►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting August 24, 2021
5. Consent Calendar
A
With
that,
we
will
move
on
to
consent
calendar.
Are
there
any
items
under
consent
that
people
want
to
have
removed
for
a
separate
vote?
Separate
vote
not
seen
any?
Are
there
items
through
the
church,
yeah
actually.
B
I'm
sorry
I
was
a
little
slow
on
the
button
there,
but
I
I
would
like
to
pull
item
j
for
a
separate
vote.
A
Got
it?
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
So
j
will
be
a
separate
anything
else
for
a
separate
vote.
Okay,
seen
not,
this
is
for
comments
or
statements
that
need
to
be
made.
I
have
two,
it
will
be
f
and
I
it
will
just
be
a
comment.
Are
there
any
others
from.
A
The
council
members,
okay,
seeing
none!
Why
don't
we
start
with?
A
A
What
also
we
always
do,
too
is
have
an
alternate
things
happen,
and
so
I
want
to
within
this
action
include
that
vice
mayor
medina
all
be
included
as
the
voting
and
attendee
alternate,
and
since
we
have
the
same
last
names,
it
would
make
it
very
easy.
On
reservations.
A
Going
on
to
I
adopt
a
resolution
approving
amendment
number
five
to
employment
agreement
between
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
mark
zapparano's
city
attorney,
and
I
need
to
read
this,
as
is
required
by
by
code
and
law
for
government
code.
Section
54953c3
item
5i
would
approve
a
2
salary
adjustment
for
the
city
attorney
to
a
salary
of
240
374
retro
active
2
february
7
2021..
A
There
are
no
other
changes
in
the
in
the
compensation
and
then
we
will
move
on
to
item
j
and
if
there's
questions
on
any
of
that,
we'll
we'll
get
through
once
we
go
to
adopt
a
resolution
authorizing
the
city
manager,
the
executive
contract,
with
w-r-e-c-o
for
design
of
the
huntington
avenue
improvements
project
and
an
amount
not
to
exceed
916
945
and
approving
a
300
000
from
measure.
A
funds
council
member.
B
You,
and
so
the
reason
I
wanted
this
one
pulled
for
a
separate
vote-
is
that
I
I
do
intend
to
not
support
this
item.
As
the
council
may
recall
back
when
this
item
first
came
to
us
for
a
decision
on
which
option
we
would
choose,
I
felt
that
spending
the
almost
seven
million
dollars
on
a
short
stretch
of
bike
track
was
incredibly
expensive
and
not
the
right
choice.
B
B
I
feel
that
the
additional
four
million
dollars
that
this
option
will
consume
could
very
well
be
spent
on
other
projects,
including
repairing
potholes
and
fixing
other
streets,
that
the
community
has
also
prioritized,
and
so
since
this
is
coming
back
to
us,
I
would
offer
to
the
council
that
you
know
they
perhaps
reconsider
that
at
this
time,
but
I
intend
not
to
support
that
item.
A
Thank
you
councilmember
for
your
comments
and
explanation.
I'd
like
to
take
two
actions,
one.
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
take
care
of
all
consent
items
with
the
exception
of
j.
Then
I
want
to
go
back
to
j,
to
see
if
there's
comments
and
dialogue
and
then
we'll
vote
on
that
one
separately.
So
at
this
time
for
all
items
on
consent
other
than
j,
is
there
any
council
action.
B
A
D
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
and
thank
you
councilman
salazar.
We
had
a
pretty
extensive
discussion
on
this
and
the
I
was
wondering
if,
if
staff
could
briefly
go
over
the
project
and
and
the
the
available
funding
that
we
have
in
grants
for
the
design
and
the
overall
project
costs,
we
don't
have
the
money
now,
but
when
the,
if
and
when
the
money
becomes
available,
I
think
is
what
we've
talked
a
lot
about.
D
I
totally
understand
councilman
salazar's
point.
It
is
a
lot
of
money.
It
is
a
short
segment
of
street,
but
it's
also
a
big
part
of
the
plan
to
to
improve
bikeability
in
san
bruno
and
just
wanted
to
hear
what
staff
had
to
say
just
to
kind
of
fully
have
it
out
here
to
go
through
this.
A
Thank
you,
city
manager,.
E
Sure,
again,
city
manager,
javon
grogan,
thank
you
juwan
richie,
for
coming
on
screen.
