►
From YouTube: San Bruno Special Planning Commission Meeting 03/04/2014
Description
San Bruno Special Planning Commission Meeting March 4, 2014
A
A
A
A
B
Be
a
Saudi
and
planning
commissioners.
Tonight
we
have
a
translator,
a
Spanish
speaking
translator
in
attendance
with
the
housing
element
update.
We
think
it's
appropriate
to
be
able
to
reach
out
to
the
spanish-speaking
population
within
our
community
boat
here
in
attendance
tonight
and
also
watching
tonight
by
way
of
cable
television.
So
we
have
a
staff
person,
Tino
Padilla,
who
will
be
available
for
translation
tonight
and
then,
as
we
move
forward
through
the
process,
this
process
will
take
approximately
a
year.
B
We
hope
to
adopt
the
housing
element
update
toward
the
end
of
this
year
and
have
it
certified
by
the
state
end
of
the
year
or
first
of
next
year
january
of
2015.
So
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
introduce
mr.
Padilla
so
that
in
Spanish
he
could
provide
some
guidance
for
our
spanish-speaking
population
in
terms
of
perhaps
this
evening
and
also
through
the
process.
Tm.
A
C
B
Thank
you,
mr.
Padilla.
At
this
point
we
were
going
to
move
into
our
presentation
and
our
long-range
planning
manager.
Mark
Sullivan,
has
prepared
a
PowerPoint
that
he's
going
to
share
with
you
this
evening
and
kind
of
giving
an
overview
of
the
process
that
we're
embarking
into
to
update
our
housing
element
for
this.
This
cycle.
B
This
cycle
is
for
the
period
of
twenty
fourteen
through
20
22,
and
the
purpose
of
tonight's
meeting
is
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
process
that
we've
been
through
in
terms
of
the
last
cycle,
some
of
our
accomplishments,
to
talk
about
the
process
before
us
through
this
year,
through
adoption
and
certification,
and
to
answer
your
questions
as
well
as
questions
of
the
look
and
then
also
to
receive
your
comments
on
this.
This
project.
D
D
D
So,
first
of
all,
just
briefly:
what's
what
is
in
the
housing
element?
First
of
all,
the
housing
element
is
required
by
state
housing
law
and
basically,
it
provides
a
tool,
a
planning
tool
to
encourage
housing,
production
and
housing
affordable
to
lower
income
people,
and
that's
really,
a
major
focus
of
the
element-
is
one
to
provide
housing
for
the
overall
community,
but
really
it
focuses
on
the
people
that
are
most
in
need
and
require
affordable
housing.
So
the
housing
element
is
divided
basically
into
four
sections.
D
One
is
an
assessment
of
the
local
housing
needs
population
existing
in
future
and
population
projections.
House,
housing
conditions,
income,
affordability,
so
address
it
address.
It
looks
at
the
at
the
community,
demographics
and
the
housing
stock
and
gives
you
a
basis
for
which
to
plan
for
the
future.
D
It
also
reviews
housing,
constraints
and
resources,
because
that
is
often
the
thing
that
stops
housing
from
being
built
or
governmental
constraints,
and
sometimes
their
market
restraints
and
the
lack
of
resources.
So
those
are
analyzed
in
the
housing
element,
there's
an
analysis
of
land
inventory
and
that
is
really
the
housing.
D
D
The
way
it's
it
is
designed,
there's
no
need
to
start
from
scratch,
we're
not
creating
a
whole
new,
a
whole
new
plan,
we're
using
the
existing
element
and
we're
updating
to
it
to
reflect
the
new
conditions
and
statutory
requirements,
we're
keeping
what
works
and
will
change
what
doesn't
okay.
This
is
a
scheduled
graphic
and,
as
you
can
see,
we
are
all
the
way
at
the
left
side
here,
so
we're
right,
we're
right
in
the
beginning
of
this
process,
but
we
have
started
to
work
on
various
sections
of
the
housing
element.
D
The
housing
needs
section
is
being
updated
right
now
and
there
there's
a
draft
that
will
soon
be
available
for
for
public
review.
So
during
the
next
few
months
we'll
be
working
on,
the
draft
will
be
identifying
the
the
sites
for
the
housing
sites
and
other
sections
of
the
plan,
and
by
the
time
we
have
a
draft.
D
The
first
draft
of
the
housing
element
I
think
that's
the
next
point
where
there
should
be
a
a
public
meeting
or
a
workshop
to
get
feedback
from
decision-makers,
Planning,
Commission,
City
Council,
but
also,
very
importantly,
the
public
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
good
job
of
getting
the
public
involved.
