►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
C
C
C
C
When
it's
your
turn
to
speak
planning
staff
will
call
your
name.
They
will
unmute
you
and
you
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission.
If
you
are
joining
us
by
telephone.
You
may
also
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
periods
by
pressing
star
nine
staff
will
identify
you,
I
believe,
using
your
phone
number,
since
they
won't
have
your
name,
and
you
will
also
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission.
B
C
C
All
right
first
item
is
approval
of
minutes.
I
know
we
had
a
tiny
correction
in
the
minutes.
Did
we
release
a
new
version
or
are
we
just
accepting?
There
was
a
vote
count
that
was
listed
as
5-1-0
for
my
abstention
on
voting
for
myself
for
chair
that
should
have
been
501.
I
don't
think
it's
terribly
important.
C
A
E
C
All
right,
our
next
item
is
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
If
we
have
anyone
in
attendance
who
wishes
to
address
the
commission
on
an
issue
other
than
what's
on
our
agenda,
this
would
be
one
of
the
two
times
to
raise
your
hand
and
take
that
opportunity.
Do
we
have
anyone
in
the
attendees
list
who
is
interested
in
suppressing
us.
C
H
H
This
is
the
location
of
the
lot
and
at
this
time,
staff
can
find
no
record
that
there
was
ever
anything
built
on
this
lot.
There
are
three
trees
on
it
currently
and
apple,
lemon
and
walnut,
which
will
be
removed
for
the
project,
but
otherwise
no
heritage,
trees,
no
easements,
nothing
of
no
historical
record
of
any
construction.
H
H
H
There
are
three
foot
setbacks
from
each
side
and,
as
you
may
be
aware,
the
san
bernardino
municipal
code
does
provide
the
provision
to
reduce
the
standard
side
setbacks
below
five
feet
if
the
lot
is
under
5
000
square
feet,
so
that
is
allowed
to
be
reduced
to
10
of
the
frontage,
but
not
less
than
3
feet.
So,
since
this
has
a
25
foot
frontage
on
the
front
of
the
lot,
it
can
be
reduced
to
the
minimum
three
foot
setbacks
on
the
side.
And
finally,
there
is
a
17
foot
setback
from
the
rear
property
line.
H
H
The,
because
neither
of
the
houses
on
each
side
have
a
side
yard,
that's
greater
than
10
feet.
There
are
no
additional
provisions
required
by
the
code,
such
as
a
youth
permit
for
a
deck
or
other
windows,
because
it's
considered
that
there's
a
not
a
significant
side
yard
that
would
be
used
that
could
provide
privacy
issues
into
the
home.
H
These
are
elevations
of
the
home
on
the
front
and
here
the
same
elevation
that
was
using
color
on
the
left
and
from
the
rear
on
the
right.
As
you
can
see
from
this
image,
it
does
utilize
horizontal
wood,
siding
on
the
top
floor
and
stucco
on
the
bottom
floor.
This
is
again
another
recommendation
from
the
san
bruno
residential
design
deadlines
to
provide
some
difference
between
the
two
floors
and
offset
the
the
size
and
mass.
H
So
on
the
proposed
lower
floor,
which
can
be
seen
on
the
left
hand,
side,
there
is
the
387
square
foot
tandem
garage,
the
formerly
the
municipal
code
did
allow
smaller
lots
to
only
provide
one
covered
space.
However,
with
parking
some
of
the
parking
code
updates
that
occurred
in
the
last
few
years,
it
requires
all
new
single
family
homes,
regardless
of
their
lot
size,
to
provide
two
covered
spaces.
H
This
is
difficult
to
accommodate
on
a
2500
square
foot
lot
with
a
short
frontage,
and
so
a
tandem
garage
is
recommended
by
the
san
bruno
residential
design
guidelines
to
accommodate
this.
There
is
a
covered
porch,
an
entry
hall
as
well,
a
laundry
closet,
two
bathrooms
in
the
rear
and
one
bathroom
again.
This
is
on
the
lower
floor
on
the
proposed
upper
floor.
There
is
an
open
concept,
kitchen
dining
room
and
family
room
in
the
rear,
which
opens
onto
a
second
story
deck.
H
H
This
chart
here
shows
some
of
the
times
in
the
past
when
this
upper
far
threshold
has
been
allowed
on
substandard
loss.
So
a
a
very
similar
example
to
this
would
be
another
new
house
on
a
vacant
lodge
at
627
massan
avenue
the
second
line
in
this
chart,
which
was
approved
by
planning
commission
in
october
of
2014..
H
C
H
F
F
It's
also
important
to
say
that
there
is
a
full
full
depth
driveway
in
this
house,
which
is
not
that
common
in
many
homes
in
the
huntington
park
area.
So
I'd
like
to
say
that
there's
plenty
of
parking
for
this
neighborhood
for
this
you
know
fairly
congested
neighborhood
and
we
believe
that
you
know
that
the
design
for
this
three
bedroom,
two
and
a
half
bath
house
is,
is,
is
appropriate
and
and
and
will
also
add
to
you
know
to
the
housing
stock.
F
B
You
know
this
is
a.
This
is
a
really
clean,
streamlined
project.
