►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting July 13, 2021
Whole Meeting
trt 2:58:15
A
All
right
good
evening,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
san
bernardino
city
council,
meeting
of
july
13
2021,
beginning
at
seven
o'clock,
and
I
will
ask
our
city
clerk.
If
she
could
please
take
roll.
A
C
A
Thank
you,
mr
hamilton.
Now
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
three
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
Individuals
allowed
up
to
three
minutes:
it
is
the
council
policy
to
refer
matters
raised
in
this
forum
to
staff
for
investigation
and
our
action
where
appropriate
brown
act,
prohibits,
counsel
from
discussing
or
acting
upon
any
matter,
not
agendas
pursuant
state
law.
If
there
are
folks
that
wish
to
speak
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda,
this
would
be
the
appropriate
time
to
please
raise
your
hand,
and
I
will
ask
our
city
clerk.
D
It
makes
a
huge
difference
and
I
hope
you'll
continue
to
have
this
done
downtown's
starting
to
look
a
lot
cleaner
and
brighter,
and
I
want
to
encourage
you
to
continue
to
put
your
efforts
into
our
downtown.
I
recognize
that
the
wind
plays
a
large
part
in
the
garbage
swirling
around,
and
I
believe
our
city
can
do
more.
D
Here
are
just
a
few
of
my
suggestions
for
some
five
minute
projects:
one
remove
the
following:
the
fallen
sides
of
the
garbage
cans
they're,
a
safety
hazard.
I
often
find
them
laying
on
the
ground
two
remove
the
newspaper
racks
that
a
certain
someone
is
using
for
personal
storage
in
front
of
starbucks
three
make
the
merchants
who
throw
their
grease
in
the
cans
clean
up
and
power
wash
around
the
cans,
especially
if
we're
getting
new
garbage
cans.
D
Four
fill
the
areas
around
the
trees
and
bring
the
dirt
to
grade
level.
So
no
one
trips
into
the
depth
of
the
area
and
five
have
code
enforcement,
keep
our
present
the
presence
of
the
storefronts
that
have
closed
up
to
some
kind
of
code.
A
lot
of
them
have
paper
on
them.
The
paper's
ripping
off
the
windows
are
dirty.
I
believe
that
we
can
make
downtown
look
a
lot
more
presentable
with
just
a
better
presentation
in
the
closed
storefronts
and
thank
you
all
very
much.
I'm
done.
D
I
have
a
suggestion
that,
even
though,
or
in
the
future,
when
we
do
go
back
to
in
person,
I
I
suggest
I
recommend
that
you
keep
the
zoom
for
people
who
can't
attend
the
meetings
but
want
to
speak.
Thank
you.
A
A
First
item
item:
a
not
vaccinated
against
covet
19.
Yet
now
is
the
time
there
are
two
options
find
a
free
vaccination
site.
You
can
visit,
smc,
health.org
vaccine
clinic
calendar
or
call
just
call
2-1-1
for
san
mateo
county
and
the
county
partner
operator
will
get
you
situated
with
clinics,
or
you
can
certainly
go
online,
which
has
been
quite
a
bit
now
for
visit.
My
turn.ca.gov
or
you
can
call.
A
Or
other
local
sites,
including
our
local
pharmacies.
So,
just
again,
I
think
our
council
is
behind
that.
We
think
it's
important
and
we
encourage
you
as
well,
and
there
are
many
options
and
opportunities.
A
A
This
is
something
that
we
want
to
acknowledge
as
a
community
and
I'm
going
to
be
presenting
an
award
on
that
behalf.
And
there
is
a
lot
of
verbiage.
But
this
person
has
given
decades
to
this
community,
and
so
I
think
it
appropriate
to
acknowledge
those
achievements
accolades
and
the
service
and
love
that
she
has
for
this
community.
A
Whereas
judith
piccini
was
promoted
to
increasing
roles
of
responsibility
during
her
16
years
on
the
staff
at
cappuccino.
High
school,
culminating
in
her
appointment
to
executive
assistant
to
the
principal
during
those
16
years
on
the
staff
at
cappuccino.
High
school
was
honored
and
revered
for
her
dedication
to
enriching
school
climate
for
students,
staff
and
teachers
in
ways
that
are
legendary
and
whereas
judith
pachini
long
after
retirement
was
still
assisting
cappuccino
high
school
in
a
volunteer
capacity,
including
mending
and
laundering
school
sport
team
items
and
uniforms
and
helped
to
create
the
cappuccino.
A
Alumni
association
serving
as
the
board.
Vice
president
committing
hours
weekly
to
connecting
alumni
in
meaningful
ways
with
the
school
and
writing.
Successful
grants
to
enhance
educational
programs,
support
cappuccino's
vision
and
mission
and
whereas
judith
paccini
exemplary
service
in
the
san
mateo
county,
included.
Appointment
to
the
grand
jury
and.
A
The
superior
court
and
board
of
supervisors
to
the
juvenile
justice
and
delinquency
prevention
committee
serving
for
12
years
and
to
the
board
of
directors
for
parents
who
care
president
and
17th
district
of
the
pta
coordinated
the
drug
diversion
program
for
project
pegasus
and
coordinated
south
county
schools,
drug
and
alcohol
consortium,
and
whereas
judith
cheney
has
served
on
the
city
of
san
bruno
culture
and
arts
commission
and
on
the
board
of
directors
of
the
western
arts.
Volunteering
at
the
gallery
in
san
bruno.
A
It
is
my
honor
to
give
this
to
somebody
well
deserving
overdue,
but
very
important,
and
these
were
the
times
of
before
facebook
and
posting
or
nextdoor.
You
did
it.
You
did
it,
because
you
had
a
commitment
and
a
desire
and
a
passion
to
leave
things
better
than
you
found
it
and
to
make
a
difference
along
the
way
and
judith
piccini
aka
judy
has
done
just
that.
A
We
are
honored
and
proud
to
have
her
and
to
have
the
ability
that
she
touched
many
lives
from
when
I
met
her
as
a
student
at
cappuccino
high
school
today.
So
it
is
with
my
honor
and
privilege
to
award
that
to
her
and
thank
her
again
from
a
grateful
community.
B
Is
everyone
able
to
see
the
presentation
thumbs
up?
Thank
you.
Okay.
First
off
tonight
we
are
going
to
discuss
the
gubernatorial
recall
election,
which
has
been
declared
by
the
california
secretary
of
state
is
to
be
held
on
september,
14
2021,
as
well
as
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
november
2021
election
one
second
here
so
earlier
this
month,
the
california
secretary
of
state
did
announce
that
september.
14
2021,
that
is
a
tuesday,
would
be
the
gubernatorial
recall
election
date.
B
This
is
a
state
election.
It
will
be
held
in
all
counties
across
the
state
and
because
this
was
announced
later
than
normal
july
is
a
pretty
late
date
to
announce
a
september
election.
We
also
were
faced
with
sb
152,
which
was
adopted
on
june
28
2021.
B
sb
152,
basically
states
that
we
would
have
had
to
have
called
an
election
prior
to
june
15
2021
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
consolidate
a
local
election
with
san
mateo
county
so
that
it
would
fall
on
september,
14
2021,
the
gubernatorial
election,
because
we
did
not
do
that
because,
frankly,
sb
152
was
adopted
on
june
28
2021.
B
We
were
unable
to
place
any
ballot
measure
on
the
september
14th
election
date.
Now
there
are
some
details
here
that
are
bulleted.
I
won't
read
them
all
to
you,
I'm
sure
they
can
get
a
little
confusing
because
they
are
directly
from
legislation,
but
it
it
details
what
spp,
sb
152
is
as
far
as
the
details
that
we
need
specifically
for
local
elections.
B
What
this
means
is,
if
we
had
had
a
resolution
to
create
a
ballot
measure
to
place
with
the
gubernatorial
recall
election
date,
we
would
have
had
to
have
picked
a
special
election
date
ourselves
and
that
date,
in
order
to
be
consolidated
with
the
gubernatorial
recall,
would
have
had
to
have
fallen
within
30
days
before
the
september
14th
date
or
30
days
after
that
date
for
us
to
be
eligible
to
consolidate,
and
because
we
had
not
done
so,
we
we
don't.
We
cannot
qualify
to
place
any
measure
on
the
september
14th
election
date.
B
So,
for
this
kind,
this
next
slide
here
is
for
september
14th,
as
well
as
a
potential
stand-alone
election
in
november.
Keep
in
mind,
there
is
no
set
november
election
this
year
that
has
been
announced.
Typically
in
even
years,
there
are
elections
in
november
odd
years.
There
are
special
elections
in
november
and
there
has
been
no
special
election
date
in
november
from
san
mateo
county
announced
at
this
point
scenario,
one
that
we
have
listed
here
in
relation
to
estimated
election
costs.
B
It
would
be
a
special
election
date
that
we
would
basically
be
creating.
We
did
receive
a
quote
from
san
mateo
county
elections
division
in
may
of
this
year.
That
gave
us
a
quote:
a
price
quote
of
421
000
up
to
505
000,
to
hold
an
election
to
have
one
ballot
measure
placed
on
a
special
election
in
2021.
B
Now
I
did
want
to
note
that
the
city
of
belmont
recently
asked
for
their
own
purposes,
for
a
quote
for
a
standalone
special
election
in
november
2021,
no
specific
date
for
two
ballot
measures
and
they
were
given
a
price
quote
of
six
hundred
and
eighty
one
thousand
six
hundred
dollars
up
to
eight
hundred
and
seventeen
thousand
nine
hundred
and
twenty
dollars
for
services
rendered
by
san
mateo
county
elections
division.
Should
they
hold
that
special
election.
B
A
Okay,
we
could
stop
sharing
the
screen
and
then
I'm
gonna,
please
and
then
I'm
gonna
call
on
council
a
member
mason.
A
F
My
connection
not
too
great,
I
just
learned
the
information
requested
for
a
couple
items
didn't
have
to
cost
me
the
same
amount
to
fix
one
whole
park.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
will
support
that
special
city
election
at
this
point,
so.
F
F
I
just
I
wouldn't
support
it
at
this
point,
but
I
really
appreciate
the
work
put
into
this
and
and
hopefully
next
time
we
would
kind
of
get
ahead
of
the
ball
around
the
june
15
state
if
there,
if
there
is
a
next
time,
but
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
getting
the
work
done
and
again
for
the
cost
that
would
be,
you
know,
cost
to
fix
an
entire
park
for
us
in
downtown.
So
thank
you
so
much.
A
We
got
that.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments.
A
We
do
have
somebody
from
the
public
and
if
a
city
clicker
you'd
be
so
kind.
D
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
rupinski.
The
proposed
special
election
for
november
would
have
been
to
have
a
rotating
mayor
instead
of
a
directly
elected
mayor
for
san
bruno.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
see
no
other
hands
up
and
none
for
my
colleagues.
We
will
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
announcements.
Presentations,
item
d
receive
a
report
from
the
san
bernardino,
police
and
fire
departments
regarding
july
4th,
2021
public
safety
operations
and
we'll
turn
it
over
to
our
police
chief
and
then
to
our
fire
chief.
G
D
G
City
clerk:
are
you
able
to
stop
my
screen
share?
Am
I
the
only
one
who's
able
to
stop
that.
D
G
Are
you
able
to
see
my
screen
now
great?
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening,
mr
mayor
members
of
council
and
members
of
the
community
that
are
watching
from
home.
My
name
is
ryan
johansen.
I
am
your
chief
of
police
here
in
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
I'll,
be
joined
this
evening
by
our
fire
chief,
ari
delay,
as
well
in
an
effort
to
give
a
brief
recap
of
our
fourth
of
july
safety
operations.
G
The
annual
report
we
get
following
the
fourth
of
july
to
inform
everybody
about
our
operations,
the
statistical
data
and
the
outcomes.
So
digging
right
in
here
a
little
bit
of
background
information,
so
safe
and
sane
fireworks
are
permitted
in
san
bruno.
This
is
via
voter
measure
g
in
2005,
through
voter
approval
and
as
a
result,
the
fourth
of
july
presents
a
number
of
safety
challenges
for
police
and
fire,
not
only
on
the
4th
of
july
itself,
but
really
in
the
days
immediately,
prior
and
immediately
following
the
4th
of
july.
G
Mostly,
this
pertains
to
the
use
of
illegal
fireworks
before,
during
and
after
the
4th,
but
also
we
have
problems
with
large
and
rurally
gatherings.
The
increased
use
of
alcohol
that
comes
with
the
celebrations-
and
this
is
always
exacerbated
to
a
certain
degree
when
the
fourth
of
july
falls
on
a
weekend
which
last
year
fell
on
a
saturday.
This
year
fell
on
the
sunday,
so
the
last
two
years
have
been
a
bit
busier
than
most
with
it
falling
on
a
weekend.
G
Some
of
the
things
we
do
immediately
to
address
this
are
really
an
expansive
education,
prevention
and
enforcement
operation
or
campaign
every
year,
and
it's
important
to
understand
and
we'll
talk
a
couple
of
times
here
today
about
the
fact
that
these
operations
are
almost
entirely
funded
by
the
sale
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks,
taxes
that
are
imposed
on
those
sales
and
and
nonetheless,
while
we
do
the
best
we
can
and
we're
going
to
talk
a
lot
about
that
here
this
evening.
G
All
this
education,
prevention
and
enforcement
does
not
and
will
not
ever
stop
the
use
of
illegal
fireworks.
In
the
city
of
san
bruno
pre-fourth
of
july,
we
engage
in
a
number
of
operations
in
an
effort
to
get
out
ahead
of
this
problem
every
year.
The
first
among
those
is
that
we
complete
a
robust
incident
action
plan,
and
this
really
is
a
plan
that
is
fairly
extensive.
It
incorporates
a
unified
command
between
police
and
fire
accounts
for
all.
G
We
also
create
a
joint
public
safety
announcement
with
fire.
This
gets
built
in
video
and
is
disseminated
through
our
various
social
media
platforms,
numerous
times
before
the
fourth
of
july,
in
an
effort
to
educate
the
community
year
over
year
about
the
potential
dangers
of
use
of
illegal
fireworks,
the
legal
ways
to
use
safe
and
sane
fireworks
and
the
potential
penalties
associated
with
using
illegal
fireworks
or
misusing
safe
insane
fireworks.
G
We
produce
educational
flyers
that
are
provided
with
every
single
fireworks
sale
at
every
booth
in
an
effort
to
make
it
very
clear
what
is
legal
and
what
is
not
within
the
city
of
san
bruno.
We
also
provide
similar
warning
notices
in
all
city
facilities.
This
is
a
little
impacted
last
year
and
this
year
due
to
covet
and
the
lack
of
traffic
in
those
city
facilities,
but
we
do
it
nonetheless
and
year
over
year.
This
is
yet
another
way
we
try
to
get
information
out
before
the
fourth
of
july.
G
We
also
use
a
great
deal
of
data
to
focus
our
resource
deployment.
This
has
to
do
with
mapping
calls
for
service
year
over
year,
as
well
as
areas
where
citations
are
written
and
then
also
this
year,
we're
able
to
utilize
our
new
mobile
command
vehicle
to
pull
in
real-time
data
as
it's
developing
in
the
field
and
populate
a
map
with
that
data
in
order
to
deploy
our
limited
resources
as
effectively
as
possible.
G
We
also
have
dedicated
enforcement
details
prior
to
the
fourth
of
july,
where
officers
come
in
on
an
overtime
basis,
respond
to
complaints
of
illegal
fireworks
and
canvas
the
busier
neighborhoods
for
people
using
illegal
fireworks
even
before
the
fourth
of
july,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
fourth
itself.
So,
fourth
of
july,
staffing
is
a
challenge
for
us.
The
reality
is
many
of
you
have
heard
me,
say
time
and
time
again
in
the
presentations
that
lead
up
to
the
fourth
of
july,
here
at
council
and
other
on
other
platforms.
G
This
means
that,
regardless
of
how
your
days
off
fall
or
what
else
you
might
have
scheduled,
you
will
be
working
if
you
work
for
the
san
bernardino
police
department
and-
and
it
is
the
fourth
of
july
this
year
that
amounted
to
42
staff
members
between
officers,
dispatchers,
clerks
and
csos,
28
sworn
and
14
non-sworn
personnel.
This
is
eight
fewer
sworn
than
in
2020,
which
means
we
were
impacted.
G
Four
teams,
our
city
runs
in
a
service
of
three
beats
or
service
areas,
and
so
each
service
area
was
minus
one,
two
officer
team
compared
to
what
it
was
last
year,
and
then
there
was
a
an
additional
two
officer
team
missing
from
our
detail.
This
has
to
do
primarily
with
authorized
staffing
levels,
budget
constraints
and
then
as
well.
