►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
David
snow,
who
is
one
of
our
city,
attorneys
to
a
presenter
when
we
begin
the
mills
park
item.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
staff
notes
that.
E
Good
evening,
sorry,
I
was
working
right
up
until
now
jump
directly
from.
E
B
No
worries,
I
think
we
can
get
started
we've
got.
Commissioner
de
razo
will
not
be
joining
us
this
evening.
E
I
do
a
quick
two,
quick
introductions,
certainly
sure.
D
She
left
us
for
a
city.
We
don't
talk
about
anymore,
but
she
came
back
because
we're
such
a
an
amazing
group-
and
so
she
is
now
our
assistant
city
manager,
deeply
responsible
for
all
of
our
development
services,
as
well
as
the
city's
economic
development
program.
She
will
have
two
departments
reporting
to
her.
D
She
does
have
two
departments
reporting
to
her:
our
community
and
economic
development
department,
as
well
as
the
public
works
department
and
in
the
interim,
as
we
all
know,
pamela
wu,
our
former
community
and
economic
development
director
departed
san
bruno
for
a
promotion
as
the
city
manager
of
cupertino,
so
in
the
interim,
darcy
is
also
serving
as
the
interim
department
head
for
our
community
and
economic
development
department,
as
we
embark
on
an
executive
recruitment
to
fill
that
position.
D
So
darcy
comes
to
us
with
a
wealth
of
experience
and
has
worked
on
a
number
of
projects
that
are
still
making
their
way
through
the
system.
One
of
them,
in
fact,
we'll
be
talking
about
tonight,
is
mills
park.
D
And
the
other
individual,
darcy,
bexy
dorothy,
feel
free
to
say
it.
A
D
F
F
It's
like
coming
home,
so
I
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
come
back
and
serve
you
and
very
passionate
about
public
service
and
serving
this
very
special
community
that
I
know
is
very
near
to
and
dear
to
all
of
you
and
making
it
a
better
community
for
the
people
that
live,
work
and
visit
so
reach
out.
If
you
want
to
chat-
and
hopefully
I'll
see
you
all
in
person
as
soon
as
possible,
yeah
no
and-
and
I
was
joking
dorothy.
D
Was
the
community
development
director
in
millbrae
for
two
years
and
so
she's
now
come
back
to
san
bernardino
david
snow,
who
we
should
promote
for
the
cannabis
item
as
well?
D
Is
our
one
of
the
city
attorneys
with
the
firm
rwg
who
is
supporting
the
city
and
will
be
here
to
support
you,
certainly
with
the
mill
spark
item
and
cannabis
if
need
be
as
well?
D
So
I
just
want
to
introduce
david
snow
because
he
will
be
a
resource
to
you
not
just
for
mills
park,
but
also
real
estate
matters,
and
so,
as
many
of
you
know,
city
attorney,
mark
zacharano
is
intent
to
retire,
and
so
the
city
council
authorized
rwg
to
serve
as
the
city's
contract,
legal
counsel
and
david
as
an
attorney
with
rwg
with
specialty
and
real
estate
matters,
and
so
has
been
a
wonderful
resource
supporting
us
since
june.
I
think
and
we'll
continue
to
do
so,
welcome
nice
to
meet
you.
B
Great
and
I
just
want
to
also
recognize
marisela
marquin,
who
is
also
from
and
david's
firm
and
she
has
been
assisting
us
with
the
cannabis
item.
E
E
Please
know
that
we
want
to
hear
from
you
if
you
are
in
the
audience
and
would
like
to
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
for
the
item
on
the
agenda.
Please
use
the
raise
your
hand
button
at
the
bottom
of
your
zoom
screen
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
planning
staff
will
call
your
name
unmute
you
and
you
will
receive
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission
if
you
are
joining
by
telephone.
E
You
also
may
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
by
pressing
star
9
staff
will
address
you
most
likely
by
your
phone
number
and
unmute
you.
You
also
would
receive
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission.
Please
note.
Anyone
in
attendance
may
only
speak
once
per
agenda
item
madeline.
Could
we
have
a
roll
call?
Please.
A
A
E
Okay,
we
need
to
go
back
over
our
minutes.
I
believe
we
have
revised
minutes
because
there
was
a
printing
error
in
the
june
item
and
then
we
have
our
july
minutes.
A
B
Yeah
so
lsao,
if
you
could
do
a
roll
call
vote,
please
yeah.
E
E
All
right
at
this
time,
we
can
receive
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
If
anyone
present
wishes
to
address
the
commission
for
something
not
on
the
agenda.
Please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time.
E
All
right,
thank
you,
commissioner
morgan,
so
I
believe
we'll
be
removing
you
from
the
meeting
when
we
get
to
that.
Okay,
all
right,
so
we
can
proceed
to
item
7a,
our
public
hearing
on
the
cannabis
topic
and
staff
presentation.
Please
that's
chair,
chair
harman.
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over
to
brian
miller.
Our
contract.
I
Good
evening,
chair
members
of
the
commission,
brian
milard,
so
I'm
this
first
time
on
your
agenda
tonight.
This
is
a
continued
public
hearing
to
consider
establishing
commercial
regulations
in
san
bernardino.
This
item
was
planning
commission
at
your
tank
meeting
and
continued
to
this
this
evening.
After
receiving
some
comment
tonight,
we'll
briefly
cover
the
direction
previously
provided
from
the
council
to
staff
a
little
bit
about
the
radio
background
and
some
of
the
recommended
recommendations
from
the
cannabis
program
itself,
or,
of
course
it
will
turn
to
qualifying
locations.
I
Where
can
commercial
campus
selected
canvas
and
commercial
cannabis
activities
be
located
and
what's
the
regulations
might
be
relative
to
that
and
some
other
considerations
before
leading
to
a
recommendation,
so
the
council
direction
to
staff
this?
This
goes
back
to
identification
of
commercial
cannabis
commissions
as
they
work
program
priority
by
council
and
as
part
of
that
earlier
this
year
in
february
there
was
a
space
session
with
council
point
overs
to
possible
program
parameters
and
approaches.
I
Completion
of
that
study
session
staff
was
directed
to
develop
some
draft
coded
procedural
documents
as
to
how
commercial
cannabis
can
be
can
be
addressed.
Thought
is
to
provide
for
up
to
three
total
commercial
cannabis
operations.
Those
could
be
accommodations
from
sales
or
distribution
type
uses
in
town.
The
focus
the
locations
would
be
generally
in
the
downtown
area,
restore
themselves
as
well
as
over
10
and
then
for
distribution
use
this
yeah
the
m1
zone,
north
interstate
380..
I
As
far
as
the
regulatory
background
state
law,
this
goes
back
to
2016
legalizing
many
aspects
of
canvas
houston,
a
person's
21
years
of
age
or
older
local
generations
can
vote
controls
as
well,
and
then
personal
allows
for
transfer
personal
use
in
2020
deliveries.
I
Canvas
to
builds
21
older
were
also
also
identified
in
san
bruno.
Current
provisions
permit
candidates
activities,
so
code
would
need
to
be
changed
and
that's
the
nature
of.
What's
before
the
creation
of
stephen
for
recommendation.
I
Also
in
2020,
voters
approved
a
cannabis
initiative
tax
in
terms
of
the
cannabis
program,
temples
forecast,
sales
and
distributions
for
storefront
sales.
The
idea
is
that
historical
responsible
allow
for
general
retail
sales,
cannabis
or
cannabis
products
along
with
packaging
and
labeling.
Those
products
can
also
include
delivery
services
to
raise
events
and
your
life,
and
then
distribution
uses
allow
for
distribution,
storage
of
commercial
cannabis
products
to
larger
scale
to
license
commercial
cannabis.
