
the
creek
below
and
to
expect
to
work
when
we
recommend
it
and
turn
to
mla
memorandum
of
agreement
with
sftc
for
their
contractor
consistently
placing
the
existence
strongly
in
resolving
the
voting
issues.
So
the
cost
of
this
work
is
estimated
to
be
450
000
and
we're
waiting
for
the
final
invoices
to
come
in
from
us.
F
But
for
that
work,
the
next
project
is
the
massage
box
covert
replacement
project
which
was
completed
in
2017,
and
this
project
was
the
result
of
the
storm
event
in
2014,
which
damaged
the
box.
Culvert
a
two
damaged
box,
covert
locations,
the
top
slabs
were
removed
and
replaced
as
far
as
work
and
one
and
nissan
and
the
other.
F
So
here's
just
some
pictures
of
the
various
projects
that
were
completed
here
so
still
the
handling
smoke
stability
project,
the
upper
left
hand
corner,
shows
the
the
beginning
of
construction
of
the
wall.
Bottom
left-hand
corner
shows
the
installation
of
the
tie-backs
and
then
the
rebars
on
the
upper
right-hand
corners
rebars
for
the
walls
and
then
the
the
finished
product
and
the
lower
right-hand
corner.
F
Here's,
the
you
know
the
christian
string
throat
storm
drain,
a
project
that
we
had
sftc
contractor
construct.
The
issue
was
the
deteriorated
corrugated
metal
pipeline
that,
basically,
you
know
was
water
was
taken
through
through
the
pipeline
and
then
eroding
the
the
hillside.
You
can
see
the
erosion,
the
gully
on
the
lower
left
hand,
corner
picture,
and
then
the
right
picture
has
a
video
as
well
to
show.
F
F
The
next
here
is
the
massam
box
cover
replacement
project.
As
mentioned
you
know,
this
was
a
damage
from
the
2014
storm
event.
You
know
the
entire
box,
the
lid
for
the
box,
cover,
uplifted
and
then
damaged
the
entire
roadway
as
well,
so
the
entire
location
would
have
had
to
be
escalated
and
replaced
as
part
of
the
the
overall
work.
So
you
can
see
the
damage
on
the
left-hand
side
and
then
the
the
demolition
work
on
the
lower
left-hand
corner
plus
the
knee
bars
that
had.
F
So,
besides
those
projects
and
what
else
were
completed,
well,
here's
a
list
of
various
unfunded
projects.
The
first
is
the
spy
classification
project
from
the
projects
that
we
showed
a
video
earlier
and
then
this
neighborhood
experiences
experiences
flooding
during
storm
events
or
severe
storm
events
due
to
capacity
issues
and
staff.
As
the
city
manager
mentioned,
we've
been
on
site
every
single
year
of
placing
and
removing
sandbags
at
the
two
properties
within
the
neighborhood
and
the
design
for
this
project
has
already
commenced,
and
it's
currently
at
the
90
design
stage.
F
So
I
heard
from
a
female
representative
today
that
they
are
finishing
the
funding
approval
process
and
anticipate
to
be
approved
by
the
end
of
this
month,
so
we're
still
waiting
for
that
approval
letter
to
come
in
from
from
fema,
but
for
our
project
here.
The
only
stipulation
with
the
grant
application
applications
that
we
can't
you
know,
commence
any
construction
of
the
improvements
which
will
notify
the
brand
application
and
the
total
cost
is
currently
estimated
as
one
point
five
billion
dollars.
F
F
However,
the
city
is
currently
proceeding
with
the
conceptual
design
of
the
regional
stormwater
capture
project.
The
city
secured
a
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
grant
through
an
epa
water
quality
improvement
fund
and
a
little
over
900
thousand
dollars
to
a
california
national
resources
agency
towards
the
preliminary
design
of
this
project.
So
we
already
have
a
consultant
on
board
to
help
us
with
the
the
conceptual
design
for
the
the
regional
stormwater
capture
project.
F
Here's
some
pictures
that
I
want
to
show
you
of
some
of
the
conditions
of
our
storm
system,
because,
as
I
mentioned,
you
know,
the
stormwater
mastermind
didn't
account
for
the
condition
of
it,
but
these
pictures
were
taken
several
years
ago
by
our
you
know
the
cctv
camera
that
we
have
that
we
utilize
here
in
the
city.
So
you
know
these
are
pictures
of
box
culverts.
These
are
large
structures
that
conveys
in
a
large
amount
of
water.
F
You
know
what
storm
water
in
our
system,
as
you
can
see,
you
know
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
the
company
that
have
kind
of
just
fallen
away.
You
know
from
the
the
box
covering
the
cw
bars,
you
know
exposed
and
a
lot
of
these
these
from
box
code
there.
So
eventually
you
know
through
time,
but
these
will
end
up
failing
right,
because
there's
just
no
not
much,
you
know
support
left.
F
F
D
So
we'll
have
willdame
come
now
to
present
the
fee
study
report
and
again
this
is
our
answer,
so
I
think
we
all
agree
that
the
status
quo
is
unacceptable
and
we
have
to
do
something
about
it,
and
so
will
dan
is
going
to
present
the
fee
study
that
we
embarked
upon
last
year
with
council
funding,
and
this
is
part
of
the
okay.
So
we
know
the
problem.
What's
the
solution
mike.
G
Hello,
my
name
is
mike
madby
with
wildan.
I'm
been
working
on
the
fee
study
for
the
stormwater
fee
since
about
september
october,
so
I'm
gonna
give
you
guys
an
idea
of
the
the
various
steps
that
I
went
through
to
arrive
at
the
the
proper
fee
that
would
fund
all
the
facilities
and
get
also
give
give
some
of
the
important
findings
and
determinations
and
statistics
that
come
from
that.
B
G
It's
essentially,
the
the
components
are
the
new
construction,
the
replacement
of
existing
facilities
and
then
the
ongoing
maintenance
and
the
new
construction
is
based
on
the
2014
master
plan.
The
reason
that
we
use,
that
was
because
of
the
facilities
recommended
there,
none
of
it
to
date.
None
of
them
have
been
constructed.
So,
even
though
it
was
prepared
in
2014,
it
does
give
us
a
modern,
current
list
of
facilities
that
are
needed,
and
then
we
developed
an
approach
and
methodology
for
the
theme
we
chose
to
go
with
impervious
area
of
each
parcel.
G
It
is,
and
the
reason
we
did
so
was
because
prop
218
requires
a
formula
that
has
a
nexus
and
there
is.
There
is
a
nexus
sort
of
connection
relationship.
There
is
definitely
a
relationship
between
impervious
area
and
and
the
amount
of
runoff
generated,
and
then
also
there
needs
to
be
rough
proportionality.
H
H
G
So
right
now
the
the
current
fee.
It's
based
on
total
lot
square
footage,
but
I
think
another
feature
to
to
consider
for
the
current
fee
is
that
it
has.
It
has
a
minimum
and
in
some
ways
this
is
a
good
thing,
because
it's
it
means
that
most
of
the
most
of
the
homeowners
most
of
the
parties
in
the
city
are
on
the
same
page.
They
pay
the
same
fee
and
they
you
know
they're
kind
of
all
in
it
together
contributing
there.
G
Also,
it's
there.
There
is
a
closer
connection
between
the
amount
of
impervious
area
of
a
parcel
and
the
amount
of
runoff
that
it
generates,
or
the
amount
of
additional
storm
water
that
the
city
will
need
to
handle
as
a
result
of
that
property.
I
I'm
not
seeing
the
powerpoint.
Can
you
guys
still
hear
me?
B
B
G
G
Essentially
it's
anything
that
when
the
when
the
storm
water
hits
it,
it
runs
off
and
most
of
the
time
once
that
water
gains
velocity,
it
will
go
into
the
streets
and
end
up
in
the
storm
drain
system.
So
the
the
way
that
we
determined
the
impervious
surface
for
each
parcel.
You
know
we,
we
couldn't
individually
measure
the
impervious
surface
for
over
12
000
parcels,
so
we
developed
a
methodology
to
do
so.
G
G
G
The
the
epa
the
the
united
states
epa
recognizes
this
approach,
and
they
they
do
say
that
this
is
really
the
the
the
most
the
closest
way
to
estimate
the
amount
of
runoff
that
a
parcel
is
going
to
generate
you.
