►
From YouTube: CC060810 8a Planned Development Ord
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
city
council.
As
you
know,
this
is
the
third
time
that
staff
is
before
you
within
the
last
five
years,
related
to
the
treetops
project
and
I'll
begin
with
a
brief
background
of
this
project
history,
the
apartment
building
that
stands
there
today
was
originally
proved
in
1985,
and
it
lasted
for
about
20
years
and
in
2005
enco
applied
to
the
city,
and
it
was
eventually
heard
by
the
city
council
in
2006
for
several
different
entitlements.
The
first
was
a
general
plan
amendment
and
what
this
general
plan.
B
The
second
thing
that
they
did
was
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
district
there
in
the
zoning
district
on
this
particular
site
is
a
plan
development,
zoning
district
and
you
need
a
development
plan
for
each
plan.
Development
and
their
development
plan
called
for
510
units
on
the
site,
the
third
entitlement
they
asked
for
any
time
that
you
have
a
plan
development.
You
also
need
a
plan
development
permit
and
what
the
permit
does.
It
goes
over
all
the
details.
B
It
goes
from
architecture
to
landscaping
to
how
the
to
how
the
site
will
be
served,
circulation,
parking
requirements
on
all
the
little
details.
So
this
after
a
number
of
hearings,
Planning
Commission
meetings,
City
Council
hearings,
this
project
was
approved
and
aimco
received
entitlements
for
510
units
on
this
site
fast
forward.
Two
years
2008,
the
economy
had
had
started
to
fall,
fall
down
at
that
point,
and
the
aimco
realized
that
the
project
that
they
had
proposed
and
God
approved
was
too
expensive
for
the
type
of
construction
materials
and
the
type
of
parking
arrangement
that
they
had.
B
So
at
that
point
they
applied
to
the
City
Council
for
amendment
to
their
plan
development
permit.
In
order
to
allow
architectural
changes,
as
well
as
architectural
trains,
primarily
as
well
as
a
new
parking
configuration,
it
was
the
same
parking
requirement,
but
it
was
a
different
parking
configuration
where
the
parking
was
embedded
in
the
building
rather
than
underneath
the
building
they
also
approved
for
us
God
approved
for
a
subdivision
map
at
that
time
to
allow
their
units
to
turn
into
condominium
it's
if
they
chose
to
go
that
route
fast
forward
again
to
this
year.
B
As
you
know,
the
apartment
buildings
still
sit
up
there
vacant.
Unfortunately,
the
economy
has
continued
to
fall
down
in
the
residential
lending
environment
is
not
suitable
for
a
large
development
at
this
time,
so
the
aimco
requested
a
unique
request,
and
what
they're
requesting
right
now
is
they're
they're,
not
they're,
not
having
to
amend
the
general
plan
because
they
do
fit
within
the
density
arrangement,
with
a
lot
line
adjustment
that
they're
proposing,
but
what
they
are
doing,
is
proposing
to
amend
the
plan
development
zoning
district
there
to
allow
to
development
options.
B
The
first
development
option
is
the
510
unit
building
that
was
already
approved
and
the
second
development
option,
and
the
one
that
they're
particularly
focused
on
right
now
is
the
renovation
project
to
simply
renovate
the
three
hundred
and
eight
units
that
exist
there.
Right
now,
+
add
d,
500
square
foot,
leasing
building.
B
So
what
this
requires
is
a
amendment
to
the
zoning
district
they're,
also
requesting
an
amendment
to
their
previously
approved
plan
development
permit
for
the
510
units
and
why
they're
doing
that
is
the
510
units
permit
was
set
to
expire
this
month,
so
the
requesting
an
amendment
to
extend
that
one
year
and
why
they're
doing
that,
although
they
do
not
have
financing
in
place
for
this
development
and
they're,
probably
not
going
to
go
that
route,
they
do
want
to
keep
all
their
options
open.
Just
in
case
the
market
changes
or
in
case
the
lending
environment
changes.
B
The
entitlement
that
they
are
focused
on
is
the
second
plan
development
permit
the
requesting
a
new
one
now
and
that's
to
renovate
the
308
units
that
are
on
site.
So
that
is
what
they
are
requesting
now
and
just
to
go
over
some
details
that
the
architect
and
the
developer
could
go
more
into
the
architectural
details
and
I
could
respond
to
any
questions
that
you
have.
B
But
I'll
go
over
a
few
aspects
of
the
project,
the
buildings
they
will
be
upgraded,
I
think
the
most
important
thing
is
the
type
of
materials
that
they
will
be
using
is
more
suitable
for
them,
the
in
but
the
environment.
As
you
know,
part
of
the
problem
was
that
they
used
a
wood
based
sighting
on
the
existing
buildings
and
that
didn't
last
well
in
the
fog
that
they
have
up
in
this
area
of
San
Bruno.
B
So
what
they
are
proposing
now
and
was
that
particular
interest
of
the
Planning
Commission
is
they're,
proposing
a
hardiplank
siding,
which
is
a
cement
based
siding
that
will
do
better
in
that
environment.
Regarding
the
layout,
the
layout
is
pretty
much
the
same.
They
are
proposing,
as
I
mentioned,
on
the
corner
of
sharp
park
and
skyline
they're,
proposing
a
6500
leasing.
Building
about
a
4,800
square
foot
footprint
it'll
also
have
a
recreation
type
center
upstairs
for
the
resonance.
B
The
existing
leasing
center
will
be
turned
into
a
gym
for
their
residents
regarding
parking
there
they're
proposing
to
maintain
the
existing
parking
level.
That
is
there,
which
is
about
1.68
parking
spaces
per
unit,
which
you
know
is
below
the
current
requirement.
However,
there
isn't
room
too
span
they're,
not
expanding
the
number
of
units
and
there
wouldn't
be
physically
room
to
expand
the
number
of
parking
spaces
on
site.
B
B
Although
the
public
has
gone
over
them
in
the
last
20
years,
they
actually
are
part
and
within
the
public
boundaries.
The
applicant
can
also
go
more
into
landscaping,
but
they
have
upgraded.
The
landscape
did
landscaping,
took
the
staff,
guidance
of
and
city
council
policy
direction
of
using
landscaping,
that
is
native
or
drought,
tolerant.
That
will
really
reduce
the
total
amount
of
water
on
site
that
has
to
be
used
for
landscaping.
A
related
aspect,
there's
a
there's,
a
the
Planning
Commission
was
really
they
wanted
to
see
this.
They
wanted
to
see
the
attachment.
B
You
could
see
all
the
green
building
techniques
that
they
are
building
into
this
project,
its
own.
It
is
at
the
level
in
which
they
could
receive
LEED
certification,
although
it's
a
pretty
costly
and
timely
effort
to
actually
receive
LEED
certification,
so
they're
not
going
to
go
for
the
LEED
certification,
but
they
will
be
lead
equivalent
for
the
project,
a
particular
interest
of
the
police
department.
They
will
have
an
on-site
security
guard
there
for
nighttime
hours.
They
also
have
four
to
five
staff
members
on
site
during
daytime
hours.
B
B
So
a
number
of
letters
that
relate
to
this,
as
currently
proposed,
as
originally
proposed
ain't
go
anco,
had
proposed
to
locate
their
trash
and
recycling
within
an
indent
into
the
Evergreen
Ridge
property
that
was
located
only
about
15
feet
away
from
the
Evergreen
Ridge
buildings,
given
the
size
of
the
property,
especially
the
size
of
the
South
property
line,
the
the
joining
property
line
that
ever
been
ridges
treetops
shares.
We
asked
em
co
to
move
that
trash
area
to
a
more
suitable
location.
They
did
move
it
up
the
property
line.
B
So
now
the
trash
compactor
sits
about
40
feet
away,
44
feet
away
from
the
nearest
evergreen
ridge.
Building
before
we
recommended
approval
this
location
we
met
with
Recology.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
a
that
the
noise
is
contained
that
is
minimal
and
feed
that
the
there's
not
a
over,
that
comes
out
of
the
trash
compactor
regarding
noise.
B
This
only
would
be
compacted
once
a
day
to
it
would
also
only
be
accessed
by
because
of
because
they
can't
compact-
and
this
is
a
preferred
method
for
ecology,
because
it
can
compact
they
only
have
to
access
the
site
once
a
week.
Recology
is
also
agreed
to
only
access
the
site
between
hours
and
12pm
to
further
reduce
the
noise
impacts
to
the
adjoining
neighbor
evergreen
Ridge.
Regarding
over
odor,
it's
a
sealed
container.
B
So
status
content
is
my
recommendation
that
they
will
come
in
patent
on
the
adjoining
papers.
It's
also
just
a
point
of
interest,
also
shown
within
your
staff
aboard,
although
when,
in
the
same
size,
trash
compactor
draw
also
evergreen
Ridge
also
has
a
dumpster
located
along
the
same
for
joining
property
line.
The
Planning
Commission
18
coach
investigates
other
areas
away
from
SF
property
line
to
see
if
they
could
be
suitable
and
co
did
explore
by
other
alternatives.
B
The
primary
obstacle
to
locate
many
of
those
I
think
there's
a
pre
primary
obstacles,
number
one
you're
already
below
the
parking
which
day
parking
apartment.
So
we
did
not
my
scene,
elimination
of
your
spaces
within
the
development
and
most
other
spots
where
they
could
locate
it
to
eliminate
spaces.
The
second
is:
there's
a
lot
of
pieces
that
go
along
the
property
is
difficult
to
locate
the
garage,
the
truck
enclosure
area
in
areas
outside
these
name.
B
The
third
thing
is
that
the
IMP
avantco
did
not
want
this
in
the
doorstep
that
there's
a
front
doorstep,
that
of
their
property,
so
they
did
not
want
to
locate
it
right
in
the
front
entrance.
So
with
all
those
three
factors
and
given
the
fact
that
this
is
suitable
and
there
won't
be
noise
or
order
impact
status,
confident
our
recommendation
to
located
in
this
new
spot
one
change
from
the
Planning
Commission
of
Planning
Commission.