I
Operators
noted
is
that
there'd
be
no
retail
sales
as
part
of
the
distribution
use
strictly
kind
of
focused
use
activity
there
among
the
users,
not
directed
by
council,
to
be
considered
for
for
crucial
cannabis
requirements,
him
luna,
no
cultivation,
no
manufacturing
protesting
or
labs,
no
micro
businesses
and
then
no
temporary
cannabis
events,
and
then
we
would
retain
the
existing
amount
of
municipal
code
permissions
for
personal
cannabis
use
as
far
as
locations.
I
I
Other
locations
could
be
considered
for
commercial
cannabis,
although
obviously
those
would
be
subject
to
commissioned
discussion
and
recommendation
voters
who
would
ultimately
consider
considering
these
locations.
I
This
is
a
map
that
shows
what
these
locations
would
would
consist
of,
and
so
in
the
downtown
core
along
san
mateo
avenue
and
san
bruno
avenue
and
el
camino
real,
excluding
the
residential
core
within
with
that
area,
and
then
there's
portland
sales
in
the
stairs
and
then
likewise
for
small
farm
sales.
I
Up
here
to
the
north,
then
just
a
little
bit
to
the
east.
The.
I
Distribution
uses,
in
addition
to
just
identifying
where
these
uses
could
go.
The
other
consideration
would
be
for
sensitive
land
uses
within
600
feet
of
any
proposed
commercial
cannabis
use
of
physics,
schools,
youth,
centers,
daycare,
centers
and
neighborhood
or
larger
parks
would
be
would
be
considered
as
seduced
into
this
boat.
So
we
did
here
simply
just
identified
the
parks
and
school
sites
that
work
in
approximately
these
downtown
areas.
That
would
be
considered.
I
You
can
see
these
are.
These
are
600
radius
rings
around
these
particular
underscore
park
uses
so
effectively.
I
What
would
happen
is
in
lane
overlay,
these
usa
areas
to
the
downtown
or,
for
example,
there's
portions
of
el
camino
right
now
that
would
fall
out
and
it
wouldn't
qualify
for
the
commercial
canvas
and
then
a
shorter
portion
along
san
mateo
avenue,
as
far
as
regulating
cannabis
and
sort
of
process
related
issues
more
or
less
three
steps,
and
although
these
are
still
going
through
further
discussions
with
staff
and
generally
this
is
sort
of
the
this
establishment
proceed
through
steps
would
be
a
person
or
a
company,
that's
interested
in
filing
or
paying
their
commercial
cannabis.
I
Approval
from
the
city
would
file
what
we're
calling
a
commercial
cannabis
operator's
permit
and
then,
secondly,
proceeding
to
and
filing
a
conditional
use
permit
and
then
lastly,
sort
of
circling
back
the
issuance
of
the
malproducers
easier.
I
So
the
first
step,
the
operator's
permit
applications
involved
with
the
city
plus,
you
would
have
essentially
an
open
filing
period
so
that
there's
interest
in
more
than
one
kind
of
separation
that
could
be
filed.
At
that
time,
we
can
have
more
than
three
that
could
be
filed.
Ultimately,
applications
filed,
although
ultimately
the
city
would
be
under
this
approach,
would
be
capped
at
a
maximum
of
three
commercial
cannabis
uses
these
under
this
initial
step
of
operator.
I
Determination
completeness
from
there
it
would
be
essentially
assigning
a
pass
fail
type
of
title
rating
based
on
the
number
of
features
that
will
go
into
the
seas.
The
city's
program
for
consideration,
business
plans
and
community
benefits
that
the
operator
might
be
opposing
voter
control
plans,
security
courts.
Things
of
that
nature,
that
is,
that
with
an
anticipated
100,
maximum
70
or
more
would
be,
would
be
a
passing
grade
as
it
were
there.
A
applicant
with
the
passing
grade
could
pursue
a
conditional
use
period.
I
That
would
be
again
reviewed
by
staff
initially
to
make
sure
and
then
ultimately
presented
to
you
to
the
commission
for
review,
and
it
was
noticeable
and
again,
a
maximum
of
three
use
permits
could
be
could
be
issued
by
the
state
once
a
use
permits
in
place
and
looking
back
the
city
would
issue
an
operator's
permit,
formal
instruments,
that's
where
we
would
also
identify
ensure
that
all
the
performance
standards
that
would
be
tied
to
the
operator's
permit
are
recognized
as
part
of
the
use
permit
and
then
any
other
additional
language
or
persons
that
planning
commission
might
want
to
attach
to
that
user
will
be
identified
as
well
and
qualified
technically
through
the
operation.
I
There
would
also
be
an
annual
review
by
the
city
for
complete
commissions
and
operating
provisions
for
that
operator's
permit,
as
well
as
the
requirement
to
obtain
necessary
licenses
as
far
as
regulations,
the
types
of
things
that
would
go
into
a
the
review
by
the
city
and,
ultimately,
in
terms
of
the
regulations.
These
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
could
also
identify.
You
know
essentially
a
good
quality
type
of
cannabis
operation.
We
look
at
things
like
hours
of
operation.
I
The
nature
of
employee
training
and
personnel
that
would
propose
to
bring
provisions
for
motor
control,
how
that
would
manage
the
types
of
equipment
that
they
would
use
and
strip
for
a
facility
there's
a
host
of
security
provisions
that
will
come
into
play
as
well,
going
back
to
personnel
building
itself,
how
that
would
be
made
secure,
storage
of
cannabis,
storage
of
monies
records
retention.
All
those
kinds
of
things
would
go
into
into
what
we
would
consider
being
a
necessary
as
well
as
kinds
of
things.
I
That
would
also
help
identify
a
good
quality
type
of
commercial
cannabis
operation.
But
again
those
things
can
be
rolled
into
the
condition
of
the
computer
conditional
use
permit
conditions.
There
could
be
other
things
as
well
that
an
applicant
can
propose
that
that
would
certainly
be
of
interest.
Is
the
connecting
upgrades
to
a
who
was
proposing
for
use
for
commercial
cannabis
community
benefits,
those
sorts
of
things
include
pedestrian
access.
A
whole
range
of
things
can
go
into
consideration
of
what
would
either
be
in
terms
of
regulations
or,
ultimately,
something
can
be.
I
I
Some
comments,
questions
about
security
and
how
police
services
might
work
well
and
I'll.
Note
that
I
think
that
we
have
a
police
chief
available
this
evening
as
well.
For
this
I
decided
odor
control
for
cannabis.
The
idea
of
the
expectation
may
be
able
to
consider
any
local
preference
that
could
be
permitted
to
to
a
nurturer
and
the
extent
of
basically
what
would
make
any
impact
speak
to
downtown
again.
We
try
to
summarize
those
in
the
staff
would
work
for
you,
sql,
review
exemption
for
this
item.
I
Each
project
would
have
its
own
individual
sequences,
exactly
the
nature
of
that
student
to
determine
what
would
be
a
consideration
and,
finally,
the
recommendation.
So
the
item
before
the
commission
tonight
is
really
focused
on
the
plumbing
provisions,
which
are
listed
here
in
the
title
twelve.
I
So
the
formal
recommendation
is
for
first
captains
for
the
planning
commission
to
put
a
resolution
recommending
to
city
council
adoption
commercial
cannabis
provisions
by
heading
to
misprocured
part
three,
which
is
zoning,
title
twelve
land
use,
chapter,
12.25,
commercial
cannabis
operations
and
then
amendment
amending
permission
to
title
12
as
well
as
as
well.
So
that
is
our
presentation
at
the
answer:
communications
commissioning.
E
E
Do
we
have
any
hands
from
the
public
wishing
to
comment
on
this
issue?
