►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting June 15, 2010
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting June 15, 2010
B
B
C
A
B
A
A
B
A
You
okay!
Well,
let's
get
into
the
meat
of
the
thing
here:
let's
go
with
the
524
poplar
avenue.
This
is
a
request
for
a
variance
to
continue
an
existing
non-conforming
setback
and
use
permit
to
allow
the
construction
of
an
addition
with
the
total
floor
area
of
2072
square
feet,
point
69,
which
exceeds
the
point:
five
five
FA
our
guideline:
/
sections,
12.1,
24.0,
10
and
12
200.0
30,
point
p2
of
the
san
bruno
zoning
ordinance
staff
report.
Please
good.
D
Evening,
commissioners,
as
indicated
the
item
before
you
as
a
request
for
a
use
permit,
as
well
as
a
variance
to
allow,
in
addition
to
an
existing
residence
at
five
to
four
poplar
avenue,
the
applicant
would
like
to
expend
stand
the
living
room
living
space
to
the
rear
of
the
existing
property
and,
as
you
noted
from
your
site
inspection,
the
neighborhood
does
consist
of
many
san
francisco
style
homes
constructed
at
zero
lot
lines.
The
property
in
question
is
25
feet
wide
and
the
existing
home
is
built
all
the
way
to
the
property
line.
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
the
use
permit
to
extend
zero
excuse
me
extend
the
the
living
space
or
a
net
increase
of
175
square
feet,
as
they
will
also
be
demolishing
the
enclosed
patio
that's
located
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
variance
is
to
extend
the
living
space
along
the
left
side
of
the
property
and
maintain
that
zero
foot
setback,
and
that
would
be
so
they
can
get
a
co
compliant
stairwell
to
access
the
first.
D
In
the
second
floor
of
the
residents
right
now,
the
stairwell
is
very
steep
and
it
does
empty
right
into
the
garage
also
having
a
non-conforming
garage
as
far
as
depth.
So
by
reorienting
the
stairwell,
they
will
have
a
deeper
garage
where
they
would
be
able
to
park
a
vehicle
and
they'll
also
be
able
to
make
that
stairwell
more
code
compliant.
So
as
a
result,
at
the
second
story,
they're
requesting
to
extend
the
living
space
to
accommodate
that
stairwell,
as
well
as
expand
the
dining
area.
D
This
item
was
reviewed
by
the
architecture
review
committee
and
at
that
meaning
there
was
staff
expressed
the
concern
that
was
conveyed
from
the
neighboring
property
owner
that
this
edition
along
the
0
setback
on
the
left
side
would
impact
their
privacy,
as
well
as
the
light
into
their
property
they're.
Also,
as
you
see
from
the
site
plan,
most
of
their
residences
as
well
at
a
zero
foot
setback,
and
then
it
does
step
in
and
jog
back
right
around
where
this
edition
is
proposed.
D
So
the
architecture
review
committee
did
discuss
that
concern
and
requested
that
the
applicant
take
another
look
at
the
measurements,
because
we
kind
of
compared
the
google
map
with
the
site
plan
that
you
have
in
your
packet
and
when
the
architect
went
out
and
did
more
accurate
measurements
from
the
to
verify
the
location,
the
neighbor
property.
They
realized
that
the
addition
would
extend
about
two
feet
beyond
where
the
neighbors
common
zero
foot
setback
is
so
it
would
extend
about
two
feet
where
their
property
jogs
back
to
their
house,
so
the
applicant
did
revise
the
plans.
D
D
As
noted,
you
do
have
a
letter
from
the
adjacent
neighbor
I've
spoken
with
him
on
several
occasions,
sent
him
a
copy
of
the
plans.
He's
out
of
town
wasn't
able
to
make
this
meeting
but,
as
indicated,
he
does
have
concern
with
the
height
of
the
addition,
as
well
as
the
proportion
of
the
addition
that
extends
along
the
zero
foot
setback
that
it
would
have
an
impact
on
to
light
into
his
property.
D
B
Just
a
couple
things
that
the
first
one
is
related
to
the
deck.