Can
you
can
kind
of
get
it
get
a
sense
of
that
by
comparing
a
you
know,
say
like
a
public
park
or
open
space
parcel
that
might
have
a
little
bit
of
impervious
area
versus
a
commercial
center
which
is
generally
almost
completely
impervious?
G
And
you
know
the
two
two
lots
that
have
the
same
lot:
square
footage
we'll
be
paying
very
different
fees
using
the
impervious
area
estimate.
Whereas
if
we're
just
doing
lot
square
footage,
then
you
know
parcels
with
quite
a
bit
of
a
pervious
surface
the
the
grass
and
that
allows
the
storm
water
to
go
directly
into
the
ground
will
be
paying
the
same
fee.
G
Another
another
reason
we
use
impervious
area
rather
than
more
complex
methods
is
that
we
are
doing
this
for
the
entire
city.
We
there
are
accepted
methods
to
calculate
impervious
area.
It's
what
most
people
use
in
california.
It's
generally
accepted,
as
as
the
the
best
methodology
for
this
type
of
thing
and
easy
to
quantify
and
yeah.
That's
pretty
much
next
slide.
G
So
here's
a
visual
representation
of
a
home
and
the
surfaces
that
we
would
consider
impervious.
You
can
see
that
the
swimming
pool,
patio
wooden
deck
and
private
walkway
driveway
and
the
roofs
are
considered
impervious.
You
can
also
kind
of
visualize
how,
when
the
rain
comes
down,
how
it
when
it
when
it
hits
those
impervious
surfaces,
it
goes
to
the
sidewalk
and
that's
where
it
would
enter
the
storm
drain
system.
G
So
our
first
step
was
to
determine
the
annual
budget.
We
again
worked
very
closely
with
with
jimmy
and
also
with
jim
steele,
to
figure
out
all
the
different
components
that
would
be
that
would
need
to
be
funded
and
financed
and
for
the
capital
improvements.
We're
we're
generally
favoring
the
the
financing
method,
we'll
be
issuing
bonds
to
try
and
get
those
constructed
as
quickly
as
possible
and
then
for
the
maintenance.
There
is
an
ongoing
burden
associated
with
that
that
also
fits
into
the
fee
that
we
created.
G
We
determine
the
total
impervious
square
footage
for
all
the
properties
within
the
city.
This
was
done
by
again
for
each
zoning
classification.
We
looked
at
typical
parcels.
We
did
a
sampling
of
those
and
measured
the
impervious
surfaces.
We
also
kind
of
checked
our
work
by
looking
at
other
studies
that
are
based
on
impervious
surface,
and
we
said,
oh,
our
calculation
that
we
did
from
gis
does
look
a
lot
like
these
other
studies,
so
we
think
we
probably
did
it
right
and
then
within
each
land
use
category
it.
G
Then
we
put
all
that
information
into
a
database
and
took
the
annual
expenditure
needs
and
divided
that
by
all
of
the
impervious
surface,
to
get
a
fee
rate
and
that
fee
rate
is
what
we
what
we
are
proposing
and
if,
if
you
want
the
the
gritty
details
of
the
calculation,
then
it
is
in
the
the
stormwater
fee
study
all
the
details.
But
here's
here's
a
few
tables
that'll,
give
you
an
idea
of
the
the
main
points.
G
So
this
first
one
is
just
the
new
construction
capital
improvement
projects.
This
comes
from
the
the
2014
stormwater
study.
We
also
applied
an
escalator
since
those
costs
in
2014
are
not
relevant
to
what
we'd
be
doing.
Today,
we
brought
that
forward
based
on
the
construction
cost
index
of
the
san
francisco
bay
area.
So
what
was?
26.4
million
is
now
about
31.
G
G
And
then,
after
gathering
all
of
those
costs
and
dividing
them
by
the
total
impervious
square
feet,
we
applied
that
fee
rate
to
the
impervious
square
feet
of
each
parcel
and
here's
just
a
sampling.
I
guess
you
could
say
of
the
the
different
zoning
categories.
I
should
say
a
summary
rather
than
a
sampling.
G
The
the
median
fee
will
give
you
an
idea
of
just
about
what
the
the
most
typical
middle
of
the
road
parcel
would
pay
in
each
of
these
categories.
You
can
see
that
there
are
four
residential
categories
and
the
the
way
that
we're
kind
of
judging
the
the
fee
is
by
looking
at
the
r1
category,
the
single-family
residential.
You
can
see
that
that
makes
up
the
bulk
of
all
the
parcels
in
the
city
8755..
G
G
Residence,
so
in
in
looking
at
the
fee,
we
again
we
paid
very
close
attention
to
single
family
residences.
The
current
fee
is
forty
six
dollars
again
that
that's
a
it
hasn't
had
any
escalation
over
the
years
and
it's
insufficient
to
fund
what
we
really
need.
So
it
does
need
to
be
raised
and,
while
percentage-wise
it
looks
like
it's
being
raised
quite
a
bit
to
154..
G
G
One
of
the
one
of
the
main
changes
I
I
kind
of
brought
this
up
before
in
the
in
the
beginning
of
the
presentation.
Is
that
there's
no
minimum
fee
and
what
happens
when
you
have
a
minimum
fee
again
there.
There
are
strengths
when
you,
when
you
tell
everybody
that
they're
gonna
be
paying
the
same
fee,
it
does
give
them
a
sense
of
we're
all
in
together
and
we're
all
paying
the
same
amount,
but
it
also
has
a
negative
effect
in
that.
G
If
you
have
a
smaller
lot,
if
you
have
a
say
a
4,
000
square
foot,
lot
you're,
paying
the
same
rate
as
somebody
who
has
an
11,
000
square
foot
lot
and,
of
course,
you're
the
same
land
use.
So
you
have
approximately
the
same
percentage
of
an
impervious
surface,
but
essentially
you're
kind
of
you
know
there
there's
a
there's
a
bit
of
subsidizing
going
on
with
when
the
minimum
fee
is
involved,
with
the
smaller
parcels
subsidizing
the
larger
parcels
by
using
a
completely
proportional
model.
G
We
get
rid
of
those
subsidies
and
we
make
sure
that
everyone
pays
their
fair
share
and
then
the
other
way
that
this
differs
is
that
we're
using
impervious
surface
rather
than
total
partial
square
footage.
So
again,
the
the
the
homes
that
have
a
lot
of
greenery,
a
lot
of
large
you
know,
lawns
and
and
the
ones
that
are
located
on
slopes
they're
only
going
to
pay
for
their
impervious
square
footage.
G
Likewise,
a
single
single-family
residence.
That's
surrounded
by
you,
know
a
lawn
and
has
a
backyard
with
a
lot
of
grass.
If
that
is
the
same
aggregate
square
footage
as
a
condominium
in
a
condo
complex
that
has
a
lot
of
impermeable
surfaces,
then
they
will
pay
different
rates
from
each
other,
because
the
the
condo
complex
is
going
to
be
generating
more
runoff
due
to
having
more
concrete
services
and
the
single-family
home
will
be
absorbing
more
than
storm
water.
G
We
I
mentioned
before
a
cash
flow
model.
It
takes
into
account
everything
that
we
need
to
fund
it'll,
really
bring
the
city's
system
up
to
date,
we're
anticipating
and
this
isn't
set
in
stone,
but
we're
anticipating
three
bond
issuances.
That
should
give
us
enough
time
to
program
this
money
as
it
comes
in.
It's
definitely
a
fast
schedule
for
construction.
But
if
we
were
to
issue
all
the
bonds
up
front,
then
we
would
have
trouble
spending
it
all,
so
it
spread
over
time.
G
The
the
net
proceeds
and
nominal
dollars
would
be
44
million,
but
it
spread
over
the
first
10
years.
So
when
you
discount
the
present
value
in
in
terms
of
the
facilities
that
we
need
to
construct,
it
gives
you
about
36
million
of
that
again
in
current
year
dollars
we're
looking
at
a
maintenance
budget
maintenance,
operation,
servicing
budget,
1
million
362
000,
and
due
to
us,
issuing
those
bonds
that
will
be
supported
by
this
fee.