A
Miss
gregory,
you
have
permission
to
speak,
just
a
reminder.
You
are
allowed
to
speak
for
three
minutes.
F
My
name
is
von
gregory.
I
live
on
the
on
green
avenue,
I'm
speaking
regarding
the
proposed
commercial
cannabis
commandments.
I'd
like
to
thank
city
staff
for
answering
several
questions
posed
at
the
july
19th
meeting.
To
reiterate
some
of
my
concerns
in
the
area
sensitive
youth
sites
attachment.
Why
are
there
no
buffer
zones
around
several
parks,
including
forest
lane
park,
7th
avenue,
park,
7th
and
walnut
park?
Hermann
park
bayshore
circle
park,
and
what
about
the
library
it
should
have
its
own
sensitive
use
buffer,
not
combined
with
allen
school.
F
The
transit
oriented
district
has
been
targeted
for
cannabis
sales
due
to
retail
businesses
already
in
existence.
However,
you've
neglected
to
point
out
that
the
transit
corridors
are
adjacent
to
residential
neighborhoods,
full
of
homes,
family
and
children.
That
will
be
negatively
impacted
by
cannabis
sales
in
their
neighborhoods.
F
I
suspect
that
very
few
commissioners
or
city
council
members
would
agree
to
have
a
cannabis
operation
adjacent
to
their
backyard,
their
home
and
their
family,
and
don't
forget
that
many
children
walk
through
the
downtown
corridors
on
their
way
to
and
from
school
with,
their
parents
to
retail
establishments
and
on
their
way
to
many
youth-oriented
activities
located
on
san
mateo
avenue.
Even
the
posy
parade
full
of
the
city's
children
will
march
through
a
cannabis
corridor.
F
Is
this
a
city
with
a
heart?
Why
have
youth
recreation
centers
such
as
the
youth
karate
center,
the
petite
ballene
swim
center
than
omitted
from
sensitive
operations
attachment
these
centers
are
full
of
kids.
So
how
are
they
not
youth
oriented
the
city
is
leaving
room
for
a
cannabis
center
next
door
to
a
youth
oriented
business,
and
why
does
the
staff
report
include
the
potential
of
lowering
the
gross
revenues
tax
to
5
percent
when
up
to
10
percent
is
allowed
by
vote
of
the
public?
F
The
voters
approved
up
to
10
and
are
expecting
that
estimated
revenues
will
not
cover
estimated
expensive
expenses
of
city
staff,
auditing
reporting,
police
and
fire
administration,
reviews
and
regulation,
and
how
can
the
citizens
of
san
bruno
be
assured
that
city
regulations
and
code
enforcement
will
be
conducted
when
there
are
many
other
city
code
infractions
that
are
not
addressed,
such
as
construction,
fencing
erected
and
not
maintained
long
after
construction
should
have
been
depleted
vacant
lots
full
of
weeds
deteriorating
buildings
not
brought
into
code?
Where
is
cannabis
enforcement
coming
from?
F
If
we
can't
even
take
care
of
these
basic
compliance
issues
and
the
police
department
and
its
code
enforcement
officer
is
already
under
staff,
cannabis
will
put
more
pressure
on
officers
as
well
as
administration.
The
annual
permitting
fee
of
six
thousand
dollars
will
not
cover
expenses
incurred
for
enforcement.
Where
is
budget
for
these?
F
C
Good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
ana.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
my
name
is
anna
villalobos.
I
am
a
lifelong
resident
of
the
city
of
san
bruno.
Thank
you
for
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
share
our
thoughts
and
concerns
regarding
the
rezoning
of
our
commercial
districts
that
would
allow
these
dispensaries
and
distribution
center.
C
Over
the
last
week,
I
have
spoken
with
over
50
businesses
on
san
mateo
avenue.
I
also
went
to
the
well
into
in
total
50
parties,
multiple
businesses
on
san
mateo
avenue
all
of
the
public
schools
in
our
city,
including
cappuccino,
high
school
and
two
private
schools,
multiple
residents
in
our
city,
more
than
half
of
them
never
heard
of
this
canopy,
the
dispensary
issue
that's
being
discussed
tonight.
They
did
not
get
notification
of
the
public
hearings.
They
do
not
know
that
this
is
being
considered
a
source
of
revenue.
C
Only
1,
000
notices
were
sent
out.
All
of
the
residents
of
the
city
of
san
bruno
should
be
informed
of
this
and
included
in
this
decision-making
process.
It
should
be
if
it
is
being
considered,
it
should
be
put
on
the
ballot
so
that
everyone
has
the
right
to
vote
on
this
issue.
Is
the
power
of
this
decision
should
not
rest
in
the
hands
of
five
people.
C
The
cannabis
dispensaries
are
a
target
for
criminal
behavior
to
come
into
our
city.
The
city
of
oakland
had
a
dispensary
burglarized
with
over
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
merchandise,
stolen
cannabis.
Dispensaries
are
making
it
more
visible
and
accessible
to
vulnerable
youth
in
our
community.
It
is
legal
in
the
state.
Those
who
wish
to
partake
in
this
can
obtain
their
product
through
dispensaries
in
neighboring
cities
like
pacifica.
They
can
order
it
online.
They
can
even
have
it
delivered
to
their
home.
C
We
are
losing
our
shopping
mall
at
tampering.
San
mateo
avenue
is
our
original
downtown
commercial
district
in
recent
years.
It
wasn't
doing
well,
but
I
can
see
the
businesses
are
starting
to
come
back.
I
visited
older.
New
businesses
saw
more
people
with
families
and
children
visiting
our
downtown
area.
We
need
to
continue
to
encourage
and
support
positive
fitnesses
that
bring
good
positive
economic
and
social
development
in
our
community.
C
Regarding
the
sensitive
land
use,
the
dispensaries
are
not
supposed
to
be
within
600
feet
of
schools.
However,
we
have
many
businesses
as
a
previously
mentioned
that
are
what
should
be
considered
sensitive
land
use.
I
saw
dozens
of
children
when
I
went
there
that
would
be
exposed
to
this
type
of
business.
C
Everybody
should
feel
safe
and
comfortable
visiting
our
downtown
area.
We
need
to
be
mindful
of
our
families
with
children,
school-aged,
youth
and
our
senior
citizens.
The
decision
being
considered
affects
our
entire
community.
The
decision
of
this
commission
and
city
council
will
impact
the
well-being
of
our
business
and
our
entire
entire
community
for
years
to
come.
What
kind
of
city
do
we
want
for
our
future
generations?
C
We
should
be
looking
for
positive
community
building
opportunities
with
our
businesses
and
we
will
receive
revenue
from
google
I'm
running
out
of
time
and
our
biomedic
campuses
coming
into
town.
We
need
to
support
positive
local
businesses,
and
I
speak
on
behalf
of
many
people
that
don't
know
about
this.
C
The
majority
of
the
city
of
san
bruno
doesn't
know
about
this,
and
we
have
the
right
as
citizens
and
a
democracy
to
have
a
say
in
such
an
important
decision
that
impacts
our
future
for
everybody,
our
downtown
business
district,
big
tongs,
belongs
to
our
entire
city.
They
should
be
taken
into
consideration
for
this
decision.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
G
Hi,
this
is
nancy
foreman.
I
just
want
to
reach
out
to
all
the
naysayers
on
cannabis
businesses
to
please
visit
one,
what
you
think
they
are
and
actually
what
they
are
are
not
the
same
cannabis
stores
doors
are
locked.
You
have
an
entry
that
you
have
to
get
through,
I'm
not
saying
they're
locked,
but
there's
a
little
entryway.
You
have
to
show
your
driver's
license.
You
have
to
show
your
proof
of
age.
G
There
have
their
own
security.
