►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
B
C
Yes,
that's
we
completely
understand.
E
There's
a
massive
tree
that
fell
over
at
the
Cemetery
blocking
sneith,
so
a
lot
of
Rolling
Wood
is
backed
up
too
so.
C
A
D
There
was
also
a
fire
up
at
Sweeney,
Ridge,
very
top
I
walked.
My
house
looks
directly
over
Sea
Ridge
and
there
was
emergency
crews
and
fire
trucks
going
up.
In
fact,
just
a
few
minutes
ago,
the
last
trucks
left.
F
G
D
Thank
goodness
that
it
was
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
damaged
to
to
any
homes
or
there
aren't
any
homes
nearby,
but
it
didn't
it
didn't.
Take
off.
That's
the
good
news,
yeah.
C
D
C
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
for
for
all
being
here
and
so
we'll
get
go
ahead
and
get
started.
E
Right
good
evening,
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
attending
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
Client
commission
will
continue
to
hold
its
meetings
remotely,
except
starting
next
month.
We
are
going
to
come
in
person.
I
believe,
please
know
that
we
want
to
hear
from
you
if
you're
in
the
audience-
and
you
would
like
to
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
for
the
item
on
the
agenda.
Please
raise
your
hand
using
the
button
in
Zoom
or
you
want
to
speak.
E
A
A
E
Great,
thank
you.
Next
on
the
agenda
is
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
Commissioner
Latin,
would
you
like
to
lead
us
in
that.
G
H
G
E
All
right
so
next
on
the
item
is
nextogen
item
is
approval
of
minutes
for
the
February
7th
special
meeting.
Does
anyone
want
to
make
a
motion
or
have
changes.
D
D
E
Great,
thank
you.
Next,
on
the
items
or
on
the
agenda.
Item
is
number
five
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
Do
we
have
any
comments
from
the
public
for
items
not
on
the
agenda?
If
so,
please
raise
your
hand
using
the
button
and
zoom
or
dial
Star
9.
If
you're
on
phone.
E
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item,
which
is
any
announcements
for
conflicts
of
interest
for
tonight's
agenda
items
for
the
commission.
E
Moving
on
item
seven
is
the
public
hearing
proposed
amendments,
commercial
cannabis
regulations
to
amend
article
3,
zoning
of
title
12,
land
use
of
the
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
by
amending
section
12.300.070
to
limit
commercial
cannabis,
retail
sales,
storefront
sales
to
the
transit
corridors,
plant
areas,
mxrtod-1
and
tod2,
and
PD
zones
to
reduce
the
number
of
commercial
cannabis
real
estate,
real
retail
sales
permits
from
three
to
one
and
allow
a
maximum
of
two
cannabis
distribution
facilities
in
the
M1
Zone
and
North
of
San,
Bruno,
Avenue
and
east
of
El
Camino,
and
deleting
section
4.70.070.
E
G
G
So
to
start
off
this
meeting
I'll
give
a
brief
overview
on
the
agendas
we
will
start
off
the
meeting
with
the
objective,
followed
by
the
background
on
Commercial
cannabis
regulations.
I
will
also
give
some
insight
on
the
subsection
of
the
operator's
permit
application
period
and
we
move.
We
will
move
on
to
council's
directed
amendments,
and
we
will
finish
off
the
presentation
with
tonight's
recommended
action
like
standard
procedure.
At
the
end
of
the
presentation,
the
floor
will
be
open
to
the
commission
to
ask
any
questions
Then
followed
by
the
public.
G
G
It
started
off
in
2018
for
Council
prohibited
commercial
cannabis
uses,
but
a
few
years
later
in
2020
it
was
a
ballot
measure
for
cannabis,
tax
and
regulations,
and
voters
approved
a
10
tax,
not
sure
the
next
year
in
2021,
the
city
initiated
a
contract
for
commercial
cannabis
regulations
and
in
2022
that's
when
a
lot
of
the
things
started
to
progress
in
cannabis
regulations.
G
So
in
February
there
was
a
city
council
study
session
on
the
regulations
and
later
that
year,
in
September
and
October
Council
adopted
the
commercial
cannabis
regulations
and
the
ordinances
number
1930
and
1931
went
into
effect
on
November
10..
But
early
this
year
in
January
there
was
a
discussion
on
revising
certain
cannabis
regulations
at
the
January
10th
meeting
and
at
the
January
24th
meeting
Council
introduced
it
and
requested
some
amendments
to
the
ordinance,
which
is
why
we
are
here
today.
G
So
some
brief
overview
on
what
was
the
adopted,
City
cannabis
regulations.
To
start
it
was
a
maximum
of
four
cannabis
businesses.