They
had
recycling
still
located
in
that
15-foot
in
that
area
and
trash
enclosure,
move
42,
the
or
40
feet
away.
B
We'd
ask
them
with
those
all
together,
so
there
will
be
no
longer
than
15
feet
away
from
everything
which
they
will
actually
be
all
located.
The
same
location,
one
other
to
use.
There
was
a
letter
from
North
Coast
water
about
the
easement
area,
spoke
to
the
general.
How
ago,
they're
no
longer
having
the
request
to
continue
to
have
worked
out
an
agreement
with
income.
They
no
longer
have
an
objection
to
the
project
to
conditions
of
approval
set
that
we
need
to
look
at
the
first.
One
relates
to
the
number
of
street
trees.
B
There's
a
street
tree
requirements
within
the
code.
Is
there
that
put
a
certain
number
of
street
racing
depending
on
the
number
of
street
vendors
that
they
had
in?
That
equates
to
a
little
bit
over
under
trees.
We
would
have
been
an
exact
number
of
how
many
would
count
towards
I
Street
the
requirement
based
on
the
current
landscaping
plan,
but
they
have,
however,
they're
finally
escaping
clients
show
they're,
actually
more
street
trees.
We
would
rather
than
that,
told
about
the
remaining
amount
that
go
towards
a
street
tree
planting
program
in
the
neighborhood
similar
successful
program.
B
Similarly,
what
we
have
a
southern
belle
project,
Arbor
Day
programs
and
plants
creatures
around
the
neighborhood
and
the
second
condition
one
that
we
should
have
been
left
out
relates
to
the
shark
car
and
Susan
drive
intersection.
As
the
council
knows
in
difficult
intersection,
as
you
go
down
that
little
snake
road
up
suits
and
drive
time,
you
have
the
crater
net
back
to
look
and
the
what
we
like
to
have
at
it
is
that
the
applicant
shall
trim
or
remove
education
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
public
service
director,
improve
site
visibility
and
Susan
dry.
B
The
intersection
we'd
also
like
to
make
sure
they
maintain
Ian,
so
the
landscaping
shall
be
maintained
to
ensure
how
to
play
site
visibility
for
the
life
of
the
project.
So
those
those
are
the
basic
overview
project.
As
a
house
of
those,
there
is,
one
remains
an
issue
of
disagreement
between
staff
and
the
applicant.
This
has
to
do
over
roadway
and
utility
ownership
issues,
their
image
of
the
three
primary
roads
that
serve
the
site,
the
pre
cop
circle,
which
Susan
drive
and
there's
high
and
dry.
B
All
three
streets
are
within
the
project
area
and
although
they
were
originally
offered
for
dedication
in
1985,
they'll,
never
officially
accepted
by
the
city
that
it
hadn't
been
maintained.
That
time
as
conditioner
in
resolutions
has
proposed
to
the
Planning
Commission,
these
roadway,
as
well
as
utility
systems,
would
remain
private,
that
we
try
to
limit
and
privately
owned.
Susan
drive
and
hide
the
drive
would
have
a
public
access
to
stand
over
them
so
that
the
public
continues
to
use
the
roadways
that
they
have
over
the
last
25
years.
B
What
a
hoe
is
proposing
is
requesting
City,
dudes
and
sitting
to
actually
accept
the
roadways
and
accept
the
utilities
underneath
these
roadways
and
for
the
life
of
the
project.
This
is
only
in
your
students
and
driving
highland
drive.
We're
actually
in
agreement
for
treetop
circle
trio
info,
has
agree
that
the
treetops
circle
utilities
in
the
treetops
circle
road
way
they
would
maintain
that
they
went
on
to
important
things
from
them.
The
first
is
it's
not
one
of
the
other
the
city
could
accept.
B
The
roadways
could
accept
susan
drive
and
highly
drive,
but
not
accept
the
utilities
underneath
thing
regarding
the
utilities
themselves,
something
that's
important
and
the
reason
the
staff
is
recommending
it.
This
way,
all
the
utilities
that
impose
proposing
for
us
to
take
ownership
of
only
serve
treetops
residents
so
to
put
in
to
make
a
common
analogy
is
like
a
a
giant
lateral
for
the
system.
As
you
know,
in
your
front
yard,
single-family
home,
you
have
your
lateral
that
connects
to
the
main
source
to
the
main
sewer
system
in
this
project.
B
They
have
the
on-site
utilities,
although
some
of
them
progres
that
eventually
connect
to
sue
to
the
sewer
system.
So
staff
does
not
feel
it's
a
good
public
policy
or
food
policy
from
planning
a
public
void
standpoint
to
take
on
these
utilities
that
only
serve
the
treetops
development.
The
roadway
it
has
been
certain
has
been
a
private
use
of
private
roadway,
although
there's
been
public
access
over
the
same
25
years.
Overall,
the
problem
is
for
public
interest
in
the
public
roadway
that
there
is
on
the
private
utilities
that
only
serve
the
progressives.
C
B
C
And
so
the
the
objection,
letters
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
are
objecting
to
that
to
that
option,
and
so
my
question
is
I.
Remember
the
510
unit
project
and
there
was
a
trash
facility.
I,
don't
know
if
the
compact
was
there,
but
it
was
adjacent
to
susan
drive
on
the
south
east
corner,
somewhat
sort
of
like
a
overflow
parking
area.
I
remember:
why
has
there
been
any
option
to
it
being
located
there
or
possibly
where
those
car
ports
are
something?
I
don't
know
what
this
thing
looks
like.
I
don't
know
if
they
don't.
B
Okay,
evergreen
ridge
of
that
during
the
original
one
also
did
not
want
it
in
that
location.
There's
a
view
easement
in
that
area.
There's
also
many
other
events
that
run
along
that
property
line
which
make
it
difficult
Lisa's
getting
a
color
exhibit
there's
black
and
white
copy,
it
exhibits
and
the
staff
report,
but
the
color
exhibit,
will
give
a
better
photo
simulation
of
what
the
trash
enclosure
looks
like.
D
A
C
B
Unfortunately,
based
on
the
side
constraints
step,
this
is
this:
is
the
area
that
we're
that
they
proposed
that
we're
recommending
be
the
final
location
of
it.
We
were
not
recommending
it
when
it
was
actually
in
a
closer
location
at
15
feet,
but
we
feel
this
is
far
away
enough,
taking
in
consideration
other
site
limitations.
B
You
know
plant
what
the
Planning
Commission
did
was.
They
asked
them
to
explore.
They
felt
that
Aimco
had
not
put
enough
time
exploring
other
locations
on
site.
We
actually
started
going
over
like
each
location
at
the
planning
commission
meeting,
which
which
took
a
long
time
and
really
wasn't
that
didn't
lead
to
anything.
So
they
asked
them
to
explore
and
then
present
to
you
the
alternative
locations.
It's
nicer
than.
E
The
same
on
the
same
subject
is
there
anything
quantifiable
that
that
we
could
look
at
to
actually
say
there's
a
certain
number
of
feet
that
so
many
decibels
of
sound
I
mean
it's
I
mean
a
nuisance,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
quantify.
But
if
we
had
some
numbers
and
say
we
could
compare
it
to
I,
don't
know
a
car
starting
up
a
trouble,
something
but.
B
What
we
do
have
and
we'll
would
also
be
required
for
this
is
required
for
any
residential
district.
Is
we
have
noise
limits
and
ambient
noise
levels
for
residential
districts?
So
we
could
add
to
this
condition
that
that
we
could
add
a
condition
to
this
that
be
consistent
with
all
ambient
noise
requirements
for
residential
districts,
and
they
could
have
a
test
or
we
could
do
a
test,
and
if
they
do
not
need
those
ambient
noise
requirements,
then
they
will
have
to
find
a
different
location
on
site.
F
B
I
mean
the
the
best
way
to
be
usually
use
ambient
noise
levels
for
construct
for
construction
related
activity,
and
you
know,
there's
a
65
decibel
level
for
it
for
after
after
10pm
at
areas,
and
that
is
generally
know.
If
you
hear
a
hammer,
that's
usually
about
it
at
65
decibel
level
I,
don't
know
all
the
particular
ones.
F
Going
back
to
the
the
same
item
couple
of
these
letters
and
glancing
at
them,
that's
the
odor
is
a
concern.
I
know,
you
said
it's
enclosed
the
noise,
which
is
someone
addressed
the
visual
which
I
think
it's
concealed.
It's
it's.
What
is
the
common
practice
or
knowledge
as
far
as
the
odor
of
concern
or
as
far
as
its
visual
effect
or
as
far
as
yeah.
B
I
mean,
I
would
say
I
have
staffs
time
out
of
the
top
three
concerns
of
visual
concerns,
noise
concerns
and
odor
concerned.
I.
Think
odor
was
probably
the
one,
because
it's
a
constant
that
we
were
most
concerned
about
after
meeting
with
recology
and
finding
out
that
these
same
type
of
compactors
are
actually
directly
underneath
units
at
the
crossing
and
there
are.
There
are
not
complaints.
We
are
confident
there
will
not
be
those
the
odor
impacts
that
there
are
typically
found
when
you
have
open
dumpster
situations.
A
G
Thank
you,
son
great,
my
name
is
Patti
Schweder
I'm
senior
vice
president
at
apartment,
investment
and
management,
company
or
namco
were
happy
to
see
you
again
and
we're
hopeful
that
the
third
time
is
a
charm
for
this
project.
I
think
Aaron
gave
a
wonderful
history
of
looking
forward
and
looking
back,
and
we
would
like
to
look
forward
tonight
hopefully
and
get
this
project
off
the
ground.
I've
got
a
whole
team
here.
G
I'll
introduce
some
of
them:
Sean
Finegan
who's,
our
regional
development
planner
he's
somewhere
around
here:
Scott
MacArthur,
regional
property
management
manager,
who's
hoping
that
actually,
people
have
a
property
to
manage
as
we
build
and
fill
up,
treetops
or
Pacific
Bay
vistas,
Jim,
Van
Sickle.
Our
VP
of
development
is
here
Cecily,
Barkley
and
George
Khoury,
our
wonderful
attorneys,
and
then
we've
got
others
on
the
development
team.