I
was
gonna
turn
it
over
to
you,
after
a
few
brief
comments,
so
not
to
replicate
the
the
conversation
that
we
had
before,
but
but
certainly
in
light
of
councilmember
salazar's
question
question
or
comments,
and
vice
mayor
medina's
request.
We
can
certainly
provide
an
overview
just
as
a
high
level
connecting
our
downtown
our
caltrain
to
tan
friend
and
the
job
center.
E
That
saab
city
is
planning
just
on
our
border,
as
well
as
what
a
reconfigured
tan
trend
is.
Connecting
those
two
areas
to
a
cycle
track,
separated
bike
and
pedestrian
path
is
critically
important.
Having
a
beautiful
design
is
critically
important
and
the
the
recommendation
of
from
staff
was
that
doing
it
and
also
maintaining
the
travel
lanes
that
are
there
is
is
a
important
concept,
and
so
that
is
part
of
the
reason
for
the
increase
in
cost
from
the
original
design
and
as
additional
development
happens
along
our
transit
corridors.
E
Having
that
viking
pedestrian
path
to
connect
the
bark
station
simply
to
caltrain,
we
do
believe,
will
generate
in
less
traffic
less
vehicle
traffic,
because
people
will
be
able
to
get
to
the
job
centers
in
our
downtown
using
that
bike
and
pay
a
corridor.
It
is
absolutely
true
that
the
project
is
unfunded.
E
We
do
have
a
grant
that
are
funded
and
we
are
on
a
grant
timeline
to
extend
those
monies,
and
so
the
monies
that
we
are
proposing
to
do
this
work
with
and
expand
meet
that
grant
target.
It
is
interim
director
richie.
Will
you
please
give
an
overview
of
the
unfunded
amount?
I
wanna
say
it's
for
three
to
four
million
dollars
at
this
point,
but
I
just
don't
to
quote
it
from
the
top,
but
we
are
looking
to
cover
that
in
a
number
of
ways.
E
Yes,
it's
true
that
any
money
we
receive,
whether
it's
development
impact-
these
are
community
benefits,
could
go
to
any
number
of
needed
improvements
in
the
city,
and
so
I'm
not
saying
that
to
counter
what
council
member
salazar
said,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
point
that
we
are
certainly
striving
to
have
a
fully
funded
project
and
knowing
that
we
don't
want
to
do
that,
to
the
detriment
of
some
of
our
of
the
resources
we
have
today.
F
Yes,
thank
you,
city
manager,
brogan
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
city,
council,
members,
hayward,
ritchie,
interim
public
works
director,
council,
member
salazar.
I
I
would
like
to
address
your
concern
and
regarding
this
item
I
would
like
to
clarify
that
there
were
two
segments
that
were
proposed
for
design,
which
is
the
first
segment
from
hermann
to
huntington,
sorry,
herman
to
san
bruno
avenue
close
to
the
caltrain
station
and
that
half
is
fully
funded
with.
You
know
mostly
grant
fundings.
F
There
is
some
local
match
associated
with
that,
but
the
direction
at
the
time
was
to
also
look
into
funding
the
design
for
the
entire
portion,
and
so
because
the
grounds
are
going
to
the
southern
half,
which
is
from
huntington
to
the
caltrain
state,
sorry
from
hermann
to
the
caltrain
station
that
is
fully
funded
in
order
to
do
the
design
of
the
northern
half.
That's
where
the
additional
300
000
appropriation
is
coming
from,
because
the
grant
is
fully
funding
the
southern
half
of
the
project.
F
And
so
I
would
say
that
you
know
we
are
able
to
do
half
with
primarily
grant
funding,
and
so
you
know
to
consider
not
you
know,
potentially
denying
the
whole
project
based
on
a
portion
of
it
being
unfunded
and
to
clarify
the
southern
half
is
where
it's
contest
anticipating
to
be
about
two
and
a
half
million
to
three
million
dollars,
and
then
the
northern
half
is
the
four
million
dollars.
That's
currently
unfunded.
B
Right
and
and
and
just
to
clarify
that
the
four
4.2
million
dollars
is
the
piece
that
is
a
concern
to
me,
mostly
because
you
know
we,
we
did
have
a
viable
alternative
that
could
have
been
completely
funded
with
the
existing
funds,
although
not
as
elaborate
and
probably
not
as
attractive
as
the
one
that
we
are
choosing,
but
the
additional
four
million
dollars
which
has
yet
to
be
identified,
I
believe,
could
be
used
in
a
lot
of
different
places.