Retail
was
allowed
with
some
limitations,
and
distribution
was
allowed
with
some
limitations
as
well,
but
the
following
were
prohibited,
so
the
city
of
San
Bruno
does
not
allow
cultivation,
manufacturing,
testing
and
Laboratories
cannabis
map,
Micro
businesses,
no
temporary
events
for
cannabis
and
no
cafes
or
on-site
conception,
foreign.
G
Cannabis
retailers
so
cannabis
retailers
also
known
as
dispensaries,
is
the
sale
of
cannabis
and
cannabis
products
for
adult
use
and
some
limitations
is
it's
restricted
only
to
adults,
21
and
Over.
It
could
also
include
some
delivery
services,
no
manufacturing,
it's
allowed
and
previous
ordinance
allowed
maximum
of
three
retailers
and
sorry
I
to
correct
myself.
The
current
ordinance
allows
a
maximum
three
cannabis
retailers.
As
for
cannabis,
distribution
facilities,
it's
the
cell
and
transport
of
cannabis
and
cannabis.
Products
between
state
license
cannabis
businesses.
G
So
the
state
recommends
the
use
of
buffers
from
sensitive
use
and
no
cannabis.
Businesses
can
be
within
600
feet
of
sensitive
uses,
which
is
City
regulation
and
state
recommendation.
So
what
that
means
is
sensitive
uses
includes
use,
centers
daycare,
centers,
schools,
parks
and
public
libraries,
and
we
will
be
able
to
visualize
this
on
the
maps
later
in
the
slides.
G
So
this
is
our
current
cannabis
map.
As
you
see
here,
you
see
the
buffers
of
600
feet
and
the
zones
where
cannabis,
retailers
and
cannabis
distribution
is
permitted.
To
recap,
a
maximum
four
facilities
are
allowed.
Retail
is
up
to
three,
which
was
only
permitted
in
the
blue
and
yellow
zones.
So
that's
the
CBD
district
Tanforan
cod1
CO2,
some
PD
zones
and
mxr
District
distribution
was
only
allowed
up
to
one
and
that
is
allowed
in
the
M1
District
visualized
in
purple,
and
once
again,
no
cannabis
facilities
are
allowed
within
those
sensitive
use
buffers.
G
So
the
adoptive
commercial
cannabis
process
had
five
steps.
The
first
was
to
file
commercial
cannabis
operators
permit
Second,
City
staff
did
some
pre-screen
applications
and
determined
whether
application
passed
or
failed
step.
Three
city
council
reviewed
and
select
an
operator's
permit
at
publicly
noticed
meeting
before
step
was
selected.
Businesses
must
file
a
conditional
use
permit
for
Planning,
Commission
and
city
council
review
and
action,
and
the
last
step
was
City
issuance
of
The
Operators
permit.
G
Now
the
operator's
permit
did
have
quite
a
bit
of
requirements,
and
these
are
listed
here,
including
background
check,
documentation,
proof
of
capitalization
assigned
or
notarized
property
owner
consent
forms
lease
agreements
and
since
most
cannabis
facilities
didn't
know
if
they
were
going
to
be
selected
by
Council,
we
did
allow
for
a
letter
of
intention
to
at
least
we
also
required
a
business
plan.
Labor
and
Community
benefits
plan,
neighborhood
compatibility
plan
and
Odor
Control
plan
safety
and
hazardous
material
plan,
security
plan
and
location
and
site
plans.
So
a
lot
of
requirements
for
the
operator's
permits.
G
G
E
Questions
or
comments
from
the
commission
I
see,
commissioner
Harmon
go
for
it.
I
Yeah
can
we
clarify
so
the
the
version
of
the
ordinance
that
allowed
three
retail
and
one
distribution
that
was
fully
adopted
already,
and
so
this
is
a
revision
that
yeah.
I
My
position
on
that
hasn't
changed.
I,
don't
I
mean
like
that's.
You
know,
I,
the
hookah
lounge
is
barely
outside
one
of
these
sensitive
use
areas.
There
is
a
liquor
store
inside
one
of
the
sensitive
youth
used
areas.
These
businesses
are
more
regulated
and
more
locked
down
than
a
hookah
lounge
or
a
liquor
store.
I
I,
don't
understand
the
concern
with
having
it.
It's
also
just
mildly
ironic
that
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
buy
CBD
in
the
CBD,
but
that's
just
either
here
or
there.
Yeah
I
I
will
not
vote
for
this
resolution.
Frankly,
I
would
vote
to
Simply
send
them
the
resolution
we
sent
them
last
time.
E
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Harmon
Mr
go
for
it.
J
C
C
So
this
is
typically
a
a
sole
proprietor,
so
they
actually,
you
know,
basically
grow
growth.
