►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting April 24, 2012 10b
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting April 24, 2012
10b. Amend Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee By-laws
B
B
After
a
slow
start,
we
actually
had
a
good
recruitment
and
a
number
of
people
applied
for
the
for
the
bpc,
and
the
number
of
those
people
were
in
front
of
the
city
council
tonight
interviewing,
and
we
actually
had
a
couple
more
that
were
also
interested
but
unable
to
make
it
tonight.
So,
along
with
the
recruitment,
we
also
are
proposing
several
changes
to
the
bpc
bylaws
in
order
to
encourage
attendance
and
increase
the
probability
that
you
will
see
a
quorum
at
a
majority
of
meetings.
Briefly,
go
over
the
five.
B
The
first
is
changing
the
frequency
of
meetings
from
a
monthly
meeting
schedule
to
a
bi-monthly
meeting
schedule.
The
second
is
to
allow
the
committee
by
a
majority
vote
to
set
the
start
time
annually.
They
had
noticed
that
people
are
fluctuating
work
schedules
and
that
allowed
to
increase
the
number
of
people
that
attend.
Each
meeting
third
is
to
allow
youth
representative
to
serve.
If
a
youth
representative
wants
to
serve,
it
won't
be
mandatory.
It
would
be
an
option,
though,
in
the
future.
Fourth
is
to
allow
a
non-resident
to
serve.
B
We
had
someone
to
interview
tonight
there
we
have
two
mass
transit
stations
in
San
Bruno.
We
have
a
large
number
of
employers
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
either
bike
directly
here
from
surrounding
communities
or
actually
take
in
part
or
caltrain
and
then
walk
or
to
ride
their
bicycle
to
their
work,
and
then
fifth
I'm
actually
changing
the
acronym
used
instead
of
be
PCB,
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
Advisory
Committee
or
be
pack
that's
more
consistent
with
countywide
committees,
as
well
as
regional
regional
committees
with
the
same
authority.
B
You
also
notice
that
tonight
I
put
in
front
of
you
redline
version
after
we
distributed
the
council
packet,
we
found
we
are
alerted
to
a
number
of
changes
that
had
to
be
made
more
consistency,
type
changes
and
updates
to
make
this
consistent
with
both
other
bylaws
within
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
current
procedures
for
the
for
the
b-pack.
So
at
this
time,
I
can
take
any
questions.
Any
questions
of.
C
To
that
through
the
chair,
three
things,
one
is
just
a
comment.
Two
questions,
one
on
regular
meetings,
I
know,
there's
a
desire
to
have
it
between
the
hours
of
five
and
seven
and
each
year
make
a
determination
of
what
that
time
start
will
be
correct.
My
question
is:
is
for
continuity
and
consistency,
shouldn't
we
say
it's,
let's
say
six
o'clock
and
less
change.
Therefore,
I
mean
cuz
every
year,
then
it
would
be
well.
What
time
is
a
meeting
life
last
year?
Was
five
I?
C
Think
it's
six
I,
don't
know
we
have
to
ask
so
I,
don't
know
if
it's
better
to
establish
a
set
time
and
then
it
can
be
reviewed
and
the
committee
can
make
it
a
change.
It
was
one
comment.
Second
thing
is
on:
absence
is
from
meeting
section
3.1
one
I
noticed
that
it
is
changed,
so
that
was
good.
But
if
we're
having
six
millions
a
year
and
we're
going
to
allow
an
absence
of
up
to
four
excuse,
I
think
that's
over
fifty
percent.
I
don't
think
that's
a
very
good
ratio.
C
I
would
at
least
maybe
recommend
that
go
down
to
three
at
least
and
then
the
final
thing
I
was
going
to
say
that
I
want
to
appreciate
staff,
because
I
know
I
SAT
up
here
before
when
we
had
the
personnel
board
about
reducing
amount
of
members
when
we
went
from
five
to
three
dead
support
dead,
of
course,
but
here
instead
of
saying
well
we're
having
a
hard
time
getting
members,
let's
go
from
seven
to
five.
We
went
the
extra
mile
we
reached
out.
C
We
got
citizens
involved,
we
have
them
part
of
the
process
and
we're
going
to.
Hopefully,
if
this
passes
then
establish,
I
think,
a
good
group
of
individuals
who
have
come
forward
that
we've
interview
tonight
and
two
weeks
ago,
and
that
is
what
I
was
referencing
back
when
we
went
on
personnel.
