►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting October 12, 2010 10a. Planning Process for Glenview Homes
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting October 12, 2010 10a. Planning Process for Glenview Homes
A
I
will
move
on
to
conduct
of
business
and,
as
I've
said
the
last
number
of
weeks,
despite
what
a
lot
of
people
who
said
we're
still
open
for
business,
the
lights
around
the
doors
are
open
and
we
have
some
regular
business
to
conduct
and
we'll
start.
At
this
evening,
item
10a
receive
a
report
and
provide
direction
related
to
an
expedited
planning
process
for
homes
affected
by
the
glenview
fire
distractin.
Thank.
B
You
and
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
city
council,
as
the
council
knows,
the
glenview
fire
destroyed
homes
within
the
crest
more
to
subdivision
and
before
I,
go
into
the
expedited
planning
and
building
process.
I
want
to
touch
on
just
a
historical
background
in
this
area,
so
it
was
developed
between
1956
in
1964,
and
the
majority
of
the
homes
in
the
area
were
originally
constructed,
with
three
or
four
bedrooms,
as
well
as
two
bathrooms,
and
compared
to
many
other
subdivisions
that
were
built
earlier
in
san
bruno.
B
B
There
also
what's
interesting
about
this
neighborhood,
at
least
from
a
planning
perspective.
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
planners
referred
to
as
legal
non-conforming.
That
means
that
they
were
built
legally
before
today's
codes.
One
of
those
issues
is
three
foot
setbacks
that
many
of
the
garages
have
as
well
as
many
smaller
garages.
B
Following
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting,
there
is
a
planning
commission
meeting
where
an
ultimate
decision
is
being
made,
and
once
it's
approved
it
moves
on
to
the
structural
review
phase,
but
takes
about
another
two
months.
There's
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
within
this
process,
less
back
and
forth.
Now
that
we
have
the
architectural
review
guidelines,
but
these
are
complex
plans
that
architects
are
are
drawing
up,
so
they
to
do
take
some
time
for
architects
to
actually
draw
the
details
and
that's
why
it
takes
a
long
retired.
B
For
the
sake
of
background
to
the
reasons
why
homes
might
have
to
go
through
the
Architectural,
Review
and
Planning
Commission
meetings
is
if
they
exceed
a
point,
five
five
floor
area
ratio.
What
that
means
is,
if
you
have
on
your
average
5,000
square
foot
lot.
If
you
build
more
than
2,000
750
square
feet,
you
would
have
to
go
through
this
process
same
with.
There's
a
lot
coverage
guideline,
there's
several
other
guidelines
that
do
that
relate
to
parking
and
windows
and
decks
I
prepared
a
report
and
I
put
another
table
in
front
of
you.
B
That
shows
three
different
likely
scenarios
of
people
wishing
to
rebuild
their
homes
and
a
potential
expedited
permit
process
for
each
one
of
those.
The
first
one
would
be
the
first
scenario.
This
would
probably
just
be
after
talking
to
people
in
the
neighborhood.
This
would
just
probably
be
a
handful
of
people
at
that,
and
that's
that
they
want
to
build
exactly
or
is
very
similar
home
to
what
they
had
before
the
home
would
be
similar
in
scale
similar
in
height
and
square
footage.
There
would
be
some
cases
in
which
this
home
may
have
non-conforming
aspects.
B
This
would
take
a
process
that
would
be
taken
ormally
four
to
six
months,
if
they
add
exceptions
and
take
it
down
to
about
one
to
two
months,
and
this
of
course
depends
on
the
complexity
of
the
plans
and
whether
the
architect,
who
is
able
to
respond
to
the
city
comments,
but
what
we
are
showing
in
this
instead
of
the
normal
time
where
it
would
take
two
to
three
weeks
to
respond.
Structural
and
architectural
promise
will
cut
that
down
to
one
week
or
maybe
two
weeks.
B
The
second
scenario,
which
I
think
is
going
to
be
the
most
likely
scenario
for
a
majority
of
the
homes,
is
that
it
would
they
would
propose
brand
new
homes,
new
architectural
styles,
but
they
would
meet
all
the
development
regulations
because
the
homes
are
pretty
big
in
this
area
and
if
you
look
at
the
homes
that
have
been
built
recently
in
san
bruno
they're
generally
under
that
2,750
square
feet.