It's
you
know
like
start
from
scratch,
you
don't
have
to
you.
Can
it's
been
to
the
architectural
review?
It
has.
It's
crossed
all
the
areas
and
it's
really
dotted
all
the
eyes
across
the
tees.
It's
a
really
clean
project
and
I
support
the
project.
G
Yeah,
because
I
you
know,
I
love
water
as
a
carpenter,
so
I
I
do
love
wood,
but
it's
the
maintenance
on
it.
I'm
trying
to
get
a
good
product
nowadays
is
difficult,
so
I'm
now
that
it
is
the
hardy
type
size
yeah,
the
hardboard
siding,
is
perfect
wood.
Now
exactly
so
yeah.
I
supported
this
product
project
also.
I
think
it's
a
very
good
design
for
a
very
tight
space
and
I
don't
think,
there's
much
more
anybody
to
do
with
it.
So
I
think
it'll
be
a
huge
improvement,
an
empty
lot
there.
So
thank
you.
C
C
C
B
G
G
D
C
F
C
A
So,
as
the
commission
may
recall
this,
this
item
was
on
your
november
agenda
and
there
was
some
good
discussion
about
application
of
the
standards
to
smaller
residential
projects.
So
we've
added
a
couple
of
minor
exceptions
that
I'll
go
over
in
my
presentation,
but
first
I
thought
it
would
be
helpful
for
the
commission
and
and
for
the
discussion
just
to
briefly
go
over
the
the
request
of
staff
for
this
amendment.
A
Currently,
construction
staging
is
addressed
in
several
ways
depending
on
the
type
of
project
so
for
public
works
projects,
it's
sometimes
addressed
through
the
specifications.
If
the
city
hires
a
contractor
to
do
the
work,
sometimes
it's
private
utility
companies
who
are
requesting
approvals
from
the
public
works
department
to
do
work
in
the
right
way.
Sometimes
the
work
is
on
private
property
for
new
developments,
and
so
some
of
those
requests.
A
So
construction
sites
on
public
or
private
property,
so
the
fencing
facing
a
public
roadway,
would
include
a
sign
that
provides
information
on
the
contract
contractor
and
also
emergency
contact
information,
and
it
should
be
large
enough
to
be
read,
10
feet
away
with
the
language
and
graphics
to
be
approved
by
city
staff,
for
engineering
planning
and
building
increased
core
enforcement.
The
staff
would
be
trained
on
newton's
standards
and
we
probably
would
also
create
some
handouts.
A
The
first
is
that
this
the
standards
would
not
require
single
family
or
small
hill
projects
to
install
construction
fencing
unless
required
to
do
so
for
safety
by
the
building
department.
So
you
may
have
a
situation
like
a
swimming
pool
where
the
the
building
department
requires
defense
to
protect
any
excavation.
A
The
second
part
would
be
that
the
standards
would
not
apply
to
encroachment
permit
time
limits
for
encroachment
permits
issued
to
private
property
owners
who
need
to
use
the
right-of-way
either
for
a
dumpster
or
material
storage
or
large
project.
They're
small
projects.
Sorry,
so
this
as
it
was
discussed
last
time,
the
example
was
given.
You
know
small
landscape
project
where
maybe
someone's
having
their
driveway
replaced
with
with
paving
stones
and
the
you
know
the
materials
get
delivered
to
the
site
and
really
the
right-of-way
is
the
only
place
they
can
be
delivered.
A
A
So
so.
Staff
recommendation
is
that
the
planning
commission
adopt
a
resolution
recommending
to
the
city
council,
the
zoning
ordinance
amendment
that
revises
section
12.84030,
the
san
bruno
municipal
code,
to
remove
all
references
to
off-site
construction
staging
areas.
That's
the
temporary
use
section
of
the
code
and
then.
C
D
Hey
I
wanted
to
start
by
thanking
staff
for
listening
to
our
recommendations
from
the
last
meeting
and
for
coming
back
with,
I
think
some
good
solutions
to
the
concerns
that
we
had
expressed.
One
question
that
just
popped
into
mind.
Well,
listening
to
the
presentation
was
the
rack,
the
the
new
rec
center,
the
recreation
aquatic
center.
I've
noticed
that
you
know
I
buy
it
every
day
and
the
fencing
that's
around
it
does
not
have
screening
and
I've
actually
been
really
glad
that
it
doesn't.
D
A
That's
I
would
say,
because
it's
it's
underway
and
the
contractor
is
already
mobilized.
I
would,
I
would
say
I
would
say
not
and-
and
it
is
an
interesting
point
where
I
know
that
the
standards
say
you
know,
the
screening
is
next
to
a
right-of-way,
but
in
that
situation
the
actual
construction,
I
know,
is
a
ways
away
from
the
right-of-way.
So
in
that
situation,
certainly,
you
know
the
screening
on
the
on.
D
E
E
Commissioner
morgan
brought
this
up
last
time
too.
You
know
once
you
put
that
tarp
on
there,
it's
going
to
tip
over
much
much
more
easily.
So
when
you're
on
a
steep
hill
like
that,
there's
not
you
know
it's
pretty
steep
behind
that
kind
of
embankment
on
the
highway
there
so
for
the
road.
