Honorable mayor and council numbers I'm david wolverine, your community development director, I'd like to start my presentation by providing some brief background on this agenda item. The city has received and deemed complete for processing and application from the San Francisco Police credit union for planning approvals to construct a new headquarters office building within the Bay Hill business park. The proposed location for this building is the site of the former and now vacant.

Tgif restaurant at 1250, gundy Lane in the Bay Hill Park immediately to the north of this site, is highway, 380 and the surrounding land uses or all office uses. The applicant has indicated that the credit union needs additional space because of growing membership and also a desire to provide a broader range of services. The proposed building will be about 66,000 800 square feet in size. It will be three storeys in height, they'll have two levels of subterranean parking, plus some additional surface parking will be about two hundred and two parking spaces total on the site.

This new facility will house all of the operational and administrative service functions that support the branch network for the credit union. In addition, there'll be a small retail credit union facility for members only on site.

They anticipate that there will be up to about 167 employees at the facility. The actual formal public hearing process for this application has not yet begun. It's still early in the process, but this item will go before the Architectural Review Committee, the Planning Commission and the City Council. A project like this does require full environmental review and that's required by the California Environmental Quality Act, and also the San Bruno Municipal Code. In a situation like this, is we receive an application we deem it complete and determine that an environmental review is required.

We typically prepare, as we did in this case, a request for proposals and send it out to qualified environmental consulting firms and receive their proposals. We did that in this case, and we received three proposals. We receive proposals from ESA, LSA and rainy planning and management.

All the proposals had similar scopes of work. The cost proposals received, though we're different. The rainy / cost proposal came in at 33 thousand two hundred and ninety dollars. Esa is at 41,000 315 about eight thousand dollars higher and LSAs at 47 thousand 240 about fourteen thousand dollars higher than the rainy proposal.

Rainy planning and management has extensive experience in similar work.

Rainy's overall time frame for completing the project was about four months, which is less a little bit less than the other two consulting firms that proposed on this project, based on our review of the proposal staff, is recommending to the City Council that you select rainy planning and management to prepare the environmental review for the San, Francisco Police credit union project and accordingly, we've prepared and attached to your staff report a resolution that we're recommending that you adopt this evening that authorizes the city manager to execute a consultant services agreement in an amount not to exceed thirty.

Three thousand two hundred and ninety dollars, with rainy planning and management for environmental review for the proposed San Francisco Police credit union office building at 1250, Grundy Lane I should point out that we're anticipating that this project will involve an initial study, an environmental initial study and mitigate negative declaration. But as his typical and standard, an initial study would be prepared first, and it could be. We don't expect this, but it could be that a higher level, a fully I our environmental impact report could be required.

If that would be the case, there would be a need to come back the men this contract. We are, though, anticipating that this would be a standard, initial study and mitigated negative declaration in terms of fiscal impact on the city. We do not anticipate any fiscal impact on the city. All costs will be the responsibility of the applicant. That concludes my presentation. I'd be happy to respond to any of your questions. Thank you. Any questions, / David.