B
And-
and
I
I
realize
that
this
is
an
important
segment
because
of
the
fact
of
its
connecting
job
centers
to
to
our
transit
points.
B
But
there's
also
been
requests
from
residents
to
improve
the
cycle
tracks
from
their
residences
down
to
the
the
transit
centers
and
those
aren't
being
addressed,
and
you
know
those
four
million
dollars
once
we
do
identify
them
could
also
be
used
for
those
projects.
B
So
you
know
really
my
concern
here
is
that
we,
you
know
we're
we're
buying
the
rolls
royce.
We
we
could
do
with
the
chevy,
and
we
could
actually
buy
a
few
chevys
with
this
money
and
actually
get
a
lot
more
mileage
out
of
this.
So
that's
why
I
still
really
can't
support
this,
but
thank
you
for
the
for
the
additional
information.
G
My
understanding
was
that
the
the
the
principal
difference
between
the
option
that
we
that
we
approved
and
the
the
less
expensive
option
was
the
that
the
less
expensive
option
removed
elaine
from
huntington,
and
that
was
the
that
I'm
not
voting
for
this,
because
it's
nicer-
I'm
not
voting
for
this,
because
it's
because
I
want
us
to
have
a
rolls-royce
instead
of
a
chevy.
G
I'm
voting
for
this
because
we're
moving
elaine
on
huntington
when
we
know
that
we're
going
to
have
thousands
of
cars
going
to
that
new
center
in
across
the
border
in
south
city
that
are
going
to
be
using
that
every
day
and
hearing
directly
from
our
police
chief
who's,
where
we
have
the
police
station
on
that
stretch
of
road
and
he's
been
hearing
from
the
police
chief
saying
that
he
would
be
adamantly
against
removing
elaine
from
huntington.
G
Those
were
the
reasons
that
I'm
voting
for
this,
not
because
it's
it's
nicer
or
flashier.
I
agree
with
you.
I
wish
it
was
cheaper.
I
do
I
do.
I
do
think
this
is
a
lot
of
money
and
I
do
think
that
that
money
could
be
if
we
were
able
to
repurpose
it
to
other
places.
That
would
be
great,
but
if
that's
not,
that
was
not
one
of
the
options,
so
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
on
that.
Thank
you.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues
on
jay,
just
I
am
I
had
been
then
as
far
as
not
wishing
the
lane
being
discontinued,
I
think
it's
just.
I
just
find
it
challenging
to
have
one
lane
on
huntington.
In
addition
to,
I
think
it
solidified
with
our
chief
just
concerned
with
safety
and
other
elements
and
getting
to
and
from
locations
from
our
department
as
well,
but
it
is
the
council
member
salazar
is,
is
correct.
We
city
manager
is
correct.
A
There
is
a
time
element
of
a
base
from
the
1.4
to
the
2
million
dollars.
The
transportation
authority
issued
there's
a
window
in
which
to
utilize
that,
but
it
is
costly.
There
is
no
doubt
and
council
member
salazar
is
correct
about
other
desires
from
the
rest
of
our
community
as
well.
Vice
mayor
medina.
D
Thank
you.
Great
questions
got
to
support
my
chief
police
when
he
says
do
not
take
a
lane.
My
question
to
staff
now
is
if
they
could
provide
some
additional
information
on
the
scheduling
of
how
long
it's
anticipated
this
design
would
take.
E
I
think
part
of
that
question
with
regard
to
timing,
director
richie
should
answer
and
so
hey
juan.
Can
you
take
that
and
then
I'll
take
the
financial.
F
Yes,
it
is
on
a
fast
track
because
we
are
trying
to
meet
the
deadlines.
The
phase
one
design
completion
is
anticipated
in
july
and
august,
because
this
is
federal
funds.
There
are
quite
a
few
groups
we
need
to
jump
through
and
in
order
to
obtain
authorization
to
proceed
with
construction,
but
that
is
our
current
deadline
for
design.
E
With
regards
to
funding
the
additional
four
million
dollars,
as
director
rick,
you
mentioned,
a
portion
is
or
portion,
one
is
fully
funded
and
there's
the
remaining
gap,
and
so
we
are
first
and
foremost
looking
to
community
benefits
and
development
impact
fees.
There
are
a
number
of
avenues
there,
I'll
just
frankly
talk
about
two.
We
are
actively
in
negotiations
with.