So,
if
they've
had
to
tarp
that
up,
it'd
be
pretty
difficult
for
them
to
sandbag
it
or
cinder
block
to
weigh
it
down.
E
So
I
think,
as
long
as
there's
some
kind
of
avenue
for
exceptions,
for
you
know
maybe
steep
hillsides
or
something
like
that.
I
I
think
I
think
we're
good,
but
just
be
aware
that
once
you
put
that
tarp
on
overturning
is
a
factor
now
the
wind
just
doesn't
blow
through
it
anymore.
It's
a
sale
now,
and
so
it's
a
lot
harder
to
make
that
work.
E
So
I
didn't
read
every
little
change,
but
I
think
I
saw
everything
we
wanted
to
cover,
but
I'm
glad
to
hear
the
rec
center
is
not
going
to
be
have
to
change
or
put
a
tarp
up,
because
I
do
like
seeing
the
progress
and
the
fence
they
have
is
pretty
dinky.
Actually,
it's
not
very
sturdy.
Looking
and
putting
a
tarp
on
that
thing
would
probably
cause
a
lot
of
problems
for
them.
So
thank
you.
C
C
C
C
B
D
D
A
D
C
All
right-
and
there
is
a
10-day
appeal
period
on
our
actions.
I
guess
this
is
only
a
recommendation.
Maybe
there
isn't.
Is
that
simply
done
with
you
know?
I
think
I
think
you're
correct,
since
it
is
just
a
recommendation,
there
would
not
be
an
appeal
all
right.
I
withdraw
a
former
remark.
Okay,
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
public
hearings.
Do
we
have
any
items
from
staff.
A
The
only
item
for
staff
is
just
a
request
for
volunteers
for
the
february
10th
arc
meeting.
So
if
I
can
get
three
three
volunteers,
okay,
commissioner
johnson,
I
am
available
carmen
and
leffen
were
the
first
three
to
put
a
band.
So
I
guess
I
guess
it's
a
popular
popular
gig
so
well
we'll
go
with
those
three,
so
johnson
carmen.
C
E
Yeah
again,
I
I
I
kind
of
knew
here
still,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
appropriate
forum
or
not,
but
is
there
any
or
maybe
staff
can
look
into
this?
And
let
us
know
next
time:
are
there
any
kind
of
ordinances
for
preventing
a
commercial
business
from
turning
a
house
into
like
their
company
headquarters,
where
they're
parking,
several
trucks.
E
A
Illegal
construction
and
a
retaining
wall-
another
construction-
that's
been
done
on
the
house
since
the
person
moved
in
so
yeah
with
within
the
city.
Of
course
you
can
have
a
home
occupation,
but
our
code
limits
that
to
basically
just
doing
paperwork
and
then,
if
you're,
a
contractor,
you
could
have
your
one
personal
trucker
van
associated
with
just
yourself
and
then
any
other
types
of
business
activity
would
need
to
occur
elsewhere.
A
So
we
have
advised
the
the
owner
that
he
needs
to
basically
send
to
the
nurse
home
his
employees
that
they
not
meet
at
the
site
if
they
needed
job
sites
only
and
so,
but
he
hasn't
followed
that
big
twice
so
we're
gonna
continue
but
continue
our
enforcement
action.
Unfortunately,
you
know
there's
there's
you
know
we
have
to
give
him
various
levels
of
warning
through
the
process,
but
we
will
but
we're
certainly
aware
of
that
that
particular
situation,
okay,
yeah,
that's.
E
The
one
I'm
talking
about,
because
not
only
are
they
packing
six
or
seven
cars
in
their
driveway
they've
have
a
smattering
of
trucks
in
the
neighborhood
and
then
they're
also
using
the
school
parking
lot
so
and
they're
they're
not
regular
trucks.
These
are
big
big
trucks
and
that
streak
gets
very
congested
when
school
is
when
the
kids
are
going
to
school
and
when
they're
getting
out
of
school,
just
even
on
a
normal
day,
it's
very
hard
to
navigate
through
that
street.
E
C
All
right,
I
had
a
just
a
minor
item
that
I
wanted
to
express
my
appreciation
to
staff.
I
know
you've
given
us
the
opportunity
to
use
that
planet
as
in
training,
which
I
have
been.
It's
been
a
busy
year
despite
being
stuck
at
home
and
I
over
the
christmas
break
finally
got
around
to
actually
starting
on
that
training
materials.
I'm
not
sure
how
many
others
took
advantage
of
that,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
work
on
this.
C
This
new
ordinance,
I've
expressed
the
staff
at
times
that
I
feel
like
we
want
to
be
as
predictable
for
the
general
citizenry
who
want
to
build
here
and
for
larger
developers
that
we
want
to
process
that's
very
clear
in
advance,
so
people
can
design
for
it
and
plan
for
it.
I
think
simplification
of
the
construction
staging
standards
is
great.
You
know,
should
streamline
things
a
little
bit
around
the
edges,
and
I
want
to
thank
my
fellow
commissioners
for
putting
your
trust
in
as
the
chair
this
year
so
happy
new
year.