At
that
point,
then
then,
there's
a
review
process
which
is
basically
HDD
that
the
California
State
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
reviews
the
the
housing
element
and
they
review
it
twice,
and
they
have
60
days
to
review
it
the
first
time.
D
Then
we
adopt
it
and
then
they
have
another
120
days
to
review
it
again.
So
when
you
put
all
that
that
length
of
time
together,
it's
the
the
deadline
for
adoption
is
January
31st
2015,
but
the
element
would
need
to
be
adopted
at
the
end
of
this
year
to
make
that
that
January
first
deadline
hope
that
made
sense.
D
Okay,
what
have
our
accomplishments
been?
Well,
the
the
the
corn
housing
element
covered
the
period
from
2007
until
2014,
and
the
city
has
real
there.
Really,
a
lot
has
been
done
in
that
time
in
terms
of
construction
and
actual
development.
Over
seven
hundred
and
thirty
units
have
been
completed
or
are
in
construction.
D
D
We've
continued
to
provide
funding,
support
for
housing
organizations
that
provide
assistance
for
residents
of
San
Bruno,
and
that
includes
hip
housing,
which
does
a
a
home
sharing
program
and
shelter
Network,
which
provides
transitional
housing
for
single
mothers
and
children.
And
finally,
we
adopted
the
below
market
rate
housing
program
and
we've
built
the
in
Luffy
fund
for
that
program,
and
that
fund
is
now
up
to
about
four
million
dollars
that
can
be
used
for
affordable
housing
and
just
to
go
through
some
of
the
projects
that
have
been
completed
or
in
progress.
D
Crestmore
rebuild
17
houses
completed
or
under
construction
and
more
to
come.
The
crossing
parcels,
3
&
4,
that
was
350
units,
cedar,
Mills,
14,
single
single-family
homes,
skycrest
24,
single-family
homes,
that
that
project
was
stopped
by
the
economic
downturn,
but
is
now
proceeding
and
nearing
completion
maramon,
that
was
70
single-family
homes
on
a
former
school
site
and
Pacific
Bay
vist
is
another
large
project
which
has
been
vacant
for
many
years
and
is
moving
along
and
starting
to
rent
up.
So
that's
that's
a
lot
in
the
last
seven
years.
D
D
The
third
thing
is:
allow
reasonable
accommodations
and
basically
allowing
an
exception
in
zoning
and
land
use
for
housing
with
for
people
with
disabilities,
so
that
if
there
were
a,
for
example,
a
retrofit
that
didn't
quite
meet
the
zoning
standards,
the
Community
Development
Director
could
make
a
judgment
that
for
reasonable
accommodations
that
can
be
done,
for
example
like
a
ramp
or
something
that
goes
into
a
setback.
Something
like
that
and
finally,
there's
a
density
bonus
law
which
needs
to
be
consistent
with
state
law
and
we're
already.
D
D
Okay,
what
has
changed?
Well,
we
are
working
in
the
the
21
elements
process
which
I
think
you're
aware
is
a
consortium
of
the
20
cities
in
the
county
and
the
county
itself,
and
it
would
use
actually
in
that
last
housing
element
cycle,
but
in
a
fairly
limited
way.
However,
this
time
the
group
is
working
together
in
a
more
coordinated
fashion
and
I
think
it
will
help
to
make
the
the
update
of
the
housing
elephant
elephant
element
a
mark,
a
more
efficient
process.
D
There
are
many
things
that
cities
have
in
common
that
not
every
you
know.
We
don't
need
to
recreate
the
wheel
21
times.
There
are
things
that
can
be
done
that
apply
to
all
communities
with
adjustments,
obviously
for
each
community,
but
that's
that's
something
that
we're
participating
in
and
is
I
think
a
really
good
process
and,
as
I
say,
all
the
communities
in
the
county
are
participating.
Then
there's
streamline
review
by
hcd
and
basically,
if
you
qualify
for
a
streamlined
review,
the
21
elements
process
will
be
reviewed
much
more
quickly
and
expeditiously
by
hcd.
They'll.
D
Look
at
everything
at
once
and
you
know
we'll
be
using
similar
methodology,
similar
data
from
a
bag.
So
the
approval
process
will
be
faster,
but
in
order
to
qualify
for
streamlined
review,
we
do
need
to
have
a
compliant
housing
element
which
going
back
to
what
we're
saying
before
we
need
to
get
those
those
zoning
amendments
completed.
D
But
the
caveat
is
that
the
the
housing
element
needs
to
be
adopted
on
time
in
order
to
qualify
for
that
eight
year
cycle.
So
basically,
that's
January
2015
with
a
grace
period
of
120
days,
so
at
the
very
outset
May.