E
The
development
that
is
planned
to
occur
in
south
san
francisco
right
at
huntington
and
smith,
south
line,
is
the
developer
or
south
line
is
the
name
of
the
of
the
project,
I'm
actually
blanking
on
the
developers
lane
partners
as
a
developer,
so
we're
actively
in
negotiations
with
lane
partners
for
community
benefits
tied
to
that
project.
E
In
addition,
in
just
a
few
weeks,
the
city
council
will
have
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
and
youtube
phase,
one
that
comes
with
a
total
financial
benefit
package
of
130
million
over
a
20-year
da.
However,
as
a
part
of
that
da,
there
is
a
prepayment
for
phases,
one
and
two
that
will
total
56
million.
A
portion
of
that
is
development,
impact
fees
and
26
million
of
that
is
community
benefits.
So
the
city
could
should
that
approval
happen
and,
and
that
project
be
the
source.
You
can
utilize
those
funds.
E
We
are
again
actively
in
negotiations
with
lane
partners
and
then
there
there
there
are
other
projects
in
the
area
as
well
as
well
as
the
the
tan
tran,
which
I
think
will
come
later
than
the
timeline
for
this.
But
there
may
be
funds
there
that
that
could
be
shifted
around
if
not
front
loaded,
so
at
a
high
level,
know
that
we're
working
on
it
and
know
that
there
are
our
areas,
but
we
are.
We
are
planning
for
that
better
tomorrow
for
san
bruno.
D
So
we
would,
there
would
be
a
span
of
time
where
we
would
have
the
opportunity
to
determine
where
our
funding
would
come
from
being
that
the
design
would
be
completed
july
august,
and
then
then
it
would
go
out
for
bid.
We
would
see
that
decision
to
be
made,
maybe
october
november,
of
2022.
D
Okay,
all
right,
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
rough
timeline,
so
there
is
time
on
our
side
there
I
am
in
support
of
this
project.
I
understand
the
cost
of
it.
I
understand
the
vision
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
have
safe
routes
for
bicyclists
to
to
go
from
tanfran
to
the
cal
train
station.
D
D
F
We
have
all
the
funding,
that's
needed
to
do
the
southern
half,
and
what
this
recommendation
is
is
that
the
northern
half
be
designed
so
that
when
the
funding
does
become
available
and
staff
does
actively
try
to
obtain
grant
funding,
and
if
that
were
to
be
successful,
that
could
be.
That
would
be
phased.
That
could
be
phased
at
a
later
date,
so
we
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
try
to
find
the
funding
before
then
I
mean
if,
if
we
did
that's,
of
course
they
could
be
constructed.
B
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
a
few
other
points,
so
I
I
am
also
definitely
absolutely
in
favor
of
safe
bicycle
routes,
and
you
know
if
we
really
wanted
to
do
a
cheap
solution.
We
could
just
paint
green
arrows
on
the
street
and
have
bikes
share
with
cars,
but
I
know
that's
not
what
we're
after
and
we
did
have
a
viable
solution.
B
That
was
a
much
more
affordable
solution
in
my,
in
my
opinion,
that
still
would
have
given
us
that,
although,
as
council
member
hamilton
mentioned
it
would
have
been
at
the
cost
of
elaine.
B
Another
point
I
wanted
to
make
there
is
that
we
also
saw
the
traffic
study
associated
with
this
showed
that
the
traffic
conditions
would
degrade
to
letter
grade
f,
regardless
of
what
we
do,
whether
or
not
we
take
away
the
lane
it's
going
to
degrade
anyway.
That's
just
it's
it's.
What
anticipated,
so
the
traffic
will
become
horrible.
So
I
believe,
if
pd
has
a
concern,
they
should
still
have
a
concern
about
the
location
of
their
station.
B
Fortunately,
most
calls
for
police,
unlike
fire,
don't
originate
from
the
police
station
and
the
units
are
out
patrolling
a
beat
and
they're
in
the
community,
usually
when
the
calls
come
in,
and
so
they
won't
necessarily
need
to
respond
from
that
station,
as
I
mentioned,
as
opposed
to
a
call
for
fire
which
would
probably
originate
at
station
51
or
52.,
and-
and
so
then
you
know
that
to
me
helps
with
that
concern.
Although
the
chief
did
say
it
was
a
concern
to
him.
B
I
don't
think
that
this
particular
option
actually
makes
anything
any
different
or
any
better,
and
if
we
are
looking
for
a
community
benefit,
I
believe
relocating
that
station
away
from
an
area.
