►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting October 25, 2011 10c.
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting October 25, 2011
10c. Amend the MOU Between the City and the Public Safety Mid-Management Group
A
B
On
a
rubber
mayor
of
members
of
the
council,
tonight,
staff
is
requesting
the
council
to
adopt
that
resolution.
Amending
the
Memorandum
of
Understanding
between
the
city
of
San
Bruno
and
the
public
bid
management
group
to
establish
compensation
for
battalion
chief
physician
assigned
to
fire
prevention
due
to
the
retirement
of
the
fire
division
chief
in
August
staff
is
recommending
replacing
that
position
with
a
40-hour
administrative
battalion
chief.
B
The
department
has
a
current
eligibility
list
for
the
position
of
battalion
chief
and
eligible
candidates
on
that
list
will
be
considered
for
the
appointment
staff
did
consider
evaluating
fire
prevention
capacity
in
neighboring
jurisdictions,
as
well
as
contracting
these
services
to
private
contractors.
Third
party,
in
both
cases
staff
concluded
there
would
not
be
comparable
level
of
sir
prevention
services
staff
believes
that
having
personnel
internally
and
on
current
eligibility
list,
we
can
flatten
the
organization
and
still
provide
a
sustainable
level
of
prevention
services.
B
Another
advantage
is,
we
also
keep
almost
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
revenue
through
private
prevention
services
and
fees,
because
the
current
salary
and
benefits
for
the
city
of
Italian
chief
position
is
based
on
a
56
hour
work
week
with
overtime
required.
There
is
a
need
to
establish
an
appropriate
and
comparable
compensation
structure
for
battalion
chief
position
assigned
to
the
administrative
functions
with
a
40-hour
week,
schedule
and
limited
eligibility
for
overtime
or
other
special
pie
pay
by
assigning
the
prevention
function
to
a
battalion
chief
position,
the
city
will
reduce
Department
caused
by
over
thirty
thousand
dollars.
C
First,
first
of
all,
let
me
just
say
chief,
that
I
have
nothing
but
the
utmost
respect
for
you
and
your
men,
so
don't
take
anything.
I
say
the
wrong
way.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
my
opinion,
but
when
I'm
looking
at
this,
what
it
sounds
to
me
like
is
we're
taking
a
position,
that's
based
on
56
hours,
we're
reducing
it
to
40
hours
and
we're
asking
to
pay
more
for
that
position.
Does
that
pretty
much
summarize
it?
What.
B
C
D
C
B
Of
it
also
yeah
and-
and
you
know
we
do
in
the
two
percent
lieu
of
it
was
you
know
we
we
looked
at
the
overtime
piece
because
I
will
require
the
fire
marshal
to
come
in
and
do
fire
investigations
off
hours
you'll
be
responsible
for
conducting
those.
So
that's
another
piece
of
the
loop
piece
that
that
made
sense.
Okay,.