►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting February 9, 2021
6a. Amend and Readopt Title 6 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare)
C
C
C
C
So
here's
the
background
you've
seen
this
slide
before,
but
it
it
never
hurts
to
see
it
again,
especially
since
there's
usually
a
couple
of
months
in
between
these
presentations
on
the
municipal
code.
So
we
started
this
back
in
late
2018
when
the
city
council
directed
me
to
comprehensively
amend
the
code
and
the
primary
focus
then
was
to
update
it
for
internal
consistency
and
to
comply
with
current
law
and
in
addition
to
that
to
have
whatever
policy
discussions
were
necessary
for
those
revisions.
C
C
So
we're
now
here
to
talk
about
title
six,
which
is
entitled
public
peace,
morals
and
welfare
and
title
six
consists
of
20
chapters
and
the
good
news
is:
we
don't
have
to
necessarily
go
through
each
one
of
them
individually.
But
what
I
do
want
to
do
is
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
the
ones
that
we
are
recommending
amendments
to
and
for
those
that
we're
not
recommending
amendments
to
the
reasons
why
why
not-
and
obviously
all
of
those
topics
are
open
for
your
discussion,
so
the
first
chapter
is
definitions.
C
So
to
finish
up
the
remaining
chapters,
we
have
assisting
locked
out
people,
that's
a
fairly
standard
one.
We
have
regulations
of
adult
businesses,
drug
paraphernalia,
we'll
talk
about
in
a
minute
because
we
are
proposing
actually
that
to
be
repealed,
aerosol
pain,
container
regulations,
animal
control
and
alcoholic
beverages
in
public
those
we're
not
proposing
any
amendments
to
at
this
time,
and
then
the
last
bucket
of
these
is
false.
Alarm.
C
C
So
the
first
one
is
6.04
definitions,
there's
a
bunch
of
relatively
minor
changes
to
that,
I
would
say
the
most
significant
change
that
that
you,
you
see,
is
for
consistency
with
state
law
having
to
do
with
the
reference
to
gender.
So
we
we
currently
have
male
and
female
state
law
requires
that
we
also
refer
to
gender
as
non-uh
one
possible.
C
Gender
identification
is
non-binary,
and
so
that's
included
in
in
that,
and
that
will
update
the
code
with
respect
to
6.08
firearms.
This
came
up
last
year
and
this
is
to
propose
guess
what
I
would
refer
to
as
a
relatively
non-controversial
ordinance
to
supplement
state
law
having
to
do
with
safe
storage
of
firearms
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
in
a
little
bit
more
detail,
trespassing
and
loitering
6.12.
C
There's
really
just
some
minor
changes
there
for
consistency
with
state
law
and
also,
you
might
remember,
when
we
did
title
iv,
we
amended
definitions
and
of
headlers
and
solicitors
to
comply
with
state
law.
Then-
and
this
conforms
this
particular
title
to
those
definitions
as
well-
drug
paraphernalia-
we're
actually
recommending
that
be
repealed,
because
state
law
has
in
essence
preempted
that
and
we've
checked
with
the
police
chief
about
that
and
he's
he's
in
agreement.
We
don't
need
that
anymore,
false
alarms.
C
C
So
those
are
the
the
five
chapters
that
we
are
proposing,
changes
to
and
let's
drill
down
a
little
bit
deeper
into
the
ones
that
the
changes
are
more
substantive
and
primarily
it's
it's
firearms.
So
we're
recommending
a
safe
storage
ordinance
and
what
is
that,
so
the
object
of
the
ordinance
is
really
to
mitigate
the
increased
risk
of
injury
or
death
from
unsecured
firearms
and
residences
and
you'll
notice
from
the
staff
report.
C
There
is
a
state
law
that
addresses
this
it's
in
the
penal
code
and,
basically,
what
it
does
is.
It
prohibits
the
unsafe
storage
of
loaded
or
unloaded
firearms
that
the
owner
knows,
or
has
reason
to
know
that
a
child
or
a
prohibited
person
could
access
them
and
a
prohibited
person
is
one
of
those
people
that
that
is
prohibited
from
owning
a
firearm
under
state
law.
C
C
C
C
Similar
ordinances
have
been
adopted
by
a
variety
of
cities
on
the
peninsula:
they're,
not
all
identical,
they're
they're
different
in
certain
ways,
some
adopted
them
earlier.
Some
have
yet
to
adopt
them,
so
we're
not
the
first
or
the
last,
but
we
what
I
tried
to
do
when
I
drafted
the
proposed
amendments
is
to
take
what
I
felt
was
the
best
features
of
all
of
those
ordinances
and
put
them
into
hours
to
to
make
it
both
simple,
easy
to
understand
and
easy
to
follow.
