►
Description
Full Agenda: https://www.sanbruno.ca.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_01242023-1764
Consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e), this meeting will be held both in person and virtually.
City Councilmembers and members of the public may attend in person at the San Bruno Senior Center, or
by teleconference, via Zoom or telephone.
Phone Line: 16465588656
Webinar ID: 849 6141 6762
Webinar Password: 699401
A
A
A
C
A
A
B
D
E
F
Thank
you.
There
was
little
to
no
press
regarding
this,
but
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
our
residents
and
city
council.
If
they're
not
already
aware
of
the
Metropolitan
Transportation
commission's
plan
to
charge
drivers
to
pay
per
mile
fees
on
our
highways
in
the
Bay
Area,
they
won't
reduce
your
gas
tax
smog
fees
or
bridge
tolls.
F
Just
make
you
pay
more
in
the
guise
of
reducing
congestion,
but
in
the
brief
that
I
that
I
watched
and
you
can
view
on
their
website,
they
even
admit
that
they
still
won't
con
reduce
congestion,
but
is
just
so
that
they
can
get
more
money
for
public
transportation
projects.
El
Camino
Real
will
be
a
parking
lot
for
everyone,
not
wanting
to
be
charged
driving
on
101
or
280.,
and
whatever
people
want
to
think
about
how
good
public
transportation
is
as
a
savior
for
congestion.
F
It's
not
nobody's
using
it
Bart's
at
30
percent
of
pre-coveted
levels
and
not
increasing
and
I,
never
see
a
full
bus
in
El
Camino.
So
I
spend
more
money
on
transportation
systems
that
people
don't
want
to
or
are
not
going
to
use
a
residence
needed
familiarize
themselves
with
Bay
Area
plan
2050
and
stop
it
now
before
we
get
on
a
bad
path.
Don't
let
them
go
forward
with
this
money
grab
and
take
more
money
out
of
your
pocket
that
you
don't
have
to
spare,
and
it
also
like
to
bring
up
that.
F
The
city
council
make
a
New
Year's
resolution
resolution
for
the
to
get
the
public
works
department
to
fix
the
asphalt
on
sneith,
Lane
and
El
Camino
to
the
post
office
and
San
Bruno
Avenue
from
El
Camino
to
the
airport.
It's
almost
undriable
I,
don't
even
want
to
ride
my
mountain
bike
on
it.
The
recent
ranges
even
have
even
done
more
damage
and
there's
lots
of
other
areas
that
need
attention,
but
these
are
really
bad
and
are
we
even
using
our
measure
G
funds?
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you
so
much
hi
there.
My
name
is
Nina
I'm
joining
you
today.
As
a
representative
of
hip
housing,
we
are
a
local,
affordable,
housing,
non-profit
that
has
been
operating
throughout
San
Mateo
County
for
50
years
now
we
invest
in
human
potential
by
improving
the
housing
and
lives
of
people
in
our
community.
On
behalf
of
Cape
housing,
I
would
like
to
thank
the
honorable
mayor
and
the
members
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno
for
your
enduring
support
of
our
organization
and
affordable
housing.
G
Hopefully,
I
can't
see
you
over
Zoom,
but
hopefully
we've
got.
They've
got
the
calendars
up
there
on
the
diocese
with
you,
otherwise,
I'm
sure
that
in
the
offices
somewhere,
these
calendars
feature
here
are
from
12
Young
Artists
living
in
San
Mateo
County
selected
from
a
pool
of
250
entrants.
Last
year,
every
month
corresponds
with
a
drawing
of
home
and
a
beautiful
quote
about
what
home
means
to
you.
G
We
are
so
proud
to
work
throughout
San,
Mateo,
County
and
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno
to
create
affordable
housing
solutions
for
low-income
individuals
and
families.
Each
year
we
house
over
1
200
people
thanks
to
our
strong
Partnerships
with
local
governments.
This
includes
the
24
people
who
are
currently
living
in
San
Bruno
through
our
home
sharing
matches.
That's
really
exciting.
G
As
you
also
know,
our
cities
are
very
interconnected
in
San,
Mateo
County
us
clients
of
ours
may
live
in
one
city
and
work
in
San
Bruno
commuting
throughout
they.
We
also
support
families
through
our
self-sufficiency
programs,
including
60
adults
and
77
children
I.
Just
finally,
I'd
like
to
close
out
with
one
of
my
favorite
quotes
in
this
year's
calendar.
G
The
month
of
June
is
occupied
by
Taryn
l,
a
kindergartner
from
quite
close
to
here,
she's
from
South
San
Francisco
she's
created
such
a
beautiful
colorful
drawing,
and
she
says
that
my
home
is
special
to
me,
because
my
family
is
there.
It
is
where
I
feel
comfortable
and
safe.
We
hope
that
our
calendar
resonates
with
you
and
Spurs
you
to
consider
the
importance
of
a
safe
and
stable
home,
especially
in
a
region
that
is
so
defined
by
housing
challenges.
I.
G
Ask
that
you
help
to
spread
the
word
about
our
programs
and
that
we
can
continue
to
support
individuals
and
families
within
our
community.
Please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
with
any
questions
or
additional
information
about
hip
housing's
Innovative
programs
with
that
I'd
like
to
turn
it
back
to
the
council.
Thank
you.
So
much.
H
Welcome,
first
of
all,
good
evening,
it's
great
to
see
you
all
here
today.
I
haven't
spoken
in
front
of
a
council
in
many
years.
So
please
excuse
me
if
I,
if
I'm
a
little
nervous
I'm
here
on
my
capacity
as
an
elected
official
for
the
San
Mateo
County
Community,
College
District.
As
you
all
know,
we
have
a
a
vacancy
and
that
vacancy
would
be
covering
trustee
area.
H
Three
I
have
a
prepared
statement
that
the
board
has
given
me
to
give
to
you
and
I'd
like
to
deliver
it
at
this
time
on
December
13th
2022
governing
board
member
Goodman
vacated
a
seat
on
the
San
Mateo
County
Community,
College,
District
Board
of
Trustees,
creating
a
board
vacancy
for
trustee
area.
Three,
at
a
special
board
meeting
on
December
20th
2022,
the
San
Mateo
County
Community
College
District
board,
took
action
to
fill
the
vacancy
by
making
a
provisional
appointment.
H
The
appointee
will
hold
the
office
until
the
next
governing
board
member
election,
which
occurs
at
the
Statewide
general
election
of
November
2024..
To
make
a
long
story
short
I'm
I'm,
recruiting
people
I'm
looking
for
someone
that
has
some
sort
of
a
connection
to
education.
A
person
that
understands
working
with
the
group
is
important.
H
A
person
has
a
regional
view,
but
a
person
who
also
has
a
local
view
to
be
able
to
represent
area
three,
the
district
that
covers
your
area,
which
is
San,
Bruno,
Millbrae
Hillsboro,
all
the
way
down,
I
cover
District
2,
which
is
Daly,
City,
Colma,
Brisbane
parts
of
South,
San,
Francisco
and
Colma.
Oh
I
think
I
already
said
that
anyway,
the
point
to
to
wrap
up
most
of
you
know
how
to
get
a
hold
of
me.
H
I'm,
looking
I'm
really
looking
for
someone
and
it
and
we
we
made
the
appointment
process
very
easy.
It's
a
500
word
essay
and
the
question
is
why
I
want
to
be
a
San
Mateo,
County,
Community,
College
trustee
so
with
your
CV.
So
please
I
know
you
know
people
and
that's
why
I'm
here.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
the
applications
are
available
online.
Thank
you
for
your.
A
A
Thank
you
again.
We
will
move
on
to
item
five
announcements
and
presentations.
First
item
is
item.
A
proclamation
of
February
as
black
history
month
and
I
will
read
portions
of
it.
This
year's
theme
of
black
history
is
of
the
black
history
resistance
representation
identified
and
the
diversity
is
set
every
year
by
the
Association
for
the
study
of
African-American
life
and
history.
An
organization
founded
in
1915
by
Dr
Carter,
G
Woodson.
A
And
whereas
in
2019,
the
city
of
San,
Bruno
brought
forward
to
the
cities
in
the
San
Mateo
County
and
the
Board
of
Supervisors,
the
United
against
hate
Campaign,
which
encourages
cities
and
residents
to
work
together
against
hate,
thereby
restoring
respect
and
civil
discourse,
embracing
the
strength
of
diversity
and
building,
inclusive
and
Equitable
communities.
For
all.
Whereas
the
city
of
San
Bruno
continues
to
work
toward
becoming
an
inclusive
community
in
which
all
citizens,
past,
present
and
future,
are
respected
and
recognized
for
their
contributions
and
potential
contributions
to
our
community,
the
state,
the
country
and
the
world.
A
Now,
therefore,
it
be
resolved
that
I,
Rico
e
Medina,
mayor
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
do
hereby
Proclaim
February
as
Black
History
Month,
and
encourage
all
residents
and
visitors
alike
to
join
us
in
celebrating
this
special
month
with
that.
Is
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
speak
on
this
item?.
A
I
Good
evening,
mayor
Medina
members
of
council,
my
name
is
Matt
Lee
I'm,
the
Public
Works
director
for
the
city
of
San,
Bruno
I'm,
here
before
you
tonight,
to
provide
you
a
brief
update
on
the
most
recent
storms.
While
we
wait
for
the
PowerPoint
presentation
to
load
just
a
little
history.
To
recap
where
we
were
severe
winter
storm
started
on
October
31st
right
before
the
new
year
on
January
3rd.
There
was
a
proclamation
by
our
city
manager
to
scare
to
declare
a
state
emergency
for
the
city
which
was
ratified
on
January
10th.
I
And
so
for
for
tonight,
the
agenda
we're
not
going
to
kind
of
rehash
all
that
has
happened
since
January
10th.
The
updates
will
be
for
from
since
then
after
January
10th.
We'll
then
talk
about
the
progress
updates
on
the
areas
of
damage
throughout
our
city
and
we'll
go
into
a
little
detail
about
the
damage
of
areas
or
damage
statuses
by
type
and
then
we'll
talk
about
our
ongoing
processes
and
next
steps
and
then
we'll
open
up
to
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
I
So
since
our
last
report,
the
Emergency
Operations
Center
has
been
deactivated
at
5
pm
on
Thursday
January
12th,
and
that
was
just
due
to
the
fact
that
the
rains
kind
of
slowed
down
a
little
bit.
The
EOC
is
ready
to
be
reactivated
at
any
time
as
needed.
However,
the
city
Still
Remains
under
a
local
state
of
emergency,
and
that
is
to
allow
us
to
continually
make
repairs
to
areas
of
damage
we're
also
currently
assessing
areas
of
damage
and
other
repairs
when
necessary.
I
Next,
this
map
is
it's
a
little
hard
to
read,
but
it
kind
of
highlights
the
areas
of
damage
throughout
our
city,
as
you
can
see,
for
areas
highlighted
in
green
mud,
hill,
slides,
they're
kind
of
on
the
west
side
of
town,
namely
west
west
of
280..