We
are
able
to
get
85
percent
of
those
facilities
funded
in
the
first
10
years.
G
We
we
did
want
to
be
efficient
with
our
with
our
fee
also.
So
what
we
do
is
we're
using
those
dollars
that
come
in
for
maintenance
and
also
for
servicing
the
debt,
but
there's
there's
always
a
little
bit
left
over
and
those
amounts
that
are
left
over
will
be
aggregated
into
a
pay-as-you-go
fund
to
help
fund
the
remainder
of
the
facilities
that
are
not
in
that
85
percent.
G
After
we,
after
that
first
30
years,
there
will
be
a
a
decrease
in
the
and
the
amount
that
we
need
most
likely
and
the
fee
will
start
probably
going
down.
It
depends
on
what
the
system
looks.
Like
I
mean,
there's,
no,
there's
there's
no
certainty
that
that
we
won't
find
something
else
that
needs
to
be
replaced
or
have
emergency
events.
G
But
you
know
the
the
expectation
is
that
after
we
fund
the
facilities,
it'll
it'll
go
down
and
on
after
that
starts
to
decrease
we,
we
will
again
hold
some
funds
in
reserve
as
a
capital
reserve
to
replace
facilities
that
get
broken
or
ones
that
deteriorate
over
time.
In
general,
the
the
maintenance
component
is
about
half
of
the
of
the
fees
that
we're
collecting.
G
So
our
recommendations
after
completing
the
study
again
we
we
took
into
account
all
of
the
costs
to
fully
update
the
city's
storm
drain
system.
It
comes
out
to
about
5
cents
per
impervious
square
foot,
that
is,
that
is
comparable
to
what's
being
charged
in
other
places
that
have
done
this
in
bay
area.
G
G
D
D
So
what
are
we
recommending
we're
recommending
that
the
city
council
adopt
a
resolution
initiating
proceedings
to
establish
a
revised
storm
dream
and
flood
flood
protection
fee
at
the
level
recommended
in
the
will,
damn
report,
and
so
that's
0.049885
per
impervious
square
foot
and
that
would
be
levied
as
a
part
of
the
property
tax
bill.
It's
important
for
council
to
know
that
a
side
benefit
of
levying
the
charge
on
the
county's
property
tax
bill
is
that
we're
paid
in
full.
If
there's
ever.
D
That
doesn't
pay
their
property
tax.
It
is
the
county's
responsibility
to
go
after
and
collect,
but
we're
on
what's
called
the
teeter
plan,
which
means
that
once
we
submit
our
property
assessment
file
to
the
county,
they
pay
us
in
pool
for
all
properties
based
on
the
installment
payments
and
they
have
the
responsibility
to
collect
any
uncollectibles.
D
C
D
D
So
it's
essentially
eight
years
today
from
when
we
embarked
on
that
master
plan
and,
as
has
been
presented,
the
backbone
of
our
system
is
that
its
end
of
life,
what's
also
important
to
note,
is
on
page
six
of
the
staff
report.
There's
a
really
nice
chart
that
talks
about
the
percent
that
the
current
fee
recovers
from
residential
and
commercial.
If
we
didn't
provide
the
chart
in
the
powerpoint,
but
I
just
want
to
reference
it,
because
there's
a
important
note
about
how
the
new
feed
model
is
more
fair.
D
D
So
the
staff
report
does
include
alternatives
for
the
city
council
to
consider-
and
there
are
three
and
we'll
talk
about
them
now.
The
first
one
is:
do
not
initiate
the
stormwater
system
being
increased
and
essentially
continue
with
the
status
quo.
Well,
we
we
know
what
that
will
lead
to.
It
will
lead
to
a
little
bit
of
what
we
have
now,
which
is.
We
only
cover
part
of
our
operations.
F
D
D
The
ratepayers
of
water
and
sewer
nine
dollars
a
month
and
essentially
transition
that
revenue
into
storm
water
revenue.
Now,
at
some
point,
we
will
have
to
address
that
loss
of
revenue
in
the
water
and
wastewater
fund,
but
this
is
a
mechanism
that
the
city
council
can
use
to
blunt.
The
impact
of
the
storm
water
increase
by
reducing,
essentially
a
commensurate
increase
that
would
ordinarily
take
effect
automatically
for
our
water
and
wastewater
rates,
subject
to
council
approval
of
our
fees
and
charges
annually.
D
The
third
item
is
to
provide
staff
with
additional
direction
about
the
materials
that
you've
been
presented
today
and
embark
on
some
other
course
to
either
continue
how
we've
been
operating
now
or
provide
some
moderate
level
of
improvement,
but
not
have
the
significant
improvement
in
the
system
that
we're
talking
about
now
next
capital
financing
for
the
capital
improvements.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
with
the
will
dan
report.
So
I'll.
D
Just
do
a
quick
highlight
key
point:
we're
using
debt
financing
to
advance
capital
projects
in
the
life
to
do
all
those
projects
now
would
mean
that
we
would
actually
have
to
charge
ratepayers
more
money.
So
it
is
a
fair
approach
to
raise
rates
only
enough
to
cover
on
them
and
debt
service
and
have
a
little
pingo
money
that
way
you
bond
for
it.
You
pay
for
it
over
time.
D
It's
fair
to
charge
the
residents
that
will
enjoy
these
improvements
that
we
would
like
to
make
over
the
next
40
to
50
years
and
pay
for
it
over
time
with
bonding.
We
are
planning
a
three
series
bond
beginning
in
22,
27
and
30
32
again,
the
major
backbone
improvements
will
take
place
over
the
next
10
to
15
years
and
by
the
time
we
actually
keep
the
final
bond
in
2032
and
do
those
upgrades
we'll
essentially
have
a
new
backbone
of
our
system.
D
Key
point
that
I
do
not
want
council
to
lose
is
that
there
were
three
components
of
the
new
revenue
of
what
the
new
revenue
would
cover:
o
m
operations
and
maintenance
debt
service
on
the
capital
projects
that
we
know
we
have
to
do
and
also
pago
tako
is
pay
as
you
go,
and
so
the
new
fee
would
raise
enough
money.
So
when
we
know
those
known
unknowns
come
up
and
our
collector
stormwater
system
or
a
new
improvement
is
needed.
That
is
not
in
the
2014
master
plan.
D
D
D
If
they
don't,
even
if
they
live
out
of
town,
a
city
manager
newsletter
article
community
presentations,
we
plan
to
go
to
condo
associations
to
our
large
property
owners
to
the
realtors
association
and
our
service
groups
really
get
out
there
like.
We
have
done
before
and
open
up
the
city
and
go
on
a
bit
of
a
virtual
world,
show
now
but
articulate
the
challenge
and
why
the
city
is
proffering.
This
effort-
and
we
are
also
developing
a
dedicated
web
page,
which
is
shown
there
and.
D
D
Is
specific
for
property
assessments?
It
is
a
two-step
process.
There
are
two
property
owner
ballots.
There
is
a
protest
hearing,
so
a
public
hearing
that
you
as
a
city
council,
will
hold
to
your
protest
on
this
potential
fee
increase
and
the
deadline
for
us
to
transmit
our
stormwater
assessment
to
the
county
is
july
31st.
D
So
we
do
have
a
hard
deadline
and
we
are
going
to
embark
on
this
effort
to
begin
it
concluded
and
transmitted
file
to
the
county
either
way
on
july
31st.
We
are
transmitting
a
file
to
the
county
that
will
include
a
stormwater
assessment.
It
will
either
be
the
new
fee
that
that
was
adopted
or
the
old
fee
at
46
flat
for
most
properties
and
so
just
at
a
high
level
of
the
calendar
for
the
prop
218
process.
D
D
D
As
long
as
we
do
not
receive
protests
of
50
plus
one
from
the
parcels
that
are
subject
to
the
assessment,
we
can
proceed
to
phase
two
and
so
what's
phase
two
for
round
two,
and
so
we're
projecting
that
if
we
are
successful
at
the
march
23rd,
we
would
proceed
with
the
round
two.
On
march
31st
and
mail
out
those
notices
which
again
had
another
required
45-day
notice
period,
the
last
day
to
receive
ballots
will
be
may
17th.
D
The
city
clerk
this
election
is
conducted
by
the
city.