They
are
cleaner
than
most
businesses
anywhere
around
san
mateo
avenue
currently
has
a
liquor
store.
It
has
a
smoke
shop.
It's
now
opening
a
second
smoke
shop
in
which
children
are
invited
to
go
into.
I
do
not
understand
how
you
can
say
that
a
cannabis
business
is
not
good
for
the
environment.
G
I
really
encourage
any
naysayer
to
go
and
check
one
out
and
see
the
security
see
really
what
they
are
about.
It's
also
been
proven
that
cannabis
businesses
also
bring
other
shopping
and
retail
while
they
are
in
the
area.
So
please
I'm
tired
of
hearing
about
it's,
not
this.
It's
not
that
go
check.
One
out.
Thank
you.
E
All
right,
I
think,
that's
done,
then
do
we
have
any
further
hands.
A
There
are
no
hands-free
okay,
oh
we
got
one
more
in
it's
eric
grayson.
You
have
permission
to
talk.
A
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Yes,
I
just
wanted
just
to
briefly
un-demonize
a
lot
of
these
things
that
are
being
said.
A
First
of
all,
at
these
dispensaries,
it's
like
70
of
the
people
have
like
cancer
cataracts,
all
just
with
different
kind
of
diseases,
anxiety,
it's
it's!
It's
getting
blown
out
of
proportion
with
all
of
this,
like
the
kids
type
of
things.
A
A
I
just
want
people
just
like
just
do
your
homework
a
little
bit
and
you'll
see
like
this.
This
is
going
to
be
great
for
san
bruno.
As
far
as
revenue
for
other
surrounding
businesses
that
it's
going
to
bring
it's
it's
going
to
bring
life
to
this
city,
it's
going
to
be
able
to
eventually
just
make
this
city
what
everybody
wants
it
to
be
like
we
got
to
think
about
the
youth
that
is
coming
up.
You
know
this.
A
E
A
A
second
thank
you,
roll
call
yourself.
E
All
right,
coming
back
to
conversation
among
the
commission,
mr
miller,
did
you
want
to
respond
to
anything
from
the
public
comment
period.
I
I
I
As
far
as
youth
centers
go
the
intent,
the
thought
there
is
that
it
would
be
primarily
used
in
most
recreation,
social
programs
for
minors,
not
necessarily
a
business
person
more
than
one
of
clubs,
organizations.
So
things
like
martial
arts,
studios
and
so
forth.
I
That
was
not
a
target
for
a
consideration
for
identification
as
a
youth
center,
which
passed
san,
diego
avenue.
G
If
I
can
just
add
so,
the
state
does
dictate
what
the
sensitive
uses
are
in
terms
of
the
600-foot
requirement
from
school
day
care
centers
youth
centers,
but
within
that
the
city
also
has
the
discretion
to
add
additional
sensitive
uses.
So
the
city
added
parks.
But
if
the
commission,
you
know
so
desires,
you
could
certainly
decide
to
include
additional
sensitive
uses
or
could
expand
the
parameters
of
the
sensitive
uses.
If
that's
something,
the
commission
would
like
to
recommend
to
the
council
for
consideration.
I
I'm
sorry
I
can
just
add
on
to
that
as
well.
One
other
element
of
commercial
canvas
program
is,
is
the
discretionary
entitlement,
in
other
words
the
condition,
and
so
out
of
that
process
would
come
specifically
for
whatever
usage
member
attendance.
Of
course,
cannabis
uses
at
a
particular
occasion
looking
at
surrounding
uses
nearby
uses
and
just
think,
among
other
things,
whether
there
would
be
sufficient
compatibility.
I
E
Well,
thank
you,
mr
miller
and
liz
markeen.
Are
there
any
questions
from
the
commission
to
staff
at
this.
A
I
I'm
sorry
in
terms
of
noticing
and
what
was
provided.
I
don't
know.
G
If
you're
able
to
address
that,
oh
sure,
I
think
the
question
didn't
directly
address
noticing,
but
I
can
address
the
noticing
issue
as
well.
So
there
was
a
notice
of
public
hearing
that
was
published
in
the
newspaper,
so
that
did
go
out
as
required
by
law.
In
addition,
in
an
abundance
of
caution
and
understanding
that
this
is
a
very
sensitive
topic
for
the
community,
there
was
additional
noticing
that
was
done
to
all
to.
I
think
it
was
within
300
feet
of
the
area
that
was
being
considered
for
cannabis
uses.
G
So
this
was
like
an
over
noticing
issue
that
we
did
in
terms
of
the
prop
64
question
that
was
asked.
So
yes,
so
it's
the
there
was
back
in
2016
prop
64,
which
essentially
said
that
cities
had
local
control
to
determine
whether
or
not
to
allow
these
uses.
In
response
to
that,
the
voters
established
attack
the
san
bruno.
Voters
establish
a
tax
of
10
percent.
G
Should
any
cannabis
uses
come
down,
be
authorized
to
operate
within
the
city,
so
it
was
a
a
maximum
of
10
that
could
be
imposed,
and
so
essentially
the
voters
were
saying
if
the
council
were
at
a
later
point
in
time
to
allow
any
type
of
cannabis.
This
is
the
tax
rate
that
they
should
be
that
should
be
imposed
as
the
maximum
on
those
businesses.
D
Sure
let
me
just
found
upon
that,
because
I
think
the
public
comment
asked:
can
this
be
put
by
voters
or
or
should
this
be
put
to
voters
in
broad
stroke?
I
really
interpreted
that,
as
should
the
regulations
that
the
planning
commission
is
considering
and
the
adoption
of
those
regulations
be
put
before
the
san
bruno
voters.
It
is
important
to
note
that
that
allowable
adopting
these
regulations
can
either
be
done
by
the
city
council
or
by
the
voters.
D
Should
they
be
taxed
up
to
10?
That
question
was
put
before
the
voters,
and
that
was
a
yes,
and
so
that
is
why
we're
here
tonight,
because
these
regulations
in
this
process
does
have
the
city
council
as
the
deciding
body
for
the
regulations.
E
And
then
this
quick
follow-up
that
was
measure
s,
as
in
sierra
of
2020,
I
think,
was
where
the
city
level
vote
was
held.
H
Yes,
thank
you.
I
just
had
a
kind
of
a
smattering
of
questions
for
stuff,
primarily
just
little
things
that
popped
up,
as
I
was
reading
staff
report
that
occurred
to
me,
the
first
one
is:
is
there
a
reason
that
the
distribution
business,
the
single
distribution
business
could
not
have
retail,
or
vice
versa?
Is
there
a
reason
why,
let's
say
one
of
the
retail
businesses
also
wants
to
provide
delivery?
H
I'm
just
curious
what
the
reasoning
is
to
to
split
it
to
and
when
I
happen
to
be
exclusive.
Well,.
H
G
Okay,
and
and
just
to,
if
you
don't
mind,
I'm
sorry
to
just
add
on
so
canada's
retailers
have
there's
there's
two
different
types
of
retailers:
there's
the
one:
that's
just
delivery
only
model,
so
you've
got
the
brick
and
mortar
store
and
you're
doing
nothing.
Deliveries,
that's
still
considered
a
retailer,
there's
also
the
store
front,
that
is
a
storefront
and
delivery
business.
So
that's
what's
encompassed
under
the
category
of
cannabis.
G
H
Yeah,
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
so
it
sounds
like
also
that's
kind
of
where
the
odor
control
really
comes
into
play,
because
I
couldn't
imagine
these
little
boutiques
that
have
their
little
glass
cases
and
little,
I
don't
know
blueberries
or
whatever,
that
they're
selling
would
need
a
lot
of
ventilation.
