►
From YouTube: San Bruno Special City Council Meeting April 12, 2011 10a. Sustainable Community Scenario
Description
San Bruno Special City Council Meeting April 12, 2011
10a. Sustainable Community Scenario
A
B
B
The
first
step
in
this
process
working
with
a
bag
as
well
as
MTC,
a
bag
of
course
in
charge
of
regional
land-use
policy
and
MTC
in
charge
of
regional
transportation
policy,
is
the
release
of
something
called
the
initial
vision
scenario,
and
what
the
initial
initial
vision
scenario
is:
is
a
growth
projection
over
the
next
25
years?
How
growth
the
growth
pattern
would
be
if
there
were
no
constraints.
B
So
if
it
was
unconstrained
from
a
policy
standpoint,
local
government
policy
standpoint,
if
it
was
unconstrained
from
a
funding
standpoint,
there
were
all
the
funding
in
the
world
to
subsidize
affordable
housing,
another
housing,
as
well
as
the
infrastructure,
as
well
as
unconstrained
from
a
market
standpoint.
If
someone
demanded
a
house,
a
home
would
be
built
for
them
in
the
city
that
they
wish
to
choose
to
live
in
a
bag,
realizes
that
this
exercise
is
going
to
produce
a
projection
pattern.
B
That
is
unrealistic,
but
it
is
something
that
is
necessary
for
SB
375,
so
they
released
this
initial
vision
scenario
and
the
numbers
are
found
within
the
staff
report,
and
the
numbers
are
would
equate
to
about
2
million
new
residents
within
the
Bay
Area.
The
primary
growth
would
be
in
santa
clara
county
as
well
as
alameda
county.
B
However,
there
is
a
significant
growth
projection
within
San
Mateo
County
as
well,
and
it
equates
to
about
93,000
new
households,
which
is
about
a
thirty-five
percent
growth
pattern
from
where
we
are
today
now
how
that
translates
to
San
Bruno,
since
we
are
an
area
that
has
higher
employment,
that
does
have
two
transit
stations
is
closer
to
san
francisco
and
close
to
Khan.
Valley
is
that
we
have
a
slightly
higher
growth
projection
of
about
forty
two
percent.
B
Now,
of
course,
as
I
stated
before,
there
are
a
number
of
concerns,
because
this
is
an
unconstrained,
an
unconstrained
formula
and
the
reason
why
this
is
important
for
the
City
Council
to
take
a
look
at
and
pay
attention
to,
as
these
numbers
are
eventually
going
to
turn
into
the
regional
housing
needs
assessment
numbers
that
we
work
together
with
the
county.
On
that
say
how
many
units
were
required
to
zone
for
in
our
next
housing
cycle.
B
B
If
that
ever
closes
down
along
the
El
Camino
Real,
where
we
have
some
older
commercial
uses
that
are
that
have
been
there
for
years
and
that
can
be
transitioned
to
more
housing
units
uses
and,
of
course,
near
the
train
station,
where
we're
doing
the
transit
corridor
plan
and
we're
playing
for
higher
density
uses.
That
said
from
a
policy
funding
and
market
standpoint,
there
are
some
things
that
are
inconsistent.
That
staff
is
concerned
about
and
we'd
like
to
relay
relay
those
concerns
to
you.
B
So
you
could
also
speak
to
a
bag
about
this
and
we
could
transmit
that
message
to
a
bag
as
well.
The
first
is
from
a
policy
standpoint.
San
bruno,
like
many
cities
in
san
mateo
county,
have
single-family
neighborhoods
next
to
the
El
Camino
Rio
and,
of
course
we
have
strong
policies
within
our
general
plan,
where
we
like
to
see
growth
in
some
areas
we
like
to
protect
those
single-family,
neighborhoods
they're,
well
established
and
maintained
a
single
family
environment
in
those
areas.
The
second
is
a
course
from
a
funding.
B
Standpoint
is
where's
the
money
for
the
infrastructure.
Now,
if
we're
going
to
produce
six
thousand
units
in
san
bruno
under
this
scenario,
where
would
we
have
the
money
for
the
sewer
pipes,
the
water
pipes,
everything
and
also
the
subsidy
for
the
affordable
housing?
That's
required
as
part
of
this
initial
vision
scenario
and
then
I
think,
even
if
the
policy
constraints
weren't
there
from
a
market
stamp
or
from
a
in
funding
standpoint
as
well
as
a
policy
standpoint,
there
would
be
market
reality.
B
We
have
well-established
single-family,
neighborhoods
up
and
down
the
El
Camino
Real
corridor,
as
well
as
in
San,
Mateo,
County
and
I.
Just
don't
believe
those
are
going
to
turn
over
in
the
next
25
years
as
projecting
to
this,
because
there's
too
much
value
already
within
those
single-family
neighborhoods,
so
a
bag
is
hosting
a
meeting
for
they
already
already
hosted
it
for
planning
directors.
B
Last
week,
I
happen
to
sit
on
the
regional
committee
representing
San,
Mateo,
County,
Planning
directors
on
the
regional,
a
bag
and
MTC,
and
so
some
of
these
have
already
been
communicated
up
to
a
bag.
They
hosted
a
meeting
for
all
planning
directors
on
April,
seventh,
which
I
attended
and
many
of
the
planning
directors
have
the
same
concerns
now
they're
hosting
a
meeting
for
City
Council
members
on
April
14th
at
six
to
eight
pm.
It's
a
Sikh
AG
meeting.
So
I
would
encourage
someone
from
the
city
council
to
attend
that
to
attend
that
meeting
as
well.
C
A
D
I
will
be
attending
to
see
Committee
on
Thursday
and
I
will
convey
those
thoughts
to
them
as
well
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
also
convey
some
positive
or
some
kind
of
give
and
take
and
Erin
talked
about
infrastructure
and
where's
that
money
coming
from.
Maybe
if
we
comply
in
some
ways
with
the
housing
that
the
state
would
look
at
different
bonding
mechanisms
that
there
would
be,
you
know,
instead
of
just
saying
no
we're
not
going
to
do
it,
that
there
would
be
some
kind
of
give
and
take
and
looking
at
how
it
could
be
done.
D
Maybe
you
know
bonding,
for
that
goes
down
to
fifty
five
percent
of
the
vote
or
some
kinds
of
things
like
that.
The
other
concern
I
have
which
I
don't
know
if
was
mentioned,
was
water
when
the
state
is
telling
us
to
restrict
our
water
intake
for
our
consumption.
Rather,
twenty
percent
by
Africa
a
year
is
2020.
D
A
D
B
Those
are
two
great
comments,
and
I
think
you
should.
I
think
the
funding
issue
is
an
important
issue,
because
they
really
actually
the
thought
behind.
This
is
a
very
positive
thought
that
they're
saying
cities
that
are
doing
the
right
thing
and
planning
for
housing
near
transit
should
be
first
in
line
for
the
for
the
funding,
so
they
actually
are
setting
up
this
process
now.
Well,
I
think
your
thought
is
greatest.