C
So
really
the
the
question
I
think
for
tonight
is:
do
we
want
to
sort
of
stop
and
pause
and
take
a
deep
dive
into
those
ordinances
or
what
staff
is
recommending
for?
A
variety
of
reasons
is
simply
to
discuss
that
work.
Effort
during
the
march
or
april
of
this
year
come
coming
up
in
really
just
a
month
or
two.
The
priority
setting
meetings
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that,
unlike
other
ordinances,
this
is
going
to
require
sort
of
a
comprehensive
effort
involving
multiple
departments.
C
So
the
next
steps
would
be
to
review
the
proposed
amendments,
introduce
the
ordinance
or,
if
you
want
to
make
some
substantive
revisions
in
it
or
provide
me
with
additional
direction.
I'm
happy
to
take
that
and
then
we
can
come
back
and
reintroduce
it
at
the
subsequent
at
a
subsequent
meeting
and
then,
but
if
not,
we
would
schedule
adoption
for
the
next
meeting.
C
A
A
You
were
not
on
the
council
the
time
that
I
brought
up
on
july
28th
and
brought
forward
to
council
under
council
comments
and
asked,
and
there
was
consensus
to
have
this
brought
back
forward
in
an
ordinance,
but
it
was
with
staff's
recommendation
to
wait
since
it
included
chapter
six
to
get
it
all
done,
right
and
and
and
collective,
so
there's
something
that
was
based,
then.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
at
this
point?
A
B
B
Hi
mayor
and
council
members
first,
I
want
to
thank
you
hugely
for
addressing
safe
storage
of
firearms
in
the
home.
As
you
know,
one
small
child
dies
every
day
in
this
country,
and
two
teens
commit
gun
suicide
every
day
after
finding
an
unsecured
firearm
in
their
home
or
a
relative's
home.
Eighty
percent
of
school
shootings,
eighty
percent
of
all
school
shootings,
occur
by
a
student
or
former
student
of
that
school
who
obtains
an
unsecured
firearm.
B
This
pasture
with
kovid,
has
seen
a
dramatic
increase
in
unintentional
child
deaths
by
a
shocking
43
percent
and
teen
suicides,
with
unsecured
guns
by
nine
percent,
mandating
that
a
firearm
be
safely
stored
in
a
securely
locked
container,
does
not
prevent
someone
from
protecting
oneself
in
an
emergency
firearms
kept
in
a
securely
stored,
lock
container
can
be
accessed
in
seconds
if
need
be.
Research
also
does
show
that
safe
storage
can
prevent
the
unintentional
deaths
of
small
children
and
teen
gun
suicides
by
up
to
85
percent.
B
D
D
D
B
Last
speaker
is
lisa
windup
just
one
moment.
Will
I
bring
you
in
hello,
hello
whenever
you're
ready?
Okay,
so
I
just
want
to
echo
the
comments
that
have
already
been
made
and
say
thank
you
for
introducing
this
amendment,
it's
so
important
and
urge
you
all
to
adopt
it.
You
know
just
as
as
a
mother
just
knowing
that
our
children
are
safer.
B
A
E
Hey
so
I
have
quite
a
bit.
I
think
that
I,
if
it's
okay
with
the
city
attorney,
should
I
just
go
down
the
list.
I
know
I
sense
an
email
and
thank
you
for
the
response,
but
there
is
a
bit
that
I
want
to
make
sure
we
touch
on
since
we're.
Looking
at
the
entire,
I
mean
we
are
essentially
proving
the
amendments,
but
we're
also
looking
at
the
entire
section.
C
So
that's
a
great
question:
we
we
did
not
explicitly
consider
a
communication
plan.
I
wonder
if
maybe
the
the
police
chief
might
have
some
thoughts
about
that
yeah.
He
and
I
spoke
about
the
ordinance
at
some
in
some
detail
before
proposing
it,
and
I
don't
want
to
put
him
on
the
spot,
but
I
wonder
if
he
has
any
thoughts
and
if
not,
we
can
certainly
come
back
to
the
city
council.
With
that
information.
F
F
But
I
think
that
you
can
count
on
it,
including
a
integrated
plan
working
with
all
the
various
city
entities
and
leveraging
the
influence
that
the
police
department
has
developed
through
various
social
media
channels
and
other
communication
networks
to
kind
of
get
the
word
out
about
this
ordinance
and
the
change
that's
being
made
to
existing
gun
law.
As
the
city
attorney
alluded
to
as
well.