We
have
injuries
and
other
people
who
are
out
and
not
able
to
work
in
the
field.
G
At
present,
many
of
these
officers
worked
a
16-hour
day
or
more
in
order
to
make
sure
that
we
had
coverage
during
the
busier
time
of
the
evening.
All
of
the
police
beats
were
staffed
as
usual
with
patrol
officers
plus
their
dedicated
enforcement
units
deployed.
This
is
sort
of
important
to
mention,
because
I
think
there's
a
bit
of
a
misconception
that
you
know
the
fourth
of
july
happens
and
100
of
our
efforts
are
dedicated
to
fireworks
enforcement.
G
The
fact
is
that
we
still
have
over
a
hundred
calls
for
service
in
that
day
that
do
not
pertain
to
illegal
fireworks
that
need
to
be
handled
by
beat
officers.
Everything
from
domestic
violence
calls
to
noise
complaints
to
all
of
the
normal
sort
of
variety
of
calls.
The
police
department
responds
to
continue
and
oftentimes
on
a
weekend
or
exacerbated
on
the
4th
of
july.
G
This
year
we
put
about
80
of
our
units
out
in
the
unmarked
units
in
an
effort
to
be
a
little
bit
less
immediately
detected
in
the
neighborhoods
where
legal
fireworks
are
being
used,
and
we
know
that
in
past
years
many
of
the
people
using
illegal
fireworks
are
incorporating
the
use
of
lookouts
and
the
black
and
white
vehicle
is
spotted
from
a
very
far
distance
and
makes
it
increasingly
difficult
to
issue
citations.
So
we
deployed
a
few
more
unmarked
units
than
marked
this
year.
We
use
both
uniformed
and
plain
clothes
personnel.
G
We
also
the
last
two
years
of
employed
undercover
surveillance
units.
These
are
vehicles
that
are
very
non-descript
and
designed
to
conduct
recorded
surveillance.
They
deploy
into
the
neighborhoods
in
an
effort
to
conduct
observations
that
they
can
then
again
direct
via
radio
to
bring
marked
units
into
issue
citations.
G
This
has
been
particularly
effective
the
past
couple
of
years,
but
it
is
a
somewhat
limited
resource
in
that
we
only
have
so
many
undercover
vehicles
available
that
are
not
easily
spotted
as
police
cars,
and
we
also
only
have
a
certain
number
of
our
personnel
that
are
qualified
or
certified
to
work.
Undercover
in
plain
clothes.
G
One
unfortunate
consequence
of
staffing
restrictions
this
year
is
that
we
did
not
have
our
bicycle
units
out
bicycle
units,
while
slower
than
vehicles
obviously,
and
have
a
little
bit
more
difficulty.
Getting
around
town
quickly
are
actually
quite
effective
in
navigating
through
the
streets
undetected
on
the
fourth
of
july
and
getting
in
and
issuing
citations,
and
we
were
not
able
to
staff
our
bicycle
units
due
to
minimal
staffing
this
year.
In
addition
to
all
of
this
police
staffing,
we
have
dedicated
fire
department
staff,
which
chief
delay
will
talk
about
in
a
few
moments.
G
Here
we
also
have
dedicated
parks,
department,
staff
and
streets
department
staff
parks
to
help
us
keep
the
parks
clean
and
clear
and
free
of
any
kind
of
dangers
throughout
the
evening
and
then
streets
department
for
what
ends
up
being
a
very
large
scale,
cleanup
operation
following
the
4th
of
july
every
year,
so
specifically
calls
for
service.
This
year.
On
the
4th
of
july,
the
police
department
handled
298
calls
for
service.
G
G
185
of
the
298
calls
for
service
on
the
fourth
of
july.
Were
fireworks
related.
This
is
three
more
than
last
year,
so
again,
fairly
consistent
with
what
we
see
on
the
fourth
of
july,
when
it
falls
on
the
holiday
or
on
the
weekend.
I'm
sorry
and
most
of
the
reports
we
get
as
I
reported
last
year-
are
actually
really
quite
vague
and
marginally
workable
at
best,
and
this
is
somewhat
important
information
for
us
to
convey
to
the
community
we're
we're.
G
G
Calls
like
you
know,
I'm
on
such
and
such
hundred
block,
and
there
are
tons
of
mortars
and
illegal
fireworks
going
off.
This
information
can
still
come
into
the
police
department.
It
is
often
reported
through
the
non-emergency
line
and
that
information
is
put
out
as
information
to
units
out
in
the
street,
so
they
kind
of
know
if
they're
in
that
area
to
check
it.
G
G
They
conduct
enforcement
very
similar
to
what
we
do
in
san
bruno
and
their
enforcement
like
ours
is
funded
by
the
sale
of
safe
and
sane
fireworks.
But
there
are
a
number
cities
that
have
big
problems
and
do
not
have
safe
and
same
fireworks.
East
palo,
alto
populated
the
top
of
that
list
this
year
with
229
calls
for
service,
notably
more
than
in
san
bruno,
and
then
we
have
daly
city
with
126
san
mateo,
with
119
in
south
san
francisco
with
107..
G
So
you
can
see
that
even
where
fireworks,
safe
and
sane
fireworks
are
not
legal,
there's
still
a
high
volume
of
illegal
fireworks
being
used
on
the
fourth
of
july
and
those
being
reported
to
their
local
police
departments,
again
important
to
note
that
none
of
those
cities
allow
safe
insane
fireworks
and
none
of
them
have
a
funding
source
for
large-scale
enforcement.
As
a
result,
they
do
not
respond
to
fireworks.
Only
complaints
if
a
caller
calls
to
say
that
they've
got
illegal
fireworks
going
off
in
their
neighborhood.
G
The
police's
stance
in
most
of
those
cities
is
to
put
that
information
out
for
units
so
that
they
can
kind
of
be
aware
of
the
problem
in
the
area,
but
they're
not
going
to
automatically
dispatch
units
due
to
the
limited
resources
and
the
high
volume
of
calls.
So
these
other
cities
have
issues
as
well
enforcement
this
year.
G
It's
important
to
to
remember
that
this
is
a
thousand
dollar
administrative
citation
that
the
police
department
is
issuing,
and
this
is
a
tool
that
was
provided
to
the
police
department
quite
some
time
ago
to
be
a
greater
deterrent
in
years
past.
Up
until
a
few
years
back,
we
actually
completed
a
misdemeanor
arrest
for
violations
of
1267
of
the
health
and
safety
code,
which
makes
it
a
misdemeanor
to
use
or
possess
any
amount
of
illegal
fireworks.
G
The
challenge
with
those
is
that
they
end
up
going
to
the
courts,
and
many
of
those
individuals
were
paying
25,
30,
40,
fines
and
walking
out,
and
so
it
was
not
serving
as
much
of
a
deterrent
at
all.
The
city
has
a
municipal
code
that
makes
it
illegal
to
use
or
possess
those
illegal
fireworks,
and
it
comes
along
with
the
one
thousand
dollar
administrative
citation
for
the
first
offense
and
that
served
as
a
much
better
tool
for
us
to
create
the
penalty
that
we're
looking
for.
G
G
This
is
something
that
is
in
long-established
case
law
and
established
by
the
penal
code,
that
for
the
officer
to
make
an
arrest
for
a
crime
at
this
level,
that
is,
it
must
be
committed
directly
in
their
presence.
They
have
to
directly
observe
the
violation
and
be
able
to
with
100,
certainly
identify
the
violator
in
order
to
issue
a
lawful
citation.
G
But
if
you,
if
you
work
in
law
enforcement,
you
can
understand
that
the
seriousness
of
this
offense
being
an
administrative
citation,
essentially
a
code
enforcement
violation
coupled
with
the
potential
need
to
use
force
in
order
to
affect
detentions
and
issue
citations,
creates
a
precarious
scenario
for
law
enforcement,
and
so
every
year
we
are
faced
with
having
to
send
officers
out
onto
the
street,
asking
them
to
be
very
proactive
and
very
aggressive
and
hunting
down
these
violators
and
issuing
citations
under
those
circumstances.
G
While
knowing
that
we
really
don't
want
them
using
any
level
of
force
to
affect
these
detentions
and
issue
these
citations,
because
the
risk
reward
simply
is
not
there
and
getting
an
officer
heard
or
hurting
a
member
of
the
public
or
having
a
use
of
force.
Incident
that
ends
up
ugly
is
simply
not
worth
it.
For
conducting
this
level
of
enforcement.
G
Again,
violators
are
cited,
they're,
not
physically
arrested
and
under
no
real
circumstances.
There
are
a
few,
but
under
no
normal
circumstances
do
they
go
to
jail.
Only
evidence
we
see
in
plain
view
can
be
seized.
So
this
is
also
a
problem
where
we
may
catch
a
person
using
illegal
fireworks
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
G
We
may
take
that
illegal
firework
and
issue
them
a
citation
only
to
find
that
they
have
much
more
illegal
fireworks
in
a
backyard
or
in
a
garage
or
in
a
vehicle
that
they
then
come
out
and
allow
someone
else
to
use
later.
So,
even
when
we're
making
these
arrests
or
issuing
these
citations,
it
doesn't
always
mean
that
we're
taking
all
of
their
ability
away
to
continue
violating
throughout
the
evening,
which
has
been
a
problem
in
the
past.
G
There's
been
a
lot
of
questions
about
resident
provided
video.
The
main
question
is
hey.
If
I
record
one
of
my
neighbors
shooting
off
illegal
fireworks,
can
I
call
report
that
to
the
police
provide
you
with
that
video
and
you
can
issue
them
a
citation.
This
is
a
very
convoluted
issue
and
the
short
answer
is
no
again.
I
fall
back
to
this
in
presence
legal
requirement
that
the
person
making
the
arrest
needs
to
physically
observe
the
violation.
G
That
being
said,
there
are
some
areas
we
are
looking
into
for
next
year
to
determine
how
that
video
surveillance
might
be
able
to
be
used.
The
challenge
is
that,
even
if
we
can
find
the
space
to
use
it,
we
will
have
to
make
sure
that,
from
that
video,
the
officer
issuing
the
citation
can
make
an
absolute
positive
identification
of
the
violator,
and
this
is
a
bit
of
a
misconception
with
video
video
is
fantastic.
G
It
doesn't
tell
the
police
department
who
that
individual
is
with
the
level
of
certainty,
that's
required
in
order
to
make
an
arrest
or
issue
a
citation,
and
this
will
certainly
be
a
challenge
with
third-party
video
provided
to
the
police
department
in
an
effort
to
spread
out
our
resources
and
issue
more
citations
year
over
year,
we
talked
last
year
about
the
fact
that,
if
you're
in
control
of
a
social
gathering,
you
can
be
cited
even
if
you're,
not
the
one
who
is
lighting
off
illegal
fireworks.
This
remains
true.
G
But
the
challenge
is
that
at
this
point
in
time,
the
police
department
has
to
not
only
prove
that
the
individual
control
of
the
party
knew
the
illegal
fireworks
were
going
off,
which
is
typically
done
by
the
first
time
we
respond
out,
giving
the
homeowner
or
the
person
in
control
of
a
residence
a
verbal
warning
and
documenting
that
warning,
but
we
also
have
to
prove
responsibility
in
that
they
had
the
ability
to
stop
the
illegal
fireworks
from
being
used,
and
this
came
about
last
year
after
we
issued
a
couple
of
these
gathering
citations
that
were
not
upheld
in
the
appellate
hearings,
and
so
these
are
the
two
requirements
that
put
some
restrictions
on
us
issuing
those
persons
in
control
violation,
citations
enforcement
data.
G
For
this
year
you
can
see
on
the
far
left
there
for
2021
we
issued
17
admin
sites.
On
the
fourth
of
july,
we
made
two
physical
arrests,
the
two
physical
arrests
one
occurred
because
a
subject
who
had
multiple
felony
warrants
did
run
from
officers.
After
committing
an
illegal
fireworks
violation,
they
gave
foot
pursuit
for
several
blocks
so
due
to
the
warrants
that
individual
went
to
jail.
G
The
second
arrest
was
because
we
had
a
level
of
intoxication
in
an
individual
such
that
they
were
not
able
to
care
for
their
own
safety
and
they
needed
to
be
taken
to
a
sobering
facility
as
you
track
back
through
the
years.
You
can
kind
of
see
how
this
number
lines
up
with
previous
years
and
it's
troubling
to
look
at
2020,
where,
obviously
we
are
less
than
half
the
number
of
citations
we
issued
last
year.
G
The
first
thing
to
note
would
be
that
last
year
was
obviously
the
highest
number
of
citations
we
had
issued
in
a
single
year
by
almost
two
times-
probably
not
sustainable
year
over
year,
especially
because
we
had
several
citations
dismissed
last
year.
We
needed
to
tighten
up
the
burden
of
proof
and
what
we
were
doing
in
terms
of
getting
the
evidence
together
to
issue
a
citation.
The
second
impact
is
fewer
staff
members,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
for
fewer
teams.
This
is
a
significant
impact
to
enforcement
operations.
G
In
addition,
we
had
a
slightly
shorter
peak
window.
The
legal
fireworks
use
this
year,
so
the
window
of
time
in
which
we
could
issue
citations
effectively,
was
a
little
bit
shorter
and
year
over
year,
the
violations
are
becoming
more
unobservable,
so
this
would
be
the
people
who
are
you
lighting,
illegal
fireworks
in
areas
where
the
officers
cannot
conduct
that
direct
observation
they
need
in
order
to
issue
citations.
G
I
understand
this
can
be
incredibly
frustrating
for
residents
who
are
saying
either
the
fireworks
are
going
off
over
and
over
again
out
of
my
neighbor's
backyard,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
remains
that
we
have
legal
mandates
as
to
where
we
can
go
in
order
to
observe
violations,
secure
evidence
and
make
arrests,
especially
for
these
low-level
violations
and
many
times
those
are
going
to
be
almost
unenforceable
of
the
17
people
who
recited
this
year.
10
of
them
were
san
bernardino
residents.
The
other
seven
were
for
were
people
who
live
outside
of
our
city.
G
We
seized
about
66
pounds
of
live
illegal
fireworks
this
year.
This
is
about
12
pounds
more
than
last
year
and
47
pounds
over
the
annual
average
that
we
seized.
We
also
seized
about
50
pounds
of
spent
fireworks.
Those
are
really
only
collected
when
they're
evidence
of
a
crime.
We
don't
go
around
and
collect
the
spent
fireworks
around
the
streets.
The
street
department
takes
care
of
that
as
part
of
their
cleanup
efforts
on
the
fifth
getting
into
costs.
It
is
expensive
to
conduct
the
enforcement
that
we
do
on
the
fourth
of
july.
G
Fortunately,
as
I've
said
before,
these
costs
are
covered
by
fees
collected
from
safe
insane
fireworks
sales,
but
nonetheless
it
is
very
expensive.
So
you
can
kind
of
work
through
the
different
costs
here,
but
the
city
manager's
office
put
together
an
educational
mailer
this
year,
send
it
out
to
every
resident
in
town,
please
tomorrow
and
put
together
a
video
public
service
announcement.
G
We
have
additional
staff
on
the
fourth
from
community
services,
the
fire
marshal
administrative
and
inspection
hours
to
handle
the
booth
inspections,
fourth
of
july
staffing
and
logistics,
increased
for
fire
and
police,
pre
and
post
fourth
of
july
education,
enforcement
and
logistics
and
then
clean
up
costs.
Obviously,
the
bulk
of
this
expense
is
the
fourth
of
july
staffing
and
logistics
for
the
police
department
at
almost
thirty
thousand
dollars
about
half
of
the
sixty
thousand
dollar.
Six
hundred
sixty
thousand
six
hundred
eighty
dollar
expense
of
our
enforcement
and
education
operations
surrounding
the
4th
of
july.
G
Every
year,
the
police
department
conducts
an
annual
debrief
in
an
effort
to
learn
lessons
from
that
year's
enforcement
and
safety
campaign
and
to
come
up
with
new
ideas
for
the
next
year.
This
debrief
is
actually
a
formal
process
that
takes
far
longer
than
the
few
days
that
have
passed
since
the
4th
of
july
at
this
point,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
we
debrief
immediately
as
well
to
come
up
with
some
things
to
talk
about
here.
G
The
first
focus
is
to
enhance
what
works.
Well,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
know
that
the
use
of
undercover
surveillance
units
is
really
about
the
most
effective
way
to
issue
citations
that
stick
and
that
people
have
to
actually
pay.
There
are
some
challenges
with
getting
enough
undercover
vehicles
and
undercover
officers
to
expand
this,
but
we
will
be
looking
to
expand
it
next
year
through
a
variety
of
different
means.
G
This
is
going
to
be
more
effective
than
just
dealing
with
the
line
level
user,
and
so
we
know
that
we
need
to
expand
those
operations.