But
if
you
don't
do
it
by
then
then
you're
required
to
update
it
every
four
years.
So
that's
sort
of
the
the
penalty
for
not
getting
it
done
on
time.
D
D
D
So
what
are
some
topics
for
the
next
cycle?
I'm,
just
gonna.
These
are
just
topic
self
up
cover
in
a
minute.
One
is
a
fair
share
of
regional
housing
needs
and
identifying
adequate
sites
to
meet
those
needs.
Second,
is
supporting
development
of
housing
for
low
and
moderate
income,
households,
including
extremely
low-income
households,
opportunities
to
address
special
needs
groups
and
remove
and
mitigate
constraints,
so
first
San
Bruno's
regional
housing
needs
allocation.
D
This
is
our.
This
is
what
we
are
required
to
provide
adequate
sites
to
accommodate
1155
units.
We
don't
have
to
build
those
units.
We
just
have
to
make
sure
that
there
are
enough
sites
to
accommodate
them
and
this
sort
of
trickles
down
from
the
top,
where
the
expectation
is
that
the
straight
the
the
state
will
grow
by
certain
size.
The
region
will
grow
by
a
certain
size
and
then
the
that
population
growth
is
allocated
in.
D
D
We're
the
process
of
analyzing
this
right
now,
but
but
I
think
we're
going
to
need
to
have
the
zone
zone
code,
update
the
comprehensive
zone
code,
update
separate
from
the
other
four
things
in
order
to
achieve
the
the
the
units
that
we
need
to
do
for
the
regional
housing
needs
allocation,
so
the
transit
quarters
plan,
as
I
mentioned,
has
you
know
it
can
accommodate
at
least
sixteen
hundred
and
ten
units.
That's
part
of
the
zone
code
update
and
you
know
when
that
is
done,
we'll
have
more
than
adequate
sites
to
you
know
fulfill
our
obligation.
D
D
These
are
specifically
analyzed
in
the
housing
element
and
they
include,
and
they
generally
have
affordable
housing
needs.
They
generally
have
lower
incomes
and
often
need
assistance.
Those
are
seniors.
People
living
with
disabilities,
female-headed,
households,
large
households,
extremely
low-income
households
and
homeless
needs.
D
The
the
last
section
of
the
housing
or
the
the
section
of
the
housing
element
that
addresses
how
we
can
accomplish
the
the
fulfilling
the
needs
of
developing
enough
providing
enough
housing
sites
providing
affordable
housing
for
people
with
special
needs.
These.
These
are
the
implementation,
actions
and
programs
and,
for
example,
we
have
an
inclusionary
program
and
that
is
covers
both
for
sale
and
rental
housing.
However,
there
has
been
a
court
case
that
has
overturned
the
rental
aspect
of
that
of
the
inclusion
aerie
housing
program,
so
we
cannot
require
affordable
housing
for
rental
rental
projects.
D
However,
if
it
were
structured
differently
as
a
as
an
exaction
or
a
development
impact
fee,
that
could
be
done,
and
so
we
are
working
actually
with
21
elements
on
an
affordable
housing
nexus
study
which
would
allow
us
to
adjust
the
program
so
that
it
would
be.
You
know
that
we
could
apply
it
to
to
housing
in
San,
Bruno,
obviously,
to
promote
a
variety
of
housing
types
to
accommodate.
You
know
wide
range
of
people
with
wide-ranging
needs,
the
transit
corridors
plan,
which
would
provide
housing
near
transit.
D
The
idea
is
to
get
that
going
and
start
to
get
some
projects
within
the
transit
corridors
area
funding
for
affordable
housing,
as
I
mentioned,
we
do
have
the
in
Luffy
fund.
There
are
other
sources
of
funding
such
as
state
tax
credits
and
other
other
types
of
funding.
We
need
to
focus
on
those
things
and
then
senior
housing
and
assisted
living,
and
this
is
more
sort
of
what's
what's
the
city's
priority
or
intention
in
that
area.
You
know
how
strongly
this
community
want
to
promote
this
type
of
housing.
D
I
just
mentioned
the
that
this
is
about
the
the
constraints
to
housing.
I
just
mentioned
the
court
decision.
That's
it's
called
the
polymer
decision
that
invalidates
the
rental,
how
the
inclusionary
housing,
and
so
we
are
working
on
trying
to
address
that
ordinance.
2012
84,
you
know
I
think
overall,
it's
it's
probably
gotten
aspects
of
it
that
the
community,
you
know,
really
wants
to
keep
and
probably
make
sense
to
keep.
But
there
are
other
aspects
of
it
that
you
know.