The
way
the
findings
are
written
now
assumed
that
the
condition
that
the
deck
be
set
back
three
feet
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
possible
to
make
the
findings
of
approval
unless
that
deck
was
set
back
three
feet
and
I
think
it's
something
that's
easily
easily
accomplished.
So
that's
something
that
is
collected
within
the
conditions
of
approval.
The
second
thing
is,
you
know
regarding
the
neighbors
issues,
the
neighbor
did
provide
a
letter
objecting
to
it.
I
apologize,
we
use
staff
you
as
staff.
B
We
usually
try
to
work
out
these
issues
beforehand
and
not
bring
you
unresolved
issues,
but
I
think
this
is
one
where
staff
is
still
confident
in
that
the
findings
for
approval
as
they're
drafted
as
the
addition
is
laid
out
now.
If
the
Planning
Commission
did
have
concerns,
though
you
could
consider
I,
think
one
mitigating
factor
could
be
the
overall
roof
height
and
lowering
the
roof
height
for
some
of
the
NATO
neighbors
concerns,
but
as
the
way
is
proposed
now
we
still
are
confident
in
our
in
our
recommendation.
B
B
D
And
also
when
you
look
at
the
plans
submitted
by
the
applicant,
you
can
see
on
the
sheet,
there
is
photographs
and
if
you
one
of
them
it
does
show
the
rear
deck
and
somebody
standing
on
the
duck.
And
then
you
can
see
that
side
of
the
property
where
there's
two
windows.
That
would
be
the
side.
The
neighbors
expressing
concern
about.
A
E
E
So
we
really
would
like
to
change
that
one
and
put
a
privacy
wall
over
there,
and
that
is
also
explained
in
in
the
plants
so
I
clearly
made
it
I
made
it
very
clear
to
him
that
that
is
not
the
case
anymore.
We
would
have
the
privacy
of
all
over
there
and
then
we
would
prefer
to
keep
that
privacy
wall
on
the
property
line
and
then
go
in
with
a
new
deck,
because
that's
existing
right
now
and
then
with
a
new
attack,
go
in
three
feet
but
began
depending
on
staff
and
watch
what
you
appreciate.
E
This
wait,
which
way
to
go,
but
I
explained
that
to
him
the
other
part.
What
explained
was
that
he
was
really
concerned
about
the
height
and
the
only
two
feet
out
fat
where
he
is.
We
don't
even
overlap
with
our
addition
to
where
his
windows
are.
So
we
really
do
not
see
too
much
of
an
impact
on
the
windows
that
he
has
on
that
side,
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
really
would
like
to
get
the
height
is
all
the
houses
are.
E
We
can
actually
move
windows
on
the
west
side
of
the
house,
so
we
can
get
XD
light
in
that
area,
because
we
cannot
have
the
side
windows
and
also
get
a
more
roomy
feeling,
and
so
we
believe
that
that
would
not
have
any
impact
on
Ernests
on
its
light
or
not
significantly,
and
then
the
third
point
he
pointed
out
that
potentially
the
build-out
from
us
would
be
devaluate.
His
house
and
I
told
him
and
said
there
should
be
no
reason
why
we
should
evaluate
your
house.
It
should
only
improve.
F
Husband
did
I
Lynam
line
item
number
11.
It
speaks
to
stormwater
management
through
landscaping,
etc,
but
I
don't
see
any
landscaping
plans.
So
that
was
one
question
and
then
similar
to
that
you've.
His
checked
off
water
conservation,
plumbing
fixtures,
but
I,
don't
see
additional
work
in
four
bathrooms
or
anything
like
that.
Is
that
something
you're
doing
or
was
it
just
checked
off?
Well.
E
A
G
A
A
E
A
A
H
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
as
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
operate
a
used
bookstore
within
the
central
business
zone.
A
district
the
site
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
san
mateo
avenue
in
the
400
block
is
currently
developed
with
a
commercial
building
that
has
two
storefronts
one
storefront
is
currently
vacant,
and
the
other
storefront
is
currently
occupied
by
a
restaurant.
The
vacant
storefront
measures
approximately
450
square
feet
and
is
developed
with
a
storage
room,
one
bathroom
and
an
open,
large
display
area.
H
H
One
thing
that
is
important
to
note
is
the
reason
why
we're
here
tonight
is
that
the
project
requires
a
use
permit,
because
for
their
use
of
second-hand
sales.