This
is
largely
covered
by
existing
law
and
common
sense
and
training
that
people
receive
when
they
obtain
their
handgun
safety
certificates.
A
E
E
E
I
would
just
request
that
they
be
reviewed,
because
some
of
this
is
placing
the
the
fines
or
the
fees
on
the
parents
and
then
can
can
they
can
they
afford
to
pay
them
and
how
are
they
being
impacted
compared
to
other
parents
who
may
also
not
be
experiencing?
Obviously
the
same
difficulties
with
their
children
if
the
kids
are
out
and
about
there's
another
penalty
under
6.14.070.
E
That
says
that
if
a
juvenile
has
been
issued,
a
citation
for
violation
and
they
fail
to
appear
to
the
division
of
the
juvenile
court,
they're
automatically
reported
to
the
state
department
of
motor
vehicles
and
then
have
their
driver's
license
suspended,
and
so
I
I
don't
I
feel
like
unless
I
don't
know
how
the
hearings
work
for
the
juveniles,
but
it
just
seems
like
one
is.
One
is
harsh.
I
mean
it's
like
you
missed,
jury
duty,
because
you
just
forgot
or
because
you
didn't
get
the
notice
or
and
all
of
a
sudden
your
license
is
suspended.
E
E
I
am
I'm
just
curious
to
know
if
we
have
ever
actually
gone
after
anybody
for
the
juvenile
truancy.
The
time
that's
spent
with
the
police.
It
looks
like
I
don't
want
to
read
the
whole
thing,
but
just
the
gist
of
it
is
that
you
know
the
police
may
have
to
drive
them
to
and
from
a
location
because
they're
out
and
about
when
they
shouldn't
be.
So
I'm
just
curious
to
know.
If
this
is
actually
you
know
active,
and
if
not,
should
we
keep
it
if
it
hasn't
been
used.
C
E
F
Respond
briefly
to
that,
I
know
there
was
an
email
response
that
yeah
we've
had
since
2014
three
cases
in
which
the
police
department
has
enforced
a
curfew
violation
on
juvenile.
None
of
those
three
cases
involved:
violation
of
the
daytime
curfew;
ordinance,
that's
designed
to
help
enforce
truancy
issues.
All
of
those
were
nighttime
curfew,
violation
issues,
so
it
would
go
without
saying.
F
The
cases
that
get
to
the
point
of
us,
referring
something
over
to
the
traffic
corridor
to
the
juvenile
criminal
system
would
would
involve.
You
know
extenuating
circumstances
where
we
either
have
a
real
difficulty
where
parents
are
asking
for
help
managing
an
issue
they're
having
with
the
child
or
we're
having.
In
all
three
of
those
cases,
I
can
tell
you
there
were
more
significant
criminal
offenses
being
investigated
and
and
the
curfew
violations
ended
up
just
being
part
of
the
case
that
was
forwarded
over.
E
The
next
section
is
the
6.24.050
and
6.24.060,
maybe
it's
being
the
only
female
on
the
council,
but
I
do
find
it
odd
that
the
title
of
the
section
only
refers
to
female
breasts,
even
though
there
are
subsections
that
deal
with
like
male
genitalia,
and
so
I
feel
like
the
title
should
either
strike
both
or
should
just
be
very
broad
and
not
refer
to
either
gender
and
maybe
just
say,
prohibition
against
display
of
private
parts
or.
However,
you
want
to
phrase
it,
but
but
I
do
it
definitely
caught
my
eye
that
it
really
focuses
on
females.
E
E
A
Would
it
would
it
be
easier
because
I
see
mark's
jotting
and
looking
mark?
Did
you
want
to
take
a
couple
of
those
maybe
and
and
keep
us
on
truck,
because
I
know
about
false
alarms
like
just
to
be
clarity
too,
when
you're
answering
the
council
member,
you
know
there
are
home,
alarms
and
stuff
that
there
is
a
sequence
of
so
many
you
can
be
charged
and
that
has
been
in
process.
But
once
you
go
ahead
and
then
we'll
go
a
couple
more
questions
and
come
back.
C
Sure
I'm
very
happy
to
do
that.
So
I
think
just
quickly
going
going
back
to
the
question
in
6.14
about
the
reporting
to
the
dmv,
I
think
we
could
easily
make
a
change
to
that.
The
section
right
now
says
shall
report.
We
can
change
that
to
may
report
and
then
I
think
you've
heard
how
the
police
will
exercise
their
their
discretion.
So
that's
something
where
it
might
address
your
your
comment
on
that
council,
member
mason
and
then
on
the
adult
businesses.