There
are
areas
of
infrastructure,
damage,
sprinkled
throughout
town
and
about
three
sinkholes
all
around
town
as
well.
I
Prior
to
going
on
to
the
next
Slide,
the
public
works
department
has
spent
approximately
130
thousand
dollars
on
the
Storm,
thus
far
approximately
sixty
thousand
dollars
in
contractor
support
and
70
000
in
supplies
and
materials
as
we
move
to
damage
status
by
types.
This
was
discussed
previously
by
our
city
manager,
Javon
Grogan.
I
The
next
damage
are
particularly
the
sinkholes
we
have
about
four
sinkhole
locations,
two
of
which
have
since
been
repaired,
one
near
one
of
our
water
tanks,
one
on
Crystal
Springs
Road
at
Cyprus,
which
is
the
photo
on
the
left,
and
we
just
recently
discovered
a
recessed
manhole
over
in
Oakmont
Drive,
which
is
the
photo
in
the
middle.
The
the
biggest
sinkhole
depression
is
up
near
Skyline,
Boulevard,
just
north
of
sneith.
In
a
parking
lot.
The
photo
on
the
right
is
the
temporary
Band-Aid
measure
that
we've
implemented
immediately
after
the
storm.
I
I
I
The
engineering
team
is
looking
at
the
type
of
repair
that
will
be
done
and
we
will
Implement
that
shortly
once
we
determine
what
is
the
most
cost
effective
solution
in
terms
of
other
types
of
Damages,
that's
Street
related,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photo
on
the
left.
There's
a
bent
guard
rail
over
by
San
Bruno
Avenue,
just
west
of
Princeton
due
to
a
fallen
tree.
I
I
As
you
can
see,
it's
that
area
is
actually
within
the
flood
zone
and
that
sump
pump
is
really
important.
It
failed
due
to
just
being
overworked
during
the
rain
staff
has
reached
out
to
manufacturers,
and
the
exact
specific
sump
pump
is
unavailable
for
at
least
six
months,
so
they
made
the
decision
to
go
with
a
different
sump
pump.
Just
so
we
can
get
the
field
ready
in
time
for
Little
League.
I
One
area
of
damage
that
has
not
yet
been
classified,
but
we
discovered
today,
is
near
ingval,
Canyon,
typically
in
large
storms.
You
may
get
settlement
of
silt
of
about
one
to
six
inches
in
the
area
we
discovered
today,
actually
as
the
water
level's
gotten
low,
there's
approximately
six
to
eight
feet
of
silt
in
in
the
area
of
involt.
Canyon
staff
has
cleared
the
drain
in
the
trash
capture
device
to
allow
for
flow
in
that
area.
I
In
terms
of
the
location,
as
you
can
see
here,
it
is
a
just.
Involcane
is
kind
of
behind
crestmore
and
Concord
Drive
at
the
end
of
Concord
Drive
in
terms
of
the
ongoing
process.
These
next
steps
we're
currently
responding
and
assessing
to
all
damages
of
infrastructure
between
in
between
storms.
Luckily,
we've
had
a
break
over
the
past
week
and
a
half,
and
that's
allowed
us
to
kind
of
make
some
assessment
and
determine
repairs.
I
We're
responding
to
new
storm
damages
when
they
do
come,
we're
doing
continual
monitoring
of
weather
patterns
and
we're
also
continuing
to
monitor
known
areas
of
interest,
and
we
Implement
repairs
as
quickly
as
possible
and
when
feasible
and
lastly,
with
that.
I
would
just
like
to
thank
the
Parks
Division
and
public
works
department
and
all
the
work
that
they've
done
during
the
storm.
I
know
that
the
rain
has
stopped,
but
the
the
team
has
been
continually
trying
to
make
infrastructure
repairs
and
what
the
last
slide
that
I
have
up.
I
There
is
just
information
for
for
the
public,
for
you
to
stay
up
to
date.
I
would
highly
encourage
that
you
register
at
SMC
alert,
which
is
www.smcalert.info.
That's
where
you
can
be
notified
with
emergency
notification
when
everything
happens
and
with
that
I'm
open
to
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank.
A
You
for
the
update
in
the
report
and
once
again
as
I
stated
last
time.
Thank
you
to
staff
because
the
rain
may
not
be
falling,
but
there
there
is
still
a
lot
of
work
and
assessments
that
have
to
be
done
on
a
day-to-day
basis
and
standby
Etc.
So
thank
you
to
that
any
questions
or
comments
from
Council.
F
J
Mr
Mayor
I
would
I
take
you're
looking
at
me
as
if
you're
kind
of
right.
If
there's
any
clarifications,
yes,
sir
know
that
staff
is
continuing
to
track
all
possible
reimbursements,
it
is
not
certain
yet
that
we
will
be
reimbursed.
There
are
certainly
our
elected
officials
at
both
the
federal
and
state
level
and
local
Regional
level
are
articulating
on
behalf
of
San
Mateo
County,
but
we
are
certainly
continuing
to
track
all
of
our
costs
and
fill
out
the
required
form
should
there
be
reimbursement
for
our
storm
impacts.
A
A
We
need
to
be
thankful
for
our
First
Responders
and
realize
that
when
everybody
thinks
and
we've
suffered
it
ourselves,
that
it
can't
happen
in
your
backyard,
it
does-
and
it's
happening
far
too
often
within
our
state.
So
with
that,
let's
move
on
to
consent,
item
six.
All
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
earlier
Council
action
and
are
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested.
A
There
will
be
a
single
public
comment
period
for
all
items
in
this
section
unless
a
council
member
requests
to
pull
an
item
for
a
separate
vote,
we
have
items
a
through
G
before
I,
open
it
up
to
council.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
on
item
G
to
clarify
that
that
is
a
five
percent
to
six
percent
tax
that
Council
has
staffed.
Are
there
any
items
that
Council
would
like
to
see
pulled
for
a
separate
vote,
any
items
that
Council
would
like
to
have
for
further
questions
clarifications
or
comments.
A
Me
see
if
there
it
has
and
I'll
come
right
back
to
that.
Is
there
anything
other
than
item
e
for
consent
for
for
clarification
or
comment
s?
Okay?
Okay.
So
let's
go
to
item
e,
as
was
just
asked,
adopt
resolution
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
amend
the
agreement
with
West
Coast
arborist
Inc
in
the
amount
not
to
exceed
200
1
600
for
the
removal
of
eucalyptus
on
Crystal
Springs
Road
from
Donner
Avenue
Westbound
to
the
West
End
of
the
Recreation
and
Aquatic
Center
construction
site
council,
member
Alvarez.
K
L
Good
evening,
Council,
due
to
the
nature
of
the
work
being
emergency
removal,
we
met
with
Finance
to
examine
the
best
course
of
action.
This
is
within
the
scope
of
the
work
under
a
current
contractor,
and
so
really
it
was
more
prudent
to
expand
the
work
through
that
removals.
We'll
take
a
look
at
that.
We'll
take
a
look
at
an
open
RFP
at
that
time.
A
M
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
members
of
the
council,
I'm
I'm,
Peter
Gilliam,
the
director
of
community
and
economic
development,
be
introducing
this
item
and
then
handing
it
off
to
Michael
Smith
our
senior
planner,
who
has
been
the
lead
on
the
housing
element
throughout
the
process.
So
if
we
could
have
the
slideshow
please
so
this
is
as
as
mentioned.
This
is
an
item
where
there
are
two
major
parts
and
one
is
the
public
hearing
to
consider
override
overriding
the
airport.
M
M
So
the
objective
for
tonight's
item
is
for
Council
to
have
the
public
hearing
deliberate
and
adopt
resolutions
related
to
the
initial
study
mitigated
negative
declaration.
That's
the
environmental
document
associated
with
all
of
these
actions.
The
airport
land
use
commission
override,
which
I
mentioned
will
be
doing
separately
and
then
a
general
plan
Amendment,
as
well
as
adoption
of
the
housing
element
itself,
I'm
going
to
be
going
a
little
through
the
background,
mostly
talking
about
the
timelines
and
deadlines
again
before
handing
it
off
to
Michael
Smith.
M
So
this
is
the
CH.
This
is
the
timeline
in
general
for
the
housing
element.
The
housing
element
is
a
state
mandated
document
and
it's
been
a
long
process
on
the
process
is
very
much
defined
by
the
law
state
law.
We
started
off
in
2021
with
significant
public
engagement.
We
had
numerous
public
workshops
in
webinar
series.
M
Then,
as
we
got
into
the
first
part
of
2022,
a
website
was
launched
for
the
housing
element
and
there
was
an
online
survey
in
which
we
did
a
utility
inserts
to
let
basically,
as
many
people
in
town
know
about
this
online
survey,
to
get
the
maximum
amount
of
response.
I
held
board
workshops,
Council
held
two
study
sessions.
We
had
meetings
also
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
what
basically
happened
was
Council
reviewed,
the
content
the
policies
gave
gave
direction
to
staff
and
the
consultant
team
that
worked
on
this
in
May
through
June.
M
There
was
a
public
draft
of
the
housing
element
that
was
that
was
published.
The
Planning
Commission
held
a
meeting
and
reviewed
it,
and
then
the
planning
and
then
the
housing
element
draft
was
submitted
to
hcd.
That's
this
State
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
housing
elements
are
somewhat
unique
in
that
they're.
One
of
the
few
planning
documents
that
the
state
actually
has
has
the
authority
to
review
and
and
make
make
comments
on.
So
the
first
round
of
review
happened
in
June.
We
got
our
comments
back
in
October
and.
M
The
revisions
made
to
the
document
to
respond
to
hcd.
They
were
numerous
and
time
consuming,
but
they
were
not
really
changing
any
of
the
policies
that
Council
had
directed
staff
to
do
in
May.
So
it
was
a
lot
of
work,
a
lot
of
a
very,
very
time
consuming,
but
the
fundamentals
of
what
council
saw
in
May
is
are
are
still
in
in
the
revised
draft.
M
So
when
those
amendments
were
made,
the
revised
draft
was
published
for
public
review,
end
of
December
on
the
30th
itself
and
then
by
state
law.
Before
coming
to
council
for
adoption,
this
item
has
to
go
to
the
Planning
Commission,
and
so
that
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
12th
of
January,
and
then
here
we
are
at
this
meeting
intended
for
the
adoption
and
then
the
intent
is
to
have
the
document.
The
adopted
housing
element
submitted
to
hcd
by
January
31st,
which
is
a
a
key
deadline.
M
It's
important
to
note
that
basically,
almost
every
Bay,
Area
city
and
county
are
going
through
this.
At
the
same
time,
when
we
checked
a
month
ago,
two
of
the
101
cities
in
the
Bay
Area
had
a
certified
housing
element.
That's
that's
two
out
of
101.
So
while
it
may
seem
that
you
know
the
deadline
is
close,
we
are
pretty
much
in
the
same
spot
as
all
the
other
cities.
Arguably
compared
to
the
timelines
of
many
in
our
County
were
arguably
ahead.