G
That
Sean
will
introduce
and
again
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
bearing
with
us
and
really
working
hard
over
these
last
few
years
to
find
a
project
that
can
be
built,
constructed
and
financed
in
this
turbulent
market
and
also
thank
the
council
for
their
patients
as
well.
The
first
slide
Jim.
Oh
there,
you
are,
our
goals
are
virtually
the
same
as
they
have
been,
and
that
is
to
provide
a
major
gateway
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
our
property
sits
in
a
wonderful
gateway
and
we
want
to
make
use
of
it.
G
As
Erin
said,
we
want
to
add
an
alternative
development
plan.
That's
consistent
with
the
previous
zoning
approvals.
We
want
to
create
a
well-designed
residential
neighborhood
and
we've
been
back
with
a
couple
of
plans,
but
we
believe
that
this
is
contextual
with
the
neighborhood
and
will
be
high
quality
architecture,
architectural
features
and
excellent
lands
take
advantage
of
the
location
and
views
it's
beautiful
up
there,
even
in
the
clouds.
It's
it's
a
wonderful
location
and
revitalize
the
neighborhood.
G
We
feel,
as
you
do,
it's
been
empty
far
too
long
and
the
best
thing
that
could
happen
is
we
build
the
project,
fill
it
up
and
revitalize
the
neighborhood
and
this
portion
of
the
city
I
want
to
stress
that
we
do
want
to
continue
our
partnership
with
the
city.
All
of
you,
the
staff
have
just
been
terrific.
G
We're
doing
two
projects
this
year
last
year
we
did
zero
you're
one
of
the
two
projects
and
so
we're
very
eager
to
get
this
off
the
ground
and
bring
it
to
reality.
Project
highlights
Aaron
mentioned.
Most
of
this
I
just
want
to
highlight
a
couple
of
things:
major
renovation
of
all
308
apartments,
complete
interior.
Next
two-year
renovation
of
all
the
14
buildings
associated
site,
work,
common
area
improvements,
buildings
will
be
down
to
the
studs.
They
will
not
be
recognizable
when
you
see
them.
The
floor
plans
will
be
significantly
upgraded.
G
There
will
be
a
new
clubhouse
with
the
leasing
center
to
be
built
on
the
vacant
parcel
on
the
corner
of
sharp
park
and
skyline
Boulevard
Susan
drive.
This
was
a
question
in
the
last
couple.
Approvals
will
remain
open
as
a
public
roadway.
Hopefully
the
city
will
accept
ownership
and
maintenance
of
that
road.
The
hillside,
our
neighbors
to
the
hillside,
have
commented
on
the
lane.
G
Gaping
our
landscape
architect,
we'll
talk
a
little
in
more
detail,
but
I
want
to
say
our
plan
is
to
have
it
sustainable
with
drought,
tolerant
plants
and
make
it
really
a
credit
to
the
property
and
to
the
city
green
project,
with
energy-efficient
units
and
energy-efficient
appliances.
This
project
will
be
500
times
more
energy
efficient
than
the
previous
one.
That's
a
huge
bang
for
the
buck,
we're
looking
at
energy,
star
appliances
and
lighting,
low-flow,
toilets
showers,
irrigation
controllers,
everything
that
we
can
put
in
that
will
make
this
a
much
more
energy-efficient
project
and
I
know.
G
Councilwoman
O'connell
has
worked
with
us
over
the
years
on
the
recycling
trash
compaction
program.
As
Erin
said,
we
did
go
around
the
site,
almost
that
the
entire
site
at
the
Planning
Commission
looking
for
spots
and
I,
believe
we've
got
it
appropriately,
designed
and
located
now
with
advanced
technology
that
will
not
be
loud,
be
very
efficient
and
really
minimize
the
need
for
trucks
on
site.
So
I
will
now
turn
it
over
to
Shawn
to
introduce
the
architectural
team,
and
then
hopefully
we
can
get
back
to
some
of
those
issues
and
questions
that
you
have.
H
We
think
this
is
a
great
milestone
for
us
and
the
city
and
we're
really
excited
about
moving
forward
and
we're
hoping
that
we
gain
your
approval
tonight
to
get
this
thing
off,
often
running
with
that
I'd
like
to
introduce
our
architect
to
go
into
just
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
what
we're
planning
on
doing
with
the
building's
architectural
II
and
also
our
landscape
architect.
So
first
be
John
garrison
with
Newman
garrison
partners
and
then
followed
by
Paul
Reed
with
Reed
&
Associates.
E
Thank
You,
Sean
and
council
members.
This
view
that
you
see
here
is
the
new
building,
where
Colin
the
leasing
center
at
the
corner
of
sharp
park
and
tree
and
skyline,
and
that's
an
all
new
building
on.
What's
currently
vacant
Parker,
it's
a
two-story
building
and
will
be
built
to
all
the
new
standards
that
are
in
current
code.
E
Let's
move
forward
to
more
to
the
elevations,
the
color
elevations
Aaron
did
an
excellent
job
of
describing
the
project
and
all
the
things
that
we
are
doing.
I
want
to
add
also
that
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
during
planning
commission
was
a
concern
for
better
materials,
and
that
also
was
brought
up
in
errands
review
of
where
the
project
has
been
over
the
last
20
years.
We
will
not
be
using
many
wood
products
on
this.
E
The
exterior
they
will
be
would
like
an
appearance
you
can
see
from
this
this
view
and
another
here's,
the
new
recreation
building.
This
is
current.
This
is
the
current
leasing
center,
which
has
a
completely
different
route,
we're
actually
after
building
a
whole
new
structure.
Here
as
well,
it
will
have
a
beach
like
or
ocean
appearance
to
it.
East
close
the
parents
and
though
the
sidings
and
such
are
would
like
materials.
They
are
actually
very
mold
resistant
and
fire
resistant
materials.
E
The
structure
actually
is
very
good
out
there
we're
going
to
reskin
it
with
very
varied
materials
here,
they're
all
citing,
but
there's
different
types
of
citing
there's
some
new
railings
we're
going
to
be
adding
some
brick
veneer
will
also
have
the
Linux
lunge
in
two
different
color
schemes
on
site,
so
that
they're
not
all
the
same
color,
not
all
the
same
look
all
the
roofing
will
be
replaced
all
deciding
all
the
windows.
Everything
on
the
outside
will
be
all
new.
E
I
just
want
to
talk
about
some
of
the
unit
plans
for
the
unit
plans.
The
last
thing
I
would
want
to
just
bring
up
is
that,
even
though
the
current
project
has
no
accessible
units,
those
for
handicapped
needs,
we
are
making
some
accommodation
where
we
can
wear.
The
grading
is
level
enough.
This
is
a
hillside
location
to
allow
us
to
do
to
make
some
units
that
will
be
accessible
so
that
people
with
special
needs
will
be
able
to
come
in
and
use
these
apartments
just
like
any
other
current
apartment.
E
In
that
regard,
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
the
current
California
Code,
which
the
city
building
official
knows
about,
but
it's
an
attempt
to
gain
some.
It
actually
and
everything
that
we're
doing
to
make
the
project
better
than
it
ever
was
better
materials,
better
plans
and
a
more
interesting
color
color.
H
Good
evening
glad
to
be
here
this
evening,
my
name
is
Paul
Reed,
on
with
Reed
associates
on
the
landscaping,
we're
basically
redoing
all
the
landscaping
on
the
project.
The
hillside
right
now
is
has
quite
a
few
quite
a
quantity
of
pampas
grass
that
will
be
removed
and
basically,
the
the
whole
courtyard
is
going
to
be
redone
walkways
widened
all-new
walkways
sitting
areas
covered
barbecue
areas,
we're
really
trying
to
create
an
experience
where
people
can
use
the
outside
as
much
as
possible,
and
also
we'll
be
doing
this
with
using
native
and
non-native
drought,
tolerant,
plant
material.
H
All
the
irrigation
will
be
completely
redone,
with
drip
systems
and
narrow
areas
and
efficient
spray
systems
and
in
larger
areas,
and
we're
adding
over
200
trees
to
the
project.
Some
of
the
trees
right
now
that
are
existing
on
the
side
that
are
not
healthy,
will
be
replaced
and
the
trees
are
going
to
be
replaced
at
a
level
of
about
three
to
one
new
trees.
For
every
tree
we
moved.
Thank
you.
C
Can
I
ask
a
question
at
this
point
sure
go
ahead
regarding
regarding
the
architect,
I
believe
patty
mentioned
that
the
buildings
will
be
stripped
to
the
studs
I
mean
is
that
is
that
the
plan
as
every
building
been
inspected,
and
so
they
will
be
thoroughly
stripped.
E
Yes,
they
will
all
be
thoroughly
stripped,
they
have
not
all
been
pre-inspected.
We
have
gone
through
an
inspection
of
some
of
the
buildings
or
we
expected
all
the
buildings,
but
we
can't
know
all
the
damage.
That's
there
until
you
really
go
in
and
there's
a
lot
of
trash,
there's
overgrown
plants
once
we
pull
up
all
the
siding
and
all
the
interiors,
and
we
can
see
where
it
any
damage
may
have
been
done
to
any
of
the
studs,
and
actually
we
found
that
the
structure
is
quite
good.
E
A
lot
of
the
framing
looks
you
know
brand
new,
just
like
it's
been,
never
never
touched
a
lot
of
the
the
bad
looking
conditions
you
see
out.
There
are
there's
mildew
and
there's
some
mold
on
the
exterior
materials.
There
is
some
obvious
rot.
All
those
things
will
be
replaced.
I
didn't
mention
that
the
building
official
also
asked
our
structural
engineer
to
improve
the
structure
of
the
buildings
from
where
they
were
originally
done.
They
can't
be
made
to
meet
current
code
because
we
really
can't
change
the
foundations
that
they
sit
on.
E
E
No,
actually,
our
intention
is
to
remove
all
the
drywall,
but
no
matter
what
shape
is
in
all
the
roofing,
all
the
windows
doors
everything
down
to
the
studs.
The
only
thing
that
will
remain
are
the
structural
items.