That's
so
isolated
and
is
inevitably
going
to
be
impacted
would
be
something
that
we
should
be
looking
to
resolve,
and
you
know-
and
I
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
revenue-
that's
being
anticipated.
We
put
a
lot
of
things
in
place
that
will
start
paying
off
as
development
continues,
but
yeah.
B
I
want
to
go
back
to
something
that
our
city
manager
told
us
a
while
ago,
and
that
was,
if
you
find
yourself
in
a
hole,
you
stop
digging
we're
in
a
hole,
and
this
four
million
dollars
is
another
few
shovelfuls
of
dirt.
That
puts
us
farther
deeper
in
where
we
are,
and
so
when
we
started
looking
at
revenue
sources,
it
was
to
address
existing
deficits
and
if
we
keep
creating
more
deficits,
we're
not
going
to
get
out
of
the
hole
so
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you.
H
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
say:
do
you
think
it's
important
to
have
the
lane
provided
the
11
000
employees
expected
to
go
to
the
new
facility
that
south
city
is
building
and
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
with
san
fran
at
this
point?
That
could
be
a
significant.
H
You
know
significantly
more
traffic,
and
I
think
the
city
is
looking
at
alternatives
as
far
as
where
the
police
department's
eventually
going
to
go,
where
I
think
this
council
has
been
a
prudent,
financially
was
when
we
had
posey
park
and
we
selected
the,
I
think
you
know
1.5
million
dollar
option
that
was
less
than
the
most
expensive
option
that
was
proposed,
but
this
really
is
an
area
where
I
think
that
we
need
to
look
forward
and
look
at
how
we're
going
to
mitigate
traffic,
and
I
don't
think
that
we
can.
H
I
don't
know
who
it
was,
but
at
one
point
somebody
said
like
wish
cars
away.
I
think
it's
gonna
be
a
long
time
before
we
get
there
and
hopefully,
by
the
time
we
get
there.
We
have
the
money
to.
You
know,
carry
out
the
plan
that
council
member
salazar
sees.
You
know
sees
fit,
which
I
think
would
be
great
in
the
future.
H
I
did
want
to
just
actually
jump
in
to
make
sure
that
the
city
manager
is
clear
on
funding,
because
I
know
I
walk
around
and
people
say
well
you're
getting
100
million
dollars
from
youtube,
and
you
know
I
want
to.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
kind
of
set
the
stage
right
now.
H
Do
we
have
100
million
right
now
and
are
we
even
close
to
that
number,
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
my
understanding
is
that
unless
the
development
occurs,
we
are
not
going
to
get
that
money,
and
so
I
just
don't
want
anybody
who's
watching
to
think
that
we're
sitting
on
all
this
money
and
and
not
using
it.
E
Sure
I
I
can
caveat
that
further.
I
I
thought
I
used
a
lot
of
gifts
there,
but
but
absolutely
there
the
youtube
phase,
one
as
well
as
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
did
receive
unanimous
approval
from
the
planning
commission
and
will
be
in
the
next
few
weeks
coming
forward
to
the
city
council
city
council
doesn't
have
to
approve
them,
so
it
is
a
recommendation
and
so
that
that's
the
biggest
caveat
one
the
city
council
has
to
approve
it.
E
We
approve
the
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
and
said
you
approve
youtube
phase
one
you
still
can't
make
anyone
build
youtube.
Has
throughout
this
process,
this
more
than
sort
of
four
million
dollar
endeavor
on
their
part.
E
Just
in
city
fees
has
been
concurrently
processing
their
phase
one
and
in
our
development
agreement
negotiations
that
is
codified
in
the
materials
that
went
to
the
planning
commission
and
will
be
before
you.
They
have
agreed
to
prepay
the
fees
for
phases,
one
and
two
when
they
receive
their
foundation
permit,
which
we
anticipate
to
occur
based
on
the
current
schedule
in
2022.
E
The
the
revenue
to
the
city
for
that
phase,
one
and
phase
two
payment
will
come
in
a
number
of
buckets
development
impact
fees,
affordable
housing
fees,
area
impact
fees.
I
know
these
are
sort
of
terms
that
everyone
will
not
relate
to
as
well
as
community
benefits,
and
so
you
know
we
we
articulated
that
at
the
planning
commission,
we
will
re-articulate
all
of
that
at
the
city
council
meeting
at
meetings-
plural,
that
we
will
discuss
that
project.
But
yes,
it
is
a.