But
it
sounds
like
the
ventilation
is
more
geared
towards,
like
maybe
the
distributor.
G
It's
actually
both
the
draft
ordinance
requires
odor
control
measures
for
both
types
of
businesses
and
ensuring
that
none
of
the
odors
from
within
the
business
cut
you
know,
are
or
smell,
are
emitted
outside
of
the
business.
H
Okay,
okay,
cool!
Thank
you
and
then
another
question
that
popped
up
in
my
mind
is:
is
there
a
reason
that
the
snith
business
park,
the
one
that's
adjacent
to
the
cemetery
and
along
smith
avenue?
I
was
just
curious
why
that
wasn't
considered?
I
think
that,
based
on
the
description
of
the
the
distributor
discussion,
that
that
would
not
be
fitting
for
that
that
kind
of
business
park,
nor
would
a
retail
space,
but
that
just
seemed
they
just
seemed
like
a
spot.
That.
I
A
H
Oh,
the
last
question
that
came
up
for
me
was,
as
I
was
reading
through
the
security
measures,
number
17
was
written
as
using
mosquitoes,
which
was
like
a
high
frequency,
sound
device
and
to
discourage
it
sounds
like
loitering,
and
I
just
thought
that
sounds
horrible
for
a
downtown
setting
where
we'd
want
foot
traffic
and
and
people
there
to
enjoy
the
businesses.
I
was
curious
if
you
could
explain
what
the
mosquitoes
are.
Well,
just
the
idea
of
having
some.
I
Type
of
technology
that
would
deter
people
coming
into
the
facility,
but
whether
it's
sound
or
some
other
factor,
that's.
H
So
this
would
be
something
that
would
be.
I
guess
maybe
you
could,
if
you
could
illustrate
kind
of
what
that
used,
would
look
like,
because
I
like,
if
this
is
for
downtown
it
just
doesn't
seem
fitting
yeah.
I
I
didn't
understand
it
typically
part
of
the
security
program
that
can
be
activated
when,
when
the
commercial
cannabis
activity
is
closed,
in
addition
to
surveillance
cameras
or
other
types
of
other
types
of
security
measures
would
also
be
this
type
of
just.
H
So,
okay,
I
think
this
is
this
is
something
that
maybe
something
we're
trying
to
take
a
look
at
that
as
well.
If
the
concern.
E
I
will
just
follow
on
commissioner
comment
that
I,
my
understanding
is
that
this
these
noise
emitters,
there's
sort
of
a
theory
that
younger
people
hear
higher
pitches
and
so
that
it
will
annoy
young
people
and
not
older
people
that
speak
against
a
45
year
old,
who
has
quite
sensitive
hearing
I.
I
know
I've
encountered
some
of
these
high
pitched
noise
emitters
and
can
hear
them
and
would
not
love
having
them
in
downtown,
even
if
they
are
only
in
the
evening.
E
H
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
believe
I
read
that
there
was
going
to
be
security
service
there
20
hours
a
day,
and
so
I
I
don't
know
I
I
don't
like
the
idea
of
allowing
any
kind
of
sound
emission
like
that
in
our
downtown
area
or
any
place
where
you
know
what,
if
they're
closed
on
a
sunday
or
what,
if
it
goes
on
a
holiday
and
people
are
gathering
to
go
out
to
dinner
or
something
else.
So
I'm
not
wild
about
this
mosquito
idea,
but
this
may
also
be
part
of
the
conditional
use
permitting
discussion.
E
G
Oh,
I
would
suggest
that
we
wait
until
all
the
comments
have
come
come
through
and
then
once
we
get
to
that
point,
if
we
need
to
suggest
modifications
to
the
ordinance,
I'm
taking
notes-
and
we
can
put
that
as
part
of
emotion,
if
needed,.
E
Okay,
are
there
any
other
questions
from
the
commission?
I
have
oh
okay,
commissioner
johnson.
C
Well,
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
noise
situation
and-
and
I
think
that
that
it's
it's
designed
to
be
a
deterrent
for
sure,
but
it
really
creates
a
whole
number
in
another
situation
and
it
feels
quite
honestly
quite
punishing
it
feels
like
it
almost
feels
it
just
feels
quite
punishing
to
those
that
are
participating
and
those
who
are
just
walker
buys
passerbys
it
just
it
doesn't
feel
humane
in
its
own
way
and
I'm
also
quite
sensitive
to
the
noise
and
I'm
an
older
person,
and
I
hear
those
noises
quite
a
bit.
C
The
other
thing
I
question
I
thought
was
about
the
odor.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
clear
on
what
I
heard
and
the
question
that
I
have
is,
even
though
the
places
are
locked
down
and
closed
in.
Does
that
mean
and
they're
trying
to
contain
all
of
the
odor,
but
what
happens
to
the
person,
the
people
that
are
in
there
and
consuming
and
and
breathing
all
of
the
smoke?
I
mean
it's.
C
What
happened?
How
is
that
protecting,
and
maybe
I
missed
something
along
the
way,
but
if
you
can
just
give
me
a
bit
of
a
clarity
on
that
sure
so
secondhand
smoke
is
that
secondhand
smoke
thing
right
now.
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
same
with
cannabis,
I'm
not
an
experienced
person,
but
certainly
certainly
when
I'm
in
the
location
and
someone's
actually
smoking
cannabis.
There's
no
doubt
that
I
can
tell
you
know
I'm
going
to
have
a
sanity
that
that's
taking
place
and
be
an
educator.
C
I
have
seen
children
being
pulled
into
an
office
and
suspended
from
school
because
they
come
in
with
the
odor
on
them
and
they
absolutely
said
it
was
not
them.
The
parent
actually
took
them
to
be
bread
tested
and
they
didn't
have
anything
in
them.
So
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff
in
that
whole
containment
of
that.
What
does
it
do
and
how
it
hasn't
been?
How
far
has
been
brought
out.
F
G
For
for
the
first
part
of
the
question,
there
is
no
on-site
consumption
permitted
at
any
of
the
retailers
or
distribution
under
state
law.
You
could
have
consumption
at
retailers
if
allowed
by
the
city.
The
city
is
not
proposing
in
this
ordinance
to
allow
any
sort
of
consumption,
so
it's
it's
truly
just
a
purchase
and
then
go
consume
or
smoke
at
home.
So
that's
the
first
part
of
it.
G
The
second
part
is
there
are
odor
control
measures
included
within
the
ordinance
that
so
having
certain
air
filtration
systems
having
a
negative
air
pressure
system
installed
to
try
to
still
control
the
odors
from
going
outside
the
building,
but
there
won't
actually
be
smoking
happening
within
the
within
the
actual
retailer.
C
I
was
aware
that
they're
not
going
to
be
smoking
in
their
bank,
there
would
be
sampling,
and
so
it
was
my
understanding
that
there
would
be
some
opportunity
for
sampling.
C
E
Okay,
commissioner,
morgan.
A
Yeah,
I
was
just
glad
to
see
that
the
item
where
a
record
of
sales
has
been
removed
from
the
the
suggested
regulations.
You
know,
I
didn't
think
it
was
a
great
idea
that
you'd
record
the
name
of
the
customers
and
the
transactions
that
intend
to
scare
people
away.
So
I
was
pleased
to
see
that
that
was
removed.
E
All
right,
thank
you.
I
did
have
one
comment,
which
was:
I
wondered
whether
again
sort
of
as
an
item
to
consider
to
as
a
sort
of
formal
comment
from
the
commission
whether
we
would
want
to
add
a
little
more
flexibility
on
citing
I
mean
I
you
know
like
we
still
have
the
discretionary
review
with
the
conventional
use
permit.
So
if
we
added
you
know
the
bay
hill
shopping
center,
you
know
which
is
a
a
retail
center.