Any
exterior
plywood,
that
is
a
part
of
the
frame,
will
remain,
but
even
those
are
going
to
be
inspected
reviewed
for
nailing.
If
things
are
rusted
connections,
aren't
good
they'll
be
replaced
in
and
made
better
than
you.
Thank
you.
H
I
I
It
is
very
much
imposed
desire
and
I
believe
everybody.
That's
worked
on
this
project
desire
to
have
the
third
time
be
a
charm,
and
so
the
first
and
most
important
issue
is
the
ownership
of
the
roads
and
the
utilities
and
I
would
like
to
take
a
few
moments
to
talk
about
the
roads
in
particular,
and
that
is
I've
laid
out
in
this
letter.
I
That
I
wrote
the
history
which
everybody
acknowledges
they
were
offered
for
dedication,
and
at
that
time
there
was
a
public
access
easement
put
on
these
roads,
so
the
public
has
been
using
them
for
20
years
and
there's
no
way
to
stop
the
public
from
using
them.
We
cannot
take
them
back
and
own
them
privately.
As
a
result,
when
we
went
out
to
get
financing
the
only
lender
that
we
have,
who
can
obtain
the
kind
of
guarantee
that
we
need
from
HUD
has
told
us
that
HUD
will
not.
I
Their
staff
has
told
them
here
in
the
San
Francisco
office.
They
will
not
guarantee
a
loan,
that's
secured
by
collateral
with
a
public
road
down
the
middle
of
it.
You
know,
after
20
years
of
apparently
no
maintenance,
we're
spending
100
and
we're
willing
to
spend
a
hundred
fifty-eight
thousand
dollars
of
maintenance,
as
part
of
this
edition
of
approval
will
do
that
if
all
we
had
to
do
was
spend
another
150,000
in
20
years.
We
wouldn't
be
asking
you
to
please
accept
dedication
on
these
roads.
I
It's
not
about
the
cost
of
maintaining
them
will
bring
them
up
to
speed,
and
we
think
that
the
maintenance
costs
are
not
that
significant.
What's
significant
is
that
it
might
interfere
with
our
ability
to
get
a
loan
and
Rick
Andrews,
whose
letter
I
gave
you
explained
to
me
that
HUD
has
gone
from
guaranteeing
ten
percent
of
the
multifamily
products
that
are
being
built
in
finance
today
to
over
fifty
percent
and
that
the
demands
on
HUD
are
enormous
and
there
are
dozens
of
loans
in
the
pipeline.
I
This
is
a
very
significant
loan
for
them
and
if
we
make
it
complicated
and
we
become
a
roadblock
instead
of
something
that's
easy
for
had
to
do,
they
could
turn
their
attention
to
a
simpler
loan,
a
loan
that
actually
is
geared
towards
restricted,
affordable
housing.
This
is
a
market-rate
project.
It
does
provide
a
lot
of
work
force,
housing
because
the
nature
of
it,
but
there
aren't
any
restrictions
on
it.
I
I
I
It's
an
extensive
amount
of
maintenance,
in
fact,
again
over
20
years,
we're
only
going
to
have
to
do
about
forty
thousand
dollars
worth
of
work,
so
we
wouldn't
necessarily
mind
keeping
these
sewers
and
maintaining
them,
but
we
have
to
go
back
and
make
sure
it's
not
going
to
mess
our
loan
up.
I
just
telling
you.
That
is
what
this
issue
is
all
about,
and
so
we
could
do
that
if
we
get
direction
from
the
council
to
to
try
to
work
this
out
and
be
able
to
keep
the
sewers,
we
could
do
that
I.
I
Think
and
if
you'd
like,
we
could
have
Shawn
and
Finnegan
and
Aaron
Aiken
or
whomever
speak
to
this
I
think
the
storm
drains
actually
do
serve
evergreen
and
they
come
off
of
evergreen
and
they
run
through
the
public
road
and
so
I
think
it
may
actually
make
sense
for
the
city
to
keep
the
stronger
rains.
It's
not
an
expensive
item,
but
I
think
that
should
be
talked
about
as
well
as
the
water,
but
it's
not
a
big
deal.
These
are
things
that
we
think
we
can
work
out.
I
The
key
is
that
if
we
keep
ownership
of
any
of
these
issue
items
and
maintenance
obligation,
would
it
not
do
anything
to
complicate
our
financing,
and
that
is
our
most
serious
concern
on
that
topic
in
terms
of
the
other
items.
I
know
that
there
was
a
discussion
by
Aaron
of
two
issues,
the
first
being
the
roads
and
utilities
and
the
second
being
the.
B
I
There
were
a
number
of
other
issues
that
I
do
want
to
bring
to
the
council's
attention
in
our
letter,
and
the
first
is
that
emco
is
willing
to
spend
at
least
two
hundred
twenty
thousand
and
maybe
more
on
improving
the
sewers
on
the
private
property
and
under
the
roads,
we're
willing
to
do
the
road
maintenance
and
all
of
the
other
financial
conditions.
But
they
do
disagree
with
staffs
recommendation
that,
as
part
of
this
rehabilitation
project
that
they
also
reimburse
the
city
for
179
thousand
dollars
that
was
spent
to
repair
an
existing
off-site
sewer
line.
I
We
think
that
should
be
paid
for
out
of
all
of
the
various
sewer
fees
that
are
collected
throughout
the
city,
not
hook
up
fees
but
ongoing
sewer
costs
that
are
funded
as
well
as
property
taxes,
we're
just
another
property
owner,
like
everybody
else,
trying
to
keep
our
308
unipart
ments
going,
and
we
don't
think
we
should
have
to
reimburse
the
city
for
an
offsite
improvement
that
wasn't
put
in
place
to
serve
this
308
unit
project.
And
so,
as
a
result.
We
don't
feel
that
it's
fair
that
that
now
be
imposed
on
our
project.
I
The
other
issues
come
back
to
that
one.
If
you'd
like
we
just
I'll,
go
ahead
and
address
the
others.
The
next
issue
on
the
which
is
on
page
five
of
our
letter
is
just
we
want
to
make
clear
that
will
repair
all
the
sewers
by
the
certificate
of
occupancy.
We've
also
wanted
to
make
clear
in
the
conditions
that
the
that
they're
not
being
an
additional
capacity
or
sewer
and
water
hookup
fees
that
were
in
the
conditions,
because
we
already
have
a
project,
but
any
new
items
like
the
clubhouse.
I
Of
course,
we
would
pay
for
those
connection
fees,
we're
also
prepared
to
replace
the
water
meters
that
are
appropriately
sized
for
the
project.
The
world
water
meters
on
they've
been
taken
off.
There
are
going
to
get
charged
for
new
water
meters.
We've
proposed
some
language
and
were
prepared
to
do
that.
We've
also
submitted
a
maintenance
plan
to
the
city
that
we
think
reflects
the
conditions
of
approval
and
the
discussions
that
we've
been
having,
but
we
did
offer
based
on
some
conversations
that
we
have
with
staff
over
the
last
month
or
two.
I
So
we're
proposing
that
if
we
start
the
demolition
process
by
November
first,
that
certain
of
the
painting
and
power
washing
and
glass
removal
would
not
need
to
occur
between
now.
November
first,
but
all
the
other
items
of
the
maintenance
plan
would
and
that
would
include
weekly
inspections
and
pool
maintenance
and
insurance
and
those
types
of
things,
and
that's
detailed
in
the
letter
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
anybody
has,
we
also
thought
important
to
add
a
condition
making
it
clear
that
we
need
to
get
a
lot
line.
I
There
was
also
a
condition
about
making
sure
that
garages
are
used
primarily
for
parking
vehicles
and
wouldn't
impede
any.
You
know,
family,
any
storage
that
a
family
might
use
in
their
garage
wouldn't
impede
their
ability
to
park
their
cars
there
and
that
any
new
structures
wouldn't
be
imposed
over
built
over
PU
ease.
There
was
a
requirement
that
there
be
no
structures
over
public
utility
easements.
At
the
moment.
I
There
are
some
structures
over
some
existing
easements,
so
we
just
made
it
clear
that
the
new
building
wouldn't
be
over
any
existing
pua,
and
that
summarizes
all
the
issues
laid
out
in
the
letter.
I
believe
that,
with
the
exception
of
the
reimbursement
of
179,000
and
the
ownership
of
the
road,
that
the
other
conditions
are
items
that
we
will
be
able
to
work
out
the
language
with
staff,
but
that
we
will
need
some
direction
from
Council
on
the
acceptance
of
the
road
and
possibly
the
utilities.
I
That's
what
we
need
to
look
into.
We
had
not
ever
discussed
with
the
city
the
idea
of
separating
the
two,
because
if
we
didn't
it
wasn't
a
path
that
we
explored
with
the
lender,
but
my
understanding
in
general,
speaking
as
to
how
it's
spoken
with
rick,
is
that
HUD
does
not
want
to
be
lending
against
property
for
which
there
are
off-site
obligations
or
ownership
of
roads
that
are
actually
being
used
by
the
public.
I
I
The
letter
is
very
focused
on
the
ownership
of
the
roads,
and
if
it
is
okay,
then
we
wouldn't
object
to
keeping
ownership
and
maintenance
of
the
utilities,
but
we
really
do
feel
like
we
need
to
go
back
and
explore
that
with
Rick,
because
we
haven't
yet
and
we
just
sort
of
lumped
ownership
of
roads
in
general
in
artist,
so
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
that
a
little
more
closely.
Any.
C
Just
going
to
make
a
comment:
I'm
not
prepared
to
make
any
decision
on
utilities
until
I
know
what
utilities
are
actually
there
I,
don't
know
we
don't
know
what's
running
through
those
roads,
we
don't
know.
All
we
know
is
that
there's
been
a
video
of
the
sewers
and
all
we
know,
there's
been
a
report
submitted
that
you're
going
to
the
condition
is
that
you
rehabilitate
based
on
on
the
report.