C
It's
there
really
should
be
a
comma
in
there,
but
I
I
would
agree
with
you
that
it
would
really
mean
the
same
thing
if
we
just
take
out
the
if
we
just
leave
in
private
parts,
because
that
that
applies
both
to
men
and
women.
So
I
think
that's
that's
an
easy
change
to
what
to
make
and
then,
lastly,
on
the
false
alarm,
so
the
the
the
problem
that
this
ordinance
is
seeking
to
address
is
not
the
the
sounding
of
a
of
an
alarm.
C
C
C
Well,
it
it,
I
believe,
and
I
I
haven't
fully
fully
read
the
the
fee
study,
but
I
was
just
scanning
it
earlier
today.
Maybe
the
police
chief
knows
the
answer
to
this
offhand,
since
it
was
from
his
department.
I
know
there
are
fees
for
a
variety
of
false
alarms
in
that
fee
schedule
for
the
first
one,
second
one
and
so
on.
I
just
don't
remember
the
details
of
that.
A
I
thought
there
was,
for
you
know
false.
You
know
you
have
to
go
to
a
complex
because
the
the
the
fire
alarm
goes
off
multiple
times
yeah
and
then
our
business
and
that
becomes
at
some
level.
Then
I
thought
it
was
in
something
in
the
master
fee
that
that
started
to
trigger
that,
after
x,
number
of
warnings
and
being
being.
C
Gracious
yeah,
I
mean
normally
you
you
know,
you
don't
want
to
necessarily
have
an
automatic
feed
that
the
city
is
required
to
oppose.
Just
when
it
happens,
you
want
to
be
able
to
have
some
discretion
to
figure
out
why
it
happened.
What's
going
on
and
so
on,
but
as
I
say,
there
are
there's
a
quite
a
robust
system
of
fees
that
the
master
fees
get.
A
G
I
had
a
follow-up
question
on
one
of
the
one
of
the
ones
that
was
just
addressed.
Okay,
regarding
the
reporting
to
the
dmv,
and
I'm
just
wondering
it
was
my
understanding
that
once
the
police
issues
a
citation,
it
becomes
a
court
issue.
Then
it's
up
to
the
court
to
decide
what
the
penalty
and
it's
not
really
up
to
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
we,
if
we
at
that
point,
have
the
ability
to
limit
what
the
court
would
would
do
or
not
do.
E
G
But
I
I
don't
even
know
that
a
failure
to
appear
would
be
reported
to
the
police
department.
Would
we
know
that
they
didn't
appear
in
court
after
being
issued
a
citation,
because
I
know
for
a
lot
of
things
once
once
the
police
department
does
their
thing.
They
hand
it
over
to
the
county
to
either
do
prosecution
or
juvenile
cases.
It
goes
to
the
juvenile
court,
but
I'm
just
wondering
do
how
much
authority
we
actually
have
over
that.
E
E
I
don't
know
why
we
need
to
allow
them
so
many
days.
So
maybe
that's
a
compromise
to
a
lot
of
the
complaints
that
we
have
all
gotten,
I
think
definitely
last
year.
So
that
would
be
a
suggested
change
is
to
allow
them
july
3rd
and
4th.
I
don't
really
see
a
lot
of
people
using
safe
insane
fireworks.
To
be
honest
any
other
days
anyway,
the
let's
see
sorry,
I've
got
a
bunch
of
notes.
The
next
section
is
oh
within
that
safe
and
sane
fireworks
section
as
well.
E
Instead
of
this
section
c,
each
violation
of
this
chapter
shall
also
be
punishable
by
a
civil
fine
in
an
amount
set
forth
by
the
city
council
resolution.
I
wanted
to
ask
if
we
have
a
resolution
and
also,
if
it's
also
possible,
just
to
hand
out
a
fine.
So
if
a
police
goes
to
your
house
and
you
get
a
citation,
you
also
get
a
bill
that
same
night.
E
Yeah
and
I
have
not
gotten
a
citation,
thank
you,
but
I
think
my
my
question
is
more
I'm
thinking
of
like
if
you
know
I've
gotten
tickets
with
my
car
parked
right
they
hand
you
the
ticket
and
you've
got
the
100
fine
in
in
the
city.
So
do
you
can
we
do
something
like
that
or
is
it
already
done?
Can
you
explain
that
process
when
someone
cited
on
fourth
of
july,
please.
A
And
just
before
the
the
police
chief
is
here
is
you
know
it
before
it
used
to
be
where
they
brought
them
into
the
station
process
them,
which
obviously
took
a
lot
longer?