They
kind
of
do
the
entire
cycle,
but
they're
they're,
just
a
small
business.
So
they
you
know
they
they
grow
I,
think
they
grow
their
own
and
then
they
you
know,
process
it
and
sell
it.
But
it's
a
very
small
quantity.
This.
J
Thank
you,
you
know
and
Michael
since
I
have
you
so
and
I
had
to
ask
you
by
email
the
why?
Why
is
this
coming
to
us
and
I'll
share
with
everyone?
You
told
me:
it's
probably
related
it's
probably
because
we
had
a
change
in
council
members
before
they
were
Pro,
and
now
we
have
a
change
in
hand
and
now
they're
against
I
I
still
didn't
get
a.
Why?
What?
What
is
the
detriment?
J
Why
what's
the
discussion
that
they
had
that
they
think
this
is
bad
and
so
they're
making
it
more
restrictive?
Can
you
can
you
shed
some
light
on
that.
C
Sure
I
believe
you
know
the
during
the
council
discussions
at
least
when
they
I
know
when
the
ordinance
was
adopted.
There
were
you
know
two
council
members
that
you
know
expressed
concerns
about.
C
You
know
the
number
and
just
the
concerns
with
the
overall
the
business
and
they
you
know
the
concern
with
cannabis
as
a
as
a
substance
in
its
potential.
You
know
for
addiction
and
so
forth,
and
so,
but
there
was
also
a
sentiment
which
I
believe
the
council
is
now
going
back
to,
which
was
you
know,
starting
small.
So
even
the
the
two
council
members
that
were
opposed
didn't
you
know,
didn't
seem
to
be
opposed
to
the
level
where
you
know
they
wouldn't
allow
a
cannabis
business.
C
They
just
were
more
interested
in
starting
slow
and
you
know
perhaps
having
having
one.
You
know.
One
retail
establishment
see
how
it
goes,
because
the
ordinance
can
be
amended
at
any
time
to
increase
the
number,
and
you
know,
and
also
the
types
of
businesses
as
well.
So
I
think
that
is
the
primary
sentiment
of
the
current.
C
J
E
Thank
you
question,
commissioner.
Harmon.
A
I
It,
oh
I,
don't
want
to
put
words
in
your
mouth,
given
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
discretionary
process
on
approving
these
at
all
as
compared
to
alcohol
or
tobacco
which
are
ministerial.
Currently,
if
the
ordinance
says
that
only
one
retail
operation
is
permitted,
once
one
is
permitted
the
barrier
to
adding
another
one
will
be
that
not
only
do
you
have
to
apply
and
get
a
discretionary
permit,
you
actually
have
to
change
the
ordinance
and
we
have
to
have
another
hearing
like
this
and
so
on.
I
So
you
know
like
it
just
it
seems
the
the
version
of
the
ordinance
that
exists.
They
could
approve
one
wait
to
see
how
it
works
and
then
I'll
prove
another
one
from
the
applicant
pool
later
it
does
not
I
mean
it
just.
It
seems
honestly
disingenuous
to
say
that,
in
order
to
start
small,
we
have
to
amend
the
current
ordinance
to
only
allow
one,
because
we
can
already
just
vote
for
one.
C
Yes,
and
that
is
that
is
correct-
the
operator's
permit
process,
which
is
the
first
step
the
the
language
in
the
ordinance,
is,
is
very
clear
that
the
city
council
has
the
ability
to
select.
C
You
know
one
or
more
operators
or
select
none
from
the
pool.
That's
provided
yes,
so
that's
that
is
true.
A
E
You
Michael
anyone
else
on
the
council
with
questions
or.
F
C
So
it
so
it's
either
or
so
it's
it's
a
maximum
of
two,
so
retail
or
distribution
or
two
distribution
with
no
retail
okay.
F
Why
the
why
the
thought
of
increasing
the
distribution
part
of
it
in
it's
I,
don't
know
it
just
seems
kind
of
odd.
A
H
Yeah
I'm
also
curious
about
the
locations.
The
change
in
location
as
I
was
thinking
about
it
with
myself
it.
It
seems
clear
that
Tanforan
is
going
to
be
redeveloped
and
likely
will
not
end
up
being
a
place
where
it
would
be.
H
You
know
a
practical
place
to
put
a
dispensary
but
downtown
I'm
I'm,
just
I,
guess
what
what
I'm
wondering
is?
What
were
the
council's?
What
did
they
express
as
far
as
their
reasoning
for
eliminating
the
downtown
area.
C
And-
and
there
were
and
I
believe
that
they,
both
the
Planning
Commission
and
at
the
city
council
hearings,
there
was,
you
know
several
several
people
that
did
speak
about
concerns
with
downtown
and
you
know
how
it
would
relate
to
other
family
related
businesses,
the
ice
cream,
parlor,
The,
Swim,
School
and
other
businesses
downtown.