Is
that
ways
to
go
outside
the
box
in
order
to
get
the
residents
and
the
citizens
involved.
D
You
so
most
of
my
questions
were
just
around
the:
how
much
rigidity
there
is
in
the
scheduling
based
on
the
bylaws,
and
we
do
dictate.
Quite
very
specifically,
you
know
the
hours
of
the
meetings,
the
duration
of
the
meetings.
I
was
just
wondering
if
that
is
that
just
based
on
on
precedents,
or
is
there
some
legal
requirement
that
makes
us
put
that
in
the
bylaws
versus
letting
the
committee
decide
these
things
as
a
committee
and
not
having
them
in.
B
B
That's
one
thing:
I
mean
it's
not
required,
but
it's
ingeneral
ii
found
in
all
bylaws
when,
when
a
start
time
is,
and
then
the
second
thing
has
to
do
with
the
length
of
the
meeting
and
what
this
does
in
this
case
previously
said,
it
was
going
to
start
at
a
certain
time
and
end
at
a
certain
time
since
there's
the
fluctuating
allowance
for
start
time,
we
said
we
just
specified
a
length
of
time.
There's
also
a
line
in
it,
though,
that
the
meaning
can
be
extended
beyond
that
point.
B
If
committee
members,
you
know
want
to,
you
know,
want
to
extend
it
I.
My
guess
is
why
you
find
that
is
that
it
generally
lays
out
the
commitment
that
committee
members
are
facing
when
that,
when
they
look
through
this
and
they're
considering
serving
on
a
committee,
they
know
that
generally
meetings
aren't
going
to
last
more
than
two
and
a
half
hours.
So
when
they're,
considering
whether
or
not
to
be
on
a
committee,
they
have
all
the
you
know
the
general
guidelines
in
front
of
them,
but.
D
E
E
But
Saturday's
of
Saturday
has
opposed
to
about
six
to
seven
or
something
I'm,
just
saying:
that's,
probably
why
it's
probably
why
that's
there,
plus,
if
they,
if
we
have
as
a
council,
have
set
like
there's
personnel
board
and
there's
council
meetings
and
there's
all
these
other
meetings
and
they
want
to
overlap
at
a
different
time.
That
would
be
a
confliction
conflict
as
well.
So
I'm
just
saying:
that's,
probably
why
it's
there
anyway,
okay.
C
I
just
I
through
the
chair,
mr.
mayor
I,
just
put
in
those
two
thoughts
about
a
definitive
starting
time
or
a
time
that
technically
it
starts
rather
than
leaving
it
vague
and
then
I
I'm,
making
a
suggestion
on
a
three
point:
one
one
that
it
not
be
four
absences.
If
they're
six
millions
a
year.
I
think
that
that's
a
little
that
needs
to
be
reevaluated
in
my
mind,
I
think
poor
zylle
out
of
six
is
not
not
not
a
good
showing
career.
E
C
C
I
I
guess:
if
you're
asking
can
they
can
we
make
appointments?
The
committee
group
come
together
and
say:
we'd
like
to
meet
at
six
o'clock,
then
I
think
that
should
be
the
start
time,
I'm,
okay
with
that,
because
they
need
to
get
together
but
I'm
just
saying
that
every
year
it's
up
for
discussion
is
between
five
and
seven
I,
think
it
makes
it
hard.
We
get
into
a
pattern
where
seven
o'clock,
every
second
and
fourth
Tuesday
people,
know
that
and
so
I
think.
C
If
it's
going
to
be
686,
they
can
certainly
change
it
or
if
we
want
to
wait
until
they
have
their
first
meeting
with
new
appointments.
That's
fine
to
set
a
time
that
it
is
known.
I
mean
I
can
almost
quote
to
you
when
every
committee
Commission
board
what
time
what
day
they
mean,
because
that's
what
it
is
it
doesn't
next
year
it's
not
going
to
change
where
I
have
to
go
figure
out
what
time
it
is
or
the
resident
does.
So
that
was
the
reason
for
the
no.
E
C
B
I
did
typically
meet
at
six
o'clock.
I
mean
what
I
would.
What
I
would
suggest
is
that
you
can't
have
a
default
time
at
six
o'clock,
but
then
it
still
allows
so
so
you
have
a
default
time
within
the
actual
bylaws,
but
then
also
allow
some
discretion
of
the
committee
on
an
annual
basis
to
change
that
when
they
look
at
the
bylaws
at
six
o'clock
and
that's.