We
also
need
to
increase
our
use
of
data
to
direct
resources.
As
I
mentioned,
we
did
that
this
year
with
live,
real-time
data
during
the
event
and
we'll
expand
that
into
next
year.
G
We
need
to
reduce
or
eliminate
what
is
ineffective,
and
I
already
mentioned
it.
But
it's
these
responses
to
calls
without
the
critical
information
to
really
be
enforceable
or
enable
officers
to
take
action.
When
you
have
you
know,
160
calls
for
service
and
some
24
sworn
officers
working
a
detail.
G
It's
pretty
and
it's
all
happening
in
a
two
and
a
half
to
three
hour
window
of
time.
You
can
simply
do
the
math
and
see
that
we're
talking
about
more
than
a
call
a
minute
and
to
handle
that
one
call
per
minute
is
dispatching
officers
constantly
continuously
before
they
can
even
get
to
a
call
they're
being
dispatched
to
the
next
call,
and
it's
not
an
effective
way
to
conduct
enforcement.
G
This
is
not
a
new
concept.
By
the
way
you
can
date
back
all
the
way
to
sir
sir
peale
and
his
founding
of
the
tenants
of
modern
law
enforcement
in
the
late
1800s,
which
made
it
very
clear
that
the
only
way
we
get
compliance
with
the
law
is
through
voluntary
cooperation
of
the
community.
Ultimately,
it's
not
going
to
be
enforcement
that
solves
the
problems
with
rampant
illegal
fireworks.
Use
it's
going
to
have
to
be
a
better
behaving
community,
we'll
also
be
considering
other
enhancements.
G
All
in
all,
it's
about
45
minutes
to
an
hour
for
one
site
and
release.
So
again,
if
you
do
the
math
and
you've
got
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
people
using
illegal
fireworks
in
the
fourth
of
july
and
a
handful
of
officers
conducting
enforcement,
even
if
they
are
ultra
diligent.
If
all
that
major
violating
is
occurring
in
a
three-hour
window,
the
average
team
can
issue
three
to
four
citations
during
that
period
of
time.
G
G
E
Can
you
hear
me,
you
got
me
yep
great
sorry
about
that,
I'm
not
sure
what
was
going
on
there,
but
we're
here
good
evening.
Honorable
mayor,
remember
the
council
ari
delay,
your
fire
chief,
thank
you
again
for
having
us
this
evening
to
provide
a
a
brief
synopsis
of
the
fourth
of
july
operations
for
the
san
bernardino
police
department
and
the
san
bruno
fire
department.
E
If
I
can
get
the
next
slide,
please
for
the
fourth
of
july
celebration
and
the
day
itself,
the
san
bernardino
fire
department
staffed,
in
addition
to
its
normal
day-to-day
staffing,
which
is
two
engines
and
one
truck
company,
we
staffed
an
additional
als
engine
company
to
help
best
protect
the
city.
In
addition,
we
had
all
of
our
fire
prevention
staff
on
duty
for
the
day
and
myself
as
your
fire
chief
was
there
for
the
entire
event
again
with
chief
johansen
as
well.
If
I
could
have
the
next
slide,
please.
E
Calls
for
service
we
handled
approximately
19
calls
for
service
on
the
4th
of
july,
and
that
was
for
the
entire
day.
So
a
fairly
light
day
for
us,
honestly,
all
things
considered
and
again,
as
chief
johansson
alluded
to
our
peak
activity
period
for
the
fire
department,
was
approximately
nine
to
11.
E
30
in
the
evening
was
when
we
saw
the
majority
of
our
calls
for
service
32
of
the
calls
of
service
for
service
for
the
fire
department
were
fireworks
related
and
if
I
could
have
the
next
slide,
please,
and,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
just
a
breakdown
of
calls
for
service
that
the
fire
department
responded
to
leading
up
to
the
fourth
of
july
and
the
fourth
of
july
itself,
and
the
the
preceding
days
so
fairly
light.
As
far
as
actual
fire
calls.
The
fourth
of
july
celebration
was
again.
E
It
was
light
for
calls
for
service
for
fire
related
calls,
but
the
overall
volume
of
fireworks,
both
legal
and
illegal,
was
fairly
heavy
this
year
as
years
in
the
past.
If
I
could
have
the
next
slide,
please
a
couple
of
our
observations.
The
illegal
fireworks
was
heavy
this
year,
as
it
has
been
in
the
past.
E
Our
prevention
and
early
detection
efforts
were
critical
in
trying
to
to
prevent
a
lot
of
those
things
from
happening,
and
then
I'd
just
like
to
to
make
a
special
note
and
thanks
to
our
public
works
and
parks
department
for
their
efforts,
leading
up
to
the
fourth
of
july
in
their
the
wii
debate
and
fire
prevention
efforts
prior
to
the
fourth
and
also
the
parks
department
for
their.
E
You
know
their
work
on
that
same
wheat
abatement
with
their
contractors
and
their
crews,
and
also
the
the
hard
work
was
done
after
the
fourth
of
july
event,
because
there's
quite
a
bit
of
cleanup
that
has
to
take
place
every
year
after
the
event
itself,
and
one
thing
I
just
wanted
to
to
really
point
out.
We
had
a
pacific,
I
know
had
an
injury,
a
couple
of
injuries
to
civilians
and
we
did
have
one
significant
injury
and
this
particular
injury
was
due
to
illegal
fireworks.
E
Not
the
safe
and
sane
kind,
where
we,
you
know,
they're
less
dangerous,
but
in
illegal
fireworks.
And
the
important
piece
to
note
here
is
some
of
these:
illegal
fireworks
are
sold
to
people
and
they
get
their
hands
on
them
and
they're
not
really
built
in
the
same
way
that
a
normal
firework
is
from
a
safe
and
sane
perspective.
They
have
some
what
they
call
fast
fuses
and
these
these
fuses.
E
They
might
seem
four
or
five
inches
long,
but
they
literally
go
off
in
a
half
a
second,
and
these
fireworks
can
explode
and
cause
a
lot
of
significant
injuries,
and
that
happened
during
the
fourth
of
july
here
in
the
city
of
san
bruno,
and
it's
been
quite
some
time.
I
think,
since
we've
had
a
significant
injury
from
fireworks-
and
this
particular
one
just
important
to
note
is-
is
from
illegal
fireworks,
and
I
really
really
wanted
to
stress
the
point
that
they
are
super
dangerous
and
they're.
E
For
you
know,
some
of
those
large
larger
type
fireworks
are
for
professional
fireworks
displays
and
they
get
in
the
hands
of
civilians
and
they're
not
really
made
for
our
use
and
they're
not
really
designed
that
way.
E
So
if
I
could
just
have
the
next
slide,
please
and
with
that,
that
concludes
our
presentation
from
the
chief
johansen
and
myself
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
A
Thank
you
both
chiefs
for
your
report
and
thank
you
to
all
the
city
staff
that
you've
highlighted
for
that
assisted
up
to
the
fourth
and
thereafter
so
comments
or
questions
from
my
colleagues.
H
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
both
of
the
chiefs
and
and
their
staff
for
for
all
the
work.
A
few
of
us
were
poking
around
there
that
night
and
really
got
to
see
firsthand
how
busy
everybody
was
and
how
dedicated
and
how
upbeat
everybody
was,
even
though
they
were
working
on
a
on
a
holiday.
H
I
did
have
one
question
going
back
to
the
trend
we
saw
on
slide
eight,
and
I
was
wondering
chief
johansson
if
there
was
anything
significant
that
happened
between
16
and
17,
that
increased
the
number
of
citations,
and
was
that
because
of
the
volume
of
infractions,
or
was
it
due
to
an
increase
in
enforcement.
G
G
F
G
Yeah
a
good
question
as
well.
Thank
you,
so
the
the
citations,
they're
administrative
citations,
so
the
first
step
in
an
appeal
process
is
that
they
have
a
hearing
with
a
hearing
officer,
a
an
impartial
hearing
officer,
that's
appointed
by
the
city,
to
sit
through
and
hear
their
evidence
and
hear
the
officer's
evidence
and
really
there's
no
single
reason.
Why
a
case
you
know
gets
upheld
or
dismissed
to
be.
To
be
honest.
G
G
Last
year
we
saw
that
with
a
couple
of
these
citations
issued
to
homeowners,
where
the
hearing
officer
just
didn't,
feel
that
we
had
enough
proof
that
the
homeowner
could
have
or
should
have
stopped
the
illegal
fireworks
usage
and
they
were
hesitant
to
hit
them
with
a
thousand
dollar
fine
still
over
the
years.
Rarely.
But
I
have
seen
citations
dismissed
because
the
officers
didn't
do
a
thorough
enough
job
of
writing.
C
I
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
echo
my
colleagues
thanks
for,
for
our
the
whole
san
bernardino
team
and
working
on
the
holiday
and
and
all
this
hard
work.
So
I
just
want
to
confirm
the
that
that
60
000
in
in
cost
that
was
100
covered
by
the
safe
insane
fireworks
sales
is
that.
G
Correct
that
is
my
understanding.
Yes,
that
the
cost
of
the
operation
is
covered
by
that
eight
percent
tax
that
gets
levied
for
the
sales
of
safe
and
same
fireworks.
C
Great,
thank
you
so
I
was.
I
was
curious
about
you.
You
touched
on
it
briefly
about
the
other
enhancements,
the
use
of
third-party
video
evidence,
and
we
have
you
know
we
talked
about
this
a
lot
year
after
year
and
and
you
you
mentioned
it
in
your
presentation.
How
how
you
know
residents
are
trying
to
help
and
say
look.
I
got
up
here
on
video,
but
that's
not
usable.
So
are
we
thinking
that
there's
going
to
be
some
changes
in
the
in
the
in
the
law
or
how?
What
do
we?
G
So
this
is
an
interesting
area
of
law
that,
in
my
opinion,
has
not
actually
clearly
articulated
in
established
case
law.
Video
evidence,
while
not
new
to
any
of
us,
is
actually
fairly
new
to
the
criminal
justice
system
and
the
question
that
looms
there
is:
can
it
count
as
direct
observation?
If
that
observation
is
conducted
of
video
and
not
of
the
actual
violation,
and
if
so,
in
what
time
frame?
Would
it
be
contemporaneous
enough
to
be
a
continuation
of
the
offense
and
to
qualify
for
the
direct
observation?
G
The
challenge
here
is
that
thinking
more
globally
about
the
good
of
communities
in
law
enforcement.
I
don't
think
we
want
the
first
case
evaluated
for
that
case
law
question,
to
involve
something
like
illegal
fireworks
enforcement.
I
think
it
will
be
something
taken
into
account
by
a
court
that
says
wow.
You
know
I
just
really
don't
think
we
want
to
open
that
door
for
police
to
be
issuing
citations
based
on
something
they
see
on
video
and-
and
so
it's
it's
more
a
matter
of
looking
into
it
in
depth.
G
Working
with
the
city
attorney,
who
I
see
is
pictured
in
so
he
may
have
more
to
add
here
as
the
expert
than
I
do.
But
it's
it's
about
working
with
that
video
and
determining
at
what
point?
Is
it
usable
and
is
there
a
mechanism?
So,
for
example,
the
misdemeanor
requirement
is
circumvented
with
warrants.
So
if
we
have
a
misdemeanor
not
committed
in
our
presence,
but
we
want
the
individual
to
ultimately
be
held
accountable
for
it,
we
simply
can't
arrest
them
on
the
spot.
G
We
submit
a
case
to
the
district
attorney
and
if
the
judge
feels
that
there's
enough,
there
they'll
issue
a
warrant
for
the
arrest,
but
here
we're
dealing
with
the
municipal
code,
violation
for
which
that's
not
really
a
feasible
mechanism
that
the
court
would
appreciate.
So
it's
it's
just
trying
to
figure
out
where's
the
happy
medium
and
what
evidence
can
we
take
from
the
community
and
put
to
good
use
to
to
be
better
at
enforcement
city
attorney?
Did
you
have
something
to
add
to
that.
D
I
I
took
the
video
and
so
then
the
city
is
relying
on
a
sort
of
third
party
who
really
has
very
little
connection
with
with
the
city,
except
they
were
there,
taking
a
video
to
show
up
at
scheduled
appeal
hearings
and
show
up
in
court
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
which
may
not
be
what
they
signed
up
for
right.
They
just
took
a
video
and
are
turning
it
over
to
the
police
department.
This
is
very
similar
to
somebody
reporting
a
code
enforcement
violation
of
any
sort
of
garden-variety
kind.
D
I
Thank
you,
mayor
medina,
javon,
grogan
city
manager.
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up,
but
council
member
hamilton
asked
has
that
60
thousand
dollars
been
reimbursed.
I
The
answer
is
not
yet
the
fireworks
vendors
have
until
september
30th
to
file
paperwork
with
the
city,
demonstrating
their
full
gross
receipts
revenue
and
then
the
city
will
will
char
will
send
an
invoice
to
each
of
the
vendor
for
their
pro-rash
year
event,
60
000.,
the
police
chief,
did
mention
a
8
tax.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
the
city
does
not
have
a
8
tax.
I
There
were
some
fire
booth
vendors
that
added
a
eight
percent
or
some
percent
fee
on
top
of
the
transaction,
that
that
is
their
their
choice,
but
we
do
not
have
a
set
percentage
tax.
What
our
municipal
code
says
is
that
the
active
fireworks
vendors
are
responsible
for
their
pro-rata
share
of
the
city's
cost
related
to
fireworks,
and
that's
that
full
sixty
thousand
dollars
just
wanted
to
provide
that.
C
J
J
J
We
were
able
to
enjoy
lighting
the
safe
and
sane
ones
and
then
were
able
to
go
home,
and
while
all
the
illegal
ones
were
going
off
for
quite
a
bit
of
the
night
and
acknowledging
that,
as
we
were
driving
through,
our
san
bruno
residents
were
were
basically,
the
majority
of
them
were
following
the
rules
following
the
law
waving,
as
as
the
police
officer
went
by
and
thumbs
up,
and
I
think
they
were
happy
to
see
that
that
the
police
had
a
presence,
and
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
sacrifice.
J
The
illegal
fireworks
are
something
that
are
all
over.
Everything
that
was
being
lit
prior
to
the
fireworks
sales
were
illegal
and,
and
that's
really
important
to
keep
in
mind,
and
I
look
forward
to
the
changes
and
in
technology
use
that
that
will
be
implemented
next
year
to
to
improve
the
chances
of
catching
those
that
are
that
are
using
the
illegal
ones.
J
And
hopefully
I
don't
think
it'll
ever
go
away,
because
people
just
are
going
to
decide
to
break
the
law,
whether
it's
speeding,
whether
it's
running
a
red,
light
or
or
doing
a
california
stop
at
a
stop
sign.
People
make
poor
choices
and,
and
sometimes
people
get
hurt
by
it
and
those
fireworks
are,
are
really
really
annoying
and
and
and
damaging
to
some
people
in
our
community
and
unfortunately,
some
people
just
don't
care.
So
so
thank
thanks
to
all
staff
for
their
efforts
and
I'm
glad
there
was
only
one
injury.
J
It's
it's
a
serious
problem,
so
hopefully
people
are
going
to
learn
by
it.
Thank
you.
A
Councilmember
mason,
you
have
your
hand
up
again
and
then
we'll
go
to
you
and
then
I
will
finish
up
with
my
final
comments
on
the
topic.
Great.
F
D
F
Footage
so
I'm
just
curious
to
know
what
the
recommendation.
G
Chief
yeah,
it's
it's
a
difficult
space
right,
so
I
think
part
of
what
you're
referring
to
is
that
last
year
there
was
a
high
level
of
interest
from
the
more
proactive
elements
in
our
community
who,
by
the
way,
we're
eternally
grateful
for
and
is
one
of,
the
things
that
makes
san
bruno
a
unique
place
to
to
live,
work
and
play
that
they
wanted
to
chip
in
and
said.
Look
we
know
that
you
can
only
you
can't
be
everywhere
at
once.
G
Oftentimes
people
act
very
irrationally,
and
the
last
thing
we
want
to
be
responding
to
is
a
good
samaritan
trying
to
help
the
police
department
that
ends
up
in
a
physical
altercation
with
a
neighbor
or
someone
from
out
of
the
community.
That's
come
in
to
to
use
illegal
fireworks,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
give
a
measure
of
caution
there.
G
I
would
say
that,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
as
the
city
attorney
touched
on,
you're
absolutely
right,
the
usability
of
that
to
actually
just
flat
out
issue
a
citation-
it's
really
not
there
at
this
point
in
time.
It
doesn't
mean,
however,
that
that
video
is
of
no
value
when
paired,
together
with
a
citation
where
you
know.