So
it
was
I
think
just
more
of
a
you
know,
just
again
concerned
for
for
families
who
are
who
are
frequenting
downtown.
H
C
I
I,
don't
think
I
know
I
I
I.
Don't
there
were
no
discussions
like
that.
Specific
discussions
like
that
at
the
ca
at
the
council
meeting
last
fall
that
the
the
recent
the
more
recent
discussions
I
know
Eliseo
has
has
I
I
was
not
in
attendance
at
the
January
10th
or
the
24th
meeting,
but
LSA
I
think
might
have
listen
to
the
conversations.
B
G
They
didn't
have
any
discussion
specifically
about
your
concern
on
what
would
happen
in
families
walk
by
these
businesses.
They
just
mentioned
that
they
wanted
to
remove
downtown
and
10
grand,
and
they
just
didn't
go
in
depth
really
on
the.
Why?
Well.
H
Thank
you,
I.
Don't
want
to
put
your
feet
to
the
fire,
but
I
think
I
asked
more
if
there
was
something
I
was
overlooking
because
it
doesn't
seem
to
me
to
be
a
harmful
or
inappropriate
place
to
have
a
dispensary
in
our
downtown
personally
I
think
it
could
actually
increase
foot
traffic
and
bring
people
to
our
restaurants
and
to
our
markets
and
other
really
wonderful
things
we
have
going
on
in
downtown
and
I
know.
We
talked
about
that
in
our
previous
meeting
that
it
could
be
a
benefit
to
our
downtown
businesses.
I
Really
quickly,
in
the
background
I've
been
looking
it
up,
it
looks
like
it
was.
Our
August
16th
meeting
was
the
one
where
we
discussed
it
and
I
I
have,
in
my
notes,
the
discussion
of
adding
Bay,
Hill
and
sorry
Bay,
Hill
and
The
Crossing,
but
in
any
case,
I
think
that
was
the
meeting
so
that
for
for
reference,
if
we
want
to
look
at
the
old
resolution
that
looks
like
that's
where
it
was.
D
I
received
a
request
from
a
Community
member,
and
let
me
read
it:
the
neighbor
said:
can
a
store
be?
Can
the
store
be
a
bistro
with
food,
music,
beverage,
on-site
consumption.
G
No
because
I
think
that
would
be
considered
a
Cannabis
Cafe.
Yes,
and
that's
not
permitted.
G
And
I
believe
this
was
also
discussed
in
the
August
yeah
Planning
Commission
meeting,
where
you
guys
express
your
concern
of
on
site
conception
and
we
made
it
pretty
clear
that
customers
would
just
go
in
walk
through
security
and
then,
after
that,
purchase
their
cannabis
product
and
exit
the
facility,
quick
in
and
out.
I
C
C
C
I
E
A
J
First
sorry
about
the
bird
in
the
background
here
so
I've
read
through
the
text
at
the
resolution
and
I'm
just
going
to
point
out
some
things.
It's
sounding
kind
of
hypocritical
here
that
and
I'll
just
read
a
Verbatim.
The
allowance
for
cannabis
sales
or
distribution
and
vacant
buildings
on
El
Camino
will
allow
for
new
distinctive
uses
that
will
support
existing
Commercial
Business
along
the
corridor.
E
A
E
E
Michael
question
for
you:
whenever
someone
is
reading
off
the
you
know
the
agenda
or
the
packet
for
audience
members.
Is
there
a
the
best
way
to
State
like
this?
Is
where
I'm
reading
from
should
we
just
say
like
the
PDF
number,
or
is
there
a
other
way?
You'd
recommend
it
so
just
turn
around
follow
along
yeah.
E
F
E
When
you're
reading
it
just
point
out
what
page
number
of
the
PDF
you're
you're
looking
at,
so
anyone
the
audience
could
follow
along.
Oh.
J
Sure
I'm
not
sure
actually.
A
J
J
So
that's
great,
and,
and
so
you
know
it's
ldu
a
lduc,
ldu54
and
then
and
then
further
along
it
does
say,
the
allowance
of
cannabis
uses
will
provide
for
additional
local
jobs
within
San
Bruno,
and
this
is
something
that
was
put
together
by
staff.
That's
the
resolution.
J
J
E
Okay,
great
commissioner
Johnson,
do
you
have
a
comment?
Your
hand
is
up.
No,
that
was
a
mistake.
Sorry.
E
No
problem
anyone
else
from
the
commission.
E
Okay,
it
doesn't
look
like
it's
all
asked
my
questions
now
so
for
staff,
just
so
I'm
totally
clear.