E
E
And
so
I
I
think
I
personally
lean
in
favor
of
giving
more
flexibility
for
where
businesses
can
be
proposed
without
that
necessarily
meaning
that
any
business
would
end
up
there
because
we'd
have
another
review,
but
I
think
I
would
probably
add
the
hill
and
maybe
the
crossing
where
you
know
next
to
the
avalon.
E
E
D
E
Well,
I
think
the
two
modifications
that
I
heard
suggested
one
was
to
discard
the
sort
of
hostile
audio
security
measure,
at
least
in
at
least
in
the
commercial,
the
retail
zone
and
possibly
everywhere.
E
Just
in
view
of
the
fact
that
you
have
night
security
would
be
affected
by
that
as
well
to
to
remove
that
as
sort
of
a
formally
recommended
form
of
security,
and
then
the
other
was
to
add
allowing
other
retail
centers
such
as
the
crossing
and
bay
hill,
with
the
understanding
that,
of
course,
they
did
easily
come
back
for
a
conditional
use
permit.
So
we're
not
saying
definitely
there
will
be
a
business
there,
just
allowing
people
to
come
and
propose
businesses
there.
E
I
think
those
are
the
two
modifications
the
one
from
commissioner
lethean
and
the
one
from
me
did.
Anybody
else
have
any
other
suggestions
that
they
wanted
to
attach
to
our
recommendations.
E
I
don't
see
any
hands.
Does
that
sound
good?
Do
we?
Are
you
good
with
that
assistant
city
manager,
smith,.
F
Yes,
that's
specific
enough,
so
the
item
you're,
referring
to
the
mosquitoes
which
are
not
really
mosquitoes.
But
yes,
the
high
pitched
item,
that's
item
number
17
under
section
12-300.100
of
the
draft
ordinance
and
then
the
addition
of
the
other
retail
centers
just
to
confirm
you
said
such
as
bay
hill
and
was
it
town.
E
F
Yeah,
there's
not,
I
mean
just
thinking
about
the
crossings
very
limited
opportunity
there,
but
and
they
go
shopping
center,
so
I
would
just
ask
back
to
the
group:
are
there
other
areas
that
should
be
part
of
that?
Or
is
it
only
those
two?
The
more
specificity
will
help
us
present
this
these
options
to
council
for
their
final
consideration.
H
So
I
just
I
just
had
a
technicality,
and
I
raised
my
hand
right
before
this
conversation
took
this
turn
I,
but
I
do
support
those
these
two
items
being
recommended
to
council
and
then
I
just
had
a
little
sorry,
I'm
taking
a
little
off
track,
but
then
I'll
go
away,
but
I
wanted
to
point
out
then
the
draft
ordinance
item
number
one.
The
date
of
august
6
should
read
august
16th.
H
There
was
a
date
discrepancy
there.
But
if
you
were
going
to
ask
me
if
other
locations,
I
think
the
ones
suggested
sounds
fine
yeah.
I
I
like
the
idea
of
offering
more
flexibility
for
the
condition
you
know
and
and
the
flexibility
of
them
being
considered
for
the
conditional
use
per
mole.
E
All
right,
so
I
think
I
think,
probably,
that
I'm
kind
of
fine
either
way
with
whether
crossing
is
included.
You're
right.
It
is
quite
small,
whereas
town
center
is
a
significantly
bigger,
plaza
and
is
somewhat
more
separated
from
other
uses.
E
So
yeah,
I'm
I'm
fine
with
just
doing
those
to
the
bay
hill
and
the
town
center.
As
the
recommendation.
E
Do
we
have
a
motion
from
a
member
on
the
recommendation
from
staff
was
to
approve
a
resolution
recommending
the
city
council,
adoption
of
the
commercial
cannabis
provisions
and
then,
with
our
two
notes,.
E
E
Thank
you
eliseo
all
right.
I
believe
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
item
seven,
a
thank
you,
everyone
who
commented.
I
know
there
are
strong
feelings
on
this
all
right
item.
7B
the
mills
park,
project
development
agreement.
Do
we
have
a
staff
presentation
on
this
topic.
B
A
B
B
I
just
wanted
to
start
with
the
project,
location
and
description,
just
so
everyone's
familiar
at
a
very
cursory
level
with
the
project.
B
B
It
would
include
two
mixed-use
buildings,
ranging
in
height
from
one
to
five
stories,
divided
into
smaller
components
and
with
an
articulated
building
setbacks
and
step
backs.
It
would
include
427
condominium
dwelling
units
and
7947
square
feet
of
commercial
space,
so
that
was
what
was
approved
by
the
city
council
next,
the
development
agreement.
B
It
was
approved
in
june
of
2020
as
part
of
the
overall
project
entitlements,
and
the
agreement
became
effective
on
november
3rd
2020,
and
the
agreement
includes
various
performance
dates
with
the
first
performance
date
being
november
3rd
2022
for
the
developer
to
submit
a
building
permit
application
for
parcel
a
for
the
one
portion
of
the
project.
That's
broken
into
two
two
sections
parcel
a
and
parcel
b.
B
So
the
community
develop
the
community
benefits
that
are
in
the
existing
development
agreement
and
include
10
million
dollars
in
community
benefits.
Payments
for
the
city's
general
fund
and
in
conjunction
with
the
city's
approval
of
the
condominiums-
and
this
was
a
doubling
of
the
former
five
million
dollar
base
community
benefit
payment
that
included
an
option
for
an
additional
5
million
dollars.
B
If
the
developer
elects
to
include
condominiums,
it
also
includes
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
the
fund
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
improvements
in
the
general
vicinity
of
the
project
on
city
streets
and
another
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
parking
enforcement
and
our
implementation
of
a
residential
parking
permit
program.
And
I
would
like
to
mention
that
in
the
fiscal,
the
fiscal
section
of
the
staff
report,
it
mentions
a
total
of
10
million
200
000
dollars
in
in
in
funds
that
would
be
non-designated
so
that
that's
actually
incorrect.
B
So
10
million
dollars
would
be
undesignated
to
the
general
fund.
The
other
two
thousand
dollars
would
be
specific
for
the
specific
uses
for
the
bicycle,
pedestrians
and
also
the
parking.
B
So
the
agreement
would
be
that
this
that
also
that
the
developer
would
work
in
good
faith
with
san
bruno
city,
net
services
for
internet
and
television.
B
B
Continuing
on
it
includes
a
55-year
term
for
affordability
in
excess
of
the
city's
requirements,
additional
commitments
related
to
affordable
housing.
It
also
includes
a
traffic
signal
and
pedestrian
crossing
at
keynes.
An
el
camino
at
the
developer
expense
also
improvements
on
linden
avenue,
which
would
include
17
parking
spaces,
nine
of
which
could
be
used
for
city
hall,
parking
or
civic
uses,
and
san
bruno
avenue
would
also
be
widened
with
an
extended
eastbound
turn
lane
onto
southbound
el
camino,
real.
B
So
this
I'll
move
on
to
the
extension
request
and
the
first
amendment,
so
the
city
has
received
a
an
extension
request.
A
copy
of
the
letter
is
included
in
your
in
your
staff
report.
The
developer
has
indicated
that,
due
to
economic
consequences
of
the
pandemic,
that
has
caught
caused
delays
in
the
project
and
a
two-year
extension
of
the
terms
and
agreements,
the
terms
of
the
agreement
have
been
requested.
B
So
the
agreement
has
multiple
triggers
within
it
and
it
kind
of
in
some
ways
kind
of
creates
kind
of
a
cascade
of
other
other
figures
within
the
document.
But
this
is
just
a
very
cursory
summary,
so
it
extends
the
overall
term
from
10
years
to
12
years.