C
So
there's
not
a
utility
plan,
we're
talking
about
utilities
taking
utilities
within
a
within
a
road
that
want
to
take
ownership
of,
but
we
don't
know,
what's
there
so
concerned
about
sewer
lines,
I'm
not
really
concerned
about
stormwater
concern
about
sewer
lines
and
water
lines,
that's
where
we've
had
a
history
of
private
property
failures
and
where
the
city
has
had
to
go
in
and
spend
a
lot
of
labor
and
time
in
you
know
in
repairing
and
fixing.
So
it's
a
big
unknown
to
me.
We.
I
Could
have
Shawn
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
what
we
do
know
because
the
video
work
that
has
been
done
and
I
believe
the
condition
you
know-
does
recommend
that
all
the
work
that's
been
done
in
that
report
be
completed
if
there
is
a
need
we're
not
going
to
physically
know
what's
under
the
roads,
unless
somebody
took
them
out.
What
we
know
is:
what's
there
by
the
video
and
that's
my
understanding
and
I,
don't
know
how
much
more
will
be
able
to
learn
about
that
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
It's.
H
Councilman
we
do
have
an
existing
utilities
plan
that
we
provided
to
staff.
We
actually
reviewed
that
existing
utilities
plan
with
Public
Works
today.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
the
existing
utilities
plan
our
engineers
here
as
well-
that's
taken
from
the
improvement
plans
that
were
prepared
back
in
1985
that
were
reviewed
and
approved
by
city
staff.
So
we
have
also
potholed
various
utilities
out
there,
both
in
the
streets
and
in
the
private
property.
H
We
are
pretty
confident
on
where
the
utilities
are
and
what
they
are
in
terms
of
their
sizes
and
where
they
go
so
and
we
have
provided
that
to
staff.
That
was
a
requirement
that
step
asked
for
a
couple
months
ago,
so
we
do
have
a
plan
that
does
show
all
those
and
they're
very
consistent
with
what
was
what
was
reviewed
and
approved
by
staff
back
in
1985
when
they
were
actually
installed.
H
H
The
only
difference
that
I
would
say
is
the
storm
drains
do
service
other.
We
know
for
a
fact
that
they
at
least
service
evergreen
about
sewer
and
water.
As
far
as
sewer,
we
do
concur
with
staff
that
it
serves
only
our
property.
Water
is
part
of
a
loop
system
that
is
were
we
all.
We
do
know
that
there
is
water
pressure
issues
up
on
that
area.
H
We
don't
know
if
our
system
was
taken
off
if
that
would
affect
the
neighboring
systems,
because,
as
you
know,
water
is
all
under
pressure
as
part
of
a
loop
system.
There
are
not
specific
lines
that
just
serve
our
property
because
it's
part
of
a
loop
system,
so
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
differ
from
staff
as
far
as
the
sewer,
yes,
I,
concur
with
that.
A
H
A
Stood
we're
in
kind
of
an
awkward
situation,
or
now
we
have
a
public
hearing.
We
want
to
try
to
introduce
an
ordinance,
but
until
you
have
that
answer,
we
sure
don't
want
to
mess
it
up.
I
mean.
Maybe
we
have
to
be
willing
tonight
to
listen
to
the
public
cuz.
They
came
down
here
and
see
what
other
concerns
they
may
have,
but
we
may
want
to
continue
this
to
the
next
meeting.
Well,.
J
That's
really
that's
really
decision
yeah,
that's
really
decision
for
the
City
Council.
How
you
want
to
approach
this
and
if
you're
not
feeling
comfortable
about
the
project,
then
don't
introduce
the
the
ordinance.
If
there
is
a
certain
comfort
level,
you
know,
then
you,
then
you
could
go
in
that
directions.
You
really
have
the
option.
It
depends
on
how
comfortable
you
are
in
approving
the
project
as
a
whole
night.
A
That
you
know
we
asked
a
number
of
times
and
they
provided
the
information
for
the
roadway
and
the
lending
and
the
and
the
possible
difficulties
and
I
would
hate
for
them
to
have
to
come
back
at
the
next
meeting.
Saying
whoa,
you
know,
capital
red
capital,
red
mortgage
says
we
have
a
real
issue
with
HUD
because
we're
going
to
absorb
the
utilities
and
now
our
loan
is
all
messed
up
and,
in
the
meantime,
we're
in
the
middle
of
an
ordinance.
J
F
I
I
was
going
to
suggest
if
you
wanted
to
take
some
public
testimony.
Maybe
we
could
chat
a
little
bit
amongst
ourselves
while
you're
doing
that,
because
I
think
we
should
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
cost
of
delay
of
two
weeks.
It's
also,
I
mean
it
is
possible
to
introduce
something
we're
all
here.
We
understand.
I
What's
going
on,
that,
might
have
to
get
amend
and
reintroduced
it's
not
ideal,
but
at
least
we
could
take
a
shot
at
trying
to
be
as
close
as
possible
to
where
we
think
we're
going,
and
it
wouldn't
be
the
first
and
last
time
that
second
ordinances
don't
get
read,
but
it's
not
ideal,
but
maybe
we
could
chat
a
little
bit
amongst
ourselves
about
what
the
two
weeks
means
and
I'm.
Assuming
you
meet
again.
The
first
20.
A
A
K
I
mean
in
the
sense
that
there's
not
enough
parking
in
evergreen
Ridge
and
every
night
people
I
see
people
coming
up
parking
there
and
then
walking
up
walking
down
the
road
to
Evergreen
trip
now,
with
three
tops
coming
and
treetops,
not
also
not
having
sufficient
parking.
I
think
life
around
that
area
is
going
to
be
seriously
impacted
by
a
parking
problem.
K
Impa
might
come
back
and
say
that
this
is
the
situation
that
existed
before
and
so
but
I
don't
see
any
reason.
Why
is
why
we
cannot
rectify
the
situation?
I
mean
just
because
we
suffered
in
the
past
doesn't
mean
we
have
to
suffer
in
the
future.
Also
and
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
rectify
the
situation
and
I.
K
Don't
think
if
the
city
has
done
any
study
as
to
what
is
the
going
to
be
the
parking
impact
if
treetop
is
allowed
to
go
forward
with
this
renovation
project,
and
my
take
is
that
any
land
that
is
at
this
point
available
should
first
be
dedicated
to
bringing
the
parking
level
of
treetop
up
to
code,
and
then
any
new
construction
be
allowed.
All.
L
L
They
need
them,
but
I
do
want
to
remind
you
that
the
residence
in
Pacific
Heights
have
to
live
with
this
project
long
after
everybody's
gone,
so
I
do
have
I'm
very
disappointed
about
one
thing:
I
had
hoped
that
egress
road
would
be
corrected
and
I
thought
maybe
that'd
be
our
reward
for
putting
up
with
the
problems
we
put
up
with
the
last
few
years.
Unfortunately,
I'm
not
seeing
any
hint
that
that's
going
to
go
for
so
I
would
certainly
hope
it
was
mentioned,
and
I
have
requested
that
that
area
along
there
be
cleaned
out.
L
L
You
know
you
have
a
lot
of
older
people
living
in
that
community
to
I'm,
probably
one
of
them,
it's
hard
to
turn
your
head
around
to
see
back
there.
Sometimes
sometimes
the
Nick
doesn't
want
to
go
the
same
way
you
want
to
go
so
I
would
like
to
see
something
done
about
making
sure
that
they
maintain
on
a
regular
basis
and
that
they
clean
up
that
whole
area
long
sharp
park,
road
I,
understand
they
own
it.
So
I,
don't
think
we're
out
of
line
to
ask
for
that.
L
Also
I'd
like
to
be
assured
that
they're
not
parking
more
along
susan
drive
with
more
cars
and
I'm,
not
saying
they'd,
be
the
only
ones.
Of
course
truth.
Evergreen
is
loaded
with
cars
along
there.
There
is
never
maintenance
up
there
unless
I
really
gripe
about
it.
It's
constant
litter
all
along
susan
drive
there,
because
the
cars
don't
move,
and
you
know
they
can't
get
in
there
clean
it
up.
So
that's
another
area
that
needs
to
be
cleaned
and
it
needs
to
be
maintained
both
by
evergreen
and
treetops
and
by
the
city
of
San.
L
Bruno
I'm
also
want
to
ask
a
question:
assuming
that
surrounding
residents
cannot
use
the
clubhouse
facilities
that
we're
not
invited
in
any
way.
They're
also
I'd
like
to
ask
there's
going
to
be
a
homeowner's
association
and
I.
Ask
that
because
I've
had
to
live
and
my
neighbors
on
Cheryl
drive
with
the
summerhill
project
and
while
is
a
nice
project
and
they've
been
fairly
cooperative,
we've
run
into
problems
back
there
with
the
drainage,
ditch
also
with
people
not
maintaining
their
backyards
and
thank
God.
L
They
had
a
homeowner's
because,
when
I
got
hold
of
some,
where
they
put
be
in
touch
wood
so
on
and
we
met
my
neighbors
and
I
met
with
them
and
told
me,
I,
don't
get
the
show
on
the
road
to
clean
it
up
back
there
or
we'd
have
water
in
our
backyards.
So
it's
very
important
that
there
be
somebody
up
there
that
well
it's
a
homeowner
association
of
what
that
we're
guaranteed
that
they're
going
to
maintain
the
property
was
not
maintained
in
past
years.
L
J
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
taking
my
comments.
I'm
I'm,
a
longtime
resident
at
Evergreen
ridge,
apartments,
I,
remember
tree
tops
when
it
was
alive
and
thriving,
and
we
look
forward
to
having
new
neighbors
once
again
I'm,
just
simply
here
to
speak
about
a
dissatisfaction
with
where
the
trash
compactors
going
to
be
placed.
This
is
a
huge
property.
My
property
is
probably
just
a
fraction
of.
J
What's
here
and
I,
understand
that
the
builders
here
will
want
to
have
very
you
know
we
would
want
to
help
premium
pricing
for
these
wonderful
new
partners,
but
I
just
don't
feel
that
it's
fair
that
we
should
have
to
you
know
pay
the
price
for
that
too.
So,
just
just
some
strong
considerations,
if
you
would
regarding
the
pavement
of
this
contractor.