This
is
something
that
will
probably
revisit
during
the
zoning
code
update
and
possibly
could
be
allowed
out
right.
Nevertheless,
the
use
permit
is
required
at
this
time
when
looking
at
the
use
permit
application.
We
really
looked
at
the
surrounding
businesses
on,
say
mattel,
Avenue
and,
as
you
know,
there
consists
many
commercial
all
retail
establishments
as
well
as
restaurants
and
various
commercial
recreation
facilities.
H
Staff
does
find
that
this
proposed
use
is
consistent
with
the
retail
establishments
on
san
mateo
avenue.
Additionally,
the
boat
traffic
will
increase
during
monday
and
wednesday
evenings
when
the
book
club
members
meet
at
the
site,
which
will
benefit
the
surrounding
businesses.
Staff
is
supporting
the
project
and
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
use
permit
application
based
on
findings.
In
fact,
1
through
3
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
13
I
behaved
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Okay,.
A
I
Else
is
all
about
joseph
richard
and
I'm
the
originator
of
the
so-called
of
house.
The
place
will
called
of
house
it's
a
501c3
nonprofit
corporation
and
I
have
been
operating
in
south
san
francisco
for
a
year
pretty
successfully,
but
the
rent
there
was
kind
of
prohibitive,
so
I
in
this
new
place
in
san
bruno
was
it
the
yeah,
the
least
was
much
better
sorry,
I
decided
to
move.
I
I
If
we
could
get
people
to
read
and
to
think
more,
and
so
that's
the
idea
of
affordable
books
and
then
this
idea
of
book
clubs,
if
I,
can
anybody
interested
to
form
for
clubs
or
sort
of
support
groups,
perhaps
for
parenting
or
psychological
book
discussion
clubs,
things
of
that
sort,
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
I
think.
G
I
G
I
A
G
A
There's
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
floor,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye,
those
opposed,
garnet,
hey
it
has
passed.
There
was
a
tenday
pale
appeal
period
and
thank
you
very
much
all
right.
The
last
item
on
our
agenda:
1053,
national
lots,
three
and
four-
the
crossing
I-
do
have
one
question
on
the
before
we
get
started
on
this.
It
does
say
here
on
our
agenda
that
it's
a
but
they're
requesting
a
period
of
two
years,
it's
crossing,
but
yet
in
our
staff
report
it
says
one
and
I
city.
C
D
Thank
you.
As
the
Commission
recalls.
You
previously
approved
a
tentative
parcel
map
to
allow
condominium
development
at
the
crossing
parcels.
Three
and
four,
then
the
Planning
Commission
did
grant
an
extension
to
the
parcel
map
that
would
bring
the
expiration
date
THU
jun,
20th
2010.
The
applicant,
has
submitted
its
final
map.
The
public
works
department
has
just
about
completed
their
review
of
that
and
I
believe
it
is
on
the
agenda
for
City
Council
hearing
on
jun
22nd.
So
we
were
being
quite
conservative
and
asking
for
this
one-year
extension
of
the
map.
D
A
A
C
A
Thank
you.
Ok,
any
questions
are
the
applicant
go
anywhere
yet
cuz
anyway,
when
do
any
of
the
Commissioner
of
any
questions
of
the
applicant?
No
okay.
Now,
thank
you
very
much
trying
to
be
funny.
Okay,
you're
doing
it
now
open
it
up
to
the
public.
Ok,
there
are,
is
no
public,
so
I'm
going
to
close
public
hearing
on
this
particular
item,
bring
it
back
to
commissioners.
G
A
B
C
B
15
july
15,
July
fifteenth
and
then
the
second
thing
is
we
will
be
releasing
the
draft
transit
corridor
plan
within
the
next
two
weeks.
So
anyone
at
home
that
wants
to
raise
the
public
review
draft-
it's
looking
at
land
uses,
will
direct
private
and
public
spending
in
the
area
surrounding
the
new
train
station
over
the
next
ten
years.
It's
probably
really
is
the
most
exciting
planning
document
that
we've
had
in
san
bruno
in
a
long
time.
So
I
encourage
all
the
planning
commissioners
to
take
a
look
at
it.