B
It
extends
the
time
to
submit
a
permit
for
personal
a
from
two
to
four
years,
and
then
it
extends
the
time
to
submit
a
permit
for
parcel
b,
which
is
tied
to
the
permit
for
parcel
a
it
extends
payment
of
public
benefits
by
two
years,
extends
the
condo
application
deadline
for
two
years
after
final
approval
to
four
years
and
amends
the
life
of
approvals,
and
I
wanted
to
point
out
there
was
an
error
on
page
48
of
the
staff
report
where
we
had
cut
and
pasted
section
3.12
instead
of
3.2.
B
Regarding
the
wording
that's
taken
directly
out
of
the
first
amendment
agreement
for
the
life
of
the
approvals,
so
I've
included
the
text
here
and
we've.
We
just
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
B
The
the
text
in
the
actual
agreement
is
is
correct
in
the
first
amendment,
so
in
conclusion,
staff
is
recommending
that
you
adopt
a
resolution
recommending
that
the
city
council
approve
the
first
amendment
to
the
development
agreement
with
williams
portfolio
16,
based
on
the
findings
for
approval
in
the
ordinance,
including
secret
conformity,
determination,
and
then
there
would
be
minor
wording.
Adjustments
to
the
point
commission
resolution
by
the
city
attorney
before
it
goes
on
to
the
city
council
on
non-substantive,
just
adjustments.
E
Thank
you,
michael
at
this
time,
do
you
have
any
clarifying
questions
on
the
topic
from
the
commission?
I
see
a
hand
from
vice
chairman.
A
A
It
sounds
like
they're
waiting
out
the
market,
so
construction
costs
go
down.
So
what
happens
if
they
don't
submit
by
then
we'll
just
ask
for
another
extension.
B
D
Also,
a
provision
that
allows
for
a
one-time
extension
with
payment
of
a
fee
that
they
could
exercise
that
as
well.
That,
I
think,
would
give
them
some
additional
time,
so
that
would
be
an
option
as
well.
That's
a
that's
an
option
that
remains
in
the
agreement.
A
C
On
there
was
a
bullet
point
that
we
talked
about
city
city
meeting,
place,
location
in
building
b
for
meetings
and
events,
and
because
it's
been
some
time
ago,
I
don't
recall
if
they
are
how
the
parking
was
being
addressed
for
those
meetings
and
events,
particularly
if
it's
evening
people
have
gotten
back
home.
You
know
streets
are
going
to
be
part
of
the
parking
for
the
or
those
that
live
there
is
there.
If
what?
C
First
of
all,
I
guess
I
should
say,
what's
the
capacity
or
is
it
just
too
early
to
ask
the
capacity
of
that
room
if
it's
for
ten
people?
It's
an
issue
right,
but
if
we're
talking
about
the
capacity
of
that
room
for
a
couple
hundred
people
and
parking
hasn't
been
designated,
then
it'll
overflow
into
our
community.
So
I'm
just
wanting
to
to
check
in
about
that.
F
F
It's
not
one
thing
different
projects
to
move
at
different
speeds
and
in
this
particular
one
they
simply,
there
were
simply
a
variety
of
delays
that
impacted
their
ability
to
move
forward
with
the
project
under
the
deadlines
and
having
worked
on
this
development
agreement
and
negotiated,
I
can
just
tell
you
we
were
aggressive
because,
as
you
know,
there
are
a
number
of
vacancies
there.
F
So
we
did
have
an
aggressive
timeline
and
this
is
not
an
uncommon
thing
when
you
set
aggressive
timelines
and
triggers
to
come
back
and
be
presented
with,
and
I
think
we
will
we'll
all
agree
that
there
were.
You
know
the
things
have
changed
in
a
variety
of
ways
over
the
last
two
years
and
five
months.
So
here
we
are
tonight,
but
the
community
room
that
was
again
negotiated
item
in
the
development
agreement
that
we
felt
was
important.
F
F
We
would
still
have
to
use
probably
a
city
facility
if
we
wanted
to
host
a
big
meeting
such
as
the
senior
center
recreation
aquatic
center,
but
it's
still
a
nice
room,
but
there
is
resident
parking
on
the
site
which
I
believe
is
gated
for
security
reasons,
which
makes
sense
much
like
a
garage.
You
want
it
secured
at
night.
There's
open
parking,
though,
for
customers
of
the
retail
businesses
right
and
so
presumably
visitors
to
the
community
could
park
there
or
they
could
park
on
the
street.
F
But
there
isn't
in
the
zoning
code,
there's
not
a
requirement
for
parking
for
the
community
room,
so
I
think
we
just
have
to
wait
and
see.
You
know
what
the
demand
is.
What
time
is?
It
could
be
a
daytime
thing
early
evening
thing
and
it
is
near
city
hall
and
near
our
downtown
and
we
would
obviously
make
city
hall
parking
available.
People
wanted
to
walk
and
so
on,
but
we'll,
certainly
if
we,
if
we
write
a
problem
and
there's
a
lot
of
spillover
parking,
you
know
we'll
address
it
that
time
down
the
road.
D
I
think
john
grogan
just
wanted
to
expound
upon
that
briefly
worth
noting
that
that
community
room
is
not
designed
as
a
purposefully
built
public
space.
It's
actually
the
amenity
space
for
the
residents
of
the
apartment
building
and
the
allowance
to
for
the
community
to
use
that
room
was
actually
something
that
came
up
fairly
late
in
the
process.
It
was
sort
of
observed
that
they
were
going
to
have.
I
believe
it's
on
the
ground
floor
directly
across
from
where
the
library
is
a
meeting
space.
D
You
know,
I
want
to
say
less
than
30
people
in
the
space,
but
it's
really
a
amenity
space,
and
so
it
was
thought
well
if
the
library
is
having
a
program
and
they
need
slightly
larger
space
or
another
space
wouldn't
be
nice
to
allow
the
community
to
use
edges,
and
so
that's
really
what
that
space
is
and
and
why
it's
in
the
va
to
allow
the
community
to
use
it,
and
I
do
believe
we
talked
about
the
reservations
for
that
space
would
go
through
the
city,
and
so
if
it
would
not
be
a
space
that
any
member
in
the
community
could
go
to
that
apartment
management.
E
City
all
right,
thank
you.
I
have
one
quick
question
in
regard
to
the
the
point
about
the
working
city,
that
is
there
an
anticipation
that
we
would
expand
the
fiber
pilot
through
this
program.
E
I
am
not
seeing
any
so
I
guess
we
can
open
for
a
public
comment.
Do
we
have
any
hands
from
the
public.
C
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm
new
to
the
information
that
you've
given
in
the
project.
One
thing
that
I
did
want
to
request
because
I've
lived
here,
my
whole
life-
I
know
housing
is
definitely
an
issue.
It
is
especially
an
issue
for
our
first
responders.
C
So
I'd
like
to
see
if
there
is
something
that
can
be
added
into
these
negotiations
and
agreements
that
allows
for
a
portion
of
these
housing
units
to
be
set
aside
to
accommodate
our
first
responders.
I
think
that's
a
basic
and
important
need
for
our
communities,
well-being
and
then
I
don't
know
how
parking
spaces
are
being
addressed.
C
C
I
would
like
to
to
request
that
there
be
adequate
parking
parking
spaces
allowed
for
all
of
the
units,
though
this
is
considered
a
transit
corridor
and
that
people
will
be
quote
unquote
using
our
public
transportation.
That
is
not
the
case.
In
reality,
they
still
will
need
a
car
to
get
to
work
if
they're,
far
away
to
go
on
vacation
to
do
trips
to
other
areas
of
you
know
where
public
transportation
isn't
readily
accessible.