G
Sometimes
these
citations
operate
in
that
gray
area,
where
an
officer
is
a
half
block
away
and
they
see
someone
in
the
dark
go
over
and
lean
down
and
light
an
illegal
firework
in
the
middle
of
the
street
and
they
move
in
quickly
and
that
person
has
moved
over
to
the
sidewalk
and
is
now
in
a
little
bit
of
a
crowd.
But
the
officer
is
sure
enough
that
they
have
the
right
person
to
issue
a
citation.
G
Well,
if
we
couple
that
with
a
neighbor
that
says
hey,
the
cops
were
out
here
and
I
was
shooting
video
now
we
have
some
added
evidence
that
can
be
of
value
to
the
officer
as
long
as
the
citizen
or
the
resident
was
able
to
get
that
video
without
putting
themselves
in
harm's
way.
It
also
can
help
to
direct
us
in.
G
So
if
you
call
to
report
a
violation-
and
you
know
who
the
person
is
and
you're
able
to
show
that
to
the
officer,
we
can
circulate
that
out
to
these
plainclothes
and
undercover
units
who
can
then
sort
of
target
that
individual
and
their
surveillance
and
come
in
and
try
to
conduct
the
observations
needed
to
actually
get
the
citation
issued
in
a
way.
That's
a
lot
more
effective
than
just
coming
in
blind
to
a
large
crowd
and
trying
to
see
who's
shooting
them
off.
A
For
myself,
thank
you
councilmember
for
myself,
as
was
indicated,
councilmember,
salazar
and
vice
mayor
medina,
and
I
did
do
a
ride
along
they.
Let
us
sit
in
the
front,
not
in
the
back
and
we
went
in
separate
vehicles,
so
we
could
touch
each
beat
that
was
in
town
from
a
different
perspective.
A
I
also
just
on
on
mine.
You
know,
daley
city
had
a
council
meeting
last
night
and
they
were
talking
about
the
illegal
fireworks,
keep
in
mind.
They
do
not
have
safe
insane
one
council
member
said
as
of
sunday.
He
was
still
hearing
the
booms.
The
mayor
there
thought
about
putting
a
committee
together.
They
felt
it
was
worse.
A
I
put
out
a
before
the
fourth
the
day
before
then
the
day
of
the
fourth
and
the
day
after
the
fourth,
the
pacifica
mayor-
and
I
talked
on
each
of
those
occasions,
just
to
get
an
idea
of
how
it
was
going
in
that
our
city
versus
their
city
in
regards
to
being
the
only
two
in
the
county
with
safe
and
sane
fireworks.
A
I
also
sent
out
a
survey
to
probably
about
a
dozen
mayors
within
the
county
of
san
mateo.
Just
to
ask
them
some
simple
questions
about:
do
they
have
additional
staffing
on
the
fourth
from
police?
Yes
or
no
fire?
Yes,
or
no
did
they
think
it
was
worse
than
equal
to
or
less
than
for
illegals,
because
they
don't
have
safe
insane
from
2020
versus
2021
and
how
they
administer
any
fines
or
assessments
and
then
any
additional
comments,
so
those
are
coming
in,
but
there's
a
and
again
it's
an
opinion
of
one.
A
But
there
is
a
mayor
further
down
south
and
feels
it
was
worse
in
in
his
community
than
it
was
last
year
still
getting
some
of
that
data
in
as
they
get
the
data
that
we
received.
A
So
again
back
on
my
colleagues,
I
wanted
to
thank
all
staff.
I've
seen
this
for
quite
a
few
years,
been
at
the
briefing
and
the
ride-along,
and
it's
not
an
easy
task
and
it's
not
an
easy
job
and
it
obviously
is
taking
away
from
one's
friends
and
family
and
other
areas
that
one
may
wish
to
focus
on,
but
cannot
thank
enough
and
remind
our
residents
that
this
monies
are
recouped
from
the
booths
that
sell
the
fireworks
to
those
folks.
A
There
are
other
communities
that
don't
have
that
resource
and
therefore
they're
at
regular
staffing,
even
with
the
additional
calls
that
was
indicated
by
the
police
chief.
So
again,
thank
you
both
for
your
report.
Thank
you
to
the
staff
and
the
team,
and
I
guess
what
I
could
say
is,
I
guess
we'll
see
you
next
year.
A
So
thank
you.
Why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
if
there
is
nothing
else,
I
think
I'm
frozen.
A
Okay,
I'm
not
okay,
so
with
that
we'll
end
our
presentations.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
let's
move
on
to
item
five
consent.
Calendar
all
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
by
an
earlier
account.
It
may
be
announced
by
one
emotion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested.
We
have
items
a
through
e.
There
are
five
items.
Is
there
anyone
that
wants
a
separate
boat
on
a
knife
to
be
pulled?
A
Not
seeing
any?
Thank
you
is
there
any
that
we
would
like
to
have
a
further
question
or
comment
on
items
a
through
e
councilmember,
mason.
A
Got
it
anything
else?
Colleagues,
all
right,
I'm
seeing
e
only
for
additional
thought
or
comment,
and
that
is
e-
is
adopt.
A
resolution
authorizing
use
of
american
rescue
ad
funds
to
support
the
san
bruno
small
business
that
qualify
for
the
bay
area,
entrepreneur,
center's
micro
grant
program
in
the
amount
not
16,
112,
000
and.
F
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
how
the
how
the
program's
going
because
we've
provided
previous
grants
before,
and
I
just
wanted
to
hear
from
the
entrepreneur
center
how
this
is
being
accepted
by
the
small
businesses,
any
feedback
that
you
could
give
us
and
how
you
feel
that
the
recovery
at
this
point
is
going.
A
I
Good
afternoon,
mayor
members
of
council
on
the
public
in
response
to
council
member
mason's
question,
can
I
ask
the
city
clerk
to
bring
in
say,
destroy
the
executive
director
for
the
bay
area
entrepreneurship
center
to
to
to
respond
in
part
to
council
member
mason's
question
just
really
quickly.
I
just
called
up
one
slide
to
provide
a
little
conduct
context
for
the
viewing
public.
I
know
the
city
council
knows
this
because
we
talked
about
this
at
budget
time,
but
the
recommended
action
is
on
the
screen.
I
And
it's
exactly
what
the
mayor
just
read.
There
is
a
grant
program
that
is
being
administered
by
the
bay
area,
entrepreneurship
center.
They
had
a
2020
grant
cycle
where
they
were
able
to
award
16
businesses
a
grant
of
four
thousand
dollars.
That
was
from
funds
provided
by
the
san
bruno
community
foundation,
not
the
city.
I
They
then
administered
a
2021
cycle
with
with
funds
again
provided
by
the
san
bruno
community
foundation
and
they
have
been
able
to.
I
They
have
funding
to
award
these
16
original
businesses,
an
additional
three
thousand
dollars
to
have
a
total
award
of
seven
thousand
dollars,
but
they
received
31
applications
from
the
2021
cycle
and
they
they
have
enough
funds
to
award
15
businesses
an
additional
or
15
new
businesses,
7
000,
but
that
leaves
16
businesses
that
they're
unable
to
provide
a
grant
award
for
due
to
lack
of
funds.
I
And
so
there
was
a
request
by
the
bay
area
entrepreneurship
center
and
we
were
able
to
incorporate
funding
within
the
budget
of
the
112
000
to
fund
those
additional
16
businesses.
And
so
the
action
that
is
before
you
tonight
is
to
authorize
the
city
manager
to
pay
the
invoice
to
the
bay
area
entrepreneurship
center.
So
then
they
can
give
the
16
grants
to
the
individual
businesses.
And
so
that's
why
this
item
is
before
you
at
its
level.
I
It
requires
a
city
council
budget
authorization
as
well
as
authorization
to
execute
and
pay
the
invoice.
So
that
that's
the
background
and
if
cyanus
route
is
on
screen,
I
will
stop
the
screen
share
and
she
can
answer
any
additional
questions.
D
Okay,
awesome
just
wanted
to
to
quickly
thank
the
city,
council
and
mayor
medina
for
having
a
quick
opportunity
to
shed
just
a
little
bit
of
light
on
this
program
for
the
support
and
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
response
that
we've
received
from
our
businesses.
So
thank
you,
city
manager,
grogan.
For
that
context,
I
think
it's.
D
My
hope
is
that
answered
some
questions
that
were
out
there
around
what
this
grant
is
about
and
how
it
was
originally
funded.
D
In
response
to
councilwoman
mason's
question
about
how
this
grant
has
been
received
by
the
local
businesses,
I
I
believe
just
from
the
feedback
I've
received
from
the
community
that
this
has
been
very
good
and
positive
for
our
local
businesses
and
any
you
know,
given
the
last
year,
challenges
they've
been
so
diverse
because
our
businesses
are
so
diverse,
any
any
little
bit
of
help
has
been
impactful,
but
probably
more
than
I
realized
when
we
set
out
to
launch
this
program
last
year.
D
So
with
this
second
round,
I'm
just
beyond
excited
and
grateful
that
all
of
the
businesses,
not
all
that
applied
because
they
all
weren't
eligible
but
of
those
eligible
businesses,
we're
able
to
support
them
all.
And
it's
because
of
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
the
support
that
that
you
all
are
giving.
So.
Thank
you
for
that.
A
Thank
you
sada,
thank
you
for
being
here
this
evening
and
waiting
to
bring
that
up
to
us.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
from
colleagues?
If
not
that
would
then
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
on
consent,
so
any
action
from
counsel
for
consent
items
a
through
e
move
to
approve.
H
H
J
I
Back
again
by
popular
demand,
javon
grogan
city
manager,
I
will
provide
a
brief
presentation
to
the
city
council
with
regard
to
our
storm,
drainage
and
flood
protection
fee
election
and
next
steps.
I
The
city
council
and
the
community
will
remember
that
on
june
22nd
of
this
year,
the
city
council
took
an
action
where
you
adopted
a
resolution
declaring
the
results
of
the
election
that
closed
on
june
15th
of
this
year
for
the
mellon
election
connected
to
the
proposed
storm,
drainage
and
flood
protection
fee
and
abandoning
proceedings,
because
the
measure
did
not
pass
at
that
meeting.
I
The
city
council
had
some
discussions
about
what
the
next
steps
would
be,
and
I
committed
to
coming
back
to
you
in
an
expeditious,
fast
fashion,
to
have
that
conversation,
and
so
that's
why
we're
here
tonight
less
than
a
month
later.
So
let's
try
to
work
through
our
technical
issues
that
we
have
seemed
to
be
having
all
night
okay
objective,
to
receive
an
oral
report.
As
the
city
clerk
said
with
regard
to
the
fee
and
provide
direction
to
staff.
Our
agenda
tonight
really
has
four
items.
I
One
is
acknowledgement
and
thank
you
we'll
overview.
The
initiative.
We'll
talk
about
the
election
results
and
then
we'll
get
on
to
the
core
part
of
the
discussion,
which
is
options
and
next
steps
moving
forward.
I
We
really
just
want
to
take
this
moment
of
to
thank
the
san
bruno
community
for
engaging
with
us
on
this
process,
a
process
that
was
a
year
and
a
half
effort
to
articulate
and
educate
the
community
of
our
storm
water
challenges
and
the
fact
that
the
current
bees
have
been
in
place
for
nearly
30
years,
27
years
to
be
in
effect
and
are
no
longer
covering
their
cost,
and
we
had
a
robust
public
communication
effort
and
outreach
effort
and
that
that
the
entire
process
really
culminated
with
following
the
state
prescribed
what
we
commonly
refer
to
as
a
proposition
218
process
for
melon
ballots,
and
so
it
was
a
process
that
was
that
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
many
many
of
our
residents
were
unused
to
because
it
was
not
like
a
typical
registered
voter
election.
I
You
may
be
saying:
well,
that's
not
not
a
lot,
but
it's
actually
42
for
these
off-cycle
melon
ballot
elections
is
is
par,
and
so
it's
around
what
we
expected
40
and
we
we
also
confirmed
with
our
consultant
wildann
that
ran
the
election.
Is
that
for
a
response
rate
of
40
percent
for
a
melon
ballot
off
cycle
only
to
property
owners
of
that's
about
right,
and
so,
as
a
part
of
our
robust
outreach.
I
The
council
knows
that
we
met
with
community
groups
and
went
on
a
bit
of
a
road
show.
So
a
little
bit
of
the
initiative.
I
But
our
fiscal
sustainability
project
really
has
a
couple
key
components
underpinning
it.
It
is
expenditure
reductions,
growing
our
revenue,
pursuing
economic
development
and
prudent
budget
management,
and
I
won't
go
through
the
the
litany
of
accomplishments
that
we've
had
with
that,
because
we've
had
sort
of
long
presentations
of
that.
But
this
effort
was
critical
to
that
and
it
was
critical
to
that
because
our
storm
water
system
is
aging.
I
Many
of
our
pipes
are
over
100
years
old
and
just
in
the
last
24
months,
we've
spent
over
1.2
million
on
infrastructure
that
has
failed
that
we
had
a
liability
to
protect
the
most
significant
one
cost,
nearly
a
million
dollars
itself
and
that's
when
we
had
a
stormwater
culvert
that
eventually
eroded
part
of
the
hillside
near
san
bruno
avenue
across
from
the
leonardy's
grocery
store
and
threatened
the
integrity
of
san
bernardino.
I
Undertook
an
effort
back
in
in
2017
to
do
a
storm
water
master
plan
that
identified
more
than
30
million
dollars
of
improvements
that
we
have
yet
to
be
able
to
embark
on
those
improvements,
and
we
know
every
year
that
passes
when
we
don't
make
those
improvements.
I
The
infrastructure
gets
worse
and
the
cost
to
eventually
make
those
improvements
is
greater,
and
so
we
we
launched
this
effort
back
in
september
2020.
We
followed
the
mail
and
ballot
procedures
that
began
in
march
21
and
then
the
election
ended
in
june
of
2015..
I
This
slide
is
sadly
all
too
familiar
to
the
city
council,
because
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussions
about
this
slide
during
our
budget
conversations
and
it's
the
precipitative
precipitous
decline
of
our
storm
water
enterprise
fund.
Now
that
well,
but
essentially
for
funding.
We
we
we're.
We
continue
to
be
at
the
status
quo,
which
is
the
revenue
does
not
cover
operating.
I
Nor
does
it
cover
the
the
30
million
dollars
of
needed
capital
improvements,
and
so
the
general
fund
has
to
become
the
backstop,
and
we
know
that
that
will
come
at
the
cost
of
services
and
programs,
and
so
the
city
council.
What
did
identify
funding
for
the
one
million
dollar
deficit
in
the
current
budget
year,
using
one-time
revenue
from
the
federal
government
in
our
funds?
I
However,
we
have
to
fix
this
problem,
and
so
what's
shown
in
this
graph,
is
the
fund
balance
in
blue
was
mildly
positive
last
fiscal
year
and
projected
to
to
be
negative
if
the
status
quo
continues,
which
is
the
fees
are
set
at
a
1994
level,
and
so
the
other
chart
is
from
our
budget
process
as
well.
I
That
shows
the
proposed
budget
that
had
a
beginning
fund,
balance
of
312
000
and
this
municipal
or
prop
218
election
ended
right
in
the
middle
of
our
council
deliberations,
and
so
this
this
is
not
the
adopted
budget,
but
this
is
the
budget
where
we
had
a
one
million
dollar
deficit
and
again,
the
current
revenue,
as
you
can
see,
is
just
over
659
thousand
dollars.
I
1994
figures,
where
the
most
of
the
properties
in
the
city
of
san
bruno
paid
46
a
year
to
fund
the
stormwater
enterprise,
but
our
operating
costs
alone
are
1.5
million,
and
so
that
leaves
a
deficit
of
875
000
and
our
capital
cost.
I
This
year
alone
was
476
000
and
that's
frankly
only
because
we
we
can't
afford
to
do
the
needed
work
and
a
large
majority
of
that
was
for
our
required
grant
match,
because
we
did
receive
a
grant
to
do
work
on
our
stormwater
system
and
spyglass,
but
that
grant
comes
with
the
requirement
to
pay
10,
and
so
we
had
to
identify
local
funds
to
do
that.
I
So
what
remains
unfunded
are
our
collection
boxes,
various
improvements
throughout
the
city.
We
have
a
regional
storm
water
capture
project
that
is
near
the
the
caltrans
right
away
at
I-280
and
I-380
and
trash
capture
devices
throughout
the
city
to
stop
trash
from
entering
into
our
stormwater
system
and
then
eventually
being
deposited
into
the
bay,
and
so
the
election
results
are
are
shown.
The
election
concluded
at
five
pm
on
june
15th
the
ballots,
a
public
county.