Clerk's
office
will
hold
a
public
forum
where
ballots
are
open
and,
of
course,
we
will
have
to
figure
out
how
we
do
that
in
combat
19.
But
thankfully
we
just
had
a
november
election
and
there
are
examples
across
the
country
and
in
california
that
we
can
use
and
then
on
may
25th
the
city
council,
if
the,
if
so
on,
phase
two,
we
need
50
plus
one
of
the
return
ballots
to
adopt
the
assessment.
D
Should
the
city
council
decide
to
adopt
that
and
if
the
city
attorney
is
on,
why
don't?
I
call
the
city
attorney
up
to
just
briefly
talk
about
this
language
change
and
the
recommendation
you,
you
did
have
a
revised
resolution
sent
to
you
today
that
included
this
this
this
very
same
language,
so
mark.
If
you're
there.
I
If
somebody
happens
to
read
the
you
know,
some
page
of
the
fee
study
that
has
that
word
in
it,
there's
no
need
to
revise
the
fee
study.
The
fee
study
is
what
it
is,
but
what
really
controls
is
what
the
city
council
says
they
they
intend,
and
that
would
be
reflected
in
the
resolution
that
it's
that
we're
recommending.
I
D
Council
on
the
public.
That
concludes
our
48
slide
presentation.
I
know
it
was
a
lot
of
information.
I
hope
that
it
was
helpful
and
the
image
you
have
up
above
is
a
the
cover
page
of
a
miller
that
we
have
already
created.
Should
the
city
council
say
yes,
so
we
can
rightly
begin
the
public,
outreach
and
effort,
and
so
that
would
be
sent
out
to
homeowners
and
it's
a
tribal
that
has
a
lot
of
information
about
what
we
talked
about
and
resources
to
find.
More.
D
A
All
right,
thank
you
to
everyone
for
the
detailed
report,
as
my
colleagues
start
to
raise
their
hands.
I
just
on
the
slide,
show
on
slide
number
30
and
I
can
just
read
it
quick.
It
says,
prepare
report,
proposition,
218
notice,
assist
with
city,
public
hearing
ballot
process
and
tabulate
ballots,
and
I
just
didn't
want
that
impression
to
be
given
that
some
outside
firm
is
actually
tabulating
the
ballots
it
is
held
through
the
city
clerk's
office.
It
has
done
like
a
regular
election
and
there's
checks
and
balances
that
could
just
be
elaborated
on.
Please.
D
A
Yes,
good
point,
and-
and
I
do
want
to
appreciate
again
in
some
of
the
alternatives-
and
I
know
one
of
the
alternatives
is
because,
obviously
in
these
challenging
times
in
covid
and
the
costs
etc
was
possibly
to
defer
the
regular
sewer
water
increases
from
use.
You
said
from
one
to
two
years:
if
it
were
for
a
year,
for
example,
what
would
that
do
to
our
overall
revenue,
because,
obviously
it's
been
a
large
increase
for
some
time,
and
so
that
would
almost
be
kind
of
like
a.
A
I
guess
you
kind
of
get
a
pass
for
now,
but
then
in
essence,
it'll
come
back.
If
that
makes
sense
what
I'm
saying
so,
because
I
know
you
recommended
as
an
alternative
one
to
two
years.
So
what
would
one
year
do
to
us?
If
we,
if
council
decided
to
say
hey,
we
need
to
go
forward
with
this
for
obvious
reasons,
but
two
we
don't
want
to
keep
going
back
to
the
residents,
especially
in
these
difficult
times,
which
I
think
obviously
for
2021.
D
The
second
part
of
the
question,
which
is
exactly
how
much
of
that
five
percent
per
fund,
would
be
lost.
We
did
not
prepare
that
information
today
because
we're
not
proffering
that
action
before
the
city
council.
Should
the
city
council
like
to
entertain
that
option.
You
would
direct
staff
to
look
into
that
and
we
will
return
at
the
march
23rd
meeting
or
sooner
with
a
full
presentation
of
what
that
would
entail
and
what
the
revenue
loss
would
be,
but
at
a
high
level
there
will
be
no
operational
or
capital
impacts
to
the
fund.
D
If,
if
that
is
delayed
for
a
year
or
two
and
the
city
council
can
make
the
decision
to
delay
it
to
a
date
certain
or
simply
to
say
you
know
what
we
are
not
going
to
have.
The
increase
that
would
ordinarily
go
into
effect
for
the
21
22
fiscal
year
occur
and
talk
at
a
later
date
about
when
that
increase
would
be
reinstated
or
portioned
thereof.
A
H
H
A
A
E
Chair
council,
member
salazar,
I
would
just
say
you
know
I
I
did
have
a
few
questions
that
came
to
mind
and
it
was
a
very
detailed
analysis.
It
was
there's
a
lot
of
information
there.
I
don't
know
that
a
lot
of
my
questions,
though,
would
be
pertinent
unless
we
actually
pass
this,
and
so
rather
than
get
into
the
weeds
and
get
into
the
minutia
of
you
know,
funding
and
calculation
of
things.
B
C
Yeah,
I
can't
I
mean
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
make
a
difference
right
now.
The
questions
that
I
have
I'm
waiting
for
public
comment.
I
guess
my
my
first
question
is
really
around
accountability
with
the
2014
master
plan.
I'm
I
don't.
I
guess
you
know.
We've
approved
a
couple
of
plans
since
we've
been
here
and
they're,
not
cheap,
and
so
I
want.
I
guess
my
question
is
one:
will
we
be
paying
for
a
new
master
plan
and
then
associated
with
the
question
around
master
plans?
D
For
council
members,
let
me
take
that
and
director
tano
will
back
me
up
if
needed
annually
at
our
budgeting
process.
We
go
fund
by
fund
and
we
typically
dedicate
an
entire
day
to
our
enterprise
and
special
funds,
and
we
talk
about
both
o
m
as
well
as
capital
and
so
what
well?
I
can
only
speak
in
detail
about
the
last
two
and
a
half
years.
D
I
know
that
the
practice
has
been
to
talk
about
when
we're
doing
our
annual
budget,
what
we
can
afford
to
fund
and
what
we
can't
afford
to
find
and,
unfortunately,
you're
right
and
we
talked
about
in
the
presentation
the
challenge
has
been.
While
we
did
a
master
plan,
and
I
think
this
community
recognized
and
the
council
and
staff
recognized
the
need
for
a
master
plan
without
the.
C
C
D
We
still
know
those
projects
need
to
be
done
and
when
the
pictures
were
taken
seven
years
ago,
they
probably
look
a
little
worse
now,
and
so
it
covers
the
entire
backbone
of
our
system
and
that's
the
core
piece
that
we
need
to
address,
and
so
we
will
not
be
professing
to
do
another
master
plan.
We
will
just
if
the
this
is
approved,
forthrightly
embark
on
a
debt
process
to
begin
those
improvements
that
were
identified
nearly
seven
years
ago.
C
Okay
and
then
the
I
don't
think
the
second
part
was
answered,
was
as
a
city.
What
are
we
doing
to
ensure
that
our
our
plans
are
being
so?
Let
me
actually
just
ask
a
broader
question:
is
there
a
place
where
all
the
plans
are
located
that
someone
like
myself
who's
been
on
the
council
for
a
year?
This
is
a
2014
plan,
no
increases
since
1994..
C
How
would
I,
how
would
I
know
as
really
part
of
an
oversight
board
that
there's
plans
that
aren't
being
attended
to
so
absent
every
year
during
the
budget
you
bring
to
us
what
the
budget
forecast
is
going
to
be,
but
I
wouldn't
know
that
there's
a
2014
plan
if
it
wasn't
brought
to
us
so
where,
where
are
the
plans
lying?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
this
doesn't
happen.
Again
I
mean
1994.
That
is
a
really
long
time
and
2014
is
a
substantial
amount
of
time
for
nothing
to
be
done.
D
C
B
D
Question
one
all
of
our
master
plans
are
on
the
city's
website.
This
master
plan
is
on
the
city's
website
with
regard
to
the
capital
improvement
budget,
there's
typically
a
section
in
our
adopted
budget
that
has
unfunded
projects
or
unmet
needs,
and
that
typically
has
all
of
our
known
all
of
our
known
projects.