So.
M
Based
on
state
law,
the
requirements
of
what
this
document
needs
to
have
it
it
it's
very
time
consuming,
and
your
colleagues
in
other
in
in
the
neighboring
cities,
are
kind
of
going
through
the
same
challenges
as
well.
So
with
that
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
about
the
deadline.
This
is
a
deadline
for
the
city
to
submit
an
adopted
housing
element
to
the
state
there
are.
This
is
important
because
there
are
consequences
of
of
late
adoption.
M
One
is
that
you
lose
access
to
certain
Grant
funds
for
housing,
not
not
necessarily
funds
that
that
the
city
always
applies
for,
but
non-profits
in
the
city
May
apply.
For
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
get
the
document
in,
for
that,
there's
also
requirements
to
expedite
certain
steps
that
are
needed
in
the
housing
element
like
the
rezoning
of
any
sites
that
we
have
to
do
for
the
housing
element
and
then
a
lot
of
potential
for
lawsuits
fined
and
even
the
loss
of
of
land
use
Authority
at
the
worst.
M
So
it's
been
an
emphasis
of
staff
to
try
to
get
this
document
to
you
in
time.
For
us
us
to
meet
this
deadline,
there's
also
this.
This
topic
called
the
Builder's
remedy.
That's
been
in
the
news
in
recent
months,
at
least
news
that
local
cities
pay
attention
to.
Maybe
not
not
the
mainstream
news
for
background
the
housing
accountability
act,
which
is
a
state
law.
It
already
limits
local
abilities
to
turn
down
certain
type
of
housing
projects
if
we
do
not
submit
the
housing
element
by
this
deadline.
M
M
N
Good
evening,
mayor
Medina
and
members
of
council
Michael
Smith
Senior
planner
I'm,
going
to
be
going
over
and
start
my
presentation
with
an
overview
of
the
components
of
a
housing
element.
So
it's
a
lot
of
technical
information
I'll
be
going
over
here,
but
housing
elements
are
required
by
law
to
include
the
following
components.
The
first
is
the
housing
needs
assessment,
and
this
examines
the
demographic,
employment
and
housing
Trends
and
conditions
and
identifies
existing
and
protecting
housing
needs
for
the
community.
N
The
next
one
is
the
housing
sites
inventory.
This
is
an
identify
identification
of
locations
available
for
sites
for
Housing,
Development
or
Redevelopment.
To
ensure
there's
enough
land
zone
for
housing
to
meet
the
future
needs
at
all
income
levels.
New
state
requirements
for
cities
to
identify
housing
sites
are
now
more
stringent,
requiring
more
justification
to
explain
why
a
site
in
the
inventory
is
likely
to
develop,
especially
if
it's
non-bakant.
N
N
Those
who
rent
tend
to
live
in
multi-family
buildings
and
experience
higher
rates
of
rent
and
burden
in
the
city,
meaning
that
they
pay
a
larger
portion
of
their
income
towards
rent
compared
to
households
on
the
West,
Side,
households
and
neighborhoods
east
of
El
Camino
are
more
rent
burdened
again,
that's
paying
more
than
30
percent
of
their
income
towards
rent.
They
experience
higher
rates
of
overcrowding
in
their
housing
and
there's
more
instances
of
substandard
Housing,
and
the
environmental
conditions
in
those
neighborhoods
is
a
little
worse
in
on
the
west
side
as
well.
N
N
N
The
Statewide
housing
Mandate
of
which
we
know
as
Rena
so
arena
for
this
cycle
is
3
165
units
and
we
have
gone
over
this
several
times
at
several
meetings.
In
the
past,
the
overall
Bay
Area
was
assigned
441
000
units
and
of
that
40
over
47
000
was
assigned
to
San
Mateo
County.
This
is
a
big
increase
over
previous
Arenas
Cycles.
N
And
then
on
the
table
right
there,
you
can
see
that
we've
applied
a
15
buffer
to
this.
That
is
recommended
by
hcd
to
make
sure
that
you
maintain
a
certain
amount
of
housing
sites
throughout
the
entire
planning
cycle,
which
is
eight
years,
and
so
we've
added
that
and
that
adds
475
units
to
our
total,
and
that
brings
our
total
up
to
3
640,
and
this
is
also
consistent
with
feedback.
We
got
from
Council
at
a
previous
study
session
as
well.
N
This
slide
shows
how
we
can
do
that.
So,
although
the
high
Arena
seems
daunting,
the
good
news
is
the
city
has
the
capacity
to
meet
its
Arena
through
a
variety
of
methods.
This
table
lists
the
city's
strategy
for
accommodating
Adrena,
so
the
first
line
is
we
have
the
pipeline
projects.
These
are
the
projects
that
have
already
been
approved
in
the
city
and
we
have
670
units
in
this
bucket
that
we
can
credit
towards
Arena.
N
N
The
site's
inventory
itself
has
identified
2709
units
on
vacant
and
non-bacan
sites
in
the
city,
and
then
the
housing
unit
is
constructed
since
July.
First,
in
that
bucket
you,
we
are
allowed
to
credit
any
housing
units
that
have
been
constructed
in
the
city
since
that
time
and
we
have
43
units
in
that
bucket,
and
that
includes
a
number
of
adus
and
the
project
at
Skyline
College.
N
N
N
Some
have
asked
why
the
Town
Center,
why
we
didn't
include
the
Town
Center
in
this,
and
that
is
because
it
appears
to
be
doing
well
economically
and
so
we're
looking
more
for
sites
that
are
more
likely
to
develop,
and
so
right
now
Town
Center
didn't
fit
that
mold.
It
also
has
a
very
complicated
ownership
structure,
but
that
does
not
preclude
the
owners
of
town
center
from
approaching
the
city
in
the
future
to
do
housing,
and
we
would
definitely
be
receptive
to
that.
N
So
under
the
land
uses
designated
in
the
city's
General
plan
and
Zoning
code,
many
acres
of
commercial
land
in
San
Bruno's
Transit
corridors
have
eligible
capacity
for
redevelopment
with
mixed
uses,
including
housing.
The
city
has
identified
a
specific
set
of
Housing
Opportunity
sites
within
the
transit
corridors,
as
well
as
the
potential
reuse
of
some
former
School
sites.
N
N
Most
sites
chosen
were
based
on
conversations
with
property
owners
and
developers
who
contacted
staff
to
express
an
interest
in
developing
those
sites
sites
we
again
focused
on
sites
also
near
high
quality
Transit,
because
that's
very
desirable
and
then
in
notifying
these
Property
Owners.
We
sent
two
rounds
of
letters
to
them
and
and
did
not
hear
any
concerns
that
their
properties
were
on
on
our
list.
N
So
now
I'm
going
to
go,
go
over
some
of
the
housing
programs,
so
each
jurisdiction
must
identify
specific
programs
in
its
housing
element
that
will
allow
it
to
implement
the
stated
policies
and
achieve
the
stated
goals
and
objectives.
Programs
must
include
specific
actions,
steps
the
locality
will
take
to
implement
its
policies
and
achieve
its
goals
and
objectives.
N
Programs
must
also
include
a
specific
time
frame
for
implementation,
identify
the
agencies
or
officials
responsible
for
implementation,
describe
the
jurisdiction,
specific
role
in
the
implementation
and,
whenever
possible,
identify
a
specific,
measurable
outcomes
so
I.
What
I've
chosen
here
on
the
slide
is
just
a
few
sample
programs
that
are
from
the
housing
element.
This
is
again
very
high
level,
so
the
first
one
is
really
to
review
our
design
standards
for
compliance
with
the
state
law
and
adopt
objective
design
standards.
I'm
sure
you
guys
might
have
heard
that
phrase.
N
N
N
So,
a
little
bit
about
the
comments
that
we
receive
from
hcd
in
their
October
letter,
while
ACD
concluded
that
the
draft
document
met
many
of
the
statutory
requirements,
they
identified
revisions
that
they
believe
are
necessary
before
the
agency
would
certify
the
housing
element
and
they
organize
their
comments
in
different
topic
areas.
I'm
going
to
go
over
some
some
of
their
comments
just
at
a
very
high
level.
N
So
some
of
hcd's
comments
only
required
technical
or
clerical
revisions,
such
as
additional
data
and
information
to
an
atd's
opinion,
comply
with
state
law
such
as
affirmatively
for
furthering
fair
housing
analysis.
Other
comments
call
for
more
robust
City
administrative
efforts
to
encourage
and
facilitate
Housing
Development.
N
Some
comments
were
more
substantive
policy
concerns
regarding
issues
such
as
the
city's
development
standards
and
permit
procedures,
staff
sorted
all
of
these
comments
into
a
table
and
provided
a
response
to
each
one,
and
that
is
also
attached
to
the
staff
report
and
then
again
we
revise
the
document
itself
to
respond
to
those
comments
to
the
best
we
could
so
I
won't
discuss
all
the
comments
here,
but
the
letter
is
attached
to
the
staff
report.
If
you're
interested.
M
A
And
the
person
is
no,
it's
me
so
you
were
building
it
up,
so
it
was
already
alluded
to
in
the
staff
report
that,
given
the
proximity
of
my
residents
to
the
Tanforan
site,
specifically
that
the
fact
that
my
home
is
directly
involved
in
the
proposed
override
of
the
airport
land
use
commission's
determination
of
inconsistency
with
the
SFO
airport
land
use
plan.
I
will
be
recusing
myself
from
consideration
on
that
aspect.
Only
of
this
agenda
item
and
returning
after
the
city
council
takes
action
on
that
issue.
A
Without
my
involvement,
the
hearing
on
that
component
of
the
housing
element
item
will
be
segmented,
which
has
been
stated
from
the
balance
of
the
item
and
taken
first
without
my
involvement.
The
vice
mayor
will
then
go
ahead
and
proceed
and
take
over
the
meeting
once
that
has
concluded.
Then
I
will
return
back
and
that's
my
advice
and
I'm
able
to
be
in
the
room
or
out,
but
I
will
be
stepping
down
from
the
diocese
so
that
it
can
continue
and
Mr
vice
mayor.
If
you
could
please.
N
So
I'm
going
to
start
this
portion
of
the
presentation
with
with
a
map
just
just
showing
you
guys
where
the
sites
lie
in
relationship
to
the
airport
noise
Contours.
So
these
noise
Contours
from
flights
taking
off
at
SFO,
are
shown,
so
you
can
see
the
overall
housing
sites
and
that
are
impacted
by
the
noise.
This
map
also
shows
San.
Bruno
has
many
existing
housing
units
already
in
the
flight
path
and
the
noise
Contours
and
those
primarily
houses
located
in
the
San
Bruno
Park
and
Bel
Air
Park
neighborhoods.
So.
N
N
N
N
The
public
utilities
code
section
also
further
states
that
the
override
process
requires
two
Council
meetings.
The
first
meeting
and
the
process
is
for
the
council
to
adopt
a
resolution,
making
an
intent
draft
fightings,
making
an
intent
to
override
the
aluc,
and
that
meeting
happened
in
November
of
last
year
and
then
after
that
meeting
after
the
council
makes
that
determination.