I
Another
ballots
began
in
this
room,
the
very
next
day
on
june
16th,
and
that
was
available
online
for
remote
viewing
and
in-person
attendance.
We
did
have
members
of
the
public
come
and
watch
the
ballot
county
as
well
as
we
live
stream.
I
The
ballot
counting
on
his
own
all
day,
and
so
the
results
are,
as
shown
one
1833,
yes,
votes,
3,
000,
310,
no
votes,
83
ballots
were
were
rejected,
and
so
I
won't
go
through
all
the
data,
but
we
did
want
to
provide
for
the
public
and
the
council
again
the
reasons
for
why
some
ballots
were
rejected.
I
Some
were
missing
a
signature,
others,
the
yes
or
no
was
not
marked
clearly,
and
we
had
a
few
duplicative
ballots
and
approximately
220
were
returned
to
sender
back
to
the
city
from
from
the
post
office.
And
so
what
are
our
next
steps?
I
Is
the
core
question
that
the
city,
council
and,
and
certainly
we
know
that
the
public
wants,
and
so
we
know
that
continuing
the
status
quo
is
not
acceptable
and
what
that
means
is
that
our
system
will
continue
to
flood
during
heavy
rains
and
cause
property
damage
and
risk
public
safety.
I
We
understand
and
we
recognize
that
property
owners
did
did
not
wish
to.
I
Say
yes
to
the
measure
and
pay
the
additional
costs,
but
we
also
know
that
both
property
owners
and
residents
want
their
want,
expect
and
deserve
to
have
their
public
infrastructure
maintained,
and
we
are
committed
to
continuing
to
find
a
solution
and
absolutely
the
council
is-
and
so
frankly
we're
committed
to
redouble
our
efforts,
and
this
was
a
strategic
initiative.
I
It
is
a
strategic
initiative,
it
is
not
closed
out
and
we
we
shall
continue
as
far
as
options
wanted
to
articulate
five
and
we
have
a
six
other
there,
because
there
are
certainly
others
that
can
be
considered.
I
But
the
the
options
that
we
wanted
to
talk
to
the
city
council
about
are
on
the
screen
and
we'll
go
through
them.
Now.
First
off
is
to
initiate
an
analysis
of
the
election
results,
and
this
would
entail
working
with
wildan
who
counted
the
ballots
for
us
and
engage
with
them
to
conduct
a
demographic
analysis
of
the
ballot
responses.
I
We
really
want
to
seek
information
on.
Are
there
patterns
of
how
property
properties
voted
by
type?
Are
there
patterns
by
neighborhood
or
if
the
assessment
amount
can
provide
us
some
sort
of
fact
based
information
on
trends
and
and
really
we
want
to
do
this
and
and
look
to
identify
funding
for
this?
I
We
would
need
to
work
with
the
city
council
to
have
approval
for
funding,
and
this
effort
is
currently
not
funded
and
we
would
align
any
future
polar
survey
to
one
of
the
future
efforts,
as
discussed
in
the
other
four
options
and
so
option
two
is
to
return
to
the
voters
with
a
further
or
additional
articulation
of
the
need.
I
think
the.
I
I
We
can
engage
on
a
second
prop
2018
process,
with
the
results
of
the
election
coming
out,
as
there
were
nearly
two
to
one,
not
in
favor,
not
sure
that
additional
articulation
would
be
helpful.
Certainly,
we
can
seek
to
do
a
a
more
robust
job
at
articulating
the
need.
It
is
also
important
to
note
that
the
city
is
barred
from
campaigning
or
asking
members
of
the
public
to
vote.
I
I
This
effort
would
be
focused
primarily
on
funding
the
master
plan
projects,
that
is,
that
30
plus
million
dollars
worth
of
projects
that
was
identified
in
the
city's
2017
master
plan,
and
essentially
what
this
would
do
is
that
it
would
bifurcate
the
problem
and
attempt
to
solve
a
portion
of
it.
The
the
storm,
drainage
and
flood
protection
fee
was
aimed
at
solving.
I
If
you
will
the
complete
issue,
both
the
issue
to
have
enough
funds
to
cover
the
operations
and
maintenance
of
the
system
and
also
recovering
enough
funds
to
complete
the
the
needed
projects,
so
that
we
can
over
time
do
that
30
million
dollars
worth
of
projects.
I
If
we
undertake
a
general
obligation
bond
or
a
parcel
tax,
we
can
really
focus
in
on
simply
doing
the
projects
and
look
for
other
ways
to
fund
the
operating
costs.
And
if
we
look
toward
funding
the
projects,
the
bonds
will
automatically
have
a
sunset
date
when
they
are
repaid,
and
that
may
address
some
concerns
that
we
heard
from
property
owners.
I
In
addition,
a
general
obligation
bond
and
a
parcel
or
a
parcel
tax
will
be
a
election
in
a
different
venue.
It
will
be
a
registered
voter
election
and
timing
that
on
election
cycles
that
have
a
high
turnout
may
also
be
something
that
the
city
council
wants
to
consider.
Whereas
the
storm
drain
and
flood
protection
fee
by
by
law
was
only
limited
to
property
owners,
not
limited,
not
not
registered
voters,
option
four
is
consider
a
special
stormwater
approved
tax
initiative.
I
This
could
likely
be
timed
for
the
november
22
or
november
24
election.
We
could
do
a
special
election,
but
as
we
saw
with
the
update
that
we
received
at
earlier
tonight's
meeting,
a
special
election,
the
cost
is
approximately
a
half
a
million
dollars,
so
500
000.
So
we
would
likely
want
to
time
any
voter
approved
initiative,
whether
in
option
three
or
option
four
to
when
there
is
a
regularly
scheduled
election.
I
That
will
require
a
two-thirds
approval
as
well
number
three,
depending
on
how
it's
structured,
but
that
is
an
option,
is
to
to
go
forward
with
a
tax
measure.
I
The
fifth
option
is
to
participate
in
a
possible
future
regional
effort.
I
As
the
I
know,
the
city
council
knows
there
has
been
a
new
county-wide
flood
control
and
sea
level
rise,
resiliency
agency
that
has
been
established,
and
there
are
conversations
about
having
a
county-wide
measure
to
look
at
storm
water
and
other
items
since
the
june
15
date.
We
have
received
inquiries
from
the
county
and
other
cities,
because
we
are
not
alone
and
having
a
challenge
with
funding
our
storm
water
system,
and
so
there
may
be
in
the
future,
a
region-wide
effort
to
look
at
stormwater
the
challenge,
with
region-wide
efforts
and
in
our
other
regional
revenue
sources.
I
Typically,
they
are
structured
as
the
revenue
from
the
county
is
pulled
together
and
given
in
strategic
grants
for
specific
projects,
and
so
we
may
not
be
able
to
look
toward
a
regional
effort
to
fund
our
for
the
full
complement
of
our
infrastructure,
because
with
typical
regional
revenue
measures,
a
city
does
not
receive
the
money
that's
collected
in
their
in
their
jurisdiction.
I
Those
funds
are
then
pooled
and
given
for
strategic
grants
and
six
is
other.
We
may
very
well
identify
other
efforts
and
we
didn't
want
to
close
off
any
possibilities
for
that
or
present
the
five
that
we've
talked
about
as
the
only
options.
And
so
as
far
as
the
staff
recommendation,
we
really
are
recommending
three,
which
is
to
proceed
with
the
analysis
of
the
prior
election
effort
for
stall.
I
Any
poll
or
survey
and
align
that
to
a
a
subsequent
effort
and
the
one
that
we
would
be
recommending
is
to
begin
looking
into
not
to
commit
but
begin
looking
into
a
general
obligation
bond
or
a
parcel
tax,
and
really
focus
that
initiative
on
accomplishing
the
capital
improvement
projects.
Those
in
pro
projects
that
we
know
about
those
projects
that
have
been
identified
because
the
infrastructure
is
aging
and
in
need
of
replacement
and
the
longer
we
wait
to
do
them
the
more
expensive.
I
They
become
that
if
a
line
was
a
bond
or
a
line
to
those
projects
would
have
a
sunset
and
then
the
fifth
item,
which
is
to
continue
to
have
conversations
with
the
county
and
other
agencies
within
the
county.
I
And
so
that
concludes
the
presentation
and
our
recommendations
and
open
for
any
questions
and
discussions
the
city
council
may
have.
I
will
take
this
slide
down
for
now,
but
if
council
would
like
me
to
call
it
back
up,
we'll
happy
happy
to
do
so.
A
F
I
Or
councilmember
mason,
yes,
at
the
prior
meeting
on
june
22nd,
you
did
ask
that,
should
the
city
conduct
analysis
that
we
look
at
the
largest
property
owners
and
have
have
they
voted
at
this
point,
the
city
in
in
the
last
three
weeks
have
not
embarked
on
that
effort.
I
We
can
look
at
that
through
the
demographic
analysis
and
look
at
the
type
when,
when
we
say
look
at
the
type
of
property
owners
in
that
first
bullet
under
number,
one
size
is
one
of
the
the
factors
that
we
will
look
into
and
that
can
also
be
attained
through
the
assessment
amount
data,
but
that
work
needs
to
be
conducted
and
funded.
But
in
the
last
three
weeks
we
have
not
begun
that
work,
and
that
is
one
of
the
recommendations
to
to
begin
network.
F
I
Council,
member
mason,
all
the
ballots
are
stored.
The
city
staff
have
not
gone
through
the
ballots
to
identify,
who
voted
and
how
how
they
voted.
The
ballots
were
counted
in
this
room
with
members
of
the
public
and
and
members
of
the
public,
both
present
and
at
home.
All
5000
plus
ballots
that
were
received
were
gone
through
and
sorted
in
yes
or
no.
I
In
order
to
undertake
the
analysis
to
to
see
the
any
demographic
trends,
we
really
need
to
embark
on
that
work,
and
we
have
not
done
that.
I
at
this
point
do
not
have
a
scope
of
work
for
the
vendor
that
we
would
look
to
do
that.
Nor
do
I
know
how
much
that
work
would
cost.
What
I
am
bringing
forward
to
the
city
council
here
at
your
request
is
a
recommendations
and
a
plan
for
next
steps.
I
That
is
one
of
the
next
steps,
and
should
the
city
council
agree
to
embark
on
that
analysis?
We
will
certainly
do
that
and
work
to
obtain
a
full
scope
of
work
and
a
timetable
in
the
last
three
weeks
that
work
has
not
been
done.
It's
not
funded.
We
are
simply
having
the
conversation
to
talk
about
next
steps
right
now,.
F
Okay,
so
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point,
but
I
I
I
just
I
don't
know
why
we
need
a
consultant
to
identify
the
top
20
landowners
and
how
they
voted,
but
I
would
just
leave
it
at
that.
It
should
be
pretty
fairly
easy
to
to
identify
that
information
without
demographics.
We
don't
need
to
know
more
information,
but
we
were
told
that
it
was
public
record
so
who
are
they
and
how
do
they
vote?
I
wanted
to
ask
also
around.
F
I
think
that
there's
questions
that
have
been
kind
of
not
like
clearly
not
maybe
clearly
communicated
around
the
the
public
and
how
the
public's
reaction
has
been
around
the
stormwater,
and
so
I
you
know,
the
areas
that
I
have
largely
heard
have
been
around.
Why
such
a
significant
increase,
and
could
it
be
phased
in
in
higher
quantities,
with
within
more
of
like
a
five
year
phase
in
five
year,
five
year,
five
year,
etc?
F
F
You
know
saying
that
it's
an
emergency,
it
is
an
emergency,
but
how
long
have
the
city
known
about
some
of
these
areas
and
then
I
think
the
other
area
that
is
really
kind
of
difficult
as
a
council
member
to
respond
to
is
why
the
city
is
prioritizing
requesting
these
funds
of
the
residents
when
we
still
haven't
initiated
the
short-term
rentals,
the
charter
city
transfer,
tax
for
commercial
buildings
and
the
cannabis
tax,
and
so
I
say
this
only
because
again,
I
don't
know
what
a
console
would
cost.
F
F
I
know
that
we
saved
a
lot
of
money
on
consultants
and
in
moving
this
forward,
but
I
do
want
to
take
a
step
back
and
just
be
very
clear
that
I
don't
think
it's
a
big
surprise
what
the
areas
of
concern
were-
and
I
think
we've
got
to
be
honest
with
ourselves
about
that
and
figure
out.
How
do
we
address
them
and
move
forward?
J
J
That
would
detail
the
costs
associated
to
do
that
study,
so
I'm
in
favor
of
of
hearing
what
that
cost
would
be,
and
until
we
get
the
cost
it's
kind
of
hard
to
move
off.
Of
that
point,
I
think
there
were.
There
was
a
bunch
of
uncertainty
in
this
election
and
coveted
made
it
much
more
difficult,
and
I'm
hoping
that
at
some
point
our
residents
will
we
need
our
residents
to
get
behind
this.
We
can't
continue
operating
with.
J
Hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
that
are
going
to
be
coming
out
of
our
general
fund
and
our
infrastructure
continues
to
age
a
we're
a
hundred
years
year.
City,
the
backbone
of
of
our
stormwater
system,
is
old
and
we
need
to
fix
it,
and
if
we
don't
have
the
funds
to
fix
it,
then
we're
going
to
have
to
take
that
out
of
our
general
fund.
J
Our
city
manager
calls
that
a
backstop
and
it's
a
different
way
of
wording
it,
but
the
money
has
to
come
out
of
somewhere
and
and
but
so
to
to
get
to
the
point
of
where
we're
going
to
go.
Now,
I'm
first
ready
to
request
that
the
data
be
generated,
and
then
we
need
to
look
at
next.
Steps
from
there
is
to
educate
our
public
on
on
the
different
scenarios
to
pay
for
it
and
to
see
how
comfortable
our
residents
will
be.
J
This
is
a
very
long,
expensive
problem
that
hasn't
been
addressed
and
and
we
need
to
take
care
of
it.
So
that's
where
I'm
at
currently,
mr
may.
C
I
am
also
in
favor
of
of
actually
all
three
of
the
of
the
staff's
recommendations
here
regarding
the
analysis.
What
I,
what
I,
what
I
was
hearing
just
to
to
clarify
with
the
the
discussion
from
council
member
mason
regarding
the
analysis,
what
I
was
hearing
was
that,
on
election
day,
the
ballots
were
went
through
and
they
were
put
into.
This
is
a
yes.
This
is
a
no.
This
is
a
yes,
this
is
a
yes.
This
is
a
no
I
mean
into
those
piles,
but
not
neces,
but
what
was
not
done
was.
C
This
is
a
yes,
and
this
is
the
parcel
number
and
the
name
from
for
that
one,
and
that
that
level
did
not
happen
on
election
day,
which
I
can
probably
understand,
given
that
it
was
a
public
open
process.
So,
which
is
why
so,
my
understanding
is
that
the
quality
ballots
are
going
to
need
to
be
gone
through
again
to
get
that
level
of
detail,
so
that
analysis
can
be
done.
Is
that
correct.
I
Yes,
councilmember
hamilton
just
to
expound
on
that,
I
think
it
would
have
been
inappropriate
for
us
to
read
off
every
ballot
and
how
each
individual
property
are
voted,
and
so
we
we
can't
undertake
an
analysis
of
the
demographics
and
and
trends.
We
would
return
that
information
without
revealing
individual
votes
and
it
would
be
aggregated
based
on
trends
based
on
the
demographics
of
of
individual
properties,
but
we
would,
we
would
still
seek
not
to
identify
how
individuals
voted.
I
I
think
we
heard
that
as
a
concern
from
some
members
of
our
community
that
were
unfamiliar
with
a
required
property
owner
election,
and
so
I
think
we
would
need
to
maintain
that,
with
the
analysis
that's
conducted.
Okay,.
C
Thank
you,
so
I
I
would.
I
am
in
favor
of
of
doing
the
analysis,
but
also
of
course,
we
want
to
know
what
it's
going
to
cost
before
we
embark
on
it,
and
I
know
that's
the
process
we
would.
We
will
follow
the
I
am
in
favor
of
considering
a
general
obligation,
bond
or
partial
tax,
exploring
that
and
focusing
on
the
capital
projects
and
also
seeing
what
we
can
do
regionally
and
partnering
just
general
comments
in
the
the
post-mortem.
From
all
of
this.
C
I
also
had
some
concerns
about
the
about
the
the
messaging.
I
felt
that
the
messaging
that
that
was
done
all
focused
on
on
was
all
okay,
but
I
don't
think
it
focused
on
everything
that
needed
to
focus
on,
and
I
think
that
I
spoke
to
many
many
residents
as
part
of
this
process
trying
to
convince
them
to
vote.
Yes,
and
I
didn't
end
up
using
any
of
the
arguments
that
were
in
any
of
the
literature.