A
yes
vote
result
modifies
the
previous
agreement
to
what
we're
seeing
tonight.
There's
a
no
vote,
kill
this
provision,
or
does
it
just
send
it
back,
as
is.
C
So
what
we
would
recommend
is,
if
you
are
to
consider
you
know
not
recommending
changing
the
ordinance
you
you
know,
would
would
State
your
reasons
for
doing
so,
and
those
would
be
passed
on
to
the
city
council.
C
E
C
I
Yeah
I
was
I
think
that
thinking
of
it
as
a
straight
yes,
no
isn't
that
it's
the
question
is
there
there
will
be
a
motion
to
submit
a
resolution
and,
as
as
I
said,
I
mean
my
position.
Is
that
that
you
know
we
need
to
go
through
public
comment
and
conclude,
but
at
least
my
position
at
this
time
is
I
would
like
us
to
Simply,
send
them
the
text
or
the
resolution.
We
sent
them
in
August
and
say
that
this
is
what
we
voted
for
then
this
is
what
we're
voting
for
now.
F
Thank
you,
a
question
for
Michael.
If
can
council,
do
let
me
see
if
I
can
frame
this
correctly?
Is
this
a
recommendation
to
council
or
can
Council
take
ours?
If
we
were
to
vote,
no,
could
Council
just
go
ahead
and
do
what
they
wanted
to
do
anyway,
or
do
they
need
a
recommendation
for
us
from
us
to
go
ahead
and
approve
to
connect
the
dots.
C
They
they
can
move
forward,
regardless
of
what
your
recommendation
is.
E
No,
okay,
all
right
next
question
did
any
I
noticed
like
the
purple
section.
The
distribution
section
is
I
believe
a
lot
of
automotive
shops,
but
there's
also
that
one
giant
building
that
I
believe
used
to
be
used
for
parking
at
SFO
like
a
parking
company
and
now
it's
kind
of
vacant
was
that
large
space
discussed
in
particular
or
that
that
that
building
site
for
some
kind
of
massive
dispensary
did
that
come
up
at
all.
C
No,
that
that
site
has
been
purchased
by
Amazon
as
a
for
a
distribution
center,
so
an
application
is
forthcoming
from
them.
That
might
be
before
this.
The
Planning
Commission
by
the
end
of
this
year
or
or
early
next
year,.
E
And
it's
like,
if
they're,
not
one
of
the
applicants
or
drone
weed
across
the
city,
to
everybody,
no,
no
all
right
and
then
my
last
question.
If
I
can
remember
it
I'm
drawing
a
blank
now,
oh
apparently
there
were
applicants
based
on
alessio's
presentation.
E
Was
there
a
significant
number
of
distribution
versus
retail,
or
vice
versa?
Was
there
any
impetus
to
that
for
some
of
these
suggested
changes
and
do
we
know
or
do
you
know
how
many
applicants
total
there
were
now.
C
So,
since
the
since
the
application
period
was
never
opened,
we
have
no
idea
how
many
applications
we
were
going
to
be
receiving
and
either
for
retail
or
for
distribution.
We
do
have
a
substantial
interest
list,
so
lsao
I
think
you
had
I,
don't
know
how
many
people
are
on
that
list,
but
we
have
a
number
of
folks
on
that
list.
They
did
not
necessarily
kind
of
tilt
their
hand
to
to
let
us
know.
C
I
know
there
were
a
couple
of
of
uses
that
later
found
that
had
already
leased
some
properties
that
had
found
out
that
they
were
actually
in
a
sensitive
use
area,
one
at
least
one
downtown
and
I
think
another
site
on
El
Camino
Real.
You
know
so,
but
we
never
we
never.
Since
the
application
period
never
opened,
we
never.
We
never
knew.
We
just
don't
know
who
was
actually
going
to
apply
or
how
many
people
are
going
to
apply.
A
G
Oh
go
ahead:
yeah
I
would
like
to
add
that
our
interested
party
list
is
around
40
people
and
throughout
the
application
period
we
were
receiving
a
lot
of
emails
and
calls
about
the
Cannabis
application
and
we
were
helping
him
about.
40
people
kick-start
the
application
trying
to
figure
out
whether
they
were
in
the
sensitive
B
site,
or
not
certain
questions
about
the
five
steps
that
we
required,
like
the
background
checks
the
letter
of
intent
form,
but
we
never
like
Michael
said
we
we
didn't
receive
any.
E
So
am
I
understanding
correct
that,
basically,
between
the
time,
the
council
changed
course
so
to
speak,
I
believe
you
said
it
was
January
10th
there
are
about
the
the
applications
were
due
a
week
later,
but
up
until
that
point,
we
had
not
received
any
formal
applications,
so
people
these
40
potential
interested
parties
were
seemingly
waiting
to
the
last
second,
is
that
correct,
yeah,
okay
and
then
maybe
you
could
shed
some
light,
who
chooses
which
applicant
gets
selected?