N
So
this
is
the
override
process
that
we've
done
to
this
point.
So
again,
on
in
October
of
last
year,
the
airport
land
use
committee
made
a
recommend
passed
a
resolution,
making
a
recommendation
determining
that
our
housing
element
was
in
inconsistent
with
their
land
use
plan
and
then
that
was
forwarded
to
the
full
airport,
land
use
Commission
and
they
held
that
meeting
on
November
10th
of
last
year
and
at
that
meeting
the
airport
land
use
Commission
found
our
housing
element
to
be
inconsistent
with
their
airport
plan.
N
And
then,
following
that,
the
council
held
their
meeting
on
November
15th,
declaring
an
intent
to
do
the
override
of
those
of
that
aluc
decision
and
then
on.
November
16th
after
the
council,
Council
had
made
their
decision
for
an
intent
to
override
that
resolution
was
forwarded
to
both
again
AL
the
aluc
and
Caltrans
for
the
required
30-day
comment
period.
N
So
the
in
the
implications
of
an
override
there
are
two
key
outcomes
of
a
local
agency
override
of
an
airport
land
use.
Commission
decision
the
proposed
land
use
action,
May
proceed,
subject
to
local
agency
review
and
permitting
processes,
as
if
it
had
been
found
consistent
with
ales
UCP
by
the
ale
by
the
aluc
and
then
two
the
agency
operating
the
airport
shall
be
immune
from
liability
for
damages
to
property
or
personal
injury
caused
by
our
resulting
directly
or
indirectly,
from
the
public
agency's
decision
to
override
the
commission's
action
or
recommendation.
N
N
N
So
the
basis
for
our
recommendation
for
the
override
tonight
is:
we
do
believe
that
orderly
development
near
the
airport
can
be
achieved.
We
can
attenuate
the
noise
inside
the
buildings
to
45
decibels
using
modern
construction,
insulation
and
Avid
navigation.
Easement
can
be
granted
to
the
city
and
county
of
San
Francisco
operating
SFO.
N
It's
also
difficult
to
find
another
location
for
the
one
over
one
thousand
units
that
we've
planned
for
for
these
two
sites,
and
then
you
know
the
additional
review.
So
another
override
additional
review
by
the
airport
land
use
committee
will
happen.
Commission
excuse
me
will
happen
on
a
project
by
project
level
for
these
projects.
So
this
is
not
the
end.
N
N
M
Thank
you
Michael.
So
if
we
could
get
the
slides
back
now
we
go
into
kind
of
the
procedural
part
of
the
of
the
override.
So
as
said
at
the
very
beginning,
we're
going
to
take
the
override
processes
recommended
action,
questions,
public
comment
and
action,
separate.
That's
what
we're
doing
right
now
and
in
the
staff
report.
M
There
are
three
recommendations:
they're
all
on
the
screen,
two
of
them
we're
not
talking
about
right
now,
so
they're
grayed
out
the
resolution
we're
asking
Council
to
act
on
is
not
grayed
out
so
that
you're
able
to
see
it.
We
can
come
back
to
this
if
you
need
it,
but
as
I
said
it
is
in
your
written
staff
report
and
just
in
general
asking
that
Council
provide
any
questions.
We
go
into
the
public
comment
period
and
then
Council
take
action
on
on
the
override.
M
C
K
Should
I
share
vice
mayor
part
of
the
FAA
noise
reduction
program
are
insulation
and
windows,
so,
in
addition
to
the
quality
of
the
insulation,
assuming
we
are
moving
forward
with
the
override,
are
we
going
to
require
any
other
requirements
to
the
developer
to
need
that
under
that
45
decibel?
You
know
in
addition
to
the
to
the
the
insulation?
Are
they
also
going
to
in
part
of
the
requirement,
will
be
the
double
I
think
for
FAA
noise
reduction?
K
J
Sure,
thank
you.
Council
woman,
Alvarez,
Javon,
Grogan
city
manager,
good
question,
I.
Think
I
want
to
begin
the
answer
to
that
by
being
very
clear
that
what
we're
doing
tonight
is
approving
the
housing
element
and
the
override,
not
the
a
potential
project
on
tanfran
and
a
lot
of
the
very
good
questions
that
you
asked
will
be
answered
through
the
review
and
approval
process
or
consideration
for
a
Tanforan
development,
but
specifically
to
what
the
sound
attenuation
would
be.
J
Certainly
there
will
be
significant
regulations
and
proposals
around
sound
attenuation
that
City
staff
will
review.
We
will
absolutely
have
Consultants
review
and
all
of
that
will
have
to
go
back
as
staff
mentioned
there
will
be
another
process
through
SFO
and
the
airport
land
use
commission
how
they
decide
on
that
I
don't
want
to
sort
of
hypothesize.
J
C
Is
there
anyone
who
wishes
to
be
heard
regarding
the
override
of
the
airport,
land
use
commission's
determination
of
inconsistency
with
the
SFO
airport,
land
use
plan,
and
so
we're
only
going
to
be
taking
comments
relating
to
the
proposed
airport
land
use
commission
override
portion
of
the
presentation
at
this
time.
Comments
on
the
other
aspects
of
the
of
this
item
will
be
taken
separately
after
Council
has
concluded
consideration
of
the
airport
land
use
commission
override.
C
C
C
D
C
A
N
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
so
now
I'm
going
to
go
over
the
the
environmental
review
that
was
done
for
the
housing
element
to
analyze
any
potential
environmental
impacts.
So
for
the
project
we
did
an
initial
study
and
that
resulted
in
a
mitigated.
Net
negative
declaration
and
with
all
impacts
could
be
that
were
identified
in
initial
study
could
be
mitigated
to
a
less
significant
level
with
implementation
of
the
mitigation
measures
and
those
are
attached
to
the
document.
N
N
So,
on
January
12th,
the
housing
element
was
reviewed
by
the
Planning
Commission.
The
Planning
Commission
passed
two
resolutions
recommending
Council
to
adopt
the
mitigated
negative
declaration
and
mitigation
monitoring
reporting
program
for
the,
which
is
the
SQL
document,
and
then
they
also
passed
a
resolution
recommending
the
council
adopt
the
2023-2031
housing
element,
update,
replacing
the
2015
to
2023
housing
element
and
instruct
staff
to
forward
it
to
hcd
for
review
and,
and
they
recommended
adoption
of
the
general
plant
text.
Amendments
that
I
spoke
of
earlier.
N
Additionally,
they
had
additional
comments
about
it
that
I'm
forwarding
to
you
now
incorporate
the
mitigation
monitoring
identified
in
the
mnd
into
the
housing
element,
as
City
policies
applicable
to
the
development
of
the
sites
and
the
inventory.
This
has
been
done,
and
this
is
at
the
recommendation
of
the
City
attorney.
N
N
Tonight's
recommended
action
again,
so
this
is
where
we
are
now
is
to
adopt.
The
initial
study,
mitigated
negative
declaration
and
mitigation
monitoring
and
Reporting
program
and
there's
a
resolution
for
that.
We've
already
done
the
grayed
out
one.
So
we're
going
to
go
down
now
to
the
third
resolution,
which
is
to
adopt
a
general
plan
text
amendment
to
policy
hs40
and
adopt
the
2023-2031
housing
element
with
findings
that
the
housing
element
substantially
complies
with
housing
element
law
and
authorized
staff
to
submit
the
housing
element
to
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
for
certification.
A
B
Q
Good
evening,
mayor
Medina
vice
mayor
Hamilton
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Katie
hofstetter
and
I
work
with
strata
Investment
Group.
We
are
partnered
with
Alexandria
on
the
Redevelopment
of
the
Tanforan
site.
We
are
very
excited
about
the
Tanforan
Redevelopment
project
and
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
working
on
the
site
plan
and
within
the
site's
constraints,
to
determine
what
goes
where
and
at
what
density.
Our
preliminary
project
application
was
submitted
in
October,
2022
and
envisions
a
mix
of
uses
for
Tanforan,
including
housing,
as
proposed.
Q
The
Redevelopment
plan
includes
roughly
a
thousand
new
units
of
housing
in
three
separate
buildings,
which
is
consistent
with
the
housing
element
update
and
will
bring
a
meaningful
amount
of
new
housing
to
San
Bruno.
We
believe
that
the
proposed
design
includes
an
ideal
mix
of
housing,
retail
and
life
science
for
feasibility.
We
look
forward
to
kicking
off
the
environmental
review
for
the
Tanforan
site,
specifically
in
the
near
term,
which
will
further
study
the
proposed
uses
and
densities
on
the
site.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
R
Thank
you
so
much
hello
Council,
my
name
is
Noel
Ling
Mack
I
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
Planning
Commission
suggestion
to
put
up
jobs
to
housing
ratio
cap
on
the
tan
brand
project.
I
think
we're
very
aware
of
the
job
to
housing
ratio,
imbalance
in
the
broader
Bay
Area
region
and
so
putting
together
a
project
that
could
have
a
significantly
imbalanced
jobs.
Housing
ratio
really
anything
over
four
to
one,
would
do
a
disservice
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
so
I'd
strongly
recommend
adopting
that
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission.
A
C
So
should
I
so
should
I
assume
regarding
the
second
recommendation
for
the
Planning
Commission
to
the
extent
possible
prior
to
submittal,
incorporate
additional
information
to
the
site.
Inventory
analysis
should
I
assume
that
there
was.
There
was
not
sufficient
time
to
to
complete
that
or
was
it
completed.
S
Darcy
Smith
assistant
city
manager,
there's
not
a
lot
of
time,
yeah
and
also
I,
think
we
we
did
the
sqa
analysis
based
on
this
document.
We
push
it
out
for
public
comment,
late
December,
so
at
this
point
really
not
inclined
to
make
substantial
changes.
That
said,
if
we
gain
any
new
information,
so,
for
example,
if
a
property
owner
would
have
contacted
us
before
tonight's
meeting
saying
hey,
we
have
major
concerns
with
you
know,
potential
and
including
this
on
the
suitable
sites.
S
S
D
T
Thank
you,
mayor
Medina
and
council
member
Salazar
I
wanted
to
introduce
my
colleague
David
snow,
who
has
been
working
with
the
city
on
the
housing
element
and
he
has
some
information.
He
can
provide
additional
information,
I
think,
and
he
can
confirm
this
most
cases
where
we've
heard
of
the
Builder's
remedy
being
potentially
exercised
in
Southern
California,
but
if
we
could
turn
it
over
to
Dave
I'd
appreciate
it.
U
At
this
point,
I'd
say
there
early
on
the
cities
are
still
working
through
the
issues
associated
with
the
with
the
assertions
by
the
property
owners
and
the
developers,
and
it
really
depends
that
it's
actually
each
of
those
cases
is
a
little
bit
different.