D
You
know
adopting
the
transit
quarters
plan,
Rock
parking
recommendations
that
will
be
proposed
in
the
zoning
code
update
and
the
next
one
is
the
water
and
sewer
infrastructure.
That's
complicated
one,
because
with
the
transit
quarters
plan
there
was
an
analysis
for
the
capacity,
and
you
know
the
water
availability
and
basically
it's
found
that
there's
there's
enough
water
to
accommodate
the
development
within
the
transit
quarters
area.
D
The
issue
is
more
the
the
condition,
and
yet
the
condition
of
the
infrastructure
and
upgrading
and
replacing
infrastructure,
which
I
think
is
a
we
know
is
it
need
all
over
the
city,
but
certainly
in
this
core
area.
So
those
those
are
that's
something
that's
very
important.
A
very
important
issue
that
will
have
to
be
addressed.
I
was
case,
so
that
sort
of
concludes
things
that
I
just
want
to
point
out.
D
Obviously,
programs
addressing
housing
needs
and
priorities
and
I
think
one
way
to
look
at
that
is
to
to
look
at
the
current
housing
element
and
the
existing
programs
and
goals
and
implementation
actions
and
sort
of
build
from
there.
What's
you
know,
what
are
the
things
in
there
that
we
still
feel
are
important?
How
can
we
adjust
them
to
make
them
better
to
make
them
more
effective.
D
Public
input
and
participation
I
think
that
you
know
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
and
definitely
want
to
put
together
a
forum
where
we
can
attract
more
public
at
the
next
stage
when
we
have
it
when
we
have
a
draft
together-
and
we
can
get
some
comment
on
that
and
then
finally
adopt
the
housing
element
on
time.
That's
that's
key.
So
the
housing
element
update
process
information
about
it.
D
D
C
D
C
D
It's
a
complicated
process
that
the
the
state
provides
a
an
overall
number
to
a
region
and
the
Council
of
Governments,
for
that
region
has
a
big
number.
So
in
our
case
was
the
association
of
Bay
Area,
but
governments
in
most
cases
in
every
other
city
except
San,
Mateo
County
a
bag
then
assigns
a
number
to
each
city.
So
it
comes
directly
from
a
bag.
In
the
case
of
San
Mateo
County
with
the
21
elements
process,
the
21
elements
actually
what
divided
up
the
the
housing
units.
So
we
as
a
group
work
together
to
do
that.
D
It
was
that
the
prot,
the
the
methodology,
was
very
similar
to
the
methodology
that
that
that
a
bag
used.
But
what
happened
was
depending
on
the
particular
sort
of
circumstances
of
each
community.
There
was
there
was
an
opportunity
to
make
adjustments,
so
there
was
local
involvement
in
determining
what
the
what
those
numbers
work
and
it's
it's.
You
know
the
correlation-
does
certainly
correlates
with
the
size
of
a
community.
C
D
C
D
B
Know
I
could
add
to
that
I
think
in
terms
of
the
transit
corridors
plan.
As
you
know,
it
was
adopted
by
the
City
Council
last
year
in
February
of
2013,
so
the
land
use
the
development
standards
and
design
guidelines.
Those
key
components
carry
forward
and
can
be
implemented,
but,
as
Marcus
is
mentioning
as
far
as
ordinance
1284
being
able
to
go
higher
than
three
stories
or
fifty
feet
is
something
we
can't
do
at
this
time
without
ordinance,
1284
being
amended
above
ground
parking
garages
is
something
we
can't
do
at
this
time.
B
Increasing
residential
densities
in
certain
areas
that
an
amendment
of
12
84
would
allow
can't
be
done
so
again,
as
mark
indicated
with
an
amendment
to
1280
for
some
of
the
key
aspects.
Really
key
aspects
of
the
adopted
transit
corridors
plan
cannot
yet
be
adopted
or
cannot
yet
be
implemented.
I
should
say,
but
in
terms
of
land
use
in
terms
of
development
standards
and
design
guidelines,
yes,
and
so
as
an
application
would
come
in
for
new
development
within
the
transit
corridors
plan
area,
we
would
be
using
that
plan
as
a
base
guide
for
new
development.
B
C
E
If
the
developer
wants
to
come
in
and
build
something
that
is
going
to
increase
by
the
units
that
we
need
in
a
one
regard
to
another,
you
know
at
least
eight
yeah
we've.
Some
of
that
pressure
from
another
area.
Excuse
me,
but
in
doing
so
his
plan
is,
you
know
a
four-story
building
in
reality.
At
this
point
can't
be
approved,
correct.