If
there
it
seems
going
to
be
highly
competitive.
E
If
there's
40
interested
parties
say
for
just
for
a
scenario,
50
actually
submit
an
application,
so
you
have
20
people
vying
for
four
spots
now
you're
they're
vying
for
two
spots
is
that
is.
This
is
not
a
first
come
applicant,
gets
the
gets
the
award
right
because
no
one
had
seemingly
submitted
early
to
get
first
in
queue.
This
is
basically
based
on
a
total.
E
G
So
staff
was
going
to
review
all
these
applications
submitted
and
if
they
received
the
pass
and
they
would
be
in
the
pool
that
would
be
presented
to
city
council
for
them
to
select
and
then
from
there
commercial
operators
permits
would
be
selected
and
it
would
move
on
to
the
three
that
or
four
businesses
that
were
going
to
be
selected
by
Council
and
then
the
last
step
would
be
applied
for
the
conditional
use
permit.
So
after
the
application
window
staff
was
going
to
review
those
applications
pass
or
fail.
E
So
say,
hypothetically
again,
all
40
interested
parties
apply,
say
30,
past
10
fail
who's,
who's,
selecting
the
winner
city
council,
or
is
it
narrowed
down
like
to
a
short
list
and
then
another
and
then
another
until
there's
one
or
is
it
city
council
is
voting
on
all
30
simultaneously
to
pick
the
two
winners?
Should
this
pass
I?
Don't
think
that
changes,
regardless
of
this
I'm,
just
curious
for
the
process?
E
How
who
picks
it
and
are
they
voting?
You
know
30
at
a
time
or
is
there
a
sliding
scale
or
it
just
seems
a
bit
odd
to
me.
E
So
they
shortlist
the
three
and
then
they
take
a
second
vote
to
pick
the
the
or
actually
yes,
there's
three
there's
only
gonna
all
would
get
a
permit
under
the
current
current
ordinance
right.
But
if
we
vote
Yes
tonight,
then
it
would
be
down
to
two:
is
that
right,
yeah,
okay,
so
essentially,
there's
a
short
list
that
could
populate
all
the
open
slots
either
way
or
perhaps
there's
an
intermediate
round,
I'm
a
little
unclear.
How
do
you
get
down
to
the
to
the
winner?
E
C
Yes
and
and
so
part
of
the
operator's
permit
submittal
requirements,
it
includes
a
low,
you
know
a
location,
indication
of
location,
so
the
city
council-
and
you
know,
I-
think
the
city
council
would
probably
be
looking
at.
You
know
the
location
as
well
as
the
strength
of
the
operator
and
their
their
track
record,
but
they
certainly
there
could
be
other
factors
as
well
and
then
just
a
reminder
too
that
after
they
go
through
the
operator's
permit
process,
there
is
a
conditional
use
permit
process
as
well.
C
E
C
Other
so
other
jurisdictions
do
have
a
us.
You
know
a
staff
level
scoring
process
and
and
many
jurisdictions
this
may
be
a
unique
process
in
that
I.
Don't
believe,
there
are
other
jurisdictions
that
have
the
operator's
permits
go
to
the
city
council,
they're
either
done
by
staff
or
or
at
another
level.
C
With
a
you
know,
perhaps
a
staff
committee
as
well
that
scores
the
applications
you
know
so,
but
in
this
in
this
case,
the
direction
we
were
given
was
just
to
do
a
pass
fail
to
make
sure
all
of
the
the
materials
are
submitted
with
the
application
that
are
required,
as
well
as
the
applicant
and
their
the
business
partners,
all
passing
their
background
checks
through
the
police
department.
C
So
if,
if
they
pass
both,
you
know
all
the
information
that
they've
submitted,
which
is
primarily
everything
on
the
checklist,
which
is
what
we
would
be
looking
for.
C
You
know
and
also
passing
the
background
check,
then
that
would
constitute
a
passing.
You
know
grade
or
passing
situation,
and
that
would
be
moved
just
moved
on
to
city
council
without
us,
without
a
staff
recommendation.
So
again,
as
Ella
Sayo
mentioned,
we
would
just
basically
be
presenting
here.
Are
the
third
2030,
whatever
that
are
that
have
passed?
C
E
C
Staff
has
not
been
directed
to
do
that.
We
would
probably
just
put
together
a
you
know,
a
spreadsheet
just
just
so
that
they
could
track
them
and
compare
them
just
for,
but
without
any
you
know,
subjective
information
that
would
you
know
favor
one
or
the
other.