I
would
say,
certainly
a
timely
adoption
of
a
housing
element
with
the
findings
that
the
the
element
is
a
substantial
compliance
with
State
housing
law
is
a
recommended
step
at
this
point
to
provide
the
the
strongest
defense
against
that
type
of
assertion.
Okay,.
D
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
a
little
clarification
on
that
and
then
also
the
just.
The
concept
in
general
of
establishing
a
jobs
to
housing
ratio
seems
interesting
and
I
know
for
Tanforan.
It's
not
something
we
want
to
pursue
at
this
point
because
there's
already
been
a
lot
of
documentation
around
it.
D
I
know
our
housing
number
really
depends
on
on
those
number
of
units,
but
it
does
seem
that
that
imbalance
is
what
put
us
in
the
situation
that
we're
in
and
keeping
an
eye
on
that,
maybe
not
for
this
particular
project,
but
in
other
projects,
where
we're
potentially
removing
housing
that
that
should
be
a
consideration
and
maybe
something
that
we
can
have
a
broad
policy
on
going
forward.
Where
that's
it's
considered,.
J
Azure
sure
I
thank
you,
councilman
salazarus,
as
projects
come
forward,
we
can
certainly
look
at
that.
I
know
a
lot
of
the
analysis
around
the
jobs.
Housing
balance
is
that
it
is
very,
very,
very
difficult
to
do
at
a
project
level
hard
to
do
at
a
city
level
and
really
needs
to
be
at
a
more
Regional
level,
and
every
project
is
very
unique,
and
so
absolutely
we
always
concerned
about
the
amount
of
jobs
that
are
created,
but
we
will
certainly
continue
to
look
at
that.
A
C
A
P
Just
want
to
thank
everyone.
This
is
a
huge
task,
just
in
case
this
is.
This
is
for
the
public.
This
is
the
housing
element,
and
this
doesn't
justify
our
the
amount
of
work
that
it
took
to
get
here
was
amazing,
so
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
all
the
work
from
staff,
the
Planning
Commission
their
comments
and
as
we
go
forward
of
making
sure
that
we
have
more
housing.
A
C
E
C
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
move
to
adopt
the
resolution
adopting
a
general
plan,
amendment
to
policy
hs-4-0
adopting
a
general
plan
amendment
to
update
the
housing
element
of
the
general
plan
for
the
period
2023
to
2031,
replacing
the
2015
to
2023
housing
element
with
findings
of
substantial
compliance
with
State
housing
element
law
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
65585
and
authorizing
staff
to
submit
the
housing
element
update
to
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
for
review
and
certification.
E
A
A
You
know,
I
think
in
this
case
you
folks
did
much
better
and
so
I
want
to
compliment
staff
for
doing
the
work,
the
presentations,
the
time,
the
commitment
and
getting
it
done
and
getting
it
done
on
time.
Thank
you
with
that.
We
will
continue
on
to
our
agenda,
and
now
we
will
move
on
to
conduct
of
business.
Please.
J
Thank
you,
mayor,
Medina
to
the
council
and
members
of
the
public,
Javon
Grogan
city
manager,
I'll
just
open
this
item.
Very
briefly,
at
our
last
city
council
meeting,
there
was
a
request
and
subsequent
Direction
by
the
city
council
to
bring
back
the
city's
commercial
cannabis
regulations,
and
so
you
have
that
before
you
in
item
8
a
in
addition.
J
Since
our
last
meeting,
the
city
did
review
the
current
application
package
that
we
had
out
and
we
did
suspend
all
we
did
suspend
that
process
and
at
the
time
that
we
suspended
the
process,
we
had
not
received
any
applications
based
on
council's
action
tonight.
If
there
are,
if
there
are
no
changes
to
the
regulations,
we
will
announce
a
new
submission
date.
If
there
are
changes,
we
will
process
those
changes.
J
They
will
require
a
review
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
action
at
the
city
council,
and
we
will
then
issue
a
new
application
package
with
a
new
submission
deadline.
But
we
are
here
fully
prepared
to
support
you
through
your
policy.
Analysis
and
I
will
now
turn
the
presentation
over
to
Peter
Gilley,
our
community
and
economic
development
director
who
will
provide
you
a
high
level
overview
of
the
current
regulations,
as
well
as
a
number
of
slides
on
potential
changes
that
were
requested
and
then
facilitate
your
policy
discussion.
Thank
you.
M
We'll
start
with
the
background
I'm
going
to
try
to
give
a
little
bit
of
the
when
what
where
and
how
of
of
our
regulations
start
with
the
timeline
back
in
2018
Council
took
action
to
prohibit
all
commercial
cannabis
uses
in
the
city
in
2020,
from
April
to
July,
Council
held
six
meetings
for
consideration
of
of
a
ballot
measure
for
either
either
attacks
or
regulations.
The
actual
ballot
measure
ended
up
just
focusing
on
the
tax.
M
M
The
key
point
of
the
ordinance
is
that,
in
its
current
form,
there's
a
maximum
of
four
commercial
cannabis
operations
that
would
be
allowed
in
the
city.
Up
to
three
can
be
retail
with
limitations.
One
can
be
a
distribution
use
also
with
limitations
in
the
ordinance.
The
ordinance
does
not
allow
any
of
the
other
type
of
businesses
that
show
on
the
screen.
M
So
no
no
commercial
cultivation,
no
manufacturing,
no
testing,
no
micro
businesses
is
which
are
combinations
of
multiple
types
of
of
of
the
business
types,
no
temporary
events
and
no
cafes
for
on-site
onset
consumption.
Only
retail
and
distribution
again
with
limitations
in
the
ordinance,
the
high
level
a
cannabis
retailer
is
a
business
that
is
selling
either
cannabis
or
cannabis
products
directly
to
customers.
It's
not
a
manufacturer
of
any
Goods
Manufacturing
happens.
Off-Site
entry
to
these
facilities
are
are
restricted
to
state
law.
These
can
include
delivery
services.
M
There
are
state
laws
that
now
say
those
have
to
be
allowed
and,
as
as
noted
earlier,
our
ordinance
has
a
maximum
of
three
in
its
current
state.
Then
there's
the
distribution
facility.
These
are
the
facilities
that
will
will
purchase
and
sell
and
transport
the
goods
between
between
businesses.
So
between
a
manufacturer
and
the
retailer,
there
is
no
interaction
with
the
public
and
our
ordinance
has
a
maximum
of
one
being
allowed
in
our
industrial
districts.
M
M
Just
for
reference,
when
you,
when
staff,
brings
a
map
for
PowerPoint,
normally
we
have
it
so
that
North
is
up.
We
purposely
on
this.
One
North
is
not
up.
North
is
really
off
to
the
side,
and
that's
so
that
the
screen
can
show
more
of
the
map
on
your
actual
printed
map.
North
is
generally
pointing
up.
This
map
shows
all
the
different
areas
we're
using
color
coding
to
assist
in
the
conversation.
M
As
we
said
right
now,
the
ordinance
allows
a
maximum
of
four
up
to
three
retail
can
be
located
in
the
blue
or
the
yellow
on
the
blue
or
yellow
sites.
Those
are
in
the
transit
Corridor
in
downtown
or
at
the
shops
at
tanfran.
Distribution
up
to
one
is
allowed
in
the
purple
Parcels.
Those
are
the
industrial
lands
north
of
380.
and
anytime,
one
of
these
Parcels,
whether
it's
yellow,
blue
or
purple,
if
they're
in
a
sense
of
use,
buff
sensitive
use
buffer
that
site's
not
allowed
it's
off
the
table.
M
The
actual
process
for
for
receiving
a
permit,
The
Operators.
The
applicants
would
have
to
file
an
operator's
permit
application.
Those
will
be
pre-screened
by
staff
on
a
pass
fail.
You
either
meet
all
the
application
requirements
or
you
don't,
then
all
of
those
that
do
meet
the
application
requirements
would
be
brought
to
council
and
presented
to
council,
who
will
add
a
a
noticed
meeting
will
select
the
applications
that
would
be
awarded
at
operators
permit.
M
Then
those
applicants
would
have
to
file
for
a
conditional
use
permit
that
will
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
to
the
council
for
final
action
upon
approval
of
the
conditioning
use.
Permit
then
that
applicant
will
receive
their
operator's.
Permit
they'll
also
need
a
business
license
and
they
also
have
a
permits
they
have
to
do
with
the
state,
but
from
a
land
use
perspective
that
handles
what
the
process
with
the
city
is.
M
Now
the
application
requirements
are
quite
extensive,
arguably
more
than
we
would
require
for
any
other
business.
There's
documentation
for
background
background
checks
of
the
ownership
group,
proof
of
capitalization
that
they
have
the
funding
in
order
to
in
order
to
do
the
business
plan
that
they
have
to
have
to
provide
us,
they
have
to
have
proof
of
either
ownership
of
a
property
or
lease
agreement
or
a
letter
of
intent
to
lease,
so
they
have
to
prove
they
have
a
location.
M
M
M
The
maximum
number
of
businesses
under
the
under
the
suggested
amendments
would
go
from
four
up
to
four
to
up
to
two
retail
would
go
from
up
to
three
to
up
to
one
and
only
on
on
the
blue
parcels,
and
then
the
distribution
could
actually
be
up
to
two.
Both
of
the
sites
could
be
distribution.
Those
are
still
located
in
the
industrial
area
north
of
380,
and
no
change
is
made
to
the
buffers.
M
M
A
H
I
understand
what
it's
like
to
to
have
to
to
to
be
in
a
position
where
you're
at
to
have
to
make
these
kinds
of
decisions
and
I'll
be
very
brief.
In
in
what
I've
read
about
your
your
your
statute,
I've
watched
the
way
that
it's
developed
over
time
and
I
do
understand
the
political
overtones
of
of
how
these
things
develop.
H
H
H
We
as
a
policy
decision,
we
expanded
it
so
that
it
would
Nursery
schools
preschools,
we
expanded
it
even,
but
we
didn't
limit
ourselves
in
the
way
of
discretion.
We
didn't
limit
the
number
we
limited
areas
and
I
see
what
you're
trying
to
do
in
this
situation.
I
would
urge
you
to
leave
yourself
open
to
discretion,
be
able
to
use
your
discretion
I've
seen
the
way
you
deliberate,
you're,
very
transparent.
If
you
don't
want
four
in
your
city,
don't
limit
Yourself
by
saying
you
know,
we'll
only
allow
two.
H
If
you
don't
get
the
kind
of
operator
that
you
want
in
this
city,
don't
I
I,
wouldn't
award
any
of
them.
So
I
understand
the
spirit
of
what
you're
trying
to
do
and
what
you're
trying
to
communicate
to
your
people,
but
I
would
say
from
a
policy
Maker's
perspective.
Anything
that
you
do
that
limits.
Your
discretion
is
something
I
would
like
to
have
as
a
council
member
I'd
like
to
have
as
much
discretion
as
possible
to
be
able
to
craft
the
policy.
H
So
this
allows
you
the
current
law
from
what
I'm
understanding
from
staff
the
current
state
of
the
law
is.