Thank
you
thank.
A
M
We
have
owned
our
property
since
1986,
so
it's
almost
25
years,
we've
owned
the
building,
we
don't
sell
a
property
and
we
expect
own
it
for
another
25
years.
God
willing.
Our
objection
is
a
you've
commented
already
should
receive
several
letters,
I
believe
from
residents
of
our
property
as
well
as
ourselves
is
the
again
the
trash
compactor.
The
trash
compactor,
just
make
sure
we're
clear
here.
This
is
a
change
from
the
original
development.
The
original
development
had
your
typical
dumpsters,
the
as
you
can
see
by
the
site.
M
Just
to
give
you
some
perspective
here,
we
are
the
only
improved
property
on
any
of
the
four
property
lines
of
the
property,
and
yet
treetops
is
continuing
to
insist
that
this
dumpster
be
located
on
our
property
line.
The
treetops
property
is
approximately
13
acres.
Just
find
it
very
difficult
to
believe
that
creative
minds
cannot
figure
out
a
way
to
locate
this
trash
compactor
somewhere
else
on
their
site
away
from
our
residents.
M
It
just
doesn't
make
any
sense
to
me.
Additionally,
the
trash
compactor
is
actually
located
closer
to
our
residents.
Is
it
not
our
trash
compactor?
It's
tree
tops
but
benefited
their
residents.
It's
located
closer
to
our
residents
than
their
own.
It's
at
least
double
the
distance,
if
not
triple
the
distance
to
the
nearest
unit
as
compared
to
our
our
particular
property.
I
also
want
to
address
the
staff
report,
and
some
of
the
comments
have
talked
about
the
fact
that
this
trash
compactor
will
only
be
picked
up
by
the
the
garbage
company
once
per
week.
M
They're,
not
emphasizing
the
fact
that
this
trash
compactor
is
going
to
be
used
daily
daily.
This
property
will
probably
have
upwards
of
a
thousand
families
in
300
units.
They've
got
one
in
two
bedroom
apartments
so
every
day
for
a
three-hour
period,
they're
going
to
have
the
staff
of
this
property
dragged
to
year
and
two
yard
containers
across
their
property,
causing
noise
on
the
other
side
of
our
property
to
dump
the
garbage
in
every
single
day.
They
propose
to
do
this
nine
to
twelve.
M
We
certainly
appreciate
the
consideration,
but
it's
not
taking
into
consideration
that
you
know
many
people
in
our
building
look
swing
shift
over
night,
and
so
they
need
to
sleep
during
the
day.
So
we
need
to
take
that
into
consideration.
We
spoke
with
the
the
garbage
company
as
far
as
location.
The
garbage
company
has
said
that
they
can
pick
up
the
the
the
trash
from
the
trash
compactor
at
any
accessible
point
on
tree
tops
property
I
believe
this
trash
compactor
is
probably
on
wheels,
so
it
can
be
pushed
out.
M
So
again,
we
simply
don't
understand
why
the
insistence,
especially
after
by
the
way
justice
background
we
have
at
meetings
with
am
code
to
express
our
objections.
We've
met
on
site
with
em
co.
This
was
a
big
deal,
the
Planning
Commission.
There
were
strong
objections
from
the
planning
commissioners
about
locating
the
trash
compactor
along
our
property
line,
feel
this
is
kind
of
being
lost
over.
M
You
know
the
Planning
Commission
was
talking
about,
find
a
different
location,
and
yet
here
we
are
back
with
the
trash
compactor
at
the
same
southern
leyte
location
there's
also
been
talked
about,
I
mean
trash
compactors.
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
garbage.
There's
a
lot
of
noise,
there's
a
lot
of
odor.
That's
why
there's
big
concern
here?
There's
been
an
effort
to
sort
of
downplay
that,
like
it's?
Okay,
it's
alright,
just
it's!
Okay,
just
leave
it
alone.
So
if
that's
the
case,
then
simply
aim.
M
M
M
M
The
note
to
answer
your
question,
the
other
issue
to
us
is,
is
the
the
amount
of
it.
The
amount
that's
depth
and
dumped
on
a
daily
basis,
and
the
noise
of
a
noise
of
a
compactor
is
different
than
a
you
know.
Every
two
or
three
days
pick
up
through,
which
is
only
you
know,
put
10
seconds
or
a
minute
or
two
minutes
or
three
minutes
as
opposed
to
a
three
hour
operation.
Taking
all
the
garbage
from
you
know,
he's
roughly
300
units
or
a
thousand
families
and
dumping
them
in
a
particular
location
and.
A
C
D
D
Think
because
I
don't
write
good
night's
worth
a
thousand
families
in
there.
Okay
and
then
I
understand
your
concerns
about
the
noise
and
all
those
other
things.
The
reports
we
have,
though,
the
other
sites
that
were
looked
at
according
to
the
reports
we
have
every
site,
has
an
objection
to
it.
As
far
as
either
it's
going
to
take
parking
away,
which
we've
already
heard
from
somebody
that
they
don't
they
want
more
parking
not
last
and
that
either
the
other
two
places
that
I
understand
from
this
report
that
would
be
okay
would
not
take
parking.
D
However,
it
would
require
people
to
go
in
a
public
right
away
and
they
would
have
safety
issues
with
it.
So
I
understand
your
concerns
and
I'm,
sir
we're
going
to
discuss
it,
but
with
everything
that
we
look
at
here
up
in
the
City
Council,
there's
a
plus
and
a
minus
somebody
has
to
give
something
or
somebody
else
has
to
give
something.
So
just
so,
it's
clear
to
everybody.
There's
issues
on
both
sides,
I.
M
As
far
as
the
trash
compactor
goes,
and
so
and
as
far
as
the
the
report
goes,
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up.
The
apparently
Aimco
after
the
Planning
Commission
commissioned
a
report
and
their
own
report.
You
know
talks
about
major
impacts
to
residents
who
live
near
the
trash
compactor,
so
their
own
report
talks
about
that
and
again
you
know
they
picked
out
five
locations.
You
know,
none
of
us
in
this
room,
I
would
imagine
other
than
n
co,
or
maybe
staff
knows
whether
they
looked
at
every
single
issue.
M
Did
they
really
look
to
avoid
the
easement
areas
or
whatnot?
So
yeah
I
just
said
you
know
with
13
acres.
You
know
that
there
should
be
an
other
than
the
acre,
so
that
runs
along
our
property
line.
There
should
be
a
location
that
they
could
find
that
we're
just
take
it.
You
know,
take
us
out
of
consideration.
This
is
our
only
objection.
Otherwise,
we
well
support
the
project
through.
F
The
chair,
just
why
you're
there
sure
I
want
to
tell
you
that
I've
read
the
reports
in
and
I
was
concerned.
I
went
up
to
evergreen
last
night
drove
around
walked
around.
Hopefully
no
one
thought
I
was
trying
to
take
anything
but
to
try
to
understand
and
have
an
appreciation
for
what
the
concerns
are.
Then
I
over
went
dependence.
The
place
over
here
dad
try
to
have
some
kind
of
a
comparison.
I
know.
What's
there,
two
different
facilities,
but
I
was
trying
to
understand
where
the
receptacles
are
located.
F
F
With
that
proposed
property,
but
I
think
that
they
have
tried
to
take
some
steps
and
look
to
some
options
and
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
a
specific
option
of
where,
within
the
13
acres,
your
reference
that
would
mitigate
and
not
have
a
problem
with
the
parking,
because
I
think
parking
is
always
an
issue
and
whatever
we
do
up
here
that
takes
away
parking,
affects
people
to
math
drastically
for
many
years
to
come.
So
I
think
that
is
something
that
I
need.
F
M
From
art,
from
our
standpoint,
we've
only
objected
to
along
the
property
line
and
we
it's
their
project.
You
know,
and
you
know,
with
the
influence
and
approval
the
City
Council.
So
our
feeling
was
that
it
was
a
good.
You
know
good
neighbor,
its
corner
them,
as
that
may
sound,
is
that
they
would
find
an
area
on
their
site.
M
M
You
know
when
I
say
we
know,
Dale
frost
of
our
company
met
with
n
co
and
we're
happy
to
meet
with
them
to
further
figure
out
an
area
that
works
here
that
doesn't
have
easement
issues
or
whatnot,
but
it
does
seem
to
me
that
they
are
looking
to
have
it
closer
to
our
building
than
theirs
and
it
is
their
trash
compactor.
So
anyway,
you
know
they
answer
your
question.
I'm
more
than
happy
to.
M
C
I,
just
before
before
you
sit
down,
sir
I
just
need
to
find
the
logic
in
the
argument.
They're
placing
a
enclosed
confined
trash
compactor.
You
can
argue
whether
how
would
the
noise
level
is,
what
smells
the
frequency
of
their
locating
it
nearly
opposite
on
the
other
side
of
the
fence
of
your
properties,
open
dumpsters.
C
You
say
that
there
are
complaints
or
there's
concerns
from
the
neighbors
in
that
area,
but
they
have
I,
have
a
picture
right
here
of
to
open
dumpsters,
not
even
they
don't
even
have
lids
on
them.
That
is
there
not
even
roofed.
So
how
can
you
say
that
there's
a
concern
about
you
know
garbage
on
the
property
line
when
your
property
has
it
right
on
the
property
line
and
even
closer
to
the
building
and
even
more
exposed
to
your
residence?
C
M
It's
a
countenance,
a
combination
of
all
the
all
the
above,
so
we
have.
We
have
noise
from
a
compactor
and
we've
heard
about
you
know
the
new
compactors
are
quieter,
but
they
do
create
noise.
We're
talking
about.
You
know,
noise
on
a
daily
basis
of
moving
the
you
know,
the
two
yard
dumpsters,
whether
they
do
by
trolley
or
whether
they
pull
them.
M
You
know
there's
going
to
be
noise
on
a
daily
bit
on
a
daily
basis
versus
the
pick
up
of
a
a
dumpster
that
happens
every
second
day
or
what
have
you
and
there's
a
short
amount
of
noise
may
actually
may
be
louder.