D
D
D
And
we
embarked
on
this
project
in
2020
after
having
embarked
on
prior
projects
to
restore
the
health
of
our
general
fund
and
those
were
some
of
our
other
efforts.
For
example,
there
was
the
the
measure
g
project.
There
was
the
tlt
increase
that
occurred,
as
well
as
the
expenditure
reductions,
expenditure
savings
and
taking
a
look
at
some
of
our
programs
and
saying
you
know
what
maybe
we
need
to
stop
providing
that
and
we
didn't
present
the
slide
of
the
comprehensive
fiscal
sustainability
project.
D
B
C
My
next
question
is
around
the
the
parking
ticketing
issue
that
has
been
brought
up
a
couple
times
with
council,
so
I
know
that
my
understanding
from
various
residents
is
that
one
of
the
reasons
that
the
east
side
is
ticketed
in
the
west
side
is
not
has
to
do
with
storm
water,
and
so
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
hear
I
guess
whether
we're
going
to
be
addressing
this
simultaneously
because
from
what
we're
seeing
the
stormwaters.
Also
the
stormwater
drainage
issue
is
also
on
the
west
side.
C
D
D
D
D
The
street
sweepers
to
issue
tickets
et
cetera,
that
is
not
on
our
work
plan.
Should
the
city
council
direct
that
I
would
call
that
a
strategic
initiative
that
we
can
mobilize
around
and
take
whatever
council
direction
there
is.
That
is
a
totally
separate
issue
from
what
we're
talking
about
now.
All
of
the
critical
improvements
that
were
identified
in
2014
and
the
o
m
costs
that
we
can't
make
are
not
connected
to
the
streets
we've
been
issued.
We
have
those
costs,
the
the
system
has
deteriorated,
we
know
it's
deteriorated.
D
C
D
If
cars
move,
if
they're,
for
example,
forced
to
move,
we
can
do
a
better
job,
sweeping
the
streets
and
potentially
less
trash
goes
into
the
drains
that
has
to
be
sucked
out
sucked
out
that
likely,
probably
yes,
has
an
oam
cost.
What
I'm
saying
is
that
delta
has
nearly
no
bearing
on
the
core
rationale
to
improve
the
health
of
our
stormwater
fund.
That
is
going
negative.
Only
has
46
thousand
dollars.
Has
millions
of
dollars
of
unmet
needs
that
we
know
about,
and
we've
only
been
able
to
fund
projects
when
they
fell
in
crumble?.
C
So
this
is
an
issue
that
council
member
marty
medina
did
bring
up
in
the
fall.
My
understanding
was
that
we
were
going
to
be
receiving
some
kind
of
a
report
in
the
first
quarter
of
this
year
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
still
going
to
be
receiving
it
and
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
make
a
decision,
and
if
we
make
that
decision
as
a
council
to
treat
both
all
of
san
bruno
the
same
then
by
the
time
we
actually
get
to
a
vote
we
may
already
be.
D
Sure
so
let
me
clarify
a
couple
things
in
that
addressing
parking
and
ticketing
and
street
sweeping
to
address
the
fact
that
we
are
ticketing
on
the
east
side
and
not
ticketing
on
the
west
is
not
on
staff's
work
program.
Staff
is
not
opposed
to
that.
We
take
our
direction
from
the
city
council,
and
so
yes,
councilmember
marty
medina
did
bring
that
up.
Should
the
city
council
direct
staff
to
work
on
that
either
through
the
strategic
initiative
process
or
through
some
other
process,
we
will
embark
on
that.
D
Yes,
two
issues
that
are
connected
to
the
stormwater
system,
but
as
far
as
cost
health
threat,
financial
threat
to
the
general
fund,
totally
bifurcated
different
issues,
so
staff
is
not
working
on
that
now
we
sell
directed
from
the
city
council.
We
can
work
on
that.
We
are
not
preparing
a
study
session
or
anything
to
that
nature,
because
we
have
a
work
plan
that
has
been
identified
by
by
council
through
your
strategic
initiatives,
and
that
is
what
we're
working
on.
Should
the
city
council
decide
to
direct
us?
Otherwise,
we
of
course
will
adapt.
C
Okay,
okay,
so
the
next
question
is
in
regards
to
why
why
now
and
so
city
manager
grogan,
I
I
actually
commend
you
for
taking
this
on.
I
mean
I
think
that
this
this
clearly
is
overdue,
but
I
do
have
to
ask
why
now
why
not?
You
know
why
not
prior
to
covid,
why
not
next
year,
why
now
I
mean
it's
just
such
a
tough
time
for
people
right
now,.
E
D
Help
turn
around
the
situation
in
the
direction
that
we
were
headed
in.
This
is
the
next
problem
right.
I
think
we
always
told
it
wouldn't
have
happened
and
we
would
be
addressing
this
and
a
potential
average
nine
dollar
a
month
increase.
Should
the
council
say
yes
and,
and
we
didn't
have
to
deal
with
colby.
D
This
is
before
you
because
of
the
frankly
financial
and
safety
imperative
and
the
city
council
can
say
you
know
what
dude
due
to
what's
going
on
not
now
or
we've
presented
a
number
of
alternatives,
and
one
of
them
is
essentially
having
a
neutral
impact
by
delaying
a
water
and
wastewater
increase
and
restoring
health
to
the
third
prong
of
our
water
system,
a
critical
component
that
is
threatening
the
health
of
the
general
fund,
and
so
this
is
bringing
broad
for
you
because
professionally.
We
believe
that
that's
our
duty.
D
You
can
delay
it,
you
can
defer
it.
We
are
in
the
alternative
that
we
presented.
It
was
to
delay
that
increase.
The
city
council
could
say
we're
delaying
it
indefinitely.
We
want
to
delay
it
a
year
or
you
know
what
we're
making
a
decision
based
on.
What's
in
front
of
us,
let's
say
no
to
no
for
next
note
for
this
year
and
let's
talk
about
that
for
next
year
and
not
put
a
day
off
date
on
it.
D
D
D
That
that
is,
that
is
correct.
Typically,
utility
rates
do
increase
because
capital
and
om
costs.
What
where
what
I
was
articulating
and
what's
articulated
in
the
staff
report
is
the
water
and
wastewater
unfortunately
had
found
itself
in
a
similar
position
that
we're
in
now,
which
is
while
the
funds
weren't
going
negative.
C
C
Mentioned
okay,
great,
thank
you
and
then
my
other
concern
is
the
likelihood
of
voter
turnout,
so
voter
turnout
is
already
low.
This
was
an
incredibly
unique
year,
but
voter
turnout
is
normally
low
on
an
off
presidential
year
election,
and
I
just
can't
even
imagine
this.
Like
this
method,
I
mean
what
what
what
is
the
likelihood?
C
D
So
we
do
not
have
any
statistics
on
what
percent
of
the
city
would
vote
I'll
mention
that
they
all
mail
process
to
property
owners,
and
so
it
is
just
not
residents
that
live
in
san
bruno.
It
will
go
to
the
property
owners
where,
where,
wherever
their
address
of
record
is,
and
so
unfortunately,
I
I
can't
give
you
any
statistics
on
how
many
people
would
choose
that,
given
we're
giving
pulpit,
19,
okay,
okay,.
D
Melon
ballot
in
november
20
and
had
almost
record
turnout
under
so
yeah.
I
think
there's
a
process
by
which
to
to
inform
the
public
and
get
them
to
pay
attention
and
you're
absolutely
right.
This
process
is
going
to
require
a
robust
community
outreach
process
and
we're
ready
to
embark
on
that.
Should
the
city
council
direct
us.
A
B
C
B
Hi
paul,
whenever
you're
ready,
I
I
read
the
agenda
packet
and
listened
to
the
brief
and
the
fees
haven't
been
raised
since
1994.
So
my
question
is:
why
not-
and
the
next
question
came,
to
my
mind-
was:
what's
the
water
department,
the
city
manager
and
the
council
been
doing
for
the
last
26
years?
You
know
what
else
in
this
city
is
deteriorating,
that
we
don't
know
about.
B
B
B
I
think
the
postponing
is
a
bad
idea.
You
know
it
does.
It
really
does
nothing.
It's
like
not
going
to
the
dentist.