So
it
was
then
became
an
administrative
citation
which
the
council
took
the
highest
possible
amount,
which
was
a
thousand
dollars
and
we
were
limited.
So
someone
says
why
don't
you
make
it
five
thousand?
F
Actually,
mr
mayor,
you
pretty
much
summed
it
up
perfectly.
I
think
your
fourth
of
july
ride-alongs
has
paid
off
yeah.
We
do
actually
both
are
true.
We
issue
an
administrative
citation
which
actually
serves
as
their
bill
as
well.
It
includes
the
amount
and
how
to
remit,
payment
and
all
the
instructions.
So
it's
really
kind
of
a
all-inclusive
process.
F
There
is
some
follow-up
that
is
done,
I
believe,
through
the
clerk's
office
in
finance,
as
far
as
you
know,
collection
and
possible
additional
notices,
if
they're
not
receiving
payment
promptly-
and
there
is
an
appeal
process
and
some
other
steps,
but
the
the
sort
of
shortcut
version
you're
describing
council
member
mason
is
essentially
what
happens.
The
police
officer
is
essentially
handing
them
a
bill.
In
essence,
at
the
point
of
the
violation.
A
E
A
You
know
on
that
because
I
just
I
don't
recall
this,
but
my
memory
says
we
used
to
have
a
longer
duration
of
days.
We
shortened
it.
We
also
used
to
have
the
hours
which
we
cut
it
off
sooner
as
far
as
sales,
and
I
know
the
complaints
when
you
said
all
the
complaints
we
get
and
I'm
not
saying
we
didn't
get
complaints
this
year
in
other
communities.
I've
spoken
to
many
of
the
electeds.
A
They
were
happening
way
before,
like
memorial
memorial
day,
they
were
happening
before
the
booths
even
opened
or
were
eligible,
and
that
was
the
illegals
which
are
illegal.
So
I
I
don't
want
to
preface
that
if
there's
I
don't
know
if
you
were
talking
about
usage
or
sales,
but
I
know
planes
and
that
I
was
hearing
or
were
certainly
way
before
the
booths
open,
but
city
attorney
on
the
duration.
C
So
I
I
do
have
a
memory
of
that
as
well.
I'm
afraid
I
don't
have
the
voter
initiative
right
up
in
front
of
me
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody
remembers
exactly
what
it
says,
but
the
the
city
council's
ability
to
further
amend
this
is
somewhat
constrained
by
6.50.080,
and
so
you
know
really
before
answering.
I
need
to
to
look
at
that
initiative.
I
don't
remember
if
there's
a
if
there's
a
beginning
date,
that's
listed
in
that
initiative.
If
anybody
on
the
call
happens
to
recall
that
that
that
would
be.
H
H
E
And
then
those
who
also
are
selling
for
fundraising
is
just
to
limit
that
to
really
the
fourth
of
july,
which
is
the
holiday
and
then
okay.
So
we
talked
about
the
penalty,
then
for
the
this
is
just
a
gen
like
general,
and
this
is
why
I'm
thinking
that
we,
you
might
have
to
take
it
back,
but
the
chapter
6.5
to
the
tobacco
retail
all
pretty
much
the
whole
section
as
it
pertains
to
tobacco
cigarette
use.
Can
we
add
e-cigarettes
to
that,
because
e-cigarettes
are
now
obviously
all
over.
C
It's
in
it's
actually
defined
as
smoking
or
smoke.
It's
it's
in.
The
n
is
in
number
of
the
definitions
of
the
very
next
section:
6.56,
okay,
yeah,
it's
a
little
confusing,
because
we
we
adopted
that
after
you
know
the
tobacco
retailer
permit,
sections
were
in
the
code
well
before
6.56,
but
it
where
it
refers
to.
C
E
Okay
and
I'm
scrolling
up
okay
and
then
the
the
last
question
was
around
the
so
around
the
chapter
6.59
and
the
commercial
cannabis
activities.
I
know
you
had
asked
that
you
had
asked
council
for
direction
in
that
area.
I
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
I
saw
that
the
zoning
went
to
planning
earlier
this
month
and
it's
going
to
be
coming
to
council.
E
Around
zoning
and
this
title
that
includes
commercial
cannabis
is
before
us
tonight,
so
it
doesn't.
I
guess
it
feels
like
staff
is
going
to
be
doing
double
work,
to
make
it
a
priority
at
another
time
when
you're
already
doing
the
zoning
the
zoning's
about
to
be
coming
to
the
council
and
we're
already
looking
at
this
title.
So
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
better
why?
Why
not
just
as
a
practical
matter,
why
we're
not
discussing
it?