We
you
know
staff
would
want
to
be
very
careful
not
to
not
to
do
that.
Got
it.
E
H
Yeah,
just
just
quickly
clarify:
let's
just
pretend
that
we
have
30
applications
and
they
all
go
to
city
council
and
they
they
are
looking
at
them
and
deciding
and-
and
they
may
look
at
each
other
and
say
you
know
what
I
don't
like
any
of
them
and
there's
no
requirement
that
they
actually
fill
these.
These
vacancies
am
I
correct
that
they
could
actually
they
know,
thank
you
to
to
all
or
any.
E
E
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
any
do
we
have
I
guess
we
go
to
public
comments
at
this
time
or
questions.
E
Yes,
so
if
anyone
from
the
public
would
like
to
speak
for
three
minutes
on
this
item,
please
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
in
the
zoom
or,
if
you're
on
the
telephone,
you
can
dial
nine
or
Star
nine
and
you'll
be
led
in
to
speak.
E
I
see
five
people
in
the
attendees
list,
a
couple
of
phone
numbers
and
three
names.
So
if
you
would
like
to
speak,
please
again
use
the
feature:
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
I'll.
E
E
D
F
E
Okay,
great
thank
you.
I'll
just
open
up
the
floor
for
any
general
discussion
by
Council;
push
your
arm
and
go
for
it.
B
Anyone
to
speak
yeah.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Harmon
thanks
for
pausing,
I
think
I
have
a
sense
where
you're
going
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know,
I
wanted
to
listen
and
I
wanted
to.
I
was
hoping
for
public
comment.
Unfortunately,
there
wasn't
any
I
watched
the
council
meter
and
meeting
on
January
10th
I
followed
the
process
by
which
this
made
its
way
back
to
the
council
after
the
November
election,
so
I
followed
the
progression
quite
a
bit.
B
I
was
especially
interested
in
the
dialogue
that
some
of
you
were
asking
about
tonight,
the
you
know
the
Downtown
Association
and
what
was
the
fear
and
what
was
the
rationale?
There
wasn't
one.
There
wasn't
a
good
one.
It
was
full
of
assumptions
and
problematic
language
and
innuendo
and
I
walked
out
of
there.
Thinking
I
don't
understand
what
the
fear
is.
I've,
never
seen
a
resolution
that
I
disliked
more
than
this
one
right.
I
know
the
council
member.
B
You
all
know
who
he
is
who
requested
this
comeback
to
council
for
discussion
said
in
his
own
words
on
January
10th.
If
it
was
up
to
me,
there'd
be
no
dispensaries,
there'd
be
no
cannabis.
The
resolution,
the
way
it's
written
now
allows
for
that
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
make
some
changes
to
it.
The
council
can
decide
whether
they
want
up
to
whatever
amount,
but
they
can
decide
that
they
can
be
none.
So
I,
don't
understand
why
we're
entertaining
this
so
I,
don't
know
why
we're
going
in
circles
about
around
it.
B
I've
never
seen
one
that
was
more
literally
more
offensive
than
this
one,
so
I
I
just
want
I
was
waiting
for
public
comment
to
say
those
things
and
I
I
just
and
you
know
we're
talking
about
undermining
the
fiscal
impact.
Commissioner
Coons
right.
This
is
full
of
hypocrisy
and
contradictions
and
I'm
absolutely
opposed
to
it.
For
those
reasons.
E
Thank
you,
Vice,
chair
durazo.
Anyone
else
before
commissioner
Harmon.
F
C
Yes,
as
as
was
discussed
when
the
operator's
permits
come
before
them,
they
can,
they
can
select.
You
know
the
operators
under
that,
though,
so
this
this
change
would
just
limit
the
number
that
they
can
select
from
the
from
the
current
ordinance,
which
allows
for
the
three
in
one
and
includes
downtown
and
Tanforan.
E
F
A
J
You
know
I
know,
we've
there's
been
some
comment
that
you
know
we're
going
round
and
round.
Is
this
really
necessary?
I
do
want
to
point
out.
I
think
this
is
good.
It's
coming
to
us
and
and
we
can
reaffirm
through
an
A
or
an
A,
that
you
know
this
is
our
expertise
as
planning
Commissioners
is
what
we
think
is
best
for
the
city,
so
it
it's.
E
Okay,
anyone
else,
okay,
just
to
preempt,
commissioner
Harmon
for
the
sake
of
simplicity,
I,
would
suggest
perhaps
motioning
for
a
approval.
As
is
that
way,
if
you
agree
with
it,
we
say
yes
and
if
you
disagree
with
it,
you
say
no,
so
if
you
motion
to
approve
it
and
it
gets
seconded-
and
you
don't
want
to
do
this-
we
all
vote
no
and
then
it's
Crystal
Clear,
rather
than
the
opposite
way,
where
it's
kind
of
a
double
negative
or.