When
your
teeth
hurt,
you
know
you're
going
to
pay
for
it
in
one
way
or
the
other.
You
might
as
well
get
it
while
you
can,
and
after
seeing
all
that,
I
think
we're
screwed
and
we
got
to
do
it.
I
mean,
but
I
think
the
city
needs
to
be
more
physically
responsible
and
forward-looking
for
the
residents
in
the
future.
It's
just
this
is
really
a
disaster.
B
It
doesn't
look
good
on
the
issue
that
was
brought
up
about
the
master
plan.
It
seems
to
me
it's
like
pretty
simple.
If
the
council
approves
the
plan
and
they
they
should
fund
it
at
the
same
time
and
it
gets
executed,
you
know,
then
you
don't
get
to
side
strike
the
side
tracked
on
other
issues
and
say
we
got
to
fund
this
and
that
you
know
you
already
did
the
funding
and
it's
it
goes
down
the
line,
and
the
last
thing
is
a
pet
peeve
of
mine
is
on
the
briefs.
B
B
You
know
it's
like
starting
friday
used
to
say
you
know
just
the
facts,
ma'am,
and
that
way
the
decision
makers
get
the
information
they
need
and
then
anything
else
they
can
ask
questions
later
and
it
would
help
the
the
public
from
having
to
listen
to
all
the
stuff
that
they
don't
need
or
or
don't
want
to
hear.
That's
all.
I
got
thank.
B
D
B
The
moment
I'm
having
some
technical
difficulties
hi,
mr
smith,
can
you
hear
us?
I
can
thank
you
whenever
you're
ready,
yeah.
My
question
was
pretty
simple:
straightforward.
It's
about
the
bonds
and
no
there's,
there's
a
general
bond
and
then
there's
a
revenue
bond,
and
I
wasn't
quite
clear
on
what
kind
of
bond
issuing
you
were
planning
on
in
the
presentation.
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
that.
B
B
E
B
A
D
D
D
D
The
master
plan
was
done
in
2014.
I
believe
was
one
question.
Another
question
was:
how
would
we
calculate
the
impervious
square
footage
and
has
that
been
budgeted?
That
has
already
been
done.
The
fee
study
includes
nearly
over
a
hundred
pages
and
has
a
impervious
calculation
for
every
parcel
by
apn
number
included.
D
There
is
an
appeals
process
because,
while
there
was
a
methodology
for
that,
we
know
that
someone
may
have
killed
it
and
we
talked
in
the
staff
report
about
we
will
utilize
staff
as
well
as
wildan,
to
conduct
the
first
round
of
appeals.
If
you
can
imagine,
there
may
be
significant
appeals
in
year,
one
and
year
two,
but
once
you
adjudicate
those
the
for
the
most
part,
the
impervious
surface
area
is
not
changing.
D
Unless
there's
an
improvement
done
on
the
property
and
through
the
planning
department
and
subsequent
gis
mapping
over
the
years,
we
can
account
for
that,
and
so
that
is
in
there.
The
city
council
funded
that
effort
last
year
through
last
year's
budget
when
they
approved
embarking
on
this
project,
as
well
as
funding
for
some
of
the
public
outreach
efforts.
D
F
D
D
Oh,
how
we
will
bond
the
what
is
envisioned
is
not
go
bonds
that
require
another
vote
of
the
people,
the
public
to
authorize.
But
we
are
looking
at
lease
revenue,
bonds
or
certificates
of
participation
which
can
be
executed
based
on
the
revenue
based
on
the
revenues
from
the
fee.
If
it's
adopted
and
done
quickly,.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
So
you
know.
For
starters,
you
know
the
timing
of
this
is
is
really
unfortunate
and
for
a
number
of
reasons.
Actually,
because
you
know
I
was,
I
have
been
a
strong
proponent
of
doing
our
infrastructure
upgrades
from
the
very
beginning
and
this
this
was
one
piece
that
was
left
behind
in
and
because
the
process
is
so
onerous.
E
E
I
was
hesitant
to
move
forward
on
that
as
well,
but
it
was
necessary
and
we,
you
know,
we've
been
making
just
leaps
and
bounds,
but
so
much
progress
on
those
systems
and
our
stormwater
system
has
just
been.
You
know
decaying.
It's
been
neglected
and
it
does
come
up
every
year.
When
we
talk
about
budget,
it's
always
mentioned
how
deficient
we
are
in
funding
those
repairs
and
how
necessary
they
are
how
important
they
are.
E
Yet
this
process-
because
you
know
this-
this
particular
increase-
is
placed
on
the
tax
rule
rather
than
just
implemented
as
a
fee.
We
have
to
go
through
some
extra
hoops
to
get
this
done,
and
so
I
am
glad
that
we
are
finally
talking
about
this
that
we're.
Finally,
you
know
moving
forward
on
a
process
to
put
this
out
there
so
unfortunate
that
it's
taken
six
years
since
we
did
that
study
to
finally
get
to
this
point.
E
I'm
also
very
unfortunate
that
you
know
the
timing
that
this
happens
to
land
in
the
middle
of
a
pandemic
and
a
huge
economic
downturn
where
a
lot
of
people
are
being
impacted,
and
so
I
had
a
lot
of
concerns
I
knew
this
was
coming
up.
I
appreciate
the
staff
gave
us
a
heads
up
and
gave
us
the
report
ahead
of
times,
and
I
did
have
a
lot
of
time
to
go
through
and
look
through
that.
E
E
I
think
I
would
be
a
little
more
hesitant
if
it
wasn't
a
process,
that's
going
to
still
involve
a
lot
of
public
input.
The
public
has
to
approve
this.
We
can't
approve
this
on
our
own.
We
can
bring
it
forward
for
them
to
vote
on,
but
it
will
be
a
public
process
that
the
public
gets
gets
a
vote
in
whether
or
not
this
happens,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
be
successful
in
convincing
the
public
we
heard
from
from
you
know
some
members
of
the
public
that
are
in
favor.
E
E
You
know
definitely
in
need
of
doing
this.
We
we
have
to
get
it
out.
We
have
to
get
the
ball
rolling
it'll,
be
you
know
that
this
is
going
to
consume,
just
the
process
of
getting
the
getting
the
election
going
and
getting
that
approval
is
going
to
consume
half
the
year,
it'll
put
us
farther
down
the
road,
we'll
get
a
little
bit
more
time
to
discuss
the
actual
rate,
but
I
it
does
seem
that
another
100
per
year
on
a
typical
home
should
be
fairly.
You
know,
absorbable
by
by
most
people.
E
Being
that
it
goes
on
on
property
tax,
in
some
cases,
that
could
even
be
something
that
gets
that
you
can
get
a
credit
on
your
taxes
for
so
there's
a
number
of
benefits
for
having
it
done.
That
way,
I
I
did
have
a
question
when
the
point
was
raised
about
the
the
correction
that
the
city
attorney
made
about.
E
You
know
what
what
is
covered
and
what's
not
covered,
and
I
wanted
a
clarification
on
whether
salaries
for
employees
that
work
in
in
this
group
is
also
covered.
It
sounds
like
this
would
be
the
sole
source
of
revenue
for
that
operation,
and
so
I
would
imagine
that
salaries
and
future
salary
increases
would
have
to
be
absorbed
by
are
any
changes
in
that
increase
as
well.
E
E
But
you
know
I
I
I
believe
I
I
made
the
statement
before
about
our
kobe
19
presentations,
where,
if
you
get
too
much
information
out
there,
it
becomes
noise,
and
so
we
do
have
to
be
very
measured
in
what
we're
putting
out
there,
understanding
the
audience
and
and
our
appetite
for
a
lot
of
nitty-gritty
details
versus
higher
level.
You
know
concepts.
E
We
get
the
full
reports,
we
read
the
full
reports
and
we
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions,
but
I
I
know
that
you
know
the
report
also
included
a
hundred
pages
as
the
city
manager
mentioned
of
all
the
apns.
I
don't
know
that
that
added
any
value
really
to
the
to
the
presentation.
That's
not
an
appendix
that
could
have
been
put
online
somewhere.
E
A
B
B
B
D
There
is
a
whole
host
of
collector
for
every
almost
every
residential
street
in
the
city
that
was
not
covered,
and
we
know
that
there
are
known
unknowns
and
those
are
going
to
have
to
be
have
to
be
replaced
as
well.