Is
that
you've
you've,
given
your
your
your
your
your
policy
makers,
a
broad
range
of
of
discretion
to
use
in
this,
and
it's
specifically
with
the
language
to
use
so
I,
would
urge
that,
if
you're,
if
you're
thinking
about
limiting
yourself
today,
you
can
limit
Yourself
by
operation
of
law.
H
H
The
second
part
is
purely
economic
I'm
from
Daly
City,
and
we
we
needed
tax
revenue,
so
we
were
looking
specifically
for
as
much
tax
revenue
as
possible.
So
again,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time,
and
this
is
a
great
place
to
have
a
city
council
meeting,
so
many
so
many
screens
and
everything
so
I'm
very
happy
to
be
here.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
wish
you
the
best
of
luck
on
your
deliberations
today.
B
V
So
as
a
license
and
regulation
consultant,
I've
worked
in
every
Major
Market
in
California
and
a
whole
bunch
of
states
around
the
country
and
one
of
the
things
that
is
always
important
not
only
for
dispensary
potential
dispensary
owners,
but
but
from
a
public
policy
standpoint.
Is
you
want
to
think
about
how
many
dispensaries
are
you
going
to
be
allowing
per
person
so
I'm
going
to
throw
some
numbers
at
you
here,
but
just
for
context?
Berkeley
has
about
one
store
per
29
000
people
Tracy
in
the
East,
Bay
or
I.
V
Don't
know
if
that
counts.
The
East
Bay
has
about
one
per
19.
000
people
Washington
state
is
about
one
store
per
16.
000
Sacramento
is
about
one
per
thirteen
thousand
Pacific
has
about
one
for
nine
thousand
San
Francisco
is
an
ever-changing
landscape,
but
it's
on
its
way
to
about
one
store
for
eight
thousand
people.
Alaska
is
a
little
bit
below
that.
Colorado
is
about
seven
thousand
and
then
Montana
Oklahoma,
yes,
Oklahoma
and
Oregon
are
all
in
this
one
store
per
six
thousand
people
range.
V
So
if
San
Bruno
goes
down
to
only
one
store
maximum,
you
would
have
one
store
per
43,
000
give
or
take
people
and,
to
the
extent
you're
trying
to
minimize
Community
impacts
from
things
like
double
parking
or
it
being
too
busy
you're,
actually
making
the
situation
worse
by
having
only
one
store
in
a
city
of
that
size.
To
say
nothing
of
the
fact
that
the
seventh
busiest
airport
in
the
country
is
right
across
the
street
right.
V
So
there's
some
good
competition
in
the
marketplace
and
definitely
definitely
I
want
to
associate
myself
with
Mike
who
spoke
before
me.
I
might
move
to
Daly
City,
so
I
can
vote
for
him
because
his
point
is
right
on
under
the
current
legislation,
you
retain
all
of
the
discretionary
Authority
already.
So
all
this
would
really
be
doing
is
delaying
the
process
tying
your
hands
and
disqualifying
some
potentially
good
applicants.
V
B
W
You
hear
me
yes,
good
thanks.
I
did
send
letters
to
the
counselors
and
I'm
going
to
just
go
over
it
quickly,
and
this
is
my
thoughts
on
this
subject.
I
do
not
believe
In
fairness
to
the
San
Bruno
community
that
we
as
Citizens
voted
on
having
some
cannabis
shop
in
San
Bruno
to
the
best
of
my
Recollections
San
Bruno
did
a
survey
a
while
back,
and
it
did
not
ask
in
that
survey
if
we
wanted
to
even
have
a
cannabis
store
here
in
San
Bruno.
W
The
vote
was
more
about
the
taxes
that
we
would
get
I
question
who
determined
that
we
would
need
four
dispensaries
here
in
town.
We
are
a
small
town.
So
do
we
need
that?
Many
I
can't
believe
that
20
000
people
are
going
to
the
cannabis
store
seems
to
me
that
two
would
work
fine,
one
for
pickup
and
another
for
a
dispensary.
Did
the
citizens
decide
this?
Did
the
counselors
decide
or
did
the
city
manager
decide
to
have
four
I'm
wondering
why
you
would
want
to
put
a
dispensary
near
Tanforan?
W
There
are
young
kids
hanging
off
out
there,
particularly
on
the
upper
level
and
what
happens
if
you
open
a
dispensary
outside
the
mall,
say
near
Town
Center
the
plan
for
Tan
plan
to
build
commercial
buildings
as
well
as
housing.
What
about
the
kids
that
we
that
will
be
living
in
that
new
housing
of
a
thousand
units
too
close
for
comfort,
in
my
opinion?
Last
but
not
least,
actually
there's
two
more
things.
I
would
think
that
would
be
better
not
to
have
any
if
we
must
use
the
elk.
W
If
we
must,
let's
use
the
El
Camino
Corridor,
not
San,
Mateo,
Avenue,
San,
Mateo
Avenue
is
used
by
many
students
going
back
and
forth
from
Bel
Air
going
Allen's
school
and
so
forth.
Keep
our
kids
out
of
trouble.
That's
why?
So?
Why
invite
trouble
and
also
my
last
thought,
is:
there's
a
row
of
buildings
on
sneak
Lane
right
opposite
the
national
cemetery
near
the
VA
offices,
the
VA
medical
office,
to
me
that
would
be
a
safe
place
to
put
a
dispensary
or
to
put
a
shop
plenty
of
free
parking
and
plenty
available.
A
O
O
A
A
Promote
Ms
Blanco,
so
with
that
we
will
go
ahead
and
conclude
the
public
comments
at
this
time
and
bring
it
back
to
council.
I
just
did
want
to
make
I
think
the
first
two
speakers
were
just
kind
of
having
similar
commentary
on
their
items,
but
the
last
speaker,
I
did
want
to
make
it
clear
that
it
is
not
the
city
manager
that
approved
this.
The
city
manager
does
the
direction
of
the
of
the
council
and
he
has
brought
forward
what
has
been
requested
of
him.
A
C
C
Don't
as
stated
by
allowing
up
to
four,
does
not
mean
we
will
have
four
it
it,
but
it
it
allows
us
to
get
a
a
greater
pool
of
applicants
and
choose
between
and
choose
between
them
to
get
the
best.
One
I
made
several
comments
in
Prior
meetings
on
this
topic.
Regarding
you
know
the
two
broad
buckets
General
flavors
of
dispensaries,
there's
ones
that
look
like
the
Apple
Store
and
there's
ones
that
look
like
a
smoke
cutter,
and
you
know
we
would
look.
C
We
would
and
we
would
be
able,
as
a
council,
to
look
at
the
applications
and
look
at
the
ones
that
have
the
best
security
practices.
The
best
track
record
the
best
the
best
look
and
feel
the
best
location
from
the
sites
available
and
make
our
and
make
our
determination
there
and
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
for
us
to
to
limit
our
maximums
in
this
way,
when
we
have
the
discretion
to
allow
zero,
if
we
don't,
if
we
don't
get
qualified
applicants,
my
other.
C
This
is
a
more
of
a
a
question
for
my
colleagues
who
want
to
make
the
who
want
to
make
these
recommend
recommended
changes
is
I
want
to
hear
the
the
reasoning
for
remote
over
half.
Almost
two-thirds
of
downtown
is
already
precluded
from
having
a
cannabis
business
because
of
sensitive
uses
that
surround
it.
A
I
would
go
ahead
and
say
when
you
talk
about
the
casino,
when
you
say
it's
a
simple
security
system,
I
would
say
a
casino
under
the
state
regulations
is
far
from
simple.
It's
face
recognition,
it's
security,
I!
Think
it's
a
little
unique
and
I
know
you
know.
In
this
city
too,
there
used
to
be
two
casinos
and
when
Casino
Royale
went
out
on
El
Camino
Real,
the
community
didn't
want
another
one
again,
just
as
Talbots
won
the
gun
store
went
out,
the
community
didn't
want
another
one
again
so
anyway.
P
P
On
the
Northern
side,
we
do
have
a
casino
some
people,
don't
like
casinos,
but
some
people
could
decide
I'm
not
going
to
go
to
I'm,
not
going
to
go
to
a
casino
and
that's
their
choice
in
the
vicinity
of
the
casino
there's
a
smoke
shop.
That's
going
in
apparently
I
believe
brand
new
in
that
vicinity.
P
P
P
It
didn't
happen.
It
took
longer,
and
here
we
are
so
I
think
we
could
I
think
I'm
going
to
wait
to
make
a
motion,
because
it's
very
clear
to
me
that
I
don't
have
at
least
I'm
thinking,
I,
don't
I!
Don't
want
to
waste
people's
time
so
I'll,
wait
and
to
to
respond
to
a
comment
from
from
my
colleagues.
I
hope,
I
hope
to
hear
something.
K
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I
want
to
Circle
back
on
the
comment
of
one
of
our
callers
regarding
eliminating
the
tan
foreign
I
I
do
agree
because
I
we
we
have
children.
We
have
high
school
students
that
do
hang
out
in
the
mall
and
if
we
do
have
stores
or
dispensary
in
the
mall,
it
wouldn't
prevent
them
to
basically
distance
their
their
themselves
within
the
500
feet
limit.
K
In
addition
to
the
downtown
area,
it's
the
same
concept
where
children
can
walk
on
a
downtown
area
and
basically
not
limit
themselves
to
walk
in
or
basically
linger
around
the
dispense.
They
go
through
the
same
process.
Even
if
we
limit
two
stores,
we
could
receive
100
applicants
and
still
go
through
the
same
process
and
the
city
and
the
staff
can
choose
the
best
applicant
to
operate
in
our
city.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
I:
don't
I
was
going
back,
I
had
a
note,
I
didn't
say
is
I,
don't
know
if
Redwood
City
was
commented
on
about
the
speaker
and
there
they
have
81
000
according
to
google
81
643,
and
they
only
have
a
handful
So
based
on
their
ratio.
It's
it's
quite
higher,
but
I,
don't
believe
that
they
were
articulated
the
other.
A
Also
that
I
I,
like
areas
that
have
a
you
know
on
on
El,
Camino,
Real,
there's
a
good
flow
of
traffic,
there's
I
think
a
high
higher
police
presence
going
back
and
forth
I
find
that
a
little
more
comforting,
obviously
they're
close
to
San
Bruno
Avenue
as
well.
I.
Think
the
other
thing
too
is
you
know,
and
now
things
opening
back
up
and
now
we're
going
to
various
act
activities
again
or
speaking
to
other
colleagues.
A
You
know
it
is
the
fact
that
there
has
been
a
situation
in
Pacifica.
There
is
a
fact
that
there
has
been
some
situations
in
San
Mateo,
not
because
they
have
a
dispensary,
but
because
there's
been
other
activities,
that's
been
brought
in
so
I
also
believe,
like
I
said
starting
off.
If
it
comes
back
and
says
you
know
what
this
is,
I'll
use
your
comment.
This
is
the
Apple
Store.
This
has
been
a
great
partner
with
the
community
correct
me,
but
the.