As
the
zoning
comes
to
council
and
this
title
six
is
coming
to
council.
C
The
question
is
in
what
zoning
districts
are,
the
is
the
city
going
to
allow
these
activities
that
are
that
are
currently
not
allowed,
and
I
I
think,
by
the
time
the
zoning
is
is
approved.
You
know
this.
This
effort
may
be
completed
as
well.
So
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
kind
of
a
long
roundabout
way
of
saying
we
need
to
you're
right
that
we
need
to
coordinate
those
efforts,
but
I
don't
think
it
means
doing
anything
at
first.
I
think
it
means
they
have
to
all
be
done
together.
E
I
Manager,
I
just
want
to
confirm
what
we're
discussing
is
potentially
advancing
the
marijuana
regulations
so
that
they're
sequenced,
when
the
other
zoning
amendments
come
before
the
city
council.
With
that.
What
I
would
say
is
that
there
is
a
significant
work
effort
to
develop
those
regulations
given
where
we
are
now
and
the
fact
that
the
draft
we've
had
a
consultant
working
for
several
months
on
our
zoning
ordinance
changes.
I
They
have
already
went
to
the
planning
commission
and
will
be
before
the
city
council
on
I
think
under
45
days.
There's
really
just
not
enough
time
to
to
do
the
work
I
mean
doing.
The
marijuana
regulations
is
several
months
that
involves
a
at
least
three
departments
outside
consultants,
and
it
just
can't
be
done.
No,
no
in
the
amount
of
time
that
we're
already
coming
back
with
the
zoning
ordinance
that
has
already
been
through
the
planning
commission,
and
it
would
essentially
be
delaying
that
comprehensive.
I
I
Should
we
decide
to
make
any
amendment.
My
recommendation
would
be
that
we
move
forward
with
the
comprehensive
amendments
that
we're
already
planning
for,
and
we
know
that
there
are
a
number
of
development
projects
and
not
not
just
large
but
also
small
projects.
That
can't
be
done,
because
our
code
is
sometimes
inconsistent.
E
E
I
I
don't
know
what
the
next
steps
would
be
to
be
honest,
because
I
don't
know
if
it,
the
next
step
is
to
take
it
back
to
make
some
of
the
changes
some
of
the
suggested
edits
and
then
bring
it
back
again
or
what
the
council,
if
the
council
says
no,
we
don't
want
to
take
any
of
these
suggestions,
but
I
do
think
especially
around
the
juvenile
truancy.
We.
We
need
to
look
at
some
options
there
around
the
penalties,
and
I
think
we
should
have
a
conversation.
C
Sorry,
just
just
one
comment
about
about
that-
the
I
think
it's
important
for
the
council
to
know
that
the
the
vast
majority
of
the
zoning
changes
that
are
proposed
are
relating
to
housing
and
are
are
not
necessarily
related
and
to
conform.
The
zoning
to
the
transit
quarters
plan
so
they're,
not
specifically
relating
to
where
we
should
have
this
this
business
or
or
that
business
necessarily,
but
they
are
related
mostly
to
housing.
Having
said
that,
I
agree
with
the
city
manager
that
it
we
we
would.
C
A
Yeah
I
mean
just
for
myself.
I
think
the
zoning
was
something
we
put
on
strategic
initiatives.
It
is
critical,
it
has
caused
delays
and
other
things
as,
for
example,
in
the
mills
park
I
mean
we,
we
had
to
adjust
it
because
the
zoning
wasn't
up
current,
and
so
I
would
hate
to
see
the
zoning
postponed
or
delayed
for
any
reason,
because
I
think
it's
important
and
a
lot
of
work
and
time
and
effort
has
been
placed
into
that,
and
I
know
I
think
it's
not
as
quick
as
it
sounds.
A
I
mean
the
cannabis.
I
know
we
had
a
speaker
that
talked
about
burlingames
doing
it.
I
didn't
know
what
that
meant,
but
I
I
know
it's
not
dispensaries.
It
is
delivery
service
in
the
very
specified
area.
So
I
I
I
personally,
I
don't
want
to
see
the
zoning
dulled
or
upheld.
I
think
it's
a
big
thing
off
our
check
checklist.
Vice
mayor
medina.
H
H
H
H
H
One
comment
that
I
would
make
to
to
my
colleagues
here
is:
you
know,
scheduling
that
is
proving
difficult
and
we're
it's
getting
pushed
pushed
out.