So,
yes,
we
believe
that
18
million
dollars
is
appropriate
and
it
gives
us
we're
essentially
bonding
for
what
we
need
now
and
then
we
transition
to
pago.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
if
we
were
to
move
ahead
with
this,
I
would
absolutely
want
to
couple
it
with
foregoing,
at
least
for
the
near
future,
for
the
next
couple
of
years
at
least
the
year
five
of
the
water
sewer
increases
just
to
you
know
just
to
offset
it
offset
the
cost
for
the
for
the
residents.
My
my
biggest
concern
is
the
outcome
of
that
vote.
We're
in
a
unique
place
right
now,
where
all
five
of
the
seated
council
members
participated
in
an
election
within
the
last
year.
B
B
H
H
But
I
do
appreciate
the
city
manager
sticking
to
a
plan.
This
has
been
kicked
down.
The
road
for
many
years
and
the
city
council
in
the
last
few
years
has
been
building
up
the
financial
sustainability
for
our
city,
and
this
is
another
step.
I
I
see
it
it's
clear,
the
timing's
horrible,
of
course
right
the
timing's,
absolutely
terrible.
H
H
For
my
part,
as
a
property
owner,
I
will
go
down
and
and
turn
my
turn
my
I
guess
you
can
mail
it
in,
but
you
can
also
drop
it
off.
I
think
I
think
I
want
some
clarity
on
that
that
you
could
take
your
protests
or
your
ballot
and
you
could
drop
it
off
at
city
hall.
I
I
like
to
drop
my
ballots
off
or
vote
in
person,
but
we
should
learn
from
our
mistakes.
H
H
So
we
don't
want
to
wait
for
a
lawsuit
to
come
out
of
our
storm
water
that
that'll
make
it
even
worse,
where
we
don't
control
that
it'll,
be
though
we
push
down
our
throats
like
our
water
rate
increases
were
that's
why
those
increases
were
so
high
is
because
we
were
forced
to
upgrade
our
system
in
a
advanced,
timely
manner
and
well.
They
are
where
there
are,
they
are
now
because
of
it.
H
H
Where
we're
going
to
cut
another
million
from
we
already
have
four
vacant
police
officer
positions,
we
already
have
two
bacon
firefighter
positions.
What's
next
right,
it's
a
shame
that
that
since
1994,
that
wasn't
thought
out
well
but
we're
inheriting
this
problem
and
we
need
to
address
it.
My
questions.
H
H
H
I
You,
council,
member
nadine,
I'd,
be
happy
to
take
a
stab
initially
at
that,
and
certainly
that
javon
jimmy
and
our
consultant
can
can
add
anything
in
it
at
the
end
that
I've
missed.
So
I
think
we
we
did
address
this
in
some
detail
in
the
responses
to
your
written
questions,
but,
to
summarize
the
in
an
answer
to
your
first
question:
yes,
it
is
legal,
it
is
absolutely
consistent
with
proposition
218.
It
has
been
used
in
the
in
other
cities.
I
I
The
the
few
cities
that
have
used
those
kinds
of
approaches
have
only
done
so
in
particular
areas
and
have
done
so
historically
for
many
many
decades,
and
so
what
we
found
when
we
talked
with
our
outside
consultant
and
also
outside
council,
is
it's
almost
impossible
for
a
city
to
switch
from
one
methodology
to
the
other,
because
what
you
end
up
with
are
really
huge
swings
in
the
amounts
of
money
that
properties
pay.
So
if
right
now,
the
city
council
is
understandably
concerned
about
a
nine
dollar
a
month
increase
in
in
the
cost.
I
I
think
they
would
be
very
concerned
to
see
the
the
numbers
that
would
result
from
from
a
system
in
which
properties
are
allocated
costs
essentially
based
on
geography
and
where
they
they
happen
to
be
so.
So
that's
a
just
a
brief
answer
to
the
question.
It
is
absolutely
consistent
with
proposition
218
and
represents
the
overwhelming
favorite
way
of
cities
to
address
these
things
in
a
way
that
is
fair
and
equitable
to
everyone.
H
H
H
So
that's
the
question
I
have
and
then,
along
with
the
bonds,
how
does
the?
How
would
the
potential
issuance
of
this
debt
impact
the
debt
capacity
for
other
projects
and
needs
two
that
come
into
mind?
Three
one
is
the
require
recreation
aquatic
center?
We
talked
about
potentially
using
debt.
For
that
we
also
talked
about
debt
for
city
net
services.
H
H
Another
question
I
have
is
when
a
new,
when
a
new
development
comes
on
board,
that
property
will
be
assessed.
We
have
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
currently
we're
looking
forward
to
and
how?
How
do
those
properties
start
paying
it'll
be
probably
this
by
the
same
function.
I
I'm
I'm
guessing,
I'm
not
sure,
and
those
are
the
questions
I
have
for
now.
D
D
With
regard
to
a
oversight
body
or
a
sunset,
neither
a
sunset
nor
an
oversight
body
are
currently
envisioned.
This
would
be
treated
like
a
enterprise
utility
similar
to
the
water
and
wastewater
rates.
The
money
for
that
can
only
be
used
for
the
storm
water
system,
whereas
for
general
purpose
revenue
that
can
technically
go
for
any
other
purpose.
That's
typically,
where
you
see
a
citizen
revenue
oversight.
D
D
Through
new
fees,
we
will
have
more
ability
to
take
out
bonds,
because
we
have
the
ability
to
pay
those
our
ability
to
pay
bonds
now
is
constrained
by
our
revenue
portrait.
If,
through
this
fee,
we
have
more
revenue
that
automatically
increases
our
bonding
capacity
and
those
ratios
that
we
present
to
you
in
the
budget.
G
G
So
what
what
that
does
is?
It
creates
a
revenue
stream
and
as
that
revenue
stream
comes
in,
we
work
within
those
constraints
to
to
get
you
guys
the
facilities
built
as
quickly
as
possible
at
the
best
interest
rates,
and
really
try
to
do
as
much
with
that
revenue
stream
as
we
possibly
can,
but
we're
not
we're
not
committing
to
the
financing
plan.
That's
in
the
cash
flow.
G
Yes,
so
if
a
piece
of
undeveloped
property
becomes
a
residential
unit,
then
we
will
apply
that
impervious
factor
to
its
square
footage
as
soon
as
it
gets
developed,
we
do
when
we
administer
these
districts.
We
monitor
the
land
use
every
year
and
we
keep
track
of
new
construction
and
parcels
that
have
new
improvement
value
and
the
the
assumption
is
that
as
those
properties
develop
it,
it
won't
necessarily
be
just
extra
money
for
us
to
it.
G
You
know
it
won't
be
gravy,
they
are
going
to
generate
more
runoff
and
we'll
need
to
consider
whether
we
need
to
add
to
the
improvements.
If
there's
a
really
large
development
that
comes
in-
and
we
start
to
have
issues
in
one
of
the
areas,
then
we
may
need
to
schedule
more
improvements.
We'll
have
the
revenues
to
do
that
because
of
the
proportionality
of
the
fee.
H
Normally,
they
have
retention.
Basins
that
are
required
to
be
put
in,
like
the
flooding
would
be
a
lot
worse
if
a
huge
development
was
put
on
the
hill
and
the
water
would
come
streaming
down,
but
these
these
developments
would
now
require
to
have
retention
basins
that
would
or
pipes
that
would
slowly
leak
that
water
out,
so
it
doesn't
create
a
an
additional
flooding
capacity
downstream.
G
Yeah
the
so
I
I
do
remember
jimmy
saying
something
like
that,
and
it
makes
sense
that
the
newer
homes
have
more
stringent
requirements
on
how
they
deal
with
stormwater.
If
we
do
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we're
where
we
have
more
revenues
than
are
that
are
necessary
to
complete
the
plan,
you
know,
and
I
another
another
one
that
I
forgot
to
address
earlier,
is
that
these
bonds
will
be
a
a
limited
obligation.
G
This
is
this
is
kind
of
kind
of
like
an
enterprise,
so
the
revenues
come
in
and
then
you
issue
bonds
and
the
and
the
fees
go
just
to
pay
those
bonds.