I
mean
I
can
say
that,
but
it's
it's
a
much
rarer
occasion
and
I
simply
to
me
at
the
end
of
day
it's
a
matter
of
fairness.
I
mean
you
can
say
we're
wrong.
M
L
Good
evening,
mayor
Ruane
and
other
honourable
members
of
the
City
Council,
my
name
is
William
nak
I'm
here
this
evening.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
Building
and
Construction
Trades
Council
San
Mateo
County.
As
a
result
of
our
discussions
with
the
developer,
we
are
optimistic
that
our
highly
skilled
decently
paid
construction
workers
receiving
quality
health
care
and
pension
benefits
will
be
employed
to
build
the
Pacific
bay
business
project,
formerly
known
as
the
treetops
project,
with
unemployment
in
the
construction
industry
running
at
thirty
percent.
L
A
I
A
I
So
during
the
public
comment
period,
Sean
Finegan
of
em
co
spoke
with
Rick
Andrews
on
the
phone,
and
his
belief
is
that
so
long
as
we
are
able
to
get
recorded
access,
easements
similar
to
the
kind
that
the
city
would
get
to
maintain
and
repair
the
sewer
and
the
water
that
it
would
be.
Okay
for
the
ownership
and
maintenance
obligation
to
be
retained
for
those
utilities
by
the
owner
and
that
the
concern
about
the
public
roads
is
that
you
would
have
all
this
public
activity
here.
I
These
really
do
mostly
serve
the
project
and
they're
underground
and
we
could
control
them.
So
he
doesn't
believe
that
that
will
be
an
off-site
obligation.
That
would
be
a
problem
for
the
lender,
so
that
was
good
news.
We
would
like
to
encourage
the
council,
however,
on
the
storm
drains
which
do
serve
other
projects
and
cover
a
greater
portion,
the
road,
not
that
we
think
they
have
any
problems,
but
that
would
be
more
appropriately
retained
by
the
city.
I
So
if
we
can
get
the
roads
accepted
along
the
way
we've
described
will
do
the
improvements
to
the
roads
will
keep.
The
sewers
will
do
all
that
work
and
believe
we
can
work
out
all
the
other
conditions
with
staff
and
do
hope
that
the
city
understands
that
we
can
come
this
far
but
would
like
to
not
have
the
past
reimbursement.
J
A
B
B
If
there
was
physically
location
to
add
additional
spaces,
you
could
add
additional
spaces
there,
just
really
isn't
room
to
add
additional
spaces,
they
did
add
a
leasing
center
and
with
that
leasing
center
they
provided
the
ample
amount
of
parking
that's
required
for
that
leasing
center,
so
that
is
that
is
out
there
and
that
will
serve
guests
that
are
coming
up
to
do
park
on
the
site.
So
this
is.
This
is
actually
above
the
parking
requirement,
that's
at
shelter
creek.
B
A
I
have
had
and
the
rest
of
the
council
of
had
complaints
up
in
that
area
about,
and
you
know,
parking
some
primarily
speeding
too,
though,
and
I
I
just
want
the
public
to
know
that
we're
trying
to
address
that
with
the
traffic
safety
and
parking
committee,
this
who
might
be
able
to
do
to
slow
people
down,
because
that's
a
real
issue
so-
and
you
know
the
other
issue
too-
is
instead
of
having
one
car
with
one
home.
Now
you
have
three
four,
sometimes
so
it's
it's
a
difficult
situation
in.
B
One
condition
we
did
have
is
that
the
garage
cannot
be
used
as
storage.
So
that's
something
that's
worked
successfully
on
other
projects.
You
know
previously,
we
didn't
have
have
that
condition,
so
that
will
keep
the
parking
open
for
par
and
regarding
a
speeding.
Usually
when
you
have
a
vacant
apartment
complex
and
no
one
in
there,
you
know
leads
people
to
zip
through.
So
hopefully
when
we
do
get
those
units
occupied
and
there's
more
activity
out
there,
people
will
slow
down.
Okay.
A
The
other
issue
that
came
up
a
couple
of
times,
of
course,
the
compactor
and
I-
think
we've
kind
of
hash
to
that
pretty
well,
it
sounds
like
there's
been
an
awful
lot
of
work
and
research
and
study
done
on
where
to
put
this
compactor
well
before
it
came
to
the
City
Council,
and
you
have
in
fact
addressed
another
location
that
was
not
addressed
with
the
Planning
Commission.
Is
that
correct,
correct.
B
They
will
the
they
went
over
alternative
locations
in
their
report.
That
was
that
were
not
addressed
with
with
the
Planning
Commission.
The
most.
The
major
change
that's
happened
is
this
proposal
that
they
have
now
is,
and
how
we're
conditioned
is
requiring
that
the
recycling,
as
well
as
the
trash
all
be
in
the
same
location
rather
than
having
the
recycling
only
15
feet
away
from
the
apartment
buildings,
as
it
was
proposed
at
the
Planning
Commission.
Okay,.
E
Back
to
the
mayor,
leading
back
to
the
mayor's
comments
and
your
comments
also
on
the
parking
not
not
being
able
to
use
the
garages
for
storage
and
and
also
with
the
noise
issues
with
the
compactor
I'm
wondering
what
mechanism
we
we
retain
to
enforce
either
a
nuisance,
and
if
we
approve
this
and
we
allow
them
to
go
forward
with
constructing
this,
they
make
an
investment
in
it.
What
I
mean
will
we
still
have
a
recourse
to
go
back
and
say
this
is
not
thin,
acceptable
limits
and
the
same
with
the
parking
you
know.
B
Take
the
parking
one
first,
cuz,
that's
a
little
bit
easier.
You
know
we
basically,
but
with
parking
type
requirements
we
enforce
them
on
a
complaint
basis.
So
if
we
got
a
complaint
from
a
resident
on
Susan,
hey
we've
seen
these
the
garage
is
open
and
the
you
know
that
there's
a
storage
and
their
people
can't
park
there.
You
know
we
would
go
and
have
a
first
call
the
property
manager
and
enforce
the
rules
and
regulations
that
they
didn't.
Then
we,
of
course
we
have
code
enforcement,
follow-up
and
issue
fines
if
necessary.
B
Regarding
the
trash
compactor,
that's
a
that's
a
little
bit,
it's
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
but
if
it
was
exceeding
any
of
our
noise
requirements
within
the
municipal
code
that
everyone
has
to
apply
to,
we
would
have
to
do
something
to
have
them
mitigate
that.
So
you
know
you
could
do
things
like.
Let's
say
it's
actually
the
compaction,
the
daily
compaction
that
it's
exceeding
the
noise
level.
No,
perhaps
we
have
them
noise,
insulate
the
enclosure
so
that
the
residents
don't
have
to
deal
with
the
noise
compaction
on
a
daily
basis.
B
I'm
sure
that,
just
when
the
garbage
trucks
generally
go
through
neighborhoods,
they
they
exceed
that
the
noise
limit,
so
I
think
that's
going
to
happen
when
they're
picking
up
evergreen,
Ridge
dumpsters
or
when
they're
picking
up
this.
This
compactor
I
think
the
difference
is,
you
know
talking
to
Recology,
instead
of
being
on
site
for
two
hours
or
three
hours,
they're
only
going
to
be
on
site
for
about
30
or
45
minutes
in
order
to
access
it.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
shorter
amount
of
time
when
they're
there.
A
I
think
this
council
has
made
it
very
clear
of
our
union
support
and,
if
there's
any
way,
shape
or
form
that
this
can
be
union.
I
know
that
the
aim
cologne
have
talked
to
them
in
the
subcommittee
that
they're
going
to
really
try
to
make
this
make
this
happen,
and
so
we
would
encourage
that
if
there's
any
way
possible
to.
F
The
chair
yeah-
yes
tackle
that,
so
we
can
ensure
the
highest
quality,
which
is
necessary
for
that
project
that
something
else
was
brought
up,
as
by
ms
Livengood
was
about.
Is
there
a
homeowners
association
was
one
of
the
questions
she
raised
and
then
the
I
think
there
was
the
concern
about
the
road,
the
question,
the
dress
right.
A
B
E
yeah,
usually
HOAs,
typically
are
with
condominium
associations
or
marisol
or
Marymount
the
two
summerhill
projects.
You
know
with
single-family
homes
that
have
an
HOA,
but
what
you
have
here
and
according
to
the
applicant
statements,
you
know
you
have
a
not
you
have
an
on-site
property
manager
and
that
would
serve
the
same
purpose
as
the
as
the
HOA.
A
Okay
and
then
what
about
the
god
I
know
the
answer
to
this
already,
but
the
clubhouse
facilities
are
for
the
yeah.
Those
are
far
as
far
as
far
as
I
know:
they're,
they're,
private,
okay
and
then
the
maintenance
of
sharp
park
road
and
the
cleanup
in
the
general.
That's
pretty
much
in
the
package
right.
B
That's
in
the
package
and
also
if
the
council,
which
is
to
include
that
additional
condition
that
I
stated
during
my
presentation
that
they
they
clear
the
vegetation
along
the
sharp
park
and
Susan
drive
intersection
for
site
visibility,
reasons
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
public
services
director
and
they
maintain
that
site
visibility
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
public
services.
Director
and
I
think
that
will
help
out
a
lot.
Carolyn
and
I
were
outside
we're.
B
Actually
there
on
that
intersection
yesterday
and
looking
back
and
there's
a
lot
of
vegetation
there
right
now
and
you
can't
see
well
so
that
will
do
a
lot
just
to
cut
down
the
some
of
the
trees
and
they're
going
to
replace
those
trees
but
cut
down
some
of
the
trees
that
are
there
and
cut
down
some
of
the
overgrown
vegetation.
That's
there
as
well.
Okay,.
A
J
A
Well
speaking,
for
myself,
we
have
a
few
issues
here.
We
have
179
thousand
dollars
which
in
fact
has
been
spent.
The
work
has
been
done.
I
for
one
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
city
taking
responsibility
for
the
work
that's
been
done
already.