C
The
the
the
primary
two
arguments
that
I
used
with
folks
were
around
the
the
fact
that
the
the
rate
had
not
been
raised
since
1994,
and
the
analogy
that
I
use
with
folks
is
you
go
down
to
grand
leader
and
try
to
buy
a
sandwich
from
mike
and
give
him
four
dollars
for
that
sandwich,
because
that's
what
you
paid
in
1994
you're
not
going
to
walk
out
of
there
with
a
sandwich,
and
that
seemed
to
resonate
with
folks,
because
it's
just
it's
just
basic
math,
but
what
people
were
really
the
most
upset
about
was
how
did
we
get
here?
C
C
It
should
have
been
addressed
sooner,
but
regardless
we
are
where
we
are,
so
I
was
able
to
convince
a
few
a
few
people
from
from
from
node,
yes,
but
not
nearly
enough
clearly,
but
using
those
arguments-
and
I
just
I
just
want
us
to
you-
know-
think
hard
about
the
the
messaging
for
next
time.
If
we
need
to
go
back,
you
know
if
we're
going
to
be
going
back
to
the
voters.
C
H
Yeah,
thank
you,
so
I
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
a
couple
of
council
member
masons
comments,
one
specifically
so
regarding
the
ability
to
provide
senior
discounts
on
something
that
we
place
on
a
property
tax.
Is
that
an
option
for
us,
because
I
think
that
would
definitely
be
a
benefit
to
the
community
if
that's
possible.
I
D
Well,
I
wish
I
could
mr
salazar
and
members
of
the
city
council.
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
without
doing
some
research,
so
we'll
we'll
take
a
look
at
that
and
come
back
with
you
about
that.
I
apologize.
I
just
don't
don't
know
off
the
top
of
my.
H
Head,
okay,
all
right,
thank
you
and
then
also
in
terms
of
other
revenue
sources,
because
I
I
heard
similar
concerns
from
residents
about
you
know.
The
city
should
be
doing
everything
it
can
to
collect
all
the
revenue
that
it
can
be
for
going
back
to
the
voters,
so
in
in
terms
of
that.
So
the
all
the
other
things
that
I
believe
that
are
on
our
horizon
right
now
are
general
fund
type
taxes,
and
so
I
wanted
to
get
an
idea.
H
Is
that
is
an
increase
in
our
general
fund
really
going
to
get
us
where
we
need
to
be
with
storm
drain
or
does
storm
drain
truly
need
a
dedicated
funding
source?
That's
only
going
to
benefit
just
like
we
do
with
water
and
sewer.
So
I
wanted
to
get
a
better
idea
about
that,
because
I
think
that
also
strengthens
the
argument
around
why
we
would
want
to
go
back
out
and
do
anything
other
than
just
focus
on
general
fund.
I
I
The
the
revenue
no
longer
captures
the
cost.
Many
of
those
expenditures
have
to
occur.
We
have
to
maintain
the
system
we
have.
We
have
infrastructure,
that's
needed.
If
we
can't
afford
it,
we
apply
for
grants.
When
we
get
a
grant,
we
have
to
pay
for
the
grant
match
that
happened
this
year.
We
have
an
option
to
say
you
know
what
we're
not
going
to
apply
for
grants,
because
we
don't
even
have
the
money
for
the
grant
match.
We're.
I
I
What
that
comes
with
is
pushing
off
other
needed
general
fund
programs
and
services
and
other
capital
improvements,
and
so
most
agencies
would
look
at
a
enterprise
like
stormwater
and
try
to
solve
that
with
recovering
additional
money
for
that
enterprise,
and
if
that
is
not
an
option,
we
still
have
mandated
costs,
and
so
the
general
fund
will
have
to
pay
for
those
costs
and
that
that
is
just
going
to
come
with
the
trade-off.
You
know.
I
Unfortunately,
san
bruno
has
been
an
under-resourced
city
for
quite
some
time
and
we
have
to
make
very
tough
challenges
every
year
with
what
we,
what
we
fund
and
what
we
don't
find-
and
you
know
candidly
at
the
end
of
this
month,
it'll
be
three
years
that
I've
been
the
city
manager.
Here
this
this
has
been
a
year
and
a
half
effort.
The
fee
hasn't
been
increased
for
26
for
27
years.
I
No
one
wanted
to
talk
about
it,
not
staff,
not
members
in
the
community,
and
it
was
an
effort
that
I
pushed
as
a
city
manager
of
this
organization,
because
I
felt
that
it
was
critically
important
to
the
financial
health
because
it
hadn't
been
done
and
the
the
the
revenue
was
constantly
being
eroded
by
the
cost.
I
And
so,
as
I
said
on
june
22nd,
it
was
a
hail
mary
pass
because
we
had
waited
to
the
very
last
moment
as
an
organization
and
as
a
city
to
address
this
to
the
point
to
where,
in
this
current
budget
year,
the
fund
is
negative,
and
so
thankfully
we
were
able
to
use
federal
dollars
to
cover
one
year
of
that
million
dollar
deficit.
We
still
have
a
problem:
we've
had
we've
had
a
problem
for
more
than
a
decade
and
we're
committed
to
continuing
to
to
work
through
a
solution.
I
We're
committed
to
debriefing
the
effort,
we're
committed
to
re-articulating.
What
I
will
say
candidly
is
that
I
do
not
think
this
organization
was
not
transparent
or
that
this
organization
cherry-picked
images.
This
is
infrastructure
that
we
are
not
saying.
If
you
don't
maintain.
If
something
may
happen,
something
has
happened.
I
We
have
spent
over
1.5
million
dollars
in
the
last
24
months,
because
infrastructure
failed
because
we
did
not
maintain
it,
and
that's
that's
that's
that
that
that's
the
reality
and
so
we're
committed
to
doing
everything
we
can
to
continue
to
debrief
the
effort
to
launch
a
new
effort,
but
I
do
take
issue
with
the
organization
not
being
transparent.
I
We
can
absolutely
improve.
We
can
absolutely
re-articulate,
but
I
do
believe
the
organ.
The
organization
did
transparently
articulate
the
challenge
and
absolutely
going
forward.
We
will
we
will
adjust.
H
Thank
you
for
that
city
manager,
and
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
what
you're
saying
and
I
can
say
that
that
transparency
goes
back
years
and
we've
we've
had
these
conversations.
We
started
these
conversations
long
back
when
we
first
decided
to
increase
the
water
and
sewer
rates,
and
I
remember
back
then
naively
asking
why
we
didn't
put
our
sewer
rates
on
the
on
the
tax
bill
on
the
property
tax
bill,
and
I
was
cautioned
then
that
it
would
be
far
more
difficult
to
get
an
increase
if
we
were
to
go
that
direction.
H
So
I
agree
with
you
that
we
have
always
been
transparent.
We
knew
this
was
coming.
We
chose
to
focus
on
the
other
two
enterprises,
and
I
think
that
we
have
made
huge
strides
in
both
of
those.
This
was
one
that
we
knew
would
be
difficult.
I
think
that
our
predictions
were
validated
with
these
results.
H
H
I
do
agree
with
council
member
hamilton
that
perhaps
the
the
facts
that
were
stated
in
the
literature
didn't
hit
the
point,
and
I
I
think
I
would
be
more
concerned
in
revisiting
what
you
know
what
we
were
trying
to
do
there
and
what
the
message
would
be
rather
than
really
trying
to
analyze.
H
You
know
the
the
demographics
of
the
votes
that
came
in,
I
think
with
as
few
ballots
I
mean
we're
talking
about.
You
know:
5
000
total
ballots,
1800
of
those
being
yeses.
I
don't
know
that
we'd
be
able
to
pull
anything.
H
That's
statistically
significant
out
of
those
few
numbers
of
data
points
to
really
help
us
re-strategize
how
we
would
go
back
out
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
really
need
to
convince
the
majority
of
our
our
residents
that
this
this
truly
is
necessary
and
it's
important
and
that
you
know
just
finding
other
revenue
sources.
Other
generic
revenue
sources
for
the
general
fund
will
not
necessarily
help
us
in
this
effort.
H
H
So
I
wouldn't
push
heavily
on
that,
and
maybe
we
start
looking
at
at
doing
a
different
type
of
tax
measure
and
and
then
finally,
just
in
terms
of
looking
at
other
alternatives,
is
there
a
reason
why
we
couldn't
do
a
storm
fee?
That's
similar
to
our
sewer
fee,
where
it's
it's
tied
to
the
sort
of
build
as
a
service,
rather
than
as
something
that
has
to
be
placed
on
the
on
the
on
the
tax
roll.
I
Yeah
so
we'll
look
into
that
and
we'll
have
the
city
attorney
research
that
question
all
right.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
when
I
use
the
word
honest
with
the
residents,
I
want
to
just
kind
of
be
clear
that
an
example
is
in
one
of
the
flyers.
It
was
that
emergency
on
san
bernardino
avenue
and
we
had
a
number
of
meetings
about
it.
F
It
was
quite
expensive
to
fix
and
I
received
an
email
from
a
resident
with
an
email
attached
to
it,
stating
that
what
happened
was
gonna
happen
about
eight
or
eight
seven
or
eight
years
ago,
and
so,
when
I
talk
about
just
being,
you
know
straightforward
with
our
residents.
It's
you
know
saying
that
these
are
things
that
we've
known
about,
but
they've
been
deferred,
and
luckily
nobody
was
hurt.
F
Nobody
was
injured,
but
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
my
conversations
with
a
number
of
residents
were
ultimately
that
we
need
to
invest
in
our
storm
water.
It
does
need
to
be
a
dedicated
fund.
I
think
the
issue
that
I
heard
over
and
over
was
that
there
were
all
these
other
questions
that
were
not
answered
and
I
think
at
one
point
or
another
they
were
answered
for
us.
F
One
of
those
mailings
could
have
been
an
faq
where
we
actually
go
question
by
question
that
we've
been
asked
as
council
members
and
just
go
ahead
and
respond
to
them,
because
I
I
my
feeling-
and
I
can't
speak
for
all
the
council
members,
but
is
that
the
city
does
need
to
invest
in
its
infrastructure
and
we
have
made
huge
efforts
in
getting
funding
but
based
on
our
budget
season
this
year.
F
It's
clear
that
most
of
our
funding
sources,
even
those
increases,
are
already
allotted
to
other
needs,
also,
some
of
which
are
infrastructure,
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
clear
about
our
needs
and
kind
of
how
far
we've
come
and
how
far
we
still
need
to
go,
because
we're
really
just
leveling
the
the
bar
right.
Now
we
we
had,
we
really
didn't
have
any
money
a
year
ago
and
not
that
we
have
a
whole
lot
more
money
now.
F
But
I
think
that
there
have
been
a
lot
of
efforts
made
to
generate
revenue
and
the
three
areas
I
just
mentioned:
short-term
rental
charter
city
transfer,
tax
and
cannabis
tax
were
responded
to
during
our
budget
meeting,
letting
us
know
where
the
city
was
with
each
one
of
those.
But
if
you
missed
that
meeting,
then
you
don't
know
what's
going
on,
you
don't
know
what
efforts
are
being
taken
to
achieve
those,
and
so
when
I
talk
about
you
know
responding.
F
F
I
can't
tell
you
how
many
people
asked
about
why
the
community
funds
weren't
being
spent
on
stormwater
and
that
could
have
been
probably
a
whole
page
of
its
of
itself,
not
just
informing
the
public
around
about
what's
going
on
with
the
community
foundation
and
how
those
funds
are
allocated,
but
also
addressing
you
know
why
those
funds
were
being
placed
into
the
rack
as
opposed
to
storm
water,
and
I
I've
responded
to
many
residents
around.
You
know
the
process
on
how
the
rack
was,
you
know
determined
by
the
residents
etc.
F
But
I
I
really
am
just
trying
to
say
that
I
think
you
know
this
is
something
that
is
desperately
needed
in
san
bruno.
We
are
going
to
have
more
emergencies
if
we
don't
invest
in
it,
but
I
do
think
it's
really
important
that
as
a
as
a
city
when
we
communicate
with
the
residents
we've
gotta
we've
got
to
understand
where
the
residents
are
coming
from
and
we
have
to
make
sure
that
our
residents
questions
are
being
answered
head-on,
and
I
just
want
to
see
in
my
notes,
if
I
had
anything
else.
F
Oh
and
I-
and
I
would
say
the
the
other
area
too,
that
I
heard
about
was
also
the
measure
g.
We
approved
measure
g
and
we're
not
seeing
our
streets
repaired
overnight
and
I've
told
a
number
of
residents
about
the
great
presentation
that
we
received
a
couple
months
ago
from
dpw
about
this
10-year
street
repair
plan,
and
that's
also
an
area
that
I
think
we
should
continue
to
share
and
communicate
with
our
with
our
residents,
because
there
are
plans
for
street
repair.
F
A
A
So
I
don't
know
if
councilmember
mason
spoken,
but
did
you
have
any
suggestions
for
staff
or.
F
I
I
think
for
me
now
that
we've
learned
from
the
earlier
presentation
that
you
know
there's
a
deadline
around
when
you've
gotta
submit
any
measures
like
you
know.
So,
for
the
recall,
I
think
they
said
it
was
like
june
15th.
So
if
we
were
looking
at
placing
this
on
a
future
ballot
measure,
what
would
that
timeline
look
like
and
then
within
that
timeline?
What
would
the
cost
be
to
determine
whether
it's
something
that
would
behoove
us
to
budget
this
year
or
a
future?
F
You
know
a
future
future
year,
I'm
and
I'm
just
saying
that,
because
we're
we're
going
to
have
an
election
in
2022.
So
what
does
that
timeline
look
like,
and
what
does
the
cost
look
like?
Thank.
J
So
at
some
point,
yes
considering
the
recommendation
number
three,
but
that's
that's
further
down
the
road.
I
believe
that
the
initial
analysis
of
the
results
will
be
beneficial
when,
when
staff
could
look
at
that
data,
they'll
have
a
better
knowledge
of
where
it
passed
and
where,
where
where
the
effort
should
be
concentrated.
J
For
me
in
in
hearing
my
colleagues
comments
about
talking
to
residents,
we
need
we
need
to
to
do
a
little
bit
better
in
educating
them
and
perhaps
looking
at
how
the
increase
won't
be
so
steep
and
and
the
the
option
three.
There
would
fall
in
my
mind
within
that
being
that
tonight
this
we're
not
gonna
solve
this
tonight,
but
we
need
to
to
get
ourselves
on
a
path
to
to
deal
with
it.
J
So
for
me,
is
first
the
data
and
then
considering
the
recommendation
three
sure,
but
that's
like
further
down
the
road
with
with
study
sessions
and
and
making
sure
that
the
questions
from
our
residents
are
answered
and
they're
repeated,
and
it's
referred
to
too
often
in
our
city.
J
People
may
say:
well,
I
didn't
know
about
that,
and
it's
like
well
here:
here's
where
the
information
is
and
in
covid
in
the
colbig
year
it
was
very
hard
to
to
to
with
all
the
the
distractions
to
to.
Let
people
know
how
important
this
really
is.
So
we
could
tweak
it,
and
I
look
forward
to
many
meetings
on
on
figuring
out
how
we're
gonna
solve
this
problem,
because
it's
really
serious.
A
Okay,
so
am
I
hearing
from
all
all
my
colleagues
that
let's
just
go
from
a
number
five,
I
think
nobody
is
saying
not
to
continue
you
in
those
efforts
or
communications
is
that
is
that
correct?
Is
there
anybody
that
disagrees
with
that
statement?
A
I'm
seeing
no
hands
no
nods
of
saying
no,
so
I
I
see
that
that's
five
thumbs
up.
Okay,
this
is
going
based
on
what
staff
was
giving
recommendation
on
item
number
one
was
initiate
the
analysis
of
the
election
results.
Am
I
hearing
from
my
colleagues
that
they'd
like
to
have
that
looked
into
get
some
data
and
then
come
back
with
a
plan
that
would
be
like
if
we
went
down
this
path
that
cost
this
that
passed
it
half
it
cost
that
just
wanted,
because
I've
heard
a
little
bit
about
that.
A
Yes,
we
want
some
analysis.
Is
that
accurate?
Mr
vice
mayor?
Yes,
mr
hamilton,
yes,
thank
you,
mr
hamilton.
Well,.
C
A
Get
conscious
conscious,
mr
salazar,
no
I'm.
H
Going
to
say
no
and
unless
you
know
number
because
number
one
relates
directly
to
number
two.
So
unless
we're
saying
we
definitely
want
to
do
number
two,
we
want
to
go
another
run
at
it.
I
don't
see
the
value
of
doing
number
one.
So
I'm
I'm
I'm
very
cool
on
one
and
two,
I
I
would
say
no
and
I
would
rather
have
staff
focus
on
three
and
four
personally.
