►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting February 22, 2011 10f. Approve Reimbursement Agreements
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting February 22, 2011
10f. Approve Reimbursement Agreements
A
Item
10
f,
adopt
resolutions
approving
reimbursement
agreements.
We
have
four
here.
The
first
is
a
resolution
of
the
City
Council,
the
city
center,
in
approving
an
authorizing
the
execution
of
a
public
improvements,
reimbursement
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
redevelopment
agency.
Is
it
easier
to
go
through
each
taking
action
on
each
one
as
we
go
well.
A
A
Of
a
public
improvements,
reimbursement
agreement
between
the
redevelopment
agency
in
the
city
item
f3
resolution
of
the
City
Council
of
city,
san
bruno,
approving
an
authorizing
execution
of
an
affordable
housing
and
reimbursement
agreement,
giving
the
city
and
the
redevelopment
agency
an
item
at
for
resolution
of
assembly
and
redevelopment
agency
approving
and
authorizing
execution
of
an
affordable
housing
reimbursement
agreement
between
the
redevelopment
agency
in
the
city.
We
have
had
this
item
these
redevelopment
items
up
the
forest
before
and
based
on
rulings
from
our
previous
city
attorney
and
our
current
city
attorney.
A
D
Can
say
anything
you
want
me
to
just
go
ahead.
A
second
so
last
year,
city
attorney
advised
that
a
couple
of
members
had
a
conflict
in
voting
on
these.
Some
of
these
RTA
decisions
that
related
to
policy
issues,
establishing
funding
or
RDA
projects,
and
so
straws
were
drawn.
Councilmember
O'connell
was
selected
to
participate,
so
recognizing
that
these
are
important
issues
that
members
would
like
to
participate
in
if
they
possibly
can.
D
I
did
take
a
fresh
look
at
the
FPPC
decisions
and
concluded
after
reviewing
them
that
the
FPPC
would
probably
still
find
that
there's
a
potential
conflict
for
the
agency
member
Salazar
and
Medina.
So
if
they
agree
at
this
time,
they
should
announce
their
recusal
indicate
the
reasons
for
that
recusal
leave
the
room
and
then
return
at
the
conclusion
of
the
item
we
go.
First,
okay,
I've
been
advised
that.
E
A
B
Just
as
the
council
knows,
the
proposed
state
budget
prohibits
is
the
proposed
budget,
prohibits
existing
redevelopment
agencies
from
creating
new
contracts
or
obligations
effective
upon
what
is
hoped
by
the
Department
of
Finance
urgency
legislation
by
the
legislature
to
effectively
end
redevelopment
by
july.
Two
thousand
eleven
existing
agencies
would
be
disestablished
and
successor.
Local
agencies
would
be
required
to
use
property
tax.
That
RDAs
would
otherwise
have
received
to
retire
RDA
debts
and
contractual
obligations
in
accordance
with
existing
payment
schedules.
B
So
the
important
issue
is
that
the
agencies
are
barred
from
creating
new
contracts
and
tax
increment.
It
money
could
still
be
used
to
pay
retire,
RDA
debts
or
contractual
obligations.
The
San
Bruno
redevelopment
agency
has
in
place
a
total
of
four
agreements:
obligating
tax,
increment
money,
those
four
agreements
are
cooperative
agreement
between
the
agency
and
the
city
for
the
advance
of
the
3
million
dollars
over
the
early
years
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
for
repayment
of
those
funds.
The
second
is
a
pledge
of
redevelopment
agency
to
pay
the
lease.
B
B
The
second
agreement-
the
affordable
housing
firstman
agreement,
provides
for
an
additional
32
million
dollars
for
various
affordable
housing
projects
envisioned
by
the
agency
over
a
long
period
of
time
and
coming
close
to
the
ability
to
to
actually
undertake
as
I
mentioned
earlier.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that.
E
B
B
Violation
of
contract
contract
law
are
all
potential
issues
that
the
state
is
sidestepping
in
going
forward
immediately
with
with
this
action,
so
we're
not
guaranteeing
anything
on
the
city's
part.
But
again,
as
I
indicated
to
my
knowledge,
every
redevelopment
agency
and
city
are
taking
these
actions
as
the
best
course
to
protect
what
the
voters
only
a
few
months
ago
said.
B
We
have
begun
that
process
and
what
we
intend
to
do
is
to
come
back
to
the
council
and
the
agency
at
your
next
meeting.
When
we
can
have
met
the
noticing
requirements
for
this
public
hearing-
and
we
will
propose
to
amend
your
action
tonight
to
include
those
two
additional
projects,
so
that's
that's
the
process.
We
need
to
follow.
We'd,
certainly
like
to
address
at
all
tonight,
but
legally,
we
cannot.