B
That
is
correct,
so
at
this
time
we
would
work
with
the
prospective
developer
and
implement
or
try
to
implement
those
parts
of
the
transit
corridors
plan
that
have
been
adopted
and
are
not
subject
to
an
amendment
to
1284.
So,
for
example,
we
could
go
up
to
three
stories
or
fifty
feet
the
land
use
scheme
of
the
transit
corridors
plan.
We
would
use
that
as
a
guide
in
terms
of
land
use.
B
You
know
the
concept
basic
concept
of
commercial
on
ground
floor
with
either
residential
units
or
office
units
above
would
be
our
guide
in
terms
of
working
with
that
perspective
developer
certain
design
guidelines,
certain
development
standards
in
the
transit
corridors
plan
would
be
our
guide.
In
terms
of
saying,
this
is
how
the
property
should
be
developed
right.
E
It
makes
it
much
more
difficult
to
to
have
a
developer
want
to
come
in
and
do
something
along
those
lines.
If
yet
land
use
is
there,
you
could
do
that,
but
yet
you're
still
restricted
by
a
height
limitation
that
do
we
have
any
idea
when
there
may
be
some
sort
of
you
know.
Public
vote
on
you
know.
Amending
that
I
mean
there
is.
Is
that
in
the
works
as
well
as
kind
of
a
couple?
Guess?
E
Maybe
I
mix
it
up
a
couple
questions
here,
but
you
know
I
mean
it
just
seems
like
you
can't
do
one
without
the
other.
You
gotta
have
the
vote
of
the
public
yet
to
have
their
approval
and
they
need
to
fully
understand
what
it
is
we're
trying
to
accomplish,
and
yet
you're
also
trying
to
you
know
I
would
imagine
you
know
kind
of
you
know
Mary
some
developers
into
the
city
to
to
develop
this
particular
plan.
But
you
can't
do
that.
It's
like
asking
them
to
get
married
without
a
ring.
E
B
Very
very
good
points,
key
aspects
of
the
transit
corridors
plan
in
terms
of
providing
incentives
to
develop
and
redevelopment
properties
here
in
San
Bruno
really
rely
on
to
a
large
extent.
These
key
things
we're
talking
about
this
evening
in
terms
of
adjusting
height
limits
to
to
go
somewhat
higher,
allowing
for
increased
residential
densities
allowing
for
above
ground
parking
garages.
Those
are
key
aspects
of
that
plan
to
really
fully
implemented,
as
Mark
said,
and
to
realize
the
economic
incentives
for
development
and
redevelopment.
B
So
in
terms
of
bringing
this
forward,
we
are
you
know
looking
at
this,
and
you
know
we
hope
to
look
perhaps
toward
the
end
of
this
year.
Perhaps
a
November
ballot
measure-
that's
not
certain
at
all
at
this
point,
but
we
realize
that
we
need
to
bring
this
this
mater
forward
to
the
voters
to
get
a
vote
of
the
people
to
to
fully
implement
that
plan,
and
it
is
very
important.
We
realize
that.
E
And
then
the
other
two
other
comments
I
would
have
again
following
up
on
courier
Peterson's
initial
comment
about
the
timeline
I'm,
probably
as
people
who
might
know
me,
I'm,
probably
not
the
best
person
to
speak
of
having
goals
and
timelines,
but
you
know
it
makes
perfect
sense
that
if
you
have
a
certain
deadline
that
you
have
to
meet
that
you
have
certain
dates
along
that
way.
You
know
that
are
that,
are
you
know
your
mark
to
be
you
know
this
is
accomplished
or-
or
you
know,
we've
gotten
through
to
this
point.
E
B
We
agree
with
you
and
it
was
an
excellent
point
that
vice
chair
Peterson
made
at
this
point.
We've
got
the
broader
timeline,
but
absolutely
we'll
be
looking
at
specific
Planning,
Commission
dates
and
City
Council
days
to
basically
make
sure
that
we
meet
this.
This
timeline
this
schedule
there's
a
lot
of
advantage
to
the
streamlined
process
that
mark
outlined
in
his
presentation
and
we'll
want
to
make
sure
that
San
Bruno
can
take
advantage
of
that.
Absolutely.
E
And
then
one
other
question
that
I
have
since
I,
don't
really
quite
understand
it
is
under
the
what
we
have
a.
What
have
we
accomplished
in
the
very
last
bullet
point
was
the
city
has
collected
over
four
million
in
fees
for
the
affordable
housing
through
the
below
market
rate
housing
program,
so
that
four
billion
dollars
is
that
supposed
to
offset
the
cost
for
the
city
or
for
the
developer
in
the
low
income
housing
market
is?
