►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting October 12, 2010 10c. Sewer Laterals in Glenview Area
B
Honorable
council
members,
this
work
is
emergency.
Work
for
health
and
safety
reason
was
the
result
of
the
explosion,
fire
and
debris
removal.
The
sewer
laterals
of
the
35
homes
demolished
were
damaged.
Our
sewer
sewer
system
is
a
gravity
line,
and
our
concern
is
that
debris
will
read
the
main
and
possible
costs
were
overclocked
to
prevent
the
debris
to
reach
the
main.
It
is
our
intent
to
cap
those
letters
on
feet
from
the
curb
the
city
has
an
ongoing
contract
with
West
Valley,
signed
after
a
comparative
bid
process.
B
They
offering
the
best
price
among
those
contractor
and
our
comfort
level
is
very
high
that
asking
them
to
provide
us
with
a
cost
estimate.
The
city
will
receive
the
best
price
possible,
their
estimated
the
work
for
this
terrifying
homes,
the
worker
costs
43,000
and
with
15th
present
contingency.
It
is
our
estimation
that
this
work
will
cost
around
fifty
three
thousand
dollars.
C
C
Sarah
and
I
know
it's
a
unique
situation
on
the
unchartered
territory.
Some
of
my
questions
are
concerned
on
items
like
this.
Is
you
know
how
do
we
know
we're
getting
the
value
for
what
the
service
were
being
provided?
Do
we
have
staff
that
can
also
assist
or
do
part
of
the
work
so
that
we
don't
have
to
go
out?
C
B
C
B
Having
got
looked
swords
back
in
less
than
three
days,
but
was
the
result
of
those
additional
the
impact
already
caused
on
the
department.
Certainly,
the
department
cannot
manage
this
additional
board,
only
loss
with
our
internal
resources
that
would
have
a
autism,
reasonable
impact
on
the
management
of
our
system
and
maybe
causing
more
swear
overflow
on
or
would
have
much
more
negative
impact
on.
B
Our
system,
but
why
I
have
a
very
high
comfort
level
that
this
is
a
very
good
price
provided
by
our
contractor,
is
that
initially
the
department
started
to
discuss
actually
with
Corey
cycle
and
the
reason
why
I'm
coming
this
late
to
you
with
this
request?
They
are.
Our
initial
intent
was
to
include
this
work
in
the
debris,
removal
that
was
the
initial
intent
to
incorporate
that
in
the
overall
contract
ads
and
the
state
did.
Nothing
did
not
agree
to
include
this
work
in
the
overall
contract,
but
based
on
their
initial
estimate
and
I.
B
C
D
Normally
this,
the
section
of
the
laterals
that
we're
talking
about,
would
be
the
responsibility
of
the
property
owner
I'm
wondering
so
in
this
case,
do
we
need
permission
from
the
property
owners
to
go
in
and
do
this
or
is
it
something
that's
part
of
the
cleanup
effort?
That's
been
agreed
to
Johnny.
D
B
B
Cod
recycling
already
had
that
right
of
entry
for
each
property
and
would
have
been
a
easier
situation
to
address,
but
them
not
agreeing
to
incorporate
in
that
contract.
Now
the
decision
was
to
cap
the
lateral
one
feet
behind
the
curve.
That
assumes
that
is
still
the
city
know
right
away
that,
basically
to
protect
our
systems,
the
sea
reveal
escapades
at
one
feet
from
the
curve,
which
is
still
public
right-of-way
with
how
to
necessitate
any
right
of
entry
from
anybody,
and
you
kept
the
lateral
at
that
location.
D
And
I
know
our
experience
with
laterals.
Another
part
of
the
sort
of
the
city
have
shown
that
some
of
those
tend
to
be
in
bad
condition
and
I'm
wondering
it
looks
like
you
have
close
to
twenty-five
percent
contingency
on
the
on
the
price.
That's
quoted
here
and
I'm
wondering.
Do
you
anticipate
that?
Because
of
what
we've
seen
in
other
parts
of
the
city
that
perhaps
those
laterals
might
be
in
such
bad
state
that
we
can't
cap
them.
B
B
Nobody
believes
aware
of
the
level
of
destruction
with
the
debris
removal
how
badly
exactly.
How
was
your
earlier
comment
in
what
shape
those
sewer,
lateral
in
the
grounds
or,
and
certainly
it's
our
assumption-
they
can
be
kept
closer
to
the
sidewalk,
but
if
they
will
not
be
able
to
cap
at
that
location,
then
they
will
have
to
go
further
in
the
sidewalk,
but
our
comfort
is
very
reasonable
that
they
will
be
able
to
do
the
work
without
the
needed
twenty-five
percent,
but
just
managing
unknown.
D
B
This
is
a
mergency
situation
and
the
emergency
situation.
Emergency
response
to
that
emergency
situation
is
certainly
I.
I,
don't
foresee
that
this
emergency
response
will
will
create
a
history
in
the
city
which
would
force
/,
/,
forward-looking
policy
in
any
direction
right
now,
working
with
the
city
manager,
the
department
is
in
the
process
of
developing
that
letter
of
policy
how
you
just
mentioned,
and
hopefully
the
department
will
be
able
to
come
back
for
your
consideration,
proposing
some
eternity
in
the
next
few
months.
Okay,.
E
This
sixth
warehouse
and
I
will
review
the
additional
language,
whereas
the
city,
rather
than
will
do
to
the
glenview
fire
and
resulting
damage,
must
hire
a
contractor
to
excavate,
etc.
The
sewer
laterals,
the
purpose
of
this
small
change
in
the
language
to
the
resolution
more
clearly
articulates
that
this
is
a
direct
fire
related
situation
and
situates
this
in
a
more
compelling
manner
to
be
one
of
those
expenses
that
may
ultimately
be
eligible
for
reimbursement.
Ok,.
A
E
It
I
would
actually,
if
I,
if
I,
wasn't
being
if
I
was
be
overly
picky
to
just
say
scratch
that
warehouse.
It's
it's
really
meaningless.
Fund
190
is
the
accounting
mechanism
that
we
have
set
up
to
identify
and
uniquely
account
for
costs
associated
with
the
disaster
response
and
recovery.
It
is
not,
it
is
not
in
any
manner
related
to
any
funding
source
and,
and
so
there
there
may
be
some
confusion
and
I
would
just
simply
suggest
that
you
strike
that
where
else.