I,
for
the
last
two
rounds
of
those
days,
moved
things
to
make
it
work
those
those
dates,
and
I
encourage
everybody
to
do
the
same,
because
the
the
longer
we
push
the
priorities
down
the
road,
the
longer
everybody
wakes
on
on
us,
making
the
changes
that
we
need
to
make
here.
So
that
was
just
a
personal
little
plea
to
my
colleagues.
Thank.
A
H
A
A
So
what
I'd
never
like
to
do
is
take
tools
away,
especially
you
know,
because
just
like
people
say
about
drinking
in
the
park
it's
not
allowed,
but
it
gives
that
officer
that
tool
if
there's
somebody
that
they
spot
or
there's
been
a
call
to
utilize
and
enforce
that.
So
and
and
again
the
city
attorney
would
have
to
clarify
the
other
particulars,
but
because
I'm
so
sorry
I
was
writing
down
and
then,
to
be
honest,
I
lost
track
a
little,
so
city
attorney
any
thoughts.
C
So,
just
a
just
a
couple
of
thoughts,
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
couple
of
the
suggestions
that
we
can
make
without
necessarily
having
to
reintroduce
the
ordinance
at
a
subsequent
meeting.
Let
me
just
quickly
go
through
those,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
the
ones
that
remain
so.
The
first
one
was
a
recommendation
to
a
strike
in
6.56.040
that
section
it's
in
the
smoking
ordinance,
that's
the
one
that
says
it's
not
implemented
until
a
later
date
and
that
date
is
already
passed.
C
So
we
can
certainly
make
that
change
with
respect
then
back
to
a
6.14
with
the
truancy
rate
and
the
the
penalties
you
know,
we
could
certainly
take
a
much
more
comprehensive
look
at
that,
but
I
think
the
the
suggestion
to
you
know
change
shall
to.
May
you
know
if
that's
enough
for
the
city
council,
then
we
can
certainly
do
that
without
reintroducing
that
ordinance
6.24.040
regarding
private
parts
and
gender.
I
think
we
can
easily
take
care
of
that
as
well
again
without
having
to
reintroduce
it.
C
That's
just
changing
the
title,
which
doesn't
really
change
the
ordinance
at
all
and
then
I
think
really
the
the
remaining
two
issues
that
are
more
policy.
Discussions
for
you
are
are
changing
the
date
and
I've
been
looking
while
you've
been
talking
to
see.
If
I
could
find
the
actual
voter
initiative
and
I'm
sorry,
I
can't
locate
it
if
anybody
can
maybe
melissa
or-
or
somebody
can
locate
that
we
can
take
a
look
at
it.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
make
that
change
or
not.
I'd
have
to
bring
bring
it
back.
C
In
order
to
answer
that
question
and
then
the
final
one
is
you
know?
What
do
we
do
about
a
cannabis?
I
think
a
couple
of
council
members
have
indicated
their
thoughts
about
that.
So
I
think
of
all
the
things
that
has
been
discussed.
The
only
one
that
we
really
need
to
take
a
careful
look
at
is
either
the
the
truancy
one
and
or
the
fireworks
one
and.
A
We
could
we
go
forward
and
on
the
fireworks
one
make
a
modification
if
the
majority
of
the
council
felt
to
limit
and
again
it's
not
the
sale
of
its
the
actual
dispensing
of
meaning
utilizing
them.
Can
that
be
done
then,
and
then
the
second
one
is
on
the
truancy,
which
I
think
very
quickly
too.
I
mean
it's
not
been
used
in
214
and
I'm
not
sure
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
pause,
because
I
saw
the
city
manager's
hand
go
up.
A
I
appreciate
that
city
manager.
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
talk
to
the
14
groups.
I
think
it's
a
matter
of.
Is
it
allowed?
Do
we
have
that
latitude
anyway?
If
the
answer
is
no
point
moot,
if
the
answer
is
yes,
what
are
they?
What
are
they
and
then
I
do
you
bring
up
a
very
good
point
that
some
people
do
work
on
the
holiday
and
you
know
so.
Do
we
deprive
them
of
that
council
member
hamilton.
H
So
I
I'm
in
I'm
in
agreement
with
that.
The-
and
you
know
this,
of
course
now
I'm
wading
into
the
political
third
rail
of
fireworks
in
san
bruno,
but
the
the
the
sale
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks
is
and
and
the
usage
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks
are
not,
for
the
vast
majority
of
cases
are
not
the
nuisances
that
people
are
reporting.
H
It's
the
illegals
and
the
illegals
start
months
weeks
and
weeks
before
the
the
legal
sales
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks
begin
and
last
for
weeks
after
so
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
that
making
this
change
is
going
to
improve
anything.
I
I
I
with
with
that
said.