E
It
is
a
planning
effort
and
a
property
owner,
slash
developer,
that
is
making
commitments
to
invest,
but
until
those
investments
occur
and
the
it
is
a
20-year
development
agreement
and
so
with
five
phases,
and
so
there
will
be
quite
some
time
before
that
that
that
revenue
is
received
and
there
certainly
caveats
with
development.
So
I
hope
that
that
clarifies.
A
We
also
have
members
of
the
puppet.
If
you
have
thoughts
or
comments,
I
do
see
we
have.
Somebody
has
raised
their
hand.
If
anybody
else,
please
feel
free
to
do
it
at
this
time
and
city
clerk,
if
you
could
bring
them
in.
C
Good
evening,
can
you
hear
me
yes,
whenever
you're
ready
yeah,
if
the
the
plan
is
to
use
bart
and
caltrain
and
ride
your
bike,
why
is
traffic
gonna
get
exponentially
bad?
That's
my
question.
C
Sure,
in
the
meantime,
councilmember
mason,
if
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
force
it
your
hand,
is
ready.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
all
right.
Give
me
a
call
all
right,
I'm
good!
The
mayor
is
having
technical
difficulties,
so
there's
a
question
from
the
public.
The
staff
have
the
ability
to
answer
that
question.
F
Yes,
thank
you.
I
will
do
my
best
to
try
to
answer
answer
the
transportation
traffic
engineering
question.
My
understanding
is
that
there
is
a
model
and
built
into
that
model.
Is
future
growth?
That's
anticipated
throughout
the
region,
and
you
know
with
increased
population
growth,
there
is
increased
traffic
also
along
with
that
growth,
and
so
I
believe
the
emphasis
moves
towards
trying
to
make
multi-modal
transportation
more
appealing
and
attempting
to
have
more
workers
and
people
use,
public
transportation
and
other
modes
of
travel
such
as
bicycling
and
walking.
A
H
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
say:
I
know
that
who
wouldn't
generally
entered
any
discussions
with
the
public,
but
just
from
the
last
update
that
we
had
received
from
the
new
south
city
development,
which
will
go
through
san
bruno
streets,
mr
wipinski,
you
may
you
may
not
know
but
they're,
anticipating
11
000
employees
and
building
parking
for
six
thousand
of
them,
which
means
that
those
six
thousand
would
likely
be
going
through
us.
There
are
streets
and
that
doesn't
include
the
sky
park
that
was
sold
to
amazon.
H
That's
acres,
that's
you
know
a
couple
acres
I
mean
apologies.
That's
that's
expected
to
have
a
number
of
employees
which
we
don't
know
yet
how
many,
and
that
also
doesn't
include
the
tanfran
and
what
the
plans
for
that
are.
So
we
know
for
sure
that
it's
at
least
going
to
be
anticipate
eleven
thousand
employees
and
that's
just
the
cell
city
development
and
again
they're
they're
building
six
thousand
parking
slots.
According
to
the
last
update
that
council
got.
E
Yes,
I
was
going
to
chime
in
after
director
with
ritchie
and
just
add
that
what
that
traffic
analysis
showed
for
the
area
along
huntington
is
not
a
typical
for
transit-centered
areas.
Just
on
the
balcony,
in
regions
like
ours,
the
expectation
is
that
growth
will
happen
around
transit.
E
This
area
is
transit,
risk,
101,
280,
380
bar
caltrain,
high
capacity
bus
route,
as
well
as
a
stone's
throw
from
sfo,
and
so
it's
not
surprising
that
any
traffic
analysis
in
areas
of
san
bruno,
irrespective
of
of
of
the
projects,
we're
talking
about,
will
show
a
increase
in
traffic
and
what
is
shown
here
is
a
increase
even
with
additional
multimodal
bike
and
pedestrian.
E
And
so
that
is,
I
think,
part
of
the
rationale
for
doing
this.
Project
is
because
the
cycle
track
will
increase
multimodal
transportation
and
provide
that
linkage
to
barton
caltran
and
those
job
centers
in
our
downtown,
where
we
have
upzone
too,
and
so
over
time,
we'll
have
more
housing
units,
and
so
having
that
connection
is
important
to
get
people
out
of
their
cars
to
decrease
the
amount
of
traffic
that
we
have
that
we
will
see,
even
though
you're
at
the
the
conversation
we're.
Having
is
absolutely
right.
E
Traffic
will
degrade
even
at
the
sort
of
no
project
scenario
that
that
was
analyzed.
D
Please
make
a
motion
to
approve.