Is
that
what
it's
is
that
how
that
money
works?
I,
cuz
I,
don't
understand
how
that
money
works.
D
D
D
C
D
A
Secondly,
secondly,
on
behalf
of
all
the
folks
that
are
sitting
at
home
whenever
we
start
talking
about
1284
and
raising
height
limits
and
stuff
everyone
freaks
out,
because
they
think
they're
going
to
build
a
skyscraper
next
door
to
him.
Would
you
be
so
kind
as
to
reiterate
and
explain
to
people
what
areas
of
town
are
going
to
be
impacted?
Which
areas
won't
be
what
we're
talking
about,
so
that
people
can
have
a
really
clear
understanding
of
what
the
area
is.
What
direction
were
really
talking
about?.
D
All
right
well,
I,
have
a
map.
I
realize
it's
the
most
the
clearest
map,
but
it's
that's
the
transit
corridors
area
and
the
different
colors
show
different
so-called
character
areas,
and
they
would
also
end
up
having
specific
zoning
zoning
specific
to
each
area,
as
well
as
as
Heights
associated
with
each
area
and
so
on
the
left
side.
The
diagonal,
that's
that
is
El
Camino
Rio
and
the
recommendation
in
the
plan
was
for
up
to
five
stories
and
70
feet
was
that
that
was
the
recommendation
in
the
transit
corridors
plan
for
downtown.
D
It
was
55
feet
which
is
just
5
feet
over
the
current
and
four
stories
and
for
the
the
area
around
the
new
train
station,
which
is
the
yellow
area
in
that
area.
You
cannot
actually
build
housing
in
that
area
because
of
the
airport
noise
contours,
it's
above
70
decibels.
So
it's
a
housing
is
not
allowed
or
new
new
housing,
but
the
proposal
there
is
for
for
office
up
to
seven
stories,
so
that
would
be.
That
would
be
the
tallest
area
and
just
right
in
the
in
the
core
of
it.
D
B
I
think
to
as
as
I
might
add
to
that
you
know
those
are
the
maximum
Heights
and
chair
via
Saudi.
As
you
indicated,
it
would
be
this.
These
provisions
would
be
limited
limited
to
these
areas
and
not
extend
beyond
so
those
are
maximums
and
limited
specifically
to
the
area's
mark,
described
on
the
diagram
and
in
addition,
through
the
transit
corridors
plan
process
over
several
years
as
you
and
the
City
Council
and
community
worked
on
that
that
plan
there
were
a
number
of
design
standards
and
guidelines.
B
They
were
added
as
well
to
address
impacts
to
adjoining
property.
So,
generally
speaking,
as
you
go
up
higher
and
height,
there
are
additional
setbacks
and
step
backs
and
other
design
standards
and
requirements,
and
a
full
design
review
process
and
environmental
review.
That
would
go
go
forward
with
these
individual
projects,
so
there
there
would
be
public
participation,
public
review,
city
staff
review
and
environmental
review
associated
with
these
individual
projects.
Thank
you,
I.
A
Mean
my
concern
is
just
always
when
you're,
when
we're
talking
about
changing
something
that
people
have
voted
on,
we
need
to
be
really
clear
and
make
sure
that
they
know
right
up
front
and
over
and
over
again
tell
them
the
same
message
that
we're
only
talking
about
the
transit
corridors
area
and
not
their
neighborhoods
residential
areas.
Okay,.
E
Through
the
chair,
please,
and
just
one
other
comment
on
that
as
I
said
on
that
transit
corridor
committee
as
well
you're,
absolutely
right,
I
mean
the
architectural
guidelines
for
the
setbacks
and
sonic
there
would
be
a
you
know:
a
90-foot
wall
of
a
building.
You
know
it
would
be
my
king
step
back
and
then
it
was.
It
was
well
thought
out
well
well
conceived,
I
believe,
by
the
general
public
in
and
everybody
who
participated
in
that
so
yeah.
A
F
Okay,
good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
Josh
hug
on
program
manager
for
the
housing
leadership
council
of
San
Mateo
County.
Our
mission
is
to
work
across
the
county
on
housing.
Affordability,
as
they
affect
the
individual
communities
here,
and
the
housing
element
process
is
a
as
mr.
Sullivan
said,
is
a
once
every
eight
year
process
now
to
have
this
explicit
conversation
about
the
housing
needs
that
is
affecting
not
only
san
bruno
but
every
other
city
in
the
Bay
Area.