There's
no
there.
It's
it
won't
be.
It
won't
be
a
general
obligation
of
the
city.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
saying,
but
also
if
we,
if
we
look
at
our
whole
plan,
the
the
debt
service,
the
ongoing
pay
go
that
we
need
the
operations
and
maintenance
and
realize
that
we're
getting
too
much
in
revenues.
G
H
D
D
H
H
Mr
mayor,
I
think
that's
my
last
question.
For
now
the
clearly
I'll
just
say:
I'm
in
favor
of
keeping
the
rates
water
rate
increases
to
kind
of
your
your
exchange
in
that
cost
increase
to
to
just
not
have
it
for
the
next
year
and
then,
when
we
do
the
next
next
cost
and
costing
for
our
rate
increases,
then
we
could
do
do
that
in
year.
Two,
but
it's
definitely
to
move
forward.
It
would
be
to
suspend
that
rate
increase
for
next
year.
C
C
If,
if
approved
by
council,
then
the
mail
out
ballots
are
going
to
be
sent
to
property
managers,
assuming
that
51
of
the
total
number
of
property
managers
that
receive
this
do
not
write
back
then
there's
going
to
be
a
hearing
number
two
on
march
11th
and
then
after
that
hearing
there's
going
to
be
mail
out
ballots
to
property
managers
throughout
san
bruno
and
then
on
may
10th.
The
last
day
to
submit
the
ballots
would
really
end
the
process
may
11th.
C
The
ballots
would
be
counted
and
51,
and
this
is
where
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
getting
this
right.
51
percent
of
the
votes
that
came
in
would
have
to
support
the
increase
for
it.
For
this
item
to
then
move
forward
and
be
effective
and
the
reporting
of
the
ballot
totals
will
be
made
to
the
council
on
may
12th.
Did
I
get
that
right.
C
D
C
D
D
D
Calendar
is
all
of
our
public
outreach,
and
so
even
before
that
notice
goes
out,
we're
planning
a
trifold
miller
that
will
go
out
to
provide
information
to
people,
so
there
will
be
public
outreach
meetings,
newsletter
news,
articles
etc
in
between
all
of
these
dates,
but
as
far
as
the
218
process,
that's
what
we're
talking
about
so
on
january,
22nd,
first
round
notices
will
go
out.
Those
are
required
to
be
out
45
days
before
the
final
day.
D
D
Okay,
based
on
what
happens
on
march
23rd,
we
would
send
out
the
second
round
notices
on
march
31st.
That
is
again
another
45
day
required
period.
The
final
day
to
receive
those
ballots
is
targeted
for
may
17th,
that's
actually
a
little
bit
more
than
45
days,
if
you're,
if
somebody's
at
home
doing
the
math.
But
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we,
you
know
we
weren't
running
up
against
the
deadline
and
that
requires
in
order
for
it
to
be
accepted.
D
D
C
Okay,
so,
ultimately
we're
really
what
we're
really
approving
tonight
is
is
saying:
go
ahead
and
start
this
process,
but
ultimately
it's
the
property
owners
who
are
responsible
for
the
payment
that
are
going
to
be
deciding
absolutely
yes,
okay,
great
and
then
I
apologize.
If
I
may
have
missed
this,
but
the
assuming
that
it
is
approved.
What
would
be
the
effective
date.
D
D
C
And
then
so
is
it
for
that
the
increases,
then,
if
the
increases
are
the
and
let
me
go
back
to
the
water
increases,
we
talked
about
suspending
them.
So
is
there
any
reason
that
we
need
that
extra
five
percent
anyway?
Is
there?
Is
that
something
that
we
can
it's
it's
a
previous
council
decision?
So
would
this
council
be
able
to
say
no
more
increases,
or
I
don't
think
I
don't
know
if
there's
been
an
analysis
done
of
what
the
loss
would
be.
C
D
Say
no
more
future
increases
because
one
council
can't
bind
the
future
council,
but
you
can
say
we
are
not
going
to
implement
the
increase
for
2122
and
I
think
we
we're
hearing
sort
of
universal
interest
in
doing
that
and
we
can
return
to
you
at
a
subsequent
meeting.
I
don't
think
we'll
be
able
to
do
that
by
the
january
26th
meeting,
but
potentially
by
the
the
first
meeting
in
february,
so
you
can
take
that
action
and
and
we
at
that
meeting
we
can
provide
you
information
with
what
that
does
to
the
fund.
D
C
Okay,
okay,
so
so
for
me,
I
really
appreciate
the
staff
report.
I
appreciate
actually
the
length
of
the
staff
report
because
of
the
great
impact
that
this
is
gonna
have
on
our
on
our
residents.
Honestly,
because
I
would
imagine
a
number
of
our
property
owners
probably
live
here
and
those
that
don't
may
be
passing
on
the
cost
to
their
renters.
C
So
I
think
the
staff
report
was
really
clear
and
the
memo
provided
to
the
city
council
was
clear
and
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
that.
For
me,
I
just
want
to
say
on
the
record
that
really
the
greatest
disappointment
is
that
this
has
been
kicked
down
the
road
for
24
years.
I
I
don't.
You
know
one
more
kind
of
baffling
thing.
When
people
talk
about
san
bruno
and
all
the
needs,
it
has
that's
just
a
really
long
time
to
be
kicked
down
the
road.
So
so
I
don't.
C
I
think
we
have
to
do
it.
Like
the
speaker
said
earlier.
I
don't
think
that
I
don't
want
to
kick
it
down
the
road,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
for
me
I
would
ask
that
that
I
don't
know.
I
don't
think
it's
time
for
the
motion
yet
because
the
mayor
hasn't
spoken
yet,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
I
don't
support
any
further
increases
on
the
water
on
the
water
rate
side.
A
Thanks
for
me,
I'll
get
to
the
point,
I
think
we're
I'm
kind
of
writing
down
that
we're
all
in
concurrence
that
we
need
to
move
forward
and
do
this
from
what
I've
heard
and
what
I've
written
down
and
as
far
as
as
I
had
asked
a
question
originally
about
deferring
or
suspending
works,
the
spending
has
come
up
to
on
the
fifth,
the
final
year
of
the
five-year
increase.
So
what
I'm?
A
A
E
E
The
the
increase
on
the
other
rates
is
a
separate
action
that
we
need
to
take,
and
I
I
would
recommend
that
we
treat
this
resolution
separately,
because
this
this
is
the
beginning
of
a
long
process,
and
I
don't
feel
that
it's
appropriate
to
tie
that
other
one.
I
think
we're
in
agreement
that
we
need
to
do
that,
that
we
want
to
do
that
when
the
time
comes
to
approve
that
other
adjustment,
I
I
don't
feel
that
it's
necessary
to
adjust
this
resolution.
E
A
No
and
I'm
not
saying
to
modify
that,
I'm
just
saying
the
modification
that
the
city
attorney
brought
up
is
what
I
mean
by
modification
on
their
resolution.
What
I'm
saying
is
because
of
the
concurrence
by
council.
It
would
be
for
staff
to
look
into
that,
but
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
this
action.
Okay,
does
that
make?
Is
that
clear?
Okay
right
so
is
there
accident
from
council.
C
A
A
Okay,
is
there
a
second
to
the
motion
or
to
the
resolution
a
vice
mayor?
Are
you
there?
Okay,
I
thought
you
froze.
No,
no
I'm
sorry.
I
thought
your
camera
froze
okay
and
then
then
the
motion
dies
for
lack
of
a
second.
So
now
I'm
going
to
have
to
go
to
the
city
attorney
city
attorney.
You
have
you
heard
the
question
that
was
asked
in
regards
to
the
alternative.
I
Yeah,
I
don't
recommend
I
do
not
recommend
that
this
resolution
be
encumbered
with
an
action
that
is
unrelated
to
the
purpose
of
of
this
particular
item.
What
I
do
recommend
is
that
the
city
council
simply
make
a
motion
to
direct
staff
after
they've
adopted
this
resolution
or
before,
as
the
case
may
be,
simply
direct
staff
to
bring
back
a
report
on
the
requested
deferral
of
the
of
the
other
fiat
at
a
subsequent
meeting,
and
that
should
take
care
of
it.