C
Council
can
come
back
to
that
comment
in
order
to
raise
it
back
up
to
raise
it
up
again.
You
know
if
we
get.
If
we
end
up
in
that
situation,
we
would
need
to
agendize
it
put
it
to
request
staff
to
come
back
with
a
report
in
a
study
session
like
this
to
start
with
and
and
re,
and
have
that
discretion
to
add
another
one
now
or
add
another
one
later.
C
C
As
far
as
tan
Fran
goes
I'm
not
gonna,
I'm
not
gonna
to
I'm,
not
gonna
die
on
that
on
die
on
that
Hill
I'm,
I'm,
I'm,
fine,
with
with
proceeding
there,
but
using
the
argument
that
we
should
preclude.
We
should
exclude
all
of
downtown
because
children
walk
through.
It
is
odd
because
that
that
means
that
so
children
don't
walk
on
El
Camino
children.
Don't
walk
on
that
if
you're,
if
you're
under
21,
you
cannot
enter
into
a
dispensary,
you
also
cannot
loiter
outside
of
a
dispensary
people.
C
Can't
smoke
can't
smoke
cannabis
in
public
outside
of
a
dispensary
or
anywhere
else
in
public.
So
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
where
you
know
I'll
make
the
same
argument
that
I
made
made
last
time.
If
this
isn't
for
you
just
keep
walking.
This
is
one
of
those
things.
It's
not
that
that's
that's
been
my
point
all
along
seeing
argument
for
why
downtown
should
be
eliminated,
given
that
most
of
downtown
is
already
eliminated.
A
Are
there
any
comments,
I
mean?
Are
there
any
further
comments
from
colleagues?
Okay?
So
this
is
again
the
report
has
been
given.
It
is
to
review
that
and
give
direction
we'll
be
with
emotion,
of
course,
but
to
give
directions
that
needs
to
be
articulated
and
then
put
a
form
in
the
motion
of
whatever
is
chosen.
D
D
I
believe
what
I'm
putting
forward
addresses
a
number
of
the
issues.
It
does
provide
us
an
opportunity
for
the
tax
revenue,
regardless
of
what
I,
personally
think
about
the
industry
in
general,
I
I
do
believe
this
will
be
the
next
big
tobacco
and
we
are,
you
know,
opening
an
opportunity
to
profit
from
that
and
I
question
whether
or
not
that's
that's
the
type
of
city
that
we
want
to
be.
Other
cities
are
doing
it
currently
60
of
the
cities
in
California.
X
D
A
X
I'm
just
glad
there
was
no
police
officers
following
me
good
evening
good
evening.
Everyone,
my
name,
is
Jennifer
Blanco
I
am
a
long-time
resident.
I
grew
up
here
in
the
Avenues
I
now
live
up
by
Scotland
College,
however,
I
also
serve
as
a
trustee
for
the
San
Bruno
Park
School
District
here
and
I
wanted
to
I
rushed
down
here
and
I
apologize.
I
wasn't
able
to
log
on,
but
I
needed
to
come
down
and
share
with
you.
X
My
concerns
also
as
a
parent,
so
I
applaud
council
member
Salazar
for
bringing
this
back
for
your
for
the
amendment.
However,
I
do
agree
with
him.
I
wish
that
our
city
would
not
move
forward
with
bringing
cannabis
dispensaries
here
in
our
community.
We
have
four
smoke
shops
here
in
San
Bruno,
where
have
where
kids
I
applaud
the
previous
speaker,
because
I
feel
her
frustration
and
I
heard
her
anger
through
her
comments
and
her
tone
so
I
thank
her.
X
So
much
for
sharing
with
the
fact
that
we
have
kids
who
are
driving
I'm,
sorry,
who
are
walking
by
liquor
stores
walking
by
the
smoke
shops
I,
don't
care
what
anyone
says.
Marijuana
is
the
gateway.
Drug
alcohol
is
the
gateway
drug.
We
just
had
we're
still
in
the
in
the
end
of
coming
out
of
a
pandemic.
X
We
still
are
living
through
epidemic
and
pandemic
with
drugs
with
our
kids
in
Pacifica
I
believe
they
have
four
on
Palmetto,
which
is
just
down
the
street
is
IBL
Ingrid,
big
Lacey,
Middle,
School
I,
don't
know
how
that's
working
out
for
Pacifica,
but
we
have
kids
who
are
smoking
in
our
schools.
They're
vaping
vaping,
nicotine
vaping,
the
marijuana
they're
from
there.
X
X
They
are
seeing
this
every
day
and
there's
nothing
there
to
protect
them.
I
feel
that
if
we
I
know
that
we're
going
to
have
these
cannabis
dispensaries
come
to
our
city,
but
we
need
to
put
some
preventative
measures
delivery
service.
How
are
we
going
to
ensure
that
our
kids
aren't
having
this
delivered,
because
kids
can
use
an
adult
name
and
have
it
delivered?
X
X
I
do
believe
you
had.
You
gave
gentleman
Mike
45
seconds,
so
I
have
a
question
for
the
city
manager.
If
you
can
answer
me
sometime
later,
not
tonight,
obviously,
but
there
is
some
with
the
monies
with
the
taxes,
how
much
percentage
of
that
tax
I
believe
has
to
go
to
some
sort
of
education
program
and
who
will
oversee
to
ensure
these
programs
I?
X
D
D
E
E
A
T
T
T
T
It
set
the
default
at
four
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
per
person
per
election
and
allowed
cities
to
enact
lower
limits
if
they
desired,
but
otherwise
the
default
amount
was
the
amount
set
in
the
statute.
That
amount
is
adjusted
for
inflation
by
annually
and
biennually
every
two
years
and
as
of
2023,
the
state
limit
is
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
T
So
what
you
have
in
front
of
you
today,
oh
I,
think
I
am
sorry,
say:
okay,
so
you?
What
you
have
now
in
front
of
you
is
an
ordinance
that
prohibits
contributions
from
a
person
to
a
candidate
in
excess
of
five
hundred
dollars
and
we've
added
a
CPI
adjustment.
It
will
be
done
in
every
odd
year
to
track
with
the
state's
adjustment
to
the
state
amount.
T
T
The
limits
do
not
apply
to
campaigns
for
a
ballot
measure,
referendum
or
initiative
election.
The
ordinance
requires
an
electronic
filing
of
campaign,
stat
statements,
and
it
establishes
penalties
much
like
any
other
municipal
code
violation
where
there
is
an
infraction
a
misdemeanor
and
an
administrative
fine.
The
ordinance
in
front
of
you
does
not
have
the
additional
civil
remedies
which
allow
for
private
right
of
action
or
bringing
a
lawsuit
against
a
Violator.
T
T
So
you
know
if
at
any
point,
you've
received
donations
from
somebody
that
aggregate
to
more
than
a
hundred
dollars
a
hundred
dollars
or
more
here,
is
a
summary
of
the
political
reform
act
that
we
discussed
last
time,
which
is
that
the
political
reform
act
prohibits
Anonymous
contributions
of
a
hundred
dollars
or,
more
again,
implicitly,
that
means
that
there
should
be
some
sort
of
tracking
to
make
sure
once
you
get
to
a
hundred
dollars
of
anonymous
donations.
Those
don't
come
from
the
same
source.
D
D
So,
thank
you
again
for
the
third
revision
of
this,
and
you
know
at
the
federal
level
they
take
years
to
pass
a
thing,
so
I
think
we're
doing.
Okay,
so
one
question
I
had
was
some
of
the
portions
of
this.
Initially,
it
starts
off
saying
that
you
know
for
a
particular
election.
No
person
shall
make
and
no
candidate
shall
receive
in
subsequent
items.
It
just
says
no
person
shall
shall
make
a
contribution.
No
contribution
shall
be
made.
D
Beyond
that,
I
there
was
one
other
change.
I
was
hoping
to
make
is
I
I
was
hoping
that
the
notice
to
contributors
could
be
I,
I,
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
as
wordy
as
it
is,
and
do
we
really
need
to
tell
all
of
our
potential
donors
that
they
need
to
go
read
the
the
municipal
code
when
they
make
a
donation?
D
T
Mayor
Medina
and
council
member
Salazar
I
think
that
that
relates
to
your
question
that
you
just
asked
me,
which
is
if,
if
it's
a
municipal
code
violation,
you
want
to
make
sure
that
your
contributors
are
aware
of
it,
and
so
the
intention
is
to
put
them
on
notice.
The
city
has
a
limit
and
that
they
don't
violate
it.
When
they're,
making
contributions
to
candidates.
K
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I,
just
it's
not
a
question.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment.
I
respectfully
do
not
support
the
ordinance,
since
we
have
the
state
law
in
place.
I,
don't
think,
there's
an
urgency
for
this
ordinance.
In
addition,
whenever
a
city
mandate
a
violation,
then
we
do
have
to
establish
a
staff
to
basically
take
care
of
all
the
complaints,
the
same
as
Code
Enforcement
Officers.
K
Whenever
we
mandate
codes,
substandard
housing,
we
have
code
enforcement
that
monitors
that
I
know
it's
not
until
two
years,
but
we
do
have
to
think
about
staff
who's
going
to
be
working
on
administering
this
complaints
receiving
calls
from
residents.
So
that's
my
opinion.
That's
why
I
do
not
support
the
ordinance.
Thank
you.
C
So
to
council
member
Alvarez's
point
of
not
wanting
to
support
this
because
there's
we
already
have
it
at
the
state
level.
Just
want
to
remind
that.
The
the
state
contribution
limit
will
be
5500
and
our
limit
is
500..
That
is
that's.
That's
the
whole
purpose
of
this.
It's
not
to
make
more
work
for
people.
It's
not
it's,
not
anything!
It's
not
any
of
those
other
things.
It's
to.
C
A
Thank
you,
yeah
I
mean
I.
Think
what
brought
us
back
here
was
the
punitive
elements
right
now
we're
talking.
Yes,
they
a
person
may
give
a
contribution
with
the
sentiment
of
just
believing
in
a
person
or
what
they
can
do
for
their
community,
but
yet
there's
a
liability.
Now
again,
you
know
where
I
think
this
was
trying
to,
as
it
was
indicated
like
well
I.
Think
that's
too
much
correct
me
to
the
City
attorney,
but
I
can
a
person
who
has
the
resources
can
self-fund
their
campaign?
Can
they
not.
A
If
you
have
the
means
you
can
have
the
best
campaign
ever,
you
could
also
have
somebody
create
a
pack.
You
could
have
a
pack
that
puts
out
mailers
that
you're
not
involved
with
that
says
either
Pro
you
or
against
you
so
I'm,
trying
to
also
grapple
with.
When
there
is
a
state,
then
it
becomes
the
ownership
of
the
city.
A
Thank
you.
So
there
is
some
work
and
we
may
not
not
having
walked
through.
This
may
not
know
that,
but
obviously
we
could
reach
out
to
another
community
so
where
I
feel
this
was
trying
to
go
to
stop
it,
doesn't
it
can
hurt
folks
that
I
I
go
back
to
Carolyn
living
good?