So
that's
how
we're
addressing
that
and
again
that
action
will
be
on
the
March
8th
agenda.
B
E
Agency
have
ok.
Just
briefly.
I
can
appreciate
you
being
very
clear
and
deliberate
and
what
you've
been
stating
it
and
don't
take
this
the
wrong
way,
but
are
we?
Is
there
network
throughout
the
state
where
your
we're
comparing
notes
and
going
over
what
sort
of
procedures
and
sort
of
strategies
that
each
city
is
doing
with
the
redevelopment
agencies
and
these
types
of
agreements?
I.
A
B
Is
I
mean
it's?
It's
certainly,
networking
I
mean
every
day,
there's
communications
among
all
the
members
of
these
agencies
and
clarifying
what
actions
are
taken.
I
mean
just
in
in
preparation
of
our
own
work.
We've
reviewed
the
work
that
many
many
many
other
cities
and
agencies
have
done
is
to
see
how
it's
worded
to
see
the
size
of
the
projects
that
scope
of
projects
that
they're
approving
so
I
would
say.
This
is
an
item
that
there's
a
lot
out
there
and
and
we're
dialed
into
it
as
much
as
as
we
can.
E
D
Our
RDA
attorney
represents
a
great
many
other
cities
on
the
peninsula
throughout
the
state
who
have
identical
concerns.
Hence
the
city
of
san
bruno
does
and
not
only
that,
but
he
is
firm,
also
represented,
as
I
recall,
the
association
as
well,
and
so
they
are
very
aware
of
all
the
latest
techniques
to
use
so
that
we
can
have
the
best
possible
chance
of
a
positive
outcome
on
this
I.
B
Mean
again,
you
know
I'm
a
pessimist
by
nature,
but
again
so
the
council
and
the
agency
are
aware
that
both
the
assembly
and
the
Senate
budget
committees
have
reviewed
the
governor's
proposal
and
are
both
recommending
to
the
full
legislature
of
Senate
and
Assembly
approval
of
the
governor's
budget.
Now
part
of
the
budget
includes,
while
the
budget
itself
requires
a
two-thirds,
the
putting
the
tax
measures
the
governor
is
interested
requires
a
two-thirds
vote
and
the
minority
Republicans
have
an
opportunity
to
block
that.
B
But
at
this
point
the
the
Senate
and
the
assembly
budget
committees
are
on
board.
The
Senate
voted
their
proposal
and
again
this
is
without
any
language.
There
is
no
language
prepared
yet
that
to
indicate
how
they
would
get
rid
of
redevelopment
agencies
so
the
so.
These
two
committees
are
voting
on
a
blank
piece
of
paper.
It's
numbers,
there's
no
numbers,
there's
no
words,
there's
no,
nothing
of
what
they're
voting
on
except
the
governor's
proposed
budget.
But
the
enacting
legislation
doesn't
exist
in
draft
form,
so
they
haven't
reviewed
anything.
B
The
the
assembly
committee
voted
to
approve
the
governor's
budget.
The
assembly
added
a
few
words
and
their
approval
that
left
open
the
possibility
of
reforming
redevelopment,
rather
than
eliminating
it
would
at
least
open
the
door
for
something
other
than
total
elimination.
But
that's
where
the
legislature
is
at
this
point
and
the
I
think
March
fifteenth
is
the
deadline
that
the
governor
needs
an
approved
budget
in
order
for
the
time
sequence
to
get
the
ballot
measure
that
ballot
measures
that
they're
interested
in
on
the
June
ballot.
C
I
just
want
to
say,
I
appreciate
all
the
work
you're
doing.
It's
not
easy,
and
it's
very,
very
quick
and
I
know
you're
doing
a
very
thorough
job.
So
I
really
appreciate
what
you're
doing
I
hope
the
people
of
San
Bruno
will
realize
and
recognize
what
redevelopment
has
done
for
us.
The
crossing
would
not
exist.
All
the
senior
low-income
housing
would
not
exist
if
we
hadn't
had
read
a
development
at
the
time,
some
of
our
street
pavings
and
our
sidewalk
repairs.
C
Some
of
our
sewer
are
the
whole
downtown
and
it's
not
glamorous,
but
the
storm
drains
that
were
replaced
on
downtown
some
of
our
all
of
our
facade
improvements,
downtown
I,
know,
there's
more
some
of
the
housing
that
the
low-income
housing
that
had
been
rehabilitated
in
the
in
the
avenues,
all
those
things
and
more
are
because
of
redevelopment,
and
you
know
the
schools
still
get
a
share.
The
city's
still
get
a
share.
The
county
still
just
gets
a
share.
It's
not
like.