I
also
don't
have
a
responsibility
for
the
city
taking
responsibility
and
ownership
of
the
roadway,
because
we
it's
been
pretty
much
a
public
roadway.
Historically.
A
E
We're
looking
at
proving
is
an
ordinance
that
would
allow
them
to
have
speak
on
sorry,
hey
we're
we're
looking
at
an
ordinance
that
would
allow
them
to
have
the
two
designs
that
the
first
thing
that
we're
going
to
decide.
I
would
have
a
question
regarding
how
this
affects
any
other
projects
that
might
come
before
us
in
the
future.
It
does
this
set
a
precedent
where
we
would
basically
be
forced
to
do
this.
For
anyone
who
requested
me
I.
J
Don't
think
so,
but
that
is
a
very
good
question
to
the
first
part.
If
you
introduce
the
ordinance
this
evening,
we
would
wait
to
adopt
the
resolutions
to
the
second
reading
so
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
make
sure
that
our
wording
is
correct.
As
to
your
second
question,
does
the
set
of
precedent
I?
D
D
I
feel
strongly
that
we
should
accept
it.
We
have
been
using
it,
as
are
the
rest
of
the
public
in
the
area,
and
the
neighborhood
has
been
enjoying
the
use
of
that
and
even
when
the
whole
project
has
been
closed
down
and
the
department's
haven't
been
used
in
the
am
coat
nobody's
been
benefiting
by
it,
our
public
has
been
able
to
access
and
go
through
it.
So
I
think
that's
a
fair
thing
for
us
to
do
utilities.
D
However,
the
I
understand
with
the
storm
drains
that
connect
with
the
streets
and
the
other
things,
but
I'm
sure
staff
can
work
that
part
out,
but
the
underground
utilities.
Sorry
guys.
Those
are
yours.
The
the
other
matters
are
are
relatively
small
and
I'm
sure
you
guys
will
work
those
parts
out,
I'm
eager
extremely
eager
to
have
this
happen.
We've
been
waiting
and
waiting.
I
know
the
neighborhood's
been
impacted.
D
I
know
people
who
drive
by
skyline
coming
to
visit
in
the
lower
area
go
what
is
that
up
there
and
why
is
it
there
and
it
was
there
five
years
ago,
when
I
came
to
see
you
and
how
come
it's
still
there.
So
I'm
eager
to
to
have
you
proceed
and
I
expect
and
I'm
sure
you
will
keep
your
promises
to
the
quality
and
excellence
that
we're
all
looking
forward
to.
J
That,
through
the
chair
mr.
mayor,
if
I
could
just
make
one
suggestion
on
the
179,
if
it
becomes
a
desirable
to
waive
that
as
to
the
308
unit
project,
excuse
me
it's
actually
a
condition
on
the
extension
of
the
500-plus
unit.
In
my
suggestion
would
be,
though,
that
you
keep
it
as
a
condition
to
the
extent.
If
they
actually
build
that
project,
then
they
pay
it
right.
J
Now,
it's
a
condition
on
extending
the
life
of
the
project,
and
so
you
could
waive
it
there,
but
if
they
actually
ended
up
dumping
the
rehab
project
and
going
back
to
the
original
project
you
you
would
probably
still
want
them
to
pay
for
it.
So
just
keep
just
clarifying
in
the
record
that
that
they
went
back
and
did
the
project.
J
F
Do
the
chair
I
was
going
to
say
that
that's
okay,
it
sounded
better
from
you.
The
hundred
thirty-nine
thousand
dollars
was
done
and
has
been
spent,
and
that
was
done
for
the
510,
which
was
the
increase.
Therefore,
if
it
was
going
to
at
any
time
go
if
this
I
know
this
will
work.
But
what
if
and
it
goes
back
then
I
would
say-
the
179
needs
to
be
paid.
No
answer,
sir,
but
in
my
opinion,
on
the
roadway
use,
I
think
we
find
fewer
folks
sitting
here
tonight
than
we
did
some
time
ago.
F
When
there
was
the
concept
of
closing
those
roadways,
we
had
many
residents
that
came
out,
wrote
and
called
because
they
thought
the
inconvenience
and
closing
those
roads,
which
was
the
font
process
back
at
the
larger
project,
brought
the
residents
out
and
I.
Think
that's
why
you
don't
see,
as
many
out
here
this
evening
is
because
in
their
mind,
this
project
has
been
brought
forward
to
have
those
public
roadways
available
to
them,
as
it
has
been
for
the
years.
F
C
Neither
and
met
him,
especially
not
with
the
utilities,
so
in
the
last
few
days,
through
discussions
with
staff,
I've
grown
to
to
accept
the
road
and
feel
comfortable
that
the
improvements
that
aimco
will
will
have,
and
the
projected
maintenance
in
the
life
of
the
road
will
be
will
be
taken.
Care
of
the
good
news
is
that
you,
you
brought
the
good
news
about
the
utilities.
C
That
I
think
the
city
needs
to
deal
with
has
has
some
work
cut
out
as
far
as
the
parking
issues
in
that
neighborhood
and
it's
not
all
your
fault,
maintenance
agreement
should
be
I
believe
we
need
to
have
a
maintenance
agreement
for
when
this
project
is
complete,
so
that
we
have
a
clear
idea
whose
responsibility
what
to
expect
in
years
to
come
with
the
landscaping,
mainly
along
the
perimeter
of
this
project,
is
stated
that
it
has
such
a
large
frontage.
So
we
don't
want
to
have
future
complaints
from
residents
on
elston
sharp
park
skyline.
C
You
know
in
Susan,
so
I
hoped
that
we'd
have
some
language
as
far
as
how
how
that's
going
to
be
funded
and
how
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
maintained
in
the
future
and
then
there's
the
hope
that
hopefully
of
the
threes,
the
charm
is
that
we
still
have
to
have
a
maintenance
agreement
prior
to
construction
I.
C
If
November
first
is
is
the
is
you
know,
is
the
date
then
so
bit
but
I
want
I,
want
this
project
to
go
through
like
the
rest
of
us
and
what
the
route
neighbors
want.
But
you
can't
guarantee
it.
No
one
can
guarantee
it,
and
if
it
doesn't,
then
we
have
to
have
something
in
place.
So
I
hope
that
that's
you
know
taken
care
of
and
that
very
pleased
with
the
improvements.
E
I
guess
I'm
a
little
less
enthusiastic
about
about
the
proposal,
because
we
were
expecting
something
a
lot
bigger
and
I
realized
it
doing.
Something
is
better
than
doing
nothing
but
I,
don't
I!
Guess
almost
new
is
not
is
not
quite
new
and
we
did
hear
that
some
foundation
work
is
going
to
be
not
quite
up
to
standards.
A
lot
of
the
original
framing
some
plywood
is
going
to
remain
I
know.
Mold
was
a
big
concern
there
and
those
are
natural,
fibers
and
likes
to
live
in
there
and
so
I.
E
I
would
have
a
question
from
staff
regarding
our
ability
to
adequately
inspect,
what's
going
to
remain
and
provide
some
level
of
confidence
to
the
future
residents
of
those
apartments
that
we're
not
going
to
have
another
molded
problem,
I
mean
just
because
you
replace
a
few
pieces.
I
mean.
How
sure
can
we
be
also
I
know,
as
I
was
looking
through
all
the
details
of
the
conditions.
E
The
conditions
are
not
the
same
for
a
renovation
as
they
would
be
for
a
new
construction
and
I
know
some
of
those
things
we
just
we
just
can't
enforce
on
on
project.
That's
not
a
new
construction,
so
I
again,
what
guarantee
can
we
give
people
that
that
they
are
going
to
be
somewhere?
That's
that's
safe!
That
has
the
same
same
concerns
to
poor
public
safety
and
for
environmental
safety
that
they
would
have
the
other
way.
Can
you
address
that
definitely.
B
Regarding
the
building
code
issues,
this
property
will
be
built
up
to
code.
It's
a
difference
of
will
d
be
meeting
the
exact
way
that
the
2007
code
specifies
you
have
to
meet
the
built.
The
building
code
also
gives
the
building
official
the
responsibility
to
have
a
meet
the
code
through
alternative
means
and
methods.
So,
although
it
might
not
be
the
exact
prescribed
way
to
build
a
foundation,
they
would
strengthen
foundation
in
a
way
that
it
gives
it
the
same
strength
as
the
letter
of
the
code
would
so
will
be
to
2007
code.
B
B
Let's
say
they
propose
to
keep
it
two
by
four
in
there
that's
been
there
before
when
our
inspectors
up
there,
if
they
notice
that
that
two-by-four
has
too
many
nail
holes
in
it,
which
makes
the
strength
not
up
to
what
the
strength
has
to
be
they're
going
to
have
to
remove
that
there
are,
you
know
we
are
taking
in
a
I.
Think
I've
mentioned
it
in
the
budget.
Hearing
that
you
know
our
building.
Inspectors
are
up
there
on
a
daily
basis
and
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
each
aspect
of
it.
B
If
the
plywood
is
moldy
or
the
plywood
is
whether
to
the
point,
it
doesn't
create
the
same
strength
as
it
should
that
plywood
will
have
to
be
removed
and
replaced
with
new
plywood
will
also
work
with
County
Health
to
ensure
that
their
the
mold
mold
remediation
plan
is
completely
in
effect,
and
I
know
that
Aimco
is
working
towards
the
same
thing.
It's
a
huge
liability
issue
if
there
were
to
have
any
mold
remaining
in
the
in
the
units,
but
we
have
been
working
with
County
Health.
B
J
Sorry
I
could
make
one
more
suggestion:
I'm
following
up
member
salazars
I'm
concerned
about
whether
this
sets
the
precedent.
I
would
suggest
that
we
that
the
ordinance
be
amended
before
the
introduction
and
I
can
make
sure
the
correct
verbiage
is
in
there
for
the
second
reading.
That
really
lays
out
how
this
is
a
unique
and
unusual
property
and
project,
and
it's
due
to
these
unusual
circumstances
that
you're
allowing
the
dual
zoning
to
go
forward
and
that
it
should
not
set
a
precedent
for
other
applications
on
this
property
or
elsewhere.