F
At
this
point,
so
there
101,
101
or
110
of
these
processes
going
on
simultaneously
right
now,
since
the
last,
how
I
guess
without
getting
into
too
many
specifics,
because
I
think
that's
where
the
process,
these
future
meetings
will
get
into
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
the
landscape
and
how
it's
changed
since
the
last
planning,
housing,
element,
review
and
I
think
mr.
Sullivan
spoked
about
these,
but
also
just
want
to
desensitize
you
about
some
of
the
ramifications.
F
Just
one
statistic
that
was
presented
earlier
this
year:
joint
venture
Silicon
Valley
in
combination
with
the
Silicon
Valley
Community
Foundation,
held
what
they
call
the
state
of
the
valley
summit
and
in
that
they
present
a
data
that
showed
that
last
year,
just
last
year,
Silicon
Valley
produced
46,000
jobs
associated
with
that
646
thousand
jobs
was
seven
thousand
homes.
So
you
can
see
already
that
the
balance
were
very
good
at
producing
jobs
and
bringing
them
here
into
Silicon
Valley,
where
the
northern
end
of
Silicon
Valley.
F
We
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
as
far
as
meeting
the
housing
needs
of
that
workforce.
As
a
result
of
that
hour,
in
commute
rates
into
the
county
is
about
61
percent.
We
have
about
200,000
people
who,
in
commute
into
the
county
every
day,
so
as
people
complain
about
traffic
and
congestion,
a
good
portion
of
that
is
because
of
the
lack
of
affordability
here
in
this
county,
and
this
process
directly
addresses
that
when
you
lie
on
top
of
that
processes,
several
processes,
one.
We
have
an
aging
community
who
has
changing
housing
needs.
F
We
have
a
lack
of
stock
to
meet.
Those
future
needs
for
a
growing
senior
population
if
seniors
want
to
downsize
their
sick
of
mowing
their
lawn.
They
have
a
tough
time,
keeping
up
their
home.
They
start
having
mobility
issues
and
they
want
to
downsize
to
something.
That's
closer
to
the
bus.
Samtrans
has
recently
improved
its
bus
service
on
El
Camino
significantly.
F
There
are
very
few
opportunities
for
seniors
to
take
advantage
of
that.
You
couple
that,
with
an
intense
investment
born
out
of
SB
375,
this
greenhouse
gas
reduction
strategy
that
is
trying
to
better
synchronize
housing
and
transportation
together,
communities
across
the
Bay
Area
have
picked
specific
areas.
What
they
call
priority
development
areas
oftentimes.
F
They
were
synonymous
with
what
used
to
be
the
old
RDAs,
the
redevelopment
areas
over
the
next
25
years,
300
billion
dollars
of
transportation
and
infrastructure
investment
is
going
into
those
very
specific
areas,
which
is
great
in
order
to
bolster
up
the
capacity
to
to
meet
that
chicken-and-egg
dilemma
of
housing
and
transportation
having
the
ridership
and
how
having
transit,
that
running,
often
enough
for
people
to
want
to
take
it.
The
problem
with
it
is
that,
under
the
current
environment,
particularly
with
the
palmer
case,
is
mr.
F
Sullivan
described,
which
affected
inclusionary
housing,
a
general
lack
of
funding
for
affordable
housing.
It's
great
that
the
city
is
four
million
dollars.
It's
an
incredible
short
supply
right
now,
particularly
because
redevelopment
went
away
that
took
away
about
a
billion
dollars
a
year
in
affordable
housing
money
across
the
state
of
California.
That
has
yet
to
be
made
up.
F
It's
a
real,
so
between
plain
Bay
Area
and
a
lack
of
mechanisms
for
inclusion.
We
have
a
real
potential
for
gentrification
here,
and
we
see
this
discussion
as
an
important
part
of
the
policies
and
goals
that
are
defined
through
the
housing
element
process
to
meet
those
gaps,
to
provide
the
funding.
That's
necessary,
we're
working
on
the
state
on
finding
a
place,
a
portion
of
it
picked
up
by
the
state,
there's
some
bills
under
consideration
right
now
and
then
finding
local
solutions
as
well
and
mr.
Sullivan
spoke
about
this
grand
nexus
study.
F
All
21
cities
are
going
through
this
process
right
now.
San
Bruno
is
an
important
part
of
that
as
well.
So
we
look
forward
to
working
with
with
you
and
staff
and
the
council
on
meeting
these
large
issues
that
really
have
generational
impacts.
Our
inability
to
address
these
issues
today
will
really
set
the
stage
for
a
lot
more
hardship
in
the
future.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
E
I
didn't
come
down
here
to
talk,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
and
I'm
not
sure
I
understand
sir
I
may
be
way
off
the
beaten
path
here,
but
you
talked
about
parking
requirements,
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
applies.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
there
ought
to
be
some
movement
towards
getting
people
to
use
their
garages
rather
than.