So
in
this
circumstance
it
would
be
the
same
thing
it
would
take
about
one
to
two
months
the
architect
would
submit
to
the
building
and
planning
department.
B
Perhaps
they
want
to
build
a
3,100
square
foot
home
on
a
lot
that
has
a
backs
of
20
750
square
feet.
Normally
this
would
be
a
two
to
three
month
planning
review
processes
that
they
would
have
to
go
to.
The
architectural
review
committee
meeting,
followed
by
the
Planning
Commission
we're
proposing,
and
this
is
that
they
would
go
straight
to
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting
meeting,
followed
by
the
Planning
Commission,
and
this
would
take
a
process
that
normally
takes
five
to
seven
months
about
cutting
in
half
to
two
to
three
months.
B
So
those
are
some
of
the
potential
expediting
scenarios.
I
think
that
I
know
looking
back
I've
been
with
the
city
for
eight
years
of
being
involved
with
this
process
and
I.
Think
there's
really
two
overall
in
intense
of
this
process
a
is
to
create
homes
that
might
be
large
but
are
still
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
that
surrounds
it,
and
that
was
the
that
was
further
gotten
into
with
the
residential
design
guidelines,
and
the
second
was
just
to
let
the
neighborhood.
What's
going,
let
them
know
what's
going
on
with
the
process.
B
So
that's
why
we
have
a
review
process
for
these
homes
will
be
proposed
to
do
under
this
scenario
for
the
homes
that
do
see
the
thresholds.
We
wouldn't
have
the
standard
mail
notices,
300
square
feet,
300-foot
radius
around
homes.
Rather,
we
would
contact
the
most
immediate
neighbors
post,
all
the
elevations
on
our
website
and
allow
feedback
through
our
website
and
allow
people
to
comment
on
those
and
take
those
comments
into
consideration
when
they're
being
considered
by
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting.
B
And
finally,
as
one
of
the
speakers
mentioned
earlier,
there
is
open
space
in
this
area
and,
as
we
begin,
this
rebuilding
process,
one
thing
that
we
are
going
to
want
to
outreach
to
the
community
on
is
something
that
we're
working
on
is
some
type
of
community
visioning
process
for
this
open
space
area
within
the
neighborhood.
So
with
that,
I
could
take
any
questions
from
the
City
Council.
Any
questions
through.
D
B
Based
on
one
of
two
things
primarily
based
on
County
records,
so
you
know
the
county
records
has
the
existing
living
area.
That's
listed
the
speed
assessed
and
then
we
added
for
two
car
garages.
We
added
on
400
square
feet
other
homes
that
have
added
on
more
recently,
we've
had
the
square
footage
numbers
straight
from
or
building
permit
records.
Okay,.
B
D
I
know
this
is
probably
a
little
too
technical,
but
it's
something
that
crossed
my
mind
is
that
once
we've
gone
through
and
we've
cleared
the
sites
and
if
you're
talking
about
replacing
a
structure
in
generally
the
same
spot,
what's
left
I
mean
were
there
any
where
all
the
foundations
got
taken
out,
I
mean
so
a
lot
of
there's
been
a
lot
of
excavation,
and
so
we
were
down
to
some
correct
they're.
All.
B
The
so
foundations,
when
they're
subjected
to
that
heat
no
longer
have
their
structural
integrity,
so
those
foundations
were
actually
they
were
all
removed,
so
yeah.
So
things
like
surveys
are
going
to
have
to
be
done
for
the
individual
Lots
as
well
as
geotechnical
investigations
for
each
one
of
the
lot,
since
the
foundations
removed
that
some
of
the
homes
are
built
on
a
partial
fill.
D
B
E
The
chair
of
my
spam,
real
quick
just
if
you
could
you
know
I
know
we
have
to
design
guidelines
in
place
which
is
probably
helpful
but
I
know.
There's
been
some
questions
about
what
we
envisioned
as
far
sighs.