Everybody
always
told
her.
Why
don't
you
run
you'd?
Be
so
good
you
care
so
much,
and
always
she
told
me
I
can't
afford
it.
I
think
she
would
have
got
the
support.
A
A
P
I
believe,
in
the
spirit
of
this
that
there
should
be
a
limit
if,
if
you
were
going
to
raise
money,
if
you're,
if
you
have
probably
all
the
council
members
here
on
the
dice
influence
themselves,
I
think
that's
probably
fairly
accurate,
you're
right.
So
it's
different
when
somebody
else
gives
you
the
money.
P
A
D
A
I
I
can
also
say,
because
I
think
all
of
us
feel
that
there's
some
value
to
this
and
in
some
ways,
but
then
at
that's,
why
we
I
think
it
keeps
coming
back
I
could
make
a
offer
a
suggestion
if
it
works,
is
that
this
item
come
back
during
strategic
initiatives.
We
talk
about
it.
We
try
to
iron
it
out
in
a
setting
that
is
more
conducive
and
see.
A
If
there
is
something
we
can,
we
can
feel
that
would
be
of
a
value
to
our
community
with
not
not
having
not
disadvantaging
those
folks
that
do
need
those
funds
and
and
I'll
tell
you.
I
speak
to
folks
and
I've
been
around
a
while
I
mean
you
just
don't
want
them
to.
You.
Don't
want
people
to
have
to
go
to
one
spot
or
to
feel
obligated,
but
it's
just
the
concern
of
not
having
it
to
where.
A
If
you
have
resources
you're
in
and
if
you
don't,
you
may
have
to
think
twice,
because
it's
just
a
challenge
or
maybe
your
Forte
is
not
asking
for
resources
depending
whether
it's
a
district
election
or
it's
an
at-large
election.
Tell
you
the
cost
for
an
at
large
election
is
going
to
be
more
than
a
district
election
candidly.
What
even,
if
you
talk
about
signs
so
is
that
fair
I
know
the
City
attorney
said:
hey.
A
B
A
C
I'd
like
to
make
a
report
out
from
the
Bay
Area
Water,
Supply
and
conservation
agency
I'll,
keep
it
brief.
I
serve
on
the
board
of
directors
of
of
bauska
and
I
want
to
I
have
just
two
two
items
from
our
recent
meeting
last
week.
The
recent
storms
obviously
caused
much
damage
and
Chaos
across
the
state
and
here
in
San
Bruno,
as
we
heard
earlier
tonight
from
director
Lee
and
but
it
had,
but
it
also
did
a
lot
to
help
with
our
water
supply.
C
A
That's
great
now,
thank
you
for
the
info.
Anybody
else.
I
was
just
going
to
say
the
Emergency
Services
Council
was
postponed
because
of
all
the
storms
and
the
rain
that
you
alluded
to.
So
it
has
been
postponed
from
last
week
to
this
week
to
give
the
county
staff
and
those
in
the
emergency
areas
that
the
ALS
jpa
that's
the
county
and
the
ambulance.
Amr
that
you
see
we
had
a
meeting
and
the
one
area
that
I'd
bring
up
to
council
and
the
staff
and
I'm
sure
they
already
know.
A
That
is
that,
on
the
communications
element
of
what
is
currently
contracted,
they're
looking
for
quite
an
increase
that
is
not
anticipated
within
the
jpa
on
the
normal
percentage
that
we
we
do
so
the
board
is
working
to
try
to
figure.
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
okay,
let's
move
on
to
item
10
comments
from
council
members.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
I
apologize!
Are
there
any
public
comments
for
it's
a
new
one,
so
any
public
comments
on
the
items
the
vice
mirror
on
myself
talked
about.
P
P
P
P
A
D
Mayor
I
would
say
that
I
absolutely
support
more
spending
on
streets,
but
I
I,
don't
really
understand
because
measure
G
is
general
fund.
There
really
wasn't
it
wasn't.
A
I'd
say
rather
than
agenda
is
something
for
discussion
around
repayment
or
anything
like
that
that
we
wait
till
budget
time
and
then
make
a
decision
at
that
point
to
allocate
any
available
funds
that
are
available.
You
know,
and
they
would
be
general
fund
dollars
for
additional
spending
on
streets
and
I
would
definitely
support
that.
D
C
J
J
C
A
For
my
thought,
too,
is
to
have
a
study
session
to
then
bring
it
up.
A
budget
study
I
think
that
is
the
time
whether
it's
one-time
monies,
whether
it's
general
fund
monies.
Where
are
we
going
but
kind
of
the
same,
but
where
are
we
going
to
put
those?
Are
we
taking
that
from
here,
putting
it
to
measure
G?
The
measure
G
is
bringing
it
back
to
us
in
that
form
and
I
appreciate
your
comment
about
you.
Would
you
supported
that
I
mean
we
were
kind
of
stuck
at
that
point?
A
Really,
you
know
with
covet
measure,
G
supported
it
with
one
caveat
but
supported
its
Council,
supported.
It
I
think
bringing
it
back
under
the
study
session
where
staff
can
formulate
the
additional
thing
was
having
it
divided
up
into
four
areas
which
that
may
be
different
when
you
talk
about
two
million
dollars
and
what
does
that
really
get
you
if
you
divide
it
in
four
districts,
so
for
me,
I
think.
The
study
session,
which
is
the
appropriate
place
to
figure
out,
are
the
monies
there.
A
Let's
look
at
it
I'm
going
to
see
people
standing
with
the
hard
hats
right
and
saying
this
is
this
is
what
what
you
saying
yes
has
done
to
help
improve
our
city.
It's
never
going
to
be
as
fast
as
everybody
wants.
We
all
know
that
that's
one
thing,
that's
consistent,
I
think
up
on
this,
no
matter
where
you
live,
you
always
hear
about
our
streets,
but
I
think
not
to
have
an
additional
study
session
when
this
can
be
coupled
into
the
budget
at
that
time.
I
think
that
that's
just
a
more
efficient,
effective
manner.
P
P
Yes,
you
know
I'm
trying
to
yes
me
too,
so
so
absolutely
so.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
that
to
have
that
discussion
and
what
makes
this
a
little
different
is
that
the
money
had
to
be
allocated
from
the
oversight
committee,
so
that
that
extra
step
for
them
to
ask
to
say
that
it
was
okay
with
their
recommendation.
I.
A
K
A
J
When
is
the
paving
for
the
measure,
G
funds
that
have
been
allocated
in
this
current
year
going
to
occur.
I
cannot
tell
you
the
month
right
now,
but
I
I
do
know
that
they
are
being
designed,
and
what
we
have
said
is
that
the
paving
will
not
occur
in
calendar
year
23.
It
will
occur
in
calendar
year,
24.,
additionally,
not
a
part
of
your
question,
but
it's
worth
noting,
because
you
said
that
we
can
legally
increase
the
bid
quantities
by
20
percent
wow
by
25.
J
While
that
may
be
the
case,
you
have
to
design
the
projects
too
right
and
so,
depending
on
where
things
are
in
the
design
cycle,
you
may
not
be
able
to
just
add
another
Street.
It
may
not
be
that
simple
and-
and
one
of
the
things
we
we
talked
about
before,
is
that
the
city
council,
through
your
direction
in
dollars.
That
said,
we're
working
on
designing
those
projects
and
staff
has
their
their
task
orders
and
the
Design
Consultants
have
theirs
to
just
simply
say:
oh,
let's
add
more
and
to
toss
into
it.
J
Let's
allocated
by
District
tosses
a
level
of
complexity
that,
as
I
sit
here
right
now,
I
can't
tell
you
that
we
would
be
able
to
accomplish
the
next
cycle
of
road
projects
and
and
let
it
be
a
comprehensive
package
and
you
may
actually
get
a
greater
discount
because
you
would
be
adding
two
million
dollars
more
than
you
would
ordinarily
be
doing.
But
we
I
think
we
can
have
all
those
discussions
at
the
budget
study
session
where
we
talk
about
Capital
Improvement
projects,
foreign.
D
A
E
E
P
Yes,
please
so
tomorrow
is
that
tomorrow,
today's
Tuesday,
tomorrow's
Wednesday
wow,
already
at
Bel
Air
elementary
school
second
harvest
distribution,
453rd
Avenue
from
145
to
4
o'clock.
If
you
want
to
volunteer
I'll,
get
there
at
1
45,
please
if
the
line
starts
right
around
two
for
people
that
like
to
receive
groceries
and
we'll
be
there
working
so
hope
to
see
you
there.
Thank
you
that's
my
comments.
P
I
I
wanted
to
to
acknowledge
the
effort
that
Recology
is
making
in
responding
to
San
Bruno.
Now
our
San
Bruno
response
app
I
I,
know
I
put
a
lot
of
those
in
there
so
but
they're.
It's
amazing
that
they
are.
They
are
within
a
day
or
two
picking
picking
things
up
so
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
their
efforts
and
and
to
show
my
appreciation.
So
thank
you.
Recology.
C
Thank
you
and
thank
you.
Marty
I
fully
agree
that
that
that
program
is
just
a
so
I
only
have
one
comment.
The
the
mayor
spoke
about
this
earlier,
but
I
just
want
to
take
a
moment
to
acknowledge
the
tragedy
and
loss
of
life
due
to
gun
violence
this
past
weekend
in
Monterey
Park
and
then
yesterday's
senseless
tragedy
that
hit
our
community
far
too
close
to
home
in
our
neighboring
city
of
Half
Moon
Bay.
C
While
we
mourn
those
lost
and
struggle
to
help
our
neighbors
heal,
we
once
again
find
ourselves
asking
when
we,
when
will
we
as
a
nation,
be
brave
enough
to
confront
the
uniquely
American
problem
that
allows
easy
and
nearly
unfettered
access
to
weapons
of
war
and
simply
ask
when
will
enough
be
enough?
Thank
you.
A
And
the
other
two
colleagues
said
they
were
fine.
I
would
just
Echo
one
one
thing:
Courthouse
I
and
then
mayor
Nogales
were
there,
and
it
was
amazing
to
me
in
that
time
and
again
it
was
a
little
bit
of
monetary
incentive.
Thank
you
exactly,
but
some
of
the
stuff,
you
would
say:
okay,
it's
probably
they
found
it
or
it's
been
there.
But
there
was
some
stuff
that
I
was
amazed
and
it
was
it.
A
A
As
you
know,
as
you
got
on
the
freeway,
there
was
that
in
Camp
a
couple
weeks
ago
to
Caltrain
in
regards
to
some
of
just
the
cleanliness
and
overall
keep
and
of
course,
as
you
know,
they've
always
had
drainage
issues,
but
they
that
will
be
it
for
me
and
with
that,
we
will
go
ahead
and
adjourn
this
meeting
to
the
next
regular
city
council
meeting,
which
will
be
held
on
February,
the
14th
2023
at
7
pm
right
here
at
the
senior
center
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you
staff.
Thank
you.
Colleagues.