C
So
I
would
like
to
hopefully
request
that
there
are
sufficient
parking
spaces
for
these
units
so
that
it
does
not
impact
us
local,
long-time
residents
and
thank
you
for
everything
that
you're
doing
everything
that
you're
reviewing
on
behalf
of
our
our
summary
is
greatly
appreciated,
and
we
appreciate
all
time
and
effort
you
put
into
these
all
of
these
different
projects.
E
You
do
we
have
any
further
discussion
or
response
to
the
comments.
B
Just
respond
to
the
affordable
housing
question
so
on
page
154
in
your
packet,
154
165,
there's
a
an
affordable
housing
plan
unit
matrix
so
just
to
respond
to
the
affordable
housing
question.
Many
there's
a
large
number
of
units
that
will
be
set
aside
as
affordable
at
various
affordability
levels,
which
would
also
allow,
for
you
know,
first
responders
and
local
service
workers
to
to
move
into
the
project.
B
Then,
on
the
following
pages,
there
are
our
site
plans
and
also
diagrams
of
the
location
of
the
units
within
the
project,
so
that
that
is,
that
is
being
addressed.
E
Can
actually,
in
regard
to
the
parking
comment,
I
have
a
recollection
and
maybe
you
can
clarify
whether
I'm
remembering
it
correctly.
E
Looking
at
comparative
similar
buildings
down
el
camino
and
the
amount
of
parking
that
was
being
provided
here
was
a
good
bit
more
than
what
was
suggested
by
that.
I
forget
the
exact
numbers,
but
it
was
like
10
or
15
more
than
what
was
required
by
the
what
would
be
suggested
by
actual
car
ownership
in
those
similar
buildings
down
through
millbrae
and
so
on.
F
E
F
Yeah
and
so
that
that's
correct,
I
think,
for
compared
to
many
transit
adjacent
projects
which
sometimes
go
down
to
0.5
stalls
per
unit
under
some
provisions-
state
law.
Now
this
has
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
to
accommodate
anticipated
demand
which
can
fluctuate
over
time
over
the
life
of
a
project.
But,
as
you
point
out,
there
is
a
special
condition
of
approval
that
addresses
resident
parking
permit
programs
if
those
were
to
be
enacted
that
would
prohibit
these
apartment,
tenants
or
condo
tenant
from
utilizing
that
you're
correct
and
there's
a
number
of
other
of
parking.
F
You
know
parking
items
that
are
also
addressed
in
the
in
the
conditions
of
approval
that
would
be
applied
to
the
license
project.
Yeah.
D
Upon
that
briefly
worth
noting
that
this
project
at
427
units
has
a
total
number
of
parking
stalls
at
669.
now,
some
of
that
is
for
commercial
parking.
D
But
it
is
true
that
the
residential
parking
is
parked
at
approximately
one
parking
space
per
bedroom
consistent
with
city
codes,
which,
as
has
noted,
is
quite
a
bit
more
than
other
projects
that
are
currently
under
review.
For
example,
I
think
the
member
of
the
public
was
referring
to
the
project
at
732
and
740
el
camino
yao.
D
That
project
is
being
proposed
to
be
entitled
under
state
codes
and
that
project
is
providing
a
hundred
and
thirty
six
units,
but
only
25
parking
stalls
so
that
that's
also
one
benefit
to
extending
this
entitlement,
because
this
entitlement
was
accomplished
under
the
city
regulations
and
if
a
project
is
developed,
because
this
is
within
the
transit
district
under
state
dense
state
laws
that
allow
for
waiver
of
parking
requirements.
You
can
have
a
building.
D
That
is
the
same
number
unit
of
this,
but
it
has
significantly
less
parking,
and
so
this
is
an
entitlement
that
the
city
did
work
very
hard
on
to
ensure
that
there
were
mitigating
factors.
Not
just
for
parking
but
for
other
items.
E
D
I
think
that's
a
very
good
question
and
it
is
a
simple
yes,
but
I
think
it's
worth
clarifying
that
the
action
that
the
planning
commission
would
be
recommending
at
the
end
that
potentially
the
city
council
would
take,
would
be
to
extend
this
entitlement.
That
does
not
mean
that
this
project
will
ever
be
built.
Nor
does
that
mean
that
a
property
owner
the
current
or
a
huge
property
owner
may
not
seek
to
re-entitle
a
project
under
state
rules
or
in
some
different
configuration,
and
so
those
options
are.
B
Always
on
the
table
for
the
property
owner-
and
I
I
do
also
want
to
just
point
out
that
the
that
the
zoning
for
the
property
is
is
not
tod.
It's
planned
development,
so
the
zoning
matches
the
current
development,
so
the
any
future
development
proposal
would
need
to
include
a
reasoning
of
the
property
as
well,
so
it
wouldn't
be
a
it
would
not
be
a
straight
sp35
project.
E
I
have
the
the
page
from
the
packet
in
front
of
me.
E
B
Staff
had
recommended
some
authority
to
the
city
attorney
and
staff
to
just
clean
up
a
couple
of
things
referring.
D
Agreement
itself,
if
we
could
just
include
a
motion,
that'd,
be.
E
Great,
certainly,
I'm
happy
to
accept
a
friendly
amendment.
E
E
All
right,
thank
you
again.
Thank
you
to
our
commenter.
I
hope
your
concerns
are
addressed.
This
is
just
a
quick
point
of
this.
Is
this
one
of
the
items
that
can
be
appealed
to
city
council,
or
this
is
just
a
recommendation
because
it's
a
resolution.
This
is
not
one
that
we
have
a
10-day
appeal
period
on
correct
all
right.
Okay,
thank
you
all
right.
That
concludes
our
public
hearings.
Do
we
have
any
further
business?
B
Our
standing
request
for
members
for
the
september
meeting
as
of
this
time,
we
do
not
have
any
any
items
for
that
agenda,
but
that.
B
So
if
I
can
get
get
three
volunteers,
mary
lou,
thank
you.
B
Anyone
else
thank
you
kelly
and
one.
E
More
val,
thank
you,
I'm
looking,
I
can
be
an
alternate
if
necessary.
It
looks
like
it
is
open
on
my
calendar.
Okay,.
B
E
You
all
right,
thank
you.
Do
we
it's
not
in
the
agenda,
but
we
do
usually
give
one
last
opportunity
for
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
agenda
before
closing
things
out.
I
think
really
quickly.
Do
we
have
any
hands
with
any
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
E
Already,
in
that
case,
oh,
was
there
a
hand,
I
thought
I
saw
a
hand
blink.
A
A
The
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
to
that
conversation
is
that,
while
that's
extended
and
not
being
developed,
that
area
is
sitting
you
know
vacant
with
businesses
moving
out
and
the
potential
for
some
real
blight
right
in
the
center
of
our
most
precious
part
of
our
city.
So
I
hope
that
whoever
is
agree.
You
know.
A
I
understand
that
businesses
need
time
that
this
has
been
an
exceedingly
difficult
economic
time
for
lots
of
development
issues
and
obviously
extending
is
a
good
idea,
but
I
hope
that
whoever
negotiates
this
extension
puts
them
in
a
position
financially
where
they
have
to
declare
that
they
are
still
viable
to
do
this
development
and
that
we
don't
have
a
a
long
period
of
empty
lots
sitting
where
a
lot
of
businesses
used
to
be
in
that
middle
park
area.
A
E
Thank
you
for
your
well-considered
comment.
All
right.
There
are
no
further
comments
from
the
commission.
We
have
reached
the
end
of
our
agenda.
Our
next
regular
meeting
is
scheduled
for
september
20th
2022
at
7
pm.
Thank
you
to
the
commenters.
Thank
you
to
staff
and
consultants
who
presented
and
we
are
adjourned.