A
Okay,
councilmember
mason,
I'm.
F
A
F
F
Yeah,
I
think
I'm
without
knowing
enough
about
the
regional
effort.
I
would
say
no
to
that,
we're
really
behind
and
I'm
worried
that.
A
You
know
well,
but
if
there's
possible
funding,
it's
like,
why
would
you
turn
it
down
if
there's
available
funding
that
we're
able
to
get
through
whatever
it
might
be?
But
that's
that's
fine,
so
it's
four
to
one
to
participate
in
possible
future
regional
effort
that
has
been
given
direction
to
staff.
Now
we're
back
to
the
initiate
the
analysis.
Council,
member
salazar
felt
that
you
know
last
conscious.
I
think
that
council
member
hamilton
is
on
the
same,
but
maybe
maybe
I'm
I'm
taking
this
off
a
little
bit.
C
Yes,
I
had
just
a
really
quick
comment
on
after
councilmember
salazar's
comment.
I
don't
think
that
the
analysis
doing
the
analysis
only
benefits
us
for
number
two.
I
I
also
agree
that
going
going
back
and
doing
this
whole
same
process
again
would
be
probably
foolish
and
and
wasteful,
but
I
do
think
that
the
that
understanding
from
a
demographic
perspective,
how
people
voted
would
might
yield
us
important
information
for
number
three
for
for
targeting
our
targeting
our
messaging
and
whatnot.
C
H
Thank
you.
Can
I
clarify
something,
mr
please
only
that
you
know
when
we
we
look
at
the
election
from
the
number.
The
number
one
results
compared
to
the
number
three
we're
not
talking
about
the
same
group
of
people
anymore,
because
we're
talking
property
owners
versus
registered
voters.
So
it's
a
completely
different
body
of
people
so
making
that
that
leap
from
one
to
the
other,
I
think,
would
be
difficult.
H
So
I
mean
some
of
these
people.
It
may
not
be
the
same
people
at
all
and
they
may
count
in
different
groups
whether
you
know
one
person
that
will
own
several
properties
would
get
several
votes,
whereas
in
the
other
way
you
know
it's
it's
individual
voters,
so
I
think
there's
less
opportunity
to
transfer
that
that
data
and
that's
why
I'm
I'm
thinking
unless.
G
A
Data
you,
council,
member
city
manager,.
I
Or
just
to
clarify
number
one,
we
would
develop
a
scope
of
work
and
bring
that
to
the
city
council
for
review
and
approval.
I
It
is
my
belief
that
we
would
need
to
utilize
the
services
of
an
outside
entity
to
do
a
comprehensive
demographic
analysis.
At
this
point,
I
can't
say
whether
those
results
would
be
solely
beneficial
for
a
similar
effort
or
may
provide
information
that
is
beneficial
for
a
general
bond
obligation.
For
example,
if
we
see
trends
where
larger
assessment
sort
of
anyone
over
x
amount
of
assessment
voted,
no,
that
may
factor
in
the
type
of
general
obligation
bond
that
we
go
out
for
the
series
of
the
bonds.
I
So
how
how
much
we
do
at
any.
Given
time
we
may
bond
for
5
million.
If
the
data
shows
that
you
know
what
to
bond
for
10
million,
it
may
be
a
no,
and
so
we
may
actually
stretch
out
the
time
horizon
at
which
we
would
undertake
the
bonds
to
do
the
work.
And
so,
if
the
city
council
says
proceed
with
number
one,
what
we
would
do
is
we
would
identify
the
scope
of
work
and
we
would
come
back
to
you
with
that
scope
of
work
and
the
projected
costs.
I
With
regard
to
number
three,
we
would
need
to
begin
work
to
understand
the
general
obligation
bond
process
and
the
parcel
tax
you
know.
While
we
have
it
seems
like
a
long
time
till
november
2022,
we
already
have
direction
for
a
number
of
potential
initiatives
that
would
be
on
the
november
22
election
cycle,
a
charter
city
and
a
potential
real
estate
transfer
tax
for
commercial
properties
being
won.
I
We
really
can't
do
all
of
that
work
in
the
first
six
months
of
2022
to
prepare
to
put
something
on
the
ballot,
and
so
should
we
look
to
proceed
down
with
this
effort.
We're
really
going
to
have
to
put
that
into
our
work
program
with
all
of
the
other
strategic
initiatives
and,
most
importantly,
ballot
initiatives
that
we
will
be
considering
for
22,
and
so
work
would
begin
on
this
in
this
fiscal
year,
and
so
that's
why
that's?
Why
it's
up
there?
I
Because
we
we
would
need
to
identify
the
precise
path
forward
and
then,
as
we
talked
about
all
of
these,
have
an
articulation
process
behind
them
an
articulation
process.
We
cannot
as
an
agency
campaign
for
passage,
but
we
can
articulate
factual
information.
A
Okay,
you
folks
have
heard
the
analysis
from
the
city
manager.
So
what
is
your
folks
thoughts
on
item?
One
councilmember
mason.
F
I'm
sorry
mayor
medina,
I
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out.
Is
there
any
reason
we
can't
go
back
again
for
another
initiative
with
similar
to
this
one
at
a
future
date,
once
we
have
more
information
and
done
in-house,
I
don't
know.
If
I'm
I,
I
don't
see
that
option
here.
F
F
J
Oh,
I
just
wanted
to
express
my
support
for
getting
getting
a
cost
estimate
for
the
analysis
of
the
election.
J
A
I
So
with
number
one,
if
the
council
says
proceed,
we're
interested
in
potentially
analyzing
the
election
results,
we
would
contact
companies
that
do
that
work,
develop
a
scope
of
work
and
return
to
the
city
council
with
a
estimated
cost
of
that
work.
I
What
I
have
not
said
up
until
this
point
is
that
we
will
take
another
look
at
our
ability
to
do
it
in-house
and
what
that
pushes
off
for
other
work,
that
is,
on
the
city's
work
program,
as
well
as
based
on
the
scope
of
work.
If
we
have
the
skill
set
to
do
that
in-house.
What
I
said
earlier
is
that
it's
my
recommendation
that
we
would
ideally
use
an
outside
firm
to
have
a
very
professional,
comprehensive
analysis.
I
But
again
that
will
my
recommendation
to
you
will
also
be
informed
by
the
cost
of
that
right
if
that's
cost
prohibitive.
I
may
say
you
know
if
the
council
wants
to
do
this,
here's
what
we
can
do
in-house
with
our
own
resources,
but
you're
not
saying
do
the
work,
you're
essentially
saying
out
of
the
possible
options
for
next
steps,
we're
interested
in
looking
into
number
one.
A
A
I'll
go
ahead
with
the
yes
as
far
as
that,
so
you
have
the
direction
there.
You
have
directions
so
far,
basically
was
four
to
one
on
number:
five,
four
to
one
on
number:
one
city
manager.
Do
you
want
to
pause
at
that
point,
or
do
you
still
want
us
to
go
over
whether
it's
number
two
or
number
three?
Or
what
are
your
thoughts
at
this
time?.
I
If
the
council
is
interested
in
us,
adding
this
as
a
to
our
work
program
to
look
at
a
possible
general
obligation,
bond
or
parcel
tax
around
our
other
ballot
initiatives
that
we
may
consider
for
20
november
22.,
you
can
do
that
now
or
we
can
have
those
discussions
later.
I
Does
the
decision
have
to
be
made
tonight?
Absolutely
not.
We
can
schedule
a
study
session,
but
what
I
would
say
is
that,
as
a
city
council
knows
the
work
program
that
we
approved
and
funded,
not
everything
on
that
work
program
will
get
done,
and
so,
if
we
are
going
to
potentially
do
this,
knowing
sooner
rather
than
later,
is
important.
I
So
I
can
organize
the
work
that
staff
has
to
do,
because
this
has
a
definite
timetable
to
it
and
it
has
an
alignment
to
the
other
ballot
items
that
we
may
be
considering
and
and
all
of
those
potential
ballot
items
really
need
to
come
to
the
city
council
fully
baked
at
the
same
time.
So
you
can
make
a
informed
decision
on
which
items
you
would
like
to
put
on
the
ballot
saying.
Consider
a
geo
or
a
parcel
tax
is
not
sort
of
saying
we're.
I
You're
you're
you're
definitely
going
to
do
that
effort
and
if
you
would
like,
we
can
sort
of
schedule
further
conversations
at
another
time.
But
if
staff
is
to
begin
work
on
it,
we
need
the
direction
and
we
really
need
to
put
it
put
it
within
the
the
work
program.
And
so
we
really
can't
wait.
I
I
I
would
say
longer
than
october
for
that
for
that
direction
and
that
that
would
really
be
pushing
up
to
sort
of
not
leaving
a
lot
of
time
for
us
to
do
work
in
in
21
on
it,
and
I
I
do
think
it's
absolutely
critical
that
we
do
some
work
in
21
on
this.
It's
an
even
remote
possibility
that
the
council
wants
to
consider
for
22.
A
Okay,
councilmember
salazar.
H
And
so
it's
it
was
this
sort
of
lack
of
concrete
direction
that
caused
me
to
try
to
put
the
brakes
on
on
approving
the
budget,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
think
it
is.
I
think
it's
critical
and
I
think
it's
time
sensitive,
and
so
I
I
want
to
definitely
make
a
decision
to
work
that
into
the
work
plan.
You
know
whether
it's
going
to
be
two
three
or
four,
but
I
I
think
we
need
to
identify
a
path
forward
sooner
rather
than
later.
H
I'd
rather
not
delay
that,
because
this
is
critical,
it's
a
it's
a
huge
gap
and
we
definitely
can't
feel
it
from
the
from
the
general
fund
based
on
you
know
what
we
projected
so
something's
got
to
give,
and
so
I'd
like
to
see
us
start
work
on
it
soon.
J
I'm
apprehensive
on,
I
understand
the
severity
and
the
need
to
do
something
with
this
adding
another
initiative
to
an
overloaded.
Currently
we
don't
know
what
is
going
to
get
be
done.
J
So
if
our
city
manager
says
that
we
could
wait
a
little
bit,
then
I
say
we
wait
and
then
we
get
an
update
on
where
we
are
with
cannabis,
where
we
are
with
with
airbnb
and
all
these
other
things,
and
we
can
have
further
discussions
on
it.
Clearly
we're
going
to
do
something,
but
it
that
decision
doesn't
have
have
to
happen
right
now
at
this
time.
That's
what
I
heard
from
our
city
manager
and
I
think
that's
what
we
should
do.
D
J
We
never
we
never
did
prioritize
our
strategic
initiatives
and
and
that's
something
that
I
think
we
really
need
to
do.
Okay,
that
we
can't
do
everything.
Let
me
just
finish,
mr
mayor
just
30
seconds
more
so
when,
when
stuff
like
this
comes
up,
where
it's
really
important
to
do
something,
we
need
to
be
able
to
say,
take
something
off,
because
it
all
won't
get
done
and
we
need
to.
A
Thank
you,
sir
anything
else
from
mr
hamilton
or
mrs
mason.
A
F
F
I
also
I
also
just
want
to.
I
guess
where
my
what
part
of
my
confusion
is
is
normally
when
you're
looking
at
your
options,
if
you're
going
to
hire
an
outside
party,
you're
they're,
going
to
let
you
know
what
the
what
the
possibilities
are
within
each
option
and
I
feel
like
we're
being
asked
to
prioritize
options
without
really
fully
knowing
what
it
is
that
we're
prioritizing
and
we
may
be
leaving
something
off
so,
for
example,
the
future
regional
effort.
F
You
know
if,
if
you're
telling
me
hey,
there's
money
available,
there
has
been
money
available
in
the
last
decade,
then
I
would
of
course
want
to
support
something
where
there's
money
available,
but
if
you're
saying
that
there's
a
possible
future
regional
effort,
nothing
really
is
known
about
it.
Right
now,
and
you
know
san
bruno,
a
smaller
city
compared
to
our
neighboring
cities
may
may
benefit
from
it.
F
F
I
think
it's,
I
think
the
stormwater
initiative
as
a
whole
needs
to
continue
to
be
a
priority
for
the
city.
I
guess
I
would
just
like
to
better
understand
or
better
understand
each
one
of
these
options
and
what
it
is
really
that
we're
trying
to
get
out
of
them
and
I'm
just
not
feeling
like
we've
been
provided.
That
answer.
C
Regarding
the,
I
already
said
my
piece
on
number
one
number:
five,
I
think
you
know
I
it's
hard
to
know
what
we
don't
know.
You
know
the
the
we
need
it
sounds
like.
We
just
need
to
keep
our
ears
open
on
and
and
let
let
all
the
players
know
that
if
there
is
a
county
initiative
that
comes
forward,
that
we
would
be
interested
in
hearing
about
it
and
potentially
participating,
but
not
knowing
what
it
is.
C
You
know
we
can't
commit
to
anything,
as
I'm
sure
no
other
city
would
without
knowing
what
it,
what
it's
going
to
be,
or
maybe
that's
maybe
it's
going
to
be
a
similar,
a
similar
tax,
but
a
county
tax
that
would
end
up
with
a
much
larger
pool
of
money
that
would
need
to
be.
F
C
Up
among
all
the
cities,
and
who
knows
what
our
portion
of
that
would
be,
it's
really
hard
to
tell
what
what
that
would
be,
but
I
think
we
need
to
you
know,
keep
our
ears
and
eyes
open
on
that
one
for
number
three
for
number:
three
yeah
I
mean
I
think
we
need
to.
I
think
we
need
to
pursue
that.
Do
I
think
we
need
to
drop
everything
this
month
and
and
push
forward
with
it.
C
No
and
the
city
manager
said
this
said
the
same
thing,
but
it
is
something
that
we're
going
to
need
to
focus
on
in
the
near
in
the
nearer
term,
because
you
know
the
the
the
prop
218
process
failed
and
we
need
to
fund
stormwater.
We
can't
we,
you
know,
as
everyone's
said
repeatedly
tonight
and
for
the
last
several
months.
We
can't
continue
this
way
and
we
have
to.
We
have
to
address
it.
A
Okay,
so
I'll
summarize
in
that
mr
salazar
would
like
to
proceed
on
on
three
I've.
I've
heard
vice
mayor
would
like
to
wait
until
possibly
october.
I've
heard
from
mr
hamilton,
I
believe,
want
to
proceed
with
three
keeping
it
at
the
line
linda.
I
know
you
were
I'm
sorry,
councilmember
mason,
you
were
talking
about
just
not
knowing
like
you
know.
I
don't
know
that
there's
any
regional
efforts
yet,
but
I
don't
want
to
turn
away
after
an
opportunity
or
option
opens
for
me.
A
I
believe
that
we
need
to
to
this
is
something
that
we
have
to
take
care
of.
We
have
to
to
move
on,
and
so
we
need
to
give
staff
those
that
that
kind
of
direction
to
to
do
that
is
important.
I
see
that
the
city
manager
has
his
hand
up
sure.
I
Let
me
attempt
to
a
plow
a
way
forward,
starting
from
the
bottom.
With
regard
to
number
five,
there
have
been
preliminary
conversations
about
a
regional
effort.
Councilmember
hamilton
is
exactly
right.
We
do
not
know
exactly
what
that
will
be.
We
do
not
know
when
that
will
materialize,
but
we
will
certainly
return
to
the
city
council
with
any
information
that
develops
and
provide
clarity
at
that
time.
This
was
really
an
effort
to
let
council
know
that
there
may
be
a
reasonable
effort.
I
There,
there's
been
a
county-wide
storm
water
sea
level,
rising
resiliency
agency,
created
they're,
looking
at
regional
projects,
they're
talking
about
finding
a
permanent
funding
source
for
the
agency,
and
there
may
be
funds
that
could
support
the
city
of
the
city
of
san
bruno.
What
I
mentioned
is
typically,
these
regional
efforts
do
not
fund
all
of
the
local
infrastructure
they
fund
strategic
grants,
one
of
which
may
be
in
san
bruno
right.
I
But
but
my
professional
assessment
is
that
number
five
is
not
mutually
exclusive
to
to
proceeding
with
other
options
to
fund
our
local
infrastructure
and
so
of
the
options
that
we
talked
about
to
look
at
additional
ways
to
fund
our
local
interests
or
our
local
infrastructure
was
to
possibly
consider
a
general
obligation
bond,
and
we
would
prepare
all
that
information
and
provide
the
city
council
with
the
full
complement
of
analysis
that
you
need
to
make
that
final
decision.
We're
we're
not
there.
I
Yet
we're
simply
talking
about
possible
avenues
to
go
down,
and
so
you
know
we
can't
advise
on
the
work
until
we
do
the
work.