J
I
I
I
would
like
to
move
okay
that
we
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
reiterating
what
we
told
them
in
August
that
what
we
said
in
August
was
fine.
The
ordinance
as
it
stands
is
fine.
If
anything,
we
would
have
added
more
locations
and
that's
what
we
think
they
asked
us
our
opinion
and
that's
what
we
thought.
Then
that's
what
I
think
we
should
say
now.
E
C
I
think
you
can
do
a
you
know.
The
motion
can
be
to
to
you
know
not
recommend
amendments
to
the
current
ordinance
and
that
your
recommendation
is
to
retain
the
existing
ordinance.
I
E
Okay,
well,
I
I
will
have
a
different
approach
just
so
it
doesn't
come
back
this
way.
Yet
again,
I
would
motion
to
approve
it
for
the
sake
of
voting.
Yes
to
approve
it
sake
of
voting.
No
to
kick
it
back
to
the
way
it
was
before.
E
B
A
I
A
B
E
C
C
C
I
Let's
take
a
real
call
vote
on
that
in
a
theory
I
suppose
chair
Madden
could
offer
it
as
a
hostile
Amendment,
but
but
yeah
I
mean
it's
it's
fundamentally
like
I.
Don't
my
understanding
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
like
there
is
no
requirement
that
we
take
a
motion
either
way
on
the
resolution
that
was
proposed.
E
If
that's
within
the
rules,
then
I
don't
see
a
problem
doing
that,
but
I
would
still
afterwards
like
to
make
a
motion
on
the
actual
packet.
If
it
doesn't
get
seconded,
then
it
doesn't
get
voted
on.
Does
that
seem
fair?
Okay?
So
let's
do
a
roll
call
vote
on
commissioner
Harmon's
proposal?
If
you
want
to
repeat
it
one
more
time
since
it's.
A
C
Just
you
know
add
to
yeah
to
to
basically
start
the
motion
to
not
recommend
changes
to
the
existing
ordinance.
Yes,.
D
I
D
D
E
Okay,
so
didn't
see
much
point
in
going
to
vote
the
other
way
or
I
would
have
voted,
no
not
to
pass
it,
but
I
wanted
it
in
a
written
document.
So
we
wouldn't
have
to
deal
with
this
coming
back
to
us,
but
we'll
go
with
this
one.
Coming.
I
E
C
On
so
yeah
I
think
it
would
be
at
this
point,
make
May
confuse
the
matter
if
we
too,
if
we
do
two
votes.
A
E
Okay,
so
I
think
that
closes
that
item
item
seven
on
the
agenda
looks
like
there's
no
item,
eight,
so
item
nine
is
items
from
staff.
Do
we
have
looks
like
an
arc
selection?
C
And
we
do
anticipate
that
this
will
be
in
person
on
the
16th
and
just
in
advance.
We
are
anticipating
two
new
homes
on
San
Marco
that
commissioner
biasoti
would
be
conflicted
with.
So
he
gets
the
night
off.
C
But
we
do
I
have
not
I've
checked
the
conflict
of
interest
maps
and
there
are
no
other
conflicts
with
that
item
and
it's
the
only
one
we
have
so
far.
So
if
anyone
so
I'll
I'll
look
for
three
volunteers,
so
we
have
Harmon
and
Johnson
Rick.
You
cannot
participate.
F
C
C
C
Why?
No?
No!
No!
These
are
two
lots.
Two
vacant
lots
that
were
part
of
a
commercial
business
that
was
right.
That's
right
on
the
corner,
I
think
right
on
the
corner
of
San
Marco
and
El
Camino
foreign.
C
I
I
checked
them
out
today
and
it's
outside
of
the
one
just
outside
of
the
1000
foot
radius.
So
there's
no
conflict
that
was
close
for
you
yeah,
because.
C
Okay,
so
we
have
Commissioners
Harvard
and
Johnson,
and
one
additional.
E
All
right
great
moving
on
item
10
is
comments
from
members.
Do
you
have
any
comments
from
members.
E
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands
so
I
guess
we
did
not
so
moving
on
to
last
item
is
adjournment,
so
our
next
regularly
held
meeting
will
be
on
March
21st
2023
7
P.M
in
person
at
the
senior
center
correct
Michael.
That.
E
Right
it'll
be
great
to
see
everybody
together,
it'll
be
my
very
first
commission
meeting
in
person.
I
have
always
been
pandemic.
Commissioner.
Now
I
will
be
the
in-person
commissioner.
For
the
first
time
we.
E
All
right,
everybody,
thank
you
so
much.
We
will
see
you
soon.