If,
if,
if
staff
wants
to
do
it,
it
can
do
a
little
bit
more
study
and
bring
us
back
some
more
useful
information
on
it.
That's
fine,
but
I
wouldn't
want
to
hold
up
the
passage
of
of
this
section
for
that.
A
C
So
I
think
I
think
the
answer
is
yes,
but
I'm
I'm
not
comfortable
with
a
you
know
if
we
can
adjust
the
dates
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks.
Let's,
let's
do
that.
I
think
that's
a
significant
change
to
the
ordinance
and
if
there's
not
a
majority
at
the
city
council
that
wants
to
direct
us
to
do
that,
then
absolutely
we
can
go
forward
and
I
think
introduce
it.
As
is.
C
A
Yeah,
okay,
why
don't
we
go
around
really
quickly
because
that
will
determine
if
we
go
to
the
first
reading.
I
believe
not
at
this
point
not
changing
the
dates.
Staff
is
not
prepared
unless
they
had
known
about
it
ahead
of
time.
So
I
just
think
and-
and
I
think
mark
you
said
it
well
and
I
know
you're
not
in
san
bruno,
but
I
know
beer
city
experienced
it
too,
because
I
talked
to
your
mayor
and
I
think
it's
the
illegals.
A
That
is
the
problem
we're
having,
and
you
know
I
don't
get
too
many
complaints
about
those
young
people
celebrating
with
the
safe
and
saying
so
anyway.
I
guess
the
question
would
be
do
we
want
to
proceed
with
not
changing
the
dates
and
and
the
firework
fake
insane
fireworks
usage
dates
at
this
time
and
proceed
yes
or
no,
mr
hamilton?
E
I
like
that,
I
thought
we're
looking.
Nobody
knows
right
now
whether
the
dates
can
be
changed,
so
it's
whether
we're
directing
staff
to
look
into
it
further,
which
I
would
support
staff
looking
into
it
further
and
I
didn't
propose,
I
think
the
city
attorney
zafrano
said
sale,
I'm
not
proposing
any
change
to
the
sale,
I'm
proposing
a
change
to
the
use
of
the
fireworks
to
narrow
it
down,
and
I
would
say
yes
because
we're
I
don't
know
when
the
last
time
this
title
was
reviewed,
we're
reviewing
it
now
so.
A
C
Your
head
go
down,
but
you
were
saying
sorry
just
just
for
perspective.
I
think
implicitly,
this
this
chapter
is
reviewed
every
single
year
when
over
the
fourth
of
july
and
everybody
rings
their
hands
about
what?
What
can
we
do
about
it?
So
I'll
just
say
that
that's
it's
a
everybody
knows
what
it
says.
I
think.
G
And
I
know
you
said
yes
or
no,
but
I
I'll
I'll
stipulate
that
I'm
90
sure
that
the
ballot
measure
did
not
include
any
dates,
but
I'm
not
comfortable
changing
those
dates
as
part
of
this
process,
and
I
I
actually
think
that
we
should
solicit
input
from
the
community
before
making
a
change
like
that.
It's
it's
become
a
tradition
here
in
san
bruno
to
do
those
fireworks,
and
so,
if
we
do
decide
to
make
that
policy
change,
I
think
that
needs
to
be
part
of
a
a
different
discussion.
G
This
process
of
cleaning
up
our
municipal
code
has
been
kind
of
a
routine
thing
where
we're
just
looking
for
inconsistencies
and
making
sure
that
we're
lining
up
with
with
state
laws-
and
this
kind
of
seems
like
a
bigger
discussion
to
me.
So
I'm
going
to
say,
I
would
like
to
move
forward
without
changing
those
dates.
Vice.
H
H
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
A
G
H
A
E
E
I
feel
like
if
we
don't
have
a
high
truancy
rate,
it
makes
our
schools
look
bad.
It
makes
our
students
look
bad.
I
mean,
if
that's
not
true,
I
want
to
take
that
out
personally
and
I
think
it's
worth
it
to
determine
whether
that's
true
and
to
look
at
the
penalties
and
and
what
other
cities
have
done
since
these
truancy
rules
came
out.
But
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
if
that
has
already.
A
I'm
going
to
go
because
we
have
another
council
member,
but
I
think
we
all
concur
it
on
the
show.
I'm
sorry
it's
the
chaldea
may
and
I
think
that
again
staff
doesn't
have
that
information
at
this
time
and
again
we
can
direct
them
if
they
had
been
prepared.
Maybe
we
could
have
hammered
all
this
out
tonight,
but
mr
hamilton
council,
member.