But
I
understand
that
there's
a
reluctance
to
say
potentially
even
go
down
that
avenue,
and
so
what
I
want
to
proffer
is
that
your
strategic
initiatives
were
funded
and
the
budget
that
was
approved
on
june
22nd,
and
so
we
are
16
days
into
the
budget
cycle
13
days
into
the
budget
cycle.
I
For
those
initiatives
I've
committed
to
the
city
council
to
come
to
you
with
quarterly
updates
and
on
the
tickler
file
that
you
guys
have
seen.
There
is
a
meeting
at
the
august
27th
meeting
where
I
want
to
come
and
give
you
guys
an
update
on
your
funded
initiatives
where
things
fit
and
give
you
a
status
update.
Why
don't
we
talk
about
this
thing
when
we're
talking
about
the
full
complement
of
strategic
initiatives
with
regard
to
number
one?
I
I
think
what
I've
heard
is
a
majority
of
the
city
council
say
put
together
information
on
what
it
would
take
to
analyze
the
ballot
responses
to
provide
some
information
on
the
demographic
analysis,
and
you
know
we're
not
saying
yes
now
but
we'll
when
you,
when
staff
comes
back
with
what
the
scope
of
work
would
be
estimated
cost
will
make
the
decision.
A
A
I
mean
you
already
did,
please
don't
don't
you,
you
have
clarified
it,
but
my
understanding
is
that
we
had
a
majority
of
the
council
that
wished
to
proceed
with
three
and
and
I
could
be
corrected.
I
know
council
member
mason
has
her
her
hand
up.
I
Yes,
mayor
medina,
I
would
just
sort
of
clarify
that
I
think
a
majority
of
the
council
has
said
not
proceed
with
number
three,
but
do
the
preliminary
work
to
articulate
to
the
city
council.
What
would
be
involved
in
a
potential
general
obligation,
bond
or
parcel
tax?
But
I
wouldn't
want
the
public
to
walk
away
tonight
that
the
council
has
made.
A
The
decision
it
is
simply
to
begin
looking
at
that
cabinet,
you're
correct.
That
was
my
understanding
as
well.
It
was
just
because,
as
you
said
too,
we
need
to
know
we
have
next
november.
Your
concern
to
us
is
you
can't
just
keep
waiting,
you
know,
and
then
we
have
a
short
window
with
other
elements
that
are
put
on
us,
councilmember,
mason
and
vice
mayor
medina.
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
city
manager,
again
for
that
clarification,
so
I'll
just
so,
I
would
support
one
to
three
and
five,
and
I
just
would
also
reiterate
and
look
and
not
read
it,
but
just
say
that,
when
we're
looking
at
the
possibilities
also
consider
other
public
entities
and
what
they're
looking
at
potential,
whether
they're
looking
at
potential
taxes
or
any
other
measures
as
well,
so
that
we're
not
competing
with
each
other.
So
thank
you.
J
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
just
wanted
to
be
clear
that
when
our
city
manager
said
it
we
could,
we
will
return
to
this,
and
it
would
need
to
be
done
by
october.
That
was
absolutely
fine.
That's
that
was
my
main
point
like
tonight.
We're
not
saying
yes
we're
going
to
pursue
it,
that
we're
going
to
make
that
decision
and
with
the
clarity
provided
by
the
city
manager
that
staff
will
be
doing
some
of
that
work
and
we're
going
to
get
updates
on
on
other
things.
A
That
that
doesn't
help
I
was
saying
city
manager.
Thank
you,
city
manager.
Do
you
feel
that
it
solidified
us
to
the
direction
from
council
for
staff?
Yes,.
I
We
will
continue
to
participate
in
conversations
about
a
potential
regional
effort.
We
will
return
to
the
city
council
with
a
scope
of
work,
an
estimated
cost
and
timing
for
a
demographic
analysis
of
the
prior
218
effort,
and
we
will
continue
to
talk
about
funding
mechanisms,
potentially
a
general
obligation
binary
of
parcel
tax
when
we
talk
about
and
receive
an
update
on
our
strategic
initiatives,
because
this
effort
really
would
be
a
significant,
a
significant
one
and
need
to
be
dovetailed
with
other
potential
ballot
initiatives.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
before
we
move
on
to
item
b,
which
will
be
the
appointments
for
the
vacancies
on
committee
commissions
and
boards,
I'm
gonna
have
us,
take
a
five-minute
break,
just
a
stretch,
water,
etc,
and
then
we
will
return
back
here
and
then
we
will
proceed
with
the
last
item
of.
A
A
We
are
on
conduct
of
business,
we
are
on
item
b
and
that
is
a
citizens
to
fill
vacancies
on
commissions,
boards
and
committees,
one
two
where
we
have
five
different
groups
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
just
take
them
as
we
see
them
listed
and
that's
in
alphabetical
order,
but
just
to
have
a
flow
to
it,
as
we
have
discussed
and
was
put
in
the
document
that
we
would
go
ahead
and
have
ask
the
city
clerk
to
assist
us,
of
course
go
to
the
first
group,
which
would
be
the
bicycle
pedestrian
advisory
committee
and
oh
she's,
already
ready
to
go
and
again.
A
The
first
round
will
be
a
nomination
and
then
everybody's
gonna
see.
If
I
got
this
right,
the
nomination
and
a
second
to
go
forward,
we'll
see
we'll
go
down
the
list
see
who
that
is,
and
then
we
will
bring
those
persons
who
have
been
nominated
and
seconded
up
to
a
vote
which
each
council
member
will
give
their
vote
to
the
candidate
that
they
would
like
to
see
select.
A
J
Mr
mayor
is
thomas
kuhn,
an
official
candidate.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
okay,
seeing
that
I
think
we
are
good
at
this
point.
I
will
allow
our
city,
I'm
sorry,
ask
our
city
clerk
to
go
ahead
and
read
the
name,
and
then
we
can
see
if
there
is
a
well
once
you
read
the
four
names
that
we
have.
This
is
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian.
We
have
two
partial
term
seats
that
are
expiring
on
october
31st.
B
We
have
four
applicants
for
the
council
to
consider
this
evening,
the
first
applicant,
and
I
should
apologize
right
off
the
bat
for
all
applicants.
I
hope
I'm
pronouncing
your
names
correctly,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
The
first
applicant
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee
is
robert
anissetti.
B
The
fourth
applicant
is
lisa
huang,
and
I
did
want
to
notate
that
mr
anasteti,
although
he
was
unable
to
interview
on
june
3rd,
which
was
the
evening
that
the
city
council
interviewed
candidates
for
all
of
these
bodies,
mr
anna
said
he
did
say
that
he
still
wanted
to
be
considered
for
appointment.
That
is
why
he's
on
this
list.
A
Thank
you
for
doing
the
names
and
clarifying
and
now
for
my
colleagues,
you
can
start
raising
your
virtual
hand
and
I'll
start
calling
upon
you
in
that
order
for
nominations
and
or
seconds.
First
is
vice
mayor
medina.
J
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
I'd
like
to
to
nominate
jules.
B
A
Let's
move
to
council
member
salazar,
please.
H
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
would
like
to
nominate
robert
anasetti.
A
Is
there
a
second
to
mr
anasteti?
I
will
go
ahead
and
second,
that.
A
Okay,
with
this
time,
I.
D
A
Is
there
a
second
not
having
a
second,
then
we
have
two:
are
there
any
more
nominations,
so
we
have
two
vacancies.
We
have
two
persons
that
have
been
motioned
and
seconded
is
ernie.
We
can
do
roll
call,
it's
kind
of
there's
two
running
for
two,
so
I
mean
basically,
we
can
maybe
have
one
motion
that
appoints
both
or
I'll.
Ask
council.
H
Mr
mayor
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
that
the
two,
the
two
candidates
that
have
been
nominated
and
seconded.
F
Mason
hi
councilmember.
B
H
D
D
B
A
D
G
B
B
How
this
will
work
is
the
first
appointment
will
fall
to
the
october
31st
2022
seat
and
the
second
appointment
will
fall
to
the
2024
seat
and
I
will
make
that
known.
When
the
motion
is
clear.
We
have
three
applicants
for
the
citizens,
revenue
measure
oversight
committee.
Those
applicants
are
gym,
evangelist,
ariella,
fiorinelli
and
tom.
A
Okay,
we
have
for
nominations
and
we'll
start
with
mr
hamilton.
First
please.
I
would
like
to
nominate
jim
evangelist.
Is
there
a
second
for
mr
evangelist?
A
second
okay
there's
been
there's
been
a
motion
by
hamilton.
A
There
was
kind
of
a
tie,
but
we'll
give
it
to
councilmember
mason
for
the
second
and
now
are
there
other
nominations.
Vice
mayor
medina.
J
Yes,
I'd
like
to
to
nominate
ariella
fiorinelli
is
that
how
that's
pronounced
is.
F
A
F
A
Okay,
so
there's
a
second
this
time,
salazar
got
there
first,
so
we'll
have
a
motion
and
a
second
are
there,
any
other
nominations:
councilmember
mason.
A
You're
on
mute
video,
no,
oh,
okay,
all
right!
So
there
are
two
nominations
and
there
are
two
vacancies,
as
clerk
already
described
about
the
time
frames
of
them.
So
that's
right,
basically
with
the
two.
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
go
to
a
round
two,
because
there
are
two
vacancies
say
clerk.
How
would
we
propose?
Is
it
the
one
you
said
got
nominated
first.
B
I
would,
although
the
council,
if
it
pleases
the
council,
you
can
decide
who
obtains
which
seat.
However,
the
council
would
like
to
proceed.
A
Okay,
let's,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
this
all
done
in
round
one
bottom
line,
we
have
two
candidates
for
two
slots:
it's
just
a
matter
of
whether
where
they're
it's
22
or
24.,
oh.
J
J
B
Yes,
we
have
three
applicants,
we
have
jules
very
lisa,
huang
and
tom.
Let
me
check
one
thing
one
moment:
please
keep
in
mind
that
you
have
just
appointed
joules
brie
to
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee.
H
I
would
like
to
nominate
tom
kuhn.
J
A
There's
salazar
medina
medina
for
that
other
nominations:
councilmember
mason.
F
A
No,
we
can
nominate
more
council
member
sellers.
Are
you
have
your
hand
up.
A
And
councilman
mason
yours
is
a
residual,
okay,
all
right!
So
we
have
again.
This
is
one
partial
term,
a
seed
expiring
on
october
31st
2024.
We
have
one
person
that
has
been
nominated.
Do
we
have
a
motion
or
action
from
council
I'll.
C
Make
a
motion
that
we
appoint
tom
to
the
parks
and
records
committee.
Second,.
H
J
A
F
A
I
will
thank
you,
there's
a
motion
and
second,
there
are
no
other
listed.
Is
there
any
other
nominations?
A
See
no
other
nominations
from
council?
Is
there
any
action
by
my
colleagues.
J
Let's
make
a
motion
to
appoint
adam
zibiger
as
our
youth
representative.
H
D
B
Now
I
do
before
we
take
any
nominations.
I
do
want
to
note
that,
since
jim
evangelist
was
just
appointed
to
the
citizens
revenue
measure
oversight
committee,
the
bylaws
of
that
committee
does
state
that
there
he
cannot
serve
on
any
other
board,
commission
or
committee.
So,
although
he
is
appearing
as
an
applicant
here
for
you
to
vote
on,
he
is
actually
not
eligible
at
this
point
to
serve
on
this
body.
So
the
applicant
you
have
before
you
is
roberta
hannibal
for
this
partial
term
c.
H
Thank
you,
sir.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
appoint
our
only
candidate
in
this
category
to
the
tspc.
J
A
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
go
forward
and
say
that
there
was
a
motion
and
second
and
let's
do
roll
call.
F
B
F
H
J
A
Okay
with
that
we're
gonna
move
on
to
item
seven
comments
from
council
members,
if
council
members
and
thank
you
city
clerk
for
your
help
and
assistance
council
members,
if
you
have
anything
that
you
want
to
conclude
on,
please
raise
your
virtual
hand
now,
we'll
take
a
look
and
I'm
going
to
go
into
a
german.
If
I
don't
see
any
hands
council
member
hamilton
just.
C
Quickly,
I
want
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
and
thank
you
to
the
san
mateo
resource
conservation
district
and
the
san
bernardino
fire
department
and
our
and
our
fire
marshal
for
organizing
the
chipper
program,
which
took
place
at
least
in
my
neighborhood
on
this
past
monday,
which
allowed
us
to
clear,
clear,
trees
and
brush
from
close
to
our
homes
to
create
a
defensible
space
and
they
came
by
they
stacked
all
the
branches
out
of
the
curve
and
they
came
by
and
and
with
the
chipper
and
took
care
of
it.
C
It
was
a
wonderful
program,
my
first
time
participating
in
it
the
the
crew
came
by
on
monday
morning.
I
had
a
fairly
sizable
pile
of
branches
and
vegetation
to
take
care
of
some
of
it,
courtesy
of
our
of
our
vice
mayor
and
his
son,
who
graciously
helped
me
with
some
of
it,
and
they
they
actually,
they
clicked.
C
They
were
at
my
house
for
less
than
10
minutes,
took
care
of
the
entire
pile,
chipped
it
and
actually
swept
and
leaf
blue
and
there's
not
even
not
even
a
leaf
was
left
behind.
It
was
a.
It
was
very
amazing
to
watch
and
it
was
just
a
great
program
and
I
encourage
all
residents
to
take
advantage
of
it
when
it
comes
back.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
hamilton,
and
it's
thank
you
for
letting
us
know.
Mr
medina
is
available
to
assist
councilmember
mason.
F
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
congratulate
everybody
that
was
just
appointed
to
their
new,
their
new
new
commitments.
I'll
call
them
thank
you
for
your
time
and
for
your
sacrifice
to
be
in
these
organizations
at
a
common
organization,
because
they're
all
kind
of
their
own,
they
have
their
own
functions
that
really
contribute
greatly
to
san
bruno.
So
congratulations
and
I'm
glad
that
some
of
them,
I
believe,
got
their
first
choices,
so
I
think
the
more
passionate
you
are
about
something
the
better
it
is
for
san
bruno.
F
I
also
just
wanted
to
correct
a
statement
that
was
made
earlier
around
the
special
election.
The
original
request
that
had
been
made
was
what
the
cost
would
be
to
add
the
item
to
the
gubernatorial
special
election.
So
while
I'm
glad
to
hear
the
cost
of
a
special
election,
because
it's
outrageously
expensive
and
we
can't
afford
it,
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
what
was
requested
was
just
the
cost
around
adding
the
measure
to
the
gubernatorial
election
and
and
unfortunately,
we're
not
going
to
make
that
cut
off
anyway.
F
So
thank
you
and
thank
you
to
everybody
who
worked
on
the
fourth
of
july.
I
do
not
envy
those
nights
away
from
home.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
mr
mayor,
I
wanted
to
thank
staff
and
and
for
the
the
effort
this
week
at
tom,
laura
field
for
for
arranging
the
wonderful
weather
and
and
and
having
a
band
out
there.
It
was
great
seeing
so
many
smiling
faces
and
all
the
good
work
that
was
put
in
to
to
fix
the
grandstands
and
to
to
fix
the
snack
bar.
J
That's
one
one
set
of
things,
and
I
also
wanted
to
encourage
people
to
continue
to
be
safe
as
as
they're
going
around
and
make
sure
and
encourage
others
to
get
vaccinated,
come
downtown
and
see
shop,
downtown
shop,
local,
san
bruno
and
I
wanted
to
thank
nancy
foreman
for
the
effort
behind
the
planters
and
all
the
volunteers
behind
it.
To
it
really
looks
nice.
J
You
know
at
first
it
was
kind
of
tough
as
it
was
growing
in,
but
it's
really
nice
to
see
the
flowers
and
and
the
care
that's
been
taken
in
those
locations.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
see
no
other
hands
again.
The
vice
mayor
had
commented
on
the
the
renovation
of
the
grandstand
and
as
well
as
the
concession
booth,
which
was
by
again,
as
we
know,
a
lot
of
folks
that
gave
up
their
time
and
their
energy
and
it
is
appreciated
and
thank
you
to
staff
for
facilitating
that
day.
And
yes,
if
that's
one
thing,
the
council
wants
to
take
credit
for
and
say
that
we
were
unanimous
on
that
weather
day.
A
I
think
we
truly
were,
and
it
was
enjoyable
and
also
thank
you
to
the
staff
for
their
reports
and
the
city
clerk
for
your
clarification
on
your
your
report
today.
That's
how
I
understood
it
too,
and
I
wanna,
as
councilmember
mason
said
as
far
as
congratulating
all
those
that
a
stepped
up
to
volunteer
for
the
city,
that
they
call
home
as
well
as
those
that
got
appointed
and
once
again,
congratulations
to
judith
piccini
for
the
mayor's
award
well
deserved.