C
G
G
G
So
that's
families
earning
a
mi
of
forty
to
sixty
percent,
but
we
have
looked
at
going
up
to
eighty
percent
depending
on
the
project
and
I'm
here,
just
to
to
say
a
couple
of
things
when
I've
had
conversations
with
mark
and
in
the
past,
and
it
seemed
like
from
a
developer
perspective.
The
ordinance
1284
mirnas
1284
is
is
a
a
challenge
for
a
developer
to
come
in
into
the
the
transit
the
transit
corridor
planning
to
develop.
We
would
like
to
develop
more
affordable
housing
in
our
area.
G
For
the
reasons
stated
to
accomplish
the
goals
in
the
housing
element
and
for
this
city
to
achieve
its
its
its
goals
of
a
producing
housing
so
and
whatever
we
could
do
to
help
that
in
terms
of
habitat,
greater
san
francisco
feel
free
to
call
on
us.
I
also
chair
the
housing
leadership
council,
which
is
josh's.
We
just
recently
spoke
on
chair
of
the
housing
leadership
council
of
San
Mateo
County
and
again,
our
mission
is
to
produce
housing
overall,
not
only
a
portable
housing
but
housing
overall
in
San
Mateo
County.
G
You
heard
the
news
our
mayor
up.
There
is
really
spoken
out
about
his
goal
of
producing
housing
at
a
faster
rate,
I
believe
housing
and
transportation
go
together.
So
if
San
Francisco
County
is
trying
to
produce
30,000
units
of
housing
by
2020,
it
would
certainly
help
the
region
if
San
Mateo
County
is
also
trying
to
produce
housing
along
with
Alameda
County.
And
you
know
we
all.
It
all
affects
the
region,
transportation
and
housing.
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Thank.
A
B
B
If
you
have
any
comments
that
you'd
like
to
to
share
with
staff
as
we
move
forward
in
terms
of
preparing
that
draft,
we
certainly
heard
some
direction
from
you
tonight
in
terms
of
identifying
a
more
specific
schedule,
for
example,
and
the
idea
of
you
know
trying
to
move
forward
with
ordinance
1284
and
trying
to
get
that
before
the
voters
here
in
this
community.
Is
there
anything
else
you
would
like
to
add
in
terms
of
comments
before
we
move
to
the
next
agenda
item
I.
B
B
Chase
sure
to
others
please
Peterson
and
Johnson.
Oh
a
commissioner
salmon,
okay.
So
the
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
V,
Planning
Commission
discussion,
and
this
has
to
do
with.
Actually
you,
your
body,
selecting
a
new
chair
and
a
vice
chair
and
just
in
terms
of
giving
you
information
as
far
as
the
order
we've
kind
of
kept
track
over
time
of
who's
been
chair
and
vice-chair
and
so
forth.
B
Vice
chair,
Peterson
would
typically
move
up
to
with
the
position
of
chair
at
this
point.
Again,
that's
at
your
your
direction
and
then
in
terms
of
vice
chair.
As
far
as
looking
at
at
the
past
our
history,
it
would
appear
that
commissioners
summit,
if
he
would
be
interested
in
being
the
vice
chair,
would
be
perhaps
the
next
in
line
followed
by
Commissioner,
Marshall
and
then
Commissioner
Johnson.
So
with
that,
if
you
could
proceed
and
select
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair,
please
very
good.
A
B
B
A
E
A
C
Just
like
to
acknowledge,
though
she's
not
here,
the
cv
shawna
has
left
and
secretary
in
for
many
many
years,
she's
taking
the
minutes
and
we
have
read
them
and
to
thoroughly
read
them
and
and
or
actually
I
should
say
thoroughly.
She
has
delivered
them
and
and
she's
a
lot
of
hard
work
site,
especially
want
to
acknowledge
Shannon
for
her
hard
work.
You
know,
but
she's
not
here,
to
receive
it
like
that
acknowledgment
to
be
to
be
now
and.
E
A
E
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
mirroring
Commissioner
Johnson's
remarks
on
behalf
of
the
entire
Commission
I
think
we
would
like
to
thank
Shawna
for
her
work
and
efforts
and
make
that
part
of
the
record
so
that
she
can
type
it
before
she
all
right
and
we'd,
also
like
to
thank
mr.
padilha
this
evening
for
reaching
out
to
the
community
and
helping
us
reach
all
the
members
of
our
community,
so
that
we
can
do
a
more
thorough
and
effective
job.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
If
there's
nothing
else,
we
are
adjourned.