How
we
compare
that
as
an
example
to
another
subdivision,
that's
come
before
the
Planning
Commission.
Is
there
any
idea
you
can
give
us
on
what
we
might
be
seeing?
I
would.
B
Say
judging
on
what's
been
demanded
in
the
market,
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
projects
like
summer
hill
and
some
of
the
homes
that
have
been
selling
recently.
I
think
that
you'll
see
you'll,
see
homes
that
are
somewhere
in
the
2002
2,400
square
foot
range.
That
seems
to
be
that
the
market
demand
right
now,
as
well
as
something
that's
slightly
bigger
than
some
of
the
homes
that
were
out
there
for
more
modern
conveniences,
larger
kitchens,
larger
family
rooms
and
aspects
like
that.
B
B
Actually
surprising
and
it's
actually
encouraging
how
many
people
are
wanting
to
build
and
wanting
to
build
quickly
over
the
last
week,
I'm
getting
calls
from
23
for
property
owners
a
day
that
are
asking.
What's
the
process
going
to
be
a
lot
of
the
architects
we've
reached
out
to
the
AIA
and
forwarded
the
residential
design
guidelines,
a
lot
of
the
architects
are
getting
familiar
with
those
guidelines.
So
there's
there's
a
number
of
people
that
want
to
rebuild
once
they're
hiring
architects
now
and
hiring
contractors.
Now
real.
E
B
Typically,
when
we
take
two
to
three
weeks
to
review
structural
plans
to
provide
comments,
we're
going
to
cut
that
down
to
a
week
or
maybe
two
weeks,
yeah,
then
that's
of
course,
starting
from
the
time
that
we
actually
receive
a
submit
ille
from
the
architect,
and
it
does
take
times
for
architects
to
create
plans
because
you're
building
at
home
that's
going
to
be
there
for
at
least
half
a
century.
Thank.
A
B
D
I
could
one
last
comment:
I
in
the
spirit
of
expediting
I,
think
there
should
still
be,
at
least
in
your
department
or
your
position.
A
some
way
to
you
know
to
extend
the
review
period,
because
knowing
the
area
fairly
well,
I
know
that
there
is
a
stretch
of
homes
that
were
all
one
story,
and
these
the
rebuild
could
conceivably
include
some
two
stories.
You
know
or
larger
homes,
or
at
least
different
volumes
that
may
cause
some
issues
with.
You
know
some
of
the
neighbors.
D
So
as
far
as
a
change,
a
big
visual
change,
so
I
would
strongly
suggest
that
you
really
you
know,
knowing
that
there
are
some
houses
that
were
originally
one-story,
the
ones
that
become
two
story.
We
really
do
some
outreach
to
those
immediate
neighbors
and
the
ones
that
are
going
to
view
it
in
a
different
light.
Absolutely
okay,.
A
B
My
understanding
is
30
days
from
the
second
reading
that
will
be
taken
into
effect.
What
we'll
do,
in
the
meantime
is
start
processing
those
applications
that
people
that
people
submit,
so
we
can
provide
feedback
and
get
them
on
the
agenda
and
then
they'll
be
approved
within
a
shorter
time
frame
once
the
ordinance
is
actually
passed.
City
manager,
you're.
C
Actually,
probably
not
going
to
have
any
down
time,
because
people
are
just
now
beginning
to
get
their
architects
on
board.
As
Erin
indicated,
you
have
two
maybe
three
months
for
architects
to
develop
the
drawings.
We
will
be
amending
the
code
in
that
time
period
and
so
I
would
really
anticipate
any
real
delay
for
residents
who
are
ready
now
to
start
the
process
and
again
they'd
start
by
hiring
an
architect
and
starting
to
work
on
their
design
concept.
B
And
what
we've
also
done
is,
you
know:
we've
asked
architects
to
come
in
early
in
the
process,
so
in
this
in
this
two
to
three
month
period
as
the
ordinances
are
coming
online,
we
can
meet
with
them
and
you
know
review
initial
plans
that
they
have
and
get
their
application
ready
to
go
so
goes
as
quickly
as
possible.
After
that,
okay.